Next Article in Journal
TP53 p.R337H Germline Variant among Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer in a Public Health System of Midwest Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Analysis of 252 Index Cases with Inherited Retinal Diseases Using a Panel of 351 Retinal Genes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of APX Gene Family in Citrus maxima and Expression Analysis at Different Postharvest Preservation Times
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

How Important Are Genetic Diversity and Cultivar Uniformity in Wheat? The Case of Gliadins

1
Department of Biotechnology-Plant Biology, School of Agricultural, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
3
QAAFI, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(7), 927; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070927 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 11 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 16 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers: 'Plant Genetics and Genomics' Section)

Abstract

Improvements in self-pollinated crops rely on crosses between different genotypes. It has been suggested that the repeated use of “the best” genotypes may lead to the restriction of the genetic diversity of the crop. In wheat, the analysis of gliadin (storage protein) polymorphism has provided evidence that genetic diversity was high and stable throughout the 20th century. Moreover, a worldwide analysis of gliadin polymorphism shows that genetic diversity is structured spatially across countries and their regions. Therefore, the analysis of gliadin genotypes in a given grain sample can provide reliable information about the origin of grains in this sample. An unexpected finding is that many registered common wheat cultivars are genetically non-uniform and composed of authentic biotypes (genotypically related lines originated from the initial cross) in spite of current crop-registration rules that include a strict demand for each new cultivar to be genetically uniform (DUS rules). In summary, the results suggest that each cultivar is the fruit of joint effects of a breeder and of a region’s environmental factors. We believe this finding will not be restricted to wheat and suggest there may be a need to re-evaluate relevant rules of cultivar registration for crop species in general.
Keywords: wheat; biotypes; DUS; genetic erosion wheat; biotypes; DUS; genetic erosion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Metakovsky, E.; Melnik, V.A.; Pascual, L.; Wrigley, C.W. How Important Are Genetic Diversity and Cultivar Uniformity in Wheat? The Case of Gliadins. Genes 2024, 15, 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070927

AMA Style

Metakovsky E, Melnik VA, Pascual L, Wrigley CW. How Important Are Genetic Diversity and Cultivar Uniformity in Wheat? The Case of Gliadins. Genes. 2024; 15(7):927. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Metakovsky, Eugene, Viktor A. Melnik, Laura Pascual, and Colin W. Wrigley. 2024. "How Important Are Genetic Diversity and Cultivar Uniformity in Wheat? The Case of Gliadins" Genes 15, no. 7: 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070927

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop