Next Article in Journal
Homoeologs in Allopolyploids: Navigating Redundancy as Both an Evolutionary Opportunity and a Technical Challenge—A Transcriptomics Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Medical Genetics in Brazil in the 21st Century: A Thriving Specialty and Its Incorporation in Public Health Policies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/genes15080976
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Mutations Induced by Different Doses of Fast-Neutron Irradiation in the M1 Generation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

by
Na Yuan
1,
Shuaiqiang Liang
2,
Ling Zhou
2,
Xingxing Yuan
1,
Chunhong Li
1,
Xin Chen
1,* and
Han Zhao
2,*
1
Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
2
Institute of Crop Germplasm and Biotechnology, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(8), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080976
Submission received: 18 June 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 July 2024 / Published: 24 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sorghum is an important C4 crop with various food and nonfood uses. Although improvements through hybridization and selection have been exploited, the introduction of genetic variation and the development of new genotypes in sorghum are still limited. Fast-neutron (FN) mutagenesis is a very effective method for gene functional studies and to create genetic variability. However, the full spectrum of FN-induced mutations in sorghum is poorly understood. To address this, we generated an FN-induced mutant population from the inbred line ‘BTx623’ and sequenced 40 M1 seedlings to evaluate the mutagenic effects of FNs on sorghum. The results show that each line had an average of 43.7 single-base substitutions (SBSs), 3.7 InDels and 35.15 structural variations (SVs). SBSs accounted for approximately 90.0% of the total number of small mutations. Among the eight treatment groups, FN irradiation at a dose of 19 Gy generated the highest number of mutations. The ratio of transition/transversion ranged from 1.77 to 2.21, and the G/C to A/T transition was the most common substitution in all mutant lines. The distributions of the identified SBSs and InDels were similar and uneven across the genome. An average of 3.63 genes were mutated in each mutant line, indicating that FN irradiation resulted in a suitable density of mutated genes, which can be advantageous for improving elite material for one specific or a few traits. These results provide a basis for the selection of the suitable dose of mutagen and new genetic resources for sorghum breeding.

1. Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is one of the oldest cereal crops in the world. It is not only an important grain crop, but also a raw material with great potential for the traditional brewing industry, animal husbandry and the new renewable-energy industry [1,2]. In recent years, the market demand for new varieties of short-stalked, early maturing grain and silage sorghum has been increasing, and sorghum breeding aimed purely at high yields can no longer meet the diverse needs of the market [3]. Therefore, cultivating new materials to meet the diverse needs of the market has become a new goal for sorghum breeders.
Since the first release of an improved tobacco cultivar in the 1930s, mutation breeding has become an effective strategy for crop improvement [4,5]. Mutants not only can be directly bred into cultivars or provide parental materials for breeding, but also are indispensable and important materials for functional genomics research in the post-genomic era [6]. Commonly used mutagenesis approaches include physical mutagenesis, chemical mutagenesis, T-DNA insertion, transposon insertion, etc. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) is the most commonly used chemical mutagen for creating a mutagenized population [7]. It has the advantages of low cost, simplicity of operation and high frequency of point mutations in the DNA, but the derived mutations are genetically less stable and impose a great risk to researcher and environmental health. Ionizing radiation mutagenesis is another popular method for developing mutant varieties [8]. Among the 3402 mutant cultivars officially registered in the FAO/IAEA mutant variety database (http://mvgs.iaea.org) (accessed on 10 December 2023), 2116 were obtained by ionizing radiation. In particular, γ-rays are the most commonly used ionizing radiation source in mutation breeding programs. However, with the development of high-energy cyclotrons and research reactors, heavy ions and neutrons, which have a significantly higher LET than γ-rays, are increasingly being used for mutation breeding [9,10]. Fast neutrons (FNs) are very efficient mutagens in plants, reacting with protons (H+) and other heavy nuclei to produce γ-rays and charged particles, which in turn bombard the DNA in the cell nucleus. FN mutagenesis usually creates deletions from few bases to several million bases (Mb) and chromosome rearrangements in the genome, and it is easy to generate FN-treated lines and deletion libraries [11]. It has been successfully used in many plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, soybean, pea, Medicago truncatula and peanut [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
The radiation dose is an important factor affecting the mutagenic efficiency [20,21]. By analyzing the biological effect induced by different neutron dosages, Xu et al. [22] observed that a low dosage of FN irradiation (0.38 Gy) significantly promoted the germination and radicle growth of the M1 generation of peas, and higher dosages (1.66, 4.33 Gy) reduced the plant height. Based on the germination rates and the relative variation frequencies, Zhang et al. [23] showed 40~45 Gy is the appropriate dose for the FN mutagenesis of the azuki bean. Normally, a dose resulting in 50% survival of the M1 plants (lethal dose 50 or LD50) is expected to have the highest mutation frequency and is considered an appropriate dose [24]. In the last decade, with the rapid development of next-generation sequencing technologies, the genome mutation profile has become another important index for evaluating the mutagenic effects of FN irradiation. For example, a genome-wide analysis of mutations induced by FN irradiation in A. thaliana found that the frequency of FN-induced single-base substitution mutations was higher than that of deletion mutations and that there were more single-base deletions than large base deletions [13]. Similar to A. thaliana, SBSs constituted the most abundant mutation type in an FN-mutagenized population of rice [14]. Researchers also found that FN-induced deletions mutate the largest number of genes. However, these studies were usually carried out in the M3 and subsequent generations; so, less is known about the original number and distribution of genomic mutations in the M1 plants induced by different FN doses.
In sorghum, EMS-induced mutant libraries have been established in diverse genetic backgrounds such as ‘BTx623’, ‘Tian C-1’, ‘Jinliang No.5’ and ‘V4B’ [25,26,27,28,29]. EMS mostly generates one type of mutation, whereas other mutagenesis approaches such as FN irradiation can induce a diversity of mutations, including single-base substitutions (SBSs), deletions, insertions, inversions, translocations and duplications [13,14,15]. A broad spectrum of mutant alleles, including loss-of-function, partial loss-of-function, and gain-of-function alleles, is highly desirable for functional genomic studies. However, other mutagenesis approaches such as FN irradiation have not been reported in sorghum, which limits the discovery of novel genes and functional elements controlling diverse biological pathways.
Sorghum is a diploid species (2n = 20) with a genome size of approximately 730 megabases (Mb), which makes it amenable to whole-genome sequencing [30]. In this study, we investigate the mutagenic effects of FN irradiation by the whole-genome re-sequencing of 40 mutagenized M1 lines of the reference genome line ‘BTx623’ and compare genetic variants at eight FN doses to determine the optimal dose of FN irradiation for sorghum. This study aims to provide insights into the mechanism of mutations induced by FN irradiation in sorghum, thereby accelerating the effective application of radiation mutagens in sorghum genomic research and breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of FN Irradiation on Seed Germination

The average seed germination rate of the control group was 89%, and the average seed germination rate of the groups treated with 5 Gy, 11 Gy, 14 Gy, 19 Gy, 26 Gy, 33 Gy, 41 Gy and 46 Gy was 94%, 86%, 95%, 93%, 91%, 82%, 81% and 72%, respectively (Figure S1). Except for the group receiving 46 Gy irradiation, the differences in average seed germination rate between the control and the other groups were not significant.

2.2. Identification of Genome-Wide Mutations in FN Lines

We randomly selected five M1 seedlings from each treatment group for whole-genome resequencing using the Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform. On average, 108 million raw reads were obtained for each sample, with an average sequencing depth of 16× (the ratio of the total number of bases obtained by sequencing to the genome size) (Table 1). After a stringent quality filtering process, more than 15 Gb of high-quality clean data (Q30 > 91.75%) was retained for each sample. The filtered high-quality reads were aligned to the ‘BTx623’ reference genome. On average, more than 98% of the clean reads were successfully mapped to the reference genome. Approximately 98% of the reference sequences were mapped at least five times, and 91% of them were mapped at least ten times (Table 1).
We used an established variant-calling pipeline containing multiple complementary programs to call variants in each mutant after filtering out variants present in the unmutagenized sorghum. A total of 1491 FN-induced small mutations were identified in the 40 mutants, including 1342 SBSs and 149 InDels (Table S1). Of the 1342 SBSs, 25 were shared by the eight mutant lines. In total, 1406 FN-induced SVs were identified in the 40 mutants, including 504 large deletions, 384 duplications and 518 inversions. On average, 43.7 single-base substitutions (SBSs), 3.7 InDels and 35.15 SVs were detected in each sorghum individual.

2.3. Characteristics of the SBSs Induced by FN Irradiation

To determine whether different doses of FN irradiation induced distinct mutations, we compared the genomic variants present in the eight mutant lines. SBSs accounted for approximately 90.0% of the total number of small mutations. The number of SBSs ranged from 329 to 534, with the 19 Gy-treated lines having the highest number of mutants (Figure 1). SBSs can be transitions (purine to purine; pyrimidine to pyrimidine) or transversions (purine to pyrimidine; pyrimidine to purine). FN irradiation induced both types of substitution, including A/T to G/G, G/C to A/T, A/T to C/G, A/T to T/A, G/C to T/A and G/C to C/G. The G/C to A/T transition was the most common substitution in all mutant lines (Figure 2). The ratio of Ti/Tv was the lowest in the 11 Gy-treated lines (~1.77) and the highest in the 41 Gy-treated lines (~2.21). A significant higher number of heterozygous mutations (average of 396.5 SBSs) than of homozygous ones (average of 2 SBSs) (p < 0.01) were detected in all mutant groups.

2.4. Characteristics of InDels and SVs Induced by FN Irradiation

A total of 253 small InDels were detected on the genome-wide scale, of which 172 (68%) were deletion mutations, and 81 (32%) were insertions. The number of small deletions and insertions in the eight groups ranged from 15 to 40 and from 5 to 16, respectively. The highest proportion of InDels was detected in the 19 Gy-treated lines (Figure 3). The size of the FN-induced InDels ranged from 1 to 125 bp. Among the 172 small deletions, 91 (53%) single-base deletions and 81 (47%) multiple-base deletions (≥2 bp) were detected. Meanwhile, 37 (46%) of the 81 small insertions were single-base mutations, of which 44 (54%) had a size ≥2 bp. Single-base InDels were the most predominant type of InDels in the FN lines exposed to 5 Gy or to doses greater than 33 Gy, whereas multiple-base InDels (≥2 bp) were the most predominant type in 11~26 Gy-treated lines (Table S2). FN irradiation induced a significant higher number of heterozygous mutations (average of 26.75 InDels) than of homozygous ones (average of 4.88 InDels) (p < 0.01; two-side Student’s t-test) in all mutant groups. The number of FN-induced large-fragment deletions (>150 bp), duplications and inversions in the eight mutant lines ranged from 81 to 373, from 36 to 332 and from 1 to 494, respectively (Table S3). The highest number of SVs was found in the 19 Gy-treated lines, which was significantly higher than that in the other mutant groups (p < 0.01).

2.5. Distribution of Mutations Induced by FN Irradiation

The distribution of SBSs and InDels in the sorghum chromosomes is shown in Figure 4. SBSs in each mutant affected all chromosomal segments. However, there were substantially more SBSs and InDels in some chromosomes than in others. For example, chromosome 4 had 42% and 38% of all SBSs and InDels (Figure 4a,b). Large-fragment deletions and duplications occurred more frequently in chromosome 2 and chromosome 3 (Figure 4c). The variants were divided into distinct categories according to their genomic locations. We found that the frequencies of SBSs in the genic regions were less than 3% in all mutant groups, significantly lower than in the intergenic regions (approximately 98%–100%) (Figure S2a). The frequencies of InDels in the genic regions were also lower than in the intergenic regions, ranging from 5% to 25%, with the highest frequency in the 19 Gy-treated lines (Figure S2b). Forty-two of the observed InDels in the 19 Gy-treated lines were located in intergenic regions, eight in downstream and upstream regions of genes, and six within untranslated regions (UTRs), with one change inducing a frameshift (Figure 5).

2.6. Genes Affected by FN Irradiation

Mutations located in the 5’UTR–3’UTR region may have an impact on gene function. A total of 19 genes were affected by 28 small mutations, with an average of 3.63 genes in each mutant line (Figure S3). SBSs and small deletions mutated 46% of the affected genes. Small insertions only affected two genes. Of the 19 genes, 6 were mutated in different mutant lines. Three of the nineteen genes produced more than two mutation types, especially in Sobic.004G197700, which produced eight types of mutation (Table 2). To further investigate the functions and pathways of the affected genes, all 19 genes were subjected to KEGG pathway and GO analyses. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the affected genes were involved in 10 pathways, including the hippo signaling pathway, NADPH-ferrihemoprotein reductase pathway, glycerolipid metabolism, nucleocytoplasmic transport, pathways involving protein phosphatases and associated proteins, DNA repair and recombination, transfer RNA biogenesis, photosynthesis, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, exosome. GO annotation analysis showed that the 10 affected genes were enriched in 6 biological process terms, 3 cellular component terms, and 16 molecular function terms (Table S4).

3. Discussion

The radiation dose is an important factor affecting the effectiveness of radiation breeding. In this study, sorghum ‘BTx623’ seeds were treated with different doses of FN irradiation, and it was expected that the degree of damage to the M1 plants would increase with an increasing irradiation dose, and seed germination would tend to decrease. However, the germination survey showed that treatment of ‘BTx623’ seeds with 5–41 Gy of FN irradiation did not result in a decrease in the germination rate with an increasing treatment dose, but treatment with 46 Gy of FN led to a significant decrease in seed germination rate. This indicates that the damage induced by FN doses under 41 Gy did not affect the normal germination of sorghum seeds.
We sequenced a selection of 40 M1 mutants with an average of 16× coverage of the whole genome and identified a total of 2897 FN-induced mutations. The number of mutations per sequenced FN-mutagenized line ranged from 98 (5 Gy) to 358 (19 Gy), with an average of 141. Based on the 108 homozygous mutations detected in the M3 plants, Belfield et al. [13] estimated an original number of 288 heterozygous FN-induced mutations in the M1 plants of A. thaliana. The average number of mutations per individual was higher in sorghum than in A. thaliana, which may be related to sorghum larger genome. The dose that leads to 50% lethality (LD50) is usually considered an appropriate dose. LD50 might lead to a high number of (mostly deleterious) mutations, but some mutations are likely to be lost or overlooked in generations following the mutagenesis due to either plant mortality or poor agronomic performance. Among the different dose treatments, our study found that 19 Gy FN irradiation induced the highest number of mutations and did not lead to a reduction in the germination rate. Maluszynski et al. [31] suggested that the final doses for a mutagenic treatment should be rather low if the aim is to add new traits to an already high-quality genetic background. The present study confirms that a moderate radiation dose and a survival rate of 90% can induce a large number of mutations and shows that 19 Gy FN irradiation appears to be the most suitable dose for sorghum mutation breeding.
Traditionally, FN mutagenesis was thought to induce large (300 bp–8 kb) deletion mutations. For example, large deletions and duplications were detected in a soybean FN-irradiated mutant population [32]. However, in A. thaliana and rice, FN-induced SBSs were found to be the most abundant mutation type in genome-sequenced M3 lines, and small deletions (<10 bp) were more prevalent than larger deletions [13,14]. The analysis of sorghum M1 lines showed that FN irradiation induced a similar number of small mutations and structural variations. In addition, unlike in A. thaliana and rice, the proportions of single-base and ≥2-base insertions and deletions were similar among the 172 InDels in sorghum, with the overall abundance of small deletions being twice as high as that of insertions. This discrepancy may be due to the fact that some large deletion mutations that are not transmitted to the progeny [33] or may result in lethality when homozygous were under-represented in the M3 lines.
Although SBS was the second most common type of mutation induced by FN irradiation in sorghum, it was much less frequent than in mutants induced by EMS. Simons et al. [28] sequenced an EMS-induced sorghum mutant population and identified 3,274,606 pf SNPs. Xin et al. [34] detected more than 1.8 million canonical EMS-induced mutations in 252 sorghum mutants. Jiao et al. [35] found that as the sequencing depth doubled, the number of mutations detected in each mutant line also doubled. Therefore, we could improve mutation detection by increasing the sequencing depth in subsequent studies. EMS mainly induces G/C to A/T DNA substitutions, which usually account for more than 95% of all SBSs it causes [36,37]. In wheat, the percentage of γ ray- and C-ion beam-induced G/C to A/T transitions was found to be approximately half of that detected in EMS mutant lines [35]. Similarly, we detected that the percentage of FN-induced G/C to A/T transitions was 40%, suggesting that physical mutagens (e.g., fast neutrons, γ rays and ion beams) induce more diverse mutations than EMS [38].
The distinct characteristics of physical/chemical mutagenesis lead to different distribution patterns of mutations. For example, chemically induced single-nucleotide variants were found to be almost uniformly distributed across the Caenorhabditis elegans genome [39]. In contrast, Liu et al. [40] detected an uneven distribution of radiation-induced SBSs across the cotton genome. In this study, FN-induced mutations were also unevenly distributed across the sorghum genome, and the number of variants was significantly higher in some chromosomes than in others. For example, SBSs and InDels in chromosome 4 accounted for 42% and 38% of all SBSs and InDels, whereas large-fragment deletions and duplications occurred more frequently in chromosomes 2 and 3. An uneven distribution of mutations may be caused by two factors. On the one hand, it may be related to genome features. Monroe et al. [41] revealed that the natural mutation bias is associated with GC content, methylated cytosines and gene structure. Weng et al. [42] found that the uneven distribution of spontaneous mutations in A. thaliana genome favored G: C to A: T transitions. Similarly, we showed that the G/C to A/T transition was the most common substitution in all mutant lines of sorghum.
In addition, we found that the mutations were mostly distributed in intergenic regions, with fewer mutations in gene regions. This observation suggests that mutations in sorghum occur preferentially in non-coding regions, and local differences in chromatin architecture might differentially affect DNA repair mechanisms and thus the local mutation rate. On the other hand, the observed uneven distribution of mutations could be related to the properties of fast-neutron radiation. High-LET particles like fast neutrons produce a strong local ionization on their penetrating path. It was found that the action of high-LET rays on cells produces a certain density of uneven energy deposition in DNA molecules and induces several local DNA damage clusters. Such localized multiple damage sites may affect the distribution of mutants [43,44].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Generation of the Mutant Library

The first sequenced inbred line, ‘BTx623’, was used to establish thane FN-induced mutant library. Dry seeds were irradiated with FNs at doses of 5 Gy, 11 Gy, 14 Gy, 19 Gy, 26 Gy, 33 Gy, 41 Gy and 46 Gy at the China institute of atomic energy. The ray energy was set to 14 MeV. The treated seeds were planted, and the resulting M1 plants were grown in the Liuhe base of the Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2023. Seeds from individual M1 plants were collected and stored.

4.2. Germination Test

For each treatment and control group, three replicates of 50 sorghum seeds were placed in plastic germination boxes (13 cm × 19 cm × 9 cm) containing four layers of filter paper moistened with sterile water and grown in a growth chamber under a 12/12 h day/night light cycle and at 25 °C. The germination rate was calculated as (number of seeds showing radicle emergence (2 mm in length) after 3 days of incubation/total number of seeds) × 100%.

4.3. Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing

The young leaves of five M1 plants were randomly collected from each treatment group and the control group, and five plants from the control group were mixed into one sample. DNA extraction was conducted using the DNeasy Plant Maxi Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA libraries were prepared with the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc.). Paired-end (2·150 bp) sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to determine genomic sequences with about 16-fold depth for each line (LC-Bio, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China).

4.4. Genomic Variant Detection and Annotation

After removing low-quality reads with adaptor sequences, the clean data were used for further bioinformatics analysis. The clean data were mapped to the reference genome Sorghum bicolor v3.1.1 (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/info/Sbicolor_v3_1_1) (accessed on 6 July 2023) using BWA with the default parameters [45]. SAMtools software (v.1.3) was used to convert, index and sort the mapping results to BAM files. If multiple read pairs had identical external coordinates, only the pair with the highest mapping quality was retained. Duplicate reads were removed using Picard MarkDuplicates (v1.94). GATK HaplotypeCaller v4.0.4 was used to call single-base substitutions (SBSs) and InDels. SNPs were filtered using VariantFiltration with QD < 2.0, FS > 60.0, MQ < 40.0, SOR > 3.0, MQRankSum < −12.5, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0, QUAL < 30.0, and InDels with QD < 2.0, FS > 200.0, QUAL < 30.0, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0. The variations were annotated by SnpEff software (v4.3). Lumpy [46] was used to call SVs. Samples from each treatment group were analyzed in groups of five mutant lines and the control line. Only those mutation sites that differed from mutation sites in both the reference genome and the control line were considered reliable mutation sites. GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses were performed to identify the functions of the affected genes [47,48]. p < 0.05 was set as the cutoff criterion for significant enrichment.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 18.0 statistical software to compare germination rates and number of mutations in the different treatment groups. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The present study investigated the genetic mutations induced by FN irradiation in sorghum. The results revealed that FN mutagenesis is a powerful tool for sorghum breeding as it can produce a moderate amount and multiple types of mutations compared to other mutagens such as EMS. The appropriate dose of FN identified in this study can be beneficial for plant breeders for further dose optimization and sorghum large-scale mutation breeding programs, as well as for breeding programs for other crops. In the future, we will conduct high-throughput phenotypic and genomic analyses of FN-irradiated M2 mutant populations to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms of radiation mutagenesis and its application in gene function analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15080976/s1, Figure S1: The germination rate of sorghum seeds at different FN irradiation doses. NS, not significant; *, p < 0.05; Figure S2: (a) The frequencies of SBSs in genic and intergenic regions; (b) the frequencies of InDels in genic and intergenic regions.; Figure S3: The number of genes affected by FN irradiation in each treatment group; Table S1: Information on 1491 FN-induced small mutations in the 40 mutants; Table S2: Number of different types of InDels induced by FN irradiation.; Table S3: Number of structural variations induced by FN irradiation; Table S4: KEGG pathway and GO analyses of genes affected by FN irradiation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Y. and H.Z.; methodology, L.Z.; software, N.Y. and L.Z.; validation, N.Y. and S.L.; formal analysis, N.Y. and L.Z.; investigation, S.L. and C.L.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, N.Y. and X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.C. and H.Z.; visualization, X.Y.; supervision, X.C. and H.Z..; project administration, C.L.; funding acquisition, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Yafu Science and Technology Service Project of Jiangsu Province, China, (KF(23)1310) and the Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchange Program of Shaanxi (202204041101032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to the anonymous referees for providing valuable and constructive comments to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Paterson, A.H.; Bowers, J.E.; Feltus, F.A. Genomics of sorghum, a semi-arid cereal and emerging model for tropical grass genomics. In Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants; Moore, P.H., Mingeds, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 469–482. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bollam, S.; Romana, K.K.; Rayaprolu, L.; Vemula, A.; Das, R.R.; Rathore, A.; Gandham, P.; Chander, G.; Deshpande, S.P.; Gupta, R. Nitrogen use efficiency in sorghum: Exploring native variability for traits under variable n-regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 643192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, S.; Liu, M.; Liu, F.; Zou, J.; Lu, X.; Diao, X. Current status and future prospective of sorghum production and seed industry in China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2021, 54, 471–482. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tollenaar, D. Untersuchungen euber Mutation bei Tabak. II. Einige kuenstlich erzeugte Chromosom-Mutanten. Genetica 1938, 20, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pathirana, R. Plant mutation breeding in agriculture. CABI Rev. 2011, 6, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sikora, P.; Chawade, A.; Larsson, M.; Olsson, J.; Olsson, O. Mutagenesis as a tool in plant genetics, functional genomics, and breeding. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2011, 2011, 314829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gillmor, C.S.; Lukowitz, W. EMS Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis Seeds. In Plant Embryogenesis: Methods in Molecular Biology; Bayer, M., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma, L.; Kong, F.; Sun, K.; Wang, T.; Guo, T. From classical radiation to modern radiation: Past, present, and future of radiation mutation breeding. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 68071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yoshihara, R.; Nozawa, S.; Hase, Y.; Narumi, I.; Hidema, J.; Sakamoto, A.N. Mutational effects of γ-rays and carbon ion beams on Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Radiat. Res. 2013, 54, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hagiwara, Y.; Oike, T.; Niimi, A.; Yamauchi, M.; Sato, H.; Limsirichaikul, S.; Held, K.D.; Nakano, T.; Shibata, A. Clustered DNA double-strand break formation and the repair pathway following heavy-ion irradiation. J. Radiat. Res. 2019, 60, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kumawat, S.; Rana, N.; Bansal, R.; Vishwakarma, G.; Mehetre, S.T.; Das, B.K.; Kumar, M.; Yadav, S.K.; Sonah, H.; Sharma, T.R.; et al. Expanding avenue of fast neutron mediated mutagenesis for crop improvement. Plants 2019, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hendry, J.H. The slower cellular recovery after higher-LET irradiations, including neutrons, focuses on the quality of DNA breaks. Radiat. Res. 1991, 128, S111–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Belfield, E.J.; Gan, X.; Mithani, A.; Brown, C.; Jiang, C.; Franklin, K.; Alvey, E.; Wibowo, A.; Jung, M.; Bailey, K.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of mutations in mutant lineages selected following fast-neutron irradiation mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 1306–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, G.; Chern, M.; Jain, R.; Martin, J.A.; Schackwitz, W.S.; Jiang, L.; Vega-Sánchez, M.E.; Lipzen, A.M.; Barry, K.W.; Schmutz, J.; et al. Genome-wide sequencing of 41 rice (Oryza sativa L.) mutated lines reveals diverse mutations induced by fast-neutron irradiation. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1078–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bolon, Y.T.; Haun, W.J.; Xu, W.W.; Grant, D.; Stacey, M.G.; Nelson, R.T.; Gerhardt, D.J.; Jeddeloh, J.A.; Stacey, G.; Muehlbauer, G.J.; et al. Phenotypic and genomic analyses of a fast neutron mutant population resource in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wyant, S.R.; Rodriguez, M.F.; Carter, C.K.; Parrott, W.A.; Jackson, S.A.; Stupar, R.M.; Morrell, P.L. Fast neutron mutagenesis in soybean enriches for small indels and creates frameshift mutations. G3 2022, 12, jkab431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Domoney, C.; Knox, M.; Moreau, C.; Ambrose, M.; Palmer, S.; Smith, P.; Christodoulou, V.; Isaac, P.G.; Hegarty, M.; Blackmore, T.; et al. Exploiting a fast neutron mutant genetic resource in Pisum sativum (pea) for functional genomics. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, Y.; Chen, R. Physical mutagenesis in medicago truncatula using fast neutron bombardment (FNB) for symbiosis and developmental biology studies. In Functional Genomics in Medicago truncatula: Methods in Molecular Biology; Cañas, L., Beltrán, J., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, J.; Sui, J.; Xie, Y.; Guo, H.; Qiao, L.; Zhao, L.; Yu, S.; Liu, L. Generation of peanut mutants by fast neutron irradiation combined with in vitro culture. J. Radiat. Res. 2015, 56, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Muhammad, I.; Rafii, M.Y.; Nazli, M.H.; Ramlee, S.I.; Harun, A.R.; Oladosu, Y. Determination of lethal (LD) and growth reduction (GR) doses on acute and chronic gamma-irradiated Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.]varieties. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2021, 14, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guha Mallick, R.; Pramanik, S.; Pandit, M.K.; Gupta, A.K.; Roy, S.; Jambhulkar, S.; Sarker, A.; Nath, R.; Bhattacharyya, S. Radiosensitivity of seedling traits to varying gamma doses, optimum dose determination and variation in determined doses due to different time of sowings after irradiation and methods of irradiation in faba bean genotypes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2023, 99, 534–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, D.; Yao, Z.; Feng, H.; Yin, Y. Effects of different dosages of neutron radiation on seed germination and seedling growth of needle leaf pea. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2015, 31, 200–204. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, L.; Zhao, B.; Wan, P.; Luo, W.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Cao, J.; Sun, W.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, H. The screening of mutants from jingnong 6 induced by fast neutron in Azuki bean (Vigna angularisi). Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2012, 28, 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain, S.M. Mutagenesis in crop improvement under the climate change. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 15, 88–106. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, C.Y.; Zhu, Z.X.; Li, D.; Cong, L.; Zhang, L. EMS mutagenesis, mutant screening and identification of sorghum. Biotechnol. Bull. 2014, 9, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiao, Y.; Burke, J.; Chopra, R.; Burow, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, B.; Hayes, C.; Emendack, Y.; Ware, D.; Xin, Z. A sorghum mutant resource as an efficient platform for gene discovery in grasses. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, W.; Zhao, W.; Bai, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, G.; Shao, R.; Xue, D. Screening and identification of ems mutants from sweet sorghum. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2020, 3, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  28. Simons, J.M.; Herbert, T.C.; Kauffman, C.; Batete, M.Y.; Simpson, A.T.; Katsuki, Y.; Le, D.; Amundson, D.; Buescher, E.M.; Weil, C.; et al. Systematic prediction of EMS-induced mutations in a sorghum mutant population. Plant Direct. 2022, 6, e404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, X.; Wang, H.; Nie, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Liang, D.; Duan, Y.; Liu, Q. Effects of EMS mutagenesis on emergence and agronomic traits in sorghum. Crops 2020, 36, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paterson, A.H.; Bowers, J.E.; Bruggmann, R.; Dubchak, I.; Grimwood, J.; Gundlach, H.; Haberer, G.; Hellsten, U.; Mitros, T.; Poliakov, A.; et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Maluszynski, M.; Szarejko, I.; Bhatia, C.R.; Nichterlein, K.; Lagoda, P.J. Methodologies for generating variability Part 4, Mutation techniques. In Plant Breeders and Farmer Participation; Ceccarelli, S., Guimaraes, E.P., Weltzien, E., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009; pp. 159–194. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bolon, Y.T.; Stec, A.O.; Michno, J.M.; Roessler, J.; Bhaskar, P.B.; Ries, L.; Dobbels, A.A.; Campbell, B.W.; Young, N.P.; Anderson, J.E.; et al. Genome resilience and prevalence of segmental duplications following fast neutron irradiation of soybean. Genetics 2014, 198, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naito, K.; Kusaba, M.; Shikazono, N.; Takano, T.; Tanaka, A.; Tanisaka, T.; Nishimura, M. Transmissible and nontransmissible mutations induced by irradiating Arabidopsis thaliana pollen with γ-rays and carbon ions. Genetics 2005, 169, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xin, Z.; Jiao, Y.; Burow, G.; Hayes, C.M.; Chen, J.; Burke, J.J.; Pugh, N.A.; Ware, D.H. Registration of 252 sequenced sorghum mutants as a community reverse genetic resource. J. Plant Regist. 2023, 17, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiao, Y.; Nigam, D.; Barry, K.; Daum, C.; Yoshinaga, Y.; Lipzen, A.; Khan, A.; Parasa, S.; Wei, S.; Lu, Z.; et al. A large sequenced mutant library-valuable reverse genetic resource that covers 98% of sorghum genes. Plant J. 2024, 117, 1543–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sega, G.A. A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat. Res./Rev. Genet. Toxicol. 1984, 134, 113–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xiong, H.; Guo, H.; Fu, M.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gu, J.; Zhao, S.; Ding, Y.; Du, Q.; Zhang, J.; et al. A large-scale whole-exome sequencing mutant resource for functional genomics in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 2047–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nawaz, Z.; Shu, Q. Molecular nature of chemically and physically induced mutants in plants: A review. Plant Genet. Resour. 2014, 12, S74–S78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thompson, O.; Edgley, M.; Strasbourger, P.; Flibotte, S.; Ewing, B.; Adair, R.; Au, V.; Chaudhry, I.; Fernando, L.; Hutter, H.; et al. The million mutation project: A new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 1749–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, J.; Zhao, G.; Geng, J.; Geng, Z.; Dou, H.; Liu, X.; An, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide analysis of mutations induced by carbon ion beam irradiation in cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1056662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Monroe, J.G.; Srikant, T.; Carbonell-Bejerano, P.; Becker, C.; Lensink, M.; Exposito-Alonso, M.; Klein, M.; Hildebrandt, J.; Neumann, M.; Kliebenstein, D.; et al. Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2022, 302, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weng, M.L.; Becker, C.; Hildebrandt, J.; Neumann, M.; Rutter, M.T.; Shaw, R.G.; Weigel, D.; Fenster, C.B. Fine-grained analysis of spontaneous mutation spectrum and frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2019, 211, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Brenner, D.J.; Ward, J.F. Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply damaged sites associated with DNA double-strand breaks. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2009, 61, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nikjoo, H.; O’Neill, P.; Wilson, W.E.; Goodhead, D.T. Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res. 2001, 156, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Layer, R.M.; Chiang, C.; Quinlan, A.R.; Hall, I.M. LUMPY: A probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tian, T.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H.; You, Q.; Yi, X.; Du, Z.; Xu, W.; Su, Z. agriGO v2.0: A GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W122–W129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 15 00976 g001
Figure 1. The number of each type of mutation in the eight treatment groups. SV, structural variation; InDel, insertion and deletion; SBS, single-base substitution.
Figure 1. The number of each type of mutation in the eight treatment groups. SV, structural variation; InDel, insertion and deletion; SBS, single-base substitution.
Genes 15 00976 g001
Genes 15 00976 g002
Figure 2. FN irradiation-induced transitions and transversions in the eight treatment groups. Ti, transitions; Tv, transversions.
Figure 2. FN irradiation-induced transitions and transversions in the eight treatment groups. Ti, transitions; Tv, transversions.
Genes 15 00976 g002
Genes 15 00976 g003
Figure 3. FN irradiation-induced InDels in the eight treatment groups. InDels, insertions and deletions; INS, insertion; DEL, deletion.
Figure 3. FN irradiation-induced InDels in the eight treatment groups. InDels, insertions and deletions; INS, insertion; DEL, deletion.
Genes 15 00976 g003
Genes 15 00976 g004
Figure 4. The number of SBSs, InDels and SVs in each chromosome induced by FN irradiation in the eight treatment groups. (a) FN irradiation-induced SBS mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. (b) FN irradiation-induced InDel mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. (c) FN irradiation-induced SV mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. SBSs, single-base substitutions; InDels, insertions and deletions; SVs, structural variations.
Figure 4. The number of SBSs, InDels and SVs in each chromosome induced by FN irradiation in the eight treatment groups. (a) FN irradiation-induced SBS mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. (b) FN irradiation-induced InDel mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. (c) FN irradiation-induced SV mutations in each chromosome in the eight treatment groups. SBSs, single-base substitutions; InDels, insertions and deletions; SVs, structural variations.
Genes 15 00976 g004
Genes 15 00976 g005
Figure 5. The distribution of InDel mutations across the genome in the 19 Gy-treated lines. InDel, insertion and deletion.
Figure 5. The distribution of InDel mutations across the genome in the 19 Gy-treated lines. InDel, insertion and deletion.
Genes 15 00976 g005
Table 1. Statistics of the whole-genome re-sequencing data of the 41 sorghum samples.
Table 1. Statistics of the whole-genome re-sequencing data of the 41 sorghum samples.
Mutant IDNumber of Raw ReadsNumber of Clean ReadsNumber of Clean Bases (Gb)Mapping Rate (%)Depth of Coverage ≥ 20× (%)Depth of Coverage ≥ 10× (%)Depth of Coverage ≥ 5× (%)Q20%Q30%GC%
Bs5_110569137410387574015.5198.1943.7992.3398.9197.0292.3243.52
Bs5_210852204810688493215.9698.7147.2093.6299.0897.1792.6543.34
Bs5_310593908210431973415.5797.5142.2892.5198.9897.1992.6643.54
Bs5_4984574009705374614.4997.2234.1889.7398.6997.2192.7643.69
Bs5_510732654010523347415.7297.9744.4593.0499.0396.8992.1243.57
Bs11_110733275410524927215.7197.7946.3389.4597.3696.9192.2344.78
Bs11_210566664410382643615.5198.0343.6492.5898.9996.9892.2443.52
Bs11_310643411610459964015.6298.4744.9592.9398.9896.9992.2643.46
Bs11_410769346210562362215.7798.1844.0392.9199.0296.8992.1343.42
Bs11_510532640210360250615.4698.5143.7692.8098.9997.0492.3343.44
Bs14_110869352210668673615.9398.3845.7693.1999.0496.9592.2943.38
Bs14_210943093610788336216.198.6448.4493.8999.1297.2192.8743.37
Bs14_310701714410516289015.798.3745.4892.8599.019792.343.41
Bs14_410715369010532413215.7398.0344.6792.7398.9997.0192.3243.46
Bs14_510458532810315140615.3998.6542.5192.3398.9697.2592.9843.29
Bs19_110846944810680068015.9497.4545.4093.4899.1197.1792.8943.59
Bs19_210812262610640436015.8998.3445.6193.5699.1297.192.4943.39
Bs19_310846944810680068015.9497.4545.4093.4899.1197.1792.8943.59
Bs19_410779686810558802615.7798.445.4893.4499.1096.8592.0443.43
Bs19_510850734410616082015.8598.5246.6493.4399.0896.6991.7843.41
Bs26_110965789010820215616.1498.6147.7994.2399.1397.5293.4743.22
Bs26_210805494410562463215.7898.2846.0293.4399.0896.791.7543.51
Bs26_310946039010719088216.0198.2947.8994.0599.1596.7691.9243.45
Bs26_410832604410612835215.8497.845.1693.3699.0996.8191.9343.49
Bs26_510814902010646290015.8998.8548.2294.0899.1797.1692.7943.35
Bs33_110884444410764481216.0597.0345.4189.3097.1197.693.7444.87
Bs33_210932618010755126416.0498.1846.6390.4297.5997.2592.9544.43
Bs33_310985090010808932616.1298.4849.8091.1197.6697.2592.9244.57
Bs33_410888503610737188416.0298.6548.3791.6197.9797.4193.2444.24
Bs33_510838917610672229015.9398.6246.8894.0099.1597.3693.0743.22
Bs41_11089686041073823381698.1848.3190.0297.2497.3493.144.75
Bs41_210895984810716703415.9894.3843.2987.8996.8097.1892.7745.56
Bs41_310778296410608522415.8398.2944.7988.9697.2197.2492.8244.56
Bs41_410979474810791263416.198.3847.0390.6897.7197.1392.6744.38
Bs41_510797355610597006615.8197.5545.6989.8497.4597.0392.4744.64
Bs46_110733275410524927215.7197.7946.3389.4597.3696.9192.2344.78
Bs46_210828281010644138015.8898.7146.4388.8997.0397.0992.5444.64
Bs46_310789251410616343215.8398.1946.0488.7096.9697.1792.6944.79
Bs46_410505552610351056815.449844.7188.3496.9897.2793.0944.8
Bs46_510850314810687161015.9498.1845.5088.5796.8497.2992.9544.67
BTx62310829379610619491615.8699.0148.7393.6999.1197.1292.5643.42
Mean10766879210585778515.8098.1045.5991.8398.4097.1092.5943.90
Table 2. Mutation information regarding the genes affected by small mutations.
Table 2. Mutation information regarding the genes affected by small mutations.
LineIDChrPosRefAltGeneID
5 GyChr01_62221922Chr0162221922GGGCSobic.001G299900.v5.1
Chr04_57358919Chr0457358919TCGATSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358941Chr0457358941CTSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358981Chr0457358981ATSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr09_28770284Chr0928770284TGSobic.009G095560.v5.1
11 GyChr03_6409060Chr036409060CACAA,CSobic.003G074700.v5.1
14 GyChr01_62221922Chr0162221922GGGCSobic.001G299900.v5.1
Chr01_10357147Chr0110357147TASobic.001G130400.v5.1
Chr02_48202647Chr0248202647TCATSobic.002G155500.v5.1
19 GyChr02_48202647Chr0248202647TCATSobic.002G155500.v5.1
Chr03_70852413Chr0370852413CAGCSobic.003G317500.v5.1
Chr03_79824423Chr0379824423AGASobic.003G431800.v5.1
Chr04_28733502Chr0428733502GASobic.004G135383.v5.1
Chr04_28733574Chr0428733574ATSobic.004G135383.v5.1
Chr05_6918726Chr056918726CT,GSobic.005G062200.v5.1
Chr05_10737537Chr0510737537TCTSobic.005G080062.v5.1
Chr06_58090348Chr0658090348ACTCTA,ACTSobic.006G219600.v5.1
Chr07_97864Chr0797864CGAGACGA,CSobic.007G000900.v5.1
26 GyChr01_30720439Chr0130720439TCSobic.001G257400.v5.1
Chr01_62221922Chr0162221922GGGCSobic.001G299900.v5.1
Chr02_48202647Chr0248202647TCATSobic.002G155500.v5.1
Chr02_68565702Chr0268565702TCTSobic.002G295100.v5.1
Chr08_62900559Chr0862900559TASobic.008G164526.v5.1
Chr09_24008650Chr0924008650TCSobic.009G092900.v5.1
33 GyChr01_62221922Chr0162221922GGGCSobic.001G299900.v5.1
41 GyChr04_57358919Chr0457358919TCGATSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358988Chr0457358988CGGGCSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358993Chr0457358993ACGGASobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57359003Chr0457359003CGATCSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358941Chr0457358941CTSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358981Chr0457358981ATSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr05_6918726Chr056918726CT,GSobic.005G062200.v5.1
Chr08_62900559Chr0862900559TASobic.008G164526.v5.1
Chr08_62900574Chr0862900574AGSobic.008G164526.v5.1
46 GyChr01_62221922Chr0162221922GGGCSobic.001G299900.v5.1
Chr01_73368414Chr0173368414AGSobic.001G408300.v5.1
Chr04_57358833Chr0457358833GASobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr04_57358850Chr0457358850TGTSobic.004G197700.v5.1
Chr10_60900949Chr1060900949CAGCSobic.010G254300.v5.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, N.; Liang, S.; Zhou, L.; Yuan, X.; Li, C.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H. Comparison of Mutations Induced by Different Doses of Fast-Neutron Irradiation in the M1 Generation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genes 2024, 15, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080976

AMA Style

Yuan N, Liang S, Zhou L, Yuan X, Li C, Chen X, Zhao H. Comparison of Mutations Induced by Different Doses of Fast-Neutron Irradiation in the M1 Generation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genes. 2024; 15(8):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Na, Shuaiqiang Liang, Ling Zhou, Xingxing Yuan, Chunhong Li, Xin Chen, and Han Zhao. 2024. "Comparison of Mutations Induced by Different Doses of Fast-Neutron Irradiation in the M1 Generation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)" Genes 15, no. 8: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080976

APA Style

Yuan, N., Liang, S., Zhou, L., Yuan, X., Li, C., Chen, X., & Zhao, H. (2024). Comparison of Mutations Induced by Different Doses of Fast-Neutron Irradiation in the M1 Generation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genes, 15(8), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop