Next Article in Journal
Genomic and Pathogenic Characterization of Akanthomyces muscarius Isolated from Living Mite Infesting Hazelnut Big Buds
Previous Article in Journal
Network of Interactions between the Mut Domains of the E2 Protein of Atypical Porcine Pestivirus and Host Proteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioinformatics Analysis of the Genome of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1362, an (−)-Isopulegol Biotransformer

by
Polina Yu. Maltseva
1,2,
Natalia A. Plotnitskaya
1,2,
Anastasiia V. Krivoruchko
1,2,
Aleksey V. Beletskiy
3,
Andrey L. Rakitin
3,
Andrey V. Mardanov
3 and
Irina B. Ivshina
1,3,*
1
Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13 Golev Str., 614081 Perm, Russia
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Perm State University, 15 Bukirev Str., 614990 Perm, Russia
3
Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 7-1 Prosp. 60-let Oktyabrya, 117312 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(8), 992; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080992
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 26 July 2024 / Published: 28 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
A genome of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was sequenced and annotated. This strain can transform monoterpene alcohol (–)-isopulegol with the formation of two novel pharmacologically promising metabolites. Nine genes encoding cytochrome P450, presumably involved in (–)-isopulegol transformation, were found in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362. Primers and PCR conditions for their detection were selected. The obtained data can be used for the further investigation of genes encoding enzymes involved in monoterpene biotransformation.

1. Introduction

(–)-Isopulegol ((1R,3R,4S)-p-menth-8-en-3-ol, C10H18O, CAS 89-79-2) is a monoterpene alcohol widely found in the essential oils of plants. Using (–)-isopulegol for the synthesis of novel bioactive compounds has a number of advantages, such as its low cost, availability, and variety of properties [1]. However, the biological transformation of this monoterpene is poorly investigated. There are only fragmented data on the enzymatic conversion of (–)-isopulegol by cutinases from Aspergillus oryzae and Humicola insolens [2] and its whole cell degradation by Rhodococcus sp. [3]. Rhodococcus actinomycetes are biotechnologically promising microorganisms due to their broad substrate specificity and high catalytic activity even under extreme environmental conditions [4]. Representatives of R. rhodochrous have a wide range of applications due to their ability to degrade ecotoxic compounds, such as pharmacological pollutants [5], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [6], and pulp and paper industry waste [7]. Furthermore, they are known to be effective catalysts for the synthesis of bioactive compounds [8,9,10,11], as well as being enzyme sources [12]. In our recent study, R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was shown to biotransform monoterpene alcohol (–)-isopulegol into two new 10-hydroxy and 10-carboxy derivatives [13,14]. Both compounds may have biological functions, such as antitumor, respiratory-stimulating and anticancer capabilities.
The ability of bacterial cells to transform various compounds is due to the action of their enzyme systems. A logical trend in the development of biotechnology is the isolation and purification of bacterial enzymes, as well as their overexpression in model organisms in order to scale the production of target compounds. The use of individual enzymes allows for highly selective reactions with repeated use, reduces sterility requirements, and simplifies the process of isolation and purification of the target product [15]. In this regard, studies on the catalytic activity of Rhodococcus spp. in relation to terpene substrates should be accompanied by the study of microbial enzymes involved in transformations, as well as the functional genes encoding them. Several rhodococcal genes and enzymes have been identified that catalyze the transformations of monoterpenoids 1,8-cineole, limonene, carveol, p-cymene, and terpineol [16,17,18,19,20]. However, data on bacterial genes and enzymes for the bioconversion of (–)-isopulegol are lacking. Our research focuses on the primary analysis of the whole genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362, an (–)-isopulegol biotransformer, to identify putative genes encoding enzymes involved in (–)-isopulegol bioconversion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Culture

R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was isolated from the Paltinskoye peat deposit, Perm region, Russia, and deposited in the Regional Specialized Collection of Alkanotrophic Microorganisms (acronym IEGM, WDCM number 768). Along with (–)-isopulegol transformation, the strain also uses n-hexadecane as a sole carbon source, degrades dehydroabietic acid, and is resistant to Cr6+ (40.0 mM), Mo6+, and Zn2+ (5.0 mM) (http://www.iegmcol.ru/strains/rhodoc/rhodoch/r_rhod1362.html, accessed on 4 July 2024).

2.2. Whole Genome Sequencing

For DNA extraction, the R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cells were grown in LB broth at 28 °C and 160 rpm for 28 h. Genomic DNA was isolated using a DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The shotgun library was prepared using an NEBNext Ultra II DNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument in paired read mode (2 × 300 nt). A total of 506,369 read pairs were generated. Low-quality sequences were trimmed using Sickle v. 1.33 (q = 30). The draft genome was assembled with Flye v. 2.8.1.

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The search for functional genes presumably involved in the biotransformation of (–)-isopulegol and rRNA genes was carried out using the online service RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology, https://rast.nmpdr.org/, accessed on 3 June 2024) [21] based on an automatically annotated whole genome of the biotransformer strain.
The 16S rRNA gene of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was aligned with 16S rRNA genes of closely related bacterial strains, and a distance tree for aligned nucleotide sequences was built in BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 14 June 2024). Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) with the genomes of type strains and phylogenetic analysis were performed on TYGS (the Type (Strain) Genome Server, https://tygs.dsmz.de/, accessed on 14 June 2024) [22]. Average nucleotide identities (ANIs) were calculated using an ANI Calculator (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani, accessed on 14 June 2024) [23].
A comparison of the target gene sequences was carried out using the BLASTN and BLASTP services available on the NCBI website. The search for biosynthetic gene clusters in the genome of the biotransformer strain was carried out using genomic mining on the online service AntiSMASH (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/, accessed on 3 June 2024) [24]. An analysis of the amino acid sequences and the construction of metabolic pathways were carried out using the KEGG database (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, https://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 3 June 2024) and the GhostKOALA service [25].

2.4. Primer Design

Primers were designed using Primer-BLAST. When selecting them, we were guided by recommendations from the NCBI, the uniqueness of specific regions in the genome, a product length of 70−1000 bp, a melting temperature of 57−63 °C, and a GC composition of 40−60%. In this case, the difference in the GC composition should be no more than 10%, the difference in the melting temperatures between the forward and reverse primers should be no more than 0.99 °C, the self-complementarity indicator should be no more than 8 arbitrary units, and the maximum complementarity of pairs should be no more than 5 arbitrary units.

2.5. Determination of Genes Encoding Enzymes Involved in (–)-Isopulegol Transformation

DNA extraction was carried out using biomass obtained after a 24 h cultivation of the strain in an LB nutrient broth (Diaem, Moscow, Russia) according to the protocol for the ExtractDNA Blood genomic DNA isolation kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). The concentration and purity of the isolated DNA were assessed using a QubitTM fluorimeter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a QuDye dsDNA BR kit (Lumiprobe, Moscow, Russia) and a NanoPhotometer N50 spectrophotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany), respectively. The resulting DNA was used for PCR with a qPCRmix-HS SYBR (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) with the selected primers on a CFX ConnectTM Real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Species-specific primers based on the 16S rRNA gene for R. rhodochrous served as a positive control. The PCR protocol included the following steps and conditions:
Stage 1:95.0 °C; 3 min.
Stage 2:95.0 °C; 30 s.
Stage 3:Gradient 55.0–65.0 °C; 30 s.
Stage 4:72.0 °C; 1:30 min.
Repetition of Stages 2–4 34 times.
Stage 5:Melting curve from 65.0 to 95.0 °C, step 0.5 °C; 5 s.
Stage 6:72.0 °C; 10 min.
The presence and size of amplicons in the reaction mixture after PCR were determined using horizontal electrophoresis in an agarose gel (1.5% agarose in TBE buffer) using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR+ gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Electrophoretic separation was carried out at a voltage of 70 V for 40 min. GelRed (Diaem, Moscow, Russia) was used as a nucleic acid dye. PCR products (5 μL) were added to an agarose gel in 4X Gel Loading Dye, Blue loading buffer (0.5 μL) (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). To determine the size of the PCR products, a DNA length marker from 700 to 50 bp (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) was added to the gel.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phylogeny and Overall Genome Characteristics

The assembly consisted of 140 contigs with a total sequence length of 5,733,046 bp, an N50 value of 126,441 bp, a GC content of 68%, and coverage of 53.0×. A total of 5331 CDSs, 5209 CDSs with proteins, and 67 RNAs were found in the R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 genome (Table 1).
Using phenotypic methods (morphology, physiological tests, chemotaxonomy), the IEGM 1362 strain was identified as belonging to the R. rhodochrous species. During the analysis of the genome and phylogenetic markers, such as the 16S rRNA gene, it was revealed that R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was not a common member of this species. The scores for the key taxonomic markers (16S rRNA gene similarities, dDDH, and ANI) of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 were close to threshold levels of 98.7%, 70%, and 94–95%, respectively [26]. According to the gene relatedness of 16S rRNA, the R. rhodochrous strain IEGM 1362 was in the same phylogenetically close group with the R. coprophilus strain NCTC10994, the R. gordoniae strain DND3, and various R. pyridinivorans and R. rhodochrous strains (Figure 1). Only the percent of identity with the 16S rRNA gene of R. coprophilus NCTC10994 was below the threshold of <98.7% [26], while the levels of identity with 16S rRNA genes of other strains were ≥98.7% (Figure 1). This indicated that R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 could be classified as R. gordoniae, R. pyridinivorans, or R. rhodochrous.
The dDDH scores were more than 70% in comparisons of the IEGM 1362 genome with genomes of R. rhodochrous type strains and less than 70% in comparisons with genomes of R. gordoniae and R. pyridinivorans type strains (Table 2). This parameter was evidence for the IEGM 1362 strain belonging to R. rhodochrous, which agrees with the phenotypic traits of this strain. However, ANI scores were above the threshold of 94–95% for two species, R. pyridinivorans and R. rhodochrous, and G+C content was less different (0.05–0.25%) between R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 and type strains of R. gordoniae and R. pyridinivorans than that between the IEGM 1362 strain and type strains of R. rhodochrous (0.38–0.45%) (Table 2).
According to the ANI and dDDH values, the IEGM 1362 strain did not belong to R. gordoniae. However, its difference from R. pyridinivorans was not evident. Summarizing all the scores (the 16S rRNA gene relatedness, the highest ANI score, and dDDH values within the species borders), the IEGM 1362 strain continued to belong to R. rhodochrous. Apparently, R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 accumulated genetic traits of both closely related species R. pyridinivorans and R. rhodochrous and occupied an intermediate position between these two species. The heterogeneity of the R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 genome, distancing this strain from common representatives of R. rhodochrous, could be a basis for its advanced catalytic properties, including its ability to transform (–)-isopulegol.

3.2. The Whole Genome Analysis

The category distribution of genes with known functions is shown in Figure 2. In the genome of IEGM 1362, 75 CDSs encoding monooxygenases/hydroxylases, 31 CDSs encoding dioxygenases, 7 CDSs encoding peroxidases, and 351 CDSs encoding dehydrogenases were found. Among monooxygenases, the genes of two alkane 1-monooxygenases, nine cytochrome P450s, eight cyclohexanone 1,2-monooxygenases, three 3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-monooxygenases, and two steroid C27-monooxygenases were revealed. Additionally, we found several genes encoding enzymes of steroid metabolism, such as cholesterol oxidases (six CDSs), 3-oxosteroid 1-dehydrogenases (four CDSs), 3-alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (one CDSs), steroid monooxygenases (three CDSs), and 3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-monooxygenases (three CDSs).
Based on the results of the analysis of metabolic pathways in the genome of strain IEGM 1362, a non-mevalonate pathway for C5 isoprenoid biosynthesis was detected, including the following enzymes: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (EC 2.2.1.7), 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.267), 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphatecytidyl transferase (EC 2.7.7.60), 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase (EC 2.7.1.148), 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase (EC 4.6.1.12), 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase (EC 1.17.7.1), and 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyldiphosphate reductase (EC 1.17.1.2) (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1) [28]. This pathway provides the formation of isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate, which are necessary for the synthesis of terpenes, sterols, carotenoids, and dolichols.
It should be noted that, at present, the vast majority of processes for the biosynthesis of terpene compounds in actinomycetes have been discovered and studied mainly for representatives of the genus Streptomyces [29], whereas for representatives of the genus Rhodococcus, only a few examples of the biosynthesis of zeatins, isoprenoid cytokinins with a dimethylallyl moiety attached to the N atom of adenine or adenosine [30,31], and valuable carotenoids such as dihydroxyneurosporine, hydroxyequinenone [32], beta-carotene, zeaxanthin, and isorenieratin [33], etc. [34], have been detected. Since the strain we used in our work is characterized by the red color of the colonies, the discovered pathway is most likely responsible for the synthesis of terpene carotenoids. In addition, using the online genomic mining service AntiSMASH, the presence of three biosynthetic gene clusters for the synthesis of terpenes in the genome, as well as biosynthetic gene clusters for the synthesis of polyketides, non-ribosomal peptide synthases, ectoines, butyro-, and beta-lactones and ε-poly-L-lysine, was shown (Table 3).

3.3. Determination of Putative Monoterpenoid Transformation Genes

To date, only a few genes and the enzymes they encode have been identified that catalyze the conversion of individual monoterpenoids [16,17,18,19,20]. Using limonene as an example, the enzymes limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase, limonene-1,2-monooxygenase, and limonene-6-monooxygenase, which are responsible for its transformation through hydroxylation, oxidation, and hydrolysis in R. erythropolis cells, were identified [17]. A gene encoding limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase was also found in the genome of IEGM 1362 (fig|6666666.993513.peg.1867), which indicates that this strain may exhibit limonene-transforming activity.
Based on the recorded transformations of (–)-isopulegol, including the stages of hydroxylation and oxidation (Figure 3), and the analysis of the literature data [35], we assumed that enzymes of the cytochrome P450 family can be involved in the bioconversion process. Automatic annotation of the obtained sequences of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 using the RAST service made it possible to search for genes encoding enzymes presumably involved in the bacterial oxidation of (–)-isopulegol. We discovered nine genes encoding enzymes of the family of cytochrome P450-dependent oxygenases and hydroxylases (Table 4). Pairwise comparison of these genes within strain in the BLAST service showed the absence of significant matches in Megablast mode and no more than 33.5% similarity accordingly to the blastp (protein–protein BLAST) algorithm (Supplementary Materials, Figure S2). This confirms the fact that all of the discovered genes are not copies, but separate functional units. It is worth noting that, based on the results of a search for genes encoding CYP450 in the NCBI database, 13 genes were identified, but the transcription products of 4 of them in the RAST system were identified more specifically as steroid C27-monooxygenases (EC 1.14.13.141) and lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (EC 1.14.13.70); therefore, they were not used by us in further experiments.
Based on the detected sequences, for the first time, pairs of primers for individual CYP450 genes of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 were selected using the Primer-BLAST service. Optimal conditions for their amplification were selected. These guaranteed the formation of products with an expected size without the amplification of extra DNA fragments of other sizes typical for GC-rich matrices (Table 4, Figure 4).
Genes encoding CYP450 enzymes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 differed from their homologues in other R. rhodochrous strains; this could be a basis for the advanced transformation capabilities of this strain. Percents of identity between the CYP450 nucleotide and amino acid sequences varied in wide ranges of 88.72–100.00% and 56.36–100.00%, respectively (Table 5). The highest (100.00%) and the lowest (88.72% and 56.36%) similarities were not typical and were detected in a comparison of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 with a few R. rhodochrous strains. Some of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cytochrome genes were rare and unique for bacteria. Gene nos. 4, 6, and 7 (see Table 4) were found only in 13, 59, and 46 bacterial strains. Among R. rhodochrous strains, gene no. 6 was unique for the IEGM 1362 strain, since it was not found in other representatives of R. rhodochrous. However, according to amino acid sequencing, an enzyme with 94.55% identity with CYP450 no. 6 of IEGM 1362 was detected in one R. rhodochrous strain (Table 5). This enzyme was also found in R. pyridinivorans with high identities of 99.85–99.92% and 99.77% for DNA and amino acid sequences, respectively (Table 5). The high similarity of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cytochromes with those in R. pyridinivorans was also evident from the close identities of these enzymes, which varied in ranges of 82.05–100.00% and 56.11–100.00% for DNA and amino acid sequences, respectively (Table 5). Moreover, cytochromes of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 were more frequently detected in R. pyridinivorans. Homologues of these enzymes and their genes were found in 1–27 strains of R. pyridinivorans compared with 0–12 strains of R. rhodochrous (Table 5). This was not related to the over-representation of sequenced genomes for one of the species in the NCBI. There were 31 strains with sequenced genomes for both species.
The genetic surroundings of CYP450 genes were analyzed. The genes that coded for transcriptional regulators were found directly before or in close proximity to eight CYP450 genes. Only gene no. 6 had no transcription regulators nearby. However, partner proteins for cytochromes, such as ferredoxin and ferredoxin reductase, were detected only in the surrounding of CYP450 no. 6. We supposed that genes encoding CYP450 no. 6, ferredoxin, and ferredoxin reductase consisted of one gene cluster expressed as a polycistron transcript, and that these proteins were responsible for a distinct metabolic process, probably (–)-isopulegol transformation. Other cytochromes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 could be involved in complex metabolic processes requiring global regulation along with other genes. Such processes could be the biosynthesis of lipids, fatty acids, or acylated polymers (glycolipids or lipoproteins), since genes coding for corresponding enzymes were found near CYP450 genes. Other metabolic processes could include the neutralization of toxic organic compounds, since genes coding for various transporting proteins and other oxidoreductases were also found near CYP450 genes. Gene no. 8 apparently was involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds, since genes encoding benzoate transporters, benzoate, and catechol dioxygenases, and some specific dehydrogenases, were annotated in the same gene cluster (Table 6). A common characteristic of cytochromes is their wide substrate specificity. Consequently, any of the CYP450 enzymes found in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 can theoretically enable the transformation of (–)-isopulegol, including providing co-oxidation conditions.
Additionally, a perspective of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of genes coding for cytochrome P450 in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 was estimated. Mobile elements were only found near three CYP450 genes. Just one mobile element protein was detected in each case (Table 6). Apparently, HGT plays a minor role in the distribution of cytochrome-coding genes between Rhodococcus species; however, it is probably responsible for the appearance of the unique CYP450 no. 6 in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.
The data obtained expand the understanding of the molecular genetic basis of the transformation of terpenoids by actinomycete cells of the genus Rhodococcus and create the prerequisites for further analysis of gene expression levels in order to identify genes and enzymes for the highly efficient selective biotransformation of the plant monoterpenoid (–)-isopulegol.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15080992/s1, Figure S1: Scheme of the terpenoid backbone biosynthesis; Figure S2: A Blast tree for CYP450 amino acid sequences extracted from the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.I.; methodology, A.V.K. and A.V.M.; validation, P.Y.M., N.A.P., A.V.B. and A.L.R.; investigation, P.Y.M., N.A.P., A.V.K., A.V.B., A.L.R. and A.V.M.; resources, I.B.I.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Y.M., N.A.P., A.V.K., A.V.B. and A.L.R.; writing—review and editing, I.B.I.; visualization, P.Y.M., N.A.P. and A.V.K.; supervision, I.B.I.; project administration, I.B.I.; funding acquisition, I.B.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 24-14-20015.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The draft genome sequence data are available at the NCBI under accession number GenBank NZ_JANFQM000000000.1.

Acknowledgments

The work was carried out using equipment from The Core Facilities Centers “Regional Specialised Collection of Alkanotrophic Microorganisms” and “Research of Materials and Matter” at Perm Federal Research Center Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences. The draft genome was sequenced and assembled at the Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Minh Le, T.; Szakonyi, Z. Enantiomeric Isopulegol as the Chiral Pool in the Total Synthesis of Bioactive Agents. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202100194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Su, A.; Kiokekli, S.; Naviwala, M.; Shirke, A.N.; Pavlidis, I.V.; Gross, R.A. Cutinases as Stereoselective Catalysts: Specific Activity and Enantioselectivity of Cutinases and Lipases for Menthol and Its Analogs. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2020, 133, 109467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shukla, O.P.; Bartholomus, R.C.; Gunsalus, I.C. Microbial Transformation of Menthol and Menthane-3,4-diol. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987, 33, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krivoruchko, A.; Kuyukina, M.; Ivshina, I. Advanced Rhodococcus Biocatalysts for Environmental Biotechnologies. Catalysts 2019, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ivshina, I.B.; Vikhareva, E.V.; Richkova, M.I.; Mukhutdinova, A.N.; Karpenko, J.N. Biodegradation of Drotaverine Hydrochloride by Free and Immobilized Cells of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 608. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 2997–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huizenga, J.M.; Schindler, J.; Simonich, M.T.; Truong, L.; Garcia-Jaramillo, M.; Tanguay, R.L.; Semprini, L. PAH Bioremediation with Rhodococcus rhodochrous ATCC 21198: Impact of Cell Immobilization and Surfactant Use on PAH Treatment and Post-Remediation Toxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 470, 134109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ivanova, K.M.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Highly Efficient Biodegradation of Ecotoxic Dehydroabietic Acid by Resting Cells of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 107. Microbiology 2022, 91, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Elkin, A.A.; Kylosova, T.I.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Enantioselective Oxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides by Gordonia terrae IEGM 136 and Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 66. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2013, 89, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grishko, V.V.; Tarasova, E.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Betulin to Betulone by Growing and Resting Cells of the Actinobacterium Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 66. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1640–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Sorokin, V.V.; Mulyukin, A.L.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Oleanolic Acid Using Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 757. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luchnikova, N.A.; Tarasova, E.V.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1360, an Effective Biocatalyst of C3 Oxidative Transformation of Oleanane Triterpenoids. Microbiology 2023, 92, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sahu, R.; Meghavarnam, A.K.; Janakiraman, S. Response Surface Methodology: An Effective Optimization Strategy for Enhanced Production of Nitrile Hydratase (NHase) by Rhodococcus rhodochrous (RS-6). Heliyon 2020, 6, e05111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ivshina, I.B.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Maltseva, P.Y.; Ilyina, I.V.; Volcho, K.P.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Korchagina, D.V.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Sorokin, V.V.; Mulyukin, A.L.; et al. Biotransformation of (–)-Isopulegol by Rhodococcus rhodochrous. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ivshina, I.B.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Maltseva, P.Y.; Ilyina, I.V.; Volcho, K.P.; Salakhutdinov, N.F. Method for Biotransformation of Plant Monoterpenoid (−)-Isopulegol to Obtain Biologically Active Compounds. Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2796679, 29 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; da Fonseca, M.M.R. Biotransformations. Compr. Biotechnol. Second Ed. 2011, 2, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Der Werf, M.J.; Van Der Ven, C.; Barbirato, F.; Eppink, M.H.M.; De Bont, J.A.M.; Van Berkel, W.J.H. Stereoselective Carveol Dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14: A Novel Nicotinoprotein Belonging to the Short Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 26296–26304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Der Werf, M.J.; Swarts, H.J.; De Bont, J.A.M. Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 Contains a Novel Degradation Pathway for Limonene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2092–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jakubovska, J.; Meškys, R. Characterization of 1,8-Cineole Degradation Encoding Operon from Rhodococcus sp. TMP1. Chemija 2016, 27, 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  19. Giang, P.D.; Churchman, L.R.; Buczynski, J.B.; Bell, S.G.; Stok, J.E.; De Voss, J.J. CYP108N14: A Monoterpene Monooxygenase from Rhodococcus globerulus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2024, 752, 109852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giang, P.D.; Churchman, L.R.; Stok, J.E.; Soo, R.M.; De Voss, J.J. CYP108N12 Initiates p-Cymene Biodegradation in Rhodococcus globerulus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2022, 730, 109410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brettin, T.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. RASTtk: A Modular and Extensible Implementation of the RAST Algorithm for Building Custom Annotation Pipelines and Annotating Batches of Genomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS Is an Automated High-Throughput Platform for State-of-the-Art Genome-Based Taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.; Chun, J. A Large-Scale Evaluation of Algorithms to Calculate Average Nucleotide Identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; Van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. AntiSMASH 6.0: Improving Cluster Detection and Comparison Capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; De Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed Minimal Standards for the Use of Genome Data for the Taxonomy of Prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Genome Sequence-Based Species Delimitation with Confidence Intervals and Improved Distance Functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kuzuyama, T. Mevalonate and Nonmevalonate Pathways for the Biosynthesis of Isoprene Units. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tarasova, E.V.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Actinomycetes as Producers of Biologically Active Terpenoids: Current Trends and Patents. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Helgeson, J.P.; Leonard, N.J. Cytokinins: Identification of Compounds Isolated from Corynebacterium fascians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1966, 56, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rudolf, J.D.; Alsup, T.A.; Xu, B.; Li, Z. Bacterial Terpenome. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Styczynski, M.; Rogowska, A.; Gieczewska, K.; Garstka, M.; Szakiel, A.; Dziewit, L. Genome-Based Insights into the Production of Carotenoids by Antarctic Bacteria, Planococcus sp. ANT_H30 and Rhodococcus sp. ANT_H53B. Molecules 2020, 25, 4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jiang, W.; Sun, J.; Gao, H.; Tang, Y.; Wang, C.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xin, F.; Jiang, M. Carotenoids Production and Genome Analysis of a Novel Carotenoid Producing Rhodococcus aetherivorans N1. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2023, 164, 110190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cappelletti, M.; Presentato, A.; Piacenza, E.; Firrincieli, A.; Turner, R.J.; Zannoni, D. Biotechnology of Rhodococcus for the Production of Valuable Compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8567–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maltseva, P.Y.; Plotnitskaya, N.A.; Ivshina, I.B. Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus. Molecules 2024, 29, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distance tree for pairwise alignments between 16S rRNA gene sequences of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 and the most phylogenetically closed strains. The tree method was Fast Minimum Evolution. The tree was unrooted. Only strains with a complete sequence of a 16S rRNA gene were selected for tree production. Values near the edges show the percentages of identity between 16S rRNA genes.
Figure 1. Distance tree for pairwise alignments between 16S rRNA gene sequences of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 and the most phylogenetically closed strains. The tree method was Fast Minimum Evolution. The tree was unrooted. Only strains with a complete sequence of a 16S rRNA gene were selected for tree production. Values near the edges show the percentages of identity between 16S rRNA genes.
Genes 15 00992 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of subsystem categories in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362. Image obtained using SEED Viewer 2.0.
Figure 2. Distribution of subsystem categories in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362. Image obtained using SEED Viewer 2.0.
Genes 15 00992 g002
Figure 3. Scheme of (–)-isopulegol biotransformation by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 [13,14].
Figure 3. Scheme of (–)-isopulegol biotransformation by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 [13,14].
Genes 15 00992 g003
Figure 4. Electropherogram of PCR products of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 with specific primers for CYP450 genes: M, DNA length marker from 700 to 50 bp. The gene numbers are the same as the gene numbers in Table 4.
Figure 4. Electropherogram of PCR products of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 with specific primers for CYP450 genes: M, DNA length marker from 700 to 50 bp. The gene numbers are the same as the gene numbers in Table 4.
Genes 15 00992 g004
Table 1. Genome features for R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 assembly (according to NCBI).
Table 1. Genome features for R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 assembly (according to NCBI).
FeatureValue
Size, bp5,733,046
GC content, %67.8
N50, bp126,441
L5013
Number of contigs140
Number of coding sequences5331
Number of RNAs67
Genome coverage53.0×
Table 2. Overall genomic characteristics of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 compared with type strains from the TYGS database.
Table 2. Overall genomic characteristics of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 compared with type strains from the TYGS database.
Subject Type StraindDDH, % *G+C Content Difference, %ANI, %
R. rhodochrous NBRC 1606979.70.4597.86
R. rhodochrous NCTC1021079.40.3897.89
R. rhodochrous DSM 4324179.60.4597.81
R. pyridinivorans TG960.40.2595.15
R. pyridinivorans DSM 4455558.90.0594.91
R. gordoniae DSM 4468941.60.1590.81
* Formula d4 (GGDC formula 2) was used: sum of all identities found in high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) divided by overall HSP length [27].
Table 3. Biosynthetic gene clusters in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.
Table 3. Biosynthetic gene clusters in the genome of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.
Coding ElementNumber of Clusters
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase6
Terpene3
Ectoine1
beta-Lactone2
Butyrolactone1
ε-Poly-L-lysine1
T1 Polyketide synthase1
Table 4. Specific primers for genes encoding CYP450 enzymes of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362, and optimal PCR conditions for their detection.
Table 4. Specific primers for genes encoding CYP450 enzymes of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362, and optimal PCR conditions for their detection.
Gene No.Contig IDGene Location (Gene Size, bp)Primer
Direction
Primer Sequence (5′ → 3′)Tm, °CAmplicon Size, bp
1NODE_57_length_21710_cov_10.08349220,649–18,289 (2361)ForwardTACAGCCCCGAACTCGACTA55.7311
ReverseTGTCCGGTATCGATGAAGCG
2NODE_33_length_49450_cov_11.18439741,128–42,420 (1293)ForwardGTTCATCGAGGGCCTGAACA57373
ReverseCTCGAAACGCAGTGTCTCCT
3NODE_17_length_96204_cov_10.94532567,773–69,119 (1347)ForwardCGACGACATCTTCTCGGTGT59389
ReverseTGTGGTGGGAGAAGTGCATC
4NODE_54_length_24166_cov_8.6038106580–7959 (1380)ForwardTCGTTCGCTTTGCACTACCT59370
ReverseCGAATGGCTTGTATGCGTGG
5NODE_2_length_337154_cov_11.648399238,563–237,184 (1380)ForwardCACGTCGACCATCACGATCT61.4448
ReverseTTGGTGGACGATCGCTTTGA
6NODE_27_length_73775_cov_9.71957162,892–64,214 (1323)ForwardGCTCTGACGCAGGAGTTCTT61.4444
ReverseACGCAGTGTGTAGTCCTGTG
7NODE_33_length_49450_cov_11.18439731,096–29,762 (1335)ForwardATCGGTTCACCCAGAACCTG59403
ReverseGAGGACAGGATCACGAAGCC
8NODE_2_length_337154_cov_11.64839999,355–98,144 (1212)ForwardCCGATCTCGTAGCCCAGTTC61.4554
ReverseTTCGCTGATCTCGATTCCCG
9NODE_20_length_89047_cov_8.54414182,615–81,383 (1233)ForwardCATCTCCCACGGCCTGTATC63.3461
ReverseTGTACTCGACACGAAGGTGC
Table 5. Percents of identities for genes encoding CYP450 enzymes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 compared with those in R. rhodochrous and R. pyridinivorans strains.
Table 5. Percents of identities for genes encoding CYP450 enzymes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 compared with those in R. rhodochrous and R. pyridinivorans strains.
Gene No.Identities for DNA Sequences, %Identities for Amino Acid Sequences, %
With R. rhodochrous StrainsWith R. pyridinivorans StrainsWith R. rhodochrous StrainsWith R. pyridinivorans Strains
188.72–99.36 (5 *)89.63–92.09 (10)92.88–100.00 (15)95.17–99.49 (13)
295.75–99.92 (6)95.44–97.91 (15)97.67–100.00 (5)97.21–99.07 (7)
395.84–99.85 (6)95.92 (1)98.50–100.00 (6)98.44 (1)
493.19–100.00 (3)82.05–93.19 (4)56.36–100.00 (12)56.11–96.70 (27)
596.16–97.10 (5)95.14–96.74 (15)97.17–100.00 (10)96.95–98.26 (17)
6Not found99.85–99.92 (4)94.55 (1)99.77 (1)
795.43–96.70 (6)95.73–96.55 (15)61.56–99.55 (9)97.52–98.37 (9)
897.11–99.67 (6)96.29–98.76 (15)85.11–99.26 (6)95.45–99.75 (5)
999.92 (1)99.35 (1)100.00 (1)98.78 (1)
A search for similar DNA and protein sequences was performed against standard NCBI databases of nucleotide collection and non-redundant protein sequences using the megablast and blastp programs, respectively. Only the percents of identity at query coverages ≥ 91% are presented. The gene numbers are the same as those in Table 4. * The numbers of the strains found are shown in brackets.
Table 6. Genetic surroundings of genes encoding CYP450 enzymes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.
Table 6. Genetic surroundings of genes encoding CYP450 enzymes in R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362.
Gene No.Nearby Genes
Upstream Transcriptional RegulatorsProteins Participating in Electron Transfers and Redox ReactionsMobile Elements and TransposasesOther
1IclR familyNoNoTwo-component system, L-proline/glycine betaine transporter ProP; enoyl-CoA hydratase; predicted hydrolase/acyltransferase
2MarR familyCYP450 gene no. 7; oxidoreductase, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase familyNoTwo uncharacterized MFS-type transporters
3IclR familyTTP-dependent protein, related to E1 component of pyruvate/2-oxoglutarate/acetoin dehydrogenase; thioredoxin reductase; 2 acyl-CoA-dehydrogenasesNoPutative hydrolase; two fluoride ion transporters CrcB; a permease and translocation protein for amino acids; enzymes for synthesis of lipids and fatty acids
4XRE familyNoOne mobile element proteinPutative peptidase; putative transmembrane protein
5AcrR family4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase; alcohol dehydrogenase; 2 acyl-CoA-dehydrogenases; putative short-chain dehydrogenaseNoOther transcriptional regulators; two methylated-DNA--protein-cysteine methyltransferases; RNA polymerase sigma factor RpoE; DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase II; DNA polymerase I
6NoFerredoxin, 2Fe-2S; ferredoxin reductase; alcohol dehydrogenase; succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase [NAD] [NADP+]One mobile element proteinEnzymes for synthesis of lipids and fatty acids
7AcrR familyOxidoreductase, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family; CYP450 gene no. 1; putative dioxygenaseNoTwo peptidases; two-component system; long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase; putative esterase
8AraC family1,2-Dihydroxycyclohexa-3,5-diene-1- carboxylate dehydrogenase; oxidoreductase FAD-binding domain protein; benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase alpha and beta subunits; 2-polyprenylphenol hydroxylase; 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase; NADH-FMN oxidoreductase; catechol 1,2-dioxygenaseNoTwo benzoate transporters; other transcriptional regulators; muconate cycloisomerase; muconolactone isomerase
9TetR familyThree oxidoreductases, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family; 3-oxosteroid 1-dehydrogenaseOne mobile element proteinIsochorismatase; enoyl-CoA hydratase; conserved protein associated with acetyl-CoA C-acyltransferase
The gene numbers are the same as those in Table 4.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maltseva, P.Y.; Plotnitskaya, N.A.; Krivoruchko, A.V.; Beletskiy, A.V.; Rakitin, A.L.; Mardanov, A.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Genome of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1362, an (−)-Isopulegol Biotransformer. Genes 2024, 15, 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080992

AMA Style

Maltseva PY, Plotnitskaya NA, Krivoruchko AV, Beletskiy AV, Rakitin AL, Mardanov AV, Ivshina IB. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Genome of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1362, an (−)-Isopulegol Biotransformer. Genes. 2024; 15(8):992. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080992

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maltseva, Polina Yu., Natalia A. Plotnitskaya, Anastasiia V. Krivoruchko, Aleksey V. Beletskiy, Andrey L. Rakitin, Andrey V. Mardanov, and Irina B. Ivshina. 2024. "Bioinformatics Analysis of the Genome of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1362, an (−)-Isopulegol Biotransformer" Genes 15, no. 8: 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080992

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop