Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Model Performance and Interpretability: Application to Biological Data Classification
Previous Article in Journal
The Emerging Role of MicroRNAs in Nasal Inflammatory Diseases and Tumors: From Bench to Bedside
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functional Genomics of Legumes in Bulgaria—Advances and Future Perspectives

1
AgroBioInstitute, Agricultural Academy, Blvd. Dragan Tsankov 8, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 8 Dragan Tsankov blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., Bl. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(3), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030296
Submission received: 20 January 2025 / Revised: 23 February 2025 / Accepted: 27 February 2025 / Published: 28 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Members of the Leguminosae family are important crops that provide food, animal feed and vegetable oils. Legumes make a substantial contribution to sustainable agriculture and the nitrogen cycle through their unique ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen in agricultural ecosystems. Over the past three decades, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus have emerged as model plants for genomic and physiological research in legumes. The advancement of innovative molecular and genetic tools, particularly insertional mutagenesis using the retrotransposon Tnt1, has facilitated the development of extensive mutant collections and enabled precise gene tagging in plants for the identification of key symbiotic and developmental genes. Building on these resources, twelve years ago, our research team initiated the establishment of a platform for functional genomic studies of legumes in Bulgaria. In the framework of this initiative, we conducted systematic sequencing of selected mutant lines and identified genes involved in plant growth and development for detailed functional characterization. This review summarizes our findings on the functions of selected genes involved in the growth and development of the model species, discusses the molecular mechanisms underlying important developmental processes and examines the potential for the translation of this fundamental knowledge to improve commercially important legume crops in Bulgaria and globally.

1. Introduction

Members of the Leguminosae family, commonly referred to as legumes, are essential crops that provide food, animal feed and vegetable oils [1]. They strengthen global food security and agricultural sustainability through their high nutritional value and suitability for intercropping and crop rotation systems [2]. A key feature of legumes in sustainable agriculture and the nitrogen cycle is the unique ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen via specialized root nodules, where symbiotic rhizobial bacteria convert it into ammonia, the form usable by plants [3]. This mutual relationship supports the nitrogen nutrition of host plants and reduces reliance on synthetic fertilizers, mitigating environmental issues like nitrate pollution and eutrophication [4]. Beyond their ecological role, legumes produce secondary metabolites like isoflavones and plant sterols, which are valued for their biomedical and nutraceutical applications [4]. Advances in genomics and molecular biology have improved our understanding of legume–rhizobia symbiosis and enabled the development of varieties with increased nitrogen-fixation capabilities and greater stress tolerance [5].

1.1. Model Legumes and Genomic Advances

Over the last thirty years, two model legumes, M. truncatula and L. japonicus, have been extensively utilized for molecular genomic and physiological research [6]. Knowledge accumulated from these model legumes could serve for the improvement of related crops, in particular alfalfa (Medicago sativa), clover (Trifolium pratense) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). The complete sequencing of the genome of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [7] in 2000 marked the onset of a new era in plant genomics and supported worldwide research initiatives. Subsequent milestones included the publication of draft genomes for rice (Oryza sativa) in 2002 [8], poplar (Populus trichocarpa) in 2006 [9], L. japonicus in 2008 [10] and soybean (Glycine max) in 2010 [11]. The improved genome of M. truncatula was released in 2014 [12]. Developments in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have further driven progress, allowing the assembly of reference genomes for other important legume crops: chickpea (Cicer arietinum), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) [13]. These genomic resources transform our understanding of legume biology and continue to advance breeding programs for improvement of crop varieties.

1.2. Functional Genomics—Tools and Applications

Among diploid annual species, M. truncatula stands out for its small genome size and high genetic conservation within the genus. This species has emerged as a premier model organism for genetic, genomic, molecular and functional studies, particularly promoting research on plant development and symbiotic nitrogen fixation [14]. The availability of its fully sequenced genome in Phytozome 13, along with extensive collections of mutant lines, provides powerful tools for the study of gene functions [15]. The sequenced genome reveals the coding sequences and proteins in plants, but understanding the biological roles of genes and their products requires functional genomic approaches. This strategy integrates high-throughput methods like transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics to decipher when and where genes are transcribed, translated into proteins, and what metabolites are synthesized. Central to functional genomic studies are mutant lines and the availability of efficient regeneration and genetic transformation systems, which allow researchers to investigate gene functions through overexpression, suppression or marker-gene fusions. Development of transgenic plants with gain- or loss-of-function mutations provides valuable insights into plant phenotypes (Figure 1).

1.3. Role of Transcriptomics and Proteomics for Functional Genomics

Given that many physiological and developmental processes in plants are regulated at the transcriptional level, the analysis of gene expression patterns in different organs and under specific conditions could promote the understanding of their functional roles in plant biology. Transcriptome analyses can be performed even without a reference genome, using approaches such as ESTs (Express Sequence Tags) or RNA sequencing. However, a fully sequenced genome greatly benefits the depth and accuracy of functional studies. In M. truncatula, transcriptomic studies have identified genes differentially expressed in various organs and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Special attention has been given to symbiotic nitrogen fixation, with studies focusing on dynamic processes in root nodules using plant and bacterial mutants [16]. Tools like the Gene Expression Atlas published by Benedito et al. [17,18] have shed light on gene expression patterns in root nodules and seeds, which revealed key regulatory genes and transcription factors that govern genetic reprogramming during development and differentiation.
Many legume-specific genes are predominantly expressed in nitrogen-fixing nodules, indicating their evolutionary specialization [17]. In M. truncatula, transcriptomic studies have further characterized gene expression responses to environmental cues and developmental stages. Research on symbiotic nitrogen fixation has elucidated the molecular mechanisms governing root nodule differentiation and function [16]. To complement transcriptomic studies, proteomics has become a key tool of post-sequencing analyses [19]. Systems biology approaches rely on well-annotated genome sequences, as annotation quality directly impacts research outcomes. The accumulation of sequencing and gene expression data in the post-genomic era requires systematic approaches to decipher gene functions.

1.4. Forward and Reverse Genetics and Mutant Plant Collections—Powerful Tools of Functional Genomics

Functional genomics primarily employs two strategic approaches: forward and reverse genetics, supported by large mutant collections. Among legumes, insertion mutagenesis has proven particularly powerful to discover gene functions (Figure 1). Transposable elements, especially retrotransposons (class I transposable elements) are effective for the generation of large number of insertional mutants via a copy-and-paste mechanism that integrates into host genomes [20]. The Tnt1 retrotransposon system has been successfully implemented in M. truncatula (R108 and Jemalong lines) [21,22], and LORE1 and Tnt1 in L. japonicus [23,24]. During in vitro transformation, Tnt1 actively transposes, producing M. truncatula lines with multiple stable inserts, ranging from 4 to 20 per regenerated plant. These insertions remain stable during the plant life cycle, and most of them are genetically independent and separable by recombination. Notably, in M. truncatula, Tnt1 seems to preferentially target genes [25]. The utility of Tnt1 has supported the creation of extensive mutant collections and enabled precise gene tagging, which has led to the identification of key symbiotic and developmental genes through forward genetics approaches [21,26]. To increase the accessibility of Tnt1 insertion mutants, reverse genetics strategies, including PCR-based methods for the identification of flanking regions and database searches, have been developed [27,28]. These web-based and PCR-based reverse screening approaches have proven highly effective in the analysis of the Tnt1 mutant collections.

1.5. Functional Genomics in Bulgaria

Building on M. truncatula Tnt1 mutant collection created in Bulgaria, twelve years ago, our research team launched an initiative to develop a platform for functional genomic studies of legumes in the country. As part of this effort, we systematically sequenced selected mutant lines and identified genes involved in plant growth and development, which became targets for detailed functional characterization. The flanking sequences, adjacent to the insertion sites of the Tnt1 retrotransposon (Flanking Sequence Tag, FST), can be identified by PCR-based methods, such as transposon display (TD) and two-step PCR approaches that include Inverse PCR (iPCR). The FST are stored in the publicly accessible M. truncatula database, which serves as a global repository for sequenced FSTs contributed by research groups working with this model plant. A subset of the Tnt1 mutant lines developed by the Bulgarian research team is also included (https://medicago-mutant.dasnr.okstate.edu/mutant/database.php, accessed on 19 January 2025). In the framework of two projects funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund (BNSF), part of the research focuses on cloning and functional characterization of genes that regulate plant growth and development in legumes. Analysis of the sequenced mutant lines allowed the identification of genes of interest and targets for further study [29,30]. In the mutant lines, the Tnt1 retrotransposon was found inserted in the exons of specific genes. BLAST analysis against the databases PLAZA2.5 [31] and NCBI identified the following genes: Histone acetyltransferase HAC1 (Mt0g02950); F-box plant like protein (Mt2g007220); Auxin influx carrier LAX3 (Mt3g072870); Auxin response factor ARF-B3 (Mt5g040880); GRAS family transcription factor (Mt2g026250) and Zinc finger CCHC-type protein (AC140549, NCBI). Based on sequencing data from the mutant lines, the above-mentioned genes were selected for cloning and functional characterization. They were also chosen for further investigation due to their role in essential processes of plant development and signaling cascades, such as secondary root formation, seed maturation, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, somatic embryogenesis and responses to environmental stress factors (Table 1). Functional genomics studies on model plants provide a basis for investigation of the complex genomes of cultivated legumes and generate valuable knowledge into their biology. The knowledge gained supports comparative genomics, an important approach for plant breeding that advances crop improvement despite the challenges posed by the large and complex genomes.
This review presents the functional characterization of selected genes in M. truncatula through the integration of findings from our research with the existing literature. Additionally, we outline potential future directions for the use of these functional genomics results to advance translational applications aimed at improving legume resilience, productivity and sustainability.

2. HAC1 as a Key Epigenetic Regulator of Plant Development and Stress Response

2.1. Histone Acetyltransferases—Classification and Function in Gene Regulation

Transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes, including plants, is determined not only by DNA sequence but also by chromatin modifications and remodeling. Histone acetylation, a dynamic and reversible process, can activate gene expression and impacts different biological processes (cell differentiation, growth, development) and responses to abiotic (e.g., light, temperature, drought) and biotic (e.g., pathogen attacks) stress [49]. The acetylation and deacetylation of histones are catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), respectively. Generally, histone hyperacetylation correlates with transcriptional activation, whereas hypoacetylation is associated with chromatin compaction and gene repression. Research data show that plant HATs and HDACs greatly contribute to the regulation of gene expression, plant development and environmental stress responses [50,51,52]. In the review by Boycheva et al. 2014 [32], we maintain a classification that divides HATs into two main classes: HAT-A and HAT-B [53,54]. Type B HATs, located in the cytoplasm, catalyze the acetylation of free histones, whereas HAT-A proteins are localized in the cell nucleus, where they acetylate core histones of the nucleosomes, functioning as transcriptional coactivators essential for gene expression. The HAT-A class is divided into five families: GCN5-linked N-terminal acetyltransferases (GNATs), MYST (MOZ, Ybf2/Sas3, Sas2 and Tip60)-linked HATs, p300/CREB binding proteins (CBPs), and initiation factor transcription TAFII 250, which interacts with the TATA-binding protein (TBP). The Arabidopsis genome encodes five p300/CBP genes, AtHAC1, AtHAC2, AtHAC4, AtHAC5 and AtHAC12, and two TAFII250 genes, HAF1 and HAF2 [32].

2.2. HAC1-Mediated Regulation of Plant Growth and Development

The histone acetyltransferase HAC1 in A. thaliana is homologous to the animal p300/CREB-binding proteins, which regulate transcription through acetylation of histone and non-histone proteins. Among the five identified AtHAC homologues in Arabidopsis, HAC1 plays a main role in vegetative and reproductive development. Deng et al. [55] studied AtHAC1 mutants and revealed multiple developmental defects such as delayed flowering, reduced primary root length and low fertility. Our investigation of the selected M. truncatula HAC1 gene (Medtr7g105660, Phytozome 13) utilized stable transgenic plants with modified expression in two model legume species (M. truncatula, MtHAC1OE and MtHAC1RNAi; L. japonucus, LjHAC1OE and LjHAC1RNAi) and the reference plant A. thaliana. Additionally, to study the transcription of HAC1, plants expressing GUS (β-glucoronidase) and GFP (green fluorescent protein) reporter genes under the control of the HAC1 promoter were constructed. These transgenic plants and their progeny confirmed the expression of the HAC1 gene in various tissues and organs with actively dividing cells. Transgenic plants with modified HAC1 expression in all three model species showed morphological deviations, including altered plant architecture and flower morphology, which proved the gene’s role in plant development [33]. Similar morphological deviations in Arabidopsis HAC1 mutants were reported in other studies [56,57] and in M. truncatula [58]. Our findings suggest that MtHAC1 is involved in the acetylation of core histones H2B and H4, which are associated with the S phase of the cell cycle, as confirmed by transcript accumulation in plants with downregulated HAC1 expression. The role of the gene in cell differentiation is further supported by its involvement in somatic embryogenesis. The participation of HAT genes in somatic embryogenesis has also been described in the studies by Daunde et al. [59] and Moronczyk et al. [52].

2.3. HAC1 Involvement in Responses to Abiotic Stress

Experiments with heterologously expressed MtHAC1 in L. japonicus demonstrated, for the first time, that its expression in root tip cells could be modulated by treatment with the acetyltransferase inhibitor curcumin [33], showing its potential as a target for biochemical regulation and developmental studies. Our further research into the function of HAC1 focused on its role in gene expression under abiotic stress conditions [40]. Using A. thaliana wild-type (WT, control) and T5 homozygous transgenic lines with overexpression (HAC1OE) and silencing (HAC1RNAi), we analyzed transcriptional and metabolite profiles under salinity and low-temperature stress. Seedlings from HAC1OE and HAC1RNAi transgenic lines and control lines were treated with 150 mM NaCl, and transcript levels were monitored at four time points: 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. In the HAC1OE line, a pronounced increase in transcript levels was observed, which remained consistently high throughout the treatment period. A similar expression pattern, albeit less pronounced, was detected in the control plants. These results indicate that the studied histone acetyltransferase is involved in the response to salt stress. In contrast, the HAC1RNAi line showed a delayed response, with a significant increase in expression observed only at 48 h compared to earlier time points (0 and 24 h). Our findings on expression profiling after salinity stress align with the data published for maize, Chinese cabbage, cotton and sugar beet, where increased expression levels of histone acetyltransferases were detected under similar stress conditions [60,61,62,63]. Application of cold stress (4 °C) for 72 h resulted in a significant elevation of transcript levels only in the HAC1OE line. Salinity stress also induced notable changes in primary metabolism after 72 h, including elevated levels of free amino acids, sugars and fatty acids in the transgenic and WT plants. These findings are consistent with other studies, which reported changes in amino acid and sugar levels in response to salt stress in barley and rice [64,65,66,67]. Dynamic environmental changes affect plant gene expression, as histone acetylation plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression in these responses to abiotic stress. The knowledge gained from epigenetic changes in the model plant M. truncatula provides a valuable foundation for the improvement of legume crops under stress conditions [68].
These findings collectively demonstrate that HAC1 functions as a master regulator of development and stress responses via control of gene expression at the epigenetic level, which shows its potential for crop improvement strategies (Table 1).

3. F-Box Proteins—Multifunctional Regulators of Plant Development and Metabolism

3.1. Molecular Mechanisms and Diverse Functions of F-Box Proteins

Plants rely on intricate regulatory mechanisms to respond to internal signals and external environmental changes, as posttranscriptional control is a major layer of gene regulation that enables rapid and precise adjustments to cellular processes. Protein degradation by the 26S proteasome is a central component of this system [69]. F-box proteins are part of enzymatic complexes responsible for the targeted ubiquitination of proteins, marking them for subsequent degradation by the proteasome [70]. These proteins ensure substrate specificity in SCF (SKP1-CULLIN-F-box) E3 ubiquitin protein ligases, which are important for the maintenance of protein turnover [71]. The expanding collection of studies sheds light on the diverse roles of F-box proteins in plant biology. They are implicated in defense responses [72], drought and salt tolerance [73,74], hormone signaling [75,76] and secondary metabolism [77,78]. F-box genes regulate key developmental processes related to organ growth [79], pollen development [80], floral development [81], leaf size control [82] and seed germination [83].

3.2. Conservation and Developmental Roles of F-Box Proteins Across Plant Species

Studies on F-box proteins spans a wide range of plant species, such as rice [84], maize [85], tobacco [86], M. truncatula [38,41,42,87], soybean [88] and A. thaliana [46]. The study of Boycheva et al. (2015) [42] explored the role and primary functions of a gene encoding an F-box protein from M. truncatula (Medtr2G007220, Phytozome 13). Stable transgenic plants with overexpression and downregulation, and transcriptional reporter lines for the three model species (M. truncatula, L. japonicus and A. thaliana), were constructed using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and served as valuable tools in this research. Various analyses, including morphological, histochemical, flow cytometry and transcriptional studies, confirmed the involvement of this protein in plant growth and development, particularly in processes such as indirect somatic embryogenesis and symbiotic nodulation. The expression of this gene was detected in all plant organs and tissues, with a preference for actively dividing cells. The transgenic lines exhibited multiple developmental variations, including in root and hypocotyl growth, leaf and silique development, ploidy levels and leaf morphology, which confirmed the role of this gene in organ development. Furthermore, experiments using a root synchronization system in A. thaliana revealed that the transcript levels of the G2/M transition-specific gene cyclin B1:1 (CYCB1:1) were increased in AtF-boxRNAi lines but reduced in AtF-boxOE lines compared to control, suggesting the potential involvement of the F-box gene in cell cycle regulation. The data collected from the three model species pointed to a conserved role for the F-box gene, providing strong evidence of its functional conservation across different plants. Our findings on the involvement of the gene in diverse plant processes, cell proliferation and cell cycle control are supported by recent studies [89,90,91]. In the study by Iantcheva et al. [38], a comparative functional characterization of the M. truncatula F-box gene and its A. thaliana ortholog (AtF-box, At1g10780) was conducted using stable transgenic plants with overexpression and downregulation of the gene. The role of MtF-box in the leaf development of M. truncatula was confirmed, showing its importance in organogenesis. Protein–protein interaction analyses identified 2-isopropylmalate synthase (IPMS), a key enzyme in the biosynthesis pathway of the branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) leucine, as a common interaction partner of MtF-box and AtF-box. In both M. truncatula and A. thaliana transgenic lines with modified F-box expression, the content of free BCAAs (leucine, isoleucine and valine) was measured and compared to control plants. Lower BCAA amounts were detected in F-box overexpression lines, whereas significantly higher levels were observed in lines with F-box downregulation. These results underscore the role of the F-box gene in the regulation of leucine homeostasis, which is important for plant growth and development (Table 1).

3.3. F-Box Proteins in Root Development—From Model Plants to Crop Applications

The study by Zhiponova et al. [46] focused on the A. thaliana F-box gene (AtF-box) and identified it as an important player in early root development. Expression analyses in published datasets, as well as in AtF-boxOE with AtF-box-GFP, demonstrated that AtF-box is actively expressed in primary and lateral roots. Knockdown of AtF-box expression in AtFboxamiRNA root tips caused defects in distal stem cells near the quiescent center (QC), leading to disrupted cell division patterns and premature exit from proliferation and slower cell division progression in the root meristem. Consequently, downregulation of AtF-box resulted in reduced root growth. Conversely, in AtF-boxOE lines, cell division activity in the root meristem was maintained for an extended period, enhancing the root growth rate. Our investigation of the F-box gene confirms its conserved functions in the model plants M. truncatula, L. japonicus and A. thaliana, with potential applications for the improvement of economically important crops. Monitoring F-box expression and its effects on root growth might improve agronomic traits (yield and stress resilience). The role of the F-box gene in the regulation of leucine and BCAA homeostasis underscores its importance for plant growth and nutritional applications. As BCAAs are synthesized only by plants, they are vital for livestock and human dietary supplements. The conserved functions of F-box proteins across model and crop species, particularly in root development and BCAA metabolism, position them as promising targets for the improvement of crop growth, stress tolerance and nutritional value.

4. Auxin Influx Carrier Protein LAX3

4.1. Auxin Transport Mechanisms and LAX3 Function

Plant hormones are among the most important elements driving plants’ ability to adapt to different environmental conditions. Despite being produced in low concentrations, they are highly responsive to changes in the environment and act as signaling molecules. Among the phytohormones, auxins play a dual role, regulating plant growth and development and their response to abiotic stress. Auxin transport in plants occurs over both long and short distances. Long-distance transport is fast and non-polar, performed via the phloem, whereas short-distance transport is slow and polar, from cell to cell. The polar, active cell-to-cell transport of auxin is mediated by three main classes of transporters: AUXIN RESISTENT 1/LIKE AUX1 (AUX/LAX) influx carriers [92,93], PIN-FORMED (PIN) efflux carriers [94] and ATP binding cassette B/P-glycoprotein/Multi-Drug-Resistance (ABCB/MDR/PGP) transporters [95].

4.2. MtLAX3 Expression and Development Regulation

In previous studies, the LAX3 gene from M. truncatula (Medtr3g072870, Plaza 4.5, MtLAX3), encoding an auxin influx carrier transmembrane transporter, was successfully cloned and subsequently introduced into the model plants M. truncatula, L. japonicus and A. thaliana to study its expression, localization and function. Stable transgenic plants with overexpression (MtLAX3OE) and downregulation (MtLAX3RNAi) of MtLAX3 were generated, along with transcriptional reporter lines, using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [39]. The function of MtLAX3 was studied in stable transformants for the first time, as previous investigations of this gene were limited to ‘composite’ transgenic plants of M. truncatula obtained by A. rhizogenes-mediated hairy roots transformation [96]. The obtained results greatly enhanced our understanding of the function of the MtLAX3 gene in model legumes and the potential for the application of this knowledge to crop species. Stable transgenic plants of M. truncatula, L. japonicus and A. thaliana were characterized by histochemical, transcriptional and phenotypic analyses [39]. The expression pattern of MtLAX3 was established in different plant tissues and organs and confirmed in plant growth and development. Expression analysis using GUS and GFP reporter genes demonstrated that MtLAX3 is transcriptionally active during symbiotic nodulation and indirect somatic embryogenesis. Auxin is a key regulator of somatic embryogenesis and a crucial trigger for the acquisition of embryogenic competence in explant cells [97]. In papaya, the auxin influx transporter genes (CpLAX1, CpLAX2 and CpLAX3) are primarily associated with somatic embryo development during the torpedo and cotyledonary stages. These genes are also expressed in later expression in leaves and roots, particularly in the primordia and regions, where the vasculature develops in later stages [98]. The accurate expression of MtLAX3 is essential for root growth and development, lateral root emergence and normal leaf morphogenesis. Auxin carriers such as PIN6 and LAX3 maintain the auxin flux to support apical dominance and affect plant architecture. In almond scion trees, for example, these carriers help to shape plant architecture by redistributing the auxin transport, which is influenced by rootstock genotype [99]. Upregulation or downregulation of MtLAX3 and its orthologs caused abnormal phenotypes and developmental alterations in transgenic lines of all three investigated model plants. Overexpression of MtLAX3 in both model legumes resulted in plants with more powerful and well-developed architecture, including an increased number of secondary root branches and root nodules, larger leaf size, bigger seed pods and higher seed production. The role of this gene in the increase in nodule formation and arbuscular mycorrhiza in M. truncatula has been confirmed by Schnabel et al. [100]. Roy et al. [101] demonstrated the involvement of MtLAX2, a functional analogue of AUX1, in nodule organogenesis. Further, Gonzales-Hernandes et al. [102] has shown that 2-oxoglutarate negatively affects lateral roots formation, whereas enhanced expression of LAX2 and LAX3 was observed in roots growing under sucrose and glucose sources.

4.3. MtLAX3 Role in Phosphate Stress Response

The ability of M. truncatula plants with modified auxin transport (MtLAX3OE and MtLAX3RNAi) to mitigate the effect of phosphate (Pi) starvation and excess was described by Revalska and Iantcheva [47]. Along with this, the interaction between auxin and strigolactones, both of which play important roles in phosphate signaling, was evaluated under the same conditions. For the study, T1 seeds from M. truncatula lines with MtLAX3OE and MtLAX3RNAi constructs, along with transcriptional reporters and WT plants, were grown on basal MS0 medium supplemented with either 1 μM Pi (deficiency) or 2 mM Pi (excess) for 21 days. Three independent lines from every transgenic construct were analyzed to evaluate alterations in phenotype, main root length (MRL), lateral root number (LRN) and relative expression levels of MtLAX3, MtMAX2 (a strigolactone signaling component) and MtMAX3 (a strigolactone biosynthetic gene). Drastic changes in root architecture were observed in the transgenic and WT plants under extreme conditions of phosphate deficiency and excess. The MtLAX3OE lines showed remarkable plasticity in surviving phosphorus starvation, characterized by the significant increase in LRN and elevated relative expression levels of MtLAX3, MtMAX2 and MtMAX3. These findings highlight the potential of MtLAX3OE lines to adapt to challenging nutrient conditions and the intricate role of auxin–strigolactone crosstalk in phosphate signaling pathways. It is hypothesized that MtLAX3 activates the phosphate cascade by facilitation of auxin transport across the cell membrane. Phosphorus deficiency is likely to increase MtLAX3 activity, which in turn stimulates secondary rooting and inhibits main root growth. Strigolactones have been confirmed to act in concert with auxin in shaping root architecture. Han et al. [103] revealed this synergistic interaction, demonstrating the role of strigolactones in the regulation of plant architecture by the inhibition of lateral branch growth in Quercus mongolica seedlings. Jiang et al. [104] further illustrated the role of phytohormonal crosstalk in phosphate accumulation, showing that the endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambaris (B3) increases phosphate uptake in peanuts (A. hypogaea L.) under Pi conditions. The results revealed that, under low Pi conditions, B3 significantly increased the concentrations of key phytohormones like IAA, gibberellins (GAs) and cytokinins (CKs) in peanuts. Similarly, Revalska and Iantcheva [48] investigated the effect of 2,4-D application on M. truncatula plants with modified auxin transport and its impact on root phenotype under Pi-starvation or excess. The expression levels of MtLAX3 and MtMAX2 were measured before and after 2,4-D treatment. In the study, transgenic and WT plants were grown under the previously described conditions but for 14 days before 2,4-D was added to the medium. Phenotypic and biometric analyses showed drastic changes in root architecture of the transgenic and WT plants exposed to extreme Pi conditions. Under low Pi concentrations, MRL was significantly reduced in all the transgenic and WT plants after 14 days treatment. In contrast, high Pi content led to only minor reductions in MRL over the same time period. Neither Pi-starvation nor Pi-excess affected the LRN in the MtLAX3OE and MtLAX3RNAi lines or WT compared to normal conditions. The additional 7-day treatment with 2,4-D significantly stimulated LRN in both the transgenic and WT plants. Treatment with 2 mM Pi combined with auxin was able to rescue the phenotype of the MtLAX3RNAi lines. All the transgenic lines and WT plants demonstrated high plasticity in response to phosphorus stress, following 2,4-D application, evidenced by a significant increase in LRN and elevated expression levels of MtLAX3 and MtMAX2 in roots. The application of 2,4-D activated MtLAX3, which subsequently triggered MtMAX2 expression, which led to increased secondary root formation and inhibition of primary root growth. These findings advance the understanding of MtLAX3 function in legumes, which contributes not only to the optimization of the growth and development of important crops but also to improving our knowledge of plant responses to nutritional stress factors.

4.4. LAX3 Involvement in Abiotic Stress Responses

In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in studies focusing on the identification and expression of genes across the entire genome. It was shown that some auxin transporter genes are involved in the response to different stress conditions [105]. The expression profiles of AUX/LAX genes under different stressors have been characterized in several plant species, including maize (Zea mays L.) [106], soybean [107], potato (Solanum tuberosum) [108] and Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis Sarg.) [109]. In tomato, overexpression of SlWRKY3 confers salinity tolerance, reducing oxidative stress and proline content compared to wild-type plants. Interestingly, these plants also showed an increased expression of LAX3 genes and higher drought tolerance [110]. The essential role of LAX3 genes as auxin transporters in cells makes them critical regulators of plant growth and development. Additionally, the role of MtLAX3 in the response to nutritional stress, particularly phosphorus starvation, has been confirmed. All the collected information provides a foundation for future research linked to the investigation of the involvement of LAX3 genes in abiotic stress responses. In the framework of the project “Investigating the role of LAX3 genes in the response to abiotic stress in the model legume M. truncatula and the crop plants soybean and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)” (KP-06 H86/3, funded by BNSF 2024), the primary objective is to elucidate the role of the auxin transporter MtLAX3 in responses to salinity and drought stress in the model plant M. truncatula and the crop plants soybean and S. lycopersicum (tomato). The research will track the expression patterns of MtLAX3 and its orthologs in soybean and tomato under both stress conditions. Morphological, physiological, biochemical and metabolic changes in the growth and development of the studied plants will be monitored following the induction of salt and drought stress. Understanding the functions of LAX3 gene, which is critical for the overall growth and development of both model and crop species under abiotic stress, will provide valuable knowledge for the improvement of stress tolerance in economically important legume crops, such as soybean, and their adaptation to adverse environmental conditions.
The main role of LAX3 in auxin transport, plant development and phosphate stress adaptation, particularly via its interaction with strigolactone signaling, makes it a valuable target for the optimization of plant architecture and nutrient stress tolerance (Table 1).

5. The Versatile Role of Auxin Response Factor ARF-B3

5.1. ARF-B3 as a Key Regulator in Auxin-Mediated Gene Expression

In plants, gene expression in response to auxin is regulated by a family of transcription factors known as Auxin Response Factors (ARFs), which function as either activators or repressors. ARF proteins bind to auxin response elements (AuxREs) in the promoters of auxin-responsive genes. The function and expression pattern of an auxin response factor from M. truncatula (Mt5g040880, PLAZA3.0 Dicots, Medtr5G040880 PLAZA4.5, MtARF-B3), containing DNA-binding pseudobarrel and B3 domains, were investigated in the three model species—the legumes M. truncatula and L. japonicus, and A. thaliana. For M. truncatula, stable transgenic plants with MtARF-B3 overexpression (OE), RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated downregulation and transcriptional reporter lines were generated [34]. In addition, MtARF-B3 was heterologously overexpressed in A. thaliana and L. japonicus. RNAi technology was employed to downregulate orthologue genes of MtARF-B3 in A. thaliana and L. japonicus, resulting in knockdown lines. The tissue-specific expression pattern of MtARF-B3 was studied using transcriptional reporter plants carrying GUS and GFP reporter genes, fused to the MtARF-B3 promoter sequence [35,36].

5.2. Role of MtARF-B3 in Development and Fertility

Phenotypic and morphological evaluations, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and histochemical GUS assays were employed to analyze the function and expression pattern of MtARF-B3 during somatic embryogenesis, and tissue and organ development, in the three model species. In M. truncatula, MtARF-B3 was shown to play a key role in overall plant growth and development, root architecture modeling, seed development and fertility [34]. Similarly, Shi et al. [111] reported the involvement of the ARF subfamily in shoot development. Detailed histochemical and transcriptional analyses revealed MtARF-B3 expression during various stages of somatic embryogenesis, organogenesis and symbiotic nodulation. Barreto et al. [112] performed transcriptional profiling of the ARF subfamily, including B3-type transcription factors during the in vitro induction of somatic embryogenesis in M. truncatula, confirming their important role in this process. The induction of MtLEC2, MtFUSCA3 and MtABI3 genes during somatic embryogenesis suggests their potential as biomarkers for in vitro regeneration and improvement of somatic embryogenic rates in legumes and other recalcitrant crops. In M. truncatula, MtARF-B3 was expressed predominantly in the leaf vascular system [34], which aligns with the reported role of ARFs in vascular tissue differentiation [113]. Expression analysis showed a strong GUS signal in the root vascular system, developing lateral root primordia and the vasculature of mature nodules, which suggest that MtARF-B3 might be involved in both lateral root development and nodulation. The OE lines exhibited a highly branched root system and a greater number of nodules compared to the WT plants. In contrast, RNAi-mediated downregulation of MtARF-B3 resulted in dramatic alterations in root architecture, including reduced root length, decreased root branching and fewer nodules than WT plants. In addition, strong MtARF-B3 expression was observed in stamens and pollen grains in M. truncatula, suggesting a potential role in the fertility. RNAi-mediated downregulation of the gene caused significant reduction of flower number, irregular flower morphology and sterility in plants.

5.3. Comparative Studies in L. japonicus and A. thaliana

Similar effects to MtARF-B3 overexpression and downregulation were observed in A. thaliana and L. japonicus. In L. japonicus, GUS reporter gene expression was localized in callus tissue and at all stages of somatic embryogenesis, confirming the involvement of MtARF-B3 in somatic embryo development. In roots, the GUS signal was detected in the root vascular system, secondary roots, root meristem and nodules. Unlike in M. truncatula, the GUS signal in leaves was localized as a spotted expression in the growing regions of the leaf petiole. This suggests that ARF-B3 may contribute to the regulation of leaf blade expansion in A. thaliana and L. japonicus [35,36]. Phenotypic analysis of L. japonicus plants with OE or downregulation showed drastic alterations in root morphology. RNAi knockdown lines exhibited severely reduced length and tripod-like root architecture. These changes were accompanied by a significant reduction in nodule number compared to WT plants, with knockdown of LjARF-B3 identified as the primary cause of these root phenotypes. The overexpression of two auxin-responsive genes, NnARF17 and NnARF18, from Indian lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) in A. thaliana similarly enhanced root development and improved stress tolerance in transgenic plants [114]. In L. japonicus, knockdown of LjARF-B3 led to abnormal pod development and sterility with no seed production observed. Practically, silencing LjARF-B3 was confirmed as the primary reason for sterility in L. japonicus plants [36].

5.4. Implications for Growth and Development in A. thaliana

The involvement of ARF-B3 in somatic embryo development in A. thaliana was also confirmed [35]. During postembryonic development, gene reporter activity was restricted to the epidermal layer of the primary root and the base of emerging lateral root primordia but was absent in the meristematic zone of these primordia. Investigation of root growth dynamics in A. thaliana showed faster growth in OE lines, resulting in well-developed final root architecture. These lines were characterized by larger serrated leaves and similar flowering times to the WT and, in some cases, the presence of numerous well-developed trichomes on the leaf surface. Approximately 60% of the RNAi-mediated knockdown mutants failed to survive in soil conditions, likely due to their shortened root systems and serrated leaves. The surviving RNAi plants exhibited slower growth, were smaller in size and matured with delayed flowering compared to the WT plants. The mature RNAi plants had shorter stems, reduced fertility and decreased seed production. Knockdown of AtARF-B3 often resulted in lethality, and the plants displayed partially or completely sterile flowers and extremely low seed production. The few seeds obtained were minute, resembling dust, and were non-viable, unable to sprout [35]. The essential role of ARF17 (orthologue gene of MtARF-B3) in anther development and pollen formation in A. thaliana was demonstrated by Wang et al. [115]. Similarly, pMtARF-B3::GUS expression in A. thaliana reporter lines showed spotted localization in the growing regions of the leaf petioles, consistent with observations in L. japonicus transcriptional reporter plants expressing the MtARF-B3 promoter sequence [36]. In OE lines, giant pavement cells were observed in the tip and the base regions of the leaf epidermis, while RNAi lines displayed only single giant cells in the leaf tip region. The results suggest that both overexpression and downregulation of ARF-B3 disrupt normal cell division patterns in leaves, likely altering the expression of genes regulating cell division and expansion. Changes in hypocotyl length in lines with modified ARF-B3 expression further indicated its role in plant growth and development. Notably, ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17, which are targeted by mir160, have been shown to modulate hypocotyl elongation in response to light, brassinazole (BRZ, a BR biosynthesis inhibitor) or paclobutrazol (PAC, a GA biosynthesis inhibitor) in Arabidopsis [116]. The conserved functions of ARF-B3 across M. truncatula, L. japonicus and A. thaliana in the regulation of key developmental processes, from root architecture to fertility, underscore its fundamental importance in plant growth and its potential value for crop improvement strategies (Table 1).

6. Exploring GRAS7—A Multifunctional Transcription Factor

6.1. GRAS7 in Genetic Engineering and Expression Studies

As part of our experimental work, we developed an efficient in vitro regeneration protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cell suspension cultures, resulting in stably transformed and fertile M. truncatula plants [117]. Cell suspension culture is a versatile tool for the study of multiple physiological, biochemical, cellular and molecular traits in plants. Transformation experiments were performed with a vector carrying two reporter genes, GUS and GFP, both under the control of endogenous gene promoters from the GRAS transcription factor (named after GD3BERELLIC ACID INSENSITIVE, GAI; REPRESSOR OF GA1, RGA; and SCARECROW, SCR; Medtr2g026250, PLAZA 4.5 Dicots). The activity of the GUS reporter gene, driven by the GRAS promoter, was observed in the roots, leaves and stems of in vitro-derived plants, demonstrating successful promoter activity and gene expression in multiple tissues [117]. The genome-wide identification and characterization of GRAS family genes from M. truncatula were performed in studies by Song et al. [118] and Zhang et al. [119]. The gene we selected from the Tnt1 M. truncatula mutant collection was identified as GRAS7. In a subsequent study, the expression pattern of the MtGRAS7 TF was investigated by functional GUS assays in M. truncatula [37]. The activity of the GUS reporter gene was detected in various tissues and organs of T1-generation transcriptional reporter plants, both before and after Rhizobium inoculation and under salinity stress.

6.2. Role of MtGRAS7 in Root Development and Nodulation

Histochemical analyses were conducted using GUS-positive MtGRAS7 transcriptional reporter plants grown hydroponically. Root samples were collected at six different time points following Sinorhizobium meliloti inoculation: 0 h, 6 h, 16 h, 144 h (6 days), 7 days and 50 days. In young plants, prior to Rhizobium inoculation, the GUS signal was detected in the vascular system of secondary root branches and the leaf petiole but was absent in the meristematic and elongation zones of the primary root cap. Six hours post-inoculation, a weak GUS signal was observed in the elongation zone of the primary root and lateral roots. In larger lateral roots, the signal appeared as a scapula shape and began forming a ring. By 16 h, gene expression was localized in the elongation and meristematic zones of the root tip and the root vascular system. Six days post-inoculation, the ring-shaped expression pattern was well-formed, and, by 7 days, GUS expression was detected in infection threads formed in the root hairs of transcriptional reporter plants. These threads exited the root hair cells and progressed toward the cortex. A few days later, the threads ramified into dividing cells of the nodule primordia. Notably, MtGRAS7 expression was observed in small vesicles trafficking trough the root toward root hairs. Using light microscopy, GUS activity was identified in the lateral root primordia and the meristematic zones of the root nodules. The obtained results suggest that MtGRAS7 expression is induced in response to bacterial infection. In mature plants, the GUS reporter gene under the control of the MtGRAS7 promoter was expressed in actively dividing zones and the vascular system of roots and leaves, including the petiole, root tip, secondary root primordia and root columella [37]. These findings confirm the role of MtGRAS7 in plant development, including nodule formation. Strong MtGRAS7 expression was observed in the vasculature and meristematic zones of the induced nodules.

6.3. Role of MtGRAS7 in Abiotic Stress Responses

The expression pattern of the MtGRAS7 TF, fused to the GUS reporter gene, was monitored before and after salinity stress. Transcriptional reporter plants were transferred to hydroponic containers containing 750 mL of commercial growth solution supplemented with 0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl. Samples of roots, leaves and nodules were collected at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h for GUS assays. Before and after salt exposure, GUS signals were detected in the root tips, secondary root branches, root nodules and leaf epidermal cells. Strong expression was particularly evident in the leaf regions where injury occurred. A notable difference in GUS signal intensity in the injured leaf areas was observed 24 h after exposure to 100 mM NaCl. By 48 h, MtGRAS7 expression in the meristematic zones of the root nodules was stronger compared to the control plants. However, the intensity of GUS staining started to decrease after 72 h. Localized or point-specific expression of MtGRAS7 was also observed in the roots, leaves and nodules following stress induction. Higher salt concentrations appeared to activate MtGRAS7 expression, supporting its role in the regulation of plant responses to abiotic stress. To further examine the effects of salinity stress, the roots and leaves of MtGRAS7 transcriptional reporter plants treated with low NaCl concentrations for 72 h were examined using light microscopy. Point-specific expression was observed in the epidermal cells of roots and leaves. In some root cells, small blue-stained vesicles were visible, which appeared to be actively transported out of the cells. Following the induction of salinity stress, the number of these vesicles increased dramatically. In roots, vesicles showed cellular localization, often arranged in rows or clustered in larger spherical structures. Occasionally, single vesicles detached from the roots and moved toward the root hairs. Similar structures were observed in leaves, where the vesicles appeared either as single beads or tightly packed in epidermal cells [37]. Revalska et al. [43] investigated MtGRAS7, a member of the PAT subgroup, to study its role in M. truncatula. Using stable transgenic lines with MtGRAS7 overexpression (MtGRAS7OE) and RNAi-mediated downregulation (MtGRAS7RNAi), they compared the phenotypes to wild-type (M. truncatula WT plants) controls. The study represented the first functional analysis of MtGRAS7 in stable transgenic M. truncatula plants. The role of this gene was examined under various abiotic stresses—drought (350 mM mannitol), salinity (150 mM NaCl) and cold (4 °C). Relative transcript levels of MtGRAS7 were measured in the leaves and nodules at different time points during stress exposure and subsequent recovery. As expected, gain-of-function MtGRAS7OE lines demonstrated enhanced growth and development during stress and recovery periods. Transcript levels were higher in MtGRAS7OE lines and lower in MtGRAS7RNAi lines compared to the WT plants. These molecular differences were reflected in phenotypic variations between the genotypes.
The OE lines developed a massive root system with multiple secondary branches and scattered nodules, whereas the RNAi and WT plants displayed long, thin and sparsely branched roots. Genotypic differences were also observed in flowers, pods and seed traits. Interestingly, the MtGRAS7RNAi plants produced a higher number of seeds with greater weight compared to the OE lines. However, the seed quality in the OE lines was compromised, with more than 50% of the seeds being flaky and exhibiting poor germination rates. These findings suggest that MtGRAS7 upregulation may negatively impact seed development, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The potential negative correlation between MtGRAS7 overexpression and seed formation warrants further investigation to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms involved. Overall, the results highlight the diverse and stage-specific roles of MtGRAS7 throughout the plant life cycle. Previous studies by Ma et al. [120] and Xu et al. [121] have demonstrated the involvement of GRAS genes in abiotic stress responses, such as cold, drought, salt and heat. In the study by Revalska et al. [43], MtGRAS7 was specifically analyzed under drought stress induced by mannitol and salinity stress simulated by NaCl. In general, drought-induced changes in MtGRAS7 expression were less pronounced in the leaves, except in the OE background, where upregulation was observed at the 24-h time point. In contrast, MtGRAS7 expression in nodules showed an initial upregulation at 24 h in all three genotypes (MtGRAS7OE, MtGRAS7RNAi and WT), followed by subsequent downregulation. The response to salinity stress was more pronounced, with significant upregulation of MtGRAS7 expression in the leaves and nodules across the transgenic and WT plants after 24 h of treatment. In the leaves, a second peak of the expression was observed at 72 h of treatment, indicating a sustained response to salinity stress. Following exposure to salt and drought stress, the plants were transferred to greenhouse conditions for further analysis of growth and seed production. The MtGRAS7RNAi transgenic lines were unable to survive the applied stresses, resulting in complete mortality. In contrast, the MtGRAS7OE plants exhibited higher stress tolerance and greater plasticity compared to the WT plants. Drought stress had a more severe impact on the plants than salinity stress. Despite this, the MtGRAS7OE lines showed improved seed quantity and quality compared to the RNAi lines. Interestingly, the abiotic stress appeared to have a positive effect on seed production in the OE lines, suggesting that overexpression of MtGRAS7 may enhance reproductive resilience under adverse environmental conditions. The involvement of MtGRAS7 in the response to cold (4 °C) stress was also confirmed. In leaf samples, the gene was clearly upregulated 72 h after cold exposure and remained elevated during the recovery period. Based on survival rates and seed production, cold stress positively affected overexpression of the gene and seed yield. Huang et al. [122] revealed the critical role of the GRAS gene family in cold stress tolerance in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in response to cold stress through genome-wide analysis. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR experiments demonstrated early or intermittent upregulation of GRAS genes under cold stress, suggesting their potential importance in cold tolerance mechanisms. Probably, the structural diversity of GRAS TFs likely contributes to their diverse functions across different plant species, influencing processes such as seedling growth, tissue development and responses to environmental stresses [122]. Similarly, the potential role of GRAS TF from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) in stress responses was reported by Zhang et al. [123]. Overall, the understanding of the GRAS protein family has greatly advanced. GRAS TFs have been shown to play multifunctional roles in the regulation of plant growth, nodulation, microsporogenesis, fruit ripening, tillering, flowering, seed germination, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis and resistance to various biotic and abiotic stress factors [124,125]. However, their specific characteristics and biological roles remain only partially understood [125]. Recent studies summarized the multifunctional roles of GRAS TFs in plant growth, development and responses to multiple stresses [126,127]. Among the known TF families, only a few have been extensively studied in response to cold and UV-B radiation stress, with GRAS TFs standing out as one of them [128]. The multifaceted roles of GRAS7 in plant development, nodulation and stress tolerance, particularly its ability to increase survival under abiotic stress conditions and to affect seed production, establish it as a promising target for the improvement of crop resilience and productivity in challenging environments (Table 1).

7. Zn Finger CCHC Type Proteins

The family of proteins harboring zing finger domains is widely distributed in all living organisms. In this family, proteins with the CCHC-type Zn-finger domain remain relatively understudied [129]. These proteins were initially described in retroviruses like HIV with a key role in the viral lifecycle [130]. CCHC-type Zn-finger proteins have various functions related to DNA recognition, RNA packaging, transcriptional activation, regulation of apoptosis and lipid binding [131]. The CCHC domain is defined by the conserved motif Cys–X2–Cys–X4–His–X4–Cys, where X can be any amino acid. Mutations in the conserved zinc-binding residues, particularly the three Cys or His, result in proteins defective in RNA binding. Through their specialized domain architecture, CCHC-type zinc finger proteins play essential roles in the mediation of protein–protein interactions and the metabolism of nucleic acids [129].

7.1. The Role of MtZn-CCHC in Flower Morphology and Seed Size

The function of a CCHC-type Zinc-finger protein in flower morphology and seed size was investigated by Radkova et al. [44]. The gene was isolated based on sequence analysis of a Tnt1 insertion mutant line of M. truncatula, showing similarity to a Zn finger CCHC-type gene (ABE91952.1) [30]. To explore its role, three types of transgenic M. truncatula plants were constructed—transcriptional reporter lines carrying GUS and GFP reporter genes and lines with modified expression of MtZn-CCHC [44]. Analysis of M. truncatula transcriptional reporter lines showed GUS staining in developing shoots, axillary buds and the vascular system of leaves and stipules. In overexpression lines, a strong GFP signal was detected in the anthers, with no signal in the stamen holder and or other flower parts. Phenotypic analysis of MtZn-CCHCRNAi lines revealed reduced seed size, shorter stems and internodes, and disrupted flower morphology. Beyond M. truncatula, studies in other species further displayed the role of Zn-finger CCHC genes in seed traits. Abd El-Wahab et al. [132] identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with seed length and width in fenugreek, where contig sequences linked to these traits showed similarity to the MtZn-finger CCHC gene described by Radkova et al. (2019) [44]. In water yam (Dioscorea alata L.), Mondo et al. [133] identified Zn-finger CCHC genes among several genes affecting plant reproduction. Similarly, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) found candidate genes related to seed size with molecular markers for hundred-seed weight (HSW) showing close homology to MtZn-CCHC [134]. More recently, Uba et al. [135] conducted a GWAS in Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] that identified 17 candidate genes associated with agro-morphological traits, including several with Zn-finger CCHC domains.

7.2. MtZn-CCHC—A Gene with Multiple Functions

The heterologous expression of MtZn-CCHC in A. thaliana was reported by Radkova et al. [45]. Phylogenic analysis revealed that MtZn-CCHC clusters closely with genes from Trifolium pretense and G. max, which share the same type of Zn-finger domain. In transcriptional reporter plants, the reporter gene signal was localized in the shoot apical meristem and the base of siliques, suggesting specific accumulation in tissues with high meristematic activity. This pattern is consistent with findings for OsCSP1 and OsCSP2 in rice, which encode RNA-binding proteins containing Zn-finger CCHC domains [136]. In A. thaliana RNAi lines, suppression of the endogenous AtZn-CCHC gene led to several phenotypic changes: shortened stem, fewer and shorter siliques, reduced seed number per silique and decreased expression of the meristem marker gene AtSWP [45]. The STRUWWELPETER (SWP) gene is known to regulate cell proliferation and shoot meristem development [137]. Similar phenotypes were observed in the mutant swp mutants: shorter organs and fewer siliques with reduced seed number. Previous studies by Sasaki et al. [138] and Nakaminami et al. [139] further demonstrated that AtCSP2 is highly expressed in meristematic and developing tissues, reinforcing the role of Zn-finger CCHC domain proteins in meristem function and organogenesis. The AtCSP2 gene encodes a glycine-rich protein (GRP) that contains both a Zn-finger CCHC domain and a cold shock domain (CSD), which show the multifunctionality of these proteins. In the study by Radkova et al. [45], in silico analysis of promoter cis-elements in MtZn-CCHC and its homolog AtZn-CCHC suggested their regulatory roles in meristem activity, seed development and responses to cold stress. Cold treatment of A. thaliana plants overexpressing MtZn-CCHC resulted in increased transcript levels of RD29A, used as a positive control. The RD29A gene encodes the Low-Temperature-Induced protein 78 (LTI78), which functions in cold stress signaling mediated by the overexpression of CBF/DREB1. Similar responses have been reported for cold shock protein genes, including AtCSP2 in A. thaliana, and OsCSP1 and OsCSP2 in O. sativa, confirming their regulation by cold stress and developmental signals [136,138]. A study by Sun et al. [140] described a family of genes encoding CCHC-type zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) in Triticum sp. The presence of numerous cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of TaCCHC-ZFP genes, associated with environmental stress and phytohormone responsiveness, suggest their involvement in multiple signaling pathways. Similarly, Khassanova et al. [129] isolated two CaZF-CCHC genes, Ca04468 and Ca07571, from chickpea (C. arietinum L.) as potentially important candidates associated with plant responses to drought and dehydration. These findings support the role of MtZn-CCHC in shoot meristem development, seed size regulation and cold stress responses, which confirm its function as a multifaceted regulator in plants (Table 1).

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

8.1. Advances in Functional Genomics for Crop Improvement

The extensive application of functional genomics has profoundly advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying plant growth, development and stress responses, particularly in the model legumes M. truncatula and L. japonicus. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the long-term research, elucidating several key regulatory genes and their networks: the epigenetic regulator HAC1 that governs histone acetylation and modulates chromatin dynamics; F-box protein regulating BCAA homeostasis and protein turnover; the hormone signaling components LAX3 and ARF-B3 coordinating auxin transport and signaling; the transcriptional regulator GRAS7 that influences stress adaptation and developmental regulation; and multiple plant development and performance regulator Zn finger CCHC. The translational potential of these findings extends beyond model species to economically important legumes like soybean, alfalfa and clover, paving the way for advancements in stress tolerance, nutrient use efficiency, root architecture and nodulation, reproductive development, and seed yield and size. Functional genomics has revealed mechanisms underlying key processes such as cell cycle regulation and leucine homeostasis, which offer opportunities to improve agriculturally important traits. Optimization of BCAA biosynthesis pathways presents promising opportunities for the improvement of protein quality and development of nutrient-enriched crop varieties. Since BCAAs are synthesized only by plants and are essential for livestock and human nutrition, understanding their regulation by F-box proteins provides a basis for the improvement of the nutritional value of legume crops. Key agricultural traits like nutrient use efficiency and stress tolerance, exemplified by the role of auxin transporters in phosphate and drought responses, are fundamental to ensure global food security. These insights support the development of resilient, high-yielding crops capable of adapting to changing environmental conditions. Moreover, the integration of functional genomics with multi-omics technologies (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) has provided a holistic view of plant stress responses, which advanced the discovery of novel genetic targets and the capacity to modify key traits, accelerating progress in crop improvement.

8.2. Future Directions and Perspectives for Crop Improvement

Future research should expand the inclusion of underutilized legume species to broaden genetic resources and support the development of climate-resilient varieties through precise genetic modifications (Figure 2). Investigation of gene network interactions under diverse stress conditions, the use of molecular knowledge to implement sustainable agricultural practices, and the establishment of predictive models for crop improvement using systems biology approaches are essential steps forward. Advancements in functional genomics, combined with emerging technologies and interdisciplinary collaboration, establish a robust foundation to address global food security challenges and foster sustainable agricultural systems. Success in these endeavors will demand coordinated efforts among academic institutions, the agricultural industry and regulatory bodies to effectively translate molecular information into practical scalable solutions. The integration of genomic advancements into breeding programs and modern agricultural practices holds immense potential for the development of resilient, high-yielding crops adapted to changing environmental conditions. A deeper understanding of plant molecular mechanisms, from gene regulation to protein function, provides a powerful platform for driving innovation in sustainable farming practices and securing a stable food supply for future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I. and V.V.; methodology, M.R. (Miglena Revalska), M.R. (Mariana Radkova), M.Z., V.V. and A.I.; validation, M.R. (Miglena Revalska), M.R. (Mariana Radkova), M.Z., V.V. and A.I.; formal analysis, M.R. (Miglena Revalska), M.R. (Mariana Radkova), M.Z., V.V. and A.I.; investigation, M.R. (Miglena Revalska), M.R. (Mariana Radkova), MZ., V.V. and A.I; writing—original draft preparation, M.R. (Miglena Revalska), M.R. (Mariana Radkova), M.Z., V.V. and A.I.; writing—review and editing V.V. and A.I.; visualization, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by the projects KP-06-H86/3 funded by Bulgarian National Science Fund and “Legume Generation” project ID 101081329, funded by EC in the frame of Horizon Europe program.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all technicians involved in the experimental work for their help in support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, B.; Xue, J.S.; Yu, Y.H.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhang, J.X.; Yao, X.Z.; Liu, Z.X.; Xu, X.F.; Yang, Z.N. Fine regulation of ARF17 for anther development and pollen formation. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dai, X.; Lu, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Xiang, F.; Liu, Z. MiR160 and its target genes ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 modulate hypocotyl elongation in a light, BRZ, or PAC-dependent manner in Arabidopsis: miR160 promotes hypocotyl elongation. Plant Sci. 2021, 303, 110686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Iantcheva, A.; Revalska, M.; Zehirov, G.; Vassileva, V. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Medicago truncatula cell suspension culture provides a system for functional analysis. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2014, 50, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Song, L.; Tao, L.; Cui, H.; Ling, L.; Guo, C. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the GRAS family proteins in Medicago truncatula. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Shang, C.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, Z.; Ma, L.; Qi, T.; Fu, C.; Bai, Z.; et al. Genome-wide characterization of GRAS family genes in Medicago truncatula reveals their evolutionary dynamics and functional diversification. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ma, H.S.; Liang, D.; Shuai, P.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L. The salt- and drought-inducible poplar GRAS protein SCL7 confers salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4011–4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, K.; Chen, S.J.; Li, T.F.; Ma, X.; Liang, X.; Ding, X.; Liu, H.; Luo, L. OsGRAS23, a rice GRAS transcription factor gene, is involved in drought stress response through regulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, M.; Zhang, G.; Gan, H.; Liu, C.; Li, M.; Shu, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the GRAS gene family in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) provides insight into its critical role in response to cold stress. Bull. Bus. Econ. 2024, 38, 2354713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Liu, D.; Guo, F.; Yang, Y.; Dong, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Tang, Z.; Li, F.; et al. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of GRAS transcription factor family in sweet potato provides insights into their potential roles in stress response. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 232. [Google Scholar]
  10. Neves, C.; Ribeiro, B.; Amaro, R.; Expósito, J.; Grimplet, J.; Fortes, A.M. Network of GRAS transcription factors in plant development, fruit ripening and stress responses. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishra, S.; Sharma, P.; Chaudhary, R. Role of GRAS Transcription Factor in Plant Growth, Development and Various Stresses: A Review. Indian J. Agricult. Res. 2024, 58, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Waseem, M.; Nkurikiyimfura, O.; Niyitanga, S.; Jakada, B.H.; Shaheen, I.; Aslam, M.M. GRAS transcription factors emerging regulator in plants growth, development, and multiple stresses. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 9673–9685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jaiswal, V.; Kakkar, M.; Kumari, P.; Zinta, G.; Gahlaut, V.; Kumar, S. Multifaceted roles of GRAS transcription factors in growth and stress responses in plants. iScience 2022, 25, 105026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morales-Merida, B.E.; Grimaldi-Olivas, J.C.; Cruz-Mendívil, A.; Villicaña, C.; Valdez-Torres, J.B.; Heredia, J.B.; León-Chan, R.; Lightbourn-Rojas, L.A.; León-Félix, J. RVE1, DBB1b, and COL2 Transcription Factors Are Responsive to Combined Stress by UV-B Radiation and Cold in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khassanova, G.; Oshergina, I.; Ten, E.; Jatayev, S.; Zhanbyrshina, N.; Gabdola, A.; Gupta, N.K.; Schramm, C.; Pupulin, A.; Philp-Dutton, L.; et al. Zinc finger knuckle genes are associated with tolerance to drought and dehydration in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1354413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Armas, P.; Calcaterra, N.B. Retroviral zinc knuckles in eukaryotic cellular proteins. In Zinc fingers: Structure, Properties, and Applications; Ciofani, R., Makrlik, L., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 51–80. [Google Scholar]
  17. Laity, J.H.; Lee, B.M.; Wright, P.E. Zinc finger proteins: New insights into structural and functional diversity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Abd El-Wahab, M.M.H.; Aljabri, M.; Sarhan, M.S.; Osman, G.; Wang, S.; Mabrouk, M.; El-Shabrawi, H.M.; Gabr, A.M.; Abd El-Haliem, A.M.; O’Sullivan, D.M.; et al. High-density SNP-based association mapping of seed traits in fenugreek reveals homology with clover. Genes 2020, 11, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mondo, J.M.; Agre, P.A.; Asiedu, R.; Akoroda, M.O.; Asfaw, A. Genome-wide association studies for sex determination and cross-compatibility in water yam (Dioscorea alata L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Olomitutu, O.E.; Paliwal, R.; Abe, A.; Oluwole, O.O.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Abberton, M.T. Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed SNP Alleles Associated with Seed Size Traits in African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms). Genes 2022, 13, 2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Uba, C.U.; Oselebe, H.O.; Tesfaye, A.A.; Abtew, W.G. Association mapping in bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] reveals loci associated with agro-morphological traits. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chaikam, V.; Karlson, D. Functional characterization of two cold shock domain proteins from Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 995–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Clay, N.K.; Nelson, T. The recessive epigenetic swell map mutation affects the expression of two step II splicing factors required for the transcription of the cell proliferation gene STRUWWELPETER and for the timing of cell cycle arrest in the Arabidopsis leaf. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1994–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sasaki, K.; Kim, M.; Imai, R. Arabidopsis cold shock domain protein 2 is an RNA chaperone that is regulated by cold and developmental signals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 364, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nakaminami, K.; Hill, K.; Perry, S.E.; Sentoku, N.; Long, J.A.; Karlson, D.T. Arabidopsis cold shock domain proteins: Relationships to floral and silique development. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1047–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sun, A.; Li, Y.; Zou, X.; Chen, F.; Ji, R.; You, C.; Yu, K.; Li, Y.; Xiao, W.; Guo, X. Comprehensive genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of CCHC zinc finger gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 13, 892105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sońta, M.; Rekiel, A. Legumes—Use for nutritional and feeding purposes. J. Elem. 2020, 25, 835–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, S.; Bamboriya, S.D.; Rani, K.; Meena, R.S.; Sheoran, S.; Loyal, A.; Kumawat, A.; Jhariya, M.K. Grain legumes: A diversified diet for sustainable livelihood, food, and nutritional security. In Advances in Legumes for Sustainable Intensification; Academic Press: London, UK, 2022; pp. 157–178. [Google Scholar]
  29. Graham, P.H.; Vance, C.P. Legumes: Importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ane, J.M.; Zhu, H.; Frugoli, J. Recent advances in Medicago truncatula genomics. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2008, 2018, 256597. [Google Scholar]
  31. Goyal, R.K.; Mattoo, A.K.; Schmidt, M.A. Rhizobial-host interactions and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legume crops toward agriculture sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 669404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Szczyglowski, K.; Stougaard, J. Lotus genome: Pod of gold for legume research. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 515–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cook, D.R. Medicago truncatula—A model in the making! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1999, 2, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, X.; Abrahan, C.; Colquhoun, T.A.; Liu, C.-J. A proteolytic regulator controlling Chalcone synthase stability and flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1157–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gonzalez-Carranza, Z.H.; Rompa, U.; Peters, J.L.; Bhatt, A.M.; Wagstaff, C.; Stead, A.D.; Roberts, J.A. Hawaiian skirt: An F-box gene that regulates organ fusion and growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1370–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gusti, A.; Baumberger, N.; Nowack, M.; Pusch, S.; Eisler, H.; Potuschak, T.; De Veylder, L.; Schnittger, A.; Genschik, P. The Arabidopsis thaliana F-box protein FBL17 is essential for progression through the second mitosis during pollen development. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, S.; Jin, C.; Su, J.; Wei, J.; Luo, X.; Wen, J.; Wei, T.; Sahu, S.K.; et al. GWAS, MWAS and mGWAS provide insights into precision agriculture based on genotype-dependent microbial effects in foxtail millet. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, Z.J.; Tian, L. Roles of dynamic and reversible histone acetylation in plant development and polyploidy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1769, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Zhao, M.; Luo, M.; Yu, C.W.; Chen, C.; Tai, R.; Wu, K. Transcriptional repression by histone deacetylases in plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Volkening, J.D.; Bailey, D.J.; Rose, C.M.; Grimsrud, P.A.; Howes-Podoll, M.; Venkateshwaran, M.; Westphall, M.S.; Ane, J.M.; Coon, J.J.; Sussman, M.R. Proteogenomic Survey of the Medicago truncatula Genome. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Revalska, M.; Iantcheva, A. Pi-starvation is mitigated in Medicago truncatula plants with upregulated auxin transport through auxin–strigolactone interaction. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2018, 103, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Revalska, M.; Iantcheva, A. Effect of exogenous application of 2,4-D on Medicago truncatula plants with modified auxin transport in extreme phosphate conditions. Agric. Food 2018, 6, 204–218. [Google Scholar]
  43. Elias, M.; Chere, D.; Lule, D.; Serba, D.; Tirfessa, A.; Gelmesa, D.; Tesso, T.; Bantte, K.; Menamo, T.M. Multi-locus genome-wide association study reveal genomic regions underlying root system architecture traits in Ethiopian sorghum germplasm. Plant Genome 2024, 17, e20436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiang, H.J.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Pan, Y.T.; Sun, K.; Xie, X.G.; Dai, C.C. The endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambaris promotes phosphorus uptake by Arachis hypogaea L. by regulating host auxin, gibberellins, and cytokinins signaling pathways. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 4913–4927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Abbas, F.; Xu, D.; Tao, S.; Xie, X.; Song, F.; Huang, Q.; Sharma, A.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of AUX/LAX family genes in Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis Sarg.) under various abiotic stresses and grafting. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1060965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moronczyk, J.; Braszewska, A.; Wójcikowska, B.; Chwiałkowska, K.; Nowak, K.; Wójcik, A.M.; Kwasniewski, M.; Gaj, M.D. Insights into the Histone Acetylation-Mediated Regulation of the Transcription Factor Genes That Control the Embryogenic Transition in the Somatic Cells of Arabidopsis. Cells 2022, 11, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kakoulidou, I.; Avramidou, E.V.; Baránek, M.; Brunel-Muguet, S.; Farrona, S.; Johannes, F.; Kaiserli, E.; Lieberman-Lazarovich, M.; Martinelli, F.; Mladenov, V.; et al. Epigenetics for Crop Improvement in Times of Global Change. Biology 2021, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, G.; Ma, H.; Neic, M.; Kong, H. Evolution of F-box genes in plants: Different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.; Zong, C.; Qi, Y.; Sun, G.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y. Translational genomics in legumes: Enhancing crop resilience and yield. Legume Genom. Genet. 2024, 15, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goff, S.A.; Ricke, D.; Lan, T.H.; Presting, G.; Wang, R.; Dunn, M.; Glazebrook, J.; Sessions, A.; Oeller, P.; Varma, H.; et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 2002, 296, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tuskan, G.A.; Difazio, S.; Jansson, S.; Bohlmann, J.; Grigoriev, I.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; Ralph, S.; Rombauts, S.; Salamov, A.; et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar]
  53. Schmutz, J.; Cannon, S.B.; Schlueter, J.; Ma, J.; Mitros, T.; Nelson, W.; Hyten, D.L.; Song, Q.; Thelen, J.J.; Cheng, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tang, H.; Krishnakumar, V.; Bidwell, S.; Rosen, B.; Chan, A.; Zhou, S.; Gentzbittel, L.; Childs, K.L.; Yandell, M.; Gundlach, H.; et al. An improved genome release (version Mt4.0) for the model legume Medicago truncatula. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Afzal, M.; Alghamdi, S.; Migdadi, H.; Khan, M.N.; Mirza, S.; Mirza, S.; El-Harty, E. Legume genomics and transcriptomics: From classic breeding to modern technologies. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 27, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Young, N.D.; Debelle, F.; Oldroyd, G.E.D.; Geurts, R.; Cannon, S.B.; Udvardi, M.K.; Benedito, V.A.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Gouzy, J.; Schoof, H.; et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 2011, 480, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lang, C.; Long, S.R. Transcriptional analysis of Sinorhizobium meliloti and Medicago truncatula symbiosis using nitrogen fixing-deficient nodules. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Benedito, V.A.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Murray, J.D.; Andriankaja, A.; Allen, S.; Kakar, K.; Wandrey, M.; Verdier, J.; Zuber, H.; Ott, T.; et al. A gene expression atlas of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008, 55, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Benedito, V.A.; Li, H.; Dai, X.; Wandrey, M.; He, J.; Kaundal, R.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Gomez, S.K.; Harrison, M.J.; Tang, Y.; et al. Genomic inventory and transcriptional analysis of Medicago truncatula transporters. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1716–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, A.; Bennetzen, J.L. Plant retrotransposons. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1999, 33, 479–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. d’Erfurth, I.; Cosson, V.; Eschstruth, A.; Lucas, H.; Kondorosi, A.; Ratet, P. Efficient transposition of the Tnt1 tobacco retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2003, 34, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Iantcheva, A.; Chabaud, M.; Cosson, V.; Barascud, M.; Schutz, B.; Primard-Brisset, C.; Durand, P.; Barker, D.G.; Vlahova, M.; Ratet, P. Osmotic shock improves Tnt1 transposition frequency in Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong during in vitro regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1563–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fukai, E.; Soyano, T.; Umehara, Y.; Nakayama, S.; Hirakawa, H.; Tabata, S.; Sato, S.; Hayashi, M. Establishment of a Lotus japonicus gene tagging population using the exon-targeting endogenous retrotransposon LORE1. Plant J. 2012, 69, 720–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Iantcheva, A.; Revalska, M.; Zehirov, G.; Boycheva, I.; Magne, K.; Radkova, M.; Ratet, P.; Vassileva, V. Tnt1 retrotransposon as a tool for developing an insertional mutant collection of Lotus japonicus. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2016, 52, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tadege, M.; Ratet, P.; Mysore, K.S. Insertional mutagenesis: A Swiss Army knife for functional genomics of M. truncatula. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tadege, M.; Wen, J.; He, J.; Tu, H.; Kwak, Y.; Eschstruth, A.; Cayrel, A.; Endre, G.; Zhao, P.X.; Chabaud, M.; et al. Large-scale insertional mutagenesis using the Tnt1 retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008, 54, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Benlloch, R.; d’Erfurth, I.; Ferrandiz, C.; Cosson, V.; Beltrán, J.P.; Cañas, L.A.; Kondorosi, A.; Madueño, F.; Ratet, P. Isolation of mtpim proves Tnt1 a useful reverse genetics tool in Medicago truncatula and uncovers new aspects of AP1-like functions in legumes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 972–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cheng, X.; Wang, M.; Lee, H.-K.; Tadege, M.; Ratet, P.; Udvardi, M.; Mysore, K.S.; Wen, J. An efficient reverse genetics platform in the model legume Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Iantcheva, A.; Vassileva, V.; Ugrinova, M.; Vlahova, M. Development of functional genomic platform for model legume Medicago truncatula in Bulgaria. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2009, 23, 1440–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Revalska, M.; Vassileva, V.; Goormachtig, S.; Van Hautegem, T.; Ratet, P.; Iantcheva, A. Recent progress in development of a Tnt1 functional genomics platform for the model legumes Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus in Bulgaria. Curr. Genet. 2011, 12, 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  71. Van Bel, M.; Proost, S.; Wischnitzki, E.; Movahedi, S.; Scheerlinck, C.; Van de Peer, Y.; Vandepoele, K. Dissecting plant genomes with the PLAZA comparative genomics platform. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Boycheva, I.; Vassileva, V.; Iantcheva, A. Histone acetyltransferases in plant development and plasticity. Curr. Genom. 2014, 15, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Boycheva, I.; Vassileva, V.; Revalska, M.; Zehirov, G.; Iantcheva, A. Different functions of the histone acetyltransferase HAC1 gene traced in the model species Medicago truncatula, Lotus japonicus and Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Revalska, M.; Vassileva, V.; Zehirov, G.; Goormachtig, S.; Iantcheva, A. Assessment of the function and expression pattern of auxin response factor B3 in the model legume plant Medicago truncatula. Turk. J. Biol. 2017, 41, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Revalska, M.; Vassileva, V.; Zehirov, G.; Iantcheva, A. Evaluation of the function and expression pattern of Medicago truncatula auxin response factor B3 after heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BJAS Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 22, 783–793. [Google Scholar]
  76. Revalska, M.; Vassileva, V.; Zehirov, G.; Iantcheva, A. Analysing the function and the expression pattern of auxin response factor B3 from Medicago truncatula in the model plant Lotus japonicus. BJAS Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 22, 253–261. [Google Scholar]
  77. Revalska, M.; Radkova, M.; Zagorchev, L.; Iantcheva, A. Functional GUS assay of GRAS transcription factor from Medicago truncatula. Bull. Bus. Econ. 2019, 33, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar]
  78. Iantcheva, A.; Zhiponova, M.; Revalska, M.; Heyman, J.; Dincheva, I.; Badjakov, I.; De Geyter, N.; Boycheva, I.; Goormachtig, S.; De Veylder, L. A common F-box gene regulates the leucine homeostasis of Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 2021, 259, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Revalska, M.; Zehirov, G.; Vassileva, V.; Iantcheva, A. Is the auxin influx carrier LAX3 essential for plant growth and development in the model plants Medicago truncatula, Lotus japonicus and Arabidopsis thaliana? Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 786–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ivanova, T.; Dincheva, I.; Badjakov, I.; Iantcheva, A. Transcriptional and Metabolic Profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana Transgenic Plants Expressing Histone Acetyltransferase HAC1 upon the Application of Abiotic Stress—Salt and Low Temperature. Metabolites 2023, 13, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Iantcheva, A.; Boycheva, I.; Revalska, M. Development of root tips synchronized system for the model legume Medicago truncatula upon replication stress. BJAS Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 21, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar]
  82. Boycheva, I.; Vassileva, V.; Revalska, M.; Zehirov, G.; Iantcheva, A. Cyclin-like F-box protein plays a role in growth and development of the three model species Medicago truncatula, Lotus japonicus, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Res. Rep. Biol. 2015, 6, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Revalska, M.; Radkova, M.; Iantcheva, A. Functional characterization of Medicago truncatula GRAS7, a member of the GRAS family transcription factors, in response to abiotic stress. Bull. Bus. Econ. 2022, 36, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Radkova, M.; Revalska, M.; Kertikova, D.; Iantcheva, A. Zinc finger CCHC-type protein related with seed size in model legume species Medicago truncatula. Biotech. Biotech. Equip. 2019, 33, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Radkova, M.; Revalska, M.; Zhiponova, M.; Iantcheva, A. Evaluation of the role of Medicago truncatula Zn finger CCHC type protein after heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biotech. Biotech. Equip. 2021, 35, 1686–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhiponova, M.; Heyman, J.; De Veylder, L.; Iantcheva, A. AtF-box gene expression fine-tunes Arabidopsis thaliana root development. Plant Root 2021, 15, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jiang, D.; Ryabova, J.; Diedhiou, P.; Hucl, H.; Randhawa, E.F.; Marillia, N.A.; Foroud, F.; Eudes, P.; Kathiria, R. Trichostatin A increases embryo and green plant regeneration in wheat. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1701–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Perez-Perez, Y.; Berenguer, E.; Carneros, E.; Testillano, P.S. Increased histone acetylation by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid enhanced microspore reprogramming and expression of somatic embryogenesis transcription factors in Brassica napus. Plant Sci. 2025, 351, 112318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Brownell, J.E.; Allis, C.D. Special HATs for special occasions: Linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1996, 6, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Roth, S.Y.; Denu, J.M.; Allis, C.D. Histone acetyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70, 81–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Deng, W.; Liu, C.; Pei, Y.; Deng, X.; Niu, L.; Cao, X. Involvement of the histone acetyltransferase AtHAC1 in the regulation of flowering time via repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Longo, C.; Lepri, A.; Paciolla, A.; Messore, A.; De Vita, D.; Bonaccorsi di Patti, M.C.; Amadei, M.; Madia, V.N.; Ialongo, D.; Di Santo, R.; et al. New Inhibitors of the Human p300/CBP Acetyltransferase Are Selectively Active against the Arabidopsis HAC Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chai, L.; Zhang, J.; Lu, K.; Li, H.; Wu, L.; Wan, H.; Zheng, B.; Cui, C.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, L. Identification of genomic regions associated with multi-silique trait in Brassica napus. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lopez, L.; Perrella, G.; Calderini, O.; Porceddu, A.; Panara, F. Genome-Wide Identification of Histone Modification Gene Families in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula and Their Expression Analysis in Nodules. Plants 2022, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Daude, M.M.; Freitas, N.C.; Ságio, S.A.; Paiva, L.V.; Barreto, H.G. Molecular analysis of ERF subfamily genes during coffee somatic embryogenesis. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2021, 57, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Eom, S.H.; Hyun, T.K. Histone Acetyltransferases (HATs) in Chinese Cabbage: Insights from Histone H3 Acetylation and Expression Profiling of HATs in Response to Abiotic Stresses. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2018, 143, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Imran, M.; Shafiq, S.; Farooq, M.A.; Naeem, M.K.; Widemann, E.; Bakhsh, A.; Jensen, K.B.; Wang, R.R.-C. Comparative Genomewide Analysis and Expression Profiling of Histone Acetyltransferase (HAT) Gene Family in Response to Hormonal Applications, Metal and Abiotic Stresses in Cotton. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yolcu, S.; Skorupa, M.; Uras, M.E.; Mazur, J.; Ozyiğit, I.I. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic classification of histone acetyltransferase genes, and their expression analysis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salt stress. Planta 2024, 259, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, D.; Cai, S.; Chen, M.; Ye, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Dai, F.; Wu, F.; Zhang, G. Tissue Metabolic Responses to Salt Stress in Wild and Cultivated Barley. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cao, D.; Lutz, A.; Hill, C.B.; Callahan, D.L.; Roessner, U. A Quantitative Profiling Method of Phytohormones and Other Metabolites Applied to Barley Roots Subjected to Salinity Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Fumagalli, E.; Baldoni, E.; Abbruscato, P.; Piffanelli, P.; Genga, A.; Lamanna, R.; Consonni, R. NMR techniques coupled with multivariate statistical analysis: Tools to analyse Oryza sativa metabolic content under stress conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2009, 195, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, P. Regulation of Plant Responses to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Vierstra, R.D. The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lechner, S.C.; Carver, C.S.; Antoni, M.H.; Weaver, K.E.; Phillips, K.M. Curvilinear associations between benefit finding and psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2006, 74, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, H.S.; Delaney, T.P. Arabidopsis SON1 is an F-box protein that regulates a novel induced defense response independent of both salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1469–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bu, Q.; Lv, T.; Shen, H.; Phi, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Xiao, L.; Engineer, C.; Kim, T.H.; et al. Regulation of drought tolerance by the F-box protein MAX2 in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 424–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, S.; Ren, Y.; Wang, W. The improvement of salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by overexpression of wheat F-box gene TaFBA1. Plant Sci. 2017, 259, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Yang, Y. The Arabidopsis F-box E3 ligase RIFP1 plays a negative role in abscisic acid signaling by facilitating ABA receptor RCAR3 degradation. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Williams, C.; Fernández-Calvo, P.; Colinas, M.; Pauwels, L.; Goossens, A. Jasmonate and auxin perception: How plants keep F-boxes in check. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 3401–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, X.; Gou, M.; Liu, C.-J. Arabidopsis Kelch repeat F-box proteins regulate phenylpropanoid biosynthesis via controlling the turnover of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4994–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Song, Y.H.; Smith, R.W.; To, B.J.; Millar, A.J.; Imaizumi, T. FKF1 conveys timing information for CONSTANS stabilization in photoperiodic flowering. Science 2012, 336, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Baute, J.; Polyn, S.; De Block, J.; Blomme, J.; Van Lijsebettens, M.; Inze, D. F-box protein FBX92 affects leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 962–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Majee, M.; Kumar, S.; Kathare, P.K.; Wu, S.; Gingerich, D.; Nayak, N.R.; Salaita, L.; Dinkins, R.; Martin, K.; Goodin, M.; et al. KELCH F-BOX protein positively influences Arabidopsis seed germination by targeting PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E4120–E4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jain, M.; Nijhawan, A.; Arora, R.; Agarwal, P.; Ray, S.; Sharma, P.; Kapoor Syagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1467–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jia, F.J.; Wu, B.J.; Li, H.; Huang, J.G.; Zheng, C.C. Genome-wide identification and characterisation of F-box family in maize. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2013, 288, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. van den Burg, H.A.; Tsitsigiannis, D.I.; Rowland, O.; Lo, J.; Rallapalli, G.; Maclean, D.; Takken, F.L.; Jones, J.D. The F-box protein ACRE189/ACIF1 regulates cell death and defense responses activated during pathogen recognition in tobacco and tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 697–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Song, J.B.; Wang, Y.X.; Li, H.B.; Li, B.W.; Zhou, Z.S.; Gao, S.; Yang, Z.M. The F-box family genes as key elements in response to salt, heavy metal, and drought stresses in Medicago truncatula. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Jia, Q.; Xiao, Z.-X.; Wong, F.-L.; Sun, S.; Liang, K.-J.; Lam, H.-M. Genome-wide analyses of the soybean F-box gene family in response to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Liu, D.; Tan, W.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Fu, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, M.; Xing, W. Genetic diversity and genome-wide association study of 13 agronomic traits in 977 Beta vulgaris L. germplasms. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Swarup, K.; Benkova, E.; Swarup, R.; Casimiro, I.; Péret, B.; Yang, Y.; Parry, G.; Nielsen, E.; De Smet, I.; Vanneste, S.; et al. The auxin influx carrier LAX3 promotes lateral root emergence. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Swarup, R.; Kargul, J.; Marchant, A.; Zadik, D.; Rahman, A.; Mills, R.; Yemm, A.; May, S.; Williams, L.; Millner, P.; et al. Structure-function analysis of the presumptive Arabidopsis auxin permease AUX1. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 3069–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Petrasek, J.; Mravec, J.; Bouchard, R.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Abas, M.; Seifertova, D.; Wisniewska, J.; Tadele, Z.; Kubes, M.; Covanová, M.; et al. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science 2006, 312, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hammes, U.Z.; Murphy, A.S.; Schwechheimer, C. Auxin transporters–a biochemical view. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2022, 14, a039875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. De Billy, F.; Grosjean, C.; May, S.; Bennett, M.; Cullimore, J.V. Expression studies on AUX1-like genes in Medicago truncatula suggest that auxin is required at two steps in early nodule development. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001, 14, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kurczynska, E.; Godel-Jędrychowska, K. Apoplastic and Symplasmic Markers of Somatic Embryogenesis. Plants 2023, 12, 1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Estrella-Maldonado, H.; Posada-Pérez, L.; Talavera, M.C.; Barredo, P.F.; Gómez-Kosky, R.; Santamaría, J.M. The Expression of CpAUX1/LAXs and Most of the Long-distance CpPINs Genes Increases as the Somatic Embryogenesis Process Develops in C. papaya cv. “Red Maradol”. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Montesinos, Á.; Rubio-Cabetas, M.J.; Grimplet, J. Identification of genes involved in almond scion tree architecture influenced by rootstock genotype using transcriptome analysis. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 324, 112628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Schnabel, E.; Bashyal, S.; Corbett, C.; Kassaw, T.; Nowak, S.; Rosales-García, R.A.; Noorai, R.E.; Müller, L.M.; Frugoli, J. The Defective in Autoregulation (DAR) gene of Medicago truncatula encodes a protein involved in regulating nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhiza. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Roy, S.; Robson, F.; Lilley, J.; Liu, C.W.; Cheng, X.; Wen, J.; Walker, S.; Sun, J.; Cousins, D.; Bone, C.; et al. MtLAX2, a functional homologue of the Arabidopsis auxin influx transporter AUX1, is required for nodule organogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 326–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. González-Hernández, A.I.; Scalschi, L.; García-Agustín, P.; Camañes, G. Exogenous carbon compounds modulate tomato root development. Plants 2020, 9, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Han, X.; Hao, X.; Qiu, S.; Guan, S.; Zhan, H.; Yu, J.; Wang, S.; Lu, X. Strigolactone regulates plant architecture by inhibiting lateral branch growth in Quercus mongolica seedlings. Scand. J. For. Res. 2021, 36, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rahman, A. Auxin: A regulator of cold stress response. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 147, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yue, R.; Tie, S.; Sun, T.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Qi, J.; Yan, S.; Han, X.; Wang, H.; Shen, C. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling analysis of ZmPIN, ZmPILS, ZmLAX and ZmABCB auxin transporter gene families in maize (Zea mays L.) under various abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Chai, C.; Wang, Y.; Valliyodan, B.; Nguyen, H.T. Comprehensive analysis of the soybean (Glycine max) GmLAX auxin transporter gene family. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, C.; Wang, D.; Zhang, C.; Ye, M.; Kong, N.; Ma, H.; Chen, Q. Comprehensive analysis and expression profiling of PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB auxin transporter gene families in Solanum tuberosum under phytohormone stimuli and abiotic stresses. Biology 2021, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Hichri, I.; Muhovski, Y.; Zizkova, E.; Dobre, P.; Gharbi, E.; Lutts, S. The Solanum lycopersicum WRKY transcription factor SlWRKY3 is involved in salt stress tolerance in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Shi, X.; Yu, W.; Wang, L.; Zhao, H.; Hu, J.; Wuyun, T.; Liu, H. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of B3 Transcription Factor Genes in Prunus armeniaca. Forests 2023, 14, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Barreto, H.G.; Ságio, S.A.; Chalfun-Júnior, A.; Fevereiro, P.; Benedito, V.A. Transcriptional profiling of the AFL subfamily of B3-type transcription factors during the in vitro induction of somatic embryogenesis in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 139, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, J.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Y. A Role for Auxin Response Factor 19 in Auxin and Ethylene Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Libao, C.; Shiting, L.; Chen, Z.; Shuyan, L. NnARF17 and NnARF18 from lotus promote root formation and modulate stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Functional genomics for characterization of unknown genes. Three model plants are used for homologous or heterologous transformation of M. truncatula genes derived from Tnt1-mutagenized population.
Figure 1. Functional genomics for characterization of unknown genes. Three model plants are used for homologous or heterologous transformation of M. truncatula genes derived from Tnt1-mutagenized population.
Genes 16 00296 g001
Figure 2. Future perspectives in legumes system biology research for global crop improvement. The image presents an experimental soybean field in Pavlikeny, Bulgaria.
Figure 2. Future perspectives in legumes system biology research for global crop improvement. The image presents an experimental soybean field in Pavlikeny, Bulgaria.
Genes 16 00296 g002
Table 1. Legume genes characterized by functional genomics in Bulgaria. SE, Somatic Embryogenesis; SN, Symbiotic Nitrogen fixation.
Table 1. Legume genes characterized by functional genomics in Bulgaria. SE, Somatic Embryogenesis; SN, Symbiotic Nitrogen fixation.
ItemSub-ItemGenesReferences
Gene expressionTranscriptional
regulation
HAC1[32,33]
ARF-B3[34,35,36]
GRAS7[37]
Zn-CCHC
Protein degradationF-Box[38]
Growth
and development
AuxinLAX3, ARF-B3[34,35,36,39]
Amino acid metabolismHAC1, F-box[38,40]
Cell divisionHAC1, F-box[33,41]
SE HAC1, F-box, LAX3, ARF-b3[33,34,35,36,39,42]
SN HAC1, F-box, LAX3, ARF-B3, GRAS7[33,34,36,37,39,42,43]
Organ
development
SeedF-box, LAX3, ARF-B3, GRAS7, Zn-CCHC[34,35,36,39,42,43,44,45]
FlowerHAC1, ARF-B3, GRAS7, Zn-CCHC[32,33,37,44,45]
LeafF-box, LAX3, ARF-B3, GRAS7, Zn-CCHC[34,35,36,38,39,42,43,44]
RootF-box, LAX3, AFR-B3, GRAS7[34,35,36,39,43,46]
Environmental
responses
P nutritionLAX3[47,48]
SalinityHAC1, GRAS7[40,43]
DroughtGRAS7[43]
Low temperatureHAC1, GRAS7, Zn-CCHC[40,43,45]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Revalska, M.; Radkova, M.; Zhiponova, M.; Vassileva, V.; Iantcheva, A. Functional Genomics of Legumes in Bulgaria—Advances and Future Perspectives. Genes 2025, 16, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030296

AMA Style

Revalska M, Radkova M, Zhiponova M, Vassileva V, Iantcheva A. Functional Genomics of Legumes in Bulgaria—Advances and Future Perspectives. Genes. 2025; 16(3):296. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Revalska, Miglena, Mariana Radkova, Miroslava Zhiponova, Valya Vassileva, and Anelia Iantcheva. 2025. "Functional Genomics of Legumes in Bulgaria—Advances and Future Perspectives" Genes 16, no. 3: 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030296

APA Style

Revalska, M., Radkova, M., Zhiponova, M., Vassileva, V., & Iantcheva, A. (2025). Functional Genomics of Legumes in Bulgaria—Advances and Future Perspectives. Genes, 16(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop