Next Article in Journal
Cell Cycle-Based Molecular Features via Synthetic Lethality and Non-Coding RNA Interactions in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of CrRLK1-like Gene Family in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) and Its Role in PAMP-Triggered Immunity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Role of CCNF Variants in Italian ALS Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypical Characterization of C9ALS Patients from the Emilia Romagna Registry of ALS: A Retrospective Case–Control Study

by
Andrea Ghezzi
1,2,
Giulia Gianferrari
1,2,*,
Elisa Baldassarri
1,
Elisabetta Zucchi
1,2,
Ilaria Martinelli
2,
Veria Vacchiano
3,
Luigi Bonan
4,
Lucia Zinno
5,
Andi Nuredini
5,
Elena Canali
6,
Matteo Gizzi
7,
Emilio Terlizzi
8,
Doriana Medici
9,
Elisabetta Sette
10,
Marco Currò Dossi
11,
Simonetta Morresi
12,
Mario Santangelo
13,
Alberto Patuelli
14,
Marco Longoni
14,
Patrizia De Massis
15,
Salvatore Ferro
16,
Nicola Fini
2,
Cecilia Simonini
2,
Serena Carra
1,
Giovanna Zamboni
1,2 and
Jessica Mandrioli
1,2
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
2
Neurology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy
3
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
5
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
6
Neurology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
7
Department of Neurology, Faenza and Ravenna Hospital, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
8
Department of Neurology, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
9
Department of Neurology, Fidenza Hospital, 43036 Fidenza, Italy
10
Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, St. Anna Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
11
Department of Neurology, Infermi Hospital, 47923 Rimini, Italy
12
Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy
13
Department of Neurology, Carpi Hospital, 41014 Modena, Italy
14
Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, “Morgagni-Pierantoni” Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy
15
Department of Neurology, Imola Hospital, 40026 Bologna, Italy
16
Department of Hospital Services, Emilia Romagna Regional Health Authority, 40127 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(3), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030309
Submission received: 29 January 2025 / Revised: 28 February 2025 / Accepted: 28 February 2025 / Published: 4 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Strategies to Unveil the Genetic and Molecular Basis of ALS)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: C9ORF72 expansion is associated with significant phenotypic heterogeneity. This study aimed to characterize the clinical features of C9ALS patients from the Emilia Romagna ALS registry (ERRALS) and compare them with non-mutated ALS (nmALS) patients matched for sex, age at onset, and diagnostic delay, sourced from the same register. Methods: In total, 67 C9ALS patients were compared to 201 nmALS. Clinical data, phenotype, and prognostic factors were analyzed in the two groups and within the C9ALS group after stratification by sex. Results: C9ALS patients displayed a higher disease progression rate and shorter times to gastrostomy and invasive ventilation, despite no differences in overall survival. Female C9ALS had a more severe bulbar and upper motor neuron involvement compared to males. Cognitive and behavioral symptoms were more common in the C9ALS group, and the former was an independent prognostic factor. Prevalences of, autoimmune diseases, and dyslipidemia were significantly higher among C9ALS patients. Conclusions: In our dataset, we show an overall increased disease progression rate in C9ALS patients and hint at sex-specific discrepancies in some phenotypical characteristics. We also suggest a possible clinically relevant involvement of C9ORF72 expansion in metabolism and autoimmunity.

1. Introduction

Hexanucleotide (G4C2)n repeat expansions (HREs) in the non-coding region of chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) are responsible for 30–50% of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS) and 7–10% of sporadic ALS (sALS) cases [1], as well as 5–10% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases [2].
In healthy individuals, C9ORF72 typically contains eleven or fewer hexanucleotide repeats, whereas ALS patients may present with hundreds to thousands of repeats. Although a clear pathological threshold has yet to be defined, most studies use a cutoff of 30 repeats as a reference [3].
C9ORF72 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, with incomplete and age-dependent penetrance: the likelihood of developing symptoms rises from 50% at 58 years of age to 99.5% by age 83 [4].
Clinically, the C9ORF72-associated phenotype is highly variable. ALS associated with C9ORF72 HRE (C9ALS) is more frequently characterized by a bulbar onset manifesting as dysphagia and dysarthria, with a higher incidence compared to ALS cases overall (30–40% vs. 25–30%, respectively) [5]. Cognitive involvement is also more common in C9ALS patients, with 20% of patients showing cognitive impairment, 10% exhibiting behavioral symptoms, and 20% meeting the criteria for the diagnosis of FTD [5].
Psychiatric symptoms are also prominent in patients with C9ORF72 HRE, with 20–60% manifesting psychotic signs such as delusions and hallucinations, but also obsessive/compulsive disorder and catatonia [6].
Parkinsonism is observed in up to 60% of patients and can sometimes be the initial symptom, with motor neuron or cognitive deficits emerging years later [7].
Notably, around 5% of patients with a clinical presentation resembling Huntington’s disease but without the CAG expansion in HTT gene harbor an expansion in C9ORF72 [7].
Despite extensive research, the pathomechanism behind the clinical heterogeneity of C9ORF72-associated diseases remains poorly understood. Some studies have attempted to correlate disease severity and age of onset with HRE length, with inconsistent results [8]. Somatic mosaicism, where the number of HRE varies among different tissues within the same individual, further complicates the genetic landscape. For example, the repeat size in blood can differ from that in the brain [9], which has implications for both genetic testing and the resulting disease phenotype.
To better understand the role of genetics in C9ALS, given that the spatial–temporal combination of motor and cognitive events leading to ALS onset and progression is influenced by factors such as age, sex [10], and gene variants [11], we conducted a retrospective case–control study. We thoroughly characterized phenotypically the C9ALS patients from the Italian Emilia-Romagna region’s ALS (ERRALS) registry and compared them with age- and sex-matched non-mutated ALS patients from the same registry.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients’ Data Collection

A total of 67 patients from the ERRALS registry [12], with a diagnosis of ALS according to El Escorial revised criteria [13] between 2009 and 2024, carrying an HRE in C9ORF72 gene, were included and matched to ALS patients from the same register with no mutation in the four major ALS-related genes (SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and C9ORF72), in order to avoid the potential effect of the other mutations on disease clinical features and progression, for a total of 201 non-mutated ALS patients (nmALS). Matched nmALS patients were selected among patients from the same registry of the same sex, age at onset (+/− 3 years), and diagnostic delay (i.e., the time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis (+/− 90 days)). In the case of multiple matches, nmALS patients diagnosed in the same period as C9ALS were chosen, as described in the flowchart (Figure 1). C9ORF72 status was determined by repeat primed PCR, using the AmplideX® PCR/CE C9orf72 Kit (Asuragen Inc., Austin, TX, USA), which allows to precisely quantify HRE’s lengths up to approximately 145 repeats, above which the expansion is accurately detected but not precisely quantified. The other mutations were identified using a panel that included up to 78 ALS-associated genes, as previously described [14,15].
Clinical data from all patients were collected at diagnosis and over disease course, as previously reported [12], including demographics, age at onset and diagnosis, site and time of onset, phenotype (classified as classic, bulbar, upper motor neuron (UMN) predominant, flail arm, flail leg, respiratory) [16], clinical signs such as spasticity, pathological reflexes, clonus, cramps, cognitive and/or behavioral involvement according to Strong’s criteria [17], comorbidities, drug history (including Riluzole) [18], familial history of neurodegenerative diseases (ALS, FTD, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease), weight, body mass index (BMI) and forced vital capacity (FVC) assessed by spirometry, time to generalization [19], disease progression using ALSFRS-r scale and disease progression rate, measured considering ALSFRS-r at diagnosis and at the last follow-up visit [20]. Data regarding the need for non-invasive ventilation (NIV), invasive ventilation (IV), enteral feeding through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and date, place, and cause of death were also gathered [21].
The disease progression rate at diagnosis was calculated as follows:
P r o g r e s s i o n   r a t e   a t   d i a g n o s i s = 48 A L S F R S r   a t   d i a g n o s i s m o n t h s   f r o m   d i s e a s e   o n s e t   t o   d i a g n o s i s
Absolute weight loss at diagnosis was defined as the difference in kilograms between the body weight during healthy status and the time of diagnosis, while relative weight loss was calculated as the percentage of the healthy weight that was lost at the time of diagnosis.
Data regarding single clinical manifestations and compound UMN and lower motor neuron (LMN) scores were also collected and quantified by the Penn Upper Motor Neuron Score (PUNMS) [22] and Devine Lower Motor Neuron Score (DLMNS) [23].

2.2. Statistical Analysis

We assessed differences across ALS patients’ groups by using a t test, ANOVA, or Chi-square tests as appropriate.
Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the influence of clinical features on the disease progression rate.
Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the Log-rank test was applied for univariate analyses, while multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression model (by stepwise backward method).
Data analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package 15 (StataCorp. 2017. College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LLC).

3. Results

Out of over 1028 patients included in the Emilia Romagna Register for ALS and tested for at least the four main genes related to ALS, 67 (6.52%) showed C9ORF72 expansion, whereas 894 (86.96%) did not show any further mutation in SOD1, FUS, or TARDBP genes.
The 201 patients that best matched the 67 C9ORF72 carriers were selected first based on diagnostic delay (±90 days) and then on sex and age at onset (±3 years).
Among the 67 C9ALS patients, 7 (10.4%) had an HRE length shorter than 145 repeats, which could be precisely quantified. In contrast, in the remaining 60 patients (89.6%), the expansion exceeded 145 repeats and could not be precisely determined (see Methods Section).
Within the nmALS cohort, some patients carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the following genes: TBK1 (n = 1), CHMP2B (n = 1), DCTN1 (n = 1), KIF5A (n = 1), MAPT (n = 3), FIG4 (n = 1), and SQSTM1 (n = 1).

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Features of ALS Patients with and Without C9ORF72 Expansion

General features of the two groups are displayed in Table 1. The male/female ratio was 0.86 (31 males and 36 females among C9ALS and 93 males and 108 females among nmALS).
Family history for ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases was significantly more frequent in C9ALS patients as well as familiarity for psychiatric diseases (Table 1). Both first- and second-degree relatives for neurodegenerative diseases were more frequent in the C9ALS patients.
There were no differences in weight, BMI, and absolute and relative weight loss at diagnosis. Despite no significant difference being found in the ALSFRS-r total score at diagnosis, the bulbar sub-score was significantly lower in the C9ALS group (mean score 9.45 ± 2.42 in C9ALS group vs. 10.56 ± 2.24 in nmALS group, p = 0.050). FVC at diagnosis was slightly lower for the C9ALS group (89.18 ± 19.34 vs. 95.65 ± 21.86, p = 0.057). The time to gastrostomy and to IV was significantly shorter in C9ALS patients. Coherently, the progression rate was slower in nmALS both at diagnosis and at the last observation.
Among C9ALS patients, there were no phenotypic differences between those with more than 145 repeats and those with fewer.

3.2. Phenotype of ALS Patients with and Without C9ORF72 Expansion

Bulbar onset and phenotype were more frequent in the C9ALS group compared to the nmALS group (Table 2).
The compound clinical scores of upper and lower motor neuron involvements such as the DLMNS and the PUMNS did not show any difference between the two groups.
When looking at clinical symptoms, no significant difference was found in all of the clinical symptoms investigated, except for cramps, which were significantly less frequent in the C9ALS group (Table 2).

3.3. Cognitive Involvement of ALS Patients with and Without C9ORF72 Expansion

Cognitive and behavioral involvement was significantly more frequent in C9ALS patients compared to the nmALS group (Table 3). Following Strong’s criteria, 33.33% C9ALS patients could be classified with ALS-associated behavioral impairment (biALS) and 29.82% with ALS-associated cognitive impairment (ciALS), and 27.27% met the diagnostic criteria for FTD.

3.4. Comorbidities of ALS Patients with and Without C9ORF72 Expansion

Autoimmune diseases and dyslipidemia were significantly more frequent in the C9ALS group compared to nmALS patients (13.43% vs. 3.48%, p = 0.003 and 38.30% vs. 16.40%, p = 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was found in other comorbidities between C9ALS and nmALS patients except for depression, which was more frequent in the second group (21.21 vs. 39.74, p = 0.017) (Table 4).

3.5. Progression Rate and Survival of ALS Patients with and Without C9ORF72 Expansion

Regression analysis confirmed that the presence of C9ORF72 expansion (Coef: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.87, p = 0.033), as well as a younger age at onset (Coef: −0.03, 95% CI: −0.05 to −0.007, p = 0.008), led to a faster disease progression rate.
No difference was found in overall survival between the two groups (33.48 ± 18.85 vs. 39.42 ± 28.12, p = 0.199) (Figure 2).
Univariate Cox regression analysis and multivariate analysis for patients with C9ALS are shown in Table 5. In C9ALS patients, the multivariate analysis of survival showed that independent prognostic factors for tracheostomy-free survival were diagnostic delay (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.98, p = 0.014), disease progression rate at diagnosis (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10–2.47, p = 0.016), and presence of cognitive involvement (HR = 7.70 95% CI 3.12–19.02, p < 0.001).

3.6. Sex-Related Differences in C9ALS Patients

When comparing clinical differences between sexes within the nmALS and the C9ALS groups (Table 6), no significant sex-related differences were found in the main clinical features, except for diagnostic delay, which was significantly shorter in male nmALS patients.
A higher disease progression rate at diagnosis was found for C9ALS males, despite not reaching clinical significance; this trend, albeit not significant, was confirmed also for time from symptoms onset to tracheostomy and death.
The site of onset was more frequently bulbar in the female population in both groups, and the ALSFRS-r bulbar subscale score was significantly higher in male C9ALS patients (10.16 ± 2.08 vs. 8.87 ± 2.56, p = 0.047).
While no differences were found in DLMNS, the PUMNS resulted in being significantly higher in females compared to males (9.92 ± 5.75 vs. 5.53 ± 5.12, p = 0.004).
Finally, when considering comorbidities, autoimmune diseases and psychosis were more frequent in female C9ALS patients, despite not reaching statistical significance
Despite a tendency towards a higher disease progression rate, shorter time to IV, or death in male C9ALS patients, no statistically significant difference in survival was found between men and women (Figure 3).
When analyzing prognostic factors in the C9ALS population stratified by sex, we found that cognitive changes (HR 3.87, 95% CI 1.12–13.34, p = 0.032), disease progression rate at diagnosis (HR 5.06, 95% CI 2.05–12.48, p < 0.001), and concomitant psychosis (HR 8.23, 95% CI 1.12–60.75, p = 0.039) were independent prognostic factors in women, whereas weight loss at diagnosis was the only independent prognostic variable in men (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33, p = 0.023) (Supplementary Table S1).

4. Discussion

In this study, we explore the phenotypic heterogeneity of ALS associated with the C9ORF72 mutation [5], comparing a population-based cohort of C9ALS patients with nmALS patients matched for sex, age, and diagnostic delay, sourced from the same population-based register.
As expected [24], we observed that both bulbar onset and bulbar phenotype were more frequent in the C9ALS cohort compared to the nmALS group. This was further corroborated by a significantly lower ALSFRS-r bulbar subscale score at diagnosis in the C9ALS group. However, unlike previous studies [25], bulbar onset in our C9ALS cohort was not associated with shorter survival. Interestingly, we identified a sex-related difference in bulbar involvement at diagnosis, with the ALSFRS-r bulbar subscale being lower in women, showing consistency with prior findings [11,25,26]. The mechanism behind the more frequent bulbar involvement in C9ALS is poorly understood, but some studies have identified multiple molecular subtypes in ALS patients which differed between bulbar and spinal onset patients, suggesting that different motor neurons could be susceptible to different pathological mechanisms [27]. For example, bulbar motor neurons may be more vulnerable to the pathological mechanisms that characterize C9ALS but are absent in nmALS, such as RNA foci formation, DPR accumulation, and C9orf72 loss of function [1].
We analyzed UMN and LMN involvement using two compound scores, PUMNS and DLMNS, respectively, in both C9ALS and nmALS cohorts. While no significant differences in global UMN and LMN scores were observed between the two groups, the stratification of C9ALS patients by sex revealed significantly higher PUMNS scores in females, indicating more prominent UMN involvement in this subgroup. No sex-related differences in PUMNS were found among nmALS patients, suggesting that increased UMN involvement may specifically affect female C9ALS patients. These findings point to the existence of sex-related differences in C9ALS pathology.
Family history of ALS was significantly more prevalent in C9ALS patients (up to 43.93%) compared to nmALS patients, consistent with C9ORF72 being the most common genetic cause of familial ALS [1]. Furthermore, the prevalence of family history for all neurodegenerative diseases in the C9ALS cohort reached 81.82%, underscoring the broader role of C9ORF72 in neurodegeneration [8]. Supporting this hypothesis, evidence suggests that C9orf72 regulates microglial amyloid clearance [28], potentially linking its dysfunction to broader neurodegenerative processes.
Indeed, the clinical spectrum of C9ORF72 HRE includes movement disorders and FTD [7]. It is plausible that, in some cases, Parkinsonism and dementia represent manifestations of C9ORF72 pathology without overt motor neuron involvement. In our cohort, only a few patients presented with Parkinsonism or psychosis, with no significant differences between the two groups. Depression, however, was significantly less frequent in the C9ALS cohort, possibly reflecting a lack of insight associated with cognitive involvement [29]. A family history of psychiatric diseases was significantly more frequent in C9ALS patients, supporting the role of C9ORF72 in psychiatric disease development [30].
Interestingly, psychiatric disorders were more common in females compared to males, suggesting a potential role for additional factors, such as hormonal influences, in the neuropsychiatric manifestations of C9ALS. Psychiatric involvement also emerged as an independent prognostic variable in female C9ALS patients. Although the association between C9ALS and psychiatric symptoms is well established [30], their impact on prognosis remains underexplored. The association between worst progression and psychiatric involvement, which is frequently seen in FTD [31], may simply reflect the poorer outcomes of the association of FTD in C9ALS patients [32].
Moreover, in our study, we observed a significantly higher incidence of autoimmune diseases in the C9ALS cohort, a result in line with the biological data on autoimmune phenotype in C9ORF72 knockout mouse models [33,34]. Despite the established relation between loss of function of C9orf72 and autoimmunity, only one prior study has reported an increased incidence of autoimmune diseases in carriers of the C9ORF72 HRE [35]. In our cohort, autoimmune diseases were more prevalent in female C9ALS patients than in males, though this difference did not reach statistical significance. While this observation might simply reflect the generally higher incidence of autoimmune diseases in females [36], emerging evidence highlights a critical role of C9ORF72 in immunity [37,38]. Therefore, a potential contribution of C9ORF72 HRE to autoimmunity in females cannot be ruled out.
Furthermore, the higher prevalence of dyslipidemia observed in female C9ALS patients compared to males suggests a complex interplay between genetic and hormonal factors in modulating metabolism [39]. The relationship between dyslipidemia and systemic inflammation is well documented [40] and may reflect metabolic dysfunction driven by the C9ORF72 mutation. This aligns with the mutation’s known involvement in immune regulation and inflammatory processes [41]. These findings, together with the increased incidence of autoimmune diseases, support the hypothesis of a broader role for C9orf72 in regulating metabolic and immune homeostasis [42]. A deeper understanding of the role of C9orf72 in metabolism and immunity could help identify specific molecular signatures for C9ALS, potentially enabling personalized treatment strategies. This approach has been recently suggested in studies investigating ALS-specific signatures in blood and CSF [43,44].
C9ALS patients are typically reported to have shorter survival, but prior studies on this topic have yielded conflicting results [25,45]. In our cohort, we found a significantly higher disease progression rate in C9ALS patients at both diagnosis and last observation. These patients also exhibited significantly shorter times to PEG and tracheostomy, consistent with the earlier and more frequent bulbar involvement in this cohort. Some studies have attempted to correlate the HRE length with disease progression and survival, but the findings remain inconclusive [8,45,46].
Unfortunately, since genetic testing was performed in a clinical setting, we do not have the exact number of C9ORF72 repeat expansions when the expansion exceeds a threshold of 145 repeats, which is widely recognized as above the pathological cutoff [7]. Precise sizing for very large expansions in fact requires complementary methods such as Southern blot analysis, which is not commonly used in clinical practice.
As a result, for most patients, data on the precise length of the HRE are unavailable, representing a significant limitation of our study. When analyzing potential correlations between the HRE length and key clinical variables, we found no significant differences between C9ALS patients with >145 and < 145 repeats. However, this could be due to the limited size of our sample.
Although not reaching statistical significance, our data showed reduced respiratory function at diagnosis in C9ALS patients. This observation might suggest the early subclinical involvement of respiratory muscles, particularly the phrenic motor neurons, in the initial stages of the disease [47]. Supporting this, we observed a significantly shorter time from diagnosis to tracheostomy in C9ALS patients. Previous studies have also reported increased vulnerability of phrenic MNs in C9ORF72-mutated iPSC models [47].
We did not find, however, a significant difference in overall survival, probably because of the small size of our cohort.
Multivariate analysis in our cohort of C9ALS patients highlighted the disease progression rate at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and cognitive involvement classified as ALSci, as independent prognostic variables, consistent with previous findings [32].
Finally, we confirm that females with C9ORF72 expansions are more likely to present with a bulbar phenotype independent of age and are more prone to developing neuropsychiatric symptoms [25,31]. Sex differences in C9ALS patients’ disease progression were also evident, with males generally experiencing a more aggressive course and shorter survival times [10]. This is in line with the known hormonal influences, in particular the neuroprotective effects of estrogen, which may contribute to attenuating disease progression in females [48]. While the pathological hallmark of C9ORF72-associated diseases—TDP-43 proteinopathy—appears similar in males and females, subtle differences in its regional distribution or severity might exist and contribute to the reported differences. Further studies will be needed to address those discrepancies [49].
Further research to document sex differences in C9ORF72 expansions could have important implications for developing tailored therapeutic strategies in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity of C9ORF72-associated ALS, revealing significant clinical and sex-related differences compared to non-mutated ALS. A family history of ALS and neurodegenerative diseases was significantly more common in C9ALS, supporting its broad role in neurodegeneration. Bulbar involvement was more frequent and severe in C9ALS, with women showing greater upper motor neuron involvement and more pronounced bulbar dysfunction. Psychiatric symptoms, particularly in females, emerged as a distinct feature and independent prognostic factor, potentially influenced by hormonal and genetic factors.
C9ALS patients demonstrated faster disease progression and an earlier need for interventions, though overall survival did not differ from nmALS, possibly due to the limited cohort size.
Sex differences in disease progression, psychiatric and autoimmune involvement, and bulbar phenotypes emphasize the importance of tailoring therapeutic strategies. Future research should focus on the interplay between genetic, immune, and sex-specific factors to better understand and manage C9ALS.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16030309/s1, Table S1: Univariate and multivariate analysis for female and male C9ALS patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M. and A.G.; methodology, J.M. and A.G.; software, J.M.; validation, J.M. and A.G.; formal analysis, J.M.; data acquisition and interpretation, A.G. and I.M., E.Z., G.G., E.T., A.N., V.V., L.B., E.C., E.B., L.Z., M.G., D.M., E.S., M.C.D., N.F., G.Z., S.M., M.S., C.S., A.P., M.L., P.D.M., S.F. and J.M.; resources, S.F. and J.M.; data curation, A.G., E.B. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G., J.M., S.C., I.M., E.Z., G.G., E.B., E.T., A.N., V.V., E.C., L.Z., M.G., D.M., E.S, M.C.D., N.F., A.P., M.L., G.Z., S.M., M.S., P.D.M., C.S., S.F., L.B. and J.M.; visualization, A.G. and J.M.; supervision, J.M. and G.Z.; project administration, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Emilia Romagna Registry for ALS (ERRALS) is supported by a grant from the Emilia Romagna Regional Health Authority: GPG/2022/1343.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the coordinating center (Comitato Etico Provinciale di Modena, file number 124/08, on 2 September 2008) and participating centers.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available upon motivated request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participants in the ERRALS group (see Appendix A).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

ERRALS group
Project coordinator: Dr. J. Mandrioli.
Collaborating centers:
Department of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena and Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Jessica Mandrioli, Nicola Fini, Ilaria Martinelli, Elisabetta Zucchi, Giulia Gianferrari, Cecilia Simonini, Annalisa Gessani, Andrea Ghezzi, and Marco Vinceti);
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, University of Bologna, and IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (Veria Vacchiano, Silvia De Pasqua and Rocco Liguori);
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Pietro Cortelli);
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy (Anna Maria Borghi and Andrea Zini);
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Interaziendale Clinica Neurologica Metropolitana (NeuroMet), Bologna, Italy (Rita Rinaldi and Pietro Cortelli);
Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, St Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy (Elisabetta Sette and Daniela Gragnaniello);
Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (Maura Pugliatti);
Department of Neurology, IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy (Elena Canali, Luca Codeluppi, and Franco Valzania);
Department of General and Specialized Medicine, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy (Lucia Zinno, Filippo Stragliati, Pietro Anceschi, Andi Nuredini, Sonia Romano, Alessandro D’Orsi, and Liborio Parrino);
Department of Neurology, Fidenza Hospital, Parma, Italy (Doriana Medici and Giovanna Pilurzi);
Department of Neurology, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy (Emilio Terlizzi and Paolo Immovilli);
Department of Neurology, Carpi Hospital, Modena, Italy (Mario Santangelo);
Department of Neurology, Imola Hospital, Bologna, Italy (Patrizia De Massis);
Department of Neurology, Faenza and Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy (Matteo Gizzi and Pietro Querzani);
Department of Neurology, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy (Simonetta Morresi, Maria Vitiello, and Marco Longoni);
Department of Neurology, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy (Alberto Patuelli, Susanna Malagù, Francesca Bianchi, and Marco Longoni);
Department of Neurology, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy (Marco Currò Dossi, Cristiana Ganino, and Claudio Callegarini);
Department of Hospital Services, Emilia Romagna Regional Health Authority, Bologna, Italy (Salvatore Ferro).

References

  1. Masrori, P.; Van Damme, P. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A clinical review. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 1918–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Greaves, C.V.; Rohrer, J.D. An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 2075–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Balendra, R.; Isaacs, A.M. C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: Multiple pathways to disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 544–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Murphy, N.A.; Arthur, K.C.; Tienari, P.J.; Houlden, H.; Chiò, A.; Traynor, B.J. Age-related penetrance of the C9orf72 repeat expansion. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Zampatti, S.; Peconi, C.; Campopiano, R.; Gambardella, S.; Caltagirone, C.; Giardina, E. C9orf72-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Clinical Diagnosis to Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 907122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Benussi, A.; Premi, E.; Gazzina, S.; Brattini, C.; Bonomi, E.; Alberici, A.; Jiskoot, L.; van Swieten, J.C.; Sanchez-Valle, R.; Moreno, F.; et al. Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI). Progression of Behavioral Disturbances and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients with Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2030194, Erratum in: JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e217664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Van der Ende, E.L.; Jackson, J.L.; White, A.; Seelaar, H.; van Blitterswijk, M.; Van Swieten, J.C. Unravelling the clinical spectrum and the role of repeat length in C9ORF72 repeat expansions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2021, 92, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Smeyers, J.; Banchi, E.G.; Latouche, M. C9ORF72: What It Is, What It Does, and Why It Matters. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2021, 15, 661447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Jackson, J.L.; Finch, N.A.; Baker, M.C.; Kachergus, J.M.; DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Pereira, K.; Christopher, E.; Prudencio, M.; Heckman, M.G.; Thompson, E.A.; et al. Elevated methylation levels, reduced expression levels, and frequent contractions in a clinical cohort of C9orf72 expansion carriers. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Trojsi, F.; Siciliano, M.; Femiano, C.; Santangelo, G.; Lunetta, C.; Calvo, A.; Moglia, C.; Marinou, K.; Ticozzi, N.; Ferro, C.; et al. Comparative Analysis of C9orf72 and Sporadic Disease in a Large Multicenter ALS Population: The Effect of Male Sex on Survival of C9orf72 Positive Patients. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Chiò, A.; Moglia, C.; Canosa, A.; Manera, U.; D’Ovidio, F.; Vasta, R.; Grassano, M.; Brunetti, M.; Barberis, M.; Corrado, L.; et al. ALS phenotype is influenced by age, sex, and genetics: A population-based study. Neurology 2020, 94, e802–e810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gianferrari, G.; Martinelli, I.; Zucchi, E.; Simonini, C.; Fini, N.; Vinceti, M.; Ferro, S.; Gessani, A.; Canali, E.; Valzania, F.; et al. Epidemiological, Clinical and Genetic Features of ALS in the Last Decade: A Prospective Population-Based Study in the Emilia Romagna Region of Italy. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Brooks, B.R.; Miller, R.G.; Swash, M.; Munsat, T.L.; World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Mot. Neuron Disord. 2000, 1, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dalla Bella, E.; Bersano, E.; Bruzzone, M.G.; Gellera, C.; Pensato, V.; Lauria, G.; Consonni, M. Behavioral and Cognitive Phenotypes of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Carrying SOD1 Variants. Neurology 2022, 99, e2052–e2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Pensato, V.; Magri, S.; Bella, E.D.; Tannorella, P.; Bersano, E.; Sorarù, G.; Gatti, M.; Ticozzi, N.; Taroni, F.; Lauria, G.; et al. Sorting Rare ALS Genetic Variants by Targeted Re-Sequencing Panel in Italian Patients: OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1 Variants Account for 3% of Rare Genetic Forms. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Faghri, F.; Brunn, F.; Dadu, A.; PARALS consortium; ERRALS consortium; Zucchi, E.; Martinelli, I.; Mazzini, L.; Vasta, R.; Canosa, A.; et al. Identifying and predicting amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical subgroups: A population-based machine-learning study. Lancet Digit. Health 2022, 4, e359–e369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Strong, M.J.; Abrahams, S.; Goldstein, L.H.; Woolley, S.; Mclaughlin, P.; Snowden, J.; Mioshi, E.; Roberts-South, A.; Benatar, M.; HortobáGyi, T.; et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—Frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): Revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Mandrioli, J.; Malerba, S.A.; Beghi, E.; Fini, N.; Fasano, A.; Zucchi, E.; De Pasqua, S.; Guidi, C.; Terlizzi, E.; Sette, E.; et al. Riluzole and other prognostic factors in ALS: A population-based registry study in Italy. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tortelli, R.; Copetti, M.; Panza, F.; Cortese, R.; Capozzo, R.; D’Errico, E.; Fontana, A.; Simone, I.L.; Logroscino, G. Time to generalisation as a predictor of prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2016, 87, 678–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mandrioli, J.; Biguzzi, S.; Guidi, C.; Sette, E.; Terlizzi, E.; Ravasio, A.; Casmiro, M.; Salvi, F.; Liguori, R.; Rizzi, R.; et al. Heterogeneity in ALSFRS-R decline and survival: A population-based study in Italy. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 36, 2243–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fasano, A.; Fini, N.; Ferraro, D.; Ferri, L.; Vinceti, M.; Errals; Mandrioli, J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, body weight loss and survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population-based registry study. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Woo, J.H.; Wang, S.; Melhem, E.R.; Gee, J.C.; Cucchiara, A.; McCluskey, L.; Elman, L. Linear associations between clinically assessed upper motor neuron disease and diffusion tensor imaging metrics in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Devine, M.S.; Kiernan, M.C.; Heggie, S.; McCombe, P.A.; Henderson, R.D. Study of motor asymmetry in ALS indicates an effect of limb dominance on onset and spread of weakness, and an important role for upper motor neurons. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2014, 15, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Glasmacher, S.A.; Wong, C.; Pearson, I.E.; Pal, S. Survival and Prognostic Factors in C9orf72 Repeat Expansion Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Palmieri, A.; Mento, G.; Calvo, V.; Querin, G.; D’Ascenzo, C.; Volpato, C.; Kleinbub, J.R.; Bisiacchi, P.S.; Sorarù, G. Female gender doubles executive dysfunction risk in ALS: A case-control study in 165 patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wiesenfarth, M.; Günther, K.; Müller, K.; Witzel, S.; Weiland, U.; Mayer, K.; Herrmann, C.; Brenner, D.; Schuster, J.; Freischmidt, A.; et al. Clinical and genetic features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with C9orf72 mutations. Brain Commun. 2023, 5, fcad087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Marriott, H.; Kabiljo, R.; Hunt, G.P.; Khleifat, A.A.; Jones, A.; Troakes, C.; Project MinE ALS Sequencing Consortium; TargetALS Sequencing Consortium; Pfaff, A.L.; Quinn, J.P.; et al. Unsupervised machine learning identifies distinct ALS molecular subtypes in post-mortem motor cortex and blood expression data. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2023, 11, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Lall, D.; Lorenzini, I.; Mota, T.A.; Bell, S.; Mahan, T.E.; Ulrich, J.D.; Davtyan, H.; Rexach, J.E.; Muhammad, A.K.M.G.; Shelest, O.; et al. C9orf72 deficiency promotes microglial-mediated synaptic loss in aging and amyloid accumulation. Neuron 2021, 109, 2275–2291.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  29. De Ruijter, N.S.; Schoonbrood, A.M.G.; van Twillert, B.; Hoff, E.I. Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments. Alzheimers Dement. 2020, 12, e12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Silverman, H.E.; Goldman, J.S.; Huey, E.D. Links Between the C9orf72 Repeat Expansion and Psychiatric Symptoms. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2019, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Devenney, E.M.; Tu, S.; Caga, J.; Ahmed, R.M.; Ramsey, E.; Zoing, M.; Kwok, J.; Halliday, G.M.; Piguet, O.; Hodges, J.R.; et al. Neural mechanisms of psychosis vulnerability and perceptual abnormalities in the ALS-FTD spectrum. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2021, 8, 1576–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Mandrioli, J.; Zucchi, E.; Martinelli, I.; Van der Most, L.; Gianferrari, G.; Moglia, C.; Manera, U.; Solero, L.; Vasta, R.; Canosa, A.; et al. Factors predicting disease progression in C9ORF72 ALS patients. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Atanasio, A.; Decman, V.; White, D.; Ramos, M.; Ikiz, B.; Lee, H.C.; Siao, C.J.; Brydges, S.; LaRosa, E.; Bai, Y.; et al. C9orf72 ablation causes immune dysregulation characterized by leukocyte expansion, autoantibody production, and glomerulonephropathy in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Burberry, A.; Suzuki, N.; Wang, J.Y.; Moccia, R.; Mordes, D.A.; Stewart, M.H.; Suzuki-Uematsu, S.; Ghosh, S.; Singh, A.; Merkle, F.T.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the C9ORF72 mouse ortholog cause fatal autoimmune disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 347ra93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Miller, Z.A.; Sturm, V.E.; Camsari, G.B.; Karydas, A.; Yokoyama, J.S.; Grinberg, L.T.; Boxer, A.L.; Rosen, H.J.; Rankin, K.P.; Gorno-Tempini, M.L.; et al. Increased prevalence of autoimmune disease within C9 and FTD/MND cohorts: Completing the picture. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 3, e301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Billi, A.C.; Kahlenberg, J.M.; Gudjonsson, J.E. Sex bias in autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2019, 31, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  37. Marques, C.; Held, A.; Dorfman, K.; Sung, J.; Song, C.; Kavuturu, A.S.; Aguilar, C.; Russo, T.; Oakley, D.H.; Albers, M.W.; et al. Neuronal STING activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2024, 147, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. McCauley, M.E.; O’Rourke, J.G.; Yáñez, A.; Markman, J.L.; Ho, R.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Lall, D.; Jin, M.; Muhammad, A.K.M.G.; et al. C9orf72 in myeloid cells suppresses STING-induced inflammation. Nature 2020, 585, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Hashimoto, K.; Jahan, N.; Miller, Z.A.; Huang, E.J. Neuroimmune dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia: Insights from progranulin and C9orf72 deficiency. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2022, 76, 102599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. O’Hagan, R.; Berg, A.R.; Hong, C.G.; Parel, P.M.; Mehta, N.N.; Teague, H.L. Systemic consequences of abnormal cholesterol handling: Interdependent pathways of inflammation and dyslipidemia. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 972140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Pang, W.; Hu, F. C9ORF72 suppresses JAK-STAT mediated inflammation. iScience 2023, 26, 106579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. Chong, Z.Z.; Menkes, D.L.; Souayah, N. Pathogenesis underlying hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72 gene in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Rev. Neurosci. 2023, 35, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fröhlich, A.; Pfaff, A.L.; Bubb, V.J.; Quinn, J.P.; Koks, S. Transcriptomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid identifies ALS pathway enrichment and RNA biomarkers in MND individuals. Exp. Biol. Med. 2023, 248, 2325–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. Kõks, S.; Rallmann, K.; Muldmaa, M.; Price, J.; Pfaff, A.L.; Taba, P. Whole blood transcriptome profile identifies motor neurone disease RNA biomarker signatures. Exp. Biol. Med. 2025, 249, 10401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Cammack, A.J.; Atassi, N.; Hyman, T.; van den Berg, L.H.; Harms, M.; Baloh, R.H.; Brown, R.H.; van Es, M.A.; Veldink, J.H.; de Vries, B.S.; et al. Prospective natural history study of C9orf72 ALS clinical characteristics and biomarkers. Neurology 2019, 93, e1605–e1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Tang, L.; Chen, L.; Liu, X.; He, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, N.; Fan, D. The repeat length of C9orf72 is associated with the survival of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients without C9orf72 pathological expansions. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 939775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Thiry, L.; Sirois, J.; Durcan, T.M.; Stifani, S. Generation of human iPSC-derived phrenic-like motor neurons to model respiratory motor neuron degeneration in ALS. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. De Jong, S.; Huisman, M.; Sutedja, N.; van der Kooi, A.; de Visser, M.; Schelhaas, J.; van der Schouw, Y.; Veldink, J.; van den Berg, L. Endogenous female reproductive hormones and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2013, 260, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rooney, J.; Fogh, I.; Westeneng, H.J.; Vajda, A.; McLaughlin, R.; Heverin, M.; Jones, A.; van Eijk, R.; Calvo, A.; Mazzini, L.; et al. C9orf72 expansion differentially affects males with spinal onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2017, 88, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart showing patient selection.
Figure 1. Flowchart showing patient selection.
Genes 16 00309 g001
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier showing survival in C9ALS and nmALS patients.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier showing survival in C9ALS and nmALS patients.
Genes 16 00309 g002
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier showing survival in male and female C9ALS patients.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier showing survival in male and female C9ALS patients.
Genes 16 00309 g003
Table 1. Clinical data from ALS patients with C9ORF72 mutations (C9ALS) and patients without mutations in the four major genes (nmALS). BMI: body mass index; ALSFRS-R: ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised; FVC: forced vital capacity; NIV: non-invasive ventilation; PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; IV: invasive ventilation.
Table 1. Clinical data from ALS patients with C9ORF72 mutations (C9ALS) and patients without mutations in the four major genes (nmALS). BMI: body mass index; ALSFRS-R: ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised; FVC: forced vital capacity; NIV: non-invasive ventilation; PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; IV: invasive ventilation.
C9ALS, n (%), Mean [SD]NmALS, n (%), Mean [SD]p-Value
Age at onset, years57.63 [9.41]57.88 [9.01]0.845
Diagnostic delay, months9.89 [7.11]9.76 [6.34]0.889
Family history for ALS 129 (43.93)7 (3.57)<0.001
Family history for dementia 225 (37.88)42 (21.21)0.009
Family history for other neurodegenerative diseases 244 (66.67%)41 (20.92%)<0.001
Family history for psychiatric disease 38 (4.98%)5 (2.55%)0.002
Family 4 history among 1st-degree relatives46 (76.79%)21 (27.27%)<0.001
Family 4 history among 2nd-degree relatives19 (33.33%)11 (14.60%)0.013
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m224.06 [4.14]24.39 [4.14]0.592
Weight loss at diagnosis (kg)3.51 [6.38]3.01 [5.74]0.584
Weight loss at diagnosis (%) 54.68 [9.25]3.86 [7.37]0.493
ALSFRS-r at diagnosis, points 640.08 [4.37]41.10 [6.00]0.202
Disease progression rate at diagnosis (points/month) 71.53 [1.50]1.06 [1.34]0.029
ALSFRS-r at last observation, points 819.60 [11.38]21.14 [12.73]0.389
Disease progression rate at last observation (points/month) 91.60 [1.34]1.01 [1.58]0.016
FVC at diagnosis (%) 1089.18 [19.34]95.65 [21.86]0.057
NIV30 (4478)98 (48.76)0.572
Time to NIV, months22.72 [11.91]28.09 [21.75]0.207
PEG32 (47.76)85 (42.29)0.434
Time to PEG, months24.57 [12.60]33.73 [24.58]0.050
IV18 (26.87)48 (23.88)0.623
Time to IV, months26.87 [21.17]38.69 [20.22]0.041
Time to death, months33.48 [18.85] 39.42 [28.12]0.199
Total 67 (100)201 (100)
1 Data on the presence of family history for ALS were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 196 out of 201 nmALS. 2 Data on the presence of family history for dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 198 out of 201 nmALS. 3 Data on the presence of family history for psychiatric diseases were available for 65 out of 67 C9ALS and 196 out of 201 nmALS. 4 Data on the degree of kinship were available for 57 out of 67 C9ALS and 74 out of 201 nmALS. 5 Data on weight loss were available for 57 out of 67 C9ALS and 179 out of 201 nmALS. 6 Data on ALSFRS-r at diagnosis were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 193 out of 201 nmALS. 7 Data on disease progression rate at diagnosis were available for 54 out of 67 C9ALS and 183 out of 201 nmALS. 8 Data on ALSFRS-r at last observation were available for 62 out of 67 C9ALS and 201 out of 201 nmALS. 9 Data on disease progression rate at last observation were available for 51 out of 67 C9ALS and 188 out of 201 nmALS. 10 Data on FVC at diagnosis were available for 58 out of 67 C9ALS and 117 out of 201 nmALS. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 2. Disease onset, clinical phenotypes, clinical signs, and compound scores of UMN and LMN involvement in C9ALS and nmALS. UMN: upper motor neuron; LMN: lower motor neuron.
Table 2. Disease onset, clinical phenotypes, clinical signs, and compound scores of UMN and LMN involvement in C9ALS and nmALS. UMN: upper motor neuron; LMN: lower motor neuron.
C9ALS n (%), Mean [SD]nmALS n (%), Mean [SD]p-Value
Site of onset
Bulbar23 (34.33)52 (28.42)0.436
Spinal44 (65.67)130 (71.04)0.440
Respiratory0 (0.00)1 (0.55)1.000
Phenotype 1
Flail6 (8.96)32 (16.58)0.162
UMN predominant2 (2.99)5 (2.59)1.000
Bulbar23 (34.33)46 (23.83)0.109
Respiratory0 (0.00)1 (0.52)1.000
Classic36 (55.77)109 (56.48)0.776
UMN and LMN involvement 2
Penn Upper Neuron Motor Score (0–32)3.82 [2.44]3.45 [3.12]0.421
Devine Lower Motor Neuron Score (0–12)7.52 [5.80]7.78 [5.93]0.788
Spasticity in most affected limb (Ashworth 0–2)58 (95.09)124 (91.85)0.600
Spasticity in most affected limb (Ashworth 3–4)3 (4.91)11 (8.15)
Palmomental reflex11 (19.64)33 (24.81)0.443
Glabellar reflex 7 (10.50)14 (10.69)0.719
Snout reflex 9 (16.07)26 (19.40)0.589
Masseter reflex 18 (32.14)27 (20.45)0.086
Hoffman reflex 8 (13.56)20 (14.81)0.071
Babinski reflex 6 (10.00)15 (11.11)0.879
Clonus 5 (8.47)15 (11.19)0.594
Cramps 11 (18.33)48 (49.48)<0.001
1 Data on phenotype were available for 67 out of 67 C9ALS and 193 out of 201 nmALS. 2 Data on UMN and LMN were available for 41 out of 67 C9ALS and 130 out of 201 nmALS. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 3. Cognitive and behavioral involvement in C9ALS and nmALS patients. ALSbi: ALS-associated behavioral impairment; ALSci: ALS-associated cognitive impairment; FTD: frontotemporal dementia.
Table 3. Cognitive and behavioral involvement in C9ALS and nmALS patients. ALSbi: ALS-associated behavioral impairment; ALSci: ALS-associated cognitive impairment; FTD: frontotemporal dementia.
C9ALS, n (%)nmALS, n (%)p-Value
ALSbi 119 (33.33)13 (9.56)<0.001
ALSci 117 (29.82)9 (6.62)<0.001
ALS-FTD 218 (27.27)9 (6.57)<0.001
Pseudobulbar syndrome 118 (31.03)28 (20.59)0.117
1 Data on presence of ALSbi, ALSci, and pseudobulbar syndrome were available for 57 out of 67 C9ALS and 136 out of 201 nmALS. 2 Data on presence of ALS-FTD were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 137 out of 201 nmALS. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 4. Comorbidities in C9ALS and nmALS patients.
Table 4. Comorbidities in C9ALS and nmALS patients.
C9ALS, n (%)nmALS, n (%)p-Value
Dyslipidemia 118 (38,30)33 (16.40)0.001
Autoimmune diseases 19 (13.43)7 (3.48)0.003
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)2 (2.99)7 (3.48)0.845
Respiratory diseases (excluding COPD)2 (2.99)6 (2.99)0.470
Diabetes 22 (3.03)6 (2.99)0.985
Hypertension21 (31.34)58 (28.86)0.699
Cardiopathies7 (10.45)17 (8.46)0.621
Parkinsonism 22 (3.08)3 (1.49)0.207
Cancer history 38(11.94)8 (10.26)0.747
Psychosis 43 (4.62)3 (1.49)0.140
Depression 514 (21.21)31 (39.74)0.017
1 Data on dyslipidemia were available for 47 out of 67 C9ALS and 201 out of 201 nmALS. 2 Data on diabetes and Parkinsonism were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 201 out of 201 nmALS. 3 Data on cancer history were available for 67 out of 67 C9ALS and 78 out of 201 nmALS. 4 Data on presence of psychosis were available for 65 out of 67 C9ALS and 201 out of 201 nmALS. 5 Data on presence of depression were available for 66 out of 67 C9ALS and 201 out of 201 nmALS. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 5. Univariate Cox regression analysis and multivariate analysis of survival in C9ALS patients. BMI: body mass index; FVC: forced vital capacity; ALSbi: ALS-associated behavioral impairment; ALSci: ALS-associated cognitive impairment; FTD: frontotemporal dementia. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 5. Univariate Cox regression analysis and multivariate analysis of survival in C9ALS patients. BMI: body mass index; FVC: forced vital capacity; ALSbi: ALS-associated behavioral impairment; ALSci: ALS-associated cognitive impairment; FTD: frontotemporal dementia. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
UnivariateMultivariate
VariableHR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Sex, male1.49 (0.85–2.61)0.165
Family history, presence0.94 (0.53–1.66)0.821
Age at onset, years1.01 (0.98–1.04)0.466
Diagnostic delay, months0.92 (0.87–0.97)0.0040.92 (0.86–0.98)0.014
Time to generalization, months0.96 (0.92–0.99)0.008
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m21.04 (0.99–1.10)0.131
FVC at diagnosis, %0.99 (0.97–1.00)0.156
ALSFRS-r at diagnosis, points0.98 (0.92–1.04)0.472
Disease progression rate at diagnosis, points/month1.40 (1.16–1.70)0.0011.65 (1.10–2.47)0.016
Weight loss, % of healthy weight1.07 (1.02–1.11)0.003
Onset, bulbar0.99 (0.55–1.77)0.965
ALSci, presence2.85 (1.48–5.46)0.0027.70 (3.12–19.02)<0.001
ALSbi, presence2.33 (1.23–4.42)0.009
ALS-FTD, presence2.38 (1.31–4.33)0.004
Depression, presence0.65 (0.31–1.35)0.248
Psychosis, presence3.16 (0.96–10.39)0.058
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), presence3.89 (0.90, 16.91)0.070
Other respiratory diseases, presence14.00 (2.78, 70.44)0.001
Diabetes, presence1.02 (0.25–4.24)0.978
Cardiopathies, presence1.59 (0.67–3.76)0.294
Hypertension, presence1.39 (0.77–2.51)0.276
Dyslipidemia, presence1.00 (0.51–1.94)0.993
Autoimmune diseases, presence0.94 (0.37–2.40)0.903
Cancer history, presence1.10 (0.47–2.60)0.823
Previous trauma, presence1.24 (0.62–2.48)0.540
Former tobacco smoking1.14 (0.58–2.25)0.701
Current tobacco smoking0.74 (0.26–2.11)0.569
Table 6. Clinical data, site of onset, clinical phenotype, and comorbidities in male and female C9ALS patients. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
Table 6. Clinical data, site of onset, clinical phenotype, and comorbidities in male and female C9ALS patients. Statistically significant values are displayed in bold.
nmALSC9ALS
Women, n (%), Mean [SD]Men, n (%), Mean [SD]p-ValueWomen, n (%), Mean [SD]Men, n (%), Mean [SD]p-Value
Age at onset, years58.57 [8.29]57.12 [9.73]0.25657,88 [9.08]57.34 [1.78]0.817
Diagnostic delay, months10.89 [7.19]8.53 [5.01]0.00810.89 [8.24]8.74 [5.41]0.219
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m223.95 [4.68]24.89 [3.41]0.13423.83 [5.47]24.33 [3.37]0.674
Weight loss at diagnosis (Kg)2.43 [5.61]3.67 [5.86]0.1612.32 [6.58]5.02 [5.90]0.943
Weight loss at diagnosis (%)3.29 [7.90]4.50 [6.71]0.2853.54 [10.73]6.13 [6.86]0.299
ALSFRS-r at diagnosis, points40.74 [6.26]41.52 [5.70]0.36839.2 [4.56]41.06 [3.98]0.083
Disease progression rate at diagnosis (points/month)0.91 [1.16]1.21 [1.51]0.1371.29 [1.12]1.82 [1.85]0.200
FVC at diagnosis, %95.54 [24.10]95.78 [19.24]0.95289.37 [19.32]88.94 [19.78]0.933
Time to NIV, months28.34 [20.08]27.86 [23.48]0.91520.73 [9.93]24.87 [13.77]0.358
Time to PEG, months33.54 [25.07]33.94 [24.36]0.94024.59 [11.73]24.56 [14.04]0.995
Time to tracheostomy, months37.67 [22.17]39.32 [19.30]0.78937.33 [26.02]20.21 [15.18]0.095
Time to death, months36.15 [26.07]41.46 [29.49]0.48232.09 [25.35]35.09 [20.70]0.572
Time to death/last observation, months42.31 [32.62]41.72 [26.58]0.93236.47 [23.53]30.00 [18.07]0.222
ALSFRS-r at last observation, points20.69 [12.86]21.64 [12.64]0.59818.41 [9.97]21.00 [13.04]0.398
Time from diagnosis to last observation, months36.20 [37.18]38.10 [32.92]0.70318.86 [12.21]18.50 [14.43]0.917
Disease progression rate at last observation, (points/month)1.11 [1.91]0.90 [1.13]0.3681.39 [1.04]1.89 [1.67]0.196
Site of onset, bulbar34 (32.38)19 (19.79)0.04315 (41.67)8 (25.81)0.173
DLMNS (0–12)4.00 [2.67]3.65 [2.20]0.4193.28 [3.26]3.66 [3.02]0.681
PUMNS (0–32)8.10 [5.55]7.45 [6.32]0.5199.92 [5.76]5.53 [5.12]0.004
ALSFRS-r bulbar score at diagnosis10.33 [2.26]10.82 [2.21]0.1538.87 [2.56]10.16 [2.08]0.047
ALSFRS-r upper limb score at diagnosis13.13 [3.36]12.65 [3.66]0.36813.10 [3.06]13.76 [2.30]0.377
ALSFRS-r upper + lower limb score at diagnosis18.87 [4.91]18.41 [4.98]0.54318.97 [4.63]19.44 [3.74]0.683
ALSFRS-r lower limb score at diagnosis5.74 [2.23]5.76 [2.22]0.9465.87 [2.29]5.68 [2.14]0.757
ALSFRS-r respiratory score at diagnosis11.63 [1.09]11.58 [1.25]0.80611.67 [0.71]11.84 [0.47]0.303
ALSbi3 (4.55)10 (14.29)0.05412 (37.50)7 (28.00)0.450
ALSci4 (6.06)5 (7.14)0.8009 (28.12)8 (32.00)0.751
ALS-FTD3 (4.48)6 (8.57)0.33411 (30.56)7 (23.33)0.512
Dyslipidemia18 (17.14)15 (15.62)0.7727 (29.17)11 (47.83)0.188
Autoimmune diseases3 (2.86)4 (4.17)0.6137 (20.59)2 (6.06)0.081
Cancer history5 (14.71)3 (6.82)0.2555 (14.71)3 (9.09)0.479
Depression15 (44.12)16 (36.36)0.48810 (29.41)4 (12.50)0.093
Psychosis2 (1.90)1 (1.04)0.6143 (8.82)0 (0.00)0.090
Parkinsonism1 (0.95)2 (2.08)0.5090 (0.00)2 (6.25)0.145
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease5 (4.76)2 (2.08)0.3011 (2.94)1 (3.03)0.983
Diabetes3 (2.86)3 (3.12)0.9112 (5.88)0 (0.00)0.164
Hypertension26 (24.76)32 (33.33)0.18011 (32.35)10 (30.30)0.856
Cardiopathies7 (6.67)10 (10.42)0.3403 (8.82)4 (12.12)0.659
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghezzi, A.; Gianferrari, G.; Baldassarri, E.; Zucchi, E.; Martinelli, I.; Vacchiano, V.; Bonan, L.; Zinno, L.; Nuredini, A.; Canali, E.; et al. Phenotypical Characterization of C9ALS Patients from the Emilia Romagna Registry of ALS: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Genes 2025, 16, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030309

AMA Style

Ghezzi A, Gianferrari G, Baldassarri E, Zucchi E, Martinelli I, Vacchiano V, Bonan L, Zinno L, Nuredini A, Canali E, et al. Phenotypical Characterization of C9ALS Patients from the Emilia Romagna Registry of ALS: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Genes. 2025; 16(3):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghezzi, Andrea, Giulia Gianferrari, Elisa Baldassarri, Elisabetta Zucchi, Ilaria Martinelli, Veria Vacchiano, Luigi Bonan, Lucia Zinno, Andi Nuredini, Elena Canali, and et al. 2025. "Phenotypical Characterization of C9ALS Patients from the Emilia Romagna Registry of ALS: A Retrospective Case–Control Study" Genes 16, no. 3: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030309

APA Style

Ghezzi, A., Gianferrari, G., Baldassarri, E., Zucchi, E., Martinelli, I., Vacchiano, V., Bonan, L., Zinno, L., Nuredini, A., Canali, E., Gizzi, M., Terlizzi, E., Medici, D., Sette, E., Currò Dossi, M., Morresi, S., Santangelo, M., Patuelli, A., Longoni, M., ... Mandrioli, J. (2025). Phenotypical Characterization of C9ALS Patients from the Emilia Romagna Registry of ALS: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Genes, 16(3), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16030309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop