Next Article in Journal
Genome Mining of Non-Conventional Yeasts: Search and Analysis of MAL Clusters and Proteins
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural and Evolutionary Insights within the Polysaccharide Deacetylase Gene Family of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Evolutionary Divergent Suppressor Mutations in Conformational Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Stasis and Proteome Innovation in Cephalochordates

Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(7), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070353
Submission received: 24 May 2018 / Revised: 11 July 2018 / Accepted: 11 July 2018 / Published: 16 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution and Structure of Proteins and Proteomes)

Abstract

Lancelets, extant representatives of basal chordates, are prototypic examples of evolutionary stasis; they preserved a morphology and body-plan most similar to the fossil chordates from the early Cambrian. Such a low level of morphological evolution is in harmony with a low rate of amino acid substitution; cephalochordate proteins were shown to evolve slower than those of the slowest evolving vertebrate, the elephant shark. Surprisingly, a study comparing the predicted proteomes of Chinese amphioxus, Branchiostoma belcheri and the Florida amphioxus, Branchiostoma floridae has led to the conclusion that the rate of creation of novel domain combinations is orders of magnitude greater in lancelets than in any other Metazoa, a finding that contradicts the notion that high rates of protein innovation are usually associated with major evolutionary innovations. Our earlier studies on a representative sample of proteins have provided evidence suggesting that the differences in the domain architectures of predicted proteins of these two lancelet species reflect annotation errors, rather than true innovations. In the present work, we have extended these studies to include a larger sample of genes and two additional lancelet species, Asymmetron lucayanum and Branchiostoma lanceolatum. These analyses have confirmed that the domain architecture differences of orthologous proteins of the four lancelet species are because of errors of gene prediction, the error rate in the given species being inversely related to the quality of the transcriptome dataset that was used to aid gene prediction.
Keywords: amphioxus; Asymmetron; Branchiostoma; domain architecture; gene prediction; genome annotation; lancelet; proteome; stasis; transcriptome amphioxus; Asymmetron; Branchiostoma; domain architecture; gene prediction; genome annotation; lancelet; proteome; stasis; transcriptome

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bányai, L.; Kerekes, K.; Trexler, M.; Patthy, L. Morphological Stasis and Proteome Innovation in Cephalochordates. Genes 2018, 9, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070353

AMA Style

Bányai L, Kerekes K, Trexler M, Patthy L. Morphological Stasis and Proteome Innovation in Cephalochordates. Genes. 2018; 9(7):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bányai, László, Krisztina Kerekes, Mária Trexler, and László Patthy. 2018. "Morphological Stasis and Proteome Innovation in Cephalochordates" Genes 9, no. 7: 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070353

APA Style

Bányai, L., Kerekes, K., Trexler, M., & Patthy, L. (2018). Morphological Stasis and Proteome Innovation in Cephalochordates. Genes, 9(7), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop