Figure 1.
Distribution of mineral content fitting with Gaussian normal distribution. (a). Quartz content ranged from 0.9% to 62.7% of the weight composition. (b). Feldspar content varied from 0.4% to 27.5%. (c) Clay minerals varied from 14.3% to 97.4%.
Figure 1.
Distribution of mineral content fitting with Gaussian normal distribution. (a). Quartz content ranged from 0.9% to 62.7% of the weight composition. (b). Feldspar content varied from 0.4% to 27.5%. (c) Clay minerals varied from 14.3% to 97.4%.
Figure 2.
Changes in water content versus time. According to the change rate of water content, it is divided into normal, acceleration and deceleration stages.
Figure 2.
Changes in water content versus time. According to the change rate of water content, it is divided into normal, acceleration and deceleration stages.
Figure 3.
Crack development process of S2. The time between (a) and (b) is 31 h. The time between adjacent pictures is 4 h. The diameter of the sample is 24 cm. After (t), cracks stopped developing (a)–(t).
Figure 3.
Crack development process of S2. The time between (a) and (b) is 31 h. The time between adjacent pictures is 4 h. The diameter of the sample is 24 cm. After (t), cracks stopped developing (a)–(t).
Figure 4.
The direction changed when cracks intersected. (a,b) The direction of crack l changed when it approached another crack m. (c,d) The extension direction changed when parallel cracks were close to each other.
Figure 4.
The direction changed when cracks intersected. (a,b) The direction of crack l changed when it approached another crack m. (c,d) The extension direction changed when parallel cracks were close to each other.
Figure 5.
Cracks ended in a variety of places: a, b. Termination at the boundary; c, d. Termination at the intersection with another crack; e, f. They were unaffected by the boundary and other cracks and ended their extension on their own. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 5.
Cracks ended in a variety of places: a, b. Termination at the boundary; c, d. Termination at the intersection with another crack; e, f. They were unaffected by the boundary and other cracks and ended their extension on their own. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 6.
Desiccation crack morphology under different BM:TC (BM:TC means the content ratio of brittle minerals to all clay minerals) conditions. From left to right in the figure are S1, S2, S3, and S4, respectively. (a) 10% brittle, 90% clay. (b) 30% brittle, 70% clay. (c) 50% brittle, 50% clay. (d) 70% brittle, 30% clay. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 6.
Desiccation crack morphology under different BM:TC (BM:TC means the content ratio of brittle minerals to all clay minerals) conditions. From left to right in the figure are S1, S2, S3, and S4, respectively. (a) 10% brittle, 90% clay. (b) 30% brittle, 70% clay. (c) 50% brittle, 50% clay. (d) 70% brittle, 30% clay. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 7.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different BM:TC.
Figure 7.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different BM:TC.
Figure 8.
Desiccation crack morphology under different K:S (K:S refers to the ratio of kaolin to smectite minerals) conditions. In the figure, from left to right are S1, S5, S6, and S7, respectively. (a) 20% kaolin, 80% smectite. (b) 40% kaolin, 60% smectite. (c) 60% kaolin, 40% smectite. (d) 80% kaolin, 20% smectite. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 8.
Desiccation crack morphology under different K:S (K:S refers to the ratio of kaolin to smectite minerals) conditions. In the figure, from left to right are S1, S5, S6, and S7, respectively. (a) 20% kaolin, 80% smectite. (b) 40% kaolin, 60% smectite. (c) 60% kaolin, 40% smectite. (d) 80% kaolin, 20% smectite. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm).
Figure 9.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different K:S.
Figure 9.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different K:S.
Figure 10.
Desiccation crack morphology under different Q:F (Q:F refers to the ratio of quartz to feldspar minerals.) conditions. S8, S9, S10, and S11 are shown in the figure from left to right. (a) 20% quartz, 80% feldspar. (b) 40% quartz, 60% feldspar. (c) 60% quartz, 40% feldspar. (d) 80% quartz, 20% feldspar. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm.).
Figure 10.
Desiccation crack morphology under different Q:F (Q:F refers to the ratio of quartz to feldspar minerals.) conditions. S8, S9, S10, and S11 are shown in the figure from left to right. (a) 20% quartz, 80% feldspar. (b) 40% quartz, 60% feldspar. (c) 60% quartz, 40% feldspar. (d) 80% quartz, 20% feldspar. (The diameter of the sample is 24 cm.).
Figure 11.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different Q:F.
Figure 11.
Distribution of crack length in samples with different Q:F.
Figure 12.
Crack number with different lengths under various quality ratios of quartz to feldspar.
Figure 12.
Crack number with different lengths under various quality ratios of quartz to feldspar.
Figure 13.
Angel distribution of desiccation cracks in nature. (a). Desiccation cracks in the Yellow River of the Huayuankou area in Zhengzhou City. (The white frame is 1 × 1 m2). (b). statistical analysis of cracks angle.
Figure 13.
Angel distribution of desiccation cracks in nature. (a). Desiccation cracks in the Yellow River of the Huayuankou area in Zhengzhou City. (The white frame is 1 × 1 m2). (b). statistical analysis of cracks angle.
Figure 14.
Desiccation crack morphological prediction diagram for various mineral compositions. The arrows indicate that the mineral ratio is increasing. The x-axis is the content ratio of brittle minerals to clay minerals. In the negative half axis of the x-axis, the y-axis shows the content ratio of smectite to kaolin. In the positive half axis of the x-axis, the y-axis shows the content ratio of quartz to feldspar.
Figure 14.
Desiccation crack morphological prediction diagram for various mineral compositions. The arrows indicate that the mineral ratio is increasing. The x-axis is the content ratio of brittle minerals to clay minerals. In the negative half axis of the x-axis, the y-axis shows the content ratio of smectite to kaolin. In the positive half axis of the x-axis, the y-axis shows the content ratio of quartz to feldspar.
Figure 15.
Shrinkage cracks in sandstone at 35°15′52″ N and 113°8′15″ E in Jiaozuo city: (a) the surface; (b) middle surface; (c) innermost surface.
Figure 15.
Shrinkage cracks in sandstone at 35°15′52″ N and 113°8′15″ E in Jiaozuo city: (a) the surface; (b) middle surface; (c) innermost surface.
Figure 16.
SEM micrographs of diagenetic shrinkage micro-fractures in lLongtan formation shale with different content of clay.
Figure 16.
SEM micrographs of diagenetic shrinkage micro-fractures in lLongtan formation shale with different content of clay.
Table 1.
Gaussian parameter values of mineral distribution.
Table 1.
Gaussian parameter values of mineral distribution.
Mineral | μ | σ | μ ± 2σ |
---|
Clay | 55 | 12 | (31, 79) |
Quart | 32 | 17 | (−2, 66) |
Feldspar | 3.16 | 1.13 | (2.03, 4.29) |
Table 2.
Simulation experiments design.
Table 2.
Simulation experiments design.
Sample | MQ:MF | MK:MS | MBM:MTC | MW:MSM | Temperature/°C |
---|
S1 | 32:3 | 2:8 | 1:9 | 2:1 | 45 |
S2 | 3:7 |
S2 | 5:5 |
S4 | 7:3 |
S5 | 9:1 | 4:6 | 1:9 |
S6 | 6:4 |
S7 | 8:2 |
S8 | 8:2 | 1:1 | 1:1 |
S9 | 6:4 |
S10 | 4:6 |
S11 | 2:8 |
Table 3.
The CWC of samples with different minerals.
Table 3.
The CWC of samples with different minerals.
Sample | Mineral Content/% | The CWC |
---|
Q | F | K | S | BM | TC |
---|
S1 | 9 | 1 | 18 | 72 | 10 | 90 | 58.43% |
S2 | 27 | 3 | 14 | 56 | 30 | 70 | 55.20% |
S3 | 46 | 4 | 10 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 46.73% |
S4 | 64 | 6 | 6 | 24 | 70 | 30 | 45.80% |
S5 | 9 | 1 | 36 | 54 | 10 | 90 | 48.38% |
S6 | 9 | 1 | 54 | 36 | 10 | 90 | 46.12% |
S7 | 9 | 1 | 72 | 18 | 10 | 90 | 41.89% |
S8 | 36 | 9 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 45 | 55 | 39.73% |
S9 | 27 | 18 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 45 | 55 | 49.69% |
S10 | 18 | 27 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 45 | 55 | 48.09% |
S11 | 9 | 36 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 45 | 55 | 46.60% |
Table 4.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MBM:MTC.
Table 4.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MBM:MTC.
Sample | MBM:MTC | Number of Cracks | Total Length/cm | Average Length/cm | Number of Joints |
---|
Boundary Joint | Termination Joint | Intersection Joint | Total Joint |
---|
S1 | 1:9 | 29 | 120.26 | 4.1 | 16 | 2 | 35 | 53 |
S2 | 3:7 | 22 | 131.12 | 6.0 | 12 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
S3 | 5:5 | 4 | 47.22 | 11.8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
S4 | 7:3 | 18 | 41.73 | 2.3 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 29 |
Table 5.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MK:MS.
Table 5.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MK:MS.
Sample | MK:MS | Number of Cracks | Total length/cm | Average Length/cm | Number of Joints |
---|
Boundary Joint | Termination Joint | Intersection Joint | Total Joint |
---|
S1 | 2:8 | 29 | 120.26 | 4.1 | 16 | 2 | 35 | 53 |
S5 | 4:6 | 12 | 96.40 | 8.0 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 23 |
S6 | 6:4 | 33 | 150.38 | 4.6 | 18 | 2 | 41 | 61 |
S7 | 8:2 | 12 | 69.89 | 5.8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 |
Table 6.
Crack area and density under different quality ratios of kaolin to smectite.
Table 6.
Crack area and density under different quality ratios of kaolin to smectite.
Sample | MK:MS | Smectite Content/% | Crack Area/cm2 | Crack Density/% |
---|
S1 | 2:8 | 72 | 107.03 | 23.67 |
S5 | 4:6 | 54 | 61.13 | 13.52 |
S6 | 6:4 | 36 | 39.30 | 8.69 |
S7 | 8:2 | 18 | 19.96 | 4.41 |
Table 7.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MQ:MF.
Table 7.
Morphological parameters of samples with different values of MQ:MF.
Sample | MQ:MF | Number of Cracks | Total Length/cm | Average Length/cm | Number of Joints |
---|
Boundary Joint | Termination Joint | Intersection Joint | Total Joint |
---|
S8 | 8:2 | 20 | 89.14 | 4.5 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 31 |
S9 | 6:4 | 22 | 95.61 | 4.3 | 6 | 20 | 16 | 42 |
S10 | 4:6 | 20 | 92.95 | 4.6 | 6 | 18 | 11 | 35 |
S11 | 2:8 | 40 | 104.51 | 2.6 | 4 | 41 | 26 | 71 |
Table 8.
Morphological parameters of samples at the scale of per dm2.
Table 8.
Morphological parameters of samples at the scale of per dm2.
Sample | Crack Density (1/dm2) | Area Density (1/dm) | Boundary Joint Density (1/dm2) | Termination Joint Density (1/dm2) | Intersection Joint Density (1/dm2) | Total Joint Density (1/dm2) |
---|
S1 | 6.41 | 2.66 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 11.7 |
S2 | 4.87 | 2.90 | 2.7 | 0 | 6.4 | 9.1 |
S3 | 0.88 | 1.04 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.8 |
S4 | 3.98 | 0.92 | 0.4 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 6.4 |
S5 | 2.65 | 2.13 | 2.4 | 0 | 2.7 | 5.1 |
S6 | 7.30 | 3.33 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 9.1 | 13.5 |
S7 | 2.65 | 1.55 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 4.2 |
S8 | 4.42 | 1.97 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 6.9 |
S9 | 4.87 | 2.11 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 9.3 |
S10 | 4.42 | 2.06 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 7.7 |
S11 | 8.85 | 2.31 | 0.9 | 9.1 | 5.8 | 15.7 |
Table 9.
Applicable conditions of the morphology prediction model.
Table 9.
Applicable conditions of the morphology prediction model.
Temperature/°C | Mineral Particle Size/μm | Overburden Pressure/MPa |
---|
45 | Q, F: 15 K, S: 10 | 0 |
Table 10.
Mineral content of sandstones in each layer.
Table 10.
Mineral content of sandstones in each layer.
Layer | MQ/% | MF/% | MCal/% | MTC/% |
---|
surface | 87.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.4 |
middle layer | 80.7 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 14.1 |
innermost layer | 80.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 18.1 |