Next Article in Journal
Influence of P and Ti on Phase Formation at Solidification of Synthetic Slag Containing Li, Zr, La, and Ta
Previous Article in Journal
Mineral-Melt Equilibria and Geothermobarometry of Campi Flegrei Magmas: Inferences for Magma Storage Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/min12030309
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Shoshonitic Dyke Swarm in the Northeast of Meshkinshahr, NW Iran

by
Mohammad Fadaeian
1,
Ahmad Jahangiri
2,
Songjian Ao
3,*,
Amin Allah Kamali
4 and
Wenjiao Xiao
3
1
Department of Geology, Payame Noor University, Tehran 19395, Iran
2
Department of Geology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51664, Iran
3
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
4
Research Center for Conservation of Culture Relics (RCCCR), Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran 11456, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(3), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030309
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 28 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The study area is located in Ardabil province in the northeast of Meshkinshahr city. More than 200 small and large Eocene-age dykes form outcrops in this area. Laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb zircon analyses yield a consistent age of 44.3 ± 1.8 Ma for the dyke swarms. These dykes include tephritic, andesitic and basaltic compositions, and show enrichment in LREEs (relative to HREEs) and are characterized by enrichment in LILEs and depletion in HFSEs. Petrological observations, along with major, rare earth and trace elements geochemistry, suggest that the dykes have a shoshonitic signature. All the rocks are highly enriched in incompatible trace elements and have variable Sr–Nd isotopes. Enrichment in incompatible elements and other geochemical features for the dyke swarm rocks suggest that a metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle is the magma source. The negative Nb–Ta–Ti anomalies in the rocks are comparable with the features of subduction-related magmatism and contamination with ancient crustal components. The radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr isotopic values of the rocks imply the involvement of slab terrigenous sediments and/or a continental lithosphere. Isotopically, the volcanic rocks exhibit a binary trend, representing 1–5% mixing between the primary mantle and sediment melts. Our melting models suggest that there are residual garnet + spinel in the source, which are incompatible with the partial melting of amphibole- and/or phlogopite-bearing lherzolites. The geochronological, geochemical and isotopic data for the northeast Meshkinshahr dyke swarms suggest that these Late Eocene magmas were derived from a small degree of partial melting of a subduction-metasomatized lithospheric mantle source in a post-collisional setting.

1. Introduction

Our understanding of dyke emplacement mechanisms is important, as dykes are feeders of volcanic eruption in which magmatic evolution take place. Crust–mantle interaction plays a significant role in the delineation of crustal provinces, as well as in deciphering crustal evolution events [1,2,3]. Shoshonitic rocks generally show SiO2 at less than 70 wt. percentage [4]. On the other hand, [5] suggested that shoshonites should also include more silicic rocks, such as dacite and rhyolite. The authors only regarded volcanic rock types with SiO2 < 63 wt. percentage as shoshonites [6]. Shoshonites can be subdivided into basic (SiO2 < 53 wt.%), intermediate (SiO2 = 53–63 wt.%) and silicic (SiO2 > 63 wt.%) types [7]. The origin of shoshonitic suites is a point of debate [8]. It seems that the chemical variability of shoshonitic rocks is not completely understood in terms of source characteristics and geodynamic setting. Shoshonites are restricted to subduction-related tectonic settings, where they were generated during the late stage of arc evolution, typically after the low-K tholeiites and calc-alkaline rock series [7]. Similarly, [9] concluded that shoshonites should be regarded as products of the magmatic activity above the subduction zones in continental arcs, post-collisional arcs or in oceanic arc settings. Most shoshonites form in a convergent continental setting, normally in association with subduction [10]. It has been suggested that they were formed by the partial melting of the lower crust, following underplating by mantle-derived magma [11,12]. The metasomatic hypothesis for the origin of shoshonites is consistent with the experimental work of [13], who showed that potassic magmas can be produced by the melting hydrated mantle. In the Anatolia, the Caucasus and northwest Iran, the Eocene epoch is characterized by widespread basic to acidic magmatism, whose temporal and spatial evolutions and origin are poorly understood [14]. Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Iran include Paleogene, Miocene and Plio–Quaternary sequences, which occur mainly in Central Iran (Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt), the Alborz–Azerbaijan mountains, and the northern Lut Block (Figure 1). Paleogene volcanic and associated volcano-sedimentary rocks are extensive and blanket vast areas with kilometer-scale thickness. Marine fossils within the Paleogene pyroclastic sequence, such as nummulitic green tuffs, indicate that volcanism was largely shallow marine (e.g., [15,16]). The cause of Paleogene volcanism has been, in general, a matter of controversy for three decades. The linear trend of Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic belt (UDMB) parallel to the Arabia–Eurasia suture and Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone (Figure 1), the subduction signature trace element characteristics of Paleogene volcanism and the steady northward motion of the northern Arabian margin from an initial position >1300 km south of the present-day suture [17] have led to the dominant opinion that the Urumieh–Dokhtar belt is a conventional active margin continental arc analogous to the Andes (e.g., [16,18]). In contrast, [19], “based on” major element data from alkaline Tertiary volcanic rocks, proposed that the Urumieh–Dokhtar belt is unrelated to the subduction environment and is a linear rift basin. The geochemical and intensity variation of volcanism related to Neotethyan oceanic subduction from the Cretaceous to Miocene interval led [20] to the change in Benioff zone geometry and the plates’ convergence rate. Meanwhile, these authors stated that extensive volcanic activity in the Paleogene occurred due to flattening subduction and accompanied extension and flare-up volcanism due to slab rollback. On the other hand, the closure time of the Neotethys Ocean and the estimation of the collision time of Eurasia and the Arabian plate is controversial, and the age of the Arabia–Eurasia collision has been estimated to range from the Late Cretaceous to Pliocene (e.g., [17,18,21]).
Paleocene volcanic rocks with shoshonitic affinity, including trachy-andesite, tephrite and basanitic rocks, mainly crop out in the Azerbaijan–Alborz–Sabzevar zone, specifically in the Ahar–Arasbaran volcanic belt and northeast of Meshkinshahr in NW Iran (which is the study area) [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The Paleocene magmatism in the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt and south of the Anatolian block is calc-alkalic to shoshonitic, which resulted from the subduction of the Neotethys Ocean beneath the central Iranian and Anatolian blocks [25,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The Eocene shoshonitic volcanism in northern Iran extends into the Central Iranian volcanic belt along a NW–SE trending linear zone. This volcanic belt contains lower Eocene-age basalts, trachybasalts, trachyandesites and volcanic bereccia in the Meshkinshahr to Qom-Aran area in its northern segment [19,38], slightly more evolved shoshonites composed of middle to upper Eocene shoshonitic swarm dykes in the northeast of Meshkinshahr [39] and basaltic lavas, tephrites, phonolites and tephrite phonolites in the Natanz–Nain and Shahrebabak areas in its central parts [40,41]. Upper Eocene trachybasalts and trachyandesites occur in the Rafsanjan area [42], and analcime-rich pyroclastic rocks crop out in the Bardsir area [43] in the southern end of the belt. The present study is focused on the petrography and mineral chemistry, whole rock geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotope composition of a shoshonitic dyke swarm located in the northwest of Iran. Our aim is to shed more light on their petrogenesis and to better understand the composition of the mantle wedge involved in Neotethys subduction, and the composition of their mantle source(s) and their possible interaction with the crustal material are discussed. The study of the magmatic features of the dyke swarm could help us narrow down the magmatic–tectonic processes acting during the Paleocene and governing lithospheric evolution in the NW of Iran [44].

Geological Setting

Cenozoic volcanism in Iran can be studied in three areas: (a) the Alborz volcanic belt, running in the north of Iran with E-W trending, which extends to the east, up to the Iran–Afghanistan border, and west, extending to the Lesser Caucasus; (b) the Central Iranian volcanic belt, running across Central Iran for about 1800 km in the NW-SE direction, roughly parallel to the Zagros trend and some 150–200 km from the main Zagros thrust to the northeast of it (known as the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt UDMA); (c) the Lut Block (Eastern Iran) volcanic province. The Alborz and Central Iranian volcanic belts join in Turkey in the Van Lake area (Eastern Anatolia) and the volcanic Lesser Caucasus (Figure 1). Volcanism in Iran is well represented from the Eocene to sub-recent times, but the main volcanic phases took place in the Eocene–Oligocene and Upper Miocene to Pliocene–Quaternary, whereas most intrusive rocks belong probably to the Oligocene [15]. Unfortunately, data on this widespread and impressive volcanism are scarce. A large, young volcanic province roughly located between the Caspian Sea and the Black Sea, extending westwards into central Anatolia, is thereby formed (with volcanism in Azerbaijan). The study area is part of this major province, and has witnessed varied and protracted volcanic activity, which can be separated into various stages, since at least the Paleogene and up to recent times [48] (Figure 1). The first studies of stratigraphy and the geological evolution of the investigated area were conducted by [49]. The oldest rock units in this area are a sequence of pelagic Cretaceous limestones with intercalations of shale and cherts accompanied with spilitic basaltic lavas that are exposed in the NW of the studied area [50] (Figure 2). The Cretaceous sequence was folded during the Upper Cretaceous and is covered uncomfortably by Paleogene volcanic and pyroclastic units. The Paleogene sequence was initiated by the alternation of shale, tuffaceous sandstones and brecciated volcanic rocks with hyaloclastic and tuff cements. This unit was cut when Eocene volcanism started and reached its climax probably during the Middle and Upper Eocene [49]. The composition of igneous rocks includes tephrite, leucite-tephritic and basanitic rocks with pyroclastic interlayers. The study area covers a large part of the collection of Eocene igneous rocks (Figure 2) [50]. The isotopic age available up to now [51] gives values from 43 to 38 my, and would place the cycle at the transition period between Eocene and Oligocene. The tectonic activity, which took place at different stages in the Tertiary and Quaternary, was mainly tensional. Faulted blocks were sometimes strongly tilted, and the faulted escarpments, up to some hundred meters high, together with differential erosion, gave rise to the rugged out-lines of some districts, especially in the northwestern part of the plateau. Dykes are distributed across the whole of the study area, and they show variable strikes; in spite of a high number of measurements, the dispersion value was such that significant frequency maxima did not emerge. They are vertical to sub-vertical, up to some kilometers long and from some decimeters to a few meters thick. Over 300 small and large dykes with thicknesses of 1–20 m are exposed in the NE of the Meshkinshahr district, covering an area of about 40 km2 (Figure 3). They are dominantly oriented in a NNE–SSW strike and intruded into the Lower Eocene volcanic breccias [50]. In the Upper Oligocene, block faulting developed and subsidence took place in the Meshkinshahr basin, where limited marine to lagoonal sediments were deposited in the Miocene times, separating the northwestern area of the plateau from the southeastern one [50].

2. Materials and Methods

During field studies, approximately 200 samples were collected and, after thin section petrographic studies, some of the unaltered samples were selected for analysis. Then, 41 whole-rock samples were analyzed for major and trace elements and REE. Whole-rock major elements were determined on fused glass disks using a Phillips PW1500 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGGCAS), Beijing. The analytical precision is better than ±5 percent, estimated from repeated analyses of the Chinese whole-rock andesite reference sample GSR-2. Trace element contents were measured on a Finnigan MAT Element mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) at IGGCAS after complete dissolution. Powders (~40 mg) were dissolved in distilled HF + HNO3 in 15 mL Savillex Teflon screw-cap beakers at 200 °C for five days, dried and then diluted to 50 mL for analysis. Indium was used as an internal reference sample to correct for matrix effects and instrument drift. Precision for all trace elements is estimated to be ±5 percentage, and accuracy is better than ±5 percent for most elements according to the analyses of the GSR-2 reference sample.
The Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic analysis (Table 2) followed procedures similar to those described by [52]. Whole-rock powders for Sr and Nd isotopic analyses were dissolved in Savillex Teflon screw-top capsules after being spiked with the mixed 87Rb–84Sr and 149Sm–150Nd tracers prior to HF + HNO3 + HClO4 dissolution. Rb, Sr, Sm and Nd were separated using the classical two-step ion exchange chromatographic method and measured using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Triton Plus multi-collector thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) at IGGCAS. The whole procedure blank was lower than 250 pg. for Rb-Sr and 100 pg. for Sm-Nd. The isotopic ratios were corrected for mass fractionation by normalizing them to 88Sr/86Sr = 8.375209 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, respectively. The international reference sample samples, NBS-987 and JNdi-1, were employed to evaluate instrument stability during the period of data collection. The measured values for the NBS-987 Sr reference sample and JNdi-1 Nd reference sample were 87Sr/86Sr = 0.710245 ± 0.000021 (n = 9, 2 SD) and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512111 ± 0.000012 (n = 9, 2 SD), respectively. USGS reference material BCR-2 was measured to monitor the accuracy of the analytical procedures, with the following results: 87Sr/86Sr = 0.705025 ± 0.000013 and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512621 ± 0.000010. The 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd data of BCR-2 show good agreement with previously published data by TIMS technique [52,53].
Following this, 22 samples for U–Pb analyses were processed using conventional magnetic and density techniques to concentrate non-magnetic heavy fractions. Zircon grains, together with zircon reference sample 91500, were mounted in epoxy mounts, which were then polished to section for analysis. All zircons were documented with transmitted and reflected light micrographs, as well as cathodoluminescence (CL) images, to reveal their internal structures, and the mount was vacuum-coated with high-purity gold prior to secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analyses at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGGCAS) in Beijing. The samples were dated via LA-ICP-MS at IGGCAS, using an Agilent 7500a quadruple ICPMS and a Thermo-Finnigan Neptune multi-collector ICPMS connected to a 193 nm Excimer ArF laser-ablation system (Geolas plus). The analyses were carried out with a beam diameter of 32 um and a 6 Hz repetition rate, and the ablation depth was 20–40 µm. Helium was used as a carrier gas to enhance the transport efficiency of the ablated material. The Harvard zircon 91500 was used as the external reference sample for age calculation, and the Australian National University zircon NIST SRM 610 was used as the external reference sample for concentration calculations. The detailed analytical procedures for LA-ICP-MS can be found in [54]. Common lead was corrected for LA-ICP-MS results using the correction proposed by [55]. The weighted mean U–Pb ages and Concordia plots were carried out using the Isoplot/Ex v. 3.00 programs [56] (Table 3).

3. Results

3.1. Petrographic Description

The petrographic description of the studied dykes is summarized below. They can be subdivided into the following four main groups, for which a nomenclature largely “based on” chemical data (see Table 1) has been used: Tephritic dykes; Andesitic dykes; Basaltic dykes.

3.1.1. The Tephritic Dykes

The tephritic dykes are porphyritic rocks with a microcrystalline or hypocrystalline groundmass. The tephritic dykes are mainly massive, and their color varies from black to greyish-green categories based on alterations. Microscopically, the tephritic dykes are composed of plagioclase of a labradorite composition, with analcime, pyroxene and amphibole as the principal constituents (Figure 4a,b). Sometimes, minor amounts of chlorite and epidote are secondary minerals. Plagioclase is present as either tabular and prismatic phenocrysts (up to 3.5–2.5 mm) or fine-grained laths (up to 0.4 mm across) in the groundmass. Euhedral to subhedral tabular plagioclase phenocrysts display lamellar twinning and zoning. In some places, plagioclase crystals are slightly altered to sericite, especially in the cores (Figure 4a). Pyroxene is in the form of euhedral to subhedral prismatic phenocrysts and granular aggregates in the groundmass. It is colorless to pale-brown, and occasionally shows simple twinning (Figure 4b). The poikilitic crystals contain inclusions of plagioclase, apatite, zircon and opaque minerals. The euhedral to subhedral analcime phenocrysts are 20–30% in volume (Figure 4a), and these minerals have a black and dark-grey color in their core (Figure 4a). The analyzed analcimes are almost homogenous in chemical composition. Petrography, mineral chemistry and SEM studies revealed that all analcimes in the studied shoshonitic succession were produced through the Na-metasomatism of leucite crystals.

3.1.2. The Andesitic Dykes

The andesite dykes are of limited abundance among the intermediate dyke swarms. Macroscopically, they are fine-grained, massive with a dark-grey to green color and range from aphyric to typical porphyritic varieties. The andesite dykes are composed of plagioclase, pyroxene and amphibole as essential minerals (Figure 4c–e). Chlorite, actinolite, epidote and sericite are alteration products. Accessory minerals are apatite, titanite, olivine and zircon. Plagioclase (An25–An40), partially altered to sericite and epidote, is the most abundant mineral component, occurring as euhedral to subhedral phenocrysts of prismatic habit (up to 2 mm), while laths (up to 0.2 mm long) form the majority of the groundmass (Figure 4e). In some instances, the plagioclase phenocrysts are twinned and zoned. Apatite and zircon occur mainly as inclusions in Cpx crystals (Figure 4d). Pyroxene is in the form of euhedral to subhedral prismatic phenocrysts and granular aggregates in the groundmass (Figure 4c,d).

3.1.3. The Basaltic and Basaltic-Andesitic Dykes

The basaltic dykes are the most common rock varieties among the mafic dyke swarm. Macroscopically, these dyke rocks are mainly massive, and the color varies from black to grayish green according to the extent of alteration. Microscopically, the basalt and basaltic-andesite dykes are composed of plagioclase of a labradorite composition (An55–60), with pyroxene and olivine as principal constituents. Sometimes, minor amounts of chlorite and epidote are present as secondary minerals, while opaque minerals, apatite and zircon are the main accessories. Plagioclase is present as either tabular and prismatic phenocrysts (up to 3.5–2.5 mm) or fine-grained laths (up to 0.4 mm across) in the groundmass. The pyroxene is mainly diopside to augite in the form of euhedral to subhedral prismatic phenocrysts and granular aggregates in the groundmass. It is colorless to pale-brown and occasionally shows sector zoning. Olivine crystals present as euhedral to subhedral phenocrysts (up to 2–3 mm) and are fine-grained in groundmass (Figure 4f).

3.2. Geochemistry

3.2.1. Major Elements

The studied samples have slight alterations, characterized by a low content of LOI (1.1–3.9 wt.%), while the tephritic rocks have a high LOI that results from the presence of analcime in these rocks (Table 1). The SiO2 content, ranging from 44.8 to 59.6 wt.%, and MgO, from 0.55 to 7.96 wt.%, with Mg# = (100 × MgO/(MgO + FeOt)) of 23.80–60.25 (Table 1). The K2O/Na2O ratios vary in the range of 0.86–5.27 and their K2O content is in the range of 2.59–7.36. In addition, they are all characterized by high concentrations of Na2O + K2O (4.58–12.5 wt.%), Al2O3 (11.45–21.60 wt.%) and TiO2 (0.39–1.41 wt.%) (Table 1). In the IUGS classification (TAS diagram) total alkali versus silica plot [58], samples are mainly plot in the intersection field of basaltic-andesite, andesite, trachy basalt, basaltic trachy andesite and alkali basalt compositions (Figure 5). Using different diagrams, such as SiO2 versus K2O [6], Co versus Th [59], Ta/Yb versus Ce/Yb and Ta/Yb versus Th/Yb diagrams for dykes [60], suggested that the dykes show affinity to shoshonitic rocks (Figure 6a–c).

3.2.2. Trace Elements

The geochemical variation diagram for Cr and some large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs) against MgO show that Ni, Sc, V, Co and Cr increase and Eu, Zr, Tb, Ce, La, Sm and Nd decrease (Figure 7). A strong, positive correlation between MgO and Ni, Cr, Co, V and Sc, suggests olivine and pyroxene fractionation. These samples are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (LILE, such as K, Rb, Sr and Ba) and have a wide range of concentrations of Cr and Ni (Figure 7). They also show negative Eu anomalies with (Eu/Eu*) ratios ranging from 0.80 to 0.97 for basalts, 0.72 to 0.91 for the andesites and 0.78 to 0.87 for the tephrites (Table 1). Primitive mantle-normalized, trace element spider diagrams for dykes are presented in Figure 8a,b, and all the samples are mainly characterized by strong enrichment in LILEs (e.g., Rb, Ba, U, K and Th). They are also characterized by conspicuous negative anomalies of HFSEs, including Nb, Ta and Ti, relative to LREEs (Figure 8a). The depletion in Nb–Ta is commonly considered to be a typical feature of subduction-related magmatism. The enrichment in LILEs and depletion in HFSEs are considered to be main features of subduction zone-related magmas [60,61,62]. In contrast to major elements, REEs are more dependent on the mineralogy of the mantle source and, hence, reflect the process of melt formation and extraction [63]. Although various modal mineralogy and relatively different signatures of major and some trace elements characterize the lavas, they display similar chondrite-normalized REE patterns (Figure 8b). The rocks are strongly enriched in light REE (90–374 times chondrite for La) relative to HREE (6–15 times chondrite for Yb; Figure 8b). The La(n)/Yb(n) ratios vary between 13 and 40 and the (Ce/Yb) N ratio between 4.48 and 12.41 for the dyke samples. A high LREE/HREE ratio in the high-K rocks could be related to the low degree of partial melting of an enriched mantle source. REE enrichment can be controlled by many things, and the melting of garnet and phlogopite is only one aspect of them [64]. The dykes have high abundances (300 times primitive mantle) of LIL elements, such as Sr, Rb, Ba, Th, U, La, and Ce, but near-basaltic values (10 times primitive mantle) for the HFSEs, Dy, Y, Er, Yb, and Lu. They display a relative depletion of Th (10 ppm), U (1.7 ppm) and Hf (4.9 ppm) (Figure 8b).

3.2.3. Sr–Nd Isotope Geochemistry

The Nd–Sr isotopic ratios of the dyke swarm rocks are given in Table 2. The initial (43 Ma) 87Sr/86Sr ratio of these rocks varies between 0.70503 and 0.70534, and it has variable εNd (t) values (1.96 to −1.46). Their initial 143Nd/144Nd ratio shows a narrow range between 0.51255 and 0.51273. The 147Sm/144Nd versus 143Nd/144Nd diagram, on which all nine data points for the dyke swarm rocks in Table 2 have been plotted, and all the samples plotted in the mantle array field display a tendency to enrich the mantle source (Figure 9).

3.2.4. Zircon U–Pb Isotopic Dating

Zircons from these rocks show complex morphologies and a variety of internal structures, as revealed by CL images (Figure 10). The analyzed zircons are euhedral and show prismatic forms. They are relatively small, with an average length of the long axis being ~50–200 μm, and the length-to-width ratios about 2:1. All zircons are transparent and colorless, and they show oscillatory zoning indicative of magmatic growth. Therefore, the ages obtained from the U–Pb isotopic data are interpreted as representing the timing of crystallization of the dated zircons and, thus, the timing of the emplacement of the rocks. The U–Pb age results are plotted in Concordia diagrams in Figure 11. Twenty-two spots on zircon subhedral based on grain morphology were measured, and the analytical results are presented in Table 3. These zircons have moderate U (146–3228 ppm) and Th (108–1889 ppm) contents, and Th/U ratios between 0.39 and 1.28. Twenty-two analyses were conducted with 21 zircons, which yield a mean age at 44.3 ± 1.8 Ma, indicating that they conform to the Eocene period (Lutetian stage) (Figure 11), which we interpret as the time of crystallization of the swarm dyke’s magmas.

4. Discussion

4.1. Partial Melting

Potassium-rich magmatic rocks occur widely in different tectono-magmatic environments, such as in continental active margins and in post-collision and within plate settings [67,68,69,70,71]. It is widely accepted that the Late Cenozoic magmatism in the Mediterranean–Iran regions occurred in a post-collisional setting and resulted from the partial melting of a subduction-related metasomatized sub-continental lithospheric mantle [37,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Most of the high-K rocks from the Anatolian plateau are thought to have been derived from the partial melting of a mantle source, either contaminated by multi-stages of oceanic subduction events during a long period and/or contaminated by continental subduction [77,81,82]. The whole-rock composition of studied samples indicates that the SiO2 content of samples varies from 46 to 51.3% and the Mg# range is about 43 to 60, which is suggestive of a mantle-derived source. Furthermore, the dyke swarms of northeast of Meshkinshahr are enriched in LILEs and LREEs relative to the primary mantle and indicate quite a flat HREE pattern (Figure 9). The lack of garnet in the mantle source indicates partial melting of the shallow upper mantle at less than ~75 km [83]. In comparison with typical mid-ocean ridge basalts, the samples have much higher HFSE/HREE and LREE/HREE ratios (e.g., Figure 8a). This finding indicates that either the mantle source of the studied samples was significantly more enriched in incompatible elements than DMM, or that the degree of partial melting beneath the 45 km-thick Iranian microplate crust was considerably lower than the ~5–15% expected for typical MORB-source mantle [84]. Both conclusions are likely to be valid, as low-degree melting will preferentially sample more fertile and, thus, more incompatible element-enriched sources. The incompatible element-enriched signature of the studied samples relative to MORB and mantle array is obvious on a Th/Yb vs. Ta/Yb plot (Figure 13). Samples also have high Th/Yb ratios, which are taken to reflect, in the absence of evidence for widespread crustal contamination, the presence of a subduction-modified mantle source. Additional evidence for a subduction-modified source comes from the negative Nb–Ta anomalies on the normalized plots (Figure 6a), reflecting the preservation of these HFSEs in insoluble components, such as rutile in the subducting slab (e.g., [85,86]). Furthermore, Sr and Nd radiogenic isotopic data preclude the depleted mantle source and the possibility of extensive contamination crustal for the genesis of Meshkinshahr dike swarm samples. The plot of Dy/Dy* vs. Dy/Yb with extended Dy/Yb (Figure 12a) shows that the dyke swarms northeast of Meshkinshahr are enriched in LILEs and LREEs relative to the primary mantle and mark the presence of crustal components. In Figure 12b, we modeled REE abundances and ratios (samples with SiO2 < 54%) to constrain the source characteristics of the dyke swarm magma(s) in terms of REE concentrations, source mineralogy and degree of partial melting. The modeling uses the non-modal batch melting equations of [87] and the REE partition coefficient compilation of [88,89]. We used two different reference compositions to define the likely mantle array: (1) the depleted MORB mantle (DMM), which is assumed here to represent the conversion of the asthenospheric mantle to the composition of the hypothetical depleted MORB source proposed by [88]; and (2) the primitive mantle (PM from [90]), which is representative of the initial mantle composition prior to MORB formation and depletion. The results of modeling are first examined in terms of the concentrations of the highly incompatible element La and less incompatible element Sm. Neither La nor Sm is affected significantly by variations in the source mineralogy (e.g., garnet or spinel) and, thus, they can provide information on the bulk chemical composition of the source. Figure 12b shows that variable degrees of partial melting of a spinel lherzolite source cannot explain the composition of the studied rocks, as these plots are well above the mantle array and spinel lherzolite melting trends. However, the plotted samples are also below the garnet lherzolite melting trend, even for an enriched mantle composition. In order for garnet lherzolite to be a viable source for mineralogy, the partition coefficients used would have to be significantly erroneous (for Yb in particular), yet these values are well established. The simplest model to account for the REE systematics of the dyke samples, thus, involves garnet + spinel mantle mineralogy. The melt modeling presented above shows that the source of rocks is enriched in LREE relative to DMM (and PM). These features suggest that the dyke swarm were derived from small degrees of the partial melting of subduction-metasomatized (subcontinental) lithospheric mantle source. However, the mixing of melts from the two types of mantle source is suggested based on trace elements ratios (Figure 12a,b). This scenario is very consistent with those of the other post-collisional magmatic rocks from the Turkish–Iranian high plateau [25,35,91,92,93,94]. Slab break-off and/or partial delamination (due to the roll-back of the subducting Tethyan lithosphere) of the mantle lithosphere associated with the partial melting of clinopyroxene–amphibole–garnet (and/or phlogopite)-rich metasomatic veins in the lithospheric mantle in a post-collisional setting have been suggested as likely processes [25]. In this model, the first batches of lava were derived mainly from the metasomatic veins and are mostly ultrapotassic as compared to the later high-K calc-alkaline and/or shoshonitic products, which were suggested to have resulted from the melting of veins surrounding peridotites [95,96]. Continental collision led to slab break-off and the development of an asthenospheric window, facilitating the partial melting of the subduction-contaminated sub-continental lithospheric mantle and generating the high-K rocks as well as adakites in the region [25,97].

4.2. Fractional Crystallization

The major element trends are a reflection of the modifications taking place during differentiation. The trend for the dyke swarm shows the classical hallmarks of crystal fractionation, with inflections in the Harker diagrams for the positive trend of FeOt, P2O5, TiO2 and CaO (Figure 7). CaO decreased equally for all samples, when using decreasing MgO as a differentiation index, suggesting that the melts experienced some plagioclase, clinopyroxene and presumably olivine fractionation. Fractionation trends based on MgO, Al2O3 and CaO are supported by decreasing Cr, Ni, Sc and Co, which typically partition into olivine and clinopyroxene. Fe-Ti oxide is observed as a phenocryst phase with SiO2 contents below 48%, so the depletion in TiO2 and P2O5 may be caused by the earlier onset of Ti-bearing magnetite and apatite fractionation. This can be caused by a high concentration of water in the magma, as this depresses the liquid temperatures of the silicates more than that of non-silicate minerals [108,109], although the fractionation of amphibole may also help to deplete the residual liquids in iron [110]. On the other hand, the Th/Nb vs. Ta/Yb diagram of Pearce (1982) shows the effects of fractional crystallization (FC) and assimilation–fractional crystallization (AFC) processes on magma evolution (Figure 13). These ratios are almost independent of fractional crystallization and/or partial melting (with pyroxenes and feldspars as the dominant crystallizing or residual phases), and thus highlight source variations and crustal assimilation. Basaltic magmas derived from the mantle asthenosphere (depleted MORB mantle; DMM), plume asthenosphere or mantle lithosphere are enriched by small degree melts from the asthenosphere, and all lie within or close to a diagonal mantle array defined by constant Th/Ta ratios. Source region metasomatism caused by subduction processes, however, results in an enrichment of Th with respect to Ta and, hence, in Th/Yb ratios higher than Ta/Yb, as subduction components in general carry Th, but not Ta or Yb. Crustal contamination may also increase Th/Yb ratios relative to Ta/Yb ratios because of higher abundances of Th relative to Ta in the crustal rocks (except for the granulite facies crust, which has low Th contents). Figure 13 shows that all rocks are displaced to high Th/Yb ratios relative to the mantle array. Although the effects of crustal contamination on magma compositions are difficult to distinguish from those of metasomatism caused by subduction processes, the significantly high Th/Yb ratio for the most basic sample rocks is unlikely to be explained solely by crustal contamination. We have used a Sm-Rb log–log bivariate diagram to evaluate the variations in trace element concentrations within the shoshonitic series (Figure 14). We use Rb as a fractionation index because it is highly incompatible throughout differentiation, and Sm, because its higher KD for amphibole/liquid compared with pyroxene/liquid separates hydrous from anhydrous crystallization assemblages (Table 4). Theoretical crystallization linear trends are also shown on this plot for specific mineral or relevant mineral assemblages. The data generally follow one trend. The Sm content of the dyke swarm rocks exhibit a positive correlation with the Rb content, which can be explained by plagioclase, clinopyroxene and olivine crystallization according to the theoretical Rayleigh vectors. The theoretical vector calculated using the average mineral assemblage of dyke swarm rocks (Plg 15% + Cpx 60% + Ol 25%; shown as vector 2) is sub-parallel to the observed fractionation trend.

4.3. Geodynamic Implications

The origin and evolution of magmatic rocks along convergent plate margins involve a series of processes [112], including the metasomatism of the mantle wedge by melt and/or fluids released by the down-going slab [60,113,114], the variable degree of partial melting of the metasomatized mantle [115] and the subsequent processes at shallower depths, such as magma mixing, assimilation, fractionation, contamination [116] and/or combinations of these processes [77,96]. The Meshkinshahr dyke swarm rocks are characterized by a fractionated REE pattern, with a high LREE/HREE ratio, resembling shoshonitic rocks from active continental margins and/or post-collisional magmatism after the closure of oceanic basins. The depletion in high field strength elements and enrichment in large lithophile elements are conspicuous. Such shoshonitic volcanism is characteristic of the Turkish–Iranian high plateau. The interaction with crustal rocks and/or derivation from a subduction-contaminated source is also clear from the Th/Yb versus Ta/Yb diagram [117]. In this diagram, the studied dykes showed a higher Th/Yb ratio far from within plate mantle trend, resembling the lava that erupted above an active continental margin (Figure 15a). Higher Th content could have also resulted from the interaction of ascending lava with crustal rocks, via assimilation–fractional crystallization (AFC) processes. The dyke swarm rocks developed in active continental margins, as shown by the Ta/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram of [118] (Figure 15a). The studied samples show an island arc lava characterization in the Zr versus Ti diagram [60] (Figure 15b). The investigated dyke samples in Zr/Y versus Nb/Y and Nb/Th versus Zr/Nb diagrams [119] form an island arc tectonic setting field (Figure 14). These observations and isotopic characteristics of the lava suggest that their magmas were probably derived from the partial melting of a subduction-metasomatized continental lithospheric mantle in the garnet/spinel lherzolite field [25]. This caused localized upwelling in the metasomatized mantle wedge, leading to partial melting that formed the Tertiary magmatism of the Urmia–Dokhtar and Alborz–Azerbaijan zones. Due to subduction, the Neotethys Ocean closing and the post-collision processes, several porphyry copper deposits were formed [120,121]. Eocene to Oligo–Miocene lava and associated plutonic rocks with high-K calc-alkaline or potassic affinities occur only in Armenia and the northwest of Iran [122,123,124]. Widespread volcanism across the Turkish–Iranian plateau throughout the Late Cenozoic until the Plio–Quaternary is strictly ascribed to post-collisional mantle upwelling during slab steeping and break-off beneath a subduction–accretion complex [33,125]. We suggest that slab break-off is an effective mechanism for heating and causes the partial melting of subduction, changing the sub-continental mantle and generating mafic shoshonitic magma in the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt and in Ahar–Arasbaran and Central Iran. Following the detachment of the subducting oceanic slab, the negative buoyancy of the under-plated Arabian crust and the asthenospheric upwelling generated the rapid post-collisional uplift of the accreted Iranian microplate. This uplift, in turn, led to in-crustal exhumation, tectonic extension and the formation of a core complex in the crystalline basement rocks in the region [126,127,128]. The tectonic extension is accompanied by crustal thinning, normal fault generation and a swarm dyke propagation setting, which facilitated the rapid ascent of magma to the crustal level with low contamination in the Meshkinshahr area, NW Iran.

5. Conclusions

Shoshonitic mafic dyke swarms with a basalt, tephrite to andesitic composition were developed during the Eocene in NE Meshkinshahr, NW Iran.
Geochemically, the studied samples show a compositional range from 44.8 to 59.6 wt.% SiO2, with high K2O, similar trace elements and REE patterns, strong enrichments in Rb, Ba, Th and La and troughs in Nb, Ta and Zr relative to primitive mantle, indicating a subduction-modified lithospheric mantle.
The initial 143Nd/144Nd and 87Sr/86Sr ratios of studied volcanic rocks were plotted in the mantle array field with slightly enriched sources, supporting the idea that the metasomatized lithospheric mantle was the source, generating subduction-related fluids.
Continental collision between Arabia and Eurasia led to slab break-off and the development of an asthenospheric window, facilitating the partial melting of the subduction-contaminated sub-continental lithospheric mantle, resulting in the production of mafic alkaline potassic magma.
The slab break-off was followed by crustal thinning, tectonic extension, normal fault generation and a swarm dyke propagation setting, which facilitated rapid ascent of the magma to the crustal level in the Meshkinshahr area, NW Iran.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., A.J., S.A. and A.A.K.; methodology, M.F., A.J., S.A., W.X., and A.A.K.; field investigation, M.F., A.J. and A.A.K.; data curation, M.F., A.J., S.A., W.X. and A.A.K.; writing— original draft preparation, M.F., A.J., S.A. and A.A.K.; writing—review and editing, M.F. and A.A.K.; supervision, M.F., A.J., S.A., and W.X.; funding acquisition, M.F., A.J., S.A., W.X. and A.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 41822204 and 41888101).

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The first author (HSM) thanks Y. Ersoy for providing him with the latest version of FC–AFC–FCA and mixing modeler software.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bleeker, W.; Ernst, R. Short-lived mantle generated magmatic events and their dyke swarms: The key unlocking Earth’s paleogeographic record back to 2.6 Ga. In Dyke Swarms—Time Markers of Crustal Evolution, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, IDC-5, Rovaniemi, Finland, 31 July–3 August 2005; Hanski, E., Mertanen, S., Rämö, T., Vuollo, J., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–24. ISBN 0-415-39899-1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Halls, H.C. The Importance and Potential of Mafic Dyke Swarms in Studies of Geodynamic Processes. Geosci. Can. 1982, 9, 3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Srivastava, R.K. Dyke Swarms: Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Joplin, G.A. The problem of the potash-rich basaltic rocks. Miner. Mag. J. Miner. Soc. 1965, 34, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keller, J. Petrology of some volcanic rock series of the Aeolian arc, Southern Tyrrhenian Sea: Calc-alkaline and shoshonitic associations. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 1974, 46, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peccerillo, A.; Taylor, S.R. Geochemistry of eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, Northern Turkey. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 1976, 58, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morrison, G.W. Characteristics and tectonic setting of the shoshonite rock association. Lithos 1980, 13, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peccerillo, A. Potassic and ultrapotassic rocks: Compositional characteristics, petrogenesis, and geologic significance. Episodes 1992, 15, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Müller, D.; Groves, D.I. Potassic Igneous Rocks and Associated Gold-Copper Mineralization, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell, I.H.; Stepanov, A.S.; Liang, H.-Y.; Allen, C.M.; Norman, M.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Xie, Y.-W. The origin of shoshonites: New insights from the Tertiary high-potassium intrusions of eastern Tibet. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2014, 167, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Y.-H.; Jiang, S.-Y.; Ling, H.-F.; Zhou, X.-R.; Rui, X.-J.; Yang, W.-Z. Petrology and geochemistry of shoshonitic plutons from the western Kunlun orogenic belt, Xinjiang, northwestern China: Implications for granitoid geneses. Lithos 2002, 63, 165–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Küster, D.; Harms, U. Post-collisional potassic granitoids from the southern and northwestern parts of the Late Neoproterozoic East African Orogen: A review. Lithos 1998, 45, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wyllie, P.J.; Sekine, T. The formation of mantle phlogopite in subduction zone hybridization. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 1982, 79, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Topuz, G.; Okay, A.; Altherr, R.; Schwarz, W.H.; Siebel, W.; Zack, T.; Satır, M.; Şen, C. Post-collisional adakite-like magmatism in the Ağvanis Massif and implications for the evolution of the Eocene magmatism in the Eastern Pontides (NE Turkey). Lithos 2011, 125, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stocklin, J. Structural History and Tectonics of Iran: A Review. AAPG Bull. 1968, 52, 1229–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berberian, M.; King, G.C.P. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Can. J. Earth Sci. 1981, 18, 210–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McQuarrie, N.; Stock, J.M.; Verdel, C.; Wernicke, B.P. Cenozoic evolution of Neotethys and implications for the causes of plate motions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Şengör, A.M.C. A new model for the late Palaeozoic—Mesozoic tectonic evolution of Iran and implications for Oman. Geol. Soc. London Spéc. Publ. 1990, 49, 797–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amidi, S.M.; Emami, M.H.; Michel, R. Alkaline character of Eocene volcanism in the middle part of central Iran and its geodynamic situation. Geol. Rundsch. 1984, 73, 917–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verdel, C.; Wernicke, B.P.; Hassanzadeh, J.; Guest, B. A Paleogene extensional arc flare-up in Iran. Tectonics 2011, 30, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Agard, P.; Omrani, J.; Jolivet, L.; Whitechurch, H.; Vrielynck, B.; Spakman, W.; Monié, P.; Meyer, B.; Wortel, R. Zagros orogeny: A subduction-dominated process. Geol. Mag. 2011, 148, 692–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Aftabi, A.; Atapour, H. Regional aspects of shoshonitic volcanism in Iran. Episodes 2000, 23, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alberti, A.; Comin-Chiaramonti, P.; Di Battistini, G.; Fioriti, R.; Sinigei, S. Crystal Fractionation in the eastern Azerbaijan (Iran) Lower Tertiary shoshonitic suite. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineral. Monatshefte 1981, 1, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  24. Comin-Chiaramonti, P.; Meriani, S.; Mosca, R.; Sinigoi, S. On the occurrence of analcime in the northeastern Azerbaijan volcanics (northwestern Iran). Lithos 1979, 12, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dilek, Y.; Imamverdiyev, N.; Şafak, A. Geochemistry and tectonics of Cenozoic volcanism in the Lesser Caucasus (Azerbaijan) and the peri-Arabian region: Collision-induced mantle dynamics and its magmatic fingerprint. Int. Geol. Rev. 2009, 52, 536–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Haghipour, A.; Aghanabati, A. Geological Map of Iran (Scale 1:2,500,000); Geological Survey of Iran: Tehran, Iran, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lescuyer, J.L.; Riou, R. Géologie de la Région de Mianeh (Azerbaijan): Contribution à L’étude du Volcanisme Tertiaire de L’Iran; Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble: Grenoble, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lotfi, M. Geology and Petrology of Mianeh, Azerbaijan Area; Tehran University: Tehran, Iran, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sauter, D.; Cannat, M.; Rouméjon, S.; Andreani, M.; Birot, D.; Bronner, A.; Brunelli, D.; Carlut, J.; Delacour, A.; Guyader, V.; et al. Continuous exhumation of mantle-derived rocks at the Southwest Indian Ridge for 11 million years. Nat. Geosci. 2013, 6, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Whitechurch, H.; Omrani, J.; Agard, P.; Humbert, F.; Montigny, R.; Jolivet, L. Evidence for Paleocene–Eocene evolution of the foot of the Eurasian margin (Kermanshah ophiolite, SW Iran) from back-arc to arc: Implications for regional geodynamics and obduction. Lithos 2013, 182–183, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dhont, D.; Chorowicz, J. Review of the neotectonics of the Eastern Turkish–Armenian Plateau by geomorphic analysis of digital elevation model imagery. Geol. Rundsch. 2005, 95, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dilek, Y.; Şafak, A. Geochemical and temporal evolution of Cenozoic magmatism in western Turkey: Mantle response to collision, slab break-off, and lithospheric tearing in an orogenic belt. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spéc. Publ. 2009, 311, 213–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Keskin, M. Magma generation by slab steepening and breakoff beneath a subduction-accretion complex: An alternative model for collision-related volcanism in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kheirkhah, M.; Allen, M.; Emami, M. Quaternary syn-collision magmatism from the Iran/Turkey borderlands. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2009, 182, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pearce, J.; Bender, J.; de Long, S.; Kidd, W.; Low, P.; Güner, Y.; Saroglu, F.; Yilmaz, Y.; Moorbath, S.; Mitchell, J. Genesis of collision volcanism in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1990, 44, 189–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Riou, R.; Dupuy, C.; Dostal, J. Geochemistry of coexisting alkaline and calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from northern Azerbaijan (N.W. Iran). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1981, 11, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Göçmengil, G.; Karacik, Z.; Genç, Ş.C.; Billor, M.Z. 40Ar-39Ar geochronology and petrogenesis of postcollisional trachytic volcanism along the İzmir-Ankara-Erzincan Suture Zone (NE, Turkey)*. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 2018, 27, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Emami, M.H. Geologie de la Region de Qom. Aran (Iran) Contribution an I’etude Dynamique Etgeochemique du Volcanisme Tertiaire I’Iran Central. Earth Grenoble 1981, 21, 489. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ghasemi-Barghi, A.; Vosoughi–Abedini, M.; Pourmoafee, M. Petrography, Geochemistry and geodynamic of moradloo dikes, Northwest of Ardebil (NW Iran). Geosciences 2006, 16, 92–107. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassanzadeh, J. Metallogenic and Tectonomagmatic Events in the SE Sector of Cenozoic Active Continental Margin of Central Iran (Shahr-e Babak Area, Kerman Province); University of California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moradian, A. Petrological and Economical Evaluation of Feldspathoidal Rocks of Northern Shahr-e Babak, Kerman. Master’s Thesis, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  42. Aftabi, A.; Atapour, H. Geochemical and petrological characteristics of shoshonitic and potassic calcalkaline magmatism at Sarcheshmeh and Dehsiahan porphyry copper deposits, Kerman, Iran. Res. Bull. Isfahan Univ. 1997, 9, 127–156. [Google Scholar]
  43. Atapour, H. Petrology and Geochemistry of Shoshonitic Association of Goud-e-Biabani Bardsir Area, Kerman Province. Master’s Thesis, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran, 1994. (In Persian). [Google Scholar]
  44. Fadaeian, M.; Jahangiri, A.; Moayyed, M. Mineral chemistry, thermobarometry and genesis of Clinopyroxenes in dyke swarm of northeast of meshkinshahr, NW Iran. Journal of Geoscience 2016, 25, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stöcklin, J. Structural Correlation of the Alpine Ranges between Iran and Central Asia; Memoire Hors Serie; Societe Geologique de France: Paris, France, 1977; Volume 8, pp. 333–353. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nabavi, M.H. An introduction to the geology of Iran. Geol. Surv. Iran 1976, 109. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nezafati, N. Au-Sn-W-Cu-Mineralization in the Astaneh-Sarband Area, West Central Iran including a Comparison of the Ores with Ancient Bronze Artifacts from Western Asia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  48. Alberti, A.A.; Comin-Chiaramonti, P.; Sinigoi, S.; Nicoletti, M.; Petrucciani, C. Neogene and quaternary volcanism in Eastern Azerbaijan (Iran): Some K-Ar age determinations and geodynamic implications. Geol. Rundsch. 1980, 69, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Didon, J.; Germain, Y.M. Le Sabalan, Volcan Plio-quaternaire de l’Azerbaidjan Oriental (Iran): Étude Géologique et Pétrographique de L’édifice et de son Environnement Régional. Doctoral Dissertation, Universite Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  50. Babakhani, A.; Khan-Nazar, H. Geological Map of Lahrud Area (1:100000); Geological Survey of Iran: Tehran, Iran, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  51. Alberti, A.; Battistini, G.; Nicoletti, M.; Petruciani, C.; Sinigoi, S. Geochronology of the Eastern Azerbaijan volcanic plateau (northwest Iran). Rend. Soc. Ital. Min. Petrol. 1976, 32, 579–589. [Google Scholar]
  52. Li, C.-F.; Li, X.-H.; Li, Q.-L.; Guo, J.-H.; Li, X.-H.; Feng, L.-J.; Chu, Z.-Y. Simultaneous Determination of 143Nd/144Nd and 147Sm/144Nd Ratios and Sm–Nd Contents from the Same Filament Loaded with Purified Sm–Nd Aliquot from Geological Samples by Isotope Dilution Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 6040–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, C.-F.; Li, X.-H.; Li, Q.; Guo, J.-H.; Li, X.-H.; Yang, Y.-H. Rapid and precise determination of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios in geological samples from the same filament loading by thermal ionization mass spectrometry employing a single-step separation scheme. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 727, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xie, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Wu, F. In situ simultaneous determination of trace elements, U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes in zircon and baddeleyite. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Andersen, T. Correction of common lead in U–Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb. Chem. Geol. 2002, 192, 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ludwig, K.R. User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication; Berkeley Geochronology Center: Berkeley, CA, USA; pp. 238–249.
  57. Whitney, D.; Evans, B.W. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. Am. Miner. 2009, 95, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Middlemost, E.A.K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hastie, A.R.; Kerr, A.C.; Pearce, J.A.; Mitchell, S. Classification of Altered Volcanic Island Arc Rocks using Immobile Trace Elements: Development of the Th–Co Discrimination Diagram. J. Pet. 2007, 48, 2341–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Pearce, J.A. Trace element characteristics of lavas from destructive plate boundaries. In Andesites: Orogenic Andesites and Related Rocks; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pearce, J.A.; Cann, J.R. Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1973, 19, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pearce, J.A.; Peate, D.W. Tectonic Implications of the Composition of Volcanic ARC Magmas. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1995, 23, 251–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hofmann, A.W.; Jochum, K.P. Source characteristics derived from very incompatible trace elements in Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea basalts, Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 1996, 101, 11831–11839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, Z.; Xiao, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Kusky, T.M. Post-collisional Plio-Pleistocene shoshonitic volcanism in the western Kunlun Mountains, NW China: Geochemical constraints on mantle source characteristics and petrogenesis. J. Southeast Asian Earth Sci. 2008, 31, 379–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.-S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liew, T.C.; Hofmann, A.W. Precambrian crustal components, plutonic associations, plate environment of the Hercynian Fold Belt of central Europe: Indications from a Nd and Sr isotopic study. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 1988, 98, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elitok, Ö.; Özgür, N.; Drüppel, K.; Dilek, Y.; Platevoet, B.; Guillou, H.; Poisson, A.; Scaillet, S.; Satır, M.; Siebel, W.; et al. Origin and geodynamic evolution of late Cenozoic potassium-rich volcanism in the Isparta area, southwestern Turkey. Int. Geol. Rev. 2009, 52, 454–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Eyuboglu, Y. Late Cretaceous high-K volcanism in the eastern Pontide orogenic belt: Implications for the geodynamic evolution of NE Turkey. Int. Geol. Rev. 2009, 52, 142–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lu, Y.-J.; Kerrich, R.; Cawood, P.A.; McCuaig, T.C.; Hart, C.J.; Li, Z.-X.; Hou, Z.-Q.; Bagas, L. Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology of potassic felsic intrusions in western Yunnan, SW China: Constraints on the relationship of magmatism to the Jinsha suture. Gondwana Res. 2012, 22, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mitchell, R.; Smith, C.; Vladykin, N. Isotopic composition of strontium and neodymium in potassic rocks of the Little Murun complex, Aldan Shield, Siberia. Lithos 1994, 32, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rock, N.M.S.; Groves, D.I. Geochemical discrimination between shoshonitic and potassic volcanic rocks in different tectonic settings: A pilot study. Miner. Pet. 1992, 46, 259–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aldanmaz, E.; Pearce, J.; Thirlwall, M.; Mitchell, J. Petrogenetic evolution of late Cenozoic, post-collision volcanism in western Anatolia, Turkey. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2000, 102, 67–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alıcı, P.; Temel, A.; Gourgaud, A.; Kieffer, G.; Gündoğdu, M. Petrology and geochemistry of potassic rocks in the Gölcük area (Isparta, SW Turkey): Genesis of enriched alkaline magmas. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1998, 85, 423–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Şafak, A.; Genc, S. Petrogenesis and time-progressive evolution of the Cenozoic continental volcanism in the Biga Peninsula, NW Anatolia (Turkey). Lithos 2008, 102, 316–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Şafak, A.; Dilek, Y.; Genc, S.; Sunal, G.; Gertisser, R.; Furnes, H.; Foland, K.A.; Yang, J. Spatial, temporal and geochemical evolution of Oligo–Miocene granitoid magmatism in western Anatolia, Turkey. Gondwana Res. 2012, 21, 961–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ersoy, E.Y.; Helvacı, C.; Uysal, I.; Karaoğlu, Ö.; Palmer, M.R.; Dindi, F. Petrogenesis of the Miocene volcanism along the İzmir-Balıkesir Transfer Zone in western Anatolia, Turkey: Implications for origin and evolution of potassic volcanism in post-collisional areas. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2012, 241–242, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ersoy, E.Y.; Helvacı, C.; Palmer, M.R. Mantle source characteristics and melting models for the early-middle Miocene mafic volcanism in Western Anatolia: Implications for enrichment processes of mantle lithosphere and origin of K-rich volcanism in post-collisional settings. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2010, 198, 112–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kirchenbaur, M.; Münker, C.; Schuth, S.; Marchev, P.; Garbe-Schönberg, D. Tectonomagmatic Constraints on the Sources of Eastern Mediterranean K-rich Lavas. J. Pet. 2011, 53, 27–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gülmez, F.; Genc, S.; Prelević, D.; Tüysüz, O.; Karacik, Z.; Roden, M.F.; Billor, Z. Ultrapotassic Volcanism from the Waning Stage of the Neotethyan Subduction: A Key Study from the Izmir–Ankara–Erzincan Suture Belt, Central Northern Turkey. J. Pet. 2016, 57, 561–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Karacık, Z.; Yılmaz, Y.; Pearce, J.A.; Ece, Ö.I. Petrochemistry of the south Marmara granitoids, northwest Anatolia, Turkey. Geol. Rundsch. 2007, 97, 1181–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ersoy, Y.E.; Helvacı, C.; Palmer, M.R. Petrogenesis of the Neogene volcanic units in the NE–SW-trending basins in western Anatolia, Turkey. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2012, 163, 379–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Moine-Vaziri, H.; Khalili Marandi, S.H.; Brousse, R. Importance doun volcanism potassique, au Miocene Superier, en Azerbaijan, Iran. Comp. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1991, 313, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar]
  83. Robinson, J.C.; Wood, B.J. The depth of the spinel to garnet transition at the peridotite solidus. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1998, 164, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Niu, Y.; Hékinian, R. Spreading-rate dependence of the extent of mantle melting beneath ocean ridges. Nature 1997, 385, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. McCulloch, M.; Gamble, J. Geochemical and geodynamical constraints on subduction zone magmatism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1991, 102, 358–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Litasov, K.D.; Foley, S.F.; Litasov, Y.D. Magmatic modification and metasomatism of the subcontinental mantle beneath the Vitim volcanic field (East Siberia): Evidence from trace element data on pyroxenite and peridotite xenoliths from Miocene picrobasalt. Lithos 2000, 54, 83–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shaw, D.M. Trace element fractionation during anatexis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1970, 34, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. McKenzie, D.; O’Nions, R.K. Partial Melt Distributions from Inversion of Rare Earth Element Concentrations. J. Pet. 1991, 32, 1021–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. McKenzie, D.; O’Nions, R.K. The Source Regions of Ocean Island Basalts. J. Pet. 1995, 36, 133–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sun, S.-s.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. In Geological Society, London, Special Publications; Geological Society of London: London, UK, 1989; Volume 42, pp. 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eyuboglu, Y.; Santosh, M.; Yi, K.; Bektaş, O.; Kwon, S. Discovery of Miocene adakitic dacite from the Eastern Pontides Belt (NE Turkey) and a revised geodynamic model for the late Cenozoic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean region. Lithos 2012, 146-147, 218–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhilong, H.; Chongqiang, L.; Hailing, Y.; Cheng, X.; Runsheng, H.; Yunhua, X.; Bo, Z.; Wenbo, L. The geochemistry of lamprophyres in the Laowangzhai gold deposits, Yunnan Province, China: Implications for its characteristics of source region. Geochem. J. 2002, 36, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Keskin, M.; Pearce, J.; Mitchell, J. Volcano-stratigraphy and geochemistry of collision-related volcanism on the Erzurum–Kars Plateau, northeastern Turkey. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1998, 85, 355–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yılmaz, Y.; Güner, Y.; Şaroğlu, F. Geology of the quaternary volcanic centres of the east Anatolia. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1998, 85, 173–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Conticelli, S.; Avanzinelli, R.; Poli, G.; Braschi, E.; Giordano, G. Shift from lamproite-like to leucititic rocks: Sr–Nd–Pb isotope data from the Monte Cimino volcanic complex vs. the Vico stratovolcano, Central Italy. Chem. Geol. 2013, 353, 246–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ersoy, E.Y.; Helvacı, C. FC–AFC–FCA and mixing modeler: A Microsoft® Excel© spreadsheet program for modeling geochemical differentiation of magma by crystal fractionation, crustal assimilation and mixing. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Agard, P.; Omrani, J.; Jolivet, L.; Mouthereau, F. Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation. Geol. Rundsch. 2005, 94, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Davidson, J.P.; Turner, S.; Plank, T. Dy/Dy*: Variations Arising from Mantle Sources and Petrogenetic Processes. J. Pet. 2012, 54, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Sims, K.W.W.; DePaolo, D.J.; Murrell, M.T.; Baldridge, W.S.; Goldstein, S.J.; Clague, D.A. Mechanisms of Magma Generation Beneath Hawaii and Mid-Ocean Ridges: Uranium/Thorium and Samarium/Neodymium Isotopic Evidence. Science 1995, 267, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Sims, K.; DePaolo, D.; Murrell, M.; Baldridge, W.; Goldstein, S.; Clague, D.; Jull, M. Porosity of the melting zone and variations in the solid mantle upwelling rate beneath Hawaii: Inferences from 238U-230Th-226Ra and 235U-231Pa disequilibria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 4119–4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Beier, C.; Turner, S.; Plank, T.; White, W. A preliminary assessment of the symmetry of source composition and melting dynamics across the Azores plume. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2010, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Niu, Y.; Collerson, K.D.; Batiza, R.; Wendt, J.I.; Regelous, M. Origin of enriched-type mid-ocean ridge basalt at ridges far from mantle plumes: The East Pacific Rise at 11°20′N. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 1999, 104, 7067–7087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Regelous, M.; Niu, Y.; Wendt, J.; Batiza, R.; Greig, A.; Collerson, K. Variations in the geochemistry of magmatism on the East Pacific Rise at 10°30′N since 800 ka. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1999, 168, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Turner, S.; Beier, C.; Niu, Y.; Cook, C. U-Th-Ra disequilibria and the extent of off-axis volcanism across the East Pacific Rise at 9°30′N, 10°30′N, and 11°20′N. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2011, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Salters, V.J.M.; Stracke, A. Composition of the depleted mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2004, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Plank, T.; Langmuir, C.H. The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chem. Geol. 1998, 145, 325–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kinzler, R.J. Melting of Mantle Peridotite at Pressures Approaching the Spinel to Garnet Transition. Miner. Mag. 1994, 58A, 483–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Parat, F.; Holtz, F.; Feig, S.T. Pre-eruptive Conditions of the Huerto Andesite (Fish Canyon System, San Juan Volcanic Field, Colorado): Influence of Volatiles (C-O-H-S) on Phase Equilibria and Mineral Composition. J. Pet. 2008, 49, 911–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Sisson, T.W.; Grove, T.L. Temperatures and H2O contents of low-MgO high-alumina basalts. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 1993, 113, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Alonso-Perez, R.; Müntener, O.; Ulmer, P. Igneous garnet and amphibole fractionation in the roots of island arcs: Experimental constraints on andesitic liquids. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2009, 157, 541–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Pearce, J.A. Role of the Sub-Continental Lithosphere in Magma Genesis at Active Continental Margins. In Continental Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths; Hawkesworth, C.J., Norry, M.J., Eds.; Shiva Publications: Cheshire, UK, 1983; pp. 230–249. [Google Scholar]
  112. Eyuboglu, Y. Slab window magmatism and convergent margin tectonics. Geosci. Front. 2013, 4, 349–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hawkesworth, C.J.; Hergt, J.; Ellam, R.M.; McDermott, F. Element fluxes associated with subduction related magmatism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Phys. Eng. Sci. 1991, 335, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Khedr, M.Z.; Arai, S.; Tamura, A.; Morishita, T. Clinopyroxenes in high-P metaperidotites from Happo-O’ne, central Japan: Implications for wedge-transversal chemical change of slab-derived fluids. Lithos 2010, 119, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pearce, J.A.; Parkinson, I.J. Trace element models for mantle melting: Application to volcanic arc petrogenesis. Geol. Soc. London, Spéc. Publ. 1993, 76, 373–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. DePaolo, D.J. Trace element and isotopic effects of combined wallrock assimilation and fractional crystallization. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1981, 53, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gorton, M.P.; Schandl, E.S. From Continents to Island Arcs: A Geochemical Index of Tectonic Setting for Arc-Related and Within-Plate Felsic to Intermediate Volcanic Rocks. Can. Miner. 2000, 38, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Schandl, E.S.; Gorton, M.P. Application of High Field Strength Elements to Discriminate Tectonic Settings in Vms Environments. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Condie, K.C. High field strength element ratios in Archean basalts: A window to evolving sources of mantle plumes? Lithos 2005, 79, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Moayyed, M. Petrologic Studies of Tertiary Volcano-Plutonic Belt in Western Alborz-Azerbaijan, with a Special Focus on Hashtchin Area, Iran. Ph.D. Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  121. Kamali, A.A.; Moayyed, M.; Amel, N.; Hosseinzadeh, M.R.; Mohammadiha, K.; Santos, J.F.; Brenna, M. Post-Mineralization, Cogenetic Magmatism at the Sungun Cu-Mo Porphyry Deposit (Northwest Iran): Protracted Melting and Extraction in an Arc System. Minerals 2018, 8, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Aghazadeh, M.; Castro, A.; Omran, N.R.; Emami, M.H.; Moinvaziri, H.; Badrzadeh, Z. The gabbro (shoshonitic)–monzonite–granodiorite association of Khankandi pluton, Alborz Mountains, NW Iran. J. Southeast Asian Earth Sci. 2010, 38, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Castro, A.; Aghazadeh, M.; Badrzadeh, Z.; Chichorro, M. Late Eocene–Oligocene post-collisional monzonitic intrusions from the Alborz magmatic belt, NW Iran. An example of monzonite magma generation from a metasomatized mantle source. Lithos 2013, 180–181, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Moritz, R.; Rezeau, H.; Ovtcharova, M.; Tayan, R.; Melkonyan, R.; Hovakimyan, S.; Ramazanov, V.; Selby, D.; Ulianov, A.; Chiaradia, M.; et al. Long-lived, stationary magmatism and pulsed porphyry systems during Tethyan subduction to post-collision evolution in the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, Armenia and Nakhitchevan. Gondwana Res. 2016, 37, 465–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Şengör, A.M.C.; Özeren, S.; Genç, T.; Zor, E. East Anatolian high plateau as a mantle-supported, north-south shortened domal structure. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Möritz, R.; Ghazban, F.; Singer, B.S. Eocene Gold Ore Formation at Muteh, Sanandaj-Sirjan Tectonic Zone, Western Iran: A Result of Late-Stage Extension and Exhumation of Metamorphic Basement Rocks within the Zagros Orogen. Econ. Geol. 2006, 101, 1497–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Verdel, C.; Wernicke, B.P.; Ramezani, J.; Hassanzadeh, J.; Renne, P.R.; Spell, T.L. Geology and thermochronology of Tertiary Cordilleran-style metamorphic core complexes in the Saghand region of central Iran. GSA Bull. 2007, 119, 961–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dilek, Y.; Sandvol, E. Seismic structure, crustal architecture and tectonic evolution of the Anatolian-African Plate Boundary and the Cenozoic Orogenic Belts in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spéc. Publ. 2009, 327, 127–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 12 00309 g001 550
Figure 1. Tectonic scheme of Iran with the main tectonic subdivisions, modified after [15,45,46] and publications of the Geological Survey of Iran [47].
Figure 1. Tectonic scheme of Iran with the main tectonic subdivisions, modified after [15,45,46] and publications of the Geological Survey of Iran [47].
Minerals 12 00309 g001
Minerals 12 00309 g002 550
Figure 2. Geological map of the northeast of the Meshkinshahr [50] and present work on the distribution of mafic dyke swarms is shown.
Figure 2. Geological map of the northeast of the Meshkinshahr [50] and present work on the distribution of mafic dyke swarms is shown.
Minerals 12 00309 g002
Minerals 12 00309 g003 550
Figure 3. Outcrop photos of dykes and their host volcanic breccia. (a) Crossed tephritic dykes intruded into the north of the study area. (b) A basaltic dyke intruded in the volcanic breccia in the west of the study area. (c) A NE–SW tephritic dyke cuts across a NW–SE dyke in the east of study area. (d) Three tephritic dykes intruded in the volcanic breccia with along a parallel NW-SE strike. (e) An andesitic dyke with a width of 5 m in the northern region. (f) Some tephritic and basaltic dykes that outcrop in the study area.
Figure 3. Outcrop photos of dykes and their host volcanic breccia. (a) Crossed tephritic dykes intruded into the north of the study area. (b) A basaltic dyke intruded in the volcanic breccia in the west of the study area. (c) A NE–SW tephritic dyke cuts across a NW–SE dyke in the east of study area. (d) Three tephritic dykes intruded in the volcanic breccia with along a parallel NW-SE strike. (e) An andesitic dyke with a width of 5 m in the northern region. (f) Some tephritic and basaltic dykes that outcrop in the study area.
Minerals 12 00309 g003
Minerals 12 00309 g004 550
Figure 4. Photomicrographs in crossed polarized light of dyke rocks. (a) Analcime, plagioclase and amphibole in tephrite. (b) Sector-zoned clinopyroxene, plagioclase and analcime in tephrite. (c) Clinopyroxene and plagioclase phenocrysts in pyroxene andesite with porphyric texture. (d) Euhedral clinopyroxene with apatite inclusions and subhedral amphiboles in pyroxene andesites. (e) Plagioclase phenocrysts, clinopyroxene and olivine with seriate texture in andesite basalt. (f) Olivine phenocrysts and plagioclase in olivine basalt. Mineral abbreviations from [57]: Amp = amphibole, Pl = plagioclase, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Anl = analcime, AP= apatite, Afs = alkali feldspar and Ol = Olivine.
Figure 4. Photomicrographs in crossed polarized light of dyke rocks. (a) Analcime, plagioclase and amphibole in tephrite. (b) Sector-zoned clinopyroxene, plagioclase and analcime in tephrite. (c) Clinopyroxene and plagioclase phenocrysts in pyroxene andesite with porphyric texture. (d) Euhedral clinopyroxene with apatite inclusions and subhedral amphiboles in pyroxene andesites. (e) Plagioclase phenocrysts, clinopyroxene and olivine with seriate texture in andesite basalt. (f) Olivine phenocrysts and plagioclase in olivine basalt. Mineral abbreviations from [57]: Amp = amphibole, Pl = plagioclase, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Anl = analcime, AP= apatite, Afs = alkali feldspar and Ol = Olivine.
Minerals 12 00309 g004
Minerals 12 00309 g005 550
Figure 5. Total alkali versus silica (TAS) classification diagram [58].
Figure 5. Total alkali versus silica (TAS) classification diagram [58].
Minerals 12 00309 g005
Minerals 12 00309 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) SiO2 versus K2O [6]. (b) Co versus Th [59]. (c) Ta/Yb versus Ce/Yb and [60].
Figure 6. (a) SiO2 versus K2O [6]. (b) Co versus Th [59]. (c) Ta/Yb versus Ce/Yb and [60].
Minerals 12 00309 g006
Minerals 12 00309 g007 550
Figure 7. Geochemical variation diagram for Ni, Sc, V, Co, Cr, Eu, Zr, Tb, Ce, La, Sm and Nd elements against MgO.
Figure 7. Geochemical variation diagram for Ni, Sc, V, Co, Cr, Eu, Zr, Tb, Ce, La, Sm and Nd elements against MgO.
Minerals 12 00309 g007
Minerals 12 00309 g008 550
Figure 8. (a,b) Primitive mantle-normalized multi-element spider diagrams for the studied mafic dyke samples. Primitive mantle and REE chondrite values are taken from [65].
Figure 8. (a,b) Primitive mantle-normalized multi-element spider diagrams for the studied mafic dyke samples. Primitive mantle and REE chondrite values are taken from [65].
Minerals 12 00309 g008
Minerals 12 00309 g009 550
Figure 9. 87Rb/86Sr versus 87Sr/86Sr diagram for the dyke swarm rocks. All 9 samples were used in the isochron and age calculations. The bars represent the two-sigma uncertainties. 143Nd/144Nd versus 87Sr/86Sr ratio for dyke swarms with the mantle components HIMU, EM1, EM2 and DMM [63]. The positions of the main oceanic mantle reservoirs thus identified are shown: DM = depleted mantle, BSE = bulk silicate earth, EMI and EMII = enriched mantle I and II, HIMU = high mantle U/Pb ratio and PREMA = frequently observed prevalent mantle composition. Many oceanic basalts define the mantle array, and a bulk earth value for 87Sr/86Sr can be obtained from this trend.
Figure 9. 87Rb/86Sr versus 87Sr/86Sr diagram for the dyke swarm rocks. All 9 samples were used in the isochron and age calculations. The bars represent the two-sigma uncertainties. 143Nd/144Nd versus 87Sr/86Sr ratio for dyke swarms with the mantle components HIMU, EM1, EM2 and DMM [63]. The positions of the main oceanic mantle reservoirs thus identified are shown: DM = depleted mantle, BSE = bulk silicate earth, EMI and EMII = enriched mantle I and II, HIMU = high mantle U/Pb ratio and PREMA = frequently observed prevalent mantle composition. Many oceanic basalts define the mantle array, and a bulk earth value for 87Sr/86Sr can be obtained from this trend.
Minerals 12 00309 g009
Minerals 12 00309 g010 550
Figure 10. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from samples of LA-ICP-MS U–Pb analyses.
Figure 10. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from samples of LA-ICP-MS U–Pb analyses.
Minerals 12 00309 g010
Minerals 12 00309 g011 550
Figure 11. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Concordia diagrams for the investigated dykes from the NW of Iran.
Figure 11. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Concordia diagrams for the investigated dykes from the NW of Iran.
Minerals 12 00309 g011
Minerals 12 00309 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Plot of Dy/Dy* vs. Dy/Yb with extended Dy/Yb scale to show fields for MORB and OIB of [98]. The OIB field extends to a much higher Dy/Yb (Samoa Dy/Yb as high as 12), reflecting the role of residual garnet. The OIB field includes data from Hawaii [99,100] and the Azores [101]. The MORB field includes N-MORB and E-MORB data from the East Pacific Rise [102,103,104]. PM, primitive mantle [90]; DM, depleted mantle [105]; GLOSS, average global subducting sediment [106]. In this diagram, the study samples are plotted in the LREE-enriched mantle field. (b) Plot of La/Sm vs. Sm/Yb, showing melt curves (or lines) obtained using the non-modal batch melting equations of [87]. Melt curves are drawn for spinel lherzolite (with mode and melt mode of Ol 0.530 + opx0.270 + cpx0.170 + sp0.030 and ol0.060 + opx0.280 + cpx0.670 + sp0.110, respectively [107]) and for garnet lherzolite (with mode and melt mode of ol0.600 + opx0.200 + cpx0.100 + gt0.100 and ol0.030 + opx0.160 + cpx0.880 + gt0.090, respectively; Walter, 1998). Mineral/matrix partition coefficients and DMM are from the compilation of [88,89]; PM, N-MORB and E-MORB compositions are from [90]. The heavy line represents the mantle array defined using DMM and PM compositions. Dashed and solid curves (or lines) are the melting trends from DMM. Thick marks on each curve (or line) correspond to degrees of partial melting for a given mantle source.
Figure 12. (a) Plot of Dy/Dy* vs. Dy/Yb with extended Dy/Yb scale to show fields for MORB and OIB of [98]. The OIB field extends to a much higher Dy/Yb (Samoa Dy/Yb as high as 12), reflecting the role of residual garnet. The OIB field includes data from Hawaii [99,100] and the Azores [101]. The MORB field includes N-MORB and E-MORB data from the East Pacific Rise [102,103,104]. PM, primitive mantle [90]; DM, depleted mantle [105]; GLOSS, average global subducting sediment [106]. In this diagram, the study samples are plotted in the LREE-enriched mantle field. (b) Plot of La/Sm vs. Sm/Yb, showing melt curves (or lines) obtained using the non-modal batch melting equations of [87]. Melt curves are drawn for spinel lherzolite (with mode and melt mode of Ol 0.530 + opx0.270 + cpx0.170 + sp0.030 and ol0.060 + opx0.280 + cpx0.670 + sp0.110, respectively [107]) and for garnet lherzolite (with mode and melt mode of ol0.600 + opx0.200 + cpx0.100 + gt0.100 and ol0.030 + opx0.160 + cpx0.880 + gt0.090, respectively; Walter, 1998). Mineral/matrix partition coefficients and DMM are from the compilation of [88,89]; PM, N-MORB and E-MORB compositions are from [90]. The heavy line represents the mantle array defined using DMM and PM compositions. Dashed and solid curves (or lines) are the melting trends from DMM. Thick marks on each curve (or line) correspond to degrees of partial melting for a given mantle source.
Minerals 12 00309 g012
Minerals 12 00309 g013 550
Figure 13. Th/Yb against Ta/Yb log–log diagram [111] for dyke swarm rocks from northwest of Iran. Shoshonitic rocks exhibit a consistent displacement from the mantle array indicating subduction-related metasomatism and/or crustal contamination. The inset diagram shows the variations of Th/Yb with changing silica contents of the rocks.
Figure 13. Th/Yb against Ta/Yb log–log diagram [111] for dyke swarm rocks from northwest of Iran. Shoshonitic rocks exhibit a consistent displacement from the mantle array indicating subduction-related metasomatism and/or crustal contamination. The inset diagram shows the variations of Th/Yb with changing silica contents of the rocks.
Minerals 12 00309 g013
Minerals 12 00309 g014 550
Figure 14. Sm against Rb log–log diagram showing theoretical fractionation vectors modelled for crystallization of individual mineral phases and phase assemblages. Phase combinations are presented in inset. Theoretical vectors are for 50% crystallization of single phases and phase combinations. Partition coefficients used for the modelling are from [93]. Key to abbreviations: Am: amphibole, Ol: olivine, Cpx: clinopyroxene, opx: orthopyroxene, Pl: plagioclase, bi: biotite, gt: garnet; b: basic; i: intermediate; a: acid.
Figure 14. Sm against Rb log–log diagram showing theoretical fractionation vectors modelled for crystallization of individual mineral phases and phase assemblages. Phase combinations are presented in inset. Theoretical vectors are for 50% crystallization of single phases and phase combinations. Partition coefficients used for the modelling are from [93]. Key to abbreviations: Am: amphibole, Ol: olivine, Cpx: clinopyroxene, opx: orthopyroxene, Pl: plagioclase, bi: biotite, gt: garnet; b: basic; i: intermediate; a: acid.
Minerals 12 00309 g014
Minerals 12 00309 g015 550
Figure 15. (a) Ta/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram [118], (b) Zr versus Ti diagram [60], (c) Zr/Y versus Nb/Y diagram [119] and (d) Nb/Th versus Zr/Nb diagram [119].
Figure 15. (a) Ta/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram [118], (b) Zr versus Ti diagram [60], (c) Zr/Y versus Nb/Y diagram [119] and (d) Nb/Th versus Zr/Nb diagram [119].
Minerals 12 00309 g015
Table
Table 1. Whole-rock major oxides (wt.%) and trace elements (ppm) of dyke swarms.
Table 1. Whole-rock major oxides (wt.%) and trace elements (ppm) of dyke swarms.
Rock TypeAndesite
Sample No.Dy-17Dy-27Dy-38Dy-43Dy-62Dy68BDy-69Dy-78Dy-79Dy-83ADy-84Dy-86Dy-87Dy-88
SiO250.2049.4050.4049.5048.9049.7048.8048.9048.6048.4048.9048.8048.9049.80
TiO20.880.680.780.760.740.840.880.760.690.700.800.810.801.41
Al2O316.2514.8014.5515.1515.9516.3515.3014.5014.1514.3015.2015.4015.3018.65
Fe2O39.729.399.6010.099.976.5210.229.919.629.8710.3410.4010.598.89
MnO0.160.160.150.170.180.090.160.170.170.180.180.160.190.16
MgO4.225.065.365.134.814.995.875.385.795.564.774.504.623.50
CaO8.039.249.438.669.429.497.679.239.719.429.028.798.727.00
Na2O3.152.622.712.652.772.762.272.482.282.453.382.772.753.91
K2O4.444.744.284.844.193.444.114.514.934.793.834.734.763.35
P2O50.430.470.470.540.440.230.340.530.530.540.520.550.560.65
Cr2O30.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01
BaO0.140.130.110.120.120.050.090.110.120.130.130.140.120.09
SO30.050.040.040.030.041.080.010.020.070.030.030.050.040.04
SrO0.100.120.110.140.130.100.080.120.110.100.150.140.140.09
LOI_10001.692.641.951.871.623.373.702.582.632.842.162.191.781.59
Total99.4799.5099.9599.6699.2999.0299.5199.2199.4199.3299.4299.4499.2899.14
FeOt8.758.458.649.088.975.879.208.928.668.889.309.369.538.00
Mg#46.2451.6352.5250.1848.8760.2653.2251.8254.3952.7447.7546.1646.3643.82
Na2O + K2O7.597.366.997.496.966.206.386.997.217.247.217.507.517.26
Na2O/K2O0.710.550.630.550.660.800.550.550.460.510.880.590.581.17
Trace
Ba1235.001210.00975.001005.001080.00492.00800.00969.001030.001135.001140.001235.001130.00783.00
Ce62.7057.4060.8065.9055.2056.2057.3064.6055.2058.0066.6068.7068.50134.50
Cr20.0060.0070.0070.0050.0080.0060.0080.00100.00100.0040.0030.0030.0010.00
Cs20.301.741.9410.008.290.722.102.341.704.346.7211.353.009.85
Dy4.904.074.654.284.054.704.614.773.894.264.674.384.706.50
Er2.562.222.291.951.892.552.402.271.841.952.432.282.343.27
Eu1.441.571.761.531.691.271.501.731.621.741.821.981.912.57
Ga19.3016.6017.3016.4018.9021.4017.1018.0015.8017.2017.3017.1017.4022.30
Gd5.595.736.035.335.635.155.385.785.535.626.266.266.358.26
Hf3.902.903.203.202.803.802.802.902.402.403.103.403.306.40
Ho0.940.800.860.760.730.930.810.740.700.710.840.870.861.20
La33.8031.7032.2035.4028.9031.1027.7033.4028.9030.4034.2035.5035.6072.20
Lu0.320.270.280.310.300.380.320.290.230.270.330.330.310.47
Nb9.405.406.507.707.1015.207.509.205.806.208.809.409.2044.20
Nd32.1029.8032.2032.9028.0025.3028.3031.5027.8029.3033.3033.8033.6055.40
Pr7.967.498.148.526.846.506.997.776.887.088.288.328.3414.90
Rb100.0096.8094.90112.5089.0083.6092.8069.9081.9079.7047.6081.7094.9096.80
Sm6.776.547.247.325.795.175.436.546.006.107.507.017.069.60
Sn2.001.002.002.001.001.001.002.001.001.003.002.002.002.00
Sr823.001010.00946.001095.001150.00942.00721.001010.00910.00836.001350.001225.001165.00809.00
Ta0.700.400.600.500.401.500.400.500.300.300.500.500.502.30
Tb0.760.770.800.770.730.790.770.790.680.690.790.910.861.16
Th9.878.438.339.028.426.436.638.256.727.078.498.688.8517.95
Tm0.340.310.330.310.320.360.330.310.260.250.340.360.380.45
U2.492.412.392.252.373.151.362.192.061.762.232.282.394.39
V280.00271.00272.00253.00296.00200.00297.00280.00277.00297.00303.00302.00295.00187.00
W5.003.002.002.001.001.001.002.002.002.002.001.002.008.00
Y24.2019.9022.7020.5021.3024.8022.6022.4019.0020.0024.2024.2023.4032.30
Yb2.301.872.242.061.782.412.001.901.731.772.222.271.972.93
Zr134.0099.00108.00113.00117.00165.00106.00119.0091.0097.00122.00123.00120.00303.00
Ag0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
As5.005.006.00 9.0083.00 6.00 7.005.00
Cd0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
Co27.0030.0029.0030.0030.0014.0033.0032.0031.0032.0030.0032.0031.0023.00
Cu127.00129.00110.00125.00122.0030.00109.00120.00138.00138.00122.00126.00132.0097.00
Li20.0010.0010.0020.0020.0010.0020.0010.0020.0020.0010.0020.0020.0030.00
Mo1.002.001.001.001.0089.00 1.00 1.001.001.002.00
Ni14.0021.0025.0024.0015.0035.0023.0024.0021.0022.0018.0016.0016.007.00
Pb18.0015.0019.0016.0017.004.0012.0019.0019.0016.0020.0019.0020.0012.00
Sc23.0028.0030.0026.0025.0019.0025.0028.0031.0030.0028.0028.0028.0014.00
Zn86.0080.0076.0087.0086.0054.0082.0086.0083.0085.0089.0092.0094.0090.00
Sum_REE162.48150.54159.82167.34141.85142.81143.84162.39141.26148.14169.58172.97172.78313.41
Dy/Dy *0.680.660.660.630.700.650.750.760.690.730.660.600.710.60
Dy/Yb2.132.182.082.082.281.952.312.512.252.412.101.932.392.22
Eu/Eu *0.720.790.820.750.910.760.850.870.870.910.820.920.880.89
Th/Hf2.532.912.602.823.011.692.372.842.802.952.742.552.682.80
(Ce/Yb)N6.937.816.908.147.895.937.298.658.128.337.637.708.8411.68
(La/Sm)N3.0712.9822.7362.9753.073.73.1383.1422.9633.0662.8053.1153.1024.626
(Sm/Yb)N3.193.793.503.853.532.322.943.733.763.743.663.353.883.55
Rock typeAndesiteBasaltTephrite
Sample No.Dy-93Dy-20Dy-29Dy-31Dy-39Dy-40Dy-46Dy-50Dy-61Dy66ADy-71Dy-9Dy-11Dy-18
SiO249.2049.2048.1047.1046.0049.2046.7047.2047.3048.6050.9050.7051.3048.10
TiO20.980.870.750.710.700.850.650.870.670.880.890.780.780.71
Al2O316.9518.0514.7514.2012.5014.5511.4514.4012.4514.9016.8516.7016.8014.70
Fe2O37.769.7910.0210.1810.9110.1810.9711.3511.0310.199.699.078.879.67
MnO0.160.190.180.180.180.170.180.180.190.150.180.180.170.17
MgO3.004.265.195.187.226.047.966.057.505.826.193.363.455.02
CaO7.589.6110.4011.5513.559.2712.9510.8011.709.258.966.767.079.81
Na2O1.622.862.211.041.182.981.822.742.162.282.783.813.522.36
K2O3.862.834.475.483.403.163.423.113.813.382.594.974.984.90
P2O50.600.440.540.550.490.340.470.550.510.270.370.490.480.52
Cr2O30.010.010.010.010.020.010.020.010.020.010.020.010.010.01
BaO0.120.070.140.150.150.090.110.080.120.090.080.110.110.14
SO30.030.030.020.020.040.020.020.010.010.010.010.080.030.04
SrO0.140.100.130.140.120.100.120.140.120.100.090.120.130.12
LOI_10007.571.422.552.832.762.852.201.762.023.700.232.211.752.75
Total99.5899.7399.4699.3299.2299.8199.0499.2599.6199.6399.8399.3599.4599.02
FeOt6.988.819.029.169.829.169.8710.219.929.178.728.167.988.70
Mg#43.3746.3050.6450.2056.7354.0358.9751.3657.3953.0855.8642.3343.5250.70
Na2O + K2O5.485.696.686.524.586.145.245.855.975.665.378.788.507.26
Na2O/K2O0.421.010.490.190.350.940.530.880.570.671.070.770.710.48
REE
Ba1105.00670.001265.001310.001455.00733.001030.00776.001065.00743.00655.001050.001030.001280.00
Ce122.5042.8063.9059.8050.6048.1049.2054.0048.9034.2047.8078.9077.7061.30
Cr 10.0050.0040.00120.0090.00170.0060.00170.0060.00160.0010.0010.0050.00
Cs5.410.402.340.280.330.632.993.0754.100.730.9016.3015.3096.70
Dy6.094.354.404.233.934.393.804.533.554.133.774.984.994.10
Er2.782.202.212.061.752.301.692.161.742.181.992.752.752.05
Eu2.871.561.781.681.511.391.551.841.491.191.331.861.891.56
Ga17.1020.1016.2015.3013.9016.5011.8017.8013.6018.1019.5018.8019.9015.70
Gd8.744.596.205.735.114.705.076.074.674.504.496.376.795.33
Hf5.302.603.302.602.002.902.002.202.202.502.604.404.002.80
Ho1.050.820.810.740.740.850.590.860.640.800.731.071.040.73
La64.1022.3035.0032.7028.2025.1026.8027.5026.2017.0025.1043.1041.1033.70
Lu0.370.320.280.250.230.330.230.270.210.320.290.410.380.27
Nb22.604.606.704.202.905.301.702.301.706.509.2012.0011.505.90
Nd54.9024.3032.3030.9029.2025.8027.5031.1027.2018.3023.4038.0037.2030.60
Pr14.205.968.228.106.996.696.687.596.494.365.8810.059.948.06
Rb124.5044.4078.20109.5060.8079.2058.2048.8064.9075.6063.60109.00110.50101.50
Sm10.305.337.386.616.545.906.327.336.074.354.397.867.666.96
Sn1.001.002.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.002.002.002.00
Sr1320.00835.001065.001105.001040.00838.00938.001205.00958.00877.00793.00974.001050.00975.00
Ta1.000.300.500.300.200.400.100.200.200.300.501.000.900.40
Tb1.170.740.800.720.680.710.640.880.670.610.680.960.940.72
Th15.104.688.768.096.375.595.183.035.484.754.1611.4011.308.51
Tm0.370.350.320.300.220.370.220.300.290.330.260.380.400.28
U3.441.262.012.171.521.431.570.691.541.151.242.762.522.31
V237.00286.00282.00299.00306.00263.00283.00362.00307.00279.00270.00246.00244.00279.00
W1.001.004.002.005.00 1.001.001.001.001.001.003.001.00
Y30.1021.9021.1019.9017.3020.8016.3021.1016.6021.4020.2025.3025.7020.40
Yb2.512.261.991.881.492.051.441.751.441.941.972.672.471.87
Zr238.0083.00105.0088.0064.0091.0064.0062.0064.0093.00103.00149.00150.0098.00
Ag0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
As7.00 7.00 5.00 8.005.006.00
Cd0.250.250.250.250.25 0.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
Co19.0030.0029.0033.0040.0034.0041.0036.0042.0033.0031.0021.0022.0031.00
Cu94.00127.00128.00158.00151.0092.00121.0036.00136.0090.0096.0090.0088.00139.00
Li10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00 20.0010.00 20.0020.0050.00
Mo 1.002.001.00
Ni1.008.0020.0017.0030.0029.0037.0023.0050.0024.0042.007.0010.0018.00
Pb15.0016.0020.0020.0021.0011.0016.008.0015.0010.0013.0019.0022.0021.00
Sc12.0023.0025.0028.0044.0031.0044.0036.0040.0028.0025.0020.0020.0027.00
Zn85.0095.0087.0086.0082.0081.0080.0085.0085.0078.0086.0099.0092.0084.00
Sum_REE291.95117.88165.59155.7137.19128.68131.73146.18129.5694.21122.08199.36195.25157.53
Dy/Dy*0.650.690.660.680.780.720.780.810.730.790.640.580.620.65
Dy/Yb2.431.922.212.252.642.142.642.592.472.131.911.872.022.19
Eu/Eu*0.930.970.810.840.800.810.840.850.860.830.920.810.810.79
Th/Hf2.851.802.653.113.191.932.591.382.491.901.602.592.833.04
(Ce/Yb)N12.414.828.178.098.645.978.697.858.644.486.177.528.008.34
(La/Sm)N3.8282.5742.9173.0432.6522.6172.6092.3082.6552.4043.5173.3733.3012.979
(Sm/Yb)N4.452.564.023.814.763.124.764.544.572.432.413.193.364.03
Rock typeTephrite
Sample No.Dy-24Dy-25CDy-41Dy-47Dy-49Dy-51Dy-59ADy-81Dy-88B
SiO247.6050.2047.8050.4044.8048.2049.1047.8047.50
TiO20.750.740.850.770.750.660.590.740.76
Al2O315.1516.9014.5016.5013.0015.0517.4514.4514.50
Fe2O310.218.2510.189.2610.889.758.2510.2110.17
MnO0.180.190.150.190.190.180.160.170.18
MgO5.023.315.733.626.425.773.935.625.36
CaO9.235.869.057.9911.309.807.519.1110.75
Na2O3.704.313.413.272.042.303.332.622.57
K2O3.805.023.235.164.644.825.594.743.96
P2O50.550.450.340.500.570.580.550.520.53
Cr2O30.010.000.010.010.010.010.010.010.01
BaO0.140.120.070.130.150.150.200.110.14
SO30.030.020.010.030.090.040.050.060.02
SrO0.140.080.080.140.140.140.140.100.14
LOI_10002.723.894.281.104.281.862.512.802.56
Total99.2399.3499.6999.0799.2699.3199.3799.0699.15
FeOt9.197.429.168.339.798.777.429.199.15
Mg#49.3444.2852.7243.6453.9053.9748.5552.1651.08
Na2O + K2O7.509.336.648.436.687.128.927.366.53
Na2O/K2O0.970.861.060.630.440.480.600.550.65
Trace (ppm)
Ba1320.001055.00643.001140.001420.001425.001870.001030.001225.00
Ce65.4055.1047.1078.8066.3059.5060.7057.4064.90
Cr50.0010.0090.0010.0080.0090.0030.0080.0050.00
Cs3.032.321.172.653.833.048.763.352.87
Dy4.464.474.185.104.163.513.124.244.89
Er2.182.182.252.511.871.631.362.022.43
Eu1.701.461.391.981.851.451.281.641.85
Ga16.8016.4017.1018.5015.5014.8016.2016.8018.50
Gd5.605.314.406.365.724.764.085.856.39
Hf3.403.102.604.302.502.202.202.502.90
Ho0.770.940.780.980.700.640.560.760.83
La35.5029.0024.4041.8036.5034.1035.8029.7033.60
Lu0.280.320.310.370.240.230.220.300.32
Nb7.307.605.1010.104.004.605.806.508.50
Nd33.9028.6025.7037.9033.2028.7027.0029.1032.40
Pr8.457.286.4610.008.867.587.317.237.83
Rb61.6094.6083.00120.0097.70104.50121.5077.90102.50
Sm7.526.045.587.557.625.805.175.966.84
Sn1.001.001.001.001.001.002.001.001.00
Sr1195.00661.00665.001165.001240.001210.001190.00860.001185.00
Ta0.500.600.400.700.300.300.400.300.40
Tb0.750.780.660.910.780.650.510.790.91
Th9.047.215.4510.858.999.1911.106.978.16
Tm0.310.350.330.370.260.260.220.290.30
U2.251.701.542.602.462.502.972.182.28
V298.00241.00271.00270.00318.00265.00207.00314.00320.00
W4.001.0012.002.001.003.002.005.001.00
Y21.4022.6020.9025.8019.2016.2015.3021.1023.40
Yb2.012.122.022.361.721.571.351.821.91
Zr106.00106.0094.00140.0081.0076.0089.00100.00116.00
Ag0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
As7.006.00 9.0014.00 14.005.00
Cd0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
Co32.0021.0032.0025.0038.0032.0025.0032.0032.00
Cu144.0081.0098.00102.00193.00181.00147.00137.00130.00
Li20.0010.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0010.00
Mo 1.001.00 1.001.00
Ni19.004.0025.007.0024.0022.0010.0020.0020.00
Pb19.0016.0010.0020.0022.0020.0025.0018.0021.00
Sc25.0015.0030.0020.0036.0028.0016.0030.0029.00
Zn96.0079.0081.0094.0089.0082.0076.0086.0090.00
Sum_REE168.83143.95125.56196.99169.78150.38148.68147.1165.4
Dy/Dy*0.670.690.700.650.690.630.610.720.77
Dy/Yb2.222.112.072.162.422.242.312.332.56
Eu/Eu*0.810.790.860.880.860.850.860.850.86
Th/Hf2.662.332.102.523.604.185.052.792.81
(Ce/Yb)N8.286.615.938.499.809.6411.448.028.64
(La/Sm)N2.9042.9542.693.4062.9473.6174.263.0653.022
(Sm/Yb)N4.053.092.993.474.804.004.153.553.88
Table
Table 2. Initial ratios for 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd of the dyke swarms.
Table 2. Initial ratios for 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd of the dyke swarms.
Sample No.Rock TypeRb (ppm)Sr (ppm)87Rb/86Sr87Sr/86SrError (2 s)Sm (ppm)Nd (ppm)147Sm/144Nd143Nd/144NdError (2 s)εNd
Dy-22BBasalt56.4810290.15890.7051440.0000106.35630.170.12750.5126280.0000150.03
Dy-24Tephrite62.5911700.15470.7052500.0000106.65331.180.12920.5126600.0000120.64
Dy-47Tephrite125.711650.31220.7052340.0000107.85936.950.12880.5125530.000015−1.46
Dy-59ATephrite124.911790.30660.7052950.0000134.94824.760.12100.5127090.0000141.62
Dy-63BBasalt18.23326.80.16140.7052120.0000094.73016.630.17220.5127280.0000141.84
Dy-71Basalt64.48743.40.25100.7052500.0000124.92223.410.12730.5126360.0000120.17
Dy-78Andesite70.48965.10.21130.7053390.0000126.54931.060.12760.5125700.000015−1.11
Dy-81Tephrite75.84804.80.27270.7052550.0000126.21028.680.13110.5126600.0000120.63
Dy-88Andesite96.19770.90.36110.7050300.0000129.9254.460.11030.5127250.0000121.96
TDM (Ma)–two-stage depleted mantle Nd model ages [66] calculated using present-day depleted mantle values of 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51315 and 147Sm/144Nd = 0.2136. CHUR values: 87Rb/86Sr = 0.0847, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.7047, 147Sm/144Nd = 0.1967 and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51263.
Table
Table 3. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating data of the dyke swarms.
Table 3. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating data of the dyke swarms.
SpotPb
(ppm)		Th
(ppm)		U
(ppm)		Th/UIsotopic RatiosAge (Ma)
207Pb/206Pb1σ207Pb/235U1σ206Pb/238U1σ208Pb/232Th1σ238U/232Th207Pb/235U1σ206Pb/238U1σ208Pb/232Th1σ
35F-012.781793380.520.06320.00800.05480.00680.00670.00020.00270.00021.936154.26.5843.31.0454.33.60
35F-029.46106011420.920.04740.00410.04090.00350.00640.00010.00210.00011.116940.73.3741.10.6941.71.45
35F-033.523163880.810.06980.00710.06550.00650.00710.00010.00220.00011.255564.46.2445.80.9245.02.30
35F-049.5595111050.860.04270.00360.03770.00280.00670.00010.00220.00011.201037.62.7643.00.7044.91.50
35F-0510.5696012140.790.05250.00350.04800.00300.00670.00010.00230.00011.410547.62.8643.20.6347.31.65
35F-062.301982800.700.05830.00990.04600.00780.00660.00020.00230.00021.494045.77.5842.21.4446.43.37
35F-071.831452100.690.11520.02400.07980.01150.00650.00020.00260.00021.484477.910.7742.01.4152.94.03
35F-083.171903790.500.07110.00740.06250.00660.00670.00010.00280.00022.031761.56.2743.30.8957.33.92
35F-092.031972340.840.10610.01760.07330.00940.00640.00020.00210.00011.244671.98.8841.41.2242.82.83
35F-103.122113800.550.11990.01510.08850.00970.00600.00020.00300.00021.838986.19.0638.51.2960.54.65
35F-112.151502540.580.07230.01250.06150.00960.00690.00020.00240.00021.725360.69.2044.51.2049.03.44
35F-123.354703641.280.08120.01000.06650.00820.00620.00010.00210.00010.799565.47.7939.60.9341.52.23
35F-133.172233820.580.07170.00820.05970.00710.00640.00020.00270.00021.728958.96.7941.21.0054.53.04
35F-141.371081460.740.10810.02920.07380.01650.00670.00030.00290.00031.374372.315.6343.21.6158.05.15
35F-1526.18188932280.580.07490.00310.06230.00240.00620.00010.00260.00011.781761.32.2939.60.5152.11.59
35F-1625.30118930310.390.09510.00570.07980.00470.00610.00010.00390.00022.597878.04.4139.50.5579.23.49
35F-174.483355310.630.04890.00510.04550.00480.00690.00010.00220.00011.595245.24.6944.10.8643.92.17
35F-183.512684150.640.07230.01130.05940.00830.00660.00010.00250.00011.564158.67.9142.10.9049.52.55
35F-192.622393170.750.05320.00880.04480.00690.00670.00020.00190.00011.342144.56.7443.01.0438.22.53
35F-203.043593201.110.07500.00850.06260.00710.00660.00020.00230.00010.926561.66.7542.31.0645.52.21
35F-229.5588711240.780.05290.00430.04560.00350.00640.00010.00230.00011.592945.33.3741.10.6647.41.95
35F-236.467047340.950.05010.00500.04360.00460.00660.00010.00240.00011.134243.34.4342.40.9349.22.37
Table
Table 4. Partition coefficients used in FC, AFC and melting models [77,96].
Table 4. Partition coefficients used in FC, AFC and melting models [77,96].
ElementsOlivineOpxCpxGarnetAmphiboleBiotitePlagioclase
Sm0.00130.010.2830.2170.850.030.11
Rb0.0020.0030.00470.0420.15.180.1
Th0.040.130.03 0.050.01450.01
Ta0.0000180.150.0130.060.250.10690.04
La0.000640.0020.04350.010.20.0350.27
Yb0.140.340.512 0.067
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fadaeian, M.; Jahangiri, A.; Ao, S.; Kamali, A.A.; Xiao, W. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Shoshonitic Dyke Swarm in the Northeast of Meshkinshahr, NW Iran. Minerals 2022, 12, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030309

AMA Style

Fadaeian M, Jahangiri A, Ao S, Kamali AA, Xiao W. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Shoshonitic Dyke Swarm in the Northeast of Meshkinshahr, NW Iran. Minerals. 2022; 12(3):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fadaeian, Mohammad, Ahmad Jahangiri, Songjian Ao, Amin Allah Kamali, and Wenjiao Xiao. 2022. "Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Shoshonitic Dyke Swarm in the Northeast of Meshkinshahr, NW Iran" Minerals 12, no. 3: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030309

APA Style

Fadaeian, M., Jahangiri, A., Ao, S., Kamali, A. A., & Xiao, W. (2022). Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Shoshonitic Dyke Swarm in the Northeast of Meshkinshahr, NW Iran. Minerals, 12(3), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop