Radiological Hazard Related with Natural Radioactivity in Natural Gas Transportation—A Case Study from Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Gamma Radiation Dose Rate
2.2. Radon
2.3. 210Pb
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Composition—Content of Heavy Metals
3.2. Activity Concentration of 222Rn in Natural Gas
3.3. Activity Concentration of 210Pb in Black Powder
3.4. Gamma Radiation Dose Rate
4. Discussion
4.1. Gamma Radiation Dose Rate—External Exposure
4.2. Gamma Radiation Dose Rate—Internal Exposure
4.3. Transport Model of 210Pb in the Gas Pipeline
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection and the Management of Radioactive Waste in the Oil and Gas Industry. In Safety Reports Series No. 34.; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP). Managing Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in the Oil & Gas Industry; Report No. 412; IOGP: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, D.; Wilson, C. Developments in the management of exposures from radon in natural gas in the UK. Radioact. Environ. 2005, 7, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar]
- Anspaugh, L. Scientific Issues Concerning Radon in Natural Gas Texas Eastern Transmission, LP and Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC New Jersey–New York Expansion Project; Docket No. CP11-56; Henderson, NV, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Rowan, E.L.; Kraemer, T.F. Radon-222 Content of Natural Gas Samples from Upper and Middle Devonian Sandstone and Shale Reservoirs in Pennsylvania: Preliminary Data; USGS Open-File Report Series 2012–1159; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2012.
- Saremi, M.; Kazemi, M. The effect of black powder composition on the erosion of compressor’s impeller in gas transmission line. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 264–265, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, T.; AlShehhi, M.; Stephen, S.; Khezzar, L. Characterization and preliminary root cause identification of black powder content in a gas transmission network—A case study. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 27, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.S.; Al-Shehhi, M.S. Review of black powder in gas pipelines—An industrial perspective. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 25, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyfi, S.; Mirzayi, B.; Seyyedbagheri, H. CFD modeling of black powder particles deposition in 3D 90-degree bend of natural gas pipelines. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 78, 103330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, W.; Abou-Khousa, M.; Haryono, A.; AlShehhi, M.; Al-Wahedi, K.; Al-Durra, A.; AlNabulsieh, I.; Daoud, M.; Geuzebroek, F.; Faraj, M.; et al. Field demonstration of a microwave black powder detection device in gas transmission pipelines. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 73, 103058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godoy, J.M.; Carvalho, F.; Cordilha, A.; Matta, L.E.; Godoy, M.L. 210Pb content in natural gas pipeline residues (‘‘black-powder’’) and its correlation with the chemical composition. J. Environ. Radioact. 2005, 83, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abbasi, A.; Zakaly, H.M.H.; Hessien, M.M. Radon concentration in compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas and its release range in residential houses. Radiochim. Acta 2021, 109, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanyotha, S.; Kranrod, C.; Pengvanich, P.; Sriploy, P. Determination of radon in natural gas pipelines. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 307, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepanov, V.E.; Naumova, K.A. Experimental study of radon content in networked natural gas under the conditions of Yakutsk. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 459, p. 52044. [Google Scholar]
- Daraktchieva, Z.; Wasikiewicz, J.M.; Howarth, C.B.; Miller, C.A. Study of baseline radon levels in the context of a shale gas development. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 141952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cowie, M.I.; El-Sherik, A.M. Naturally occurring radioactive material and naturally occurring mercury assessment of black powder in sales gas pipelines. Radiat. Prot. Environ. 2021, 42, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, J.; Jodłowski, P.; Macuda, J. Radioactivity of the gas pipeline network in Poland. J. Environ. Radioact. 2020, 213, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jodłowski, P.; Kalita, S. Gamma-Ray Spectrometry Laboratory for high-precision measurements of radionuclide concentrations in environmental samples. Nukleonika 2010, 55, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
- Jodłowski, P. A revision factor to the Cutshall self-attenuation correction in 210Pb gamma-spectrometry measurements. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016, 109, 566–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Minister of Economy of the Republic of Poland. Regulation of the Minister of Economy of 16 July 2015 concerning the acceptance of waste for storage in landfills. J. Laws Repub. Pol. 2015, poz.1277. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kozak, K.; Mazur, J.; Kozłowska, B.; Karpińska, A.; Przylibski, T.A.; Mamont-Cieśla, K.; Grządziel, D.; Stawarz, O.; Wysocka, M.; Dorda, J.; et al. Correction factors for determination of annual average radon concentration in dwellings of Poland resulting from seasonal variability of indoor radon. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Atomic Energy Agency (PAA). Annual Report Activities of the President of the National Atomic Energy Agency and the Assessment of Nuclear Safety and Radiological Protection in Poland in 2014; PAA: Warszawa, Poland, 2014. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- The Council of Ministers of the Republic of Poland. Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 14 December 2015 Concerning Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel. J. Laws Repub. Pol. 2015, poz.2267. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60; ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.); ICRP: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Vohra, K.G.; Subbaramu, M.C.; Mohan Rao, A.M. A study of the mechanism of formation of radon daughter aerosols. Tellus 1966, 18, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paatero, J.; Ioannidou, A.; Ikonen, J.; Lehto, J. Aerosol particle size distribution of atmospheric lead-210 in northern Finland. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 172, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Location | Concentration of Heavy Metals [mg/(kg Dry Weight)] | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | Ba | Cr | Cd | Hg | Ni | Pb | |
1 SP-B | 11 | 140 | 304 | <0.01 | 0.11 | 402 | 112 |
SP-C | 12 | 220 | 442 | <0.01 | 0.18 | 482 | 278 |
2 WG-J | 10 | 126 | 208 | 0.4 | 0.11 | 342 | 74 |
WG-L | 18 | 146 | 506 | <0.01 | 0.19 | 856 | 112 |
WG-O | 11 | 170 | 98 | 1 | 0.24 | 88 | 38 |
3 LS-DN | 14 | 144 | 162 | <0.01 | 0.42 | 932 | 388 |
LS-K | 9 | 182 | 516 | 2 | 0.13 | 490 | 60 |
Limit value for the classification of waste as hazardous | 25 | 300 | 70 | 5 | 2 | 40 | 50 |
Location | The Activity Concentration of 222Rn [Bq/m3] | 210Pb [Bq/kg] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Min. | Max. | Average | ||
SP-B | 46.9 (4.1) 1 | 64.6 (5.6) | 56.4 (4.2) | 445 (50) |
SP-C | <30 2 | <30 | <30 | 5600 (600) |
WG-J(1) | 278 (25) | 425 (31) | 361 (26) | 12,500 (1300) |
WG-J(2) | - | - | - | 16,000 (1500) |
WG-L | <30 | 69.5 (6.1) | 55.0 (8.0) | 2100 (200) |
WG-O(1) | <30 | <30 | <30 | 645 (60) |
WG-O(2) | - | - | 1360 (120) | - |
WG-Lw | 55.2 (5.2) | 79.9 (7.1) | 65.3 (6.5) | - |
WG-G | 63.0 (6.0) | 97.1 (8.7) | 77.5 (7.8) | - |
WG-H | 53.2 (4.2) | 104 (10) | 80 (10) | - |
LS-DN (MFL pig) | - | - | - | 15,700 (1600) |
LS-K (brush cleaning pig) | - | - | - | 3300 (350) |
LS-K (MFL pig) | - | - | - | 2620 (250) |
Location | Gamma Radiation Dose Rate [µGy/h] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Background | A Pipeline Valve | A Filter Station | A Transmitting/Receiving Lock | |
SP-B | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 |
SP-C | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 |
WG-J | 0.044–0.061 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 |
WG-L | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 |
WG-O | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 |
WG-Lw | 0.044–0.070 | 0.061–0.087 | 0.061–0.087 | 0.061–0.087 |
WG-G | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 | 0.044–0.061 |
WG-H | 0.052–0.061 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.052–0.070 | 0.070–0.096 |
Location | Description of the Measurement Point | Gamma Radiation Dose Rate [µGy/h] |
---|---|---|
LS-K (brush-cleaning pig) | Background (transmitting lock) | 0.087–0.096 |
The pig (before pigging process) | 0.070–0.078 | |
Background (receiving lock) | 0.052–0.061 | |
Receiving lock after the pig’s arrival | 0.087–0.21 | |
The pig (after pigging process) | 0.087–0.20 | |
Black powder in cuvette | Up to 0.87 | |
LS-K (MFL pig) | Background (transmitting lock) | 0.087–0.096 |
The pig (before pigging process) | 0.061–0.070 | |
Background (receiving lock) | 0.052–0.061 | |
Receiving lock after the pig’s arrival | 0.052–0.061 | |
The pig (after pigging process) | 0.052–0.070 | |
Black powder in cuvette | 0.13–0.15 | |
LS-DN (MLF pig) | Background (transmitting lock) | 0.052–0.070 |
The pig (before pigging process) | 0.052–0.070 | |
Background (receiving lock) | 0.052–0.061 | |
Receiving lock after the pig’s arrival | 0.052–0.070 | |
The pig (after pigging process) | 0.072–0.10 | |
Black powder in cuvette | Up to 0.35 |
Data Description | Location | |
---|---|---|
WG-J(1) | WG-L | |
Diameter of the gas pipeline [mm] | 700 | 700 |
Length of the gas pipeline [km] | 145 | 150 |
Average content of particulate matter in gas [mg/m3] | 0.28–0.42 | 0.20–0.30 |
Average gas volumetric flow rate [m3/s] | 4.2–5.6 | 5.6–8.7 |
Average 222Rn activity concentration [Bq/m3] | 361 | 55 |
Calculated 210Pb activity concentration [kBq/kg] | 11.5–12.9 | 1.9–2.4 |
Measured 210Pb Activity concentration [kBq/kg] | 12.8(1.3) * | 2.10(0.20) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nowak, J.; Jodłowski, P.; Macuda, J.; Nguyen Dinh, C. Radiological Hazard Related with Natural Radioactivity in Natural Gas Transportation—A Case Study from Poland. Minerals 2022, 12, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12060662
Nowak J, Jodłowski P, Macuda J, Nguyen Dinh C. Radiological Hazard Related with Natural Radioactivity in Natural Gas Transportation—A Case Study from Poland. Minerals. 2022; 12(6):662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12060662
Chicago/Turabian StyleNowak, Jakub, Paweł Jodłowski, Jan Macuda, and Chau Nguyen Dinh. 2022. "Radiological Hazard Related with Natural Radioactivity in Natural Gas Transportation—A Case Study from Poland" Minerals 12, no. 6: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12060662
APA StyleNowak, J., Jodłowski, P., Macuda, J., & Nguyen Dinh, C. (2022). Radiological Hazard Related with Natural Radioactivity in Natural Gas Transportation—A Case Study from Poland. Minerals, 12(6), 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12060662