Next Article in Journal
Seismic Response Models and the AVO Simulation of Coal-Bearing Reservoirs
Previous Article in Journal
Mathematical Model of Ilmenite Separation Efficiency Using a High Gradient Plate Magnetic Separator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Leaching of V and Ni in Spent FCC Catalyst Using Oxalic Acid/H2O2 under Microwave-Assisted Conditions

1
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Mineral Metallurgical Resources Utilization and Pollution Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
3
Collaborative Innovation Center of Strategic Vanadium Resources Utilization, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
4
Hubei Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of High Efficient Cleaning Utilization for Shale Vanadium Resource, Wuhan 430081, China
5
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(7), 834; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070834
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Revised: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
In this work, we propose a rapid and facile method (oxalic acid leaching under microwave-assisted conditions) to study the simultaneous recovery of vanadium (V) and nickel (Ni) from spent fluid catalytic cracking (SFCC) catalysts. The central issue in all of these studies is to test the modeling and experimental results of excellent fitting effects of leaching parameters. In order to maximize the recovery of V and Ni, leaching parameters were investigated. Furthermore, response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the leaching parameters. The optimum conditions obtained were as follows: oxalic acid concentration of 1.8 mol/L; leaching time of 91 min; microwave-assisted power of 500 W; H2O2 concentration of 1.1 mol/L. The maximum leaching rates of V and Ni reached the values of 91.36% and 46.35%, respectively. The results showed that microwave energy was very helpful in improving the efficiency of the leaching process and shortening the leaching time by 75%. According to the shrinking core model, test results showed that a surface chemical reaction was the controlling step of the overall reaction kinetics. The activation energy of V and Ni during the leaching reaction was calculated to be 3.28 and 34.41 kJ/mol, respectively.

1. Introduction

Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts are used for converting heavy oil-gas into gasoline-blended mixtures [1]. A typical FCC catalyst contains an active matrix (alumina), an inert matrix (kaolin), a rare earth exchanged Y-zeolite, and a binder (silica or silica-alumina) [2]. During the FCC process, contaminant metals (such as, Ni and V) are deposited on the surface of the catalyst, and diffused through the pores of the catalyst [2,3,4]. As a result, poisoning of active sites, pore blocking, or both [2,4] gives rise to a significant activity loss, resulting in the formation of a spent FCC catalyst (SFCC) [5,6]. Ordinarily, these SFCC catalysts have been discarded for landfills. However, the air-, soil-, and marine-related environmental pollution caused by these SFCC catalysts has become a serious global problem [7,8].
SFCC catalysts can be regarded as important secondary resources because they contain a certain amount of vanadium (V) and nickel (Ni) compounds. Our group has studied the occurrence and location of V and Ni in SFCC catalysts; it is believed that vanadium exists in two valence states: V5+ and V4+, V is presented in the form of V2O5 and VO2 in the SFCC catalyst. Because of its mobility, V could be homogenously distributed in the SFCC catalyst. The state of Ni in SFCC catalyst using XPS shows that Ni exists as either NiSiO3 or NiAl2O4, with a small portion as Ni and NiO. In the same study, Ni was found to be concentrated at the SFCC catalyst surface uniformly and hardly migrated into the interior of the particles [9].
Current research is focused on replacing the storage of SFCC catalysts and assessing an environment-friendly and economical method, in which the leaching residue is used as the raw material of geopolymer and metals are recovered [10,11]. Oxalate has been considered as a sustainable reagent that can offer a wide range of selectivity and efficient leaching capabilities for various mixed metals under mild reaction conditions. Although the acidity of oxalic acid is very weak [12], the oxalate has good chelating properties, and therefore, has a strong tendency to form complexes with metal ions [13]. However, these processes have certain disadvantages, such as long reaction times for leaching process and the removal rate of V and Ni is low.
Therefore, it is important to study and develop a method which not only shortens the reaction times but also improve the removal rate of V and Ni. Generally, dipole rotation and migration current loss (existence of free moving electrons) are the two major principles of microwave heating [14,15,16]. Recent experiments on microwave-assisted leaching have indicated that it can be used in metals leaching from industrial residues. This is due to an effective mineral breakage and faster processing. Studies regarding the recovery of metals from industrial residues proved to be significantly faster when microwave energy was applied, and in some cases metal dissolution is greatly enhanced [16,17,18]. However, previous studies on the recovery of valuable metals from SFCC catalysts are limited to the investigation of only a single factor influence on the leaching rate; thus, systematic and comprehensive analysis of various acting factors as well as the impact of their interactions on leaching efficiency is required. At the same time, to further elucidate the role of leaching parameters on the leaching of valuable metals from SFCC catalysts. The kinetics determines the reaction rate and considers the influent parameters on yield and efficiency of reaction directly affecting the engineering of the process [19]. There are a number of models for describing metals leaching from spent catalysts. In these models, the shrinking core model has been widely used in the process of spent catalysts leaching metals [20]. However, few researchers have studied extracted metals by oxalic acid leaching with microwave-assisted methods [21], especially the effect of microwave on leaching kinetic of vanadium and nickel.
In the current work, the effects of different parameters on the leaching efficiencies of V and Ni from SFCC catalysts using microwave-assisted methods have been studied. Based on the Box-Behnken Design (BBD) experimental design, the response surface method was used to optimize the microwave-assisted leaching conditions for optimal recovery of V and Ni from the SFCC catalyst. In addition, the kinetics of the system was investigated including the presentation of a kinetic model. The activation energy of the optimized kinetic model was determined as well. Furthermore, a comparison is drawn between the microwave-assisted and conventional heating methods. The purpose of this research is to determine an energy-efficient approach for leaching V and Ni from SFCC catalysts using microwave heating.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The SFCC catalyst was obtained from a refinery (Hubei, China). The main chemical composition of the SFCC catalyst was determined using ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Optima, PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and the corresponding results are presented in Table 1. As shown by the results presented in Table 1, the SFCC catalyst was characterized by a small number of recyclable metals, such as vanadium (V; 0.44%) and nickel (Ni; 0.53%); the fresh FCC catalyst base material was composed of aluminosilicates. Therefore, the SFCC catalyst shows a higher content of Al and Si.
Oxalic acid dihydrate (C2H2O4·2H2O) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were purchased from China Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., Shantou, China. Deionized water was obtained from a purified system (Cascada III·I 20, Pall, New York, NY, USA) and used in the experiments.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Preparation of the Catalyst

The contents within the dotted line in Figure 1 are the ones that are discussed in the current work. The samples were crushed, screened, and ground to D50 (median diameter) of less than 17.40 µm [22], which not only avoids any impact on the particle diameter of the leaching, but also facilitates the subsequent use of leaching residue.

2.2.2. Method for Leaching Tests

The conventional leaching experiments were performed in a digital display intelligent temperature-controlled magnetic stirrer (SZCL-2A, Wuhan Keer Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) under normal pressure. The microwave leaching experiments were performed under normal pressure in a microwave furnace (MAS-II plus type; SINEO Microwave Chemistry Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) that was equipped with a spherical condenser, temperature sensor, and mechanical stirrer. Figure 2 shows the schematic of the MAS-II plus type microwave furnace equipment. In this study, the stirring speed and liquid-to-solid ratio for the conventional and microwave-assisted acid leaching experiments were 500 r/min and 50 g/L, respectively. Acidic leaching of SFCC catalyst is an endothermic process. However, the relationship between the recovery rates of V and Ni and temperature requires more research to further the current understanding about the kinetics of the leaching process. The optimum reaction temperature was considered to be 95 °C for the leaching of V and Ni, which was based upon the results from a previous study [23]. The experimental parameters included the concentration of addition agent H2O2 (0–4 mol/L), concentration of oxalic acid (26 mol/L), leaching time (20–240 min), and the response power (150–500 W). After the leaching test, the leaching residue (including the leaching solution and the leaching residue) was separated from the mixture using vacuum filtration, and washed several times using deionized water. The leaching liquid volume was 500 mL. Furthermore, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was used to determine the concentration of V and Ni in the leaching solution. The leaching residue was dried at 120 °C for 24 h, and then weighed. The toxin leaching experiment was performed. All the experiments were performed at least thrice, and average values were used for further analysis and reporting.

2.3. Characterization Techniques

The ICP-OES was used to determine the contents of V, Ni, Fe, Si, and Al in the leaching residue. Surface morphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM-IT300; JOEL Company, Tokyo, Japan) that was equipped with an INCAx-act energy spectrum analyzer (OXFORD Company, Oxford, UK). Surface areas and pore size distribution were determined using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method (BET; Nova 3000; Quantachrome Corporation, Boynton Beach, FL, USA).
A pH meter (PHS-3C, LabTech Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China) was used to measure the pH of the leaching solution.

2.4. Mechanism of Kinetic Model Determination

The process of leaching metals will involve the solid film diffusion and surface chemical reaction. To determine the relationship between operating parameters and the recovery yield of V and Ni, the mechanism of kinetic model is studied based on the experiment data. The dynamic equations for the leaching of V and Ni for solid- liquid reactions include:
(1)
Surface chemical reaction control model:
Kt = 1 − (1 − Xi)1/3
(2)
Diffusion controls model:
Kt = 1 + 2 (1 − Xi) − 3 (1 − Xi)2/3
where Xi is the leaching rate of V or Ni, t is the reaction time, and k is the rate constant.

2.5. Experimental Design

Response surface method (RSM) is a statistical and mathematical model that is used to optimize a process with the least number of experiments and analyzes the interactions among various parameters [24,25,26].
Three independent variables performed with the Box-Behnken Design (BBD) were selected at three levels, coded as −1 (low), 0 (central point), and 1 (high), as shown by the results presented in Table 2. The relevance between the independent variables and the dependent response can be fitted using a second-order quadratic polynomial equation (Equation (3)).
Y   response = α 0 + i 1 k α i x i + i 1 k α i i x i i 2 + 1 i j k α i j x i x j
where Y stands for the response (% metal recovery), α 0 represents the content coefficient, α i , α i i , and α i j represent the coefficients for linear, quadratic, and interaction effects, respectively, while x i and x j stand for the chosen independent factors.
The statistical significance and the capability of the model were analyzed using variance analysis (ANOVA). Design-Expert 8 can actively reflect the relationship between the response and the level of each variable, whereas the three-dimensional (3D) surface graph expresses the fitted polynomial equation. The leaching rates of V and Ni with the microwave-assisted process were represented by the response variables Y1, and Y2, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Statistical Analysis and Model Fitting

According to the Box-Behnken experimental design, all 29 experiments were performed under corresponding conditions, and the experimental results are listed in Table 3. According to the data, two quadratic models with interdependent terms were obtained, as given by Equations (4) and (5).
Y (V) = 91.36 + 6.98 × A + 5.71 × B + 8.10 × C + 0.50 × D − 3.67 × AB + 0.74 ×AC − 0.53 × AD − 1.47 × BC + 1.10 × BD − 2.08 × CD − 6.84 × A2 − 5.37 × B2 − 7.44 × C2 + 0.91 × D2
Y (Ni) = 46.35 + 1.08 × A + 1.86 × B + 3.37 × C + 1.62 × D − 1.85 × AB − 0.41 ×AC − 0.93 × AD − 2.53 × BC − 2.67 × BD − 1.29 × CD − 0.77 × A2 − 6.90 × B2 − 2.19 × C2 − 0.87 × D2
The statistical results of ANOVA for the response surface quadratic models of V and Ni are listed in Table 1. The results showed that the F-values of the respective model for V and Ni were 11.78 and 8.60, respectively. The data indicated the significance of the model. The prob > F values for the models were <0.0001, which indicate the significance of the model terms. Moreover, the model terms of V, A, B, C, AB, BC, A2 and B2 and the model terms of Ni, A, B, C, AC, BC, A2 and B2 were found to be significant. The values of R2 were determined to be 0.959 and 0.971, as shown by the results presented in Table 4. In the present study, R2 and R2 adj. coefficients guaranteed the satisfied adjustment of the quadratic model to the experimental data. The percentage recovery of coefficient of variance (CV) for V and Ni were confirmed to be (in %) 3.30 and 2.74, respectively. The ratio of the standard deviation to the mean value of the observed response, indicated by CV%, represents the degree of reproducibility of the models. The models produced a satisfactory degree of fitting and an adequate precision to measure the ‘signal-to-noise ratio’. They indicated an adequate signal.

3.2. Process Optimization

Comprehensive factor analysis of variance illustrated the main effects and interactions of the evaluated variables. In order to achieve a graphical interpretation of the interactions, it is strongly recommended to use the regression model with 3D surface plots and the 2D contour plots.
Interactions among the parameters of V leaching rate are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Figure 3A–C and Figure 4A–C show the leaching rate of V for different H2O2 solution concentrations. The results demonstrate that the leaching efficiency of V improved significantly from 62.82% to 91.56%, with the increase in the concentrations of H2O2 solution from 0 to 1.5 mol/L, which suggests that the addition of H2O2 in the reaction system had a significant effect in increasing the extraction of V. This result is mainly attributed to the low valence of V (in the form of VO2) that was oxidized to high valence (in the form of V2O5) in the SFCC catalysts [27]. In this condition, the high valence species could easily react with oxalic acid. As seen in Figure 3A,D,E and Figure 4A,D,E, with different reaction times, the V recovery rate increased almost linearly with the increase in the concentration of oxalic acid from 1.5 mol/L to 2.0 mol/L. However, the slope curve lowered when the concentration of oxalic acid exceeded 2.0 mol/L. This is because a higher acid concentration provides enough H+ to accelerate the leaching process, and therefore, more V could be recovered. However, after the reaction stabilized, simply increasing the H+ could not further promote the reaction. As seen in Figure 3B,D,F and Figure 4B,D,F, the presented data explain that the factor of time has a more significant influence on leaching rate for vanadium compounds. When the leaching time extended from 0.25 to 1.5 h, a sharp increase in the productivity was observed. Any further extension in the leaching time could not increase the leaching rate significantly and it became practically unchanged. As shown in Figure 3C,E,F and Figure 4C,E,F, the leaching rate of V enhanced with the increasing microwave-assisted power (up to 500 W), and thereafter, the metal leaching stabilized.
Interactions among various parameters of Ni leaching rate are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. As seen in Figure 5A–C and Figure 6A–C, the data suggests that the addition of H2O2 in the reaction system had an insignificant effect on the extraction of Ni. This is due to the reason that H2O2 could not further oxidize Ni compounds in SFCC catalysts. Based on Figure 5A,D,E and Figure 6A,D,E, the recovery of Ni first increased, and then, decreased, which was due to the reason that the value was higher than the stoichiometric value due to the increase in acid concentration. This results in over-saturation due to the existence of large amounts of H+ ions, which decreased the nickel recovery [28]. As seen in Figure 5B,D,F and Figure 6B,D,F, extending the leaching time increased the Ni recovery. When the critical time of 1.5 h was extended and the leaching time was continuously extended, the Ni recovery decreased slightly. In this case, the reason could be attributed to the existence of impurities with some increase in the concentration of other ions. It is possible that some of the Ni2+ species precipitated out. As shown in Figure 5C,E,F and Figure 6C,E,F, the leaching rate of Ni enhanced with the increasing microwave-assisted power (up to 500 W), and thereafter, the metal leaching stabilized. The phenomenon is similar to the leaching characteristics of V.
Based on the statistical modeling, the optimal conditions for vanadium and nickel recovery were found to be as follows: oxalic acid concentration of 1.8 mol/L; leaching time of 91 min; microwave-assisted power of 500 W; H2O2 concentration of 1.1 mol/L. As shown in Figure 7, the actual values were evenly distributed around the predicted values. The desired values of Y1 and Y2 were 91.64%, 46.89%, respectively. The experimental results for Y1 and Y2 under the same conditions were 91.56% and 46.78%, respectively, which agreed well with the predicted values. In order to test the optimal experimental parameters estimated by the response surface model, three verification experiments were conducted in the optimal process conditions. At the same time, other experimental conditions were confirmed with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 50 g/L and a stirring speed of 500 r/min. The leaching rates of V were fixed as 91.62%, 91.41%, and 91.48% respectively, and the average value was 91.50% with the relative error of 0.07%. In addition, the leaching rates of Ni were 46.46%, 46.49%, and 46.83%, for which the average value of Ni leaching rate was 46.59%, and the relative error is 0.40%. The results above further explain that this model accurately predicts the leaching rates of V and Ni and they also prove the reliable optimal process conditions. The key influencing factors of the leaching rate and their corresponding optimum range can be identified by the single-factor experiment. The response surface method is very effective for studying the importance of each factor and the interaction among different factors and for figuring out the optimal process conditions.

3.3. Leaching Kinetics

The experimental data of leaching processes of V and Ni in oxalic acid are shown in Figures S1 and S2. To determine the optimum kinetic model, the plots of the left-hand sides of Equations (1) and (2) against time for oxalic acid are shown in Figure 8. The apparent ratio constant (k) and multiple regression coefficients (R2) of V and Ni at various leaching temperatures using different kinetic models are listed in Table 5.
As shown in Figure 8 and Table 5, a better fit is obtained using Equation (1) with a high R2 value (>0.93) and there is a good agreement between the proposed kinetic model and the experimental data. This indicates that the control step in the reactions between oxalic acid and metals (V and Ni) under microwave-assisted is the surface chemical reaction.
To calculate the activation energy (Ea), lnk is plotted against 1/T according to the Arrhenius equation [20]. The linear fitting of (lnk) versus (1/T) with a slope of (–Ea/R) is depicted in Figure 9. The activation energies calculated from the Arrhenius plots are 3.28 kJ/mol for V and 34.41 kJ/mol for Ni during the leaching process under microwave-assisted. The apparent activation energy of V in the acid leaching process is lower than that of Ni, this indicates that V tends to be more soluble than Ni, because Ni tends to form both oxalate compounds and oxalate complexes, whereas V forms only oxalate compounds [29].

4. Discussion

According to the experiments on conventional leaching processes, without the addition of H2O2, the leaching efficiencies of V and Ni were found to be 73.51% and 41.25%, respectively. The conventional leaching time was found to be 240 min, whereas the C2H2O4 concentration was 2 mol/L. Based on the experiments of conventional leaching process in the presence of H2O2, the V and Ni leaching efficiencies were determined to be 91.56% and 46.78%, respectively. Obviously, when the data for conventional and microwave-assisted experiments were compared, it was found that the microwave-assisted approach had a significant positive impact on the extraction of V and Ni from SFCC catalysts.
The results presented in Table 6 show that the microwave-assisted leaching residue had a larger specific surface area and a richer pore structure than the conventional leaching residue. In addition, H2O2 had an effect on the specific surface area and pore structure of SFCC catalysts, which is explained by the fact that H2O2 will react with V compounds in SFCC catalysts. The oxidation of low-price vanadium resulted in better absorption and conversion of microwave energy than that of the conventional leaching. The reaction mechanism of V in the leaching process is shown in Figure 10a. As a strong oxidant, H2O2 can oxidize low-valence metal compounds under acidic conditions [30]. Therefore, the use of H2O2 to pretreat SFCC catalysts can improve the efficiency of metal leaching without calcination. When the pH value was ≤1, vanadium pentoxide was dissolved in acid to generate vanadium oxide ions [VO2]+. The [VO2]+ ions of positive pentavalent vanadium can be reduced to [VO]2+ ions of positive tetravalent vanadium by C2H2O4. The leaching of Ni depended on the pH and the concentration of oxalate, while it was restricted by the low solubility of nickel (II) oxalate. Moreover, other metals that formed complexes with the oxalate (such as V and Al) would also consume the available oxalate ions, and therefore, affect the solubility of Ni. The related reaction mechanism is shown in Figure 10b, which is consistent with the results reported in Verma [31] and Pathak [32].
The SEM images of SFCC catalysts and various leaching residues are shown in Figure 11. It can be found from Figure 11a that metal oxides were deposited on the surface of FCC catalyst, which reduced the surface area of FCC catalyst, and therefore, deactivated it. Comparing the conventional oxalic acid leaching residue in Figure 11b with the SEM-EDS image of the conventional oxalic acid + H2O2 leaching residue in Figure 11c, it can be clearly shown that the average grain size of the latter was significantly reduced. Combined with the average grain size analysis presented in Table 6, it can be seen that the conventional stirring of the SFCC catalyst particles would also cause the particles to break, though the reaction of H2O2 and vanadium oxide intensified further fragmentation of the particles. The SEM-EDS image of the microwave-assisted leaching residue shown in Figure 11d indicates that when the thermal stress increased to a certain level, the particle size of the leaching residues was further reduced. The EDS images of the SFCC catalyst and various leaching residues are shown in Figure 12. Compared with the content of each substance shown in Figure 12a–c, Figure 12d shows that the microwave-assisted process was beneficial to the leaching of metals. The carbon is from carbon coating; its content changes can be ignored. According to the EDS analysis of leaching residue by C2H2O4, there is still a certain amount of V and Ni in the residue, and the content of Al and Si has little changes. As shown in Figure 12c,d, the contents of V and Ni were below the detection value. At the same time, the contents of Al and Si decreased seriously, indicating that the leaching effect of H2O2 and microwave-assisted on Al and Si was obvious. As shown in Figure 13, Figure 13a is a schematic diagram of the SFCC catalyst, Figure 13b under the combined action of oxalic acid and H2O2, the SFCC catalyst particles form an unreacted nucleation model, and Figure 13c is fragmentation reaction model of the SFCC catalyst particles under microwave conditions. The possible reason is that a temperature gradient is generated in the SFCC catalyst, which further causes the decomposition of spent catalyst particles, and results in a stronger diffusion of oxalic acid. However, the microwave-assisted process also facilitated the formation of pores on the surface of spent catalyst particles. After the microwave-assisted treatment, significant changes in the behavior of these particles resulted in a faster dissolution of metals from the SFCC catalysts.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the combination of the addition of H2O2 and microwaves has been proved to be an effective process to leach metals from SFCC catalysts. The optimized reaction conditions (concentration of C2H2O4, reaction time, microwave power, and concentration of H2O2) for the microwave-assisted process have also been reported. The optimum conditions obtained are as follows: oxalic acid concentration of 1.8 mol/L; leaching time of 91 min; microwave-assisted power of 500 W; H2O2 concentration of 1.1 mol/L. Under optimized conditions, the leaching rates of V and Ni reach the values of 91.36% and 46.35%, respectively. The apparent activation energies of V and Ni during the leaching process were calculated to be 3.28 and 34.41 kJ/mol, respectively. Moreover, BET and SEM were applied to analyze the mechanism of the microwave-assisted leaching process. It is shown that different activated metals in the SFCC catalysts have diverse characteristics for microwave absorption, which results in local temperature gradient, leading to the separation of V and Ni compounds from the pores of SFCC catalysts and exposing the V and Ni compounds to the surface of SFCC catalysts. Therefore, the leaching agent can easily react with V and Ni compounds. The present investigation explores the advantages of microwave-assisted heating, and the addition of H2O2 to the leaching system for the recovery of valuable metals from SFCC catalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min12070834/s1, Figure S1: The effect of time and temperature on the leaching rate of V; Figure S2: The effect of time and temperature on the leaching rate of Ni.

Author Contributions

D.Z., investigation, data curation, visualization, and writing—original draft; Y.Z., conceptualization and methodology; T.L., validation; J.H., project administration; Z.C., supervision; R.Z., resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFC1900602), Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774216), and Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Hubei Province (T201802). The authors cordially thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments on this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks to the State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Mineral Metallurgical Resources Utilization and Pollution Control, Wuhan 430081, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Strategic Vanadium Resources Utilization, Wuhan 430081, China; Hubei Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of High Efficient Cleaning Utilization for Shale Vanadium Resource, Wuhan 430081, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferella, F. A review on management and recycling of spent selective catalytic reduction catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 246, 118990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bai, P.; Etim, U.; Yan, Z.; Mintova, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Gao, X. Fluid catalytic cracking technology: Current status and recent discoveries on catalyst contamination. Catal. Rev. 2018, 61, 333–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferella, F.; Innocenzi, V.; Maggiore, F. Oil refining spent catalysts: A review of possible recycling technologies. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 108, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vogt, E.T.C.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Fluid catalytic cracking: Recent developments on the grand old lady of zeolite catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7342–7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhou, Q.; Qi, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ren, F.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Etschmann, B.; Zhang, L. A detailed speciation of iron on FCC catalysts based on an integrated use of advanced characterisation methods and thermodynamic equilibrium simulation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 599, 1175977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.S.; Lu, X.; Owen, R.; Manos, G.; Xu, R.; Wang, F.R.; Maskell, W.C.; Shearing, P.R.; Brett, D.J.L. Fine structural changes of fluid catalytic catalysts and characterization of coke formed resulting from heavy oil devolatilization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luan, H.; Lin, J.; Xiu, G.; Ju, F.; Ling, H. Study on compositions of FCC flue gas and pollutant precursors from FCC catalysts. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Senter, C.; Mastry, M.C.; Mannion, A.M.; McGuire, R.; Houtz, D.; Yilmaz, B. Quantitative Visual Characterization of Contaminant Metals and their Mobility in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Wan, Q.; Zheng, D. Immobilization of vanadium and nickel in spent fluid catalytic cracking (SFCC) catalysts-based geopolymer. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 332, 130112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, R. Using mechanical activation of quartz to enhance the compressive strength of metakaolin based geopolymers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 111, 103635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wan, Q.; Rao, F.; Song, S.; Leon-Patino, C.A.; Ma, Y.; Yin, W. Consolidation of mine tailings through geopolymerization at ambient temperature. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 2451–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Le, M.N.; Lee, M.S. A Review on Hydrometallurgical Processes for the Recovery of Valuable Metals from Spent Catalysts and Life Cycle Analysis Perspective. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2020, 42, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mazurek, K. Recovery of vanadium, potassium and iron from a spent vanadium catalyst by oxalic acid solution leaching, precipitation and ion exchange processes. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 134–135, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Le, T.; Li, X.; Ravindra, A.V.; Wang, Q.; Peng, J.; Ju, S. Leaching behavior of contaminant metals from spent FCC catalyst under microwave irradiation. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 035509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, Z.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.-K.; Liu, M.-D.; Liu, Z.-Z. Recovery of vanadium and molybdenum from spent petrochemical catalyst by microwave-assisted leaching. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2019, 26, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, K.; Jiang, Q.; Gao, L.; Chen, J.; Peng, J.; Koppala, S.; Omran, M.; Chen, G. Investigations on the microwave absorption properties and thermal behavior of vanadium slag: Improvement in microwave oxidation roasting for recycling vanadium and chromium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 395, 122698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, H.; Jiang, T.; Xu, Y.; Wen, J.; Xue, X. Leaching Kinetics of Vanadium and Chromium During Sulfuric Acid Leaching with Microwave and Conventional Calcification-Roasted High Chromium Vanadium Slag. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2018, 41, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pinto, I.S.S.; Soares, H.M.V.M. Microwave-assisted selective leaching of nickel from spent hydrodesulphurization catalyst: A comparative study between sulphuric and organic acids. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 140, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hosseini Nasab, M.; Noaparast, M.; Abdollahi, H. Dissolution optimization and kinetics of nickel and cobalt from iron-rich laterite ore, using sulfuric acid at atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2020, 52, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tavakoli, M.R.; Dreisinger, D.B. The kinetics of oxidative leaching of vanadium trioxide. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 147–148, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sadeghi, S.M.; Jesus, J.; Pinto, E.; Almeida, A.A.; Soares, H.M.V.M. A simple, efficient and selective process for recycling La (and Al) from fluid cracking catalysts using an environmentally friendly strategy. Miner. Eng. 2020, 156, 106375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le, M.N.; Lee, M.S. Selective dissolution of vanadium(V) from spent petroleum catalysts by oxalic acid solution. J. Min. Metall. Sect. B Metall. 2020, 56, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Huang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Xue, N. Source separation of vanadium over iron from roasted vanadium-bearing shale during acid leaching via ferric fluoride surface coating. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petrus, H.T.B.M.; Wijaya, A.; Putra, A.D.P.; Iskandar, Y.; Bratakusuma, D.; Mufakhir, F.R.; Astuti, W.; Wiratni. Effect of temperature and acid concentration on Ianthanum extraction from spent catalyst using organic acid. In Proceedings of the 2nd Mineral Processing and Technology International Conference, Tangerang, Indonesia, 1 November 2018; Volume 10, pp. 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  25. Biswas, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Chaudhuri, M.G.; Banerjee, P.C.; Mukherjee, S.; Dey, R. Optimization of process parameters and dissolution kinetics of nickel and cobalt from lateritic chromite overburden using organic acids. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chauhan, G.; Pant, K.K.; Nigam, K.D. Development of green technology for extraction of nickel from spent catalyst and its optimization using response surface methodology. Green Process. Synth. 2013, 2, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Waba, I.E.; Abubakar, A.; Yunusa, S.; Audu, N. Reactivation of Spent FCC Catalyst via Oxidation and Acid Treatment. Appl. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2020, 6, 22–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, J.; Qiu, Z.; Yang, J.; Cao, L.; Zhang, W. Recovery of Mo and Ni from spent acrylonitrile catalysts using an oxidation leaching–chemical precipitation technique. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 164, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Verma, A.; Kore, R.; Corbin, D.R.; Shiflett, M.B. Metal Recovery Using Oxalate Chemistry: A Technical Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 15381–15393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mulak, W.; Szymczycha, A.; Leśniewicz, A.; Żyrnicki, W. Prliminary resluts of metals leaching from a spent Hydrodeslphurzation HDS catalyst. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2006, 40, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nagar, N.; Garg, H.; Gahan, C.S. Integrated bio-pyro-hydro-metallurgical approach to recover metal values from petroleum refinery spent catalyst. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pathak, A.; Vinoba, M.; Kothari, R. Emerging role of organic acids in leaching of valuable metals from refinery-spent hydroprocessing catalysts, and potential techno-economic challenges: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 51, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the simultaneous recovery of V and Ni from the SFCC catalyst.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the simultaneous recovery of V and Ni from the SFCC catalyst.
Minerals 12 00834 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the MAS-II Plus atmospheric microwave workstation.
Figure 2. Schematic of the MAS-II Plus atmospheric microwave workstation.
Minerals 12 00834 g002
Figure 3. Contour plots of the effect of various parameters on V extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Figure 3. Contour plots of the effect of various parameters on V extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Minerals 12 00834 g003aMinerals 12 00834 g003b
Figure 4. 3D response surface plots of the effect of various parameters on V extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Figure 4. 3D response surface plots of the effect of various parameters on V extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Minerals 12 00834 g004aMinerals 12 00834 g004b
Figure 5. Contour plots of the effects of various parameters on Ni extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Figure 5. Contour plots of the effects of various parameters on Ni extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Minerals 12 00834 g005aMinerals 12 00834 g005b
Figure 6. 3D response surface plots of the effect of various parameters on Ni extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Figure 6. 3D response surface plots of the effect of various parameters on Ni extraction: (A) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and leaching time; (B) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and C2H2O4 concentration; (C) Relationship of H2O2 concentration and microwave power; (D) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and microwave power; (E) Relationship of C2H2O4 concentration and leaching time; (F) Relationship of leaching time and microwave power.
Minerals 12 00834 g006aMinerals 12 00834 g006b
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots of quadratic model. ((A) Predicted v/s the Actual values for V; (B) Predicted v/s the Actual for Ni).
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots of quadratic model. ((A) Predicted v/s the Actual values for V; (B) Predicted v/s the Actual for Ni).
Minerals 12 00834 g007
Figure 8. Leaching kinetics of different elements in oxalic acid: (A) V using the surface chemical reaction control model; (B) V using the diffusion control model; (C) Ni using the surface chemical reaction control model; (D) Ni using the diffusion control model.
Figure 8. Leaching kinetics of different elements in oxalic acid: (A) V using the surface chemical reaction control model; (B) V using the diffusion control model; (C) Ni using the surface chemical reaction control model; (D) Ni using the diffusion control model.
Minerals 12 00834 g008
Figure 9. Linear fitting of (lnk) vs. (1/T).
Figure 9. Linear fitting of (lnk) vs. (1/T).
Minerals 12 00834 g009
Figure 10. Extraction mechanism of V and Ni in SFCC catalyst by oxalic acid under microwave-assisted conditions ((a). Extraction mechanism of V; (b). Extraction mechanism of Ni).
Figure 10. Extraction mechanism of V and Ni in SFCC catalyst by oxalic acid under microwave-assisted conditions ((a). Extraction mechanism of V; (b). Extraction mechanism of Ni).
Minerals 12 00834 g010
Figure 11. SEM images of the spent catalyst and various leaching residues: ((a) SFCC catalyst; (b) leaching residue by C2H2O4; (c) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2; (d) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2 with microwave-assisted process).
Figure 11. SEM images of the spent catalyst and various leaching residues: ((a) SFCC catalyst; (b) leaching residue by C2H2O4; (c) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2; (d) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2 with microwave-assisted process).
Minerals 12 00834 g011
Figure 12. EDS images of the spent catalyst and various leaching residues: ((a) SFCC catalysts; (b) leaching residue by C2H2O4; (c) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2; (d) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2 with the microwave-assisted process).
Figure 12. EDS images of the spent catalyst and various leaching residues: ((a) SFCC catalysts; (b) leaching residue by C2H2O4; (c) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2; (d) leaching residue by C2H2O4 + H2O2 with the microwave-assisted process).
Minerals 12 00834 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the SFCC catalyst under different condition ((a) SFCC catalyst; (b) unreacted nucleation model, (c) fragmentation reaction model).
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the SFCC catalyst under different condition ((a) SFCC catalyst; (b) unreacted nucleation model, (c) fragmentation reaction model).
Minerals 12 00834 g013
Table 1. Elemental analysis of the SFCC catalyst.
Table 1. Elemental analysis of the SFCC catalyst.
ElementAlSiFeVNiLaCe
(wt.%)29.2617.590.480.440.531.670.68
Table 2. Independent factors and levels for design.
Table 2. Independent factors and levels for design.
FactorsSymbolRange and Levels
−101
H2O2 amount (mol/L)x1024
C2H2O4 concentration (mol/L)x2246
leaching time (min)x3204060
microwave power (W)x4150350550
Table 3. Experimental design matrix and results.
Table 3. Experimental design matrix and results.
RunX1X2X3X4Y1Y2RunX1X2X3X4Y1Y2
111.59045085.6430.58161212055091.3746.35
20.52.59050078.3540.36170.529045078.2642.65
31.529045091.3946.381812.512050091.3840.38
412.59055091.3840.211911.512050083.5942.35
5129050091.3546.352012.56050076.3538.66
611.56050062.5930.51211.51.59050086.3840.28
71.526050073.2940.2622126045073.2537.25
80.529055080.3946.3523129050091.3746.34
9129050091.3646.342411.59055081.2641.28
10126055081.5442.3825129050091.3646.36
111212045091.3846.37261.52.59050091.3840.39
120.5212050080.4446.33270.526050065.2838.59
131.5212050091.3946.36281.529055091.3946.35
1412.59045091.3740.21290.51.59050058.6932.84
15129050091.3646.35
Table 4. Statistical results of the ANOVA.
Table 4. Statistical results of the ANOVA.
Statistical ResultsVNi
Model F-value11.1960.37
Model prob > F<0.0001<0.0001
R-squared0.9590.971
CV%3.302.74
Adjusted R-squared0.9180.942
Adequate precision15.99821.700
Table 5. Kinetic parameters at different leaching temperatures using different kinetic models.
Table 5. Kinetic parameters at different leaching temperatures using different kinetic models.
Kt = 1 − (1 − Xi)1/3Kt = 1 + 2 (1 − Xi) − 3 (1 − Xi)2/3
T (K)kR2T (K)kR2
V353.156.38 × 10−40.952353.151.83 × 10−40.887
358.157.00 × 10−40.969358.152.26 × 10−40.889
363.157.58 × 10−40.938363.152.41 × 10−40.921
368.157.64 × 10−40.979368.153.50 × 10−40.986
373.158.00 × 10−40.942373.153.59 × 10−40.904
Ni353.154.46 × 10−60.994353.153.84 × 10−60.953
358.152.81 × 10−50.993358.152.85 × 10−50.858
363.154.04 × 10−50.945363.153.18 × 10−50.881
368.155.04 × 10−50.997368.154.17 × 10−50.901
373.157.17 × 10−50.983373.156.83 × 10−50.886
Table 6. Pore structure parameters of SFCC catalysts before and after acid leaching.
Table 6. Pore structure parameters of SFCC catalysts before and after acid leaching.
SampleSpecific Surface Area (m2/g)Average Grain Size (nm)
Fresh FCC catalyst51.3420.10
Spent FCC catalyst34.8624.23
Conventional leaching residue58.9118.48
Conventional leaching with H2O2 leaching residue72.4513.56
Microwave-assisted with H2O2 leaching residue83.337.47
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Huang, J.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, R. Research on Leaching of V and Ni in Spent FCC Catalyst Using Oxalic Acid/H2O2 under Microwave-Assisted Conditions. Minerals 2022, 12, 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070834

AMA Style

Zheng D, Zhang Y, Liu T, Huang J, Cai Z, Zhang R. Research on Leaching of V and Ni in Spent FCC Catalyst Using Oxalic Acid/H2O2 under Microwave-Assisted Conditions. Minerals. 2022; 12(7):834. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Dalong, Yimin Zhang, Tao Liu, Jing Huang, Zhenlei Cai, and Ruobing Zhang. 2022. "Research on Leaching of V and Ni in Spent FCC Catalyst Using Oxalic Acid/H2O2 under Microwave-Assisted Conditions" Minerals 12, no. 7: 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop