Next Article in Journal
Improving the Efficiency of Downhole Uranium Production Using Oxygen as an Oxidizer
Next Article in Special Issue
Genesis of the Dongpuzi Gold Deposit in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China: Constraints from Geology, Fluid Inclusion, and C–H–O–S–Pb Isotopes
Previous Article in Journal
Desorption of REEs from Halloysite and Illite: A Link to the Exploitation of Ion-Adsorption RE Ore Based on Clay Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ore Genesis of the Dongping Gold Deposit in the Northern Margin of North China Craton: Constraints from In-Situ Major, Trace Elemental Analysis of Magnetite and Pyrite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton

Shenyang Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(8), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genesis and Metallogeny of Non-ferrous and Precious Metal Deposits)

Abstract

:
Some Early Cretaceous granitoids characterized by abundant mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) formed by magma mixing have been associated with gold deposits in the eastern North China Craton (NCC). However, the genetic connection of magma mixing with gold mineralization remains unclear. The zircon U–Pb ages and in situ Lu-Hf isotopic compositions, whole-rock major- and trace-element and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions, as well as EPMA biotite compositions, were presented for the Sanguliu granodiorite and enclaves in the Liaodong Peninsula in order to obtain insights into the spatial and temporal distribution, and internal connection of magma mixing with the decratonic gold deposits in the eastern NCC. The Sanguliu granodiorite yielded coeval formation ages with the enclaves (~123 Ma), and their acicular apatites and plagioclase megacrysts suggest that the enclaves were formed by mixing between mafic and felsic magmas. Geochemically, the Sanguliu granodiorite is high-K calc-alkaline I-type granite, with an initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.70552 to 0.71470 and strongly negative εNd(t) (−11.4 to −21.3) and zircon in situ εHf(t) values (−15.1 to −25.4), indicating that the felsic magmas were ancient lower crust with the involvement of mantle-derived materials. Meanwhile, the enclaves have high MgO (4.18 to 6.17 wt.%), Cr (45.91 to 290.04 ppm), and Ni (19.65 to 88.18 ppm) contents, with high Mg# values of 50 to 57 at intermediate SiO2 contents (53.68 to 55.78 wt.%), highly negative εNd(t) values (mostly −18.42 to −22.03), and in situ zircon εHf(t) values (−18.6 to −22.7), indicating that the mafic magma was mainly derived from the enriched lithospheric mantle. Furthermore, the biotites from the Sanguliu granodiorite clustered between the MH and NNO buffers in the Fe2+–Fe3+–Mg diagram. This, combined with the high Ce/Ce* ratios (1.30 to 107.18) of the zircons, indicates that the primary magmas forming the Sanguliu granodiorite had a high oxygen fugacity, which is favorable for gold mineralization. These findings, together with previous studies of the Early Cretaceous granitoids with enclaves in the eastern NCC, suggest that magma mixing commonly occurred during 110–130 Ma and is temporally, spatially, and genetically related to decratonic gold systems in eastern NCC.

1. Introduction

Granites commonly contain lithic inclusions or bodies, generally referred to as enclaves, whose nature and origin are documented [1,2]. Considering their occurrences, microstructural features, and relationship with host granites, enclaves have been grouped into (1) xenoliths, as solid fragments of wall rock, (2) restite, as segregated refractory source materials left after a partial melting event, (3) autolith, as early crystallized cumulus phases or segregated mafic phases or fragments of a border rock series of a felsic pluton, (4) microgranular enclaves representing felsic, mafic, and mafic-felsic (intermediate) hybridized magmas entrained and mingled into felsic host magma, and (5) fragments of synplutonic mafic dyke intrusions [2]. In general, mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) are indicators of magma mingling and mixing processes and provide critical information regarding magma chamber processes and dynamics [2,3,4].
The eastern North China Craton (NCC) is characterized by widespread Early Cretaceous granitic intrusions. Some of these granitic intrusions contain abundant MMEs, which are considered a result of magma mixing and mingling via the intrusion of mafic magmas into felsic magma chambers [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Previous studies have mainly focused on field observations, the petrological characteristics of the host granitoids and MMEs, and the geochemistry of the host granitoids [5,6,9]. However, further MME information is limited, especially regarding their formation ages, magma sources, and mechanisms. Moreover, only the Gudaoling intrusion-enclosing MMEs in the Liaodong Peninsula have been generally researched. The intrusion is considered to have formed through a complex, multi-stage hybridization process that involved mantle- and crustal-derived magmas and several concomitant magmatic processes [7,8].
Furthermore, the mixing and mingling processes involving crustal- and mantle-derived magma may contribute to the formation of endogenetic metal deposits, especially gold deposits [10,12,13]. The Early Cretaceous granitic plutons enclosing MMEs formed by magma mixing and mingling, such as the Guojialing and Weideshan granitic intrusions, may be associated with gold deposits in the Jiaodong Peninsula in the eastern NCC [10]. However, the role of magma mixing in gold mineralization remains unclear. New field observations have identified the occurrence of MMEs in the Sanguliu intrusion, which hosts the large-scale Wulong gold deposit in the Liaodong Peninsula. The petrogenesis of the Sanguliu intrusion has not yet been investigated. The genetic relationships between the Sanguliu intrusion and the Wulong gold deposit remain controversial. Li et al. proposed that the Sanguliu intrusion is a metallogenetic intrusion of the Wulong gold deposit [14]. However, Wei et al. believed that the Sanguliu intrusion did not directly provide any ore-forming fluids or materials for Wulong gold mineralization but had similar Sr and Nd isotopic compositions to the deeper source material of the Wulong deposit [15]. The existence of deeper magma as the metallogenic intrusion has also been supported by Yu et al. [16] and Chen et al. [17]. Therefore, research on the Sanguliu intrusion may provide critical information regarding the relationship between magma mixing and gold mineralization.
On the basis of the field observation and petrography, this paper presents new zircon U-Pb ages and in situ Lu-Hf isotopes, whole-rock major and trace elements and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic data of the MMEs and host Sanguliu granodiorite. The mineral compositions of biotite from the Sanguliu granodiorite were also analyzed. Based on the results, the petrogenesis and magma source of the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves were determined. We also discuss the relationship between the Sanguliu intrusion and the Wulong gold deposit and propose a new petrogenetic-dynamic model for these rocks. Furthermore, we review the published data for other Early Cretaceous granitoids enclosing MMEs in the Jiaodong, Liaodong, and Taihang areas in order to constrain the temporal and spatial distribution and identify any genetic relation between decratonic gold deposits and magma mixing in the eastern NCC.

2. Regional Geology

The Liaodong Peninsula is located in the eastern part of the NCC at the western margin of the Pacific Plate (Figure 1 and Figure 2a). The exposed rocks in the area comprise metamorphosed Archean-Paleoproterozoic basement, Mesoproterozoic-Paleozoic post-cratonization cover sequences, and a series of Mesozoic intrusive and volcanic rocks (Figure 2b). The metamorphosed basement sequences include the Archean supracrustal rocks and diorite–tonalite–granodiorite suites, and the Paleoproterozoic metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic successions of the Liaohe Group, as well as associated granitic and mafic intrusions. The Paleoproterozoic sedimentary and volcanic successions of the Liaohe Group metamorphosed from greenschist to the lower amphibolite facies and locally up to the granulite facies [18], which are conventionally divided into five formations: Liangzishan, Li’eryu, Gaojiayu, Dashiqiao, and Gaixian Formations [19]. The lowermost Liangzishan Formation is composed of basal conglomerate-bearing quartzites, transitioning upwards to chlorite-sericite quartz schists, phyllites, garnet-bearing mica schists, minor graphite-bearing garnet-staurolite mica schists, and kyanite-bearing mica schists. It is conformably overlain by the Li’eryu and Gaojiayu Formations, which consist of boron-bearing fine-grained felsic gneiss, amphibolites, and mica quartz schist. Overlying the Gaojiayu Formation is the Dashiqiao Formation, which is composed predominantly of dolomitic marbles intercalated with minor carbonaceous slates and mica schists. The uppermost Gaixian Formation comprises phyllites, andalusite-cordierite mica schists, staurolite mica schists, and sillimanite mica schists, with minor quartzite and marble present.
Voluminous Paleoproterozoic granitoid and mafic intrusions are also exposed in this area (Figure 2b). These mafic intrusions consist of gabbros and dolerites, most of which have been metamorphosed into greenschists and amphibolites, and the granitoid plutons are composed of deformed monzogranitic gneisses (traditionally called the Liaoji Granites), undeformed porphyritic monzogranites and granites, and alkaline syenites [26].
After the Paleoproterozoic rifting/orogenic events, this area was partially covered by Mesoproterozoic to Paleozoic metasediments (Figure 2b) [27]. During the Late Triassic, the area was affected by either the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean or the amalgamation of the Yangtze Craton (YC) and NCC to be featured by the local emplacement of Middle-Late Triassic granite (Figure 2b). Since the Late Mesozoic, the Liaodong Peninsula has become an important part of the circum-Pacific tectono-magmatic zone and is characterized by intensive tectonic, magmatic, and metallogenic events [28,29]. The Late Mesozoic intrusions are mainly divided into (1) Jurassic (180–153 Ma) tonalite, diorite, and gneissic two-mica monzogranite, which have experienced ductile deformation, and (2) Early Cretaceous (131–100 Ma) undeformed to slightly deformed diorite, granodiorite, monzogranite, and syenogranite (Figure 2b) [8,30]. Accompanied by the widespread Late Mesozoic granitoids, several episodes of volcanism, terrestrial deposition, extensional structures, and gold mineralization occurred.

3. Geology and Petrography of the Sanguliu Pluton

The Sanguliu pluton is situated in the middle of the Wulong ore field in Dandong City (Figure 3a), which contains the large tonnage of Wulong and Sidaogou gold deposits, as well as many other small gold deposits and occurrences (Figure 2a). This pluton is cut by the auriferous quartz veins of the large Wulong gold deposit (Figure 3b) and has slight sericitization and disseminated pyritization. It occurs as a stock with an outcrop of 40–50 km2 intruding into the Paleoproterozoic metamorphic rocks of the Liaohe Group and Jurassic Wulong gneissic two-mica granite with a sensitive high-resolution ion micro-probe (SHRIMP) zircon U-Pb age of 158 ± 2 Ma [31] and is cut by a series of north-northeast-trending faults (Figure 3a). The Sanguliu intrusion yields obvious facies zoning, wherein its lithology changes from monzogranite in the center to granodiorite and quartz diorite at the border (Figure 3a).
With the exception of the xenoliths of the metamorphic rocks of the Liaohe Group, monzodioritic enclaves are ubiquitous in the Sanguliu intrusion and are oval or elliptical, ranging from five to forty centimeters in diameter (Figure 4a,b). In general, these enclaves have sharp contact with the host Sanguliu intrusion (Figure 4c). The petrography of the host Sanguliu granodiorite and its enclave studied herein are described as follows.
The Sanguliu granodiorite has a medium–fine-grained granular texture and consists of quartz (20%–30%), plagioclase (35%–45%), potassium feldspar (15%–25%), biotite (10%–15%), and minor hornblende (approximately 5%), as well as accessory minerals of titanite and apatite (Figure 4c). Note that plagioclase commonly develops compositional zoning.
Meanwhile, the monzodiorite enclave has, in general, a hypautomorphic granular texture and comprises plagioclase (40%–45%), potassium feldspar (15%–20%), hornblende (approximately 20%), biotite (5%–10%), and minor quartz (<5%), as well as accessory minerals of apatite and zircon (Figure 4c–f). Furthermore, some plagioclase within the enclave occurs as an elliptic chadacryst that is trapped from the host granodiorite and develops resorption and zonal textures (Figure 4d,e). The apatite is always acicular with a length–width ratio of 10:1–20:1 (Figure 4f).

4. Analytical Methods

4.1. Zircon LA–ICP–MS and SHRIMP U–Pb Isotopic Dating

Separation, target preparation, and cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircon from Sanguliu granodiorite (sample SGL) were carried out by the Hongxin Geology and Exploration Technology Service Limited Company of Hebei Province, China, and laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) zircon U–Pb dating was completed at Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Land and Resource.
Target preparation, CL images, and the SHRIMP U–Pb isotopic dating of zircon from the monzodiorite enclave (sample BTZ-1) were performed at the Beijing Ion Probe Center of the China Institute of Geological Sciences. Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb isotopic dating was completed using a SHRIMP II instrument. The primary O−2 flow intensity and beam spot diameter were maintained at 3–5 nA and 25 μm, respectively. The standard sample M257 (U = 840 × 10−6, [33]) and TEM (age, 417 Ma; [34]) were used to correct the zircon U content and age, respectively. The standard zircon TEM was analyzed after investigating all three unknown samples. SQUID and ISOPLOT software were used for data processing [35]. The measured 204Pb content was used to correct for ordinary lead, and 207Pb/206Pb (more than 1000 Ma) or 206Pb/238U (less than 1000 Ma) ages were adopted for the zircon age. Details of the testing methods and experimental procedures, as well as related parameters and error corrections, were identical to those applied in Williams [36].

4.2. Zircon In Situ Lu–Hf Isotopes

Zircon in situ Lu–Hf isotopic analyses were conducted at the State Key Laboratory for Endogenic Metal Deposits Research, Nanjing University, using a Neptune Laser Ablation Multiple-Receiver LA–ICP–MS with a 193 nm laser sampling system. The laser spot diameter was 60 μm, the pulse width was 15 ns, and the abrasion material carrier gas was He. Detailed analytical procedures are provided in the literature [37,38]. Measurements of the 91500 and MT zircons were conducted after every ten sample analyses. These standard samples, that is, 91500 and MT, had 176Hf/177Hf ratios of 0.282316 ± 30 and 0.282507 ± 50, respectively. In the εHf(t) and model age calculations, the 176Lu decay constant was 1.867−11 [39], and the 176Lu/177Hf and 176Hf/177Hf ratios of the present-day chondritic and depleted mantle were 0.0332 and 0.282772 [40], and 0.0384 and 0.28325, respectively [41]. Additionally, the calculation of the crustal model ages determined an average crustal value of 176Lu/177Hf = 0.015 [42].

4.3. Whole-Rock Geochemistry

A total of 21 fresh and unaltered samples for the Sanguliu granodiorite (16) and monzodiorite enclave (5) were selected for major, trace, and rare earth element (REE) compositions analyses, which were conducted at the Northeast China Supervision and Inspection Center of Mineral Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources of China. The major element compositions were analyzed using a Philips PW2404 type X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, which has an analytical precision of better than 5%. Meanwhile, the trace element and REE compositions were determined using a nHR–ICP–MS (Element I), which has a precision of better than 5% if the contents of trace elements were more than 10 ppm, and better than 10% if their contents were less than 10 ppm.

4.4. Sr–Nd–Pb Isotopes

A total of 10 fresh and unaltered samples of the Sanguliu granodiorite (5) and monzodiorite enclave (5) were selected for Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd, and Pb isotope analyses, which were conducted at the Analytical Laboratory of Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology using an ISOPROBE-T type thermoelectric ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS). The mass fractionations of the Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopes were corrected using 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, respectively, with corresponding standard results of NBS987 = 0.710250 ± 7 and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512109 ± 3 (JMC). The experiment background values of Rb, Sr, Sm, and Nd were 2 × 10−10 g, 2 × 10−10 g, <50 × 10−12 g, and <50 × 10−12 g, respectively.
The Pb isotopes were identified via static acceptance and the uncorrected results of NBS981 were 208Pb/206Pb = 2.164940 ± 15, 207Pb/206Pb = 0.914338 ± 7, and 204Pb/206Pb = 0.591107 ± 2. The experimental background Pb content was <100 × 10−12 g.

4.5. Mineral Chemical Compositions

Mineral compositions were determined at the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), using a JEOL JXA-8100 Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA) equipped with four wavelength-dispersive spectrometers. Prior to analysis, the samples were coated with a thin conductive carbon film. Precautions suggested by Zhang and Yang [43] were employed to minimize the differences in the carbon film thickness between samples in order to obtain a uniform coating of approximately 20 nm. During the analysis, an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, beam current of 20 nA, and 10 µm spot size were used. The data were corrected online using a modified ZAF (atomic number, absorption, fluorescence) correction procedure. The peak counting times were 10s for F, Cl, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, and Fe, and 20s for Ti and Mn. The background counting time was half of the peak counting time for the high- and low-energy background positions. The following standards were used: Fluorite (F), Halite (Cl), Sanidine (K, Al), Almandine (Fe), Diopsode (Ca, Mg), Jadeite (Na), Rhodonite (Mn), Olivine (Si), and Rutile (Ti).

5. Results

5.1. Zircon U–Pb Dating

The LA–ICP–MS and SHRIMP zircon U–Pb dating data for the granodiorite intrusion (sample SGL) and monzodioritic enclave (sample BT1) are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. The analyzed zircon grains from the granodiorite and monzodiorite are euhedral–subhedral, colorless, exhibit weak or clear oscillatory growth zoning in the CL images (Figure 5), and have Th/U ratios of 0.78 to 1.47 and 0.47 to 1.79, respectively. These zircon characteristics are indicative of magmatic origins [44].
Twenty-four granodiorite zircon analyses formed a relatively tight concordia cluster (Figure 6a) and their 206Pb/238U ages ranged from 118 ± 3 to 127 ± 4 Ma, with a weighted mean age of 122.2 ± 1.3 Ma (MSWD = 0.45, N = 24) (Figure 6b), which may represent the final emplacement age of the host granodiorite.
Similarly, thirteen zircons’ analyses from the monzodioritic enclaves resulted in a tight cluster on a concordia (Figure 6c) and their 206Pb/238U ages range from 119.1 ± 3.1 to 129.4 ± 2.6 Ma, with a weighted mean age of 125.3 ± 1.6 Ma (MSWD = 1.01, N = 12) (Figure 6d), which could be considered to be the crystallization age of the monzodioritic enclave. Furthermore, one zircon spot yielded an older 207Pb/206Pb age of 1776 ± 24 Ma, which may have been inherited from the Paleoproterozoic Liaohe Group.

5.2. Zircon In Situ Lu–Hf Isotopes

Lu–Hf isotopic analyses were conducted on the 13 zircon grains with concordant SHRIMP U–Pb ages, and the results are listed in Table 3. The 176Lu/177Hf ratios for 13 spots ranged from 0.000362 to 0.00125, with εHf(t) values ranging from −18.6 to −22.7, and TDM2 model ages of 2404 to 2613 Ma (Figure 7).

5.3. Major and Trace Elements

Major and trace elemental data for the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclave are listed in Table 4. The Sanguliu granodiorite has medium SiO2 (67.54 to 68.45 wt.%), medium Al2O3 (14.82 to 15.39 wt.%), K2O (4.20 to 4.40 wt.%), and low MgO (1.51 to 1.72 wt.%) and Na2O (3.22 to 3.46 wt.%) contents, with total alkalis and Na2O/K2O ratios ranging from 7.50 to 7.86 wt.%, and from 0.75 to 0.82, respectively. It also has medium values of aluminum saturation index (A/CNK = 0.92–1.02) and Mg# values ranging from 43.73 to 47.40. Conversely, the monzodioritic enclave has low SiO2 (54.17 to 55.78 wt.%) and Na2O (2.15 to 4.67 wt.%), variable Al2O3 (12.92 to 17.07 wt.%) and K2O (1.93 to 5.95 wt.%), and high MgO (4.18to 6.17 wt.%) and CaO (5.45 to 6.53 wt.%) contents, with total alkalis contents of 6.56 to 8.32 wt.%. The monzodioritic enclave also exhibits low values of aluminum saturation index (A/CNK = 0.62–0.84), and Mg# values ranging from 49.76 to 56.62. In the total alkali–silica diagram, the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclave samples fell into the sub-alkalic granodiorite and alkalic monzodiorite-monzonite fields, respectively (Figure 8a), while the Sanguliu granodiorite samples plotted in the high-K calc-alkaline field in the SiO2–K2O diagram (Figure 8b), and all the evaluated samples plotted into the metaluminous field of the A/NK–A/CNK diagram (Figure 8c). These results indicate that the Sanguliu granodiorite is high-K calc-alkaline and metaluminous, whereas the monzodiorite is alkalic and metaluminous.
Table 3. Zircon in situ Lu–Hf isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
Table 3. Zircon in situ Lu–Hf isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
SampleSHRIMP Age
(Ma)
176Yb/177Hf176Lu/177Hf176Hf/177Hf176Hf/177HfieHf(0)eHf(t)TDM (Ma)TDMC (Ma)fLu/Hf
BTZ-1-1124.30.0331520.0005450.0012500.0000210.2820560.0000190.282053 −25.3 −22.7 0.7 1697 2614 −0.96
BTZ-1-2122.50.0127280.0001120.0004620.0000040.2820940.0000190.282093 −24.0 −21.3 0.7 1610 2527 −0.99
BTZ-1-3126.80.0103770.0000690.0003620.0000020.2821140.0000180.282113 −23.3 −20.5 0.6 1578 2479 −0.99
BTZ-1-4119.80.0125390.0001120.0004580.0000040.2821100.0000200.282109 −23.4 −20.8 0.7 1587 2493 −0.99
BTZ-1-5127.60.0125720.0001210.0004520.0000050.2821040.0000180.282103 −23.6 −20.9 0.6 1595 2501 −0.99
BTZ-1-6126.60.0174420.0000280.0006550.0000010.2821020.0000160.282101 −23.7 −21.0 0.6 1606 2507 −0.98
BTZ-1-7129.10.0159080.0003680.0005800.0000130.2821400.0000190.282139 −22.3 −19.6 0.7 1551 2420 −0.98
BTZ-1-8125.60.0105170.0001870.0003810.0000060.2820990.0000180.282099 −23.8 −21.1 0.6 1599 2512 −0.99
BTZ-1-9129.60.0132940.0000630.0004850.0000020.2820740.0000150.282072 −24.7 −21.9 0.5 1638 2568 −0.99
BTZ-1-10126.70.0197750.0002410.0006620.0000070.2821190.0000190.282117 −23.1 −20.4 0.7 1583 2470 −0.98
BTZ-1-11123.40.0179980.0003450.0006030.0000110.2821500.0000170.282148 −22.0 −19.4 0.6 1539 2403 −0.98
BTZ-1-13128.60.0145340.0004120.0005230.0000160.2820840.0000190.282082 −24.3 −21.6 0.7 1626 2546 −0.98
BTZ-1-14125.10.0253540.0007840.0009680.0000310.2821310.0000200.282128 −22.7 −20.0 0.7 1580 2446 −0.97
TW005-1.1125.10.0063580.0000460.0002740.0000020.2820650.0000200.282042 −25.8 −23.1 0.7 16722642 −0.99
TW005-10.1121.80.0067220.0000680.0002800.0000030.2821050.0000180.282082 −24.4 −21.7 0.6 16182555 −0.99
TW005-11.1120.60.0099480.0000470.0004200.0000030.2820530.0000190.282030 −26.2 −23.6 0.7 16952672 −0.99
TW005-12.1121.20.0119330.0000550.0005000.0000020.2820640.0000190.282041 −25.8 −23.2 0.7 16832647 −0.98
TW005-15.1121.90.0104520.0000950.0004390.0000040.2820580.0000190.282035 −26.1 −23.4 0.7 16892660 −0.99
TW005-3.1122.20.0081210.0000200.0003400.0000010.2820960.0000200.282073 −24.7 −22.1 0.7 16332576 −0.99
TW005-4.1123.90.0106370.0000630.0004420.0000030.2821070.0000230.282084 −24.3 −21.6 0.8 16222550 −0.99
TW005-5.1120.40.0127980.0002430.0005190.0000090.2821210.0000210.282098 −23.8 −21.2 0.7 16062521 −0.98
TW005-6.1126.60.0090110.0000390.0003710.0000020.2820970.0000210.282074 −24.7 −21.9 0.7 16332571 −0.99
TW005-7.1123.30.0100100.0002210.0004110.0000080.2821300.0000230.282107 −23.5 −20.9 0.8 15902501 −0.99
TW005-9.1125.80.0123470.0001060.0004920.0000040.2821010.0000280.282078 −24.5 −21.8 1.0 16322563 −0.99
TW006-1.1125.50.0125400.0001460.0005240.0000060.2820370.0000200.282014 −26.8 −24.1 0.7 17212704 −0.98
TW006-11.1121.20.0112370.0003700.0004670.0000160.2820350.0000220.282012 −26.9 −24.3 0.8 17222713 −0.99
TW006-13.1121.80.0107050.0001040.0004410.0000050.2820510.0000210.282028 −26.3 −23.7 0.7 16982675 −0.99
TW006-15.1126.60.0107190.0002340.0004450.0000100.2820440.0000220.282021 −26.6 −23.8 0.8 17092689 −0.99
TW006-2.1123.70.0120800.0000400.0005100.0000020.2820630.0000190.282041 −25.9 −23.2 0.7 16852648 −0.98
TW006-3.1123.30.0154310.0002570.0006420.0000120.2820890.0000420.282066 −25.0 −22.3 1.5 16552591 −0.98
TW006-5.1122.80.0098280.0000940.0004010.0000040.2820880.0000200.282065 −25.0 −22.3 0.7 16462593 −0.99
TW006-6.1126.20.0150920.0003180.0006270.0000140.2820080.0000240.281985 −27.8 −25.1 0.9 17662769 −0.98
TW006-8.1120.60.0146810.0000780.0006090.0000040.2820450.0000210.282022 −26.5 −23.9 0.7 17152691 −0.98
TW006-9.1125.30.0103710.0003380.0004260.0000140.2820030.0000200.281980 −28.0 −25.3 0.7 17642781 −0.99
Note: The Hf isotopic data of the host Sanguliu granodiorite (TW005 and TW006) are from [45].
The Sanguliu granodiorite samples have medium total REE contents (∑REE), ranging from 239.80 to 281.96 ppm, and exhibit strong differentiation between the light rare earth element (LREE) and heavy rare earth element (HREE), demonstrating LREE/HREE and LaN/YbN ratios of 15.05–16.68 and 20.92–24.38, respectively. Further, their REE patterns present an LREE-enriched pattern with medium negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.60–0.72) (Figure 9a). In comparison, the monzodioritic enclave samples have lower REE contents (∑REE = 93.43–138.87 ppm), a slightly flatter LREE segments pattern, and LREE/HREE amd LaN/YbN ratios of 4.94–10.59 and 4.08–11.62, respectively. In addition, they feature weak negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.65–0.85) (Figure 9a).
The granodiorite and monzodioritic enclave samples yielded similar variations of trace elemental compositions in the primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram (Figure 9b). They are characterized by enrichments in large ion lithisphile elements (LILEs, i.e., Rb and U), high field strength elements (HFSEs, i.e., Zr, Hf, and Ti), and depletions in LILEs (i.e., K and Sr) and HFSEs (i.e., Nb, P, and HREE) (Figure 9b).

5.4. Sr–Nd–Pb Isotopes

The Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotope data for the host granodiorite and monzodioritic enclave samples are listed in Table 5 and shown in Figure 10a. The initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios and εNd(t) values were calculated at 122 and 125 Ma from the zircon U–Pb dating. All the samples exhibited similar Sr isotopic features with high 87Rb/86Sr (1.1227 to 1.9851) and initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.71436 to 0.71470). In addition, both the host granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves are characterized by strongly negative εNd(t) values of −18.92–−21.34, and −18.42–−30.93 (mostly −18.42–−22.03), respectively. Furthermore, the enclave samples were scattered in the εNd(t)–SiO2 diagram (Figure 10b).
Moreover, the host granodiorite and monzodioritic enclave generated similar Pb isotopic ratios: (206Pb/204Pb)i = 17.6200–17.8360, (207Pb/204Pb)i = 15.5970–15.6190, and (208Pb/204Pb)i = 38.8410–39.9490, as summarized in Table 6 and Figure 11.

5.5. Biotite Compositions

Six biotite mineral spots on the host Sanguliu granodiorite were analyzed, and their EPMA data are listed in Table 7. The cations were initially calculated based on 22 oxygen atoms [65]. The EPMA data indicate that the biotite has high TiO2 (2.71 to 3.71 wt.%), MgO (10.54 to 11.48 wt.%), FeO (20.10 to 21.49 wt.%), and K2O (9.24 to 9.87 wt.%) contents, and low CaO (0.01 to 0.024 wt.%) and Na2O (0.06 to 0.11 wt.%) contents. Further, the calculated Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg), Mg/(Mg + Fe2+) ratios, and AlVI values were found to be 0.46–0.50, 0.47–0.50, and 0.058–0.112, respectively. In the Mg-AlVI + Fe3+ + Ti-Fe2+ + Mn diagram, the biotite from the host Sanguliu granodiorite was classified as magnesio-biotite (Figure 12a). In the Fe2+-Fe3+-Mg2+ diagram, all of the samples plotted between the NNO and MH buffers (Figure 12b).

6. Discussion

6.1. Petrogenesis

The Sanguliu granodiorite samples show relatively low contents of SiO2 (67.54%–68.45%) and Al2O3 (14.82%–15.39%), and low A/CNK values (0.92–1.02), indicating that Sanguliu granodiorite belongs to calc-alkaline I-type granite [69,70]. In addition, the granodiorite samples also exhibit low Ga/Al ratios (Figure 8d), similar to I-type granites, which are different from A-type granite (Figure 8d) [71]. This also could be supported by the petrographic features of the Sanguliu granodiorite. The Sanguliu granodiorite consists of quartz, plagioclase, potassium feldspar, biotite, and minor hornblende (Figure 4), with no muscovite. The petrographic and geochemical data indicate that the Sanguliu granodiorite belongs to typical calc-alkaline I-type granite.
The monzodioritic enclaves found in the host Sanguliu intrusion via field investigation may provide significant insights into the magma processes present [2]. The enclaves in the granitoids are generally interpreted as restites, country-rock xenoliths, autoliths, schlieren, and MMEs [2,72]. The monzodioritic enclaves in the Sanguliu intrusion are usually oval or elliptical and have typical igneous microtextures and sharp contacts with the host rocks. The monzodioritic enclaves have homogeneous U-Pb ages (125.3 ± 1.6 Ma, SHRIMP) with the host Sanguliu intrusion (122.2 ± 1.3 Ma, LA-ICP-MS), which are within the range of acceptable error. Furthermore, the monzodioritic enclaves yield similar medium to weakly negative Eu anomalies and relative Sr depletion to that of the host intrusion, as shown in Figure 9, thereby excluding the possibility of an autolith characterization [73]. These petrographic, geochemical, and geochronological features indicate that the monzodioritic enclaves in the Sanguliu intrusion were not restitic, xenoliths of wallrock, autoliths, or schlierens, but rather MMEs in origin.
MMEs usually represent remnants of a mafic component added to intermediate or felsic magma chambers [4,8,72,74,75]. The MMEs in the Sanguliu intrusion generally contain acicular apatites and megacrysts. The presence of both acicular apatites, which are attributed to rapid cooling, and megacrysts, such as K-feldspar or plagioclase, which are elliptical, implies that the enclaves are hybrids, meaning that they are related to the mingling of small volumes of hot basalt with a cooler granitic melt [3,76]. Furthermore, the MMEs are characterized by wide ranges of εNd(t) values (−18.42–−30.93), which have up to 10 epsilon units. These features suggest that magma mixing between mafic and granitic melts played an important role in the genesis of the Sanguliu granodiorite and MMEs.
The MMEs and host Sanguliu granodiorite show similar whole-rock Sr and isotopic compositions (Figure 11), indicating rapid homogenization and radiogenic isotopic equilibrium during the magma mixing process [24,77,78,79]. In addition to magma mixing, crystal fractionation was involved in the formation of the Sanguliu granodiorite, which is supported by the weak to medium negative Eu anomalies (Figure 9a) and the significant Sr and P depletion shown in the spidergram (Figure 9b). Therefore, the Sanguliu granodiorite and MMEs were the result of mixing between mafic and intermediate to felsic magmas, followed by apatite- and feldspar-dominated fractionation. The magma mixing process likely occurred within the primary magma chambers rather than during magma ascent or evolution, which is reflected by the lack of correlations between the εNd(t) and SiO2 contents of the enclaves (Figure 10b) [80].

6.2. Magma Source

The host granodiorite has high SiO2 (67.54 to 68.45 wt.%) and low MgO (1.51 to 1.72 wt.%), TiO2 (0.47 to 0.52 wt.%) contents, and strongly negative εNd(t) values of −15.53 to −21.34, and εHf(t) values of −20.86 to −25.31, indicating a crustal derivation. The primitive magma can be inferred to have isotopic compositions with εHf(t) values less than −25.31 and ancient Hf model ages (TDM2, 2501–2781 Ma, [45]). As the samples plotted close to the ancient lower crust of the NCC field in the t-εHf(t) diagram (Figure 7a), the host granodiorite may have been primarily derived from an ancient lower crust source. However, the high Mg# values of 43.73–47.40 of the host granodiorite suggest the involvement of mantle-derived material as a result of magma mixing.
The MMEs have high MgO (4.18 to 6.17 wt.%), Cr (45.91 to 290.04 ppm), and Ni (19.65 to 88.18 ppm) contents, and high Mg# values of 50–57 at intermediate silica contents (SiO2 = 53.68–55.78 wt.%), making them distinct from crustal materials or crust-derived melts [81], thereby suggesting that the parental magma of the enclaves was mantle-derived basaltic magma. However, the MMEs yielded strongly negative εNd(t) values of −18.42 to −30.93, which may be the result of the partial melting of an enriched lithospheric mantle or a depleted lithospheric mantle with significant contamination by ancient crustal materials during magma evolution [80]. The voluminous incorporation of crustal components significantly modifies the concentrations of major and trace elements and Mg# values [47,80]. However, the relatively low SiO2 and high MgO contents and Mg# values indicate that significant crustal contamination during magma evolution did not occur. Therefore, the enclave-forming magmas were likely derived mainly from an enriched mantle source.
The enclaves yielded lower negative εNd(t) values (−18.42 to −30.93) than those of the majority of Early Cretaceous mafic rocks in the NCC, which were derived from an enriched lithospheric mantle modified from crustal or slab melts [45,58], and the enclaves plot between the “primitive” mafic rocks from the NCC and ancient lower crust in the diagrams of t–εHf(t) and εNd(t)–(87Sr/86Sr)i (Figure 7a and Figure 10a). These clues suggest that the enclave-forming magmas were contaminated by lower crustal melts. This is supported by the distinct LILE and LREE enrichment and HFSE depletion in the enclaves (Figure 9) [82]. The SHRIMP zircon U-Pb age of 1776 ± 24 Ma for the enclaves also indicates the incorporation of NCC basement materials, which are characterized by late Archean and Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal events [83]. Both Pei et al. [58] and Li et al. [84] proposed that the delaminated NCC lower continental crust materials modified the lithospheric mantle in the Liaodong area. Furthermore, the enclaves have highly negative εNd(t) values (−18.42 to −30.93) that are similar to those of the Early Cretaceous low-Ti lamprophyres in the Luxi area and the Pujiadaba olivine gabbro in the southern Liaoning area (Figure 10a). These low-Ti lamprophyres were derived from the partial melting of a lithospheric mantle modified by crustal melts from both the delaminated NCC lower crust and the broken-off YC slab [45] and the Pujiadaba olivine gabbros in the southern Liaoning area were derived from the partial melting of the lithospheric mantle metasomatized by melts from the broken-off YC slab [58]. Therefore, the enclave-forming magma originated from the partial melting of lithospheric mantle modified by the delaminated NCC lower crustal and broken-off YC slab melts.
Based on the aforementioned petrography, major and trace element geochemical, and Sr, Nd, Pb, and zircon in situ Hf isotopic compositions of the MMEs and host granodiorite, a complex, multi-stage process involving magma mixing and crystal fractionation, is proposed for the generation of the Sanguliu intrusion and monzodioric enclaves. The Sanguliu granodiorite was mainly derived from the partial melting of the ancient NCC lower crust, which was mixed with mantle-derived magma. Meanwhile, the enclaves were derived from the partial melting of enriched lithospheric mantle modified by melts from the delaminated NCC lower crust and broken-off YC slab, followed by crystal fractionation. The Sr and Pb isotopic equilibrium and crystal exchange occurred during the mixing of mafic-felsic magma.

6.3. Highly Oxidized Magma

Highly oxidized magmas can incorporate significant amounts of S [12], and thus serve as an effective medium for transporting Au and other ore-forming materials [10]. The primary biotites from the Sanguliu granodiorite yield homogeneous Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg) ratios of 0.46–0.50, indicating that the biotites were not modified by later fluids [85]. The biotite has high Mg/(Mg + Fe2+) ratios of 0.47–0.50, and plots in the magnesium biotite field on the Mg-AlVI + Fe3+ + Ti-Fe2+ + Mn diagram (Figure 12a) indicating that the biotite is magnesium biotite. Further, biotites show high TiO2 content (2.71 to 3.71 wt.%) and low AlVI values (0.058 to 0.112) and cluster between the MH and NNO buffers (Figure 12b). Therefore, they likely formed under relatively high temperatures at high oxygen fugacities. This is supported by the high Ce/Ce* (1.30 to 107.18, average = 27.29) ratio of zircons from the Sanguliu intrusion [86], further suggesting that the parental magma of the Sanguliu intrusion has a relatively high oxygen fugacity.
The fluid inclusion Rb–Sr isochron age (120 ± 3 Ma; [15]), pyrite Rb–Sr isochron age (119 ± 1 Ma; [32]), and sericite 40Ar/39Ar plateau age (122.8 ± 0.8 Ma; [87]) date the Wulong gold mineralization. The Sanguliu granodiorite has a zircon U–Pb age of 122.2 ± 1.3 Ma, representing its emplacement age. The formation age of the Wulong gold deposit is in good agreement with this age. Further, the Sanguliu intrusion hosts the Wulong gold orebodies, which indicates that the Sanguliu intrusion may be related to gold mineralization.
The Sanguliu intrusion has been previously considered to be a metallogenetic intrusion of the Wulong gold deposit [14]. However, Wei et al. [15] proposed that the Sanguliu intrusion did not directly provide any ore-forming fluids or materials for Wulong gold mineralization but had similar Sr and Nd isotopic compositions to the deeper material source of the Wulong deposit. The Pb isotopic compositions of the Sanguliu intrusion are consistent with those of the sulfides from the Wulong deposit, both plotting near the lower crust curve (Figure 11), implying that the Pb in the Wulong gold deposit and Sanguliu intrusion was mainly derived from a similar lower crust source. Some Early Cretaceous intrusions hidden at depths below the Wulong ore field have been identified via geophysical detection and have been verified to provide important ore-forming fluids and materials for the Wulong gold mineralization [16,17]. Therefore, we suggest that the Sanguliu intrusion and the concealed metallogenic intrusion below the Wulong ore field originated from a magma chamber with a relatively high oxygen fugacity, which is favorable for gold mineralization.

6.4. Magma Mixing and Gold Mineralization

Abundant MMEs were found within the Early Cretaceous granitic plutons in the eastern NCC. Some of the host granitic plutons have been researched in terms of emplacement ages, petrogenesis, and magma sources [5,6,7,9,11,23,55,56,68,75,88,89,90]. Significant similarities were found in the Early Cretaceous plutons (Table 8), including high K2O and Fe2O3 contents and Mg# values [5,6,7,9,11,23,55,56,68,75,88,89,90], and the presence of magnesian biotites that were crystallized under high oxygen fugacity conditions [68,88,89].
Zircons from the studied Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves show typical zoning absorption, euhedral to subhedral shapes, and have high Th/U ratios of 0.78–1.47 and 0.47–1.79, respectively, indicating magmatic origins. Moreover, zircon U-Pb age data indicate that the Sanguliu granodiorite had coeval 206Pb/238U ages (122.2 ± 1.3 Ma, LA-ICP-MS) with the monzodiorite enclave (125.3 ± 1.6 Ma, SHRIMP) within the range of acceptable error, suggesting that the Sanguliu intrusion formed in the Early Cretaceous (125–122 Ma). This is consistent with the ages of Gudaoling monzogranite and dioritic enclaves in the Liaodong area (120 ± 1 Ma; [8]), the granitic intrusions containing enclaves in the Jiaodong area (105–130 Ma; [6,11,21,22]), and the Taihang plutons in the Taihang orogeny (127–129 Ma; [20]). Thus, the enclaves hosted within the Early Cretaceous granitic plutons were formed by magma mixing and mingling [10], with significant participation of enriched lithospheric mantle-derived magma [7]. These Early Cretaceous granitic plutons and abundant coeval enclaves indicate that magma mixing was common in the eastern NCC, even in the Taihang orogeny and mainly occurred during 110–130 Ma (Figure 1), which is consistent with the formation ages of the decratonic gold deposits (130–120 Ma) in the Jiaodong and Liaodong areas [91]. Furthermore, some gold deposits or occurrences were located near or hosted within the Early Cretaceous granitic plutons containing MMEs in the eastern NCC (Figure 3a) and are considered to be closely related to the plutons. In particular, the Guojialing granodiorite is believed to be associated with the Wang’ershan gold deposit in the Jiaodong area [92]. Although the studied Sanguliu granodiorite did not serve as a metallogenic intrusion of the Wulong gold deposit in the Liaodong area, the pluton shares a similar material source with the Wulong gold mineralization. These findings imply that magma mixing is temporally, spatially, and genetically related to the Early Cretaceous gold systems in the eastern NCC.
As previously mentioned, the enclaves within the Sanguliu granodiorite were formed by the partial melting of the mixed magma of the enriched lithospheric mantle and NCC lower crust, and the enriched lithospheric mantle was previously metasomatized by melts derived from the delaminated ancient lower crust and broken-off Yangtze slab. Zhu et al. [93] proposed that the decratonic gold deposits are closely related to the interaction between the lower crust and melts derived from the enriched lithospheric mantle, which could induce the formation of voluminous gold-bearing magma, rapidly creating giant gold accumulations. Li and Santosh [10] summarized the mineralogical, geochemical, and isotopic data of the igneous rocks, ore-forming fluids, and ore minerals from the gold deposits in the NCC and suggested that mantle fluids and metals substantially contributed to the decratonic gold systems. Therefore, the mingling and mixing of mafic magma with felsic magma not only provides insights into the magma chamber process and dynamics [3] but is also a critical process for the involvement of gold-bearing mantle components in magmatic-metallogenic systems [10,12].
During the Early Cretaceous, the Liaodong area was affected by the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate and lithospheric thinning in the NCC [10,94], which led to magma mixing and associated large-scale gold mineralization in the NCC [95,96,97]. A new diagenetic and metallogenic model for the Wulong gold deposit is shown in Figure 13.

7. Conclusions

The host Sanguliu granodiorite was emplaced at 122.2 ± 1.3 Ma and showed consistent zircon U-Pb ages with the monzodioritic enclaves (125.3 ± 1.6 Ma), as indicated by LA–ICP–MS and SHRIMP zircon U–Pb age data.
The field and petrological observations, as well as elemental, isotopic, and zircon U-Pb age data, indicate that the enclaves within the Sanguliu intrusion were mainly formed by magma mixing between mafic and felsic magmas. The felsic magmas were mainly derived from the partial melting of the ancient lower crust, and the mafic magmas were derived from the partial melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle modified by the delaminated ancient lower crust and broken-off Yangtze slab.
The primary magma forming the Sanguliu granodiorite had a relatively high oxygen fugacity, which is favorable for gold mineralization.
In general, the Early Cretaceous magma mixing occurred in the eastern NCC from 110 to 130 Ma and is temporally, spatially, and genetically related to the decratonic gold deposits in the Jiaodong and Liaodong areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W. and C.C.; Formal analysis, C.C.; Funding acquisition, C.C. and Y.Z. (Yongheng Zhou); Investigation, C.C., Y.Z. (Yan Zhao) and C.Z.; Methodology, D.L.; Supervision, C.C.; Visualization, C.Z.; Writing—original draft, T.W. and C.C.; Writing—review and editing, T.W. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [grant number 2016YFC0600108], and the project from China Geological Survey [grant numbers DD20160346, DD20190379, DD20221806].

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the anonymous reviewers for the critical and constructive comments and suggestions. We also deliver special thanks to Hao Yujie and Liu Xiaohe for their support during the zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb dating.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, S.; Rino, V.; Pal, A.B. Field evidence of magma mixing from microgranular enclaves hosted in Palaeo-proterozoic Malanjhkhand granitoids, central India. Gondwana Res. 2004, 7, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, S. Mafic to hybrid microgranular enclaves in the Ladakh batholiths, northwestern Himalaya: Implications on calc-alkaline magma chamber processes. J. Geol. Soc. India 2010, 76, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Perugini, D.; Poli, G.; Christofides, G.; Eleftheriadis, G. Magma mixing in the Sithonia Plutonic Complex, Greece: Evidence from mafic microgranular enclaves. Miner. Petrol. 2003, 78, 173–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barbarin, B. Mafic magmatic enclaves and mafic rocks associated with some granitoids of the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California: Nature, origin, and relations with the hosts. Lithos 2005, 80, 155–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qu, X.M.; Wang, H.N.; Rao, B. A study on the genesis of dioritic enclaves in Guojialing granite. Acta Mineral. Sin. 1997, 17, 302–309. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Song, M.C.; Yan, Q.L. Characteristics of dioritic inclusions in Weideshan superunit and its magma origin in Jiaonan Area. Shandong Geol. 2000, 4, 16–22. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y.; Chung, S.L.; Wilde, S.A.; Chu, M.F. Multiple sources for the origin of granites: Geochemical and Nd/Sr isotopic evidence from the Gudaoling granite and its mafic enclaves, northeast China. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2004, 68, 4469–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y.; Wilde, S.A.; Liu, X.M. Petrogenesis of Late Triassic granitoids and their enclaves with implications for post-collisional lithospheric thinning of the Liaodong Peninsula, North China Craton. Chem. Geol. 2007, 242, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, G.J.; Sun, F.Y.; Li, Y.C.; Liu, K. U–Pb dating, geochemical characteristics and geological significance of Guojialing granodiorite in Jiaodong Peninsula. Glob. Geol. 2014, 33, 39–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, S.R.; Santosh, M. Geodynamics of heterogeneous gold mineralization in the North China Craton and its relationship to lithospheric destruction. Gondwana Res. 2017, 50, 267–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Z.D.; Yu, X.F.; Wang, Q.M.; Du, Z.Z.; Cao, Q.; Shi, M.Y.; Wang, R. Petrogenesis of Sanfoshan granite, Jiaodong: Diagenetic physical and chemical conditions, zircon U-Pb geochronology and Sr–Nd isotope constraints. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2018, 34, 447–468. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Chai, P.; Sun, J.G.; Xing, S.W.; Men, L.J.; Han, J.L. Early Cretaceous arc magmatism and high-sulphidation epithermal porphyry Cu–Au mineralization in Yanbian area, Northeast China: The Duhuangling example. Int. Geol. Rev. 2015, 57, 1267–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, X.A.; Li, C.; Hou, K.J.; Li, K.J.; Li, G.R.; Liu, J.J. Magma mixing and gold mineralization in the Maevatanana gold deposit, Madagascar. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 91, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Z.L.; Xu, W.D.; Qin, Q.M.; Pang, W.Z. Geological characteristics and ore genesis of Wulong gold deposit, Liaoning Province. Contrib. Geol. Miner. Resour. Res. 1987, 2, 31–39. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, J.H.; Qiu, X.P.; Guo, D.Z.; Tan, W.J. Geochemistry of ore fluids and Rb-Sr isotopic dating for the Wulong gold deposit in Liaoning, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu, B.; Zeng, Q.D.; Frimmel, H.E.; Wang, Y.B.; Guo, W.K.; Sun, G.T.; Zhou, T.C.; Li, J.P. Genesis of the Wulong gold deposit, northeastern North China Craton: Constraints from fluid inclusions, H–O–S–Pb isotopes, and pyrite trace element concentrations. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 102, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.; Li, D.T.; Wu, T.T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, C.Q.; Yang, J.L.; Gu, Y.C. Genesis of gold deposits in the Wulong orefield, Liaodong Peninsula, North China Craton: Constraints from ore deposit geology, REE, and C–H–O–S–Pb isotopes. Geol. J. 2020, 55, 5914–5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, S.Y.; Yang, S.Y.; Dai, B.Z.; Lu, J.J. Mineral chemistry, trace elements and Sr-Nd-Hf isotope geochemistry and petrogenesis of Cailing and Furong granites and mafic enclaves from the Qitianling batholith in the Shi-Hang zone, South China. Gondwana Res. 2012, 22, 310–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, S.Z.; Zhao, G.C.; Sun, M.; Han, Z.Z.; Hao, D.F.; Luo, Y.; Xia, X.P. Deformation history of the Paleoproterozoic Liaohe Group in the Eastern Block of the North China Craton. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2005, 24, 659–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, B.; Tian, W.; Zhai, M.G.; Arakawa, Y. Zircon U–Pb geochronology and geochemistry of the Mesozoic magmatism in the Taihang Mountains and other places of the North China Craton with implications for petrogenesis and geodynamic setting. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2005, 21, 13–24. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Qiu, L.G.; Ren, F.L.; Cao, Z.X.; Zhang, Y.Q. Late Mesozoic magmatic activities and their constraints on geotectonics of Jiaodong region. Geotecton. Metallog. 2008, 32, 117–123. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Qiu, Y.M.; Groves, D.I.; McNaughton, N.J.; Wang, L.G.; Zhou, T.H. Nature, age, and tectonic setting of granitoid-hosted, orogenic gold deposits of the Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern North China Craton, China. Miner. Depos. 2002, 37, 283–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Li, S.Y.; Song, Y.X.; Jiang, M.Y.; Bi, M.G.; Wang, S.S.; Jiang, L.; Sun, L.L. Study on zircon U-Pb chronology and rock geochemistry of Guzhuang diorite in Jiaodong area. Shandong Land Resour. 2018, 34, 35–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, G.C.; Cawood, P.A.; Li, S.Z.; Wilde, S.A.; Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.H.; Yin, C.Q. Amalgamation of the North China Craton: Key issues and discussion. Precambrian Res. 2012, 222–223, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Kou, L.L.; Yang, H.Z.; Yang, F.C. Zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os geochronology of copper–molybdenum deposits in southeast Liaoning Province, China. Int. Geol. Rev. 2016, 58, 1481–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, S.Z.; Zhao, G.C. SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of the Liaoji granitoids: Constraints on the evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Jiao-Liao-Ji belt in the Eastern Block of the North China Craton. Precambrian Res. 2007, 158, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, F.Y.; Yang, J.H.; Wilde, S.A.; Zhang, X.O. Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the Jurassic granites in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China. Chem. Geol. 2005, 221, 127–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, F.Y.; Lin, J.Q.; Wilde, S.A.; Zhang, X.O.; Yang, J.H. Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneous event in eastern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2005, 233, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duan, X.X.; Zeng, Q.D.; Yang, J.H.; Liu, J.M.; Wang, Y.B.; Zhou, L.L. Geochronology, geochemistry and Hf isotope of Late Triassic magmatic rocks of Qingchengzi district in Liaodong peninsula, Northeast China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014, 91, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, F.Y.; Yang, J.H.; Liu, X.M. Geochronological framework of the Mesozoic granitic magmatism in the Liaodong Peninsula, Northeast China. Geol. J. China Univ. 2005, 11, 305–317. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Gu, Y.C.; Chen, R.Y.; Li, D.T.; Yang, J.L.; Yang, F.C.; Jia, H.X.; Dick, J.; Hu, Q.H.; Ju, N.; Cao, J. Jurassic ca. 160 Ma crustal remelting and Paleoproterozoic intrusive rock residues in the Liaodong Peninsula, East China: Evidence from in situ zircon U–Pb dating and Lu–Hf isotopic analysis. Geol. J. 2018, 53, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, P.; Kou, L.L.; Zhao, Y.; Bi, Z.W.; Sha, D.M.; Han, R.P.; Li, Z.M. Genesis of the Wulong gold deposit, Liaoning Province, NE China: Constrains from noble gaseradiogenic and stable isotope studies. Geosci. Front. 2020, 11, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nasdala, L.; Hofmeister, W.; Norberg, N.; Martinson, J.M.; Corfu, F.; Dörr, W.; Valley, J.W. Zircon M257: A homogeneous natural reference material for the ion microprobe U–Pb analysis of zircon. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2008, 32, 247–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Black, L.P.; Kamo, S.L.; Allen, C.M.; Aleinikoff, J.N.; Davis, D.W.; Korsch, R.J.; Foudoulis, C. TEMORA 1: A new zircon standard for Phanerozoic U–Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2003, 200, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ludwig, K.R. Isoplot 3.0—A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronol. Cent. Spec. Publ. 2003, 4, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, I.S. U–Th–Pb Geochronology by Ion Microprobe. In Applications of Microanalytical Techniques to Understanding Mineralizing Processes; McKibben, M.A., Shanks, W.C., III, Ridley, W.I., Eds.; Reviews in Economic Geology: Canberra, Australia, 1998; Volume 7, pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu, F.Y.; Yang, Y.H.; Xie, L.W.; Yang, J.H.; Xu, P. Hf isotopic compositions of the standard zircons and baddeleyites used in U-Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2007, 234, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, L.W.; Zhang, Y.B.; Zhang, H.H.; Sun, J.F.; Wu, F.Y. In situ, simultaneous determination of trace elements, U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes in zircon and baddeleyite. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bouvier, A.; Vervoort, J.D.; Patchett, P.J. The Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 273, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Blichert-Toft, J.; Albarède, F. The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle-crust system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1997, 148, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; Belousova, E.; Jackson, S.E.; Achterbergh, E.V.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Shee, S.R. The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Griffin, W.L.; Win, T.T.; Davis, R.; Wathanakul, P.; Andrew, A.; Metcalfe, I.; Cartigny, P. Diamonds from Myanmar and Thailand: Characteristics and possible origins. Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, R.X.; Yang, S.Y. A mathematical model for determining carbon coating thickness and its application in electron probe micro analysis. Microsc. Microanal. 2016, 22, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Belousova, E.; Suzanne, G.W.; Fisher, Y. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 143, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, F.C.; Song, Y.H.; Yang, J.L.; Shen, X.; Gu, Y.C. SHRIMP U–Pb age, geochemical characteristics and geological significance of granite complex in Wulong-sidaogou gold deposit, eastern Liaoning. Geotecton. Metallog. 2018, 42, 1–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Xu, Y.G.; Wu, X.Y.; Luo, Z.Y.; Ma, J.L.; Huang, X.L.; Xie, L.W. Zircon Hf isotope compositions of middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous intrusions in Shandong Province and its implications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 307–316. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, B.; Tian, W.; Jahn, B.M.; Chen, Z.C. Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb ages and in-situ Hf isotopic analysis for the Mesozoic intrusions from in south Taihang, north China craton: Evidence for hybridization between mantle-derived magmas and crustal components. Lithos 2008, 102, 118–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kamei, A.; Owada, M.; Nagao, T.; Shiraki, K. High-Mg diorites derived from sanukitic HMA magmas, Kyushu Island, southwest Japan arc: Evidence from clinopyroxene and whole rock compositions. Lithos 2004, 75, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, S.S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. In Magmatism in the Ocean Basins; Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J., Eds.; Geological Society London Special Publications; Geological Society: London, UK, 1989; pp. 313–345. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen, B.; Zhai, M.G. Geochemistry of late Mesozoic lamprophyre dykes from the Taihang Mountains, birth China, and implications for the sub-continental lithospheric mantle. Geol. Mag. 2003, 140, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, B.; Jahn, B.M.; Zhai, M.G. Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics of the Mesozoic magmatism in the Taihang-Yanshan orogenm north China craton, and implications for Archean lithosphere thinning. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 2003, 160, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, C.Q.; Li, Z.; Ehlers, C.; Yang, K.; Wang, R. A post-collisional magmatic plumbing system: Mesozoic granitoid plutons from the Dabieshan high-pressure and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic zone, east-central China. Lithos 1998, 45, 431–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jahn, B.M.; Wu, F.Y.; Lo, C.H.; Tsai, C.H. Crust-mantle interaction induced by deep subduction of the continental crust: Geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from post-collisional mafic-ultramafic intrusions of the northern Dabie complex, central China. Chem. Geol. 1999, 157, 119–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, B.; Jahn, B.M.; Wei, C.J. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids in the Dabie UHP complex, central China: Trace elemant and Nd-Sr isotope evidence. Lithos 2002, 60, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, J.H.; Chu, M.F.; Liu, W.; Zhai, M.G. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Guojialing granodiorites form the northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2003, 19, 692–700. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang, J.H.; Chung, S.L.; Zhai, M.G.; Zhou, X.H. Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions of mafic dikes from the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: Evidence for vein-plus-peridotite melting in the lithospheric mantle. Lithos 2004, 73, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, F.; Fan, W.M.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, M. Origin of early Cretaceous calc-alkaline lamprophyres from the Sulu orogen in eastern China: Implications for enrichment processes beneath continental collisional belt. Lithos 2004, 78, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pei, F.P.; Xu, W.L.; Yang, D.B.; Yu, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Q.G. Geochronology and geochemistry of Mesozoic mafic–ultramafic complexes in the southern Liaoning and southern Jilin provinces, NE China: Constraints on the spatial extent of destruction of the North China Craton. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2011, 40, 636–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pang, C.J. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Cretaceous mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks in the eastern North China Craton. Guangzhou Guangzhou Insititute Geochem. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2015. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  60. Li, X.S. The Petrogenesis and Tectonic Setting of the Early Cretaceous Basic Dikes in Pulandian Area, Liaodong Peninsula. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang, H.T. Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Compositions of the Early Cretaceous Lamprophyres in Western Shandong: Constraints on the lithospheric Mentle of the Eastern North China Craton. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2018. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  62. Jahn, B.M.; Auvray, B.; Cornichet, J.; Bai, Y.L.; Shen, Q.H.; Liu, D.Y. 3.5 Ga old amphibolites from eastern Hebei province, China: Field occurrence, petrology, Sm–Nd isochron age and REE geochemistry. Precambrian Res. 1987, 34, 311–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zartman, R.E.; Doe, B.R. Plumbotectonics-The model. Tectonophysics 1981, 75, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheng, X.H. Integrated Research on Mesozoic Magmatism and Gold-Uranium Metallogenesis in the Liaodong Peninsula, Liaoning Province. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  65. Lin, W.W.; Peng, L.J. The Estimation of Fe3+ and Fe2+ contents in amphibole and biotite from EPMA data. J. Changchun Univ. Earth Sci. 1994, 24, 155–162. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  66. Foster, M.D. Interpretation of the composition of trioctahedral Mica. United States. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1960, 354, 11–48. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wones, D.R.; Eugster, H.P. Stability of biotite-experient therory and application. Am. Mineral. 1965, 50, 1228–1272. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yang, Y.; Wang, X.X.; Yu, X.W.; Ke, C.H.; Wang, L.G.; Guo, R.P.; Wang, S.A.; Li, X.X. Chemicalcomposition of biotite and amphibole from Mesozoic granites in northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula, China, and their implications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2017, 33, 3123–3136. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  69. Maniar, P.D.; Piccoli, P.M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1989, 101, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R. I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 1992, 83, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  71. Collins, W.J.; Beams, S.D.; White, A.J.R.; Chappell, B.W. Nature and Origin of A-type Granites with Particular Reference to Southeastern Australia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1982, 80, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Didier, J.; Barbarin, B. Enclaves and granite petrology. Dev. Petrol. 1991, 13, 625. [Google Scholar]
  73. Guan, Y.L.; Yuan, C.; Long, X.P.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Huang, Z.Y.; Chen, B.; Qu, S.D. Genesis of mafic enclaves from Early Paleozoic granites in the South China Block: Evidence from petrology, geochemistry and zircon U–Pb Geochronology. Geotecton. Metallog. 2016, 40, 109–124. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  74. Bonin, B. Do coeval mafic and felsic magmas in post-collisional to within-plate regimes necessarily imply two constrasting, mantle and crust, sources? A review. Lithos 2004, 78, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y.; Wilde, S.A.; Xie, L.W.; Yang, Y.H.; Liu, X.M. Tracing magma mixing in granite genesis: In situ U–Pb dating and Hf-isotope analysis of zircons. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2007, 153, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sparks, R.S.J.; Marshall, L. Thermal and mechanical constraints on mixing between mafic and silicic magmas. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1986, 29, 1–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lesher, C.E. Decoupling of chemical and isotopic exchange during magma mixing. Nature 1990, 344, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Poli, G.; Tommasini, S.; Halliday, A.N. Trace elements and isotopic exchange during acid-basic magma interaction processes. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1996, 87, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, S.Y.; Zhu, J.C.; Li, L.; Dai, B.Z.; Jiang, Y.H.; Ling, H.F. Hf isotopic composition of zircons from the Huashan-Guposhan intrusive complex and their mafic enclaves in northeastern Guangxi: Implication for petrogenesis. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2010, 55, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, B.; Chen, Z.C.; Jahn, B.M. Origin of mafic enclaves from the Taihang Mesozoic orogen, north China craton. Lithos 2009, 110, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rudnick, R.L.; Gao, S. The Composition of the Continental Crust. In The Crust; Rudnick, R.L., Ed.; Elsevier-Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yu, J.J.; Hou, X.G.; Ge, W.C.; Zhang, Y.L.; Liu, J.C. Magma mixing genesis of the Early Permian Liulian pluton at the northeastern margin of the Jiamusi massif in NE China: Evidences from petrography, geochronology and geochemistry. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2013, 29, 2971–2986. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhai, M.G.; Guo, J.H.; Liu, W.J. Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic continental evolution and tectonic history of the North China Craton: A review. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2005, 24, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, J.Y.; Qian, Y.; Sun, J.L.; Li, H.R.; Zhao, C.J.; Sun, F.Y.; Shen, Y.J. Early Cretaceous granitoids and gabbro in the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for delamination of the North China Craton and Paleo-Pacific Plate subduction. Mineral. Petrol. 2021, 115, 299–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Stone, D. Temperature and pressure variations in suites of Archean felsic plutonic rocks, Berens River area, northwest Superior Province, Ontario, Canada. Can. Mineral. 2000, 38, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xie, J.C.; Yang, X.Y.; Sun, W.D.; Du, J.G. Early Cretaceous dioritic rocks in the Tongling region, eastern China: Implications for the tectonic settings. Lithos 2012, 150, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, J.; Wang, S.L.; Li, T.G.; Yang, Y.; Liu, F.X.; Li, S.H.; Duan, C. Geochronology and isotopic geochemical characteristics of Wulong gold deposit in Liaoning Province. Miner. Depos. 2018, 37, 712–728. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  88. Li, L.; Santosh, M.; Li, S.R. The “Jiaodong type” gold deposits: Characteristics, origin and prospecting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 589–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Q.; Santosh, M.; Li, S.R.; Zhang, J.Q. Petrology, geochemistry and zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopes of the Cretaceous dykes in the central North China Craton: Implications for magma genesis and gold metallogeny. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 67, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, F.F.; Han, Z.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lai, Z.Q.; Ai, L.N. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Yashan granite and its enclaves, Qixia. Contrib. Geol. Miner. Resour. Res. 2019, 34, 393–405. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  91. Goldfarb, R.; Santosh, M. The dilemma of the Jiaodong gold deposits: Are they unique? Geosci. Front. 2014, 5, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Li, Y.J.; Li, S.R.; Liu, S.A.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.T.; Song, Y.X.; Wang, B.X. Zircon geochronology, geochemistry and stable isotopes of the Wang’ershan gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 113, 695–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhu, R.X.; Fan, H.R.; Li, J.W.; Meng, Q.R.; Li, S.R.; Zeng, Q.D. Decratonic gold deposits. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2015, 58, 1523–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhu, R.X.; Yang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y. Timing of destruction of the North China Craton. Lithos 2012, 149, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, S.R.; Santosh, M.; Zhang, H.F.; Luo, J.Y.; Zhang, J.Q.; Li, C.L.; Zhang, X.B. Metallogeny in response to lithospheric thinning and craton destruction: Geochemistry and U-Pb zircon chronology of the Yixingzhai gold deposit, central North China Craton. Ore Geol. Rev. 2014, 56, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tian, Y.F.; Sun, J.; Ye, H.S.; Mao, J.W.; Wang, X.X.; Bi, M.F.; Xia, X.P. Genesis of the Dianfang breccia-hosted gold deposit, western Henan Province, China–Constraints from geology, geochronology and geochemistry. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 91, 963–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhu, R.X.; Zhang, H.F.; Zhu, G.; Meng, Q.R.; Fan, H.R.; Yang, J.H.; Zheng, T.Y. Craton destruction and related resources. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2017, 106, 2233–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Tectonic location and division of the North China Craton (the zircon U–Pb ages from [6,8,11,20,21,22,23], modified from [24]). The locations of the mapped areas in Figure 2 have been marked by the red rectangle.
Figure 1. Tectonic location and division of the North China Craton (the zircon U–Pb ages from [6,8,11,20,21,22,23], modified from [24]). The locations of the mapped areas in Figure 2 have been marked by the red rectangle.
Minerals 12 01004 g001
Figure 2. (a) Location map of the Liaodong Peninsula. (b) Sketch map showing the regional geology and distribution of gold deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula (modified from [25]).
Figure 2. (a) Location map of the Liaodong Peninsula. (b) Sketch map showing the regional geology and distribution of gold deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula (modified from [25]).
Minerals 12 01004 g002
Figure 3. Geological maps of the Wulong gold orefield (a) and Wulong gold deposit (b) (modified from [16]. The geochronological data are from [30,31,32]).
Figure 3. Geological maps of the Wulong gold orefield (a) and Wulong gold deposit (b) (modified from [16]. The geochronological data are from [30,31,32]).
Minerals 12 01004 g003
Figure 4. Photographs (a,b) and microphotographs (cf) of the Sanguliu granodiorite and enclaves. (a,b) The monzodioritic enclaves occur in elliptic and marquise shape within the Sanguliu granodiorite; (c) The host granodiorite and enclave have sharp contact; (d) The plagioclase within the host granodiorite has zonal texture; (e,f) The monzodioritic enclave has plagioclase of zonal texture and acicular apatite. Apl—Apatite; Bt—Biotite; Hbl—Hornblende; Kfs—Potassium feldspar; Pl—Plagioclase; Qtz—Quartz.
Figure 4. Photographs (a,b) and microphotographs (cf) of the Sanguliu granodiorite and enclaves. (a,b) The monzodioritic enclaves occur in elliptic and marquise shape within the Sanguliu granodiorite; (c) The host granodiorite and enclave have sharp contact; (d) The plagioclase within the host granodiorite has zonal texture; (e,f) The monzodioritic enclave has plagioclase of zonal texture and acicular apatite. Apl—Apatite; Bt—Biotite; Hbl—Hornblende; Kfs—Potassium feldspar; Pl—Plagioclase; Qtz—Quartz.
Minerals 12 01004 g004
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves.
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves.
Minerals 12 01004 g005
Figure 6. LA–ICP–MS and SHRIMP zircon U–Pb concordia and weighted mean age diagrams of the Sanguliu granodiorite (a,b) and monzodioritic enclave (c,d).
Figure 6. LA–ICP–MS and SHRIMP zircon U–Pb concordia and weighted mean age diagrams of the Sanguliu granodiorite (a,b) and monzodioritic enclave (c,d).
Minerals 12 01004 g006
Figure 7. Evolution εHf(t) from in situ analysis of zircon Hf versus age (Ma, (a)) and histogram of TDM2 model ages (Ma, (b)) of the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves. The data of enriched mantle-derived magma and ancient lower crust in the NCC, the Sanguliu granodiorite, as well as enclaves are from [45,46,47], respectively.
Figure 7. Evolution εHf(t) from in situ analysis of zircon Hf versus age (Ma, (a)) and histogram of TDM2 model ages (Ma, (b)) of the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves. The data of enriched mantle-derived magma and ancient lower crust in the NCC, the Sanguliu granodiorite, as well as enclaves are from [45,46,47], respectively.
Minerals 12 01004 g007
Figure 8. TAS (a), SiO2 versus K2O (b), A/CNK versus A/NK (c), and Al2O3 versus Ga (d) diagrams of the Sanguliu granodiorite and its enclaves.
Figure 8. TAS (a), SiO2 versus K2O (b), A/CNK versus A/NK (c), and Al2O3 versus Ga (d) diagrams of the Sanguliu granodiorite and its enclaves.
Minerals 12 01004 g008
Figure 9. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (a) and primitive mantle-normalized spiderdiagrams (b) for the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves. The chondrite and primitive mantle values are from [49].
Figure 9. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (a) and primitive mantle-normalized spiderdiagrams (b) for the Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodioritic enclaves. The chondrite and primitive mantle values are from [49].
Minerals 12 01004 g009
Figure 10. εNd(t) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i plot (a) and SiO2 versus εNd(t) diagram (b). The data of the mafic rocks in the Taihang-Yanshan area are sourced from [50,51]; those in the Dabie area are from [52,53,54]; those in the Jiaodong area are from [55,56,57]; those in the Southern Jilin and Southern Liaoning areas are from [58]; the intermediate-basic rocks from the Liaodong area are from [59,60]; lamprophyres in the Luxi area are from [61]; LCC–lower crust of the NCC, which was taken from [62].
Figure 10. εNd(t) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i plot (a) and SiO2 versus εNd(t) diagram (b). The data of the mafic rocks in the Taihang-Yanshan area are sourced from [50,51]; those in the Dabie area are from [52,53,54]; those in the Jiaodong area are from [55,56,57]; those in the Southern Jilin and Southern Liaoning areas are from [58]; the intermediate-basic rocks from the Liaodong area are from [59,60]; lamprophyres in the Luxi area are from [61]; LCC–lower crust of the NCC, which was taken from [62].
Minerals 12 01004 g010
Figure 11. (206Pb/204Pb)i versus (208Pb/204Pb)i diagram (modified from [63]). The data of the Wulong gold deposit are from [17,64].
Figure 11. (206Pb/204Pb)i versus (208Pb/204Pb)i diagram (modified from [63]). The data of the Wulong gold deposit are from [17,64].
Minerals 12 01004 g011
Figure 12. Diagrams of classification ((a), modified from [66]) and Fe3+–Fe2+–Mg ((b), modified from [67]) of the biotites from the Sanguliu, Guojialing, Weideshan, and Sanfoshan plutons. The data of EPMA biotite compositions are from [23,68] and this paper, respectively).
Figure 12. Diagrams of classification ((a), modified from [66]) and Fe3+–Fe2+–Mg ((b), modified from [67]) of the biotites from the Sanguliu, Guojialing, Weideshan, and Sanfoshan plutons. The data of EPMA biotite compositions are from [23,68] and this paper, respectively).
Minerals 12 01004 g012
Figure 13. Schematic model for the Wulong gold mineralization and its links with the Early Cretaceous magma mixing in the Liaodong Peninsula. The tectonic setting for the Liaodong Peninsula during the Early Cretaceous is from [10,94,97].
Figure 13. Schematic model for the Wulong gold mineralization and its links with the Early Cretaceous magma mixing in the Liaodong Peninsula. The tectonic setting for the Liaodong Peninsula during the Early Cretaceous is from [10,94,97].
Minerals 12 01004 g013
Table 1. Zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb data of the host Sanguliu granodiorite.
Table 1. Zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb data of the host Sanguliu granodiorite.
SpotTh (ppm)U (ppm)Th/U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U206Pb/238U
Age
(Ma)
SGL-1314.54394.930.800.047950.002170.125680.005790.019010.000481213
SGL-2339.58305.641.110.056410.002320.144930.006110.018630.000471193
SGL-3113.0697.691.160.04890.004370.128440.011390.019050.000561224
SGL-4253.45237.221.070.048020.002330.125680.006170.018980.000491213
SGL-5268.08343.250.780.048290.002080.127060.00560.019080.000481223
SGL-6247.74228.561.080.050510.002910.128660.007420.018480.00051183
SGL-7180.27207.670.870.046660.003040.122890.007980.01910.000521223
SGL-8271.5250.811.080.049140.002310.128640.006140.018990.000491213
SGL-9130.22140.730.930.053350.003260.140750.008590.019140.000521223
SGL-10282.68321.850.880.049160.002370.129450.00630.01910.000491223
SGL-11292.1319.060.920.048590.001980.129150.00540.019280.000481233
SGL-12329.77317.111.040.050330.002170.133160.005860.019190.000491233
SGL-13108.9189.631.220.073390.004330.200950.011760.019860.000561274
SGL-1476.2871.691.060.048580.00410.128030.010730.019120.000551223
SGL-15108.2698.941.090.050520.003770.133110.009860.019110.000541223
SGL-1696.3572.881.320.050130.004660.13130.012090.0190.000571214
SGL-17252.7290.280.870.048370.002030.127740.005470.019150.000481223
SGL-1883.5876.591.090.06650.004230.182420.011520.01990.000561274
SGL-19157.08176.610.890.050920.00260.131540.006770.018740.000491203
SGL-20234.14219.761.070.04810.002440.128380.006560.019360.00051243
SGL-21333.06263.031.270.048280.002170.125770.005730.018890.000481213
SGL-2267.0361.71.090.048930.004330.132750.011650.019680.000581264
SGL-2361.0360.071.020.049270.004130.133730.011140.019680.000561264
SGL-2483.7657.041.470.047480.003870.127730.010340.019510.000551253
Table 2. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb data of the monzodiorite enclaves.
Table 2. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb data of the monzodiorite enclaves.
Spot206Pbc (%)U (ppm)Th (ppm)232Th/238U206Pb * (ppm)207Pb */206Pb *1 σ (%)207Pb */235U1σ (%)206Pb */238U1σ (%)Errors206Pb/238U Age
(Ma)
207Pb/206Pb Age
(Ma)
BTZ-1-10.2773901.281.240.055200.15200.019652.70.135124.3 ± 3.3432 ± 440
BTZ-1-20.592372090.913.930.04838.30.1288.60.019182.10.241122.5 ± 2.5115 ± 200
BTZ-1-30.94121980.832.090.0505140.139150.019912.30.159126.8 ± 2.7219 ± 330
BTZ-1-41.031051221.201.710.043250.112250.018642.60.104119.8 ± 2.7−140 ± 630
BTZ-1-51.5598940.991.70.0445140.122140.019892.40.166127.6 ± 2.9−80 ± 350
BTZ-1-60.563712880.806.330.04497.80.122380.0197520.252126.6 ± 2.5−60 ± 190
BTZ-1-71.412863581.296.780.25353.30.9513.90.0272120.523129.1 ± 3.13207 ± 52
BTZ-1-81.66961001.071.650.0455160.123160.01962.90.176125.6 ± 3.5−29 ± 390
BTZ-1-90.413942690.716.890.04755.60.13285.90.0202720.338129.6 ± 2.576 ± 130
BTZ-1-100.651602771.792.740.0462140.126140.01982.20.156126.7 ± 2.79 ± 340
BTZ-1-111.511081721.651.790.0391180.103190.01912.50.132123.4 ± 2.8−413 ± 480
BTZ-1-120.10179890.5145.20.10861.34.42.40.29420.8381649 ± 321776 ± 24
BTZ-1-130.861581390.912.750.0447150.124160.020052.30.145128.6 ± 2.7−72 ± 380
BTZ-1-140.952662040.794.490.04275.40.11465.70.0194520.353125.1 ± 2.5−183 ± 130
Note: Errors = 1 σ; Pb and Pb indicate common and radiogenic portions, respectively. Common Pb corrected using measured Pb.
Table 4. Major (wt.%) and trace element (ppm) geochemical data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
Table 4. Major (wt.%) and trace element (ppm) geochemical data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
SampleSGL-1SGL-2SGL-3SGL-4SGL-5BT-1BT-2BT-3BT-4BT-5BT-6BT-7BT-8BT-9BT-10BT-11BT-12BT-13BT-14BT-15BT-16
Element
Na2O3.453.463.463.223.433.874.244.374.214.412.434.464.614.674.634.394.374.603.022.392.15
MgO1.591.641.511.531.724.824.914.604.414.626.174.874.404.825.544.314.184.206.035.955.91
Al2O314.8214.8214.8415.3915.0915.9016.5416.9116.7716.9114.1016.7017.0716.7016.5016.8616.8917.0314.4512.9213.50
SiO268.0267.8768.4567.8767.5455.1054.1755.0355.7354.6552.5954.9255.2454.6953.6855.6555.7855.7254.6155.7454.91
P2O50.110.110.110.100.110.200.210.190.180.180.190.210.220.220.210.170.170.180.120.150.13
K2O4.274.204.404.284.403.612.662.973.412.805.892.442.612.051.933.033.252.564.155.115.95
CaO3.203.202.952.813.215.646.105.985.806.035.705.805.456.276.485.725.565.766.286.356.53
TiO20.480.520.480.470.490.890.940.880.880.900.900.940.980.920.850.820.820.830.650.900.81
MnO0.060.060.060.060.060.150.150.140.140.140.180.140.130.150.150.140.130.140.180.180.18
Fe2O31.130.550.410.410.481.181.391.321.261.281.881.371.491.361.331.531.471.311.651.441.38
FeO2.522.972.883.142.977.287.196.476.206.478.276.966.566.877.036.386.026.297.237.286.83
LOI0.380.440.630.480.521.111.101.121.131.191.281.071.051.241.310.871.011.001.371.371.35
SUM100.0299.85100.1899.76100.0399.7399.5999.97100.1299.5799.5799.8999.8099.9599.6499.8599.6499.6299.7499.7799.62
Na2O + K2O7.727.667.867.507.837.486.907.347.627.218.326.907.226.726.567.427.627.167.177.508.10
Na2O/K2O0.810.820.790.750.781.071.591.471.231.580.411.831.772.282.401.451.341.800.730.470.36
A/NK1.441.451.421.551.451.551.681.631.581.641.361.671.641.691.701.611.581.651.531.371.35
A/CNK0.920.920.941.020.930.780.790.800.790.800.680.810.840.780.770.810.810.820.690.620.62
Mg#44.4845.7645.3143.7347.4050.7450.9051.7151.7351.9352.4751.4449.8151.4954.5549.7650.3650.0655.2255.2956.62
Ba989.91940.11952.401000.001000.00721.28539.31562.96618.55519.331600.00567.97565.53531.14483.39566.21634.77481.85987.971300.001800.00
Cr59.0459.2054.6043.0245.92130.54112.5973.8575.8379.05230.0297.3474.06101.45104.4353.6151.7745.91247.62290.04253.74
Ga17.2717.8716.8717.9617.2623.3424.9923.6022.4124.3119.4324.8626.1425.8925.8124.7525.3125.4518.9617.8416.06
Nb10.1111.2010.8410.4610.5118.9316.2613.5214.2313.6911.3618.1019.0918.1216.6520.8018.4119.0412.9718.0512.96
Pb24.0825.8323.9325.3026.3424.1219.4824.7925.0623.7532.3519.5718.5221.6021.3124.6326.2021.9029.0530.0034.32
Rb144.85156.41168.43175.55154.60187.28168.28162.14166.57161.04266.68165.08174.25133.00125.83154.96158.27140.98186.87181.20215.11
Sr383.88385.99371.63378.42397.14276.09291.76309.92317.66315.11261.95314.28331.28309.25308.86297.53301.49287.52271.62236.82305.79
Zr245.26257.54236.68267.02241.48246.84301.37308.43296.56300.95179.14206.22240.36219.86321.37286.55273.99230.20143.6182.61149.12
Li15.9418.8317.9717.9816.9826.0229.5327.7926.7528.4532.6630.1930.9826.4825.6728.4829.2629.5725.3417.0716.03
Be2.102.192.202.062.033.513.643.293.113.331.943.963.713.773.993.633.793.982.482.131.55
Sc9.459.377.776.939.0530.4730.5227.8025.4128.3021.7425.3420.6728.2730.6926.3126.0626.8926.4333.8429.86
Co7.969.168.257.678.9519.6020.0218.0517.3418.2026.2819.4717.6818.0218.6617.3917.7918.0221.9321.9723.31
Cs1.592.801.891.872.013.213.122.602.592.634.443.653.512.342.272.162.162.141.992.622.47
Ni12.0813.1811.7911.0713.4227.2524.4920.5819.6519.8788.1828.7825.6022.9024.5521.9922.2422.5552.0858.2868.65
U3.292.832.753.142.352.032.842.762.933.0612.841.821.821.211.451.331.611.551.212.642.19
Hf7.797.717.097.557.518.667.909.358.799.055.466.437.577.449.098.078.568.984.863.674.38
Ta1.141.090.940.960.940.570.590.460.480.530.510.660.750.610.500.850.840.840.370.670.46
Th29.8425.9825.6326.1024.546.558.817.709.948.0214.764.906.143.464.084.084.233.852.593.772.75
La70.7159.7862.0263.9060.7618.7125.9727.2330.9227.7161.8022.0224.6917.5719.3019.1019.0217.7417.4313.7914.45
Ce125.43107.05107.71111.22106.7340.7852.0151.6458.7551.42111.3344.0148.2937.1640.0439.4939.4837.1737.5133.9833.56
Pr14.1012.3011.8512.4711.965.366.386.166.966.2312.905.636.185.085.355.205.094.865.335.285.09
Nd47.1041.4340.0041.4539.8920.9523.3122.5124.9723.2244.9621.8623.0720.5621.7019.5519.1618.1821.9523.5323.05
Sm6.886.125.705.945.673.894.134.054.324.166.714.024.304.214.353.653.463.354.575.695.57
Eu1.261.221.241.271.250.950.920.910.980.921.291.020.960.860.870.930.910.881.051.221.44
Gd5.985.385.105.144.953.513.593.553.763.675.873.513.663.603.833.163.073.023.814.804.54
Tb0.790.720.680.690.650.580.560.540.560.570.780.570.560.600.620.510.490.490.650.840.80
Dy3.973.693.403.503.253.142.912.882.873.063.903.003.013.263.372.752.692.683.604.764.38
Ho0.770.720.670.680.630.650.610.580.580.610.750.630.630.660.670.590.580.560.720.920.87
Er2.171.971.861.901.741.901.791.621.691.702.021.751.721.801.881.721.701.642.002.402.22
Tm0.340.320.300.310.280.330.310.280.280.280.320.300.300.310.310.310.310.300.320.380.34
Yb2.142.051.911.951.792.342.211.971.911.892.092.002.002.022.112.272.192.192.162.422.14
Lu0.310.290.270.290.260.410.380.330.320.320.320.340.320.350.360.390.380.380.350.400.32
Y19.7918.4817.4817.2916.2518.2016.9516.1215.3015.5919.4417.0819.4419.4519.1416.7716.6316.0118.5922.6220.46
ΣREE281.96243.03242.72250.69239.80103.52125.07124.25138.87125.75255.04110.65119.6998.04104.7799.6098.5493.43101.44100.4198.76
LREE265.49227.89228.52236.24226.2490.65112.72112.49126.89113.67238.9998.56107.4885.4491.6287.9287.1282.1987.8483.4983.16
HREE16.4715.1414.2014.4413.5612.8712.3511.7511.9812.0816.0512.1012.2012.5913.1511.6911.4111.2413.6116.9115.60
LREE/HREE16.1215.0516.0916.3616.687.049.139.5710.599.4114.898.158.816.796.977.527.637.316.454.945.33
LaN/YbN23.6720.9223.2523.5524.385.728.429.9011.6210.5421.197.918.876.246.566.056.225.805.784.084.84
δEu0.600.650.700.700.720.790.730.730.740.720.630.830.740.670.650.830.850.850.770.710.87
δCe0.970.970.970.970.971.000.990.980.980.960.970.970.960.960.970.970.980.980.950.980.96
Note: A/NK = Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) (mol); A/CNK = Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) (mol); Mg# = 100 × Mg/(Mg + total Fe) [48].
Table 5. Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
Table 5. Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
SampleRb
(ppm)
Sr
(ppm)
87Rb/86Sr87Sr/86SrISrεSr(0)εSr(t)fRb/SrSm
(ppm)
Nd
(ppm)
147Sm/144Nd143Nd/144NdINdTDMT2DMTchurεNd(0)εNd(t)fSm/Nd
SGL−11493831.12270.7166290.71467172.2146.412.586.6542.80.0940.5115790.511503199724671569−20.66−19.06−0.52
SGL-21663891.23410.7167710.71461174.2145.613.926.3643.10.08930.5115770.511505192424651503−20.7−19.02−0.55
SGL-31763691.3770.7171030.7147178.9146.915.655.8138.30.09170.5115840.51151195324561527−20.56−18.92−0.53
SGL-41893781.45030.7170210.71449177.7143.916.546.2142.20.08890.5115590.511488194024931523−21.05−19.35−0.55
SGL-51773951.29540.7166220.71436172.114214.666.0640.70.090.5114580.511386208026531682−23.02−21.34−0.54
BT-11992911.98510.7180260.7145192144.1233.9119.40.1220.5115980.511498257124692114−20.29−19.11−0.38
BT-21783031.70260.7176850.71466187.2146.319.594.1522.50.11140.5115230.511432241725751986−21.75−20.39−0.43
BT-31763211.58250.7173020.71449181.7143.918.143.8620.40.11430.5109850.510892330034233037−32.24−30.93−0.42
BT-41753271.5460.7172990.71455181.7144.817.694.0822.10.11170.5116240.511533227424161813−19.78−18.42−0.43
BT-51703291.49770.7172620.7146181.2145.517.114.1121.50.11590.5114430.511348265027052245−23.31−22.03−0.41
Table 6. Pb isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
Table 6. Pb isotopic data for the host Sanguliu granodiorite and monzodiorite enclaves.
Sample206Pb/204Pb207Pb/204Pb208Pb/204Pb(206Pb/204Pb)i(207Pb/204Pb)i(208Pb/204Pb)i
SGL-117.91415.62739.48417.74615.61938.984
SGL-217.95515.61539.33817.8215.60838.933
SGL-317.83815.60939.27117.69715.60238.841
SGL-417.98915.60739.5717.83615.639.153
SGL-517.84715.61639.27617.73815.61138.901
BT-117.83615.61338.98717.73215.60838.877
BT-217.8315.60939.13317.64815.638.949
BT-317.8215.61739.13817.68115.6139.011
BT-417.79915.61539.0917.65415.60838.929
BT-517.7815.60538.99517.6215.59738.858
Table 7. Electron microprobe data of the biotites from the host Sanguliu granodiorite (results in wt%).
Table 7. Electron microprobe data of the biotites from the host Sanguliu granodiorite (results in wt%).
Sample2-bt-12-bt-32-bt-52-bt-62-bt-72-bt-8
Element
SiO236.45337.33237.39136.84936.9536.949
TiO23.6223.7132.7073.6093.0892.586
Al2O313.69413.50213.8313.48313.58113.406
FeO21.49320.45820.09921.14720.75921.292
MnO0.2460.2480.2320.2580.2810.255
MgO10.55410.94711.47810.75810.54711.1
CaO0.0110.0140.0130.0010.0240.016
Na2O0.0770.0550.1290.1080.1050.09
K2O9.3999.8659.5139.3489.2399.344
Si2.81272.84942.86372.83502.86432.8598
Al1.18731.15061.13631.16501.13571.1402
Al0.05800.06390.11200.05760.10510.0826
Ti0.21020.21320.15600.20890.18010.1506
Fe3+0.17720.18550.16950.18840.20020.1537
Fe2+1.20971.12041.11791.17221.14571.2245
Mn0.01610.01600.01500.01680.01850.0167
Mg1.21401.24561.31051.23391.21881.2807
Ca0.00090.00110.00110.00010.00200.0013
Na0.01150.00810.01920.01610.01580.0135
K0.92520.96060.92950.91750.91370.9226
Total7.82287.81457.83057.81167.79987.8463
Table 8. Characteristics of the Early Cretaceous granitoids with MMEs in the Jiaodong and Liaodong areas.
Table 8. Characteristics of the Early Cretaceous granitoids with MMEs in the Jiaodong and Liaodong areas.
IntrusionSanguliu
Intrusion
Gudaoling IntrusionGuojialing IntrusionSanfoshan IntrusionWeideshan IntrusionYashan Intrusion
Features
LocationLiaodong PeninsulaJiaodong Peninsula
Occurrenceplutonplutonplutonplutonplutonpluton
Emplacement age122.2 ± 1.3 Ma120 ± 1 Ma127.9 ± 1.3 Ma119–114 Ma127–105 Ma118 Ma
Rock typegranodioritemonzogranite, and minor granodiorite, quartz dioritegranodioritemedium-coarse- grained monzogranite, with minor syenogranite and medium-fine grained monzogranitegneiss quartz monzodiorite, quartz monzonite, and monzogranitegranite
Enclavemonzodioriticdioriticdioriticmonzodioriticdioriticdioritic
Enclave shapeoval, irregularangular to ovaloval, roundoval, roundoval, round, irregularoval, round
Main mineralsquartz (20%–30%), plagioclase (35%–45%), potassium feldspar (15%–25%), biotite (10%–15%), and minor hornblende (~5%)plagioclase
(39%–43%), potassium feldspar (24%–29%), quartz
(19%–35%), biotite (5%), and hornblende
(1%–3%)
quartz (20%–25%), plagioclase (35%–55%), potassium feldspar (10%–30%), and minor biotite and hornblende (4%–5%)quartz (20%–25%), plagioclase (35%–55%), potassium feldspar (30%–35%), biotite (5%–10%), and hornblende (1%–3%)quartz (20%–30%), plagioclase (26%–33%), potassium feldspar (27%–30%), hornblende (8%–9%), and biotite (6%–7%)quartz, plagioclase, potassium feldspar, hornblende, and biotite
Accessory mineralstitanite, zircon, and apatiteapatite, zircon, titanite, and Fe–Ti oxidesmagnetite, titanite, zircon, and apatitemagnetite, titanite, zircon, and apatitemagnetite, titanite, zircon, and apatitezircon, apatite, magnetite, and titanite
Distinctive mineralshornblende and biotitebiotite and hornblendehornblende and biotitebiotite and hornblendebiotite and hornblendehornblende and biotite
Relation to country rockintrusiveintrusiveintrusiveintrusiveintrusiveintrusive
Relation to faultcut by NE-trending faultscut by NNE-trending faultscut by NE- and NNE-trending faultscut by NE- and NNE-trending faultscut by NE-, NNE-, and NW-trending faultscut by NE-trending faults
Relation to gold depositshosts Wulong gold deposit-hosts major gold deposits-hosts Mo, Cu, Pb-Zn, Ag, as well as minor Au deposits-
ACNK0.9–1.01–1.090.8–1.10.93–1.04-0.89–1.03
SiO2 (wt.%)67.54–68.4571.44–72.56~6771.16–76.63Mainly 65.29–66.6565.5–68.82
K2O (wt.%)4.20–4.403.61–4.473.97–4.294.34–5.223.95–4.573.45–4.53
Na2O (wt.%)3.22–3.463.39–4.893.90–3.983.59–4.403.73–4.503.47–4.13
Mg#47–53Most 45–7235–64---
Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg) ratios of biotite44–47-41.335–4026–49-
εNd(t)granodiorite:−18.92–−21.34; enclave: −18.42–−30.93 (mostly −18.42–−22.03)monzogranite: −18.5–−20.9;
enclave: ~−7.2
granodiorite: −11.2–−17.5monzogranite: −18.5–−17.5; enclave: −15.1-granite:
−17.0–−18.2; enclave:
−15.9–−17.7
OriginI typeI typeI typeI typeI typeI type
ReferencesThis paper[7,75][9,22][11][6][90]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, T.; Chen, C.; Li, D.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, Y. The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton. Minerals 2022, 12, 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004

AMA Style

Wu T, Chen C, Li D, Zhao Y, Zhao C, Zhou Y. The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton. Minerals. 2022; 12(8):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Taotao, Cong Chen, Dongtao Li, Yan Zhao, Chunqiang Zhao, and Yongheng Zhou. 2022. "The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton" Minerals 12, no. 8: 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004

APA Style

Wu, T., Chen, C., Li, D., Zhao, Y., Zhao, C., & Zhou, Y. (2022). The Early Cretaceous Granitoids and Microgranular Mafic Enclaves of Sanguliu Pluton, the Liaodong Peninsula: Implications for Magma Mixing and Decratonic Gold Mineralization in the Eastern North China Craton. Minerals, 12(8), 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12081004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop