Next Article in Journal
Application and Mechanism of Mixed Anionic/Cationic Collectors on Reverse Flotation of Hematite
Previous Article in Journal
Textures and Chemical Compositions of Magnetite from Zhibo Submarine Volcanic Iron Oxide Deposit, Xinjiang, China: Implications for Re-Equilibration Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cooperative Exploration Model of Coal–Gallium Deposit: A Case Study of the Heidaigou Coal–Gallium Deposit in the Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Occurrence and Distribution of Nitrogen in Coal of Different Ranks and Densities

1
College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2
College of Geoscience and Survey Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
3
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Bauxite Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Jinzhong 030620, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060549
Submission received: 1 April 2024 / Revised: 23 May 2024 / Accepted: 24 May 2024 / Published: 26 May 2024

Abstract

:
Nitrogen is one of the significant pollutants emitted from coal combustion, and the study of its distribution and occurrence is very important for the efficient and clean utilization of coal resources. Four kinds of coal with different metamorphic ranks from major coal-producing provinces of China were studied. A gravity float-and-sink experiment was applied to obtain coal samples with different densities from Shanxi Province. The microscope optical method, Kjeldahl method, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to assess the occurrence, form, and distribution of nitrogen in the coal. The results show that the nitrogen content was about 0.47%–1.85%, and the maximum nitrogen content was positively correlated with the rank of coal, but the difference was not obvious. In the low-rank coal, the nitrogen content was mainly related to vitrinite and inertinite, while in the middle–high-rank coal, the nitrogen content was mainly related to inertinite and minerals. Pyrrolic (N-5) and pyridinic (N-6) were the main forms of nitrogen in the low-rank coal. The contents of N-6 and N-5 decreased with increases in the coal density, but the contents of quaternary N-Q1 and quaternary N-Q2 increased. N-Q2 mainly comes from fixed ammonia nitrogen in minerals, and vitrinite and liptinite contain more N-6 and less N-Q1 than inertinite. This research provides valuable evaluation guidance for the efficient utilization of coal.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen is the main constituent of the Earth’s atmosphere, but its provenance in the Earth remains uncertain [1,2]. The relative contribution of primordial nitrogen inherited during carbonization is unclear. Most scientists believe that nitrogen in coal mainly comes from the proteins, amino acids, porphyrins, alkaloids, etc., of plants trapped during the process of peat accumulation [3,4]. These are combined with organic matter and also exist in clay minerals, such as in ammonium illite in the form of fixed ammonium [5,6,7]. Previous studies have shown that the nitrogen content in Chinese coal is 0.4% to 1.6%, and the main coal accumulation periods in China were the middle Jurassic, Cenozoic Paleogene, Neogene, and Paleozoic Carboniferous–Permian, according to their low to high nitrogen contents [8,9,10]. The combustion of coal produces a lot of harmful volatile substances containing nitrogen, such as NOx, N2O, NH3, and HCN, causing heavy air pollution. Therefore, research addressing nitrogen in coal is very important, especially in China with its huge coal consumption of over four billion tons per year [11,12,13]. The types of organic nitrogen in coal exist as pyrrolic nitrogen, pyridinic nitrogen, quaternary, amine, protonated or oxidized heterocyclic nitrogen, and pyridinic N-oxide complexes [6,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In immature coal, pyrrolic nitrogen is the main type, followed by pyridines, pyridones, and aromatic amines [20,21,22,23]; from low-grade metamorphism to the meta-anthracite stage, edge-located nitrogen (such as pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen) is gradually eliminated, and some nitrogen atoms are introduced into the condensation ring to form a more stable structure of quaternary nitrogen (N-C3) [19].
The different thermal stabilities of nitrogen species have been confirmed by many pyrolysis experiments, which have shown that unstable nitrogen species are converted into stable species. The protonated pyridine nitrogen is transformed into pyridine nitrogen, and pyrrolic nitrogen is converted into pyridine or quaternary nitrogen during pyrolysis [6,24,25]. Under the combustion conditions, quaternary nitrogen tends to be converted into pyrrolic and pyridinic nitrogen [24]. Hydrothermal treatments change pyrrolic nitrogen into pyridinic or quaternary nitrogen [25,26]. The results of the thermal extraction of coal samples using methylnaphthalene and light cycle oil showed that the nitrogen in HyperCoal was mainly composed of pyrrolic nitrogen, with lower amounts of pyridinic nitrogen and no quaternary nitrogen, which also suggests that the stability of quaternary nitrogen is high [27].
Usually, coal needs to undergo a washing and flotation process before it is utilized as fuel, a coking material, or a chemical material. Washing and flotation are necessary because they can improve the calorific value and decrease the negative effects of the coal on the environment, as well as increase the ratio of active components (such as vitrinite and liptinite) to inert components (such as minerals), which has a significant influence on the metallurgy [24,28,29,30]. Flotation could substantially decrease the content of inorganic sulfur due to the high density of pyrite [31]. Potentially harmful trace elements can also be segregated from the coal, due to their different occurrence states; for example, chromium is mainly combined with clay minerals, and nickel exists in both iron-bearing sulfide and organic matter [32,33].
Although there have been some studies on nitrogen in coal, few researchers have focused on the study of nitrogen content and its occurrence modes in coal samples of different densities, and there is not enough valuable guidance for the processing and washing of fine minerals. Therefore, four coals from different coalfields in Shanxi Province of China were collected, and the nitrogen content and density fractions of the samples of different species were investigated. This research is helpful for deeply understanding the occurrence mechanism of nitrogen in coal and provides a valuable reference for the clean use of coal.

2. Geological Setting

Shanxi Province is an important coal production base in North China. There are six coal fields in the province. Except for the Datong–Ningwu area in the north, which comprises Carboniferous Permian and Jurassic coal fields, they are all Carboniferous Permian coal fields. All the coal fields share a unified basin with the Carboniferous Permian giant coal field in North China, that is, the weathering surface of the early Paleozoic Ordovician and its lower strata. Devonian, Silurian, and Early Carboniferous strata are absent from the region [34].
The four coal seam samples in this study were collected from the four major coal fields from the north to south of Shanxi Province (Figure 1). The Datong coal field is mainly composed of Carboniferous Permian, Jurassic, and Lower Cretaceous strata, and the Xishan, Huoxi, and Qinshui coal fields are mainly composed of Carboniferous Permian and Triassic strata. The Paleogene and Neogene strata are exposed at different levels in the four coal fields.

3. Materials and Methods

The No. 8 coal from the Xiaoyu mine of the Datong coalfield (XY08) had an Ro,max of 0.82% (Table 1), the No. 8 coal from the Tunlan mine of the Xishan coalfield (TL08) had an Ro,max of 1.10%, the No. 10 coal from the Lingshi mine of the Huoxi coalfield (LS10) had an Ro,max of 1.32%, and the No. 15 coal from the Sihe mine of the Qinshui coalfield (SH15) had an Ro,max of 1.77% (Figure 1 and Table 1). All coal samples were collected from underground via the channel sampling method. These four coal seams are all from the middle and lower part of the Taiyuan Formation of Carboniferous–Permian coal-bearing strata, and belong to the same coal seam, which has regional comparability.
In accordance with the Chinese national standard GB/T 478-2008 [35], the raw coal samples were crushed to 0.5 mm−3.0 mm before density flotation. ZnCl2 solutions of different densities (1.3 g/cm3, 1.4 g/cm3, 1.5 g/cm3, 1.6 g/cm3, 1.7 g/cm3, and 1.8 g/cm3) were used to obtain coal samples with different density fractions (DDFs). According to the standard working requirements, the static layering time of each sample in the density solution was 2 min. Then, the coal samples obtained from the experiments were labeled as <1.3 g/cm3, 1.3 g/cm3–1.4 g/cm3, 1.4 g/cm3–1.5 g/cm3, 1.5 g/cm3–1.6, g/cm3 1.6 g/cm3–1.7 g/cm3, 1.7 g/cm3–1.8 g/cm3, and >1.8 g/cm3. Subsequently, all coal samples were washed with distilled water and then dried at a temperature of 50 °C. The proximate and ultimate analyses were carried out according to the ISO 17246: 2010 and ISO 17247: 2013 standards, respectively [36,37].
Coal petrography analyses were performed using a Leitz Orthoplan microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a high-resolution digital camera and counter. The polished section of the oil-immersed coal was observed using reflected polarization, and the volume fractions of organic macerals and minerals were calculated using a counting point method. On one side of the polished section, the composition was identified at the intersection of the cross of the visual field with a fixed horizontal and vertical shifting length. Cements, cavities, cracks, and unidentified tiny particles were recorded as invalid measuring points, and no fewer than 500 testing effective points were recorded for each polished section. Then, the percentage of statistical points of each composition out of the total effective statistical points was calculated as the content of the macerals.
The maximum reflectance of the vitrinite was tested with a Berek prism illuminator and a polarizer located at 45 degrees. The polished section of coal was moved slightly to obtain a suitable area for vitrinite testing where there were no cracks, polishing sag, mineral inclusions, or other maceral fragments. The testing area was kept away from the boundary of the macerals and not influenced by the bulge. There was no high-reflectivity material, such as pyrite, within 10 μm of the outer edge of the test area. Then, light was projected onto a photoelectric converter, and the maximum reflectance was recorded as the object platform slowly rotated 360 degrees.
Coal samples (0.2 g) of less than 0.2 mm (air-dry basis) were set into a 50 mL Kelvin bottle, and 2 g of catalyst (a mixture of anhydrous sodium sulfate, mercuric sulfate, and selenium powder) and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid were added. The mixture was heated to about 350 °C until it was transparent and the floating black particles disappeared completely. Then, the solution was transferred into a 250 mL Kelvin bottle and diluted to 100 mL. Subsequently, it was mixed with 25 mL of lye (37 g of sodium hydroxide +3 g of sodium sulfide dissolved in 1000 mL of distilled water) and distilled. The distilled NH3 was absorbed using 20 mL of boric acid solution (30 g/L) with an acid–base indicator, and the color of boric acid solution changed from purple to green. Then, the sulfuric acid solution (0.025 mol/L) was used to titrate the boric acid solution until the color changed from green to steel gray. The content of nitrogen in the sample was calculated according to the amount of sulfuric acid solution, and 0.2 g of sucrose was used to replace the sample for a blank control experiment.
N ad = C × ( V 1 V 2 ) × 0.014 M × 100
where Nad is the mass percentage of nitrogen in the sample (air-dry basis), %; C is the concentration of sulfuric acid solution, mol/L; M is the quality of the sample, g; V1 is the dosage of the sulfuric acid solution in the coal sample test, mL; V2 is the dosage of sulfuric acid solution in the blank test, mL; and 0.014 is the molar mass of nitrogen, g/mmol.
All of the DDF coal samples were tested using the XPS method with the ESCALAB 250 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Technology (China) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) equipped with an anode Al X-ray source and a hemispherical analyzer. The samples were crushed to 75 μm in an agate mortar and then pressed at 8 t/cm2 before XPS analysis. The transmission energy values of the survey scan and the narrow scan were 150 eV and 60 eV, respectively. The binding energy was determined to a precision of ± 0.1 eV and calibrated taking C1s (285 eV at the maximum) as a standard. Version 4.1 of XPSPEAK software was used for the spectra curve resolution process, and the envelopes were curve-fitted with mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian functions (30% Lorentzian and 70% Gaussian).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Coal Petrology and Coal Quality

The contents of vitrinite, inertinite, liptinite, and mineral were between 6.2% and 89.36%, 5.5% and 75%, 0.0% and 5.3%, and 1.5% and 69.3%, respectively, in all DDF samples (Table 1). This showed that vitrinite, inertinite, and mineral were the dominant components of the coal, while the contents of liptinite were low in all four kinds of coal (Figure 2).
Generally, with increases in density, the vitrinite content had a downward trend, the inertinite content showed an increasing–decreasing trend, and the mineral content had an upward trend. The mineral content increased sharply and reached 69.30%, 54.21%, 53.35%, 39.00% in the XY08, TL08, LS10, and SH15 samples at the density level of >1.8 g/cm3, while the contents of vitrinite, inertinite, and liptinite tended to sharply decrease. This reflects that the mineral contents were dominant in the high-density DDF samples. The 1.4 g/cm3–1.5 g/cm3 samples of the XY08 coal and the 1.5 g/cm3–1.6 g/cm3 samples of the TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal had the lowest mineral contents compared with the other DDF samples. With the increase in the coal’s rank, the maximum value of the mineral content decreased in the DDF samples of >1.8 g/cm3 (Figure 2d).
Vitrinite mainly appeared at a density level of <1.5 g/cm3, and its relative content in the XY08 coal was less than in the TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal (Figure 2a). The vitrinite content in the XY08 coal and SH15 coal had better negative correlation with the density level, while the vitrinite contents in the TL08 coal and LS10 coal suddenly increased at the >1.8 g/cm3 density level compared with the 1.7 g/cm3–1.8 g/cm3 level.
The inertinite contents in the DDF samples of the LS10 coal were obviously lower than in the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and SH15 coal. The DDF samples of 1.5 g/cm3–1.8 g/cm3 density level comprised high values of inertinite content, greater than 50% in the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and SH15 coal (Figure 2b).
The relative contents of liptinite were between 0.2% and 5.3% in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, obviously higher those that in the TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal (Figure 2c).
The Ad yield (dry basis) of the DDF samples of the four coals had a positive correlation with the density, and the XY08 coal samples had a higher Ad yield than the TL08 coal, LS10 coal, or SH15 coal (Table 2). Except for the LS10 coal, the Odaf content (dry, ash-free oxygen) had an increasing trend with the increase in the density level and sharply increased to 35.17%, 54.79%, and 21.06%, respectively, in the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and SH15 coal at a density of >1.8 g/cm3.
The Vdaf yields (dry ash-free basis) were between 16.09% and 36.05%, 18.70% and 25.90%, 15.56% and 22.56%, and 5.59% and 40.16% in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal, respectively. At the density level of <1.6 g/cm3, the Vdaf yield in the DDF samples of low-rank coal was higher than that in the higher-rank coal. This change was consistent with the degree of coal metamorphism. The Vdaf yield was obviously higher in the DDF samples of SH156 coal (Table 2); this was partly due to the thermal decomposition of the carbonate minerals (CaO comprised 13.18%).
The FCd contents (dry basis) were between 9.92% and 57.97%, 51.57% and 74.50%, 30.36% and 78.15%, and 28.10% and 87.85%, respectively, in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal. With the increase in the density level, the FCd contents in the DDF samples of the four coals generally decreased.
According to the results of the ultimate analysis, the Cdaf also had a decreasing trend when the density of the DDF samples increased, which demonstrates that the organic matter was lower in the relatively high-density samples. The Cdaf value was between 33.86% and 81.35%, 22.66% and 88.76%, 62.87% and 89.86%, and 73.64% and 93.52% in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal, respectively (Table 2). This shows that the carbon content was higher in the higher-rank coal than it was in the low-rank coal.
The St,daf had a sharp increase at a density of >1.8 g/cm3, with values of 23.02%, 15.69%, and 31.97%, respectively, in the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and LS10 coal. The DDF samples of the SH15 coal had a relatively stable St,daf value, which was obvious lower than that in the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and LS10 coal (Table 2).

4.2. Nitrogen Content

The Kjeldahl nitrogen contents (Ndaf%) in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal were 0.85%–1.35%, 0.47%–1.47%, 1.09%–1.49%, and 1.17%–1.85%, respectively (Table 2). There were sharp decreases in the nitrogen contents in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal and TL08 coal with the increase in density (Figure 3a). In contrast, the nitrogen contents in the DDF samples of the SH15 coal increased sharply, and the nitrogen contents in the DDF samples of the LS10 coal increased first and then decreased. Taking 1.5 g/cm3–1.6 g/cm3 as the boundary, when the density was higher than 1.6 g/cm3, the nitrogen contents in the SH15 DDF samples were higher than those in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and LS10 coal; when the density was lower than 1.5 g/cm3, the nitrogen contents in the SH15 DDF samples were less than those in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal, TL08 coal, and LS10 coal (Figure 3a).
Variations in the nitrogen content with the carbon content are often used to characterize the evolution behavior of nitrogen during coal formation [38,39,40]. The relationships between the Ndaf% and Cdaf% in all the DDF samples were established (Figure 3b). They showed that with the increase in the Cdaf%, the distribution of the Ndaf% changed along a parabola trend, and the Ndaf% reached its peak value when the Cdaf% was near 85 wt.%. Some studies have shown a similar relationship between the Ndaf% and Cdaf% in coal [19,41,42]. It can also be seen that the DDF samples may have had very different Ndaf% when the Cdaf% was similar; near the Cdaf% of 85 wt.%, the Ndaf% values in the SH154 and SH155 coals were significantly higher than in the other DDF samples (Figure 3b). The differences in the maceral characteristics were compared with the DDF samples whose Cdaf% was near 85 wt.%, and it was found that SH154 and SH155 had obviously low vitrinite contents (10.8% and 14%, mineral matter basis) and high inertinite contents (71.1% and 67.4%, mineral matter basis). In addition, the DDF sample of SH156 had a low Cdaf% value of 73.64%, which was less than 85%; however, its Ndaf% value reached the highest content of 1.85% and it had the lowest vitrinite content (6.2%, mineral matter basis) among all DDF samples. This means that in higher-rank coal, the content of Ndaf% was more closely correlated with the mineral content. The SH156 had the highest mineral content of 53.04%.
The differences in macerals may have affected the nitrogen contents in the DDF samples of coal. There were strong positive correlations between the Ndaf% and the vitrinite, inertinite, and liptinite contents in the XY08 coal, with r = 0.68, 0.67, and 0.80, respectively, and there were weak positive correlations between the Ndaf% and the macerals in the TL08 coal (Figure 4a–c). Strong negative correlations between the nitrogen content and the mineral content appeared in the XY08 and TL08 coal samples, with r = −0.99 and −0.98, respectively (Figure 4d). This indicates that nitrogen has closer relationships with organic macerals, and minerals make less contribution to the nitrogen in lower-rank coal. Several studies have shown that the nitrogen content in vitrinite is higher than that in inertinite [43,44,45], and the content of liptinite in coal is very low (no more than 5.5%) (Table 1). Therefore, it is thought that macerals, especially those in vitrinite, make a significant contribution to the content of nitrogen in lower-rank coal.
For the LS10 coal, only the inertinite had a high correlation coefficient of 0.69 (Figure 4b). The nitrogen content in the SH15 coal had a strong negative correlation with the vitrinite content (Figure 4a) and strong positive correlations with the inertinite content (Figure 4b) and the mineral content (Figure 4d). This showed that the inertinite and minerals made an important contribution to the nitrogen occurrence in SH15 coal.
These results indicate that the macerals had a certain influence on the Ndaf% in the coals of different ranks. In the low- and middle-rank coal, the nitrogen content was the most correlated with the macerals; in the low-rank coal, it was correlated with the vitrinite; in the middle–low-rank coal, it was correlated with the inertinite, and in the middle–high-rank coal, it was most correlated with the inertinite and minerals. Although the overall nitrogen content slowly increased, this also meant that the occurrence state of N was related to the coal rank, and the inorganic nitrogen content may have increased.

4.3. Nitrogen Occurrence State of DDF Samples

The N1s XPS spectra of the XY08 coal DDF samples were analyzed (Figure 5). A total of five sub-peaks were determined in the curve-fitting process of the N1s XPS spectra. The binding energies of the sub-peaks were fixed at 398.8 eV (N-6), 400.6 eV (N-5), 401.3 eV (N-Q1), 402.7 eV (N-Q2), and 403.6 eV (N-X). The full width at the half-maximum of the sub-peaks was fixed at 1.4 eV. Sub-peak N-6 is related to pyridinic nitrogen, in which one nitrogen atom replaces one carbon atom in the aromatic ring and connects with two carbon atoms. Sub-peak N-5 is related to three kinds of organic nitrogen: (i) the pyrrolic nitrogen structure, in which a nitrogen atom replaces a carbon atom in a non-aromatic ring and is bonded to a hydrogen atom and two carbon atoms; (ii) pyrrolic or pyridinic nitrogen with an oxygen substituent; (iii) amine or pyridone. It was not possible to distinguish between pyrrolic, amide, amines, and pyridone using XPS, and hereafter, N-5 is collectively referred to as pyrrolic nitrogen. Sub-peak N-Q1 is mainly related to quaternary nitrogen (named N-C3), in which a nitrogen atom with a positive charge or a neutral sp3 coordination is bonded with three carbon atoms in a condensation partial aromatic system. Sub-peak N-Q2 is related to fixed ammonia in minerals, and sub-peak N-X is mainly related to pyridinic N-oxide complexes. Meanwhile, the N-C3 type may also contribute to N-Q2 and N-X [6,19].

4.3.1. Sub-Peaks N-X: Oxidized Nitrogen

The sub-peaks of N-X and N-Q2 with a binding energy of >402 eV remain unresolved and have three possible contributions, including pyridinic N-oxide complexes, quaternary nitrogen, and ammonium fixed in clay minerals [6,19]. The weak N-X peak in residues from low-temperature ashing of ammonium illite-containing coal and the presence of a N-X peak in kerogen without silicate minerals demonstrated that the N-X may be not related to the NH4+ in clay minerals, and it may correspond to the pyridinic N-oxide complexes rather than quaternary nitrogen [19]. The N-X sub-peak could also result from oxidation during preparation and storage [19,46]. The content of N-X in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal did not show a significant change; it presents an abnormally low point in Figure 6, which may be due to the complexity of the N-X source and the heterogeneity of the coal. Since the content of N-X was relatively low, it is not discussed further in this work.

4.3.2. Sub-Peak N-Q2: Contributing to Inorganic Nitrogen or Organic Nitrogen

A strong N-Q2 sub-peak was found in the low-temperature ashing of ammonium illite-containing coal, which confirmed the significant contribution of NH4+ in clay minerals to the N-Q2 peak [19]. Figure 7a shows the abundance changes in the N-Q2 sub-peak with ash yield in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal. It can be seen that although the relative content of N-Q2 had a period of decline, it experienced an overall upward trend with the increase in ash yield. The abundance of N-Q2 had a strong positive correlation with the ash yield (r = 0.82). This demonstrates that the inorganic ammonium nitrogen in the minerals in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal made a significant contribution to the content of N-Q2.
The N-Q2 sub-peak in the pure kerogen samples without minerals indicates that organic nitrogen may also contribute to N-Q2 and is thought to represent organic quaternary nitrogen (N-C3), because when nitrogen replaces carbon in a condensed aromatic system, the charge transfer and hybridization produce a higher binding energy [19]. Figure 7b–d show the abundance changes in N-Q2 with vitrinite, inertinite, and liptinite in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal. With the increases in the vitrinite and liptinite contents (vol.%, mineral matter basis), there was an overall downward trend in the content of N-Q2, and there were strong negative correlations between the abundance of N-Q2 and the contents of vitrinite (r = −0.85) and liptinite (r = −0.88). The inertinite content (vol.%, mineral matter basis) showed a weak negative correlation with the abundance of N-Q2. Therefore, it is inferred that the contribution of organic nitrogen N-C3 to the abundance of the N-Q2 peak may have been very weak in the XY08 coal, and the N-Q2 peak mainly originated from the fixed ammonium in the minerals.

4.3.3. Sub-Peaks N-6, N-5, and N-Q1: Contributing to the Certain Organic Nitrogen

The sub-peaks N-6, N-5, and N-Q1 are distinctly from the contribution of organic nitrogen, therefore the relative percentage content of N-6, N-5, and N-Q1 in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal was normalized to a hundred percent, and the organic macerals (vitrinite, inertinite, and liptinite) were also normalized to the mineral-free basis. Then, the relationships between N-6, N-5, and N-Q1 with the organic macerals were assessed (Figure 8).
N-5 abundance maintained a basically stable level with the increase in vitrinite, inertinite, and liptinite (mineral-free basis), while the N-6 and N-Q1 abundances changed significantly, indicating that the organic macerals may have had an important effect on the abundances of N-6 and N-Q1 in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal. Figure 8a,c show that with the increase in the vitrinite and liptinite contents (mineral-free basis), the abundance of N-6 exhibited an increasing trend, and the abundance of N-Q1 decreased. Figure 8b shows that with the increase in the inertinite content, the abundance of N-6 decreased and the abundance of N-Q1 increased. Therefore, there may be more N-6 and less N-Q1 in vitrinite and liptinite, and less N-6 and more N-Q1 in inertinite. According to the relative contents of the three organic macerals in the coal, the vitrinite and inertinite accounted for the main contents, so priority was given to analyzing the effects of vitrinite and inertinite on the changes in N-6 and N-Q1 in the DDF samples.
As a result of coal-mining activities, the nitrogen cycle in the environment has been significantly altered and nitrogen pollution has increased [47,48]. Especially, the change of the occurrence forms of N in char during ammonia–coal co-pyrolysis affects the release of N and the formation of NOx [49]. Therefore, if coal washing can be carried out according to the content and occurrence form of nitrogen, it will reduce the proportion of nitrogen in raw coal, which is beneficial to reducing the environmental pollution caused by coal combustion.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the occurrence and distribution of nitrogen in coal of different ranks and densities were analyzed by coal petrology, geochemistry, and the XPS method. The results showed that there were obvious differences in the contents of Ndaf in the coals of different ranks and densities.
(1)
The nitrogen content was about 0.47%–1.85%, and the maximum nitrogen content was positively correlated with the rank of the coal, but the difference was not obvious. The Ndaf% reached a maximum value near 85 wt.% of carbon content.
(2)
In the low-rank coal, the nitrogen content was mainly related to vitrinite and inertinite, while in the middle–high-rank coal, the nitrogen content was mainly related to inertinite and minerals. The higher rank coal had higher nitrogen content when the density was >1.6 g/cm3, while it had lower nitrogen content when the density was <1.5 g/cm3.
(3)
Pyrrolic (N-5) and pyridinic (N-6) were the main forms of nitrogen in the low-rank coal. The contents of N-6 and N-5 decreased with increases in the coal density, but the contents of quaternary N-Q1 and quaternary N-Q2 increased. In addition, the vitrinite and liptinite may have contained more N-6 and less N-Q1, while the inertinite may have contained less N-6 and more N-Q1. N-Q2 mainly came from fixed ammonia nitrogen in minerals. The nitrogen tended to form a more stable structure in the high-density-level samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and X.L.; methodology, Q.Z.; software, X.L.; validation, Q.Z., X.L. and S.Z.; formal analysis, Q.Z.; investigation, X.L.; resources, D.L.; data curation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.; writing—review and editing, D.L., and F.Z.; visualization, Q.Z. and S.Z.; supervision, F.Z.; project administration, F.Z.; funding acquisition, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41372164 and 41802191), Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 202203021221077) and Geoscience Think Tank Open Foundation of Shanxi (No. 2023010).

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the reviewers for their careful suggestions and academic editors for their sincere affirmations. Thanks to all those who helped with the field sampling and experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Johnson, B.; Goldblatt, C. The Nitrogen Budget of Earth. Earth Sci. Rev. 2015, 148, 150–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Golubyatnikov, L.L.; Mokhov, I.I.; Eliseev, A.V. Nitrogen Cycle in the Earth Climatic System and Its Modeling. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 2013, 49, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krevelen, D.W. Coal: Typology, Chemistry, Physics, Constitution; Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 145–155. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meyers, R.A. Coal Structure; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buckley, A.N.; Kelly, M.D.; Nelson, P.F.; Riley, K.W. Inorganic Nitrogen in Australian Semi-Anthracites; Implications for Determining Organic Nitrogen Functionality in Bituminous Coals by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Fuel Process. Technol. 1995, 43, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valentim, B.; Guedes, A.; Boavida, D. Nitrogen Functionality in “Oil Window” Rank Range Vitrinite Rich Coals and Chars. Org. Geochem. 2011, 42, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Müller, P.J. CN Ratios in Pacific Deep-Sea Sediments: Effect of Inorganic Ammonium and Organic Nitrogen Compounds Sorbed by Clays. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1977, 41, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, D.S.; Zheng, B.S.; Tang, X.Y.; Wang, M.S.; Hu, J.; Li, S.H.; Wang, B.B.; Finkelman, R.B. Contents and Distribution of Nitrogen in Chinese Coals. Earth Environ. 2006, 34, 1–6, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y.F.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, W.M.; Qin, C.X. Study on Distribution of Nitrogen Content in Chinese Coal. Clean Coal Technol. 2008, 14, 71–74, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  10. Xiao, H.Y.; Liu, C.Q. The Elemental and Isotopic Composition of Sulfur and Nitrogen in Chinese Coals. Org. Geochem. 2011, 42, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shamooni, A.; Debiagi, P.; Wang, B.; Luu, T.D.; Stein, O.T.; Kronenburg, A.; Bagheri, G.; Stagni, A.; Frassoldati, A.; Faravelli, T.; et al. Carrier-Phase DNS of Detailed NOx Formation in Early-Stage Pulverized Coal Combustion with Fuel-Bound Nitrogen. Fuel 2021, 291, 119998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.Q.; Zhou, Y.G.; Bai, N.M.; Han, J.C. Experimental Investigation of the Characteristics of NOx Emissions with Multiple Deep Air-Staged Combustion of Lean Coal. Fuel 2020, 280, 118416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.X.; Miao, Z.Q. Effects of Moisture and Its Input Form on Coal Combustion Process and NOx Transformation Characteristics in Lignite Boiler. Fuel 2020, 266, 116970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Valentim, B.; Guedes, A.; Rodrigues, S.; Flores, D. Case Study of Igneous Intrusion Effects on Coal Nitrogen Functionalities. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2011, 86, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Valentim, B.; Algarra, M.; Guedes, A.; Ruppert, L.F.; Hower, J.C. Notes on the Origin of Copromacrinite Based on Nitrogen Functionalities and δ13C and δ15N Determined on Samples from the Peach Orchard Coal Bed, Southern Magoffin County, Kentucky. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 160–161, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kelemen, S.R.; Gorbaty, M.L.; Kwiatek, P.J.; Fletcher, T.H.; Watt, M.; Solum, M.S.; Pugmire, R.J. Nitrogen Transformations in Coal during Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 1998, 12, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J.A.; Matzner, S.; Boehm, H.-P. The Development of Nitrogen Functionality in Model Chars during Gasification in CO2 and O2. Carbon 1999, 37, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Phiri, Z.; Everson, R.C.; Neomagus, H.W.J.P.; Wood, B.J. The Effect of Acid Demineralising Bituminous Coals and De-Ashing the Respective Chars on Nitrogen Functional Forms. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2017, 125, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boudou, J.P.; Schimmelmann, A.; Ader, M.; Mastalerz, M.; Sebilo, M.; Gengembre, L. Organic Nitrogen Chemistry during Low-Grade Metamorphism. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2008, 72, 1199–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitra-Kirtley, S.; Mullins, O.C.; Branthaver, J.F.; Cramer, S.P. Nitrogen Chemistry of Kerogens and Bitumens from X-Ray Absorption near-Edge Structure Spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 1993, 7, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kelemen, S.R.; Gorbaty, M.L.; Kwiatek, P.J. Quantification of Nitrogen Forms in Argonne Premium Coals. Energy Fuels 1994, 8, 896–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kelemen, S.R.; Freund, H.; Gorbaty, M.L.; Kwiatek, P.J. Thermal Chemistry of Nitrogen in Kerogen and Low-Rank Coal. Energy Fuels 1999, 13, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelemen, S.R.; Afeworki, M.; Gorbaty, M.L.; Kwiatek, P.J.; Sansone, M.; Walters, C.C.; Cohen, A.D. Thermal Transformations of Nitrogen and Sulfur Forms in Peat Related to Coalification. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.C.; Zhang, J.; Sheng, C.D.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.X.; Zhao, L.; Xie, F. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Investigation of Nitrogen Functionalities during Coal Char Combustion in O2/CO2 and O2/Ar Atmospheres. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.H.; Li, Q.; Lin, Z.M.; Whiddon, R.; Qiu, K.; Kuang, M.; Cen, K.F. Transformation of Nitrogen and Sulphur Impurities during Hydrothermal Upgrading of Low Quality Coals. Fuel 2016, 164, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geng, W.H.; Kumabe, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Takanashi, H.; Ohki, A. Analysis of Hydrothermally-Treated and Weathered Coals by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). Fuel 2009, 88, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kawashima, H.; Koyano, K.; Takanohashi, T. Changes in Nitrogen Functionality Due to Solvent Extraction of Coal during HyperCoal Production. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 106, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Z.; Zhao, B.; Tian, C.; Sheng, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Yang, X. Polyaspartic Acid, an Eco-Friendly Regulator for the Improvement of Coking Coal Flotation: Applications and Mechanism. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gui, X.H.; Liu, J.T.; Cao, Y.J.; Miao, Z.Y.; Li, S.L.; Xing, Y.W.; Wang, D.P. Coal Preparation Technology: Status and Development in China. Energy Environ. 2015, 26, 997–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Z.; Yu, W.; Yang, C.; Zhou, A.N. Actuality and Expectation on Upgrading Utilization of Low-Rank Coal. Min. Process. Equip. 2013, 41, 1–6, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, Q.; Chen, S. Research Status of Coal Desulfurization by Microbial Pretreatment and Flotation Separation. Clean Coal Technol. 2015, 21, 118–120, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  32. Song, D.Y.; Zhang, X.K.; Zhang, J.Y.; Zheng, C.G. Migration Characteristics of Hazardous Trace Elements in Coal in the Process of Flotation. J. China Coal Soc. 2010, 35, 1170–1176, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  33. Khorasanipour, M.; Karimabadi, F.R.; Espahbodi, M.; Ebrahimnejad, M.R. The Effect of Flotation Desulfurization on the Trace Element Geochemistry of Sarcheshmeh Mine Tailings, SE of Iran: Recycling and the Environmental Opportunities. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, Z.; Liu, K.; Wei, Y. Characteristics of Tectonic Evolution of Carboniferous-Permian Coal Measures in the North-Central Qinshui Basin. Coal Geol. Explor. 2020, 48, 85–91, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  35. GB/T 478–2008; Method for Float and Sink Analysis of Coal. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese)
  36. ISO 17246: 2010; Coal-Proximate Analysis. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  37. ISO 17247: 2013; Coal Ultimate Analysis. International Organisation for Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  38. Jones, M.C.; Peteet, D.M.; Sambrotto, R. Late-Glacial and Holocene δ15N and δ13C Variation from a Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Peatland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2010, 293, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Broder, T.; Blodau, C.; Biester, H.; Knorr, K.H. Peat Decomposition Records in Three Pristine Ombrotrophic Bogs in Southern Patagonia. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 1479–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Andersson, R.A.; Meyers, P.; Hornibrook, E.; Kuhry, P.; Mörth, C.M. Elemental and Isotopic Carbon and Nitrogen Records of Organic Matter Accumulation in a Holocene Permafrost Peat Sequence in the East European Russian Arctic. J. Quat. Sci. 2012, 27, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boudou, J.P.; Mariotti, A.; Oudin, J.L. Unexpected Enrichment of Nitrogen during the Diagenetic Evolution of Sedimentary Organic Matter. Fuel 1984, 63, 1508–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burchill, P.; Welch, L.S. Variation of Nitrogen Content and Functionality with Rank for Some UK Bituminous Coals. Fuel 1989, 68, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hindmarsh, C.J.; Wang, W.X.; Thomas, K.M.; Crelling, J.C. The Release of Nitrogen during the Combustion of Macerals, Microlithotypes and Their Chars. Fuel 1994, 73, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xie, K.C.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, C.Z.; Ling, D.Q. Pyrolysis Characteristics of Macerals Separated from a Single Coal and Their Artificial Mixture. Fuel 1991, 70, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, H.Z.; Wang, C.G.; Zeng, F.; Li, J.; Li, W.Y.; Xie, K.C. XPS Comparative Analysis of Coal Macerals with Different Reducibility. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2006, 34, 389–394, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  46. Gong, B.; Buckley, A.N.; Lamb, R.N.; Nelson, P.F. XPS Determination of the Forms of Nitrogen in Coal Pyrolysis Chars. Surf. Interface Anal. 1999, 28, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, H.W.; Cheng, M.K.; Xu, J.Y.; Chen, S.; Niu, F.; Yu, D.X. Nitrogen Migration and Transformation from Ammonia to Char during Ammonia-Coal/Char Co-Pyrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 49, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Q.G.; An, L.; Wu, P.; Wang, S.; Gu, S.; Yuan, Y.; Fu, Y. The Introduction of Nitrogen from Coal into the Surface Watershed Nitrogen Cycle Due to Coal Mining Activity. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 900, 165822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tan, L.L.; Li, C.Z. Formation of NOx and SOx Precursors during the Pyrolysis of Coal and Biomass. Part I. Effects of Reactor Configuration on the Determined Yields of HCN and NH3 during Pyrolysis. Fuel 2000, 79, 1883–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The location of the coal sample collection.
Figure 1. The location of the coal sample collection.
Minerals 14 00549 g001
Figure 2. Characteristics of content of vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), liptinite (c), and minerals (d) (mineral matter basis (vol.%)) in DDF maceral samples.
Figure 2. Characteristics of content of vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), liptinite (c), and minerals (d) (mineral matter basis (vol.%)) in DDF maceral samples.
Minerals 14 00549 g002
Figure 3. (a) Characteristics of nitrogen contents (Ndaf%) in DDF samples of XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal; (b) relationship between Ndaf% and Cdaf% in samples with different density fractions (DDF).
Figure 3. (a) Characteristics of nitrogen contents (Ndaf%) in DDF samples of XY08 coal, TL08 coal, LS10 coal, and SH15 coal; (b) relationship between Ndaf% and Cdaf% in samples with different density fractions (DDF).
Minerals 14 00549 g003
Figure 4. The correlations between the nitrogen content and the contents of vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), liptinite (c), and minerals (d) in the DDF samples.
Figure 4. The correlations between the nitrogen content and the contents of vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), liptinite (c), and minerals (d) in the DDF samples.
Minerals 14 00549 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectra of N1s of DDF samples of XY08 coal.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of N1s of DDF samples of XY08 coal.
Minerals 14 00549 g005
Figure 6. Change trends of the nitrogen species contents in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Figure 6. Change trends of the nitrogen species contents in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Minerals 14 00549 g006
Figure 7. The relationships betwee the N-Q2 abundance and the ash yield (a), vitrinite (b), inertinite (c), and liptinite (d) contents of the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Figure 7. The relationships betwee the N-Q2 abundance and the ash yield (a), vitrinite (b), inertinite (c), and liptinite (d) contents of the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Minerals 14 00549 g007
Figure 8. The change trends of normalized sub-peaks N-6, N-5, and N-Q1 with vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), and liptinite (c) in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Figure 8. The change trends of normalized sub-peaks N-6, N-5, and N-Q1 with vitrinite (a), inertinite (b), and liptinite (c) in the DDF samples of the XY08 coal.
Minerals 14 00549 g008
Table 1. Maceral compositions of coal with different density fractions.
Table 1. Maceral compositions of coal with different density fractions.
SampleRo,max
(%)
Density
(g/cm3)
Mineral Matter Basis (vol.%)Mineral-Free Basis (vol.%)
VitriniteInertiniteLiptiniteMineralVitriniteInertiniteLiptinite
XY08XY0810.821.3–1.452.0040.605.302.2053.1241.475.41
XY0821.4–1.534.1061.003.401.5034.6261.933.45
XY0831.5–1.621.1074.402.701.9021.4975.762.75
XY0841.6–1.720.2073.102.504.1021.0976.302.61
XY0851.7–1.815.0075.001.608.4016.3881.881.75
XY086>1.87.5023.200.2069.3024.2775.080.65
TL08TL0801.10<1.380.569.490.239.7289.2310.510.26
TL0811.3–1.458.5724.521.4315.4769.3029.011.69
TL0821.4–1.555.3524.210.9419.5068.7530.071.17
TL0831.5–1.635.7654.850.309.1039.3360.330.33
TL08451.6–1.8 &17.9771.630.2410.1720.0079.730.26
TL086>1.832.1813.610.0054.2170.2829.720.00
LS10LS1001.32<1.389.366.440.283.9293.006.710.29
LS1011.3–1.485.938.890.254.9490.399.350.26
LS1021.4–1.566.0424.360.476.1472.6726.810.52
LS1031.5–1.651.0641.223.194.5353.4843.183.34
LS1041.6–1.751.2423.020.5025.2568.5430.790.66
LS1051.7–1.829.7216.730.2053.2563.7135.870.42
LS106>1.841.255.500.0053.3588.2411.760.00
SH15SH1501.77<1.368.5014.800.4016.3081.8417.680.48
SH1511.3–1.479.306.600.5013.6091.787.640.58
SH1521.4–1.577.3010.900.6011.2087.0512.270.68
SH1531.5–1.619.6071.101.008.4021.3777.541.09
SH1541.6–1.710.8071.100.7012.2013.0886.080.85
SH1551.7–1.814.0067.400.2017.7017.1682.600.25
SH156>1.86.2054.600.3039.0010.1589.360.49
Note: The superscript “&” indicates that the density fraction is a mixture of 1.6 g/cm3–1.7 g/cm3 and 1.7 g/cm3–1.8 g/cm3; vol.%, volume percentage; Ro,max, maximum vitrinite reflectance.
Table 2. Proximate and ultimate analyses of coal with different density fractions.
Table 2. Proximate and ultimate analyses of coal with different density fractions.
SampleDensity
(g/cm3)
Proximate Analysis (wt.%)Ultimate Analysis (wt.%)
MadVdafFCdAdCdafHdafN*dafOdafSt,daf
XY0811.3–1.41.3236.0557.979.3681.105.161.3511.071.32
XY0821.4–1.51.5932.4657.5314.5381.174.671.3111.910.92
XY0831.5–1.61.5430.2855.0021.1281.354.441.2712.210.75
XY0841.6–1.71.7130.4749.3828.9879.104.621.3014.250.75
XY0851.7–1.81.4333.4042.0836.8276.024.811.2516.950.97
XY086>1.80.5216.099.9273.9833.867.110.8535.1723.02
TL080<1.30.4325.9072.941.5788.074.881.473.631.96
TL0811.3–1.40.5521.8574.504.6888.764.61.403.691.56
TL0821.4–1.50.4920.3968.7513.6588.734.421.274.261.33
TL0831.5–1.60.5319.3661.7223.4687.544.291.325.371.50
TL08451.6–1.80.6318.7054.1833.3686.034.051.376.901.67
TL086>1.80.5422.5151.5733.4526.662.420.4754.7915.69
LS100<1.30.6018.0880.092.2388.454.491.222.753.10
LS1011.3–1.40.4817.0678.155.7889.234.461.241.893.18
LS1021.4–1.50.6016.8671.3614.1889.864.471.341.043.30
LS1031.5–1.60.6418.2662.8923.0687.874.241.362.094.43
LS1041.6–1.70.5921.4654.3630.7885.484.101.494.674.28
LS1051.7–1.80.5422.5648.9636.7784.414.031.231.618.71
LS106>1.80.4015.5630.3654.0862.873.921.090.1731.97
SH150<1.31.296.5986.107.8292.753.041.182.600.41
SH1511.3–1.41.225.9087.856.6493.523.121.171.830.36
SH1521.4–1.51.376.1485.918.4892.652.971.222.810.36
SH1531.5–1.61.257.9776.3916.9991.893.181.353.190.36
SH1541.6–1.70.8510.8164.5627.6190.083.671.644.230.36
SH1551.7–1.80.9717.6952.8535.7986.223.401.648.410.34
SH156>1.83.2140.1628.1053.0473.643.191.8521.060.26
Note: M, moisture; V, volatile; FC, fixed carbon; A, ash; St, total sulfur; d, dry basis; daf, dry ash-free basis; the superscript “*” indicates that the nitrogen content was obtained using the Kjeldahl method; wt.%, weight percentage.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S. The Occurrence and Distribution of Nitrogen in Coal of Different Ranks and Densities. Minerals 2024, 14, 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060549

AMA Style

Liu D, Zhang Q, Zhao F, Liu X, Zhang S. The Occurrence and Distribution of Nitrogen in Coal of Different Ranks and Densities. Minerals. 2024; 14(6):549. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060549

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Dongna, Qi Zhang, Fenghua Zhao, Xile Liu, and Shangqing Zhang. 2024. "The Occurrence and Distribution of Nitrogen in Coal of Different Ranks and Densities" Minerals 14, no. 6: 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060549

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop