Next Article in Journal
Selective Recovery of Mushistonite from Gravity Tailings of Copper–Tin Minerals in Tajikistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Joint Application of Fractal Analysis and Weights-of-Evidence Method for Revealing the Geological Controls on Regional-Scale Tungsten Mineralization in Southern Jiangxi Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of a Novel Cationic Surfactant: Tributyltetradecyl-Phosphonium Chloride for Iron Ore Flotation: From Prediction to Experimental Verification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Geostatistical Methodology to Characterize Volcanogenic Massive and Stockwork Ore Deposits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Indicator Variograms as an Aid for Geological Interpretation and Modeling of Ore Deposits

1
Department of Mining Engineering, University of Chile, Santiago 8370448, Chile
2
Advanced Mining Technology Center, University of Chile, Santiago 8370448, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2017, 7(12), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241
Submission received: 1 November 2017 / Revised: 28 November 2017 / Accepted: 30 November 2017 / Published: 5 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Modelling)

Abstract

Geostatistics offers a set of methods for modeling, predicting, or simulating geological domains in space. In addition of being an input of some of these methods, indicator direct and cross-variograms convey valuable information on the geometry of the domain layouts and on their contact relationships, in particular, on the surface area of a domain boundary, on the surface area of the contact between two domains, on the propensity for a domain to be in contact with, or separated from, another domain, and on the minimum and maximum distances between points from two domains. Accordingly, the indicator variograms inferred from sparse sampling data can be used to determine whether or not an interpreted model of the subsurface is consistent with the sampling information. The previous concepts are illustrated through a case study corresponding to a porphyry copper deposit.
Keywords: geological domaining; indicator direct and cross-variograms; edge effects; contact relationships geological domaining; indicator direct and cross-variograms; edge effects; contact relationships
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maleki, M.; Emery, X.; Mery, N. Indicator Variograms as an Aid for Geological Interpretation and Modeling of Ore Deposits. Minerals 2017, 7, 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241

AMA Style

Maleki M, Emery X, Mery N. Indicator Variograms as an Aid for Geological Interpretation and Modeling of Ore Deposits. Minerals. 2017; 7(12):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maleki, Mohammad, Xavier Emery, and Nadia Mery. 2017. "Indicator Variograms as an Aid for Geological Interpretation and Modeling of Ore Deposits" Minerals 7, no. 12: 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241

APA Style

Maleki, M., Emery, X., & Mery, N. (2017). Indicator Variograms as an Aid for Geological Interpretation and Modeling of Ore Deposits. Minerals, 7(12), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop