Next Article in Journal
The Hydrothermal Fluid Evolution of Vein Sets at the Pipeline Gold Mine, Nevada
Next Article in Special Issue
Electron Microscopy Observation of Biomineralization within Wood Tissues of Kurogaki
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Additives on Arsenic, Boron and Selenium Leaching from Coal Fly Ash
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 7
Issue 6
10.3390/min7060097
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Organic Matter in the Formation of High-Grade Al Deposits of the Dopolan Karst Type Bauxite, Iran: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sulfur Isotope Data

by
Somayeh Salamab Ellahi
,
Batoul Taghipour
* and
Mostafa Nejadhadad
Department of Earth Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71454, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2017, 7(6), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/min7060097
Submission received: 23 March 2017 / Revised: 20 May 2017 / Accepted: 31 May 2017 / Published: 12 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organo-Mineral Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mineralogical and geochemical analyses of the Dopolan karstic bauxite ore were performed to identify the characteristics of four bauxite horizons, which comprise from top to bottom, bauxitic kaolinite, diaspore-rich bauxite, clay-rich bauxite, and pyrite-rich bauxite. Diaspore, kaolinite, and pyrite are the main minerals; böhmite, muscovite, rutile, and anatase are the accessory minerals. The main minerals of the Dopolan bauxite deposit indicate slightly acidic to alkaline reducing conditions during bauxitization. Immobile elements (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, and rare earth elements) are enriched in the diaspore-rich horizon, which also has the highest alumina content, whereas redox sensitive elements (e.g., Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Ag, U, and V) are enriched in the lowest horizon of pyrite-rich bauxite. The presence of a high content of organic matter was identified in different horizons of bauxitic ore from wet chemistry. The presence of organic matter favored Fe bioleaching, which resulted in Al enrichment and the formation of diaspore-rich bauxite. The leached Fe2+ reacted with the hydrogen sulfur that was produced due to bacterial metabolism, resulting in the formation of the pyrite-rich horizon towards the bottom of the Dopolan bauxite horizons. Biogeochemical activity in the Dopolan bauxitic ore was deduced from the reducing environment of bauxitization, and the deposition of framboidal and cubic or cubic/octahedral pyrite crystals, with large negative values of δ34S of pyrite (−10‰ to −34‰) and preserved fossil cells of microorganisms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Previous studies have demonstrated that differences in the mineralogical compositions of bauxite horizons could be related to different Eh and pH of the depositional environment as a result of organic matter variations in the original host rocks [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In the presence of a high content of organic matter, microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, convert metal compounds into their water-soluble forms. These water-soluble metals are biocatalytic productions of this leaching process [7]. Microorganisms are able to mobilize metals by (1) the formation of organic and inorganic acids, (2) oxidation and reduction reactions, and (3) the excretion of complexing agents [8,9,10,11,12]. Bacterial activity has an important role in the leaching of iron to alter a high-iron, low-grade red bauxite ore to a high-grade, gray alumina ore with low Fe content [2,3,13].
The bauxite deposits of the Zagros orogenic belts in southwestern Iran were deposited during two periods: (1) in karst cavities at the boundary between the Sarvak and Ilam Formations (Cretaceous bauxite deposits), such as the Mandan, Dehnow, and Sarfaryab deposits, and (2) deposited at the boundary between the Neyriz and Khaneh-Kat Formations (Triassic bauxite deposits), such as the Dopolan deposit. Most of Iranian karst bauxites in the Zagros orogenic belts are low-grade, böhmitic, diasporic bauxites [14,15,16,17]. They contain 20–45 wt % Al2O3, 3–38 wt % Fe2O3, and in most cases appear red in outcrops. Contrastingly, the Dopolan bauxite has exceptionally high Al2O3 (62–78 wt %, average 65 wt %), low total Fe (0.56–32 wt %, average 5 wt %), and is almost gray in the field [18]. The Dopolan bauxite deposit has been in production for more than 40 years. Mineralization includes three separated pocket and tabular orebodies (Shahid Nilchian, Dorag, and C mine). The ore reserves total 8 to 15 million metric tonnes of 47 wt % Al2O3 [19].
A previous study of the Dopolan bauxite described mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the bauxitic horizons [18]. Salamab [18] suggests that the bauxite formed as a continental deposit filling karstic cavities at the boundary of the Khaneh-Kat and Neyriz formations. The present study is focused on the organic matter rich bauxite horizons, which are characterized by an association with the abundance of pyrite. We investigated the role of organic matter and microorganisms in the mobility of trace elements, mobilization and deposition of iron, and Al enrichment in the bauxite profile. To attain these goals, the ore composition (major, trace, and rare earth elements), the organic matter content, and the sulfur isotopic values of pyrite of a series of bauxite horizons were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

2. Geology

The Dopolan bauxite deposit is located 110 km northwest of Share-Kord city, southwestern Iran (Figure 1a) [18]. The deposit is situated in the high Zagros Mountains and developed in the Triassic carbonates of the Khaneh-Kat Formation in the contact zone with the Jurassic carbonates of the Neyriz Formation. The Zagros orogenic belt extends for approximately 1500 km from Kermanshah in the northwest of Iran to Bandar Abbas in the south of the country. The Zagros zone is located in the boundary between the Arabian and Eurasian lithospheric plates. It was formed during the Cenozoic orogenic movements as a result of collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates [20,21]. This collision created numerous folds and thrusts that now appear as large linear anticlines. Outcrops of the bauxitic horizons occur in a large structure called the Sabzkuh–Kelar anticlinorium, which is bounded by two thrust faults. The Sabzkuh anticline is 65 km long. In the studied area, the Zagros stratigraphy consists of Cambrian to Quaternary sequences. The youngest strata are located on limbs and the oldest rocks are in the core of the anticlinorium (Figure 1b). The Dalan Formation is the oldest exposed rock unit in the core of the Sabzkuh anticline. The Dopolan bauxite deposit is hosted within Triassic carbonate rocks of the Khaneh-Kat Formation. The Khaneh-Kat Formation includes dolostones, dolomitic limestones, marly limestones with interbedded marl, and argillaceous limestones overlying Permian pink dolostones of the Dalan Formation. The Dopolan bauxite deposit is stratabound and crops out in an erosional window. The boundary between the Khaneh-Kat Formation and the overlying Jurassic limestone and shaly limestone of the Neyriz Formation is an erosional unconformity that contains the Dopolan bauxite horizon. On its turn, the Neyriz formation is covered by a sequence comprising, from older to younger: the Surmeh, the Sarvak, and the Gurpi Formations [19]. Karstified features within the Khaneh-Kat Formation are infilled by bauxite. The layers of bauxite vary from 1 to 8 m in thickness and can be more than 1000 m in length.

3. Methodology

The exposures of the Dopolan bauxite were divided into four different horizons on the basis of their macromorphological facies and their relation to the foot wall and hanging wall. A total of 28 samples, each weighing 3 kg, of different layers were selected during the fieldwork. Samples were obtained from the topmost part of the Khaneh-Kat Formation, the bauxite profiles, and the lowest part of the Neyriz Formation carbonates in three different cross-sections. Thin and polished sections were prepared for different mineralogical examinations including optical microscopy (both transmitted and reflected), SEM. SEM-Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) analysis was performed at the Razi Metallurgical Research Center (Iran), using a Tescan VEGAΙΙ XMU-EDS. Minerals were identified using XRD at the Kansaran Binallod, Pardis Science and Technology Park, Tehran, using a Philips X-pert PW diffractometer. The concentrations of major, trace, and rare earth elements (REE) were determined using inductively cople plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) by ACME Analytical Lab Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Total organic carbon (TOC) of selected samples was determined following the method of Walkey and Black [22]. In this method, organic carbon present in organic matter (OM) is oxidized by chromic acid in the presence of concentrated sulfuric acid.
The analysis of sulfur isotopes was performed on three handpicked pyrite samples and three whole-rock samples from both pyrite-rich and bauxitic kaolinite horizon samples at the University of California, Davis (UC Davis), stable isotope analysis facility (Davis, CA, USA). The δ34S was analyzed by an elemental vario isotope cube interfaced to a Ser Con 20–22 IRMS packed with tungsten oxide. The sample gases were reduced with elemental copper at 880 °C. Sample SO2 was passed directly to the isotope ratio mass Spectrometer (IRMS) for measurement. Calibration data were from standards IAEA S.1, S.2, S.3, IAEA-SO-5, IAEA-SO-6, and HHS. The results are given in per mil (‰) relative to Vienna Canon diablo Troilite (VCDT).

4. Mineralogical Characteristics

The Dopolan karst bauxite ore [18] mainly consists of diaspore, kaolinite, nacrite, and pyrite (Table 1). Böhmite, anatase, rutile, quartz, and muscovite are present as minor minerals. On the basis of the main mineral contents, the bauxite profile can be divided into four bauxite horizons: bauxitic kaolinite, diaspore-rich bauxite, clay-rich bauxite, and pyrite-rich bauxite (Figure 2).
Above the karstified dolomites of the footwall, within the pyrite-rich horizon, the main ore minerals are kaolinite, nacrite, and pyrite; whereas böhmite, muscovite, anatase, and rutile are minor minerals. Optical microscopy, XRD and SEM studies of the pyrite-rich horizon revealed abundant pyrite (20% in modal proportion to more than 35%). The pyrite-rich horizon is ~1.5 m thick. Pyrite grains are mainly framboidal and cubic in shape; some cubic-octahedral crystals are also present (Figure 3). Above the pyrite-rich horizon, in the clay-rich bauxite, the amount of pyrite decreases to less than 5% in modal proportion. The main minerals in this horizon include kaolinite and diaspore whereas böhmite is minor. The clay-rich bauxite, ~5 m thick, is gray to light gray in color and has a fine-grained oolitic texture. Up to the top of the bauxite sequence, the amount of kaolinite decreases and diaspore increases to a maximum of 80% modal. In the diaspore-rich bauxite, minor minerals include nacrite, muscovite, rutile, and anatase. The diaspore-rich bauxite is the main ore zone and is mined. The layer contains an average of 70% Al2O3, 3% Fe2O3, and 2% TiO2 [18]. This horizon is distinguished by its pisolitic and oolitic textures. At the top of the bauxite profile, there is a layer of black bauxitic kaolinite that is enriched in organic matter and is 0.35–1.5 m thick, indicating a large supply of organic matter in the depositional environment of this layer. In this horizon, kaolinite, nacrite, and pyrite are the main minerals whereas böhmite, diaspore, rutile, and anatase are the minor minerals. The morphology of pyrite in the bauxitic kaolinite horizon is the same as in the pyrite-rich bauxite horizon (Figure 3).

5. Geochemical Features

5.1. Distribution of Elements

The geochemical data (Table 2) confirm the mineralogical results. The aluminum, titanium, potassium, and magnesium contents decrease from the top to bottom of the bauxite profiles, i.e., from the diaspore-rich to the pyrite-rich horizon (Figure 4). In contrast, the silica and iron content increases from the diaspore-rich to the pyrite-rich horizon (Figure 4). REE and immobile elements such as the HFSE (Th, Ta, Nb, Zr, and Hf) are enriched in the diaspore-rich bauxite and decrease to the bottom of the bauxite profile (Figure 4), whereas more mobile elements of the weathering profile such as redox-sensitive elements (Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Ag, As, U, and V) increase from top to bottom (Figure 4). The total content of mobile elements is more than twice that in the pyrite-rich bauxite compared to other horizons.

5.2. Organic Matter of Bauxite Horizons

The TOC content of different bauxite horizons, foot, and hanging walls of the Dopolan bauxite was calculated (Table 2) to investigate the relationship between elemental mobility and TOC. The TOC content of the Dopolan bauxite deposits varies from 0.18% in the diaspore-rich bauxite to 1% in the bauxitic kaolinite. Both the lowest and the uppermost parts of the bauxitic profile, which have higher TOC contents, have higher contents of pyrite. The alumina content of bauxite samples displays a negative correlation with TOC (Figure 5). The REE behavior in bauxite horizons is the inverse of those of Fe and TOC (Figure 4).

5.3. Sulfur Isotopes

The δ34S values of handpicked pyrites from the pyrite-rich bauxite horizon and whole-rock from the bauxitic kaolinite and pyrite-rich bauxite samples display a wide negative range, from −10.12‰ to −34.58‰ (Table 3; Figure 6). However, the δ34S values of the bauxitic kaolinite vary from −26.77‰ to −33.58‰, exhibiting a narrower range than that of the pyrite-rich bauxite samples (−10.12‰ to −34.59‰).

6. Discussion

6.1. Formation of the Pyrite-Rich Horizon

Significant amounts of pyrite were deposited in the lowest part of the bauxite sequence of the Dopolan deposit, forming an unusual pyrite-rich horizon. The presence of Fe-oxy-hydroxide minerals in bauxitic horizons is commonly reported, but pyrite-rich bauxites are uncommon and have been described from only some areas, such as the Taurides region in Turkey [1]; the Minjera deposit, Croatia; and the gray part of the Parnassos–Ghiona bauxite deposit in Greece [3]. The TOC values of the Dopolan bauxite ore vary from 0.18% in the diaspore-rich bauxite, 0.2% in the clay-rich bauxite, 0.4% in the pyrite rich bauxite, and up to 1% in the upper bauxitic kaolinite horizon. These data indicate that the TOC content of the Dopolan bauxite is higher than that of most bauxite deposits of the world [3,4]. The high content of preserved organic matter in the gray bauxite of the Dopolan resulted in reducing conditions caused by decomposition of the organic matter. In these conditions, the sparingly soluble Fe3+ was reduced to more soluble Fe2+ [23], which is leached out from the upper part of the sequence. Microorganisms could accelerate this reaction by their enzymes or metabolism. In water-saturated soils, microbial reduction of Fe oxides in the presence of organic matter facilitates mobility and removal of iron from the soil profile [24,25]:
4FeOOH + CH2O + 8H+ = 4Fe2+ + CO2 + 7H2O.
Hydrogen sulfide is produced from the reduction of sulfate by a variety of bacterial species, e.g., Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, when organic matter as an energy source is present as a reducing agent [3,26]. The following reaction has been proposed [27,28,29,30]:
2 CH2O + SO42+ → H2S + 2 HCO3−
Bacteria fossils and associated microorganisms with the pyrite are the best evidence for the aforementioned conditions (Figure 7). The morphology of pyrite is essentially related to the degree of Fe and S saturation of pore water [31,32,33]. If the interstitial water is supersaturated with respect to FeS, monosulfides are deposited. When these monosulfides change to pyrite, the pyrite will have a spherulitic morphology and form clusters of well-formed grains and euhedral crystals (Figure 3). If pyrite is directly deposited from solution, the most common morphology is cubic to cubic-octahedral [34]. Therefore, the cubic-octahedral morphology of the Dopolan pyrite is due to the saturation of pore water with respect to iron and sulfur.

6.2. Deposition Mechanisms of High-Grade Al Bauxite

It is well known that the solubilization of Al and Si in bauxite profiles is particularly sensitive to pH, but the rate of Fe mobility is mainly controlled by both pH and Eh [35,36,37]. In bauxite profiles, many factors can influence pH, such as organic matter content, CO2 availability, standing electrolyte content, and the nature of the host rock [38,39]. The pH range in karstic bauxite is 5–9; however, most deposits have a pH range of 6–8. In the pH range of 5–9, the solubility of Si is 10–20 times greater than that of Al and Fe. Thus, after long-term weathering, significant dissolution of Si will have taken place, but Fe and Al will remain. For a constant environmental pH, the solubility of Fe can increase in competition to Al as a result of decreasing Eh [35,40,41]. Laskou and Economou-Eliopoulos [3] argued for a close relationship between iron leaching and alumina enrichment in the gray and red ores of the Parnassos–Ghiona deposits, Greece. The Dopolan bauxite deposit, with an average of 3% Fe, is essentially iron-poor bauxite (except for the pyrite-rich horizon, which has an average of 13% Fe). Fe leaching could take place during (syngenetic) or after (epigenetic) bauxite deposition [3,35]. Diaspore formed in a mildly reduced and alkaline environment and pyrite should precipitate under mildly acidic conditions. Therefore, the environmental conditions of the Dopolan bauxite deposit, based on the predominant ore minerals such as diaspore, pyrite, and kaolinite were changed from acidic reducing to slightly alkaline reducing (Figure 8). The existence of reducing conditions can also be deduced by the presence of the high content of organic matter. Field evidence such as the presence of plant root casts show that the Dopolan bauxite deposit formed in a swamp sedimentary basin. The high organic matter content of the Dopolan bauxite probably results from plant root casts as bauxite deposition was a preferred system for plant growth [18,42].
Therefore, the main difference between the depositional environments of the Dopolan bauxite deposit and other Zagros bauxite deposits may be the greater reducing conditions, which caused Fe- leaching and Al enrichment (Table 4).

6.3. Mobility of REE and Trace Elements

The mobility of REE and trace elements in bauxite deposits is dependent on the physico-chemical conditions of pore water as it percolates through the soil [3,44,45,46]. Under oxidizing conditions, the solubility and deposition of REE are similar to those of Al2O3, P2O5, and TiO2. In addition, the concentration of other immobile elements such as Zr, Nb, Ta, and Hf increase with increasing Al2O3, P2O5, and TiO2 [47,48,49]. The REE can be absorbed by or adsorbed onto diaspore and böhmite. However, the high positive correlation between REE and P2O5 in the Dopolan karstic bauxite suggests that at the least some REE can be accommodated in the structure of some phosphates (i.e., Al-phosphates or members of the rhabdophane group). The mildly positive correlation of HFSE with TiO2 suggests that these elements can be accommodated in the structure of TiO2 polymorphs, as rutile. The highest contents of Al2O3, TiO2, P2O5, Zr, Nb, Ta, and Hf were detected in the diaspore-rich bauxite, implying similarity of the geochemical characteristics during deposition (Figure 9) [50,51]. In contrast, the lowest contents of these elements were detected in the bauxitic kaolinite horizon with the lowest weathering rate and highest organic matter content. Therefore, the concentrations of these elements are mainly controlled by weathering factors [18,46,48,50,51,52]. The presence of organic matter in the bauxite profile caused reducing conditions, favoring the removal of REE and other immobile elements [3].
In contrast to REE and other immobile elements, which are enriched in the diaspore-rich horizon, the more mobile trace elements (e.g., Cu, Ni, Co, Cr, Pb, Zn, Sb, Ag, As, U, and V) are enriched in the pyrite-rich bauxite horizon with higher organic matter (0.37%) and lower Al2O3. These elements are more than twice as abundant in the pyrite-rich bauxite horizon (2200 ppm) than in the diaspore-rich (870 ppm) and clay bauxite (850 ppm) horizons. These elements appear to have been leached from the upper parts of the bauxitic profile and become precipitated in the lower part of the weathering profile in which the upper parts are more acidic and oxidizing but the lower pyrite-rich horizon is slightly acidic to alkaline and more reducing.
For the pH range 4–8 [53], it has been demonstrated that the mobility of most elements increased in soils with increasing Eh and vice versa. Additionally, some bacteria can play an important role in the mobility and precipitation of multiple redox state elements (e.g., Cu, Fe, Mn, Cr, and V) by means of their metabolic products [11,54,55,56]. Microorganism activity in the Dopolan bauxite deposit was demonstrated by microbial pyrite deposition (Section 6.2), and sulfur isotopic evidence (Section 6.4). Other important factors for the fixation of more mobile elements in the Dopolan deposit can be absorption by and/or adsorption onto the surface of pyrite and co-precipitation by clay minerals. Negatively charged surfaces of clay minerals offer extensive surfaces to adsorb positive charge elements largely in the pH range of 5 to 8 [7,10,11,54,55,56].

6.4. Sulfur Isotope Constraints

The δ34S values have been used as a tracer for biogenic sulfate reduction and reconstruction of paleoenvironments [57]. Pyrite formation in sedimentary and low-temperature environments has been well studied because of the relation between redox conditions and the biogeochemical cycles of sulfur, iron, and carbon [58]. The whole-rock and pyrite δ34S values of the Dopolan bauxite deposit fall in a wide negative range, from −10‰ to −34‰, suggesting involvement of bacterial sulfate reduction after bauxitization. Sulfur isotope variation is dependent on the occurrence of sulfate reduction in an open or closed system [59]. Negative δ34S values of pyrite imply fractionation by microorganisms during their sulfur metabolism by sulfate reduction in an open system [29,30,33]. The bacteria and microorganisms grew in a temperature range of 28–60 °C [60]. The negative sulfur values previously reported for Turkish bauxite deposits (Dogøankuzu and Mortas deposits; [1]) and the Parnassos–Ghiona deposit in Greece [4] are comparable to those of the Dopolan deposit and have been attributed to the reduction of sulfate by bacteria [4]. Surface water is the probable source of the sulfur, as indicated in other places [60,61].

7. Conclusions

The high-grade, gray-colored Dopolan bauxite deposit is found in the Triassic carbonates of the Khaneh Kat Formation. This deposit is a diaspore-rich karst-type bauxite with low Fe content and an unusual pyrite-rich horizon in the lowest part of the sequence. This study has focused on the role of organic matter and microorganisms in the bioleaching of elements, e.g., upgrading the alumina content of the deposit. The study offers the following conclusions:
  • The main minerals, such as diaspore, pyrite, kaolinite, and its association with preserved organic matter, suggest that bauxitization occurred in acidic reducing to slightly alkaline reducing conditions.
  • The low Fe content of the Dopolan bauxite implies that Fe leaching under reducing conditions may have resulted from organic matter in the presence of microbial activity. Fe was leached from the upper part of the bauxite profile and was deposited as pyrite in the lower part, generating a pyrite-rich bauxite horizon.
  • During the formation of the bauxite profile, less mobile elements, such as REE, Nb, Ta, Zr, and Hf, accumulated in the diaspore-rich horizon with higher alumina content, whereas redox sensitive elements such as Cr, Ni, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, U, and V, were concentrated in the pyrite-rich horizon.
  • Sulfur isotope data reveal a wide range of negative values of δ34S for pyrite samples (from −10‰ to −34‰), suggesting the biogeochemical reduction of sulfate to sulfur.
  • Mineralogical data, geochemical evidence, and sulfur isotope data in this study suggest that biological activity played an important role in Fe remobilization, Al-upgrading, and the formation of the pyrite-rich horizon in the Dopolan bauxite deposit.

Acknowledgments

All financial support for this research was provided by the Research Office at Shiraz University, Iran. Iranian Mines & Mining Industries Development & Renovation (IMIDRO) is greatly acknowledged for support of the ICP-MS and XRD analyses. The CEO of the Dopolan bauxite mine is thanked for providing unlimited access to the Dopolan deposits. The Enago group is thanked for their assistance in editing the English. We would like to give our sincere thanks to Maria Economou-Eliopoulos of the University of Athens for reviewing an earlier version of the manuscript and constructive comments. Special thanks are extended to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Salamab Ellahi, Taghipour, and Nejadhadad conceived and designed the experiments; Taghipour, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Nejadhadad, Taghipour and Salamab Ellahi wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozturk, H.; Hein, R.J.; Hanilci, N. Genesis of the Dog¢ankuzu and Mortas, bauxite deposits, Taurides, Turkey: Separation of Al, Fe, and Mn and implications for passive margin metallogeny. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 1063–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laskou, M.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Micro-organisms as fossils and present day development in Ni-laterites and bauxites of the Balkan Peninsula. In Mineral Deposits Research Meeting the Global Challenge, Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial SGA Meeting, Beijing, China, 18–21 August 2005; Mao, J., Bierlein, F.P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 1003–1006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Laskou, M.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. The role of microorganisms on the mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the Parnassos-Ghiona bauxite deposits, Greece. J. Geochem. Explor. 2007, 93, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laskou, M.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Bio-mineralization and potential biogeochemical processes in bauxite deposits: genetic and ore quality significance. Mineral. Petrol. 2012, 73, 124–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalaitzidis, S.; Siavalas, G.; Skarpelis, N.; Carla Viviane Araujo, C.; Christanis, C. Late Cretaceous coal overlying karstic bauxite deposits in the Parnassus-Ghiona Unit, Central Greece: coal characteristics and depositional environment. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2010, 81, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kalatha, S.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Framboidal pyrite and bacterio-morphic goethite at transitional zones between-Fe-Ni-laterite and limestones: Evidence from Lokris, Greece. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lovely, D.R. Microbial reduction of iron, manganese, and other metals. Adv. Agron. 1995, 54, 175–231. [Google Scholar]
  8. Berthelin, J. Microbial weathering processes. In Microbial Geochemistry; Krumbein, W.E., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1983; pp. 223–263. [Google Scholar]
  9. Furrer, G.; Stumn, W. A coordination chemical approach to the kinetics of weathering. I. Dissolution of δ-Al2O3 and BeO. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1986, 50, 1847–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McBride, M.; Sauvé, S.; Hendershot, W. Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1997, 48, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Müller, B.; Axelesson, M.D.; Öhlander, B. Adsorption of trace elements on pyrite surfaces in sulfidic mine tailing from Kristenberg (Sweden) a few years after remediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 298, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lazo, O.; Cullaj, A.; Deda, T. Arsenic in soil environments in Albania. In Arsenic in Soil and Groundwater: Biogeochemical Interactions; Bhattacharya, P., Mukherjee, A.B., Zevenhoven, R., Loeppert, R., Eds.; Elsevier Book Series; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oliveira, F.S.; Varajao, A.F.D.; Varajao, C.A.C.; Schaefer, C.E.G.R.; Bolange, B. The role of biogical agents in the microstructural and mineralogical transformations in aluminium lateritic deposit in Central Brazil. Geoderma 2014, 226–227, 250–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liaghat, S.; Hossini, M.; Zarasvandi, A. Determination of the origin and mass change geochemistry during bauxitization process at the Hangam Deposit, SE Iran. Geochem. J. 2003, 37, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zarasvandi, A.; Charchi, A.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Alizadeh, B. Karst bauxite deposits in the Zagros mountain belt, Iran. Ore Geol. Rev. 2008, 34, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zarasvandi, A.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Ellahi, S.S. Geological, geochemical, and mineralogical characteristics of the Mandan and Deh-now bauxite deposits, Zagros Fold Belt, Iran. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 48, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Calagari, A.A.; Abedini, A. Geochemical investigations on Permo-Triassic bauxite horizon at Kanisheeteh, east of Bukan, West-Azarbaidjan, Iran. J. Geochem. Geoexplor. 2007, 93, 232–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salamab Ellahi, S.; Taghipour, B.; Zarasvandi, A.; Bird, M.I.; Somarin, A.K. Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Stable Isotope Studies of the Dopolan Bauxite Deposit, Zagros Mountain, Iran. Minerals 2016, 6, 11. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehsanbakhsh, M.H.; Rahimzadeh, F. Ardal Map 1; 100000; Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration: Tehran, Iran, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  20. Takin, M. Iranian geology and continental drift in the Middle East. Nature 1972, 235, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agard, P.; Omrani, J.; Jolivet, L.; Mouthereau, F. Convergence history across Zagros, Iran: Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2005, 94, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walkey, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baskar, S.; Baskar, R.; Kaushik, A. Role of microorganisms in weathering of the Konkan-Goa laterite formation. Curr. Sci. 2003, 85, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar]
  24. Spatio, G. The Geochemistry of Soil; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chapelle, F.H. Ground-Water Microbiology and Geochemistry; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Berner, R.A. Biogeochemical cycles of carbon and sulfur and their effect on atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1989, 75, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jensen, M.L. Sulfur isotopes and mineral genesis. In Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits; Barnes, H.L., Ed.; Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: New York, NY, USA, 1967; pp. 143–165. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohmoto, H.; Rye, R.O. Isotopes of sulfur and carbon. In Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits; Barnes, H.L., Ed.; Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 509–567. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohmoto, H.; Goldhaber, M.B. Sulfur and carbon isotopes. In Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits; Barnes, H.L., Ed.; Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 517–611. [Google Scholar]
  30. Seal, R. Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry of Sulfide Minerals; U.S. Geological Survey Staff-Published Research: Reston, VA, USA, 2006; p. 345. [Google Scholar]
  31. Roedder, E. The noncolloidal origin of “colloform” textures in sphalerite ores. Econ. Geol. 1968, 63, 451–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anderson, G.M. The mixing hypothesis and the origin of Mississippi Valley-type ore deposits. GeoFluids 2008, 103, 1683–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nejadhadad, M.; Taghipour, B.; Zarasvandi, A.K.; Somarin, A. Geological, geochemical, and fluid inclusion evidences for the origin of the Ravanj Pb–Ba–Ag deposit, north of Delijan city, Markazi Province, Iran. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 2016, 25, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, H.; Morse, H.C. IRF8 regulates myeloid and B lymphoid lineage diversification. Immunol. Res. 2009, 43, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Patterson, S.H. Bauxite Reserves and Potential Aluminum Resources of the World; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1967; pp. 1228–1258.
  36. Brimhall, G.H.; Lewis, C.J.; Ague, J.J.; Dietrich, W.E.; Hampel, J.; Teague, T.; Rix, P. Metal enrichment in bauxites by deposition of chemically-mature aeolian dust. Nature 1988, 333, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ehrlich, H.L.; Wickert, L.M.; Noteboom, D.; Doucet, J. Weathering Pisolitic Bauxite by Heterotrophic Bacteria; University of Chile: Santiago, Chile, 1995; Volume I, pp. 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  38. McLean, E.D. Chemistry of soil aluminum. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1976, 7, 619–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thomas, G.W. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods; Soil Sciences Society of America/American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; Part 3; pp. 475–496. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, X.; Wang, Q.; Feng, Y.; Cai, Z. Genesis of the Guangou karstic bauxite deposit in western Henan, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2013, 55, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Wu, C.; Zheng, C. The “coal–bauxite iron” structure in the ore-bearing rock series as a prospecting indicator for southeastern Guizhou bauxite mines. Ore Geol. Rev. 2013, 53, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buchanan, S.J.; So, H.B.; Kopittk, P.M.; Menzies, N.W. Influence of texture in bauxite residues on void ratio, water holding characteristics, and penetration resistance. Geoderma 2010, 158, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garrels, R.; Christ, L.C. Solutions, Minerals, and Equilibria; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1965; 450p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Maksimovic, Z.; Panto, G. Contribution to the geochemistry, of rare earth elements in the karst-bauxite deposits of Yugoslavia and Greece. Geoderma 1991, 51, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carrillo-González, R.; González-Chávez, M. Metal accumulation in wild plants surrounding mining wastings. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Meshram, R.R.; Randiv, K.R. Geochemical study of laterites of the Jamnagar district, Gujarat, India: implications on parent rock, mineralogy and tectonics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2011, 42, 1271–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mordberg, L.E.; Spratt, J. Alteration of zircons: The evidence of Zr mobility during bauxitic weathering. In Proceedings of the Goldschmidt Conference Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 30 August–3 September 1998; pp. 1021–1022. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hill, I.G.; Worden, R.H.; Meighan, I.G. Geochemical evolution of a palaeolaterite: The Interbasaltic Formation, Northern Ireland. Chem. Geol. 2000, 166, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Karadag, M.M.; Kupeli, S.; Aryk, F.; Ayhan, A.; Zedef, V.; Doyen, A. Rare earth element (REE) geochemistry and genetic implications of the Mortas bauxite deposit (Seydisehir/Konya-Southern Turkey). Chemie der Erde 2009, 69, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Laufer, F.; Yariv, S.; Steinberg, M. The adsorption of quadrivalent cerium by kaolinite. Clay Miner. 1984, 19, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mongelli, G. Ce-anomalies in the textural components of Upper Cretaceous karst bauxites from the Apulian carbonate platform (southern Italy). Chem. Geol. 1997, 14, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roaldest, E. Mineralogical and Chemical Changes during Weathering, Transportation and Sedimentation in Different Environments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  53. Forstner, U. Metal speciation–general concepts and applications. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Geochem. 1993, 51, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kersten, M.; Forstner, U. Geochemical characterization of the potential trace metal mobility in cohesive sediments. Geo-Mar. Lett. 1991, 11, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nealson, K.H.; Stahl, D.A. Microorganisms and biogeochemical cycles: What can we learn from layered microbial communities. Rev. Mineral. 1997, 35, 5–34. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ehrlich, H.J. Geomicrobiology, 4th ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002; p. 800. [Google Scholar]
  57. Strauss, H.; Scchieber, J. A sulfur isotope study of pyrite genesis: The Mid-Protezoic Newland Formation, Belt supergroupe, Montana. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Goldhaber, M.B. Sulfur-Rich Sediments. Treatise on Geochemistry: Sediments, Diagenesis, and Sedimentary Rocks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 7, pp. 257–288. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoefs, J. Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 6th ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; p. 285. [Google Scholar]
  60. Smock, A.M.; Bottcher, M.E.; Cypionka, H. Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during thiosulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Arch. Microbiol. 1998, 169, 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Smith, D.W.; Rittenberg, S.C. On the sulfur-source requirement for growth of Thiobacillus intermedius. Arch. Microbiol. 1974, 100, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Minerals 07 00097 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Location of the Dopolan karstic bauxite in the Zagros fold belt. (b) Geological map of the Dopolan bauxite deposit (modified after [18]).
Figure 1. (a) Location of the Dopolan karstic bauxite in the Zagros fold belt. (b) Geological map of the Dopolan bauxite deposit (modified after [18]).
Minerals 07 00097 g001
Minerals 07 00097 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic stratigraphic column of the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Figure 2. Schematic stratigraphic column of the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Minerals 07 00097 g002
Minerals 07 00097 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Back scatters images (BSE) showing pyrite with inclusions of diasporic pisoliths (di). (B) Enlargement of panel A. Different morphological forms of pyrite, spherules of framboidal pyrite, and cubic pyrite. di: diaspore.
Figure 3. (A) Back scatters images (BSE) showing pyrite with inclusions of diasporic pisoliths (di). (B) Enlargement of panel A. Different morphological forms of pyrite, spherules of framboidal pyrite, and cubic pyrite. di: diaspore.
Minerals 07 00097 g003
Minerals 07 00097 g004 550
Figure 4. Variations in major oxides (in wt %), ∑REE, and selected trace elements (in ppm) in the Dopolan bauxite sequence in response to Total organic content (TOC). Points refer to the average content of the selected samples.
Figure 4. Variations in major oxides (in wt %), ∑REE, and selected trace elements (in ppm) in the Dopolan bauxite sequence in response to Total organic content (TOC). Points refer to the average content of the selected samples.
Minerals 07 00097 g004
Minerals 07 00097 g005 550
Figure 5. Al2O3 and TOC values of the Dopolan samples, displaying a negative correlation coefficient.
Figure 5. Al2O3 and TOC values of the Dopolan samples, displaying a negative correlation coefficient.
Minerals 07 00097 g005
Minerals 07 00097 g006 550
Figure 6. Frequency histogram of the δ34S values of the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Figure 6. Frequency histogram of the δ34S values of the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Minerals 07 00097 g006
Minerals 07 00097 g007 550
Figure 7. Representative back-scattered images showing different types of bacterial fossils and filamentous microorganisms (f) between pyrite (py: cubic pyrite; f-py: framboidal pyrite) in the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Figure 7. Representative back-scattered images showing different types of bacterial fossils and filamentous microorganisms (f) between pyrite (py: cubic pyrite; f-py: framboidal pyrite) in the Dopolan bauxite deposit.
Minerals 07 00097 g007
Minerals 07 00097 g008 550
Figure 8. Eh–pH diagram illustrating the natural environmental conditions [40,43] of the stability fields of minerals in the Dopolan deposits. The thermodynamic data of the diagram were T = 25° and p = 1 bar.
Figure 8. Eh–pH diagram illustrating the natural environmental conditions [40,43] of the stability fields of minerals in the Dopolan deposits. The thermodynamic data of the diagram were T = 25° and p = 1 bar.
Minerals 07 00097 g008
Minerals 07 00097 g009 550
Figure 9. Variation diagrams showing the correlations between selected trace elements and Al2O3, P2O5, and TiO2. Positive correlation between P2O5 and ∑REE (A); mildly positive correlation between P2O5 and Hf (B); mildly positive correlation between TiO2 and ∑REE (C); Zr (D); Nb (E); Ta (F); Positive correlation between Al2O3 and Hf (G); mildly positive correlation between Al2O3 ∑REE (H); Zr (I).
Figure 9. Variation diagrams showing the correlations between selected trace elements and Al2O3, P2O5, and TiO2. Positive correlation between P2O5 and ∑REE (A); mildly positive correlation between P2O5 and Hf (B); mildly positive correlation between TiO2 and ∑REE (C); Zr (D); Nb (E); Ta (F); Positive correlation between Al2O3 and Hf (G); mildly positive correlation between Al2O3 ∑REE (H); Zr (I).
Minerals 07 00097 g009
Table
Table 1. XRD results of the Dopolan deposit [18].
Table 1. XRD results of the Dopolan deposit [18].
Sample No.Bauxite LayersMajor PhasesMinor Phases
Do-orgbauxitic kaolinitenacrite, kaolinite, pyriteanatase, rutile
Do-oodiaspore-richdiaspore, nacriteanatase, muscovite, rutile
Do-pidiaspore-richdiasporeanatase, nacrite, muscovite, rutile
Do-clclay bauxitekaolinite, diasporeböhmite
Do-irpyrite-rich kaolinite, pyrite, nacriteanatase, böhmite, muscovite, rutile
KhaKhaneh-kat dolomitecalcite, dolomite, montmorillonite-
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of the Dopolan bauxite deposit. Measurements for major oxides and sulfur contents are in wt %; trace elements and rare earth elements (REE) are in ppm.
Table 2. Chemical composition of the Dopolan bauxite deposit. Measurements for major oxides and sulfur contents are in wt %; trace elements and rare earth elements (REE) are in ppm.
HorizonPyrite-Rich HorizonClay-Rich BauxiteDiaspore-Rich BauxiteBlack Bauxitic Kaolinite
SamplesDo-IR-1Do-IR-2Do-IR-3Do-IR-4Do-cl-1Do-cl-2Do-oo-1Do-oo-2Do-oo-3Do-oo-4Do-pi-1Do-pi-2Do-pi-3Do-org-1Do-org-2
SiO27.2116.1414.6211.2535.2831.877.445.685.633.204.675.453.1134.8435.44
Al2O342.0231.3437.5847.147.3950.6968.1167.7868.2372.8974.9873.2575.0931.126.55
Fe2O319.6821.0816.4211.1825.91.023.532.474.550.922.262.331.365.527.45
CaO0.060.100.040.130.060.050.070.110.040.030.040.080.070.900.13
K2O0.511.160.610.850.800.360.300.650.801.210.251.640.294.063.83
MnO0.010.020.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.020.030.00
Na2O0.010.010.010.060.010.010.010.020.010.070.010.040.060.050.12
P2O50.100.090.080.070.060.070.100.070.090.080.130.120.150.060.05
MgO0.280.580.360.420.100.280.050.410.100.240.020.030.340.320.91
TiO21.471.071.751.501.922.382.152.352.352.652.832.342.770.950.94
LOI26.325.928.1326.3211.2712.6217.3520.3616.8917.8215.4215.6716.5622.6723.24
TOC0.420.37--0.180.2-0.18--0.0160.21-1.001.14
Sum97.6497.4899.6298.8899.4799.3599.1299.8998.6999.11100.62100.9699.82100.5098.66
Bi0.890.750.90.750.820.71.40.551.820.691.010.530.430.890.53
As294851497.5614.627.3305.25.94.811
Cd1.42.212.372.250.590.330.890.641.241.750.270.050.660.30.13
Ni340394345382296290236150111273220258170407270
Co2031791551975.28.36.45.743.11721434.62.717.911
Cr4292865773813592554864423893291321393037471088
Cs0.180.260.150.360.110.280.050.130.228.30.150.330.033.393.21
Cu403184389144926315510222814315170.7965.250.2
Pb2121891801304328301017725.5564454435
Hf6.636.5413.69.668.8914.8212.29.9318.917.7216.8715.4617.785.296.21
Ag4.023.418.595.502.12.73.12.372.953.111.480.960.331.630.94
La8.7179.918.513.59.91.823.8248.90.31.244.262.12
Ce28.947.938.6542.010.8810.14.475619812.80.630.0487.998
Pr3.235.644.354.20.320.21.940.714.6223.972.090.080.410.316.69
Nd14.12519.914.711.0912.75.482.761494.06.690.280.2538.310.56
Sm2.867.293.969.040.360.11.060.762.847.761.130.090.036.732.48
Eu0.572.180.951.530.111.980.280.20.521.40.210.051.441.353.51
Gd4.2518.35.837.320.70.381.620.993.585.661.430.166.78.8716.25
Dy4.5928.45.7913.950.8610.951.471.433.48.361.680.231.856.028.04
Ho0.985.731.163.210.22.240.290.280.731.810.320.050.21.132.64
Er2.8614.93.759.90.630.740.790.872.275.480.990.20.83.387.34
Tm0.472.020.631.640.121.10.150.150.430.920.150.050.10.481.2
Yb2.810.4411.10.77.4112.66.340.80.30.537.41
Lu0.411.50.621.710.121.150.140.140.410.890.120.030.780.470.9
Th24.525.734.336.1621.5449.6444.5228.4146.3551.9238.5738.7554.6610.617.34
Zn9610119712214412314597.211712069.551.5548.221
Zr246250340364271583419308557535.8467.2437.8478.4206132
Mo4.098.443.936.7425.920.515.42132.3283.8313.971.351.4
Nb43.135.346.238.3445.654.4352.654.777.767.941.428.462.438.233.8
S>5>5>5>512.11.41.52.51.751.21.41.22.21.7
Sb10.64.4411.79.653.892.522.742.346.534.332.842.511.990.360.23
Ta4.583.876.212.724.44.975.355.197.28.15.63.16.43.62.9
Tl0.191.120.20.560.180.10.120.140.370.250.090.210.380.180.22
U67.470.411135.056.827.129.210.223.417.411.12.311.62.69.4
V12507591441472272310186330365485277304442107163
Y17.114717.8553.24.664.613.941.065.51.256.3429.955.4
Table
Table 3. Sulfur isotope compositions of pyrite and whole-rock samples from the Dopolan deposit.
Table 3. Sulfur isotope compositions of pyrite and whole-rock samples from the Dopolan deposit.
Sample No.HorizonDescriptionδ34S
S-1pyrite-richwhole rock−34.59
S-2pyrite-richseparated pyrite−34.47
S-3pyrite-richseparated pyrite−10.12
S-4bauxitic kaoliniteseparated pyrite−26.77
S-5bauxitic kaolinitewhole rock−33.58
S-6bauxitic kaolinitewhole rock−28.63
Table
Table 4. Mineral descriptions and comparative Fe2O3, SiO2, and Al2O3 contents of the Zagros bauxite deposits.
Table 4. Mineral descriptions and comparative Fe2O3, SiO2, and Al2O3 contents of the Zagros bauxite deposits.
DepositMain MineralsAl2O3 (wt %)SiO2 (wt %)Fe2O3 (wt %)Reference
Dopolan diaspore–kaolinite–pyrite–nacrite38–715–352–17[18]
Sarfaryab böhmite > gibbsite–calcite–kaolinite–hematite18–636–142–18[15]
Dehnow böhmite–calcite–kaolinite–hematite34–644–83–21[16]
Mandan böhmite–calcite–kaolinite–hematite12–563–301–24[16]
Hangam böhmite–kaolinite–hematite–goethite17–4515–1916–20[14]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salamab Ellahi, S.; Taghipour, B.; Nejadhadad, M. The Role of Organic Matter in the Formation of High-Grade Al Deposits of the Dopolan Karst Type Bauxite, Iran: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sulfur Isotope Data. Minerals 2017, 7, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7060097

AMA Style

Salamab Ellahi S, Taghipour B, Nejadhadad M. The Role of Organic Matter in the Formation of High-Grade Al Deposits of the Dopolan Karst Type Bauxite, Iran: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sulfur Isotope Data. Minerals. 2017; 7(6):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7060097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salamab Ellahi, Somayeh, Batoul Taghipour, and Mostafa Nejadhadad. 2017. "The Role of Organic Matter in the Formation of High-Grade Al Deposits of the Dopolan Karst Type Bauxite, Iran: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sulfur Isotope Data" Minerals 7, no. 6: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7060097

APA Style

Salamab Ellahi, S., Taghipour, B., & Nejadhadad, M. (2017). The Role of Organic Matter in the Formation of High-Grade Al Deposits of the Dopolan Karst Type Bauxite, Iran: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sulfur Isotope Data. Minerals, 7(6), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7060097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop