1. Introduction
The (generalized) hypergeometric function [
1] is defined to be the complex analytic function
where
denotes the The Pochhammer symbol,
is the Euler’s
-function,
p is a non-negative integer, the complex numbers
,
are called, respectively, the numerator and denominator parameters, and
z is called the variable. The denominator parameters are not allowed to be zero or negative integers (
). If the numerator parameters
, then the series
reduces to a finite sum. The series
converges when
for all choices of
,
. If
, the series converges for
The case
when
is called the Gauss hypergeometric function. The following well-known and celebrated summation formula for
is due to Gauss:
Another interesting formula for
is due to Ramanujan:
where
n is a positive integer and which is obtained by replacing
n by
in Entry 29(b) in ([
2], p. 39). This formula was stated without proof by Ramanujan in his first letter to Hardy. There are numerous hypergeometric series identities in mathematical literature (see [
3,
4]). The evaluation of the hypergeometric sum
(the Clausenian hypergeometric function with unit argument) is of ongoing interest, since it appears ubiquitously in many physics and statistics problems [
5,
6,
7]. The q-extension of the 3F2(1)-series is also very interesting and has been studied by many researchers; for example, see [
8] and the references therein.
Recently, Asakura et al. [
9] proved that
where
is the beta function and the right hand side denotes the
-linear subspace of
generated by 1,
, and
’s,
under some conditions on
.
To obtain an explicit description of Equation (
3) has not been completed except some cases. Asakura, Yabu [
10] evaluated the cases with
,
for the examples of their works. For example,
and
where
They list all the explicit values of the cases
,
,
,
, where
,
, and
by applying their method to the elliptic fibration
where
, respectively. Motivated by their works, it is interesting to give an explicit formula for the corresponding general form. In this paper, we aim to give an explicit formula for
where
n is an arbitrary integer and
,
,
, where
, and
. For the sake of brevity and our convenience, we sometimes will denote
as
. For example, for any non-negative integer
n, we have the following explicit formulas:
where
is stated in Equation (
6).
For
and
, let
be Ramanujan’s generalized elliptic integral of the first kind of order
s. The moment
is given by
where
n is a real number. Borwein et al. ([
11], Theorem 2) proved that for
,
Thus, our hypergeometric series
can be got by setting
, and we have
In the last section, we will use the moments of Ramanujan’s generalized elliptic integral to give another method of obtaining the explicit evaluations.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In
Section 2, we give some preliminaries. We provide two recurrence relations for the hypergeometric series
. Then, we solve these recurrence relations to obtain explicit evaluations of the hypergeometric series
for
and
in
Section 3. In
Section 4, we list the explicit forms of
for
. In the final section, we use the moments of Ramanujan’s generalized elliptic integral to give another method of obtaining the same evaluations.
2. Preliminaries
We list an explicit formula in ([
12], Equation 3.13-(41)) which we need to use later.
where
,
, and
. Thus, let
we have
We first prove a useful lemma.
Lemma 1. Let x be a complex number with . Then Proof. We rewrite this hypergeometric series
as
We use the partial fraction decomposition of
to the above identity, we have
The first two hypergeometric series in the right-hand side of the above equation can be evaluated by Equation (
7) and the Gauss formula Equation (
1):
Substituting these values into the last equation of our , we can get the required formula. □
We reverse Equation (
8) and get another recurrence relation for our
.
Lemma 2. Let x be a complex number with and . Then We have listed the explicit formulas of
which Asakura, Yabu have obtained in [
10], in Equations (
4) and (
5). Here we list the remaining explicit formulas for
, which is given in [
10].
where
Let
,
,
,
and
where
takes the principal values,
Then Asakura, Yabu [
10] gave
This formula for is complicated. It can be seen that, although the results in Theorems 1 and 2 can be used to obtain their general formulas, the formulas will be more cumbersome and complicated, so we will not deal with the formula and its general form for in this paper.
We give examples applying Equation (
8) and note that
Thus,
where
are defined in Equation (
6) and
are defined in Equation (
10).
3. Explicit Formulas
We will solve the recurrence relations in Lemmas 1 and 2 as explicit formulas in this section.
Theorem 1. Let m be a non-negative integer, p be a non-zero complex number such that is not a non-positive integer. Then Proof. Consider the hypergeometric series
with
. So we can decomposite
, where
. Applying the recurrence relation in Lemma 2 a positive integer
ℓ times, we get
where
Using the mathematical induction on the integer
ℓ, it is easy to prove that the above formula is correct. We use the Pochhammer symbols to rewrite the function
T and note that
, we have
Our result is followed by the fact . □
Followed by using the similar method to the recurrence relation in Lemma 1, we have the explicit formula for
:
Furthermore, we use the Pochhammer symbols at the negative integer index
, which is defined by
Then, the explicit formula is symmetry to the formula .
Theorem 2. Let m be a non-negative integer, p be a non-zero complex number such that is not a non-positive integer. Thenwhere is defined by In the end of this section we give the explicit formulas with , , , , , and .
Proposition 1. For any non-negative integer n, we havewhere are defined in Equation (6) and are defined in Equation (10). 5. Moments of Ramanujan’s Generalized Elliptic Integrals
For
and
, let
be Ramanujan’s generalized elliptic integral of the first kind of order
s. The moment
is given by
where
n is a real number. Borwein et al. ([
11], Theorem 2) proved that for
,
Thus, our hypergeometric series
can be got by setting
, and we have
The following formula is in ([
11], Equation (29)).
where
and
is the digamma function. We substitute
in the above identity and use the fact
we have
Therefore, we give another evaluation of Equation (
4), which recently was obtained in ([
10], Equation (4.1)). In fact, this number is related to the generalized Catalan constant
which was defined in [
11].
Borwen et al. ([
11], Equation (76)) found a result that followed by Carlson’s Theorem:
Using Equation (
48) we transform the above identity into the following
This is exactly the same recurrence relation Equation (
8) in Lemma 1. This provides a new approach to our results. Moreover, if we use the formula for odd moments of
in ([
11], Theorem 3), we could get Equation (
27):