Next Article in Journal
Cauchy Integral and Boundary Value for Vector-Valued Tempered Distributions
Next Article in Special Issue
Decision Optimization for Water and Electricity Shared Resources Based on Fusion Swarm Intelligence
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Investigation of Non-Periodic Snap BVP in the G-Caputo Sense
Previous Article in Special Issue
Software Defects Prediction Based on Hybrid Beetle Antennae Search Algorithm and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm with Comparison
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Nature-Inspired Algorithm

Tijuana Institute of Technology, TecNM, Tijuana 22414, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2022, 11(8), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11080391
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022

Abstract

:
This paper presents the discrete version of the Mycorrhiza Tree Optimization Algorithm (MTOA), using the Lotka–Volterra Discrete Equation System (LVDES) formed by the Predator–Prey, Cooperative and Competitive Models. The Discrete Mycorrhizal Optimization Algorithm (DMOA) is a stochastic metaheuristic that integrates randomness in its search processes. These algorithms are inspired by nature, specifically by the symbiosis between plant roots and a fungal network called the Mycorrhizal Network (MN). The communication in the network is performed using chemical signals of environmental conditions and hazards, the exchange of resources, such as Carbon Dioxide (CO2) that plants perform through photosynthesis to the MN and to other seedlings or growing plants. The MN provides water (H2O) and nutrients to plants that may or may not be of the same species; therefore, the colonization of plants in arid lands would not have been possible without the MN. In this work, we performed a comparison with the CEC-2013 mathematical functions between MTOA and DMOA by conducting Hypothesis Tests to obtain the efficiency and performance of the algorithms, but in future research we will also propose optimization experiments in Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems to verify with which methods these algorithms perform better.

1. Introduction

In the literature, multiple definitions of optimization can be found, and can be summarized as the search for the best probable solutions for a given problem. In [1], the desired concepts and objectives represent obtaining the best solution [2]. When integrating processes, optimization is an effective and powerful tool. The objective function being optimized quantifies the level of the solution being sought [3]. The constraints are actually the limitations of the system model in the search process. Consequently, in optimization we maximize or minimize the value of the objective function subject to constraints imposed on the decision variables [4].
The proposal presented in this work is a new optimization algorithm inspired by nature, where the roots of plants and the Mycorrhiza Network (MN) play the main role, i.e., the symbiosis that occurs between these two protagonists is modeled through LVDES.
The principal contribution of this research is to model the symbiosis between plant roots and the Mycorrhizal Fungal Network (MN) with the Lotka–Volterra Discrete Equation System (LVDES), unlike the previous research [5] for which we used the Lotka–Volterra Continuous Equation System (LVCES). We believe that this algorithm can provide more flexibility and operability in the handling of the parameters and that it adapts to iterative processes.
Many articles were developed using the Lotka–Volterra system of equations, and some investigations followed the direction of continuous equations such as the works of Atena Ghasemabadi and Mohammad Hossein Rahmani Doust in 2019, “Investigating the dynamics of Lotka–Volterra model with disease in the prey and predator species” [6]; James P. O’Dwyer in 2018, “Whence Lotka–Volterra? Conservation laws and integrable systems in ecology” [7]; Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan in 2015, who studied the “Lotka–Volterra Two-Species Mutualistic Biology Models and Their Ecological Monitoring” [8]; other LV discrete equations were explored in the investigations of Qamar Din in 2013, while the dynamics of a discrete Lotka–Volterra model can be found in [9]; Li Xu, Lianjun Zou, Zhongxiang Chang, Shanshan Lou, Xiangwei Peng, and Guang Zhang in 2014, presented a “Bifurcation in a Discrete Competition System” in [10]; Li Xu, Shanshan Lou, Panqi Xu, and Guang Zhang in 2018, studied “Feedback Control and Parameter Invasion for a Discrete Competitive Lotka–Volterra System”, in [11], etc. From 1925, when Alfred Lokta independently published ’Elements of Physical Biology’ and in 1926 when Vito Volterra published ’Variations and fluctuations in the number of individuals in cohabiting animal species’ [12,13], their works became conceptual ground for modern theoretical ecology and many researchers have been inspired in their work to pursue new fields of research.
The Mycorrhiza Tree Optimization Algorithm (MTOA) [14] is the antecedent of the Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Algorithm (DMOA) presented in this work, in which both algorithms have the same inspiration, they use the Lotka–Volterra System of Equations and the fundamental difference between both is that the DMOA uses the discrete LV equations, which provides a radical change in the convergence and optimization process of the algorithm.
This article is organized as follows: In Section 1, we discuss optimization algorithms inspired by nature and also refer to the inspiration that gave rise to this DMOA algorithm. Section 2 shows the symbiotic relationship between the Mycorrhiza Network (MN) and plants that are the foundation of this algorithm. Section 3 shows the Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Algorithm (DMOA). Section 4 shows the results of the experiments performed with the DMOA and MTOA [14] algorithms and the hypothesis tests that were performed between these two methods. Section 5 describes the conclusions that resulted from the experiments conducted between these algorithms.

2. Mycorrhiza Network and Plants

Mycorrhizal Networks (MNs), shown in Figure 1, are fungal hyphae or filaments that connect the roots of at least two plants that may or may not be of the same species. These networks are very important ecologically because they facilitate the transfer of resources between plants such as carbon and nitrogen, colonization, and substantially improve plant regeneration, as shown in Figure 1. In these MNs there are “donor” trees, which are old trees also referred to as “mother trees”, as shown in Figure 2, which donate all their resources (carbon, nitrogen, potassium, sulfur, and other nutrients) to the seedlings or growing plant “recipients” and it has been proven that they have a higher degree of survival due to this generous fact of nature; furthermore, it has been proven that the MN are essential for the regeneration of forests and the colonization and survival of plants in arid areas. In this exchange of resources, because of their height, trees (large plants) can perform better photosynthesis due to their exposure to the sun and their main contribution is carbon, while fungi contribute mainly water and some nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, etc., to the MN. The complete life cycle of MN fungi involves recognition, communication and the establishment of symbiosis as shown in Figure 2 between fungi and plant roots [15]. Figure 3 shows the topology of the MN with the links between the different plants. The nodes of the trees and according to their diameter are represented by circles with different shades of green or yellow and increase their shade in relation to age, while the lines between trees represent their linkage with Euclidean distances. The thickness of the line increases with the number of links between pairs of plants [16].
Thousands of mycorrhizae form in the subsoil of a forest with the roots of plants and different types of fungi [17]. Many plants share fungi whose mycelia connect the roots of different plants, as shown in Figure 3, resulting in the formation of mycorrhizal networks. Mycorrhizal networks of established plants can colonize other nearby plants and seedlings and create fungal pathways that allow plants to exchange carbon, nutrients or water [18,19,20,21,22,23]. In forest dynamics, mycorrhizal networks are recognized for their role in plant establishment, survival, growth and competitive ability [24,25,26,27,28,29]. The importance of mycorrhizal networks for seedling success in relation to other biotic or abiotic constraints is not well understood and may vary with growth stage, climatic and site conditions [30]. Mycorrhizal networks are considered to be the most important form of forest colonization; even when mycorrhizal networks are disrupted by soil disturbance (climatic factors such as snow, wind, ice, floods, fires, logging, animals, etc.), mycelial fragments retain inoculum potential, and the network can rapidly reform [31]. Fungal colonization of naturally regenerating seedlings occurs through mycorrhizal networks and through inoculum dispersed by wind, soil, or mammals, and the role of mycorrhizal networks decreases with an increasing severity of disturbance and loss of residual trees [32]. When disturbances are very severe, plants die, the forest floor is consumed and biomass is reduced. Recolonization requires other sources such as spores carried by air, soil, or mammals, and fungal hyphae found deeper in the soil [33,34].

3. Discrete Mycorrhized Optimization Algorithm (DMOA)

Through photosynthesis, trees produce carbon-rich sugars (CO2) which they exchange with fungi that form a symbiotic association with plant roots. In the Mycorrhizae Network, exchange with plants consists mainly of water (H2O), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and other nutrients. Mycorrhizae have also been found to connect plants to each other.
This algorithm, as mentioned above, is inspired by the symbiotic relationship between plant roots and the mycorrhizal fungal network. Research has shown that the following processes occur in these associations, which are the foundations on which this algorithm is based [16,35]:
(A)
Plant defense against external stress and danger situations by means of biochemical signals via the MN.
(B)
Cooperation in the ecosystem with the exchange of resources (carbon, water, nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients) through the MN.
(C)
Competition for resources between the various plants and the MN. These processes are modeled in the algorithm by the Lotka–Volterra system of discrete equations [36,37,38].
  • Predator-Prey Defense Model: Defensive behavior against predators that can be insects or animals, for the survival of the entire habitat (plants and fungi).
  • Resource Exchange Cooperative Model: Exchange of resources, such as carbon, water, nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients to other plants and the fungal network through the MN.
  • Colonization Competitive Model: In any ecosystem, resources are limited and all living beings compete to obtain them. In a forest, colonization occurs by the MN, where the different plants and fungi compete for the resources provided by all the members connected by the Mycorrhiza.
In this research, the initial population for both × and y were different and were obtained by random solutions. With these populations, we found the best fitness solution. With the best solutions found, we used the Lotka–Volterra Cooperative Equation for parameters a and d; the result will influence one of the two LV Equations (Predator-Prey or Competitive), depending on the random diversity result. Diversity is controlled by the probability d [1,2] to choose one of the two Lotka–Volterra equations to try to simulate what happens in an ecosystem.
To overcome the stagnation of the algorithm at local minima, this is controlled by the epochs where the two populations are renewed after each cycle of 30 iterations.
In the Prey–Predator Model, trees are constantly subjected to abiotic stresses (external factors) that exert an influence on plants, which are as follows: water (water stress), salts (salt stress), temperature (heat stress), anoxia (lack of oxygen), oxidative stress, heavy metals, environmental pollutants and atmospheric pollutants. Both the trees and the mycorrhizal network, through chemical signals, are alerted to the danger of animals, insects or any other threat. The Cooperative Model, in which the resources of the entire ecosystem are shared as a way of survival of the entire habitat, the large trees supply the network and other plants with CO2 because with their height they can perform photosynthesis, and the Mycorrhizae Network supplies the trees and other plants that are connected to the network, mainly with water and other nutrients such as phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium and zinc, among others. The Competitive Model simulates the colonization of the forest, the expansion of the Mycorrhizae network, and the inclusion of other plants in the ecosystem. This process of Defense, Cooperation and Competition ensures the survival of the entire habitat.

3.1. DMOA Pseudocode

Algorithm 1 describes the pseudocode of the DMOA Algorithm with two populations (plants and MN) and the following three biological operators: Defense (Predator-Prey Model), Resource Exchange (Cooperative Model), and Colonization (Competitive Model) represented by the LVDES.
Algorithm 1. Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Algorithm (DMOA).
Objective min or max f(x), × = (x1, x2, ..., xd)
Define parameters (a, b, c, d, e, f, x, y)
Initialize a population of n plants and mycorrhiza with random solutions
Find the best solution fit in the initial population
while (t < maxIter)
for i = 1:n (for n plants and Micorrhiza population)
X p = a b s F i t A
X m = a b s F i t B
end for
  a = m i n o r X p
  d = m i n o r X m
Apply (LV-Cooperative Model)
x i t + 1 = x t a b y t
y i t + 1 = y t c + d x t
if  x i < y i
  x t = x i
else
  x t = y i
end if
rand ([1 2])
if (rand = 1)
Apply (LV-Predator-Prey Model)
  x i t + 1 = x t a b x t c y t
  y i t + 1 = y t d e x t f y t
else
Apply (LV- Competitive Model)
  x i t + 1 = x t a b x t + c y t
  y i t + 1 = y t d + e x t f y t
end if
Evaluate new solutions.
If the new solutions are better, the best new solutions are updated.
Find the current best fit solution.
end while

3.2. DMOA Flowchart

The flowchart of the DMO algorithm is shown in Figure 4 where the biological operators of defense, resource exchange and colonization model the symbiosis between plants and MN. The flowchart illustrates how the information flows in the algorithm.

3.3. Lotka–Volterra Discrete Equation System

Discrete models governed by difference equations are more suitable than continuous models when reproductive generations last only one reproductive season (non-overlapping generations) [5,39]. The Discrete Lotka–Volterra models shown in Table 1 have many applications in applied sciences. These models were initially developed in mathematical biology, then their studies were extended to other areas [40,41,42,43].
Equations and Rational Difference Equations can be found in [44,45,46,47,48,49]. Additionally, other authors discussed the dynamics of Rational Difference Equations [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62].
The mathematical description of Discrete Equations (1) and (2) are part of the Lotka–Volterra System of Discrete Equations for the Predator–Prey-Defense Model, where the parameters a, b, d, and g are positive constants, and xi and yi represent the initial conditions of the population for the two species and are positive real numbers [37,63].
Discrete Equations (3) and (4) are the Cooperative Model of Lotka–Volterra (Resource Exchange) for two species, where the parameters a, b, d, e, g, and h are positive constants, and xi and yi represent the initial conditions of the population for the two species and are positive real numbers [36].
Discrete Equations (5) and (6) represent the Lotka–Volterra Competitive Model-Colonization for two species, where the parameters a, b, d, e, g, and h are positive constants, and xi and yi are the populations for each of the species and are positive real numbers. Each of the parameters of the aforementioned equations are described below [9,36].
The main differences among the three biological operators are as follows:
  • The six equations are different and each pair of equations corresponding to each biological operator model the conditions under which said operators work.
  • The Cooperative model infers randomly in one of the two biological operators of either Defense and Competitive, to try to simulate what can happen in a living and changing ecosystem over time.
The inspiration of the MTOA Algorithm is the symbiosis between the Trees and the Mycorrhizal Network and uses the System of Continuous Equations of Lotka–Volterra. The algorithm, DMOA is inspired by the symbiosis between the Plants and the Mycorrhizal Network and tries to simulate in part what happens over time in this ecosystem. There is no modification of the algorithm, with the difference being the use of the Lotka–Volterra System of Discrete Equations. In the MTOA algorithm, the best fitness values are decided by taking the lowest result of the three biological operators. In the DMOA algorithm, the result of the cooperative operator is randomly inferred through the parameter xi (grow rates of populations x at time t) in one of the two biological operators of Predator–Prey or Competitive, resulting in the best fitness; we used this parameter because in the experimentation it provided us with better results for the desired purpose.

3.4. DMOA Parameters

Table 2 lists the parameters of population, growth rate, dimensions, epochs, iterations, etc., that were used in the experiments with DMOA and MTOA algorithms.
The parameters a and d result from the populations for x and y, which change in each iteration followed by the smallest values being selected. These results are assigned to the population growth rates xi and yi of the discrete Lotka–Volterra equations, while the other parameters such as population size, dimensions size, number of epochs, and iteration size are positive integers that are initially defined and usually have the following values: 20, (30, 50, 50, 100, 200), 20, and 30, respectively, however there is flexibility to play with other data to achieve better results.

4. Experimental Results

Table 3 shows the 36 mathematical functions of the CEC-2013 competition that we used to carry out the experiments. Table 1 shows the name of the functions, their range and their nature (Unimodal or Multimodal) and Figure 5 shows the corresponding graphs of a sample of the functions for illustration purpose.

4.1. Results of the MTOA Algorithm Experiments with CEC-2013

Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 show the results of the experiments of the 36 mathematical functions of the CEC-2013. The tables show the means and standard deviations that were obtained for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions and for 30, 50, 100, and 500 iterations, respectively.
Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the convergence of mathematical functions: Sphere, Ackley, and Rastrigin, and for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions for the MTOA and DMOA algorithms.

4.2. Results of the DMOA Algorithm Experiments with CEC-2013

Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 show the results of the experiments of the 36 mathematical functions of the CEC-2013 of the mean and standard deviation that were carried out for 30, 50 and 100 dimensions and for 30, 50, 100, and 500 iterations, respectively.
Figure 9 show the convergence of the following three mathematical functions: Sphere, Ackley, and Rosenbrock for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions for the DMOA and MTOA algorithms.
Figure 10 show the convergence of the following three mathematical functions: Ackley, Rosenbrock, and Rastrigin for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions for the DMOA and MTOA algorithms.
Figure 11 show the convergence of the following three mathematical functions: Rosenbrock, Rastrigin, and Griewank for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions for the DMOA and MTOA algorithms.

4.3. Hypothesis Tests

All hypothesis tests were performed for two independent samples with 30 experiments each, where µ1, µ2, σ1, and σ2 were known [64,65,66,67]. Table 10 shows the null and alternative hypothesis, while Equation (7) shows the Z test statistics formula and Table 11 shows the hypothesis test parameters.
Table 12 shows 108 hypothesis tests (z) that were performed on the MTOA and DMOA algorithms for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions and 30, 500, and 100 iterations, respectively. In most of the tests, in 92% of cases there was significant evidence that the MTOA algorithm is favorable over the DMOA algorithm, and the DMOA algorithm only performed better in eight tests (7.4%), in two functions for 30 × 30, in 2 for 50 × 50, and in four functions for 100 × 100.

4.4. Compared with Others Methods

In Table 13 and Table 14, a comparative study of the DMOA Algorithm with other methods of the mean and Standard Deviation is shown, including MTOA (Mycorrhiza Tree Optimization Algorithm) [14], Self-Defense (A New Bio-inspired Optimization Algorithm Based on the Self-defense Mechanism of Plants in Nature) [68], FA (FireFly Algorithm) [69], GSA (Gravitational Search Algorithm) [69], CS (Cuckoo Search) [69], GA (Genetic Algorithm) [69], DE (Differential Evolution) [70], HS (Harmony Search) [69], and GA (Genetic Algorithm) [69] for 30 and 50 dimensions. In Figure 12 and Figure 13, we observe the behavior of the Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm and the aforementioned methods for 30 and 50 dimensions and realize that in both behaviors the Mean and Standard Deviation of the DMOA were superior in most cases compared to the other methods.

4.5. Programming Environment

The language used in the programming of the DMOA algorithm in MATLAB R2019b and the equipment where the programming and experiments were carried out is a Desktop Computer Intel Core i5 4460S 2.90 GHz, RAM DDR3 16 Gb, Intel HD Graphics 4600, and Operating System Windows 10 Professional.

5. Conclusions

The MTOA and DMOA algorithms have the same inspiration in nature, derived from the symbiosis between the roots of the plants and the Mycorrhiza Network (MN). The main difference between both algorithms is the use of the Lotka–Volterra equations system; in the MTOA algorithm, we previously used continuous LV equations and in the DMOA algorithm we used the discrete LV equations that according to the literature have better handling, flexibility and results in the algorithms in the use of time.
In this research, 36 mathematical functions from CEC-2013 were used. All 36 experiments of the MTOA and DMOA algorithms were performed in 30, 50, and 100 dimensions, and for 30, 50, 100, and 500 iterations. Additionally, 108 hypothesis tests were performed for two samples and there was significant evidence that the DMOA algorithm was better in only eight tests, as shown in Table 9. The research will be furthered as experiments will be carried out in the future with Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems (T1FLS-IT2FLS) in the adaptation and optimization of parameters, as well as in the optimization of neural networks and it is possible that each of these algorithms could be better suited to different fields, recalling the No Free Lunch Theorem (NFLT) of Optimization principle that “a general-purpose, universal optimization strategy is impossible” [71,72].
A comparative analysis of the behavior of the Mean and the Standard Deviation for 30 and 50 dimensions was carried out with the methods of MTOA (Mycorrhiza Tree Optimization Algorithm) [14], Self-Defense (A New Bio-inspired Optimization Algorithm Based on the Self-defense Mechanism of Plants in Nature) [68], FA (FireFly Algorithm) [69], GSA (Gravitational Search Algorithm) [69], CS (Cuckoo Search) [69], GA (Genetic Algorithm) [69], DE (Differential Evolution) [70], HS (Harmony Search) [70], and GA (Genetic Algorithm) [69] for five mathematical functions of Sphere, Ackley, Rosenbrock, Rastrigin and Griewank. The results we obtained revealed that the Mean and the Deviation of the DMOA standard were lower than in the other six methods and was only surpassed by the MTOA in the five functions, the Self-Defense in two functions (F1 and F3) and the GSA in two functions (F1 and F2). We can conclude that the DMOA is a competitive algorithm in relation to the other compared methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.V. and O.C.; methodology, F.V.; software, H.C.-O.; validation, H.C.-O. and F.V.; formal analysis, H.C.-O.; investigation, O.C.; resources, O.C.; writing—original draft preparation, F.V. and O.C.; writing—review and editing, H.C.-O.; visualization, F.V.; supervision, F.V. and O.C.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank CONACYT and Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico/Tijuana Institute of Technology for the support during this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors in the paper have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, X.S. Cuckoo Search and Firefly Algorithm: Overview and Analysis. In Cuckoo Search and Firefly Algorithm; Yang, X.-S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 516, pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Malik, H.; Iqbal, A.; Joshi, P.; Agrawal, S.; Bakhsh, F. Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications. Stud. Comput. Intell. 2021, 916, 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boussaïd, I.; Lepagnot, J.; Siarry, P. A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inf. Sci. 2013, 237, 82–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Blum, C.; Roli, A. Metaheuristics in Combinatorial Optimization: Overview and Conceptual Comparison. ACM Comput. Surv. 2001, 35, 268–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X. A note on the existence of periodic solution in discrete predator-prey models. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 2477–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghasemabadi, A.; Rahmani, D.; Mohammad, H. Investigating the dynamics of Lotka–Volterra model with disease in the prey and predator species. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. IJNAA 2021, 12, 633–648. [Google Scholar]
  7. O’dwyer, J. Whence Lotka–Volterra? Conservation Laws and Integrable Systems in Ecology. Theor. Ecol. 2018, 11, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vaidyanathan, S. Lotka–Volterra Two-Species Mutualistic Biology Models and Their Ecological Monitoring. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 2015, 8, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  9. Din, Q. Dynamics of a discrete Lotka–Volterra model. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, L.; Zou, L.; Chang, Z.; Lou, S.; Peng, X.; Zhang, G. Bifurcation in a Discrete Competition System. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2014, 2014, 193143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, L.; Lou, S.; Xu, P.; Zhang, G. Feedback Control and Parameter Invasion for a Discrete Competitive Lotka–Volterra System. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018, 2018, 7473208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lotka, A.J. Element of Physical Biology. Sci. Prog. Twent. Century 1919, 21, 341–343. [Google Scholar]
  13. Volterra, V. Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1928, 3, 3–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carreon-Ortiz, H.; Valdez, F.; Castillo, O. A new mycorrhized tree optimization nature-inspired algorithm. Soft Comput. 2022, 26, 4797–4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teste, F.; Simard, S.; Durall, D.; Guy, R.; Jones, M.; Schoonmaker, A. Access to mycorrhizal networks and roots of trees: Importance for seedling survival and resource transfer. Ecology 2009, 90, 2808–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Simard, S.W. (Ed.) Memory and Learning in Plants. In Signaling and Communication in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 191–213. [Google Scholar]
  17. Molina, R.; Massicotte, H.; Trappe, J.M. Specificity phenomenon in mycorrhizal symbiosis: Community-ecological consequences and practical implications. In Mycorrhizal Functioning: An Integrative Plant-Fungal Process; Allen, M., Ed.; Chapman Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 357–423. [Google Scholar]
  18. Simard, S.W.; Perry, D.A.; Jones, M.D. Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature 1997, 388, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Birch, J.; Simard, S.W.; Beiler, K.; Karst, J. Beyond seedlings: Ectomycorrhizal fungal networks and growth of mature Pseudotsuga menziesii. J. Ecol. 2020, 109, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, X.H.; Bledsoe, C.S.; Zasoski, R.J. Rapid nitrogen transfer from ectomycorrhizal pines to adjacent ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal plants in a California oak woodland. New Phytol. 2006, 170, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nara, K. Ectomycorrhizal networks and seedling establishment during early primary succession. New Phytol. 2006, 169, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Egerton-Warburton, L.M.; Querejeta, J.I.; Allen, M.F. Common mycorrhizal networks provide a potential pathway for the transfer of hydraulically lifted water between plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Warren, J.M.; Brooks, R.; Meinzer, F.C. Hydraulic redistribution of water from Pinus ponderosa trees to seedlings: Evidence for an ectomycorrhizal pathway. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, Y.; Simard, S.; Carroll, A.; Mohn, W.W.; Zeng, R.S. Defoliation of interior Douglas-fir elicits carbon transfer and stress signalling to ponderosa pine neighbors through ectomycorrhizal networks. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kytoviita, M.M.; Vestberg, M.; Tuomi, J. A test of mutual aid in common mycorrhizal networks: Established vegetation negates benefit in seedlings. Ecology 2003, 84, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nara, K.; Hogetsu, T. Ectomycorrhizal fungi on established shrubs facilitate subsequent seedling establishment of successional plant species. Ecology 2004, 85, 1700–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simard, S.W.; Durall, D.M. Mycorrhizal networks: A review of their extent, function, and importance. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1140–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cline, E.T.; Ammirati, J.F.; Edmonds, R.L. Does proximity to mature trees influence ectomycorrhizal fungus communities of Douglas-fir seedlings. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 993–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mcguire, K.L. Common ectomycorrhizal networks may maintain monodominance in a tropical rain forest. Ecology 2007, 8, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Myers, J.A.; Kitajima, K. Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simard, S.W. Mycorrhizal Networks and Seedling Establishment in Douglas-Fir Forests. In Biocomplexity of Plant-Fungal Interactions; Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, UK, 2012; pp. 85–107. [Google Scholar]
  32. Teste, F.P.; Simard, S.W.; Durall, D.M. Role of mycorrhizal networks and tree proximity in ectomycorrhizal colonization of planted seedlings. Fungal Ecol. 2009, 2, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Defrenne, C.E.; Philpott, T.J.; Guichon, S.H.A.; Roach, W.J.; Pickles, B.J.; Simard, S.W. Shifts in Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities and and Exploration Types Relate to the Environment and Fine-Root Traits Across Interior Douglas-Fir Forests of Western Canada. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Barker, J.S.; Simard, S.W.; Jones, M.D.; Durall, D.M. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community assembly on regenerating Douglas-fir after wildfire and clearcut harvesting. Oecologia 2013, 172, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gorzelak, M.; Asay, A.; Pickles, B.; Simard, S.W. Inter-plant communication through mycorrhizal networks mediates complex adaptive behaviour in plant communities. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lin, L.; Yi, L.; Chaoling, L. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls. Open Math. 2017, 15, 218–232. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, M.; Xuan, Z.; Li, C. Dynamics of a discrete-time predator-prey system. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Din, Q.; Khan, M.I. A Discrete-Time Model for Consumer–Resource Interaction with Stability, Bifurcation and Chaos Control. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 2021, 20, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, Z.; Zou, X. Stable periodic solutions in a discrete periodic logistic equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 2003, 16, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Krebs, W. A general predator-prey model. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 2003, 9, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Müller, J.; Kuttler, C. Methods and Models in Mathematical Biology, Deterministic and Stochastic Approaches. In Lecture Notes on Mathematical Modelling in the Life Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 157–291. [Google Scholar]
  42. Brauer, F.; Castillo-Chavez, C. Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Heidelberg, Germany; London, UK, 2012; pp. 123–134. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chou, C.S.; Friedman, A. Introduction to Mathematical Biology, Modeling, Analysis, and Simulations. In Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics and Technology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  44. Radin, M.A. Difference Equations for Scientists and Engineering, Interdisciplinary Difference Equations; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2019; pp. 77–145. [Google Scholar]
  45. Camouzis, E.; Ladas, G. Dynamics of Third-Order Rational Difference Equations with Open Problems and Conjectures; Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Elaydi, S. An Introduction to Difference Equations (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics); Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  47. Agarwal, R.P.; Wong, P. Advanced Topics in Difference Equations; Springer Science+Business MediaL: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  48. Elaydi, S.; Hamaya, Y.; Matsunaga, H.; Pötzsche, C. Advances in Difference Equations and Discrete Dynamical Systems; Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2017; pp. 125–135. [Google Scholar]
  49. Grove, E.A.; Ladas, G. Periodicities in Nonlinear Difference Equations; Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Aloqeili, M. Dynamics of a rational difference equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 176, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mickens, R.E. A note on exact finite difference schemes for modified Lotka–Volterra differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2018, 24, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stevic, S. On some solvable systems of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 5010–5018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bajo, I.; Liz, E. Global behaviour of a second-order nonlinear difference equation. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2011, 17, 1471–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Senada, K.; Kulenović, M.; Pilav, E. Dynamics of a two-dimensional system of rational difference equations of Leslie-Gower type. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011, 29. [Google Scholar]
  55. Touafek, N.; Elsayed, E.M. On the solutions of systems of rational difference equations. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55, 1987–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Touafek, N.; Elsayed, E.M. On the periodicity of some systems of nonlinear difference equations. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum 2012, 2, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  57. Din, Q. On A System of Rational Difference Equation. Demonstr. Math. 2012, 47, 2014–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Din, Q. Global behavior of a rational difference equation. Acta Univ. Apulensis 2013, 34, 35–49. [Google Scholar]
  59. Din, Q.; Qureshi, M.; Khan, A. Dynamics of a fourth-order system of rational difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhang, Q.; Yang, L.; Liu, J. Dynamics of a system of rational third-order difference equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Shojaei, M.; Saadati, R.; Adibi, H. Stability and periodic character of a rational third order difference equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 39, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elsayed, E.M. Behavior and expression of the solutions of some rational difference equations. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2013, 15, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  63. Saha, P.; Bairagi, N.; Biswas, M. On the Dynamics of a Discrete Predator-Prey Model. In Trends in Biomathematics: Modeling, Optimization and Computational Problems; Mondaini, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 219–232. [Google Scholar]
  64. Anderson, D.R.; Sweeney, D.J.; Williams, T.A.; Camm, J.D.; Cochran, J.J.; Fry, M.J.; Ohlmann, J.W. Statistics for Business & Economics, 14th ed.; Cengage: Boston, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  65. Triola, M. Elementary Statistics, 13th ed.; Pearson Education Boston: Boston, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 428–442. [Google Scholar]
  66. Johnson, R.; Kuby, P. Elementary Statistics, 17th ed.; Cengage Boston: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 498–504. [Google Scholar]
  67. Larson, R.; Farber, B. Elementary Statistics Picturing the World, 7th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2019; pp. 440–449. [Google Scholar]
  68. Caraveo, C.; Valdez, F.; Castillo, O. A New Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithm Based on the Self-Defense Mechanism of Plants in Nature; SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology Computational Intelligence; Division of Graduate Studies Tijuana Institute of Technology: Tijuana, Mexico, 2019; pp. 23–52. [Google Scholar]
  69. Rakhshani, H.; Rahati, A. Snap-drift cuckoo search: A novel cuckoo search optimization algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 52, 771–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tvrdık, J.; Polakova, R. Competitive Differential Evolution Applied to CEC 2013 Problems. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Cancún, México, 20–23 June 2013; pp. 1651–1657. [Google Scholar]
  71. Joyce, T.; Herrmann, J.M. A Review of No Free Lunch Theorems, and Their Implications for Metaheuristic Optimisation. Stud. Comput. Intell. 2018, 744, 27–51. [Google Scholar]
  72. Djafari-Rouhani, B.; Khatibzadeh, H. Nonlinear Evolution and Difference Equations of Monotone Type in Hilbert Spaces; Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; pp. 129–205. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. MN shows how communication and resource exchange between plants and fungi takes place, and Reciprocal resource exchange between plants through MN, carbon (CO2) transferred by trees in exchange for water (H2O), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), and other nutrients provided by the Mycorrhiza Network (MN).
Figure 1. MN shows how communication and resource exchange between plants and fungi takes place, and Reciprocal resource exchange between plants through MN, carbon (CO2) transferred by trees in exchange for water (H2O), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), and other nutrients provided by the Mycorrhiza Network (MN).
Axioms 11 00391 g001
Figure 2. Other plants integrated in the MN, and Symbiosis between plant roots and fungi.
Figure 2. Other plants integrated in the MN, and Symbiosis between plant roots and fungi.
Axioms 11 00391 g002
Figure 3. MN involves plants of different species and sizes as well as shrubs, and the Topology MN.
Figure 3. MN involves plants of different species and sizes as well as shrubs, and the Topology MN.
Axioms 11 00391 g003
Figure 4. Flowchart of Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Algorithm—DMOA.
Figure 4. Flowchart of Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Algorithm—DMOA.
Axioms 11 00391 g004
Figure 5. Example of benchmark mathematical functions.
Figure 5. Example of benchmark mathematical functions.
Axioms 11 00391 g005
Figure 6. Sphere-Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 30 dimensions.
Figure 6. Sphere-Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 30 dimensions.
Axioms 11 00391 g006
Figure 7. Ackley-Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 50 dimensions.
Figure 7. Ackley-Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 50 dimensions.
Axioms 11 00391 g007
Figure 8. Rastrigin Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 100 dimensions.
Figure 8. Rastrigin Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 100 dimensions.
Axioms 11 00391 g008
Figure 9. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 30 dimensions, for the functions F1, F2, and F3.
Figure 9. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 30 dimensions, for the functions F1, F2, and F3.
Axioms 11 00391 g009
Figure 10. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 50 dimensions, for the functions F2, F3, and F4.
Figure 10. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 50 dimensions, for the functions F2, F3, and F4.
Axioms 11 00391 g010
Figure 11. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 100 dimensions, for the functions F3, F4, and F5.
Figure 11. Convergence of the DMOA and MTOA algorithms for 100 dimensions, for the functions F3, F4, and F5.
Axioms 11 00391 g011
Figure 12. Behavior of the Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm and the methods: MTOA, Self Defense, FA FireFly Algorithm, GSA, CS, GA, DE, HS, and GA for 30 dimensions.
Figure 12. Behavior of the Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm and the methods: MTOA, Self Defense, FA FireFly Algorithm, GSA, CS, GA, DE, HS, and GA for 30 dimensions.
Axioms 11 00391 g012
Figure 13. Behavior of the Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm and the methods: MTOA, Self Defense, FA FireFly Algorithm, GSA, CS, GA, DE, HS, and GA for 50 dimensions.
Figure 13. Behavior of the Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm and the methods: MTOA, Self Defense, FA FireFly Algorithm, GSA, CS, GA, DE, HS, and GA for 50 dimensions.
Axioms 11 00391 g013
Table 1. Lotka–Volterra Discrete Equation System.
Table 1. Lotka–Volterra Discrete Equation System.
ModelDiscrete Equations
Predator-Prey
(Defense)
x i t + 1 = a x i 1 x i b x i y i (1)
y i t + 1 = d x i y i g y i (2)
Competitive
(Colonization)
x i t + 1 = a x i b x i y i 1 + g x i (3)
y i t + 1 = d y i e x i y i 1 + h y i (4)
Cooperative
(Resource Exchange)
x i t + 1 = a x i b x i y i 1 g x i (5)
y i t + 1 = d y i + e x i y i 1 + h y i (6)
Table 2. DMOA and MTOA Algorithm Parameters.
Table 2. DMOA and MTOA Algorithm Parameters.
DescriptionParameterValue
Population x at time t x i t + 1
Population x at time t y i t + 1
Grow rates of populations x at time t x i
Grow rates of populations y at time t y i
timet
Population growth rate xa0.01
Influence of population x on itselfb0.02
Influence of population y on population xg0.06
Population growth rate yd0
Influence of population x on population ye1.70
Influence of population y on itselfh0.09
Initial population in xx0.0002
Initial population in yy0.0006
Population sizePopulation20
Number of populationsPopulations2
Dimensions sizeDimensions30, 50, 100
Number of epochsEpochs30
Iterations sizeIterations30, 50, 100, 500
In the absence of population x = 0, In the absence of population y = 0
a, b, c, d, e and f—are positive constants
Parameter settings: a—Population growth rate x. d—Population growth rate y. xi—Population growth rates x at time t. yi—Population growth rates y at time t. Population size. Dimensions size. Number of epochs. Iteration size.
Table 3. 36 Mathematical Functions CEC-2013.
Table 3. 36 Mathematical Functions CEC-2013.
FnFunctionRangeNature
F1Sphere[−5.12, 5.12]U
F2Rosenbrok[42]U
F3Griewank[−600, 600]M
F4Rastrigin[−5.12, 5.12]M
F5Ackley[−32.768, 32.768]M
F6Dixon-Price[42]U
F7Michalewicz[0, π]M
F8Powell[15]U
F9RHE—Rotate Hyper Ellipsoid[−65.536, 65.536]U
F10Schwefel[−500, 500]M
F11Styblinski-Tang[15]U
F12SDP—Sum Different Powers[1]M
F13Sum Squares[42]U
F14Trid[−d2, d2]U
F15Zakharov[42]U
F16Bukin No 6[−15, −5]U
F17Cross-in Tray[42]M
F18Drop-Wave[−5.12. 5.12]M
F19Eggholder[−5.12, 5.12]M
F20Beale[−4.5, 4.5]U
F21Holder-Table[42]M
F22Branin[42]M
F23Levy[42]M
F24Levy 13[42]M
F25Schaffer 2[−100, 100]M
F26Schaffer 4[−100, 100]M
F27Shubert[42]M
F28Bohachevsky 1[−100, 100]M
F29Bohachevsky 2[−100, 100]M
F30Bohachevsky 3[−100, 100]M
F31Booth[42]U
F32Matyas[42]U
F33Mccormick[−1.5, 4]U
F34Easom[−100, 100]U
F35Goldstein-Price[2]M
F36Three-Hump Camel[15]M
Table 4. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 30 dimensions.
Table 4. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 30 dimensions.
Dim30
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f14.72 × 10−81.98 × 10−83.28 × 10−81.25 × 10−82.34 × 10−88.91 × 10−98.11 × 10−94.79 × 10−9
f21.67 × 10−81.06 × 10−88.33 × 10−96.77 × 10−96.17 × 10−103.78 × 10−101.64 × 10−91.39 × 10−9
f31.29 × 10−87.35 × 10−94.32 × 10−93.38 × 10−92.67 × 10−101.21 × 10−101.44 × 10−91.21 × 10−9
f43.85 × 10−81.69 × 10−82.78 × 10−81.16 × 10−82.29 × 10−81.04 × 10−88.13 × 10−94.42 × 10−9
f55.62 × 10−82.45 × 10−83.26 × 10−81.34 × 10−84.30 × 10−81.99 × 10−86.58 × 10−93.32 × 10−9
f63.12 × 10−81.88 × 10−82.63 × 10−89.75 × 10−92.21 × 10−89.88 × 10−96.76 × 10−94.01 × 10−9
f73.51 × 10−81.94 × 10−82.51 × 10−81.12 × 10−81.55 × 10−87.70 × 10−95.70 × 10−93.18 × 10−9
f84.49 × 10−82.02 × 10−82.52 × 10−81.17 × 10−81.98 × 10−89.02 × 10−99.13 × 10−92.87 × 10−9
f93.88 × 10−81.93 × 10−82.27 × 10−89.90 × 10−91.97 × 10−89.81 × 10−96.95 × 10−93.99 × 10−9
f104.95 × 10−81.86 × 10−82.57 × 10−81.37 × 10−81.60 × 10−89.72 × 10−98.42 × 10−94.41 × 10−9
f113.91 × 10−82.31 × 10−83.20 × 10−81.06 × 10−81.98 × 10−89.47 × 10−98.11 × 10−94.14 × 10−9
f124.09 × 10−82.16 × 10−82.26 × 10−81.18 × 10−82.02 × 10−81.09 × 10−86.34 × 10−93.72 × 10−9
f134.03 × 10−81.87 × 10−82.40 × 10−81.20 × 10−82.02 × 10−89.20 × 10−98.02 × 10−94.68 × 10−9
f144.80 × 10−82.22 × 10−82.12 × 10−81.09 × 10−82.24 × 10−81.03 × 10−87.02 × 10−93.78 × 10−9
f154.41 × 10−82.11 × 10−82.21 × 10−81.28 × 10−82.50 × 10−81.09 × 10−89.58 × 10−94.28 × 10−9
f163.35 × 10−81.96 × 10−82.69 × 10−81.07 × 10−82.57 × 10−81.09 × 10−88.75 × 10−94.63 × 10−9
f171.96 × 10−81.13 × 10−89.04 × 10−95.96 × 10−95.60 × 10−103.88 × 10−101.73 × 10−91.24 × 10−9
f182.86 × 10−92.62 × 10−97.57 × 10−105.65 × 10−103.92 × 10−103.13 × 10−109.52 × 10−111.13 × 10−10
f193.46 × 10−82.04 × 10−82.48 × 10−81.12 × 10−82.57 × 10−81.07 × 10−89.63 × 10−94.01 × 10−9
f204.87 × 10−82.29 × 10−82.49 × 10−81.18 × 10−81.96 × 10−88.25 × 10−98.04 × 10−94.75 × 10−9
f211.75 × 10−81.02 × 10−88.60 × 10−95.31 × 10−91.88 × 10−77.25 × 10−92.95 × 10−91.93 × 10−9
f224.45 × 10−81.95 × 10−82.10 × 10−81.03 × 10−82.26 × 10−81.03 × 10−88.31 × 10−94.30 × 10−9
f233.60 × 10−81.91 × 10−82.92 × 10−81.33 × 10−82.19 × 10−88.63 × 10−91.00 × 10−84.81 × 10−9
f244.72 × 10−82.30 × 10−82.40 × 10−81.10 × 10−81.71 × 10−89.74 × 10−99.08 × 10−94.24 × 10−9
f254.09 × 10−92.64 × 10−92.48 × 10−91.75 × 10−92.48 × 10−81.15 × 10−81.77 × 10−101.86 × 10−10
f263.52 × 10−71.50 × 10−83.36 × 10−72.03 × 10−83.23 × 10−72.82 × 10−82.93 × 10−72.68 × 10−8
f275.13 × 10−82.22 × 10−82.22 × 10−89.72 × 10−91.80 × 10−89.18 × 10−98.15 × 10−94.08 × 10−9
f284.46 × 10−82.27 × 10−82.43 × 10−81.15 × 10−83.60 × 10−81.57 × 10−87.36 × 10−94.10 × 10−9
f294.19 × 10−81.81 × 10−82.68 × 10−81.22 × 10−83.10 × 10−81.31 × 10−88.07 × 10−94.05 × 10−9
f303.67 × 10−81.99 × 10−82.37 × 10−81.25 × 10−82.88 × 10−81.21 × 10−88.35 × 10−94.71 × 10−9
f314.73 × 10−81.82 × 10−82.52 × 10−81.10 × 10−82.09 × 10−81.09 × 10−88.10 × 10−94.17 × 10−9
f321.57 × 10−87.77 × 10−91.07 × 10−85.53 × 10−95.20 × 10−81.93 × 10−81.06 × 10−85.44 × 10−9
f333.89 × 10−82.05 × 10−82.62 × 10−81.12 × 10−82.60 × 10−81.30 × 10−86.78 × 10−94.07 × 10−9
f343.72 × 10−244.26 × 10−244.98 × 10−258.72 × 10−252.92 × 10−311.06 × 10−316.35 × 10−271.08 × 10−26
f353.91 × 10−81.85 × 10−82.50 × 10−81.11 × 10−82.55 × 10−81.03 × 10−88.48 × 10−94.75 × 10−9
f364.06 × 10−81.90 × 10−82.17 × 10−89.43 × 10−91.81 × 10−81.19 × 10−87.27 × 10−94.03 × 10−9
Table 5. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 50 dimensions.
Table 5. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 50 dimensions.
Dim50
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f14.58 × 10−82.02 × 10−82.84 × 10−81.65 × 10−82.33 × 10−81.04 × 10−88.56 × 10−94.23 × 10−9
f21.72 × 10−81.18 × 10−81.00 × 10−87.87 × 10−92.70 × 10−91.79 × 10−98.26 × 10−106.32 × 10−10
f33.77 × 10−93.30 × 10−94.64 × 10−93.76 × 10−95.86 × 10−102.81 × 10−101.25 × 10−109.09 × 10−11
f43.71 × 10−81.89 × 10−82.74 × 10−81.25 × 10−82.16 × 10−81.02 × 10−87.36 × 10−93.90 × 10−9
f55.67 × 10−82.47 × 10−82.89 × 10−81.15 × 10−83.06 × 10−81.13 × 10−81.49 × 10−85.59 × 10−9
f64.69 × 10−82.15 × 10−83.22 × 10−81.52 × 10−82.42 × 10−81.11 × 10−87.82 × 10−94.45 × 10−9
f72.60 × 10−81.70 × 10−82.55 × 10−81.18 × 10−81.70 × 10−88.06 × 10−96.37 × 10−93.01 × 10−9
f84.10 × 10−82.20 × 10−83.21 × 10−81.35 × 10−82.43 × 10−89.38 × 10−95.95 × 10−93.45 × 10−9
f95.03 × 10−81.91 × 10−83.48 × 10−81.40 × 10−81.88 × 10−89.42 × 10−96.11 × 10−94.01 × 10−9
f103.91 × 10−81.98 × 10−82.87 × 10−81.61 × 10−82.46 × 10−89.12 × 10−96.57 × 10−93.95 × 10−9
f114.93 × 10−82.28 × 10−83.38 × 10−81.38 × 10−82.22 × 10−81.10 × 10−86.98 × 10−93.57 × 10−9
f124.93 × 10−101.34 × 10−101.50 × 10−101.52 × 10−102.96 × 10−101.70 × 10−109.63 × 10−121.45 × 10−11
f134.52 × 10−82.09 × 10−82.99 × 10−81.52 × 10−82.29 × 10−89.79 × 10−98.00 × 10−93.95 × 10−9
f144.85 × 10−81.73 × 10−83.54 × 10−81.42 × 10−82.37 × 10−88.52 × 10−99.64 × 10−94.11 × 10−9
f154.05 × 10−82.32 × 10−83.17 × 10−81.52 × 10−82.31 × 10−81.04 × 10−85.45 × 10−94.34 × 10−9
f164.09 × 10−82.14 × 10−82.78 × 10−81.36 × 10−82.41 × 10−81.15 × 10−86.95 × 10−94.19 × 10−9
f171.07 × 10−88.19 × 10−91.05 × 10−88.30 × 10−93.95 × 10−92.34 × 10−99.38 × 10−106.17 × 10−10
f183.10 × 10−92.10 × 10−091.63 × 10−091.55 × 10−94.06 × 10−103.66 × 10−101.09 × 10−109.07 × 10−11
f193.93 × 10−81.86 × 10−83.81 × 10−81.57 × 10−81.94 × 10−81.12 × 10−87.40 × 10−94.11 × 10−9
f204.22 × 10−82.30 × 10−82.70 × 10−81.21 × 10−82.23 × 10−81.06 × 10−87.70 × 10−94.55 × 10−9
f214.12 × 10−81.93 × 10−81.65 × 10−88.64 × 10−91.80 × 10−88.26 × 10−91.61 × 10−91.13 × 10−9
f224.27 × 10−81.91 × 10−83.42 × 10−81.54 × 10−82.08 × 10−81.06 × 10−86.47 × 10−94.02 × 10−9
f235.26 × 10−82.13 × 10−83.10 × 10−81.44 × 10−82.06 × 10−89.27 × 10−98.40 × 10−94.93 × 10−9
f244.96 × 10−81.99 × 10−83.23 × 10−81.55 × 10−81.60 × 10−89.57 × 10−97.24 × 10−93.80 × 10−9
f251.57 × 10−88.34 × 10−91.87 × 10−91.56 × 10−91.57 × 10−88.03 × 10−92.44 × 10−92.60 × 10−9
f263.52 × 10−71.61 × 10−83.40 × 10−71.99 × 10−83.22 × 10−72.80 × 10−82.66 × 10−71.78 × 10−8
f274.09 × 10−81.83 × 10−82.45 × 10−81.33 × 10−81.81 × 10−88.69 × 10−96.69 × 10−93.34 × 10−9
f284.45 × 10−82.16 × 10−82.84 × 10−81.41 × 10−82.49 × 10−81.04 × 10−87.98 × 10−93.79 × 10−9
f294.95 × 10−81.88 × 10−83.17 × 10−81.55 × 10−82.58 × 10−89.34 × 10−97.54 × 10−94.22 × 10−9
f304.57 × 10−82.00 × 10−83.14 × 10−81.49 × 10−81.94 × 10−89.71 × 10−91.12 × 10−84.68 × 10−9
f314.31 × 10−82.05 × 10−83.02 × 10−81.48 × 10−82.11 × 10−81.03 × 10−88.47 × 10−94.58 × 10−9
f323.24 × 10−81.52 × 10−82.68 × 10−84.44 × 10−96.94 × 10−93.62 × 10−99.48 × 10−94.10 × 10−9
f335.17 × 10−81.88 × 10−82.71 × 10−81.53 × 10−82.25 × 10−89.29 × 10−97.88 × 10−94.07 × 10−9
f341.34 × 10−242.27 × 10−241.55 × 10−241.95 × 10−241.04 × 10−262.98 × 10−261.19 × 10−291.99 × 10−29
f353.64 × 10−82.07 × 10−83.08 × 10−81.55 × 10−82.22 × 10−81.14 × 10−88.68 × 10−94.51 × 10−9
f364.10 × 10−82.34 × 10−83.23 × 10−81.61 × 10−82.49 × 10−81.04 × 10−87.70 × 10−94.00 × 10−9
Table 6. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 100 dimensions.
Table 6. MTOA: Results of the experiments for 100 dimensions.
Dim100
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f14.63 × 10−81.90 × 10−83.02 × 10−81.65 × 10−82.12 × 10−81.18 × 10−87.00 × 10−93.83 × 10−9
f29.89 × 10−97.36 × 10−98.01 × 10−95.84 × 10−96.08 × 10−103.60 × 10−101.03 × 10−95.81 × 10−10
f33.15 × 10−97.40 × 10−105.75 × 10−92.80 × 10−105.05 × 10−92.17 × 10−102.99 × 10−94.99 × 10−10
f43.29 × 10−81.80 × 10−83.19 × 10−81.64 × 10−81.94 × 10−88.33 × 10−98.40 × 10−93.98 × 10−9
f56.71 × 10−82.42 × 10−83.23 × 10−81.43 × 10−82.49 × 10−88.37 × 10−91.16 × 10−72.13 × 10−8
f63.62 × 10−81.76 × 10−83.31 × 10−81.21 × 10−82.13 × 10−81.10 × 10−86.82 × 10−94.31 × 10−9
f73.16 × 10−81.58 × 10−82.35 × 10−81.07 × 10−81.50 × 10−87.20 × 10−96.99 × 10−93.73 × 10−9
f83.79 × 10−82.01 × 10−82.42 × 10−81.41 × 10−81.90 × 10−81.00 × 10−87.87 × 10−94.35 × 10−9
f94.18 × 10−82.19 × 10−83.31 × 10−81.58 × 10−81.99 × 10−81.01 × 10−86.87 × 10−94.61 × 10−9
f104.75 × 10−82.21 × 10−83.18 × 10−81.32 × 10−82.05 × 10−88.57 × 10−98.17 × 10−94.17 × 10−9
f113.59 × 10−82.10 × 10−82.50 × 10−81.40 × 10−82.12 × 10−81.05 × 10−88.02 × 10−93.98 × 10−9
f1200000000
f134.09 × 10−81.83 × 10−82.21 × 10−81.12 × 10−81.70 × 10−81.06 × 10−86.96 × 10−94.36 × 10−9
f144.36 × 10−82.19 × 10−83.37 × 10−81.69 × 10−81.95 × 10−88.85 × 10−98.99 × 10−94.28 × 10−9
f156.03 × 10−102.63 × 10−105.35 × 10−101.80 × 10−104.86 × 10−101.69 × 10−101.39 × 10−101.44 × 10−10
f164.04 × 10−81.97 × 10−83.20 × 10−81.43 × 10−81.85 × 10−89.95 × 10−99.20 × 10−93.32 × 10−9
f171.03 × 10−88.56 × 10−98.67 × 10−95.12 × 10−98.02 × 10−103.94 × 10−101.06 × 10−95.57 × 10−10
f182.01 × 10−91.62 × 10−91.01 × 10−91.04 × 10−95.64 × 10−104.15 × 10−106.24 × 10−116.16 × 10−11
f193.62 × 10−81.68 × 10−83.34 × 10−81.54 × 10−82.35 × 10−81.06 × 10−87.23 × 10−93.54 × 10−9
f204.87 × 10−82.14 × 10−82.85 × 10−81.72 × 10−82.44 × 10−81.15 × 10−87.85 × 10−94.55 × 10−9
f214.19 × 10−92.89 × 10−92.82 × 10−81.48 × 10−81.22 × 10−74.49 × 10−97.48 × 10−93.66 × 10−9
f223.91 × 10−81.93 × 10−83.09 × 10−81.42 × 10−82.21 × 10−81.01 × 10−88.31 × 10−94.03 × 10−9
f234.12 × 10−81.86 × 10−82.62 × 10−81.42 × 10−82.20 × 10−81.03 × 10−87.23 × 10−93.76 × 10−9
f244.59 × 10−81.97 × 10−83.20 × 10−81.54 × 10−81.90 × 10−81.04 × 10−86.63 × 10−94.48 × 10−9
f253.04 × 10−81.17 × 10−82.94 × 10−81.02 × 10−82.44 × 10−81.32 × 10−83.24 × 10−92.92 × 10−9
f263.47 × 10−72.36 × 10−83.40 × 10−71.86 × 10−83.19 × 10−72.51 × 10−82.63 × 10−71.53 × 10−8
f274.24 × 10−81.92 × 10−82.38 × 10−81.24 × 10−81.76 × 10−89.79 × 10−96.32 × 10−94.13 × 10−9
f284.06 × 10−81.79 × 10−83.44 × 10−81.83 × 10−81.75 × 10−88.24 × 10−98.55 × 10−93.84 × 10−9
f293.99 × 10−82.07 × 10−83.29 × 10−81.51 × 10−82.26 × 10−81.03 × 10−88.21 × 10−94.25 × 10−9
f304.37 × 10−82.26 × 10−82.76 × 10−81.49 × 10−82.13 × 10−89.86 × 10−98.63 × 10−94.91 × 10−9
f314.64 × 10−81.81 × 10−82.78 × 10−81.52 × 10−82.09 × 10−81.01 × 10−88.57 × 10−94.66 × 10−9
f323.95 × 10−81.84 × 10−82.35 × 10−81.08 × 10−81.99 × 10−86.87 × 10−93.11 × 10−81.64 × 10−9
f334.50 × 10−82.20 × 10−82.29 × 10−81.49 × 10−82.72 × 10−81.21 × 10−88.07 × 10−94.96 × 10−9
f349.61 × 10−262.37 × 10−256.93 × 10−282.11 × 10−275.46 × 10−313.48 × 10−311.61 × 10−301.63 × 10−30
f354.06 × 10−82.30 × 10−82.69 × 10−81.42 × 10−82.24 × 10−81.07 × 10−87.99 × 10−94.38 × 10−9
f364.02 × 10−82.05 × 10−83.31 × 10−81.63 × 10−82.02 × 10−81.11 × 10−87.76 × 10−94.23 × 10−9
Table 7. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 30 dimensions.
Table 7. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 30 dimensions.
Dim30
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f12.79 × 10−72.36 × 10−72.17 × 10−71.79 × 10−71.36 × 10−79.36 × 10−81.87 × 10−81.35 × 10−8
f26.51 × 10−83.74 × 10−84.63 × 10−83.32 × 10−81.83 × 10−81.74 × 10−82.69 × 10−92.53 × 10−9
f32.88 × 10−82.40 × 10−81.53 × 10−81.15 × 10−86.42 × 10−96.60 × 10−91.00 × 10−98.92 × 10−10
f43.34 × 10−72.44 × 10−71.90 × 10−71.65 × 10−79.94 × 10−86.43 × 10−81.61 × 10−81.46 × 10−8
f54.01 × 10−73.75 × 10−72.23 × 10−71.89 × 10−71.32 × 10−71.06 × 10−72.02 × 10−81.78 × 10−8
f63.32 × 10−72.61 × 10−72.08 × 10−71.66 × 10−79.40 × 10−87.98 × 10−81.82 × 10−81.88 × 10−8
f73.67 × 10−72.84 × 10−71.95 × 10−71.55 × 10−71.05 × 10−78.18 × 10−81.95 × 10−81.53 × 10−8
f82.34 × 10−72.73 × 10−71.67 × 10−71.18 × 10−71.14 × 10−77.66 × 10−81.89 × 10−81.41 × 10−8
f93.55 × 10−72.65 × 10−71.42 × 10−71.59 × 10−71.09 × 10−79.83 × 10−81.88 × 10−81.66 × 10−8
f102.67 × 10−72.36 × 10−72.61 × 10−71.80 × 10−71.07 × 10−77.59 × 10−82.04 × 10−81.90 × 10−8
f113.66 × 10−72.91 × 10−72.53 × 10−71.61 × 10−71.08 × 10−77.56 × 10−81.61 × 10−81.51 × 10−8
f123.00 × 10−72.98 × 10−72.03 × 10−71.62 × 10−71.14 × 10−78.19 × 10−81.65 × 10−81.62 × 10−8
f133.06 × 10−72.80 × 10−72.20 × 10−71.38 × 10−79.61 × 10−87.50 × 10−81.68 × 10−81.31 × 10−8
f143.49 × 10−72.50 × 10−71.60 × 10−71.22 × 10−71.13 × 10−77.40 × 10−82.14 × 10−81.68 × 10−8
f153.43 × 10−72.77 × 10−72.03 × 10−71.67 × 10−78.07 × 10−85.44 × 10−81.84 × 10−81.62 × 10−8
f162.87 × 10−72.69 × 10−72.13 × 10−71.64 × 10−71.17 × 10−79.83 × 10−81.87 × 10−81.47 × 10−8
f175.39 × 10−84.18 × 10−83.94 × 10−83.06 × 10−81.73 × 10−81.34 × 10−82.16 × 10−91.89 × 10−9
f182.20 × 10−93.13 × 10−99.75 × 10−108.56 × 10−104.31 × 10−104.48 × 10−102.40 × 10−112.89 × 10−11
f193.43 × 10−72.52 × 10−71.91 × 10−71.24 × 10−79.13 × 10−87.10 × 10−81.62 × 10−81.39 × 10−8
f203.49 × 10−72.46 × 10−71.51 × 10−71.49 × 10−78.26 × 10−86.69 × 10−81.53 × 10−81.36 × 10−8
f211.28 × 10−71.05 × 10−76.40 × 10−86.31 × 10−82.21 × 10−82.66 × 10−84.21 × 10−94.46 × 10−9
f223.21 × 10−72.62 × 10−71.92 × 10−71.72 × 10−78.15 × 10−86.76 × 10−81.64 × 10−81.51 × 10−8
f233.47 × 10−72.65 × 10−71.98 × 10−71.84 × 10−71.02 × 10−76.45 × 10−81.78 × 10−81.38 × 10−8
f243.37 × 10−72.18 × 10−72.15 × 10−71.81 × 10−77.28 × 10−87.30 × 10−82.17 × 10−81.51 × 10−8
f252.03 × 10−82.47 × 10−87.98 × 10−91.06 × 10−83.50 × 10−93.14 × 10−93.98 × 10−103.72 × 10−10
f261.08 × 10−42.07 × 10−81.08 × 10−41.37 × 10−81.08 × 10−47.91 × 10−91.08 × 10−42.58 × 10−9
f273.23 × 10−73.01 × 10−72.20 × 10−71.90 × 10−77.78 × 10−86.82 × 10−81.92 × 10−81.66 × 10−8
f282.68 × 10−72.10 × 10−72.42 × 10−71.72 × 10−79.09 × 10−87.59 × 10−82.48 × 10−81.95 × 10−8
f293.86 × 10−73.05 × 10−71.94 × 10−71.74 × 10−79.27 × 10−87.64 × 10−81.94 × 10−81.50 × 10−8
f304.48 × 10−72.79 × 10−71.88 × 10−71.83 × 10−71.14 × 10−77.91 × 10−81.64 × 10−81.28 × 10−8
f313.92 × 10−72.27 × 10−72.25 × 10−71.54 × 10−71.13 × 10−79.11 × 10−81.44 × 10−81.51 × 10−8
f323.21 × 10−72.57 × 10−71.65 × 10−71.42 × 10−78.84 × 10−87.41 × 10−81.18 × 10−81.22 × 10−8
f333.44 × 10−72.31 × 10−72.11 × 10−71.50 × 10−71.28 × 10−78.49 × 10−81.55 × 10−81.65 × 10−8
f345.22 × 10−282.25 × 10−283.61 × 10−282.22 × 10−282.37 × 10−281.60 × 10−285.19 × 10−293.51 × 10−29
f353.60 × 10−72.92 × 10−72.44 × 10−72.04 × 10−71.12 × 10−78.18 × 10−81.73 × 10−81.55 × 10−8
f363.01 × 10−72.52 × 10−71.91 × 10−71.54 × 10−78.06 × 10−86.31 × 10−81.62 × 10−81.54 × 10−8
Table 8. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 50 dimensions.
Table 8. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 50 dimensions.
Dim50
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f14.24 × 10−72.89 × 10−71.78 × 10−71.34 × 10−71.09 × 10−77.52 × 10−81.84 × 10−81.52 × 10−8
f25.64 × 10−84.83 × 10−83.77 × 10−82.84 × 10−81.79 × 10−81.27 × 10−82.59 × 10−92.55 × 10−9
f32.25 × 10−82.16 × 10−82.27 × 10−81.65 × 10−81.22 × 10−89.04 × 10−91.03 × 10−99.38 × 10−10
f43.49 × 10−73.02 × 10−71.81 × 10−71.40 × 10−71.25 × 10−77.72 × 10−81.83 × 10−81.64 × 10−8
f53.15 × 10−73.36 × 10−73.22 × 10−73.08 × 10−71.54 × 10−71.25 × 10−72.79 × 10−82.24 × 10−8
f63.50 × 10−72.92 × 10−71.59 × 10−71.38 × 10−77.60 × 10−86.45 × 10−82.07 × 10−81.55 × 10−8
f73.32 × 10−72.48 × 10−72.23 × 10−71.66 × 10−78.10 × 10−87.95 × 10−81.69 × 10−81.62 × 10−8
f82.55 × 10−72.18 × 10−71.94 × 10−71.45 × 10−77.25 × 10−86.91 × 10−82.16 × 10−81.66 × 10−8
f93.64 × 10−72.91 × 10−72.26 × 10−71.91 × 10−71.16 × 10−77.89 × 10−81.71 × 10−81.60 × 10−8
f102.51 × 10−72.07 × 10−71.94 × 10−71.64 × 10−71.01 × 10−77.44 × 10−81.67 × 10−81.36 × 10−8
f112.39 × 10−72.15 × 10−71.87 × 10−71.67 × 10−79.65 × 10−87.85 × 10−81.66 × 10−81.52 × 10−8
f1200000000
f132.97 × 10−72.17 × 10−71.84 × 10−71.66 × 10−79.41 × 10−86.93 × 10−81.62 × 10−81.46 × 10−8
f142.84 × 10−72.35 × 10−71.86 × 10−71.37 × 10−79.72 × 10−87.04 × 10−81.66 × 10−81.47 × 10−8
f153.69 × 10−72.89 × 10−72.04 × 10−71.64 × 10−79.23 × 10−87.53 × 10−81.75 × 10−81.72 × 10−8
f163.57 × 10−72.54 × 10−72.48 × 10−71.88 × 10−71.03 × 10−77.70 × 10−81.54 × 10−81.42 × 10−8
f176.91 × 10−85.62 × 10−83.47 × 10−82.78 × 10−81.66 × 10−81.23 × 10−83.68 × 10−92.86 × 10−9
f182.31 × 10−93.42 × 10−98.79 × 10−108.52 × 10−102.59 × 10−102.89 × 10−103.09 × 10−114.05 × 10−11
f193.60 × 10−72.88 × 10−72.45 × 10−71.74 × 10−79.82 × 10−87.93 × 10−81.80 × 10−81.75 × 10−8
f203.89 × 10−72.89 × 10−72.28 × 10−71.75 × 10−71.03 × 10−78.89 × 10−81.45 × 10−81.49 × 10−8
f211.48 × 10−71.07 × 10−77.75 × 10−86.17 × 10−82.28 × 10−82.48 × 10−82.51 × 10−93.17 × 10−9
f222.64 × 10−72.50 × 10−71.68 × 10−71.49 × 10−79.59 × 10−86.50 × 10−81.63 × 10−81.45 × 10−8
f232.82 × 10−72.02 × 10−71.97 × 10−71.66 × 10−78.36 × 10−85.98 × 10−82.17 × 10−81.48 × 10−8
f243.33 × 10−72.83 × 10−71.95 × 10−71.47 × 10−77.44 × 10−86.45 × 10−81.91 × 10−81.45 × 10−8
f252.20 × 10−82.46 × 10−81.33 × 10−81.53 × 10−83.27 × 10−94.29 × 10−94.84 × 10−104.15 × 10−10
f261.08 × 10−41.95 × 10−81.08 × 10−41.43 × 10−81.08 × 10−49.69 × 10−91.08 × 10−42.51 × 10−9
f272.99 × 10−72.46 × 10−71.51 × 10−79.83 × 10−88.82 × 10−86.57 × 10−81.61 × 10−81.61 × 10−8
f283.15 × 10−72.36 × 10−71.99 × 10−71.77 × 10−71.29 × 10−77.41 × 10−82.22 × 10−81.83 × 10−8
f293.88 × 10−72.88 × 10−72.51 × 10−71.88 × 10−78.23 × 10−87.30 × 10−82.22 × 10−81.94 × 10−8
f303.66 × 10−72.42 × 10−72.36 × 10−72.03 × 10−71.04 × 10−78.31 × 10−82.26 × 10−81.91 × 10−8
f314.14 × 10−73.22 × 10−71.69 × 10−71.44 × 10−79.73 × 10−87.94 × 10−81.84 × 10−81.63 × 10−8
f323.37 × 10−72.50 × 10−71.88 × 10−71.43 × 10−71.20 × 10−78.49 × 10−81.99 × 10−81.62 × 10−8
f333.24 × 10−72.59 × 10−72.08 × 10−71.33 × 10−71.13 × 10−78.01 × 10−82.51 × 10−81.64 × 10−8
f347.10 × 10−283.34 × 10−283.81 × 10−282.20 × 10−282.82 × 10−281.64 × 10−285.98 × 10−294.80 × 10−29
f353.06 × 10−72.48 × 10−72.06 × 10−71.67 × 10−71.09 × 10−78.47 × 10−81.83 × 10−81.65 × 10−8
f364.33 × 10−13.13 × 10−71.90 × 10−71.41 × 10−77.89 × 10−86.22 × 10−82.21 × 10−81.74 × 10−8
Table 9. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 100 dimensions.
Table 9. DMOA: Results of the experiments for 100 dimensions.
Dim100
Iter3050100500
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
f13.55 × 10−73.12 × 10−71.75 × 10−71.88 × 10−79.84 × 10−88.69 × 10−82.49 × 10−82.02 × 10−8
f26.51 × 10−85.65 × 10−82.93 × 10−82.59 × 10−81.66 × 10−81.35 × 10−82.38 × 10−92.04 × 10−9
f31.89 × 10−71.55 × 10−71.10 × 10−71.04 × 10−74.70 × 10−83.89 × 10−81.22 × 10−89.77 × 10−9
f43.54 × 10−72.65 × 10−71.91 × 10−71.82 × 10−79.54 × 10−87.94 × 10−82.25 × 10−81.50 × 10−8
f51.18 × 10−69.47 × 10−75.55 × 10−74.44 × 10−72.76 × 10−72.37 × 10−77.94 × 10−85.61 × 10−8
f63.49 × 10−72.54 × 10−71.92 × 10−71.28 × 10−71.11 × 10−77.17 × 10−81.57 × 10−81.44 × 10−8
f73.12 × 10−72.81 × 10−72.51 × 10−71.90 × 10−78.44 × 10−87.15 × 10−82.14 × 10−81.41 × 10−8
f83.79 × 10−72.67 × 10−71.81 × 10−71.35 × 10−79.76 × 10−87.78 × 10−81.55 × 10−81.72 × 10−8
f93.23 × 10−72.34 × 10−72.98 × 10−71.84 × 10−78.54 × 10−87.36 × 10−82.29 × 10−81.76 × 10−8
f102.84 × 10−72.32 × 10−71.79 × 10−71.59 × 10−71.02 × 10−79.02 × 10−81.99 × 10−81.53 × 10−8
f113.62 × 10−73.09 × 10−71.87 × 10−71.75 × 10−79.09 × 10−88.45 × 10−82.35 × 10−81.59 × 10−8
f1200000000
f133.00 × 10−72.52 × 10−71.61 × 10−71.32 × 10−79.33 × 10−88.23 × 10−82.08 × 10−81.67 × 10−8
f142.81 × 10−72.25 × 10−72.05 × 10−71.63 × 10−71.09 × 10−78.33 × 10−82.35 × 10−81.59 × 10−8
f151.20 × 10−91.73 × 10−92.40 × 10−109.13 × 10−100000
f162.97 × 10−73.05 × 10−71.15 × 10−71.28 × 10−78.98 × 10−86.56 × 10−81.71 × 10−81.39 × 10−8
f174.77 × 10−84.51 × 10−83.34 × 10−82.90 × 10−81.66 × 10−81.72 × 10−82.46 × 10−92.03 × 10−9
f182.60 × 10−092.37 × 10−099.563 × 10−109.67 × 10−103.35 × 10−104.152 × 10−102.42 × 10−113.06 × 10−11
f193.89 × 10−73.17 × 10−72.13 × 10−71.73 × 10−79.34 × 10−88.40 × 10−81.95 × 10−81.60 × 10−8
f201.95 × 10−71.43 × 10−72.25 × 10−71.33 × 10−78.72 × 10−88.20 × 10−81.67 × 10−81.60 × 10−8
f211.03 × 10−78.05 × 10−85.74 × 10−86.44 × 10−83.34 × 10−82.55 × 10−84.57 × 10−93.79 × 10−9
f222.54 × 10−72.19 × 10−71.99 × 10−71.40 × 10−78.83 × 10−89.01 × 10−81.57 × 10−81.37 × 10−8
f232.82 × 10−72.03 × 10−71.80 × 10−71.69 × 10−71.11 × 10−71.03 × 10−71.76 × 10−81.68 × 10−8
f242.44 × 10−72.37 × 10−72.03 × 10−71.80 × 10−79.99 × 10−86.72 × 10−81.98 × 10−81.51 × 10−8
f251.93 × 10−82.48 × 10−81.39 × 10−81.43 × 10−82.71 × 10−92.42 × 10−94.36 × 10−103.45 × 10−10
f261.08 × 10−41.97 × 10−81.08 × 10−41.42 × 10−81.08 × 10−48.79 × 10−91.08 × 10−42.43 × 10−9
f272.77 × 10−72.67 × 10−72.08 × 10−71.18 × 10−71.00 × 10−78.68 × 10−81.31 × 10−81.27 × 10−8
f283.77 × 10−73.26 × 10−72.12 × 10−71.91 × 10−71.10 × 10−77.39 × 10−81.59 × 10−81.57 × 10−8
f293.42 × 10−72.58 × 10−71.99 × 10−71.44 × 10−71.07 × 10−79.12 × 10−82.27 × 10−81.62 × 10−8
f303.07 × 10−72.63 × 10−72.24 × 10−71.74 × 10−78.61 × 10−87.65 × 10−81.86 × 10−81.58 × 10−8
f312.80 × 10−72.53 × 10−71.52 × 10−71.27 × 10−71.24 × 10−77.30 × 10−81.77 × 10−81.90 × 10−8
f322.87 × 10−72.85 × 10−72.25 × 10−71.48 × 10−79.29 × 10−87.73 × 10−81.09 × 10−81.06 × 10−8
f334.20 × 10−72.74 × 10−72.55 × 10−71.67 × 10−71.17 × 10−79.39 × 10−81.64 × 10−81.53 × 10−8
f344.93 × 10−283.04 × 10−284.35 × 10−282.07 × 10−282.78 × 10−281.60 × 10−287.02 × 10−294.37 × 10−29
f352.25 × 10−72.39 × 10−072.11 × 10−71.81 × 10−79.11 × 10−88.29 × 10−81.41 × 10−81.55 × 10−8
f362.88 × 10−72.44 × 10−71.95 × 10−71.97 × 10−71.19 × 10−78.09 × 10−82.36 × 10−81.57 × 10−8
Table 10. Null and Alternative Hypothesis and Z Test Statistics Formula.
Table 10. Null and Alternative Hypothesis and Z Test Statistics Formula.
H 0   :   μ 1   μ 2

H a   :   μ 1 < μ 2   c l a i m
H 0   : D M O A

H a   : M T O A
z = x ¯ 1 x ¯ 2 D 0 σ 1 2 n 1 + σ 2 2 n 2    (7)
Table 11. Hypothesis Test Parameters.
Table 11. Hypothesis Test Parameters.
x ¯ 1 = Mean of sample 1
x ¯ 1 = Mean of sample 2
σ 1 = Standard Deviation of sample 1
σ 2 = Standard Deviation of sample 2
n 1 = Number of sample data 1
n 2 = Number of sample data 2
μ 1 μ 2 = D 0
D 0 = 0
Table 12. Results for the MTOA vs. DMOA hypothesis tests.
Table 12. Results for the MTOA vs. DMOA hypothesis tests.
Dim/Iter30 × 3050 × 50100 × 100
FuncMTOA vs. DMOAMTOA vs. DMOAMTOA vs. DMOA
f1−5.35 × 100−6.07 × 100−4.82 × 100
f2−6.81 × 100−5.15 × 100−6.50 × 100
f3−3.47 × 100−5.84 × 100−5.90 × 100
f4−6.61 × 100−5.99 × 100−5.22 × 100
f5−5.02 × 100−5.20 × 100−5.79 × 100
f6−6.29 × 100−5.00 × 100−6.77 × 100
f7−6.38 × 100−6.49 × 100−5.29 × 100
f8−3.78 × 100−6.08 × 100−5.49 × 100
f9−6.51 × 100−5.48 × 100−4.83 × 100
f10−5.02 × 100−5.51 × 100−4.94 × 100
f11−6.13 × 100−5.02 × 100−4.48 × 100
f12−4.74 × 1005.41 × 100Nan
f13−5.20 × 100−5.06 × 100−5.03 × 100
f14−6.58 × 100−5.99 × 100−5.84 × 100
f15−5.90 × 100−5.75 × 1001.58 × 101
f16−5.15 × 100−6.40 × 100−5.88 × 100
f17−4.33 × 100−4.57 × 100−5.03 × 100
f188.86 × 10−12.31 × 1002.13 × 100
f19−6.68 × 100−6.47 × 100−4.52 × 100
f20−6.66 × 100−6.28 × 100−4.15 × 100
f21−5.75 × 100−5.36 × 1001.87 × 101
f22−5.76 × 100−4.87 × 100−4.00 × 100
f23−6.41 × 100−5.44 × 100−4.70 × 100
f24−7.25 × 100−6.01 × 100−6.51 × 100
f25−3.58 × 100−4.08 × 1008.86 × 100
f26−2.30 × 104−2.40 × 104−2.21 × 104
f27−4.93 × 100−6.97 × 100−5.19 × 100
f28−5.80 × 100−5.28 × 100−6.82 × 100
f29−6.17 × 100−6.37 × 100−5.05 × 100
f30−8.06 × 100−5.51 × 100−4.60 × 100
f31−8.31 × 100−5.25 × 100−7.67 × 100
f32−6.50 × 100−6.17 × 100−5.15 × 100
f33−7.20 × 100−7.39 × 100−5.21 × 100
f344.79 × 1004.36 × 100−9.46 × 100
f35−6.02 × 100−5.70 × 100−4.51 × 100
f36−5.64 × 100−6.10 × 100−6.66 × 100
NaN—Not a Number—For expressions like 0/0.
Table 13. Comparison of the Mean and Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm with other methods, for 30 dimensions.
Table 13. Comparison of the Mean and Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm with other methods, for 30 dimensions.
30 Dimensions
MethodDMOAMTOASELF-DEFENSEFAGSA
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
F12.79 × 10−72.36 × 10−74.72 × 10−81.98 × 10−81.53 × 10−86.42 × 10−81.99 × 10−35.13 × 10−49.45 × 10−173.81 × 10−17
F26.51 × 10−83.74 × 10−81.67 × 10−81.06 × 10−84.98 × 1007.54 × 1001.06 × 10−21.42 × 10−37.16 × 10−91.69 × 10−9
F32.88 × 10−82.40 × 10−81.29 × 10−87.35 × 10−94.92 × 10−94.02 × 10−93.41 × 1011.84 × 1012.70 × 1017.45 × 100
F43.34 × 10−72.44 × 10−73.85 × 10−81.69 × 10−84.22 × 10−41.61 × 10−33.71 × 1019.92 × 1002.63 × 1015.69 × 100
F54.01 × 10−73.75 × 10−75.62 × 10−82.45 × 10−81.94 × 10−46.99 × 10−43.38 × 10−31.59 × 10−33.19 × 10−23.06 × 10−2
MethodCSGADEHSGA
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
F12.13 × 10−42.18 × 10−44.20 × 10−33.88 × 10−31.59 × 10−34.28 × 10−43.66 × 10−25.95 × 10−39.28 × 10−55.09 × 10−5
F22.15 × 1001.09 × 1004.71 × 10−15.22 × 10−19.78 × 10−31.31 × 10−32.32 × 1004.68 × 10−12.62 × 10−35.91 × 10−4
F32.88 × 1013.29 × 1011.59 × 1012.54 × 1013.38 × 1012.25 × 1011.02 × 10+26.06 × 1015.06 × 1013.83 × 101
F45.34 × 1011.22 × 1011.31 × 1014.13 × 1003.72 × 1011.17 × 1012.89 × 1014.68 × 1008.76 × 1013.13 × 101
F52.72 × 10−25.86 × 10−24.43 × 10−45.20 × 10−43.18 × 10−31.57 × 10−32.71 × 10−22.34 × 10−21.93 × 10−33.33 × 10−3
Table 14. Comparison of the Mean and Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm with other methods, for 50 dimensions.
Table 14. Comparison of the Mean and Standard Deviation of the DMOA Algorithm with other methods, for 50 dimensions.
50 Dimensions
MethodDMOAMTOASELF-DEFENSEFAGSA
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
F14.24 × 10−72.89 × 10−74.58 × 10−82.02 × 10−81.78 × 10−77.25 × 10−51.15 × 10−23.20 × 10−34.54 × 10−12.19 × 10−1
F25.64 × 10−84.83 × 10−81.72 × 10−81.18 × 10−83.77 × 10−88.79 × 1002.49 × 10−23.66 × 10−37.27 × 10−22.73 × 10−1
F32.25 × 10−82.16 × 10−83.77 × 10−93.30 × 10−92.27 × 10−85.90 × 10−55.85 × 1013.18 × 1017.62 × 1013.50 × 101
F43.49 × 10−73.02 × 10−73.71 × 10−81.89 × 10−81.81 × 10−79.60 × 10−37.45 × 1012.47 × 1015.07 × 1011.26 × 101
F53.15 × 10−73.36 × 10−75.67 × 10−82.47 × 10−83.22 × 10−75.97 × 10−27.01 × 10−32.04 × 10−31.24 × 1002.44 × 10−1
MethodCSGADEHSGA
FuncMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
F19.90 × 10−17.89 × 10−11.77 × 1006.66 × 10−17.19 × 10−31.79 × 10−33.54 × 10−17.94 × 10−21.77 × 1006.66 × 10−1
F24.84 × 1001.32 × 1001.73 × 1003.15 × 10−11.86 × 10−22.05 × 10−33.12 × 1003.14 × 10−11.73 × 1003.15 × 10−1
F32.28 × 10+21.27 × 10+22.96 × 1015.07 × 1014.80 × 1017.41 × 10−12.04 × 10+27.36 × 1012.96 × 1015.07 × 101
F41.15 × 10+22.07 × 1013.70 × 1017.63 × 1007.81 × 1012.27 × 1018.26 × 1018.04 × 1003.70 × 1017.63 × 100
F56.21 × 10−12.13 × 10−15.05 × 10−21.61 × 10−25.91 × 10−31.09 × 10−31.22 × 1007.73 × 10−25.05 × 10−21.61 × 10−2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carreon-Ortiz, H.; Valdez, F.; Castillo, O. A New Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Nature-Inspired Algorithm. Axioms 2022, 11, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11080391

AMA Style

Carreon-Ortiz H, Valdez F, Castillo O. A New Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Nature-Inspired Algorithm. Axioms. 2022; 11(8):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11080391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carreon-Ortiz, Hector, Fevrier Valdez, and Oscar Castillo. 2022. "A New Discrete Mycorrhiza Optimization Nature-Inspired Algorithm" Axioms 11, no. 8: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11080391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop