Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Oscillatory Properties of Solutions of Differential Equations Using Kneser-Type Criteria
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Step Prediction of Typhoon Tracks Combining Reanalysis Image Fusion Using Laplacian Pyramid and Discrete Wavelet Transform with ConvLSTM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Commutator of the Calderón–Zygmund Operator on Mixed-Norm Herz-Slice Spaces

College of Mathematics and System Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(9), 875; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090875
Submission received: 10 August 2023 / Revised: 31 August 2023 / Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematical Analysis)

Abstract

:
We obtain the separability of mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, establish a weak convergence on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, and get the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces. Moreover, we get the necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, where b is a locally integrable function.

1. Introduction

To understand the Bernstein theorem for absolutely convergent Fourier transforms, Beurling [1] researched the Herz space A u ( R n ) in 1964. The Herz space K u ( R n ) is further explored by Herz [2] in 1968. In the 1990’s, Lu and Yang [3] introduced the homogeneous Herz space ( K ˙ u β , s ) ( R n ) and the non-homogeneous Herz space ( K u β , s ) ( R n ) . In recent years, Herz spaces has been extensively studied in the fields of harmonic analysis, see [4,5,6,7,8] and so on.
Wiener amalgam is an indispensable tool in time-frequency analysis [9,10] and sampling theory [11]. At first, amalgam spaces is elaborated by Wiener in [12]. Still, the systematic investigation of amalgam spaces should look at the study of Holland [13], which contains the research of dual spaces and multipliers on R n . Wiener amalgam spaces are generalized by Feichtinger and Weisz from R or R n to Banach function spaces, see, [14,15,16,17,18] and so on. A definition of the amalgam space L v , L u R n is defined by:
L v , L u ( R n ) : = f L loc v R n : f 1 B ( y , 1 ) L v ( R n ) L u R n ,
where
f ( L v , L u ) ( R n ) = R n f 1 B ( y , 1 ) L v ( R n ) u   d y 1 / u ,
with the usual modification for v = or u = , denote B ( y , 1 ) the open ball with centered at y with the radius 1. 1 B ( y , 1 ) is the characteristic function of the ball B ( y , 1 ) .
Very recently, the slice space E t u R n was introduced by Auscher and Mourgoglou [19], an exceptional examples of classical amalgam spaces. Auscher and Prisuelos-Arribas [20] researched some classical operators of harmonic analysis for generalized version slice space E v u t R n in 2017, and proved that amalgam spaces and slice spaces are equivalent. In recent years, many authors studied slice-type spaces, such as, in 2019, Zhang, Yang, Yuan, and Wang [21] introduced Orlicz-slice spaces and Orlicz-slice Hardy spaces. In 2022, Lu, Zhou and Wang [22] introduced Herz-slice spaces. In 2023, we defined mixed-norm Herz-slice space ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) in [23], and the theory of the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator is given in this space. Given f L loc 1 R n and x R n , the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function M ( f ) is defined by
M ( f ) ( x ) : = sup B 1 | B | B | f ( y ) | d y ,
where the supremum is taken over all balls B B containing x.
In 1961, the mixed-norm Lebesgue space L u R n was introduced by Benedek and Panzone [24], where u = ( u 1 , , u n ) ( 0 , ] n , which can be traced back to [25]. Because mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces has a more refined structure on partial differential equations [26,27], more scholarly authors like to study problems on it. For example, the mixed-norm amalgam space ( L u , L v ) ( R n ) was introduced by Zhang and Zhou [28] in 2022, and the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T and the commutators with BMO ( R n ) functions on the mixed-norm amalgam space ( L u , L s ) ( R n ) was established [29]. The properties of the BMO ( R n ) function b are referred to [30]. A function b L loc 1 R n , we define the mean of b over Q by b Q : = 1 | Q | Q b ( x ) d x . The bounded mean oscillation space, namely BMO ( R n ) space is defined by
b BMO : = b : = sup Q 1 | Q | Q b ( x ) b Q d x < ,
the supremum is taken over all cubes Q in R n . For a deeper discussion about mixed-norm spaces, we can see [26,31,32,33] and so on.
Our motivation is based on our introduction of the mixed-norm Herz-slice space ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) , to consider whether we can establish the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T and commutators with BMO ( R n ) functions on the mixed-norm Herz-slice space ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . In this paper, we get the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, and demonstrate the necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces. Our results are all new when we return to the classical Herz-slice spaces, slice spaces and Lebesgue spaces. The commutator [ b , T ] is defined by
[ b , T ] f ( x ) = b ( x ) T f ( x ) T ( b f ) ( x ) .
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some necessary space definitions and operator notation, and we also give crucial lemma. In Section 3, we obtain the separable, weak convergence of mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces. To get the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, we explain whether ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) has an absolutely continuous quasi-norm and the class C c R n is dense in ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . C c R n is the space of infinitely differentiable functions with compact support in R n . Furthermore, we get the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T of commutators with BMO ( R n ) functions on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces by M b is bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . Let b BMO ( R n ) . The commutators of the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function with BMO ( R n ) functions M b are defined, respectively, by
M b f ( x ) = sup r > 0 | B ( x , r ) | 1 B ( x , r ) | b ( x ) b ( y ) | · | f ( y ) | d y ,
where B ( x , r ) = y R n : | y x | < r the ball in R n centered at x R n with the radius r ( 0 , ) . Finally, we establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces.
By K R n we denote the class of Lebesgue measurable functions on R n . Let N : = { 1 , 2 , } . Denote the characteristic function of a set G by 1 G . Denote the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set by | G | . Given B k = B 0 , 2 k , let S k : = B k B k 1 with k N , 1 k = 1 S k when k N , and 1 S 0 = 1 B 0 , 1 S is the characteristic function of S. Let S R n denote the collection of all Schwartz functions on R n , equipped with the well-known classical topology determined by a countable family of semi-norms. We denote C R n by the space of infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions. Denotes the unit sphere in R n by S n 1 := S n 1 : = x R n : | x | = 1 . We denote C c R n by the space of all continuos, complex-valued functions with compact support. The letters u , v , will denote n-tuples of the numbers in [ 0 , ] , u = u 1 , , u m , v = v 1 , , v m , m N . 0 < u < indicates that 0 < u i < for each i = 1 , , m . Moreover, for u = u 1 , , u m and ϑ R , let u = u 1 , , u m be its conjugate index, that is, and u satisfies 1 / u + 1 / u = 1 . Let
1 u = 1 u 1 , , 1 u m , u ϑ = u 1 ϑ , , u m ϑ
The letter D > 0 is used for various constants, it is independent of the main parameters and maybe change from line to line. We denote a positive constant depending on the indicated parameters A , B , by D A , B . We write ϕ ψ , ϕ D ψ mean that for some constant D > 0 , especially, ϕ ψ indicates that ϕ ψ and ψ ϕ .

2. Definition and Preliminary Lemmas

In this section, to more clearly show the progress from the problem to the solution, we first do some preliminary preparation. Now, we recall some basic notation.
Definition 1.
([28]). Let 0 < t < and v , u ( 1 , ) n . The mixed amalgam spaces ( E v u ) t ( R n ) is defined as the set of all measurable functions f satisfy f L loc 1 ( R n ) ,
( E v u ) t ( R n ) : = f : f ( E v u ) t ( R n ) = f 1 B ( · , t ) L v ( R n ) 1 B ( · , t ) L v ( R n ) L u ( R n ) < ,
where the usual modification when   u i = , i = 1 , , n .
Definition 2.
([23]). Let 0 < t < , 0 < s , β R and v , u ( 1 , ) n .
(1) The homogeneous mixed-norm Herz-slice space ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is defined by
( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) : = f L loc 1 ( R n ) : f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) < ,
and
f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) : = k = 2 k β s f 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s ,
where the usual modification made for s = .
(2) The non-homogeneous mixed-norm Herz-slice space ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is defined by
( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) : = f L loc 1 ( R n ) : f ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) < ,
and
f ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) : = k = 0 2 k β s f 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s ,
where the usual modification made for s = .
Now we introduce ball Banach function spaces. Let y R n and R ( 0 , ) , for B ( y , R ) : = z R n : | y z | < R and
B : = B ( y , R ) : y R n   and   R ( 0 , ) .
Definition 3.
([34]). A quasi-Banach space X K R n is called a ball quasi-Banach function space if it satisfies
(1)
φ X = 0  means that  φ = 0  almost everywhere;
(2)
| ϕ | | φ |  almost everywhere means that  ϕ X φ X ;
(3)
0 φ k φ almost everywhere means that φ k X φ X ;
(4)
B B means that 1 B X with B is as in (5).
and, if the norm of X satisfies the triangle inequality, then X is called a ball Banach function space, namely
(5)
Given φ , ϕ X
φ + ϕ X φ X + ϕ X ,
moreover, let B B . There exists a positive constant D ( B ) , depending on B, such that,
(6)
Given ϕ X
B | ϕ ( x ) | d x D ( B ) ϕ X .
Definition 4.
A quasi-Banach function space X is said to have an absolutely continuous quasi-norm if 1 G j X 0 as j whenever G j j = 1 is a sequence of measurable sets in R n satisfying that G j G j + 1 for any j N and j = 1 G j = .
Definition 5.
(Mollifiers, [35]). Let ψ : R n R be a radial, decreasing, nonnegative function pertain to C c R n and having the properties:
(1)
ψ ( z ) = 0 when | z | 1 ,
(2)
R n ψ ( z ) d z = 1 .
Let η > 0 . Suppose that the function ψ η ( x ) = η n ψ ( z / η ) is nonnegative, pertain to C c R n , and satisfies
(1)
ψ η ( x ) = 0 if | z | η and
(2)
R n ψ η ( x ) d x = 1 , then mollifier is defined the following convolution operator:
Ψ ε ( f ) ( z ) = R n ψ η ( z y ) f ( y ) d y .
In what follows, we give the notion of the following operators.
Definition 6.
([36]). Let 0 < τ , D < . A function K ( x , y ) is called the standard kernel if
(1)
x , y R n , x y ,
| K ( x , y ) | D | x y | n ,
(2)
there exist positive constants  0 < τ 1 ,
K ( x , y ) K u , y D x u τ | x y | + u y n + τ ,
for  x u 1 2 max | x y | , u y .
K ( x , y ) K x , v D y v τ | x y | + x v n + τ ,
for  y v 1 2 max | x y | , x v .
Definition 7
([36]). Let 0 < τ , D < and K satisfying (8), (9), and (10). A Calderón-Zygmund operator associated with K is a linear operator T defined on S R n that admits a bounded extension on L 2 R n ,
T ( f ) L 2 B f L 2 , T ( f ) ( x ) = R n K ( x , y ) f ( y ) d y
with f C c ( R n ) and x supp   ( f ) .
Let us show some crucial lemmas as follow, first, we give Hölder’s inequality on ( E v u ) t ( R n ) .
Lemma 1
([28]). Let 0 < t < and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Suppose that ϕ ( E v u ) t ( R n ) and ψ ( E v u ) t ( R n ) , we have ϕ ψ is integrable and
ϕ ψ L 1 ( R n ) ϕ ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ψ ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ,
with 1 / v + 1 / v = 1 / u + 1 / u = 1 .
Lemma 2
([23]). Let 0 t and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Then the characteristic function on B ( y 0 , λ ) satisfies
1 B ( y 0 , λ ) ( E v u ) t ( R n ) λ i = 1 n 1 u i .
where y 0 R n , 1 < λ < .
Lemma 3
([37], Proposition 2.7). Let ψ η be a mollifier and g L loc 1 R n . We have
sup ε > 0 ψ η g ( x ) M g ( x ) .

3. Main Result

In this part, we first establish the separability of Herz-slice spaces with a mixed-norm, get a weak convergence on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, then, to show the Calderón–Zygmund operator T is bounded on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, we need to indicate that T f is well-defined on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . Furthermore, we get the necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces.
Now, we prove that ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is separable space.
Theorem 1.
Let 0 < t , s < , β R and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Then ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is separable space.
Proof. 
Let ϕ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) and ϖ < , by using Corollary 2, there exist ψ C c R n such that
ϕ ψ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) < ϖ ,
which implies that ψ is uniformly continuous. Thus, there exists dyadic cube Q i i = 1 M sequence and rational number a i i = 1 M sequence such that
ψ i = 1 M a i 1 Q i ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) < ϖ .
Denote Θ is a set of simple functions and
( x ) = i = 1 M a i χ Q i
with Q i i = 1 M is a dyadic cube’s sequence and a i i = 1 M is a rational numbers’s sequence. It suffices to show that is countable and dense in ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . Thus, ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is separable. The proof is complete. □
Theorem 2.
Let 0 < t , s < , β R and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Assume that there exists a positive constant D such that
ϕ l ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) < D ,
then there exists a subsequence ϕ l τ τ = 1 that is weakly convergent in the space ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Proof. 
For 1 < s < , applying ([23], Theorem 3.1), we can see that
( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) = ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Therefore, we only need to explain that there exists a subset ϕ l τ τ = 1 such that for any ψ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ,
lim τ R n ϕ l τ ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x = R n ϕ ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x ,
where ϕ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
By using Theorem 1, suppose that ψ l l = 1 is dense in ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . Denote
Ϝ l ( ψ ) : = ( ϕ l , ψ ) : = R n ϕ l ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x .
Applying the Hölder inequality,
Ϝ l ψ l D ψ l ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n )
Then there exist convergent subsequences Ϝ l , 1 ψ 1 l = 1 via the boundedness of Ϝ l ψ 1 l = 1 . Repeat this step, we get a subsequence Ϝ l , 2 ψ 2 l = 1 of Ϝ l , 1 ψ 2 l = 1 satisfying Ϝ l , 2 ψ 2 l = 1 is convergence. Thus, for ψ l 0 l 0 i there exists a convergent subsequences Ϝ l , i ψ l 0 . After a diagonal process, for any ψ ι , we know that a subsequence Ϝ i , i ψ ι i = 1 is convergence and
Ϝ i , i ( ψ ) = R n ϕ l , i ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x : = R n ϕ l i ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x .
For any ψ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) and ϑ > 0 , there exists ψ ι have
ψ ψ ι ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ϑ / 2 D .
Thus
Ϝ k , k ( ψ ) Ϝ k , k ( ψ ) R n ϕ l k ( x ) ϕ l k ( x ) ψ ι ( x ) d x + R n f l k ( x ) ϕ l k ( x ) ψ ( x ) ψ ι ( x ) d x R n ϕ l k ( x ) ϕ l k ( x ) ψ ι ( x ) d x + ϑ .
If k and k are large enough, then
Ϝ k , k ( ψ ) Ϝ k , k ( ψ ) 2 ϑ ,
therefore, for any ψ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) , Ϝ i , i ( ψ ) i = 1 is a Cauchy sequence. Let Ϝ ( ψ ) = lim i Ϝ i , i ( ψ ) and Ϝ ( ψ ) be a linear bounded functional on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . By using ([23] Theorem 3.1), we see that there exist ϕ ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) such that
R n ϕ ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x = ( ϕ , ψ ) = Ϝ ( ψ ) = lim i Ϝ i , i ( ψ ) = lim i R n ϕ l i ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x ,
the proof is completed. □
In following that, we investigate the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Theorem 3.
Let 0 < t , s < , β R , v , u ( 1 , ) n and i = 1 n 1 / u i < β < n 1 / i = 1 n 1 / u i . If the Caldeón-Zygmund operator T satisfies
(1) 
Given function f, supp   ( f ) S k and | x | 2 k + 1 with k R ,
| T f ( x ) | C f L 1 ( R n ) | x | n ;
(2) 
Given function f, supp   ( f ) S k and | x | 2 k 2 with k R ,
| T f ( x ) | C 2 k n f L 1 ( R n ) .
We have T is bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Before we come to the proof of the above theorem, we should to explain that T f is well-defined on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Lemma 4.
Let 0 < t , s < , β R and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Then ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) has an absolutely continuous quasi-norm.
Proof. 
Let G j j = 1 be a sequence of measurable sets. For any j N , G j G j + 1 and j = 1 G j = . We see that,
1 G j 1 B ( x , t ) L v R n = B ( x , t ) 1 G j ( y ) d y 1 / v ,
when j , we know that 1 G j 1 B ( x , t ) L v R n 0 , which, together with Definition 1, we have
lim j 1 G j ( G v u ) t ( R n ) = lim j 1 G j 1 B ( x , t ) L v ( R n ) 1 B ( x , t ) L v ( R n ) L u = 0 .
By Definition 4, we know that ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) has an absolutely continuous quasi-norm. This accomplishes the desired result. □
Lemma 5.
Let X be a ball quasi-Banach function space having an absolutely continuous quasi-norm and M is bounded on X. If g X , then ψ η g g in X as η 0 + .
Proof. 
Let g X . Then the assertion is trivial. Combining Lemma 3, we have
ψ η g X M g X C g X ,
where ψ η g X for all η > 0 . We know that the class C c R n is dense in X, see [38], where C c R n is continuous functions with compact support. Then there is a function h C c R n such that
g h X < ε .
based on these, when h C c R n , we have ψ η h C c R n for all η > 0 . Namely, ψ η h h uniformly on compact sets as η 0 + . Thus, we get
ψ η h ( x ) h ( x ) 0 ,
with supp ψ η h supp h K , K R n compact. By using Definition 2.1, we get
ψ η h h X < η .
Finally by using (14) and (15),
g ψ η g X g h X + h ψ η h X + ψ η h ψ η g X < C η ,
the proof is complete. □
As a consequence of Lemma 5, we deduce the following result.
Corollary 1.
Let X be a ball quasi-Banach function space having an absolutely continuous quasi-norm. Suppose that M is bounded on X. We have the class C c R n is dense in X.
We know that ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) is ball quasi-Banach function space (see [23], Proposition 3.2). We immediately get the following result, which means that T f is well-defined on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Corollary 2.
Let 0 < t , s < , β R and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Then the class C c R n is dense in ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Proof of Theorem 3.
Let
f ( x ) = m Z f ( x ) 1 S m ( x ) : = m Z f m ( x ) .
By Corollary 2, we know T f is well defined on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) , Observe that
T f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) = k Z 2 k β s T f 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s = k Z 2 k β s m = T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s k Z 2 k β s m = k 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s + k Z 2 k β s m = k 1 k + 1 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s + k Z 2 k β s m = k + 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s : = I + II + III .
First estimate I , using Lemma 1 and (13), we have
m = k 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k 2 f m L 1 ( R n ) 2 k n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 S m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 2 k n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s .
For s ( 0 , 1 ] , we use Lemma 2, we have
I k Z 2 k β s m = k 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 ( m k ) s ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) 1 s m Z 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ,
First estimate s ( 1 , ) , we use Lemma 1 and (13), we know that
m = k 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k 2 f m L 1 ( R n ) 2 k n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 S m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 k n s 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s .
We can estimate I by Lemma 2, we have
I k Z 2 k β s m = k 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 ( k m ) s ( i = 1 n 1 u i n ) 1 s k Z 2 k β s m = k 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 ( k m ) ( i = 1 n 1 u i n ) s / 2 1 s   × m = k 2 2 ( k m ) ( i = 1 n 1 u i n ) s / 2 s / s 1 s f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
We need to pay attention to T is bounded on ( E v u ) t ( R n ) as in Definition 1 (see [29], Corollary 4.1), to estimate II ,
II k Z 2 k β s m = k 1 k + 1 T f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s k Z m = k 1 k + 1 2 ( k m ) β s 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s m Z 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Finally, we to estimate III , we use Lemma 1 and (5.1), we conclude that
m = k + 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k + 2 f m L 1 ( R n ) 2 m n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k + 2 2 m n 1 S k f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 S m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s .
For 0 < s 1 , using Lemma 2, we have
III k Z 2 k β s m = k + 2 2 m n f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 B m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 B k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s k Z 2 k β s m = k + 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 m s ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) 2 m s n 2 k s i = 1 n 1 u i 1 s k Z 2 k β s m = k + 2 2 m β k β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Using Lemma 1 and (12), we know that
m = k + 2 T f m 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k + 2 f m L 1 ( R n ) 2 m n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s m = k + 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 S m ( E u u ) t ( R n ) 2 m n 1 S k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s .
For 1 < s < , by Lemma 2 yields
III k Z 2 k β s 2 m n m = k + 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 B m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 B k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s k Z 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 s f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ,
we got what we want. □
The following theorem aims is to give the necessary conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces.
Theorem 4.
Let 0 < t < and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Let b BMO ( R n ) . T be an Calderón–Zygmund operator satisfies the local size condition
| T f ( x ) | C | x | n R n | f ( y ) | d y
where f L 1 ( R n ) ,   supp f A k , and | x | 2 k + 1 with k Z , and the condition
| T f ( x ) | C 2 k n f L 1 ( R n )
where f L 1 ( R n ) , supp f A k and | x | 2 k 2 with k Z . We have [ b , T ] is also bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) , provided that i = 1 n 1 / u i < β < n i = 1 n 1 / u i and 0 < s < .
Before we come to the proof of the above Theorem, we need give the boundedness of M b on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Lemma 6.
Let 0 < t , s < , v , u ( 1 , ) n and i = 1 n 1 / u i < β < n i = 1 n 1 / u i . Let b BMO ( R n ) . For any f L loc 1 R n , then M b is bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Proof. 
By [23], Lemma 5.1, we find that M b f is well defined on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . Set f = m = f 1 m m = f m . We write
M b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) = k = 2 k β s M b f 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s C k = 2 k β s m = k 3 M b f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s + C k = 2 k β s m = k 2 k + 2 M b f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s + C k = 2 k β s m = k + 3 M b f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s : = I + II + III .
For the part of II , by using [29], Theorem 2.4, we get
II C k = 2 k β s m = k 2 k + 2 f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s C f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
For I , denote b m is the mean value of b on B 0 , 2 m . Observe that if m k 3 , from the properties of BMO ( R n ) functions (see Stein [30]), by Lemma 1 and Remark 1, we have
  M b f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C 2 k n b ( x ) b ( · ) ) · ( f m ( · ) 1 A m L 1 ( R n ) 1 A k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C 2 k n f m L 1 R n ( b ( · ) b m ) 1 A k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) + C 2 k ( m = 1 n 1 u i n ) f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ( b m b ( · ) ) 1 A m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C b 2 ( m k ) ( n m = 1 n 1 u i ) ( k m ) f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) .
Therefore, for s ( 0 , 1 ] ,
I C b k = m = k 3 2 m β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 2 ( k m ) ( β n + i = 1 n 1 u m ) ( k m ) s 1 / s C b m = 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s × k = m + 3 2 ( k m ) ( β ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) ) s ( k m ) s 1 / s C b m = 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s = C b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
For s ( 1 , ) , using Hölder’s inequality can deduce that
I C b k = m = k 3 2 m β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 2 ( k m ) ( β ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) ) ( k m ) s 1 / s
C b k = m = k 3 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 2 ( k m ) ( β ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) ) s / 2 1 / s × m = k 3 ( k m ) s s / s 2 ( k m ) ( β ( n i = 1 n 1 u i ) ) s 2 1 / s C b m = 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s = C b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Since β < n i = 1 n 1 / u i . For part of III , when m k + 3 and x A k , we have
M b f m ( x ) C 2 m n A m | b ( x ) b ( y ) | · f m ( y ) d y C 2 m n b ( x ) b k · f m L 1 R n + C 2 m n A m b k b ( y ) · | f ( y ) | d y .
Thus, by Lemmas 1 and 2, we can see that
M b f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C b 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) + C b 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i ( m k ) f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C b 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i ( m k ) f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) .
Hence, when s ( 0 , 1 ] ,
III C b k = m = k + 3 2 m β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ( m k ) 2 ( m k ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s 1 / s C b m = 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s k = m 3 ( m k ) s 2 ( k m ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s 1 / s = C b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
For s ( 1 , ) , using the Hölder inequality, we have
III C b k = m = k + 3 2 m β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ( m k ) 2 ( m k ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s 1 / s C b k = m = k + 3 2 m β s f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s · 2 ( m k ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s 2 1 / s × k = m = k + 3 ( m k ) s 2 ( m k ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s / 2 s / s 1 / s = C b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Because β > i = 1 n 1 / u i . We got what we want. □
In what follows, we show commutators [ b , T ] is also bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Proof of Theorem 4.
Write f = m = f 1 m : = m = f m . We then have
[ b , T ] f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) = k = 2 k β s [ b , T ] f 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s C k = 2 k β s [ b , T ] m = k 3 f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s + C k = 2 k β s [ b , T ] m = k 2 k + 2 f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s + C k = 2 k β s [ b , T ] m = k + 3 f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s : = I + II + III .
For II , since [ b , T ] is bounded on ( E v u ) t ( R n ) in [29], we have
II C k = 2 k β s m = k 2 k + 2 f m E v u ) t ( R n s 1 / s C f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
For I , when x A k and j k 3 , using (16), we get
[ b , T ] m = k 3 f m ( x ) C | x | n | b ( x ) b ( y ) | · m = k 3 f m ( y ) d y C M b f ( x ) .
Therefore, by Lemma 6,
I C M b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) C f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
For part of III , when x A k , y A m and m k + 3 , then 2 | x | < | y | . Therefore,
[ b , T ] m = k + 3 f m ( x ) C 2 | x | < | y | | b ( x ) b ( y ) | · | y | n · | f ( y ) | d y : = C T b 1 ( | f | ) ( x ) .
Set 1 < s < and
T b 0 g ( x ) = | x | n | y | < 2 | x | | b ( x ) b ( y ) | g ( y ) d y .
Thus, by Corollary 3.1,
III C T b 1 ( | f | ) ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) = C sup g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) 1 T b 1 ( | f | ) , g = C sup g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) 1 | f | , T b 0 g C f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) sup g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . 1 M b g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
By Lemma 6, we have
M b g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) C g ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Thus,
III C f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
Now let 0 < s 1 . By Lemma 1 and (17), we first deduced that, when m k + 3 ,
[ b , T ] f m 1 k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C | b ( · ) b k | · | T f m ( · ) | 1 A k ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C b 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) + C 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) · ( b ( · ) b k ) 1 B ( 0 , 2 m ) ( E v u ) t ( R n ) 1 B ( 0 , 2 m ) ( E v u ) t ( R n ) C b 2 ( k m ) i = 1 n 1 u i ( m k ) f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) .
By this and (1.1), we have
III C b k = m = k + 3 2 m β f m ( E v u ) t ( R n ) ( m k ) 2 ( m k ) ( β + i = 1 n 1 u i ) s 1 / s C b k = 2 k β s f k ( E r u ) t ( R n ) s 1 / s = C b f ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) .
because β > i = 1 n 1 / u i . This accomplishes the desired result. □
Finally, we prove the other side, namely, the sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces.
Theorem 5.
Let i = 1 n 1 / u i < β < n i = 1 n 1 / u i , 0 < t , s < and v , u ( 1 , ) n . Let T be an Calderón–Zygmund operator with K ( x ) satisfying (9), (10), and K ( x ) C S n 1 . Let b be a locally integrable function. If [ b , T ] is bounded on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) , then b BMO ( R n ) .
Using a similar way of [23], Proposition 3.2, we immediately have the following lemma.
Lemma 7.
Let 0 < t , s < and v , u ( 1 , ) n . If i = 1 n 1 / u i < β < n i = 1 n 1 / u i , then the characteristic function on B ( y 0 , R 0 ) satisfies
1 B ( y 0 , R 0 ) ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) 1 B ( y 0 , R 0 ) ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) R 0 n ,
where y 0 R n , 1 < R 0 < .
Proof of Theorem 5.
Suppose that boundedness of commutator [ b , T ] on ( K ˙ E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) . We use the same method as Janson [39]. Let us take 0 z 0 R n and ρ > 0 such that 0 B ( z 0 , n ρ ) . Then for x B ( z 0 , n ρ ) , K ( x ) C ( B ( z 0 , n ρ ) ) such that K ( x ) 1 can be written as the absolutely convergent Fourier series,
K ( x ) 1 = m Z n a m e i < v m , x > .
with a m < , where the exact form of the vectors v m is unrelated, then we have the expansion
K ( x ) 1 = ρ n K ( ρ x ) = ρ n a m e i v m , ρ x   for   x z 0 ρ 1 < n .
Given cubes Q = Q x 0 , r and Q = Q x 0 r z 0 / ρ , r , if x Q and y Q , then
x y r z 0 ρ x x 0 r + y x 0 r z 0 ρ r < n .
Let T ( x ) = sgn   B ¯ and B = Q ( b ( x ) b ( y ) ) d y . Then
Q b ( x ) b Q d x = 1 Q Q | B | d x = 1 | Q | Q Q T ( x ) ( b ( x ) b ( y ) ) d y d x = R n R n ( b ( x ) b ( y ) ) K ( x y ) a m e i v m , x y r s ( x ) 1 Q ( x ) 1 Q ( y ) d y d x .
Setting g m ( y ) = e i v m , y r 1 Q ( y ) and h m ( x ) = e i v m , x r s ( x ) 1 Q ( x ) , we have
Q b ( x ) b Q d x = a m R n R n ( b ( x ) b ( y ) ) K ( x y ) g m ( y ) h m ( x ) d y d x = a m R n [ b , T ] g m ( x ) h m ( x ) d x .
Applying Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 7, we have
1 | Q | Q b ( x ) b Q d x 2 | Q | Q b ( x ) b Q d x 2 | Q | m Z n a m [ b , T ] f m ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) g m ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) 2 | Q | m Z n a m f m ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) g m ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) × [ b , T ] ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) [ b , T ] ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ( K E u , v β , s ) t ( R n ) ,
then b BMO ( R n ) . This completes the conclusion. □

4. Conclusions

We obtain the separable of on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, establish a weak convergence of on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces, and get the boundedness of the Calderón–Zygmund operator T on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces. Moreover, we get the necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the commutator [ b , T ] on mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equality and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12061069).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All authors would like to express their thanks to the referees for valuable advice regarding previous version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beurling, A. Construction and analysis of some convolution algebras. Ann. Inst. Fourier 1964, 14, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Herz, C.S. Lipschitz spaces and Bernstein’s theorem on absolutely convergent Fourier series. J. Math. Mech. 1968, 18, 283–324. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, S.; Yang, D.C. The decomposition of the weighted Herz spaces on Rn and its applications. Sci. China Ser. A 1995, 38, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chikami, N. On Gagliardo-Nirenberg type inequalities in Fourier-Herz spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 2018, 275, 1138–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Houamed, H. Well-posedness and long time behavior for the electron inertial Hall-MHD system in Besov and Kato-Herz spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 501, 125–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Yang, D.C. Boundedness of some sublinear operators on Herz spaces. Ill. J. Math. 1996, 40, 484–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Min, D.; Wu, G.; Yao, Z. Global well-posedness of strong solution to 2D MHD equations in critical Fourier-Herz spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 504, 125–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, H. Some estimates for Bochner-Riesz operators on the weighted Herz-type Hardy spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 381, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gröchenig, K. Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis. Appl. Comput. Harmon. A 2001.
  10. Weisz, F. Gabor analysis and Hardy spaces. East J. Approx. 2009, 15, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  11. Heil, C.E. An introduction to weighted Wiener amalgams. In Wavelets and their Applications; Krishna, M., Radha, R., Thangavelu, S., Eds.; Allied Publishers Private Limited: Mumbai, India, 2003; pp. 183–216. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wiener, N. On the representation of functions by trigonometric integrals. Math. Z. 1926, 24, 575–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holland, F. Harmonic analysis on amalgams of Lp and q. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1975, 2, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feichtinger, H.G.; Gröbner, P. Banach spaces of distributions defined by decomposition methods. Math. Nachr. 1985, 123, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feichtinger, H.G. Banach spaces of distributions defined by decomposition methods. II. Math. Nachr. 1987, 132, 207–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feichtinger, H.G. Generalized amalgams and its applications to Fourier transforms. Can. J. Math. 1990, 42, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feichtinger, H.G.; Weisz, F. Wiener amalgams and pointwise summability of Fourier transforms and Fourier series. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2006, 140, 509–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weisz, F. Convergence of the inverse continuous wavelet transform in Wiener amalgam spaces. Analysis 2015, 35, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Auscher, P.; Mourgoglou, M. Representation and uniqueness for boundary value elliptic problems via first order systems. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 2019, 35, 241–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Auscher, P.; Prisuelos-Arribas, C. Tent space boundedness via extrapolation. Math. Z. 2017, 286, 1575–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.Y.; Yang, D.C.; Yuan, W.; Wang, S.B. Real-variable characterizations of Orlicz-slice Hardy Spaces. Anal. Appl. 2019, 17, 597–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.B. Herz-slice spaces and applications. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2204.08635v1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, L.H.; Zhou, J. Mixed-norm Herz-slice spaces and their applications. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.12013v1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Benedek, A.; Panzone, R. The space Lp, with mixed norm. Duke Math. J. 1961, 28, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hörmander, L. Estimates for translation invariant operators in Lp spaces. Acta Math. 1960, 104, 93–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Antonić, N.; Ivec, I. On the Hörmander-Mihlin theorem for mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 433, 176–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krylov, N.V. Parabolic equations with VMO coefficients in Sobolev spaces with mixed norms. Funct. Anal. 2007, 250, 521–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.K.; Zhou, J. Mixed-norm amalgam spaces and their predual. Symmetry 2022, 14, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.B. Operators on mixed-norm amalgam spaces via extrapolation. J. Contemp. Math. Anal. Armen. Acad. Sci. 2022, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stein, E.M.; Murphy, T.S. Harmonic Analysis: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  31. Llinares, A.; Vukotić, D. Contractive inequalities for mixed norm spaces and the Beta function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2022, 509, 125–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Clavero, N.; Soria, J. Mixed norm spaces and rearrangement invariant estimates. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 419, 878–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, Y.; Yang, D.C.; Zhang, Y.Y. Mixed-norm Herz spaces and their applications in related Hardy spaces. Anal. Appl. 2022, 21, 1131–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sawano, Y.; Ho, K.-P.; Yang, D.C.; Wang, S.B. Hardy spaces for ball quasi-Banach function spaces. Diss. Math. 2017, 525, 1–102. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aydin, I. Weighted variable Sobolev spaces and capacity. J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 2012, 2012, 132690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grafakos, L. Classical Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Duoandikoetxea, J. Fourier Analysis. Grad. Stud. Math. Am. Math. Soc. 2001, 29, xviii+222. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tao, J.; Yang, D.C.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, Y.Y. Compactness characterizations of commutators on ball Banach function spaces. Potential Anal. 2023, 58, 645–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Janson, S. Mean oscillation and commutators of singular integral operators. Ark. Mat. 1978, 16, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Zhou, J. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Commutator of the Calderón–Zygmund Operator on Mixed-Norm Herz-Slice Spaces. Axioms 2023, 12, 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090875

AMA Style

Zhang L, Zhou J. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Commutator of the Calderón–Zygmund Operator on Mixed-Norm Herz-Slice Spaces. Axioms. 2023; 12(9):875. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090875

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Lihua, and Jiang Zhou. 2023. "Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Commutator of the Calderón–Zygmund Operator on Mixed-Norm Herz-Slice Spaces" Axioms 12, no. 9: 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop