Next Article in Journal
The Existence and Representation of the Solutions to the System of Operator Equations AiXBi + CiYDi + EiZFi = Gi(i = 1, 2)
Previous Article in Journal
On Bivariate Distributions with Singular Part
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Two-Variable Analogue Matrix of Bessel Polynomials and Their Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Harmonic Series with Multinomial Coefficient 4nn,n,n,n and Central Binomial Coefficient 2nn

1
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou 466001, China
2
Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2024, 13(7), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13070434
Submission received: 10 May 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Special Functions)

Abstract

:
Classical hypergeometric series are reformulated as analytic functions of their parameters (in both the numerator and the denominator). Then, the coefficient extraction method is applied to examine hypergeometric series transformations. Several new closed form evaluations are established for harmonic series containing multinomial coefficient 4 n n , n , n , n and central binomial coefficient 2 n n . These results exclusively concern the alternating series of convergence rate “ 1 / 4 ”.

1. Introduction and Outline

Harmonic numbers have a very long history that can be traced back to Euler, who initiated his investigation in the course of a correspondence with Goldbach in 1742. Nowadays, these numbers appear frequently in the literature of mathematics (particularly number theory [1,2,3] and combinatorial analysis [4,5]), physics (standing waves in strings [6]), and computer science (analysis of algorithms [7]), just for examples. They are defined, for m , n N 0 , by partial sums
H n m = k = 0 n 1 1 ( k + 1 ) m , O n m = k = 0 n 1 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) m ; H ¯ n m = k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) m , O ¯ n m = k = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) m .
When m = 1 , it will be suppressed by the above notation. These numbers satisfy the following two simple but useful relations:
H 2 n m = O n m + 2 m H n m and H ¯ 2 n m = O n m 2 m H n m .
For an indeterminate x and n N 0 , the rising factorial is defined by
( x ) 0 1 and ( x ) n = x ( x + 1 ) ( x + n 1 ) for x N .
Denote by [ x m ] ϕ ( x ) the coefficient of x m in the formal power series ϕ ( x ) . When n N , it is almost routine to check that
H n = [ x ] n ! ( 1 x ) n = [ x ] ( 1 + x ) n n ! , 2 O n = [ x ] ( 1 2 ) n ( 1 2 x ) n = [ x ] ( 1 2 + x ) n ( 1 2 ) n .
By means of the generating function approach (see Wilf [8]), it is not difficult to establish the following general formulae (cf. Chu [9]):
[ x m ] n ! ( 1 x ) n = Ω m H n k and [ x m ] ( 1 x ) n n ! = Ω m H n k , [ x m ] ( 1 2 ) n ( 1 2 x ) n = Ω m 2 k O n k and [ x m ] ( 1 2 x ) n ( 1 2 ) n = Ω m 2 k O n k ;
where the Bell polynomials (cf. [10] §3.3) are expressed by the multiple sum
Ω m T k = [ x m ] exp k 1 x k k T k = Λ ( m ) k = 1 m T k j k j k ! k j k ,
with Λ ( m ) denoting the set of m-partitions represented by m-tuples ( j 1 , j 2 , , j m ) N 0 m subject to the linear condition k = 1 m k j k = m . The first five polynomials are recorded as follows:
Ω 1 T k = T 1 , Ω 2 T k = 1 2 T 1 2 + T 2 , Ω 3 T k = 1 6 T 1 3 + 3 T 2 T 1 + 2 T 3 , Ω 4 T k = 1 24 T 1 4 + 6 T 2 T 1 2 + 8 T 3 T 1 + 3 T 2 2 + 6 T 4 , Ω 5 T k = 1 120 T 1 5 + 10 T 2 T 1 3 + 20 T 3 T 1 2 + 15 T 2 2 T 1 + 30 T 4 T 1 + 20 T 2 T 3 + 24 T 5 .
There exist different techniques to deal with infinite series with harmonic numbers, for example, Abel’s lemma on summation by parts (cf. [11,12,13]), integral computations (cf. [14,15,16,17,18]), and the Legendre–Fourier series (cf. [19,20,21]). During the course of our investigation, we find that the “coefficient extraction” method (cf. [9,22]) based on the hypergeometric series is more powerful. For a given hypergeometric series equality, this approach consists of the three main steps below:
  • Reformulate the equality by identifying a variable “x” and eventual parameters { a , b , c } so that both sides of the resulting equality are analytic in x at x = 0 .
  • Determine the formal equality by extracting across the equality and then equating the coefficients W m ( a , b , c ) for a fixed monomial x m .
  • Find infinite series identities by computing the coefficients W m ( a , b , c ) for particularly specified values of parameters { a , b , c } .
As sample series, we highlight in advance the following eight representative ones:
n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 5 + 12 n 1 + 2 n ( 3 + 20 n ) H n = 24 ln 2 π , ( Equation ( 2 ) ) n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 1 + 12 n 1 + 2 n 2 ( 3 + 20 n ) O n = 8 ln 2 π , ( Equation ( 3 ) ) n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 4 n n 3 2 ( 3 + 10 n ) n O n 2 = ζ ( 3 ) , ( Equation ( 8 ) ) n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n ( 1 4 n ) ( 3 4 n ) n 4 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 H n 2 = 0 , ( Equation ( 4 ) ) n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 1 + 6 n 32 n 2 n 3 ( 2 n 1 ) + 4 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 O n 2 = 14 ζ ( 3 ) , ( Equation ( 5 ) ) n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 3 n n 3 + 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) O 2 n + 1 = ζ ( 3 ) 2 , ( Equation ( 6 ) ) n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 4 n 4 n 4 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) O n 2 = π 4 360 , ( Equation ( 7 ) ) n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 n 5 4 O n 2 n 3 + 4 ( 3 + 10 n ) n ( 1 + 4 n ) ( O n 2 ) 2 O n 4 = ζ ( 5 ) , ( Equation ( 9 ) )
where we have employed the notations for the Riemann zeta function
ζ ( z ) = n = 1 1 n z for ( z ) > 1
and the multinomial coefficient
n 1 + n 2 + + n m n 1 , n 2 , , n m = ( k = 1 m n k ) ! k = 1 m n k ! , in particular , m + n n = m + n m , n .
Throughout the paper, the classical hypergeometric series (cf. Bailey [23]) is defined by
F m 1 + m a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , , a m b 1 , b 2 , , b m | z = k = 0 z k ( a 0 ) k ( a 1 ) k ( a 2 ) k ( a m ) k k ! ( b 1 ) k ( b 2 ) k ( b m ) k ,
where we assume that | z | < 1 and that none of the parameters { a i , b j } is a non-positive integer, so that the series is well-defined and convergent. When a hypergeometric series admits a closed formula, it is generally expressed in terms of the Γ -function quotient (cf. [23,24,25]):
Γ α , β , , γ A , B , , C = Γ ( α ) Γ ( β ) Γ ( γ ) Γ ( A ) Γ ( B ) Γ ( C ) ,
where the Γ -function is defined by the Euler integral
Γ ( x ) = 0 τ x 1 e τ d τ for ( x ) > 0 .
Its logarithmic differentiation results in the digamma function (cf. Rainville [26] §9):
ψ ( z ) = d d z ln Γ ( z ) = Γ ( z ) Γ ( z ) = γ + n = 0 z 1 ( n + 1 ) ( n + z ) ,
with the Euler–Mascheroni constant being given by the limit
γ = lim n H n ln n 0.57721566490 .
By introducing two further sequences of zeta-variants
σ 1 = γ and σ m = ζ ( m ) for m 2 , τ 1 = γ + 2 ln 2 and τ m = ( 2 m 1 ) ζ ( m ) for m 2 ,
we then have the power series expansions of the Γ -function [22]
Γ ( 1 x ) = exp k 1 σ k k x k , Γ ( 1 2 x ) = π exp k 1 τ k k x k ,
which will be crucial for extracting coefficients from the Γ -function quotients.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The next section constitutes the central part of the paper, where the transformation formula previously published by the second author (see [27] Theorem 2.13) will be examined by employing the “coefficient extraction” method, which leads us to numerous infinite series identities with the multinomial coefficient 4 n n , n , n , n . Finally, the paper will end with Section 3, where a brief concluding discussion will be given.

2. Infinite Series of Convergence Rate  “ 1 / 4

Ten years ago, the second author (see [27] Theorem 2.13) found an accelerating formula between a slowly convergent series (with the convergence rate “1”) and a faster convergent one (with the convergence rate “ 1 / 4 ”), which can be reproduced as in the lemma below.
Lemma 1.
For four parameters { a , b , c , d } C satisfying the condition ( c + d a b ) > 1 , the following transformation holds:
k = 0 ( a ) k ( b ) k ( c ) k ( d ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( a ) n ( c b ) n ( d a ) n ( d b ) 2 n ( c ) n ( d ) 2 n + 1 ( c + d a b 1 ) 2 n + 2 W n ( a , b , c , d ) ,
where the cubic polynomial W n ( a , b , c , d ) is given by
W n ( a , b , c , d ) = ( d + 2 n ) ( c + d a b + 2 n ) ( c + d b 1 + 3 n ) ( a + n ) ( c b + n ) ( d b + 2 n ) .
By means of the “coefficient extraction” method, this transformation will be utilized to evaluate the infinite series containing both harmonic numbers and the multinomial coefficient 4 n n , n , n , n . In order to reformulate the series with respect to k on the left to an analytic function with a fixed variable, we shall frequently make use of Thomae’s transformation formula (cf. Bailey [23] §3.2), which is recorded as below:
F 2 3 a , c , e b , d 1 = F 2 3 b a , d a , Δ c + Δ , e + Δ 1 Γ ( Δ ) Γ ( b ) Γ ( d ) Γ ( a ) Γ ( c + Δ ) Γ ( e + Δ ) ,
where Δ = b + d a c e denotes the parameter excess.

2.1. a 1 2 + a x ,   b 1 2 + b x ,   c 1 + c x ,   d 1 + d x

Hereafter, we suppose that x is always a variable. Under the parameter setting in the title, the transformation in Lemma 1 can be written equivalently as
x ( c + d a b ) k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 + c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n 1 2 + a x , 1 2 + b x , 1 + c x , 1 + d x × ( 1 2 + a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + c x ) n ( 1 2 a x + d x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 1 .
According to D’Alembert’s ratio test, the series on the left diverges when x 0 . We have to reformulate it by means of Thomae’s transformation (1) as below, so that it can be expanded into Maclaurin series in x:
x ( c + d a b ) k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 + c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = x ( c + d a b ) F 2 3 1 , 1 2 + a x , 1 2 + b x 1 + c x , 1 + d x 1 = F 2 3 c x , d x , x ( c + d a b ) 1 2 + x ( c + d a ) , 1 2 + x ( c + d b ) 1 Γ 1 + c x , 1 + d x , 1 + x ( c + d a b ) 1 2 + x ( c + d a ) , 1 2 + x ( c + d b ) .
By substitution, we have derived the following transformation formula.
Proposition 1
(Functional equality).
n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n 1 2 + a x , 1 2 + b x , 1 + c x , 1 + d x ( 1 2 + a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + c x ) n ( 1 2 a x + d x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 1 = F 2 3 c x , d x , x ( c + d a b ) 1 2 + x ( c + d a ) , 1 2 + x ( c + d b ) | 1 Γ 1 + c x , 1 + d x , 1 + x ( c + d a b ) 1 2 + x ( c + d a ) , 1 2 + x ( c + d b ) .
Observing that this is an analytic equality around x = 0 , we can expand both sides into Maclaurin series in x. Let A m ( a , b , c , d ) stand for the resulting equality from the coefficients of x m extracted across the above equality. As a couple of examples, we illustrate how to deduce infinite series identities from the above transformation.
First, letting b = d = 0 in Proposition 1, we can reformulate the resulting expression as
Γ 1 + c x , 1 + c x a x 1 2 + c x , 1 2 + c x a x = n = 0 4 n n , n , n , n W n 1 2 + a x , 1 2 , 1 + c x , 1 ( 1024 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 × ( 1 2 + a x ) n ( 1 2 a x ) n ( 1 2 + c x ) n n ! ( 2 n + 1 ) ! ( 1 2 ) n 3 ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 a x + c x ) 2 n + 1 .
By extracting the coefficient of x across the above equation and then making some simplifications, we obtain the equality
2 ( a 2 c ) ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 3 a 7 c + 12 n ( a c ) 8 ( 2 n + 1 ) H n 16 ( 3 + 20 n ) ( a 3 c ) O n 8 ( 3 + 20 n ) ( a + c ) .
By assigning “ a = 1 , c = 1 ” and “ a = 3 , c = 1 ”, we find the two summation formulae:
A 1 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 ) 24 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 5 + 12 n 1 + 2 n ( 3 + 20 n ) H n ,
A 1 ( 3 , 0 , 1 , 0 ) 8 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 1 + 12 n 1 + 2 n 2 ( 3 + 20 n ) O n .
We point out that (2) and (3) refine the following conjecture by Sun [28] (Conjecture 3.23):
56 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 12 + ( 3 + 20 n ) H 2 n 3 H n .
By carrying out the same process, we can further establish the infinite series identities:
  • A 0 ( a , b , c , d ) Ramanujan [29]
    8 π = n = 0 4 n n , n , n , n 3 + 20 n ( 1024 ) n .
  • A 1 ( 1 , 0 , 0 , 0 )
    16 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 3 ( 1 + 4 n ) 1 + 2 n ( 3 + 20 n ) H 2 n .
  • A 1 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    8 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 2 1 + 2 n + ( 3 + 20 n ) H ¯ 2 n .
  • A 1 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 )
    8 ln 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 3 + 8 n 1 + 2 n + 2 ( 3 + 20 n ) O 2 n .
  • A 2 ( 1 , 1 , 0 , 1 )
    4 π 3 = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 3 ( 1 + 4 n ) ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 + 3 + 20 n 4 ( H n 2 12 O n 2 ) .
  • A 2 ( 1 3 , 4 , 3 + 3 , 4 )
    38 π 3 216 ln 2 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 6 ( 1 + 4 n ) ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 + 6 ( 5 + 12 n ) H n 1 + 2 n ( 3 + 20 n ) ( H n 2 + 3 H n 2 ) .
  • A 2 ( 1 3 3 , 4 , 1 3 , 4 )
    3 π 4 ln 2 2 π = n = 0 1 1024 n 4 n n , n , n , n 11 ( 1 + 4 n ) ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 + 2 ( 1 + 12 n ) O n 1 + 2 n + 2 ( 3 + 20 n ) ( 3 O n 2 O n 2 ) .

2.2. a a x 1 2 ,   b b x 1 2 ,   c c x 1 2 ,   d d x 1 2

Under this parameter setting, the transformation in Lemma 1 can be restated as follows:
k = 0 ( a x 1 2 ) k ( b x 1 2 ) k ( c x 1 2 ) k ( d x 1 2 ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n a x 1 2 , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 × ( a x 1 2 ) n ( c x b x ) n ( d x a x ) n ( d x b x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x 1 2 ) 2 n + 1 ( c x + d x a x b x 1 ) 2 n + 2 .
Since the series on the left diverges when x 0 , we have to reformulate it so that it can be expanded into Maclaurin series in x. Denoting by L α ( k ) and R α ( n ) the summands on the left and the right
L α ( k ) = ( a x 1 2 ) k ( b x 1 2 ) k ( c x 1 2 ) k ( d x 1 2 ) k , R α ( n ) = ( 1 ) n W n a x 1 2 , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 × ( a x 1 2 ) n ( c x b x ) n ( d x a x ) n ( d x b x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x 1 2 ) 2 n + 1 ( c x + d x a x b x 1 ) 2 n + 2 ,
we can restate the above equality as
L α ( 0 ) R α ( 0 ) + L α ( 1 ) k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 2 + c x ) k ( 1 2 + d x ) k = n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n a x 1 2 , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 × ( a x 1 2 ) n ( c x b x ) n ( d x a x ) n ( d x b x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x 1 2 ) 2 n + 1 ( c x + d x a x b x 1 ) 2 n + 2 ,
where the difference of the initial terms can be factorized into
L α ( 0 ) R α ( 0 ) = ( 1 2 a x ) c + d a b + 2 a d x + 2 b 2 x 2 b c x 2 d 2 x 2 ( 1 2 d x ) ( a + b c d ) ( 1 + a x + b x c x d x ) .
According to Thomae’s transformation (1), the series on the left can be reformulated as follows:
k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 2 + c x ) k ( 1 2 + d x ) k = F 2 3 1 , 1 2 + a x , 1 2 + b x 1 2 + c x , 1 2 + d x 1 = Γ 1 2 + c x , 1 2 + d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 x ( c + d a ) 1 2 , x ( c + d b ) 1 2 × F 2 3 c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 , x ( c + d a b ) 1 x ( c + d a ) 1 2 , x ( c + d b ) 1 2 1 .
By making a substitution, we derive, after dividing by ( a x 1 2 ) ( c x b x ) ( d x a x ) ( d x b x ) ( 1 2 c x ) ( 1 2 d x ) ( a x + b x c x d x ) 2 across the resulting expression, the transformation formula as in the following proposition.
Proposition 2
(Functional equality).
n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n a x 1 2 , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 ( 1 2 + a x ) n 1 ( 1 a x + d x ) n 1 ( 1 b x + c x ) n 1 ( 1 + d x b x ) 2 n ( d x b x + 2 n ) ( 1 2 + c x ) n 1 ( 1 2 + d x ) 2 n ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n = ( 1 2 c x ) c + d a b + 2 a d x + 2 b 2 x 2 b c x 2 d 2 x 4 x 2 ( a d ) ( b c ) ( b d ) + Γ 1 2 + c x , 1 2 + d x , 1 + x ( c + d a b ) 1 2 + c x + d x a x , 1 2 + c x + d x b x × F 2 3 c x 1 2 , d x 1 2 , x ( c + d a b ) 1 x ( c + d a ) 1 2 , x ( c + d b ) 1 2 1 ( 1 2 b x ) ( 1 2 + a x c x d x ) ( 1 2 + b x c x d x ) x 3 ( a d ) ( b c ) ( b d ) .
Denoting by B m ( a , b , c , d ) the resulting equality from the coefficients of x m extracted across the above equation, we derive the following infinite series identities.
  • B 0 ( a , b , c , d )
    4 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 .
  • B 1 ( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 4 ( 2 n 1 ) n 2 + ( 2 n 1 ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 O 2 n .
  • B 1 ( 0 , 1 , 1 , 0 )
    2 π 2 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 30 n 3 64 n 2 n 2 ( 2 n 1 ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 H n + 6 O n .
  • B 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n ( 1 4 n ) ( 3 4 n ) n 4 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 H n 2 .
  • J { B 2 ( 1 , 2 2 , 1 + 2 2 , 0 ) }
    14 ζ ( 3 ) = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 1 + 6 n 32 n 2 n 3 ( 2 n 1 ) + 4 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 O n 2 .
  • B 2 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 2 n 2 8 ( 2 n 1 ) n 2 O 2 n + ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 O 2 n 2 + O 2 n 2 .
  • B 3 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 2 O 2 n 3 + O 2 n 3 + 3 O 2 n O 2 n 2 + 6 n 2 O 2 n 12 ( 2 n 1 ) n 2 ( O 2 n 2 + O 2 n 2 ) .
  • lim b 0 B 3 ( 1 , b , 1 , b ) / b
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 4 ( 1 2 n ) n 4 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 O 2 n H n 2 + ( 1 4 n ) ( 3 4 n ) n 4 O 2 n 4 ( 1 2 n ) n 2 H n 2 .
  • B 4 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n 2 ( 1 4 n ) ( 3 4 n ) n 4 H n 1 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) n 2 ( H n 2 ) 2 H n 4 .
  • B 6 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 16 ) n 4 n n , n , 2 n ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 10 n ) 6 n 2 ( H n 2 ) 3 3 H n 2 H n 4 + 2 H n 6 + ( 3 4 n ) ( 1 4 n ) n 4 H n 1 2 n 2 ( H n 2 ) 2 H n 4 2 .

2.3. a a x ,   b b x 1 2 ,   c c x 1 2 ,   d d x

Under this parameter setting, the transformation in Lemma 1 becomes
k = 0 ( a x ) k ( b x 1 2 ) k ( c x 1 2 ) k ( d x ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n a x , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x × ( a x ) n ( b x + c x ) n ( a x + d x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 2 .
Denoting by L β ( k ) and R β ( n ) the summands respectively on the left and the right as
L β ( k ) = ( a x ) k ( b x 1 2 ) k ( c x 1 2 ) k ( d x ) k , R β ( n ) = ( 1 ) n W n a x , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x × ( a x ) n ( b x + c x ) n ( a x + d x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 2 ,
we can rewrite the above equality as
L β ( 0 ) R β ( 0 ) + L β ( 1 ) k = 0 ( 1 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 2 + c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n a x , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x ( a x ) n ( c x b x ) n ( d x a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( c x 1 2 ) n ( d x ) 2 n + 1 ( c x + d x a x b x 1 ) 2 n + 2 ,
where the difference of the initial terms can be decomposed into
L β ( 0 ) R β ( 0 ) = a c b + 2 b 2 x 2 b c x + 2 a d x 2 d 2 x 2 d ( a + b c d ) ( 1 + a x + b x c x d x ) .
According to Thomae’s transformation (1), the series on the left can be expressed as
k = 0 ( 1 + a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 2 + c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = F 2 3 1 , 1 + a x , 1 2 + b x 1 2 + c x , 1 + d x 1 = F 2 3 d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 , c x 1 2 c x + d x b x , c x + d x a x 1 2 1 × Γ 1 + d x , 1 2 + c x , c x + d x a x b x 1 c x + d x b x , c x + d x a x 1 2 .
By making substitutions first and then multiplying d ( c x 1 2 ) ( a x + b x c x d x ) 2 a ( a x d x ) ( b x c x ) across the resulting equation, we find, after some simplifications, the transformation as in the proposition below.
Proposition 3
(Functional equality).
n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n a x , b x 1 2 , c x 1 2 , d x ( 1 + a x ) n ( 1 + c x b x ) n ( 1 + d x a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + d x ) 2 n ( n + a x ) ( n b x + c x ) ( n a x + d x ) ( 1 2 + c x ) n 1 ( 1 + d x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x + d x a x b x ) 2 n = ( c x 1 2 ) ( c b + 2 b 2 x 2 b c x + 2 a d x 2 d 2 x ) 2 x ( a d ) ( b c ) + ( c + d b ) b x 1 2 ( c x + d x a x 1 2 ) x ( a d ) ( b c ) × Γ 1 + d x , 1 a x b x + c x + d x , 1 2 + c x 1 + c x + d x b x , 1 2 + c x + d x a x F 2 3 d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 , c x 1 2 c x + d x b x , c x + d x a x 1 2 1 .
Let C m ( a , b , c , d ) stand for the resulting equality from the coefficients of x m extracted across the above equality. Then, we derive the following infinite series identities.
  • C 0 ( a , b , c , d )
    2 ln 2 2 = n = 1 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n ( 4 ) n .
  • C 1 ( 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 )
    3 ln 2 4 ln 2 π 2 12 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 13 60 n + 64 n 2 2 n 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n H n .
  • C 1 ( 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 )
    π 2 8 ln 2 2 2 + 2 ln 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 1 + 28 n 64 n 2 4 n 2 + ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n O n .
  • C 1 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 )
    2 2 ln 2 π 2 8 ln 2 2 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 1 12 n + 24 n 2 4 n 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n O 2 n .
  • C 1 ( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 )
    2 ln 2 2 4 ln 2 π 2 6 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 16 n ) n 2 ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n H 2 n .
  • C 1 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    π 2 12 + ln 2 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 7 16 n 2 n 2 + ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n H ¯ 2 n .
  • C 2 ( 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 )
    7 ζ ( 3 ) 2 + π 2 2 + ln 3 2 3 π 2 4 ln 2 2 ln 2 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 9 36 n + 64 n 2 4 n 3 + 1 + 28 n 64 n 2 n 2 O n + ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n H ¯ 2 n 2 + 2 O n 2 .
  • C 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 )
    π 2 2 + ln 3 2 3 + π 2 4 ln 2 + 2 ln 2 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 ( 1 4 n ) ( 9 8 n ) 4 n 3 1 12 n + 24 n 2 n 2 O 2 n + ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n H ¯ 2 n 2 2 O 2 n 2 + 2 O 2 n 2 .
  • C 2 ( 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 )
    2 π 2 3 + 6 ζ ( 3 ) + 12 ln 3 2 24 ln 2 2 π 2 ln 2 = n = 1 1 4 n 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 × 97 380 n + 320 n 2 n 3 2 ( 13 60 n + 64 n 2 ) n 2 H n + ( 1 2 n ) ( 9 20 n ) n 4 O n 2 9 H n 2 + 2 H n 2 .

2.4. a 1 2 + a x ,   b b x ,   c c x ,   d 1 + d x

Under this parameter setting, we can rewrite the transformation in Lemma 1 as
k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( b x ) k ( c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n 1 2 + a x , b x , c x , 1 + d x × ( 1 2 + a x ) n ( c x b x ) n ( 1 2 + d x a x ) n ( 1 + d x b x ) 2 n ( c x ) n ( 1 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( c x + d x a x b x 1 2 ) 2 n + 2 .
In view of Thomae’s transformation (1), the above series on the left can be reformulated as
k = 0 ( 1 2 + a x ) k ( b x ) k ( c x ) k ( 1 + d x ) k = F 2 3 1 , 1 2 + a x , b x c x , 1 + d x 1 = Γ c x , 1 + d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 2 c x + d x a x 1 2 , c x + d x b x × F 2 3 c x 1 , d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 2 c x + d x a x 1 2 , c x + d x b x 1 .
By making substitutions, we derive, after multiplying by ( c x ) ( c x + d x a x b x 1 2 ) ( c x b x ) across the resulting expression, the transformation formula as in the following proposition.
Proposition 4
(Functional equality).
n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n 1 2 + a x , b x , c x , 1 + d x ( 1 2 + a x ) n ( 1 + c x b x ) n 1 ( 1 2 + d x a x ) n ( 1 + d x b x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n 1 ( 1 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 2 + c x + d x a x b x ) 2 n + 1 = c x ( c + d b ) b c + c x ( 1 + 2 a x ) ( 1 b x + d x ) ( 1 + d x ) ( 1 2 a x 2 b x + 2 c x + 2 d x ) b c d b c 1 2 + a x c x d x × Γ 1 + c x , 1 + d x , 1 2 + c x + d x a x b x 1 + c x + d x b x , 1 2 + c x + d x a x , F 2 3 c x 1 , d x , c x + d x a x b x 1 2 c x + d x a x 1 2 , c x + d x b x 1 .
Denote by D m ( a , b , c , d ) the resulting equality from the coefficients of x m extracted across the above equation. Particular care should be paid when determining the related coefficients from the above F 2 3 -series on the right. This is quite different from previous subsections, since the following k-sums are indispensable:
k = 1 H k k ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 1 k ( k + 1 ) j = 1 k 1 j = j = 1 1 j 2 = ζ ( 2 ) , k = 1 O k k ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 1 k ( k + 1 ) j = 1 k 1 2 j 1 = j = 1 1 j ( 2 j 1 ) = 2 ln 2 ; k = 1 H k k 2 ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 H k k 2 H k k ( k + 1 ) = 2 ζ ( 3 ) ζ ( 2 ) , k = 1 O k k 2 ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 O k k 2 O k k ( k + 1 ) = 7 4 ζ ( 3 ) 2 ln 2 ; k = 1 H k 2 k ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 1 k ( k + 1 ) j = 1 k 1 j 2 = j = 1 1 j 3 = ζ ( 3 ) , k = 1 O k 2 k ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 1 k ( k + 1 ) j = 1 k 1 ( 2 j 1 ) 2 = j = 1 1 j ( 2 j 1 ) 2 = π 2 4 2 ln 2 .
They can be shown easily by means of series rearrangements.
Another series that we need is
k = 1 H ¯ 2 k 2 k ( k + 1 ) = 2 ln 2 + 2 ln 2 2 ζ ( 3 ) π 2 12 .
This can be confirmed by writing it first as a double integral and then computing it manually (or by Mathematica 11):
k = 1 H ¯ 2 k 2 k ( k + 1 ) = k = 1 1 k ( k + 1 ) 0 1 0 1 ( 1 x 2 k ) ( 1 y 2 k ) ( 1 + x ) ( 1 + y ) d x d y = 0 1 0 1 ( 1 x 2 y 2 ) ln ( 1 x 2 y 2 ) 2 ( 1 x 2 ) y 2 ln ( 1 x 2 ) ( 1 + x ) ( 1 + y ) x 2 y 2 d x d y .
We remark that this double integral can be refined by the following two integrals:
0 1 0 1 ( 1 x 2 y 2 ) ln ( 1 x 2 y 2 ) ( 1 + x ) ( 1 + y ) x 2 y 2 d x d y = 2 ln 2 2 ln 2 2 ζ ( 3 ) + π 2 6 ln 2 π 2 12 , 0 1 0 1 ( 1 x ) ln ( 1 x 2 ) ( 1 + y ) x 2 d x d y = ln 2 0 1 ( 1 x ) ln ( 1 x 2 ) x 2 d x = π 2 12 ln 2 2 ln 2 2 .
The infinite series identities derived from Proposition 4 are recorded as follows.
  • D 0 ( a , b , c , d )
    1 4 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n n ( 1 + 5 n ) ( 1 + 4 n ) .
  • D 1 ( 0 , 2 , 1 , 1 )
    1 2 ln 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 5 + 24 n 1 + 4 n 6 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n H n .
  • D 1 ( 2 , 0 , 1 , 1 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 + 2 n 1 + 4 n + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O n .
  • D 1 ( 1 , 0 , 2 , 0 )
    1 4 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 2 n 1 + 4 n n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O 2 n + 1 .
  • D 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 1 + 4 n + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O n 2 .
  • D 2 ( 1 1 , 0 , 1 1 , 2 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 1 + 4 n + 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) 1 + 4 n O n + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O n 2 .
  • J { D 2 ( 1 1 , 4 , 3 1 , 2 ) }
    π 2 24 1 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 2 + 13 n + 16 n 2 2 n ( 1 + 2 n ) ( 1 + 4 n ) n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n H n 2 .
  • 2 D 2 ( 0 , 2 , 1 , 1 ) D 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    π 2 3 + 4 ln 2 4 ln 2 2 3 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 6 + 39 n + 52 n 2 n ( 1 + 2 n ) ( 1 + 4 n ) 3 ( 5 + 24 n ) 1 + 4 n H n + 9 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n H n 2 .
  • D 2 ( 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 1 + 4 n 8 n 1 + 4 n O 2 n + 1 + 2 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O 2 n + 1 2 + O 2 n + 1 2 .
  • D 3 ( 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 2 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 3 ( 1 + 4 n ) 2 O 2 n + 1 3 + O 2 n + 1 3 + 3 O 2 n + 1 O 2 n + 1 2 + O 2 n + 1 1 + 4 n 4 n ( O 2 n + 1 2 + O 2 n + 1 2 ) 1 + 4 n .
  • D 3 ( 1 1 , 0 , 1 1 , 2 )
    0 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n O n 1 + 4 n + 1 + 2 n 1 + 4 n O n 2 + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 3 ( 1 + 4 n ) ( O n 3 O n 3 ) .
  • lim a 1 D 3 ( a , 0 , 1 , 0 ) / a 1
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n O 2 n + 1 1 + 4 n 8 n O n 2 1 + 4 n + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n O 2 n + 1 O n 2 ) .
  • D 4 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n O n 2 1 + 4 n + 2 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n ( O n 2 ) 2 O n 4 .
  • D 6 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    0 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 3 ( O n 2 ) 2 3 O n 4 1 + 4 n + 4 n ( 1 + 5 n ) 1 + 4 n ( O n 2 ) 3 3 O n 2 O n 4 + 2 O n 6 .

2.5. a + a x ,   b 1 2 + b x ,   c 1 + c x ,   d 1 2 + d x

Under this parameter setting, the transformation in Lemma 1 can be reformulated as
x ( c + d a b ) k = 0 ( a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 + c x ) k ( 1 2 + d x ) k = n = 0 ( 1 ) n W n a x , 1 2 + b x , 1 + c x , 1 2 + d x × ( a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + c x ) n ( 1 2 a x + d x ) n ( d x b x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 2 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 1 .
Denote by L γ ( k ) and R γ ( n ) the summands respectively on the left and the right:
L γ ( k ) = ( a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 + c x ) k ( 1 2 + d x ) k , R γ ( n ) = ( 1 ) n W n a x , 1 2 + b x , 1 + c x , 1 2 + d x . × ( a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + c x ) n ( 1 2 a x + d x ) n ( d x b x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 2 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 1 .
By factorizing the difference of the two initial terms
L γ ( 0 ) R γ ( 0 ) = a x { a x c x 2 d x 1 + 2 x 2 ( a d + b 2 b c d 2 ) } ( 1 + 2 d x ) ( 1 + c x + d x a x b x )
and then applying Thomae’s transformation (1),
x ( c + d a b ) k = 1 ( a x ) k ( 1 2 + b x ) k ( 1 + c x ) k ( 1 2 + d x ) k = a x 2 ( c + d a b ) ( 1 2 + b x ) ( 1 + c x ) ( 1 2 + d x ) F 2 3 1 , 1 + a x , 3 2 + b x 2 + c x , 3 2 + d x 1 = ( a x ) Γ 1 + c x , 1 2 + d x 1 + x ( c + d b ) , 1 2 + b x F 2 3 d x b x , 1 2 b x + c x , x ( c + d a b ) 1 + x ( c + d b ) , 1 + x ( c + d a b ) 1 ,
we can express, after dividing by “ a x 2 ( d b ) ” across, the resulting transformation as follows.
Proposition 5
(Functional equality).
n = 1 ( 1 ) n W n a x , 1 2 + b x , 1 + c x , 1 2 + d x ( a x + n ) ( d x b x + 2 n ) ( 1 + a x ) n ( 1 2 b x + c x ) n ( 1 2 a x + d x ) n ( 1 + d x b x ) 2 n ( 1 + c x ) n ( 1 2 + d x ) 2 n + 1 ( 1 a x b x + c x + d x ) 2 n + 1 = a x c x 2 d x 1 + 2 x 2 ( a d + b 2 b c d 2 ) ( 1 + 2 d x ) ( d x b x ) ( 1 + c x + d x a x b x ) + 1 d x b x Γ 1 + c x , 1 2 + d x 1 + x ( c + d b ) , 1 2 + b x × F 2 3 d x b x , 1 2 b x + c x , x ( c + d a b ) 1 + x ( c + d b ) , 1 + x ( c + d a b ) 1 .
Denoting by E m ( a , b , c , d ) the resulting equality from the coefficients of x m extracted across the above equation, and then making use of the following easily proved k-sums
k = 1 ( 1 2 ) k k ! × k 2 = π 2 6 2 ln 2 2 , k = 1 ( 1 2 ) k k ! × k 3 = 2 ζ ( 3 ) π 2 3 ln 2 + 4 3 ln 3 2 , k = 1 ( 1 2 ) k H k k ! × k 2 = 9 2 ζ ( 3 ) 2 π 2 3 ln 2 , k = 1 ( 1 2 ) k O k k ! × k 2 = 7 2 ζ ( 3 ) π 2 2 ln 2 ,
we can establish infinite series identities as below.
  • E 0 ( a , b , c , d )
    2 4 ln 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n ( 3 + 10 n ) 4 n 2 n n ( 4 n + 1 ) .
  • E 1 ( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 ) E 1 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 )
    π 2 6 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) .
  • E 1 ( 5 , 4 , 13 , 0 )
    π 2 12 + 8 ln 2 2 7 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 7 1 + 2 n + 3 ( 3 + 10 n ) n H n .
  • E 1 ( 1 , 4 , 1 , 0 )
    π 2 4 1 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 1 + 2 n 2 ( 3 + 10 n ) n O n .
  • E 1 ( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 )
    π 2 2 4 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 3 + 8 n n ( 1 + 2 n ) 3 + 10 n n O 2 n + 1 .
  • { E 2 ( 1 , 1 + 1 , 1 , 0 ) }
    1 5 4 ζ ( 3 ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 1 + 4 n ) 1 + 8 n + 20 n 2 + 14 n 3 2 n 3 ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 + 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) O n .
  • E 2 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) E 2 ( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 ) + E 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    ζ ( 3 ) 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 3 n n 3 + 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) O 2 n + 1 .
  • E 3 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    π 4 360 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 4 n 4 n 4 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) O n 2 .
  • E 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    ζ ( 3 ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 4 n n 3 2 ( 3 + 10 n ) n O n 2 .
  • J { E 2 ( 1 , 1 + 1 , 1 , 0 ) }
    3 4 ζ ( 3 ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 8 n 3 + O n 2 n 2 + 3 + 10 n n ( 1 + 4 n ) O n 2 .
  • E 2 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 )
    4 6 ζ ( 3 ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 4 n + 1 ) 1 + 2 n n 3 + 2 ( 1 + n ) n 2 O 2 n + 1 + 3 + 10 n n O 2 n + 1 2 + O 2 n + 1 2 .
  • E 4 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    ζ ( 5 ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 n 5 4 O n 2 n 3 + 4 ( 3 + 10 n ) n ( 1 + 4 n ) ( O n 2 ) 2 O n 4 .
  • E 5 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    π 6 945 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n 1 n 6 4 O n 2 n 4 + 8 ( 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 ) n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) ( 1 + 4 n ) ( O n 2 ) 2 O n 4 .
  • { E 2 ( 1 , 1 1 , 4 1 , 0 ) }
    12 + 4 π 2 ln 2 27 ζ ( 3 ) 6 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 1 + 4 n ) 2 ( 1 + 3 n ) ( 1 + 5 n + 5 n 2 ) n 3 ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 3 ( 1 + 6 n + 10 n 2 ) n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) H n 3 + 10 n n H n 2 .
  • 2 E 2 ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 0 ) E 2 ( 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 )
    3 + 4 π 2 ln 2 16 ln 3 2 21 ζ ( 3 ) 27 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 2 n n 4 n 2 n ( 1 + 4 n ) 17 + 136 n + + 340 n 2 + 264 n 3 72 n 3 ( 1 + 2 n ) 2 9 + 54 n + 76 n 2 12 n 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) H n + 3 + 10 n 4 n H n 2 .

3. Concluding Comments

The paper is entitled “Harmonic Series with Multinomial Coefficient 4 n n , n , n , n and Central Binomial Coefficient 2 n n ” since we have evaluated many series in closed form that have the following four binomial structures in their summands:
4 n n , n , n , n , 1 4 n n , n , 2 n = 2 n n 4 n n , n , n , n , 4 n 2 n 2 n n 2 = 4 n n , n , n , n 2 n n 4 , 2 n n 4 n 2 n = 2 n n 3 4 n n , n , n , n .
Even though it is quite common to encounter sums involving central binomial coefficients (see [30,31,32,33,34,35]), there exist few infinite series containing the above binomial/multinomial components in the literature (cf. [36,37,38,39,40]). Most of the results presented in this paper are new (except for those explicitly indicated).
According to what we have achieved, the “coefficient extraction” method is successful in dealing with series of harmonic numbers. However, there are serious difficulties to go further when the involved harmonic numbers have orders beyond two. In this case, the n-series to be evaluated have more complicated summands (with harmonic numbers of higher order). Another obstacle comes from the k-sums as in Section 2.4 and Section 2.5, which may not admit closed expressions. To tackle these problems, alternative approaches will be necessary. The interested reader is enthusiastically encouraged to make further exploration.

Author Contributions

Writing & editing, formal analysis, C.L.; original draft & review, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the three reviewers for the careful reading, critical comments, and valuable suggestions that contributed significantly to improving the manuscript during revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, K.-W. Generalized harmonic numbers and Euler sums. Int. J. Number Theory 2017, 13, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Furdui, O. Series involving products of two harmonic numbers. Math. Mag. 2011, 84, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sebbar, A. Harmonic numbers, harmonic series and zeta function. Moroc. J. Pure Appl. Anal. (MJPAA) 2018, 4, 122–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Batir, N.; Sofo, A. A unified treatment of certain classes of combinatorial identities. J. Integer Seq. 2021, 24, 3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjiamin, A.T.; Preston, G.O.; Quinn, J.J. A Stirling encounter with harmonic numbers. Math. Mag. 2002, 75, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Britannica. Harmonic Number|Physics. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/harmonic-number (accessed on 11 April 2024).
  7. Greene, D.H.; Knuth, D.E. Mathematics for the Analysis of Algorithms, 2nd ed.; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA; Basel, Switzerland; Stuttgart, Germany, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilf, H.S. Generatingfunctionology, 3rd ed.; A K Peters: Natick, MA, USA; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chu, W. Hypergeometric approach to Apéry–like series. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2017, 28, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics; Holland: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, K.W.; Chen, Y.H. Infinite series containing generalized harmonic functions. Number Theory Discret. Math. 2020, 26, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valean, C.I.; Furdui, O. Reviving the quadratic series of Au–Yeung. J. Class. Anal. 2015, 6, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.Y. Infinite series containing generalized harmonic numbers. Results Math. 2018, 73, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boros, G.; Moll, V.H. Irresistible Integrals; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Freitas, P. Integrals of polylogarithmic functions, recurrence relations, and associated Euler sums. Math. Comp. 2005, 74, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jameron, G.; Lord, N. Integrals evaluated in terms of Catalan’s constant. Math. Gaz. 2017, 101, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.L.; Chu, W. Evaluating Infinite Series Involving Harmonic Numbers by Integration. Mathematics 2024, 12, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vǎlean, C.I. (Almost) Impossible Integrals, Sums, and Series; Springer Nature AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cantarini, M.; D’Aurizio, J. On the interplay between hypergeometric series, Fourier Legendre expansions and Euler sums. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 2019, 12, 623–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, H.W. Interesting Ramanujan-Like Series Associated with Powers of Central Binomial Coefficients. J. Integer Seq. 2022, 25, Article 22.1.8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chu, W.; Campbell, J.M. Expansions over Legendre Polynomials and Infinite Double Series Identities. Ramanujan J. 2023, 60, 317–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chu, W. Hypergeometric series and the Riemann Zeta function. Acta Arith. 1997, 82, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bailey, W.N. Generalized Hypergeometric Series; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1935. [Google Scholar]
  24. Brychkov, Y.A. Handbook of Special Functions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gessel, I.; Stanton, D. Strange evaluations of hypergeometric series. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1982, 13, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rainville, E.D. Special Functions; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chu, W. Dougall’s bilateral 2H2-series and Ramanujan–like π-formulae. Math. Comp. 2011, 80, 2223–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, Z.-W. Series with summands involving harmonic numbers. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2210.07238v8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramanujan, S. Modular equations and approximations to π. Quart. J. Math. 1914, 45, 350–372. [Google Scholar]
  30. Boyadzhiev, K.N. Series with central binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers, and harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Elsner, C. On sums with binomial coefficient. Fibonacci Quart. 2005, 43, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gould, H.W. Some generalizations of Vandermonde’s convolution. Amer. Math. Mon. 1956, 63, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lehmer, D.H. Interesting series involving the central binomial coefficient. Amer. Math. Mon. 1985, 92, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Riordan, J. Combinatorial Identities; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zucker, I.J. On the series k = 1 2 k k 1 k n . J. Number Theory 1985, 20, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chu, W.; Zhang, W.L. Accelerating Dougall’s 5F4-sum and infinite series involving π. Math. Comp. 2014, 83, 475–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chu, W. q-series reciprocities and further π-formulae. Kodai Math. J. 2018, 41, 512–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gasper, G. Summation, transformation and expansion formulas for bibasic series. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1989, 312, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gasper, G.; Rahman, M. An indefinite bibasic summation formula and some quadratic, cubic and quartic summations and transformation formulae. Canad. J. Math. 1990, 17, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gessel, I.M. Finding identities with the WZ method. J. Symb. Comput. 1995, 20, 537–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Chu, W. Harmonic Series with Multinomial Coefficient 4nn,n,n,n and Central Binomial Coefficient 2nn. Axioms 2024, 13, 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13070434

AMA Style

Li C, Chu W. Harmonic Series with Multinomial Coefficient 4nn,n,n,n and Central Binomial Coefficient 2nn. Axioms. 2024; 13(7):434. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13070434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chunli, and Wenchang Chu. 2024. "Harmonic Series with Multinomial Coefficient 4nn,n,n,n and Central Binomial Coefficient 2nn" Axioms 13, no. 7: 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13070434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop