1. Introduction and Outline
For 
 and 
, define the parametric/alternating harmonic numbers by
In case 
, they become the odd harmonic numbers
When 
 and/or 
, they will be suppressed from these notations. There are two almost obvious, but useful equalities:
  1.1. Coefficient Extraction
For an indeterminate 
x and 
, the Pochhammer symbol reads as
Let 
 stand for the coefficient of 
 in the formal power series 
. Then, we have
In general, it is not hard to show, by the generating function approach, the following formulae:
        where the Bell polynomials (cf. [
1], §3.3) are expressed explicitly by the multiple sum
        with 
 being the set of all 
m-partitions represented by 
m-tuples 
 subject to the linear condition 
.
  1.2. -Function Expansion
Recall that the Pochhammer symbol can also be expressed in terms of the 
-function
For the sake of brevity, the 
-function quotient will be abbreviated to
Denote the Euler constant by 
. Then, the logarithmic differentiation of the 
-function results in the digamma function (cf. Rainville [
2], §9)
For a real number 
, we can extract the coefficients
        from the exponential expression
Henceforth, the Riemann and Hurwitz zeta functions are defined respectively by
		In addition, we shall utilize 
G to denote the Catalan constant
  1.3. Hypergeometric Series Transformations
Following Bailey [
3], the classical hypergeometric series is defined by
Among numerous transformations in the literature (see for example [
4,
5,
6]), the following formula due to Thomae is fundamental (cf. Bailey [
3], §3.2; where 
):
In 2011, the second author discovered, among several transformation formulae, the following useful one, which can be restated as in the lemma below.
Lemma 1 (Chu [
5], Theorem 2.7). 
For four indeterminates  subject to the condition , we have the transformation formula where  is a quadratic polynomial defined by By introducing a free variable 
x, the aim of this paper is to consider, via the coefficient extraction method (cf. [
7,
8,
9]), the above transformation under the following four parameter settings:
Numerous closed formulae will be established for the series (of convergent ratio “
”) containing both cubic central binomial coefficients and harmonic numbers, including one prominently conjectured formula by Sun [
10] (Conjecture 33 and Equation (99)):
Our results will be distributed from 
Section 2 to 
Section 5, devoted to dealing with the series under the four parameter settings 
, respectively. During the course of computing harmonic series, four crucial 
k-sums emerged. In order not to interrupt the route of investigation, their evaluations are put together in 
Section 6, where further related problems are briefly discussed.
There exist various summation formulae containing harmonic numbers (cf. [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20]). Many of them involve binomial coefficients (cf. [
17,
21,
22,
23,
24]) and squared central binomial coefficients (cf. [
9,
25,
26,
27,
28]). To the best of the author’s knowledge, almost all of the identities (except for a few cited explicitly) presented in this paper for the series concerning cubic central binomial coefficients are not only new, but also challenging. They may serve as a reference source to readers for further investigation. In order to ensure accuracy, all the displayed equations throughout the paper have been tested numerically using the inbuilt commands of computer algebra system 
Wolfram Mathematica (version 11).
  2. Series Under Parameter Setting 
Under the parameter setting “
”, the transformation in Lemma 1 becomes
The 
-series on the left diverges when 
. By making use of Thomae’s transformation (
4), we can express it as
Therefore, we have established the following transformation formula involving a free variable “x” and four independent indeterminates .
Theorem 1. Let  be as in Lemma 1. The following transformation formula holds:  In order to derive identities for binomial/harmonic series from this theorem, we often come across the following remarkable binomial sum, which corresponds to the coefficient of 
 in the above 
-series:
Gosper [
29] discovered it by an iterative use of Abel’s lemma on summation by parts. Joakim Petersson found another proof (reproduced in [
30]) by differentiating the parametric integral ingeniously:
We shall present new alternative proofs for it in 
Section 6.1.
Both sides of the equality displayed in Theorem 1 are convergent series around 
. By analytic continuation, we can expand, via Equations (
1)–(
3), the two sides into power series in 
x. Denote by 
 the equality formed by extracting the coefficients of 
 across the equation in Theorem 1. By assigning particular values for parameters 
 and then making simplifications, we can establish several identities for series with harmonic numbers.
To showcase, we illustrate, for 
, how to carry out the procedure just described. In this case, the equation corresponding to 
 reads as
Then, it is trivial for us to write down the two formulae labeled by 
 and 
 under the respective parameter specifications.
Analogously, we can examine the series 
. After some routine simplifications, it can be written explicitly as shown below: 
From this equation, we can deduce three interesting identities.
- Firstly, comparing the coefficient of  -  in ( 6- ) gives rise to the summation formula below: 
- Secondly, by extracting the coefficient of  -  across ( 6- ), we establish the identity: 
- Recall the known equality due to the authors: (cf. [ 31- ], Equation (3)) 
- By adding six times of it to ( 7- ), we arrive at the following remarkable identity conjectured by Sun [ 10- ] (Equation (99) and Conjecture 33): 
- Thirdly, let  - , which annihilates  -  in the summand of ( 6- ). In accordance with one of the solutions of algebraic equation  -  and  - , we find from ( 6- ) the following formula: 
- Then, it can be shown alternatively that ( 8- ) follows also by relating ( 9- ) to yet another known identity (cf. Li and Chu [ 31- ], Equation (4)): 
By carrying out the same procedure just demonstrated, further binomial/harmonic series identities can be derived from Theorem 1. The following representatives are recorded as examples, where most of them seem new except for a few series (reproduced for integrity) that were previously evaluated by the authors in [
31]. Theoretically, there are infinite choices of “
” values that lead to binomial/harmonic sums. Our selection of identities to include (here and next sections) are based on three criteria: representative sums, elegantly closed formulae, and non-routine outcome results.
  3. Series Under Parameter Setting 
Performing the parameter replacement “
” in Lemma 1
      and then applying the Thoame transformation Formula (
4)
      we can state the resulting expression as in the following theorem.
Theorem 2. Let  be as in Lemma 1. The following transformation formula holds:  Let 
 stand for the summation term indexed by 
k in the above 
-series. By putting two initial terms aside, we can express this series as
In order to derive identities for binomial/harmonic series from Theorem 2, it is necessary to determine the constant term of the 
-series. It is given by the following formula and will be confirmed in 
Section 6.2:
Denote by  the resulting formula by equating the coefficients of  across the equation displayed in Theorem 2. By specifying particular values for parameters  and then making simplifications, we derive the following binomial/harmonic series identities.
  4. Series Under Parameter Setting 
Making the parameter substitution “
” in Lemma 1
      and then invoking the Thomae transformation Formula (
4)
      we can express the resulting transformation as in the following theorem.
Theorem 3. Let  be as in Lemma 1. The following transformation formula holds:  For the above 
-series, denote by 
 its general term. Taking out the first term, we can reformulate it as
Then, the coefficient of 
x in this 
-series will play a crucial role in the subsequent computations. It can be stated equivalently as shown below and validated in 
Section 6.3:
Denote by  the resulting formula by equating the coefficients of  across the above displayed equation. By specifying particular values for parameters , and then making simplifications, we establish from Theorem 3 the following identities of binomial/harmonic series.
- As an anonymous reviewer observed, this identity follows simply by telescoping 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
- Linear combination:  -  with the above equation 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Real part) 
-  (Imaginary part) 
-  (Real part) 
  5. Series Under Parameter Setting 
Under the parameter setting “
” in Lemma 1
      we can reformulate the resulting equation as in the theorem below, where the third expression follows by Thomae’s transformation (
4).
Theorem 4. Let  be as in Lemma 1. We have the transformation formulae , where  For the above 
-series, the coefficient of 
x leads to the following 
k-sum,
      that is useful in the subsequent evaluation and its proof will be given in 
Section 6.4.
Denote by , and  the triplet coefficients of  extracted from , and , respectively. By specifying particular values for parameters , and then making simplifications, we establish from Theorem 4 the following identities of binomial/harmonic series.
- By considering  - , we immediately deduce the following formula as a byproduct: - 
          which is a special case of Gauss’ summation formula for  - -series (cf. Bailey [ 3- ], §1.3). 
- There exist two analogous series in terms of the Catalan constant: 
- Under the above two parameter settings, we have the system of linear equations: 
- The solutions for  and  recover the two formulae below: 
- According to the above two parameter settings, the system of linear equations reads as 
- Resolving this linear system yields the following formulae: - 
          where the first formula is due to Wang–Chu [ 9- ] and 
- The last identity is due to Cantarini and D’Aurizio [ 35- ], who also found a companion formula 
- Analogously, we can produce three further series as shown below: - •
- •
- •
 - Unfortunately, these two formulae are far from sufficiency for determining values of the following “4” series in closed form (except for those in Equations ( 16- )–( 19- )). 
- where  -  denotes the  k- -sum below that unlikely admits a closed form value: 
- In order to be able to evaluate the remaining series in closed form, the additional parameter restrictions  and/or  will be imposed for simplicity. 
  6. Evaluation of Four -Sums
In order to establish identities for the series involving harmonic numbers, we have utilized the closed form values of four k-sums , and  in the precedent sections. Their proofs are produced below.
  6.1. Proof of (5)
First recalling the beta integral
        and then making use of the known 
-sum (cf. [
6], Corollary 10), we can express
Under the change of variables 
, the above integral becomes
This integral value can be found in [
36] (§5.5), where more improper integrals were evaluated in closed form.
The following alternative proof is based on a double integral. First, it is routine to write the series in terms of the beta integral
Evaluating this integral by Mathematica (Wolfram, version 11) directly confirms the claimed result. However, a human proof would be expected for this curious identity. Joakim Petersson may be the first to find this integral value by differentiating the parametric integral (see [
30]). Here, we present another proof. Observing the following easily verified equalities
        and then applying the integration by parts, we have an alternative expression
Under the change of variables 
, the above integral becomes
Keeping in mind that
        and then decomposing the rational function into partial fractions
        where 
, we reduce, after substitutions and simplifications, the double integral to a single one:
Luckily enough, these two dilogarithm functions with reciprocal arguments can be unified by
        that enables us to simplify further
Finally, making another change of variables 
, we return surprisingly to the same simpler integral expression as demonstrated before:
  6.2. Proof of (13)
We remark that the combined difference “
” results in an interesting formula, for which a direct and elementary proof would be desirable:
To prove (
13), it is enough to show (
22). For the sequence 
 defined below, compute its difference
Then, we can evaluate the series by telescoping
The formula in (
13) can be shown similarly as (
5). Rewriting the series in terms of the beta integral
        we can proceed with
Evaluating the 
-series by [
6] (
)
        and then determining the coefficient
        we obtain the following integral expression
  6.3. Proof of (14)
Notice that linear combination “
” yields the following identity:
To prove (
14), it suffices to show (
23). Write the 
k-sum in terms of hypergeometric series
According to the linear relation
        we can reformulate the series
        where both 
-series have been evaluated by Whipple’s theorem (cf. Bailey [
3], §3.4).
Finally, the claimed value follows by extracting the coefficient of 
:
Analogous to (
5) and (
13), we record the following proof for (
14). Reformulating the series in terms of the beta integral
        we can proceed with
Evaluating the 
-series by [
6] (
)
        and then determining the coefficient
        we obtain the following integral expression:
  6.4. Proof of (15)
Express the 
k-sum in terms of hypergeometric series
According to the linear relation
        we can manipulate the series
        where both 
-series have been evaluated by Whipple’s theorem (cf. Bailey [
3], §3.4). Finally, the claimed value follows by extracting the coefficient of 
:
  7. Conclusions and Further Problems
Under four parameter settings 
, the hypergeomeric transformation in Lemma 1 has efficiently been utilized to derive numerous formulae for binomial/harmonic series via the coefficient extraction method. However, the associated 
k-sums emerged during the course in realizing this process is not routine as commented on in (
12) and (
21), and shown by the four sums evaluated in 
Section 6.
There exist different 
k-sums where the factorial quotients in the summands are replaced by their reciprocals as in (
20). The authors fail to evaluate these 
k-sums in closed form, which prevents us from finding more analytic values for the series containing harmonic numbers of higher order. The interested readers are encouraged to make further attempts.
 
  
    Author Contributions
Writing and computation, C.L.; Original draft and review, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to three anonymous reviewers for their careful reading, critical comments, and constructive suggestions that contributed significantly to improving the manuscript during the revision.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics; D. Reidel Publ. Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Rainville, E.D. Special Functions; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, W.N. Generalized Hypergeometric Series; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1935. [Google Scholar]
- Brychkov, Y.A. Handbook of Special Functions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, W. Dougall’s bilateral 2H2-series and Ramanujan–like π-formulae. Math. Comp. 2011, 80, 2223–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, W. Trigonometric expressions for Gaussian 2F1-series. Turk. J. Math. 2019, 43, 1823–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.W. Hypergeometric series and generalized harmonic numbers. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2025, 31, 85–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, W.; Campbell, J.M. Harmonic sums from the Kummer theorem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 501, 125179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.Y.; Chu, W. Further Ramanujan–like series containing harmonic numbers and squared binomial coefficients. Ramanujan J. 2020, 52, 641–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.-W. Series with Summands Involving Higher Harmonic Numbers. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2210.07238. [Google Scholar]
- Chavan, P. Hurwitz zeta functions and Ramanujan’s identity for odd zeta values. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2023, 527, 127524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.W.; Yang, F.Y. Infinite series involving harmonic numbers and reciprocal of binomial coefficients. AIMS Math. 2024, 9, 16885–16900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheon, G.S.; El-Mikkawy, M.E.A. Generalized harmonic numbers with Riordan arrays. J. Number Theory 2008, 128, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J. Summation formulas involving binomial coefficients, harmonic numbers, and generalized harmonic numbers. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 501906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coppo, M.A. New identities involving Cauchy numbers, harmonic numbers and zeta values. Results Math. 2021, 76, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dattoli, G.; Srivastava, H.M. A note on harmonic numbers, umbral calculus and generating functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2008, 21, 686–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genčev, M. Binomial sums involving harmonic numbers. Math. Slovaca. 2011, 61, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komatsu, T.; Sury, B. Polynomial identities for binomial sums of harmonic numbers of higher order. Mathematics 2025, 13, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, M.E. An odd variant of multiple zeta values. Commun. Number Theory Phys. 2019, 13, 529–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olaikhan, A.S. An Introduction to the Harmonic Series and Logarithmic Integrals, 2nd ed.; Olaikhan: Seattle, WA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Adegoke, K.; Frontczak, R.; Goy, T. Combinatorial sums, series and integrals involving odd harmonic numbers. Afr. Mat. 2025, 36, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batir, N. Parametric binomial sums involving harmonic numbers. RACSAM 2021, 115, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyadzhiev, K.N. Series with central binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers, and harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 12.1.7. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H. Interesting series associated with central binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers and harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2016, 19, 16.1.5. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, J.M. Ramanujan-like series for  involving harmonic numbers. Ramanujan J. 2018, 46, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, J.M. New series involving harmonic numbers and squared central binomial coefficients. Rocky Mt. Math. 2019, 49, 2513–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nimbran, A.S.; Levrie, P.; Sofo, A. Harmonic-binomial Euler-like sums via expansions of (arcsin x)p. RACSAM 2022, 116, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vǎlean, C.I. Binoharmonic Series with the Squared Central Binomial Coefficient and Their Integral Transformation Using Elliptic Integrals. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374739982 (accessed on 7 July 2025).
- Gosper, R.W. A Calculus of Series Rearrangements. In Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, Proceedings of the a Symposium on New Directions and Recent Results in Algorithms and Complexity, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 7–9 April 1976; Traub, J.F., Ed.;  Carnegie-Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1976; pp. 121–151. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, D.M. Representations of Catalan’s Constant. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/2325473 (accessed on 7 July 2025).
- Li, C.L.; Chu, W. Infinite series about harmonic numbers inspired by Ramanujan–like formulae. Electron. Res. Arch. 2023, 31, 4611–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanujan, S. Modular equations and approximations to π. Quart. J. Math. 1914, 45, 350–372. [Google Scholar]
- Guillera, J. Hypergeometric identities for 10 extended Ramanujan–type series. Ramanujan J. 2008, 15, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.Y.; Chu, W. Series with harmonic–like numbers and squared binomial coefficients. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2022, 52, 1849–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantarini, M.; D’Aurizio, J. On the interplay between hypergeometric series, Fourier–Legendre expansions and Euler sums. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 2019, 12, 623–656, Erratum in Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 2024, 17, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.L.; Chu, W. Improper integrals involving powers of inverse trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|  | Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. | 
      
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).