1. Introduction
Let
M be a compact, connected, orientable
n-dimensional Riemannian manifold, with the Riemannian metric
g. Let
be a
map into another Riemannian manifold
. The
Hilbert-Schmidt norm of
is
. Let us consider the functional
A
map
is
exponentially harmonic if it is a critical point of
E i.e.,
for any smooth 1-parameter variation
of
. Exponentially harmonic maps were first studied by J. Eells & L. Lemaire [
1], who derived the
first variation formula
where
and
is the
tension field of
(cf. e.g., [
2]). Also
is the infinitesimal variation induced by the given 1-parameter variation. In particular, the Euler-Lagrange equations of the variational principle
are
where
is the Laplace-Beltrami operator and
are the Christoffel symbols of
. The (partial) regularity of weak solutions to (
1) was investigated by D.M. Duc & J. Eells (cf. [
3]) when
and by Y-J. Chiang et al. (cf. [
4]) when
. Differential geometric properties of exponentially harmonic maps, including the second variation formula for
E, were found by M-C. Hong (cf. [
5]), J-Q. Hong & Y. Yang (cf. [
6]), L-F. Cheung & P-F. Leung (cf. [
7]), and Y-J. Chiang (cf. [
8]).
The purpose of the present paper is to further study exponentially harmonic maps
winding in
, a situation previously attacked in [
4], though confined to the case where
M is a Fefferman space-time (cf. [
9]) over the Heisenberg group
and
is
invariant. Fefferman spaces are Lorentzian manifolds and exponentially harmonic maps of this sort are usually referred to as exponential wave maps (cf. e.g., Y-J. Chiang & Y-H. Yang, [
10]). Base maps
associated (by the
invariance) to
turn out to be solutions to degenerate elliptic equations [resembling (cf. [
11]) the exponentially harmonic map system (
1)] and the main result in [
4] is got by applying regularity theory within subelliptic theory (cf. e.g., [
12]).
Through this paper,
M will be a compact Riemannian manifold and
an exponentially harmonic map. Although the properties of an exponentially harmonic map may differ consistently from those of ordinary harmonic maps (see the emphasis by Y-J. Chiang, [
13]), we succeed in recovering, to the setting of exponentially harmonic maps, the result by B. Solomon (cf. [
14]) that for any nonconstant harmonic map
from a compact Riemannian manifold either
or
isn’t homotopically null. Here
is an arbitrary codimension 2 totally geodesic submanifold.
The ingredients in the proof of the exponentially harmonic analog to Solomon’s theorem (see [
14]) are (i) setting the Equation (
1) in divergence form
(got by a
verbatim repetition of arguments in [
4]), (ii) observing that
is isometric to the warped product manifold
, and (iii) applying the Hopf maximum principle (to conclude that there are no nonconstant exponentially harmonic maps into hemispheres).
2. Exponentially Harmonic Maps into Warped Products
Let
, where
L is a Riemannian manifold with the Riemannian metric
. Let
such that
for any
and let us endow
S with the
warped product metric
where
,
is the Cartesian coordinate on
, and
are projections. The Riemannian manifold
is customarily denoted by
. Let
be an exponentially harmonic map and let us set
We need to establish the following
Lemma 1. Let M be a compact, connected, orientable Riemannian manifold anda nonconstant exponentially harmonic map. Then u is a solution to If additionally then for some .
Also for an arbitrary test function
we set
so that
is a 1-parameter variation of
. For each
let
be a local
g-orthonormal (i.e.,
) frame, defined on an open neighborhood
of
. Then
on
U. On the other hand
for every tangent vector field
. Formula (
3) for
yields
Hence (differentiating with respect to
s)
where
. Moreover
where
is the divergence operator with respect to the Riemannian volume form
i.e.,
and
is the Laplace-Beltrami operator (on functions) i.e.,
. Substitution from (
5) into (
4) together with Green’s lemma yields [by
and the density of
in
]
which is (
2) in Lemma 1. When
Equation (
6) is
Equation (
7) is part of the Euler-Lagrange system associated to the variational principle
. Next (by (
7))
Let us integrate over
M in (
8) and use Green’s lemma. We obtain
yielding (as
is assumed to be nonconstant)
for some
and any
. Q.e.d.
3. Exponentially Harmonic Maps Omitting a Codimension 2 Sphere Aren’t Null Homotopic
Let be a codimension 2 totally geodesic submanifold. A continuous map meets if and links if and is not null homotopic. The purpose of the section is to establish
Theorem 1. Let be a nonconstant exponentially harmonic map from a compact, connected, orientable Riemannian manifold M into the sphere . If is a codimension 2 totally geodesic submanifold, then φ either meets or links Σ.
Proof. The proof is by contradiction, i.e., we assume that
doesn’t meet
and the map
is null homotpic. Let
be a system of coordinates on
such that
is given by the equations
. Let
be the hemisphere
Let
denote the canonical Riemannian metric on
. The map
I is an isometry of
onto
with the warping function
Let us consider the map . We need the following. □
Lemma 2. Let S andbe Riemannian manifolds,a local isometry, andan exponentially harmonic map. Then every mapsuch thatis exponentially harmonic.
Proof. Let h and be the Riemannian metrics on S and . For every 1-parameter variation of we set so that is a 1-parameter variation of . A calculation relying on yields for every . Q.e.d.
By Lemma 2 the map
is exponentially harmonic. Let us set
where
and
are projections. Next let us consider a point
and set
. Also, considered the covering map
,
, pick
such that
. As
is null homotopic, the map
is null homotopic as well. Then
where
is the first homotopy group of
M. Consequently there is a unique smooth function
such that
and
. The map
is exponentially harmonic [because
and
is a local isometry, where
is given by
]. We may then apply Lemma 1 to the map
with
to conclude that
for some
. It follows that
is exponentially harmonic. We shall close the proof of Theorem 1 by showing that exponentially harmonic mappings into
are constant. □
4. Exponentially Harmonic Map System in Divergence Form
Let us consider the
inner products
Let us think of the gradient ∇ as a first order differential operator
and let
be its formal adjoint, i.e.,
for any
and
. Ordinary integration by parts shows that
. Let
. Starting from
one has
for any
, that is
Lemma 3. Letbe an exponentially harmonic map andwhereis the inclusion. Ifthenfor any. Proof. Let
be the projection, where
is the open unit ball. With respect to this choice of local coordinates, the standard metric
and its Christoffel symbols are
Let us substitute from (
13) into (
1) [with
] and take into account
The exponentially harmonic map system (
1) becomes
Multiplication of (
15) by
and subtraction from (
9) [with
] yields (
10) for any
.
To see that (
15) (and therefore (
10)) holds for
as well, one first exploits the constraint
together with (
11) and (
14) to show that
Finally, one contracts (
15) by
and uses once again the constraint together with
. Q.e.d.
We may now end the proof of Theorem 1 as follows. Let
be an exponentially harmonic map. Let us integrate over
M in (
10) for
. Then (by Green’s lemma)
and
so that
yielding
constant. So
is constant as well, a contradiction. □
As well known and are homotopically equivalent. Therefore a continuous map is null homotopic if and only if is null homotopic. The homotopy classes of continuous maps form an abelian group (the Bruschlinski group of M) naturally isomorphic to . We may conclude that
Corollary 1. Let M be a compact, orientable, connected Riemannian manifold with. Then every nonconstant exponentially harmonic mapmeets Σ.