Stationary Type-Approval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Programme and Research Methodology
- Checking the operating range of the unloader valve (cut-in and cut-out pressure);
- Checking coupling pressure;
- Check the tightness of the pneumatic system;
- Checking the capacity of the compressor;
- Checking the capacity of the compressed air reservoir;
- Checking the response time of the pneumatic system and the service braking system of a tractor;
- Checking the emergency brake device of the air brake system (only for tractors towing category R3 and R4 trailers).
2.1. Checking the Regulator’s Operating Range
- The air pressure in the braking system should be checked with the engine running, either by applying and releasing the brakes by cycling the brake pedal or by simulating air intake by releasing to the atmosphere;
- The place for measuring the pressure is the compressed air tank; it is much easier to check the operation of the unloader valve using the pneumatic accessories shown in Figure 2. For this purpose, it is necessary to perform the following:
- Connect a 500 cm3 calibration reservoir with a pressure transducer to the coupling head of the tractor’s control line (yellow);
- Connect a 385 cm3 calibration reservoir with a pressure transducer and a 2/2 solenoid valve with an adjustment throttle valve on the air outlet to the atmosphere to the coupling head of the supply line (red).
- After five regulator actions, the average cut-on and cut-out pressures should be within the operating range specified by the manufacturer in the tractor’s technical data (e.g., cut-off pressure 8.1 + 0.2 bar; operating range 0.6 + 0.4 bar [8]).
- PC with software for data acquisition, graphic display of results, and air system diagnostics;
- PRN printer for printing test reports;
- CU control unit with a measurement card;
- PT transducers for measuring air pressure at selected points on the pneumatic system;
- HT transducer for measuring pressure in the tractor’s hydraulic service braking system;
- FT brake pedal force transducer.
2.2. Checking Coupling Pressure
- With the engine running, carry out a pressure test of the air braking system by applying and releasing the brake pedal cyclically;
- Connect test calibration reservoir CR1 with pressure transducer PT1 to the coupling head of the tractor’s control line;
- Connect a calibration reservoir CR2 with pressure transducer PT2 and solenoid valve SV to the coupling head of the tractor control line with a throttle valve on the air outlet to the atmosphere.
- When the brake pedal is actuated several times (e.g., 5 times), the pressure in both reservoirs should be within the regulated pressure but not outside the permissible range, which according to Wabco [28] is 7 − 8.1 + 0.2 bar.
2.3. Checking the Tightness of the Pneumatic System
- Checking for leakage is carried out when the engine is not running and the tractor brakes are released;
- Connect calibration reservoirs CR1 and CR2 to the coupling heads as shown in Figure 3;
- Set the initial pressure value in the system; if the pressure is too high, bleed the air through the throttle valve TV after opening the solenoid valve SV; if the pressure is too low, force the compressor by bleeding the air from the tank below the minimum regulated value with the engine running;
- Stop the engine with the tractor brakes released;
- Measure the drop in pressure in reservoir CR2 over a certain time.
- According to industry standard BN-86/3611-03 [29], the tightness of the system should be such that within 10 min, the pressure drop from the pressure measured at the supply port (CR2 reservoir) does not exceed 2% of the initial pressure equal to the minimum regulated pressure pmin;
- According to Wabco [28], a system is considered leak-proof if the pressure drop does not exceed 0.2 bar within 5 min. The maximum regulated pressure pmax is taken as the initial pressure. This test is shorter and less restrictive and can therefore be recommended for use in an industrial environment.
2.4. Checking the Capacity of the Compressor
- The test shall be carried out with a dummy tank (simulating the trailer braking system) connected to the supply line and having a volume V calculated in dm3 according to the following formula:V = 20 × R/pmax,
- The initial pressure of the system should be 0 bar;
- The time of filling the substitute reservoir should be measured from the moment of starting the preheated engine until the maximum pressure is reached with the engine running at the speed corresponding to its maximum power or at the speed allowed by the speed governor.
- The compressor capacity of tractors designed to tow trailers must be selected so that the time t1 required to fill the reserve tank is not more than 6 min in the pressure range from 0 to 65% of the minimum regulated pressure pmin and the time t2 is not more than 9 min in the pressure increase range from 0 to 100% of the minimum pressure. In the case of a tractor not designed to tow a trailer, these times are 3 and 6 min, respectively.
2.5. Checking the Capacity of the Compressed Air Reservoir
- Cut off the supply to the brake system reservoir—engine stopped (compressor shaft speed nsp = 0);
- Set the initial pressure in the tractor reservoir equal to the minimum value of the regulated pressure pmin (by applying and releasing the brakes or by draining the tractor reservoir using the drain valve);
- Connect a CR1 reservoir with a volume of 500 ± 5 cm3 to the control coupling head, which must be vented before each successive braking operation; the supply line must be blanked off).
- In the case of tractors suitable for towing trailers, the capacity of the compressed air reservoir shall be such that after eight successive service braking operations using the full travel of the brake pedal, the pressure in the reservoir at the end of the control line is not less than half the pressure obtained after the first braking operation.
2.6. Checking the Response Time
- The response time of the tractor system is determined by registering pressure changes in a transducer placed at the end of a 2.5 m long 13 mm diameter pipe (imitation of the trailer control pipe connected to the control coupling head—Figure 6);
- A calibration reservoir CR2 with a capacity of 385 ± 5 cm3 and a solenoid valve SV shall be connected to the supply coupling head of the dual-line system;
- At the start of the test, the pressure in the system should be equal to the switch-on pressure of the compressor (minimum regulated pressure pmin);
- The response time tr is obtained as a function of the actuation time tp by successive full actuation of the brake pedal, starting from the shortest possible actuation and increasing to a time of about 0.4 s; then, a graph of the response time as a function of the actuation time tr = f(tp) is plotted;
- The response time to be taken as the result of the test is the time corresponding to an actuation time tp = 0.2 s (emergency braking); this time can be obtained from the graph by interpolation.
- The response time of the tractor’s pneumatic braking system, measured from applying pressure on the brake pedal to the moment when 10% and 75% of the asymptotic pressure is reached in the control line, should not exceed 0.2 and 0.4 s, respectively.
- The response time of the tractor’s service braking system, measured from the start of the brake pedal pressure to the moment when 75% of the asymptotic pressure is reached in the brake cylinder, must not exceed 0.6 s.
2.7. Checking the Emergency Brake Device of the Air Brake System
- The pressure shall be measured at the end of a 2.5 m pipe with an internal diameter of 13 mm connected to the coupling head of the supply line (Figure 8);
- Failure of the coupling head control line shall be simulated (e.g., by connecting an open trailer control coupling);
- The pressure shall be measured when the service brake control device is actuated within 0.2 s.
- When one of the trailer brake control devices is fully applied (e.g., to achieve a force of 600 N on the brake pedal), the pressure in the supply line shall drop to 1.5 bar within the next 2 s; in addition, when the control device is released, the pressure in the supply line shall be restored.
3. Measurement System and Sample Test Results
3.1. Checking the Operating Range of the Pressure Regulator
3.2. Tightness Test
3.3. Compressor Capacity Check
3.4. Checking the Selection of the Compressed Air Receiver
3.5. Response Time Test
3.6. Checking the Emergency Braking Device of the Tractor’s Pneumatic Braking System
4. Summary and Conclusions
- The proposed stationary test methodology allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the braking system parameters and complies with the legal and technical requirements for the safety of agricultural vehicles;
- The developed measurement system ensures high-precision diagnostics and reduces the risk of errors resulting from manual testing, which increases the efficiency of the testing process;
- The proposed methodology’s application in approval and qualification tests can significantly improve the quality of new series-produced tractors and ensure their compliance with safety regulations;
- The introduction of periodic technical inspections of vehicles operated as per the proposed procedures will allow tractors with defective braking systems to be removed from road traffic, thus increasing the safety of agricultural transport;
- One area requiring further research is optimising the speed of the emergency brakes, which in their current design do not fully meet the normative requirements.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Breuer, B.J.; Bill, K.H. Brake Technology Handbook, 1st ed.; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008; pp. 128–231. [Google Scholar]
- Podrigalo, M.; Abramov, D. Selection of tractor brake type in main phase of its design engineering. In Proceedings of the Brake Conference 2001—Brakes of Road Vehicles, Łódź, Poland, 19–21 April 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Pronar. Tractor Pronar 320AM. Available online: https://pronar.pl/en/produkt/tractor-pronar-320amk/ (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Keyser, D.E.; Hogan, K. Hydraulic brake systems and components for off-highway vehicles and equipment. In National Fluid Power Association Technical Paper Series, I92-1.4; MICO, Incorporated: Mankato, MN, USA, 1992; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Keyser, D.E. Full power hydraulic brake actuation, circuit design considerations for off-highway vehicles and equipment. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fluid Power—The Future for Hydraulics, Brugge, Belgium, 5–7 April 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, M.; Zhang, W. Dynamic simulation and experiment of a full power hydraulic braking system. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing 2007, 29, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
- KIROVETS K-744R1, K-744R2, K-744R3, K-744R4 Tractors. Operation manual 744R-0000010 IE, Edition 2016. Available online: https://www.mtzequipment.com/sites/default/files/manuals/new_manuals/K744_Manual_2016_11052018%20.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Wabco. Pneumatic Braking System Agriculture and Forestry. Product Catalogue, 8150100823. Available online: https://www.wabco-customercentre.com/catalog/docs/8150100823.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Glišović, J.; Lukić, J.; Šušteršič, V.; Ćatić, D. Development of tractors and trailers in accordance with the requirements of legal regulations. In Proceedings of the 9th International Quality Conference, Kragujevac, Serbia, 4–6 June 2015; pp. 193–202. [Google Scholar]
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/68 of 15 October 2014 Supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with Regard to Vehicle Braking Requirements for the Approval of Agricultural and Forestry Vehicles. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32015R0068 (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Radlinski, R.W.; Flick, M.A. Tractor and trailer brake system compatibility. SAE Trans. 1986, 95, 872–895. [Google Scholar]
- Dodd, M.; Bartlett, R.; Knight, I. Provision of Information and Services on the Subject of the Performance Requirements, Testing Methods and Limit Values for Braking Systems of Agricultural and Forestry Tractors, Their Trailers and Interchangeable Towed Machinery—Final Report; TRL Unpublished Project Report, No. UPR/VE/064/07; TRL: Wokingham, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Scarlett, A. In-Service Assessment of Agricultural Trailer and Trailed Appliance Braking System Condition and Performance—HSE Research Report RR697; Health and Safety Executive (HSE Books): Bootle, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Safholland. Test Sheet for Synchronization of Braking Forces for Semi-Tractor/Trailer Combinations. Available online: https://literature1.safholland.com/sites/damedit/literature/BrakeTech_Test_sheet_for_synchronization_en-DE.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Caban, A.; Kidawski, A.; Włodarczyk, A. Synchronization of the braking of heavy tractor-trailer and tractor-semitrailer units: Operational problems. Arch. Automot. Eng. Arch. Motoryz. 2017, 77, 17–29. [Google Scholar]
- Borawska, E.; Borawski, A. Influence of the initial speed of the agricultural tractor on the brakes heating process during emergency braking. Heat Transf. Res. 2020, 51, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamiński, Z.; Czaban, J. Diagnosing of the agricultural tractor braking system within approval tests. Eksploat. I Niezawodn.—Maint. Reliab. 2012, 14, 319–326. [Google Scholar]
- Kuchar, P.; Janoško, I.; Holúbek, M.; Čedík, J.; Pexa, M. The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests. Acta Technol. Agric. 2022, 25, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recommendation N° 8 “Brake Testing in Periodic Technical Inspection”. CITA/WG1-09-2017-110. 2018. Available online: https://citainsp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CITA_Recommendation_8_brakes.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- Kožuch, P.; Hujo, Ľ.; Muślewski, Ł.; Markiewicz-Patalon, M. Dynamic and Stationary Testing of Vehicle Braking Systems. Acta Technol. Agric. 2023, 26, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zha, X.; Wu, D. The theoretical analysis of test result’s errors for the roller type automobile brake tester. In Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IV; Book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 347, pp. 382–389. [Google Scholar]
- Muthoriq, E.; Abidin, Z.; Hariyanto, A.; Bur, M. A method for measuring tire characteristic using brake tester. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research, Kuantan, Malaysia, 30–31 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, Z.; Lee, C.K.M.; Yaqiong, L.; Keung, K.L. Fault detection and diagnosis of air brake system: A systematic review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 71, 34–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, R.; Jing, Z. Study on braking stability of commercial vehicles. An optimized air brake system. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2019, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleksendric, D.; Duboka, C.; Arsenic, Z. Vehicle combination braking compatibility behavior. SAE Trans. 2002, 111, 2161–2168. [Google Scholar]
- Czaban, J.; Kamiński, Z. Performance testing of agriculture tractor braking systems. Arch. Motoryz. 2010, 1, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
- Kamiński, Z. Simulation and Experimental Testing of the Pneumatic Brake System of Agricultural Vehicles; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej: Białystok, Poland, 2012; p. 250. [Google Scholar]
- Wabco. Air Brake System Agriculture and Forestry. Maintenance, Testing & Fault-Finding. Available online: https://www.wabco-customercentre.com/catalog/docs/8150100833.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
- BN-86/3611-03; Motor Vehicles and Trailers. Brakes. General Principles of Construction of Air Transmission Devices. Przemysłowy Instytut Motoryzacji: Warszawa, Poland, 2012.
- FOS “Polmo” Łódź. Recommendations for Compressor Installation and Commissioning. Available online: http://katalog.polmo-lodz.com.pl/wp-content/uploads/zalecenia.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
No. | pmin [bar] | Pmax [bar] |
---|---|---|
1 | 7.398 | 8.384 |
2 | 7.387 | 8.374 |
3 | 7.388 | 8.356 |
4 | 7.384 | 8.350 |
5 | 7.386 | 8.341 |
mean | 7.39 | 8.36 |
tp [s] | t10 [s] | t75 [s] | th [s] |
---|---|---|---|
0.25 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
0.37 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
0.30 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.11 |
0.29 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.13 |
0.22 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.10 |
0.28 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.14 |
0.39 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.13 |
0.24 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.13 |
0.21 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.08 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kamiński, Z.; Czaban, J. Stationary Type-Approval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control. Machines 2025, 13, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030217
Kamiński Z, Czaban J. Stationary Type-Approval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control. Machines. 2025; 13(3):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030217
Chicago/Turabian StyleKamiński, Zbigniew, and Jarosław Czaban. 2025. "Stationary Type-Approval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control" Machines 13, no. 3: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030217
APA StyleKamiński, Z., & Czaban, J. (2025). Stationary Type-Approval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control. Machines, 13(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030217