Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
- The skin effect can be represented by equations (8) and (9). These equations should list out the citation in References.
- Two figures in Figure 7(a) and 7(b) should be amplified because of too small and fuzzy.
- The efficiency should be listed out for the with three different (single-V, flat , and dual-delta) magnet shapes and rotor structures.
- Extensive editing of English language and style should be processed.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The research topic and execution is useful however it is not written clearly in a way a general audience in the field can not understand. Please improve the following points.
(1) The authors are starting the paper claiming iron loss separation concepts are inadequate but this paper has not clearly outlined what they contributed to making it sufficient.
(2) To address this, a method section with an explanation of ideas, explanation simulation software, method of execution of the simulation, data acquisition, and analysis should be clearly explained.
(3) The result from this method should be compared with the previous inadequate method and analyzed.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The abbreviation for Classical Steinmetz Equation (CSE) is incorrect used in lines 85 and 215.
The methods of loss calculation used for comparison are not clearly named in the subsections of paragraph 2. It will be more readable if the captions in this paragraph carry the name of the method.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
This paper has been revised according to the reviewer's comments. This paper should be accepted.
Reviewer 2 Report
It is OK to publish.
