Next Article in Journal
Digital Twins: From Personalised Medicine to Precision Public Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Systems Radiology and Personalized Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Incidence of Adnexal Torsion in the Republic of Korea: A Nationwide Serial Cross-Sectional Study (2009–2018)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiorenal Syndrome: Emerging Role of Medical Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Management
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Morphological-Hemodynamic Risk Factors for Aneurysm Rupture Including a Newly Introduced Total Volume Ratio

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(8), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080744
by Ui Yun Lee 1 and Hyo Sung Kwak 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(8), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080744
Submission received: 5 July 2021 / Revised: 26 July 2021 / Accepted: 27 July 2021 / Published: 29 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systems Radiology and Personalized Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript revision.

In general it is correct, and the results are well presented.
However I have several observations before it can be published:

1. The input velocity profile must be reported.
2. The mesh used and a mesh independence study must be reported.
3. The relationships shown in Figure 2 do not seem adequate to me given the small number of samples, both broken and non-broken aneurysms follow the same trend, these graphs are, in my opinion, artificial and the linear regresion is not seen.
4. In the disusion, they should compare their morphological and hemodynamic values ​​obtained with the literature and explain why they obtain different values ​​from other studies, it is not enough to say that there are other studies that report WSS, AR, etc., the numerical values ​​must be compared.

In summary, with so few cases, it is difficult to see the contribution, perhaps due to the new parameter that has a good P factor, it can be published, if the previously detailed observations are corrected, and an new manuscript is sended.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop