Next Article in Journal
Screening of Mood Symptoms Using MMPI-2-RF Scales: An Application of Machine Learning Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Real-World Long-Term Outcomes of People with CF Homozygous for the F508del Mutation Treated with CFTR Modulators
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Acceptance in Performance-Based and Self-Reported Physical Functioning in Individuals with Fibromyalgia and Obesity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sweat Chloride Testing and Nasal Potential Difference (NPD) Are Primary Outcome Parameters in Treatment with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulators
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Management of Individual Patient Expectations When Starting with Highly Effective CFTR Modulators

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(8), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080811
by Bente L. Aalbers *, Inez Bronsveld, Regina W. Hofland and Harry G. M. Heijerman
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(8), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080811
Submission received: 5 August 2021 / Revised: 13 August 2021 / Accepted: 18 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cystic Fibrosis and Personalized Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Aalbers, et al. reviewed recent literature on various aspects of CFTR modulator therapy based on patient questions/expectations. The topic is relevant to CF care in the post-modulator era. The way the authors arranged the clinical information accordingly to various commonly asked questions is innovative. The major weakness of the manuscript is the authors' failure to summarize their specific findings on the subject in the abstract. Instead, they just described what they did.

Author Response

We have adjusted the abstract to make it more of a summary rather than an introduction. Changes can be found on page 1 lines 7-23.

If any other concerns arise, we’d be glad to learn about these so we can adjust the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

All of my concerns from the previous revision, have been addressed. I recommend to accept it in present form.

Author Response

Based on the other reviewers’ comments, we have adjusted the abstract. In the rest of the manuscript, no changes were made. If any new concerns arise, we’d be glad to learn about this.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop