Next Article in Journal
Personalized 5-Year Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction Model in Korea Based on Nationwide Representative Data
Previous Article in Journal
Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/jpm12010005
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database

by
Hyeong-Geun Jo
1,†,
Kyeoul Jeong
1,†,
Ji-Young Ryu
1,
Soyun Park
1,
Yun-Seok Choi
1,
Won-Gun Kwack
2,
Yeo-Jin Choi
3,* and
Eun-Kyoung Chung
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
2
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul 02447, Korea
3
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Clinical Pharmacy, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea
4
Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Korea
5
Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010005
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 19 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose a global public health threat, substantially contributing to death. Due to the relative paucity of clinical evidence regarding fatal ADRs, this study was performed to characterize the epidemiology of fatal ADRs in Korea. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of ADR cases reported to the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System from 2010 to 2019. All ADRs were coded using the World Health Organization-Adverse Reaction Terminology system and classified as either fatal or non-fatal events. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fatal events. Among 289,756 ADR records, 629 fatal events (0.2%) occurred. The most common causative agent of fatal ADRs was antibacterials (20.3%), followed by antimycobacterials (5.4%), analgesics (4.0%), and contrast media (1.9%). Among antimicrobials, vancomycin was most frequently implicated without significantly increasing the risk of fatal events. The risk for fatal ADRs was significantly increased with male sex; advanced age; polypharmacy; piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor; cefotetan; ceftriaxone; combination antimycobacterial therapy consisting of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; morphine; and iopromide (reporting odds ratio > 1, p < 0.05 for all). Although fatal ADRs are uncommon (<1%) in Korea, they are primarily caused by commonly used medications including antibiotics, analgesics, and contrast media.

1. Introduction

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose a substantial global burden in healthcare and medicine, endangering patient safety. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study, ADRs commonly occur with the reported prevalence and incidence of 2,673,100 and 34,975,000 in 2017, respectively [1]. The majority of ADRs are temporary and minor; however, a growing proportion of patients may experience sentinel events associated with drug therapy, potentially resulting in hospitalizations or even death [2]. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the number of serious adverse event reports has been consistently increasing every year, leading to a 2.6-fold increase in the total serious adverse event reports from 2006 to 2014 [3]. Previous studies suggested adverse drug events (ADEs) as one of the most common causes of hospitalization, accounting for approximately 5% to 10% of total hospital admissions [4,5]. The number of fatal ADE cases reported to the FDA has been continuously increasing with a 2.7-fold increase over the period of 2006 to 2014 [3], accounting for the fourth to sixth leading cause of death [6].
As the population ages, the prevalence of chronic diseases is increasing with more medication therapy required. This contributes to the increasing prevalence of polypharmacy associated with a high risk of serious ADRs including fatal events. Thus, for safe and effective medication use, the epidemiologic characteristics of serious ADEs, particularly drug-related fatal events, should be elaborated including causative agents, associated ADRs, and risk factors. Currently, only a few previously published studies evaluated fatal ADEs [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, approximately half of the studies were conducted before 2010, highlighting the urgent need for updated information regarding fatal ADRs. A recently published study assessed the association between fatal ADEs and various potentially etiologic medications, including anti-cancer medications, suggesting oncologic drugs as one of the most common causative medications of fatal ADRs [6]. However, the inclusion of oncologic medications as potential offending agents leaves the interpretation of the study results challenging due to substantial mortality associated with cancer. Furthermore, fatal ADE cases have never been analyzed in Korea except for opioid drug abuse or overdose cases [6,14]. Considering the variable demographic, clinical, and sociocultural aspects associated with medication use in clinical practice, timely assessment of the real-world data for medication use in a specific country and/or ethnic group may assist in preventing excessive fatal ADEs and ultimately, promoting patient safety.
In addition to fatal ADEs, non-fatal ADEs might adversely affect patient outcomes including increased morbidity and decreased quality of life. A recent meta-analysis suggested ADEs as a major cause of hospitalizations leading to complicated hospital course [12]. Moreover, according to a long-term, prospective safety study, approximately 20% of serious ADEs resulting in hospitalization were preventable, primarily associated with using potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly population [15]. In an effort to ensure patient safety, voluntary ADR reporting systems have been constructed in many countries; in Korea, the first spontaneous ADR report was received in 1988 [16]. The voluntary ADR reporting system is one of the real-world data (RWD) sources commonly used for post-approval pharmacovigilance assessment based on the real-world pattern of medication utilization. However, under-reporting is the major drawback of using the spontaneous ADR reports for reliable and accurate data analysis due to lack of interest or time, ignorance on non-serious ADRs, and limited pharmacovigilance knowledge [17,18]. In fact, the annual number of ADR reports was <100,000 cases per year in Korea until 2012, suggesting substantial under-reporting of ADRs. With the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) constructed by the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS) in 2012 as a voluntary ADR reporting system, spontaneous ADR reports have been systematically collected and evaluated in collaboration with regional pharmacovigilance centers (RPVCs) [16,19,20]. The annual number of ADR reports was exponentially increased in 2013 to 183,260 when at least 22 RPVCs were designated [20], highlighting significantly improved data quality to assess medication safety based on voluntary ADR reporting data in the KAERS throughout the pharmaceutical product life cycle.
Despite rigorous investigation of medication safety in pre-approval clinical trials, only limited evidence regarding safety of the medication might be available from these studies due to limited study population and relatively short-term use of the medication. In order to assess the real world, long-term safety of medications used in clinical practice, analysis of RWD is pertinent. Although the National Health Insurance service sample (NHISS) cohort data is the most frequently used RWD source in Korea, due to the national health insurance system, it does not contain non-reimbursement data records. Thus, voluntary ADE reports may be a more appropriate and comprehensive RWD source to evaluate fatal ADRs because (1) they include ADEs associated with non-reimbursed as well as reimbursed medications, and (2) healthcare practitioners are legally required to report clinically serious ADEs, such as death. Therefore, the aims of this study were to characterize the prevalence and causes of fatal ADEs in Korea and to identify risk factors associated with fatal ADEs based on the national pharmacovigilance database in Korea over the period of 10 years.

2. Results

2.1. Baseline Demographics

A total of 289,756 ADE records reported to the KAERS from January 2010 to December 2019 were included in this study. Among them, drug-related fatal events accounted for 629 (0.2%) reports. The baseline demographic characteristics of patients included in the analysis are summarized in Table 1. While non-fatal ADRs were more likely to occur in females [n = 164,621 (56.9%)], fatal events were predominantly reported in males [n = 361 (57.4%)]. Both fatal and non-fatal ADRs were most frequently reported in patients at the age of 70 years or older [n = 214 (34.0%) for fatal and n = 69,965 (24.2%) for non-fatal cases]. The majority of the non-fatal and fatal ADRs were reported by nurses (n = 127,962; 44.3%) and physicians (n = 266; 42.3%), respectively.

2.2. Etiologic Medications Implicated in Fatal Events

The causative agents and drug classes significantly associated with death are summarized in Table 2; Supplementary Table S1 shows the comprehensive results of the estimated risk of fatal events associated with all included medications in our present analysis. Drug-related fatal events were reported at the highest relative frequency for antibacterial drugs (20.3%; reporting odds ratio [ROR] 1.432, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.179–1.740), followed by antimycobacterial agents (5.4%; ROR 2.390, 95% CI 1.691–3.377), analgesics (3.9%; ROR 2.484, 95% CI 1.665–3.706), and contrast media (1.9%; ROR 4.274, 95% CI 2.358–7.770). Among antibacterial agents, piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (e.g., tazobactam) combination was most frequently associated with antibacterial-related deaths (n = 18; ROR 1.685, 95% CI 1.054–2.694), followed by ceftriaxone (n = 9; ROR 4.617, 95% CI 2.391–8.917) and cefotetan (n = 3; ROR 3.859, 95% CI 1.241–12.002). Most of antimycobacterial- and contrast media-induced fatal events were reported with the first-line antimycobacterial agents (n = 33 out of 34), including rifampicin (ROR 2.079, 95% CI 1.113–3.884), isoniazid (ROR 1.991, 95% CI 1.066–3.721), ethambutol (ROR 2.743, 95% CI 1.302–5.779), pyrazinamide (ROR 2.622, 95% CI 1.173–5.861), and iopromide (n = 11 out of 12; ROR 4.280, 95% CI 2.358–7.770), respectively. Morphine was the most common culprit agent associated with analgesic-related fatal cases (n = 7 out of 25; ROR 4.779, 95% CI 2.269–10.068).
Among the fatal adverse drug reactions associated with antibacterial agents, specific antibiotic-induced adverse reactions leading to at least three fatal cases over the study period are summarized in Figure 1. All of the reported fatal adverse reactions associated with the antibacterial agents are typical of each medication as stated in their prescribing information [21]. The most predominant drug-specific fatal adverse reaction was vancomycin-induced urinary system disorders (e.g., nephrotoxicity) (n = 18); followed by platelet, bleeding, and clotting disorders (e.g., thrombocytopenia) caused by vancomycin (n = 11) and piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (n = 8). Although much less common, the following immune-mediated, hypersensitivity reactions were also implicated in death: skin and appendages disorders (e.g., skin eruption) induced by piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (n = 5), vancomycin (n = 4), and ceftriaxone (n = 3); and general disorders (e.g., anaphylactic shock) resulting from cefotetan (n = 3).

2.3. Factors Associated with Drug-Induced Fatal Events

The univariate analysis showed significant association of drug-induced fatal events with sex, age, the number of concomitantly used medications, and the offending agent (p < 0.05, Table 3). All of these factors remained significantly associated with the risk of drug-related death in the multivariate regression analysis (p < 0.05, Table 3). Fatal adverse reactions were more likely to be reported in the following: males (ROR 1.894, 95% CI 1.616–2.222, p < 0.001); individuals with advanced age (ROR 1.013, 95% CI 1.009–1.018, p < 0.001); patients taking multiple medications (ROR 1.072, 95% CI 1.052–1.092, p < 0.001); and those treated with piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (ROR 2.255, 95% CI 1.404–3.621, p = 0.001), cefotetan (ROR 3.991, 95% CI 1.280–12.440, p = 0.017), ceftriaxone (ROR 5.218, 95% CI 2.694–10.107, p < 0.001), morphine (ROR 4.783, 95% CI 2.264–10.103, p < 0.001), iopromide (ROR 4.649, 95% CI 2.550–8.473, p < 0.001), and the four-drug combination antimycobacterial regimen consisting of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (RIPE) (ROR 3.238, 95% CI 2.276–4.605, p < 0.001). Each antimycobacterial component of the RIPE regimen was significantly associated with the risk of fatal adverse drug reactions in the univariate analysis; however, only the RIPE regimen, but not each individual antimycobacterial agent, significantly increased the risk of drug-induced fatal events in the multivariate analysis (Table 3).

3. Discussion

Adverse drug events pose a substantial threat to public health and patient safety [6,22]. The majority of ADEs are mild to moderate, resulting in no harm to reversible harm to patients. The proportion of serious ADEs including life-threatening events and death is not negligible, reported from < 1% up to 67.0% depending on the study population and medications [23,24,25,26,27]. Despite the significance of serious ADEs, few published pharmacovigilance data are available focusing on drug-induced fatal cases [3,6,9,10]. Our current study characterized fatal adverse events associated with medications based on spontaneous ADE reporting data in Korea from 2010 to 2019. Similar to previous studies [6,9], the incidence of drug-related fatal events was not negligible [0.2% (n = 629) of all ADE reports (n = 289,127)]; however, our estimated incidence was much lower than that in previous studies (1.34–3.88%) [3,6,9]. The lower rate of drug-induced death in our present study might be attributed to excluding ADE cases caused by antineoplastic agents (WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system code of L01) in an attempt to minimize confounding effects associated with cancer. In fact, a recent study investigating fatal ADRs based on the WHO pharmacovigilance database suggested anticancer drugs as the most common causative agent of fatal ADRs [6]. Furthermore, our study only included ADR cases with causality assessed as certain, probable/likely, or possible to ensure significant contribution of the reported etiologic medication to the fatal event. Overall, the exclusion of ADE reports associated with oncologic medications and those with causality graded lower than possible might lead to a lower rate of drug-related fatal events compared to previous studies [3,6,9,10]. However, their exclusion minimized confounding effects associated with underlying oncologic diseases as well as other potential causes of death than a drug, which might suggest our estimated incidence of drug-induced death to be more robust and reliable. Future large-scale studies, preferably prospective studies, are warranted to determine a more precise and accurate incidence of drug-related fatal events.
Similar to previous studies, our present study suggested an increased risk of drug-related fatal events in males, elderly patients, and patients concurrently using multiple medications, which was confirmed in the univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis [28,29,30]. While aging and polypharmacy have been extensively reported in previous studies as major risk factors of serious ADRs [28,29], the increased risk of fatal ADRs in males compared to females could not be clearly explained from the physiological standpoint. However, this difference in the risk of drug-induced fatal events between genders might be accounted for by the different attitudes toward health [31,32]. Actually, according to a previous study, men tended to perceive their health as good as women, despite overall worse health status when measured objectively. In addition to sex, age, and the number of concurrently used medications, individuals with more comorbidities might be at an increased risk of fatal ADRs. However, due to extensive missing information regarding comorbid diseases in the KAERS data (44.0% to 58.2%), the association of the fatal ADR risk and the number and/or severity of underlying diseases could not be examined in the multivariate analysis. Additional studies with more comprehensive, large-scale data are imperative to investigate the impact of the number and/or severity of underlying diseases on the risk of drug-related fatal events.
In our current study, antibacterial drugs were most frequently associated with drug-induced fatal events. This is consistent with a previous pharmacovigilance study conducted in Italy, suggesting systemic anti-infectives as the most common medications involved in the fatal ADRs [9]. In contrast to the Italian study, our study showed significantly increased risk for fatal events with antibacterial agents (ROR (95% CI); 1.432 (1.179–1.740) vs. 0.48 (0.39–0.58)). One of the possible reasons for the significantly increased risk of antibacterial-induced fatal events was relatively high rates of antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions such as skin/appendages disorders and anaphylactic general disorders, primarily associated with beta-lactams (e.g., piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor, ceftriaxone, and cefotetan). This is consistent with previous studies suggesting significantly increased risk of drug hypersensitivity reactions, including beta-lactam allergy, in Asian-Pacific ethnic groups, including Koreans compared to Caucasians [33,34]. Additionally, relatively high incidence of antibiotic-associated thrombocytopenia in our study might contribute to the significantly increased risk of antibacterial-related fatal events. Considering the dose-dependent risk of antibiotic-induced thrombocytopenia, fatal platelet disorders might result from prevalent dosing errors of antibiotics as suggested in a previous study [35]. This might account for the highest frequency of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity among drug-specific fatal reactions; however, the risk of fatal events was not significantly increased with vancomycin. This suggests non-fatal adverse events including nephrotoxicity occur much more frequently than fatal cases, as documented in the vancomycin prescribing information as well as previous studies [21,36]. Overall, the significantly higher incidence of antibiotic-induced fatal events in this study might be associated with an increased risk for drug hypersensitivity reactions in the Asian-Pacific ethnic group including Koreans and the high prevalence of antibiotic dosing errors leading to fatal platelet disorders. Further large-scale comparative studies are required to confirm the association of fatal events caused by antibiotics with ethnic risk of drug hypersensitivity reactions as well as inappropriate antibiotic dosing.
To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a significantly increased risk of fatal adverse reactions associated with antimycobacterial agents. The relatively high prevalence and significantly increased risk of fatal ADEs caused by antimycobacterial agents might be associated with the high prevalence and incidence of tuberculosis in Korea [37,38,39]. In 2018, the reported average incidence of tuberculosis among countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was 9 cases per 100,000 population, which was much lower than the incidence in Korea (62 cases per 100,000) [40]. The high disease burden of tuberculosis in Korea results in higher prevalence of anti-tuberculosis medication use, which might contribute to the reported high risk of fatal ADRs induced by anti-tuberculosis medications [39]. Moreover, as suggested in a previous study, the relatively lower body mass among Koreans might lead to substantially larger systemic exposures of antimycobacterial agents, consequently increasing the risk of AEs including fatal ADRs [41]. Our multivariate analysis showed a significantly increased risk of fatal ADRs with the RIPE regimen, but not with each antimycobacterial agent in the RIPE regimen. This is consistent with previous study findings because hepatotoxicity commonly occurs with anti-tuberculosis medications such as isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide; thus, use of more than one hepatotoxic antimycobacterial agent increases the incidence as well as the severity of anti-tuberculosis ADRs, potentially leading to fatal events [42]. In contrast to a previous study suggesting long-term INH treatment as a risk factor for serious INH-induced hepatotoxicity, INH, which is commonly used for at least 6 months, was not significantly associated with the risk of fatal ADRs in our multivariate analysis when used alone. This may be associated with a relatively low frequency of NAT2 slow acetylator alleles in Koreans compared to other ethnic groups, specifically Caucasians (32% vs. 76%) [43]; the slower clearance of INH in slow acetylators results in the accumulation of INH, consequently increasing the risk of INH-induced hepatotoxicity including fatal AEs [44]. Overall, patients receiving the four-drug RIPE regimen, especially over a prolonged period of time, should be monitored closely in clinical practice to prevent potentially fatal ADRs. Future large-scale studies may assist in identifying individuals at high risk of antimycobacterial-related death by accounting for various genetic, demographic, and clinical characteristics.
Consistent with previous studies [23,25,28,45], analgesics were one of the most common medication classes implicated in fatal ADRs with morphine as the only analgesic agent significantly increasing the risk of fatal adverse events. This finding is similar to our previous study results suggesting opioids including morphine account for the majority of analgesic-related deaths [28]. The prevalent opioid-related deaths might be closely associated with the current opioid epidemic characterized by opioid abuse and overuse [46,47]. As previous studies suggested, opioid-induced oversedation frequently results in serious adverse events including respiratory depression and cardiovascular toxicities such as hypotension, potentially leading to death [48,49]. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting the increased risk of morphine-related death reported in our current study. Considering morphine is one of the most commonly prescribed analgesic medications in terminally ill patients, the significantly increased risk of fatal events associated with morphine might be confounded by the underlying diseases of morphine users. In fact, potentially fatal ADRs of opioids such as respiratory dysfunction and cardiovascular collapse are common clinical manifestations of terminal illness [50]. Unfortunately, due to extensive missing information regarding comorbidities in the KAERS database, the impact of the patient’s underlying diseases such as terminal cancer could not be adjusted when estimating the risk of morphine-induced fatal ADRs in our present study. Overall, morphine should be used judiciously by evaluating the therapeutic benefit versus risk based on patient characteristics such as comorbid diseases.
Our present study suggested contrast media implicated in substantial fatal ADR reports. The majority of contrast media-induced fatal cases resulted from iopromide, which is a nonionic, low-osmolar, iodinated contrast media agent commonly used for X-ray imaging studies in clinical practice [51]. Similarly, a previous pharmacovigilance study in Korea reported iopromide as the most common causative agent of ADRs among seven iodinated contrast media [51]. This finding should be interpreted with caution because iopromide accounts for the largest share of the contrast media market in practice [51], potentially leading to the highest rate of iopromide-induced ADR reports. Although the majority of the contrast media-induced AEs are mild and reversible including nausea, vomiting, itching, and nephrotoxicity, ADRs caused by radiocontrast media might result in life-threatening or even fatal events such as hypotensive shock, respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, and convulsions [51]. The increased risk for fatal ADRs caused by contrast media might be associated with the high risk of drug hypersensitivity reactions including radiocontrast media hypersensitivity in Asian-Pacific ethnic groups such as Koreans compared to Caucasians [33,34,52]. In fact, a previous study comparing the safety profiles of seven iodinated contrast media in Korea showed iopromide-induced skin reactions such as urticaria as the most frequently reported ADE [51], which is a common clinical manifestation of radiocontrast media hypersensitivity reaction [52,53]. Considering the high risk of developing severe and even fatal ADRs associated with contrast media including radiocontrast hypersensitivity reactions, close monitoring should be implemented for patients receiving at least one dose of contrast media agents for prompt and appropriate management of potentially fatal ADRs due to contrast media.
Some limitations should be considered when evaluating the results of this study. First, because the KAERS database is a spontaneous reporting system, under-reporting of AEs could occur although it is unlikely for fatal cases due to the required case reporting for compensatory relief of injury from ADRs [54,55]. Nevertheless, the total number of fatal adverse event cases was relatively small; thus, statistical analysis was performed for limited medications and drug classes to ensure adequate robustness and reliability. In addition, the number of safety reports for a specific etiologic agent might be substantially affected by the amount of medication use in clinical practice, highlighting the need to carefully interpret our current study findings. Lastly, considering the nature of the study design as well as extensive missing information to characterize the reported ADRs such as indications, comorbid diseases, and concurrent medications, our present study should not be used to determine a definite causality between the reported fatal event and the offending medication. In order to minimize the effects of potential confounding factors such as underlying diseases on the risk of fatal ADRs, ADE reports associated with oncologic medications were excluded in our study. Considering antineoplastic agents reported as the most frequently implicated class in fatal ADRs according to a recent global pharmacovigilance study [6], additional studies with more comprehensive real-world data including anticancer drug safety data are imperative for more accurate and precise characterization of fatal ADRs. Although the quality of recorded information in the safety reports was considered adequate through data verification by a reporter and an independent record reviewer in the KIDS, future large-scale, preferably prospective, studies are warranted to elaborate the impact of various nondrug factors or other medications than the reported culprit drug on the risk of fatal ADRs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Data Source and Definition

In this retrospective pharmacovigilance study, ADR reports voluntarily submitted to the KAERS over the period of January 2010 to December 2019 were evaluated to compare epidemiologic characteristics of fatal and non-fatal ADRs. The KAERS is the Korean national pharmacovigilance database consisting of spontaneous ADR reports forwarded to the KIDS. All individual ADRs were recorded using standardized case reporting forms, developed and validated by the KIDS, to document the following information: (1) patient demographics including age, sex, and comorbidities; (2) medication information including concomitant medications, dates of treatment initiation and cessation, and the offending agent; (3) ADR information including the year of case reports and causality assessment between the documented ADR and the causative drug; and (4) seriousness of adverse events [19]. Each ADR report was submitted by the general public, healthcare professionals, and pharmaceutical companies [16,19]. The submitted ADR reports were further reviewed and verified by healthcare professionals in the KIDS prior to deposition into the KAERS.
The included ADR reports in this study were individual case safety reports submitted to the KAERS from January 2010 to December 2019 and those with causality between the ADR and etiologic drugs assessed as “certain”, “probable/likely”, or “possible” according to the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria [56]. The ADR reports were grouped into either fatal events or non-fatal events. Fatal events were defined as the individual ADR case safety reports documented to result in death based on the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E2D Guideline [57]. Non-fatal events were the ADR reports that did not meet the criteria for fatal events. Individual case safety reports associated with drugs exclusively leading to non-fatal events were excluded from this comparative analysis of fatal vs. non-fatal ADRs. Causative medications associated with reported ADRs were classified according to the WHO ATC classification system up to the second level. All ADRs were recorded based on the WHO-Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART) as preferred terms or included terms [58], which were grouped into System Organ Class (SOC) disorders. In an effort to minimize the obscure relationship between offending agents and adverse events, particularly fatal outcomes, the ADR cases reportedly caused by antineoplastic agents with the WHO ATC code of L01 were excluded due to the substantial disease severity of underlying malignant tumors [59].
The study protocol for using the KAERS database was approved by the KIDS (No. 2006A0035, No. 2007A0058) and the institutional review board of Kyung Hee University (No. KHSIRB-20-314) (Seoul, Korea). Informed consents were exempted by the board.

4.2. Statistical Analysis

For statistical analyses, SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) were used. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics of fatal and non-fatal cases of ADR reports with mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Comparison between fatal and non-fatal reports was performed utilizing the Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous data, unpaired 2-tailed t test for normally distributed continuous data, and the χ2 or the Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. Normality for continuous variables was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The association between death and causative drugs or drug classes was assessed using disproportionality analysis based on the ADR reporting odds ratios (RORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For reliable analyses, RORs were estimated for specific offending medications or drug classes with at least three reported fatal cases [28,60,61,62]. Disproportionality was defined as the lower limit of the ROR 95% CI greater than 1, which was considered to robustly increase the risk for fatal ADRs [60,63].
In order to identify factors significantly associated with risk for drug-related fatal events, the univariate analysis was first performed for the following factors: sex, age, implicated drug, and the number of concurrently used medications. Multiple logistic regression analysis was then conducted using a stepwise forward method by examining the factors significantly associated with fatal cases in the univariate analysis. Variables with p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis and clinical plausibility were further tested in the multiple logistic regression. Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05 throughout statistical analyses.

5. Conclusions

The prevalence of fatal events associated with medications is relatively low in Korea (0.2%). The risk of fatal ADRs is significantly increased with antibacterial drugs, antimycobacterials, analgesics, and contrast media. Antibacterial agents are the most common cause of fatal ADRs, among which vancomycin is most frequently involved in fatal adverse events without significantly increasing the risk of fatal events vs. non-fatal ADRs. Fatal adverse drug events are more likely to occur in male, elderly patients receiving multiple medications, especially when treated with piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor; cefotetan; ceftriaxone; four-drug anti-tuberculosis regimen consisting of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; morphine; and iopromide (an iodinated contrast media agent). Large, national pharmacovigilance database is a unique tool to elaborate the epidemiologic characteristics of fatal ADRs in the country or ethnic group considering specific demographic, clinical, and sociocultural characteristics of medication use in clinical practice. Further studies evaluating fatal ADRs based on more comprehensive pharmacovigilance data analysis are warranted to promote safe medication use in clinical practice, ultimately ensuring patient safety.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jpm12010005/s1, Table S1: Medications implicated in fatal adverse drug reactions reported to the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-G.J., Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; methodology, H.-G.J., K.J., J.-Y.R. and E.-K.C.; software, H.-G.J., K.J. and J.-Y.R.; validation, W.-G.K., Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; formal analysis, H.-G.J., K.J., J.-Y.R. and S.P.; investigation, H.-G.J., K.J., J.-Y.R. and S.P.; resources, Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; data curation, J.-Y.R., Y.-S.C. and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-Y.R., W.-G.K., Y.-S.C., Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; visualization, H.-G.J., K.J., J.-Y.R., and S.P.; supervision, Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; project administration, Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C.; funding acquisition, Y.-J.C. and E.-K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant (No. 21153MFDS601-1) from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2021. This study was partially supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education in Korea (2021R1I1A1A01044500).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol for utilizing the KAERS database was approved by the KIDS (No. 2006A0035, No. 2007A0058). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the institutional review board of Kyung Hee University (No. KHSIRB-20-314, approved on 26 August 2020) (Seoul, Korea).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the reported study results are available from the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS) for approved study protocols. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data due to the need for approval from the KIDS and the inclusion of private medical information. Data are available from the authors with permission from the KIDS.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all individuals who have been contributing toward establishing the KAERS database and the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management, as well as the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety for providing these data. We also thank Soo Min Shin and Mi So Kim for their assistance in data curation and management. This research was supported by a grant (No. 21153MFDS601-1) from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2021. This study was partially supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education in Korea (2021R1I1A1A01044500).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1789–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moore, T.J.; Cohen, M.R.; Furberg, C.D. Serious Adverse Drug Events Reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998–2005. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 1752–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sonawane, K.B.; Cheng, N.; Hansen, R.A. Serious Adverse Drug Events Reported to the FDA: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System 2006–2014 Database. J. Manag. Care Spéc. Pharm. 2018, 24, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bénard-Laribière, A.; Miremont-Salamé, G.; Pérault-Pochat, M.-C.; Noize, P.; Haramburu, F.; the EMIR Study Group on behalf of the French network of pharmacovigilance centres. Incidence of hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in France: The EMIR study. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 29, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Giardina, C.; Cutroneo, P.M.; Mocciaro, E.; Russo, G.T.; Mandraffino, G.; Basile, G.; Rapisarda, F.; Ferrara, R.; Spina, E.; Arcoraci, V. Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: Results of the FORWARD (Facilitation of Reporting in Hospital Ward) Study. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Montastruc, J.L.; Lafaurie, M.; de Canecaude, C.; Durrieu, G.; Sommet, A.; Montastruc, F.; Bagheri, H. Fatal adverse drug reactions: A worldwide perspective in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 4334–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zoppi, M.; Braunschweig, S.; Kuenzi, U.P.; Maibach, R.; Hoigné, R. Incidence of lethal adverse drug reactions in the comprehensive hospital drug monitoring, a 20-year survey, 1974–1993, based on the data of Berne/St. Gallen. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 56, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Juntti-Patinen, L.; Neuvonen, P.J. Drug-related deaths in a university central hospital. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 58, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Leone, R.; Sottosanti, L.; Luisa Iorio, M.; Santuccio, C.; Conforti, A.; Sabatini, V.; Moretti, U.; Venegoni, M. Drug-related deaths: An analysis of the Italian spontaneous reporting database. Drug Saf. 2008, 31, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mouton, J.; Mehta, U.; Parrish, A.G.; Wilson, D.P.K.; Stewart, A.; Njuguna, C.W.; Kramer, N.; Maartens, G.; Blockman, M.; Cohen, K. Mortality from adverse drug reactions in adult medical inpatients at four hospitals in South Africa: A cross-sectional survey. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 80, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Angamo, M.T.; Chalmers, L.; Curtain, C.M.; Yilma, D.; Bereznicki, L. Mortality from adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations in south-west Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 43, 790–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Patel, T.K.; Patel, P.B. Mortality among patients due to adverse drug reactions that lead to hospitalization: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 74, 819–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fountain, J.S.; Tomlin, A.M.; Reith, D.M.; Tilyard, M.W. Fatal Toxicity Indices for Medicine-Related Deaths in New Zealand, 2008–2013. Drug Saf. 2020, 43, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chung, H.; Park, M.; Hahn, E.; Choi, H.; Choi, H.; Lim, M. Recent Trends of Drug Abuse and Drug-Associated Deaths in Korea. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1025, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schmiedl, S.; Rottenbkolber, M.; Szymanski, J.; Drewelow, B.; Siegmund, W.; Hippius, M.; Farker, K.; Guenther, I.R.; Hasford, J.; Thuermann, P.A.; et al. Preventable ADRs leading to hospitalization—Results of a long-term prospective safety study with 6427 ADR cases focusing on elderly patients. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2018, 17, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shin, J.Y.; Jung, S.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Seong, J.M.; Chung, S.Y.; Park, B.J. New initiatives for pharma-covigilance in South Korea: Introducing the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS). Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2014, 23, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lopez-Gonzalez, E.; Herdeiro, M.T.; Figueiras, A. Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009, 32, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hazell, L.; Shakir, S.A. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006, 29, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shin, Y.S.; Lee, Y.W.; Choi, Y.H.; Park, B.; Jee, Y.-K.; Choi, S.-K.; Kim, E.-G.; Park, J.-W.; Hong, C.-S. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug events by Korean regional pharmacovigilance centers. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2009, 18, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management. Available online: https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/ko/index.do (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  21. DAILYMED. Available online: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  22. Haukland, E.C.; Mevik, K.; von Plessen, C.; Nieder, C.; Vonen, B. Contribution of adverse events to death of hospitalised patients. BMJ Open Qual. 2019, 8, e000377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cazacu, I.; Miremont-Salamé, G.; Mogosan, C.; Fourrier-Réglat, A.; Loghin, F.; Haramburu, F. Preventability of adverse effects of analgesics: Analysis of spontaneous reports. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 71, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cazacu, I.; Stroe, R.; Dondera, R.; Mogosan, C.; Haramburu, F.; Fourrier-Réglat, A.; Loghin, F. Adverse drug reactions of analgesic medicines: Analysis of the Romanian pharmacovigilance database. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 32, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Min, J.; Osborne, V.; Kowalski, A.; Prosperi, M. Reported Adverse Events with Painkillers: Data Mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System. Drug Saf. 2017, 41, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Figueras, A.; Capellà, D.; Castel, J.M.; Laorte, J.R. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A report from the Spanish System of Pharmacovigilance, including an early analysis of topical and enteric-coated formulations. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1994, 47, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duprey, M.S.; Al-Qadheeb, N.S.; O’Donnell, N.; Hoffman, K.B.; Weinstock, J.; Madias, C.; Dimbil, M.; Devlin, J.W. Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System. Drugs—Real World Outcomes 2019, 6, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Choi, Y.J.; Kim, M.H.; Chung, E.K.; Lee, J.K.; Yoon, J.; Yug, J.S.; Jang, D.K. Prevalence and seriousness of analgesic-induced adverse events in Korea: A 10-year nationwide surveillance. J. Patient Saf. 2020, 16, e215–e224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Choi, Y.-J.; Yang, S.-W.; Kwack, W.-G.; Lee, J.-K.; Lee, T.-H.; Jang, J.-Y.; Chung, E.-K. Comparative Safety Profiles of Sedatives Commonly Used in Clinical Practice: A 10-Year Nationwide Pharmacovigilance Study in Korea. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Holm, L.; Ekman, E.; Blomgren, K.J. Influence of age, sex and seriousness on reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2017, 26, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mosnier-Pudar, H.; Hochberg, G.; Eschwege, E.; Virally, M.-L.; Halimi, S.; Guillausseau, P.; Peixoto, O.; Touboul, C.; Dubois, C.; Dejager, S. How do patients with type 2 diabetes perceive their disease? Insights from the French DIABASIS survey. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sood, R.; Jenkins, S.M.; Sood, A.; Clark, M.M. Gender Differences in Self-perception of Health at a Wellness Center. Am. J. Health Behav. 2019, 43, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Thong, B.Y.-H.; Lucas, M.; Kang, H.R.; Chang, Y.S.; Li, P.H.; Tang, M.M.; Yun, J.; Fok, J.S.; Kim, B.K.; Nagao, M.; et al. Drug hypersensitivity reactions in Asia: Regional issues and challenges. Asia Pac. Allergy 2020, 10, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Buka, R.J.; Crossman, R.J.; Melchior, C.L.; Huissoon, A.P.; Hackett, S.; Dorrian, S.; Cooke, M.W.; Krishna, M.T. Anaphylaxis and ethnicity: Higher incidence in British South Asians. Allergy 2015, 70, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoon, J.; Yug, J.S.; Ki, D.Y.; Yoon, J.-E.; Kang, S.W.; Chung, E.K. Characterization of Medication Errors in a Medical Intensive Care Unit of a University Teaching Hospital in South Korea. J. Patient Saf. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Filippone, E.J.; Kraft, W.K.; Farber, J.L. The Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 102, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. OECD Reviews of Public Health: Korea A Healthier Tomorrow. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/OECD-Reviews-of-Public-Health-Korea-Assessment-and-recommendations.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  38. Korean National Tuberculosis Association. Available online: https://www.knta.or.kr/tbInfo/tbCondition/tbCondition.asp (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  39. IAMAT 60 Years. Korea-South for Specific Travelers: Tuberculosis. Available online: https://www.iamat.org/country/korea-south/risk/tuberculosis# (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  40. OECDiLibrary. Tuberculosis. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/f494a701-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/f494a701-en (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  41. Bliven-Sizemore, E.E.; Sterling, T.R.; Shang, N.; Benator, D.; Schwartzman, K.; Reves, R.; Drobeniuc, J.; Bock, N.; Villarino, M.E.; the TB Trials Consortium. Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid is less hepatotoxic than nine months of daily isoniazid for LTBI. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2015, 19, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Saukkonen, J.J.; Cohn, D.L.; Jasmer, R.M.; Schenker, S.; Jereb, J.A.; Nolan, C.M.; Peloquin, C.A.; Gordin, F.M.; Nunes, D.; Strader, D.B.; et al. An Official ATS Statement: Hepatotoxicity of Antituberculosis Therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 935–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lin, H.J.; Han, C.-Y.; Lin, B.K.; Hardy, S. Ethnic distribution of slow acetylator mutations in the polymorphic N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) gene. Pharmacogenetics 1994, 4, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ali, M.H.; Alrasheedy, A.A.; Kibuule, D.; Hassali, M.A.; Godman, B.; Abdelwahab, M.F.; Abbadi, R.Y. Isoniazid acetylation phenotypes in the Sudanese population; findings and implications. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobac. Dis. 2019, 17, 100120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sunara, P.; Krnic, D.; Puljak, L. Adverse drug reactions of non-opioid and opioid analgesics reported to Croatian national authority from 2007 to 2014. Acta Med. Acad. 2018, 46, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dart, R.C.; Surratt, H.; Cicero, T.J.; Parrino, M.W.; Severtson, S.G.; Bucher-Bartelson, B.; Green, J.L. Trends in Opioid Analgesic Abuse and Mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jones, M.R.; Viswanath, O.; Peck, J.; Kaye, A.D.; Gill, J.S.; Simopoulos, T.T. A Brief History of the Opioid Epidemic and Strategies for Pain Medicine. Pain Ther. 2018, 7, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nandakumar, R.; Gollakota, S.; Sunshine, J.E. Opioid overdose detection using smartphones. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Meisenberg, B.; Ness, J.; Rao, S.; Rhule, J.; Ley, C. Implementation of solutions to reduce opioid-induced oversedation and respiratory depression. Am. J. Health Pharm. 2017, 74, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wiffen, P.J.; Wee, B.; Moore, R.A. Oral morphine for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 4, CD003868. [Google Scholar]
  51. Seong, J.-M.; Choi, N.-K.; Lee, J.; Chang, Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yang, B.R.; Jin, X.-M.; Kim, J.-Y.; Park, B.-J. Comparison of the Safety of Seven Iodinated Contrast Media. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 1703–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Endrikat, J.; Michel, A.; Kölbach, R.; Lengsfeld, P.; Vogtländer, K. Risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide after intra-arterial versus intravenous administration: A nested case-control analysis of 133,331 Patients. Investig. Radiol. 2020, 55, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Polkampally, P.; Jovin, I.; Bottinor, W. Adverse Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media. Int. J. Angiol. 2013, 22, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Korean Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management. Relief of Injury from ADR. Available online: https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/iwt/ds/en/introduction/EgovPropelSummary.do (accessed on 16 October 2021).
  55. Arora, A.; Jalali, R.K.; Vohora, D. Relevance of the Weber effect in contemporary pharmacovigilance of oncology drugs. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017, 13, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The Use of the WHO-UMC System for Standarised Case Causality Assessment. Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOcausality_assessment.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2021).
  57. International Conference on Harmonisation. Post-Approval Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standard for Expedites Reporting E2D 2003. Available online: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2D_Guideline.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  58. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology-WHO-ART 2018. Available online: https://www.who-umc.org/media/164200/who-umc-causality-assessment_new-logo.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2021).
  59. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index 2021. Available online: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  60. Nguyen, K.-D.; Nguyen, H.-A.; Vu, D.-H.; Le, T.T.-L.; Dang, B.-V.; Nguyen, T.-N.; Nguyen, D.-H.; Nguyen, T.-B.; Montastruc, J.-L.; Bagheri, H. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in a Vietnamese Pharmacovigilance Database: Trends and Specific Signals from a Disproportionality Analysis. Drug Saf. 2018, 42, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. van Puijenbroek, E.P.; Bate, A.; Leufkens, H.G.; Lindquist, M.; Orre, R.; Egberts, A.C. A comparison of measures of dis-proportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2002, 11, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Raschi, E.; Piccinni, C.; Poluzzi, E.; Marchesini, G.; De Ponti, F. The association of pancreatitis with antidiabetic drug use: Gaining insight through the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Acta Diabetol. 2011, 50, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. European Medicines Agency. Screening for Adverse Reactions in EudraVigilance. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/screening-adverse-reactions-eudravigilance_en.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2021).
Jpm 12 00005 g001 550
Figure 1. Specific antibiotic-induced adverse reactions resulting in at least three fatal cases over the study period.
Figure 1. Specific antibiotic-induced adverse reactions resulting in at least three fatal cases over the study period.
Jpm 12 00005 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics of patients included in this study (n = 289,756) a.
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics of patients included in this study (n = 289,756) a.
CharacteristicsFatal Case
(n = 629)		Non-Fatal Case
(n = 289,127)
Sex
Male361 (57.4)124,506 (43.1)
Female268 (42.6)164,621 (56.9)
Age (Years)
<1016 (2.5)7758 (2.7)
10–199 (1.4)8319 (2.9)
20–2913 (2.1)17,667 (6.1)
30–3923 (3.7)28,589 (9.9)
40–4996 (15.3)39,211 (13.6)
50–59129 (20.5)59,357 (20.5)
60–69129 (20.5)58,261 (20.2)
≥70214 (34.0)69,965 (24.2)
Causality b
Certain1 (0.2)7025 (2.4)
Probable/likely102 (16.2)80,917 (28.0)
Possible526 (83.6)201,185 (69.6)
Individuals reporting adverse events c
Physicians266 (42.3)47,138 (16.3)
Pharmacists51 (8.1)76,171 (26.3)
Nurses47 (7.5)127,962 (44.3)
General Public32 (5.1)6787 (2.3)
Others135 (21.5)15,490 (5.4)
Number of concurrently used medications
1197 (31.3)122,920 (42.5)
295 (15.1)39,434 (13.6)
3120 (19.1)36,842 (12.7)
452 (8.3)35,579 (12.3)
≥5165 (26.2)54,352 (18.8)
Number of comorbidities d
1152 (24.2)150,842 (52.2)
244 (7.0)7044 (2.4)
329 (4.6)2396 (0.8)
45 (0.8)924 (0.3)
≥533 (5.2)847 (0.3)
a Data presented as the number of cases (% relative frequency). b Causality was assessed according to the World Health Organization—Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. c Information was missing in 98 (15.6%) fatal and 15,579 (5.4%) non-fatal cases, respectively. d Information was missing in 366 (58.2%) fatal and 127,074 (44.0%) non-fatal cases, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Causative agents significantly associated with fatal adverse drug reactions.
Table 2. Causative agents significantly associated with fatal adverse drug reactions.
WHO-ATC
Code a		Therapeutic Class or AgentNumber (%) of Reported Fatal Events (n = 629)ROR (95% CI) bp-Value c
Number of Fatal EventsRelative Frequency
J01Antibacterial drugs12820.3%1.432 (1.179–1.740)<0.001
Piperacillin/BLI182.9%1.685 (1.054–2.694)0.029
Ceftriaxone91.4%4.617 (2.391–8.917)<0.001
Cefotetan30.5%3.859 (1.241–12.002)0.020
J04Antimycobacterials345.4%2.390 (1.691–3.377)<0.001
Rifampicin101.6%2.079 (1.113–3.884)0.022
Isoniazid101.6%1.991 (1.066–3.721)0.031
Ethambutol71.1%2.743 (1.302–5.779)0.008
Pyrazinamide61.0%2.622 (1.173–5.861)0.019
N02Analgesic drugs254.0%2.484 (1.665–3.706)<0.001
Morphine71.1%4.779 (2.269–10.068)<0.001
V08Contrast media121.9%4.274 (2.413–7.568)<0.001
Iopromide111.7%4.280 (2.358–7.770)<0.001
Abbreviations: WHO-ATC, World Health Organization-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System; ROR, reporting odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BLI, beta-lactamase inhibitor. a WHO-ATC code shown up to the second level (bolded). b ROR from the Mantel–Haenszel test for fatal events compared to non-fatal events. c p-value from the Mantel–Haenszel test between fatal and non-fatal events.
Table
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for the association of fatal adverse drug reactions with patient characteristics and causative medications.
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for the association of fatal adverse drug reactions with patient characteristics and causative medications.
Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
ROR (95% CI)p ValueROR (95% CI)p Value
Baseline characteristics
Male sex1.783 (1.520–2.088)<0.0011.894 (1.616–2.222)<0.001
Age1.015 (1.011–1.020)<0.0011.013 (1.009–1.018)<0.001
Number of concurrently used medications1.099 (1.082–1.116)<0.0011.072 (1.052–1.092)<0.001
Causative medication
Piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor1.685 (1.054–2.694)0.0292.255 (1.404–3.621)0.001
Cefotetan3.859 (1.241–12.002)0.0203.991 (1.280–12.440)0.017
Ceftriaxone4.617 (2.391–8.917)<0.0015.218 (2.694–10.107)<0.001
Rifampicin2.079 (1.113–3.884)0.022
Isoniazid1.991 (1.066–3.721)0.031
Pyrazinamide2.622 (1.173–5.861)0.019
Ethambutol2.743 (1.302–5.779)0.008
RIPE 3.238 (2.276–4.605)<0.001
Morphine4.779 (2.269–10.068)<0.0014.783 (2.264–10.103)<0.001
Iopromide4.280 (2.358–7.770)<0.0014.649 (2.550–8.473)<0.001
Abbreviations: ROR, reporting odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; RIPE, four-drug combination antimycobacterial regimen consisting of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jo, H.-G.; Jeong, K.; Ryu, J.-Y.; Park, S.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kwack, W.-G.; Choi, Y.-J.; Chung, E.-K. Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010005

AMA Style

Jo H-G, Jeong K, Ryu J-Y, Park S, Choi Y-S, Kwack W-G, Choi Y-J, Chung E-K. Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jo, Hyeong-Geun, Kyeoul Jeong, Ji-Young Ryu, Soyun Park, Yun-Seok Choi, Won-Gun Kwack, Yeo-Jin Choi, and Eun-Kyoung Chung. 2022. "Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop