Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease and Variation of Its Risk Factors by the Regions in Okayama Prefecture
Next Article in Special Issue
From Bench to Bedside in Precision Medicine: Diabetes Mellitus and Peri-Implantitis Clinical Indices with a Short-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
EPR Effect-Based Tumor Targeted Nanomedicine: A Promising Approach for Controlling Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Translational Trends in Personalized Medicine: Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and Plasma for COVID-19 Patient
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Skeletal and Dental Morphological Characteristics of the Maxillary in Patients with Impacted Canines Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Clinical Study

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(1), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010096
by María Elena Montes-Díaz 1, Alicia Martínez-González 1, Riánsares Arriazu-Navarro 2, Alfonso Alvarado-Lorenzo 3,*, Nuria Esther Gallardo-López 4 and Ricardo Ortega-Aranegui 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(1), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010096
Submission received: 12 December 2021 / Revised: 29 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 12 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Precision Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

commented are mentioned in the below file 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I congratulate for your manuscript and scientific work!

My remarks: 

  1. In Materials and methods please review the proper name of the CBCT device:  Planmeca Promax roMX 3D MID
  2. In Materials and methods please review the proper company info of Invivo™ 6 KaVo (KaVo, Berlin, Germany)
  3. In Materials and methods "nostrils" refer to a soft tissue anatomical landmark. The measurements were carried out on hard tissue anatomical landmarks. Please clarify!
  4. The skeletal variables were measured on 3D rendered images, not on the reconstructed CBCT images according to the Figure 1, 2 and 4. If it is true, the validity of measurements on 3D rendered images needs to be stated in the manuscript and supported by other studies from the scientific literature. If the measurements were carried out on the reconstructed CBCT images, then it needs to be indicated, that the Figures of 3D rendered images are just demonstrating the mesurement for a better understanding.
  5. Table 2 showing results in Materials and Methods section. Please revise it's proper position in the manuscript! 
  6. The several spelling or spacong error shall be revised and corrected.
Back to TopTop