Next Article in Journal
Physical Activity Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Longitudinal Study
Next Article in Special Issue
A Holistic Approach for the Identification of Success Factors in Secondary Cleft Osteoplasty
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Exome Sequencing in Healthy Individuals of Extreme Constitution Types Reveals Differential Disease Risk: A Novel Approach towards Predictive Medicine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry

1
Institute for Translational Research in Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
2
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(3), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030490
Submission received: 9 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 18 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine)

Abstract

Recently, three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning has been gaining popularity in personalized dentistry. Integration of the digital dental model into the 3D facial image allows for a treatment plan to be made in accordance with the patients’ individual needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of extraoral markers on the accuracy of digital dentofacial integrations. Facial models were generated using smartphone and stereophotogrammetry. Dental models were generated with and without extraoral markers and were registered to the facial models by matching the teeth or markers (n = 10 in each condition; total = 40). Accuracy of the image integration was measured in terms of general 3D position, occlusal plane, and dental midline deviations. The Mann–Whitney U test and two-way analysis of variance were used to compare results among face-scanning systems and matching methods (α = 0.05). As result, the accuracy of dentofacial registration was significantly affected by the use of artificial markers and different face-scanning systems (p < 0.001). The deviations were smallest in stereophotogrammetry with the marker-based matching and highest in smartphone face scans with the tooth-based matching. In comparison between the two face-scanning systems, the stereophotogrammetry generally produced smaller discrepancies than smartphones.
Keywords: face scan; dental scan; image integration; extraoral marker; accuracy; stereophotogrammetry; smartphone face scan; dental scan; image integration; extraoral marker; accuracy; stereophotogrammetry; smartphone

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mai, H.-N.; Lee, D.-H. Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030490

AMA Style

Mai H-N, Lee D-H. Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(3):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mai, Hang-Nga, and Du-Hyeong Lee. 2022. "Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 3: 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030490

APA Style

Mai, H.-N., & Lee, D.-H. (2022). Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(3), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop