Next Article in Journal
Variable Drug-Target Exposure, Tumor Signatures, and Combinatorial Targeted Treatment: Approaches of Personalized Medicine in Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Previous Occupational Exposure on Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Privacy and Security for a Genomic Information System Based on Standards
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correlation Comparison and Personalized Utility of Field Walking Tests in Assessing the Exercise Capacity of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lack of Association between Inhaled Corticosteroid Use and the Risk of Future Exacerbation in Patients with GOLD Group A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(6), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060916
by Sun Hye Shin 1, Deog Kyeom Kim 2, Sang-Heon Kim 3, Tae Rim Shin 4,5, Ki-Suck Jung 4,6, Kwang Ha Yoo 7, Ki-Eun Hwang 8, Hye Yun Park 1,*,†, Yong Suk Jo 9,*,† and on behalf of the KOCOSS Cohort ‡
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(6), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060916
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 7 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 31 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made an interesting study on Lack of Association between Inhaled Corticosteroid Use and the Risk of Future Exacerbation in Patients with GOLD Group A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The manuscript can be published; however, the authors need to justify the scientific writing manuscript. Some of the general comments are provided below:
1. It is very interesting study, as some other studies with mild-to-very-severe COPD and predominantly low exacerbation risk showed no differences in mortality with LAMA/LABA versus LAMA/LABA/ICS, suggesting that the survival benefit of triple therapy seen in some recent studies may be specific to a high-risk population. This supports the current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommendations that triple therapy should be reserved for the subpopulations of patients who need it to avoid ICS overuse. How would the authors comment on those results in comparison to their study?

  1. Authors should compare their studies with some recent studies using ICS or combination therapy in the discussion.
  2. They have a low number of participants in this study.
  3. More references from the last five years should be added.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Despite the fact that this is a retrospective study and that the C group is very few patients, it is well designed to reach a conclusion that is supported by other work: the limited usefulness of inhaled corticosteroids in phenotype A COPD. It has important limitations, which the authors point out at the end of the paper, but even so, its information is useful for clinical practice.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer. 

Back to TopTop