Coping Styles in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Consideration in the Co-Designing of Integrated Care Concepts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- A required response to overcome fragmentation in care delivery.
- (2)
- An approach to improve care quality and its cost-effectiveness.
- (3)
- A service innovation guided by the principle of people- and population-centeredness.
2. Co-Design in Integrated Care Concepts: Research with and Not on PwPs
3. Addressing the Question of Personality—Take a Closer Look at Our Patients!
- openness to experience (inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious)
- conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. extravagant/careless)
- extraversion (outgoing/energetic vs. solitary/reserved)
- agreeableness (friendly/compassionate vs. critical/rational)
- neuroticism (sensitive/nervous vs. resilient/confident)
4. Coping Styles in PwPs: How Do They Influence the PwPs’ Journey?
5. Can the Inclusion of Coping Styles in the Co-Design of Integrated Care Concepts Be a Game Changer?
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jankovic, J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, H.; Burton, E.A.; Ross, G.W.; Huang, X.; Savica, R.; Abbott, R.D.; Ascherio, A.; Caviness, J.N.; Gao, X.; Gray, K.A.; et al. Research on the premotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: Clinical and etiological implications. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pont-Sunyer, C.; Hotter, A.; Gaig, C.; Seppi, K.; Compta, Y.; Katzenschlager, R.; Mas, N.; Hofeneder, D.; Brücke, T.; Bayés, A.; et al. The onset of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (the ONSET PD study). Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quelhas, R.; Costa, M. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2009, 21, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Halteren, A.D.; Munneke, M.; Smit, E.; Thomas, S.; Bloem, B.R.; Darweesh, S.K.L. Personalized Care Management for Persons with Parkinson’s Disease. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2020, 10, S11–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajan, R.; Brennan, L.; Bloem, B.R.; Dahodwala, N.; Gardner, J.; Goldman, J.G.; Grimes, D.A.; Iansek, R.; Kovács, N.; McGinley, J.; et al. Integrated Care in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mov. Disord. 2020, 35, 1509–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate-General. The 2014 EU Summit on Chronic Diseases Brussels: Conference Conclusions. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/other-pages/basic-page/chronic-diseases-summit-3-4-april-2014_en#about-the-conference (accessed on 22 April 2022).
- De Lau, L.M.L.; Breteler, M.M.B. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pringsheim, T.; Jette, N.; Frolkis, A.; Steeves, T.D.L. The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov. Disord. 2014, 29, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Eijk, M.; Nijhuis, F.A.P.; Faber, M.J.; Bloem, B.R. Moving from physician-centered care towards patient-centered care for Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2013, 19, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mestre, T.A.; Kessler, D.; Côté, D.; Liddy, C.; Thavorn, K.; Taljaard, M.; Grimes, D. Pilot Evaluation of a Pragmatic Network for Integrated Care and Self-Management in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov. Disord. 2021, 36, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloem, B.R.; Henderson, E.J.; Dorsey, E.R.; Okun, M.S.; Okubadejo, N.; Chan, P.; Andrejack, J.; Darweesh, S.K.L.; Munneke, M. Integrated and patient-centred management of Parkinson’s disease: A network model for reshaping chronic neurological care. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouwens, M.; Wollersheim, H.; Hermens, R.; Hulscher, M.; Grol, R. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: A review of systematic reviews. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2005, 17, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- World Health Organization. WHO Global Strategy on People-Centred and Integrated Health Services: Interim Report; No. WHO/HIS/SDS/2015.6; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin, N. Understanding Integrated Care. Int. J. Integr. Care 2016, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Amelung, V.; Stein, V.; Goodwin, N.; Balicer, R.; Nolte, E.; Suter, E. (Eds.) Handbook Integrated Care; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 9783319561011. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd, H.; McKernon, S.; Mullin, B.; Old, A. Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. N. Z. Med. J. 2012, 125, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Fabbri, M.; Caldas, A.C.; Ramos, J.B.; Sanchez-Ferro, Á.; Antonini, A.; Růžička, E.; Lynch, T.; Rascol, O.; Grimes, D.; Eggers, C.; et al. Moving towards home-based community-centred integrated care in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2020, 78, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosjean, S.; Ciocca, J.-L.; Gauthier-Beaupré, A.; Poitras, E.; Grimes, D.; Mestre, T. Co-designing a digital companion with people living with Parkinson’s to support self-care in a personalized way: The eCARE-PD Study. Digit. Health 2022, 8, 20552076221081695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosjean, S.; Jordi, F.C.; Gal, O.; Laffan, A.; Sendra, A.; Stuempel, J.; Mestre, T.A. Co-designing an Integrated Care Network with People Living with Parkinson’s Disease: From Patients’ Narratives to Trajectory Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2021, 31, 2585–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beutler, L.E.; Harwood, T.M.; Kimpara, S.; Verdirame, D.; Blau, K. Coping style. J. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 67, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livneh, H.; Antonak, R.F.; Gerhardt, J. Psychosocial adaptation to amputation: The role of sociodemographic variables, disability-related factors and coping strategies. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 1999, 22, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martz, E.; Livneh, H. Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-387-48668-0. [Google Scholar]
- Ward, M.E.; de Brún, A.; Beirne, D.; Conway, C.; Cunningham, U.; English, A.; Fitzsimons, J.; Furlong, E.; Kane, Y.; Kelly, A.; et al. Using Co-Design to Develop a Collective Leadership Intervention for Healthcare Teams to Improve Safety Culture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clemensen, J.; Rothmann, M.J.; Smith, A.C.; Caffery, L.J.; Danbjorg, D.B. Participatory design methods in telemedicine research. J. Telemed. Telecare 2017, 23, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bate, P.; Robert, G. Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006, 15, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grosjean, S.; Bonneville, L.; Redpath, C. The design process of an mHealth technology: The communicative constitution of patient engagement through a participatory design workshop. ESSACHESS J. Commun. Stud. 2019, 12, 5–26. [Google Scholar]
- Sendra, A.; Grosjean, S.; Bonneville, L. Co-constructing experiential knowledge in health: The contribution of people living with Parkinson to the co-design approach. QHC 2022, 1, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hackett, C.L.; Mulvale, G.; Miatello, A. Co-designing for quality: Creating a user-driven tool to improve quality in youth mental health services. Health Expect. 2018, 21, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revenäs, Å.; Hvitfeldt Forsberg, H.; Granström, E.; Wannheden, C. Co-Designing an eHealth Service for the Co-Care of Parkinson Disease: Explorative Study of Values and Challenges. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2018, 7, e11278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Donetto, S.; Pierri, P.; Tsianakas, V.; Robert, G. Experience-based Co-design and Healthcare Improvement: Realizing Participatory Design in the Public Sector. Des. J. 2015, 18, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bate, P.; Robert, G. Bringing User Experience to Healthcare Improvement: The Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience-Based Design; Radcliffe Publishing: London, UK, 2007; ISBN 9781846191763. [Google Scholar]
- Robert, G. Participatory action research: Using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare services. In Understanding and Using Health Experiences: Improving Patient Care; Ziebland, S., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 138–149. ISBN 9780199665372. [Google Scholar]
- Wannheden, C.; Revenäs, Å. How People with Parkinson’s Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e19195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessler, D.; Hauteclocque, J.; Grimes, D.; Mestre, T.; Côtéd, D.; Liddy, C. Development of the Integrated Parkinson’s Care Network (IPCN): Using co-design to plan collaborative care for people with Parkinson’s disease. Qual. Life Res. 2019, 28, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richard, S.; Lazarus, P.; Susan Folkman, P. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 9780826141927. [Google Scholar]
- Brandes, M.; Bienvenu, O.J. Personality and anxiety disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006, 8, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allport, F.H.; Allport, G.W. Personality Traits: Their Classification and Measurement. J. Abnorm. Psychol. Soc. Psychol. 1921, 16, 6–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eysenck, M.W. Learning, Memory and Personality. A Model for Personality; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 169–209. [Google Scholar]
- Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K.; Goldberg, L.R. The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2007, 42, 1515–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, L.R. An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 59, 1216–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T.; Ostendorf, F.; Angleitner, A.; Hřebíčková, M.; Avia, M.D.; Sanz, J.; Sánchez-Bernardos, M.L.; Kusdil, M.E.; Woodfield, R.; et al. Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 78, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCrae, R.R.; John, O.P. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Pers. 1992, 60, 175–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, P.T., Jr.; McCrae, R.R. Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. Eur. J. Personal. 1998, 12, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cattell, R.B.; Kline, P.E. The Scientific Analysis of Personality and Motivation; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; ISBN 012164250X. [Google Scholar]
- Kotov, R.; Gamez, W.; Schmidt, F.; Watson, D. Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 768–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, E.K.; James, B.D.; Jackson, K.L.; Willroth, E.C.; Boyle, P.; Wilson, R.; Bennett, D.A.; Mroczek, D.K. Associations between Personality Traits and Cognitive Resilience in Older Adults. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2021, 76, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caspi, A.; Roberts, B.W.; Shiner, R.L. Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005, 56, 453–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atherton, O.E.; Grijalva, E.; Roberts, B.W.; Robins, R.W. Stability and Change in Personality Traits and Major Life Goals from College to Midlife. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2021, 47, 841–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutin, A.R.; Zonderman, A.B.; Ferrucci, L.; Terracciano, A. Personality traits and chronic disease: Implications for adult personality development. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2013, 68, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donnellan, M.B.; Oswald, F.L.; Baird, B.M.; Lucas, R.E. The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychol. Assess. 2006, 18, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poletti, M.; Bonuccelli, U. Personality traits in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Assessment and clinical implications. J. Neurol. 2012, 259, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pontone, G.M.; Mari, Z.; Perepezko, K.; Weiss, H.D.; Bassett, S.S. Personality and reported quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2017, 32, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santangelo, G.; Garramone, F.; Baiano, C.; D’Iorio, A.; Piscopo, F.; Raimo, S.; Vitale, C. Personality and Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2018, 49, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Endler, N.S.; Parker, J.D. Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 58, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, M.H.; Oswald, F.; Palmqvist, S.; Slaug, B. Coping Styles among People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitworth, S.R.; Loftus, A.M.; Skinner, T.C.; Gasson, N.; Barker, R.A.; Bucks, R.S.; Thomas, M.G. Personality affects aspects of health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease via psychological coping strategies. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2013, 3, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pusswald, G.; Fleck, M.; Lehrner, J.; Haubenberger, D.; Weber, G.; Auff, E. The “Sense of Coherence” and the coping capacity of patients with Parkinson disease. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2012, 24, 1972–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carver, C.S.; Scheier, M.F.; Weintraub, J.K. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 56, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinclair, V.G.; Wallston, K.A. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment 2004, 11, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurt, C.S.; Landau, S.; Burn, D.J.; Hindle, J.V.; Samuel, M.; Wilson, K.; Brown, R.G. Cognition, coping, and outcome in Parkinson’s disease. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2012, 24, 1656–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucks, R.S.; Cruise, K.E.; Skinner, T.C.; Loftus, A.M.; Barker, R.A.; Thomas, M.G. Coping processes and health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2011, 26, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurt, C.S.; Thomas, B.A.; Burn, D.J.; Hindle, J.V.; Landau, S.; Samuel, M.; Wilson, K.C.M.; Brown, R.G. Coping in Parkinson’s disease: An examination of the coping inventory for stressful situations. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2011, 26, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krakow, K.; Haltenhof, H.; Bühler, K.E. Coping with Parkinson’s disease and refractory epilepsy. A comparative study. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1999, 187, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liebermann, J.D.; Witte, O.W.; Prell, T. Association between different coping styles and health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e036870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cutrona, C.; Bodenmann, G.; Randall, A.K.; Clavél, F.D.; Johnson, M. Stress, Dyadic Coping, and Social Support. In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, 2nd ed.; Vangelisti, A.L., Perlman, D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA; Port Melbourne, Australia; New Delhi, India; Singapore, 2018; pp. 341–352. ISBN 9781316417867. [Google Scholar]
- Bodenmann, G. A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss J. Psychol./Schweiz. Z. Psychol./Rev. Suisse De Psychol. 1995, 54, 34–49. [Google Scholar]
- Lyons, R.F.; Mickelson, K.D.; Sullivan, M.J.L.; Coyne, J.C. Coping as a Communal Process. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 1998, 15, 579–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helgeson, V.S.; Jakubiak, B.; van Vleet, M.; Zajdel, M. Communal Coping and Adjustment to Chronic Illness: Theory Update and Evidence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2017, 22, 170–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rentscher, K.E. Communal Coping in Couples with Health Problems. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lloyd, J.; Muers, J.; Patterson, T.G.; Marczak, M. Self-Compassion, Coping Strategies, and Caregiver Burden in Caregivers of People with Dementia. Clin. Gerontol. 2019, 42, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Navarta-Sánchez, M.V.; Senosiain García, J.M.; Riverol, M.; Ursúa Sesma, M.E.; Díaz de Cerio Ayesa, S.; Anaut Bravo, S.; Caparrós Civera, N.; Portillo, M.C. Factors influencing psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in Parkinson patients and informal caregivers. Qual. Life Res. 2016, 25, 1959–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Haahr, A.; Groos, H.; Sørensen, D. ‘Striving for normality’ when coping with Parkinson’s disease in everyday life: A metasynthesis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021, 118, 103923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.T.; McCrae, R.R. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2—Personality Measurement and Testing; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2008; pp. 179–198. [Google Scholar]
- Butcher, J.N. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Carver, C.S. You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope. Int. J. Behav. Med. 1997, 4, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ledermann, T.; Bodenmann, G.; Gagliardi, S.; Charvoz, L.; Verardi, S.; Rossier, J.; Bertoni, A.; Iafrate, R. Psychometrics of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in Three Language Groups. Swiss J. Psychol. 2010, 69, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Phase of EBCD * | Proposed Action for the Participants * |
---|---|
(1) Set-up | Setting up the project (administration, project management arrangements) |
(2) Staff Engagement | Gather experiences of staff with observational fieldwork and in-depth interviews Review findings with staff and prioritize main findings to improve services |
(3) Patient Engagement | Gather experiences of patients and care partners through narrative interviews Review findings with patients and care partners and prioritize main findings to improve services |
(4) Connecting stakeholders and exchange | Connect all stakeholders Share experiences in an initial co-design event Identify priorities for change |
(5) Co-design activities | Co-work in small groups Focus on identified priorities Design and implement improvements to services |
(6) Review and renewal | Collaborative assessment by participants |
Promotion | Point in Time of Co-Design Process * | Type of Research | Instrument ** |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment of personality traits
| (1) Set-up | Literature review of tools appropriate to setting and stakeholder | _ |
(3) Patient Engagement | Quantitative evaluation | PwPs and Care Partners: The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) [74], Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) [75] | |
Assessment of coping strategy
| (1) Set-up | Literature review of tools appropriate to setting and stakeholder | _ |
(3) Patient Engagement | Quantitative evaluation | PwPs: COPE inventory [59] or Brief COPE [76]; The Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) [77] Care partner: The Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) [77] | |
Staff Education
| (2) Staff Engagement | Training/Workshop (online or face-to-face) | _ |
Patient education
| (3) Patient Engagement | Training/Workshop (online or face-to-face) | _ |
Care partner education
| (3) Patient Engagement | Training/Workshop (online or face-to-face) | _ |
Exchange and mutual discussion:
| (4) Connecting stakeholders and exchange | Team Discussion | _ |
Continuous review:
| (1)–(6) | Team Discussion | _ |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Stümpel, J.; van Munster, M.; Grosjean, S.; Pedrosa, D.J.; Mestre, T.A.; on behalf of the iCare-PD Consortium. Coping Styles in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Consideration in the Co-Designing of Integrated Care Concepts. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060921
Stümpel J, van Munster M, Grosjean S, Pedrosa DJ, Mestre TA, on behalf of the iCare-PD Consortium. Coping Styles in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Consideration in the Co-Designing of Integrated Care Concepts. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(6):921. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060921
Chicago/Turabian StyleStümpel, Johanne, Marlena van Munster, Sylvie Grosjean, David J. Pedrosa, Tiago A. Mestre, and on behalf of the iCare-PD Consortium. 2022. "Coping Styles in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Consideration in the Co-Designing of Integrated Care Concepts" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 6: 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060921