Next Article in Journal
Stability of Multi-Parametric Prostate MRI Radiomic Features to Variations in Segmentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey-Based Study on a Sample of Italian Physicians’ Opinions on Telemedicine
Previous Article in Journal
Chlamydial and Gonococcal Genital Infections: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Telemedicine and Its Application in Cystic Fibrosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Use of Radio and Telemedicine by TMAS Centers in Provision of Medical Care to Seafarers: A Systematic Review

by
Gopi Battineni
1,*,
Nalini Chintalapudi
1,
Giulio Gagliardi
2 and
Francesco Amenta
1,2
1
Clinical Research Centre, School of Medicinal and Health Products Sciences, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
2
Research Department, International Radio Medical Centre (C.I.R.M.), 01444 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(7), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071171
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Revised: 9 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 22 July 2023

Abstract

:
Objective: From medicine via radio to telemedicine, personalized medical care at sea has improved significantly over the years. Currently, very little research has been conducted on telemedicine services and tools at sea. This study aims to review real-time case studies of seafarers’ personalized treatment via telemedical devices published in medical journals. Methods: A literature search was conducted using three libraries such as PubMed (Medline), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), BioMed Central, and Google Scholar. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used for information retrieval and document selection was conducted based on the guidelines of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flowchart. Selected articles were subjected to quality checks using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). Results: The literature search produced 785 papers and documents. The selection was conducted in three stages such as selection, screening, and inclusion. After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, only three articles on real-time medical assistance with telemedical tools were identified. It is reported that medical attention is delivered to seafarers in real time thanks to advancements in telemedicine, satellite technology, and video conferencing. Conclusions: By improving the quality of medical care and reducing response times for medical emergencies at sea, lives have been saved. There are still several gaps despite these advancements. Medical assistance at sea should therefore be improved to address many of the still unsolved issues.

1. Introduction

The history of medical assistance at sea dates back to the early days of ocean exploration when mariners encountered various health hazards and medical emergencies with no possibility of being properly treated due to the lack of onboard health professionals. The development of radiotelegraphy by Guglielmo Marconi in 1897 has allowed us to provide medical assistance to ships from ashore medical centers or ships with medical facilities on board [1]. The realm of medical assistance at sea has evolved over the past century, largely owing to advancements in radio communication and, subsequently, telemedicine [2]. However, the medical assistance available to seafarers is often basic and limited to the use of elementary medical equipment, and non-advanced communication systems, such as, in the past, radio telegrams, and, currently, conventional e-mail or telephone calls.
With the development of radiotelegraphy and later radio telephony, medical professionals were able to transmit instructions and guidance to seafarers experiencing medical emergencies [3,4]. The use of internet-based communication systems, such as video conferencing, has enabled remote medical treatment to be provided to patients at sea more effectively and efficiently than ever before. These advancements in telecommunications have ensured swift and effective medical assistance along with the ability of providing medical services in the maritime environment. This approach has remarkably changed the provision of medical assistance at sea over time and has become relevant to ensure the safety and well-being of those on board.
Delivering medical assistance at sea poses several challenges and issues due to the unique environment and logistical constraints. Ships, especially those on long voyages or in remote areas, can be far from medical facilities or specialized care. This makes it difficult to access timely medical assistance in case of need. Having limited medical resources and specialized equipment can hinder the delivery of comprehensive medical care onboard. Also, limited or unreliable satellite connections can hinder real-time consultations with onshore medical professionals and delay diagnosis and treatment. In case of medical emergencies, timely evacuation to a shore-based medical facility may be necessary. However, arranging medical evacuations at sea can be logistically complex and expensive, especially in adverse weather conditions.
The use of telehealth on onboard ships helps deliver medical help minimizing the challenges and burdens encountered by seafarers. This is due to the limited medical knowledge of ship masters or onboard medical staff. Telehealth can also improve monitoring, timeliness, and communication within healthcare systems. Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service (TMAS) centers provide medical services based on radio codes through different channels such as email, marine radio, telephone, video conferences, and fax [5,6,7]. TMAS centers and seafarers began to use telehealth more frequently, especially, during the recent pandemic to reduce in-person contact [8,9]. The doctors at TMAS centers communicate over the phone, email, or video, which is beneficial for both patient health and practice [10,11]. Using digital medical devices, vitals are gathered, progress is monitored, external lesions can be viewed, and images of skin, ears, eyes, etc., can be captured and evaluated. The availability of digital devices like these has increased the effectiveness of telemedicine, overcoming the handicap of inaccurate information provided from the ship’s side.
In the past few decades, telemedicine has further transformed the field, enabling the remote medical diagnosis and treatment of patients in maritime environments. A literature review of telemedical assistance in the marine industry domain has never explored the previous objectives in detail. Therefore, we will be able to provide a broader understanding of the area and facilitate future technological applications. Only two reports gave an overview of patient safety and legal impacts [12,13]. Another study gave an overview of European remote medical care services at sea from a variety of communication channels and generational perspectives [14].
As far as we know, no comprehensive study has focused on contextualizing data collection and medical operations between ships and TMAS centers using radio communications and telemedical devices. The purpose of this study was to explore the evolution of medical assistance at sea, from primitive radio-based methods to modern telemedicine. A discussion of existing medical assistance case studies has also been provided, along with the most important aspects, including techniques and communication tools.

2. Methodology

2.1. Document Search

The document search was conducted via different medical databases, such as PubMed (Medline), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), BioMed Central (BMC), and Google Scholar. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed for document selection to promote transparency, completeness, and clarity in research reporting [15]. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms are used for document indexing and retrieval. The search keywords ‘telemedicine’, ‘seafarers’, ‘maritime industry’, ‘marine telehealth’, ‘seafarers health’, ‘radio medicine’, ‘remote telemonitoring’, ‘maritime telemedicine’, and ‘medical assistance at sea’ were applied to identify real-time case studies where medical assistance at sea was carried out. Boolean operators like ‘AND’ and ‘OR’ were included in search databases to acquire variations in the vocabulary and for a better search strategy. Table 1 presents the document count retrieved from different databases.

2.2. Inclusion Exclusion Criteria

Only documents published in the English language were considered. All the identified articles included a case study in which medical assistance at sea with tools or techniques was applied. The degree of analysis was not a significant inclusion criterion. Articles that did not include evidence of a case study with a clear motivation to protect seafarers from a medical point of view were included. Review articles and books were excluded from the study. Case studies on seafarers’ blood sample data, onsite doctor visits, autopsy reports, and clinical pathways were excluded. Non-peer-reviewed, unpublished, conference proceedings, abstracts, and publications in languages other than English were also not considered.

2.3. Quality and Risk Bias Assessment

During the review process, each author independently screened papers and assessed their quality and relevance to the research. Papers were selected based on consensus among reviewers and conformity to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Upon reading the abstracts, the authors compiled a list of articles that they believed qualified in primer appraisal. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS), which is a quality assessment tool that ranks studies and assesses the risk of bias [16]. It is fairly simple to interpret the NOS scale, which rates studies as poor (0–4), fair (5–6), and good (7–9). The studies that scored NOS ≥ 7 were considered for final review.

3. Results

The review findings and study characteristics, including interventions and outcomes, are presented in this section. We also summarize the key findings derived from the research across the studies in terms of providing medical assistance at sea.

3.1. Document Selection Flowchart

Figure 1 provides a PRISMA flow diagram for selected 785 articles among the given searched libraries. A careful review of the title and summary of each study revealed that 358 papers were ineligible; 139 were withdrawn because there were duplicates, and three did not have enough data. In total, 288 studies were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 253 articles were excluded because they did not satisfy the exclusion and inclusion criteria (n = 94), they were reviews and books (n = 129), due to the unavailability of full text (n = 29), and because they were written in a language other than English (n= 1). Ultimately, 35 papers met the eligibility criteria for the review. Before reaching the final selection, the previously mentioned search words were examined for differences, and when one word was different from others of a similar kind, various thoughts were discussed. By considering NOS criteria, the authors gathered information helpful to the exploration effort by reading all the articles before choosing those that were qualified to be used for the study. Ultimately, nine studies were included in the final review because other studies did not provide the motivation behind the case study presentation, news synopsis, and meta-analysis.

3.2. Communication Channels

By analyzing the studies that were finally selected, we identified that most seafarers contact TMAS centers for medical help through different means of communication. Figure 2 presents the frequency of work associated with distinct communication channels or telemedical technologies that were used by ships to contact onshore doctors. Five studies adopted the telephone [8,17,18,19,20], followed by email [8,18,19,21], radio [22,23], and web application platforms [24].

3.3. TMAS Centers and Means Communication

Maritime emergencies, illnesses, accidents, and other incidents that require medical advice, based on the captain’s decision, are managed by TMAS centers. Providing seafarers with health care is an essential part of their mission. TMAS centers in Europe conducted the majority of studies, while only one study was conducted in the US (Table 2). It appears that the Italian TMAS center, the International Radio Medical Center (C.I.R.M.), is one of the most populated in Europe. Additionally, seafarers contact these centers by telephone or by email to transfer their medical data, unlike RMD and CCMM, which use radios.

3.4. Study Characteristics

The major characteristics of examined studies based on study type, number of patients, year published, and observations are presented in Table 3. There was no evidence of studies reporting the telemedical assistance of seafarers with case studies before 2015. One study published in 1980 highlighted the transformation of medical messages from the casualty officer of the Royal Naval Hospital Plymouth via Portishead Radio [11]. This study analyzed the range of medicines prescribed for seafarers’ medical problems. Several diseases have been linked to diet-associated factors, such as alcohol and obesity. Because the full free text was not available, it was not included in the final survey.

3.4.1. Medical Assistance via Radio

Radio was the first telecommunication system used to provide medical assistance at sea. It became an essential tool for ship captains in the early 20th century, allowing them to inform onshore centers and authorities about medical issues aboard their ships. During the literature search, two published works were found on radio medical assistance for seafarers. One study from the Denmark TMAS center (i.e., RMD) adopted radio-telephone communication to analyze the injury patterns of workers and the factors that contribute to injuries [22]. The system allowed ship captains to communicate with a medical doctor onshore and receive immediate medical advice over the radio. This allowed physicians to guide ship captains, who were responsible for providing emergency medical care to injured crews and passengers.
Five case studies presented by the French TMAS center (CCMM) illustrated the use of radiotelegraphy to diagnose and follow up on different medical conditions among seafarers living on ships [23]. To advance these practices, there is a need to develop video-conferencing technology. It is mentioned that radio calls enabled ships in the middle of the ocean to communicate effectively with medical personnel ashore, reducing the number of medical emergencies and deaths at sea.

3.4.2. Telemedicine Technologies

Seven studies are associated with the use of telemedicine, where medical professionals can now communicate with ships (via email, telephone, video conferencing, and web applications). This allows them to diagnose and treat medical conditions in real time [8,17,18,19,20,21,24]. Ships can contact TMAS by phone or by e-mail to provide a verbal description of a crew member’s medical condition, followed by an email with images. There are, however, still several problems to be solved. In general, the doctor ashore does not talk directly with the patient or does not see him, as contact is mediated through the captain or the ship’s officer with medical duties on board. This does not help to establish the fundamental patient-doctor relationship in the provision of medical assistance. On the other hand, the medical skills of the people with duties of medical assistance at sea are quite limited, and therefore this makes the delivery of medical assistance mediated by a third person complex. In an epidemiological study of seafarers’ injuries, telemedicine was found to provide remote access to medical care for those suffering from health issues while at sea [24]. With telemedicine, physicians can provide medical consultations and treatment to individuals aboard ships or boats via secure remote connections. For instance, with telemedical devices (presented in Figure 3), medical information (or knowledge) can be shared between sailors and onshore doctors. Some studies have shown that physicians can examine and diagnose medical problems miles away from patients via telephone communications from a TMAS center [17,20]. Handling seafarers’ medical records with email technology allows healthcare workers access to patient medical records, which helps determine appropriate treatment protocols [8,19,21]. In this way, seafarers obtain in-depth medical care regardless of where they are, and individuals at sea continue to benefit from telemedicine as technology advances.
Different contact possibilities are currently available for medical assistance at sea. The most popular is the store and forward method, which involves taking images or videos of a patient and transmitting them to a specialist for consultation [19,20,25]. Live telemedicine involves real-time audio-visual interaction between the provider and patient, similar to a video call. Remote patient monitoring involves collecting data from medical devices worn by patients and transmitting them to healthcare providers for analysis. This allows healthcare professionals to properly and continuously monitor patients’ health status and intervene, if necessary. Mobile health (mHealth) uses mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets to remotely deliver healthcare services [26,27]. These include educational resources, appointment scheduling, and virtual doctor visits. As these studies do not align with the research objectives, they were therefore excluded from the final survey. Telemedicine is becoming an increasingly valuable tool for medical assistance at sea as technology advances.
Adopted works in this review have highlighted the implementation of ship-to-shore video conferencing, which has revolutionized the provision of medical assistance at sea [23,24]. Through this technology, medical officers onboard can communicate with onshore doctors in real time, allowing a more accurate diagnosis and treatment. Medical personnel on board can consult with experienced professionals onshore through video streaming and reliable communication channels. In this way, ships without qualified health professionals can still obtain high-level medical care and transfer at-risk patients to ashore medical facilities. Ship-to-shore video conferencing has greatly improved the lives of mariners, ensuring timely and effective medical treatment and reducing the risks associated with remote treatment.

4. Discussion

Medical assistance at sea has come a long way since its inception with radio-based medicine. The procedures used over the last century at TMAS centers for seafarers’ healthcare are still in use today. Now onboard medical personnel can consult specialists onshore, share vital signs, and receive training via real-time audio and video communication. Our study explored the use of medical assistance via radio and telemedical devices during emergencies which have revolutionized the way patients at sea were treated. Medical professionals can guide crew members on board ships with limited medical equipment and resources [28,29].
Telemedicine has further enhanced the delivery of medical care at sea through real-time communication with onshore healthcare facilities [30]. Telemedical solutions provide remote access to healthcare professionals, electronic medical records, and consultations via satellite communications. Medical care at sea requires reliable medical care, which makes telemedicine increasingly important. The maritime industry relies on it to provide rapid medical assistance during emergencies, as well as ensure seafarers’ safety.
TMAS centers provide remote healthcare services that allow maritime patients to receive medical care and advice from medical professionals located on land in real-time [30]. It ensures that medical advice and diagnosis can be received even on vessels far away from medical facilities. Using telemedicine, medical professionals on land can visit patients using images, vital signs, and video conferences and consequently prescribe treatments. The improvement of medical assistance provided by telemedicine has also been shown to reduce medical evacuations, prolong major interventions, and save lives [31]. The use of telemedicine has revolutionized the delivery of medical care to those at sea.
The advent of satellite technology has significantly expanded the geographic availability of medical assistance, enabling healthcare providers to reach remote and isolated destinations. As maritime activities continue to increase in a globalized world, medical assistance at sea has become increasingly indispensable. With the ongoing advancements in technology and the expanding role of telemedicine, it is poised to play an even greater role in the protection of seafarers’ health in the future. With the continuous development of technology, healthcare providers can now rely on telemedicine to monitor patients’ conditions and manage medical emergencies in real-time. Efforts should be carried out to provide seagoing vessels with appropriate telemedicine equipment and to guarantee that solutions provided by different producers work on the maritime environment and that their friendly use would allow the proper transmission of biomedical data ashore.

4.1. What Needs to Be Done?

Telemedicine systems have advanced to include high-resolution video conferencing capabilities, which make it possible for diagnosis, treatment, and consultation to be conducted remotely [32,33]. By using these technologies, onshore medical practitioners can provide direction and guidance to onboard medical officers. Telemedicine ensures that crew members and passengers have access to qualified health care with accurate medical advice and support [34,35]. Additionally, it reduces unnecessary rescue operations and costs. Hence, telemedicine is an efficient, cost-effective, and beneficial method to deliver medical assistance to ships.

4.1.1. Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Telemedicine

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has provided telemedicine with the ability to offer a more personalized approach to diagnosis and treatment. The establishment of AI-based telemedicine systems for maritime vessels has numerous benefits. An AI-based marine doctor system enables prompt and efficient medical assistance to seafarers and crew members who encounter health complications [25]. Physicians can make informed decisions based on AI algorithms that analyze patient histories, laboratory results, and imaging studies [36]. Medical professionals will be able to make more accurate diagnoses, provide better treatment plans, and improve patient outcomes. It is important to address concerns regarding data privacy and ethical considerations regarding AI in telemedicine. AI has the potential to revolutionize telemedicine and enable healthcare providers to reach remote and underserved populations with high-quality medical care.

4.1.2. Satellite Telecommunications

Medical assistance at sea has been remarkably improved by satellite communication. Communication channels can be established between vessels and land-based medical professionals, allowing for real-time consultations, diagnosis, and intervention on-site [37,38]. Satellite networks can transmit large amounts of data, including high-definition images and videos, which are essential for accurate diagnosis and medical support [39]. Satellite connections also allow remote monitoring of vital signs and other health parameters, making it possible for medical professionals to track the health status of patients in real-time.
Telemedicine consultations in case of medical issues on board are becoming increasingly popular for providing health care at sea. Using this approach, doctors can provide advice and guidance to seafarers from their locations using video conferencing. This method of healthcare delivery is especially helpful for remote vessels that lack onboard medical facilities and personnel [40]. In emergencies, telemedicine consultations can help diagnose and treat illnesses and injuries in real-time, reducing the need for medical evacuation. As technology continues to improve, telemedicine will become more accessible and affordable for mariners, providing them with much-needed medical assistance at sea. Despite these benefits, there are still challenges to overcome, such as connectivity issues and regulatory hurdles. There is also a need for greater diffusion of telemedical devices on ships and specific training of ship medical officers in telemedicine.

4.2. Implications of Medical Assistance at Sea in Healthcare

The implications of medical assistance at sea are numerous and far-reaching in the field of healthcare. The ability to provide medical care remotely, particularly in critical situations where time is essential has proven to be lifesaving in many instances [37,41,42,43]. The advancement of technology has enabled healthcare professionals to virtually reach patients in remote areas, improving diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. The use of telemedicine can also reduce healthcare costs by avoiding expensive and potentially risky emergency medical evacuations. Additionally, telemedicine can improve access to health care in underserved areas. Healthcare providers and policymakers will need to address questions of efficacy and ethics as remote medical services expand.

4.3. Regional Context and Digital Divide Issues

Telemedicine is a rapidly growing field that has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery, especially in remote and underserved regions. It is important to consider the regional context and digital divide issues when considering telemedicine for sailing seafarers.
The availability and accessibility of telemedicine services can vary significantly across different regions. Seafarers may already be able to access telemedicine services in coastal areas or regions with a strong maritime industry, such as major port cities [44]. A dedicated telemedicine center or clinic should be properly equipped to provide remote consultations, diagnoses, and even certain treatments to seafarers at sea in such regions. On the other hand, in less developed or remote coastal regions, the availability of telemedicine services may be limited. Telemedicine may not be feasible in areas lacking reliable internet connectivity or advanced medical equipment [45]. Telemedicine for seafarers would require significant infrastructure development and capacity building.
The digital divide refers to the gap in access to and utilization of digital technologies between different populations or regions [46]. Seafarers who work on vessels operating in international waters or regions with limited connectivity may face difficulties in accessing telemedicine services due to unreliable or nonexistent internet connections [47]. The digital divide requires collaborative efforts from the government, maritime industry bodies, and telecommunications companies. By improving internet infrastructure and providing training programs for seafarers, telemedicine services can be made more accessible to all. Consequently, while telemedicine can provide valuable medical care to sailing seafarers, regional context and digital divide issues need to be considered. By addressing disparities in internet access and telemedicine infrastructure in a particular region, seafarers can access effective healthcare.

4.4. Limitations

This study typically focuses on specific research questions or interventions. As such, there is a chance it is not addressing all relevant aspects of the topic, potentially overlooking important outcomes, subgroups, or alternative interventions. Due to a limited number of studies the applicability and review findings with a special group of population, settings, or contexts may be limited. Because the included studies have focused on seafarers, it makes it challenging to generalize the findings to broader populations or different healthcare systems. Despite these limitations, we are confident that this study could contribute to the synthesis of evidence and provide an overview of the available literature.

5. Conclusions

In modern medical care at sea, telemedical assistance is an essential component, allowing for quick and accurate diagnosis, timely treatment, and improved patient outcomes. Although medical assistance at sea has been available for more than 100 years, little research has been carried out on its evaluation. In this study, we examined telemedicine’s role in maritime healthcare and examined how it has evolved. Throughout this review, we discussed technological advancements in medical assistance at sea. Since radio medical assistance was introduced in the past, telemedicine has improved the quality of healthcare for seafarers worldwide.
Despite its current limitations, telemedicine is set to continue improving medical assistance onboard ships in the future. More accurate remote diagnosis and treatment may be possible for doctors and other health professionals with advanced technology. Sophisticated monitoring systems and medical equipment can contribute to achieving this goal. As a result of AI, accurate predictions of illnesses and identification of high-risk patients could be achieved with significant benefits. Research and development investment by government agencies is crucial for improving healthcare service delivery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and N.C.; methodology, G.B.; PRISMA, G.B.; validation, G.B., N.C. and G.G.; formal analysis, G.B.; investigation, N.C.; resources, G.G.; data curation, G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, G.B. and F.A.; visualization, N.C.; supervision, F.A.; project administration, F.A.; funding acquisition, F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grant No. 1624/2021 of the ITF Trust, London.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guglielmo Marconi. Available online: https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/guglielmo-marconi (accessed on 22 May 2023).
  2. Norman, G. Medical education: Past, present and future. Perspect. Med. Educ. 2012, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Flesche, C.W.; Jalowy, A. Telemedicine in medical emergency situations in terms of maritime personnel. Dtsch Med. Wochenschr. 2007, 132, 463–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grappasonni, I.; Petrelli, F.; Amenta, F. Deaths on board ships assisted by the Centro internazionale radio medico in the last 25 years. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2012, 10, 186–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hunt, J.; Lucas, D.; Laforet, P.; Coulange, M.; Auffray, J.P.; Dehours, E. Medical treatment of seafarers in the Southern Indian Ocean—Interaction between the French Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service (TMAS) and the medical bases of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands (TAAF). Int. Marit. Health 2022, 73, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Westlund, K.; Attvall, S.; Nilsson, R.; Jensen, O.C. Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service (TMAS) to Swedish merchant and passengers ships 1997–2012. Int. Marit. Health 2016, 67, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mahdi, S.S.; Amenta, F. Eighty years of CIRM. A journey of commitment and dedication in providing maritime medical assistance. Int. Marit. Health 2016, 67, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sagaro, G.G.; Battineni, G.; Chintalapudi, N.; Di Canio, M.; Amenta, F. Telemedical assistance at sea in the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Int. Marit. Health 2020, 71, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Le Gac, J.M.; Texier, S. Training in the detection of psychological distress on board ships through health simulation during the COVID-19 epidemic. Int. Marit. Health 2022, 73, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Legido-Quigley, H.; Chuah, F.L.H.; Howard, N. Southeast Asian health system challenges and responses to the “Andaman Sea refugee crisis”: A qualitative study of health-sector perspectives from Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brayley, N.F. A Review of Three Years Experience of Medical Advice to Seafarers by the Casualty Officer, Royal Naval Hospital Plymouth, via Portishead Radio (W/T Medico Portishead). J. R. Nav. Med. Serv. 1980, 66, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ricci, G.; Pirillo, I.; Rinuncini, C.; Amenta, F. Medical assistance at the sea: Legal and medico-legal problems. Int. Marit. Health 2014, 65, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. McKay, J.; Bradley, N.; Lough, M.; Bowie, P. A review of significant events analysed in general practice: Implications for the quality and safety of patient care. BMC Fam. Pract. 2009, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sagaro, G.G.; Amenta, F. Past, present, and future perspectives of telemedical assistance at sea: A systematic review. Int. Marit. Health 2020, 71, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  17. Holt, T.E.; Tveten, A.; Dahl, E. Medical emergencies on large passenger ships without doctors: The Oslo-Kiel-Oslo ferry experience. Int. Marit. Health 2017, 68, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Szafran-Dobrowolska, J.; Renke, M.; Wołyniec, W. Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service at the University Center of Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Gdynia. The analysis of 6 years of activity. Med. Pract. 2020, 71, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Di Canio, M.; Burzi, L.; Ribero, S.; Amenta, F.; Quaglino, P. Role of teledermatology in the management of dermatological diseases among marine workers: A cross-sectional study comparing general practitioners and dermatological diagnoses. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dehours, E.; De Camaret, E.; Lucas, D.; Saccavini, A.; Roux, P. The COVID-19 pandemic and maritime telemedicine: 18-month report. Int. Marit. Health 2022, 73, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Apostolatos, C.; Andria, V.; Licari, J. Overall comparative analysis of management and outcomes of cardiac cases reported on board merchant ships. Int. Marit. Health 2017, 68, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Herttua, K.; Gerdøe-Kristensen, S.; Vork, J.C.; Nielsen, J.B. Age and nationality in relation to injuries at sea among officers and non-officers: A study based on contacts from ships to Telemedical Assistance Service in Denmark. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e034502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Dehours, E.; Saccavini, A.; Roucolle, P.; Roux, P.; Bounes, V. Added value of sending photograph in diagnosing a medical disease declared at sea: Experience of the French Tele-Medical Assistance Service. Int. Marit. Health 2017, 68, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sagaro, G.G.; Dicanio, M.; Battineni, G.; Samad, M.A.; Amenta, F. Incidence of occupational injuries and diseases among seafarers: A descriptive epidemiological study based on contacts from onboard ships to the Italian Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service in Rome, Italy. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e045343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Battineni, G.; Chintalapudi, N.; Amenta, F. Maritime Telemedicine: Design and Development of an Advanced Healthcare System Called Marine Doctor. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Battineni, G.; Di Canio, M.; Chintalapudi, N.; Amenta, F.; Nittari, G. Development of physical training smartphone application to maintain fitness levels in seafarers. Int. Marit. Health 2019, 70, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mariners Medico Guide. Available online: https://www.medicoguide.no/ (accessed on 17 May 2023).
  28. Asser, T.; Linnamägi, Ü. Telemedicine in Baltic Sea Region: Experiences of Tartu University. Croat. Med. J. 2004, 45, 523–525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Oldenburg, M.; Baur, X.; Schlaich, C. Cardiovascular diseases in modern maritime industry. Int. Marit. Health 2010, 62, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Mair, F.; Fraser, S.; Ferguson, J.; Webster, K. Telemedicine via satellite to support offshore oil platforms. J. Telemed. Telecare 2008, 14, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Çakir, E. Determinants of medical evacuations from merchant cargo ships: Evidence from Telemedical Assistance Service of Turkey data. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 211, 105797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Latournerie, G.; Dehours, É.; Roux, P.; Houze Cerfon, C.-H.; Balen, F. Teleconsultation at Sea and Acute Wound Management Onboard. Telemed. e-Health 2023, 29, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lateef, F.; Anantharaman, V. Maritime radio-medical services: The Singapore General Hospital experience. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2002, 20, 349–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sagaro, G.G.; Di Canio, M.; Amenta, F. Correlation between body mass index and blood pressure in seafarers. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2021, 43, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Amenta, F.; Dauri, A.; Rizzo, N. Organization and activities of the International Radio Medical Centre (CIRM). J. Telemed. Telecare 1996, 2, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Al-Antari, M.A. Artificial Intelligence for Medical Diagnostics-Existing and Future AI Technology! Diagnostics 2023, 13, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Morosi, S.; Jayaousi, S.; Falletti, E.; Araniti, G. Cooperative strategies in satellite assisted emergency services. Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 2013, 31, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Franck, L.; Berioli, M.; Boutry, P.; Harles, G.; Ronga, L.S.; Suffritti, R.; Thomasson, L. On the role of satellite communications for emergency situations with a focus on Europe. Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 2011, 29, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Skinnemoen, H.; Hansen, S.; Jahn, A. Satellite-Based Infrastructure for Emergency Communications. In Proceedings of the 25th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (organized by APSCC), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 10–13 April 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anscombe, D.L. Healthcare delivery for oil rig workers: Telemedicine plays a vital role. Telemed. e-Health 2010, 16, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pengput, A.; Schwartz, D.G. Telemedicine in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. Telemed. J. e-Health 2022, 28, 1711–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nikolić, N.; Nilson, R.; Briggs, S.; Ulven, A.J.; Tveten, A.; Forbes, S.; Pardal, C.V.; Viruly, L.; Berbist, R. A medical support in offshore racing—Workshop on Medical Support for Offshore Yacht Races, Telemedical Advice Service (TMAS), 1-2 December 2018, London, United Kingdom. Int. Marit. Health 2019, 70, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amenta, F.; Dauri, A.; Rizzo, N. Telemedicine and medical care to ships without a doctor on board. J. Telemed. Telecare 1998, 4, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bifulco, P.; Narducci, F.; Vertucci, R.; Ambruosi, P.; Cesarelli, M.; Romano, M. Telemedicine supported by Augmented Reality: An interactive guide for untrained people in performing an ECG test. Biomed. Eng. Online 2014, 13, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Digital Divide Library and Information Science Education Network. Available online: https://www.lisedunetwork.com/digital-divide/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
  47. Khan, Z.; Mlawa, G.; Yousif, Y.; Afghan, A.; Balami, D.; Mohammed, M.; Muhammad, S.; Warrier, V.; Gupta, A.; Ibrahim, M.; et al. The Future of Cross-Continental Telemedicine in the Management of Complicated Endocrine Patients and Its Suitability Based on a Case Report. Cureus 2022, 14, e22174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases only (* searched database).
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases only (* searched database).
Jpm 13 01171 g001
Figure 2. Different communication technologies are used for requests of medical assistance at sea.
Figure 2. Different communication technologies are used for requests of medical assistance at sea.
Jpm 13 01171 g002
Figure 3. On-board telemedicine case containing medical devices courtesy of TelePharmaTec, the spin-off of Camerino University, Italy.
Figure 3. On-board telemedicine case containing medical devices courtesy of TelePharmaTec, the spin-off of Camerino University, Italy.
Jpm 13 01171 g003
Table 1. Document search count among different databases.
Table 1. Document search count among different databases.
NDatabasesDocument Count
1.PubMed (Medline)316
2.CINAHL8
3.BMC5
4.Google Scholar456
Table 2. List of TMAS centers associated with the present study.
Table 2. List of TMAS centers associated with the present study.
TMAS CentreLocation and CountryMeans of Communication
Med solutions internationalNew York, USAEmail
RMNBergen, NorwayTelephone
CCMMToulouse, FranceRadiotelegraphy, Telephone
UCMTMGdynia, PolandTelephone and Email
RMDEsbjerg, DenmarkRadio
C.I.R.M.Rome, ItalyTelephone, Email, and Web applications
RMN: Radio Medico Norway; CCMM: Centre De Consultation Medicale Maritime; UCTM: University Center of Maritime and Tropical Medicine; RMD: Radio Medical Denmark; and C.I.R.M: Centro Internazionale Radio Medico.
Table 3. Study characteristics.
Table 3. Study characteristics.
Study TypeSampleYearMedical AdviceObservationsRef
Descriptive5512016Management of cardiac symptomsPre-employment medical examinations improved preventive measures.[21]
Observational1692017Emergency helicopter evacuations (helivacs) between the two ferriesEvery two weeks, one person was airlifted. The majority of Halifax was heart-related, with more cardiac cases airlifted than ambulances[17]
Case study52017Diagnoses and follows up on medical conditions were carried outIn the development of telemedical technologies, the participants demonstrate a continual interest in teleconsultations with photographs[23]
Observational2252019Ensure permanent access to medical advice for seafarersProviding medical assistance for various medical problems to seafarers requires close multidisciplinary cooperation between medical officers.[18]
Retrospective cohort14012019Medical advice for injuries among seafarersDanish-flagged merchant ships carry an increased risk of injuries to non-officers and European seafarers.[22]
Retrospective11,4812020Proposing prevention measures in COVID-19 ControlFever, sore throats, and shortness of breath appeared to be more common during Coronavirus outbreaks[8]
Epidemiological4232021Assistance to control injuries and diseases among seafarersNon-officers reported significantly more injuries and diseases than officers[24]
Cross-sectional4202022Diagnosis of marine workers’ dermatological diseasesHighlighted insufficient remote management of dermatological conditions.[19]
Observational3842022Diagnosis of COVID-19Promotes social distancing and quarantine procedures at sea to limit the spread of the pandemic[20]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Battineni, G.; Chintalapudi, N.; Gagliardi, G.; Amenta, F. The Use of Radio and Telemedicine by TMAS Centers in Provision of Medical Care to Seafarers: A Systematic Review. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071171

AMA Style

Battineni G, Chintalapudi N, Gagliardi G, Amenta F. The Use of Radio and Telemedicine by TMAS Centers in Provision of Medical Care to Seafarers: A Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13(7):1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Battineni, Gopi, Nalini Chintalapudi, Giulio Gagliardi, and Francesco Amenta. 2023. "The Use of Radio and Telemedicine by TMAS Centers in Provision of Medical Care to Seafarers: A Systematic Review" Journal of Personalized Medicine 13, no. 7: 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop