Next Article in Journal
Primary Actinomycosis of the Stomach: A Review of the Literature for A Rare Entity
Previous Article in Journal
Personalizing Breast Cancer Surgery: Harnessing the Power of ROME (Radiological and Oncoplastic Multidisciplinary Evaluation)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insidiously Progressive, Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(3), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030115
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 8 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 15 March 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) as a type of immune-related adverse event (irAE). The characteristics of ICI-ILD are diverse. The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical features of ICI-ILD, with particular emphasis on insidiously progressive ICI-ILD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 232 patients with advanced lung cancer who were treated with ICIs (including combination therapy with cytotoxic agents). Results: IrAEs were observed in 85 patients (36.6%). The most frequent irAE was ICI-ILD (41 patients, 17.7% of all patients). The occurrence of ICI-ILD was associated with a significantly better response compared to the non-irAE group (response rates: 88% vs. 33%), longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 17.5 vs. 3.0 months), and longer overall survival (median: 52.6 vs. 16.6 months), respectively. However, six patients died from ICI-ILD, which could be divided into two patterns: early-onset ICI-ILD in three patients (median PFS: 1.2 months), and insidiously progressive ICI-ILD in three patients. In the latter type, ICI-ILD developed unnoticed, progressed insidiously, and led to respiratory failure (median PFS: 7.2 months). The non-organizing pneumonia pattern and a weak response to corticosteroid therapy were also common findings. On average, six cycles of ICI treatment were administered between the time when ICI-ILD became retrospectively recognizable and the discontinuation of ICI treatment. During this period, C-reactive protein levels and the extent of ILD involvement gradually increased. Conclusions: Insidiously progressive ICI-ILD can lead to fatal outcomes. Early discontinuation of ICIs upon recognition of this type of ICI-ILD may improve patient outcomes.

1. Personalized Medicine

Personalized medicine for patients with lung cancer has made remarkable progress. The cornerstone of personalized medicine includes molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This study describes the characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung diseases (ICI-ILDs) for patients with advanced lung cancer and the characteristics of ICI-ILDs in which ICI should be discontinued early. In particular, we focus on “insidiously progressive ICI-ILD”, which can result in fatal outcomes.

2. Introduction

Personalized medicine for patients with lung cancer has made remarkable progress. The cornerstone of personalized medicine includes molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are tailored based on driver gene status and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1, and exert antitumor effects by activating the host’s immune system. ICIs now play a central role in immunotherapy for lung cancer. Clinical trials targeting advanced lung cancer have shown that treatment with ICIs, both alone and in combination with cytotoxic agents, resulted in better clinical outcomes compared to treatment with cytotoxic agents alone [1,2]. However, excessive activation of the host immune system can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect various organs. Among these irAEs, ICI-related interstitial lung diseases (ICI-ILDs), in particular, can result in fatal outcomes. In clinical trials, the frequency of ICI-ILD has been reported to be approximately 5% [1,2], while real-world data, especially from Japan, have shown a higher incidence, ranging from 12.4% to 18.6% [3,4,5,6].
In 144 reported cases of lung injury caused by nivolumab, radiographic patterns included organizing pneumonia (OP), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), etc., with OP being the most frequent [7]. The radiologic OP pattern is characterized by areas of consolidation, often in a predominantly peripheral or peribrochovascular distribution [8]. Several studies have reported that ICI-ILDs occurring within several months after the initiation of ICI treatment generally present with higher grades, including grade 5 ILDs [3,4]. However, ICI-ILDs can occur at any point during treatment and may sometimes progress insidiously over several months. When ICI-ILD develops rapidly, subjective symptoms such as fever, cough, or dyspnea may occur, and chest imaging, along with certain blood tests, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), may show abnormal findings. On the other hand, when ICI-ILD develops gradually, these symptoms and abnormalities may be minimal, and there are no reports on the usefulness of blood tests for detecting early ICI-ILD. Although the presence of subjective symptoms is associated with the severity of ICI-ILD [9], data on chronic progressive ICI-ILDs, particularly in relation to the speed of progression, remain limited. The present study aims to investigate the clinical features of ICI-ILDs, including “insidiously progressive ICI-ILD” in patients with advanced lung cancer.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Patients

Patients with pathologically confirmed advanced lung cancer who presented to the Department of Internal Medicine, Kagawa University Hospital, between July 2012 and December 2023 were retrospectively identified, and relevant clinical and laboratory data were collected from their medical records. Patients treated with ICIs in the first or later line were included in this study. Both ICI alone or in combination with cytotoxic anticancer drugs were included. However, patients with locally advanced disease who had undergone definitive thoracic irradiation and subsequent ICI consolidation therapy were excluded. Patients who had undergone surgery with curable intent or had another concomitant active malignancy were also excluded. Patients were not excluded based on preexisting ILD, driver gene status, or PD-L1 status.

3.2. Evaluation of ILDs

General blood tests, including CRP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and white blood cell (WBC) count, as well as chest X-rays, were routinely performed at each visit for ICI treatment. Chest computed tomography (CT), spirometry, and blood tests, such as von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), were conducted when deemed necessary by the treating physician. The evaluation of ILDs on high-resolution CT was performed in accordance with the ATS/ERS/JRS/LATA statement [8,10]. ICI-ILDs were diagnosed based on the patients’ clinical features, radiologic findings, and bronchoscopic examination when available. In accordance with the sequential reading method, at least two board-certificated pulmonologists independently reviewed all of the patients’ CT scans and classified the ILD patterns. The toxicity severity of ICI-ILD was determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm (assessed on 8 March 2025)) and was briefly summarized in a recent review [11]. The treatments for ICI-ILDs were determined by the treating physician based on the clinical severity of ICI-ILD.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration of time from the start of ICI treatment (an ICI, two ICIs, or combination therapy with an ICI and cytotoxic agents) to disease progression or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration of time from the diagnosis of lung cancer to death. PFS and OS curves were constructed by using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences in survival were assessed by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of PFS was performed with the Cox proportional hazards model. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the frequency of ICI-ILD. Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t-test were used to analyze risk factors for ICI-ILD deaths. All statistical analyses were performed using BellCurve for Exel version 4.08 (Social Survey Research Information, Tokyo, Japan).

4. Results

4.1. Clinical Characteristics and ICI Responsiveness

Table 1 Characteristics associated with PFS are listed in Table 2. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status, low PD-L1 expression, and second-line or later ICI treatment were independently associated with shorter PFS.

4.2. Immune-Related Adverse Events and ICI Responsiveness

IrAEs were observed in 85 of the 232 patients (36.6%). Among the irAEs, ICI-ILD was the most frequent, affecting 41 patients (17.7% of the 232 patients). The occurrence of irAEs or ICI-ILD was associated with a significantly better response rate compared to non-irAEs (response rates: 81% or 88% vs. 33%, respectively, p < 0.01, Figure 1A), significantly longer PFS (median PFS: 12.6 or 17.5 vs. 3.0 months, respectively, p < 0.01, Figure 1B), and significantly longer OS (median OS: 49.4 or 52.6 vs. 16.6 months, p < 0.01, Figure 1C). ICI-ILD was observed in two of 45 patients with driver gene mutations/fusions; one was the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patient shown later as patient 1. The other was a Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)-positive patient. The frequency of ICI-ILD was lower in patients with EGFR mutation compared with patients without driver gene mutations/fusions (3.3% vs. 20.9%, respectively, p = 0.02). Similarly, the frequency of ICI-ILD was lower in patients with driver gene mutations/fusions compared with those without (4.4% vs. 20.9%, respectively, p = 0.01).

4.3. Characteristics Associated with Death Due to ICI-ILD

Six patients died from ICI-ILD (15% of patients with ICI-ILD). Table 3 shows the characteristics associated with death from ICI-ILD. The characteristics of the ICI-ILDs that resulted in death included a non-organizing pneumonia (non-OP) pattern, involvement in all five lobes, higher grade (a median of 4), and elevated CRP levels at the time of ICI discontinuation. Retrospective analysis of the process leading up to ICI discontinuation revealed that the extent of ILD expanded, and CRP levels increased from the time when ILD became visible on CT scans. Further examination revealed that the PFS of patients who died from ICI-ILD could be divided into two patterns (Figure 1D). Three patients died from early-onset ICI-ILD, while in the other three patients, the ICI-ILD developed unnoticed, progressed insidiously, and ultimately led to death due to respiratory failure (PFS: 6.8, 7.2, and 11.1 months). We refer to the ICI-ILD observed in these three patients as “insidiously progressive ICI-ILD”.

4.4. The Three Patients Who Died of Insidiously Progressive ICI-ILD

Table 4 shows the characteristics of patients who died from insidiously progressive ICI-ILD, and Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show CT findings throughout the entire treatment course. In all three patients, the initial occurrence of ICI-ILD was localized and subtle, such that the physicians did not notice it. As a result, ICI treatment was continued, and ILD progressed insidiously before treatment discontinuation. After discontinuation of ICI treatment, ILD improvement was poor despite corticosteroid therapy, and the patients eventually died from respiratory failure. An average of six cycles of ICI treatment were administered between the development of ICI-ILD and the discontinuation of ICI treatment. During this period, CRP, LDH, and WBC counts in peripheral blood, the extent of ILD involvement, and ILD grade gradually increased.

4.4.1. Patient 1 (Figure 2, Table 4)

A 65-year-old Japanese woman was treated with erlotinib as second-line therapy. A 45-day interval was allowed after the completion of erlotinib, and then pembrolizumab was initiated as third-line therapy. After 22 cycles of pembrolizumab, the patient’s physician noted the development of ICI-ILD (grade 2) on a CT scan performed to assess lung cancer, and pembrolizumab was discontinued (Figure 2E,F). At this time, the patient had a mild cough as the only symptom. Retrospective observation revealed that ICI-ILD had already developed after 13 cycles of pembrolizumab (Figure 2C,D, grade 1). Although corticosteroid treatment was initiated (prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg), after the discontinuation of pembrolizumab, the patient’s ICI-ILD progressed (Figure 2G,H), and she died from respiratory failure without responding to methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy.

4.4.2. Patient 2 (Figure 3, Table 4)

Carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab were administered as the first-line therapy to this 68-year-old Japanese man. After four cycles of this combination therapy, the patient exhibited a partial response. Following four additional cycles of pembrolizumab maintenance therapy, the patient’s physician noticed the occurrence of ICI-ILD (Figure 3E,F, grade 1) on a CT scan performed to assess lung cancer, and pembrolizumab was discontinued. At that time, the patient had no symptoms. Retrospective observation revealed that ICI-ILD had already developed after four cycles of first-line combination therapy (Figure 3C,D). After an additional three months of best supportive care, the ICI-ILD worsened (Figure 3G,H, grade 4), and the patient eventually died from respiratory failure despite the administration of corticosteroids, including mPSL pulse therapy.

4.4.3. Patient 3 (Figure 4, Table 4)

Pembrolizumab monotherapy was administered as first-line therapy for this 81-year-old Japanese man. After 17 cycles of pembrolizumab, the patient’s physician observed the occurrence of ICI-ILD (Figure 4C, grade 2) on CT scans performed to evaluate lung cancer, and the pembrolizumab was discontinued. The patient had no symptoms at that time. Retrospective analysis revealed that ICI-ILD had already developed after 11 cycles of pembrolizumab (Figure 4B, grade 1). Although corticosteroid therapy was initiated after pembrolizumab was discontinued, ICI-ILD progressed five months later (Figure 4D, grade 4), and he eventually died from respiratory failure.

5. Discussion

This retrospective analysis of 232 patients treated with ICIs for advanced lung cancer demonstrated that the occurrence of ICI-ILD was associated with a high response rate (88%) and better survival outcomes (median [m]PFS 17.5 months and mOS 52.6 months). However, some cases of ICI-ILD progressed insidiously and showed a weak response to corticosteroid therapy, leading to fatal outcomes.
The occurrence of irAEs is well known to be associated with better outcomes [12,13,14,15]. A survival analysis adjusted for relevant clinical factors demonstrated that even after accounting for immortal time bias, pembrolizumab and chemotherapy-induced pneumonitis were independently associated with shorter survival [3]. However, in the present population, the survival of patients with ICI-ILD (including six patients who died from ICI-ILD) was significantly longer than that of patients without irAEs. This finding clearly suggests that ICI-ILDs do not always result in poor outcomes. Consistent with this, some reports documented that ICI-ILD correlates with ICI efficacy [16,17]. In a report of 39 patients who experienced irAE, response rate and PFS were significantly better in patients with ICI-ILD than in patients with irAEs-non-ILD and non-irAEs [16]. In another report of 22 patients with ICI-ILD, OS was significantly shorter in patients with severe grade ICI-ILD than in those without severe grade (p = 0.011; median OS 3.0 vs. 12.7 months, respectively) [17]. The pooled analyses of phase 3 randomized clinical trials using atezolizumab showed that even grade 3 to 5 irAEs are not a poor prognostic factor if the acute phase can be overcome [18]. We believe that manageable ICI-ILDs can be considered favorable events, similar to most other irAEs.
Several studies have shown that fatal ICI-ILDs occur in the early phase after the initiation of ICI treatment. In a retrospective study of patients treated with a combination of platinum, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab [3], all 10 patients with grade 3 or higher ICI-ILD developed within 4 months of starting this combination therapy. In a prospective study of 138 patients who received anti-PD-1 monotherapy [4], all eight patients with grade 3 or worse ICI-ILD (including three patients with grade 5 ILD) developed ICI-ILD within 60 days of initiating the ICI monotherapy. Consistent with these reports, in the present study, three of the six patients who died from ICI-ILD experienced early-onset ILD after the initiation of ICI therapy, which progressed acutely. However, in the remaining three patients, ICI-ILD progressed insidiously and ultimately led to fatal outcomes. This finding represents the most important contribution of our study.
Three patients in the present series died from insidiously progressive ICI-ILD that developed more than three months after the initiation of ICI therapy. In these three fatal cases, the behavior of ICI-ILD was notably similar: insidious progression, a non-OP pattern (initially presenting as an NSIP or unclassified IIP pattern and eventually evolving into a DAD pattern), and a weak response to corticosteroid therapy. In contrast, all patients with the OP pattern recovered from ICI-ILD. The OP pattern, characterized by consolidation, is relatively easy to detect on a chest X-ray or CT scan, whereas the non-OP pattern, which lacks significant changes on X-rays, is more difficult to identify. This raises the critical question of how clinicians can best recognize the development of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD. In this contest, peripheral blood tests might serve as valuable tools for the early detection of ICI-ILD. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports of blood tests being helpful for detecting early ICI-ILD, although several studies reported that KL-6, interleukin-9, and other factors before initiation of ICI are useful in predicting the development of ICI-ILD [19,20]. In the present patient series, classical ILD markers such as CRP, LDH, and WBC levels gradually increased during the progression of ICI-ILD. Since the early non-OP pattern is often difficult to detect using plain chest X-rays alone, we recommend close monitoring of classical ILD markers. In patients with abnormal blood test results, a chest CT examination should be performed promptly to avoid delays in ICI discontinuation. Among patients with ICI-ILD, those with subjective symptoms exhibited a higher grade (3–5) of ICI-ILD than those whose ICI-ILD was detected during routine examinations [9]. However, deaths have also occurred among patients whose ICI-ILD was discovered through routine examinations. Pulmonary function tests, KL-6, and autoantibody screening were not routinely conducted in this study. Therefore, the utility of these tests or markers for the early detection of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD remains unclear.
It remains unknown whether early treatment interventions for insidiously progressive ICI-ILD can prevent fatal outcomes. Corticosteroids did not demonstrate sufficient efficacy to prevent the death of the three patients described above. In the INBUILD trial, it was reported that among patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity was significantly lower in patients who received nintedanib compared to those who received a placebo [21]. Anti-fibrotic agents such as nintedanib might also be effective in preventing the progression of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD.
Several clinical studies have demonstrated the limited efficacy of ICI monotherapy in patients with EGFR mutations. Although OS was longer in patients treated with ICI monotherapy than in those treated with docetaxel, no OS benefit of ICI monotherapy was observed in subgroup analysis of patients with EGFR mutations in the CheckMate 057 and KEYNOTE-010 studies [22,23]. In the ATLANTIC study, 111 patients in cohort 1 had EGFR mutation-positive or ALK fusion-positive tumors [24]. Among patients with PD-L1 expression greater than 25%, an objective response was achieved in 9 (12.2%) of 74 patients. In fact, some EGFR-positive patients respond dramatically, even to ICI monotherapy [25,26]. The duration of response to prior EGFR-TKIs may predict ICI responsiveness in patients with EGFR mutations [27]. In a subgroup analysis of patients with EGFR mutations of the IMpower 150 trial, improved OS was observed in patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ABCP) compared with those without atezolizumab [28]. In the phase III ATTLAS trial, 228 patients with EGFR mutation (n = 215) or ALK fusion (n = 13) were enrolled [29]. Objective response rates (69.5% vs. 41.9%, p < 0.01) and PFS (median 8.48 vs. 5.62 months, hazard ratio 0.62, p = 0.004) were significantly better in the ABCP group than in the pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin group [29]. Based on these results, ABCP, rather than ICI monotherapy, can be recommended for patients with EGFR mutations who tolerate chemotherapy. Regarding the frequency of ICI-ILD in patients with EGFR mutations, there were two treatment-related deaths (1.3%) due to ILD in the ABCP arm of the ATTLAS trial [29]. In the present study, the frequency of ICI-ILD was lower in patients with EGFR mutations compared with those without driver gene mutations/fusions (3.3% vs. 20.9%, respectively). Thus, regardless of EGFR mutation status, the frequency of ILD correlates with the efficacy of ICIs. In the present study, one patient who died of ICI-ILD was positive for EGFR mutation (patient 1). The patient received second-line erlotinib and third-line pembrolizumab, with a 45-day interval between the two drugs. The blood half-life of erlotinib has been reported to be short, approximately 26 h [30]. After a 45-day interval, erlotinib in the body is expected to be virtually eliminated. ILD due to EGFR-TKI occurs during oral administration, including cases of re-administration [31], and the development of ILD after TKI discontinuation is not common. In the analysis of 353 patients using a claims database, pre-treatment with EGFR-TKI was not associated with ICI-ILD [32]. Based on these findings, we think it is unlikely that pre-treatment with erlotinib had any effect on the development of ILD after pembrolizumab in patient 1.
The limitations of this study are as follows. First, it was a retrospective, single-center investigation. The patient management strategy during ICI treatment, including the intervals of CT scans and the interpretation system for radiological examinations, varies among facilities. Such differences could influence the early diagnostic accuracy of ICI-ILD, the treatment approach, and patient outcomes. Second, the diagnosis of ICI-ILD in the present study was primarily based on patients’ clinical courses and radiological findings. Although bronchoscopic examinations were performed for some patients to rule out other conditions, such as infection, not all cases underwent such evaluations. Lastly, this study included both ICI therapy and combination therapy with ICI and cytotoxic agents. While some cases of treatment-related ILD might have been induced by cytotoxic agents rather than ICIs, the frequency of ILD caused by cytotoxic chemotherapy is known to be significantly lower than that of ICI-ILD [4,33,34].

6. Conclusions

ICI-ILD is generally associated with favorable response rates, PFS, and OS. However, it should be noted that insidiously progressive ICI-ILD exists and can lead to fatal outcomes. Pulmonologists should be aware of the occurrence of ICI-ILD presenting with a non-OP pattern. Early discontinuation of ICI at the onset of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD may improve patient outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K. (Nobuhiro Kanaji); methodology, N.K. (Nobuhiro Kanaji); analysis, N.K. (Nobuhiro Kanaji); resources, N.K. (Nobuhiro Kanaji), N.W., T.I., H.M. and N.K. (Norimitsu Kadowaki); writing—original draft preparation, N.K. (Nobuhiro Kanaji); writing—review and editing, N.W., T.I., H.M., Y.K., Y.O. and N.K. (Norimitsu Kadowaki). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kagawa University on 18 June 2024 (No. 2024-043).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not obtained from the patients because the study was retrospective and included data from deceased patients. However, our institute officially presented the study design to provide all potential participants the opportunity to evaluate it and reject participation if desired.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due the publication of raw data have not been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kagawa University (No. 2024-043).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript.
CRPC-reactive protein
DADdiffuse alveolar damage
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
HPhypersensitivity pneumonitis
ICIimmune checkpoint inhibitor
ILDinterstitial lung disease
irAEimmune-related adverse event
KL-6Krebs von den Lungen-6
LDHlactate dehydrogenase

References

  1. Gandhi, L.; Rodríguez-Abreu, D.; Gadgeel, S.; Esteban, E.; Felip, E.; De Angelis, F.; Domine, M.; Clingan, P.; Hochmair, M.J.; Powell, S.F.; et al. KEYNOTE-189 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2078–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reck, M.; Rodríguez-Abreu, D.; Robinson, A.G.; Hui, R.; Csőszi, T.; Fülöp, A.; Gottfried, M.; Peled, N.; Tafreshi, A.; Cuffe, S.; et al. Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024, Pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fujimoto, D.; Miura, S.; Yoshimura, K.; Wakuda, K.; Oya, Y.; Yokoyama, T.; Yokoi, T.; Asao, T.; Tamiya, M.; Nakamura, A.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy-induced pneumonitis in chemo-naïve patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Eur. J. Cancer. 2021, 150, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Suzuki, Y.; Karayama, M.; Uto, T.; Fujii, M.; Matsui, T.; Asada, K.; Kusagaya, H.; Kato, M.; Matsuda, H.; Matsuura, S.; et al. Assessment of immune-related interstitial lung disease in patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicenter prospective study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Okada, N.; Matsuoka, R.; Sakurada, T.; Goda, M.; Chuma, M.; Yagi, K.; Zamami, Y.; Nishioka, Y.; Ishizawa, K. Risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease in patients with lung cancer: A single-institution retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakanishi, Y.; Masuda, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Horimasu, Y.; Nakashima, T.; Miyamoto, S.; Tsutani, Y.; Iwamoto, H.; Fujitaka, K.; et al. Pre-existing interstitial lung abnormalities are risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease in non-small cell lung cancer. Respir. Investig. 2019, 57, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baba, T.; Sakai, F.; Kato, T.; Kusumoto, M.; Kenmotsu, H.; Sugiura, H.; Tominaga, J.; Oikado, K.; Sata, M.; Endo, M.; et al. Radiologic features of pneumonitis associated with nivolumab in non-small-cell lung cancer and malignant melanoma. Future Oncol. 2019, 15, 1911–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Johkoh, T.; Lee, K.S.; Nishino, M.; Travis, W.D.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Ryerson, C.J.; Franquet, T.; Bankier, A.A.; Brown, K.K.; et al. Chest CT diagnosis and clinical management of drug-related pneumonitis in patients receiving molecular targeting agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A Position Paper from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2021, 298, 550–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yokoi, M.; Yonezawa, A.; Hira, D.; Handa, T.; Tanizawa, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Tsuda, M.; Ikemi, Y.; Itotani, R.; Yoshida, H.; et al. Subjective symptoms are triggers for the detection of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease and associate with disease severity: A single-center retrospective study. J. Pharm. Health Care Sci. 2024, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raghu, G.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Myers, J.L.; Richeldi, L.; Ryerson, C.J.; Lederer, D.J.; Behr, J.; Cottin, V.; Danoff, S.K.; Morell, F.; et al. American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, e44–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ando, H.; Suzuki, K.; Yanagihara, T. Insights into potential pathogenesis and treatment options for immune-checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grangeon, M.; Tomasini, P.; Chaleat, S.; Jeanson, A.; Souquet-Bressand, M.; Khobta, N.; Bermudez, J.; Trigui, Y.; Greillier, L.; Blanchon, M.; et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer 2019, 20, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sato, K.; Akamatsu, H.; Murakami, E.; Sasaki, S.; Kanai, K.; Hayata, A.; Tokudome, N.; Akamatsu, K.; Koh, Y.; Ueda, H.; et al. Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer 2018, 115, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Teraoka, S.; Fujimoto, D.; Morimoto, T.; Kawachi, H.; Ito, M.; Sato, Y.; Nagata, K.; Nakagawa, A.; Otsuka, K.; Uehara, K.; et al. Early immune-related adverse events and association with outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab: A prospective cohort study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017, 12, 1798–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shankar, B.; Zhang, J.; Naqash, A.R.; Forde, P.M.; Feliciano, J.L.; Marrone, K.A.; Ettinger, D.S.; Hann, C.L.; Brahmer, J.R.; Ricciuti, B.; et al. Multisystem immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 1952–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sugano, T.; Seike, M.; Saito, Y.; Kashiwada, T.; Terasaki, Y.; Takano, N.; Hisakane, K.; Takahashi, S.; Tanaka, T.; Takeuchi, S.; et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated interstitial lung diseases correlate with better prognosis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tone, M.; Izumo, T.; Awano, N.; Kuse, N.; Inomata, M.; Jo, T.; Yoshimura, H.; Minami, J.; Takada, K.; Miyamoto, S.; et al. High mortality and poor treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with severe grade checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer. 2019, 10, 2006–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Socinski, M.A.; Jotte, R.M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Nishio, M.; Mok, T.S.K.; Reck, M.; Finley, G.G.; Kaul, M.D.; Yu, W.; Paranthaman, N.; et al. Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analyses of the Phase 3 IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncol. 2023, 9, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakahama, K.; Izumi, M.; Yoshimoto, N.; Fukui, M.; Sugimoto, A.; Nagamine, H.; Ogawa, K.; Sawa, K.; Tani, Y.; Kaneda, H.; et al. Clinical significance of KL-6 in immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2023, 92, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Murata, D.; Azuma, K.; Murotani, K.; Matsuo, N.; Matama, G.; Tokito, T.; Sasada, T.; Hoshino, T. Survival and soluble immune mediators of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2023, 184, 107351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flaherty, K.R.; Wells, A.U.; Cottin, V.; Devaraj, A.; Walsh, S.L.F.; Inoue, Y.; Richeldi, L.; Kolb, M.; Tetzlaff, K.; Stowasser, S.; et al. INBUILD Trial Investigators. Nintedanib in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1718–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Borghaei, H.; Paz-Ares, L.; Horn, L.; Spigel, D.R.; Steins, M.; Ready, N.E.; Chow, L.Q.; Vokes, E.E.; Felip, E.; Holgado, E.; et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Herbst, R.S.; Baas, P.; Kim, D.W.; Felip, E.; Pérez-Gracia, J.L.; Han, J.Y.; Molina, J.; Kim, J.H.; Arvis, C.D.; Ahn, M.J.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Garassino, M.C.; Cho, B.C.; Kim, J.H.; Mazières, J.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Lena, H.; Corral Jaime, J.; Gray, J.E.; Powderly, J.; Chouaid, C.; et al. ATLANTIC Investigators. Durvalumab as third-line or later treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ATLANTIC): An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, D.; Cheng, C.; Song, W.P.; Ni, P.Z.; Zhang, W.Z.; Wu, X. Dramatic response to immunotherapy in an epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A case report. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 11419–11424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baglivo, S.; Mandarano, M.; Bellezza, G.; Minotti, V.; Bonaiti, A.; Fischer, M.J.; Birocchi, I.; Roila, F.; Metelli, N.; Ludovini, V.; et al. Inflamed Tumor Phenotype as Predictor of Long-Term Response to Pembrolizumab in an EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patient with Acquired Resistance to Afatinib: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Oncol. Ther. 2022, 10, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ichihara, E.; Harada, D.; Inoue, K.; Shibayama, T.; Hosokawa, S.; Kishino, D.; Harita, S.; Ochi, N.; Oda, N.; Hara, N.; et al. Characteristics of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2021, 70, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Reck, M.; Mok, T.S.K.; Nishio, M.; Jotte, R.M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Orlandi, F.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; Nogami, N.; Rodríguez-Abreu, D.; Moro-Sibilot, D.; et al. IMpower150 Study Group. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower150): Key subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR mutations or baseline liver metastases in a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, S.; Kim, T.M.; Han, J.Y.; Lee, G.W.; Shim, B.Y.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, I.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.J.; et al. Phase III, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR- or ALK-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ATTLAS, KCSG-LU19-04). J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamamoto, N.; Horiike, A.; Fujisaka, Y.; Murakami, H.; Shimoyama, T.; Yamada, Y.; Tamura, T. Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of the oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor Ro50-8231 (erlotinib) in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2008, 61, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kanaji, N.; Ichihara, E.; Tanaka, T.; Ninomiya, T.; Kozuki, T.; Ishikawa, N.; Nishii, K.; Shoda, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kawakado, K.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Re-administration of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) After EGFR-TKI-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease (CS-Lung-005). Lung 2024, 202, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Okada, N.; Hamano, H.; Yagi, K.; Niimura, T.; Aizawa, F.; Goda, M.; Zamami, Y.; Kitahara, T.; Ishizawa, K. Effect of pre-treatment with EGFR-TKIs on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated interstitial lung disease in lung cancer patients: Analysis using a Japanese claims database. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2024, 62, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tamiya, A.; Naito, T.; Miura, S.; Morii, S.; Tsuya, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Kaira, K.; Murakami, H.; Takahashi, T.; Yamamoto, N.; et al. Interstitial lung disease associated with docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 1103–1106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.; Miao, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y. The efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) The responses of the patients with or without immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease (ICI-ILD). p < 0.01 compared to irAE (−). (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with or without irAEs or ICI-ILD. p < 0.01 vs. irAE (−). (C) Kaplan–Meier curves of the overall survival of the patients with or without irAEs or ICI-ILD. p < 0.01 vs. irAE (−). (D) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS of patients who died of ICI-ILD.
Figure 1. (A) The responses of the patients with or without immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease (ICI-ILD). p < 0.01 compared to irAE (−). (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with or without irAEs or ICI-ILD. p < 0.01 vs. irAE (−). (C) Kaplan–Meier curves of the overall survival of the patients with or without irAEs or ICI-ILD. p < 0.01 vs. irAE (−). (D) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS of patients who died of ICI-ILD.
Jpm 15 00115 g001
Figure 2. Case 1, a 65-year-old female. CT images. (A,B) Before pembrolizumab. (C,D) After 13 cycles of pembrolizumab. (E,F) After 22 cycles of pembrolizumab. (G,H) After an additional 3 months of corticosteroid therapy.
Figure 2. Case 1, a 65-year-old female. CT images. (A,B) Before pembrolizumab. (C,D) After 13 cycles of pembrolizumab. (E,F) After 22 cycles of pembrolizumab. (G,H) After an additional 3 months of corticosteroid therapy.
Jpm 15 00115 g002
Figure 3. Case 2, a 68-year-old man. CT images. (A,B) Before treatment. (C,D) After four cycles of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab. (E,F) After an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab. (G,H) After an additional 3 months with best supportive care.
Figure 3. Case 2, a 68-year-old man. CT images. (A,B) Before treatment. (C,D) After four cycles of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab. (E,F) After an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab. (G,H) After an additional 3 months with best supportive care.
Jpm 15 00115 g003
Figure 4. Case 3, an 81-year-old man. CT images. (A) Before pembrolizumab. (B) After 11 cycles of pembrolizumab. (C) After 17 cycles of pembrolizumab. (D) After an additional 5 months with best supportive care.
Figure 4. Case 3, an 81-year-old man. CT images. (A) Before pembrolizumab. (B) After 11 cycles of pembrolizumab. (C) After 17 cycles of pembrolizumab. (D) After an additional 5 months with best supportive care.
Jpm 15 00115 g004
Table 1. Patient and tumor characteristics.
Table 1. Patient and tumor characteristics.
CharacteristicPatients (n = 232)
Age, median (range)70 (41–94)
Male/female182/50
Smoking history
       Smoker/never smoker195/37
       Pack-years in smokers, average (range)54.5 (0.75–171)
ECOG Performance Status
       0/1/2/3/467/109/35/17/4
Histology
       Adenocarcinoma132
       Squamous cell carcinoma45
       Non-small cell carcinoma, NOS12
       Others16
       Small cell carcinoma27
Driver mutations
       EGFR/ALK/others/no mutations30/3/12/84
Clinical stage (8th edition of TNM classification)
       III/IV27/205
PD-L1 TPS (%)
       <1/1–49/50≤/not evaluated42/55/71/64
ICI Regimens
ICI monotherapy
       nivolumab39
       pembrolizumab51
       atezolizumab18
ICI + chemotherapy
       pembrolizumab + carboplatin + PEM28
       pembrolizumab + carboplatin + nab-PAC22
       atezolizumab + carboplatin + etoposide16
       atezolizumab + carboplatin + PEM12
       atezolizumab + carboplatin + nab-PAC11
       durvalumab + carboplatin + etoposide10
       ipilimumab + nivolumab9
       ipilimumab + nivolumab + carboplatin + PEM6
       tremelimumab + durvalumab + carboplatin + nab-PAC6
       others4
Therapeutic line of ICI
       1/2/3/4/5 or later148/47/16/10/11
ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NOS: not otherwise specified, TPS: tumor proportion score, ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor, PEM: pemetrexed, and PAC: paclitaxel.
Table 2. Characteristics associated with PFS.
Table 2. Characteristics associated with PFS.
CharacteristicnMedian
PFS, Days
Univariate Analysis
p-Value
Multivariate Analysis
HR (95%CI)p-Value
Age
       Older, ≥75572020.69
       Younger, <75135154
Gender
       Male1511720.56
       Female41140
Smoking history
       Never smoker32830.17
       Smoker160181
ECOG Performance Status
       2−46674<0.012.22 (1.45–3.38)<0.01
       0−1126217
Histology
       SCLC231830.50
       NSCLC169168
Driver mutations
       Yes321400.81
       No160172
PD-L1 TPS
       <5080171<0.011.68 (1.17–2.42)<0.01
       50≤51241
Preexisting ILD
       Yes261260.19
       No166172
Therapeutic line of ICI
       2nd or later7968<0.012.51 (1.66–3.81)<0.01
       1st113225
Therapeutic regimen
       IO only (one or two ICIs)103880.12
       IO plus chemotherapy89203
CRP (mg/dL)
       1≤1061540.16
       <185183
LDH (U/L)
       220≤771190.24
       <22028191
NLR
       5≤7294<0.010.65 (0.42–1.00)0.05
       <5119203
PNI
       <4079119<0.010.82 (0.53–1.28)0.38
       40≤111205
Table 3. Characteristics associated with ICI-ILD death.
Table 3. Characteristics associated with ICI-ILD death.
CharacteristicSurvival (n = 35)Death (n = 6)Univariate Analysis
p-Value
At ICI discontinuation
      ICI-ILD pattern, non-OP/OP (n)18/176/00.03
      ICI cycle number7 ± 69 ± 80.80
      CRP (mg/dL)4.6 ± 5.010.4 ± 5.0<0.05
      LDH (U/L)299 ± 214394 ± 1510.25
      WBC (/microL)7623 ± 29359772 ± 34020.23
       Number of lung lobes affected by ICI-ILD4 ± 15 ± 0<0.01
      ICI-ILD grade2 ± 14 ± 1<0.01
Between ICI initiation and ICI-ILD development
      Period (days)159 ± 133106 ± 1040.34
Between ICI-ILD development and ICI discontinuation
      Period (days)31 ± 6789 ± 920.23
      Additional ICI cycle number1 ± 33 ± 30.27
      Change in CRP0.01 ± 1.064.51 ± 3.780.04
      Change in LDH3 ± 27127 ± 1600.14
      Change in WBC627 ± 20552588 ± 24320.14
       Change in lung lobes affected by ICI-ILD0 ± 12 ± 20.03
      Change in ICI-ILD grade0 ± 12 ± 10.08
Table 4. Three patients died of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD.
Table 4. Three patients died of insidiously progressive ICI-ILD.
Patient No.Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3
Age656881
GenderFMM
Smoking (pack-year)03048
Histologyadenocarcinomaadenocarcinomaadenocarcinoma
Clinical stagecT1bN0M1b (OSS), IVAcT3N2M1c (ADR, LYM),cT3N0M1a (PLE), IVA
IVB
1st line therapycarboplatin + pemetrexedcarboplatin + pemetrexed+pembrolizumab
pembrolizumab
2nd line therapyerlotinib
3rd line therapypembrolizumab
Days between ILD197119211
Development and ICI
discontinuation
At ICI-ILD development and at ICI discontinuation
ICI cycle number13 and 224 and 811 and 17
CRP (mg/dL)0.13 and 2.920.15 and 8.491.1 and 7.76
LDH (U/L)188 and 215210 and 543214 and 586
WBC (/microL)4510 and 71804900 and 10,8504300 and 9910
Lobes of ICI-ILD2 and 52 and 52 and 5
ICI-ILD grade1 and 21 and 41 and 4
CRP: C-reactive protein, ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor, ILD: interstitial lung disease, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanaji, N.; Watanabe, N.; Inoue, T.; Mizoguchi, H.; Komori, Y.; Ohara, Y.; Kadowaki, N. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insidiously Progressive, Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030115

AMA Style

Kanaji N, Watanabe N, Inoue T, Mizoguchi H, Komori Y, Ohara Y, Kadowaki N. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insidiously Progressive, Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025; 15(3):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanaji, Nobuhiro, Naoki Watanabe, Takuya Inoue, Hitoshi Mizoguchi, Yuta Komori, Yasuhiro Ohara, and Norimitsu Kadowaki. 2025. "Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insidiously Progressive, Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease" Journal of Personalized Medicine 15, no. 3: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030115

APA Style

Kanaji, N., Watanabe, N., Inoue, T., Mizoguchi, H., Komori, Y., Ohara, Y., & Kadowaki, N. (2025). Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insidiously Progressive, Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(3), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop