Fake News and the “Wild Wide Web”: A Study of Elementary Students’ Reliability Reasoning

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The work has a good structure.
Working methods and procedure are described in detail.
The results are presented synthetically.
The discussions refer to the results and to the results of other studies carried out on the studied direction.
The bibliographic references are mostly new and are related to the research topic.

Author Response

Thank you for your feedback. We appreciate your time!

Reviewer 2 Report

The content of the contribution is interesting, but the description should be improved with regard to the details of the research design, questions, hypotheses and methods. The arguments and discussion of the results are clear but could be improved by creating a correspondence related to the research questions to be better explained. It is advisable to add any prospects for future research to the conclusions.

Author Response

Hello!

Thank you for your feedback. I have addressed comments below:

Reviewer note:

The content of the contribution is interesting, but the description should be improved with regard to the details of the research design, questions, hypotheses and methods. The arguments and discussion of the results are clear but could be improved by creating a correspondence related to the research questions to be better explained. It is advisable to add any prospects for future research to the conclusions.

Response:

Text includes:  Future work, therefore, should address instructional implications, a focus on needed skills for the evaluation of online resources, and the creation of credible online media. 

Thank you!