Next Article in Journal
Aftermaths of COVID-19 Lockdown on Socioeconomic and Psychological Nexus of Urban Population: A Case in Hyderabad, Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Capacity Building for Student Teachers in Learning, Teaching Artificial Intelligence for Quality of Education
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Aasan et al. The Relative Importance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities for the Mental Wellbeing of Adolescents: The Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies 2023, 13, 93

by
Bodil Elisabeth Valstad Aasan
1,2,*,
Monica Lillefjell
3,4,
Steinar Krokstad
1,2,
Mari Sylte
3 and
Erik Reidar Sund
1,2,5
1
HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7600 Levanger, Norway
2
Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, 7600 Levanger, Norway
3
Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
4
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
5
Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2024, 14(8), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080149
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
In the original publication [1], two errors were discovered in the analysis script that slightly impacted the article’s results, as well as three errors in terms of reference numbers. Thus, the following corrections must be made:
Firstly, the following text corrections must be made to reflect the updated analyses:
In the Abstract, the sixth sentence is slightly misconceiving and has been corrected to “Generally, these associations did not vary significantly between low and high parental education”.
In the Results, Section 3.1. Descriptive Statistics, the original mean and standard deviation for school climate and leisure activities are incorrect and have been corrected to (M = 3.25) and (M = 1.56, SD = 1.14), respectively.
In the Results, Section 3.2. Parental Education and Family Cohesion, School Climate, and Number of Leisure Activities, the association estimate for high parental education and number of leisure activities is incorrect and has been corrected to (β 0.20, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.26).
In the Results, Section 3.3. Parental Education and Psychological Distress, Loneliness, and Life Dissatisfaction, the original estimates are incorrect. A correction has been made and the following paragraph is correct: “Results showed an association between high level of parental education and lower levels of psychological distress (β −0.03, 95% CI −0.06 to −0.01), loneliness (β −0.07, 95% CI −0.12 to −0.01), and life dissatisfaction (β −0.07, 95% CI −0.11 to −0.02)”.
In the Results, Section 3.4. The Relative Significance of Family Cohesion, School Climate, and Number of Leisure Activities, the original association estimates between family cohesion and psychological distress and between leisure activities and life dissatisfaction are incorrect and have been corrected to “−0.32 SD (−0.34 to −0.29 95% CI)” and “−0.10 (−0.12 to −0.07 95% CI)”, respectively.
In the Results, Section 3.5. Parental Education and the Relative Significance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities, the original paragraph is incorrect and has been corrected to “Comparing the coefficients across adolescents from low and high SEP showed no statistically significant difference in association between family cohesion, school climate and number of leisure activities and the two outcomes loneliness and life dissatisfaction (Table 2). However, we did find that the relative strength of the association between low parental education and psychological distress was higher than for high parental education (p = 0.031)”.
In the Discussion, first paragraph, the second and fourth sentences are incorrect and have been corrected to “Further, we observed that high parental education levels were associated with lower levels of psychological distress, loneliness, and life dissatisfaction” and “Further, the relative importance of the social contexts did not seem to differ between adolescents from high and low parental education for most outcomes, though a stronger association was found between number of leisure activities and psychological distress for low parental education level”, respectively.
In the Discussion, paragraph two, the following part is incorrect and has been removed: “though the association between parental education and psychological distress became non-significant when adjusting for covariates”.
In the Discussion, paragraph 8, the first sentence is incorrect and has been corrected to “Lastly, the present result suggests that the gradient of relative association from family, school, and leisure activities seems to be similar between adolescents of low and high parental education, though the association between number of leisure activities and psychological distress was relatively stronger for adolescents of low parental education than high parental education level”.
Secondly, the following reference citations should be updated:
  • In the original publication, reference number [34] was cited wrongly in the text. The citation has now been inserted in the Introduction, paragraph 3, and should read “and that school peer support is related to the mental wellbeing of children and adolescents as well [12]”, and the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly.
  • In the original publication, reference number [18] in the Discussion, paragraph 2, was incorrect and should be [17].
  • In the original publication, reference number [20] in the Discussion, paragraph 8, was incorrect and should be [37].
Thirdly, in the original publication [1], there are a few mistakes in Table 1 as certain estimates were affected by the correction of analyses. The corrected Table 1, Table 2 and Table S1 appear below.
We sincerely apologize for these errors and any inconvenience these errors may have caused. In general, the overall conclusion still withstands, and with the presented corrections, the results should be correct. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Table 2. Associations (standardized coefficients) between family cohesion, school environment, leisure activities and psychological distress, loneliness, and life dissatisfaction.
Table 2. Associations (standardized coefficients) between family cohesion, school environment, leisure activities and psychological distress, loneliness, and life dissatisfaction.
Psychological DistressLonelinessLife Dissatisfaction
Beta(95% CI)p-Value for Diff.Beta(95% CI)p-Value for Diff.Beta(95% CI)p-Value for Diff.
All a
Family cohesion−0.32−0.34 to −0.29F. vs. S p < 0.001−0.27−0.30 to −0.24F. vs. Sp = 0.017−0.37−0.40 to −0.35F. vs. S p < 0.001
School climate−0.21−0.24 to −0.19S vs. LAp < 0.001−0.23−0.26 to −0.20S vs. LAp < 0.001−0.29−0.32 to −0.26S vs. LAp < 0.001
No. of leisure activities−0.04−0.06 to −0.01LA vs. Fp < 0.001−0.06−0.08 to −0.03LA vs. Fp < 0.001−0.10−0.12 to −0.07LA vs. Fp < 0.001
By parental education b
Family
Low parental education−0.32−0.36 to −0.28Low vs. −0.27−0.31 to −0.23Low vs. −0.37−0.41 to −0.33Low vs.
High parental education−0.31−0.34 to −0.27Highp = 0.557−0.26−0.30 to −0.23Highp = 0.836−0.38−0.41 to −0.34Highp = 0.824
School
Low parental education−0.23−0.27 to −0.18Low vs. −0.26−0.30 to −0.21Low vs. −0.30−0.35 to −0.26Low vs.
High parental education−0.22−0.25 to −0.19Highp = 0.724−0.22−0.25 to −0.19Highp = 0.212−0.29−0.33 to −0.25Highp = 0.676
Leisure activities
Low parental education−0.07−0.11 to −0.03Low vs. −0.06−0.10 to −0.02Low vs. −0.12−0.16 to −0.08Low vs.
High parental education−0.01−0.04 to 0.02Highp = 0.031−0.04−0.07 to −0.01Highp = 0.384−0.08−0.12 to −0.05Highp = 0.203
a Adjusted for sex, age, parental separation, and subjective family economy. b Stratified by parental education. CI; confidence interval, F; family cohesion, S; school climate, LA; number of leisure activities, Diff.; difference, No.; number.
Table S1. Supplementary table.
Table S1. Supplementary table.
Model 1 aModel 2 bModel 3 c
Beta (95% CI)Beta (95% CI)Beta (95% CI)p-Value for Diff.
Psychological distress
 Family cohesion−0.32 (−0.34 to −0.29)−0.28 (−0.31 to −0.26)−0.28 (−0.31 to −0.26)F vs. S p < 0.001
 School climate −0.14 (−0.17 to −0.12)−0.15 (−0.17 to −0.12)S. vs. LAp < 0.001
 No. of leisure activities 0.00 (−0.02 to 0.03)LA vs. Fp < 0.001
Loneliness
 Family cohesion−0.27 (−0.30 to −0.24)−0.23 (−0.26 to −0.20)−0.23 (−0.26 to −0.20)F vs. Sp = 0.009
 School climate −0.17 (−0.20 to −0.15)−0.17 (−0.20 to −0.15)S. vs. LAp < 0.001
 Leisure activities −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.01)LA vs. Fp < 0.001
Life dissatisfaction
 Family cohesion−0.37 (−0.40 to −0.35)−0.32 (−0.35 to −0.29)−0.32 (−0.35 to −0.29)F vs. Sp < 0.001
 School climate −0.21 (−0.24 to −0.19)−0.21 (−0.24 to −0.19)S. vs. LAp < 0.001
 Leisure activities −0.05 (−0.07 to −0.03)LA vs. Fp < 0.001
a Adjusted for sex, age, subjective family economy, parental separation, and family cohesion. b Model 1 + adjusted for school climate. c Model 2 + adjusted for leisure activities. CI, confidence interval; diff, difference; F, family cohesion; S, school climate; LA, leisure activities.

Reference

  1. Aasan, B.E.V.; Lillefjell, M.; Krokstad, S.; Sylte, M.; Sund, E.R. The Relative Importance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities for the Mental Wellbeing of Adolescents: The Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies 2023, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the Young-HUNT4 Survey (2017–2019).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the Young-HUNT4 Survey (2017–2019).
Low Parental EducationHigh Parental EducationTotal
(N = 3075)(N = 4629)(N = 8066)
No. or Mean(% or SD)No. or Mean(% or SD)No. or Mean(% or SD)
Sex
Girls1587(52%)2343(51%)4106(51%)
Boys1488(48%)2286(49%)3960(49%)
Parental separation
No1768(58%)3186(69%)5114(64%)
Yes, but have since moved back together93(3%)85(2%)192(2%)
Yes1172(38%)1330(29%)2663(33%)
Subjective family economy
Worse than others336(11%)253(6%)629(8%)
About the same as most others2226(74%)3246(71%)5682(72%)
Better than others465(15%)1086(24%)1636(21%)
Age16.22(1.81)16.09(1.85)16.15(1.83)
Social contexts 1
Family cohesion4.21(0.83)4.32(0.76)4.27(0.79)
School climate3.25(0.56)3.25(0.55)3.25(0.56)
No. of leisure activities1.41(1.13)1.65(1.12)1.56(1.14)
Outcomes 2
Psychological distress1.66(0.69)1.58(0.61)1.61(0.65)
Loneliness1.94(1.21)1.81(1.10)1.87(1.15)
Life dissatisfaction2.06(0.95)1.92(0.88)1.98(0.91)
1 A higher score indicates improved family cohesion and school climate, and a higher number of leisure activities. Score on family cohesion ranges from one to five, school climate from one to four, and number of leisure activities from zero to eight. 2 A higher score indicates a higher level of psychological distress, loneliness, and life dissatisfaction. Score on psychological distress ranges from one to four, loneliness from one to five, and life dissatisfaction from one to five. SD; standard deviation, No.; number.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aasan, B.E.V.; Lillefjell, M.; Krokstad, S.; Sylte, M.; Sund, E.R. Correction: Aasan et al. The Relative Importance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities for the Mental Wellbeing of Adolescents: The Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies 2023, 13, 93. Societies 2024, 14, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080149

AMA Style

Aasan BEV, Lillefjell M, Krokstad S, Sylte M, Sund ER. Correction: Aasan et al. The Relative Importance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities for the Mental Wellbeing of Adolescents: The Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies 2023, 13, 93. Societies. 2024; 14(8):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aasan, Bodil Elisabeth Valstad, Monica Lillefjell, Steinar Krokstad, Mari Sylte, and Erik Reidar Sund. 2024. "Correction: Aasan et al. The Relative Importance of Family, School, and Leisure Activities for the Mental Wellbeing of Adolescents: The Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies 2023, 13, 93" Societies 14, no. 8: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop