Next Article in Journal
The Weak Engagement Paradox: Public Support and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Bulgaria
Next Article in Special Issue
Algorithms in Scientific Work: A Qualitative Study of University Research Processes Between Engagement and Critical Reflection
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Media and Political Engagement: Shaping Youth Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors in Four European Societies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Algorithmic Burnout and Digital Well-Being: Modelling Young Adults’ Resistance to Personalized Digital Persuasion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth

1
Department of Media Studies, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
2
Department of Library, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
Department of Central Library, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia
4
President Office, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2025, 15(11), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301
Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 24 October 2025 / Accepted: 25 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Algorithm Awareness: Opportunities, Challenges and Impacts on Society)

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes a decade of peer-reviewed research (2015–2025) examining the interplay of filter bubbles, echo chambers, and algorithmic bias in shaping youth engagement within social media. A total of 30 studies were analyzed, using the PRISMA 2020 framework, encompassing computational audits, simulation modeling, surveys, ethnographic accounts, and mixed-methods designs across diverse platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, and Weibo. Results reveal three consistent patterns: (i) algorithmic systems structurally amplify ideological homogeneity, reinforcing selective exposure and limiting viewpoint diversity; (ii) youth demonstrate partial awareness and adaptive strategies to navigate algorithmic feeds, though their agency is constrained by opaque recommender systems and uneven digital literacy; and (iii) echo chambers not only foster ideological polarization but also serve as spaces for identity reinforcement and cultural belonging. Despite these insights, the evidence base suffers from geographic bias toward Western contexts, limited longitudinal research, methodological fragmentation, and conceptual ambiguity in key definitions. This review highlights the need for integrative, cross-cultural, and youth-centered approaches that bridge empirical evidence with lived experiences.
Keywords: algorithmic bias; filter bubbles; echo chambers; youth engagement; social media; polarization; media literacy algorithmic bias; filter bubbles; echo chambers; youth engagement; social media; polarization; media literacy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmmad, M.; Shahzad, K.; Iqbal, A.; Latif, M. Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth. Societies 2025, 15, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301

AMA Style

Ahmmad M, Shahzad K, Iqbal A, Latif M. Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth. Societies. 2025; 15(11):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmmad, Mukhtar, Khurram Shahzad, Abid Iqbal, and Mujahid Latif. 2025. "Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth" Societies 15, no. 11: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301

APA Style

Ahmmad, M., Shahzad, K., Iqbal, A., & Latif, M. (2025). Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth. Societies, 15(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop