Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Samples Cleaning Methods Prior to Hydrogen Content Determination in Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement of Copper Metal Leaching in Sulfuric Acid Solution by Simultaneous Use of Oxygen and Cupric Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Application Research on Critical High-Temperature Deformation of Low-Lead Brass Alloy

Instrument Center, Instrument Development Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
Metals 2020, 10(6), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060722
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 25 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020

Abstract

:
This study investigated the critical high-temperature deformation of the low-lead (Pb) Cu38Zn3Pb alloy. Moreover, the dezincification mechanism of this alloy for high-temperature applications was evaluated. The results reveal that tensile temperatures influence the phase structures of the brass alloy matrix. Many voids and holes formed at the phase boundaries above 400 °C due to the hard-brittle β’ phase which transformed into the softer β phase, thus causing low-strength and high-ductility values. High strain rate deformation promotes more obvious intermediate-temperature brittleness in the brass alloy. The Cu38Zn3Pb alloys display the lowest impact toughness between 400 °C and 600 °C. Long-term hot working caused dezincification in the brass alloy, thus deteriorating its ductility. The influences of thermal dezincification on the mechanical properties of the alloy must be considered during processing or heat treatment.

1. Introduction

Brass alloys are composed of copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), which form a substitutional alloy. The strength and wear resistance of the alloys can be improved through the use of a solid solution of Zn in Cu. According to a previous report [1], the tensile strength of brass generally increased with an increase in Zn content when the Zn content was less than 45 wt.%; while the Zn content in the brass exceeded 45 wt.%, and its strength deteriorated rapidly. The most used brass in industrial application contains a Zn content of 30–45 wt.% [2,3], and its performance can be improved through adding alloy elements (Al, Sn, Ni, Fe) [4,5,6]. To improve the applicability of free-cutting brass, this study reduces lead (Pb) content and adds Fe and Sn to fabricate the Cu-38Zn-3Pb (Cu38Zn3Pb) alloy and evaluate its thermal resistance.
Brass with less than 45 wt.% Zn is usually used in industrial applications. It can be divided into α brass, α + β’ brass, and β’ brass, and their microstructures are influenced by Zn content. The strength of α brass after a solution treatment is higher than that of pure Cu, and has excellent ductility at room temperature; the texture of β’ brass is hard, but its toughness is poor. Therefore, α + β’ brass can undergo a larger load than α brass, and its applications are wider. Moreover, the high-temperature β phase is softer than the low-temperature β’ phase, which causes α + β’ brass to have a better hot workability [7]. In recent years, lead-free or low-lead free-cutting brasses have been investigated, among which Cu-Zn-Si and Cu-Zn-Bi alloys are mainly used [8,9]. However, the cost of lead-free or low-lead free-cutting brass is high, and its high-temperature strength remains to be improved. Therefore, α + β’ brass with 38–40 wt.% Zn, a low content of 1–2 wt.% Pb and traces of Fe and Sn was used in this study, which explores the influences of hot working conditions on the mechanical properties of brass.
Metals are subjected to high-temperature plastic processing, which causes dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization to occur [10,11]. Cu is a low stacking fault energy metal, thus indicating a low dynamic recovery and obvious dynamic recrystallization under high-temperature strain [12]. The addition of Zn to the brass used in the present study will reduce the stacking fault energy and dynamic recovery, causing obvious dynamic recrystallization to improve high-temperature formability [13]. In general, the displacement of dislocation in metals is easier with an increase in temperature, causing an easier deformation and a high ductility. However, an intermediate-temperature brittleness phenomenon was found in Cu alloys [14]. The dual-phase brass (40 wt.% Zn) has a higher tensile strength than the single-phase brass (30 wt.% Zn) at room temperature. The strength and toughness of both brass alloys decreased significantly when the temperature exceeded 400 °C. However, the impact toughness of the dual-phase brass recovered when the temperature was increased to 500 °C [15]. For the brass with a Pb content above 1 wt.%, intermediate-temperature brittleness appeared significantly at low temperatures due to softened Pb, which resulted in a decrease in the strength of the grain boundary [16]. The processing technology for brass that can be directly hot-worked at high temperatures is novel. Therefore, this study conducts a high-temperature impact test, as clarifying the effect of intermediate-temperature brittleness on brass is important for academic research. Moreover, Zn atoms in brass will be released under long-term hot working, which influence the mechanical properties of the material [17]. Notably, the critical conditions and diffusion mechanisms of the dezincification in brass have not yet been clarified.
Therefore, in this study, the low-Pb dual-phase brass alloy was fabricated, and the effects of various temperatures and strain rates on the mechanical properties of the alloy were explored. Moreover, the influences of hot working conditions on the fracture mechanism and the dezincification of the brass alloy were investigated. The results can also be used as a data base for practical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

A hot extruded low-lead Cu38Zn3Pb alloy (α + β’ phase brass) rod (JIN JIA SING Industry Corporation, Taoyuan, Taiwan) was used in the present study, and the chemical composition is presented in Table 1. The tensile and impact specimens fabricated using the alloy rods were shaped, and the dimensions of these specimens are displayed in Figure 1. Tensile and impact tests were used to evaluate the influences of various temperatures on the deformation resistance and impact toughness of the given alloy specimens. The tensile temperatures were configured at 25–600 °C for 10 min to conduct tensile tests with an initial strain rate set of 1.67 × 10−3 s−1 by a universal material tester (Hung Ta Instrument Corporation, Taichung, Taiwan). For the impact toughness, the given specimens were heated at 25–750 °C for 10 min using the Charpy impact test. A pendulum with a weight of 25 kg, a length of 0.75 m, and an initial angle of 120° was used for the impact test. An impact angle was obtained after the impact test, and the impact energy corresponding to each temperature was calculated. Moreover, the dezincification test was configured at 700 °C for 1 h and 12 h to explore the phenomenon of zinc release, and the effects of dezincification on the mechanical properties of the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimen.
The following steps were conducted to investigate the effects of high-temperature tensile and impact tests on microstructural evolution: The alloy specimens were polished using up to #4000-grit SiC papers, and etched through 2 wt.% FeCl3 ethanol solution. Then, the microstructural morphologies of the resulting specimens were observed through optical microscopy (OM) (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). After the tensile and impact tests, the fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of the specimens were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) to clarify the mechanism of fracture. The phase composition of the dezincification of the specimen surface was examined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA). Moreover, the given alloy specimen was examined by secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) using a CAMECA IMS-7f analyzer (CAMECA, Genevilliers, France) with an O2 primary ion beam to examine the effect of long duration heating on dezincification.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Temperature on Plastic Deformation

A macrograph image of the low-lead Cu38Zn3Pb alloy rod is displayed in Figure 2a. The material used for the present study corresponds to a high-Zn content Cu38Zn3Pb alloy. At room temperature, two main phases appear in the alloy specimen along the extrusion direction (ED) plane; these phases correspond to the α and β’ phases, respectively; see Figure 2b. The trace amount of Pb was not solidified in the alloy matrix and was distributed at the boundaries between the α and β’ phases. The present Cu38Zn3Pb alloy corresponds to α + β’ brass [7], which causes the alloy to have a better hot workability. However, the β phase in the alloy matrix is transferred into the β’ phase during the hot working process [18]. Furthermore, the liquid Pb phase penetrated the phase boundaries, thus influencing the mechanical properties of material. Based on the aforementioned results, it is necessary to clarify the influences of hot working conditions on the processing characteristics of α + β’ brass.
The deformation resistances of the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimen at different temperatures were determined through the tensile test displayed in Figure 3. The stress–strain curves obtained from the tensile specimens of the given alloy subjected to a tensile test at 25 °C to 600 °C are displayed in Figure 3a. The results revealed that the tensile strengths of the given specimens at 25 °C to 300 °C were higher than 500 MPa, and the ductility did not significantly change; see Figure 3b,c. The tensile strength of the specimen decreased substantially with an increase in temperature, and its ductility increased. The plastic deformation exhibits a total elongation of more than 20%, but the uniform elongation decreased. This finding revealed that the alloy used in the present study showed a weakened high-temperature tensile strength, and had a brittle behavior of low uniform deformation. In this case, the test result is not consistent with the literature that reported the brittle behavior of reduced elongation at intermediate-temperature [19]. The deformation resistance of the given alloy at intermediate-temperature needs further investigation to clarify the material deformation characteristics.
The fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of the specimens after the tensile test were examined to analyze the tensile fracture behavior of the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy at different temperatures; see Figure 4. Many dimples formed on the fracture surface at room temperature (25 °C). The dimple structures decreased and the proportion of cleavages increased with an increase in temperature, thus indicating that the fracture behavior tended to show brittle failure. At temperatures of 500 °C and 600 °C, the fracture surface still showed brittle fracture morphology. This indicates that the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy has high-temperature brittle failure behavior. Subsurface observations of the tensile specimens below 300 °C reveal that a material fracture did not proceed along a specific interface, but occurred in the α or β’ phase, which is a transgranular fracture. For the 400 °C tensile specimen, the α phase is round and its boundary is complete, which indicates that the fracture tended to occur at the phase boundaries and in the β’ phase. Many voids and holes can be found at the phase boundary, which is attributed to a sliding between the α and β’ phases [20]. In an environment above 400 °C, the ductility of the specimens increased due to an increase in temperature which deteriorated the phase boundary strength. Moreover, the hard and brittle β’ phase transformed into the softer β phase at high temperatures (>400 °C), thus decreasing the strength and improving the ductility.
Tensile tests of 500 °C with higher strain rates (1.67 × 10−1 s−1 and 1.67 × 10−2 s−1) were performed to understand the plastic deformation and rheological properties of the Cu-Zn-Pb alloy at high temperatures. The tensile strength of the Cu38Zn3Pb specimens increased, and their ductility decreased with an increase in the strain rate; see Figure 5. Subsurface observation of the tensile specimen with a low strain rate reveals that many gaps and holes were observed at the grain boundaries, indicating an obvious sliding phenomenon. More cleavage in the phase was observed during high strain rate deformation. Tensile toughness of the alloy specimens can be obtained through calculating the integrated area under the stress–strain curve. The toughness is higher at a low strain rate, indicating that the formation of voids and holes can help energy absorption during fracture. Grain boundary sliding accompanied atomic diffusion; thus, the low strain rate allowed the atoms to sufficiently diffuse, resulting in the formation of gaps and holes in the grain boundaries, which provides the required ductility during deformation. This is the main deformation mechanism at high temperatures. Therefore, the subsurface morphology of the tensile specimen with a high strain rate exhibits low ductility.

3.2. High-Strain and High-Temperature Plastic Deformation Characteristics

Figure 6 displays the impact toughness as a function of the test temperatures pertaining to the given alloy specimens. The impact toughness of the alloy specimen at room temperature was similar to that of 200 °C. The impact toughness of the specimens gradually decreased with an increase in temperature, and reached their minimum values in the range of 400–600 °C. Then, the impact toughness value started to increase when the test temperature exceeded 600 °C. This finding confirmed that the impact brittleness of the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy existed between 400 °C and 600 °C.
Fracture surface and subsurface observations of the given alloy specimen obtained after the impact test are displayed in Figure 7. The results observed that the fracture mechanism of the alloy specimen below 400 °C corresponded to the transgranular failure due to a low relative temperature and high strain rate. The existence of voids and holes can be observed at 600 °C, and the cracks extend from the grain boundary. This indicates that the deformation of the alloy has a phase boundary sliding phenomenon. The fracture morphologies of the specimens were transformed into transgranular failure again at temperatures above 700 °C. Moreover, many fine particles were present on the formed boundaries, and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) analysis confirmed that these fine structures were Pb particles; see Figure 8. The voids existed between the grain boundaries. This result reveals that the Pb existing in the voids melted at high temperatures, thus causing molten Pb to penetrate the grain boundaries, which resulted in a decrease in phase boundary strength. This indicates that the intermediate-temperature brittleness of the given alloy has a specific temperature range, and the brittleness behavior becomes more obvious with an increase in the strain rate.

3.3. Mechanism of High-Temperature Dezincification

According to a previous report [21], Zn in the Cu-Zn alloy easily escaped at high temperatures due to its high vapor pressure, which reduced the Zn content in the material and thus influenced its structure. In addition, the dezincification behavior of brass occurred easily in a high Zn content β solid solution, which diffused outward from the grain boundaries, causing a loose Cu-rich layer, and thus decreased the mechanical properties of the alloy [16]. The macrograph images of the tensile Cu38Zn3Pb specimens obtained after high-temperature heat treatment are displayed in Figure 9a. The surface of the 12-h-heated specimen displays an obvious film peeling. This finding confirmed that the composition of the peeled film was ZnO, indicating that the alloy specimen had been severely dezincified. Moreover, Cu, Zn, and Pb contents of the alloy specimen surface where the ZnO film had peeled off were detected using SIMS to clarify the influence of dezincification on structural characteristics; see Figure 9b. The Zn content pertaining to the surface of the 12-h-heated specimen is slightly higher than that pertaining to the surface of the given specimen. This finding can be attributed to a residual ZnO film that was detected on the specimen surface. The Cu content of the 12-h-heated specimen surface is lower than that of the given specimen surface, but the Pb content is higher. The dezincification behavior caused a large amount of Zn to diffuse towards the specimen surface. This result caused the precipitation of Pb which accumulated on the specimen surface where the ZnO film had peeled off, and thus the Cu migrated towards the alloy matrix; see Figure 9c.
The mechanical properties of the 1-h and 12-h-heated specimens were also determined through the tensile test; see Figure 10. The tensile strength of the 12-h-heated specimen is slightly lower than that of the 1-h-heated one, and the elongation is approximately 19% lower. This indicates that long-term high-temperature exposure increases dezincification, causing the accumulation of high-content Pb on the specimen surface, which results in the deterioration of the mechanical properties of the specimen. To summarize, for the processing and heat treatment of the Cu-Zn alloy, the influences of thermal dezincification on its mechanical properties must be considered.

4. Conclusions

The mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of the α + β’ phase brass alloy after high-temperature tensile and impact tests were investigated in this study. The tensile strength of the alloy decreased as the tensile temperature was increased, and its ductility increased. High temperatures (>400 °C) led to a sliding grain boundary and reduced the grain boundary strength. Moreover, the β’ phase was transformed into a high-ductility β phase when the temperature exceeded 400 °C, which greatly improved ductility. The impact test confirmed that the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy demonstrates an intermediate-temperature brittleness phenomenon in the range of 400–600 °C. A high strain rate led to more obvious brittleness behavior of the alloy. A large amount of Zn was released from the alloy after a long-term high-temperature heat treatment, resulting in the formation of a ZnO film on the specimen surface. The precipitation of a Pb layer obtained after the dezincification caused the Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimen to exhibit less elongation.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Instrument Center at National Cheng Kung University (NCKU), the Department of Materials Science and Engineering of NCKU, and the Institute of Microelectronics and the Department of Electrical Engineering of NCKU for supporting this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reed-Hill, R.E.; Abbaschian, R. Physical Metallurgy Principles, 3rd ed.; PWS-KENT: Boston, MA, USA, 1992; pp. 691–692. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zaretsky, E.B.; Kanel, G.I. Abnormal temperature effects on the dynamic yield stress of alpha-brass. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 045902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davoodi, A.; Honarbakhsh, S.; Farzi, G.A. Evaluation of corrosion resistance of polypyrrole/functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite coating on 60Cu-40Zn brass alloy. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 88, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adineh, M.; Doostmohammadi, H.; Raiszadeh, R. Effect of Si and Al on the microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of 65Cu-35Zn brass. Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 16, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sohn, S.; Kang, T. The effects of tin and nickel on the corrosion behavior of 60Cu-40Zn alloys. J. Alloy. Comp. 2002, 335, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bydalek, A.W.; Kula, A.; Blaz, L.; Najman, K. Analysis of the impact of modifiers on the formation of non-metallic inclusions during continuous casting of CuZn39Pb2 brass. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2019, 19, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  7. Suárez, L.; Rodriguez-Calvillo, P.; Cabrera, J.M.; Martinez-Romay, A.; Majuelos-Mallorquin, D.; Coma, A. Hot working analysis of a CuZn40Pb2 brass on the monophasic (β) and intercritical (α + β) regions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 627, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, W.; Jia, Y.; Yi, J.; Wang, M.; Derby, Q.; Lei, B. Effect of addition of Ni and Si on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu-Zn alloys. J. Mater. Res. 2017, 32, 3137–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Suksongkrm, P.; Rojananan, S.; Rojananan, S. Bismuth formation in lead-free Cu-Zn-Si yellow brass with various bismuth-tin alloy additions. Mater. Trans. 2018, 59, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Humphreys, F.J.; Hatherly, M. Chapter 13 hot deformation and dynamic restoration. In Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena; Elsevier: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  11. McQueen, H.J.; Imbert, C.A.C. Dynamic recrystallization: Plasticity enhancing structural development. J. Alloy. Comp. 2004, 378, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Guo, J.M.; Chen, J.H.; Wu, C.L.; Kormout, K.S.; Ghosh, P.; Zhang, Z.L. On the stacking fault energy related deformation mechanism of nanocrystalline Cu and Cu alloys: A first-principles and TEM study. J. Alloy. Comp. 2019, 776, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spigarelli, S.; Mehtedi, M.E.; Cabibbo, M.; Gabrielli, F.; Ciccarelli, D. High temperature processing of brass: Constitutive analysis of hot working of Cu-Zn alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 615, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ashby, M.F.; Gandhi, C.; Taplin, D.M.R. Perspectives in Creep Fracture; Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 1983; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolley, D.J.; Fox, A.G. The embrittlement of leaded and unleaded α + β (60-40) brasses in the temperature range 300 to 500 °C. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1988, 7, 763–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heidersbach, R.H.; Verink, E.D. The dezincification of alpha and beta brasses. Corrosion 1972, 28, 397–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, C.G.; Kim, J.G.; Chung, Y.M.; Han, J.G.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, C.H. A study on corrosion characterization of plasma oxidized 65/35 brass with various frequencies. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2005, 200, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Illarionov, A.G.; Loginov, Y.N.; Stepanov, S.I.; Illarionova, S.M.; Radaev, P.S. Variation of the structure-and-phase condition and physical and mechanical properties of cold-deformed leaded brass under heating. Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 2019, 61, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chu, Z.K.; Yu, J.J.; Sun, X.F.; Guan, H.R.; Hu, Z.Q. Tensile property and deformation behavior of a directionally solidified Ni-base superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 3010–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Izumi, O. Intermediate temperature embrittlement and intercrystalline cracking in copper alloys. Bull. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1979, 54, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giacobbe, F.W. Thermodynamic dezincification behavior of brass during annealing. J. Alloy. Comp. 1993, 202, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dimensions of tensile and impact specimens.
Figure 1. Dimensions of tensile and impact specimens.
Metals 10 00722 g001
Figure 2. Cu38Zn3Pb alloy: (a) Macrograph, (b) Microstructure images.
Figure 2. Cu38Zn3Pb alloy: (a) Macrograph, (b) Microstructure images.
Metals 10 00722 g002
Figure 3. Tensile properties of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy from room temperature to high temperature: (a) Stress–strain curve, (b) Tensile strength, (c) Elongation.
Figure 3. Tensile properties of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy from room temperature to high temperature: (a) Stress–strain curve, (b) Tensile strength, (c) Elongation.
Metals 10 00722 g003
Figure 4. Fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens after tensile test at different temperatures.
Figure 4. Fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens after tensile test at different temperatures.
Metals 10 00722 g004aMetals 10 00722 g004b
Figure 5. Stress–strain curves as a function of subsurface morphologies for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens.
Figure 5. Stress–strain curves as a function of subsurface morphologies for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens.
Metals 10 00722 g005
Figure 6. Impact toughness as a function of test temperatures for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens.
Figure 6. Impact toughness as a function of test temperatures for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens.
Metals 10 00722 g006
Figure 7. Fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens obtained after impact test at different temperatures.
Figure 7. Fracture surface and subsurface morphologies of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens obtained after impact test at different temperatures.
Metals 10 00722 g007aMetals 10 00722 g007b
Figure 8. Impact fracture surface and EDS analysis of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimen at 600 °C.
Figure 8. Impact fracture surface and EDS analysis of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimen at 600 °C.
Metals 10 00722 g008
Figure 9. Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens after dezincification test: (a) Surface observations and X-ray diffractometer, (b) High-resolution mass analyses, (c) Dezincification mechanism of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy after long-term hot working.
Figure 9. Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens after dezincification test: (a) Surface observations and X-ray diffractometer, (b) High-resolution mass analyses, (c) Dezincification mechanism of Cu38Zn3Pb alloy after long-term hot working.
Metals 10 00722 g009aMetals 10 00722 g009b
Figure 10. Tensile properties as a function of heating duration for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens; (a) Tensile strength, (b) Elongation.
Figure 10. Tensile properties as a function of heating duration for Cu38Zn3Pb alloy specimens; (a) Tensile strength, (b) Elongation.
Metals 10 00722 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition of Cu-38Zn-3Pb alloy (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of Cu-38Zn-3Pb alloy (wt.%).
ElementZnPbFeSnNiCu
wt.%38.103.300.220.210.12Bal.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, K.-J. Novel Application Research on Critical High-Temperature Deformation of Low-Lead Brass Alloy. Metals 2020, 10, 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060722

AMA Style

Chen K-J. Novel Application Research on Critical High-Temperature Deformation of Low-Lead Brass Alloy. Metals. 2020; 10(6):722. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Kuan-Jen. 2020. "Novel Application Research on Critical High-Temperature Deformation of Low-Lead Brass Alloy" Metals 10, no. 6: 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060722

APA Style

Chen, K. -J. (2020). Novel Application Research on Critical High-Temperature Deformation of Low-Lead Brass Alloy. Metals, 10(6), 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop