Next Article in Journal
Hydrometallurgical Process and Economic Evaluation for Recovery of Zinc and Manganese from Spent Alkaline Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
On the Effect of Electron Beam Melted Ti6Al4V Part Orientations during Milling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/met10091171
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Wear Characteristics of Superalloy and Hardface Coatings in Gas Turbine Applications–A Review

by
Ahmad Afiq Pauzi
1,*,
Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali
2,
Wan Fathul Hakim W. Zamri
2 and
Armin Rajabi
2
1
Materials Engineering and Testing Group, TNB Research Sdn Bhd, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
2
Centre for Materials Engineering and Smart Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor 436000, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2020, 10(9), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171
Submission received: 9 June 2020 / Revised: 9 July 2020 / Accepted: 9 July 2020 / Published: 1 September 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the gas-turbine research field, superalloys are some of the most widely used materials as they offer excellent strength, particularly at extreme temperatures. Vital components such as combustion liners, transition pieces, blades, and vanes, which are often severely affected by wear, have been identified. These critical components are exposed to very high temperatures (ranging from 570 to 1300 °C) in hot-gas-path systems and are generally subjected to heavy repair processes for maintenance works. Major degradation such as abrasive wear and fretting fatigue wear are predominant mechanisms in combustion liners and transition pieces during start–stop or peaking operation, resulting in high cost if inadequately protected. Another type of wear-like erosion is also prominent in turbine blades and vanes. Nimonic 263, Hastelloy X, and GTD 111 are examples of superalloys used in the gas-turbine industry. This review covers the development of hardface coatings used to protect the surfaces of components from wear and erosion. The application of hardface coatings helps reduce friction and wear, which can increase the lifespan of materials. Moreover, chromium carbide and Stellite 6 hardface coatings are widely used for hot-section components in gas turbines because they offer excellent resistance against wear and erosion. The effectiveness of these coatings to mitigate wear and increase the performance is further investigated. We also discuss in detail the current developments in combining these coating with other hard particles to improve wear resistance. The principles of this coating development can be extended to other high-temperature applications in the power-generation industry.

1. Introduction

A power-generating gas turbine is designed to run continuously under base-load operation with a major yearly inspection. The hot-gas-path components of a gas turbine consist of high-value and finite-life components [1]. The durability of hot-gas-path components has always been of interest to gas-turbine operators because half of the maintenance and repair costs of gas-turbine units can be attributed to the overhaul manpower and the refurbishment and replacement of these high-value parts [2].
Bohidar et al. [3] found that hot-gas-path components are subjected to extremely high temperatures ranging from 570 to 1300 °C and thus experience simultaneous thermal damages, such as creep, fatigue, and high temperature wear. The materials used in hot-gas-path components are made from various strengthened superalloys with excellent weldability and manufacturability, such as Nimonic 263 and Hastelloy X [4].
A gas turbine has a typical configuration comprising a compressor and turbines fixed together on a single shaft, which is connected to a generator [5]. Compressed air, at a typical pressure of 14 atm, is directed into the combustion section where the fuel is injected and burned and thus reacts with the compressed air. The hot gasses, as the output of this reaction, expand through the turbine section before being exhausted to the atmosphere [6]. Figure 1 shows the main sections of a gas turbine in a typical configuration.
For the operation of power generation gas turbines, the compressor draws compressed air into the combustion section at speeds of 160 km/h. In the combustion system, the fuel is injected into the combustion chamber where it is mixed with the compressed air. The mixture of compressed air and fuel is burned at a temperature of approximately 1300 °C. The combustion that has been produced by the reaction between compressed air and fuel produces high temperature and high pressure gasses and expands the hot gasses into the turbine section. The turbine section consists of stationary and rotating blades [7].
As hot gas combustion expands through the turbine, it spins the rotating blades. The rotating blades drive the compressor section to draw more compressed air into the combustion section, as well as generate the electricity power by spinning the generator [8]. The power generation gas turbines are operated at a constant speed to maintain the frequency at the generator output. Baseload is the most favorable operating mode and it has been recommended by Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Under a peak load condition, there are many start–stop modes which can cause the combustor components to undergo a large relative motion, thereby resulting in wear problems [9].
A superalloy is well known as a high-performance alloy, usually used at high temperatures due to its excellent performances. These alloys are excellent in thermal resistance and due to this capability, they are normally used in power generation gas turbines. Nimonic, Hastelloy, and Inconel are some of the examples of the materials that are being used in recent models of power generation gas turbines [10,11,12].
Kurz et al. [13] revealed that wear is the main degradation of gas turbines, particularly the wear effect on contacting surfaces among components in the system. This wear problem induces significant physical changes onto the surface of the components. Wear is categorized as a high-cost problem because it inflicts permanent damage that disables the refurbishment of the affected components [14].
One of the best techniques to protect the affected surfaces is using a wear-resistant coating. Wear-resistance coatings, also known as hardface coatings, are characterized by their hard properties, among others [15]. The hardness of hardface coatings and their excellent abrasive resistance are important when selecting an appropriate coating for wear protection. Moreover, their thermal stability and high melting temperature are some of the important considerations for applications at elevated temperatures [16]. A pair of hard coatings between two contacting surfaces is one of the best options for wear protection. For this reason, Vencl et al. [17] found excellent wear-resistance results when using hardface-coated surfaces in a gas turbine. Chromium-based hardface coatings are preferable because of their excellent wear-protection ability, particularly at high temperatures [18]. Stellite 6 (a combination of chromium and cobalt elements) also has excellent wear protection properties, such as good abrasion, corrosion, and erosion resistances, whereas chromium carbide (CrC) has excellent wear and oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures [19,20]. CrC and Stellite 6 are the main hardface coatings used for superalloys.
According to Bernstein [21], the contacting surfaces between two components in a gas turbine, such as a combustion liner and a transition piece or a turbine blade and a ring, continually rub against each other owing to vibrations during operation. These surfaces undergo a large relative motion during start–stop operations. Under this condition of operation, wear severity increases. Considering the high contact pressure and temperature, the components degrade over time, thereby limiting the life of the components. The components undergo relative motion associated with the fretting wear mode [22]. The other type of severe surface degradation is erosion wear. Solid-particle erosion is an important surface damage for gas-turbine components, especially turbine blades [23]. Figure 2 shows the wear problems in the hot-gas-path components of a gas turbine [24].
Wear-resistance coatings can be improved by adding a sufficient amount of other hard coating materials. The most important properties of these hardface coatings are excellent wear resistance, thermal stability at elevated temperatures, and resistance to thermal degradations at high temperatures, such as creep, thermal fatigue, and oxidation [25]. Some example metallic elements in a hardface coating that can be incorporated with chromium-based coatings are titanium, tungsten, and zirconium. Surface modifications and treatments of hardface coatings can increase the mechanical properties and thus reduce wear [26].
The main objective of this paper is to summarize wear issues in gas-turbine hot-section components. Wear-resistance coatings are used for combustor–component contacting surfaces, whereas erosion wear-resistance coatings are used for turbine blades and vanes. This review paper presents an overview of a gas-turbine superalloy, characterization of wear, selection of hardface coatings, and current developments in hardface composite coatings for wear protection.

2. Gas Turbine Superalloy

Bohidar [3] found that the hot-section components of gas turbines are subjected to extremely high temperatures of 1000 to 1300 °C and experience simultaneous thermal fatigue, creep, and high-temperature wear. Hot-gas-path components are fabricated from high-grade superalloys, such as nickel- and cobalt-based ones. Nickel-based superalloys are well-known metallic alloys with high-temperature applications [27]. The nickel-based superalloys of a gas turbine have some advantages when operated at elevated temperatures. Good strengthening; corrosion, wear, and oxidation resistance; and grain-boundary strengthening are some of the factors that enable these superalloys to maintain their excellent properties at high temperatures for an extended period [28]. Combustor parts are made from various superalloys, such as Nimonic 263 and Hastelloy X [4]. The less critical components such as fuel nozzles, which are subjected to low or moderate temperatures, are made from the high-strength stainless steel SS 304. High-grade stainless steels are generally fabricated for turbine discs, wheels, and other non-critical components [29].
Hastelloy X is widely used as combustion-section components in gas turbines. This superalloy is one of the best selections for oxidation environments owing to its capability to withstand excessive operation at high temperatures and repeated thermal cycles [30]. With increased operating temperatures up to 1300 °C, the superalloy Hastelloy X is slowly being replaced by Nimonic 263, which is a favorable choice of material for combustor components in gas turbines. This nickel-based superalloy is typically used in high-temperature and high-stress environments that result in combined degradations, such as high-temperature wear, creep, and thermal fatigue [31].
During the operation of peaking load with continuous starting and stopping operations, combustor parts are exposed to sudden changes in temperature, i.e., from ambient to high temperatures of 1300 °C, as well as from 1300 °C to ambient temperature, during a shut-down [32]. Hastelloy X has a melting-temperature range from 1260 to 1355 °C, whereas Nimonic 263 has a melting temperature range from 1300 to 1400 °C. Currently used turbine blades made from strengthened solution and participation-hardened directional solidified and equiaxed GTD 111 [33]. Figure 3 shows a GTD 111 blade used in a gas turbine.
Turbine blades, particularly first-stage ones, must withstand the most aggressive environments, thereby limiting the life of the components. Creep life, low cycle fatigue, wear-protection coatings, and oxidation resistance are examples of mechanical properties [34]. For some gas-turbine applications that require a > 700 °C operating temperature, high-strength, and creep-resistant ferritic steels are preferred given their lower cost [35]. Hot-gas-path components are usually fabricated from many different alloy elements and have excellent mechanical properties at high temperatures [36].
Other materials such as FSX 414 and Inconel 738 are primarily used for turbine vanes. These materials have excellent thermal stability, weldability, oxidation resistance, and wear resistance [37]. For example, Inconel 738 is used for third-stage blades because of its lower strength than GTD 111, which is primarily used for first- and second-stage turbine blades. These materials have a combination of a few elements used for an aggressive environment. For example, a combination of chromium and carbon forms carbides with excellent strength in various environments [38]. These carbides also have excellent protection against wear, oxidation, and corrosion. Other examples of materials with a similar strength to these materials are MarM 247 and RENE 80, which are also used for turbine vanes [39]

3. Relation of Wear to the Hot-Gas-Path Components of Gas Turbines

Wear significantly affects the hot-gas-path components of gas turbines. The contact surfaces of the main components, such as a combustion liner and a transition piece, as well as turbine blade roots in contact with their rings, continually rub against each other owing to combustion pulsations during the start and stop operations of gas turbines. These contacting surfaces can undergo large and severe relative motion [40,41].
Tzimasa et al. [42] revealed that under continuous cyclic-duty applications, wear is one of the significant problems experienced by gas-turbine hot-gas-path components. During a hot-gas-path inspection, component disassembly is performed to replace the worn-out components. A proper inspection concentrates on the main components. Wear damage including inspection wear, erosion wear, and cracks due to fretting fatigue occurs on a gas-turbine blade owing to fretting effects during hot-gas-path inspection [43,44]. Figure 4 shows the examples of wear damage on a gas-turbine blade [45,46].
Kim et al. [47] explained the details of a gas-turbine hot-gas-path inspection. The components of the combustion system are very costly, and significant efforts are exerted to repair the components before scrapping them. Combustor parts and turbine parts are fabricated by structures. During repair, the worn surfaces or other damaged areas can be cut and new pieces can be welded into place. The purpose of repair is to return the component to its original condition, “like new,” or “almost new” [48]. The standard process used to repair gas-turbine components are heat treatment, welding, brazing, and recoating [49].
Sahraoui et al. [50] revealed that friction and wear are the most severe degradations undergone by several main components of gas turbines. A similar study was carried out by Schlobohm et al. [51], who found that 70% of the total of hot-gas-path components experience wear problems. Detailed wear characterization is important to investigate the wear mechanisms and to monitor damages during inspection intervals. Chan et al. [52] revealed that fretting wear is one of the main failure modes of hot-gas-path components. These components are subjected to a fretting phenomenon owing to the high vibrations during gas-turbine operations. Damage by fretting-wear mode causes a failure problem, which affects the safety, economy, and lifetime service of hot-gas-path components. Barella et al. [53] showed that a combination of operating parameters influence wear initiation in gas turbines; these parameters include the load of component contact surfaces, movement of surfaces caused by vibration, temperature, wear debris, and materials properties. The appearance of worn out surfaces on hot-gas-path components, regardless of severity, is usually visible [54]. Surface roughness, debris size, friction, and wear rates are amongst the physical considerations to characterize wear severity. For example, severe wear shows a very rough surface in line with the wear track, large delaminated surface, and large debris size, and the friction and wear rates are usually very high [55].

4. Relation of Wear to the Hot-Gas-Path Components of Gas Turbines

4.1. Wear-Protection Coatings

The use of hardface coatings can significantly increase the wear lives of gas-turbine hot-gas-path components for operating conditions under which the wear protection of these components exceeds the acceptance criteria and limits [56]. The quality of a hardface coating depends on the surface properties of the hardface materials. To correlate the interaction between a hardface coating and its substrate, the compatibility amongst materials, surface roughness, and hardness is important [57]. High hardness and low surface roughness of a hardface coating require wear protection for long operation in gas turbines [58].
Several authors have discussed the use of these protection methods to reduce fretting fatigue wear. CrC is one of the most common choices to reduce fretting because of its capability to delay wear and reduce the formation of wear debris [59]. An anti-fretting coating, Ni-CrC, has been discussed by [60,61]. The addition of nickel binder into the original CrC improves its performance to mitigate wear. The turbine blade root that undergoes shot peening is coated with a copper–nickel coating to produce fretting-resistant surfaces [62]. Figure 5 shows the microstructure of CrC for hard-coating purposes [63].
Fang et al. [64] revealed that tungsten carbide (WC) and titanium carbide (TiC), which are usually used in gas-turbine parts, can be subjected to air-plasma spray (APS) and high-velocity oxygen fuel technique (HVOF). The use of these coatings together with melted binders such as nickel and copper is for quick melting through thermal-spraying techniques. WC and TiC have very high hardness (up to 700 HV) as well as the cross sectional section of a titanium-carbide coated surface [65]. The main constraint of using WC is its limited operation in moderate temperatures of up to 600 °C. CrC and TiC coatings have excellent performance up to 1100 °C. WC coatings are widely used at mid-range temperatures. This coating has excellent capability because of its high hardness and strong adhesion capability, rendering it suitable for wear resistance [66]. Figure 6 shows an example of thermal-sprayed TiC for hardface coating [67].
Abradable coatings such as nickel aluminum and aluminum silicon are suitable for gas-turbine components, which experience rubbing modes. The root surface of the turbine blades experiences rubbing with the contact to the casing. The rotating blades experience severe rubbing wear against stationary blades [68]. The significant efforts to minimize the clearance between casing and blade roots using these abradable coatings have resulted in turbine efficiency [69]. Abradable coating plays a very significant role in protecting the blade root, thereby minimizing the clearance between two contacting surfaces, as well as reducing friction between the surfaces. During operation, an abradable coating remains smooth; it does not produce a significant amount of wear debris nor initiates groove surfaces under all possible rubbing modes [70].

4.2. Erosion-Protection Coatings

Erosion is one of the main degradations usually occurring on turbine-blade surfaces. Material loss from a solid surface because of severe particle impact is called erosion wear. Mechanical action caused by fluid particles is also defined as erosion. The effect of erosion wear is significant when it comes to gas-turbine efficiency. The turbine blades of hot-gas-path components are subjected to efficiency loss because of the impact of solid-particle erosion on blade surfaces [71].
Erosion-resistant coatings are introduced to reduce the damage caused by particle impact. The continuous process of erosion on the surfaces of hot-gas-path components causes severe material loss that can lead to failure. Examples of erosion-resistant coatings are titanium-based ones such as TiC and titanium nitride [72,73,74]. With an average hardness of 700 HV and thickness of 50 µm, these coatings can reduce the particle impact, which can lead to cracks or premature failures. These coatings provide a protective layer to reduce the continuous propagation of particle impact.
WC–Co–Cr hardface coating also has excellent erosion resistance as a hard coating. This coating has shown a consistently low erosion rate because of its high hardness and toughness. WC is applied to a gas-turbine blade to reduce the friction between blade surfaces and wear particles. Moreover, this coating is used to increase the durability of the blade surface and prolong the service life of components by enhancing surface properties [75,76].
Fe–Cr coating is built over a bond coat of a turbine blade to prevent the leading and trailing edges from significant, premature material loss because of erosion. The overall thickness layer of Fe–Cr coating is approximately 3–25 µm. Owing to the severe impact of hard erosion particles, Fe–Cr suffers significant material loss, which leads to crack formation. The remaining thickness of the eroded surface is between 1–10 µm [77].
In general, research on erosion-resistant coatings is significant. Severe mechanical attack from solid particles reduces the original dimension of the hot-gas-path components of gas turbines [78]. Several cases of fluid erosion or water-droplet erosion have been reported; however, solid-particle erosion plays a significant role in the occurrence of premature failures of gas-turbine hot-gas-path components. Power plants located in dusty and sandy environments are prone to erosion problems. Premature failures are important because of erosion, which causes cracks [79,80].

4.3. Current Developments in Combination Wear-Resistant Coatings

The APS technique is the most widely used thermal-spray technique for hardface coatings in gas turbines. Fretting fatigue decreases the wear and fatigue strengths of gas-turbine materials, particularly for cyclic load operations. In fretting fatigue, microcracks and cracks can be initiated at the fretting zones, and these cracks propagate into the substrates [81]. To mitigate this problem, advanced hardface coatings for hot-gas-path components should be designed to have a dual function, namely, high hardness and low porosity to reduce wear, and the ability to reduce wear debris trapped under the fretting bridge [82]. Current hardface coatings are usually designed for baseload conditions. However, hardface coatings are subjected to wear damage under severe peaking conditions, thereby limiting the wear lives of the components [83]. Advances are needed for these hardface coatings to be sustained under peaking-load condition, including their thermal-spray parameters. The selection of appropriate hardface coatings is important to ensure that the coating is excellent for wear protection and can adhere very well onto a substrate [84].
Combining hard metallic coatings is one of the best methods of developing excellent hardface coatings for wear resistance. With prolonged reaction time and increased firing temperatures of the gas turbine up to 1300 °C, suitable hardface coatings with the abilities to withstand operation at this temperature and be operated under cyclic load are important to find [85]. Currently, minimal research has focused on mitigating fretting fatigue wear in gas turbines. As an advanced thermal-spray technique, HVOF has been introduced to produce low porosity and high-hardness coated surfaces [86].
Titanium nitride–titanium has excellent erosion resistance for blade surfaces. However, this material’s working temperatures is limited only to <800 °C [87]. Xu et al. [88] developed an aluminum-based composite coating (Al2O3), i.e., Stainless Steel 304, for gas-turbine combustor materials. This composite coating can be used only for high-grade stainless steels. The average hardness of the coating is 600 HV, which renders it suitable for wear resistance. Al2O3 coating also has excellent wear and erosion resistance and can be used at low temperatures. The fuel nozzle of a gas turbine can be made from SS 304, and the operating temperature of this component is below 500 °C.
Stellite 6 coating is one of the main hardface coatings used in gas turbines. Bartkowski et al. [89] prepared Stellite 6 and WC (S6/WC) composites through a laser-cladding technique to improve the wear, hardness, and corrosion resistance of metals. The average hardness is 350 to 650 HV. The composite coating shows strong bonding between the main carbide particles of M7C3, M6C, and M23C6. Similarly, Li et al. [90] prepared solid-state WC reinforced on Stellite 6 coating to improve the tribological property of a new coating. A higher WC content in Stellite 6 increases the wear resistance and thus reduces the tendency of surface-cracking initiation. WC addition shows excellent ability to increase the wear-resistance performance; however, WC is well-known for its limited performance at temperatures below 700 °C.
Wang and Zui [91] fabricated HVOF-sprayed CrC by adding metal cermet. They further investigated the erosion behavior of several candidates of CrC–NiCr particles. The composite powder is found to have a lower chromium content and a higher nickel content than CrC coating. The composite also excellently performs for erosion-wear resistance as the coatings have high microhardness, fine microstructure after HVOF spraying, low oxidation, and low porosity.
Szymanski et al. [92] compared several candidate hardface coatings used for power generation. They are WC–Co, WC–Co–Cr, WC–CrC–Ni, and Cr2Cr3–NiCr. Tribological-property studies indicate that WC–Co–Cr has the highest hardness amongst all candidates, i.e., between 1250 and 1400 HV. Thus, this hardface coating has excellent cavitation resistance and corrosion resistance. The powder is produced through various techniques. Figure 7 shows the powders produced for the comparative study.
The rule of thumb for a coating combination is to produce coatings with properties similar to those of the substrate. NiCrCoAlY and CoNiCrAlY coatings have similar thermal expansion coefficients to the nickel-based superalloy for the hot-gas-path components of gas turbines. These coatings have excellent oxidation and corrosion resistance at elevated temperatures. The recommended thermal-spray processes are APS and HVOF as these methods induce high bond strength after coating [93]. Figure 8 shows the powder feedstock for NiCrCoAlY and CoNiCrAlY.

5. Conclusions

This review paper presents a detailed discussion of wear problems in hot-gas-path components and various hardface coatings. Wear is concluded as one of the main problems in gas-turbine hot-gas-path components. Erosion-resistant coatings can improve the erosion life of hot-gas-path components, particularly turbine blades. Fretting-wear-resistant coatings protect the contact area between two components from fretting fatigue, wear, and crack initiation.
Hardface coating is the most valuable coating process to improve the life of the worn-out components in gas turbines. Recently, this process has been widely chosen for wear reduction and wear replacement of the components. This application of hardface coating has the advantages of reducing wear as well as increasing the life of the components. With respect to coating selection, Chromium Carbide and Stellite 6 are the most popular for gas turbine components while other coatings are being used for some low-temperature applications. The cost effectiveness of the hardface coating and hardface materials depend on specific applications based on materials and elemental composition for the particular area to be protected.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.P., M.J.G. and A.R.; methodology, A.A.P.; validation, A.A.P., M.J.G. and A.R.; formal analysis, A.A.P., M.J.G. and A.R.; investigation, A.A.P., M.J.G. and A.R.; resources, A.A.P., M.J.G. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.P.; writing—review and editing, M.J.G., W.F.H.W.Z. and A.R.; visualization, A.A.P.; supervision, M.J.G., W.F.H.W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the TNB Research Sdn Bhd (Malaysia) and The National University of Malaysia (UKM).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Calindro, A. Performance Analysis and Economic Effects of Maintenance and Hot Gas Path Inspection of a Combined Cycle Power Plant. In Corso Di Laurea Magistrale In Ingegneria Meccanica; Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli: Caserta, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloch, H.P.; Geitner, F.K. Major Process Equipment Maintenance and Repair; Gulf Publishing Company: Houston, TX, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohidar, S.K.; Dewangan, R.; Kaurase, P.R. Advanced Materials used for different components of Gas Turbine. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. 2013, 1, 366–370. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh, K. Advanced Materials for Land Based Gas Turbines. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2014, 67, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zohuri, B. Gas Turbine Working Principles. In Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 147–171. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vishwanathan, R. Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High. Temperature Components, 4th ed.; ASM International: Novelty, OH, USA, 2006; pp. 415–417. [Google Scholar]
  7. Office of Fossil Energy. How Gas. Turbine Power Plant. Works; Office of Fossil Energy, Energy Government: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
  8. Soares, C. Gas Turbine. A Handbook of Air, Land and Sea Application; BH Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2017; 1020p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Scherer, L.G.; Tambara, R.V.; de Carmago, R.F. Gas Turbine Applications. IET Renew. Power Generat. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Elizarasn, C.; Kumar, V.S.S.; Velayudham, A. An experimental analysis and measurement of process performances in machining of nimonic C-263 super alloy. Measurement 2013, 46, 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, J.W.; Kuo, Y.C. A study on the microstructure and cyclic oxidation behavior of the pack aluminized Hastelloy X at 1100 °C. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2006, 201, 3867–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mazur, Z.; Luna-Ramirez, A.; Islas, J.A.J.; Compos-Amezcua, A. Failure analysis of a gas turbine blade made of Inconel 738LC alloy. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2005, 12, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kurz, R.; Homji, C.M.; Brun, K. Gas Turbine Degradation. In Proceedings of the 43rd Turbomachinery & 30th Pump Users Symposia, Houston, TX, USA, 23–25 September 2014; Texas A&M University, Turbomachinery Laboratories: College Station, TX, USA, 2014; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Laguna-Camachoa, J.R.; Villagrán-Villegasa, L.Y.; Martínez-Garcíaa, H.; Juárez-Moralesa, G.; Cruz-Orduñaa, M.I.; Vite-Torresb, M.; Ríos-Velascoc, L.; Hernández-Romeroc, I. A study of the wear damage on gas turbine blades. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2016, 61, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghazali, M.J.; Forghani, S.M.; Hasanuddin, N.; Muctar, A.; Daud, A.R. Comparative wear study of plasma sprayed TiO2 & Al2O3-TiO2 on mild steels. Tribol. Int. 2015, 93, 681–686. [Google Scholar]
  16. Choteborsky, R.; Hrabě, P.; Müller, M.; Válek, R. Effect of carbide size in hardfacing on abrasive wear. Res. Gate 2009, 4, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Vencl, A.; Gligorijević, B.R.; Katavić, B.; Nedic, B. Abrasive wear resistance of the iron-and WC-based hardfaced coatings evaluated with scratch test method. In Tribology in Industry; Faculty of Engineering: Kragujevac, Serbia, 2013; Volume 35, pp. 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zamana, H.A.; Sharifb, S.; Kimc, D.W.; Idris, M.H.; Suhaimib, M.A.; Tumurkhuyag, Z. Machinability of Cobalt-based and Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum Alloys—A Review. Proc. Manuf. 2017, 11, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeshvaghania, R.A.; Shamanianb, M.; Jaberzadehb, M. Enhancement of wear resistance of ductile iron surface alloyed by stellite 6. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 2028–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sen, S. Influence of chromium carbide coating on tribological performance of steel. Mater. Des. 2006, 27, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernstein, H.L. Materials Issues for User of Gas Turbines; Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, USA, 1999; pp. 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ahmadi, A.; Sadeghi, F.; Shaffer, S. In-situ friction and fretting wear measurements of Inconel 617 at elevated temperatures. Wear 2018, 410, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prasanna, N.D.; Siddaraju, C.; Shetty, G.; Ramesh, M.R.; Reddy, M. Studies on the role of HVOF coatings to combat erosion in turbine alloys. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 3130–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajendran, R. Gas turbine coatings—An overview. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2012, 26, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kesavan, D.; Kamaraj, M. The microstructure and high temperature wear performance of a nickel base hardfaced coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 204, 4034–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zikin, A.; Hussainov, I.; Katsich, C.; Badisch, E.; Tomastik, C. Advanced chromium carbide-based hardfacings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 4270–4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blau, P.J. Elevated-temperature tribology of metallic materials. Tribol. Int. 2010, 43, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pollock, T.M.; Tin, S. Nickel-Based Superalloys for Advanced Turbine Engines: Chemistry, Microstructure and Properties. J. Propuls. Power 2006, 22, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maziasz, P.J.; Swindeman, R.W.; Montague, J.P.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Browning, P.F.; Grubb, J.F.; Klug, R.C. Improved creep-resistance of austenitic stainless steel for compact gas turbine recuperators. J. Mater. High. Temp. 1999, 16, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, J.C.; Larsen, M.; Ravikumar, V. Phase precipitation and time–temperature-transformation diagram of Hastelloy X. Mater. Sci. Engin. A 2000, 293, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.M.; Lin, Y.C.; Chen, M.S.; Lid, H.B.; Wen, D.X.; Zhang, J.L.; Hea, M. Microstructural evolution of a nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. Mater. Des. 2015, 77, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roche, R.; Idoumghar, L.; Suryanarayanan, S.; Daggag, M.; Solacolu, C.A.; Miraoui, A. A flexible and efficient multi-agent gas turbine power plant energy management system with economic and environmental constraints. Appl. Energy 2013, 11, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pouranvari, M.; Ekrami, A.; Kokabi, A.H. Microstructure development during transient liquid phase bonding of GTD-111 nickel-based superalloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2008, 461, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eliaz, N.; Shemesh, G.; Latanision, R.M. Hot corrosion in gas turbine components. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2002, 9, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ennis, P.J.; Filemonowicz, C. Recent advances in creep-resistant steels for power plant applications. Sadhana 2003, 28, 709–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Caron, P.; Khan, T. Evolution of Ni-based superalloys for single crystal gas turbine blade applications. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 1999, 3, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khazaei, B.A.; Jahanbakhsh, A.; Bakhtiari, R. TLP bonding of dissimilar FSX-414/IN-738 system with MBF-80 interlayer: The effect of homogenizing treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Engin. A 2016, 65, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  38. El-Awadi, G.A.; Abdel-Samad, S.; Elshazly, E.S. Hot corrosion behavior of Ni based Inconel 617 and Inconel 738 superalloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 378, 224–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Basak, A.; Das, S. Microstructure of nickel-base superalloy MAR-M247 additively manufactured through scanning laser epitaxy (SLE). J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 705, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koiprasert, H.; Dumrongrattana, S.; Niranatlumpong, P. Thermally sprayed coatings for protection of fretting wear in land-based gas-turbine engine. Wear 2004, 257, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Done, V.; Kesavan, D.; Krishna, M.R.; Chaise, T.; Nelias, D. Semi analytical fretting wear simulation including wear debris. Tribol. Int. 2017, 109, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tzimasa, E.; Müllejans, H.; Peteves, S.D.; Bressers, J.; Stamm, W. Failure of thermal barrier coating systems under cyclic thermomechanical loading. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 4699–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Su, Y.; Han, Q.N.; Zhang, C.C.; Shi, H.J.; Niu, L.S.; Deng, G.J.; Ruia, S.S. Effects of secondary orientation and temperature on the fretting fatigue behaviors of Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Tribol. Int. 2019, 130, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ilieva, G.I. Erosion failure mechanisms in turbine stage with twisted rotor blade. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2016, 70, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barella, S.; Boniardi, M.; Cincera, S.; Pellin, P.; Degive, X.; Gijbels, S. Failure analysis of a third stage gas turbine blade. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2020, 18, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khajavi, M.R.; Shariat, M.H. Failure of first stage gas turbine blades. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2004, 11, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, M.N.; Yun, N.; Jeon, Y.H.; Lee, D.H.; Cho, H.H. Failure analysis in after shell section of gas turbine combustion liner under base-load operation. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2004, 17, 848–856. [Google Scholar]
  48. Torshizi, S.E.M.; Ebrahimic, M. Failure analysis of gas turbine transition pieces, leading to a solution for prevention. Engin. Fail. Anal. 2013, 32, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nicolaus, M.; Möhwald, K.; Maier, H.J. A Combined Brazing and Aluminizing Process for Repairing Turbine Blades by Thermal Spraying Using the Coating System NiCrSi/NiCoCrAlY/Al. J. Spray Technol. 2017, 26, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sahraoui, T.; Fenineche, N.E.; Montavon, G.; Coddet, C. Alternative to chromium: Characteristics and wear behavior of HVOF coatings for gas turbine shafts repair (heavy-duty). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 152, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schlobohm, J.; Bruchwald, O.; Frąckowiak, W.; Li, Y.; Kästner, M.; Pösch, A.; Reimche, W.; Maier, H.J.; Reithmeier, E. Advanced Characterization Techniques for Turbine Blade Wear and Damage. Procedia CIRP 2017, 59, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chan, K.S.; Enright, M.P.; Moody, J.; Golden, P.J.; Chandra, R.; Pentz, A.C. Residual Stress Profiles for Mitigating Fretting Fatigue in Gas Turbine Engine Disks. Int. J. Fatigue 2010, 32, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chandra, S.; Golden, P.; Enright, M.P.; Chan, K.S. Fretting Fatigue-Based Risk Assessment of Gas Turbine Engine Disks. In Proceedings of the Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Schaumbug, IL, USA, 7–10 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mandard, R.; Witz, J.-F.; Boidin, X.; Fabis, J.; Desplanques, Y.; Mériaux, J. Interacting Force Estimation During blade/Seal Rubs. Tribol. Int. 2015, 82, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lavella, M. Contact Properties and Wear Behaviour of Nickel Based Superalloy René 80. Metals 2016, 6, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tkadletz, M.; Schalk, N.; Daniel, R.; Keckes, J.; Czettl, C.; Mitterer, C. Advanced Characterization Methods for Wear Resistant Hard Coatings: A Review on Recent Progress. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2016, 285, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sahraoui, T.; Fenineche, N.-E.; Montavon, G.; Coddet, C. Structure and Wear Behaviour of HVOF Sprayed Cr3C2–NiCr and WC–Co Coatings. Mater. Des. 2003, 24, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feng, K.; Chen, Y.; Deng, P.; Li, Y.; Zhao, H.; Lu, F.; Li, R.; Huang, J.; Li, Z. Improved High-Temperature Hardness and Wear Resistance of Inconel 625 Coatings Fabricated by Laser Cladding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 243, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yunus, S.M.; Ghazali, M.J.; Zamri, W.F.H.W.; Pauzi, A.A.; Husin, S. Characterisation of chromium carbide-based coated combustion liner for gas turbines. J. Teknol. 2015, 76, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hussainova, I.; Pirso, J.; Antonov, M.; Juhani, K.; Letunovits, S. Erosion and Abrasion of Chromium Carbide Based Cermets Produced by Different Methods. Wear 2007, 263, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kerr, C.; Barker, D.; Walsh, F.; Archer, J. The Electrodeposition of Composite Coatings Based on Metal Matrix-Included Particle Deposits. Trans. IMF 2000, 78, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, H.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Hwang, S.-Y. Superhard Nano WC–12%Co Coating by Cold Spray Deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 391, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yaghtin, A.; Salahinejad, E.; Khosravifard, A.; Araghi, A.; Akhbarizadeh, A. Corrosive Wear Behavior of Chromium Carbide Coatings Deposited by Air Plasma Spraying. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 7916–7920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fang, W.; Cho, T.Y.; Yoon, J.; Song, K.; Hur, S.; Youn, S.; Chun, H. Processing Optimization, Surface Properties and Wear Behavior of HVOF Spraying WC–CrC–Ni Coating. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 3561–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tang, J.; Saha, G.C.; Richter, P.; Kondas, J.; Colella, A.; Matteazzi, P. Effects of Post-spray Heat Treatment on Hardness and Wear Properties of Ti-WC High-Pressure Cold Spray Coatings. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2018, 27, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jafari, M.; Enayati, M.H.; Salehi, M.; Nahvi, S.; Park, C.-G. Microstructural and mechanical characterizations of a novel HVOF-sprayed WC-Co coating deposited from electroless Ni–P coated WC-12Co powders. Mater. Sci. Engin. A 2013, 578, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yin, X.; Gotman, I.; Klinger, L.; Gutmanas, E. Formation of titanium carbide on graphite via powder immersion reaction assisted coating. Mater. Sci. Engin. A 2005, 392, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Neuman, E.W.; Hilmas, G.E.; Fahrenholtz, W.G. A high strength alumina-silicon carbide-boron carbide triplex ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 7958–7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Rani, S.; Agrawal, A.K.; Rastogi, V. Failure investigations of a first stage Ni based super alloy gas turbine blade. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xue, W.; Gao, S.; Duan, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, S. Effects of blade material characteristics on the high-speed rubbing behavior between Al-hBN abradable seal coatings and blades. Wear 2018, 410, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Venkatesh, L.N.; Venkataraman, B.; Tak, M.; Sivakumar, G.; Gundakaram, R.C.; Joshi, S.; Samajdar, I. Room temperature and 600 °C erosion behaviour of various chromium carbide composite coatings. Wear 2019, 422, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rajabi, A.; Ghazali, M.J.; Syarif, J.; Daud, A.R. Development of an application of tool wear: A review of the characterisation of TiC-based cermets with different binders. Chem. Engin. J. 2012, 255, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Siow, P.C.; Ghani, J.A.; Rizal, M.; Jaafar, T.R.; Ghazali, M.J.; Che Haron, C.H. The study on the properties of TiC x N 1−x coatings processed by cathodic arc physical vapour deposition. Tribol. Mater. Surf. Interf. 2019, 13, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rajabi, A.; Ghazali, M.J. Quantitative analyses of TiC nanopowders via mechanical alloying method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 14233–14243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Maiti, A.; Mukhopadhyay, N.; Raman, R. Effect of adding WC powder to the feedstock of WC–Co–Cr based HVOF coating and its impact on erosion and abrasion resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 7781–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fellows, L.; Nowell, D.; Hills, D. On the initiation of fretting fatigue cracks. Wear 1997, 205, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Souza, C.; Ribeiro, D.V.; Kiminami, C.S. Corrosion resistance of Fe-Cr-based amorphous alloys: An overview. J. Non Crystal. Solids 2016, 442, 6–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Matthews, S.; James, B.; Hyland, M. High temperature erosion–oxidation of Cr3C2–NiCr thermal spray coatings under simulated turbine conditions. Corros. Sci. 2013, 70, 203–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cernuschi, F.; Lorenzoni, L.; Capelli, S.; Guardamagna, C.; Karger, M.; Vaßen, R.; Von Niessen, K.; Markocsan, N.; Menuey, J.; Giolli, C. Solid particle erosion of thermal spray and physical vapour deposition thermal barrier coatings. Wear 2011, 271, 2909–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Corsini, A.; Marchegiani, A.; Rispoli, F.; Venturini, P.; Sheard, A.G. Predicting Blade Leading Edge Erosion in an Axial Induced Draft Fan. J. Engin. Gas Turbin. Power 2012, 134, 042601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Abbasi, F.; Majzoobi, G. An investigation into the effect of elevated temperatures on fretting fatigue response under cyclic normal contact loading. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2018, 93, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kirk, A.M.; Shipway, P.H.; Sun, W.; Bennett, C.J. Debris development in fretting contacts—Debris particles and debris beds. Tribol. Int. 2019, 149, 105592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, X.; Zhu, X. Fretting fatigue analysis of FGM coating under out-of-phase loadings. Trobol. Int. 2019, 134, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Venkatesh, B.; Sriker, K.; Prabhakar, V. Wear Characteristics of Hardfacing Alloys: State-of-the-art. Proc. Mater. Sci. 2015, 10, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Torgerson, T.; Harris, M.; Alidokht, S.A.; Scharf, T.; Aouadi, S.; Chromik, R.; Zabinski, J.; Voevodin, A. Room and elevated temperature sliding wear behavior of cold sprayed Ni-WC composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 350, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Koga, G.Y.; Wolf, W.; Schulz, R.; Savoie, S.; Bolfarini, C.; Kiminami, C.S.; Botta, W. Corrosion and wear properties of FeCrMnCoSi HVOF coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 357, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Borisyuk, Y.; Oreshnikova, N.; Berdnikova, M.; Tumarkin, A.; Khodachenko, G.V.; Pisarev, A. Plasma Nitriding of Titanium Alloy Ti5Al4V2Mo. Phys. Proc. 2015, 71, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Xu, P.; Lin, C.-X.; Zhou, C.; Yi, X. Wear and corrosion resistance of laser cladding AISI 304 stainless steel/Al2O3 composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 238, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bartkowski, D.; Młynarczak, A.; Piasecki, A.; Dudziak, B.; Gościański, M.; Bartkowska, A. Microstructure, microhardness and corrosion resistance of Stellite-6 coatings reinforced with WC particles using laser cladding. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 68, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, B.; Jin, Y.; Yao, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q. Solid-state fabrication of WCp-reinforced Stellite-6 composite coatings with supersonic laser deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 321, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, B.Q.; Shui, Z.R. The hot erosion behavior of HVOF chromium carbide-metal cermet coatings sprayed with different powders. Wear 2012, 274, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Szymański, K.; Hernas, A.; Moskal, G.; Myalska, H. Thermally sprayed coatings resistant to erosion and corrosion for power. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 268, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pereira, J.; Zambrano, J.; Licausi, M.; Tobar, M.; Amigó, V. Tribology and high temperature friction wear behavior of MCrAlY laser cladding coatings on stainless steel. Wear 2015, 330, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 10 01171 g001 550
Figure 1. Main sections of a gas turbine.
Figure 1. Main sections of a gas turbine.
Metals 10 01171 g001
Metals 10 01171 g002 550
Figure 2. Wear problems and hardface coatings for hot gas path components in a gas turbine (Rajendran et al., 2012).
Figure 2. Wear problems and hardface coatings for hot gas path components in a gas turbine (Rajendran et al., 2012).
Metals 10 01171 g002
Metals 10 01171 g003 550
Figure 3. Gas turbine blade GTD 111.
Figure 3. Gas turbine blade GTD 111.
Metals 10 01171 g003
Metals 10 01171 g004 550
Figure 4. Wear damage of gas turbine components: (a) fretting wear damage for turbine blade GTD 111 (Barella et al., 2011); (b) erosive wear on gas turbine blades (Khajavi and Shariat, 2004).
Figure 4. Wear damage of gas turbine components: (a) fretting wear damage for turbine blade GTD 111 (Barella et al., 2011); (b) erosive wear on gas turbine blades (Khajavi and Shariat, 2004).
Metals 10 01171 g004
Metals 10 01171 g005 550
Figure 5. Chromium Carbide coating: (a) powder form; (b) cross sectional image for chromium carbide coating (Yaghtin et al., 2015).
Figure 5. Chromium Carbide coating: (a) powder form; (b) cross sectional image for chromium carbide coating (Yaghtin et al., 2015).
Metals 10 01171 g005
Metals 10 01171 g006 550
Figure 6. Titanium carbide coating: (a) powder; (b) cross sectional image (Yin et al., 2005).
Figure 6. Titanium carbide coating: (a) powder; (b) cross sectional image (Yin et al., 2005).
Metals 10 01171 g006
Metals 10 01171 g007 550
Figure 7. Titanium Carbide coating on austenitic steel produced by the way of: (a) spraying, (b) agglomerating and sintering, (c) mechanical alloying, (d) high temperature synthesis (Szymanski et al., 2014).
Figure 7. Titanium Carbide coating on austenitic steel produced by the way of: (a) spraying, (b) agglomerating and sintering, (c) mechanical alloying, (d) high temperature synthesis (Szymanski et al., 2014).
Metals 10 01171 g007
Metals 10 01171 g008 550
Figure 8. Microstructure of powder feedstock: (a) NiCrCoAlY and (b) CoNiCrAlY (Pereira et al., 2015).
Figure 8. Microstructure of powder feedstock: (a) NiCrCoAlY and (b) CoNiCrAlY (Pereira et al., 2015).
Metals 10 01171 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pauzi, A.A.; Ghazali, M.J.; W. Zamri, W.F.H.; Rajabi, A. Wear Characteristics of Superalloy and Hardface Coatings in Gas Turbine Applications–A Review. Metals 2020, 10, 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171

AMA Style

Pauzi AA, Ghazali MJ, W. Zamri WFH, Rajabi A. Wear Characteristics of Superalloy and Hardface Coatings in Gas Turbine Applications–A Review. Metals. 2020; 10(9):1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pauzi, Ahmad Afiq, Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali, Wan Fathul Hakim W. Zamri, and Armin Rajabi. 2020. "Wear Characteristics of Superalloy and Hardface Coatings in Gas Turbine Applications–A Review" Metals 10, no. 9: 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171

APA Style

Pauzi, A. A., Ghazali, M. J., W. Zamri, W. F. H., & Rajabi, A. (2020). Wear Characteristics of Superalloy and Hardface Coatings in Gas Turbine Applications–A Review. Metals, 10(9), 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop