Next Article in Journal
Effects of Residual Stresses on the Fatigue Lifetimes of Self-Piercing Riveted Joints of AZ31 Mg Alloy and Al5052 Al Alloy Sheets
Next Article in Special Issue
Formation of Complex Inclusions in Gear Steels for Modification of Manganese Sulphide
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Laser Treatment as a Method for Fatigue Crack Growth Retardation in Aluminum Alloy 2198-T851
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Determination of Phase Equilibria in the Na2O-SiO2-WO3 System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Silica in the Chlorination–Volatilization of Cobalt Oxide by Using Calcium Chloride

1
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(12), 2036; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11122036
Submission received: 10 November 2021 / Revised: 7 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fundamentals of Advanced Pyrometallurgy)

Abstract

:
The role of silica in the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt oxide, using calcium chloride, is investigated in this paper. It is found that the Co volatilization percentage of the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system is not larger than 12.1%. Silica plays an important role in the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt oxide by using calcium chloride. In the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system, the Co volatilization percentage is initially positively related to the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2, and remains almost constant when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 rises from zero to eight. The critical molar ratios of SiO2 to CaCl2 are 1 and 2 when the molar ratios of CaCl2 to CoO are 8.3 and 16.6, respectively. The Co volatilization percentage remains almost constant with the increase in CaO concentration, and decreases when Al2O3 and MgO are added. Ca2SiO3Cl2 is determined after roasting at 1073 K and 1173 K, and disappears at temperatures in excess of 1273 K in the calcines from the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system. CaSiO3 always exists in the calcines at temperatures in excess of 973 K.

1. Introduction

When roasted at a high temperature, nonferrous metal oxides are converted into corresponding chlorides and volatilize in the form of gaseous chlorides in the presence of chlorinating agents. The chlorination–volatilization method has been used for the recovery of valuable metals from slags or refractory ores, such as Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn [1,2,3,4,5,6].
In regards to cobalt recovery, many works have concentrated on chloride roasting as the pretreatment to convert cobalt compounds into soluble chloride, followed by a subsequent hydrometallurgical step [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The chloridizing agents used for chloride roasting include gaseous Cl2 and HCl, and solid MgCl2•6H2O, NaCl, AlCl3•6H2O, and NH4Cl. However, there are few investigations about the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt at present. It was reported that to obtain approximately 50% volatilization percentage, a chlorine consumption of approximately 2.5 times the stoichiometric amount was needed, in the case of producing iron ore pellets from pyrite cinders containing nonferrous metals by using chlorine [15].
Calcium chloride is a popular chloridizing agent because of its high stability and lack of toxicity in practice. The chlorination–volatilization of cobalt, using calcium chloride, was investigated in our previous paper [16]. The effects of different variables on the cobalt volatilization percentage were investigated, including flow rate, oxygen partial pressure and water vapor content of the carrier gas, roasting time, and temperature. The aims of this paper are to investigate the effects of silica, other gangues (Al2O3, CaO, and MgO) and CaCl2 dosage on the Co volatilization percentages during the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt oxide, and on the phases of calcines after roasting.

2. Materials and Methods

Cobalt-containing slags were prepared using reagent-grade CoO, SiO2, Fe2O3, Al2O3, MgO and CaO powders. Reagent-grade anhydrous CaCl2 was adopted as the chlorinating agent. All the reagents were precisely weighed according to the compositions shown in Table 1 and pressed into briquettes after sufficient mixing. The effects of CaCl2 dosage on the Co volatilization percentage were investigated from No.1 to No.5. The effects of the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 on the Co volatilization percentage were also investigated from No.4 to No.14. Finally, the effects of Al2O3, MgO and CaO additions on the Co volatilization percentage were investigated from No.14 to No.20.
The chlorination–volatilization experiments were carried out in a muffle furnace. Furnace temperature was set to increase at 25 K/min. An alumina boat (length: 60 mm, width: 30 mm) containing approximately 10 g of briquettes was located at the center of the furnace at approximately 873 K. The furnace was turned off after the sample was held at the desired temperatures for 1 h, which was sufficient to reach the maximum cobalt volatilization percentage according to previous work [16]. There was an air inlet under the thermocouple and an air outlet at the top of the furnace hearth to connect with the atmosphere. Hot air in the furnace hearth escaped through the outlet and was exhausted by a negative pressure fan above the furnace into the air after alkaline solution treatment. Samples were cooled inside the furnace to approximately 873 K and then naturally cooled to room temperature.
Samples after roasting were prepared carefully for the chemical and phase analyses. The phases of calcines were detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’PertPro, PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) and identified by comparisons between diffraction peaks of XRD data and no less than three main characteristic peaks of substances. Cobalt concentration was measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Optima 8000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, MA, USA). The Co volatilization percentage was calculated according to Equation (1).
η = c i m i c f m f c i m i × 100 % ,
where ci and cf are Co concentrations of samples before and after roasting, respectively. mi and mf are the masses of the samples before and after roasting, respectively. The analysis results of cobalt concentrations are within ±0.015 mass%. Therefore, the errors of volatilization percentages are calculated to be within ±2.5% according to Equation (1).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Effect of CaCl2 Dosage

Figure 1 shows the effect of CaCl2 dosage on Co volatilization percentage in the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 and CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 systems. The Co volatilization percentage obviously increases as the CaCl2 dosage in the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system is strengthened at 1173 K, and slightly increases with increasing CaCl2 dosage at 1273 K and 1373 K. Similar trends are observed in the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system. It should be noted that the Co volatilization percentages in the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system are much larger than those in the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system.
Chlorination could be divided into direct chlorination and indirect chlorination using calcium chloride. It reacts directly with cobalt oxide in the former case, which could be represented as follows:
CaCl2 + CoO = CoCl2 + CaO,
CaCl2 firstly reacts with oxygen to release Cl2 in the latter case, followed by cobalt oxide being chlorinated by Cl2. It could be expressed as follows:
2CaCl2 + O2 = 2CaO + 2Cl2,
2CoO + 2Cl2 = 2CoCl2 + O2,
Figure 1 shows that the Co volatilization percentage of the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system is not larger than 12.1%, even with a higher CaCl2 dosage, and it becomes much larger in the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system. This indicates that SiO2 is more beneficial to the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt oxide compared with Fe2O3 in both the cases of direct and indirect chlorination. The direct chlorination of cobalt oxide by calcium chloride, in the presence of SiO2, could be expressed as follows:
CaCl2 + CoO + SiO2 = CoCl2 + CaSiO3,
The generation of Cl2 by the decomposition of CaCl2, in the presence of SiO2, could be expressed as follows:
2CaCl2 + O2 + 2SiO2 = 2CaSiO3 + 2Cl2,
The standard Gibbs free energies of Equations (2)–(6) are calculated according to the data from [17], and are shown in Figure 2. Equations (7)–(9) in Section 3.4 are also listed in Figure 2. CoCl2 is considered to be in the gaseous state. The standard Gibbs free energies of Equations (5) and (6) are much lower than those of Equations (2) and (3), respectively, which means that the chlorination of cobalt oxide is promoted in the presence of SiO2. A larger CaCl2 dosage is helpful to improve the Co volatilization percentage in the presence of SiO2 in both the cases of direct and indirect chlorination.

3.2. Effect of the Molar Ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2

Figure 3 shows the effect of the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 on the Co volatilization percentage in the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system. When the molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO is 8.3, the Co volatilization percentage increases significantly, as the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 rises from 0 to 1, and remains almost constant when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 increases from 1 to 8 at all the desired temperatures. Similar trends are observed when the molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO is 16.6 at 1273 K and 1373 K. The Co volatilization percentage increases significantly and remains almost constant when the critical molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is two. However, it increases significantly as the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is amplified at 1173 K.
Equation (5) is initially promoted with an increase in the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 from zero. The enhancement becomes weaker when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is large enough. As shown in Equation (6), SiO2 plays an important role in the generation of Cl2, by the decomposition of CaCl2. This result is consistent with the works of Liu et al. [18], Zhu et al. [19], and Ding [20]. The Co volatilization percentage is very low when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is zero. Most of the CaCl2 is lost in the form of volatilization in this case. This also means that the role of Fe2O3 in the generation of Cl2, by the decomposition of CaCl2, is much weaker than that of SiO2. More Cl2 is released when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is increased, which leads to an increase in the Co volatilization percentage. There is sufficient Cl2 at a high molar ratio of SiO2, resulting in a constant Co volatilization percentage.

3.3. Effect of Al2O3, MgO and CaO

Figure 4 shows the effects of Al2O3, MgO, and CaO on the Co volatilization percentage in the CoO–SiO2–(Al2O3/MgO/CaO)–Fe2O3–CaCl2 systems. The Co volatilization percentage remains almost constant with increasing CaO concentration, with a molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO of 8.3 and a molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 of eight. This could be attributed to the sufficient amount of SiO2 existing in the system. The molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is still larger than two, taking into consideration that some SiO2 could react with CaO. However, it decreases with increasing Al2O3 and MgO concentrations under the same conditions. The reasons for this need further study. Table 2 shows the comparisons of the effects of Al2O3, MgO, CaO, and SiO2 on the volatilization percentages of CoO, ZnO [19], Zn•Fe2O3 [19], Cu2O [21], and CuO [21]. It should be noted that the molar ratios of CaCl2 to ZnO, CaCl2 to Zn•Fe2O3, CaCl2 to Cu2O, and CaCl2 to CuO are much lower than the molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO in this study.

3.4. Phases of Calcines

Figure 5 shows the XRD results of the calcines from the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system after roasting with a molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO of 16.6. Fe2O3, CaFe2O4, Ca2Fe2O5, and CaCO3 are identified in the calcines at 973 K, which is a temperature lower than the melting point of CaCl2 (1055 K). The diffraction peaks of CaCO3 disappear at temperatures higher than 1173 K, which could be attributed to the decomposition of CaCO3. The generation of Cl2, by the decomposition of CaCl2, in the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system could be expressed as follows:
2CaCl2 + O2 + Fe2O3 = Ca2Fe2O5 + 2Cl2,
2CaCl2 + O2 + 2Fe2O3 = 2CaFe2O4 + 2Cl2,
2CaCl2 + O2 + 2CO2 = 2CaCO3 + 2Cl2,
where Equation (9) occurs at temperatures no more than 1173 K. The equilibrated chlorine partial pressure of Equation (9) is calculated according to Equation (10), and is shown in Figure 6, where the O2 and CO2 partial pressures are 0.209 and 3.1 × 104, respectively. The chlorine partial pressure is approximately 109 when the activity of solid or liquid CaCl2 is set to one. This means that Equation (9) could theoretically take place when the chlorine partial pressure is less than 109. The equilibrated chlorine partial pressure becomes much larger when CaCl2 changes from the solid or liquid state to the gaseous state.
Δ G 9 0 R T = ln ( P Cl 2 / P 0 ) 2 a CaCl 2 ( P CO 2 / P 0 ) 2 ( P O 2 / P 0 ) 0.5 o r = ln ( P Cl 2 / P 0 ) 2 ( P CaCl 2 / P 0 ) 2 ( P CO 2 / P 0 ) 2 ( P O 2 / P 0 ) 0.5
Figure 7 shows the XRD results of the calcines from the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system after roasting with a molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO of 16.6. There is newly generated CaSiO3, and unreacted SiO2 and CaCl2, at 973 K. Newly generated Ca2SiO3Cl2 exists alongside CaSiO3 at 1073 K and 1173 K. The formation reaction of Ca2SiO3Cl2 could be expressed as follows:
4CaCl2 + O2 + 2SiO2 = 2Ca2SiO3Cl2 + 2Cl2,
The diffraction peaks of Ca2SiO3Cl2 disappear at temperatures in excess of 1273 K, and only newly generated CaSiO3 and unreacted SiO2 remain in the calcines. This could be attributed to the instability of Ca2SiO3Cl2 at higher temperatures. The reaction could be expressed as follows:
2Ca2SiO3Cl2 + O2 + 2SiO2 = 4CaSiO3 + 2Cl2,
Ca2SiO3Cl2 was formed when the molar ratios of SiO2 to CaCl2 were two and one at 1023 K and 1073 K, respectively [22]. In this study, Ca2SiO3Cl2 is formed when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is approximately 7.4 at 1073 K and 1173 K. Considering the results presented by Zhang [22], along with those from this study, it is suggested that the intermediate product Ca2SiO3Cl2 is formed when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 is larger than one at temperatures between 1023 K and 1173 K.
CaSiO3, CaFe2O4, Ca2Fe2O5, and Ca3Fe2(SiO4)3 are generated in the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system at 1273 K, with a molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO of 8.3 and a molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 of eight [16]. CaAl2Si2O8 and CaMg(SiO3)2 are generated after the addition of Al2O3 and MgO, respectively, as shown in Figure 8.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions could be drawn from this study:
  • The Co volatilization percentage of the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system is not larger than 12.1%.
  • SiO2 plays an important role in the chlorination–volatilization of cobalt oxide, using calcium chloride. In the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system, the Co volatilization percentage is initially positively related to the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2, and remains almost constant when the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 rises from zero to eight. The critical molar ratios of SiO2 to CaCl2 are 1 and 2 when the molar ratios of CaCl2 to CoO are 8.3 and 16.6, respectively.
  • The Co volatilization percentage remains almost constant with increasing CaO concentration, and decreases when Al2O3 and MgO are added, with a molar ratio of CaCl2 to CoO of 8.3 and a molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 of eight.
  • Fe2O3, CaFe2O4, Ca2Fe2O5, and CaCO3 are identified in the calcines from the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system at 973 K, and CaCO3 disappears at temperatures higher than 1173 K.
  • Ca2SiO3Cl2 exists in the calcines from the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system at 1073 K and 1173 K, and disappears at temperatures in excess of 1273 K. CaSiO3 always exists in the calcines at temperatures in excess of 973 K.

Author Contributions

Methodology, P.H. and S.Y.; formal analysis, P.H.; investigation, P.H., Z.L., X.L. and J.Y.; data curation, P.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.H.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.; supervision, S.Y.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the research funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51804292) and Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. IAGM-2019-A05).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed or generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jena, P.K.; Brocchi, E.A. Metal extraction through chlorine metallurgy. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1997, 16, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yazawa, A.; Kameda, M. The removal of impurities from pyrite cinders by a chloride volatilization process. Can. Metall. Q. 1967, 6, 263–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Panias, D.; Neou-Syngouna, P. Gold extraction from pyrite cinders by high temperature chlorination. Erzmetall 1990, 43, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ojeda, M.W.; Perino, E.; Ruiz, M.C. Gold extraction by chlorination using a pyrometallurgical process. Miner. Eng. 2009, 22, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, T.; Hu, X.; Matsuura, H.; Tsukihashi, F.; Chou, K. Kinetics of Zn removal from ZnO-Fe2O3-CaCl2 system. ISIJ Int. 2010, 50, 1084–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ding, J.; Han, P.; Lv, C.; Qian, P.; Ye, S.; Chen, Y. Utilization of gold-bearing and iron-rich pyrite cinder via a chlorination-volatilization process. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2017, 24, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaballah, I.; Djona, M. Processing of spent hydrorefining catalysts by selective chlorination. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1994, 25, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gaballah, I.; Djona, M. Recovery of Co, Ni, Mo, and V from unroasted spent catalysts by selective chlorination. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1995, 26, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, C.; Zhai, X.; Fu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, T. Extraction of nickel and cobalt from reduced limonitic laterite using a selective chlorination—Water leaching process. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 105, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fan, C.; Zhai, X.; Fu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, T. Kinetics of selective chlorination of pre-reduced limonitic nickel laterite using hydrogen chloride. Miner. Eng. 2011, 24, 1016–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, M.; Zhu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, X. A study of recovery of copper and cobalt from copper–cobalt oxide ores by ammonium salt roasting. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 129–130, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z. Chlorination roasting of laterite using salt chloride. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 148, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, C.; Cheng, H.; Li, G.; Lu, C.; Lu, X.; Zou, Z.; Xu, Q. Extraction of metals from complex sulfide nickel concentrates by low-temperature chlorination roasting and water leaching. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2017, 24, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cui, F.; Mu, W.; Wang, S.; Xin, H.; Shen, H.; Xu, Q.; Zhai, Y.; Luo, S. Synchronous extractions of nickel, copper, and cobalt by selective chlorinating roasting and water leaching to low-grade nickel-copper matte. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 195, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lippert, K.K.; Pietsch, H.B.; Roeder, A.; Walden, H.W. Recovery of non-ferrous metal impurities from iron ore pellets by chlorination (CV or LDK process). Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Sect. C 1969, 78, 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, P.; Xiao, L.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ye, S. Cobalt recovery by the chlorination-volatilization method. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barin, I. Thermochemical Data of Pure Substance, 3rd ed.; WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmbh: Weinheim, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, J.; Wen, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, D.; Bai, S.; Wu, D. Process optimization and reaction mechanism of removing copper from an Fe-rich pyrite cinder using chlorination roasting. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2013, 20, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, D.; Chen, D.; Pan, J.; Zheng, G. Chlorination behaviors of zinc phases by calcium chloride in high temperature oxidizing-chloridizing roasting. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 1773–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ding, J. Research on the Extraction of Gold from Gold-Bearing Pyrite Cinder by High-Temperature Chlorination Method. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu, D.; Chen, D.; Pan, J.; Chun, T.; Zheng, G.; Zhou, X. Chlorination behaviors of copper phases by calcium chloride in high temperature oxidizing-chloridizing roasting. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Process, Orlando, FL, USA, 11–15 March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, L. Research on the Chloridizing Segregation Process of Nickel Laterites. Master’s Thesis, Central South University, Changsha, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of CaCl2 dosage on the Co volatilization percentage.
Figure 1. Effect of CaCl2 dosage on the Co volatilization percentage.
Metals 11 02036 g001
Figure 2. The standard Gibbs free energy of reactions: (a) solid or liquid CaCl2; (b)gaseous CaCl2.
Figure 2. The standard Gibbs free energy of reactions: (a) solid or liquid CaCl2; (b)gaseous CaCl2.
Metals 11 02036 g002
Figure 3. Effect of the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 on the Co volatilization percentage.
Figure 3. Effect of the molar ratio of SiO2 to CaCl2 on the Co volatilization percentage.
Metals 11 02036 g003
Figure 4. Effect of (a) Al2O3, (b) MgO and (c) CaO on Co volatilization percentage.
Figure 4. Effect of (a) Al2O3, (b) MgO and (c) CaO on Co volatilization percentage.
Metals 11 02036 g004
Figure 5. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system.
Figure 5. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–Fe2O3–CaCl2 system.
Metals 11 02036 g005
Figure 6. The equilibrated chlorine partial pressure of the following reaction: 2CaCl2 + O2 + 2CO2 = 2CaCO3 + 2Cl2.
Figure 6. The equilibrated chlorine partial pressure of the following reaction: 2CaCl2 + O2 + 2CO2 = 2CaCO3 + 2Cl2.
Metals 11 02036 g006
Figure 7. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system (a) at 973 K; (b) at 1073 K and 1173 K; (c) between 1273 K and 1473 K.
Figure 7. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–SiO2–CaCl2 system (a) at 973 K; (b) at 1073 K and 1173 K; (c) between 1273 K and 1473 K.
Metals 11 02036 g007
Figure 8. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–(Al2O3/MgO)–CaCl2 system at 1273 K.
Figure 8. XRD results of calcines from the CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–(Al2O3/MgO)–CaCl2 system at 1273 K.
Metals 11 02036 g008
Table 1. Sample compositions and CaCl2 dosage.
Table 1. Sample compositions and CaCl2 dosage.
No.Slag Composition (Mass%)CaCl2
Dosage
(Mass%)
Molar Ratio
of CaCl2
to CoO
Molar Ratio
of SiO2
to CaCl2
CoOSiO2Al2O3MgOCaOFe2O3
1100009912.38.30
2100009918.512.50
3100009924.616.60
4199000012.38.314.9
5199000024.616.67.7
616.6600092.3424.616.60.5
7113.3300085.6724.616.61
8126.6600072.3424.616.62
9153.3100045.6924.616.64
1013.3300095.6712.38.30.5
1116.6600092.3412.38.31
12113.3300085.6712.38.32
13126.6600072.3412.38.34
14153.3100045.6912.38.38
15153.31100035.6912.38.8
16153.31200025.6912.38.38
17153.31010035.6912.38.38
18153.31020025.6912.38.38
19153.31001035.6912.38.38
20153.31002025.6912.38.38
Table 2. The effects of Al2O3, MgO, CaO and SiO2 on the volatilization percentage.
Table 2. The effects of Al2O3, MgO, CaO and SiO2 on the volatilization percentage.
PhasesSystemAl2O3MgOCaOSiO2Reference
CoOCoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaCl2Negatively This study
CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–MgO–CaCl2 Negatively
CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaO–CaCl2 None
CoO–SiO2–Fe2O3–CaCl2 Positively
ZnOZnO–Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaCl2Negatively [19]
ZnO–Fe2O3–MgO–CaCl2 Negatively
ZnO–Fe2O3–CaO–CaCl2 Positively
ZnO–Fe2O3–SiO2–CaCl2 Positively
Zn•Fe2O3Zn•Fe2O3–Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaCl2Negatively [19]
Zn•Fe2O3–Fe2O3–MgO–CaCl2 Negatively
Zn•Fe2O3–Fe2O3–CaO–CaCl2 Negatively
Zn•Fe2O3–Fe2O3–SiO2–CaCl2 Negatively
Cu2OCu2O–Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaCl2Negatively [21]
Cu2O–Fe2O3–MgO–CaCl2 Negatively
Cu2O–Fe2O3–CaO–CaCl2 Negatively
Cu2O–Fe2O3–SiO2–CaCl2 Negatively
CuOCuO–Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaCl2None [21]
CuO–Fe2O3–MgO–CaCl2 Negatively
CuO–Fe2O3–CaO–CaCl2 Positively
CuO–Fe2O3–SiO2–CaCl2 Positively
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, P.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Yan, J.; Ye, S. The Role of Silica in the Chlorination–Volatilization of Cobalt Oxide by Using Calcium Chloride. Metals 2021, 11, 2036. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11122036

AMA Style

Han P, Li Z, Liu X, Yan J, Ye S. The Role of Silica in the Chlorination–Volatilization of Cobalt Oxide by Using Calcium Chloride. Metals. 2021; 11(12):2036. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11122036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Peiwei, Zhengchen Li, Xiang Liu, Jingmin Yan, and Shufeng Ye. 2021. "The Role of Silica in the Chlorination–Volatilization of Cobalt Oxide by Using Calcium Chloride" Metals 11, no. 12: 2036. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11122036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop