Next Article in Journal
Transformation of the Microstructure of Fe-Cr Steel during Its Production
Previous Article in Journal
Flow Stress of 6061 Aluminum Alloy at Typical Temperatures during Friction Stir Welding Based on Hot Compression Tests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

AA7075-ZrO2 Nanocomposites Produced by the Consecutive Solid-State Process: A Review of Characterisation and Potential Applications

by
Huda M. Sabbar
1,*,
Zulkiflle Leman
1,2,*,
Shazarel B. Shamsudin
3,
Suraya Mohd Tahir
1,
Che N. Aiza Jaafar
1,
Mohamed A. Azmah Hanim
1,
Zahari N. Ismsrrubie
1 and
Sami Al-Alimi
3
1
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
Advanced Engineering Materials and Composites Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
3
Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology, Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Center (SMART-AMMC), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat 86400, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(5), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050805
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 7 May 2021 / Published: 15 May 2021

Abstract

:
Solid-state recycling is a direct conversion method for producing metal chips, whereas the materials are plastically deformed into the final product without melting, offering lower energy consumption and metal waste. This technique was reported for fabricating aluminium-zirconium oxide (Al-ZrO2) composite and it was widely used to avoid metal chips bounding at high temperatures during the extrusion process. Aluminium alloy (AA7075) is known for its high yield strength of more than 500 MPa under optimum ageing conditions. However, AA7075 can be further reinforced by zirconium oxide nanoparticles when needed for high-performance applications. Hot extrusion is used to obtain better mechanical properties of composite materials. The equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), a severe plastic deformation technique, was recently used to produce bulk and light recycled metal chips, such as porosity-free and ultra-fine-grained aluminium nanocomposites (ANCs). Heat treatments (HT) and ECAP post hot extrusion are mostly incorporated to improve tribological and mechanical properties and aluminium nanocomposite bonding efficiency. In this review, ANCs’ fabrication by the hot extrusion technique and the effects of ZrO2 nanoparticle are duly summarised and discussed. Furthermore, this review emphasises the importance of using HT and ECAP techniques to acquire better metal alloy incorporation, such as AA7075-ZrO2. Interestingly, owing to the lightweight properties and superior performance of AA7075-ZrO2, it was reported to be suitable for fabricating many drones’ parts, military equipment, and some other promising applications.

1. Introduction

Aluminium alloys constitute the bulk of modern structural materials that are deployed in a variety of engineering applications, including aerospace, automotive, marine, and military [1], primarily because of their low density and favourable mechanical properties [2]. The promising competitive advantages of aluminium in industrial applications and the excellent machinability are part of this review’s motivation. Earlier studies forecast a global average annual increase of 20% in demand for aluminium alloys, being justified by the vast areas of aluminium alloy applications (as presented in Table 1).
Aluminium alloys are broadly categorised into two major classes: cast alloys and wrought alloys. In the classification of heat treatment, these alloys are further divided into heat treatable and non-heat-treatable alloys [3].
The low melting point temperature of cast aluminium alloys (~655 °C) places these alloys at a cost-effective position on the production method hierarchy [4,5]. The inherent properties of aluminium when alloyed with other metals result in better mechanical properties, such as improved strength, hardness, and corrosion resistance, in addition to the lightweight properties of aluminium [6]. The need for improved physical and mechanical properties of aluminium alloys is central to the expansion of recycled aluminium applications [7]. The conversion of chips to different engineering applications is carried out using two common methods, which are liquid metallurgy (LM) and powder metallurgy (PM) [8]. The main aim of producing recycled reinforced aluminium metal is to take advantage of the attractive properties of aluminium and the reinforcing material to form a unique composite material [9]. A collection of aluminium alloys in various shapes have been used in the formation of MMCs (Metal Matrix Composites) [10], with the formation of precipitation hardening particles that improved the strengths of the 6xxx and 7xxx alloy series. This development broadens the areas of application, which makes it possible for these alloys to replace steel [11,12].
The 7xxx series alloys are known as aluminium-zinc alloys; hence the major alloying element is Zn which ranges from 5.1 wt.% to 6.1 wt.% (weight fraction) of chemical composition [13]. When aluminium alloy was used as the matrix material (continuous phase), the properties were enhanced by adding desirable single and multiple reinforcement particulates [14]. AA7075 is used in aerospace wings and fuselage components, and it is also used to manufacture rock climbing equipment and bicycle components [15,16]. The composition of AA7075 was reported to be 5.6–6.1 wt.% Zn, 2.1–2.5 wt.% Mg, 1.2–1.6 wt.% Cu, 0.5 wt.% Fe, 0.4 wt.% Si, 0.3 wt.% Mn, 0.2 wt.% Ti, and 0.18–0.28 wt.% Cr [17]. The excellent thermal conductivity, good workability, high machinability, increased corrosion resistance, and low costs are the main reasons for the use of AA7075 [18]. Imran and Khan [19] reported that the mechanical, physical, and tribological properties of AA7075 metal matrix composite were improved by heat treatment, which, in return, can vary with the used components and the filler materials.
Aluminium-based metal matrix composites (AMMCs) have been developed to satisfy the demands for wear resistance, high stiffness, high strength, and enhanced fracture toughness [20], and AMMCs are fabricated using various techniques, like powder metallurgy, plasma spraying, spray atomisation casting, and stir and squeeze casting [21]. However, most of the previous works on AMMCs were limited to micron size reinforcement particles [21,22,23,24,25]. At present, research on AMMCs focuses on the use of nano-sized reinforcement particles due to the tendency of nanoparticles to mix with the base alloy when compared to microparticles, thus improving the performance of the composite materials. Besides, nanocomposites have been found to possess enhanced strength with a good amount of ductility [26,27]. Solid-state recycling is a method involving five major stages to produce recyclable aluminium metal from waste chips through to the preparation of the final product [28]. The method adopted depends on desired properties with parameters such as chip size, cold-pressing parameters, extortion temperature, extrusion rate, and ratio, which influence the mechanical properties of aluminium chips [4].
Nanoparticles (NP) have been acknowledged as one of the most promising materials for their unique surface area to volume ratio. Zirconium oxide nanoparticles are among the functional nanoparticles used in tooth coating, cosmetic products, and many other industrial applications [29]. The addition of zirconium oxide nanoparticles has been reported to improve the mechanical properties and expand the application of recycled aluminium chips [30]. The end material was cheaper using the solid-state recycling of scraps from machining operations through hot forward extrusion.
Aluminium 7075 alloy composites can be used in the treated, lightweight transmission gears. Such transmissions properties can potentially be used in drones or military robots [31]. However, the literature on the physical and mechanical properties of the AA7075 composite and the application of ECAP and HT following metal fabrication by hot extrusion was not covered or reviewed elsewhere, despite the importance of its emerging applications. In the current review, ANCs manufacturing techniques and the effect of ZrO2 nanoparticle addition on the morphology, microstructure, physical, and mechanical properties of AA7075-ZrO2 are covered and extensively discussed.

2. Recycling Aluminium Techniques

Recycled aluminium techniques were used to augment the supply of aluminium alloys, such as sheets, plates, channels, and rods, for various engineering applications and reduce the energy demand in the bauxite to aluminium process [32]. The reported study considered the reprocessing of solid wastes of aluminium scraps to obtain improved properties. The powder metallurgy technique and solid-state recycling are the two main standard recycling techniques [33]. The solid-state technique was found to be more suitable for the Al-ZrO2, as chips were reported to be bound at high temperatures during the extrusion process.

2.1. Solid-State Recycling Method (Conversion Method)

Solid-state recycling offers a low energy consumption and metal loss [34]. It is a method of recovering metal chips through direct conversion, whereas materials are plastically deformed into the final product without melting. In this method, metal chips are pulverised, then cleaned and dried. Next, the dried chips are cold compacted and hot extruded before the resulting piece is cut to the desired length. The mechanical properties of aluminium processed by solid-state recycling method are affected by a few factors such as type of chips, heat treatment, die design, and other processing factors [8,35]. Shamsudin et al. [8] reported that solid-state recycling or direct conversion of aluminium and its alloys contribute to environmental protection as carbon footprints caused by extraction of aluminium from its ores and secondary processes are reduced. Thus, direct conversion is considered a better recycling route than conventional recycling. The direct conversion of aluminium scrap into a compact metal saves 40% material, 26–31% energy, and 16–60% labour; however, the conventional recycling process showed higher mechanical and physical properties with improved microstructure and chemical compositions [35]. The potentials that are displayed by the technique and the ease of processing served as evidence of the deployment of the direct solid-state method, with the ECAP aimed at strengthening the observed weakness of the direct conversion processes.

2.2. Powder Metallurgy Technique

Powder Metallurgy is one of the standard techniques used to fabricate lightweight metals, such as particle-reinforced metal matrix composites (PRMMCs). Powder metallurgy techniques, such as stir casting technique, infiltration techniques, compo-casting technique, and ultrasonic cavitation, are mainly based on solidification techniques [8]. The ability to fabricate advanced elements is the significant economic advantage of this process. Furthermore, this process produces low-value and high-volume products. The stages of powder metallurgy can be divided into three main steps: powder mixture, cold compaction, and sintering [32]. Wagiman et al. [36] recently performed research on recycling aluminium scraps chips using the powder metallurgy technique followed by the plastic deformation extrusion method. The method involved the conversion of scraps from AA7075 into a finished product directly without the melting process. The findings above were relevant to the current review, showing that aluminium chips can be recycled using either the powder metallurgy or the direct recycling route. However, the study was short in terms of accessing the maximum behaviour of the composite material before and after the T6 heat treatment. Aluminium matrix composites are reinforced with ceramic nanoparticles such as ZrO2. The introduction of ZrO2 allows the material to have a low coefficient of thermal expansion, good thermal shock resistance, a high melting point, low thermal conductivity, and excellent thermodynamic stability [37]. These findings were similar to those of the composite material that had a Young’s modulus of 190 GPa and hardness of 200 HV, respectively, at 750 °C. Improved tensile strength was also observed alongside the characteristics that were mentioned earlier [38]. However, most of the reinforcements and composites added to form a matrix bulk material were used to increase the strength and stiffness of the matrix [39].

2.3. Conventional Recycling Method

The conventional method of processing recycled aluminium chips involves the melted alloy being recycled. This technique is known for its high energy consumption, higher operating costs, and lengthy processes, resulting in long operating times [36]. The claim of Wagiman et al. [36] outlined here was based on the fact that about 10% of the total material was lost during the initial melting process, while scraps were converted to ingots. Among those lost include the materials that may settle as slags and those that stick to the crucible. Cumulatively, about 35% of the melting process is performed in gas furnaces rather than induction [33]. The recycled aluminium that was fabricated through the direct recycling method has been reported to demonstrate high strength, because the refinement of the chips and a homogeneous hardness of oxide precipitates were obtained.

3. The Mixing Technique

Mixing is achieved when the powder metallurgy process is deployed by blending a mix of metal powder with particulate or whiskers ceramic reinforcement and placed in a mould of the desired shape. The objective of the blending is to develop a uniform distribution of particulate throughout the composite material for homogeneous reinforcement. The process was followed by the compacting of the mixture under high pressure. The hot-pressing process involves heating the die to a temperature below the metal’s melting point, enough to form a significant solid-state diffusion. Sintering helps the bonding of ceramic reinforcement with the metal powder. At this stage, undesired gases are removed through a degassing process, followed by the sealing or canning of the container, which is then stripped to remove the part that had been consolidated. Other methods include pressing the mixture via cold-pressing, followed by a separate consolidation stage after the mixture is blended. The compaction level depends on the density of all the constituents that make up the composite material, as presented in Equations (1)–(4) [32].
ρ = m/v
Vc = Vr + Vm,
ρc = ρr + ρm,
ρc = Mr/Vc + Mm/Vc,
where ρc is the density of the composite material, ρr is the density of reinforcement, and ρm is the metal matrix 7075 aluminium alloy density. Vr and Vm are the volume friction of the reinforcement and the metal matrix, respectively.
The above relationship is essential in providing requisite knowledge of the physical properties of the composite material understudied in the current work. This means that the density of the composite material is directly related to the density of the reinforcement and AA7075 metal matrix, and the level of compaction affects the pair.

4. Fundamentals of Hot Extrusion Process

The hot extrusion process is a widely accepted method of recycling aluminium directly from chips, eliminating the heating stage of the production process, making it flexible and cost-effective. The consolidation process of the excellent chip was accomplished by hot extrusion, as this process is capable of crushing the oxide layer across the surfaces of the chip and fostering a sufficient weld bond under an excessive strain of plastic and pressure [40]. This method allows the passage of hot, round, and hollow billet of aluminium through a forming die. While passing through the die, the hollow material is compressed due to the high temperature and it forms a single solid material that can be further processed [41]. On the other hand, forged and cold extruded products are also extruded through dies.
The primary principle of extrusion is the creation of objects with a fixed cross-sectional profile. This is accomplished by forcing the material through a predetermined die with an area that is lower than the billet size. The movement of the material through the gap naturally deforms the material into the shape through which it passes. This production process has two main advantages over other production processes.
Firstly, very complex cross-sections can be fabricated through this process; hence, brittle materials can be processed as the materials are only subjected to compressive and shear stresses. Secondly, the process form parts with an excellent surface finish [42].
In the extrusion process, the pressure is connected to the billet by the compressing ram, and the die can then compress the billet. During this process, the temperature is the most crucial parameter to be considered because the magnitude of the temperature determines the compactness and fusion of the material in the matrix. This, in effect, determines the properties of the material, such as hardness and surface finishing of the extruded part. Previous studies revealed that aluminium alloys were extruded into a round and hollow bar, demonstrating the potentialities of the process. Pre-heating temperature to around 500 °C in the furnace was also recorded in the experiments carried out [42]. The reason for the choice of hot extrusion was based on potentials, and the purpose of optimising the properties was to obtain parameters that utilise the most suitable temperature during the extrusion process.

Classification of Extrusion Process

Compacted billets are transformed into extrudates using the hot extrusion process. The two main extrusion methods are direct or indirect hot extrusion, with differing applied forces in each case. Previous studies have focused on the direct hot extrusion process [36,43,44] because the pressing force that is required by direct extrusion is higher when compared to indirect extrusion. The large contact area between the surface of the billet being compacted and the wall of the container supports the higher friction force observed in a direct hot extrusion. This force simplifies the billet surface. The high sticking status reduces in the middle of the billet, which helps to break the oxide layer on the chip surface and allows consolidation between the chips.
Conversely, indirect extrusion has rarely been applied in recycling aluminium due to the reduced friction force and restricted length of the extrudate and the hollow ramp, limiting the applied maximum load [36]. The solid temperature of the 7xxx alloys can be controlled by careful selection of the billets’ chemical composition of the alloy and homogenisation conditions. Because of the dissolution in the maximum degree of the low melting alloy parts, a more significant temperature increase led to a higher deformation rate, and it is possible to boost the solidus temperature (Table 2). Furthermore, the dislocation density of the specimen deformed at higher temperatures is lower than that deformed at lower temperatures for a given strain rate and strain, as described above [45,46,47].

5. Principles of Severe Plastic Deformation (SPD)

The severe plastic deformation (SPD) technique of processing light materials has been intensively used in recent years, because the method offered improved mechanical and physical properties of recycled materials. The technique revealed an intense deformation in plastic materials, resulting in the minimal distortion of microstructures and pores and reduced grain size to the micro- or nanoscale. However, SPD is still defined as a light metal forming technique where very high strains are applied without any significant changes in the overall shape and dimensions of the product, resulting in ultra-fine grain refinement. This is the cause of greater deformation in the matrix of composite materials, in which the products showed superior mechanical and physical properties [9]. Metal can be fabricated at lower temperatures using SPD consolidation, making it suitable for particles with highly metastable structures such as nanocrystal materials. It is beneficial in the fabrication of multiphase reinforced materials, including metal matrix nanocomposites. Severe plastic deformation induced a high dislocation density [48]. Severe plastic deformation of the extrudate occurs in a way similar to channel angular extrusion (CAE); thus, an extensively promoted practical strain level is achieved, although it is not always uniform across a section [49].
There are several techniques that are associated with SPD, including equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) hot extrusion, multiaxial deformation, conformation, twist extrusion, friction extrusion, high-pressure torsion, forging, accumulative roll bonding, rolling, and other methods. A common SPD technique is the equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), which uses the ECAP die at different angles [50]. The ECAP is flexible and it has been deployed in combination with hot extrusion, which led to the choice of ECAP in combination with hot extrusion. More recently, some newly developed SPD techniques, such as curved profile extrusion (CPE) [51], sideways extrusion [52], multi-hole extrusion [53], and injection forging [54], are being used for metal fabrication.

5.1. Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP)

The main purpose of ECAP is to produce composite materials with high mechanical properties and enhance the strain of billets. This process has been implemented to study its effect on light metals and alloys of aluminium, copper, and titanium. Previous research on ECAP focused on metallic alloys, pure metals, and plastic deformation [55]. In recent times, the process has gained acceptance for the fabrication of metals, increasing the level of application in the industries. ECAP is an attractive method, because it can produce large samples using plastic deformation [56]. It has been reported that the mechanical behaviour of the developed chip-based nanocomposite is affected by the ECAP process. Therefore, it has become imperative to investigate the effect of the ECAP operations on the properties of the composite material. The choice of the technique was based on the level of acceptability of ECAP for industrial applications. The cast was conducted using a hybrid composite of samples with a diameter of 10 mm and length of 80 mm. The product was annealed for 4 h using 400 °C temperature to homogenise the microstructure. After the annealing, a two-channel ECAP die was used for further treatment of the composite. The channels had the same circular cross-section with a diameter of 10 mm. The two channels of intersecting the model at the inner and outer corners of φ = 120° and ψ = 12°, respectively. According to the theoretical geometry of the mould, the effective strain is represented by the following Equation (5) [57]:
ϵ = 1/√3(2 cot ((φ + ψ)/2) + 1/√3(Ψ csc (2 cot ((φ + ψ)/2)
where, ϵ = the effective strain, Ψ = outer angle, and Φ = inner angle.
There are four schematic dies (routes A, B, B, and C) for ECAP passes. The differences between routes A, B, and C are the shearing directions that route B is an excellent processing route, especially for equiaxed ultra-fine microstructures.
The ECAP technique is being used to manufacture many materials within different industrial fields, such as automotive, procedures, and instruments in the medical facility, and the assembly of microelectromechanical components, including the distinct shape of memory alloy. The commercialisation of products implemented with the ECAP technique is currently undergoing extensive research. Figure 1 depicts the sequence of the chip pre-processing before and after the consolidation.

5.2. ECAP Die Construction and Design

ECAP has been reported to be suitable for the development of ultra-fine grain reinforced materials and has resulted in an enhancement of the design for better light material performance quality, and it is one of the direct recycling techniques, as shown in Table 3. Two independent studies reported ECAP as an attractive tool, as it offered a high potential strain rate and superior plasticity in the microstructure of nanostructured materials [56,58]. The technique was applied in the investigation of AMMC materials, including the use of boron carbide particles in the aluminium matrix. Particles of materials, such as copper, magnesium, nickel, and intermetallic materials, were also used in the aluminium matrix with ECAP as fabrication methods [59].
A new approach to the design of ECAP has been created for the current research. The system was constructed from a hydraulic machine with a pressing limit of 50 tons, and ECAP related accessories, such as a data logger, were connected with thermocouples that were inserted in the 8 ECAP holes to obtain the distributed temperature along with the system [66]. The proposed concept was deemed to be adequate for the hot ECAP ex-trusion die used in producing sufficiently high pressure and strain for the consolidation of chips.

5.3. Experimental Factors Influencing the ECAP Method

5.3.1. Inner Angle

The inner angle Φ is one crucial factor that is required to obtain an improved strain of the AMMC material. A previous study suggested that the inner angle should be selected between 90° and 120°, with the analysis of finite element analysis demonstrating that the microstructure of the composite material was affected by the inner angle [67]. An inner angle of 90° was reported to be the most significant angle and it effectively achieved ultra-fine-grained microstructure development [58]. The parameters that can be modified during ECAP include the processing routes, the consecutive numbers of passes, and the inner angle [58]. However, the above studies were relevant in providing information on the choice of the inner angle, the processing route, and the number of passes. However, the effect of the inner angle on the microstructure of the recycled aluminium alloy-based nanocomposite (AA7075-ZrO2) was not the main objective of the study. It was evident that this parameter may affect the properties of the new composite herein reported, hence the reason for the investigation of the microstructure after the ECAP operation on the composite.

5.3.2. Outer Angle

It is important to note the impact of the outer angle, ѱ on the extruded billet when using the ECAP, as it affects the strain of the AA7075-ZrO2 nanocomposite. The outer angle (ѱ) was suggested to be 20° to obtain a well-homogenised product and delivered good grain refinement [68]. The average equivalent plastic strain that was obtained for nanocomposite was influenced by the angles that were used in the ECAP channel. Friction is an important factor in getting the punch load to extrude the billet. A previous study reported that the maximum strain was obtained when φ = 90°, ψ = 15°, and μ = 0.3 [58].

5.3.3. Pressing Speed

The pressing speed is a significant factor to be addressed in the ECAP process. A study investigating the effect of pressing force on the quality of products using ECAP suggested using a combination of the FEM software (Finite Element Method) and a comparative study with experimental work. It was found that the punch force during the experimental procedures and simulation had very close similarities and the same conditions [69].
The challenges of ductility, toughness, and durability of the die set used in ECAP were reducible when the temperature was low. This was possible through high straining during the processing of the composite material [70]. An experimental study showed less influence on the equilibrium state of ultra-fine grain that formed by the ECAP process when pure Al was pressed [56]. Suitable pressing speed choice and temperature are important in obtaining a high-quality, ultra-fine grain nanocomposite.

5.3.4. Pressing Force

The quality of the nanocomposite product is a function of the pressing force that is used in the ECAP die, and the force determines the microstructure and level of compactness, as the composite homogeneity is force-dependent among the other parameters. Previous studies have validated the pressing force using the FEM software while comparing the outcome with experimental work to the theory [71].

5.3.5. Pressing Temperature

The effect of temperature used during the ECAP process is of key consideration, as it affects the quality of the composite material. A study involving the fabrication of a composite material using a metallic powder of aluminium and steel suggested that the consolidation of powder metals be performed at room temperature. However, the higher the pressing temperature, the lower the tensile strength during the ECAP processing, and there was also an increase in the total elongation [72]. Besides, the importance of temperature is due to the reduction in high-angle boundaries and the transformation of the metal phase. Furthermore, it has also been reported that 15 min was used in heating the die to obtain the desired temperature of the furnace [55]. When the temperature was increased from 200 °C to 250 °C and 450 °C during the continuous ECAP process, there was a reduction in the grain size and microstructure [73]. When the temperature was reduced, more straining force was required for mitigating the challenges of ductility in the composite material and durability of the die set during the ECAP process [67]. It was evident from previous studies that the physical and mechanical properties of the current AA7075-ZrO2 nanocomposite could be affected by temperature variation, among other experimental parameters, further emphasising the need for optimisation to obtain the best mechanical properties for industrial applications.

5.3.6. Processing Routes of ECAP

In principle, the routes that were used for the deformation of the billet followed the process of turning the billets over 0°, 90°, and 180° as the material undergoes each ECAP extrusion pass [74]. The procedure was repeated to attain a good distribution of the strain along the cross-section of the material. Generally, four leading handling routes are commonly used to investigate the microstructural changes of materials through ECAP [66].
  • Route A: The sample was pressed in a single direction without rotation. This point of entry at the beginning was maintained throughout the pressing operation.
  • Route BA: The sample was rotated at 90° alternatively, clockwise, or counterclockwise, with the material suggested to be exposed to pressing routes in two opposite directions when rotated at 90°.
  • Route BC: The sample was rotated 90° clockwise between the passes.
  • Route C: The sample was rotated with an angle of 180°. This route was proposed to expose the material to pressing in all directions during the operation. The implication was that the composite material would show uniform homogeneity while using this route, as the crystalline arrangement is affected in all directions.
The routes used during the ECAP process affect the microstructure, compression, mechanical properties, deformation behaviour, and strain distribution of the light metal workpiece [18], as the flow of the bulk material is informed by the direction of pressing.

6. Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite

Metal matrix composites (MMCs) are metal-based, and composites made from aluminium alloys have advantages when compared to steel-made ones. This is due to the unique features of aluminium alloys, including being lightweight and having high specific strength. In addition, the alloy has strong corrosion resistance, and it is easily extruded because it is ductile and malleable. Alloys of aluminium 7075 are being explored for diverse applications at the premises that are mentioned above, such as structural components requiring thin walls and the capacity to bear a load. Some building structures have been constructed using this alloy, including bridge floors, offshore stages, and large-span spatial lattice structures. Examples of areas of application include the Dome of Discovery in the United Kingdom, the Shanghai International Gymnasium in China, and the Shanghai Science and Technology Museum in the United States, which were all fabricated using aluminium alloys [75].
The application areas of MMCs have spanned structural components, such as engineering systems, the automotive, and aerospace industries. MMCs were reported to possess some strength improvement mechanisms when compared to conventional materials and continuously reinforced composites [6]. MMCs formed using aluminium as the matrix with particulate as reinforcement materials have been reported to be used for key automotive applications. For example, components of the engine, such as piston cylinder, parts of the brake system, such as discs/drums in railway vehicles, and aerospace are application areas of MMCs [76]. Aluminium alloys are extensively reinforced using ceramic particles, such as SiC and Al2O3. Other reinforcement materials have now been suggested as alternatives, including a new group of particles, like ZrO2 and ZrB2, with the end products displaying encouraging results [47].
Heat treatment improves the mechanical properties of this alloy, as the formation of secondary phases and homogeneous distribution of fine precipitates during heat treatment improve the properties [76]. The pursuit of improved reliability in applications, being cheaper and affordable, and enhanced material quality were the reasons for designing materials from monolithic to composite materials [19]. The main alloy element in the 7xxx series alloy is Zn; hence, this alloy is also known as an aluminium–zinc alloy. The wt.% of zinc is between 5.1% and 6.1%, as presented in the chemical composition that is shown in Table 4. This alloy was initially designed to fabricate airframes that were used by the Imperial Japanese Navy [77].
The mechanical, tribological properties and corrosion behaviour of AA-7075 metal matrix composites (AMMCs) are affected by the addition of desirable reinforcements from the foregoing due to the microstructure and composition of alloy elements changing with the addition of reinforcements. Earlier investigations have shown that reinforcements may be particulates, micro, or nanoparticles of SiC, Al2O3, Gr, TiO2, bagasse ash, and ZrO2 [47]. These reinforcements were reported to be partly responsible for the significant improvement that was observed in the properties. Table 5 presents the typical physical, mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of AA7075 [78,79].
Despite the good mechanical properties that are presented above, the addition of composite particulates to the AA7075 was reported to improve the properties and widen the application area of the alloy, with the rationale being the level of reinforcement provided to the alloy chips with the addition of particulates or nanocomposite additives. With improved compressive behaviour and tensile strength in terms of mechanical properties, the composite material was formed using aluminium alloy as matrix material. Changes in the tribological properties were also observed when the matrix or the particulate used as filler material phase was changed [19]. When fabricating AMMC materials, it was found that the chemical composition was different as a reflection of the method that was adopted for combining or mixing the composite material during sinter face and separating them. For instance, the composite material can be formed with more than two macro, micro, or nano-constituents [80].
Unreinforced materials may have less strength than reinforced materials. In contrast, the latter has improved stiffness, high specific modulus, low thermal expansion coefficient, lightweight, high thermal conductivity, increased wear resistance, tailored electrical properties, and improved damping capabilities [80]. Metal matrix composites are among the fast-developing group of materials due to their unique combination of properties that guarantee low weight, improved strength, improved wear, corrosion resistance, and comparatively sensible plasticity. This mix of properties may result from the mixture of two kinds of materials with entirely different properties. Metal as the ductile matrix was reinforced with oxides and carbides, with Al2O3, SiC, and ZrO2 being the most favoured reinforcement materials. Reducing particle size considerably benefits the overall mechanical properties. Consequently, the current trends in MMC production primarily embrace the use of nanoparticles, thus creating various types of nanocomposites [74]. However, this study was conducted to obtain optimum mechanical properties using nanocomposites. The rationale for using nanocomposites was based on improved mechanical properties instead of macro or micro particulates. There are many materials used to reinforce aluminium alloys, with carbides (e.g., assault and TiC), borides (TiB2 and ZrB2) and oxides (ZrO2, Al2O3, and SiO2) on the list of superior reinforcement materials, and these particulates have an equally high melting point and good thermal stability [74]. Titanium diboride (TiB2) is incredibly enticing due to its high elastic modulus and hardness.

7. Zirconium Oxide ZrO2 Reinforces the Aluminium Matrix Composite

Technological advancement has demonstrated the need to develop innovative materials that can be deployed for structural applications in the aerospace, automotive, electronics, energy, and manufacturing sectors [81]. Recently, advances in nanoscale technology have made the use of nano-sized particles possible in all spheres of life. The objective was to assess the feasibility of fabricating the AA7075-ZrO2 nanocomposite utilising a combination of SPD processes. The crystal structure of zirconia is different with temperature changes; hence, it is a polymorphic material with a monoclinic phase, a tetragonal phase, and a cubic phase [82]. The monoclinic structure of ZrO2 is stable at moderate or room temperatures, due to the formation of a solid covalent bond (Zr–O) and it forms the monoclinic ZrO2 [83].
ZrO2 has favourable mechanical and electrical behaviour, good wear resistance and corrosion resistance, and a wide bandgap. The material is thermally stable with high dielectric constants and chemical inertness [84]. The properties that are mentioned above suggest that the formation of the AA7075-ZrO2 nanocomposite with high mechanical properties may find applications in the transportation industry. Other areas of application of ZrO2 include solid fuel cells, catalytic agents with durability as a coating material, and gas sensors [85].
The literature lacks reports where zirconium has been used as a reinforcing material in aluminium matrix composites, with limited studies reporting the use of a small weight fraction of zircon oxide. For instance, 2.5 wt.%, 5 wt.%, and 7.5 wt.% volume fraction were used [86]. On the other hand, reduced wt.% to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 respectively [85], while utilised 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 wt.%, respectively, with both studies being performed using the stir casting process [87] prepared MMCs by strengthening zirconium oxide nanoparticles in aluminium alloy Al7075, using a stir casting technique with a percentage of volume fraction of reinforced particles as two factors of 5% and 10%. Optimal ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was observed at 95% Al 7075/5% ZrO2 with 135 N/mm2 [88]. However, for 90% Al 7075, the highest hardness was 104 BHN at 10 wt.% ZrO2. The microstructural analysis demonstrated a uniform distribution of ZrO2 particles. The mechanical properties of the AA6061 alloy were enhanced following the reinforcement of the alloy with zirconium dioxide. The wt.% zirconium varied at 0 wt.%, 2.5 wt.%, 5 wt.%, and 7.5 wt.%, respectively, while using the stir casting route and the reinforcement enhanced tensile strength and hardness of the MMC [89].
In an independent study, a new material of A356 aluminium alloy was fabricated by reinforcing it with 0.75%, 1.5%, and 2.5% of Al2ZrO5 nanoparticles through the stir casting method. The 1.5 wt.% composite showed improved compressive strength and hardness values with values of 900 MPa and BHN 61, respectively [90].
On the other hand, AMMCs were fabricated using Molten Al356.1 reinforced with nano-sized zirconium particles with different proportions at 1.0 wt.%, 1.5 wt.%, and 2.0 wt.% through stir casting at a temperature of 750 °C [85]. Thixoforming (semi-solid processing) was obtained for 7075 aluminium alloy through the addition of modifying agents. The use of 0.5 wt.% of scandium and zirconium led to an increase in the average tensile strength and hardness [91]. Prasad and Mallikarjuna [37] investigated the tribological properties of aluminium alloy and demonstrated that the uniform distribution of particles that were integrated with B4C and ZrO2 improved the wettability and porosity of the composite material. Fabrication was carried out using the stir casting route with varying the weight fraction of ceramic particles at 1%, 2%, and 3%, respectively. The results reveal that the wear resistance improved with an increase in B4C and ZrO2 reinforcement in the wear test [37]. The planetary ball mill, horizontal attritor mill, and shaker mill were employed to process the composite with two different contents of ZrO2 2 wt.% and 5 wt.% nanoparticles to analyse the features of each mill that can affect the composite synthesis during processing [92].
A study investigating the effect of the addition of ZrO2 content and temperature used during casting on the mechanical structures and behaviour of fractures of A356 Al/ZrO2 composites was conducted by [93]. The AA 6061 was used as the base material, while different weight percentages of Silicon Carbide (SiC) were used as reinforcements at 2 wt.%, 4 wt.%, and 6 wt.%, respectively, and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) was fixed at 3.0 wt.%. In fabricating the AHMMCs, the stir casting method was adopted using a stirrer speed at 350 rpm and then held for 5 min [93]. Similarly, when there was an increased weight percentage of the reinforcing material, the impact of energy also improved. It was observed that the formation of hardening reinforcement particles was responsible for the properties (Table 6) [94].
Based on earlier studies, zircon is a hybrid reinforced particle that has superior material matric characteristics, such as (i) great mechanical and physical abilities, (ii) high fracture toughness, (iii) excellent resistance to corrosion, (iv) excellent wear resistance, and (v) excellent heat resistance.

8. Mechanical Properties

The material’s mechanical properties play a significant role in determining the area of applying the material and the appropriate combination of the processing parameter. Strength, ductility, stiffness, resistance to impact, and fracture toughness are the most important mechanical properties to be considered. In the current research, the tensile properties and microhardness of the aluminium composite were used as parameters for evaluating the product through hot extrusion and ECAP process.

8.1. Tensile Strength

Maximum tensile strength refers to a material or structure’s ability to withstand a charge that tends to elongate. The attractive high strength to weight ratio observed in the AA7075 has earned a place in applying construction materials. The lightweight made the material suitable for rock climbing equipment and bicycle components. Although superior properties were stated above, there are also issues limiting the application areas of the alloy [47]. A tensile test was performed in previous studies to determine the aluminium and plastic flow stress of aluminium 7075. A standard test bar was used, with an inner diameter D of 6 mm and a length of the narrow segment (L) of 30 mm. The obtained data were converted into a true stress-true strain diagram, and the flow stress was then measured, as seen in [41]. The DEFORM 3D finite element software was utilised to conduct the theoretical investigation in order to simulate the stress–strain relationship. The aim was to demonstrate that the material behaved as aimed. During the simulation, the central axis of the symmetry model was used to improve the speed of the simulation. The parameters were collected for the AA7075 alloy and used as the plastic flow stress values during the tensile test. These parameters substituted the data for the 7075 alloys in the database [99].
Table 7 shows the development of TS (Tensile Strength) results from different types of reinforced materials. The nanomaterials composites in the matrix increased the material strength.

8.2. Microhardness

Hardness is common mechanical research that is used to estimate the mechanical strength of a material. The hardness value that was obtained from the hardness test reflects the material’s resistance to plastic deformation. A material with higher hardness values was associated with greater resistance to deformation [100]. Microhardness is directly influenced by the temperature effect and ECAP number of passes. Increasing the temperature from 350 °C to 500 °C caused the solid-state light metal recycling to be decreased due to the increase in recovery and grain size. Higher hardness values were obtained because of the plastic strain during compaction [101,102].

8.3. Compressive Strength Test

Compressive strength is the ability of a material to retain load or withstand burden until it fails. This is the opposite of the material’s tensile strength, which is its ability to withstand elongated loads that are applied to one end of the material. In the simplest sense, compressive strength is the ability of a material to resist compression. Knowing that the compression test is where the load is applied and the specimen is squeezed between two plates, it was observed that the compressive test caused the cross-section to increase [103].

9. Conclusions and Prospective

In summary, the previous literature was explored to examine studies on reinforcing nanoparticles to enhance the mechanical and physical properties of composite aluminium-based materials. ZrO2 nanoparticles have good properties, such as low thermal expansion coefficient, good re-resistance to thermal shock, high melting point, and low thermal conductivity. AA7075 is considered to be a high-strength alloy, since its yield strength is over 500 MPa in optimal ageing conditions. The alloy also has good corrosion resistance, as well as good electrical and thermal conductivity among the Al alloy family.
Hot extrusion is an innovative process in which low energy and less labour are required, and the mechanical properties of the composite are improved. The heat treatment that was conducted after hot extrusion improves the tribological and mechanical properties and the high bonding quality of Al nanocomposite.
The ECAP is considered to be the most recent on SPD techniques producing bulk and light recycled metal chips, such as aluminium characterised porosity-free and ultra-fine-grained materials.
An extrusion preceding the ECAP method was used to produce miniaturising Al specimens, and the thermal stability was reported to be good. It was also evident from the literature that limited studies were carried out using AA7075 alloy as AMMC and ZrO2 as a nano-articulate of directly recycled alloy chips. The need for optimisation was due to the variations in the nanocomposite fabrication parameters, which makes it challenging to obtain the best mechanical and physical properties.
For decades, inefficient waste management raised many global concerns regarding the way that we preserve energy and the apparent underestimation of the disposals’ environmental impact. All of that leads to the revolution of waste recycling and reusing and encourage more researchers and companies to develop energy-efficient approaches to fabricating recycled metals. Much of the newly emerging research discusses multicomponent products’ properties, such as AA7075 incorporated ZrO2 belonging to high-entropy alloys with high-performance properties using different manufacturing techniques. Thus, reducing the metal waste and developing green manufacturing processes decreases greenhouse gas emissions and lower energy usage. On the other hand, the increasing attention to the superior properties of ultrafine-grained metals with a 1 μm average grain size put them as strong upfront candidates for their high structural stability and controllability and the variety of applications, especially in lightweight-needed properties, such as aircraft engines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.S.; writing, review and editing, S.A.-A.; validation, S.M.T., C.N.A.J., M.A.A.H. and Z.N.I.; supervision, Z.L.; project administration, S.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University Putra Malaysia, grant number 9686400.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks the School of Graduate Studies, for financial support to study at Universiti Putra Malaysia. We acknowledge the use of facilities within the Centre for Graduate Studies, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) and Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology, Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Center (SMART-AMMC), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). We equally acknowledge the College of Engineering, Wasit University, Iraq, for research collaborations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, J.M.; Zhang, Z.; Jia, M.T.; Cao, L.; Li, C.G.; Gao, H.Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.L. The microstructures and tensile mechanical properties of ultrafine grained and coarse grained Al-7Si-0.3Mg alloy rods fabricated from machining chips. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 729, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soren, T.R.; Kumar, R.; Panigrahi, I.; Sahoo, A.K.; Panda, A.; Das, R.K. Machinability behavior of aluminium alloys: A brief study. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 5069–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Song, B.; Wei, Q.; Bourell, D.; Shi, Y. A review of selective laser melting of aluminum alloys: Processing, microstructure, property and developing trends. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pereira, L.H.; Asato, G.H.; Otani, L.B.; Jorge, A.M.; Kiminami, C.S.; Bolfarini, C.; Botta, W.J. Changing the solidification sequence and the morphology of iron-containing intermetallic phases in AA6061 aluminum alloy processed by spray forming. Mater. Charact. 2018, 145, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaufman, J.G. Properties and Characteristic of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. In Fire Resistance of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys and Measuring the Effects of Fire Exposure on the Properties of Aluminum Alloys; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, S.D.; Ravichandran, M.; Meignanamoorthy, M. Aluminium metal matrix composite with zirconium diboride reinforcement: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 19844–19847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, X.; Chen, L.; Jin, X.; Du, J.; Xue, W. Influence of temperature on tribological properties of microarc oxidation coating on 7075 aluminium alloy at 25–300 °C. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 12312–12318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shamsudin, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Zhong, Z.W. Solid-state recycling of light metals: A review. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2016, 8, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shamsudin, S.; Lajis, M.; Zhong, Z.W. Evolutionary in Solid State Recycling Techniques of Aluminium: A review. Procedia CIRP 2016, 40, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, J.T.; Xie, L.; Luo, K.Y.; Tan, W.S.; Cheng, L.; Chen, J.F.; Lu, Y.L.; Li, X.P.; Ge, M.Z. Improving creep properties of 7075 aluminum alloy by laser shock peening. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 349, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dursun, T.; Soutis, C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choi, Y.; Lee, J.; Panicker, S.S.; Jin, H.K.; Panda, S.K.; Lee, M.G. Mechanical properties, springback, and formability of W-temper and peak aged 7075 aluminum alloy sheets: Experiments and modeling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 170, 105344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, Y.; Bai, X.; Klenosky, D.; Trumble, K.; Johnson, D. A Study on Peripheral Grain Structure Evolution of an AA7050 Aluminum Alloy with a Laboratory-Scale Extrusion Setup. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 5156–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Joel, J.; Anthony Xavior, M. Optimization on machining parameters of aluminium alloy hybrid composite using carbide insert. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, D.C.; You, C.S.; Gao, F.Y. Analysis and experiment of 7075 aluminum alloy tensile test. Procedia Eng. 2014, 81, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ravindran, S.; Mani, N.; Balaji, S.; Abhijith, M.; Surendaran, K. Mechanical behaviour of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 16, 1020–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, J.; Song, Y.; Hua, L.; Zhou, P.; Xie, G. Effect of temperature on friction and galling behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy sheet based on ball-on-plate sliding test. Tribol. Int. 2019, 140, 105872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vishnu, P.; Raj Mohan, R.; Krishna Sangeethaa, E.; Raghuraman, S.; Venkatraman, R. A review on processing of aluminium and its alloys through Equal Channel Angular Pressing die. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Imran, M.; Khan, A.R.A. Characterization of Al-7075 metal matrix composites: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 3347–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoo, H.-S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Son, H.-T. Effect of Mn and AlTiB Addition and Heattreatment on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Al–Si–Fe–Cu–Zr Alloy. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 6249–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Morovvati, M.R.; Lalehpour, A.; Esmaeilzare, A. Effect of nano/micro B4C and SiC particles on fracture properties of aluminum 7075 particulate composites under chevron-notch plane strain fracture toughness test. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 125026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baradeswaran, A.; Elaya Perumal, A. Study on mechanical and wear properties of Al 7075/Al2O3/graphite hybrid composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 56, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boostani, A.F.; Tahamtan, S.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Wei, D.; Yazdani, S.; Azari Khosroshahi, R.; Taherzadeh Mousavian, R.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Gong, D. Enhanced tensile properties of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphene encapsulated SiC nanoparticles. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 68, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mazahery, A.; Shabani, M.O. Mechanical properties of squeeze-cast A356 composites reinforced with B 4C particulates. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2012, 21, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saravanan, L.; Senthilvelan, T. Investigations on the hot workability characteristics and deformation mechanisms of aluminium alloy-Al2O3 nanocomposite. Mater. Des. 2015, 79, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, R.; Chauhan, S. Study on surface roughness measurement for turning of Al 7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites by using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networking (ANN). Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2015, 65, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kannan, C.; Ramanujam, R.; Venkatesan, K.; Dheeraj, N.V.; Raudhraa Sundaresh, M.; Vimal, A. An investigation on the tribological characteristics of Al 7075 based single and hybrid nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 12837–12847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tokarski, T. Mechanical Properties of Solid-State Recycled 4xxx Aluminum Alloy Chips. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 3252–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Atalay, H.; Çelik, A.; Ayaz, F. Investigation of genotoxic and apoptotic effects of zirconium oxide nanoparticles (20 nm) on L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 296, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Selyanchyn, R.; Fujikawa, S. Molecular Hybridization of Polydimethylsiloxane with Zirconia for Highly Gas Permeable Membranes. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 1165–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hassanalian, M.; Rice, D.; Abdelkefi, A. Evolution of space drones for planetary exploration: A review. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2018, 97, 61–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paraskevas, D.; Kellens, K.; Deng, Y.; Dewulf, W.; Kampen, C.; Duflou, J.R. Solid state recycling of aluminium alloys via a porthole die hot extrusion process: Scaling up to production. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1896, 140008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kore, A.S.; Nayak, K.C.; Date, P.P. Formability of aluminium sheets manufactured by solid state recycling. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 896, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Chiba, R.; Yoshimura, M. Solid-state recycling of aluminium alloy swarf into c-channel by hot extrusion. J. Manuf. Process. 2015, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wagiman, A.; Mustapa, M.S.; Shamsudin, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Asmawi, R.; Harimon, M.A.; Yusof, F.; Rady, M.H. Effect of Chip Treatment on Chip-Based Billet Densification in Solid-State Recycling of New Aluminium Scrap. Lect. Notes Mech. Eng. 2020, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wagiman, A.; Mustapa, M.S.; Asmawi, R.; Shamsudin, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Mutoh, Y. A review on direct hot extrusion technique in recycling of aluminium chips. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prasad, C.V.M.; Mallikarjuna Rao, K. Improvement of tribological properties of aluminium alloy reinforced with B4C and ZrO2. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 26843–26849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, H.; Cao, F.; Song, G.-L.; Zheng, D.; Shi, Z.; Dargusch, M.S.; Atrens, A. Review of the atmospheric corrosion of magnesium alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 2003–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chaudhry, S.A.; Khan, T.A.; Ali, I. Zirconium oxide-coated sand based batch and column adsorptive removal of arsenic from water: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Egypt. J. Pet. 2017, 26, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rady, M.H.; Mustapa, M.S.; Harimon, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.R.; Shamsudin, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Wagiman, A.; Msebawi, M.S.; Yusof, F. Effect of hot extrusion parameters on microhardness and microstructure in direct recycling of aluminium chips. Materwiss. Werksttech. 2019, 50, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, X.; Chen, L.; Chen, G.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, C. Joining of 1060/6063 aluminum alloys based on porthole die extrusion process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 250, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ngernbamrung, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Takatsuji, N.; Dohda, K. Investigation of surface cracking of hot-extruded AA7075 billet. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 15, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Msebawi, M.S.; Murugesan, J.; Shamsudin, S.; Rady, M.H.; Sabbar, H.M.; Mustapa, M.S.; Lajis, M.A.; Abbas, M.A. Strength performance of micro alumina reinforced direct recycled aa6061 chips based matrix composite. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 961, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abbas, A.T.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Erdakov, I.N.; Taha, M.A.; El Rayes, M.M.; Soliman, M.S. Artificial intelligence monitoring of hardening methods and cutting conditions and their effects on surface roughness, performance, and finish turning costs of solid-state recycled aluminum alloy 6061 chips. Metals 2018, 8, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lesniak, D.; Zaborowski, K.; Madura, J.; Gromek, P.; Leszczynska-Madej, B.; Woznicki, A.; Zasadzinski, J.; Libura, W.; Jurczak, H. Research on susceptibility of 7075 aluminium alloy to extrusion welding. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 27, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dong, X.; Chen, F.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; Feng, S.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X. Microstructure and microhardness of hot extruded 7075 aluminum alloy micro-gear. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 219, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Z.; Lu, J.; Liu, H.; Liao, X. Experimental investigation on the post-fire mechanical properties of structural aluminum alloys 6061-T6 and 7075-T73. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016, 106, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, W.; Yu, J.; Lin, J.; Dean, T.A. Manufacturing a curved profile with fine grains and high strength by differential velocity sideways extrusion. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2019, 140, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, W.; Lin, J.; Dean, T.A.; Wang, L. Feasibility studies of a novel extrusion process for curved profiles: Experimentation and modelling. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2018, 126, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Al-Alimi, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Shamsudin, S. Solid-State Recycling of Light Metal Reinforced Inclusions by Equal Channel Angular Pressing: A Review. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 135, 00013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhou, W.; Shao, Z.; Yu, J.; Lin, J. Advances and trends in forming curved extrusion profiles. Materials 2021, 14, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, W.; Yu, J.; Lin, J.; Dean, T.A. Effects of die land length and geometry on curvature and effective strain of profiles produced by a novel sideways extrusion process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 282, 116682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sahu, R.K.; Das, R.; Dash, B.; Routara, B.C. Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Study on Forward, Backward and Forward-backward Multi-hole Extrusion Process. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 5229–5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, S.; Qin, Y.; Chen, J.G.; Choy, C.M. A forging method for reducing process steps in the forming of automotive fasteners. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 137, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Shaeri, M.H.; Shaeri, M.; Ebrahimi, M.; Salehi, M.T.; Seyyedein, S.H. Effect of ECAP temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2016, 26, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dileep, B.P.; Vitala, H.R.; Ravi Kumar, V.; Suraj, M.M. Effect of ECAP on Mechanical and Micro-Structural Properties of Al7075-Ni Alloy. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 25382–25388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lokesh, K.; Kavitha, G.; Manikandan, E.; Mani, G.K.; Kaviyarasu, K.; Rayappan, J.B.B.; Ladchumananandasivam, R.; Aanand, J.S.; Jayachandran, M.; Maaza, M. Effective ammonia detection using n-ZnO/p-NiO heterostructured nanofibers. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 2477–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Medvedev, A.E.; Neumann, A.; Ng, H.P.; Lapovok, R.; Kasper, C.; Lowe, T.C.; Anumalasetty, V.N.; Estrin, Y. Combined effect of grain refinement and surface modification of pure titanium on the attachment of mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 71, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Esmaeili, A.; Shaeri, M.H.; Noghani, M.T.; Razaghian, A. Fatigue behavior of AA7075 aluminium alloy severely deformed by equal channel angular pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 757, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khosroshahi, N.B.; Mousavian, R.T.; Khosroshahi, R.A.; Brabazon, D. Mechanical properties of rolled A356 based composites reinforced by Cu-coated bimodal ceramic particles. Mater. Des. 2015, 83, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cui, J.; Kvithyld, A.; Roven, H.J. Degreasing of aluminum turnings and implications for solid state recycling. TMS Light Met. 2010, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tan, G.; Kalay, Y.E.; Gür, C.H. Long-term thermal stability of Equal Channel Angular Pressed 2024 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 677, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Niu, P.L.; Li, W.Y.; Li, N.; Xu, Y.X.; Chen, D.L. Exfoliation corrosion of friction stir welded dissimilar 2024-to-7075 aluminum alloys. Mater. Charact. 2019, 147, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yusuf, N.K.; Lajis, M.A.; Ahmad, A. Hot press as a sustainable direct recycling technique of aluminium: Mechanical properties and surface integrity. Materials 2017, 10, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gebril, M.A.; Omar, M.Z.; Mohamed, I.F.; Othman, N.K. Microstructural evaluation and corrosion resistance of semisolid cast a356 alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing. Metals 2019, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Afifi, M.A.; Wang, Y.C.; Pereira, P.H.R.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, S.; Langdon, T.G. Mechanical properties of an Al-Zn-Mg alloy processed by ECAP and heat treatments. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 769, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Haase, C.; Kremer, O.; Hu, W.; Ingendahl, T.; Lapovok, R.; Molodov, D.A. Equal-channel angular pressing and annealing of a twinning-induced plasticity steel: Microstructure, texture, and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 2016, 107, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alo, O.A.; Akande, S. Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-SiCp Composites. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2015, 6, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ma, M.; Li, Z.; Qiu, W.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xia, Z.; Huang, H. Development of homogeneity in a Cu-Mg-Ca alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 820, 153112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Meshkabadi, R.; Faraji, G.; Javdani, A.; Pouyafar, V. Combined effects of ECAP and subsequent heating parameters on semi-solid microstructure of 7075 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2016, 26, 3091–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Al-alimi, S.; Lajis, M.A.; Shamsudin, S.; Chan, B.L.; Ismail, A.E.; Sultan, N.M. Development of Metal Matrix Composites and Related Forming Techniques by Direct Recycling of Light Metals: A Review. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2020, 1, 144–171. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zare, H.; Jahedi, M.; Toroghinejad, M.R.; Meratian, M.; Knezevic, M. Compressive, shear, and fracture behavior of CNT reinforced Al matrix composites manufactured by severe plastic deformation. Mater. Des. 2016, 106, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Sitdikov, O.; Avtokratova, E.; Latypova, O.; Мarkushev, M.V. Structure and superplasticity of the Al-Mg-TM alloy after equal channel angular pressing and rolling. Lett. Mater. 2018, 8, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Harichandran, R.; Selvakumar, N. Effect of nano/micro B4C particles on the mechanical properties of aluminium metal matrix composites fabricated by ultrasonic cavitation-assisted solidification process. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2016, 16, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yu, J.; Zhao, G.; Chen, L. Analysis of longitudinal weld seam defects and investigation of solid-state bonding criteria in porthole die extrusion process of aluminum alloy profiles. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016, 237, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aoba, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Miura, H. Effects of aging on mechanical properties and microstructure of multi-directionally forged 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 700, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guler, K.A.; Kisasoz, A.; Ozer, G.; Karaaslan, A. Cooling slope casting of AA7075 alloy combined with reheating and thixoforging. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2019, 29, 2237–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Altenbach, C.; Schnatterer, C.; Mercado, U.A.; Suuronen, J.P.; Zander, D.; Requena, G. Synchrotron-based holotomography and X-ray fluorescence study on the stress corrosion cracking behavior of the peak-aged 7075 aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 152722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumar, D.R.; Kumar, V.R.; Rao, C.P. Influence of T6-heat treatment on mechanical properties of Al7075 alloy reinforced with Cenosphere. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 25036–25044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gireesh, C.H.; Prasad, K.D.; Ramji, K.; Vinay, P.V. Mechanical Characterization of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Aloe vera powder. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 3289–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ahmad, I.; Islam, M.; Parvez, S.; AlHabis, N.; Umar, A.; Munir, K.S.; Wang, N.; Zhu, Y. Reinforcing capability of multiwall carbon nanotubes in alumina ceramic hybrid nanocomposites containing zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2019, 84, 105018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Keiteb, A.S.; Saion, E.; Zakaria, A.; Soltani, N. Structural and optical properties of zirconia nanoparticles by thermal treatment synthesis. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1913609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Bagbi, Y.; Sharma, A.; Bohidar, H.B.; Solanki, P.R. Immunosensor based on nanocomposite of nanostructured zirconium oxide and gelatin-A. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jeon, N.; Choe, H.; Jeong, B.; Yun, Y. Propane dehydrogenation over vanadium-doped zirconium oxide catalysts. Catal. Today 2020, 352, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Girish, K.B.; Shobha, B.N. Synthesis and Mechanical Properties of Zirconium Nano-Reinforced with Aluminium Alloy Matrix Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 3008–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Patoliya, D.M.; Sharma, S.; Student, P.G. Preparation and Characterization of Zirconium Dioxide Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2007, 3297, 3315–3321. [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang, L.; Xu, Z. A critical review of material flow, recycling technologies, challenges and future strategy for scattered metals from minerals to wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 1001–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yao, Z.T.; Xia, M.S.; Sarker, P.K.; Chen, T. A review of the alumina recovery from coal fly ash, with a focus in China. Fuel 2014, 120, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hamzah, M.Q.; Mezan, S.O.; Tuama, A.N.; Jabbar, A.H.; Agam, M.A. Study and Characterization of Polystyrene/Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites (PS/TiO2 NCs) for Photocatalytic Degradation Application: A Review. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khorramie, S.A.; Baghchesara, M.A.; Gohari, D.P. Fabrication of Aluminum matrix composites reinforced with Al 2ZrO5 Nano particulates synthesized by sol-gel auto-combustion method. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 1556–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dutkiewicz, J.; Atkinson, H.V.; Lityńska-Dobrzyńska, L.; Czeppe, T.; Modigell, M. Characterization of semi-solid processing of aluminium alloy 7075 with Sc and Zr additions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 580, 362–373. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hernández-Martinez, S.E.; Cruz-Rivera, J.J.; Garay-Reyes, C.G.; Martínez-Sánchez, R.; Estrada-Guel, I.; Hernández-Rivera, J.L. Comparative study of synthesis of AA 7075-ZrO2 metal matrix composite by different mills. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 643, S107–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Abdizadeh, H.; Baghchesara, M.A. Investigation on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of A356 aluminum alloy based ZrO2 particle reinforced metal-matrix composites. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2045–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Srinivasan, R.; Vignesh, S.B.; Veeramanipandi, P.; Sabarish, M.; Yuvaraj, C.S. Experimental investigation on aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites fabricated through stir casting technique. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 27, 1884–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Khamis, S.S.; Lajis, M.A.; Albert, R.A.O. A sustainable direct recycling of aluminum chip (AA6061) in hot press forging employing Response surface methodology. Procedia CIRP 2015, 26, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Safeen, W.; Hussain, S.; Wasim, A.; Jahanzaib, M.; Aziz, H.; Abdalla, H. Predicting the tensile strength, impact toughness, and hardness of friction stir-welded AA6061-T6 using response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 87, 1765–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. El-Galy, I.M.; Saleh, B.I.; Ahmed, M.H. Functionally graded materials classifications and development trends from industrial point of view. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Chmura, W.; Gronostajski, J. Mechanical and tribological properties of aluminium-base composites produced by the recycling of chips. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2000, 106, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tan, S.; Zheng, F.; Chen, J.; Han, J.; Wu, Y.; Peng, L. Effects of process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir lap linear welded 6061 aluminum alloy to NZ30K magnesium alloy. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2017, 5, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Frint, P.; Wagner, M.F.X. Strain partitioning by recurrent shear localization during equal-channel angular pressing of an AA6060 aluminum alloy. Acta Mater. 2019, 176, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ramachandra, M.; Abhishek, A.; Siddeshwar, P.; Bharathi, V. Hardness and Wear Resistance of ZrO2 Nano Particle Reinforced Al Nanocomposites Produced by Powder Metallurgy. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2015, 10, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Srivyas, P.D.; Charoo, M.S. Role of Reinforcements on the Mechanical and Tribological Behavior of Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites—A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 20041–20053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nathan, V.B.; Soundararajan, R.; Abraham, C.B.; Rahman, F. Evaluation of mechanical and metallurgical properties on aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 2520–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pre-processing of chips before and after consolidation.
Figure 1. Pre-processing of chips before and after consolidation.
Metals 11 00805 g001
Table 1. The uses and areas of application of aluminium alloys.
Table 1. The uses and areas of application of aluminium alloys.
Aluminium AlloyUse of Alloy
7075Construction materials and aerospace (wings and fuselage).
1050/1200Food and chemical industry.
2014Airframes.
5214/5052Vehicle panelling, marine-exposed buildings, habitats, mining cages.
6063Architectural extrusions (internal and external), window frames, irrigation pipes.
6061/6082Stressed members of the framework, bridge, roof truss cranes, beer barrels.
Table 2. Pre-heating sintering Temperature.
Table 2. Pre-heating sintering Temperature.
ProcessTemperatureAverageRef.
Extrusion welding520 °C450 °C, 500 °C, and 550 °C[45]
Micro-gear extrusion450 °C and 500 °C[46]
post-fire elastic modulus450 °C, 500 °C, and 550 °C[47]
Table 3. Miscellaneous Methods in Direct Recycling Technique.
Table 3. Miscellaneous Methods in Direct Recycling Technique.
MaterialsMethodFindingRef.
Semi-Solid Stir Casting and Rolling Method
A356Semi-solid stir casting and rolling methodImproved the distribution of fine SiC (Silicon Carbide) particles and eliminated remaining porosity after the first step of the casting process. Examination of the mechanical properties of the obtained composites detected that samples that contained a bimodal ceramic reinforcement of fine SiC and coarse Al2O3 particles, the strength and hardness were the best.[60]
Equal channel Angular pressing method
AA6060ECAPImplemented ECAP in the direct recycling of aluminium waste for cars. The efficiency of aluminium degreasing methods alloy AA6060 turnings was also investigated. The study suggested that the ECAP technique was suitable for aluminium alloy chips.[61,62]
Friction stir casting
Al 7075Stir castingThe findings found that mechanical properties were greatly enhanced, such as superior wear and corrosion resistance and low thermal expansion coefficient relative to conventional base alloys. Albeit the improved properties, the process was deficient in maximising the usage of materials, and energy demand were relatively high compared to direct recycling. The study showed that AA 7xxx alloys are recyclable, and this information was relevant for selecting the AA7075 alloy.[19]
Friction extrusion
AA2024
AA7075
Friction stir weldingThe effect of base metal (BM) locations on the corrosion actions of dissimilarly welded friction stir welded 2024-T351 to 7075-T651 aluminium alloy joints in an EXCO solution was reported. The possible usage of the AA7075-ZrO3 composite reported in the automobile industry required that the composite be weldable.[63]
Forging
AA6061-T6Direct hot forgingDirect hot forging was carried out on AA6061-T6 chips and eliminated the phases of cold-compact and pre-heating. The RSM (response surface methodology) was used to optimise the process.[64,65]
Table 4. Chemical composition of the AA7075 aluminium in wt.%.
Table 4. Chemical composition of the AA7075 aluminium in wt.%.
ElementPercent (wt.%)Atomic Mass (u)
Si0.127.97
Fe0.1955.84
Cu1.5363.54
Mg2.5524.3
Zn5.8965.38
Mn0.0754.93
Cr0.1851.99
Ni0.005858.69
Ti0.02447.86
AlBal26.98
Table 5. The properties of AA7075.
Table 5. The properties of AA7075.
Physical PropertiesValue
Density (g/cc)2.81
Melting Point (°C)660
Mechanical PropertiesValue
Hardness (BHN)150
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)228
Yield strength (MPa)103
Modulus of Elasticity (GPa)70–80
Poisson’s ratio0.33
Thermal PropertiesValue
Melting Temperature (Tm)477 °C (891 °F)
Thermal conductivity (k)196 W/m × K
Linear thermal expansion coefficient (α)2.36 × 10−5 K−1
Specific heat capacity (c)714.8 J/kg × K
Electrical PropertiesValue
Volume resistivity (ρ)51.5 nOhm × m
Table 6. Volume friction % of ZrO2 reinforced particles and nanoparticles.
Table 6. Volume friction % of ZrO2 reinforced particles and nanoparticles.
MMCsVolume Friction % ZrO2TechniqueRefs.
Al2O3/ZrO35%, 10%, 15%, 20%Surface modification with aqueous solutions[95]
Al7075/ZrO3/Fly Ash0%, 3% ZrO2, 6% fly ash
4th 3% ZrO2, 6% fly ash
Stir casting[96]
Al/ZrO25–80%Powder technology[97]
Al/ZrO21%, 2%, 3%Liquid Routing[98]
Al/ZrO2/Al2O3/TiO20–5%Stir casting method[99]
Al6061/ZrO2/SiC2%, 4%, 6% SiC3% ZrO2Stir casting method[94]
Al6061/ZrO22.5%, 5%, 7.5%Stir casting[89]
A356/Al2ZrO50.75%, 1.5%, 2.5% Al2ZrO5 nanoparticleStir casting[90]
Al356/ZrO21.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% nanoparticleStir casting[85]
Al7075/Sc/ZrO20.5% Sc, 0.5% ZrO2Semi-solid processing[91]
Al/B4C/ZrO21%, 2%, 3% B4C/ZrO2Stir casting[37]
Al7075/ZrO22%, 5% ZrO2 nanoparticlesThree balls mills[92]
A356/ZrO25%, 10%, 15% ZrO2Stir casting[93]
Table 7. The tensile strengths of different samples.
Table 7. The tensile strengths of different samples.
MaterialTS (MPa)
TiC and TiB2 reinforced AA7075 hybrid composite125
Sic-6%, ZrO2-3% reinforced AA7075131.15
Cenosphere reinforced AA7075160
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sabbar, H.M.; Leman, Z.; Shamsudin, S.B.; Tahir, S.M.; Aiza Jaafar, C.N.; Hanim, M.A.A.; Ismsrrubie, Z.N.; Al-Alimi, S. AA7075-ZrO2 Nanocomposites Produced by the Consecutive Solid-State Process: A Review of Characterisation and Potential Applications. Metals 2021, 11, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050805

AMA Style

Sabbar HM, Leman Z, Shamsudin SB, Tahir SM, Aiza Jaafar CN, Hanim MAA, Ismsrrubie ZN, Al-Alimi S. AA7075-ZrO2 Nanocomposites Produced by the Consecutive Solid-State Process: A Review of Characterisation and Potential Applications. Metals. 2021; 11(5):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sabbar, Huda M., Zulkiflle Leman, Shazarel B. Shamsudin, Suraya Mohd Tahir, Che N. Aiza Jaafar, Mohamed A. Azmah Hanim, Zahari N. Ismsrrubie, and Sami Al-Alimi. 2021. "AA7075-ZrO2 Nanocomposites Produced by the Consecutive Solid-State Process: A Review of Characterisation and Potential Applications" Metals 11, no. 5: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop