Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Methodology and Metallurgical Application of Turbulence Modelling: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Selective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V-2%Hydroxyapatite Composites: Manufacturing Behavior and Microstructure Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Laboratory X-ray Diffraction Complex for In Situ Investigations of Structural Phase Evolution of Materials under Gaseous Atmosphere
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/met11081296
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Composition-Induced Magnetic Transition in GdMn1-xTixSi Intermetallic Compounds for x = 0–1

by
Roman D. Mukhachev
1,2 and
Alexey V. Lukoyanov
1,2,*
1
Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
2
M.N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(8), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081296
Submission received: 28 June 2021 / Revised: 10 August 2021 / Accepted: 11 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phase Transformations and Physical Properties of Alloys)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Magnetic intermetallic compounds based on rare earth elements and 3d transition metals are widely investigated due to the functionality of their physical properties and their variety of possible applications. In this work, we investigated the features of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of ternary intermetallic compounds based on gadolinium GdMn1-xTixSi, in the framework of the DFT + U method. Analysis of the densities of electronic states and magnetic moments of ions in Ti-doped GdMnSi showed a significant change in the magnetic properties depending on the contents of Mn and Ti. Together with the magnetic moment, an increase in the density of electronic states at the Fermi energy was found in almost all GdMn1-xTixSi compositions, which may indicate a significant change in the transport properties of intermetallic compounds. Together with the expected Curie temperatures above 300 K, the revealed changes in the magnetic characteristics and electronic structure make the GdMn1-xTixSi intermetallic system promising for use in microelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

Recently, researchers have paid much attention to magnetic cooling based on the magnetocaloric effect of solid-state working substances [1]. RTX ternary compounds (R = rare earth elements, T = 3d/4d/5d transition metals, and X = p elements) are a huge family of intermetallic compounds [2,3]. Most of these compounds crystallize into hexagonal, orthorhombic, and tetragonal crystal structures [2,4]. Due to the various crystal structures, unusual magnetic and electrical properties have been found in these compounds, such as complex magnetic orderings, valence fluctuations, unusual types of superconductivity, heavy fermion behavior, metamagnetism, spin glass, memory effect, magnetoresistance, magnetocaloric effect, etc. [5,6,7,8]. Although these compounds have been known for a long time, they have recently attracted greater interest, since they exhibit enormous magnitudes of the magnetocaloric effect and magnetoresistance [7,9,10]. The magnetic ordering temperatures in RTX range from very low temperatures to temperatures well above room temperature, for example, reaching 510 K in TbMnGe [11].
This allows the RTX series to cover a very large temperature range for a variety of functional applications [6]. RMnSi compounds, where R is a rare earth element, are intermetallic compounds with two magnetic sublattices R and Mn, in which the magnetic atoms are located in layers separated by silicon layers in the order R–Si–Mn2–Si–R. The manganese sublattice is characterized by a significant localized magnetic moment of Mn ions [12]. Magnetic ordering in RMnSi compounds is formed due to different types of exchange interactions: R–R, R–Mn, and Mn–Mn. A change in interactions with decreasing temperature can lead to magnetic phase transition ferromagnetism—antiferromagnetism [13].
Several magnetic transitions were found in the GdMnSi compound at temperatures of 50, 275, and 310–325 K [13,14]. The lowest temperature corresponds to the antiparallel ordering of the magnetic moments of gadolinium ions relative to the moments of manganese ions; higher temperatures characterize the ferri- and ferromagnetic orderings of the moments of Mn ions [14]. At sufficiently high temperatures, large values of the magnetocaloric effect were found in GdMnSi [13]; it should be noted that in other ternary intermetallic compounds of the GdTX series, the magnetocaloric effect was also found [15]. The low-temperature saturation magnetization in GdMnSi, according to experimental data [16], is 5 µB, and in strong magnetic fields it increases to 8.8 µB [17]. The Curie temperature TC = 294 K was experimentally determined in GdTiSi [18]. The high Curie temperatures of the intermetallic compounds GdTiSi and GdMnSi suggest that alloys of the intermediate composition GdMn1-xTixSi should have high ordering temperatures too. In the literature, there is only one article [19] with data on the crystal structure of synthesized samples in a wide range of Mn concentrations. Results of experimental measurements of the magnetic or spectral properties of these compositions have not been published in the literature, except for data for several samples with x = 0–0.3, which showed an increase in the Curie temperature to 387 K (in GdMn0.7Ti0.3Si) with increasing Ti content [20]. In [19], in almost all intermediate compositions of GdMn1-xTixSi compounds, in addition to the tetragonal phase of the CeFeSi-type, another secondary phase was found.
The data available in the literature show the relevance and timeliness of studying the GdMn1-xTixSi system. The representatives of this series may have a number of interesting properties that make them promising for functional applications. Theoretical studies of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of GdMn1-xTixSi have not been performed previously.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, we investigated GdMn1-xTixSi compounds with a tetragonal crystal structure of the CeFeSi-type (space group P4/nmm, SG 129) with 2 formula units per unit cell. Gadolinium ions occupy 2c positions (0.25, 0.25, ZGd), manganese and titanium ions occupy 2a positions (0.75, 0.25, 0), and silicon ions occupy 2c positions (0.25, 0.25, ZSi). The coordinates for gadolinium are ZGd = 0.6044, and the coordinates for silicon are ZSi = 0.3922 [19]. In Figure 1, the crystal structure of GdMnSi is plotted using the VESTA package [21]. To model the doped compositions, we used a supercell with 24 atoms. We checked possible configurations of Mn and Ti in the 3d sublattice and took into account only those with the lowest total energy in the doped cases. Gadolinium atoms are marked with large pink spheres, manganese atoms are dark purple, and silicon atoms are blue. Both compounds with a tetragonal structure are natural multilayer magnetic systems in which atoms of the rare earth element Gd, Mn or Ti atoms, and Si atoms are located in layers in the direction of the c-axis in the sequence Gd–Si–Mn2 or Ti2–Si–Gd.
The lattice parameters for pure and doped compounds according to the data of [19] are shown in Figure 2 for the CeFeSi-type phase only. One should note that in [19], for some samples (with x = 0.4–0.6; 0.9), the secondary phase Ti5Ga4-type (Gd3Ti2MnSi3) admixture to the basic CeFeSi-type tetragonal phase was identified. In [20], which reports only x = 0–0.3 concentrations of this series, only the CeFeSi-type tetragonal phase was reported. In our theoretical investigation, we solely concentrate on the CeFeSi-type tetragonal phase, as it can provide a clear picture of the magnetic transition in the GdMn1-xTixSi family. Further synthesis of this family is required. It can be seen that for high titanium (low manganese) concentrations above 0.3, the lattice parameters a and c increase significantly; for titanium concentrations below 0.3, an increase in the c parameter is observed. Thus, the volume of the cell increases. Apart from in [19,20], there are no experimental data on the structural and magnetic properties of this system, which is associated with the multiphase nature of the samples obtained [22].
In this work, the electronic structure and magnetic properties of intermetallic compounds were calculated within the DFT + U method [23] in the Quantum ESPRESSO software package [24], using the exchange correlation functional in the approximation of the generalized gradient correction (GGA) of the PBE version [25]. To take into account the strong electron correlations of 4f electrons of Gd, the U correction was included for the parameters of the direct Coulomb U = 6.7 eV and exchange J = 0.7 eV interactions. These values are generally accepted for Gd ions [8,23,26]. Thus, the rotationally invariant scheme of DFT + U was used [27]. Wave functions were expanded into plane waves, and interactions between ions and valence electrons were taken into account within the framework of the method of augmented plane waves. The calculations used the PAW potentials GGA-PBE-paw (Gd) [28] and pbe-spn-kjpaw (Ti, Mn, Si) from the pseudopotential library of Quantum ESPRESSO. The Gd potential is of the same type and approximation but with the 4f states explicitly included as valent, not semi-core, which is important for intermetallic compounds with magnetic moments of Gd ions.

3. Results

3.1. Magnetic Ordering and Moments

In our DFT + U calculations, the ferromagnetic (FM) ordering of the magnetic moments of manganese ions relative to each other was simulated. In the calculations, titanium and silicon ions remain nonmagnetic (up to 0.06 μB). For Gd ions, the values of spin polarization obtained as a result of self-consistent calculations correspond to a magnetic moment of 7.21 μB per Gd ion (see Table 1) in good agreement with the experimental value of 7.47 μB in GdTiSi [18]. The total energy in the calculation for GdTiSi with ferromagnetic ordering of the magnetic moments of gadolinium ions was –2119.4517 Ry, and for GdMnSi –2033.9852 Ry. Additionally, simulations were performed with antiferromagnetic ordering of the magnetic moments of Gd. The total energy of GdMnSi in the calculation with the antiferromagnetic ordering of the magnetic moments of Gd was –2033.9713 Ry, which is higher than in the FM calculation by 0.0139 Ry (189 meV). The total energy of GdTiSi calculated with the antiferromagnetic ordering of the magnetic moments of gadolinium ions was −2119.4420 Ry, which is 0.0097 Ry (131 meV) higher than in the FM calculation. Thus, for the compounds GdMnSi and GdTiSi, the lowest total energy value was obtained for ordering of the FM type, in agreement with the experimental data [18,20].

3.2. Electronic Structure

The calculated densities of electronic states and band structure of the intermetallic compound GdMnSi are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. The data are given per formula unit for two opposite directions of majority and minority spin in the case of FM ordering. The Fermi energy (EF) is located at zero energy. Intense peaks in DOS of this compound (Figure 3) are formed by several localized bands of different intensities. In the energy range from −5 to 6 eV, there is a broad band of the density of electronic states formed due to the 3d states of manganese and 3p states of silicon. In the valence band from –7.5 to –7 eV for the majority spin and in the conduction band from 4 to 5 eV for the minority spin, there are narrow peaks of the 4f states of Gd. These peaks can be found in the band structure of GdMnSi in Figure 4 as tight packages of bands in the energy ranges discussed above. At the Fermi energy, there are a number of bands crossing EF from a number of electronic states of all ions in GdMnSi.
The calculated densities of electronic states and band structure of GdTiSi are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Similar sharp peaks can be traced near −7 and 5 eV in Figure 6, stemming from the spin-polarized Gd-4f electronic states. The densities of states in the GdMnSi and GdTiSi compounds are different for two opposite spin directions, since the resulting state is ferromagnetic both in the Gd lattice and in the sublattice of 3d metals. The density of states of manganese has a high intensity below EF for minority spin, and an intense broad peak for majority spin (1.25 eV) located above EF. The X-ray photoemission spectrum shows filled electronic states corresponding to the total density of states in the calculations. The main features of the experimental spectrum of GdTiSi, namely, a peak at about 2 eV and a shoulder at about 0.7 eV, are present in the total density of states of GdTiSi in Figure 5 [18].
Next, we consider GdMn1-xTixSi compounds with partial substitution of titanium ions for manganese ions. As can be seen from Figure 5, for the compositions of GdTiSi, the 4f states of gadolinium have the highest intensity in the valence band, as well as in the conduction band (similar to GdMnSi, Figure 3). From Figure 3 and Figure 5, one can see that the states of gadolinium practically do not change upon substitution of titanium for manganese; therefore, below we consider in detail the changes occurring in the 3d sublattice of Mn and Ti. In Figure 7, the densities of states of GdMn1-xTixSi compounds for x = 0.2 (a), 0.4 (b), 0.5 (c), 0.6 (d), and 0.8 (e) are shown with two opposite directions of majority (up) and minority (down) spin projections. A significant contribution to the density is made by a broad band formed by the 3d states of manganese and titanium, which lies near EF in the energy range from −5 to 8 eV.
When 20% of manganese ions were replaced by titanium ions (compound GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si, see Figure 7a), titanium states with two peaks of low intensity below EF appeared, repeating the corresponding states of manganese, in the energy ranges from −2 to −1.5 eV and from −1 to −0.5 eV. Above EF, broad bands of titanium states appeared for both spin directions. In this case, the intensity of all manganese states decreased; an intense peak with the minority spin in the range from 0 to 1 eV disappeared; and the peak with the majority spin, lying in the range from 0.5 to 1.5 eV, in GdMnSi (Figure 3) shifted higher in energy by approximately 0.5 eV, with its intensity decreasing by more than 30%, while the broad peak with the minority spin below EF shifted lower in energy.
When 40% of manganese ions were replaced by titanium ions (GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si, Figure 7b), the following changes occurred. Compared with GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si, an increase in all titanium states by a factor of 2 was observed. No new peaks appeared. The intensities of all states of manganese decreased in proportion to the decrease in the concentration of manganese.
When 50% of manganese ions were replaced by titanium ions (GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si, Figure 7c), new peaks of titanium states appeared: a redistribution of the electron density took place, resulting in the formation of two maxima at the ends of the valence and conduction bands. For the minority spin above EF, the peaks of the titanium states split, as a result of which two implicit maxima appeared at 1 eV, the peak at 2 eV increased significantly, and one more peak of titanium states appeared, which was higher in energy. The intensity of the manganese states increased in comparison with the compound GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si. Also, two separate maxima merged into one peak at 1.5 eV with the majority spin orientation.
When 60% of manganese ions were replaced by titanium ions (GdMn0.4Ti0.6Si, Figure 7d), a redistribution of the electron density occurred in the conduction band. The titanium states, separated into several distinct peaks, in the GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si compound formed a density with one intense peak in the range from 1.5 to 2.1 eV and one broad band in the range from 0 to 1.5 eV. The states of titanium above EF began to prevail over the states of manganese. All manganese states decreased: intense peaks with the minority spin in the range from –4 to –1.5 eV decreased by almost two times. The intense peak of the manganese states in the range from 1 to 2 eV split into two less intense peaks. At −1.8 eV for the minority spin, an intense peak was formed, which corresponds to a similar peak with the majority spin.
When 80% of the manganese ions were replaced by titanium ions (GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si, Figure 7e), a small peak was observed at the −1.1 eV level for the minority spin. The states of manganese decreased, on average, by two times. Compared with the pure compound GdTiSi (Figure 5), the states of titanium in GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si are not symmetric, there are no intense peaks at EF, and there are peaks lying lower in energy from –0.9 to –0.2 eV. In the GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si compound, the intensity of the minority spin peak lying from −2.1 to −1.2 eV is 50% less than in the GdTiSi compound. In GdTiSi, the titanium states for opposite spins are similar (see Figure 5b). In the GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si compound (see Figure 7e), the minority spin states of titanium below EF begin to be partially replaced by the manganese states.
For all considered compounds, the values of the total densities of electronic states at EF are presented in Table 2. In GdMnSi, these values are lower, since Mn 3d states are highly polarized, as a result of which the minority states are almost completely filled, and EF passes through a pseudogap in the minority spin. On the contrary, in GdTiSi the Ti 3d states are unpolarized and give a much higher density of states at EF. An increase in the density of electronic states at EF for the majority spin of more than 50% is observed. Intermediate compositions are characterized by an increase in the density of electronic states at EF for the minority spin with an increase in the titanium concentration. The smallest value is found in GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si, which is associated with the same contribution from the Ti and Mn states to EF. The high Curie temperatures of the intermetallic compounds GdTiSi and GdMnSi and the high values of the electron density of states at EF for intermediate compositions suggest that alloys of the intermediate composition GdMn1-xTixSi will have similar properties.
Table 1 above shows the values of the total and partial magnetic moments of all ions in the Ti-doped GdMnSi compound. The magnetic moment of the gadolinium ion remains practically unchanged. The silicon magnetic moment remains close to zero (see the last column of Table 1). The total magnetic moment of 4.86 µB in GdMnSi is in excellent agreement with the data for a low-temperature saturation magnetization of 5 µB in GdMnSi [16]. With an increase in the titanium concentration, a decrease in the magnetic moment in the Mn and Ti sublattices is observed, since the magnetic Mn ions are replaced by nonmagnetic Ti ions. The total magnetic moment of GdTiSi is increased by more than 60% compared with GdMnSi. Close values of the magnetic moments of manganese ions in the range of 3.3–3.6 μB were experimentally determined in the compounds GdMnGa and GdMnGe [12].
Figure 8 clearly illustrates the substitution of Ti ions for Mn ions, which leads to an increase in the magnetic moment in the 3d Ti-Mn subsystem. This effect arises due to the opposite direction of the magnetic moments of Gd and Mn, which leads to a decrease in the total magnetic moment. The magnetic moment Gd practically does not change in all compositions. The arising moment in the 3d sublattice partially compensates for the large magnetic moment of Gd; as a result, the total magnetic moment in the system increases from 4.89 to 7.19 μB.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we report a study on GdMn1-xTixSi intermetallic compounds with a tetragonal crystal structure in a wide range of concentrations (x) from 0 to 1. For this, the theoretical DFT + U method was used, within which strong electronic correlations were taken into account for the 4f electronic states of gadolinium ions. The performed theoretical calculations for this system showed that with a change in the content of transition metals in the system, a significant change in the magnetic properties occurs; in particular, the total magnetic moment changes from 4.86 to 7.19 μB. At the same time, the value of the magnetic moment of Gd in GdMn1-xTixSi practically does not change. At the same time, in almost all GdMn1-xTixSi compositions, an increase in the total density of electronic states at the Fermi energy was found in comparison with the extreme compounds, which may indicate a significant change in the transport properties of intermetallic compounds. Together with the expected high Curie temperatures, the revealed changes in the magnetic characteristics and electronic structure make the GdMn1-xTixSi intermetallic system promising for use in practical applications, e.g., for ferromagnetic layers in multilayer structures for spin and microelectronics [29].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.D.M. and A.V.L.; methodology, A.V.L.; software, R.D.M. and A.V.L.; validation, A.V.L.; investigation, R.D.M. and A.V.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D.M.; writing—review and editing, A.V.L.; supervision, A.V.L.; project administration, A.V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 18-72-10098) for the electronic structure calculations in Section 3.2. The results of Section 3.1 (antiferromagnetic ordering calculations) were obtained within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme “Electron” no. АААА-А18-118020190098-5).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Ipus, J.J.; Law, J.Y.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A. Magnetocaloric effect: From materials research to refrigeration devices. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 112–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gupta, S.; Suresh, K.G. Review on magnetic and related properties of RTX compounds. J. Alloys Comp. 2015, 618, 562–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, H.; Shen, B.-G. Magnetocaloric effects in RTX intermetallic compounds (R = Gd–Tm, T = Fe–Cu and Pd, X = Al and Si). Chin. Phys. B 2015, 24, 127504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gupta, S.; Suresh, K.G.; Nigam, A.K.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Magnetism in RRhGe (R = Tb, Dy, Er, Tm): An experimental and theoretical study. J. Alloys Comp. 2015, 640, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Klosek, V.; Verniére, A.; Ouladdiaf, B.; Malaman, B. Crystal and magnetic structures of the R(=Y, Dy–Tm)MnGe compounds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2003, 256, 69–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kuchin, A.G.; Platonov, S.P.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Volegov, A.S.; Gaviko, V.S.; Mukhachev, R.D.; Yakovleva, M.Y. Remarkable increase of Curie temperature in doped GdFeSi compound. Intermetallics 2021, 133, 107183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, S.; Suresh, K.G.; Nigam, A.K.; Knyazev, Y.V.; Kuz’min, Y.I.; Lukoyanov, A.V. The magnetic, electronic and optical properties of HoRhGe. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 365002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gupta, S.; Suresh, K.G.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Effect of complex magnetic structure on the magnetocaloric and magneto-transport properties in GdCuSi. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 5723–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Shen, B.G.; Dong, Q.Y.; Hu, F.X.; Sun, J.R. Giant reversible magnetocaloric effect in metamagnetic HoCuSi compound. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 152501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, H.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Long, Y.; Wang, H.-S.; Zhong, K.-X.; Hu, F.-X.; Sun, J.-R.; Shen, B.-G. Large reversible magnetocaloric effect in antiferromagnetic HoNiSi compound. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 213902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Venturini, G.; Malaman, B.; Ressouche, E. Neutron diffraction study of the TbMnGe compound. J. Alloys Comp. 1996, 243, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ivanova, T.I.; Nikitin, S.A.; Bogdanov, A.E.; Morozkin, A.V.; Suski, W.; Warchulska, J.K. Effect of Ga substitution for Ge on magnetic and crystal properties of the GdMnGe1-xGax intermetallics. Intermetallics 2005, 13, 857–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nikitin, S.A.; Ivanova, T.I.; Ovchenkova, Y.A.; Maslennikova, M.V.; Burkhanov, G.S.; Chistyakov, O.D. The influence of interatomic distances on magnetic ordering in RMnSi compounds (R = La, Y, Sm, and Gd). Phys. Solid State 2002, 44, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gschneidner, K.A.; Pecharsky, V.K. The influence of magnetic field on the thermal properties of solids. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2000, 287, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oboz, M.; Talik, E. Properties of the GdTX (T = Mn, Fe, Ni, Pd, X = Al, In) and GdFe6Al6 intermetallics. J. Alloys Comp. 2011, 509, 5441–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nikitin, S.A.; Ivanova, T.I.; Tskhadadze, I.A.; Skokov, K.P.; Telegina, I.V. Magnetic anisotropy and magnetic properties of RTSi (R = Gd, Y; T = Mn, Fe) compounds. J. Alloys Comp. 1998, 280, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ovtchenkova, I.A.; Nikitin, S.A.; Ivanova, T.I.; Tskhadadze, G.A.; Skourski, Y.V.; Suski, W.; Nizhankovskii, V.I. Magnetic ordering and magnetic transitions in GdMnSi compound. J. Alloys Comp. 2008, 451, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Skorek, G.; Deniszczyk, J.; Szade, J.; Tyszka, B. Electronic structure and magnetism of ferromagnetic GdTiSi and GdTiGe. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2001, 13, 6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morozkin, A.V. Quarternary Gd3Ti2MnSi3 compound in the GdMn1−xTixSi (x = 0…1) section of Gd-Mn-Ti-Si system at 1073 K. J. Alloys Compd. 1999, 292, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nikitin, S.A.; Tskhadadze, I.A.; Morozkin, A.V.; Seropegin, Y.D. The influence of Ti on the itinerant magnetism of RTX compounds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 196–197, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-demensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphologt data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhan, Y.; Ma, J.; Sun, Z.; Hua, Z.; Du, Y. The isothermal section of the Gd–Ti–Si ternary system at 773 K. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 475, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anisimov, V.I.; Aryasetiawan, F.; Lichtenstein, A.I. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: The LDA+U method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1997, 9, 767–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Giannozzi, P.; Andreussi, O.; Brumme, T.; Bunau, O.; Buongiorno Nardelli, M.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Cococcioni, M.; et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 465901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, J.P.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Baglasov, E.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Electronic structure of intermetallic antiferromagnet GdNiGe. Symmetry 2019, 11, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liechtenstein, A.I.; Anisimov, V.I.; Zaanen, J. Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 52, R5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Topsakal, M.; Wentzcovitch, R.M. Accurate projected augmented wave (PAW) datasets for rare-earth elements (RE = La–Lu). Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 95, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vedmedenko, E.Y.; Kawakami, R.K.; Sheka, D.D.; Gambardella, P.; Kirilyuk, A.; Hirohata, A.; Binek, C.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Sanvito, S.; Kirby, B.J.; et al. The 2020 magnetism roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 453001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 11 01296 g001 550
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the GdMnSi intermetallic compound, plotted with VESTA [21].
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the GdMnSi intermetallic compound, plotted with VESTA [21].
Metals 11 01296 g001
Metals 11 01296 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in the parameters of the crystal structure a (a) and c (b) in GdMn1-xTixSi depending on x (the Ti concentration), according to the data of [19] for the CeFeSi-type phase.
Figure 2. Changes in the parameters of the crystal structure a (a) and c (b) in GdMn1-xTixSi depending on x (the Ti concentration), according to the data of [19] for the CeFeSi-type phase.
Metals 11 01296 g002
Metals 11 01296 g003 550
Figure 3. The density of states of GdMnSi per formula unit. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) partial density of states for Mn-3d; (c) partial density of states for Si-3p. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Figure 3. The density of states of GdMnSi per formula unit. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) partial density of states for Mn-3d; (c) partial density of states for Si-3p. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Metals 11 01296 g003
Metals 11 01296 g004 550
Figure 4. Band structure of GdMnSi. (a) Majority spin projection; (b) minority spin projection. The Fermi level is a solid horizontal line.
Figure 4. Band structure of GdMnSi. (a) Majority spin projection; (b) minority spin projection. The Fermi level is a solid horizontal line.
Metals 11 01296 g004
Metals 11 01296 g005 550
Figure 5. The density of states of GdTiSi per formula unit. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) partial density of states for Ti-3d; (c) partial density of states for Si-3p. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Figure 5. The density of states of GdTiSi per formula unit. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) partial density of states for Ti-3d; (c) partial density of states for Si-3p. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Metals 11 01296 g005
Metals 11 01296 g006 550
Figure 6. Band structure of GdTiSi. (a) Majority spin projection; (b) minority spin projection. The Fermi level is a solid horizontal line.
Figure 6. Band structure of GdTiSi. (a) Majority spin projection; (b) minority spin projection. The Fermi level is a solid horizontal line.
Metals 11 01296 g006
Metals 11 01296 g007 550
Figure 7. The partial densities of the 3d states of Mn and Ti per formula unit in the following compounds: (a) GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si; (b) GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si; (c) GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si; (d) GdMn0.4Ti0.6Si; (e) GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Figure 7. The partial densities of the 3d states of Mn and Ti per formula unit in the following compounds: (a) GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si; (b) GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si; (c) GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si; (d) GdMn0.4Ti0.6Si; (e) GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si. The Fermi level is a dashed vertical line.
Metals 11 01296 g007
Metals 11 01296 g008 550
Figure 8. Total and partial magnetic moments of ions in GdMn1-xTixSi depending on x (concentration of Ti), x = 0–1.
Figure 8. Total and partial magnetic moments of ions in GdMn1-xTixSi depending on x (concentration of Ti), x = 0–1.
Metals 11 01296 g008
Table
Table 1. The values of the total and partial spin densities of electronic states at the Fermi energy in GdMn1-xTixSi for x = 0–1.
Table 1. The values of the total and partial spin densities of electronic states at the Fermi energy in GdMn1-xTixSi for x = 0–1.
CompoundTotal Magnetic Moment, μBGd Magnetic Moment, μBMn Magnetic Moment, μBTi Magnetic Moment, μBSi Magnetic Moment, μB
GdMnSi4.867.21−2.41-0.06
GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si4.667.16−3.280.590.01
GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si5.517.19−3.240.630.01
GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si6.097.21−3.030.80−0.01
GdMn0.4Ti0.6Si6.347.21−3.130.67−0.02
GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si7.097.21−3.170.68−0.03
GdTiSi7.197.21-0.01−0.03
Table
Table 2. The values of the total and partial spin densities of electronic states at the Fermi energy in GdMn1-xTixSi for x = 0–1.
Table 2. The values of the total and partial spin densities of electronic states at the Fermi energy in GdMn1-xTixSi for x = 0–1.
CompoundDOS Value for Majority (Up) Spin, States/(eV f.u.)DOS Value for Minority (Down) Spin, States/(eV f.u.)Total DOS Value, States/(eV f.u.)
GdMnSi1.730.472.20
GdMn0.8Ti0.2Si1.450.912.36
GdMn0.6Ti0.4Si1.430.592.03
GdMn0.5Ti0.5Si1.360.351.71
GdMn0.4Ti0.6Si1.221.012.22
GdMn0.2Ti0.8Si1.111.382.48
GdTiSi1.862.204.06
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukhachev, R.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Composition-Induced Magnetic Transition in GdMn1-xTixSi Intermetallic Compounds for x = 0–1. Metals 2021, 11, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081296

AMA Style

Mukhachev RD, Lukoyanov AV. Composition-Induced Magnetic Transition in GdMn1-xTixSi Intermetallic Compounds for x = 0–1. Metals. 2021; 11(8):1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukhachev, Roman D., and Alexey V. Lukoyanov. 2021. "Composition-Induced Magnetic Transition in GdMn1-xTixSi Intermetallic Compounds for x = 0–1" Metals 11, no. 8: 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081296

APA Style

Mukhachev, R. D., & Lukoyanov, A. V. (2021). Composition-Induced Magnetic Transition in GdMn1-xTixSi Intermetallic Compounds for x = 0–1. Metals, 11(8), 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop