Next Article in Journal
Split-Plot I-Optimal Design Optimisation of Combined Oil-Based and Friction Stir Rotation-Assisted Heating in SPIF of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy Sheet under Variable Oil Pressure
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Magnetostrictive Tb-Dy-Fe Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ Generated Shear Bands in Metallic Glass Investigated by Atomic Force and Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface Investigation of Ni81Fe19 Thin Film: Using ARXPS for Thickness Estimation of Oxidation Layers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Step Sintering Process for the Production of Magnetocaloric La(Fe,Si)13-Based Composites

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths, Baotou 014030, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
4
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
5
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
6
Singapore-HUJ Alliance for Research and Enterprise (SHARE), Nanomaterials for Energy and Energy-Water Nexus (NEW), Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), Singapore 138602, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(1), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12010112
Submission received: 9 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metal-Containing Magnetic Materials)

Abstract

:
A one-step sintering process was developed to produce magnetocaloric La(Fe,Si)13/Ce-Co composites. The effects of Ce2Co7 content and sintering time on the relevant phase transformations were determined. Following sintering at 1373 K/30 MPa for 1–6 h, the NaZn13-type (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)13 phase formed, the mass fraction of α-Fe phase reduced and the CeFe7-type (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)7 phase appeared. The mass fraction of the (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)7 phase increased, and the α-Fe phase content decreased with increasing Ce2Co7 content. However, the mass fraction of the (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)7 phase reduced with increasing sintering time. The EDS results showed a difference in concentration between Co and Ce at the interphase boundary between the 1:13 phase and the 1:7 phase, indicating that the diffusion mode of Ce is reaction diffusion, while that of Co is the usual vacancy mechanism. Interestingly, almost 100 % single phase (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)13 was obtained by appropriate Ce2Co7 addition. After 6 h sintering at 1373 K, the Ce and Co content in the (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)13 phase increased for larger Ce2Co7 content. Therefore, the Curie temperature increased from 212 K (binder-free sample) to 331 K (15 wt.% Ce2Co7 sample). The maximum magnetic entropy change (−ΔSM)max decreased from 8.8 (binder-free sample) to 6.0 J/kg·K (15 wt.% Ce2Co7 sample) under 5 T field. High values of compressive strength (σbc)max of up to 450 MPa and high thermal conductivity (λ) of up to 7.5 W/m·K were obtained. A feasible route to produce high quality La(Fe,Si)13 based magnetocaloric composites with large MCE, good mechanical properties, attractive thermal conductivity and tunable TC by a one-step sintering process has been demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Climate change is of high global significance, resulting in high interest in more efficient cooling systems. Therefore, there is considerable research interest in the emerging attractive topic of magnetic refrigeration (MR) [1,2]. Advances in magnetocaloric materials (MCMs) are urgently needed to realize the promise of MR. MCMs which exhibit a giant magnetocaloric effect (MCE) include Gd5(SixGe1−x)4 [3,4], MnFe(P,As) [5], Mn(Fe,Co)Ge [6], LaFe13−xSix [7,8], and Heusler alloys [9], which undergo a first-order magnetic transition (FOMT) near their Curie temperatures (TCs). Recently, other materials, such as RE2ZnMnO6 (RE = Gd, Dy, and Ho) perovskites [10], RE2FeAlO6 (RE = Gd, Dy, Ho) oxides [11], RE60Co20Ni20 (RE = Ho and Er) amorphous ribbons [12], LaFe12B6-based materials [13], and rare earth-based intermetallic compounds [14], were found to exhibit outstanding magnetocaloric performance at cryogenic temperatures. The development of these materials can promote the development of magnetic refrigeration technology.
NaZn13-type La(Fe,Si)13 compounds have attracted considerable attention as magnetocaloric materials due to their large magnetocaloric effect (MCE) values, relatively low cost, tunable Curie temperature (TC), and environmental friendliness [1,7,15]. However, these compounds have some disadvantages [16,17,18]: First, it is difficult to form single-phase La(Fe,Si)13 material. An ingot of La(Fe,Si)13 has to be annealed above 1273 K for several days or even a month to obtain a single phase [18]. Second, the TC of LaFe13−xSix (1.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.6) compounds is less than 210 K, which is too low for near room temperature magnetic cooling. Third, these compounds show a first-order magnetic transition (FOMT), which has a desirable large magnetic entropy change, but is accompanied by thermal and magnetic hysteresis and relatively large undesirable changes in crystal symmetry and/or volume [17]. The magneto-volume effect can lead to pulverization of bulk LaFe13−xSix magnetocaloric materials when the magnetic field is varied during the MR process [17]. The brittleness and magnetic volume change reduce formability, limiting the progress of this material for commercial applications.
Considerable research has been performed to overcome these shortcomings. Short time annealing produced a single phase material in melt-spun samples [19]. Combining kilogram-scale strip-casting with short time annealing has been deployed for mass production of LaFe13−xSix-based magnetic cooling materials [20]. Elemental substitution of Fe (by Co [18,21,22], Si [23], etc.) or La (by Ce [24]) can improve magnetocaloric performance. TC can be raised from ~200 K to room temperature or even higher by addition of interstitial atoms like H [23,25,26,27]. Hydrogenation of LaFe13−xSix is the most effective method to shift TC to room temperature while maintaining a large magnetocaloric effect [28]. Quaternary La(Fe,Co,Si)13 compounds can increase TC and change the magnetic transition from first-order to second-order, accompanied by lower MCE.
LaFe13−xSix bulk composites can be prepared through powder metallurgy technology using LaFe13−xSix particles and binder powder as raw materials. Although LaFe13−xSix is hard and brittle, particle fracture can be avoided by adding low hardness binders during the powder metallurgy process. Additionally, the magneto-volume effect can be reduced by pulverization of the material [29]. Various binder materials, such as polymers [30], high thermal conductivity metals [31], and low melting alloys [32,33], have been studied to obtain high performance using relatively low sintering temperatures. High-temperature sintering will lead to metallurgical reactions between the binder and the particles, it will also significantly decrease the mass fraction of the 1:13 phase and lower the MCE of the composites [31]. The magnetocaloric properties of the composites arise from the La-Fe-Si based alloy. Addition of binder material reduces the mass fraction of magnetocaloric material and decreases the MCE of the composites.
La-Co alloys [34,35] have been used as binder due to the low enthalpy of formation of the LaCo13 phase (–5.79 kJ/mol) [36], lower La-Fe binary phase content and the low melting point of a La-based eutectic alloy [37]. Based on grain boundary diffusion (GBD) theory [38], Co diffusion occurs through annealing after hot pressing [34,39]. During annealing, Co can diffuse into the 1:13 matrix, influencing the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties and promoting the formation of the 1:13 phase. The binder content and annealing parameters play an important role in the phase formation process. For example, addition of more than 5 wt.% of La-Al alloy was detrimental to 1:13 phase formation in La-Fe-Si/La-Al composites [40]. Our previous work [41] showed that excess addition of Ce-Co alloy binder would result in the formation of a new phase, which disappeared with increasing heat treatment time. However, the sintering temperature is below the melting point of Ce40Co60 (1323 K), resulting in a porous structure and insufficient mechanical properties. The large pressure of hot pressing (600 MPa) and long diffusion annealing times (up to 24 h) are unfavorable for industrial production. To overcome these limitations, we combined the advantages of hot pressing and diffusion annealing in this work. We developed a novel process to prepare La-Fe-Si-based composites by sintering to shorten the processing time and improve the compressive properties. The effect of Ce2Co7 binder on the formation of the 1:13 phase, thermal conductivity, mechanical, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of LaFe11.6Si1.4/Ce2Co7 composites was studied. The diffusion mechanism of Ce and Co was also investigated. The TC increased from ~200 K to near room temperature. High values of the compressive strength (σbc)max of up to 450 MPa and of the thermal conductivity (λ) of up to 7.5 W/m·K were successfully obtained.

2. Experimental Section

Annealed LaFe11.6Si1.4 flakes were prepared following the procedure described in our previous work [41]. The Ce2Co7 compounds were prepared by an arc melting process with pure Ce (≥99.5 wt.%) and Co (≥99.9 wt.%). The annealed LaFe11.6Si1.4 flakes were mechanically milled to powders with a particle size in the range of 45 to 100 μm. Ce2Co7 fine powders were prepared with a particle size smaller than 30 μm. The LaFe11.6Si1.4 and Ce2Co7 powders were homogenously mixed with 0, 5, 10, and 15 wt.% content of Ce2Co7 powder, followed by sintering under uniaxial stress of 30 MPa at 1373 K to produce cylindrical samples with 15 mm in diameter and 5 mm in height.
XRD characterization was carried out using X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku D/max-2200/PC, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) at a scan rate of 2°/min. The phase compositions and microstructures were analyzed by a thermal field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Nova Nano SEM 430, Davis, CA, USA) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) attachment. Measurements of thermal conductivity and magnetic properties were carried out using a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS-9, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA)). The compressive strengths of the samples were measured by a mechanical testing system (Shimadzu AG-100NX, Kyoto, Japan). The porosity (P) of the composites were determined by the following equation: P = 1 − ρ/ρ0, where ρ is the effective density and ρ0 is the theoretical density. The effective density (ρ) of each sample was tested by the Archimedes method. The theoretical density (ρ0) of each sample was calculated by the following equation: ρ 0 = 100 i m i ρ i , where mi was the mass of the corresponding phase in the 100 g sample and the ρi was the density of the specific phase.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase Analysis

Figure 1a shows the Rietveld refined X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h. LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 5, 10, and 15) sintered composites exhibited a majority 1:13 phase. The α-Fe phase content decreased, corresponding to the appearance of a CeFe7-type phase (1:7 phase) and a La2O3 phase. For composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h, higher Ce2Co7 binder content (less than 15 wt.%) can promote formation of the 1:13 phase and decrease the α-Fe phase content (Figure 1a and Table 1).
For example, LaFe11.6Si1.4/5wt.%Ce2Co7 composites contained 93.21 wt.% 1:13 phase, 5.90 wt.% α-Fe phase and a small amount of 1:7 phase (0.89 wt.%). However, when the addition of Ce2Co7 binder rose to 10 wt.% or more, the mass fraction of 1:7 phase increased. Moreover, the mass fraction of 1:7 phase in the LaFe11.6Si1.4/10 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites decreased with an increase in sintering time. As reported earlier [41], the 1:7 phase occurred at grain boundaries after annealing for a short time. Clearly, the 1:7 phase content after short time annealing increased for larger binder content.
To investigate the kinetics of diffusion mode of Ce and Co, binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h were prepared. The Rietveld refined. XRD patterns are shown in Figure 1b,c, respectively. The weight percentages of the phases obtained from the Rietveld refined XRD data are listed in Table 1. The phase composition of annealed LaFe11.6Si1.4 flakes was 84.69(5) wt.% 1:13 phase, and 15.31(2) wt.% α-Fe phase. There were no peaks of the La2O3, LaFeSi (1:1:1), and (La,Ce)2(Fe,Co,Si)17 (2:17) phases (Figure 1) in the XRD patterns due to the limitation of the resolution of normal XRD, indicating the low content of these phases in the sintered composites.
Compared with the annealed flakes, the 1:13 phase content in the binder-free sample sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h (Figure 1b) slightly increased, accompanied by a decrease in α-Fe phase content. This indicated that additional formation of the 1:13 phase occurred during sintering. The XRD patterns of LaFe11.6Si1.4/10 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h are displayed in Figure 1c. When the sintering time was extended from 1 h to 6 h, the 1:7 phase content reduced from 8.00 wt.% to 2.77 wt.% (Table 1), indicating that increased high-temperature sintering time can significantly reduce the 1:7 phase content.

3.2. Microstructure Evolution

The microstructure of the composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h is shown in Figure 2 for various values of Ce2Co7 binder content. For the binder-free sample, the black area is the α-Fe phase, the dark gray area is the 1:13 phase (matrix phase), and white grains consist of the La2O3 phase (not detected in the XRD results owing to its low mass fraction). After sintering at 1373 K for 6 h, a high mass fraction of the 1:13 phase and a small α-Fe phase content (Table 1) were obtained. It was reported that the temperature range for thermal decomposition (TD) reaction for La(Fe,Si,Co)13 based compounds is 873–1173 K [42]. A lamellar structure, usually observed upon decomposition of the 1:13 phase was not seen, indicating no decomposition of the 1:13 phase occurred during sintering of the binder-free LaFe11.6Si1.4 composites [43]. The sintering temperature was near the formation temperature of the 1:13 phase, thus, a large amount of precipitation was observed (Figure 2b). The α-Fe phase (black areas), the LaFeSi (1:1:1) phase (white grains inside the 1:13 particles) and the La2O3 phase (white grains besides the α-Fe phase), shown in Figure 2b, were observed. As previously reported [42,43], the white phase at the particle interfaces (Figure 2a) is believed to be a La- and Si-rich phase.
From the Ce-Co binary phase diagram [44], the melting point of Ce2Co7 alloy is 1418 K, which is 45 K higher than the sintering temperature (1373 K). Therefore, the soft Ce2Co7 alloy binder and LaFe11.6Si1.4 particles could be bonded by solid phase sintering to obtain a highly dense microstructure under a pressure of 30 MPa [45,46].
For the LaFe11.6Si1.4/5 wt.%Ce2Co7 sintered composites (Figure 2c,d), the fraction of α-Fe phase (black area), La- and Si-rich boundary phase and La2O3 phase (white area) decreased markedly. A small amount of CeFe7-type phase (light grey) appeared in the binder bonded composites. The formation enthalpy of CeCo7 (−10.704 kJ/mol calculated by the modified Miedema (ZSL’s Model) [36] is more negative than that of LaCo13 (−5.79 kJ/mol) [34], favoring the formation of the 1:7 phase. The EDS map results of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/5 wt.%Ce2Co7 sintered composites are shown in the inset of Figure 2c, uniform diffusion of Co occurred in the 1:13 phase. However, there are some regions of La and Ce enrichment, accompanied by up to ~68 at.% for oxygen (Figure 2d). Owing to the limitation of EDS in quantifying the concentration of light elements, this value for oxygen must be regarded as a rough estimate. These La- and Ce-rich regions can correspond to the (La,Ce)2O3 phase. Ce is mainly found in the 1:7 phase, a small amount of Ce is found in the 1:13 phase. Sintering at 1373 K for 6 h cannot produce a uniform distribution of Ce or eliminate the 1:7 phase.
Interestingly, the LaFeSi (1:1:1), La-, and Si-rich phases are virtually absent in LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 5, 10, 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h. The chemical compositions of the 1:7 and 1:13 phases and lattice constant (a) of 1:13 phase for the sintered composites are listed in Table 2. The 1:13 phase, with a composition of La0.87Ce0.13Fe9.70Co0.56Si1.35, La0.82Ce0.18Fe9.24Co0.91Si1.34, and La0.75Ce0.25Fe9.10Co1.30Si1.28 was obtained in sintered composites with 5 wt.%, 10 wt.%, and 15 wt.% Ce2Co7, respectively.
On the other hand, in sintered composites with 10 wt.% and 15 wt.% Ce2Co7, the fraction of 1:7 phase (light gray) increased remarkably, accompanied by a decrease in the α-Fe phase content. With 10 wt.% Ce2Co7, the content of Ce and Co in the 1:13 phase reached 1.34 at.% and 7.51 at.%, respectively. With 15 wt.% Ce2Co7, the values of Ce and Co content in the 1:13 phase matrix were 1.89 at.% and 10.26 at.%, respectively. This change in the composition of the 1:13 phase illustrates that diffusion of Ce and Co increased for larger Ce2Co7 binder content. The lattice parameter a of the 1:13 phase is similar in the sintered samples with 0–10 wt.% Ce2Co7. However, the a of the 1:13 phase increased for 15 wt.% Ce2Co7 samples. For the 1:7 phase, the Co content increased while the Ce fraction in the 1:7 phase was almost unchanged with increasing Ce2Co7 content. The 1:7 phase is an iron-poor type 2:17 phase, these two phases have the same crystal structure [47]. For the 2:17 phase in the composite, the atom ratio of (Fe + Co + Si) to (La + Ce) is 8.5. The EDS results of the 1:7 phase include the contribution from the 2:17 phase, thus the ratio is not always equal to 7 (Table 2).

3.3. Kinetics of Diffusion of Ce and Co

To understand the diffusion of Ce and Co, the binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 composites were studied. Backscattered SEM micrographs of the composites with and without 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3, and 6 h are shown in Figure 3. For the binder-free samples (Figure 3a–c), with increasing sintering time from 1 to 6 h, the grain boundaries (white phase) are more obvious. It is likely that a La- and Si-rich phase formed at the particle boundaries of the 1:13 phase during sintering [43], similar to the microstructure of Nd2Fe14B magnets produced by liquid phase sintering (LPS). Sintering occurred at approximately the temperature of 1:13 phase formation, resulting in 1:13 phase formation [20]. The La- and Si-rich phases were distributed at particles boundaries while the α-Fe phase was inside the 1:13 particles [42]. The fraction of α-Fe phase in the 1:13 particles decreased, while the size of the α-Fe phase grains increased. The EDS results show that the content of Fe in the 1:13 phase matrix decreased, indicating that the 1:13 phase formed in the binder-free samples by the following reaction [48]:
α-Fe + LaFeSi → La(Fe,Si)13
For the 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 samples (Figure 3d–f), the content of the 1:7 and α-Fe phases reduced with increasing sintering time, which is consistent with the results in Figure 1 and Table 1. The α-Fe phase in the 1:13 phase reduced and eventually disappeared with increasing sintering time. The increase of Ce, Co content in the 1:13 phase (Table 2) indicated that Ce, Co diffusion increased for larger sintering time. As sintering time increased, the α-Fe phase content decreased while the content of Fe in the 1:7 phase increased. In sintered composites with 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder, the ratio of (La,Ce) to (Fe,Co,Si) in the 1:13 phase was higher than that of binder-free samples.
In the La(Fe,Si)13 unit cell, La atoms occupy 8a sites, Fe atoms occupy 8b (FeI) and 96i (FeII) positions in the ratio of 1:12. Si atoms occupy Fe positions [49,50]. The similar electronic structure of Co and Fe atoms or Ce and La atoms implies that Co atoms will occupy the position of FeII atoms, and Ce atoms will substitute the position of La atoms. In all Ce2Co7 bonded sintered composites, the relative atomic content of La and Ce atoms for the 1:7 phase remains unchanged at ~27:73, but the relative content of Co, Fe, and Si is changed (Table 2). The SEM micrographs of composites with 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 sintered at 1373 K for 6 h is shown in the inset of Figure 3f. The line scan of the interphase boundary between the 1:13 phase and the 1:7 phase showed a sudden change in Ce content and little change in Co concentration. Thus, the diffusion of Ce and Co in the 1:13 phase occurs by different mechanisms. Co diffuses by the usual vacancy diffusion mechanism in the 1:13 phase. On the other hand, Ce diffusion is by reaction diffusion. The Ce content in the 1:13 phase is mainly due to the reaction between the Ce-rich (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)7 phase and the La(Fe,Co,Si)13 phase, resulting in the formation of (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)13 phase. Therefore, Ce is mainly enriched in 1:7 phase but Co is uniformly distributed.

3.4. Thermal Conductivity, Mechanical and Magnetic Properties

The thermal conductivity of the studied samples in this work was measured at room temperature. The porosity, thermal conductivity, and mechanical properties (Figure 4) of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h are listed in Table 3. For the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites, structures with density up to 95% were successfully obtained. This high density resulted in a high value of compressive strength (σbc)max of up to 450 MPa and high thermal conductivity of up to 7.5 W/m·K. These composites exhibited markedly higher (σbc)max value than those of low melting point alloy bonded composites fabricated by low temperature hot pressing (200 MPa) [32].
The thermal conductivity of these composites are comparable or larger than the values for hot-pressed La0.7Ce0.3Fe11.45Mn0.15Si1.4/13.5%Fe (7.5 W/m·K) [51] and LaFe11.6Si1.4Hy/Sn (7.9 W/m·K) [32], but smaller than those of hot-pressed La0.8Ce0.2(Fe0.95Co0.05)11.8Si1.2/Sn42Bi58 (10.72–19.64 W/m·K) [33], LaFe11Co0.8Si1.2/Al (9.9~17.0 W/m·K) [52], and La0.7Ce0.3Fe11.48Mn0.12Si1.4H1.8/20 wt.%In (11.5 W/m·K) [53]. As La(Fe,Si)13 and residual Ce-Co phase possess different thermal conductivities, thermal conductivity of sintered composites may be improved by even longer sintering time. The strain values are larger than 4.7%, which is about 4.5 times the values of sintered LaFe11.7Co1.3Si composites [42]. Thus, the ductility of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h is markedly improved. These improved properties are mainly due to the stress distribution in the α-Fe and 1:7 phases and the improved quality of the sintered compacts during high temperature sintering. High ultimate compressive stress and better elongation can lead to better machinability.
The normalized MnormT (M/Mmax–T) curves upon cooling process under 0.05 T, normalized magnetization temperature derivative curves (dMnorm/dT–T) measured during cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T and the (−ΔSM)–T curves measured under applied field changes of 0–2 and 0–5 T for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. The isothermal magnetization curves for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 were measured with an increasing magnetic field in a wide temperature range. The sweep rate of the field was slow enough to ensure that the data were recorded in an isothermal process. The value of the isothermal magnetic entropy change −ΔSM(T, H) is given by the Maxwell relationship:
Δ S M T , H = 0 H M / T d H
Another parameter called RCP (Relative Cooling Power) can be employed to evaluate the refrigeration efficiency. RCP was defined as the product of (−ΔSM)max times the full temperature width at half maximum of the peak (RCR = (−ΔSM)max × δTFWHM) [54]. The values of TC, (−ΔSM)max and RCP of the studied composites are presented in Table 2.
The binder-free sintered composites show higher TC (212 K) than that of the annealed LaFe11.6Si1.4 flakes (196 K). The sintering temperature is close to the optimum formation temperature of the 1:13 phase [55], which may bring about 1:13 phase formation and decrease the α-Fe phase content (Table 1), resulting in the formation of a nonstoichiometric Fe deficient 1:13 phase (Table 2). This Fe-deficient 1:13 phase has elevated TC (Table 2), which weakens the first order magnetic transition (FOMT) and lowers the (−ΔSM)max [7,18,34]. The binder-free composites exhibited the maximum magnetic entropy change (−ΔSM)max of 5.2 and 8.8 J/kg·K under applied field changes of 0–2 and 0–5 T, respectively (Table 2).
The TC of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x= 5, 10, and 15) composites increased linearly with larger Ce2Co7 content due to the higher Co content diffused into the 1:13 phase. Sintering caused Ce and Co to diffuse from the Ce2Co7 binder to the 1:13 particles through the particle boundaries. It changed the chemical composition of the 1:13 phase, the 1:13 phase content, and the magnetocaloric performance. As calculated from the results in Table 2, the content of Ce and Co in the 1:13 phase increased from 1.03 to 1.97 at.% and 4.44 to 10.25 at.%, respectively. The TC of sintered composites increased from 247 K to 331 K due to the substitution of Fe by Co in the 1:13 phase. Under the applied field changes of 2 T and 5 T, the (−ΔSM)max values of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 composites with x = 0, 5, 10 and 15 were 5.2, 4.0, 3.9, 3.2 J/kg·K and 8.8, 8.6, 7.6, 6.0 J/kg·K, respectively. RCP values of these composites were 146.7, 158.4, 209.2, and 178.3 J/kg and 339.0, 428.7, 457.7, and 399.2 J/kg, respectively (Table 2).
Interestingly, the (−ΔSM)max (~5.2 J/kg·K@2 T at 212 K) of the binder-free composite was larger than that of the LaFe11.6Si1.4 bulk composite with particle size smaller than 100 μm (~4.0 J/kg·K@2 T at 220 K) [56], and far larger than that of La(Fe,Co)11.4Al1.6 alloy (2.2 J/kg·K@2 T at 205 K) [50] in a similar temperature range. The (−ΔSM)max value (~4 J/kg·K@2 T at 247 K) of the composite with 5 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder was larger than those of LaFe11.6Si1.4/5 wt.%Pr40Co60 (~2.9 J/kg·K@2 T at 247 K) [56] and Gd50Co48Zn2 as-spun ribbons [57] (2.6 J/kg·K@2 T at 260 K) in a similar temperature range. Compared with Gd [58], the values of (−ΔSM)max (~3.9 J/kg·K@2 T at 291 K) and RCP (209.2 J/kg@2 T) of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/10 wt.%Ce2Co7 composite is smaller. For an applied field change of 2 T, the values of (−ΔSM)max and RCP for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/15 wt.%Ce2Co7 composite (Table 2) are much larger than those of Fe77Ta3B10Zr9Cu1 amorphous ribbons ((−ΔSM)max~1.47 J/kg·K@2 T at 336 K; RCP~123.9 J/kg) in the similar temperature [59].
The Arrott plots near TC of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h are shown in Figure 7. According to the Banerjee criterion [60], the slopes of the Arrott plots for the composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h are all positive. The magnetic phase transition of these sintered composites near its TC is a second-order magnetic phase transition, which is due to Co diffusion in Ce2Co7 bonded composites and enrichment of Si in the 1:13 matrix for the binder-free composite. A similar behavior was observed for the binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder composites sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h, which also exhibited a second-order magnetic phase transition near their TC.
The normalized M/MmaxT curves upon cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T of the binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder composites sintered at 1373 K are shown in Figure 8. The (−ΔSM)–T curves (0 − 2 T) are shown in the inset of Figure 8, respectively. For the binder-free composites, there is a composition change of the magnetocaloric phase (1:13 phase) after sintering. Based on earlier work [61], the decrease of Fe/Si ratio in 1:13 phase results in higher TC and lower −ΔSM. With increasing annealing time from 1 to 6 h, the Fe/Si ratio in the binder-free composites decreased from ~6.89 (10.95/1.59) to ~6.58 (10.53/1.60), the TC increased from ~206 to 212 K while (−ΔSM)max decreased from 7.5 to 5.2 J/kg·K (ΔH = 2 T) (Table 2). The 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder composites also exhibited higher (−ΔSM)max due to the diffusion of Ce, which increased the Ce content in the 1:13 phase. Hence, the change of TC and magnetocaloric properties is attributed to the formation of the 1:13 phase (Table 1) and grain boundary diffusion of Ce and Co atoms.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the diffusion of Ce and Co into the desired (La,Ce)(Fe,Co,Si)13 phase and the partial substitution of La by Ce and Fe by Co could be realized by a one-step sintering of La(Fe,Si)13/Ce-Co composites. The line scan of the interphase boundary between the 1:13 phase and the 1:7 phase showed a sudden change in Ce content and little change in Co concentration. Thus, the diffusion mechanism of Ce in the 1:13 phase was different from that of Co. Co diffused by the usual vacancy diffusion mechanism while the diffusion mode of Ce was by reaction diffusion. After 6 h sintering at 1373 K, a high value of compressive strength (σbc)max of up to 450 MPa and a high thermal conductivity (λ) of up to 7.5 W/m·K were successfully obtained. The magnetocaloric properties of the composites could also be tuned by varying the content of Ce-Co alloy binder and the sintering time. TC increased from 212 K to 331 K with increasing Ce2Co7 from 0 to 15 wt.% in LaFe11.6Si1.4/Ce-Co bulk composites. The magnetic entropy change decreased from 8.8 to 6.0 J/kg·K, the relative cooling power increased from ~339 to 428, 457 J/kg and then decreases to 399 J/kg under 5 T.
Thus, a feasible route to produce high quality La(Fe,Si)13 based magnetocaloric composites with large MCE, good mechanical properties and thermal conductivity and tunable TC by a one-step sintering process has been demonstrated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—original draft, X.-C.Z.; Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—original draft, X.-T.D.; Software, Resources, Validation, J.-H.H., C.-L.L., H.Z. and Y.-L.H. Visualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, H.-Y.Y.; Writing—review & editing R.V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51874143, 52066001, 51671022, 51461012), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant Nos. 2019A1515010970, 2017A030313317), the National Key Research & Development Program of China (Materials Genome Initiative) (Grant No. 2017YFB0702703), the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (Grant No. 201904010030), and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Baiyunobo Rare Earth Resource Researches and Comprehensive Utilization (Grant No. 2020Z2218). This Research is also supported by Singapore-HUJ Alliance for Research and Enterprise (SHARE), Nanomaterials for Energy and Energy-Water Nexus (NEW), Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), Singapore 138602. And the APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51874143).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Chun-Ming Li for experimental assistance. The authors wish to also thank Yu-Cai Wu for modifying the figures of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gutfleisch, O.; Willard, M.A.; Brück, E.; Chen, C.H.; Sankar, S.G.; Liu, J.P. Magnetic Materials and Devices for the 21st Century: Stronger, Lighter, and More Energy Efficient. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 821–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chaudhary, V.; Chen, X.; Ramanujan, R.V. Iron and manganese based magnetocaloric materials for near room temperature thermal management. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 100, 64–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd5(Si2Ge2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Virgil, P.; Alexander, J.S.; Robert, D.S. Reduction of hysteresis losses in the magnetic refrigerant Gd5Ge2Si2 by the addition of iron. Nature 2004, 429, 853–857. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tegus, O.; Brück, E.; Buschow, K.H.J.; De Boer, F.R. Transition-metal-based magnetic refrigerants for room-temperature applications. Nature 2002, 415, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Y.; Zeng, Q.Q.; Wei, Z.Y.; Liu, E.K.; Han, X.L.; Du, Z.W.; Li, L.W.; Xi, X.K.; Wang, W.H.; Wang, S.G.; et al. An efficient scheme to tailor the magnetostructural transitions by staged quenching and cyclical ageing in hexagonal martensitic alloys. Acta Mater. 2019, 174, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, F.X.; Shen, B.G.; Sun, J.R.; Cheng, Z.H.; Rao, G.H.; Zhang, X.X. Influence of negative lattice expansion and meta-magnetic transition on magnetic entropy change in the compound LaFe11.4Si1.6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 3675–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fujita, A.; Fujieda, S.; Fukamichi, K.; Mitamura, H.; Goto, T. Itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition and large magne-tovolume effects in La(FexSi1–x)13 compounds. Phys. Rev. 2001, B65, 014410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krenke, T.; Duman, E.; Acet, M.; Wassermann, E.F.; Moya, X.; Mañosa, L.; Planes, A. Inverse magnetocaloric effect in ferro-magnetic Ni-Mn-Sn alloys. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, L.W.; Xu, P.; Ye, S.K.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.D.; Huo, D.X.; Yan, M. Magnetic properties and excellent cryogenic magnetocaloric performances in B-site ordered RE2ZnMnO6 (RE=Gd, Dy and Ho) perovskites. Acta Mater. 2020, 194, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, B.B.; Zhang, Y.K.; Guo, D.; Wang, J.; Ren, Z.M. Structure, magnetic properties and cryogenic magneto-caloric effect (MCE) in RE2FeAlO6 (RE=Gd, Dy, Ho) oxides. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 6290–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.M.; Guo, D.; Wu, B.B.; Geng, S.H.; Zhang, Y.K. Magnetocaloric effect and refrigeration performance in RE60Co20Ni20 (RE = Ho and Er) amorphous ribbons. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 498, 166179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, Z.P.; Dong, X.S.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, L.W. Achievement of promising cryogenic magnetocaloric performances in La1−xPrxFe12B6 compounds. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 92, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, L.W.; Yan, M. Recent progresses in exploring the rare earth based intermetallic compounds for cryogenic magnetic refrigeration. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 823, 153810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, J.D.; Shen, B.G.; Gao, B.; Shen, J.; Sun, J.R. The magnetocaloric effect of LaFe11.6Si1.4, La0.8Nd0.2Fe11.5Si1.5, and Ni43Mn46Sn11 compounds in the vicinity of the first-order phase transition. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, B.G.; Sun, J.R.; Hu, F.X.; Zhang, H.W.; Cheng, Z.H. Recent Progress in Exploring Magnetocaloric Materials. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4545–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lyubina, J.; Schafer, R.; Martin, N.; Schultz, L.; Gutfleisch, O. Novel design of La(Fe,Si)13 alloys towards high magnetic refrigeration performance. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3735–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hu, F.X.; Shen, B.G.; Sun, J.R.; Zhang, X.X. Great magnetic entropy change in La(Fe,M)13 (M=Si, Al) with Co doping. Chin. Phys. 2000, 9, 550–556. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gutfleisch, O.; Yan, A.; Müller, K.H. Large magnetocaloric effect in melt-spun LaFe13−xSix. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 10M305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhong, X.C.; Feng, X.L.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.L.; Liu, Z.W.; Jiao, D.L. Microstructure evolution and large magnetocaloric effect of La0.8Ce0.2(Fe0.95Co0.05)11.8Si1.2 alloy prepared by strip-casting and annealing. Aip Adv. 2018, 8, 048102. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, X.B.; Altounian, Z. Effect of Co content on magnetic entropy change and structure of La(Fe1−xCox)11.4Si1.6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2003, 264, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, F.X.; Gao, J.; Qian, X.L.; Ilyn, M.; Tishin, A.M.; Sun, J.R.; Shen, B.G. Magnetocaloric effect in itinerant electron metamagnetic systems La(Fe1−xCox)11.9Si1.1. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 10M303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fujita, A.; Fujieda, S.; Hasegawa, Y.; Fukamichi, K. Itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition and large magnetocaloric effects in La(FexSi1−x)13 compounds and their hydrides. Phys. Rev. 2003, B67, 104416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fujieda, S.; Fujita, A.; Fukamichi, K. Enhancements of magnetocaloric effects in La(Fe0.90Si0.10)13 and Its hydride by partial substitution of Ce for La. Mater. Trans. 2004, 45, 3228–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mandal, K.; Pal, D.; Gutfleisch, O.; Kerschl, P.; Müller, K.H. Magnetocaloric effect in reactively-milled LaFe11.57Si1.43Hy intermetallic compounds. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 053906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krautz, M.; Moore, J.D.; Skokov, K.P.; Liu, J.; Teixeira, C.S.; Schäfer, R.; Schultz, L.; Gutfleisch, O. Reversible solid-state hydrogen-pump driven by magnetostructural transformation in the prototype system La(Fe,Si)13Hy. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 083918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lyubina, J.; Hannemann, U.; Ryan, M.P.; Cohen, L.F. Electrolytic hydriding of LaFe13−xSix alloys for energy efficient magnetic cooling. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2042–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zheng, H.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Xue, X.; Wang, J.; Pang, W. The high-temperature hydrogenation behavior of LaFe11.6Si1.4 and splitting of LaFe11.6Si1.4Hy magnetocaloric transition. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 646, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, F.X.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Bao, L.F.; Sun, J.R.; Shen, B.G. Particle size dependent hysteresis loss in La0.7Ce0.3Fe11.6Si1.4C0.2 first-order systems. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 072403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Skokov, K.; Karpenkov, D.; Kuz’Min, M.D.; Radulov, I.A.; Gottschall, T.; Kaeswurm, B.; Fries, M.; Gutfleisch, O. Heat exchangers made of polymer-bonded La(Fe,Si)13. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 17A941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.; Zhang, M.X.; Shao, Y.Y.; Yan, A.R. LaFe11.6Si1.4/Cu magnetocaloric composites prepared by hot pressing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51, 2501502. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.; Shao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, A. LaFe11.6Si1.4Hy/Sn magnetocaloric composites by hot pressing. Scr. Mater. 2016, 120, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dong, X.T.; Zhong, X.C.; Peng, D.R.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, D.L.; Liu, Z.W.; Ramanujan, R.V. La0.8Ce0.2(Fe0.95Co0.05)11.8Si1.2/Sn42Bi58 magnetocaloric composites prepared by low temperature hot pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 737, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhong, X.C.; Peng, D.R.; Dong, X.T.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, D.L.; Liu, Z.W.; Ramanujan, R.V. Improvement in the magnetocaloric properties of sintered La(Fe,Si)13 based composites processed by La-Co grain boundary diffusion. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 780, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhong, X.C.; Peng, D.R.; Dong, X.T.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.L.; Wu, S.M.; Yu, H.Y.; Qiu, W.Q.; Liu, Z.W.; et al. Improvement in mechanical and magnetocaloric properties of hot-pressed La(Fe,Si)13/La70Co30 composites by grain boundary engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 263, 114900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, S.H.; He, Z.J.; Jing, J.; Sheng, S.H. Miedema Calculator: A thermodynamic platform for predicting formation enthalpies of alloys within framework of Miedema’s Theory. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2016, 209, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, Q.W.; Wang, G.S.; Guo, G.C. Non-Ferrous Metal Atlas of Binary Alloy Phase; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou, Q.; Liu, Z.W.; Zhong, X.C.; Zhang, G.Q. Properties improvement and structural optimization of sintered NdFeB magnets by non-rare earth compound grain boundary diffusion. Mater. Des. 2015, 86, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Chen, Y.G.; Tang, Y.B. The effect of high-temperature annealing on LaFe11.5Si1.5 and the magnetocaloric properties of La1−xCexFe11.5Si1.5 compounds. Rare Metals 2011, 30, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, W.B.; Hou, Y.H.; Ge, X.J.; Huang, Y.L.; Luo, J.M.; Zhong, Z.C. Microstructure and improved magnetocaloric properties: LaFeSi/LaAl magnets prepared by spark plasma sintering technique. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 115003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhong, X.C.; Dong, X.T.; Peng, D.R.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, D.L.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.W.; Ramanujan, R.V. Table-like magnetocaloric effect and enhanced refrigerant capacity of HPS La(Fe,Si)13 based composites by Ce-Co grain boundary diffusion. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 5908–5919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Löwe, K.; Liu, J.; Skokov, K.; Moore, J.D.; Amin, H.S.; Hono, K.; Katter, M.; Gutfleisch, O. The effect of the thermal decom-position reaction on the mechanical and magnetocaloric properties of La(Fe,Si,Co)13. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 4268–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, J.; Krautz, M.; Skokov, K.; Woodcock, T.G.; Gutfleisch, O. Systematic study of the microstructure, entropy change and adiabatic temperature change in optimized La-Fe-Si alloys. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 3602–3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Predel, B. Ce-Co (Cerium-Cobalt) phase diagram. In Phase Equilibria, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data of Binary Alloys Landolt-Börnstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology-New Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 3, ISBN 9783540614333. [Google Scholar]
  45. Laptev, A.V. Structure and properties of WC-Co alloys in solid-phase sintering. I. Geometrical evolution. Powder Met. Met. Ceram. 2007, 46, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pribytkov, G.A.; Andreeva, I.A.; Korzhova, V.V. Bulk changes and structure formation in solid-phase sintering of Ti − TiAl3 powder mixtures. Powder Met. Met. Ceram. 2008, 47, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Itoh, M.; Machida, K.I.; Hirose, K.; Adachi, G.Y. Nitrogen absorption and desorption characteristics for CeFe7. Chem. Lett. 2001, 30, 294–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hou, X.L.; Lampen-Kelley, P.; Xue, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Xu, H.; Han, N.; Ma, C.W.; Srikanth, H.; Phan, M.H. Formation mechanisms of NaZn13-type phase in giant magnetocaloric La–Fe–Si compounds during rapid solidification and annealing. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 646, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Krypiakewytsch, P.I.; Zaretschniuk, O.S.; Hladyschewskyj, E.I. Ternäre verbindungen vom NaZn13-type. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1968, 358, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Passamani, E.C.; Larica, C.; Proveti, J.R.; Takeuchi, A.Y.; Gomes, A.M.; Ghivelder, L. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of La(Fe,Co)11.4SP1.6 compounds (SP=Al or Si). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 312, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shao, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Wang, K.; Zhang, M.X.; Liu, J. Impact of interface structure on functionality in hot-pressed La-Fe-Si/Fe magnetocaloric composites. Acta Mater. 2020, 195, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, M.X.; Ouyang, Y.; Zhang, Y.F.; Liu, J. LaFe11Co0.8Si1.2/Al magnetocaloric composites prepared by hot pressing. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 823, 153846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, E.K.; Zhong, X.C.; Tao, K.; Wu, M.L.; Xing, C.F.; Xiao, Y.N.; Liu, J.; Long, Y. Outstanding comprehensive performance of La(Fe,Si)13Hy/In composite with durable service life for magnetic refrigeration. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1700636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gschneidner, K.A., Jr.; Pecharsky, V.K. Magnetocaloric materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 387–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Fujieda, S.; Fukamichi, K.; Suzuki, S. Microstructure and isothermal magnetic entropy change of La(Fe0.89Si0.11)13 in a single-phase formation process by annealing. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 566, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, S.M.; Zhong, X.C.; Dong, X.T.; Liu, C.L.; Huang, J.H.; Huang, Y.L.; Yu, H.Y.; Liu, Z.W.; Huang, Y.S.; Ramanujan, R.V. LaFe11.6Si1.4/Pr40Co60 magnetocaloric composites for refrigeration near room temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 873, 159796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, P.; Zhang, N.Z.; Cui, Y.T.; Wu, Z.M.; Wen, L.; Zeng, Z.Y.; Xia, L. Achieving better magneto-caloric effect near room temperature in amorphous Gd50Co50 alloy by minor Zn addition. J. Non-Crystall. Solids 2016, 434, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dan’Kov, S.Y.; Tishin, A.M.; Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Magnetic phase transitions and the magnetothermal properties of gadolinium. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 3478–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhong, X.C.; Tian, H.C.; Wang, S.S.; Liu, Z.W.; Zheng, Z.G.; Zeng, D.C. Thermal, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of Fe80−xMxB10Zr9Cu1 (M = Ni, Ta; x = 0, 3, 5) amorphous alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 633, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Banerjee, B.K. On a generalised approach to first and second order magnetic transitions. Phys. Lett. 1964, 12, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hu, F.X. Magnetic and Magnetic Entropy Changes of Fe-Based La(Fe,M)13 Compounds and Ni-Mn-Ga Alloys; Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Beijing, China, 2002. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns for LaFe11.6Si1.4/xwt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h; (b) XRD patterns for binder-free LaFe11.6Si1.4 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively; (c) XRD patterns for LaFe11.6Si1.4/10wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns for LaFe11.6Si1.4/xwt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h; (b) XRD patterns for binder-free LaFe11.6Si1.4 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively; (c) XRD patterns for LaFe11.6Si1.4/10wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively.
Metals 12 00112 g001
Figure 2. Backscattered SEM micrographs of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 composites with x = 0 (a,b), 5 (c,d), 10 (e,f), and 15 (g,h) sintered at 1373 K for 6 h, respectively. The inset of (c)shows the mapping results of La, Ce, Fe and Co elements for LaFe11.6Si1.4/5 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h, respectively.
Figure 2. Backscattered SEM micrographs of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 composites with x = 0 (a,b), 5 (c,d), 10 (e,f), and 15 (g,h) sintered at 1373 K for 6 h, respectively. The inset of (c)shows the mapping results of La, Ce, Fe and Co elements for LaFe11.6Si1.4/5 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h, respectively.
Metals 12 00112 g002
Figure 3. Backscattered SEM micrographs of binder-free LaFe11.6Si1.4 composites (ac) and LaFe11.6Si1.4/10 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites (df) sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively. The inset of Fig.3(f) shows the line scan results of the interphase boundary between the 1:13 phase and the 1:7 phase for LaFe11.6Si1.4/10wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Figure 3. Backscattered SEM micrographs of binder-free LaFe11.6Si1.4 composites (ac) and LaFe11.6Si1.4/10 wt.%Ce2Co7 composites (df) sintered at 1373 K for 1, 3 and 6 h, respectively. The inset of Fig.3(f) shows the line scan results of the interphase boundary between the 1:13 phase and the 1:7 phase for LaFe11.6Si1.4/10wt.%Ce2Co7 composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Metals 12 00112 g003
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Metals 12 00112 g004
Figure 5. Normalized M/Mmax–T and dMnorm/dTT curves of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h upon cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T.
Figure 5. Normalized M/Mmax–T and dMnorm/dTT curves of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h upon cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T.
Metals 12 00112 g005
Figure 6. Magnetic entropy change (−ΔSM) as function of temperature for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Figure 6. Magnetic entropy change (−ΔSM) as function of temperature for the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Metals 12 00112 g006
Figure 7. Arrott plots (ad) of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/xwt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Figure 7. Arrott plots (ad) of the LaFe11.6Si1.4/xwt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10, and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Metals 12 00112 g007
Figure 8. Normalized M/MmaxT curves of the binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder composites sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h upon cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T. Insets in panels (a,b) are (−ΔSM) vs. T curves for the composites with and without Ce2Co7 binder under a magnetic field change of 0–2 T, respectively.
Figure 8. Normalized M/MmaxT curves of the binder-free and 10 wt.% Ce2Co7 binder composites sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h upon cooling under an applied field of 0.05 T. Insets in panels (a,b) are (−ΔSM) vs. T curves for the composites with and without Ce2Co7 binder under a magnetic field change of 0–2 T, respectively.
Metals 12 00112 g008
Table 1. The weight percentages of phases in the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) sintered composites and fit coefficient.
Table 1. The weight percentages of phases in the LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) sintered composites and fit coefficient.
SampleSintering@1373 KWeight Percentage (wt.%)Fit Coefficient
1:13 phaseα-Fe Phase1:7 PhaseRpRwpRexpχ2
Annealed
LaFe11.6Si1.4 flakes
84.69(5)15.31(2)0.951.620.804.16
LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7
composites
x = 01 h89.36(5)10.64(2)/0.951.441.101.71
3 h87.74(5)12.26(2)/1.281.731.421.49
6 h89.26(5)10.82(2)/0.871.361.011.80
x = 56 h93.21(5)5.90(1)0.890.871.201.011.43
x = 101 h87.28(5)4.72(1)8.001.081.461.261.33
3 h87.02(5)6.28(1)6.700.981.271.231.07
6 h93.93(5)3.30(1)2.770.901.190.981.46
x = 156 h88.29(5)4.96(1)6.751.191.531.091.98
Table 2. Lattice constant (a), phase composition, Curie temperature (TC), maximum magnetic entropy change ((−ΔSM)max), and relative cooling power (RCP) of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h.
Table 2. Lattice constant (a), phase composition, Curie temperature (TC), maximum magnetic entropy change ((−ΔSM)max), and relative cooling power (RCP) of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 1~6 h.
LaFe11.6Si1.4/Ce2Co7
Composites
1:13 Phase
a (Å)
Phase CompositionTC
(K)
(−ΔSM)max
J/(kg·K)
ΔH = 2 T (5 T)
RCP
J/kg
ΔH = 2 T (5 T)
Binder ContentSintering1:7 Phase1:13 Phase
Binder- free1373 K/1 h11.49282(6)------LaFe10.95Si1.592067.5 (/)122.4 (/)
1373 K/3 h 11.49015(9)------LaFe10.73Si1.572105.0 (/)106.6 (/)
1373 K/6 h11.49209(9)------LaFe10.53Si1.602125.2 (8.8)146.7 (339.0)
5 wt.%1373 K/6 h11.49190(0)La0.26Ce0.74Fe6.02Co0.56Si0.93La0.87Ce0.13Fe9.70Co0.56Si1.352474.0 (8.6)158.4 (428.7)
10 wt.%1373 K/1 h11.49271(9)La0.28Ce0.72Fe5.75Co1.27Si0.87La0.89Ce0.11Fe9.71Co0.91Si1.352750.9 (/)------
1373 K/3 h11.49559(8)La0.27Ce0.73Fe6.14Co0.82Si0.90La0.83Ce0.17Fe9.82Co0.95Si1.292962.2 (/)185.2 (/)
1373 K/6 h11.49301(7)La0.27Ce0.73Fe6.32Co0.72Si1.04La0.82Ce0.18Fe9.24Co0.91Si1.342913.9 (7.6)209.2 (457.7)
15 wt.%1373 K/6 h11.51400(9)La0.28Ce0.72Fe5.71Co0.98Si0.91La0.75Ce0.25Fe9.10Co1.30Si1.283313.2 (6.0)178.3 (399.2)
Table 3. Porosity, thermal conductivity, and mechanical properties of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
Table 3. Porosity, thermal conductivity, and mechanical properties of LaFe11.6Si1.4/x wt.%Ce2Co7 (x = 0, 5, 10 and 15) composites sintered at 1373 K for 6 h.
SamplePorosity (%)λ (W/m·K)bc)max (MPa)Strain (%)
Binder free5.1413.714585.0
5 wt.%4.027.814744.7
10 wt.%4.788.215306.1
15 wt.%4.567.504574.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, X.-C.; Dong, X.-T.; Huang, J.-H.; Liu, C.-L.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.-L.; Yu, H.-Y.; Ramanujan, R.V. One-Step Sintering Process for the Production of Magnetocaloric La(Fe,Si)13-Based Composites. Metals 2022, 12, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12010112

AMA Style

Zhong X-C, Dong X-T, Huang J-H, Liu C-L, Zhang H, Huang Y-L, Yu H-Y, Ramanujan RV. One-Step Sintering Process for the Production of Magnetocaloric La(Fe,Si)13-Based Composites. Metals. 2022; 12(1):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12010112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Xi-Chun, Xu-Tao Dong, Jiao-Hong Huang, Cui-Lan Liu, Hu Zhang, You-Lin Huang, Hong-Ya Yu, and Raju V. Ramanujan. 2022. "One-Step Sintering Process for the Production of Magnetocaloric La(Fe,Si)13-Based Composites" Metals 12, no. 1: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12010112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop