Next Article in Journal
Alloying Effects on the Stability of D022 γ”-Ni3M (M: Nb, Ta, V) Precipitates at Elevated Temperatures in Alloy 718 Type Ni-Based Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Atomistic Investigation of the Effects of Different Reinforcements on Al Matrix Composite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Quality Assessment of Laser Welding Dual Phase Steels

by
Eva S. V. Marques
1,
António B. Pereira
1,2,* and
Francisco J. G. Silva
1,3,4
1
TEMA—Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
LASI—Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
3
INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
4
ISEP—School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(8), 1253; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081253
Submission received: 19 June 2022 / Revised: 23 July 2022 / Accepted: 24 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Laser Welding of Metallic Materials)

Abstract

:
Since non-conforming parts create waste for industry, generating undesirable costs, it is necessary to set up quality plans that not only guarantee product conformity but also cut the root causes of welding defects by developing the concept of quality at origin. Due to their increasing use in automotive industry, dual phase (DP) steels have been the chosen material for this study. A quality plan for welding DP steel components by laser was developed. This plan is divided into three parts: pre-welding, during and post-welding. A quality assessment regarding mechanical properties, such as hardness, microstructure and tensile strength, was also performed. It was revealed that DP steel does not present considerable weldability problems, except for the usual softening of the heat affected zone (HAZ) and the growth of martensite in the fusion zone (FZ), and the best analysis techniques to avoid failures in these steels are finite element method (FEM), visual techniques during welding procedure and digital image correlation (DIC) for post-weld analysis.

1. Introduction

There are several international standards that industry must obey to guarantee quality on products obtained by welding processes. The entities responsible by issuing these standards are the following: EN (European Standards), ISO (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland), AWS (American Welding Society, Miami, FL, USA), ASME (American Society for Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, USA), among others [1]. However, product quality does not depend exclusively on compliance with these standards, but also depends on other factors, such as the material itself, the welding conditions and the operator’s experience, the last being the most critical. Nevertheless, in automated processes, defects can also occur due to incorrect parameter setting of the devices, lack of maintenance or failure of the system itself [2] (Figure 1).
Toivanen [3] refers that the criteria for producing welded joints are often unknown by most of the workers in a shop floor and by the hierarchy chain, which leads to constant non-conform products. It was concluded that the coordination of welding, according to ISO 3834 [4], is an asset for companies, as it contributes to the continuous improvement of the process and ensures quality requirements.
The ISO 6520 standard [5,6] describes some hypothetical defects that can occur in welded joints, especially in fusion or pressure welding processes. The standard defines that:
  • “An imperfection in welding is the lack of continuity or deviation in the defined geometry”;
  • “A defect in welding is an inadmissible imperfection”.
ISO 6520 defines the following as defects:
  • Cracks;
  • Cavities/porosities;
  • Solid inclusions;
  • Penetration failure;
  • Dimensional defects;
  • Various defects.
Within these defects, dimensional deviations or distortions are considered the most harmful for production, since they cause two main problems: firstly, it results in dimensional inaccuracies that make non-conform parts [7,8], and secondly, this defect increases production costs, due to the extra rework need to straighten the part, which, as reported in [9,10,11,12,13,14], is expensive in terms of time and ergonomics for workers.
Industries, such as automotive, aerospace and naval, are those that have higher costs about parts rectification. According to [15,16], the corrections of distortions reached 30% of the total cost of product manufacturing.
The industrial control of welding distortions is performed using empirical formulas, however, for larger and complex structures these formulas should not be applied [9]. The alternative is to use numerical models based on finite element analysis. The use of finite element analysis (FEA) requires an initial investment in equipment and is also time consuming [17]. Nevertheless, the time spent correcting the distortions is greater than the time spent performing the simulation. The use of these techniques had a significant contribution to the development of methods for the prevention of these defects [11].
Dual phase steels (DP) are one of the most studied steels in the automotive industry, especially after the 1990s when it was decided to reduce the cars’ weight to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other emissions. These steels are composed by a ferritic matrix with about 5 to 20% martensite. The process of transforming austenite into martensite is done with intercritical heat treatment, followed by quenching [18,19]. Although the ductility tends to decrease with increasing stress [20], they have good mechanical characteristics with tensile stress values from 450 to 1200 MPa [18,21]. These steels are mainly used in the industry as stamped, but the need may arise from creating parts by welding. The spot welding process is one of the most used in the automotive industry, but the laser welding process has advantages, such as low heat input, low deformation after welding and high energy density [22].
The assessment regarding welding DP steel parts should be able to prevent defects from occurring, using finite element method (FEM) analysis to study the material behavior considering the parameterization used during the welding process. It is also necessary to control the possible occurrence of defects during the process, such as porosities, cracks, lack of penetration, etc., controlling the parameters of the welding fixture and ensuring that the operator follows procedures and standards. A batch sample should be subjected to some tests after production to check if there are any defects, such as dimensional errors or porosities in the bead.

2. Quality Assessment Pre-Welding: Virtual Prototype FEM Analysis

Due to advances in technology, it is now possible to prevent certain defects from occurring before starting the welding process. Indeed, there are defects that are possible to predict their behavior through numerical simulations, such as distortions and misalignment, as these defects are directly linked to the use of jigs and clamp placement (Table 1).

2.1. FEM Analysis

Simulation is a set of mathematical models or statistical tools, able to predict the behavior of a product when making specific inputs. Simulations can offer researchers the ability to impose certain conditions and obtain predictions about the results, which can be compared with experimental data. To exercise this comparison, it is necessary to choose an error percentage. There are several packages of software that can be used in this field, such as CAEplex, MATLAB, Ansys, OpenFOAM, EMS, SolidWorks Simulation Premium, COMSOL Multiphysics, Flow-3D, and ProModel Optimization Suite [24], among others.
To design a certain product, simulation plays a crucial role when it comes to execute a virtual prototype. This type of prototype will help to verify the ideal conditions under which the product must be manufactured. Regarding laser welding, it is possible to check the welding parameters and conditions, such as power, speed, weld bead size, operations sequencing, etc. Thus, the simulation allows the production of the product virtually to find possible unconformities before the prototype is physically executed, thereby eliminating costs of non-quality parts.
To perform a laser welding simulation of a DP steel regarding the study of strains and distortions that might occur during welding, it is necessary to implement thermo-mechanical simulation [25,26,27]. This type of simulation is highly used for studying large-sized structures, verifying if the residual stresses and distortions are contained within the tolerances. To perform this simulation requires three stages: thermal modelling, metallurgical modelling and mechanical modelling [28].

2.1.1. Thermal Model

For large structures, it is not yet possible to complete a full simulation (due to the amount of time required), thus, several assumptions are usually made about the interaction of the material with the process, which must be reduced to the volume of the heat source itself. This assumption generates difficulties, since gas and liquid flows are neglected. Therefore, it is necessary to include these effects in the volume of the heat source [28].
Heat transfer is an important phenomenon in the simulation, since the major consequences of the laser–material interaction are obtained by its thermal expansion [28]. To calculate this volume heat source, it is necessary to solve the equation for heat transfer from the volumetric heat source to the metal during welding phase, considering convection and radiation heat losses [29]. Thus, some models can be chosen for simulating the heat source, such as Gaussian (conical heat source) and Goldak’s model. [29].

2.1.2. Mechanical Model

In this field, two mechanical models can be used: the elastoplastic (EP) model and the elastoplastic with transformation induced volumetric strain model (VEP). The simulation of these two models can be carried out under the same conditions and meshing to verify different residual stress outputs. The resolution of the mechanical equation is based on the equation of static equilibrium, solving the global deformation during welding [30].

2.1.3. Metallurgical Model

During heating, the only transformation that occurs is into austenite, which does not depend completely on the heating rate [31]. Owing to changes in thermal expansion coefficient during the welding process, the phase transformation is a key step in modeling residual stresses [32]. This stage has two phases: thermal and mechanical. To carry out this simulation, it is necessary to consider variables, such as cooling rate, laser power and speed.

3. Quality Assessment during Welding

During the laser welding process, energy can be emitted in many ways, and to be able to study this energy and the effects that it will produce in the material, various methods can be used. Several use optical or acoustic sensors to be able to have a physical model of the phenomena, which occurs between laser and material, including defects that may happen during the laser welding process (Figure 2) [33].
In the literature, [34] shows that nowadays it is possible to control laser welding in real time and evaluate defects that might occur during the welding process, such as blowouts, undercuts and lack of penetration (Table 2).
In the column “How to prevent/control”, several techniques have been presented, which are explained in the next section:

3.1. Image Processing Techniques

These techniques focus on extracting information, patterns and features from a set of images. They are used in various types of welding, including laser welding. They are divided into three categories:
  • Thermal: this method studies the thermal field. IR thermal cameras can be used to capture the temperature distribution in the part to be welded. It is expensive and low sampling [35,36,37,38].
  • Vision: with this method it is possible to characterize plasma plume, spatters and molten pool in welding. In the literature, there are papers in which a vision system was used together with vision sensor, based on the principle of triangulation in which it is possible to obtain information through 3D profiles. Some authors also used couple charged device (CCD) sensors to extract surface information, such as depth pool [39,40,41].
  • Combined camera-oriented techniques: it is possible to check molten pool, thermal field, spatters and plasma plume. Since CCD cannot detect mid and long infrared radiations, this technique joints thermal IR cameras with CCD sensor. It is expensive and presents setup limitations [42,43,44].

3.2. Acoustic Emission Techniques

With this technique, it is only possible to study the plume vapor and the workpiece. The only defect that can be verified is penetration, but since this system is very dependent on sound waves, it has the disadvantage that it is very sensitive to sound [45,46,47].

3.3. Optical Techniques

These techniques are used essentially for monitoring the welding process itself. The optical sensors are classified in the following three categories:
  • Photodiode sensor: the variables that can be characterized are steam plume, thermal radiation and reflected laser beam energy. This method is not able to detect microdefects, but its low cost is an advantage [48,49,50];
  • Spectrometer: only able to check the spectrum of plasma plume and spatters. The only limitation is that they can only check the behavior of the plume [51,52];
  • Pyrometer sensor: it detects changes in temperature by thermal radiation. It is used to characterize the molten pool and steam plume. It can be used for real-time temperature monitoring and online quality control [53,54,55].

3.4. Fused Techniques

Fused techniques are a new belief that a multi-sensor approach can be more accurate in obtaining data from welding processes, which will improve the study of welding defects. Authors have studied combinations of infrared and ultraviolet sensors with acoustic techniques and visual sensing with photodiode sensing [56,57,58].

4. Quality Assessment Post-Welding

Even with all existing standards, there is always room for error (Figure 3). Therefore, after the laser welding process, a sample of parts should be taken and submitted to tests to verify if the batch complies to the requirements.
Each technique presented in Figure 3 is explained in the following section.

4.1. Digital Image Correlation (DIC)

The digital image correlation (DIC) concept used by [59,60,61] is a method of optical analysis, without contact and of total field. With the use of two cameras and image recording techniques, using correlation algorithms, the surfaces and the outline of an object can be determined using the DIC method. The surface profiles obtained before and after welding are compared with the results of the 3D deformation of the object. This method requires the proper calibration of the cameras and can be used to measure any type of transient welding distortion, as well as welding distortion after the process. The DIC software, ARAMIS®, developed by GOM©, is one of the best known in this field.

4.2. Photogrammetry

This is a method based on remote sensors that uses photographs to get the exact place of a point or surface using the triangulation of several points. To measure the distortion occurred in the welding process, the most used type is short-range photogrammetry. In this method, the camera is close to the object. The configuration used in photogrammetry is like that of DIC and can be used to obtain the 3D models of the photographed object [62].

4.3. Linear Variable Differential Transformer (LVDT)

Another method that can be used is LVDT, which is a device like an electrical transformer that measures linear displacements, measuring the variation of the induced internal voltage. The LVDT can be used to measure the size of the distortion at fixed points during welding and after cooling it [63,64].

4.4. Ultrasonic

Ultrasonic inspection methods involve the generation of ultrasonic waves that interact with the weld. If there are defects in the bead, these will cause waves to be reflected and diffracted. Within the ultrasonic waves, a technique called time of flight measurement (ToF) allows calculating the quality of the bead through its geometry. However, to apply this method, an exact knowledge of the speed of sound is necessary to define the geometry [65,66,67].

4.5. X-ray Radiography

X-rays and gamma rays can be used to show discontinuities and inclusions within opaque material. This feature has become useful in the study of weld beads, where it is possible to verify defects, such as porosities. However, this technique requires the operator to be qualified in interpreting the results. Moreover, it is very expensive due to the handling of parts, equipment and the necessary protection. Usually, it is not used in automated environments [68,69,70,71,72].

4.6. Eddy Current

Defects and changes in material properties result in changes in the signals of these currents. This method has a great ability to detect distinctive defects in welds with a depth of less than 2 mm, and it can be automated in the inspection after the welding process. Despite the advantages, it is only applicable to conductive materials. However, the surface of the welds must be accessible to the probe because the surface finish and its irregularities can interfere with the reference standard [73,74,75,76].

4.7. Magneto-Optical Detection Method

This procedure is a non-destructive testing based on magneto-optical (MO) imaging, which transforms the magnetic leakage field into a light intensity map to visualize defects [77,78,79]. In the study [80], a vertical combined magnetic field (VCNF) and a parallel combined magnetic field (PCMF) were compared to traditional magnetic fields where it was found that magneto-optical imaging under VCMF could detect weld defects of any shape and distribution accurately. This technique was also used in [81], where weld surface and subsurface cracks were detected by an MO sensor. It was shown that the magnetic flux leakage signals of the weld surface and subsurface cracks could be easily distinguished.

5. Quality Assessment Considering Mechanical Properties

In laser welding, the most common welding joint is butt welding. In this type of joint, it is necessary to pay special attention to the alignment of the parts, as the size beam is very narrow compared to other fusion welding processes. Any space between the parts to be joined will cause defects, such as weld concavity, undercut, and the appearance of a notch that increases fatigue in parts [82].
In industry, the laser welding process with keyhole is used, due to the high penetration and fast welding speed, but it can cause defects, such as rough and ropy surfaces due to the instability of the keyhole. In addition to these problems, there are also metallurgical problems, such as the softening of the HAZ. This phenomenon occurs because the martensite present in DP steel is tempered [82]. This problem will be described in the following Section 5.1.

5.1. Hardness

Gathering several authors, it was possible to conclude that there are two main problems regarding hardness in DP laser welding joints: the growth of martensite in fusion zone (FZ), and a softening phenomenon in the HAZ.
  • Growth of martensite in FZ:
    • The amount of martensite contributes to the decrease of the joint ductility, as demonstrated in [83]. For example, the welding parameters presented in [84] led to a 53.7% increase in hardness in the fusion zone.
    • It was possible to conclude in [85] that hardness in FZ, duplicated its original value, due to the rapid cooling rate after the welding process.
    • The higher the welding speed, the higher the cooling rate [82,86].
    • The FZ is strongly dependent on the carbon content. It was verified by [82] that FZ decreased with the increasing of carbon and other alloys.
Table 3 represents an outline of the papers where the hardness of laser welded DP steels was studied. It can be verified that hardness in FZ is always greater than in HAZ, due to the existence of martensite in FZ.
2.
Softening phenomenon in HAZ:
  • HAZ softening has been associated with tempered martensite in the base metal.
  • The width of soft zone decreases with increasing welding speed and decreasing beam width.
  • It was also found in [96] that the appearance of fine-grained martensite in the subcritical HAZ results in an increased hardness, while the tempered martensite contributes to a soft zone.
  • The size of the HAZ soft zone decreased with increasing pulse duration 83.
  • In the work of [97], DP600, DP800 and DP1000 were studied, verifying that HAZ softening increased with steel grades, which is related to the amount of martensite in each type of DP steel.
To deal with the appearance of martensite and its contribution to increasing hardness, it is possible to use thermal treatments: post-welding heat treatment (PWHT) and pre heat welding treatment (PHWT).
  • Pre Heat Welding Treatment:
    • In [98], the study of DP980 steel welded at room temperature and preheated to 526 °C has been performed. Using preheating, it was observed that the microstructure in the FZ of the bead changed from martensitic (with a hardness between 320 and 500 HV) to a microstructure composed by bainite, ferrite and austenite, presenting 280 HV of hardness.
  • Post-Welding Heat Treatment:
    • In paper [85], two types of thermal treatments were tested with the purpose of resetting the initial characteristics of DP600 before welding. The hardness values in the welding and in the HAZ dropped significantly but still showed values 40% above the base metal. In paper [99], PWHT has been used in a DP1400 steel, and it was shown that the heat treatment had little significance regarding tensile strength due to the transformation of martensite into tempered martensite. However, it had relevant results with elongation, which contributes to lower defects, such as cold cracking.
    • In the paper presented by [100], it was verified that using post-welding heat treatments, the tensile stress decreased from 725 ± 7 MPa to 679 ± 5 MPa, but the elongation increased from 2.8% to 3.5%.

5.2. Microstructure

In addition to the nomenclature used to characterize welding joints, BM (base metal), FZ (fusion zone), HAZ (heat affected zone), there is an extra nomenclature that was adopted for the HAZ [99,100,101]. In steels, the peak temperature achieved in the HAZ results in specific metallurgical transformations is based on the local phase diagram (Figure 4). The main transformations in DP steels are described below:
  • Sub-critical HAZ (S-HAZ) is the region where the peak temperature during welding is below Ac1 temperature of steel phase diagram [101].
    • It was verified by [101] that martensite in the BM was transformed into tempered martensite during subsequent heating and cooling, since the local temperature was below Ac1 and austenization did not take place.
    • The martensite phase in the BM is tempered causing HAZ to soften. The severity of HAZ softening decreases with increasing distance from the Ac1 isotherm [82].
  • Inter-critical HAZ (I-HAZ) is the region where the peak temperature during welding is between Ac1 and Ac3 temperature of steel phase diagram [101].
    • It was verified by [101] that the local peak temperature was between Ac3 and Ac1; originating the austenitization of martensite and ferrite from BM and after cooling, it transformed into ferrite and M-A constituent.
    • The volume fraction of martensite in the HAZ increases as the peak temperature rises from Ac1 to Ac3 [82].
  • Super-critical or upper-critical HAZ (SC-HAZ): during welding, the steel is heated above Ac3 [101].
    • The microstructure changes to austenite during heating. Depending on how high above Ac3 the temperature is, it can also occur grain growth. When the area of the HAZ with a temperature above Ac3 cools down, it transforms into martensite [82].
Table 4 shows a summary of papers with all microstructures that were originated by laser welding in several DP steels in the HAZ.
It is possible to verify the existence of predominant structures as: TM in S-HAZ, Martensite and Ferrite in I-HAZ and LM in SC-HAZ, in almost all grades of DP steel.

Effects of Laser Characteristics in Microstructure

Heat input is the ratio between laser power and welding speed; it increases with laser power and decreases with welding speed [102]. Heat input not only affects softening phenomenon but also the appearance of defects, such as lack of penetration and pores. The effect of heat input is usually detrimental for the mechanical properties of welded joint [86].
  • Heat input too low (excessive welding speed or insufficient power) may cause lack of penetration and pores at FZ in the welded joint [79,103].
  • Heat input too high generates larger weld beads, promotes HAZ softening and leads to a less refined microstructure [104].
  • Lower speed favours weld penetration but increase heat dissipation in the transverse direction to weld, which leads to wider welds.
  • Constant welding speed increases welding width and penetration [103].

5.3. Tensile Properties

Metallurgical properties have a direct influence on the tensile and yield strength values of all DP steels. The softening phenomenon, for example, can contribute to the collapse of the joint in the HAZ. Table 5 shows the results obtained in the studies regarding the mechanical properties of the welded joints of various types of DP steels.
It was verified in [88] that the welding process did not change the component yield behavior. All samples reached the minimum required UTS for DP600 (600 MPa). All samples have broken at BM, which confirms the absence of softening phenomenon.
Regarding DP780 [101], the fracture occurred in BM. In the fracture surface, dimples were observed, which means ductile fracture. The curves of similar welding joints were like BM ones. In that study, high welding speed and lower heat input was selected, thus, HAZ softening did not occur.
It was found in [105] that different thicknesses (1.3 to 2.1 mm), for the DP800 joints, did not significantly affect the strength properties, and the fracture occurred in the BM. In DP1000 steel, the elongation at fracture was reduced compared to the BM values, and the fracture arose at the welded joint.
Regarding fiber laser [93], the strength of welded joints did not decrease in contrast to welded joints made with diode laser. It was possible to verify the existence of a smaller soft zone in the joints produced by fiber laser, than in the joints made by diode laser. It can be concluded that a smaller laser beam spot, together with a higher power and speed in the fiber laser, significantly increased the joint strength by decreasing the soft zone.
It was found in [94], that increasing the welding speed from 12 m/min to 16 m/min, resulted in a decrease in UTS from 1081 MPa to 1041 MPa, although YS has remained like BM. Fracture occurred in SC-HAZ due to low hardness values (softening phenomenon).
In this work, welded joints on different energy inputs were studied (325 J/mm and 108 J/mm), observing that a low energy input has resulted in greater ductility and, consequently, greater elongation.

6. Discussion

Of all these techniques under analysis in this paper, it is necessary to verify their effectiveness if they will be more appropriate to the industrial or laboratory scope, regarding the research purposes. To study DP steel, a finite element analysis is necessary, where a study of influence of laser welding process in the thermal field is verified. Therefore, the most appropriate analysis techniques to carry out during welding (both laboratory and industrial) are visual techniques. Among them, the most favorable will be the combination of the thermal with the visual ones, due to the variables that are possible to quantify (including the thermal field) and the possible defects to be observed. However, in this case, the high costs for the use of this technique can only be justified due to the necessary investigation around this material. Moreover, at the industrial level, the same costs can be amortized in the production of the parts.
Regarding post-weld analysis for laboratory methods, any of the techniques are reliable, although laboratories should have the necessary resources to execute these methods. If the case is transposed to the industrial field, it is possible to conclude that the ultrasonic method is not practical, this method only works below the surface and only from 2–3 mm, which in a 3 mm DP plate it is not possible to evaluate anything. Additionally, it is difficult to obtain X-ray equipment, so this method is also discarded at industry level. The best option is to opt for DIC or photogrammetry techniques, where it essentially involves the acquisition of equipment that, as in the case of vision techniques, can be amortized in the production of components. Table 6 exhibits a summary of which techniques can be used in industry or in the laboratory field.
In the industrial field, it is not easy most of the time to perform metallographic analysis, which would be necessary to resort to a laboratory. Therefore, analysis must be carried out in specific cases to try to discover if the root cause of a certain defect, has its origin in a phase transformation.
The main defects in DP steels are the appearance of martensite in the FZ and the phenomenon of softening in the HAZ of the joint. To overcome these defects, heat treatments should be used. Thus, the company must carry out energy cost studies to verify the cost–benefit results, and whether to buy ovens to carry out these treatments or to subcontract them.
Tensile tests of laser welded DP steel specimens must be performed before this steel is used for production. The welds must be performed by the welder responsible for the process, with the parameters defined by the FEM analysis, to verify that the mechanical properties of the bead are within the values presented in Table 5.
The values obtained in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 can be used as reference values for welded joints of various grades of DP steel, although the hardness values (Table 3) can always be improved using heat treatments. The metallographic values can also be studied for different laser types, laser modes and other parameters, such as speed and power. From there it would be possible to have a standard for all DP steel grades. The values presented in Table 5 can be used as UTS values for the presented grades of DP steel, since for all of them, a UTS above the standard of the raw material was achieved.
Regarding sequence, tensile tests should be done pre-welding, metallography and hardness post-welding.
To study more acceptance criteria for welding quality, the following standards can be employed: 3834-1 [106], ISO. 3834-2 [107], ISO. 3834-4 [108], ISO. 3834-5 [109], ISO. 9001 [110], ISO. 14731 [111], DIN. 18800-7:2008 [112] and ISO. 15609-4:2009 [113].

7. Conclusions

DP steels and laser welding are increasingly being studied, due to their environmental impact on the automotive industry.
In this paper, a theoretical study about the quality criteria in laser welding DP steels is presented. The quality assessment for these steels was developed regarding general aspects of laser welding and specific criteria for DP steels due to their chemical composition and specific mechanical properties and microstructure.
DP steel does not present considerable weldability problems, except for the usual softening of the HAZ and the growth of martensite in the FZ, which can increase hardness in the weld bead.
The best analysis techniques to avoid failures in DP steel are FEM, visual techniques during welding procedure and DIC for post-weld analysis.
This plan is divided into three stages related to the welding process: pre, during and post welding. The values exposed in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 should be considered as possible references for welded joints for the different DP steels grades. This plan was developed considering a possible application in industry, helping researchers rapidly understand what kind of values they can expect in their works as well.

Author Contributions

E.S.V.M.: investigation and writing original draft; F.J.G.S.: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing; A.B.P.: supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work was done and funded under the scope of projects UIDB/00481/2020 and UIDP/00481/2020—FCT—Fundação para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia; and CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022083—Centro Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Centro2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund. LAETA/INEGI/CETRIB is acknowledge due to the support provided in all research activities.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding this paper.

References

  1. Pereira, A.B.; de Melo, F.J.M.Q. Quality Assessment and Process Management of Welded Joints in Metal Construction—A Review. Metals 2020, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. DIN. V 4113-3:2003; Aluminium Constructions under Predominantly Static Loading—Part 3: Execution and Qualification of Constructors. German Institute for Standardization: Berlin, Germany, 2003.
  3. Toivanen, J.; Kah, P.; Martikainen, J. Quality Requirements and Conformity of Welded Products in the Manufacturing Chain in Welding Network. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Appl. 2015, 3, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. ISO 3834-3:2005; Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding of Metallic Materials—Part 3: Standard Quality Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  5. ISO 6520-2:2013; Welding and Allied Processes—Classification of Geometric Imperfections in Metallic Materials, Part 2 Weld. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  6. ISO 6520-1:2007; Welding and Allied Processes—Classification of Geometric Imperfections in Metallic Materials, Part 1 Fusion Welding. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  7. Camilleri, D.; McPherson, N.; Gray, T.G. The applicability of using low transformation temperature welding wire to minimize unwanted residual stresses and distortions. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2013, 110, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, D.; Murakawa, H.; Liang, W. Numerical simulation of welding distortion in large structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2007, 196, 4613–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bachorski, A.; Painter, M.; Smailes, A.; Wahab, M. Finite-element prediction of distortion during gas metal arc welding using the shrinkage volume approach. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1999, 92–93, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghosh, B.P.K.; Devakumaran, K.P. Effect of Pulse Current on Shrinkage Stress and Distortion in Multipass GMA Welds of Different Groove Sizes. AWS 2010, 89, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  11. Choobi, M.S.; Haghpanahi, M.; Sedighi, M. Prediction of welding-induced angular distortions in thin butt-welded plates using artificial neural networks. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 62, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Shibahara, M.; Zhang, X.; Murakawa, H. Investigation on twisting distortion of thin plate stiffened structure under welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2012, 212, 1705–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, L.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X. Prediction of transverse and angular distortions of gas tungsten arc bead-on-plate welding using artificial neural network. Mater. Des. 2014, 54, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, D.; Zhou, Y.; Bi, T.; Liu, X. Experimental and numerical investigations of welding distortion induced by CO2 gas arc welding in thin-plate bead-on joints. Mater. Des. 2013, 52, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Holder, R.; Larkin, N.; Li, H.; Kuzmikova, L.; Pan, Z.; Norrish, J. Development of a DC-LSND welding process for GMAW on DH-36 Steel. In Proceedings of the 56th WTIA annual conference 2011, Cairns, Australia, 25–27 September 2011; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shen, C. Low Distortion Welding for Shipbuilding Industry. Master’s Thesis, University of Wollongong, Hong Kong, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deng, D.; Murakawa, H. FEM prediction of buckling distortion induced by welding in thin plate panel structures. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 591–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gomes, T.; Silva, F.; Campilho, R. Reducing the Simulation Cost on Dual-phase Steel Stamping Process. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Regueras, J.M.G.; López, A.M.C. Investigations on the influence of blank thickness (t) and length/wide punch ratio (LD) in rectangular deep drawing of dual-phase steels. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 91, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tisza, M.; Lukács, Z. Springback Analysis of High Strength Dual-phase Steels. Procedia Eng. 2014, 81, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fonstein, N. Advanced High Strength Sheet Steels, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xue, X.; Pereira, A.; Vincze, G.; Wu, X.; Liao, J. Interfacial Characteristics of Dissimilar Ti6Al4V/AA6060 Lap Joint by Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Welding. Metals 2019, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Silva, F.J.G. Tecnologia da Soldadura Uma Abordagem Técnico-Didática, 2nd ed.; Quântica Editora: Porto, Portugal, 2016; ISBN 9789897231704. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Butt, J. A Strategic Roadmap for the Manufacturing Industry to Implement Industry 4.0. Designs 2020, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martinson, P.; Daneshpour, S.; Koçak, M.; Riekehr, S.; Staron, P. Residual stress analysis of laser spot welding of steel sheets. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 3351–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zain-ul-Abdein, M.; Nelias, D.; Jullien, J.F.; Deloison, D. Prediction of laser beam welding-induced distortions and residual stresses by numerical simulation for aeronautic application. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 2907–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zain-Ul-Abdein, M.; Nélias, D.; Jullien, J.-F.; Boitout, F.; Dischert, L.; Noe, X. Finite element analysis of metallurgical phase transformations in AA 6056-T4 and their effects upon the residual stress and distortion states of a laser welded T-joint. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2011, 88, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dal, M.; Fabbro, R. An overview of the state of art in laser welding simulation. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 78, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kouadri-Henni, A.; Seang, C.; Malard, B.; Klosek, V. Residual stresses induced by laser welding process in the case of a dual-phase steel DP600: Simulation and experimental approaches. Mater. Des. 2017, 123, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bonollo, P.F.H.P.A.T.F. The influence of phase transformations on residual stresses induced by the welding process—3d and 2d numerical models. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2006, 14, 117–136. [Google Scholar]
  31. Leblond, J.; Devaux, J. A new kinetic model for anisothermal metallurgical transformations in steels including effect of austenite grain size. Acta Met. 1984, 32, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deng, D. FEM prediction of welding residual stress and distortion in carbon steel considering phase transformation effects. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shao, J.; Yan, Y. Review of techniques for on-line monitoring and inspection of laser welding. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2005, 15, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stavridis, J.; Papacharalampopoulos, A.; Stavropoulos, P. Quality assessment in laser welding: A critical review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 94, 1825–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Z.; Gao, X. Detection of weld pool width using infrared imaging during high-power fiber laser welding of type 304 austenitic stainless steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 74, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Speka, M.; Matteï, S.; Pilloz, M.; Ilie, M. The infrared thermography control of the laser welding of amorphous polymers. NDT E Int. 2008, 41, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bardin, F.; Morgan, S.; Williams, S.; McBride, R.; Moore, A.J.; Jones, J.D.C.; Hand, D.P. Process control of laser conduction welding by thermal imaging measurement with a color camera. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 6841–6848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hutter, F.X.; Brosch, D.; Graf, H.-G.; Klingler, W.; Strobel, M.; Burghartz, J.N. A 0.25 µm logarithmic cmos imager for emissivity-compensated thermography. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference-Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 8–12 February 2009; pp. 354–355. [Google Scholar]
  39. Saeed, G.; Zhang, Y.M. Weld pool surface depth measurement using a calibrated camera and structured light. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 2570–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, W.; Kovacevic, R. A Laser-Based Vision System for Weld Quality Inspection. Sensors 2011, 11, 506–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Gao, X. Analysis of characteristics of molten pool using cast shadow during high-power disk laser welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 70, 1979–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Habaibeh, A.; Shi, F.; Brown, N.; Kerr, D.; Jackson, M.; Parkin, R.M. A novel approach for quality control system using sensor fusion of infrared and visual image processing for laser sealing of food containers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 1995–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Von Witzendorff, P.; Kaierle, S.; Suttmann, O.; Overmeyer, L. Using pulse shaping to control temporal strain development and solidification cracking in pulsed laser welding of 6082 aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 225, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Voelkel, D.D.; Mazumder, J. Visualization of a laser melt pool. Appl. Opt. 1990, 29, 1718–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dorsch, F.; Braun, H.; Keßler, S.; Magg, W.; Pfitzner, D.; Plaßwich, S. Process Sensor Systems for Laser Beam Welding: Enabling and assuring reliable production. Laser Tech. J. 2012, 9, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, L. A comparative study of ultrasound emission characteristics in laser processing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 186, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Purtonen, T.; Kalliosaari, A.; Salminen, A. Monitoring and Adaptive Control of Laser Processes. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Park, Y.W.; Park, H.; Rhee, S.; Kang, M. Real time estimation of CO2 laser weld quality for automotive industry. Opt. Laser Technol. 2002, 34, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. You, D.; Gao, X.; Katayama, S. Multiple-optics sensing of high-brightness disk laser welding process. NDT E Int. 2013, 60, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Ashida, E.; Matsuda, F. Relationship between weld quality and optical emissions in underwater Nd: YAG laser welding. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2004, 41, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rizzi, D.; Sibillano, T.; Calabrese, P.P.; Ancona, A.; Lugarà, P.M. Spectroscopic, energetic and metallographic investigations of the laser lap welding of AISI 304 using the response surface methodology. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2011, 49, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sebestova, H.; Chmelickova, H.; Nozka, L.; Moudry, J. Non-destructive Real Time Monitoring of the Laser Welding Process. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2012, 21, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sibillano, T.; Rizzi, D.; Mezzapesa, F.P.; Lugarà, P.M.; Konuk, A.R.; Aarts, R.; Veld, B.H.I.; Ancona, A. Closed Loop Control of Penetration Depth during CO2 Laser Lap Welding Processes. Sensors 2012, 12, 11077–11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Smurov, I. Pyrometry applications in laser machining. Laser-Assist. Microtechnol. 2001, 4157, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bertrand, P.; Smurov, I.; Grevey, D. Application of near infrared pyrometry for continuous Nd:YAG laser welding of stainless steel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 168, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Farson, D.; Ali, A.; Sang, Y. Relationship of optical and acoustic emissions to laser weld penetration. Weld. J. 1998, 77, 142-s. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kamimuki, K.; Inoue, T.; Yasuda, K.; Muro, M.; Nakabayashi, T.; Matsunawa, A. Behaviour of monitoring signals during detection of welding defects in YAG laser welding. Study of monitoring technology for YAG laser welding (Report 2). Weld. Int. 2003, 17, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Smurov, I. Laser process optical sensing and control. In Proceedings of the IV International WLT-Conference on Lasers in Manufacturing, Munich, Germany, 18–22 June 2007; pp. 537–546. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chu, T.C.; Ranson, W.F.; Sutton, M.A. Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp. Mech. 1985, 25, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chao, Y.J.; Luo, P.-F.; Sutton, M.A. Application of stereo vision to three-dimensional deformation analyses in fracture experiments. Opt. Eng. 1994, 33, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peters, W.H.; Ranson, W.F. Digital Imaging Techniques in Experimental Stress Analysis. Opt. Eng. 1982, 21, 213427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lightfoot, M. The measurement of welding distortion in shipbuilding using close range photogrammetry. In Proceedings of the Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 11–14 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
  63. Dye, D.; Hunziker, O.; Roberts, S.M.; Reed, R.C. Modeling of the mechanical effects induced by the tungsten inert-gas welding of the IN718 superalloy. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2001, 32, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masubuchi, K. CHAPTER 3-Fundamental Information on Residual Stresses Analysis of Welded Structures; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  65. Salzburger, H.J.; Mohrbacher, H.; Kralj, S.; Kozuh, Z. In-line quality control of laser welds of tailored blanks by couplant free ultrasonic inspection. In Proceedings of the European Federation for Non-Destructive Testing (EFNDT), European Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Barcelona, Spain, 17–21 June 2002. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nakamura, S.; Sakurai, M.; Kamimuki, K.; Inoue, T.; Ito, Y. Detection technique for transition between deep penetration mode and shallow penetration mode in CO2 laser welding of metals. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2000, 33, 2941–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Passini, A.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Riva, R.; Travessa, D.N.; Cardoso, K.R. Ultrasonic inspection of AA6013 laser welded joints. Mater. Res. 2011, 14, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mai, T.A.; Spowage, A.C. Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminium. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 374, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Miller, M.; Mi, B.; Kita, A.; Ume, I. Development of automated real-time data acquisition system for robotic weld quality monitoring. Mechatronics 2002, 12, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, X.-G.; Xu, J.-J.; Ge, G.-Y. Defects recognition on X-ray images for weld inspection using SVM. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX826), Shanghai, China, 26–29 August 2004; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2004; Volume 6, pp. 3721–3725. [Google Scholar]
  71. Colegrove, P.; Ikeagu, C.; Thistlethwaite, A.; Williams, S.; Nagy, T.; Suder, W.; Steuwer, A.; Pirling, T. Welding process impact on residual stress and distortion. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2009, 14, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chao, Y.J.; Zhu, X.; Qi, X. ‘WELDSIM-A WELDing SIMulation code for the determination of transient and residual temperature, stress, and distortion. Adv. Comput. Eng. Sci. 2000, 2, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zösch, A.; Seidel, M.; Qualitätssicherung, I.I.F.M. Non destructive testing of laser welded lap seams by eddy current technique. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on NDT-ECNDT 2006, Berlin, Germany, 25–29 September 2006; Available online: https://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt2006/doc/P99.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2022).
  74. Todorov, E.; Nagy, B.; Levesque, S.; Ames, N.; Na, J. Inspection of laser welds with array eddy current technique. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, Anchorage, AK, USA, 22–26 September 2003; American Institute of Physics: College Park, MD, USA, 2003; Volume 1511, pp. 1065–1072. [Google Scholar]
  75. Lashkia, V. Defect detection in X-ray images using fuzzy reasoning. Image Vis. Comput. 2001, 19, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ho, S.K.; White, R.M.; Lucas, J. A vision system for automated crack detection in welds. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1990, 1, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ma, N.; Gao, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y. Optimization of Magneto-Optical Imaging Visualization of Micro-Defects Under Combined Magnetic Field Based on Dynamic Permeability. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Radtke, U.; Zielke, R.; Rademacher, H.G.; Crostack, H.A.; Hergt, R. Application of magneto-optical method for real-time visualization of eddy currents with high spatial resolution for nondestructive testing. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2001, 36, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gao, X.; Lan, C.; You, D.; Li, G.; Zhang, N. Weldment Nondestructive Testing Using Magneto-optical Imaging Induced by Alternating Magnetic Field. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2017, 36, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ma, N.; Gao, X.; Tian, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, P.P. Magneto-Optical Imaging of Arbitrarily Distributed Defects in Welds under Combined Magnetic Field. Metals 2022, 12, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Zheng, Q.; Gao, P.P.; Zhang, N. Weld cracks nondestructive testing based on magneto-optical imaging under alternating magnetic field excitation. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2018, 285, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nayak, S.S.; Biro, E.; Zhou, Y. Laser Welding of Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS); Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; ISBN 9780857098580. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pereira, A.B.; Santos, R.O.; Carvalho, B.S.; Butuc, M.C.; Vincze, G.; Moreira, L.P. The Evaluation of Laser Weldability of the Third-Generation Advanced High Strength Steel. Metals 2019, 9, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Oliveira, D.F. Pârametros da Soldadura LASER Pulsado de Nd:YAG em Aços Avançados de Alta Resistência; University of Aveiro: Aveiro, Portugal, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  85. Farabi, N.; Chen, D.; Zhou, Y. Fatigue properties of laser welded dual-phase steel joints. Procedia Eng. 2010, 2, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Xie, C.; Yang, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y. Microstructure and Fatigue Properties of Laser Welded DP590 Dual-Phase Steel Joints. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2017, 26, 3794–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sun, Q.; Di, H.-S.; Li, J.; Wang, X.-N. Effect of pulse frequency on microstructure and properties of welded joints for dual phase steel by pulsed laser welding. Mater. Des. 2016, 105, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mansur, V.M.; Mansur, R.A.D.F.; de Carvalho, S.M.; de Siqueira, R.H.M.; de Lima, M.S.F. Effect of laser welding on microstructure and mechanical behaviour of dual phase 600 steel sheets. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tunçel, O.; Aydın, H.; Çetin, Ş. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Similar and Dissimilar Laser Welds of DP600 and DP1000 Steel Sheets Used in the Automotive Industry. Turk. J. Eng. 2020, 5, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gandhi, A.; Kundu, A.; Sarkar, A.; Mahato, J.K.; Chakraborti, P.C. Effect of Laser Pulse Duration on Tensile and Electrochemical Behavior of Laser-Welded Dual-Phase Steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2021, 30, 4263–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, T.; Xin, L.J.; Wang, Z.Y. Study on Fiber Laser Welding for DP780 High Strength Steel. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 328–330, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jia, Q.; Guo, W.; Peng, P.; Li, M.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, G. Microstructure- and Strain Rate-Dependent Tensile Behavior of Fiber Laser-Welded DP980 Steel Joint. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Parkes, D.; Xu, W.; Westerbaan, D.; Nayak, S.; Zhou, Y.; Goodwin, F.; Bhole, S.; Chen, D. Microstructure and fatigue properties of fiber laser welded dissimilar joints between high strength low alloy and dual-phase steels. Mater. Des. 2013, 51, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Saha, D.; Westerbaan, D.; Nayak, S.; Biro, E.; Gerlich, A.; Zhou, Y. Microstructure-properties correlation in fiber laser welding of dual-phase and HSLA steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 607, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, W.; Westerbaan, D.; Nayak, S.; Chen, D.; Goodwin, F.; Biro, E.; Zhou, Y. Microstructure and fatigue performance of single and multiple linear fiber laser welded DP980 dual-phase steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 553, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wan, Z.; Guo, W.; Jia, Q.; Xu, L.; Peng, P. Hardness Evolution and High Temperature Mechanical Properties of Laser Welded DP980 Steel Joints. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2017, 37, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhao, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.S.; Hu, W. Effect of welding speed on microstructure, hardness and tensile properties in laser welding of advanced high strength steel. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2013, 18, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ferreira, C.C.D.A.; Braga, V.; de Siqueira, R.H.M.; de Carvalho, S.M.; de Lima, M.S.F. Laser beam welding of DP980 dual phase steel at high temperatures. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 124, 105964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sisodia, R.P.S.; Gáspár, M. Investigation of Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties of Laser Beam Welded and Post-weld Heat Treated DP1400 Steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2021, 30, 1703–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, X.; Niu, C.; Lian, C.; Lin, J. The Evaluation of Formability of the 3rd Generation Advanced High Strength Steels QP980 based on Digital Image Correlation Method. Procedia Eng. 2017, 207, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Di, H.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Microstructure and properties in dissimilar/similar weld joints between DP780 and DP980 steels processed by fiber laser welding. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 1561–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bandyopadhyay, K.; Lee, M.-G.; Panda, S.K.; Saha, P.; Lee, J. Formability assessment and failure prediction of laser welded dual phase steel blanks using anisotropic plastic properties. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2017, 126, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Alves, P.; Lima, M.; Raabe, D.; Sandim, H. Laser beam welding of dual-phase DP1000 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 252, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, X.-N.; Sun, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Di, H.-S. Microstructure and fracture behavior of laser welded joints of DP steels with different heat inputs. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 699, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. He, H.; Forouzan, F.; Volpp, J.; Robertson, S.; Vuorinen, E. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Laser-Welded DP Steels Used in the Automotive Industry. Materials 2021, 14, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. ISO 3834-1:2005; Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding of Metallic Materials—Part 1: Criteria for the Selection of the Appropriate Level of Quality Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  107. ISO 3834-2:2005; Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding of Metallic Materials—Part 2: Comprehensive Quality Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  108. ISO 3834-4:2005; Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding of Metallic Materials—Part 4: Elementary Quality Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  109. ISO 3834-5:2015; Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding of Metallic Materials—Part 5: Documents with which it Is Necessary to Conform to Claim Conformity to the Quality Requirements of ISO 3834-2, ISO 3834-3 or ISO 3834-4. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  110. ISO 9001:2015; Quality Management Systems—Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  111. ISO 14731:2019; Welding Coordination—Tasks and Responsibilities. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  112. DIN 18800-7:2008; Steel Structures—Part 7: Execution and Constructor’s Qualification. German Institute for Standardization: Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  113. ISO 15609-4:2009; Specification and Qualification of Welding Procedures for Metallic Materials—Welding Procedure Specification—Part 4: Laser Beam Welding. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
Figure 1. Ishikawa’s diagram of welding defects.
Figure 1. Ishikawa’s diagram of welding defects.
Metals 12 01253 g001
Figure 2. Quality assessment during welding [34].
Figure 2. Quality assessment during welding [34].
Metals 12 01253 g002
Figure 3. Quality assessment post-welding [34].
Figure 3. Quality assessment post-welding [34].
Metals 12 01253 g003
Figure 4. HAZ areas [102].
Figure 4. HAZ areas [102].
Metals 12 01253 g004
Table 1. How to prevent laser welding defects—pre-welding [23].
Table 1. How to prevent laser welding defects—pre-welding [23].
ProblemPotential
Effects
CausesSolutionsHow to Prevent/
Control
Distortion and molten pool
geometry
Geometric
deformations
Welder
inexperience
Welding resorting to jigs. Study and adjust jigs through simulation.FEM analysis
High heat input and number of beads.Adjust welding parameters to reduce heat input and select the ideal quantity of beads.
Incorrect welding sequenceStudy different welding sequencings through simulation.
Slow welding speedStudy different welding speeds in simulation.
Table 2. How to prevent laser welding defects—during welding [23].
Table 2. How to prevent laser welding defects—during welding [23].
ProblemPotential EffectsCauseSolutionHow to Prevent/Control
BlowoutThe bead section can be weakened, affecting the mechanical strength of the joint.Human failureHire highly skilled welders with certification.Thermal
Low welding currentIncrease welding current
High speedLower welding speed
Lack of penetrationWeakening of the bead section, stress concentrations, nucleation of cracks, which can lead to joint collapse.Low pre-heatingIncrease pre-heating temperatureThermal
Combined
Acoustic emission techniques
Photodiode sensor
Pyrometer sensor
High welding speedDecrease welding speed
Human failureHire highly skilled welders with certification.
UndercutReduction in the part’s resistance when it is in working cycle.High heat input in the joint.Decrease welding power and adjust welding speed.Thermal
Vision
Combined
Photodiode sensor
Fused techniques
PorosityDecrease in resistance of the welding beadHuman failureHire highly skilled welders with certification.Thermal
Excessive flow rate in the shielding gasControl shielding gas flow
Inclusion of oxygen due to ineffective gas protectionRemove impurities and follow standards for joint preparation.
High welding speed.Decrease welding speed.
Table 3. Hardness values for several laser welded DP steels.
Table 3. Hardness values for several laser welded DP steels.
AuthorMaterialWelding Method/Power (W)Laser TypeHardness FZ (HV)Hardness HAZ (HV)
Xie et al. [81]DP590Continuous/3000Fiber365180
Sun et al. [87]DP590Pulsed/132Nd:YAG270160
Mansur et al. [88]DP600Continuous/1200–1500Fiber350200
Tuncel et al. [89]DP600Pulsed/300 Nd:YAG300–400200–400
Gandhi et al. [90]DP780Pulsed/325Nd:YAG385240
Huang et al. [91]DP980Continuous/1000–2000Fiber500325
Jia et al. [92]DP980Continuous/4000Fiber415320
Parkes et al. [93]DP980Continuous/6000Fiber410240
Saha et al. [94]DP980Continuous/6000Fiber480295
Xu et al. [95]DP980Continuous/6000Fiber480280
Tuncel et al. [89]DP1000Pulsed/300Nd:YAG350–400290–360
Table 4. Microstructural transformations in HAZ.
Table 4. Microstructural transformations in HAZ.
AuthorMaterialWelding Method/Power (W)S-HAZI-HAZSC-HAZ
Sun et al. [87] —single spotDP590Pulsed/132TM + FM + FLM
Sun et al. [87] —8 (pulse)DP590Pulsed/132TM + TBLM + B + M-ALM
Di et al. [101]DP780Continuous/2000TMF + M-ALM
Parkes et al. [93]DP980Continuous/6000PTMMTM
Saha et al. [94]DP980Continuous/6000-F + M + CarbidesM + B
TM—tempered martensite/F—ferrite/TB—tempered bainite/PTM—partial tempered martensite/M—martensite/LM—lath martensite/M-A—martensite–austenite compound.
Table 5. Mechanical properties of DP steels weld joints.
Table 5. Mechanical properties of DP steels weld joints.
AuthorMaterialWelding Method/PowerYield Strength Re MPaUltimate Tensile Strength UTS MPATotal Elongation %
Mansur et al. [88] DP600Continuous/1200–1500363 *629 *15.7
Di et al. [101]DP780Continuous/200052587517.2
He et al. [105]DP800Continuous/30007018687.9
Di et al. [101]DP980Continuous/2000695108012.7
Parkes et al. [93]DP980Continuous/600072010675.3
Saha et al. [94]DP980Continuous/600072510414.7
He et al. [105]DP1000Continuous/300088310341.9
* Average values.
Table 6. Comparison of techniques (Industrial vs. Laboratory).
Table 6. Comparison of techniques (Industrial vs. Laboratory).
TechniqueIndustryLaboratory
FEM analysisXX
ThermalXX
VisionXX
Combined X
Acoustic emission techniques X
PhotodiodeXX
SpectrometerXX
PyrometerXX
Fused Techniques X
DICXX
PhotogrammetryXX
LVDTXX
Ultrasonic X
X-ray X
Eddy currentXX
Hardness tests X
Metallographic tests X
Tensile tests X
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marques, E.S.V.; Pereira, A.B.; Silva, F.J.G. Quality Assessment of Laser Welding Dual Phase Steels. Metals 2022, 12, 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081253

AMA Style

Marques ESV, Pereira AB, Silva FJG. Quality Assessment of Laser Welding Dual Phase Steels. Metals. 2022; 12(8):1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marques, Eva S. V., António B. Pereira, and Francisco J. G. Silva. 2022. "Quality Assessment of Laser Welding Dual Phase Steels" Metals 12, no. 8: 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop