Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Water Flow Characteristics on the Physical and Mechanical Qualities of Underwater Wet Welded A36 Marine Steel Plate
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of High Magnetic Field in Combination with High-Temperature Tempering on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of GCr15 Bearing Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneously Improving Microstructures and Wear Properties of Ni60 Coating by Heat Treatment

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(8), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081294
Submission received: 28 June 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022

Abstract

:
Ni60 self-lubricated anti-wear composite coatings were successfully precipitated on the 35CrMoV substrate by laser cladding technology. The effects of heat treatment on the macro-morphology, microstructure, precipitated phase, microhardness, and wear properties of the composite coatings with different heat treatment temperatures (25 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 1 h) were investigated systemically. The macro-morphology, microstructure, precipitated phases, and elements distribution of laser cladding layers were detected by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), respectively. The mechanical and tribological properties of the cladding layers were tested using a microscopic Vickers hardness tester and friction and wear tester, respectively. The results show that the main phases of Ni60 coatings are composed of γ-(Ni, Fe), Cr7C3, Cr23C6, CrB, CrFeB, and Cr2Ni3. In particular, the micro-structure and mechanical properties reach the best levels after heat treatment at 600 °C. The micro-hardness, average friction coefficient, and wear volume of the cladding layer are 771.4 to 915.8 HV1 and 0.434 and 2.9546 × 10−5 mm3, respectively. In conclusion, the micro-structure and mechanical properties of the cladding layer are greatly improved by the proper heat treatment temperature.

1. Introduction

The wear properties of 35CrMoV steel are poor under heavy load and wet conditions, as the service life and working stability of the components are dramatically reduced. Further, 35CrMoV steel is applied to a load-bearing connector of the coal shearer, due to its excellent hardenability, creep, and high-strength properties [1,2]. Due to the excellent corrosion resistance and wear properties of Ni60 (Ni-Cr-B-Si) alloys, they have been widely used in metallurgy, mining, and other fields for the repair and protection of fragile parts [3]. Therefore, laser cladding Ni60-based coating on the 35CrMoV substrate is an effective way to reinforce the surface performance of components [4]. Nevertheless, the cracks and stress concentration are susceptible to generation in the laser cladding process [5]. There is an increasingly prominent solution in enhancing the surface properties of the coating by post-treatment methods, such as aging, quenching, heat treatment, and tempering [6,7,8].
Heat treatment is an effective method to improve surface properties. Heat treatment can eliminate residual stress, further improving the mechanical and tribological properties of the coating [9,10,11,12]. Lu et al. [13] reported that Ni60/h-BN self-lubricating anti-wear composite coating on 304 stainless steels were heat-treated at 600 °C for 1 h. The results indicated that the maximum microhardness of the coatings was first increased from 667.7 HV1 to 765.0 HV1. The friction coefficients of the coating after heat treatment were decreased, obviously. Guo et al. [14] investigated the friction and wear properties of laser cladding iron-base alloy by heat treatment. The results showed the crystalline grains of the coating are smaller after heat treatment for austenite and lath martensite grains, which are helpful in improving the hardness. Sun et al. [15] studied the microstructure conversion and grain size development in various stages of heat treatment. Meanwhile, magnitude, shape, and distribution in the secondary phase during heat treatment were investigated to explore the function mechanism of micro-alloyed elements on the evolution of microstructure and grain during heat treatment. Homogeneous microstructure and composition are obtained after heat treatment. Chai et al. [16] studied the effect of heat treatment on microstructures and properties of a 304 stainless-steel coating on 27SiMn steel by laser cladding. The results showed that the heat treatment process can refine the grain size of cladding layers, which makes microstructures denser. The heat treatment process can improve the plasticity and toughness and it enhances the tensile strength and reduces the microhardness of materials. Gong et al. [17] studied the influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the FeCrNi coating produced by laser cladding. The results showed that the heat treatment, at a temperature ranging from 1073 to 1273 K, refined the grains in the substrate materials and effectively removed the soft zone of hardness between the fused zone and base material, mainly due to a secondary quench of heat treatment. When the temperature of heat treatment was 1073 K, the maximum ultimate tensile strength values of the laser cladding component were obtained.
However, reports on reinforced laser cladding Ni-based alloys via heat treatment are scarce [18,19]. In this study, the composite coatings on 35CrMoV steel were heat-treated at different temperature (25 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 1 h). The wear and hardness tests were analyzed. Further, the effects of heat treatment on the macro-morphology, microstructure, and element segregation of the Ni60 cladding layer were systematically investigated systemically.

2. Materials and Experimental Procedures

2.1. Materials

First, 35CrMoV steel (KENNAMETAL Co., Shanghai, China) samples with dimensions of 100 mm × 60 mm × 20 mm were used for the substrate. In order to eliminate the oxide film on the surface of 35CrMoV steel, the specific process is as follows: the surface of 35CrMoV steel is polished with fine sandpaper and then cleaned with acetone. The raw powder material is the Ni60 (ZHUJIN Co., Jingdezhen, China) with a composition (wt.%) of 0.8 C, 0.4 Si, 15.5 Cr, 0.2 Mo, 15.0 Fe, 3.0 B, and balance Ni and the particle size is 100 μm. Excellent fluidity and uniform Ni60 powder is obtained by the powder by ball milling for 3 h with a ball milling speed of 200 r/min. Additionally, it is dried in a desiccator at 375 K for 2 h.

2.2. Laser-Cladding Process

The 35CrMoV matrix was firstly surface-treated (burning–cleaning–drying) and then the powder was preset on the substrate with a thickness of 1.5 mm through a self-made mold. The coatings were then obtained by BS-OF-3000-15-4L industrial laser equipment (WISCO.HGLASER, Wuhan, China). Table 1 shows the optimized laser processing parameters.

2.3. Heat Treatment

After laser-cladding treatment, the coatings were cut by electro-sparking machining. Heat treatment was carried out by Muffle furnace (BYT, Nanjing, China) with a heating rate of 10 °C /min. Laser-clad coatings were heat treated at 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 1 h, respectively, followed by furnace cooling.

2.4. Coating Characterization

The samples were cut into 10 × 10 × 10 mm samples by wire cutting and the surfaces of the coatings were cleaned by a film grinder. The phase composition of the coatings was detected by X-ray diffraction (BRUKER-AXS-D8, Germany). The SEM sample was polished to a mirror surface with a grinder (SYNTEM, Shangdong, China) and a polishing machine (ORTLAL, Tianjin, China) and then the sample was corroded with aqua regia (hydrochloric acid and nitric acid 3:1) for 25 s, scrubbed with 99% alcohol, and then dried. The microstructure of the coating was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL/JSM-5610LV, JEOL, Japan) with energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS, JEOL, Japan) for analyzing the distribution of elements. The tribological behavior of the cladding was detected by a high-speed reciprocating wear and friction tester (MFT-R4000, QUANLITEST, Jinan, China), and a Si3N4 ball with a diameter of 6 mm was used for grinding materials. The tests were carried out with a wear time of 20 min, a load of 5 N, a reciprocating frequency of 2 Hz, and a wear length of 10 mm. Surface topography 3D characteristics and wear volume of the coatings were analyzed by a MicroXAM-800 non-contact optical profiler (ADE Corporation, Westwood, MA, USA). A Vickers microhardness Tester (HMAS-D1000SZ, WHW, Shanghai, China was used to test the hardness of the cladding layer; the loading force was 9.8 N and lasted for 10 s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase Structure of Cladding Layer

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of the Ni60 coatings with different heat treatment temperatures. The diffraction peaks of γ-(Ni, Fe), Cr7C3, Cr23C6, CrB, CrFeB, and Cr2Ni3 were detected in all specimens. It is obvious that the diffraction peak intensity of Cr7C3, Cr23C6, and Cr2Ni3 of the four composite coatings after heat treatment at 500 °C for 1 h is higher than that of other heat-treatment temperatures (Figure 1A2). This can be attributed to the fact that laser cladding is a rapid non-equilibrium solidification process [20,21]. During the laser-cladding process, parts of boron atoms do not have enough time to combine with carbon or nickel atoms or the solute in the unstable supersaturated solid solution (Ni,Fe) in the molten pool [22]. In the process of heat treatment, atomic diffusion is active and boron atoms are prone to react with carbon and nickel atoms to form Cr7C3, Cr23C6, and Cr2Ni3 phases. Thus, the intensity of the diffraction peaks of Cr7C3, Cr23C6, and Cr2Ni3 increases (Figure 1A2) [13]. After heat treatment at 600 °C, the characteristics of the diffraction peaks changed. It can be clearly seen in Figure 1A1 that the diffraction peak angle shifted 0.11 degrees to the left relative to the diffraction peak angle of coating without heat treatment, and the half width of the diffraction peak becomes larger. According to the Debye–Scherrer Formula (1), the microstructure is refined with heat treatment at 600 °C. This result is consistent with SEM analysis. The phenomenon of diffraction peak shift can be explained as that after solid solution treatment, the atoms of precipitated phase elements, such as C, Cr, and Fe, are dissolved back into the matrix and the solid solution atoms are not precipitated but squeezed into the crystal cell to produce distortion. After heat treatment at 700 °C, the intensity of the diffraction peak increases and shifts to the right due to element segregation. This illustrates that improper heat treatment cannot refine the microstructure and make elements uniform.
D = k λ β cos θ
In Equation (1), D is the grain size, K is the Scherrer constant, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray, β is the half-height width of the diffraction peak, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle.
The results indicate that strengthening phases of the non-heat-treatment cladding layer are composed of Cr7C3, Cr23C6, CrB, and CrFeB. In addition, CrB, CrFeB, and other boride ceramic phases can simultaneously improve the hardness and the brittleness of the cladding layer. However, severe thermal stress occurs from excessive brittle phases in rapid heating and rapid non-equilibrium solidification processes, which leads to cracks in the laser-clad coating [23,24]. After heat treatment at 600 °C, diffraction peak intensity decreases, brittle phases number decreases, and the coating exhibits a refined grain as well as excellent properties.

3.2. Macro-Morphology of Cladding Layer

The macro-morphologies (OMs) of the coatings after different heat-treatment temperatures are shown in Figure 2. The microstructure morphology of a non-heat-treatment specimen is a relatively coarse columnar grain (Figure 2a). A large number of columnar crystals separate out when the sample is heat treated at 500 °C (Figure 2b). Especially after heat treatment at 600 °C, the eutectic structure is refined and distributed uniformly (Figure 2c). However, the eutectic structure has a solid solution phenomenon and gradually develops into rod-shaped crystals with heat treatment at 700 °C (Figure 2d). It is worth noting that the matrix after heat treatment at 600 °C exhibits obvious grain refinement and a refined crystal structure, which can improve the wear resistance of composite coatings.

3.3. Microstructure

Figure 3 shows SEM image analyses of a Ni60 cladding layer on a 35CrMoV steel substrate with different heat treatments. It can be seen that heat treatments have great influence on the microstructure of the coating. The phases of the coating without heat treatment are composed of a reticular structure and coarse eutectic with large grain size and sparse structure distribution (Figure 3a). With the temperature of the heat treatment increasing, the microstructure of the coatings changes obviously. The coarse dendritic eutectic appears with a “decomposition” phenomenon and the dendritic eutectic of a larger size was refined after heat treatment at 500 °C (Figure 3b). In particular, after heat treatment at 600 °C, the reticular grains distribute uniformly and the massive solid solution is further refined (Figure 3c). Moreover, the microstructure becomes relatively sparse and coarse and the microstructure of the solid solution transfers to being rodlike after heat treatment at 700 °C (Figure 3d).
The results obtained by energy spectrum analysis (ESP) of points (P) are given in Table 2. It can be deduced that the dendrite region of P (dendritic tissue marked by red triangle) is mainly composed of Ni, Fe, Si, Cr, C, and B, which is regarded as γ, Cr7C3, Cr23C6, Cr2Ni3, CrB, and CrFeB solid solution. In the microstructure, borides are typically brittle phases, such as CrB and CrFeB. The high content of B in the massive structure is more brittle, resulting in poor cladding-layer properties [25]. Carbides exhibit excellent high hardness, which can improve cladding-layer strength [26]. It can be obtained from Table 2 that, after the 600 °C heat treatment, the content of B decreased by 86.4% compared with that of the coating without heat treatment, but the content of C increased by 51%, indicating that the brittle-phase CrB and CrFeB decreased greatly and the enhanced-phase Cr7C3 and Cr23C increased, which was conducive to the suppression of cracks, thus, improving the properties of the coating. This demonstrates that heat treatment at 600 °C promotes the redistribution of the elements, which is beneficial for improving the wear resistance of the coatings.

3.4. Solute Segregation Analysis

Figure 4 shows the distribution of Ni, Fe, Si, and Cr elements in the composite coating after 1 h of heat treatment at different heat−treatment temperatures. The redistribution behavior of solute atoms during laser−cladding solidification leads to the uneven distribution of alloying elements, and the element segregation caused by the above behavior seriously affects the microstructure uniformity of the cladding layer and reduces the mechanical properties in the coating. Therefore, heat treatment is often used to reduce or eliminate micro−segregation and improve the thermal deformation stability of the cladding layer. During the rapid solidification, solute segregation appears between the crystal boundaries and the inner area of the dendrites without heat treatment (Figure 4a–d). Homogenization was carried out at a 500 °C heat−treatment temperature to analyze the diffusion behavior of Ni, Fe, Si, and Cr elements. Ni and Cr elements were mainly distributed between the dendrites, while Fe and Si elements still had different degrees of segregation on the dendrites, indicating that the element segregation could not be eliminated at 500 °C (Figure 4a1–d1). Homogenization was carried out at a 600 °C heat−treatment temperature, element enrichment degree disappears, and element distribution is the best (Figure 4a2–d2). After homogenization under heat treatment at 700 °C, the enrichment degree of Ni, Fe, Si, and Cr gradually increases and the distribution uniformity degree of alloying elements becomes worse (Figure 4a3–d3). Due to element segregation, there is a concentration gradient between the central part of the dendrite and the surrounding part of the dendrite, and the growth of the dendrite is affected by solute diffusion. This indicates that heat treatment at 700 °C cannot refine the grain and reduce segregation to improve the properties of the alloy but can aggravate the element segregation. It can be concluded from the above investigation that heat treatment promotes element redistribution in the coating. The element segregation caused by laser cladding is reduced.

3.5. Microhardness

In order to evaluate the effect of different heat-treatment temperatures on the microhardness of coating, microhardness distribution along the depth direction was measured, as shown in Figure 5. The profiles can be divided into three zones: coating, heat affect zone, and substrate. It can be clearly seen that microhardness was closely related to the heat treatment. Non-heat-treated coatings exhibit the smallest micro-hardness (633.6 to 805.22 HV1) and the average hardness is 702.68 HV1. After heat treatment at 500 °C, the average hardness of the coating increases to 826.22 HV1 and the coating microhardness ranges from 669.6 HV1 to 947 HV1. The increase in heat-treatment temperature improves coating microhardness. Obviously, the surface microhardness at 600 °C is comparatively higher (771.4 to 915.8 HV1), with an average hardness of 843.1 HV1. Nevertheless, the microhardness of the coating ranges from 660.2 to 857.6 HV1 and average hardness decreases to 760.77 HV1 after heat treatment at 700 °C. The microhardness results (Figure 5) indicate that the average value of coating microhardness with 600 °C is the highest and more stable. The microhardness enhancement is more significant at 600 °C.

3.6. Tribological Properties

In order to intrinsically reflect the tribological performance of coatings, wear experiments were carried out by a wear-testing machine (MFT-R4000). The wear time, load, reciprocating stroke, and frequency of experimental parameters are 20 min, 30 N, 5 mm, and 15 Hz, respectively. The Si3N4 ball is used as the grinding ball. The 3D wear morphology of wear scratch was carried out by the MicroXAM-800 non-contact optical profiler (ADE Corporation, USA). Figure 6 shows the 3D (three-dimensional) wear morphologies of coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures. The wide groove scratches, wear chips, tribo-film, and shallow plow appeared on the surface of the non-heat-treated coating (Figure 6a and Figure 7a). The formation of the tribo-film is possibly due to the combination of oxidative and adhesive wear phenomena. The occurrence of the adhesive wear can be attributed to the counter-material of inert Si3N4 ball, which results in initial material transferred from the coating onto the ball. Therefore, the formation of debris and peel-off areas is caused by the breaking-off of the tribo-film. Moreover, due to the hardness of the counter-material Si3N4 ball and the presence of debris in the contact, abrasive lines occurred simultaneously. Thus, the results indicated that the coating with non-heat treatment exists in fatigue wear, plastic deformation, adhesive, oxidative, and abrasive wear. Figure 6b and Figure 7b show that the wear mechanism is mainly abrasive wear, adhesive wear, and plastic deformation after heat treatment at 500 °C, which can be attributed to the uneven distribution of reinforcement phases that results in the rough wear surface. It is worth noting that the wear surface of the coating is relatively flat and smooth after heat treatment at 600 °C, and the wear mechanism exhibits mainly plastic deformation and adhesive wear (Figure 6c and Figure 7c). However, when the temperature increases to 700 °C, the deep grooves on the worn surface of the coating are caused by improper heat treatment (Figure 6d and Figure 7d). Therefore, the wear mechanism is mainly adhesive wear and plastic deformation. The SEM images of wear scratch morphology intrinsically reflect the tribological performance of coatings. The results justified the conclusion of the wear mechanism in the above investigations: Ni60 cladding exhibits the best wear resistance at 600 °C.
The wear volume and curves of width and depth of layers are shown in Figure 8. The wear volume reflects the wear resistance of materials. Detailed results are shown in Table 3. It can be clearly observed that, with the heat treatment increasing to 500 °C, the wear volume of the coating decreases to 3.7532 × 10−5 mm3, the wear width is about 330 μm, and the wear depth is about 6.5 μm. In particular, after heat treatment at 600 °C, the wear volume of the coating is 2.9546 × 10−5 mm3, the wear width is about 290 μm, and the wear depth is about 5 μm. However, the wear of the coating increases to 3.3572 × 10−5 mm3 and the wear width and wear depth rise simultaneously after heat treatment at 700 °C. It can be concluded that the coating after the 600 °C heat treatment obtained the best wear resistance.
The temperatures of heat treatment are responsible for the friction coefficient. To sum up, under the same wear conditions, the wear properties in the untreated coating are poor. The proper heat-treatment temperature promotes reinforced phase production and the redistributed phases not only reduce the stress concentration, but also enhance the bonding with the matrix interface [27,28]. During the wear processing, the coating after 600 °C heat treatment’s wear mechanism is plastic deformation. Owing to the heat accumulated during continuous sliding friction, forming a hardened or oxide layer on the worn surface of the coating can be prevented by the higher combined force between the phase and the matrix, thus, exhibiting excellent wear resistance.
The curves of the friction coefficient with different heat-treatment temperatures are presented in Figure 9. The friction pair combination has a great influence on the friction and wear performance, which is directly related to whether the coating performance can meet the requirements of the working conditions on the friction coefficient. The Si3N4 was used to conduct friction and wear experiments on the grinding ball to explore the wear resistance of Ni60 coating. Comparing the friction performance of coatings at different heat-treatment temperatures, the results show that average friction coefficients of the coatings are 0.601, 0.561, 0.434, and 0.458 with different heat-treatment temperatures of 25 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C, respectively. When the heat-treatment temperature increases to 600 °C, the wear mass loss obviously decreases. Owing to the reinforced phases of the coatings without heat treatment segregating, the curve swings largely throughout the whole stage of the friction experiments. The brittle phases distribute uniformly in the coating and the friction coefficient curves are prone to being stable with the increasing heat-treatment temperature. The uniform reinforced phases improve the metallurgical bonding strength in the matrix phases; thus, the heat treatment plays an important role in grain refinement and element redistribution, resulting in a reduction in the friction coefficient.

4. Conclusions

The Ni60 self-lubricated anti-wear composite coatings were successfully precipitated on a 35CrMoV substrate by laser-cladding technology. The effects of heat treatment on the macro-morphology, microstructure, precipitated phase, microhardness, and wear properties of the Ni60 coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures (25 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C for 1 h, respectively) were investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn:
The micro-structure of the Ni60 composite coating is mainly composed of refined crystals at 600 °C heat treatment. The coating exhibits refined grain, a homogeneous microstructure, and uniform element distribution of Si, Cr, Fe, and Ni. The dendritic areas of P mainly consist of a γ + Cr7C3 + Cr23C6 + Cr2Ni3 + CrFeB solid solution.
The phases of enriched Cr of the coating gradually decompose with the increase in heat-treatment temperatures from 500 °C to 700 °C, resulting in the intensity of peak Ni60 coatings decreasing dramatically. The diffraction peak shifts to the left and the half-height width of the diffraction peak is the largest after heat treatment at 600 °C.
The mechanical properties of the coating are significantly improved by the 600 °C heat treatment. The micro-hardness of the cladding layer becomes more stable, ranging from 771.4 to 915.8 HV1, the average friction coefficient is 0.434, with a small range of fluctuation, and the wear volume is reduced to 2.9546 × 10−5 mm3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W., Z.Y. and C.Z.; methodology, Y.W. and L.K.; software, Y.W., Z.Y. and Y.L.; validation, Y.W. and Z.Y.; formal analysis, Y.W., Z.Y. and L.K.; investigation, Y.W. and Z.Y.; resources, Y.W., Z.Y. and Y.L.; data curation, Y.W. and L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and C.X.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., C.X. and L.K.; supervision, Y.W., C.Z. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant No. 2017YFC0804310) and the General Special Scientific Research Plan of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education (grant No. 20JK0754).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editors for their editing assistance. Lastly, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, Z.M.; Ren, H.B.; Yu, Y.; Gao, Z.M.; Liu, E.Y.; Zhang, C.W. Effect of CeO2 on the microstructure and microhardness of las60 on 3er-cladded Ni5CrMoV alloys. Micron 2021, 150, 103146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chai, M.; Han, Z.; Liu, P. High-Temperature Tensile and Creep Behavior in a CrMoV Steel and Weld Metal. Materials 2022, 15, 109. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qi, K.; Yang, Y.; Hu, G.; Lu, X.; Li, J. Thermal expansion control of composite coatings on 42CrMo by laser cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 397, 125983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, Z.T.; Ren, H.B.; Yu, Y.; Guo, W.; Zhang, C.W.; Gao, Z.M. Effect of nano-WC content on microstructures and wear resistance of laser cladding Fe-based alloy coatings. Mater. Res. Express. 2020, 7, 096515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kimme, J.; Zeisig, J.; Frohlich, A.; Krausel, V. Technology Innovation for the Manual Laser Cladding of High-Alloy Tool Steels. Metals 2021, 11, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ke, J.; Liu, X.B.; Liang, J.; Liang, L.; Luo, Y.S. Microstructure and fretting wear of laser cladding self-lubricating anti-wear composite coatings on TA2 alloy after aging treatment. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 119, 105599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Masaylo, D.V.; Orlov, A.V.; Igoshin, S.D. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Structure and Phase Composition of a High-Temperature Nickel Alloy Obtained by Laser Cladding. Met. Sci. Heat. Treat. 2019, 60, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zaharia, S.M.; Chicos, L.A.; Lancea, C.; Pop, M.A. Effects of Homogenization Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Sandwich Structures Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Metals 2020, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Durge, G.; Chandak, A.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Kiran, K.U.V.; Sunil, B.R.; Dumpala, R. Effect of heat treatment on the hardness and wear characteristics of NiCrBSi laser clad deposited on AISI410 stainless steel. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 086524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, X.B.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Zhai, Y.J.; Qiao, S.J.; Xu, J.N.; Luo, Y.S.; Tu, R. Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Fretting Wear Resistance of Laser Clad Ti-matrix Composite Coatings. J. Mater. Eng. 2018, 46, 79–85. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rashid, R.A.R.; Nazari, K.A.; Barr, C.; Palanisamy, S.; Orchowski, N.; Matthews, N.; Dargusch, M.S. Effect of laser reheat post-treatment on the microstructural characteristics of laser-cladded ultra-high strength steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 372, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miyake, Y.; Sato, Y.; Teranishi, R.; Kaneko, K. Effect of heat treatments on the microstructure and formability of Al-Mg-Mn-Sc-Zr alloy. Micron 2017, 101, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lu, X.L.; Liu, X.B.; Yu, P.C.; Qiao, S.J.; Zhai, Y.J.; Wang, M.D.; Chen, Y.; Xu, D. Synthesis and characterization of Ni60-hBN high temperature self-lubricating anti-wear composite coatings on Ti6Al4V alloy by laser cladding. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 78, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, W.; Zhang, L.; Xu, C.; Chai, R.; Gao, Z.; Kogo, B.; Chizari, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, B. Study on the wear resistance of laser cladding iron-base alloy by heat treatment. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 026572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sun, J.; Ji, K.; Jiang, C.W.; Zhang, Y.C. Influence of Various Heat Treatment Stages on Evolution of Microstructure and Grain in H407 Steel. Met. Mater. Int. 2016, 22, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chai, R.X.; Li, K.K.; Guo, W.; Fang, X.R. Effect of Heat Treatment Process on Microstructures and Properties of 304 Stainless Steel Cladding Layers. Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 2018, 55, 051405. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong, F.B.; Shen, J.; Gao, R.H.; Zhang, T.; Xie, X.; Li, Y. Influence of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of FeCrNi coating produced by laser cladding. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2016, 26, 2117–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, G.; Kutsuna, M.; Liu, Z. CO2 laser cladding and plasma cladding of Ni-based alloy powder on the SUS316LN stainless steel. JSME Int. J. C Mech. Syst. 2006, 49, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gao, Z.T.; Ren, H.B.; Geng, H.M.; Yu, Y.; Gao, Z.M.; Zhang, C.W. Effect of CeO2 on Microstructure and Wear Property of Laser Cladding Ni-Based Coatings Fabricated on 35CrMoV Steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thuvander, M.; Magnusson, H.; Borggren, U. Carbide Precipitation in a Low Alloyed Steel during Aging Studied by Atom Probe Tomography and Thermodynamic Modeling. Metals 2021, 11, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, S.T.; Yang, Y.Q.; Chen, B.; Liu, K.; Ma, Y.C.; Ding, L.L.; Shi, J.J. Influence of yttrium on purification and carbide precipitation of superalloy K4169. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 86, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quazi, M.M.; Fazal, M.A.; Haseeb, A.; Yusof, F.; Masjuki, H.H.; Arslan, A. Effect of rare earth elements and their oxides on tribo-mechanical performance of laser claddings: A review. J. Rare Earths 2016, 34, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ratkus, A.; Torims, T. Study of the impact of the powder laser cladding position on the parameters of the cladded layer. P. Est. Acad. Sci. 2020, 69, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, L.M.; Xu, H.F.; Xiao, J.K.; Wei, X.L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, C. Effect of heat treatment on structure and property evolutions of atmospheric plasma sprayed NiCrBSi coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 325, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chien, S.K.; Tsai, K.T.; Li, Y.H.; Wu, Y.T.; Chen, W.L. A Simple and Accurate 3D Numerical Model for Laser Cladding. J. Eng. Mech. 2020, 36, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, T.G.; Xiao, H.Q.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Yao, B.; Yang, F. Effect of Y2O3 Addition on Microstructural Characteristics and Microhardness of Laser-Cladded Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Coating. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2020, 29, 8221–8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moon, G.; Lee, E. Combined Effects of Optimized Heat Treatment and Nickel Coating for the Improvement of Interfacial Bonding in Aluminum–Iron Alloys Hybrid Structures. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, H.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Compound Casting of Layered Aluminum Matrix Composite Brake Drum. Materials 2021, 14, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the composite with different heat−treatment temperatures.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the composite with different heat−treatment temperatures.
Metals 12 01294 g001
Figure 2. The microstructures of composite coatings of different heat−treatment temperatures: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Figure 2. The microstructures of composite coatings of different heat−treatment temperatures: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Metals 12 01294 g002
Figure 3. Microstructures of the composite coatings with different heat−treatment temperatures: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Figure 3. Microstructures of the composite coatings with different heat−treatment temperatures: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Metals 12 01294 g003
Figure 4. Element distribution of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures: (ad) 25 °C; (a1d1) 500 °C; (a2d2) 600 °C; (a3d3) 700 °C.
Figure 4. Element distribution of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures: (ad) 25 °C; (a1d1) 500 °C; (a2d2) 600 °C; (a3d3) 700 °C.
Metals 12 01294 g004
Figure 5. (a) Microhardness distribution of the composite coatings with different heattreatment temperatures; (b) average microhardness of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures.
Figure 5. (a) Microhardness distribution of the composite coatings with different heattreatment temperatures; (b) average microhardness of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures.
Metals 12 01294 g005
Figure 6. Three−dimensional surface morphology of the wear scratch: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Figure 6. Three−dimensional surface morphology of the wear scratch: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Metals 12 01294 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the wear scratch: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Figure 7. SEM images of the wear scratch: (a) 25 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Metals 12 01294 g007
Figure 8. Wear volume and curves of width and depth of scratch: (a) wear volume; (b) width and depth of the scratches.
Figure 8. Wear volume and curves of width and depth of scratch: (a) wear volume; (b) width and depth of the scratches.
Metals 12 01294 g008
Figure 9. (a) Friction coefficient of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures; (b) average friction coefficient of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures.
Figure 9. (a) Friction coefficient of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures; (b) average friction coefficient of the composite coatings with different heat-treatment temperatures.
Metals 12 01294 g009
Table 1. Laser-cladding parameters.
Table 1. Laser-cladding parameters.
ParametersValue
Power3000 w
Spot sizes15 mm × 3 mm
Scanning speed120 mm/min
Overlap ratio0.4
Gas flow rate of argon15 L/min
Wavelength1080 nm
Table 2. EDS results of the coating.
Table 2. EDS results of the coating.
Spectrum of PC/wt.%B/wt.%Si/wt.%Cr/wt.%Fe/wt.%Ni/wt.%
Spec. 12.328.563.098.9938.1447.77
Spec. 23.475.552.8021.0521.8245.31
Spec. 35.741.163.749.0225.7856.26
Spec. 42.337.050.4342.6731.5615.97
Table 3. The wear volume, width, and depth of coatings.
Table 3. The wear volume, width, and depth of coatings.
SampleWear Volume/10−5 mm3Wear Width/μmWear Depth/μm
25 °C4.0651 mm3385 μm7.5 μm
500 °C3.7532 mm3330 μm6.5 μm
600 °C2.9546 mm3290 μm5 μm
700 °C3.3572 mm3360 μm6 μm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Kang, L.; Xu, C.; Liu, Y. Simultaneously Improving Microstructures and Wear Properties of Ni60 Coating by Heat Treatment. Metals 2022, 12, 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081294

AMA Style

Wang Y, Yu Z, Zhang C, Kang L, Xu C, Liu Y. Simultaneously Improving Microstructures and Wear Properties of Ni60 Coating by Heat Treatment. Metals. 2022; 12(8):1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuan, Zhengyang Yu, Chuanwei Zhang, Le Kang, Chao Xu, and Yan Liu. 2022. "Simultaneously Improving Microstructures and Wear Properties of Ni60 Coating by Heat Treatment" Metals 12, no. 8: 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12081294

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop