Next Article in Journal
Laser-Ignited Self-Propagating Sintering of AlCrFeNiSi High-Entropy Alloys: An Improved Technique for Preparing High-Entropy Alloys
Next Article in Special Issue
Atmospheric Corrosion Sensor Based on Strain Measurement with an Active Dummy Circuit Method in Experiment with Corrosion Products
Previous Article in Journal
Tying Processing Parameters to the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured FeNiZr Consolidated via the Field Assisted Sintering Technique
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulation Approach for Cathodic Protection Prediction of Aluminum Fin-Tube Heat Exchanger Using Boundary Element Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Fe3Al/TiC and Fe3Al-Cr/TiC Coatings Prepared by HVOF in NaCl Solution

Metals 2019, 9(4), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/met9040437
by Najmeh Ahledel 1, Robert Schulz 2, Mario Gariepy 3, Hendra Hermawan 1 and Houshang Alamdari 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Metals 2019, 9(4), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/met9040437
Submission received: 20 December 2018 / Revised: 7 March 2019 / Accepted: 9 April 2019 / Published: 13 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corrosion and Protection of Metals)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

  Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The aim of the paper, i.e. the corrosion behavior of Fe3Al/TiC and Fe3Al-Cr/TiC composite coatings, prepared by high velocity oxy fuel (HVOF) spraying, is quite interesting.

This is a good paper with new and interesting results. My impression is that this work is a very solid piece of science and an important one. The abstract summarize the work. The purpose of the study is clearly outlined and the findings of prior work are well discussed. All topics are relatively well presented and discussed. However, the discussion of some results requires improvement. The summary and conclusions are sound and justified. All presented figures are good quality and they prove their point. The paper is written in good English. The manuscript is easily readable concerning language, style and presentation. The references are appropriate and up to date.

Following are some of my comments.

1. There is no discussion and references to the literature regarding the results obtained for open circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization tests.

2. The authors mentioned that “The morphology and the elemental analysis of the coatings were analysed after performing the potentiodynamic polarization tests. This was done using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-840A, equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), to evaluate the composition of corrosion products.” I couldn’t find these results, unless they are presented in Figure 9. However, according to the text “Elemental analyses, extracted from XPS spectra of three coatings, before and after passivation tests during potentiodynamic polarization test in 3.5 % NaCl solution, are presented Fig. 9.” It should be clarified.

Author Response

We thank the editor and reviewers for giving us the chance to revise our manuscript and for providing us such constructive comments. The following are our brief responses:


Reviewer 2

The aim of the paper, i.e. the corrosion behavior of Fe3Al/TiC and Fe3Al-Cr/TiC composite coatings, prepared by high velocity oxy fuel (HVOF) spraying, is quite interesting. This is a good paper with new and interesting results. My impression is that this work is a very solid piece of science and an important one. The abstract summarize the work. The purpose of the study is clearly outlined and the findings of prior work are well discussed. All topics are relatively well presented and discussed. However, the discussion of some results requires improvement. The summary and conclusions are sound and justified. All presented figures are good quality and they prove their point. The paper is written in good English. The manuscript is easily readable concerning language, style and presentation. The references are appropriate and up to date. Following are some of my comments.

 

1. There is no discussion and references to the literature regarding the results obtained for open circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization tests.

-- Discussion added, thank you.

 

2. The authors mentioned that “The morphology and the elemental analysis of the coatings were analysed after performing the potentiodynamic polarization tests. This was done using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-840A, equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), to evaluate the composition of corrosion products.” I couldn’t find these results, unless they are presented in Figure 9. However, according to the text “Elemental analyses, extracted from XPS spectra of three coatings, before and after passivation tests during potentiodynamic polarization test in 3.5 % NaCl solution, are presented Fig. 9.” It should be clarified.

-- A major revision is done on the surface analysis section. A supplementary file on XPS results is added, referred and discussed in the text. Thank you.


Round  2

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please find attached the PDF format of a point by point response.

Thanks 

Najmeh

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round  3

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Back to TopTop