Next Article in Journal
A Step towards a Sustainable Tourism in Apennine Mountain Areas: A Proposal of Geoitinerary across the Matese Mountains (Central-Southern Italy)
Next Article in Special Issue
LGM Glaciations in the Northeastern Anatolian Mountains: New Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Geoheritage and Cultural Heritage—A Review of Recurrent and Interlinked Themes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Age of the Most Extensive Glaciation in the Alps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soil Formation and Mass Redistribution during the Holocene Using Meteoric 10Be, Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy

1
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
2
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 3, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
3
Institute of Hydrology, Albert-Ludwig University Freiburg, Friedrichstraße 39, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
4
Section Hydrology, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
5
Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2022, 12(2), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020099
Submission received: 21 July 2021 / Revised: 31 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 February 2022 / Published: 21 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutting Edge Earth Sciences: Three Decades of Cosmogenic Nuclides)

Abstract

:
Soil development and erosion are important and opposing processes in the evolution of high-mountainous landscapes, though their dynamics are not fully understood. We compared soil development between a calcareous and a siliceous chronosequence in the central Swiss Alps at high altitudes, which both cover soil formation over the Holocene. We calculated element mass balances, long-term erosion rates based on meteoric 10Be and we determined the rates of soil formation. We also analyzed the shifts in the mineralogical composition, weathering indices, the particle size distribution, carbon stocks and oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and Mn. The siliceous soils had high chemical weathering rates at the early stage of soil formation that strongly decreased after a few millennia. The development of calcareous soil was characterized by high carbonate losses and a shift to finer soil texture. Soil erosion hampered the upbuilding of soil horizons in the early stages of soil development, which led to a delay in soil and vegetation development. This study shows how soil formation drivers change over time. In the early stages of soil development, the parent material predominantly drives soil formation while at later stages the vegetation becomes more dominant as it influences surface stability, hydrological pathways, and chemical weathering that determine water drainage and retention.

1. Introduction

Soils and their formation, i.e., the physical and chemical alteration of the parent material, have been studied for more than a century. Dokuchaev [1] laid the foundation of soil science with his observations in the Russian steppe. He also laid the ground for the factorial model of soil development, which Jenny developed further in 1941 in his publication, Factors of Soil Formation [2]. Jenny described soil formation as the product of five independent factors: climate, organisms, relief, parent material, and time. Over the years, other models have been developed. Simonson [3] presented a model which looks at soils from a process-oriented point of view (i.e., additions, removals, translocations). Johnson and Watson-Stegner [4] introduced the concept of pathways. Their model allows soil formation to move in two directions and acknowledges soil formation as a highly dynamic process: soils experience progressive pedogenesis phases (characterized by horizonation, soil deepening, and developmental upbuilding) or regressive pedogenetic phases (halploidization, soil thinning, and retardant upbuilding). As the environmental conditions are never entirely stable, soil development may switch between progressive and regressive phases. The state of a soil at one point in time is merely the integration of all past soil development processes [4,5,6].
The formation of soils is in essence a balance between soil production (the conversion of bedrock or parent material to soil) and denudation (physical and chemical soil loss) [7]. This can be expressed as:
F s o i l = P s o i l D s o i l
Fsoil is the soil formation rate, Psoil the soil production rate and Dsoil the soil denudation rate.
Soil production (Psoil) is the sum of transformation of parent material to soil (TPsoil), atmospheric (dust) input (A), net organic matter input (O), and organic matter decay (G) (e.g., [8])
P s o i l = T P s o i l + A + ( O G )
Denudation (Dsoil) is the sum of chemical weathering (Wsoil) and erosion (Esoil):
D s o i l = W s o i l + E s o i l
It has been shown that chemical weathering rates and physical erosion are closely linked [9]. Furthermore, the weathered layer acts as a protective layer which hinders weathering of the underlying parent material [10].
In glacial landscapes, glaciers shrink as a result of climate warming, exposing new surfaces and form fresh ground leading to significant amounts of sediment being eroded and accumulated downstream [11,12]. Periglacial areas are therefore useful to study processes related to early soil formation, chemical weathering, and erosion processes. They can provide good age constraints, and the till which generally forms the parent material can be regarded as well mixed. Based on the concept of Jenny [2] according to which the factor time and its influence on soil formation can be isolated when the other factors remain constant have become widely used approaches to trace and compare the transformation of soils over various timescales [13,14]. Chronosequences have been applied in various locations of the Alps for many decades. They show that most soil properties change very rapidly at early stages of soil development [15,16,17]. With time, this rate of alteration usually declines, reaching a plateau [14,18,19,20,21,22]. This is due to the high abundance of easily weatherable material in proglacial areas, because the glacial till has already undergone considerable physical weathering and provides, based on its grain size distribution, large surface areas [14]. Thus, weathering fluxes are usually highest in the beginning and taper off, usually after several millennia [23,24]. The rates depend on the composition and properties of the parent material. Granite or gneiss-based parent materials are expected to lose mainly silicon, iron, and aluminum, as they are the major components of micas and feldspars [25]. Micas have been observed to weather easily and be transformed into vermiculite and smectites, i.e., clay minerals [26]. Limestone-based soils will mainly loose calcium and varying amounts of magnesium through the dissolution of carbonates [23]. These shifts in the mineralogy will alter the physical and chemical soil properties, leading to finer texture and a higher proportion of fine pores which has a generally positive effect on the water retention capabilities of the soil [27,28].
When discussing soil development, it is important to consider the development of the biosphere as it influences the substrate considerably. Although Jenny defined it as independent factor, it is not. As both the soils and the vegetation influence each other simultaneously, their connection is not easy to quantify [29,30]. In the early stages of soil development, the processes of physical and chemical weathering improve the conditions for plant growth by providing the substrate for root growth and plant stability, water storage, and a steady supply of nutrients. At first, a combination of pioneer plants, which reproduce rapidly but are not very resilient, will add organic matter to the soils at a high rate via roots [31,32,33]. Roots are able to release large quantities of C to the soils as root detritus, exudates, and by transferring C to root symbionts [34,35]. Organic carbon and nitrogen can therefore be expected to accumulate rapidly in the first centuries after deglaciation [27,36,37]. The plants stabilize the soil surfaces and thus reduce soil erosion, and promote soil deepening [20,29,30]. As erosion is reduced [38] and the soil conditions provide more favorable and stable habitats, the composition of plant communities shift towards more resistant and competitive species. If the conditions are favorable, primary successions from pioneer species to trees can develop in less than two centuries in the Alps [39]. The subsequent accumulation of soil organic matter (SOM) [40] plays a crucial role in increasing soil water retention (by increasing the microporosity, [41]) and nutrient supply [42] which further improve the soil’s qualities as a habitat.
The extent to which the vegetation influences the substrate depends not only on the degree of coverage but also on the functional plant traits [43]. In a species-rich plant community, the diversity of different traits is assumed to positively influence ecosystem functioning, e.g., by the complementarity of nutrient recycling (diversity hypothesis). In order to quantify these relationships, scientists often use the concept of functional diversity, which is calculated as the combination of the abundance of plant species and their functional traits [44]. In principle, functional diversity cannot be described by one single index. One prominent measure of functional diversity often related to soil processes is the functional richness (FRic) meaning the total amount of niche space filled by the traits of all species in a certain community [45].
Meteoric 10Be is a new and novel method to obtain information about the balance between soil production and soil erosion [46]. Meteoric 10Be is, among others, produced in the upper atmosphere through spallation of nitrogen and oxygen by cosmic radiation [47]. Precipitation washes it out of the atmosphere and deposits it in soils (hence it is referred to as ‘meteoric’ 10Be, [48]). It is adsorbed strongly to soil particles which makes it a useful tracer for long-term soil erosion and sedimentation processes [46], soil residence times (e.g., [49]), and soil production (e.g., [50]). This method enables us to calculate the net soil loss during soil evolution. In contrast, fallout radionuclides (e.g., 239+240Pu) cover the last 60 years and enable the determination of erosion rates at a decadal scale. As soil erodibility generally decreases with (progressive) soil formation, the erosion rates are expected to decrease with increasing surface age. Vegetation and abiotic factors such as the topography and climatic conditions shape this temporal development. However, with increasing age, soils become less permeable and, thus, generate more surface runoff [51] which can induce more surface erosion. The roughness of the soil surface additionally influences the spatial distribution of the surface runoff. A rougher surface can lead to more channeling and, thus, increasing erodibility [52].
In order to improve our understanding of how high-mountainous (and, by extension, arctic) environments will develop under future climate warming, we must understand and quantify the processes that drive landscape evolution. This study explores soil formation in two proglacial areas with the aim to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the progression of chemical weathering and long-term erosion rates. We investigated soils on moraines of two periglacial chronosequences (one on granite/gneiss and the other one on carbonate parent material) which covered the Holocene and the Late Pleistocene. We used meteoric 10Be to measure long-term soil erosion rates and related them with our data on weathering. We linked the results to short-term erosion rates [53], a vegetational survey [54], and hydrological properties of the soils [55,56], including a flow accumulation analysis, all of which were investigated in the same area as part of the same project.

2. Site Descriptions

2.1. Klausenpass

We studied the proglacial area of the Griess Glacier (2000–2200 m a.s.l.), a small glacier near the Klausenpass, central Switzerland (Figure 1). The glacial sediment is mostly composed of limestone from the Early Cretaceous and the Late Jurassic period with some addition of Flysch [57]. The mean annual temperature in the area is about +2 °C (annual averages for the 1961–1990 period, [58]) and the mean annual precipitation is ca. 2000 mm (1961–1990 period, [59]). The snowy season typically lasts from mid-October to mid-June.
The chronosequence comprised four moraines: 110 a, 160 a, 4.9 ka, 13.5 ka (Table 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). We estimated the age of the 110 a site by tracking the glacier’s retreat using historical maps [60]. The 160 a moraine corresponds to the Little Ice Age (LIA). We can identify LIA moraines with ease in the field and on aerial images as they are large and well preserved. Moreover, glaciers in the Alps advanced to almost the same extent as previously reached 3000 years ago, so that they form a prominent boundary between well-developed vegetation on the outside and the sparsely vegetated glacial foreland on the inside [61]. Approximations of the surface ages of the second oldest and the oldest moraines were obtained by radiocarbon dating of the H2O2 resistant fraction of soil organic matter in the top horizons [62]. Radiocarbon dating of soil organic matter is useful when no other dating methods are applicable, but there are limitations which need to be kept in mind. In general, the ages of the H2O2 resistant fraction indicate the oldest organic matter fraction in soils. These ages should rather be considered as minimum ages, because organic matter accumulation on moraines starts only then when plants are present which requires some time, especially when erosion rates are high (which may be the case in mountain soils, [53]). Musso et al. [62] obtained (2 σ) age ranges of 4969–4852 a cal BP for the second oldest and 14,001–13,760 and 13,287–13,120 a cal BP for the oldest moraine (Table 2 in [62]). They used the ‘averages’ 4900 a cal BP and 13,500 a cal BP as the respective surface ages. For consistency and simplicity, this paper will use the same ages and henceforth refer to these two moraine ages as ‘4.9 ka’ and ‘13.5 ka’.

2.2. Sustenpass

The study site at Sustenpass is located in the proglacial area of the Stein Glacier (Figure 1). The parent material originates from the Aarmassif and consists of metagranitoids (variscan intrusion), gneiss, amphibolite, and mica-rich schist [57]. The mean annual temperature is ca 0–2 °C (1961–1990 period, [58]) and the mean annual precipitation ca 1700–2000 mm (1961–1990 period, [59]) in the study area. The snowy season typically lasts from mid-October to mid-June.
The Sustenpass chronosequence had four moraines: 30 a, 160 a, 3 ka, and 10 ka (Figure 2 and Figure 3, Table 1). The age and location of the 30 a site was estimated by tracking the glacier’s retreat after its advance in the mid-1980s using maps as well as aerial images. The soil barely shows any weathering and the vegetation is sparse and consists mostly of an initial grassland vegetation. The 160 a moraine (corresponding to the LIA) is well preserved in the east side of the valley, but it was not possible to sample there for logistical reasons. We therefore studied historical maps and located a suitable area on the opposite side of the valley which had the same surface age (Figure 1 and Figure 2, [63,64,65]).
The proglacial area of Steingletscher was previously studied by King [66] and Heikkinen and Fogelberg [67]. King identified three ridges (Figure 1) which originated from different glacial advances. Two LIA moraines, one from the 17th century and one from the 19th century, are situated directly behind a distinctly older moraine. Schimmelpfennig et al. [68] provided 10Be surface exposure ages on boulders and determined that the oldest of these three ridges was deposited nearly 3000 years ago. The 10 ka site was dated using the same method.
Table 1. Site description for Klausenpass and Sustenpass with the surface ages (years) [62], aspect, slope (degrees), and elevation (m a.s.l.) and some basic soil parameters. The lowest depth of each profile refers to the depth that was reached during the dig (see also Figure 3). The soils were classified using the World Reference Base (WRB) classification [69]. The pH was measured with an absolute instrument error of ±0.003. LOI (Loss on ignition) represents the soil organic matter content of the fine earth fraction. The relative errors between lab replicates are 0.1%.
Table 1. Site description for Klausenpass and Sustenpass with the surface ages (years) [62], aspect, slope (degrees), and elevation (m a.s.l.) and some basic soil parameters. The lowest depth of each profile refers to the depth that was reached during the dig (see also Figure 3). The soils were classified using the World Reference Base (WRB) classification [69]. The pH was measured with an absolute instrument error of ±0.003. LOI (Loss on ignition) represents the soil organic matter content of the fine earth fraction. The relative errors between lab replicates are 0.1%.
Soil ProfileSurface AgeAspectSlopeElevationVegetationSoil TypeHorizonDepth Bulk DensitySkeletonpH (CaCl2)LOI
(years) (deg)(m a.s.l.)(Dominating Species) (cm)(g cm−3)(wt. %) (%)
K-A1110WNW272200Saxifraga aizoides dominated stocksHyperskeletic LeptosolC10–101.8 ± 0.1627.81.8
C210–20+1.4 ± 0.561.27.62
K-A2110WNW272200Initial snowbed communities of type Arabidion caeruleaeHyperskeletic LeptosolC10–101.5 ± 0.268.37.71.9
C210–20+1.3 ± 0.667.67.61.8
K-B1160NE312030Thlaspietum rotundifoliiHyperskeletic LeptosolAC0–151.2 ± 0.471.67.38.4
C15–25+0.7 ± 0.174.57.83.3
K-B2160NE312030Dryadetum octopetalaeHyperskeletic LeptosolAC0–101.1 ± 0.7687.58.9
C10–28+0.8 ± 064.67.73.2
K-C14900 1WNW362020Caricetum ferrugineiCalcaric Skeletic CambisolA0–150.5 ± 0.111.35.818.7
B15–210.7 ± 0.164.57.310
BC21–601.5 ± 0.177.97.82.7
C60–80+1.5 ± 085.37.72.2
K-C24900 1N372010Rhododendretum hirsutiCalcaric Skeletic CambisolOA0–180.3 ± 03.84.534.4
B18–420.8 ± 0.122.76.714
BC42–511.5 ± 084.67.83.8
C51–75+1.7 ± 0.180.87.72.7
K-D113,500 2NW442000Seslerio-Caricetum sempervirentisCalcaric Skeletic CambisolA10–150.3 ± 0.16.95.942.4
A215–280.5 ± 040.86.820.5
B28–320.8 ± 0.273.57.65.8
BC132–681.6 ± 0.1757.81.64
BC268–80+1.7 ± 0.1757.81.63
K-D213,500 2ENE322010Caricetum ferrugineiCalcaric Skeletic CambisolOE0–300.5 ± 0.122.86.624.5
B30–351.4 ± 0.174.37.82.3
BC35–70+1.9 ± 0.182.17.81.7
S-A130ENE401950Initial grassland vegetation, rich in Trifolium badium/pallescens, Luzula alpino-pilosaHyperskeletic LeptosolAC0–100.9 ± 0.653.56.11.1
C10–30+1.5 ± 0.479.46.61.3
S-A230ENE351950Pioneer vegetation at sandy sites, Epilobietum fleischeri subass rhacomitrietosumHyperskeletic LeptosolC0–50+0.7 ± 0.453.26.70.8
S-B1160ENE311990Creeping dwarf shrup patches, high coverage of Salix retusaHyperskeletic LeptosolOA0–101.7 ± 0.159.44.74.4
AC10–201.8 ± 0.157.44.81.7
C120–401.9 ± 0564.81.3
C240–55+1.6 ± 0.342.35.11.1
S-B2160NE281990Grassland of the type Poion alpinaeHyperskeletic LeptosolA0–101.5 ± 0.342.75.538.4
C110–301.9 ± 0.256.94.71.8
C230–45+1.8 ± 0.270.851.5
S-C13000SW251890Agrostio rupestris-Sempervivetum montaniSkeletic CambisolA0–101.3 ± 0.150.44.63.4
B10–301.5 ± 0.268.94.62.8
BC30–55+1.9 ± 063.45.31.9
S-C23000S241910Carici sempervirentisSkeletic CambisolA0–231 ± 0.572.2522.5
Bw23–401.5 ± 0.381.25.613
BC40–60+1.7 ± 0.179.56.12.4
S-D110,000N221880Geo montani-NardetumEntic PodzolO0–200.7 ± 0.574.43.444
OE20–360.7 ± 0.247.93.628.7
Bs36–631.3 ± 0.154.84.45.2
BC63–80+1.4 ± 0.141.74.46.1
S-D210,000NNE301880Rhododendro ferruginei-VaccinietumEntic PodzolOE0–350.5 ± 0.212.83.638
Bs35–681 ± 0.234.14.110
BC68–80+1.1 ± 0.173.94.316
1 Radiocarbon 2 σ age range of soil organic matter: 4969–4852 a cal BC [61]. 2 Radiocarbon 2 σ age range of soil organic matter: 14,001–13,760, 13,287–13,120 a cal BC [62].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sampling Strategy

This study is part of a series of studies which all used the same sampling scheme in order to ensure maximum comparability. Both the calcareous (Klausenpass) and the siliceous (Sustenpass) chronosequence comprised four moraines at which we excavated two soil pits each. We based the location of the pits on a vegetational mapping and the functional diversity of the vegetation. The functional diversity measures those components of plant diversity which influence the ecological functions and processes. The index used was the Functional Richness Index (FRI). It is based on the value, range, distribution, and the abundance of different plant traits in a vegetation community [70]. The parameters taken into account were: leaf dry matter content, specific leaf area, vegetative height [68], the plant life form, and the level of woodiness [71]. Soil pits were dug at two sites on each moraine where the FRI was highest and lowest, intending to cover the whole spectrum and see any effects, should they occur.

3.2. Physical and Chemical Properties

The skeleton (wt.%) is the weight percentage of the fraction >2 mm and was obtained by dry-sieving 1 kg of soil. Note that, for logistical reasons, we did not include rocks larger than roughly 5 cm. Therefore, the skeleton content presented here underestimates the actual situation in the field as there were many large cobbles and boulders in the soil profiles (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The bulk density was determined by sampling soil with an Eijkelkamp soil corer (volume: 100 cm3) and measuring its dry weight. Due to the size of the steel cylinders, rocks larger than a few centimeters were not included in the sampling, thus leading to a slight underestimation of the bulk density. The values presented (Table 1) are the means of 2–3 field replicates. The organic matter (OM) content was obtained via loss on ignition (LOI). 2 g of fine earth were dry-ashed at 550 °C for 6 h. Corrected for the skeleton content, the lost material represents the organic matter content of the soil [72]. The pH was determined by mixing 5 g of fine earth with 12.5 mL of 0.01 M CaCl2, equating to a ratio of 1:2.5. We conducted the measurements on a Mehtrohm 692 pH/IonMeter with an absolute error of ±0.003. The carbonate content was calculated from total inorganic carbon (Cinorg) measurements using a MultiEA (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany), which operates with phosphoric acid.
The total element contents were measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Spectro Xepos, Spectro Analytical Instruments GmbH, Kleve, Germany). The instrument is calibrated using two glass beads (FLX-SP1, FLX-SP2, Fluxana, Bedburg-Hau, Germany). We used the certified reference soil sample SO-4 (Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Canada) as a control standard during measurements to detect drifts. To measure the samples, 5 g of fine earth were finely milled and measured as powder samples. The instrument performs 6 repeat measurements per sample and outputs mean and standard error.
We calculated the oxide forms of the most abundant elements in the soils (Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe). In order to differentiate the two Ca species (CaCO3 and CaO), we subtracted Ca in carbonates (CaCO3 contents obtained from Cinorg) from the total Ca content. The difference represents Ca in silicates (CaO). Ctot and N contents of the fine earth were obtained with EA-IRMS (Elemental Analyzer Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry; Flash HT Plus CNSOH, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) measuring 2 lab replicates.
We calculated three weathering indices for all soil profiles. All indices compare the molar ratios of easily weathered (‘mobile’) elements to more ‘immobile’ elements:
Ca + K Ti
This ratio was introduced by Dorn [73] on rock varnishes and it has proven useful in soils as well, as Ti is mostly immobile in soils (alternatively, Zr can be used as the immobile element, [74]). Here, we calculated this ratio using the total Ca. It therefore also reflects the dissolution of carbonates. An alternative version to this ratio is:
Na + K Ti
That only reflects weathering of silicates. We also used the Chemical Index of Alteration [75]. It is normally used in for igneous rocks or siliceous soils. There, an increase in the CIA (relative accumulation of Al) is indicative of stronger silicate weathering.
CIA = Al 2 O 3 Al 2 O 3 + CaO + Na 2 O + K 2 O × 100
The oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and Mn contents of the fine earth fraction were determined according to [76] with 2–3 replicates The Fe and Al measurements were conducted on a flame-AAS (atomic absorption spectrometer; ContrAA 700, Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). The values presented are the averages of 2–3 replicates.

3.3. Mineralogical Analysis

The mineralogy of the samples was determined on randomly oriented powder specimens with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. First, the samples were air-dried. The fine earth fraction (<2 mm) of the bulk soil was comminuted by hand using a mortar and sieved (400 µm). This fraction was subsequently Ca saturated. A representatively split aliquot of about 2 g was then milled in ethanol to a grain size below 20 µm with a McCrone micronizing mill and dried afterwards at 65 °C. For frontloading preparation, about 1 g of the powdered material was gently pressed in a sample holder for packing, sample-height adjustment, and forming a flat surface. Preferred orientation was avoided by using a blade for surface treatment [77]. For an improved identification of the clay mineralogy, appr. 1 g of the untreated <2 mm sample was sieved with a 20 µm sieve to enrich the clay minerals. From this <20 µm-fraction, we produced oriented specimens by carefully smearing a thin layer of the sample onto a glass slide. They were prepared for enhancement of the basal reflexes of layer silicates, thereby facilitating their identification. The textured samples were measured before and after treatment. The changes in the reflex positions in the XRD pattern by intercalation of different organic compounds (e.g., ethylene glycol) and after heating were used for the identification of expandable clay minerals.
X-ray diffraction measurements were made using a Bragg-Brentano X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) using CoKα (35 kV, 40 mA) radiation. The instrument worked with automatic beam optimization (equipped with an automatic theta compensating divergence slit and an automatic air scatter screen). The detector was an energy dispersive Lynx-Eye XE-T detector. The powder samples were step-scanned at room temperature from 2 to 80°2Theta (step width 0.02°2Theta, counting time 2 s per step).
The qualitative phase analysis was carried out with the software package DIFFRACplus (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). The phases were identified on the basis of the peak positions and relative intensities in the comparison to the PDF-2 database (International Centre for Diffraction Data). The quantitative amount of the mineral phases was determined with Rietveld analysis using the Rietveld program Profex/BGMN [78]. This full pattern-fitting method consists of the calculation of the X-ray diffraction pattern and its iterative adjustment to the measured diffractogram. In the refinements phase, specific parameters and the phase content were adapted to minimize the difference between the calculated and the measured X-ray diffractogram.

3.4. Meteoric 10Be Sample Preparation and Analysis

Our method of extraction of 10Be from soil is based on the methods described in [10,79]. A fine-milled soil sample is spiked with 9Be standard solution and leached overnight twice using 16% HCl. The leachate undergoes a series of pH adjustments in order to separate metals, mainly iron, by precipitating as hydroxides. Thereafter, a fraction containing beryllium is isolated on ion-exchange resin Bio-Rad AG 50W-X8. A special grade of chemical reagents and water are used through all steps of sample preparation to ensure an ultra-low level of 10B, which is an isobar of 10Be.
Prior to the accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurement, all the resulting BeO samples were mixed with Nb powder and pressed in a cathode insert. The measurements were performed with MILEA AMS system at ETH Zurich, Switzerland. The results were normalized to in-house standards S2007N and S2010N with nominal values of 10Be/9Be = 28.1 × 10−12 and 10Be/9Be = 3.3 × 10−12 and errors of 2.7% and 2.2%, respectively [80]. The in-house standards are calibrated to a primary standard ICN 01-5-1 [81]. The final 10Be concentrations were corrected to preparation blank, while the final errors include a preparation blank error and an error of the in-house AMS standards.

3.5. Calculation of Weathering and Erosion Rates

The progression of chemical weathering was determined by comparing the differences in the chemical composition of the weathered and unweathered soil material. Using an immobile element (Ti), we calculated element-specific mass balances. As the soil ages were known, it was also possible to calculate long-term weathering rates (mass balances) [80,81]. We calculated these for Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Mn, and Fe. We will refer to the sum of these elements as the ‘total’ mass balance, henceforth.
Following [82], we first calculated the volume change between the unweathered parent material and the weathered material, or strain coefficient ε, for each weathered horizon:
ε w = ( ρ p C i , p ρ w C i , w ) 1
where ρp and ρw are the bulk densities (kg m−3) of the parent material (=lowermost horizon of each profile) and the weathered material, Ci,p (g kg−1) is the concentration of the immobile element (Ti was used) of the parent material, and Ci,w (g kg−1) is the concentration of the immobile element (Ti) of the weathered soil.
The open-system mass transport function τj,w [82] is defined as:
τ j , w = ( ρ p C j , w C i , p ρ w C i , w C i , p ( ε i , w + 1 ) ) 1
with Cj,w (g/kg) as the concentration of element j in the weathered material, and Cj,p for the unweathered parent material (=lowermost horizon) and the strain coefficient ɛw. Ci,w and Ci,p (g kg−1), the concentrations of the immobile element, were calculated with Ti. The change in mass for an element j (mj, flux(z) in kg m−2) for n soil layers is defined by Egli and Fitze [83]:
m ¯ j , f l u x ( z ) = a = 1 n C j , p ρ p ( 1 ε i , w + 1 ) τ j , w Δ z w
The long-term erosion rates were calculated using meteoric 10Be in the soils. When the surface ages are known, soil erosion rates can be calculated by comparing the measured concentrations of 10Be in the soils with the expected concentrations based on their age, as demonstrated by [84,85,86].
With no erosion, the surface age on a soil is defined as:
t = 1 λ ln ( 1 λ N e x p q )   and   N e x p = q e λ t 1 λ
with λ = the decay constant of 10Be (4.997 × 10−7 y−1), q (atoms cm−2 year−1) = annual deposition rate of 10Be (calculated according to [46,87,88]), and Nexp (atoms cm−2) = the expected 10Be inventory in the soil profile (i.e., the accumulated 10Be in the soil due to atmospheric deposition, assuming no erosion or other disturbances). The deposition rates of 10Be will have to be estimated for a specific area, as they are not known precisely. However, Maejima et al. [84] have shown that they are mostly dependent on the amount of precipitation.
With soil erosion, Equation (9) is rewritten as:
t = 1 λ ln ( 1 λ N e x p q ρ C 10 B e f E s o i l )   and   E s o i l = 1 ρ f C 10 B e ( λ N e λ t 1 ) + q
where C10Be (atoms g−1) = concentration of 10Be in the top eroding horizons (ca. the top 20 cm), Esoil (cm year−1) = soil erosion rate, f = fine earth fraction, and ρ (g cm−3) = bulk density of the top horizons, λ = decay constant of 10Be, N = inventory of 10Be. As C10Be changes over time, it can be approximated by using the average between t = 0 and t, i.e., 0.5 × C10Be(today). We also assume that the erosion occurs mostly in the top 20 cm of the soil profile. We calculate the 10Be inventory N using [86]:
N = a = 1 n ( z w ρ w C w f w )
for n horizons, and with the horizon thickness z, the bulk density ρ, the 10Be concentration C and the fine earth fraction f of the weathered (w) material.
For comparison, we also used the method of Lal et al. [47]:
K E = N D N S [ Q + q a N D λ ] λ   and   E s o i l = z 0 K E  
KE is the first order rate constant for removal of soil, with NS = 10Be inventory in the S layer (comprising O and A horizons), ND = 10Be inventory in the D layer (below 20 cm), Q = flux of atmospheric 10Be into topsoil (atoms cm−2 year−1), qa = flux of meteoric 10Be (atoms cm−2 year−1), and λ = decay constant of 10Be. The soil erosion rate Esoil (cm year−1) is then calculated using z0 = thickness of topsoil horizons (comprising O and A horizons) multiplied by KE.
In addition, the rates of soil formation were calculated. Most approaches are based on the assumption that the soil in question is in equilibrium, i.e., that the soil thickness remains stable because soil production and soil denudation are equal. As this is clearly not the case for such young and still intensely developing soils (see Figure 3), we used the changes in the profile thickness as an approximation for soil formation rates. The soil thickness function was first developed by [89] and further developed by Johnson et al. [90]. According to this model, the soil thickness (T) is a function of soil deepening factors (SD), upbuilding factors (U), and removals (R):
T = S D + U R
We calculated the soil formation rates (F = SD + U) based on the changes in thickness (z) [91]:
F s o i l   = z p r o f i l e age

3.6. Flow Accumulation Analysis

Digital surface models (DSM) were created using centimeter-resolution aerial drone images. The drone flights and the post-processing of the images were conducted by WWL Umweltplanung und Geoinformatik GbR [92]. Flow direction and flow accumulation analyses were conducted in ArcMap (ESRI). The flow direction analysis uses the DSM to compute the most likely flow path that water would take according to the steepness when moving from one grid cell to the next. The D-∞ (‘D-infinity’) method was used [93]. The flow accumulation shows the spatial distribution and intensity of the flow pathways, i.e., how much water is directed to each pathway. We used this output in combination with the microtopography measurements of Maier et al. [56] to better evaluate the results of our erosion analysis, as more bundled and therefore more intense flow paths have a higher potential for surface erosion than dispersed ones.

3.7. Uncertainty Calculation and Propagation

We defined the standard uncertainties for the different used parameters by calculating the standard deviation between field replicates (bulk density) and lab replicates (oxalate extractable Fe, Al, Mn; Corg, N contents) and by using the instrument measurement errors (elemental contents, mineralogy).
When using these datasets in further calculations (weathering indices, Corg, Corg stocks, C/N, element mass balances, 10Be erosion rates), the standard uncertainties were accounted for by propagating them following the recommendations of the Guide of Expression of Uncertainty [94].

4. Results

4.1. Profile Descriptions

The soils of the 110 a moraine were classified as Hyperskeletic Leptosol. The moraine was covered in boulders and cobbles of varying sizes and was vegetated with initial snowbed communities of the type Arabidion caeruleae and Saxifraga aizoides (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, Table 1). The 160 a moraine was classified as Hyperskeletic Leptosol and had already accumulated a humus-rich A horizon. The vegetation was dominated by Thlaspietum rotundifolii and Dryadetum octopetalae. The 4.9 ka soils were Calcaric Skeletic Cambisols which reached a depth of approximately 60 cm. They were vegetated by dense grass, mainly Caricetum ferruginei and Rhododendretum hirsuti with roots to 40–50 cm. The 13.5 ka moraine had Calcaric Skeletic Cambisols as well and was also densely vegetated. The dominating species were Seslerio-Caricetum sempervirentis and Caricetum ferruginei.
The two soils at the 30 a moraine Hyperskeletic Leptosols, one of which had accumulated an A horizon (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The surface was covered by pioneer species (mainly Epilobium fleischeri) and initial grassland vegetation rich in Trifolium badium/pallescense and Luzula alpino-pilosa (Table 1). The 160 a soils were also Hyperskeletic Leptosols with 10–20 cm thick A horizons. They were covered by a grassland vegetation of the type Poion aplinae. There were also creeping dwarf shrubs with a high coverage of Salix retusa present. The 3 ka soils were Skeletic Cambisols vegetated by grasses (mainly Agrostio rupestris-Sempervivetum montani and Carici sempervirentis). The 10 ka soils were Entic Podzols with thick, humus-rich topsoils that reached a depth of 30–40 cm. The surface was largely covered by shrubs (Rhododendro ferruginei-Vaccinietum) and some grasses (Geo montani-Nardetum) in between and underneath the shrubs.

4.2. Soil Properties

The bulk density is similar in both locations. At Klausenpass, it varied from 0.7 to 1.8 g cm−3 in the younger soils and from 0.3 to 1.9 g cm−3 in the older soils. The soils at Sustenpass display clear age trends, ranging from 1.2 to 1.7 g cm−3 in the 30 a, 160 a, and 3 ka soils and 0.7–1.4 in the 10 ka soils.
The soils had a high skeleton content throughout all sites, often over 50% (Table 1). At Klausenpass, it decreased with age, most strongly in the topsoil. There is also a strong increase in the skeleton fraction with depth. At Sustenpass, the skeleton content varied more strongly from moraine to moraine and the depth trend was less clear compared to Klausenpass.
The highest organic matter (OM) contents (measured as loss on ignition, Table 1) were found in the topsoil of the oldest soils, ranging from 19% to 42% at Klausenpass and 22% to 38% at Sustenpass. The OM in the young topsoils at Klausenpass (110 a, 160 a: 1.8–8.9%) was distinctly smaller compared to the young soils at Sustenpass (30 a, 160 a: 0.8–38.4%). The differences between the profiles of one moraine is also higher at Sustenpass than at Klausenpass.
The pH at Klausenpass was mostly in the neutral to weakly alkaline range (pH 6.7–7.8) except for the top horizons in the older soils where the pH was below 6. At Sustenpass, the pH was in the neutral to strongly acidic range (pH 3.4–6.7).

4.3. Weathering

4.3.1. Klausenpass

The elemental composition is presented in Table 2. The calculated strain coefficients and open-system mass transport functions for each Klausenpass soil profile are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The element mass fluxes of each moraine are summarized in Figure 5a. High losses were recorded for the mobile elements Mg and Ca, as well as P, while less-mobile elements passively accumulated. The total losses are highest at the 13.5 ka soil (−152 ± 49 kg m−2), Figure 5b. When including the soil age to calculate rates of chemical weathering, the rates do not change very strongly over time (+28 ± 2 to −7 ± 1 m−2 kyear−1 in the youngest soils to +1 ± 0 to −11 ± 4 m−2 kyear−1 in the oldest soils).
The Corg stocks (Figure 6) at the youngest soils are 0.4 ± 0.0–0.8 ± 0.0 kg m−2 and increase to around 5.3 ± 0.1–15.9 ± 0.0 kg m−2 after 4.9 ka, where the stocks level off to 11.6 ± 0.0–12.5 ± 0.0 kg m−2 at the 13.5 ka moraine.
The weathering indices (Figure 7a) show strong alterations in the uppermost 20 cm of the soils. The variability between the soils at each moraine becomes slightly larger with age.
The oxalate extractable forms of Fe, Al, and Mn increase throughout the chronosequence (Table 5, Figure 8a). The proportion of Feo/Fetot increases from ca 6% to7% in the young topsoils to 14 ± 1.8–22 ± 1.0% in the 4.9 ka soil, and decreases slightly in the 13.5 ka moraine (due to an increase of total Fe). The Mno/Mntot ratio increases sharply early on, reaching over 50% in the oldest soils. The Alo/Altot ratio increases steadily to a maximum of around 4.8% in the older moraines.

4.3.2. Sustenpass

The element contents are given in Table 2. As the pH of the Sustenpass soils was below 6.5 in most soil horizons (Table 1), total Ca corresponds to the silicate form CaO. The strains and the results of the open-system mass transfer function (τ) for the most abundant elements are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The total element range from +8 ± 5 to −36 ± 23 kg m−2, resulting in high weathering rates at the youngest moraine (−69 ± 67 kg m−2 kyear−1) which decrease strongly with age to 0 ± 1 to −4 ± 2 m−2 kyear−1 (Figure 5a,b).
The Corg stocks of the soil profiles (Figure 6) increased at high rates with the youngest soils, starting from 0.17 ± 0.0–0.15 ± 0.0 kg m−2 (at the 30 a moraine) to 2.4 ± 0.0–16.9 ± 0.0 kg m−2 (160 a moraine). The highest Corg stocks occurred in the 10 ka moraine (20.3 ± 0.0–37.8 ± 0.0 kg m−2).
Both the (Ca + K)/Ti and the (Na + K)/Ti ratios (Figure 7b) show similar patterns among the Sustenpass soils. The soils of each moraine show a homogenous profile and the soils are clearly grouped by age. The Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) mostly increases with soil age. The variability is however high among the top horizons, particularly at the 160 a moraine site.
The ratio of Feo/Fetot only increased slowly; fluctuating at around 5–6 ± 0.5% in the first 3 ka of soil development. Between 3 ka and 10 ka, the ratio sharply increased to 29 ± 1.9–35 ± 1.2% in the topsoil (Figure 8b). Similarly, the Alo/Altot ratio changed little during the first 3 ka of soil development (0.4–2.3 ± 0.2% in the topsoil) and then increased to 9–10% in the 10 ka soils. The Mno/Mntot ratio increased too with age, although the variability is very high.

4.4. Mineralogy

The mineral composition of the Klausenpass fine earth (Figure 9a) at the 110 a moraine consists mostly of calcite (59%), quartz (22–24%), mica (8–10%) chlorite (10%), and a small amount (3%) of feldspar. The 160 a soil contained 25–36% calcite, 28–33% quartz, 21–23% mica, and 10% chlorite. The 4.9 ka soil contained 0–79% calcite, 11–50% quartz, 7–33% mica, and 2–9% chlorite. Lastly, the 13.5 ka soil contained 0–95% calcite, 3–53% quartz, 2–31% mica, and 0–7% chlorite. The errors of the measurements were <1% throughout.
The mineral composition of the 30 a soil at Sustenpass (Figure 9a) was mainly quartz (30–33%), plagioclase (32–33%) and potassium feldspar (6%), mica (16–18%), and chlorite (5–7%). The 160 a moraine contained 34–36% quartz, 32–33% plagioclase and 6% potassium feldspar, 15–16% mica, and 5–6% chlorite. The 3 ka moraine contained 26–30% quartz, 28–31% plagioclase and 4–5% potassium feldspar, 16–19% mica, and 9–22% chlorite. The 10 ka moraine contained 25–38% quartz, 21–22% plagioclase and 4–5% potassium feldspar, 14–20% mica, and 3–29% chlorite. The errors of these measurements were <1%.

4.5. Meteoric 10Be Inventories and Erosion Rates

The 10Be concentration in the fine earth at Klausenpass ranged from 0.63 ± 0.01 × 108 to 13.32 ± 0.31 × 108 at g−1 in the 4.9 ka soil and 1.46 ± 0.02 × 108 to 17.39 ± 0.46 × 108 at g−1 in the 13.5 ka soil (Figure 10, Table 6).
At Sustenpass, the 10Be concentration ranged from 0.17 ± 0.00 to 1.04 ± 0.02 × 108 at g−1 in the 3 ka soil and 1.31 ± 0.02 to 3.55 ± 0.05 at g−1 × 108 at g−1 in the 10 ka soil (Figure 10, Table 6).

4.6. Flow Accumulation

The GIS analysis to model the flow accumulation (Figure 11) produced a homogeneous pattern on the Klausenpass slopes. There, the surface runoff is dispersed with a low intensity. The Sustenpass slopes have a runoff pattern that indicates channeling and more intense flow accumulation (dark blue) of the surface water runoff. The same patterns also emerged in the younger moraines.

5. Discussion

5.1. Soil Development in Calcareous Parent Material

Weathering in calcareous soils is primarily characterized by carbonate leaching [95]. The values of carbonate leaching in the study area generally fit to the range of observations from other calcareous soils in the Alps [24,96]. The weathering front seems to advance in the soil column ’stepwise’. This leads to a divergence of top- and subsoil properties, where the topsoil is strongly altered, while the subsoil has changed very little or might have accumulated elements that were leached above (such as Ca). We observed this in the pH (drop of pH to <6 in the topsoil), mineralogy (dissolution of calcite), weathering indices and τ values (high element losses in the topsoil) as well as the oxalate extractable fractions (accumulation of Feo, Alo and Mno). Soil texture data (Figure 12 and Figure 13, obtained from [54] at the same moraines) showed that the topsoils at this location were altered very strongly with time, shifting from sandy loam to a silty clay loam texture.
Despite 110 and 160 years of rapid soil carbonate leaching, the profiles of the youngest two moraines showed almost no carbonate losses. We calculated Ca mass balances between +2 and −2 kg m−2 which would translate to +6 to −6 kg m−2 CaCO3. In comparison, [24] calculated losses of 15–30 kg m−2 in 193 a soils. The 4.9 and 13.5 ka soils had mass balances between +7 and −154 kg m−2. Indeed, the rates of weathering (based in mass balances) remained roughly the same over the course of 13,500 years. Because the mass balances were calculated by comparing the soil column with the lowermost horizon, soil erosion may account for the small carbonate losses in the young soils. As soil erosion removes the weathered residue of the soil and exposes fresh material, it effectively leads to a rejuvenation of the soil.

5.2. Soil Development in Siliceous Parent Material

Soil development in siliceous parent materials is characterized by soil acidification and weathering of primary minerals. With weathering, elements are either rearranged into secondary minerals (i.e., clays) and remain in the soil profile [97], are used as nutrients by the vegetation, or lost through leaching into the groundwater. Overall, the progression of chemical weathering and the accumulation of soil organic carbon at Sustenpass is in agreement with other observations of mountainous soils of similar age and parent material [37,98,99,100]. Siliceous soils from other regions of the world show similar weathering and carbon accumulation rates [100,101,102,103]. The chemical weathering rates were high in the <160 a soils (losses of up to 69 kg m−2 kyear−1) and decreased thereafter rapidly. These findings match the hydrological data on the same moraines by Maier et al. [51] and Hartmann et al [104]. The saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) decreased significantly with soil age [51], leading to a less efficient draining of the soil column in the older moraines. Blue dye experiments by Hartmann et al. [104] also showed that the flow paths become more heterogeneous with age and that the macropore flow (via root channels) becomes more important in the older moraines. This concurs with the shift in soil texture from rather coarse, sandy soils to more silty compositions. The overall texture at Sustenpass is coarser compared to Klausenpass.
The elemental composition (Table 2) revealed some irregularities in the parent material composition. We found the Fe contents increased strongly with soil age and with depth. The concentrations of Fe in the oldest soil are roughly twice as high as in the youngest soils. This can be linked to the high chlorite concentrations in the 3 ka and 10 ka soils (Figure 9). As pedogenic chlorite forms very slowly, this must be primary chlorite, which suggests a fluctuation in the mineral composition of the glacial sediment. The distribution of the chlorite in the profiles of the 10 ka and 3 ka moraines is not uniform either. There is an accumulation of chlorite in lower horizons and an apparent depletion in the topsoil.

5.3. Soil Production vs. Erosion

The most challenging part in calculating erosion rates using meteoric 10Be is the estimation of the meteoric 10Be deposition rates. We applied a variety of approaches given in the literature [48,87,105]. Independent of the approach used, we found the expected inverse relationship between soil age and erosion at both locations. In addition, lower rates of long-term soil loss at the calcareous site (Klausenpass) were found when compared to the siliceous site (Sustenpass). This is in contrast to findings of the short-term erosion rates (averaged over decades). Short-term erosion rates using fallout plutonium showed similar erosion rates at both locations [53]. Overall, the long-term erosion rates measured at these two proglacial areas are in a similar range to findings of [106] for soils of the eastern Swiss Alps (up to 0.44 t ha−1 year−1 of soil loss). Interestingly, ref. [107] found denudation rates that are twice as high at formerly glaciated slopes, which are now very active geomorphologically (760–2100 mm kyear−1). They found comparable rates to the Sustenpass soils at slopes which were not influenced by glaciers (60–560 mm kyear−1). In Southern Alpine soils (New Zealand), a range of 1.2–14 t ha−1 year−1 soil erosion was found, which is on the higher end compared to the 0.1–10 ha−1 year−1 for global soils [108].
The differences in the long-term erosion rates between the calcareous and the siliceous chronosequence are surprising. The sites at Klausenpass have a steeper slope and the material is siltier. These conditions usually would give rise to higher erosion rates [109,110]. Ref. [54] showed that these soils all have similar root tissue densities in the topsoil, from which we can derive that the soil surfaces experience similar stabilization by the plant roots. The SOM, which also greatly influences soil erodibility by acting as a binding agent for aggregation and protective layer for the mineral soil underneath [111,112], is higher at the 4.9 ka soil (187 g kg−1 vs. 37 g kg−1 at Sustenpass in the top horizon), and lower in the 13.5 ka soil (424 g kg−1 vs. 439 g kg−1). The most important reason why the Klausenpass soils have lower erosion rates than expected may be related to the small-scale topography. Surface roughness determines the pathways of the surface water runoff and can, thus, have a large influence on the erodibility of a slope [52,113,114,115]. A flow direction and accumulation analysis revealed that the Sustenpass and Klausenpass slopes differ in their flow patterns (Figure 11). The Sustenpass slopes produced patterns that rather lead to a channeling of the surface water runoff, indicating a higher terrain roughness compared to Klausenpass, where the surface runoff is more spatially homogeneous and less intense. This is especially pronounced at the 10 ka moraine (Sustenpass), where the Rhododendron bushes promoted the formation of small-scale channels on the soil surface. The Klausenpass slopes, covered with grasses and having only few boulders interspersed on the surface (Figure 2), were able to retain a smoother surface. This GIS analysis has some limitations, as it is based on a digital surface model (DSM) which includes the volume and shapes of the vegetation, as it was produced from drone images, and not by using LiDAR (light detection and ranging, ‘laser scanning’). However, we can support this hypothesis with the results of a detailed investigation of the terrain microtopography on the same slopes by Maier and van Meerveld [56]. The authors calculated a tortuosity index based on high-resolution transect measurements of the surface roughness of the moraine slopes. The tortuosity index at Sustenpass (10 ka: 0.64–1.14; 3 ka: 0.33–0.65) is indeed higher than at Klausenpass (13.5 ka: 0.25–0.30; 4.9 ka: 0.26–0.40), supporting the argument that the microtopography may be the factor causing lower erosion rates at Klausenpass [114,116].
We estimated the soil production rates (Equation (1)) using soil formation, weathering and erosion rates (Table 7). The soil production rates were considerably higher at the siliceous soils compared to the calcareous soils. Furthermore, the Klausenpass soils show clear signs of regressive soil formation. The denudation at the 110 a moraine greatly outstrips the soil production, preventing it from building up an organic top horizon (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Such a delay in the soil development was also mirrored in the Corg stocks, which increased at a much smaller pace compared to the Sustenpass soils (Figure 6). It is further accompanied by a slower development of the vegetation: the Klausenpass moraines took more time to be covered in vegetation and to inhabit more complex species (i.e., grasses and woody species) compared to Sustenpass [54].
The soil production rates of the siliceous soils showed a strong decline with increasing age, which was to be expected. The 30 a moraine is estimated to have soil production rates of at least 34 t ha−1 year−1 while the 10 ka moraine has 3.5 t ha−1year−1. This is three times as high as other Alpine soils (ca 0.4–10 t ha−1 year−1 [107,117]). It is also high compared to global soil production and formation rates measured in soils and river sediments which are in the range of 1–30 t ha−1 year−1 [8,108,118,119,120].

5.4. Interaction with Vegetation and Hydrology

In many areas of the Alps, the snow cover lasts for roughly six months or more and in summer, the day and night temperatures on the ground can vary strongly, as the shallow and debris-rich soils in the proglacial areas offer little moisture and little vegetation to buffer these fluctuations [121]. Therefore, in the earlier stages of soil development, the habitability for plants would be primarily given by the physical properties of the soil substrate. A loamy soil texture would have a higher water retention [122] but may also lead to a higher erodibility [123], which would slow down if not stop a deepening of the soil profile, thus inhibiting the progression of soil development. If pioneer plant species manage to inhabit the substrate, they will stabilize its surface with their roots and enhance soil aggregation by accumulating organic matter in the soils (via litter and root exudates).
These improved conditions for the soils would enable new species to inhabit these soils, thus setting in motion a succession of plant species and communities as well as a progressive soil development [124].
Overall, the texture at Klausenpass is consistently finer compared to the Sustenpass location, which remains low in clay-sized particles (Figure 12 and Figure 13). Due to the dissolution of carbonates, the clay and oxide residues accumulate passively giving rise to fine-grained soils. Concurrent to the decrease in particle sizes, the water retention also increases with age at both sites [54]. What may have reinforced this effect of decreasing particle sizes in the topsoil, are loess inputs, which are common in the Alps [125].
Some data seem to indicate a noticeable influence of the vegetation on soil development. For example, the SOC stocks of the siliceous chronosequence increased consistently faster under the more functionally rich vegetation, while we could only see differences between some of the calcareous soil profiles in SOC accumulation (Figure 6). The total mass balances (Figure 5b) of the older soils, showed higher losses in the low FRI soils at both locations.
The weathering indices (Figure 7) showed stronger weathering in the low FRI profile at 3 ka. At the 10 ka moraine, this relationship is only detectable with the CIA. The oxalate-extractable fractions do not exhibit a clear and consistent pattern (Figure 8). Only the 10 ka soils show a difference between the two FRI types.
Figure 13. Particle size distribution on top of the USGS soil texture classification for each depth increment and for all depths together (same dataset as Figure 12 [55], plots were drawn in R [126]). The blue dots represent the Klausenpass and the red dots the Sustenpass soils. Light hues represent younger and the dark hues the older ages. Per age/moraine and depth, there are three replicates. (Data reproduced with permission of [55]). It therefore seems that the functional diversity of the vegetation has an effect on soil formation. The variability of functional diversity gives rise to a different litter input, root activity, and the microbial activity which in turn influence soil weathering and stabilization processes. How the FRI precisely relates to soil formation is not clear yet. The FRI, however, might be a useful parameter to better describe the natural variability of soils. Both chronosequences demonstrate that the FRI only started to have an effect on soil evolution when the vegetation was already well established, i.e., sometime between 160 and 3000 years of soil development. Before that, the physical site properties and the climate (mainly the precipitation, [127]) are the stronger drivers. The small-scale topography of the moraines (indentations offer protection from wind and erosion and have a higher retention of moisture [128]), inhomogeneity in the mineralogical and chemical composition of the parent material, and soil texture drive the soil formation and are therefore responsible for the high spatial variability of mountainous soils. These properties also influence the hydrological conditions of the soils [129] and have therefore a strong control on the early stages of vegetation settlement [39,90,130,131].
Figure 13. Particle size distribution on top of the USGS soil texture classification for each depth increment and for all depths together (same dataset as Figure 12 [55], plots were drawn in R [126]). The blue dots represent the Klausenpass and the red dots the Sustenpass soils. Light hues represent younger and the dark hues the older ages. Per age/moraine and depth, there are three replicates. (Data reproduced with permission of [55]). It therefore seems that the functional diversity of the vegetation has an effect on soil formation. The variability of functional diversity gives rise to a different litter input, root activity, and the microbial activity which in turn influence soil weathering and stabilization processes. How the FRI precisely relates to soil formation is not clear yet. The FRI, however, might be a useful parameter to better describe the natural variability of soils. Both chronosequences demonstrate that the FRI only started to have an effect on soil evolution when the vegetation was already well established, i.e., sometime between 160 and 3000 years of soil development. Before that, the physical site properties and the climate (mainly the precipitation, [127]) are the stronger drivers. The small-scale topography of the moraines (indentations offer protection from wind and erosion and have a higher retention of moisture [128]), inhomogeneity in the mineralogical and chemical composition of the parent material, and soil texture drive the soil formation and are therefore responsible for the high spatial variability of mountainous soils. These properties also influence the hydrological conditions of the soils [129] and have therefore a strong control on the early stages of vegetation settlement [39,90,130,131].
Geosciences 12 00099 g013
At later stages, however, the vegetation influences the site properties by increasing chemical weathering, reducing surface erosion and altering the hydrological properties of the substrate as well as the vertical water transport by causing heterogeneous infiltration patterns, leading to an increase in preferential flow paths [51,55,104]. The functional richness of the vegetation affects soil parameters that are directly related to the vegetation (e.g., SOC).

6. Conclusions

Calcareous and siliceous soil evolution in two proglacial areas in the Swiss Alps follow, not surprisingly, different traits of chemical weathering. Chemical weathering of the calcareous soils was characterized by high CaCO3 losses over time, whereas the siliceous soils lost predominantly Si, Fe, and Al. By using meteoric 10Be, we found higher long-term erosion rates along the siliceous chronosequence than along the calcareous chronosequence. A flow direction and flow accumulation analysis revealed that the lower terrain roughness at Klausenpass likely led to a lower erodibility. The temporal evolution of the erosion rates was completed by a combined approach of short-term (239+240Pu) and long-term (10Be) rates. The soil erosion rates counterbalanced the soil production rates at the calcareous location, delaying the development of both soil and vegetation in comparison to the siliceous soils. Overall, we found that the relative importance of the parent material decreased with increasing soil age and vegetation coverage. The vegetation is an important driver of soil development as it accelerates chemical weathering, increases surface stabilization, and changes the hydrological properties. Differences in the functional diversity are, however, only detectable with parameters that strongly depend on the vegetation such as SOC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and M.E.; Methodology, A.M., M.E., M.L.P., D.T., F.P. and F.M.; Investigation, A.M., M.L.P., D.T., F.M. and F.P.; Resources, M.E.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.M.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.M., M.E., K.G., A.H., C.G., D.T., M.L.P., F.P. and F.M.; Visualization, A.M.; Supervision, M.E.; Funding Acquisition, M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is part of the HILLSCAPE project which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project grant no. 200021E-167563/1.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study will be made available in Pangaea (https://pangaea.de/, accessed on: 12 February 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gerald Raab, Raquel de Castro Portes and Diogo Spinola for their help in the field, and Tatjana Kraut, Yves Brügger (UZH), Annette Röthlisberger and Marion Rothaupt (ETH) for their assistance in the laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dokuchaev, V.V. Russkii Chernozem; Moscow, Russia, 1883. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jenny, H. Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1941. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simonson, R.W. Outline of a Generalized Theory of Soil Genesis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1959, 23, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Johnson, D.L.; Watson-Stegner, D. Evolution Model of Pedogenesis. Soil Sci. 1987, 143, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Egli, M.; Poulenard, J. Soils of Mountainous Landscapes. In International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology; Richardson, D., Castree, N., Goodchild, M.F., Kobayashi, A., Liu, W., Marston, R.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sommer, M.; Gerke, H.H.; Deumlich, D. Modelling soil landscape genesis—A “time split” approach for hummocky agricultural landscapes. Geoderma 2008, 145, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dosseto, A.; Buss, H.; Suresh, P. The delicate balance between soil production and erosion, and its role on landscape evolution. Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, S24–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Heimsath, A.M.; Dietrich, W.E.; Nishiizumi, K.; Finkel, R.C. The soil production function and landscape equilibrium. Nature 1997, 388, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Riebe, C.S.; Kirchner, J.; Finkel, R.C. Long-term rates of chemical weathering and physical erosion from cosmogenic nuclides and geochemical mass balance. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 4411–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. von Blanckenburg, F.; Hewawasam, T.; Kubik, P.W. Cosmogenic nuclide evidence for low weathering and denudation in the wet, tropical highlands of Sri Lanka. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2004, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cannone, N.; Diolaiuti, G.; Guglielmin, M.; Smiraglia, C. Accelerating Climate Change Impacts on Alpine Glacier Forefield Ecosystems in the European Alps. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Delaney, I.; Bauder, A.; Huss, M.; Weidmann, Y. Proglacial erosion rates and processes in a glacierized catchment in the Swiss Alps. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2018, 43, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Huggett, R. Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: A critical review. CATENA 1998, 32, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sauer, D.; Schülli-Maurer, I.; Wagner, S.; Scarciglia, F.; Sperstad, R.; Svendgård-Stokke, S.; Sørensen, R.; Schellmann, G. Soil development over millennial timescales—A comparison of soil chronosequences of different climates and lithologies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2015, 25, 12009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. White, A.F.; Blum, A.E.; Schulz, M.; Bullen, T.D.; Harden, J.W.; Peterson, M.L. Chemical weathering rates of a soil chronosequence on granitic alluvium: I. Quantification of mineralogical and surface area changes and calculation of primary silicate reaction rates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 2533–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bain, D.; Mellor, A.; Robertson-Rintoul, M.; Buckland, S. Variations in weathering processes and rates with time in a chronosequence of soils from Glen Feshie, Scotland. Geoderma 1993, 57, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taylor, A.; Blum, J.D. Relation between soil age and silicate weathering rates determined from the chemical evolution of a glacial chronosequence. Geology 1995, 23, 979–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mavris, C.; Egli, M.; Plötze, M.; Blum, J.D.; Mirabella, A.; Giaccai, D.; Haeberli, W. Initial stages of weathering and soil formation in the Morteratsch proglacial area (Upper Engadine, Switzerland). Geoderma 2010, 155, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vilmundardóttir, O.K.; Gísladóttir, G.; Lal, R. Between ice and ocean; soil development along an age chronosequence formed by the retreating Breiðamerkurjökull glacier, SE-Iceland. Geoderma 2015, 259–260, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. D’Amico, M.E.; Freppaz, M.; Filippa, G.; Zanini, E. Vegetation influence on soil formation rate in a proglacial chronosequence (Lys Glacier, NW Italian Alps). CATENA 2014, 113, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Righi, D. Clay Formation and Podzol Development from Postglacial Moraines in Switzerland. Clay Miner. 1999, 34, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bockheim, J.G. Solution and use of chronofunctions in studying soil development. Geoderma 1980, 24, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Egli, M.; Fitze, P.; Mirabella, A. Weathering and evolution of soils formed on granitic, glacial deposits: Results from chronosequences of Swiss alpine environments. CATENA 2001, 45, 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Egli, M.; Fitze, P. Quantitative aspects of carbonate leaching of soils with differing ages and climates. CATENA 2001, 46, 35–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Egli, M.; Mirabella, A.; Fitze, P. Clay mineral formation in soils of two different chronosequences in the Swiss Alps. Geoderma 2001, 104, 145–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Föllmi, K.B.; Arn, K.; Hosein, R.; Adatte, T.; Steinmann, P. Biogeochemical weathering in sedimentary chronosequences of the Rhône and Oberaar Glaciers (Swiss Alps): Rates and mechanisms of biotite weathering. Geoderma 2009, 151, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mavris, C.; Plötze, M.; Mirabella, A.; Giaccai, D.; Valboa, G.; Egli, M. Clay mineral evolution along a soil chronosequence in an Alpine proglacial area. Geoderma 2011, 165, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Birkeland, P.W. Soils and Geomorphology; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Oxford, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  29. Haselberger, S.; Ohler, L.-M.; Junker, R.R.; Otto, J.-C.; Glade, T.; Kraushaar, S. Quantification of biogeomorphic interactions between small-scale sediment transport and primary vegetation succession on proglacial slopes of the Gepatschferner, Austria. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2021, 46, 1941–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eichel, J.; Corenblit, D.; Dikau, R. Conditions for feedbacks between geomorphic and vegetation dynamics on lateral moraine slopes: A biogeomorphic feedback window. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2016, 41, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dümig, A.; Smittenberg, R.; Kögel-Knabner, I. Concurrent evolution of organic and mineral components during initial soil development after retreat of the Damma glacier, Switzerland. Geoderma 2011, 163, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Burga, C.A. Vegetation development on the glacier forefield Morteratsch (Switzerland). Appl. Veg. Sci. 1999, 2, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hudek, C.; Stanchi, S.; D’Amico, M.; Freppaz, M. Quantifying the contribution of the root system of alpine vegetation in the soil aggregate stability of moraine. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2017, 5, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, R.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, A. Plant roots and carbon sequestration. Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 885–890. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tresder, K.K.; Morris, S.J.; Allen, M.F. The Contribution of Root Exudates, Symbionts, and Detritus to Carbon Sequestration in the Soil. In Roots and Soil Management: Interactions between Roots and the Soil; Zobel, R.W., Wright, S.F., Eds.; Agronomy No. 48; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 2005; pp. 145–162. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khedim, N.; Cécillon, L.; Poulenard, J.; Barré, P.; Baudin, F.; Marta, S.; Rabatel, A.; Dentant, C.; Cauvy-Fraunié, S.; Anthelme, F.; et al. Topsoil organic matter build-up in glacier forelands around the world. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 1662–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Montagnani, L.; Badraghi, A.; Speak, A.F.; Wellstein, C.; Borruso, L.; Zerbe, S.; Zanotelli, D. Evidence for a non-linear carbon accumulation pattern along an Alpine glacier retreat chronosequence in Northern Italy. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, B.; Yang, Y.-S.; Zepp, H. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water erosion and nutrient losses of a severely eroded clayey Plinthudult in southeastern China. CATENA 2004, 57, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Burga, C.A.; Krüsi, B.; Egli, M.; Wernli, M.; Elsener, S.; Ziefle, M.; Fischer, T.; Mavris, C. Plant succession and soil development on the foreland of the Morteratsch glacier (Pontresina, Switzerland): Straight forward or chaotic? Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2010, 205, 561–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hinsinger, P. Plant-induced changes in soil processes and properties. In Soil Conditions and Plant Growth; Gregory, P.J., Nortcliff, S., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Ames, IA, USA, 2013; pp. 323–365. [Google Scholar]
  41. Walczak, R.; Rovdan, E.; Witkowska-Walczak, B. Water retention characteristics of peat and sand mixtures. Int. Agrophys. 2002, 16, 161–165. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang, F.; Zhang, G.-L.; Yang, J.-L.; Li, D.-C.; Zhao, Y.-G.; Liu, F.; Yang, R.-M.; Yang, F. Organic matter controls of soil water retention in an alpine grassland and its significance for hydrological processes. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 3086–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Faucon, M.-P.; Houben, D.; Lambers, H. Plant Functional Traits: Soil and Ecosystem Services. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Villéger, S.; Mason, N.W.H.; Mouillot, D. New Multidimensional Functional Diversity Indices for a Multifaceted Framework in Functional Ecology. Ecology 2008, 89, 2290–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mason, N.W.H.; de Bello, F. Functional diversity: A tool for answering challenging ecological questions. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 24, 777–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Willenbring, J.K.; von Blanckenburg, F. Meteoric cosmogenic Beryllium-10 adsorbed to river sediment and soil: Applications for Earth-surface dynamics. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2010, 98, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lal, D. New methods for studies of soil dynamics utilizing cosmic ray produced radionuclides. In Sustaining the Global Farm. 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting; Stott, D.E., Mohtar, R.H., Steinhardt, G.C., Eds.; Purdue University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory: Purdue, IN, USA, 2001; pp. 1044–1052. [Google Scholar]
  48. Heikkilä, U.; Beer, J.; Feichter, J. Meridional transport and deposition of atmospheric 10Be. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Foster, M.; Anderson, R.S.; Wyshnytzky, C.E.; Ouimet, W.B.; Dethier, D.P. Hillslope loweing rates and mobile-regolith residence times from in situ and meteoric 10Be analysis, Boulder Creek Critical Zone Observatory, Colorado. GSA Bull. 2015, 127, 862–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schoonejans, J.; Vanacker, V.; Opfergelt, S.; Christl, M. Long-term soil erosion derived from in-situ 10Be and inventories of meteoric 10Be in deeply weathered soils in southern Brazil. Chem. Geol. 2017, 466, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maier, F.; van Meerveld, I.; Greinwald, K.; Gebauer, T.; Lustenberger, F.; Hartmann, A.; Musso, A. Effects of soil and vegetation development on surface hydrological properties of moraines in the Swiss Alps. CATENA 2020, 187, 104353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Helming, K.; Römkens, M.J.M.; Prasad, S.N. Surface Roughness Related Processes of Runoff and Soil Loss: A Flume Study. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1998, 62, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Musso, A.; Ketterer, M.E.; Greinwald, K.; Geitner, C.; Egli, M. Rapid decrease of soil erosion rates with soil formation and vegetation development in periglacial areas. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2020, 45, 2824–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Greinwald, K.; Dieckmann, L.A.; Schipplick, C.; Hartmann, A.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M.; Gebauer, T. Vertical root distribution and biomass allocation along proglacial chronosequences in Central Switzerland. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2021, 53, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hartmann, A.; Weiler, M.; Blume, T. The impact of landscape evolution on soil physics: Evolution of soil physical and hydraulic properties along two chronosequences of proglacial moraines. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2020, 12, 3189–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maier, F.; van Meerveld, I. Long-Term Changes in Runoff Generation Mechanisms for Two Proglacial Areas in the Swiss Alps I: Overland Flow. Water Resour. Res. 2021, 57, e2021WR030221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Swisstopo). Geologische Karte der Schweiz. 2008. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/8f6671cce7 (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  58. Meteoswiss. Climate Normals Temperature 1961–1990. 2019. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/93c9144885 (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  59. Meteoswiss. Climate Normals Precipitation 1961–1990. 2019. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/93c91528d3 (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  60. Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Swisstopo). Siegfriedkarte: TA50, Blatt 403. 1899. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/8f679fc9f6 (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  61. Ivy-Ochs, S.; Kerschner, H.; Maisch, M.; Christl, M.; Kubik, P.W.; Schlüchter, C. Latest Pleistocene and Holocene glacier variations in the European Alps. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2009, 28, 2137–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Musso, A.; Lamorski, K.; Sławiński, C.; Geitner, C.; Hunt, A.; Greinwald, K.; Egli, M. Evolution of soil pores and their characteristics in a siliceous and calcareous proglacial area. CATENA 2019, 182, 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Swisstopo). Aerial Image. 1988. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/8804d2594d (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  64. Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Swisstopo). Aerial Image. 1992. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/8804d210f5 (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  65. Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Swisstopo). Aerial Image. 1993. Available online: https://s.geo.admin.ch/8804cdd7ca (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  66. King, L. Studien zur postglazialen Gletscher- und Vegetationsgeschichte des Sustenpassgebietes, 2nd ed.; Helbing und Lichtenhahn: Basel, Switzerland, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  67. Heikkinen, O.; Fogelberg, P. Bodenentwicklung im Hochgebirge: Ein Beispiel vom Vorfeld des Steingletschers in der Schweiz. Geogr. Helv. 1980, 35, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Schimmelpfennig, I.; Schaefer, J.M.; Akçar, N.; Koffman, T.; Ivy-Ochs, S.; Schwartz, R.; Finkel, R.C.; Zimmerman, S.; Schlüchter, C. A chronology of Holocene and Little Ice Age glacier culminations of the Steingletscher, Central Alps, Switzerland, based on high-sensitivity beryllium-10 moraine dating. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014, 393, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. FAO. World reference base for soil resources 2014. In International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tilman, D. Functional diversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity; Levin, S.A., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001; pp. 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lauber, K.; Wagner, G.; Gygax, A. (Eds.) Flora Helvetica: Illustrierte Flora der Schweiz: Mit Artbeschreibungen und Verbreitungskarten von 3200 wild Wachsenden Farn- und Blütenpflanzen, Einschliesslich Wichtiger Kulturpflanzen; Sechste, Vollständig Überarbeitete Auflage; Haupt Verlag: Bern, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  72. Heiri, O.; Lotter, A.F.; Lemcke, G. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: Reproducibility and comparability of results. J. Paleolimnol. 2001, 25, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dorn, R. Cation-ratio dating: A new rock varnish age-de-termination technique. Quat. Res. 1983, 20, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stiles, C.A.; Mora, C.I.; Driese, S.G. Pedogenic processes and domain boundaries in a Vertisol climosequence: Evidence from titanium and zirconium distribution and morphology. Geoderma 2003, 116, 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nesbitt, H.W.; Young, G.M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature 1982, 299, 715–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. McKeague, J.A.; Brydon, J.E.; Miles, N.M. Differentiation of Forms of Extractable Iron and Aluminum in Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1971, 35, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, G.; Germaine, J.T.; Martin, T.; Whittle, A.J. A simple sample-mounting method for random powder X-ray diffraction. Clays Clay Miner. 2003, 51, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Döbelin, N.; Kleeberg, R. Profex: A graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. von Blanckenburg, F.; Belshaw, N.; O’Nions, R. Separation of 9Be and cosmogenic 10Be from environmental materials and SIMS isotope dilution analysis. Chem. Geol. 1996, 129, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Christl, M.; Vockenhuber, C.; Kubik, P.; Wacker, L.; Lachner, J.; Alfimov, V.; Synal, H.-A. The ETH Zurich AMS facilities: Performance parameters and reference materials. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2013, 294, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nishiizumi, K.; Imamura, M.; Caffee, M.W.; Southon, J.R.; Finkel, R.C.; McAninch, J. Absolute calibration of 10Be AMS standards. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2007, 258, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chadwick, O.A.; Brimhall, G.H.; Hendricks, D.M. From a black to a gray box—A mass balance interpretation of pedogenesis. Geomorphology 1990, 3, 369–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Egli, M.; Fitze, P. Formulation of pedologic mass balance based on immobile elements: A revision. Soil Sci. 2000, 165, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maejima, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Higashi, T. Application of cosmogenic 10Be to dating soils on the raised coral reef terraces of Kikai Island, southwest Japan. Geoderma 2005, 126, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tsai, C.; Chen, Z.; Kao, C.; Ottner, F.; Kao, S.; Zehetner, F. Pedogenic development of volcanic ash soils along a climosequence in Northern Taiwan. Geoderma 2010, 156, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Egli, M.; Brandová, D.; Böhlert, R.; Favilli, F.; Kubik, P.W. 10Be inventories in Alpine soils and their potential for dating land surfaces. Geomorphology 2010, 119, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Graly, J.A.; Reusser, L.J.; Bierman, P.R. Short and long-term delivery rates of meteoric 10Be to terrestrial soils. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2011, 302, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Deng, K.; Wittmann, H.; von Blanckenburg, F. The depositional flux of meteoric cosmogenic 10Be from modeling and observation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2020, 550, 116530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Phillips, J.D.; Marion, D.A.; Luckow, K.; Adams, K.R. Nonequilibrium Regolith Thickness in the Ouachita Mountains. J. Geol. 2005, 113, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Johnson, D.; Domier, J.; Johnson, D.N. Animating the biodynamics of soil thickness using process vector analysis: A dynamic denudation approach to soil formation. Geomorphology 2005, 67, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Egli, M.; Dahms, D.; Norton, K. Soil formation rates on silicate parent material in alpine environments: Different approaches–different results? Geoderma 2014, 213, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Lustenberger, F. Event-Based Surface Hydrological Connectivity and Sediment Transport on Young Moraines. Master’s Thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tarboton, D.G. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. JCGM 100:2008: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (JCGM); BIPM: Sevres, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  95. Martignier, L.; Verrecchia, E.P. Weathering processes in superficial deposits (regolith) and their influence on pedogenesis: A case study in the Swiss Jura Mountains. Geomorphology 2013, 189, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Egli, M.; Merkli, C.; Sartori, G.; Mirabella, A.; Plötze, M. Weathering, mineralogical evolution and soil organic matter along a Holocene soil toposequence developed on carbonate-rich materials. Geomorphology 2008, 97, 675–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Allen, C.; Darmody, R.; Thorn, C.; Dixon, J.; Schlyter, P. Clay mineralogy, chemical weathering and landscape evolution in Arctic–Alpine Sweden. Geoderma 2001, 99, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Egli, M.; Sartori, G.; Mirabella, A.; Giaccai, D. The effects of exposure and climate on the weathering of late Pleistocene and Holocene Alpine soils. Geomorphology 2010, 114, 466–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Böhlert, R.; Mirabella, A.; Plötze, M.; Egli, M. Landscape evolution in Val Mulix, eastern Swiss Alps—Soil chemical and mineralogical analyses as age proxies. Catena 2011, 87, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Mahaney, W.; Kalm, V.; Kapran, B.; Milner, M.; Hancock, R. A soil chronosequence in Late Glacial and Neoglacial moraines, Humboldt Glacier, northwestern Venezuelan Andes. Geomorphology 2009, 109, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Earl-Goulet, J.R.; Mahaney, W.C.; Sanmugadas, K.; Kalm, V.; Hancock, R.G. Middle-Holocene timberline fuctuation: Influence on the genesis of Podzols (Spodosols), Norra Storfjället Massif, northern Sweden. Holocene 1998, 8, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Eger, A.; Almond, P.C.; Condron, L.M. Pedogenesis, soil mass balance, phosphorus dynamics and vegetation communities across a Holocene soil chronosequence in a super-humid climate, South Westland, New Zealand. Geoderma 2011, 163, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dahlgren, R.; Boettinger, J.; Huntington, G.; Amundson, R. Soil development along an elevational transect in the western Sierra Nevada, California. Geoderma 1997, 78, 207–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hartmann, A.; Semenova, E.; Weiler, M.; Blume, T. Field observations of soil hydrological flow path evolution over 10 millennia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 24, 3271–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, P.; Yi, P.; Czymzik, M.; Aldahan, A.; Ljung, K.; Yu, Z.; Hou, X.; Zheng, M.; Chen, X.; Possnert, G. Relationship between precipitation and 10Be and impacts on soil dynamics. CATENA 2020, 195, 104748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zollinger, B.; Alewell, C.; Kneisel, C.; Meusburger, K.; Brandová, D.; Kubik, P.; Schaller, M.; Ketterer, M.; Egli, M. The effect of permafrost on time-split soil erosion using radionuclides (137Cs, 239 + 240Pu, meteoric 10Be) and stable isotopes (δ 13C) in the eastern Swiss Alps. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1400–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Norton, K.P.; von Blanckenburg, F.; Kubik, P.W. Cosmogenic nuclide-derived rates of diffusive and episodic erosion in the glacially sculpted upper Rhone Valley, Swiss Alps. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2010, 35, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Larsen, I.J.; Almond, P.C.; Eger, A.; Stone, J.O.; Montgomery, D.R.; Malcolm, B. Rapid Soil Production and Weathering in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Science 2014, 343, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Renard, K.; Foster, G.R.; Weesies, G.A.; McCool, D.K.; Yoder, D.C. (Eds.) Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE); USDA, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  110. Saedi, T.; Shorafa, M.; Gorji, M.; Moghadam, B.K. Indirect and direct effects of soil properties on soil splash erosion rate in calcareous soils of the central Zagross, Iran: A laboratory study. Geoderma 2016, 271, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pintaldi, E.; D’Amico, M.E.; Stanchi, S.; Catoni, M.; Freppaz, M.; Bonifacio, E. Humus forms affect soil susceptibility to water erosion in the Western Italian Alps. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 123, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Stanchi, S.; Falsone, G.; Bonifacio, E. Soil aggregation, erodibility, and erosion rates in mountain soils (NW Alps, Italy). Solid Earth 2015, 6, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Darboux, F.; Huang, C. Does Soil Surface Roughness Increase or Decrease Water and Particle Transfers? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Luo, J.; Zheng, Z.; Li, T.; He, S. Assessing the impacts of microtopography on soil erosion under simulated rainfall, using a multifractal approach. Hydrol. Process. 2018, 32, 2543–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Luo, J.; Zheng, Z.; Li, T.; He, S. Spatial variation of microtopography and its effect on temporal evolution of soil erosion during different erosive stages. CATENA 2020, 190, 104515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Luo, J.; Zheng, Z.; Li, T.; He, S.; Zhang, X.; Huang, H.; Wang, Y. Quantifying the contributions of soil surface microtopography and sediment concentration to rill erosion. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Alewell, C.; Egli, M.; Meusburger, K. An attempt to estimate tolerable soil erosion rates by matching soil formation with denudation in Alpine grasslands. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1383–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Riebe, C.S.; Kirchner, J.W.; Granger, D.E.; Finkel, R.C. Strong tectonic and weak climatic control of long-term chemical weathering rates. Geology 2001, 29, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Small, E.E.; Anderson, R.S.; Hancock, G.S. Estimates of the rate of regolith production using and from an alpine hillslope. Geomorphology 1999, 27, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dixon, J.L.; von Blanckenburg, F. Soils as pacemakers and limiters of global silicate weathering. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2012, 344, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Körner, C. Alpine plant life. In Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems, 2nd ed.; Körner, C., Ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  122. Saxton, K.E.; Rawls, W.J.; Romberger, J.S.; Papendick, R.I. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Thorarinsdottir, E.F.; Arnalds, O. Wind erosion of volcanic materials in the Hekla area, South Iceland. Aeolian Res. 2012, 4, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dontsova, K.; Balogh-Brunstad, Z.; Chorover, J. Plants as drivers of rock weathering. In Biogeochemical Cycles: Ecological Drivers and Environmental Impact; Dontsova, K., Balogh-Brunstad, Z., Le Roux, G., Eds.; Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA; Americal Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; pp. 33–58. [Google Scholar]
  125. Gild, C.; Geitner, C.; Sanders, D. Discovery of a landscape-wide drape of late-glacial aeolian silt in the western Northern Calcareous Alps (Austria): First results and implications. Geomorphology 2018, 301, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  127. Egli, M.; Lessovaia, S.N.; Chistyakov, K.; Inozemzev, S.; Polekhovsky, Y.; Ganyushkin, D. Microclimate affects soil chemical and mineralogical properties of cold alpine soils of the Altai Mountains (Russia). J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1420–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Holtmeier, F.-K.; Broll, G. The Influence of Tree Islands and Microtopography on Pedoecological Conditions in the Forest-Alpine Tundra Ecotone on Niwot Ridge, Colorado Front Range, U.S.A. Artic Antarct. Alp. Res. 1992, 24, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lohse, K.A.; Dietrich, W.E. Contrasting effects of soil development on hydrological properties and flow paths. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wondzell, S.M.; Cornelius, J.M.; Cunningham, G.L. Vegetation patterns, microtopography, and soils on a Chihuahuan desert playa. J. Veg. Sci. 1990, 1, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. McGrath, G.S.; Paik, K.; Hinz, C. Microtopography alters self-organized vegetation patterns in water-limited ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2012, 117, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the Griess Glacier (Klausenpass, calcareous bedrock) and Stein Glacier (Sustenpass, siliceous bedrock) proglacial areas. The maps are multi-directional hill shade reliefs (name: ‘SwissAlti3D’). The arrows point to the study sites. Maps: www.map.geo.admin.ch (accessed on 20 December 2021).
Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the Griess Glacier (Klausenpass, calcareous bedrock) and Stein Glacier (Sustenpass, siliceous bedrock) proglacial areas. The maps are multi-directional hill shade reliefs (name: ‘SwissAlti3D’). The arrows point to the study sites. Maps: www.map.geo.admin.ch (accessed on 20 December 2021).
Geosciences 12 00099 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of the studied moraines at Klausenpass and Sustenpass (photos: A. Musso). Dashed lines have been added to highlight the moraine ridges or mark the outlines of the study sites.
Figure 2. Photographs of the studied moraines at Klausenpass and Sustenpass (photos: A. Musso). Dashed lines have been added to highlight the moraine ridges or mark the outlines of the study sites.
Geosciences 12 00099 g002
Figure 3. Soil profiles of both the Klausenpass and Sustenpass areas. The profile name codes include the location (K/S = Klausen/Susten), the age category (A = youngest, D = oldest) and the whether the functional richness of the vegetation at those soil pits’ surroundings was high (=1) or low (=2). The functional richness is a measure encompassing plant species and their traits of a certain community. It is used to predict ecological functions and processes. The bottom depth of each profile represents the depth to which we were able to dig the profile (y-axis = depth in cm). Note that in the 30 years profiles at Sustenpass, we found both rounded and unrounded rocks. In general, the depicted amount and sizes of the rocks represent the amount and size of the largest rocks encountered in the soil pits.
Figure 3. Soil profiles of both the Klausenpass and Sustenpass areas. The profile name codes include the location (K/S = Klausen/Susten), the age category (A = youngest, D = oldest) and the whether the functional richness of the vegetation at those soil pits’ surroundings was high (=1) or low (=2). The functional richness is a measure encompassing plant species and their traits of a certain community. It is used to predict ecological functions and processes. The bottom depth of each profile represents the depth to which we were able to dig the profile (y-axis = depth in cm). Note that in the 30 years profiles at Sustenpass, we found both rounded and unrounded rocks. In general, the depicted amount and sizes of the rocks represent the amount and size of the largest rocks encountered in the soil pits.
Geosciences 12 00099 g003
Figure 4. Profile pictures from the moraines of (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass (images: Musso et al. [61], reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 4. Profile pictures from the moraines of (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass (images: Musso et al. [61], reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Geosciences 12 00099 g004
Figure 5. (a) Mass balances for Sustenpass and Klausenpass. The balances were calculated relative to the bottommost horizon of each soil profile. There are two soil profiles per moraine except for the 30 a moraine at Sustenpass, because profile S-A2 consisted of only one horizon and no mass balance could be calculated. (b) Total mass balances for Sustenpass and Klausenpass (includes Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Mn, and Fe). The balances were calculated relative to bottommost horizon of each soil profile. There are two soil profiles per moraine except for the 30 a moraine at Sustenpass, because profile S-A2 consisted of only one horizon and no mass balance could be calculated.
Figure 5. (a) Mass balances for Sustenpass and Klausenpass. The balances were calculated relative to the bottommost horizon of each soil profile. There are two soil profiles per moraine except for the 30 a moraine at Sustenpass, because profile S-A2 consisted of only one horizon and no mass balance could be calculated. (b) Total mass balances for Sustenpass and Klausenpass (includes Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Mn, and Fe). The balances were calculated relative to bottommost horizon of each soil profile. There are two soil profiles per moraine except for the 30 a moraine at Sustenpass, because profile S-A2 consisted of only one horizon and no mass balance could be calculated.
Geosciences 12 00099 g005aGeosciences 12 00099 g005b
Figure 6. Stocks of organic carbon (kg m−2) for the soil profiles at each moraine. FRI = functional richness index.
Figure 6. Stocks of organic carbon (kg m−2) for the soil profiles at each moraine. FRI = functional richness index.
Geosciences 12 00099 g006
Figure 7. Weathering indices. The (Ca + K)/Ti ratio was calculated with total Ca in order to reflect the dissolution of calcium carbonate. In contrast, (Na + K)/Ti is not affected by carbonates. The Chemical Index of Weathering (CIA) reflects the loss of Al2O3, CaO, K2O, and Na2O relative to Al2O3.
Figure 7. Weathering indices. The (Ca + K)/Ti ratio was calculated with total Ca in order to reflect the dissolution of calcium carbonate. In contrast, (Na + K)/Ti is not affected by carbonates. The Chemical Index of Weathering (CIA) reflects the loss of Al2O3, CaO, K2O, and Na2O relative to Al2O3.
Geosciences 12 00099 g007
Figure 8. Oxalate extractable Feo, Alo, and Mno (measured with atomic absorbance spectroscopy, AAS) as a fraction of the total contents, Fetot, Altot, and Mntot (measured with X-ray fluorescence, XRF). The error bars represent the measurement uncertainties.
Figure 8. Oxalate extractable Feo, Alo, and Mno (measured with atomic absorbance spectroscopy, AAS) as a fraction of the total contents, Fetot, Altot, and Mntot (measured with X-ray fluorescence, XRF). The error bars represent the measurement uncertainties.
Geosciences 12 00099 g008
Figure 9. Bulk mineralogical composition of the fine earth at (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass for each horizon measured with XRD. (Based on one soil profile per moraine. For consistency, all soil profiles selected were from the high functional richness index (FRI) sites). di = dioctahedral, tri = trioctahedral. The XRD measurement uncertainties were <1% throughout.
Figure 9. Bulk mineralogical composition of the fine earth at (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass for each horizon measured with XRD. (Based on one soil profile per moraine. For consistency, all soil profiles selected were from the high functional richness index (FRI) sites). di = dioctahedral, tri = trioctahedral. The XRD measurement uncertainties were <1% throughout.
Geosciences 12 00099 g009
Figure 10. 10Be concentrations at the oldest two moraines of Klausenpass and Sustenpass measured in atoms per gram of soil (fine earth). The horizontal error bars represent the measurement uncertainty of the 10Be and the vertical errors represent the thickness of the horizon.
Figure 10. 10Be concentrations at the oldest two moraines of Klausenpass and Sustenpass measured in atoms per gram of soil (fine earth). The horizontal error bars represent the measurement uncertainty of the 10Be and the vertical errors represent the thickness of the horizon.
Geosciences 12 00099 g010
Figure 11. Output of the flow accumulation on top of high-resolution drone imagery (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass. North direction is upward in all images. The darker blue shades indicate stronger flow accumulation.
Figure 11. Output of the flow accumulation on top of high-resolution drone imagery (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass. North direction is upward in all images. The darker blue shades indicate stronger flow accumulation.
Geosciences 12 00099 g011
Figure 12. Particle size distributions for (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass. The particle size distributions were measured at fixed depths and with six replicates (here, the averages are shown [54]). The corresponding horizons are written in parentheses underneath (from Figure 3). Sand: 63–2000 µm, Silt: 2–63 µm, Clay: <2 µm. (Data reproduced with permission of [55]).
Figure 12. Particle size distributions for (a) Klausenpass and (b) Sustenpass. The particle size distributions were measured at fixed depths and with six replicates (here, the averages are shown [54]). The corresponding horizons are written in parentheses underneath (from Figure 3). Sand: 63–2000 µm, Silt: 2–63 µm, Clay: <2 µm. (Data reproduced with permission of [55]).
Geosciences 12 00099 g012
Table 2. Elemental contents composition of the soil samples (fine earth fraction) in their oxidized form based on XRF measurements (Na2O to ZrO2). The Ca was split into CaCO3 and CaO. The proportion was determined by separate Cinorg measurements.
Table 2. Elemental contents composition of the soil samples (fine earth fraction) in their oxidized form based on XRF measurements (Na2O to ZrO2). The Ca was split into CaCO3 and CaO. The proportion was determined by separate Cinorg measurements.
ProfileHorizonDepth Na2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3K2OCaCO3CaOTiO2MnOFe2O3ZrO2
cmg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kgg/kg
Klausenpass (Griess Glacier)
110 years
K-A1C10–103.23 ± 0.0833.6 ± 0.4454.09 ± 0.18289.58 ± 0.421.76 ± 0.010.8 ± 0.019.23 ± 0.02555.49 ± 0.240 ± 0.143.46 ± 0.010.35 ± 030.75 ± 0.030.16 ± 0
C210–20+3.87 ± 0.0934.73 ± 0.4363.43 ± 0.22283.27 ± 0.411.78 ± 0.010.74 ± 0.0110.75 ± 0.02545.3 ± 0.240 ± 0.133.7 ± 0.010.33 ± 032.14 ± 0.030.13 ± 0
K-A2C10–103.19 ± 0.0832.61 ± 0.4353.18 ± 0.18296.92 ± 0.411.68 ± 0.010.82 ± 0.018.93 ± 0.02547.84 ± 0.240 ± 0.133.53 ± 0.010.41 ± 031.85 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
C210–20+2.36 ± 0.0632.96 ± 0.4354.54 ± 0.2284.49 ± 0.411.79 ± 0.010.76 ± 0.019.23 ± 0.02561.28 ± 0.240 ± 0.133.38 ± 0.010.35 ± 030.79 ± 0.030.15 ± 0
160 years
K-B1AC0–158.88 ± 0.2642.32 ± 0.49113.04 ± 0.3426.85 ± 0.431.05 ± 0.011.44 ± 0.0221.57 ± 0.02242 ± 0.130 ± 0.076.97 ± 0.010.58 ± 051.2 ± 0.030.26 ± 0
C15–25+7.29 ± 0.241.53 ± 0.48105.03 ± 0.28389.75 ± 0.421.06 ± 0.011.18 ± 0.0119.46 ± 0.02347.14 ± 0.250 ± 0.146.28 ± 0.010.53 ± 047.1 ± 0.030.21 ± 0
K-B2AC0–107.79 ± 0.2341.82 ± 0.49107.59 ± 0.29430.37 ± 0.431.02 ± 0.011.46 ± 0.0220.48 ± 0.02243.35 ± 0.130 ± 0.076.33 ± 0.010.64 ± 049.62 ± 0.030.23 ± 0
C10–28+8.11 ± 0.1640.15 ± 0.4890.52 ± 0.26365.38 ± 0.421.12 ± 0.011.03 ± 0.0116.93 ± 0.02396.89 ± 0.250 ± 0.145.15 ± 0.010.55 ± 041.85 ± 0.030.19 ± 0
4900 years
K-C1A0–1510.81 ± 0.3935.6 ± 0.46131.33 ± 0.33521.18 ± 0.441.62 ± 0.022.82 ± 0.0226.47 ± 0.020 ± 0.027.27 ± 0.017.65 ± 0.011.51 ± 066.41 ± 0.040.26 ± 0
B15–2110.98 ± 0.3640.28 ± 0.51142.86 ± 0.35503.99 ± 0.452.26 ± 0.021.62 ± 0.0228.74 ± 0.0383.96 ± 0.051.54 ± 0.038.43 ± 0.011.62 ± 073.79 ± 0.040.28 ± 0
BC21–600 ± 031.86 ± 0.3848.67 ± 0.17177.07 ± 0.262.38 ± 0.010.58 ± 0.018.39 ± 0.01674.53 ± 0.230 ± 0.132.95 ± 0.010.37 ± 025.75 ± 0.030.09 ± 0
C60–80+1.99 ± 0.0433 ± 0.4145.88 ± 0.17163.54 ± 0.252.41 ± 0.010.54 ± 0.017.77 ± 0.02696.6 ± 0.230 ± 0.132.76 ± 0.010.28 ± 022.84 ± 0.030.08 ± 0
K-C2OA0–1810.44 ± 0.3728.66 ± 0.42108.43 ± 0.29410.59 ± 0.442.14 ± 0.024.13 ± 0.0223.24 ± 0.010 ± 0.027.18 ± 0.016.75 ± 0.010.89 ± 053.29 ± 0.030.23 ± 0
B18–4211.16 ± 0.3838.79 ± 0.49150.88 ± 0.37507.85 ± 0.652.2 ± 0.022.3 ± 0.0231.7 ± 0.0224.47 ± 0.036.16 ± 0.018.69 ± 0.011.68 ± 073.79 ± 0.040.27 ± 0
BC42–512.44 ± 0.0633.49 ± 0.4166.17 ± 0.21202.09 ± 0.192.29 ± 0.010.66 ± 0.0112.03 ± 0.02608.08 ± 0.230 ± 0.134.11 ± 0.010.46 ± 030.46 ± 0.030.11 ± 0
C51–75+2.05 ± 0.0532.92 ± 0.4251.27 ± 0.18173.13 ± 0.262.33 ± 0.010.58 ± 0.019.51 ± 0.02672.39 ± 0.230 ± 0.133.03 ± 0.010.37 ± 024.98 ± 0.030.1 ± 0
13,500 years
K-D1A10–1511.83 ± 0.3727.29 ± 0.4180.3 ± 0.24344.11 ± 0.462.77 ± 0.025.97 ± 0.0318 ± 0.010 ± 0.0318.94 ± 0.015.27 ± 0.011.26 ± 059.72 ± 0.030.19 ± 0
A215–288.18 ± 0.332.59 ± 0.45104.98 ± 0.3466.5 ± 0.462.77 ± 0.023.53 ± 0.0222.86 ± 0.0152.94 ± 0.0510.41 ± 0.036.8 ± 0.011.32 ± 081.98 ± 0.050.25 ± 0
B28–320.46 ± 0.0129.08 ± 0.3935.21 ± 0.14159.18 ± 0.262.3 ± 0.010.95 ± 0.016.68 ± 0.01673.8 ± 0.240 ± 0.132.16 ± 0.010.47 ± 031.69 ± 0.030.08 ± 0
BC132–680 ± 029.62 ± 0.4114.3 ± 0.0841.8 ± 0.122.4 ± 0.010.49 ± 0.012.5 ± 0.01880.17 ± 0.460 ± 0.260.95 ± 0.010.15 ± 011.32 ± 0.020.03 ± 0
BC268–80+0.9 ± 0.0229.91 ± 0.4118.72 ± 0.165.6 ± 0.162.4 ± 0.010.54 ± 0.013.48 ± 0.01843.27 ± 0.460 ± 0.261.28 ± 0.010.24 ± 017.18 ± 0.010.05 ± 0
K-D2O/OA0–3011.23 ± 0.3936.16 ± 0.47118.41 ± 0.31468.5 ± 0.451.73 ± 0.023.84 ± 0.0225.84 ± 0.030.19 ± 0.0312.26 ± 0.016.81 ± 0.010.87 ± 069.25 ± 0.040.23 ± 0
A30–351.05 ± 0.0229.68 ± 0.4126.23 ± 0.1294.61 ± 0.192.23 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.014.24 ± 0.01799 ± 0.450 ± 0.251.69 ± 0.010.2 ± 017.43 ± 0.010.05 ± 0
BC35–70+0.45 ± 0.0130.24 ± 0.4121.55 ± 0.180.35 ± 0.182.39 ± 0.010.51 ± 0.013.43 ± 0.01826.37 ± 0.450 ± 0.251.44 ± 0.010.21 ± 016.28 ± 0.010.05 ± 0
Sustenpass (Stein Glacier)
30 years
S-A1AC0–1031.22 ± 0.6724.83 ± 0.29132.4 ± 0.35705.99 ± 0.691.02 ± 0.020.43 ± 0.0128.71 ± 0.030 ± 018.55 ± 0.025.86 ± 0.010.65 ± 038.83 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
C10–30+32.15 ± 0.6824.68 ± 0.28139.66 ± 0.34689.58 ± 0.680.73 ± 0.010.43 ± 0.0131.57 ± 0.030 ± 017.98 ± 0.015.35 ± 0.010.7 ± 043.63 ± 0.030.08 ± 0
S-A2C0–50+29.59 ± 0.6724.25 ± 0.29129.84 ± 0.35714.21 ± 0.691.09 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.0128.39 ± 0.030 ± 018.78 ± 0.026.03 ± 0.010.64 ± 038.12 ± 0.030.14 ± 0
160 years
S-B1OA0–1030.98 ± 0.6519.05 ± 0.25121.37 ± 0.32699.74 ± 0.680.92 ± 0.011.01 ± 0.0226.49 ± 0.030 ± 016.01 ± 0.015.08 ± 0.010.56 ± 034.34 ± 0.030.11 ± 0
AC10–2029.44 ± 0.6419.2 ± 0.25124.68 ± 0.32722.97 ± 0.680.77 ± 0.010.53 ± 0.0128.46 ± 0.030 ± 015.91 ± 0.015.21 ± 0.010.56 ± 034.68 ± 0.030.11 ± 0
C120–4032.78 ± 0.6218.13 ± 0.26126.1 ± 0.32722.13 ± 0.670.9 ± 0.020.81 ± 0.0128.59 ± 0.030 ± 015.89 ± 0.015.39 ± 0.010.57 ± 035.56 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
C240–55+33.12 ± 0.617.4 ± 0.28123.32 ± 0.31733.17 ± 0.670.73 ± 0.010.38 ± 0.0126.83 ± 0.020 ± 015.97 ± 0.014.87 ± 0.010.53 ± 032.62 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
S-B2A0–1023.02 ± 0.5513.95 ± 0.274.83 ± 0.23427.05 ± 0.442.5 ± 0.024.29 ± 0.0217.74 ± 0.010 ± 022.23 ± 0.013.64 ± 0.010.62 ± 025.82 ± 0.010.06 ± 0
C110–3030.85 ± 0.6723.91 ± 0.28131.28 ± 0.34701.1 ± 0.680.88 ± 0.010.58 ± 0.0128.97 ± 0.030 ± 017.32 ± 0.015.82 ± 0.010.67 ± 040.96 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
C230–45+31.08 ± 0.6219.53 ± 0.28125.94 ± 0.34717.88 ± 0.670.9 ± 0.020.48 ± 0.0128.24 ± 0.030 ± 017.39 ± 0.015.44 ± 0.010.63 ± 037.8 ± 0.030.1 ± 0
3000 years
S-C1A0–1036.68 ± 0.6527.48 ± 0.34133.38 ± 0.35641.27 ± 0.661.42 ± 0.021.01 ± 0.0221.02 ± 0.010 ± 033.17 ± 0.017.63 ± 0.011.1 ± 061.67 ± 0.040.08 ± 0
B10–3030.05 ± 0.6728.02 ± 0.31138.55 ± 0.35663.26 ± 0.70.93 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.0127.23 ± 0.030 ± 017.45 ± 0.027.47 ± 0.010.83 ± 057.24 ± 0.030.13 ± 0
BC30–55+31.92 ± 0.6324.46 ± 0.31131.42 ± 0.33685.16 ± 0.670.93 ± 0.010.54 ± 0.0125.27 ± 0.030 ± 018.33 ± 0.017.22 ± 0.010.8 ± 054.38 ± 0.030.11 ± 0
S-C2A0–2329.09 ± 0.6326.92 ± 0.3108.08 ± 0.3485.32 ± 0.452.89 ± 0.033.64 ± 0.0316.97 ± 0.010 ± 030.35 ± 0.018.19 ± 0.011.37 ± 061.99 ± 0.030.07 ± 0
Bw23–4027.15 ± 0.6326.28 ± 0.28119.1 ± 0.32582.21 ± 0.681.38 ± 0.022.16 ± 0.0222.65 ± 0.010 ± 021.8 ± 0.017.91 ± 0.010.89 ± 057.96 ± 0.030.12 ± 0
BC40–60+35.37 ± 0.7233.21 ± 0.32141.44 ± 0.36642.39 ± 0.691.24 ± 0.020.98 ± 0.0223.41 ± 0.030 ± 031.51 ± 0.016.88 ± 0.011.06 ± 058.04 ± 0.030.08 ± 0
10,000 years 20.27 ± 0.5310.34 ± 0.1779.38 ± 0.25383.81 ± 0.442.74 ± 0.025.95 ± 0.0315.72 ± 0.010 ± 07.06 ± 0.017.02 ± 0.010.24 ± 027.52 ± 0.010.12 ± 0
S-D1O0–2020.99 ± 0.5314.12 ± 0.2199.85 ± 0.28491.92 ± 0.452.47 ± 0.024.1 ± 0.0220.18 ± 0.010 ± 09.92 ± 0.019.2 ± 0.010.36 ± 039.3 ± 0.030.17 ± 0
OE20–3627.88 ± 0.6128.61 ± 0.31135.28 ± 0.36621.23 ± 0.672.09 ± 0.020.69 ± 0.0126.98 ± 0.030 ± 017.59 ± 0.0110.25 ± 0.011.23 ± 075.75 ± 0.040.17 ± 0
Bs36–6325.75 ± 0.6429.17 ± 0.3140.03 ± 0.37606.96 ± 0.692.41 ± 0.020.97 ± 0.0227.74 ± 0.030 ± 016.98 ± 0.0210.33 ± 0.011.22 ± 076.88 ± 0.050.18 ± 0
BC63–80+21.31 ± 0.5412.81 ± 0.1990.74 ± 0.27419.15 ± 0.442.62 ± 0.025.31 ± 0.0316.64 ± 0.010 ± 07.59 ± 0.018.2 ± 0.010.32 ± 035.37 ± 0.030.13 ± 0
S-D2OE0–3524.54 ± 0.6128.56 ± 0.3136.17 ± 0.36576.97 ± 0.681.86 ± 0.021.23 ± 0.0226.18 ± 0.030 ± 013.96 ± 0.0110.75 ± 0.010.89 ± 078.95 ± 0.050.17 ± 0
Bs35–6827.83 ± 0.6441.91 ± 0.34132.89 ± 0.35504.05 ± 0.442.06 ± 0.031.42 ± 0.0217.37 ± 0.010 ± 018.28 ± 0.018.59 ± 0.011.17 ± 084.82 ± 0.040.09 ± 0
BC68–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Table 3. Strain coefficients (εTi), open-system mass transport functions (τ) for each element at each soil profile. The lowermost horizon of each soil profile was used as the corresponding parent material in the calculations.
Table 3. Strain coefficients (εTi), open-system mass transport functions (τ) for each element at each soil profile. The lowermost horizon of each soil profile was used as the corresponding parent material in the calculations.
ProfileHorizonDepthɛ τ
(Ti)NaMgAlSiPKCaMnFe
(cm)
110 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
K-A1C10–10−0.16 ± 40.5−0.11 ± 00.03 ± 0−0.09 ± 00.09 ± 00.06 ± 0−0.08 ± 00.09 ± 00.11 ± 00.02 ± 0
C210–20+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-A2C10–10−0.15 ± 43.810.3 ± 0.01−0.05 ± 0−0.07 ± 00 ± 0−0.1 ± 0−0.07 ± 0−0.07 ± 00.12 ± 0−0.01 ± 0
C210–20+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
160 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
K-B1AC0–15−0.53 ± 30.50.1 ± 0−0.08 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−0.1 ± 00 ± 0−0.37 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−0.02 ± 0
C15–25+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-B2AC0–10−0.4 ± 58.2−0.22 ± 0.01−0.15 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.04 ± 0−0.25 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−0.5 ± 0−0.04 ± 0−0.04 ± 0
C10–28+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
4900 years (calcaric skeletic cambisol)
K-C1A0–15−0.82 ± 29.830.96 ± 0.04−0.61 ± 0.010.03 ± 00.15 ± 0−0.76 ± 0.010.23 ± 0−0.99 ± 00.96 ± 0.010.05 ± 0
B15–21−0.73 ± 15.510.81 ± 0.03−0.6 ± 0.010.02 ± 00.01 ± 0−0.69 ± 0.010.21 ± 0−0.96 ± 00.91 ± 00.06 ± 0
BC21–60−0.4 ± 7.93−1 ± 0.02−0.1 ± 0−0.01 ± 00.01 ± 0−0.08 ± 00.01 ± 0−0.09 ± 00.25 ± 00.05 ± 0
C60–80+0 ± 2.850 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-C2OA0–18−0.56 ± 6.731.28 ± 0.05−0.61 ± 0.01−0.05 ± 00.07 ± 0−0.59 ± 0.010.1 ± 0−0.99 ± 00.09 ± 0−0.04 ± 0
B18–42−0.81 ± 15.320.89 ± 0.04−0.59 ± 0.010.03 ± 00.02 ± 0−0.67 ± 0.010.16 ± 0−0.98 ± 00.6 ± 00.03 ± 0
BC42–510.06 ± 6.25−0.12 ± 0−0.25 ± 0−0.05 ± 0−0.14 ± 0−0.28 ± 0−0.07 ± 0−0.33 ± 0−0.08 ± 0−0.1 ± 0
C51–75+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
13,500 years (calcaric skeletic cambisol)
K-D1A10–15−0.67 ± 17.132.21 ± 0.11−0.78 ± 0.020.04 ± 00.28 ± 0−0.72 ± 0.010.26 ± 0−0.99 ± 00.27 ± 0−0.15 ± 0
A215–28−0.72 ± 11.910.72 ± 0.03−0.79 ± 0.020.06 ± 00.34 ± 0−0.78 ± 0.010.24 ± 0−0.98 ± 00.03 ± 0−0.1 ± 0
B28–320.15 ± 28.71−0.69 ± 0.02−0.42 ± 0.010.12 ± 00.44 ± 0−0.43 ± 00.14 ± 0−0.53 ± 00.14 ± 00.1 ± 0
BC132–680.37 ± 10.85−1 ± 0.020.34 ± 00.03 ± 0−0.14 ± 00.35 ± 0−0.03 ± 00.41 ± 0−0.15 ± 0−0.11 ± 0
BC268–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-D2OA0–30−0.83 ± 22.494.29 ± 0.17−0.75 ± 0.010.16 ± 00.23 ± 0−0.85 ± 0.010.59 ± 0−0.99 ± 0−0.11 ± 0−0.1 ± 0
B30–35−0.2 ± 00.99 ± 0.03−0.16 ± 00.04 ± 00 ± 0−0.2 ± 00.05 ± 0−0.18 ± 0−0.18 ± 0−0.09 ± 0
BC35–70+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
30 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
S-A1AC0–10−0.37 ± 0.24−0.11 ± 0−0.08 ± 0−0.13 ± 0−0.06 ± 00.29 ± 0.01−0.17 ± 0−0.06 ± 0−0.14 ± 0−0.19 ± 0
C10–30+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-A2C0–50+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
160 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
S-B1OA0–10−0.08 ± 0.01−0.07 ± 0−0.02 ± 00 ± 00.01 ± 0−0.18 ± 00.05 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−0.02 ± 0
AC10–20−0.21 ± 0.040 ± 0−0.1 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.08 ± 00.02 ± 0−0.06 ± 0−0.04 ± 0−0.02 ± 0
C120–40−0.36 ± 0.060.11 ± 0−0.05 ± 00.06 ± 00.09 ± 0−0.17 ± 00.06 ± 00.04 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−0.01 ± 0
C240–55+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-B2A0–10−0.06 ± 0.010.1 ± 00.07 ± 0−0.11 ± 0−0.11 ± 03.13 ± 0.06−0.06 ± 00.91 ± 00.46 ± 00.02 ± 0
C110–30−0.38 ± 0.05−0.07 ± 00.14 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.09 ± 0−0.08 ± 0−0.04 ± 0−0.07 ± 0−0.01 ± 00.01 ± 0
C230–45+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
3000 years (skeletic cambisol)
S-C1A0–100.02 ± 00.09 ± 00.06 ± 0−0.04 ± 0−0.11 ± 00.43 ± 0.01−0.21 ± 00.71 ± 00.3 ± 00.07 ± 0
B10–300.43 ± 0.07−0.09 ± 00.11 ± 00.02 ± 0−0.06 ± 0−0.03 ± 00.04 ± 0−0.08 ± 00 ± 00.02 ± 0
BC30–55+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-C2A0–230.03 ± 0.01−0.31 ± 0.01−0.32 ± 0−0.36 ± 0−0.36 ± 00.96 ± 0.02−0.39 ± 0−0.19 ± 00.09 ± 0−0.1 ± 0
Bw23–400.04 ± 0.01−0.33 ± 0.01−0.31 ± 0−0.27 ± 0−0.21 ± 0−0.03 ± 0−0.16 ± 0−0.4 ± 0−0.27 ± 0−0.13 ± 0
BC40–60+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
10,000 years (entic podsol)
S-D1O0–205.18 ± 3.750.16 ± 0.01−0.48 ± 0.01−0.17 ± 0−0.07 ± 00.67 ± 0.01−0.17 ± 0−0.39 ± 0−0.71 ± 0−0.47 ± 0
OE20–361.39 ± 0.38−0.08 ± 0−0.46 ± 0.01−0.2 ± 0−0.09 ± 00.15 ± 0−0.18 ± 0−0.34 ± 0−0.67 ± 0−0.43 ± 0
Bs36–630.36 ± 0.050.09 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−0.03 ± 00.03 ± 0−0.12 ± 0−0.02 ± 00.04 ± 00.02 ± 0−0.01 ± 0
BC63–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-D2OE0–35−0.32 ± 0.11−0.2 ± 0.01−0.68 ± 0.01−0.28 ± 0−0.13 ± 00.33 ± 0.010 ± 0−0.56 ± 0−0.71 ± 0−0.56 ± 0
Bs35–68−0.66 ± 0.16−0.3 ± 0.01−0.46 ± 0.01−0.18 ± 0−0.08 ± 0−0.28 ± 00.2 ± 0−0.39 ± 0−0.39 ± 0−0.26 ± 0
BC68–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Table 4. Mass balances for each element for each soil profile. The lowermost horizon of each soil profile was used as the corresponding parent material for the calculations, therefore indicating a mass balance of zero.
Table 4. Mass balances for each element for each soil profile. The lowermost horizon of each soil profile was used as the corresponding parent material for the calculations, therefore indicating a mass balance of zero.
ProfileHorizonDepthMass Balance
NaMgAlSiPKCaMnFe
cmkg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2kg m−2
110 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
K-A1C10–10−0.03 ± 00.04 ± 0−0.32 ± 0.021.33 ± 0.070.01 ± 0−0.08 ± 02.1 ± 0.110 ± 00.06 ± 0
C210–20+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-A2C10–100.02 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−0.08 ± 0.010 ± 00 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−0.62 ± 0.060 ± 0−0.01 ± 0
C210–20+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
160 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
K-B1AC0–150.02 ± 0−0.03 ± 0.01−0.05 ± 0.01−0.06 ± 0.020 ± 00 ± 0−1.52 ± 0.440 ± 0−0.02 ± 0.01
C15–25+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-B2AC0–10−0.04 ± 0.02−0.05 ± 0.03−0.04 ± 0.03−0.19 ± 0.110 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−2.13 ± 1.240 ± 0−0.03 ± 0.02
C10–28+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
4900 years (calcaric skeletic cambisol)
K-C1A0–150.05 ± 0.01−0.19 ± 0.060.02 ± 0.010.37 ± 0.11−0.03 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.01−9.02 ± 2.690.01 ± 00.02 ± 0.01
B15–210.02 ± 0−0.09 ± 0.010.01 ± 00.01 ± 0−0.01 ± 00.02 ± 0−4.07 ± 0.630 ± 00.01 ± 0
BC21–60−0.08 ± 0.01−0.05 ± 0−0.01 ± 00.05 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0−1.51 ± 0.120 ± 00.05 ± 0
C60–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-C2OA0–180.12 ± 0.01−0.34 ± 0.01−0.08 ± 00.31 ± 0.01−0.04 ± 00.05 ± 0−15.8 ± 0.40 ± 0−0.04 ± 0
B18–420.08 ± 0.01−0.33 ± 0.050.04 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.02−0.04 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.01−15.55 ± 2.180.01 ± 00.03 ± 0
BC42–51−0.01 ± 0−0.09 ± 0−0.05 ± 0−0.43 ± 0−0.01 ± 0−0.02 ± 0−3.45 ± 0.010 ± 0−0.07 ± 0
C51–75+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
13,500 years (calcaric skeletic cambisol)
K-D1A10–150.01 ± 0−0.07 ± 0.010 ± 00.08 ± 0.01−0.01 ± 00.01 ± 0−3.31 ± 0.530 ± 0−0.02 ± 0
A215–280.01 ± 0−0.16 ± 0.020.01 ± 00.25 ± 0.03−0.02 ± 00.02 ± 0−7.88 ± 0.820 ± 0−0.03 ± 0
B28–32−0.01 ± 0−0.04 ± 0.010.01 ± 00.16 ± 0.04−0.01 ± 00 ± 0−2.03 ± 0.570 ± 00.01 ± 0
BC132–68−0.1 ± 0.010.43 ± 0.040.04 ± 0−0.63 ± 0.060.05 ± 0−0.01 ± 020.22 ± 1.850 ± 0−0.19 ± 0.02
BC268–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
K-D2OA0–300.66 ± 0.15−3.04 ± 0.680.84 ± 0.194.01 ± 0.89−0.41 ± 0.090.78 ± 0.17−153.33 ± 34.16−0.01 ± 0−0.55 ± 0.12
B30–350.01 ± 0−0.02 ± 00.01 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0−1 ± 0.070 ± 0−0.02 ± 0
BC35–70+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
30 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
S-A1AC0–10−0.13 ± 0.09−0.06 ± 0.04−0.47 ± 0.33−0.99 ± 0.70 ± 0−0.21 ± 0.15−0.04 ± 0.020 ± 0−0.27 ± 0.19
C10–30+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-A2C0–50+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
160 years (hyperskeletic leptosol)
S-B1OA0–10−0.14 ± 0.03−0.02 ± 00.01 ± 00.19 ± 0.05−0.01 ± 00.09 ± 0.02−0.03 ± 0.010 ± 0−0.03 ± 0.01
AC10–20−0.01 ± 0−0.11 ± 0.03−0.13 ± 0.03−0.87 ± 0.220 ± 00.04 ± 0.01−0.07 ± 0.020 ± 0−0.06 ± 0.01
C120–400.62 ± 0.15−0.13 ± 0.030.9 ± 0.227.13 ± 1.74−0.02 ± 00.29 ± 0.070.11 ± 0.030 ± 0−0.05 ± 0.01
C240–55+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-B2A0–100.14 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.01−0.44 ± 0.1−2.18 ± 0.490.07 ± 0.02−0.08 ± 0.020.65 ± 0.150.01 ± 00.03 ± 0.01
C110–30−0.3 ± 0.050.29 ± 0.05−0.32 ± 0.05−5.2 ± 0.89−0.01 ± 0−0.17 ± 0.03−0.15 ± 0.030 ± 00.05 ± 0.01
C230–45+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
3000 years (skeletic cambisol)
S-C1A0–100.14 ± 0.020.06 ± 0.01−0.19 ± 0.02−2.51 ± 0.290.01 ± 0−0.31 ± 0.040.64 ± 0.070.01 ± 00.19 ± 0.02
B10–30−0.21 ± 0.030.15 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.02−2.03 ± 0.310 ± 00.08 ± 0.01−0.1 ± 0.020 ± 00.06 ± 0.01
BC30–55+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-C2A0–23−0.63 ± 0.34−0.49 ± 0.27−2.07 ± 1.13−8.49 ± 4.610.04 ± 0.02−0.59 ± 0.32−0.33 ± 0.180.01 ± 0−0.32 ± 0.17
Bw23–40−0.49 ± 0.11−0.35 ± 0.08−1.13 ± 0.25−3.59 ± 0.790 ± 0−0.17 ± 0.04−0.51 ± 0.11−0.01 ± 0−0.3 ± 0.07
BC40–60+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
10,000 years (entic podsol)
S-D1O0–200.08 ± 0.06−0.21 ± 0.16−0.31 ± 0.23−0.51 ± 0.370.02 ± 0.01−0.1 ± 0.07−0.12 ± 0.09−0.02 ± 0.01−0.65 ± 0.47
OE20–36−0.09 ± 0.02−0.42 ± 0.12−0.78 ± 0.23−1.34 ± 0.390.01 ± 0−0.22 ± 0.06−0.22 ± 0.06−0.03 ± 0.01−1.21 ± 0.35
Bs36–630.32 ± 0.06−0.04 ± 0.01−0.36 ± 0.061.67 ± 0.3−0.02 ± 0−0.08 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.020 ± 0−0.07 ± 0.01
BC63–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
S-D2OE0–35−0.62 ± 0.23−2.6 ± 0.95−3.03 ± 1.11−4.58 ± 1.670.05 ± 0.020.01 ± 0−1.12 ± 0.41−0.1 ± 0.04−5.06 ± 1.85
Bs35–68−1.72 ± 0.49−3.24 ± 0.91−3.58 ± 1−5.63 ± 1.58−0.07 ± 0.020.83 ± 0.23−1.43 ± 0.4−0.1 ± 0.03−4.28 ± 1.2
BC68–80+0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Table 5. Organic matter and oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and Mn of the fine earth. OM (organic matter) content was derived from LOI measurements. Corg, N, and C/N are based on EA-IRMS measurements (Corg was calculated as Ctot minus Cinorg). The oxalate extractable fractions, Feo, Alo, and Mno were measured with Flame-AAS.
Table 5. Organic matter and oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and Mn of the fine earth. OM (organic matter) content was derived from LOI measurements. Corg, N, and C/N are based on EA-IRMS measurements (Corg was calculated as Ctot minus Cinorg). The oxalate extractable fractions, Feo, Alo, and Mno were measured with Flame-AAS.
ProfileHorizonDepth OMCorgNC/NFeoAloMno
cmg kg−1g kg−1g kg−1 mg kg−1mg kg−1mg kg−1
Klausenpass (Griess Glacier)
110 years
K-A1C10–1017.510.96 ± 00.39 ± 02.87 ± 01494 ± 124206 ± 032 ± 2
C210–20+19.830.29 ± 00.31 ± 01.11 ± 01390 ± 169266 ± 019 ± 0
K-A2C10–1018.950.78 ± 00.35 ± 0.022.56 ± 0.041571 ± 121191 ± 053 ± 2
C210–20+17.9100.24 *N/A1545 ± 271212 ± 032 ± 5
160 years
K-B1AC0–1583.8526.99 ± 0.182.2 ± 0.0514.33 ± 0.022751 ± 158293 ± 0149 ± 26
C15–25+33.445.74 ± 0.060.68 ± 0.019.81 ± 0.012007 ± 91215 ± 452 ± 14
K-B2AC0–1089.2922.07 ± 3.921.89 ± 0.3313.62 ± 0.252767 ± 331309 ± 48157 ± 7
C10–28+32.154.84 ± 0.020.67 ± 0.028.39 ± 0.021665 ± 137229 ± 041 ± 6
4900 years
K-C1A0–15187.0671.2 ± 0.026.71 ± 0.0512.38 ± 0.016621 ± 8312578 ± 183671 ± 180
B15–2199.6525.61 ± 0.073.35 ± 0.138.93 ± 0.047416 ± 2692379 ± 211758 ± 282
BC21–6027.370.94 ± 00.68 ± 0.011.62 ± 0.022451 ± 236667 ± 093 ± 0
C60–80+22.3200.42 ± 0.01N/A1739 ± 115544 ± 047 ± 0
K-C2OA0–18344.02150.89 ± 2.9811.29 ± 0.1615.59 ± 0.028225 ± 3772564 ± 0405 ± 57
B18–42140.0345.9 ± 0.175.07 ± 0.0210.56 ± 0.017806 ± 11933317 ± 01040 ± 122
BC42–5137.643.88 ± 00.92 ± 0.024.9 ± 0.022912 ± 475630 ± 18138 ± 11
C51–75+27.332.12 ± 00.67 ± 0.033.68 ± 0.042065 ± 245549 ± 6102 ± 13
13,500 years
K-D1A10–15424.36185.86 ± 1.6514.44 ± 0.1915.01 ± 0.029993 ± 1172059 ± 0750 ± 88
A215–28204.9078.91 ± 2.57.66 ± 0.1512.03 ± 0.0411,423 ± 5282661 ± 132724 ± 141
B28–3257.9613.82 ± 0.051.69 ± 0.029.52 ± 0.012748 ± 6795 ± 0262 ± 51
BC132–6816.4400.44 ± 0N/A465 ± 3226 ± 051 ± 10
BC268–80+16.3600.42 ± 0.01N/A880 ± 128260 ± 3447 ± 5
K-D2O/OA0–30244.6699.66 ± 232.568.21 ± 0.0914.17 ± 2.337092 ± 5982102 ± 0456 ± 2
A30–3522.983.06 ± 3.370.63 ± 0.035.69 ± 1.11120 ± 99279 ± 5846 ± 2
BC35–70+16.750 00.35 ± 0N/A487 ± 8261 ± 039 ± 1
Sustenpass (Stein Glacier)
30 years
S-A1AC0–1011.400.97 ± 0.190.11 ± 010.21 ± 0.21103 ± 147266 ± 030 ± 0
C10–30+13.460.26 ± 0.69N/AN/A1436 ± 230575 ± 035 ± 0
S-A2C0–50+8.390.39 ± 3.49N/AN/A1460 ± 243413 ± 027 ± 1
160 years
S-B1OA0–1044.352.07 ± 2.950.3 ± 0.018.2 ± 1.421184 ± 107433 ± 033 ± 0
AC10–2017.481.4 *0.19 *8.73 *1160 ± 58308 ± 026 ± 0
C120–4013.041.21 *0.11 *12.43 *1342 ± 15290 ± 034 ± 0
C240–55+10.957.37 ± 19.261.24 ± 0.026.93 ± 2.611033 ± 90256 ± 021 ± 1
S-B2A0–10384.24105.65 ± 12.6312.48 ± 0.019.88 ± 0.121228 ± 140653 ± 097 ± 4
C110–3017.531.96 *0.29 *7.9 *1111 ± 138337 ± 6029 ± 3
C230–45+14.611.03 *0.21 *5.72 *885 ± 112286 ± 029 ± 1
3000 years
S-C1A0–1034.09N/AN/AN/A2829 ± 2831009 ± 2664 ± 2
B10–3027.962.53 ± 0.710.57 ± 05.14 ± 0.282104 ± 217549 ± 047 ± 0
BC30–55+19.461.66 ± 5.550.21 ± 0.019.3 ± 3.352451 ± 414283 ± 8342 ± 2
S-C2A0–23225.1227.96 ± 4.438.31 ± 0.083.93 ± 0.163238 ± 4691274 ± 0297 ± 49
Bw23–40130.4010.6 ± 7.654 ± 0.033.09 ± 0.721862 ± 383466 ± 100108 ± 44
BC40–60+24.391.34 ± 0.390.53 ± 0.012.95 ± 0.291565 ± 264435 ± 098 ± 20
10,000 years
S-D1O0–20439.8154.34 ± 142.1213.71 ± 0.394.62 ± 2.626726 ± 2323797 ± 1103 ± 0
OE20–36287.4070.42 ± 65.939.26 ± 0.18.88 ± 0.948226 ± 4384023 ± 01 ± 0
Bs36–6352.246.51 *0.71 *10.78 *9394 ± 12063874 ± 0183 ± 18
BC63–80+61.3710.3 *1.04 *11.6 *9887 ± 16553474 ± 362186 ± 4
S-D2OE0–35379.81159.29 ± 25.0311.83 ± 0.0115.71 ± 0.167347 ± 4694773 ± 04 ± 2
Bs35–6899.7721.03 *2.09 *11.75 *11,650 ± 8605502 ± 059 ± 2
BC68–80+159.5311.63 *2.83 *4.79 *13,020 ± 2309754 ± 0146 ± 5
N/A = no data available; * no replicate measurements.
Table 6. Long-term erosion rates derived from meteoric 10Be in soils. Different equations and q values from literature were used.
Table 6. Long-term erosion rates derived from meteoric 10Be in soils. Different equations and q values from literature were used.
ProfileHorizonThicknessBulk DensityFine EarthSkeleton10Be 10BeErosion Rates
(conc.) (per Horizon)Equation (10) 1Equation (10) 2Equation (10) 3Equation (13)
(cm)(g cm−3)(g cm−2)(wt. %)(at g−1 108)(at cm−2 108)(t ha−1 year−1)(t ha−1 year−1)(t ha−1 year−1)(t ha−1 year−1)
Klausenpass 4900 years
K-C1A150.507.4511.3113.32 ± 0.6387.94 ± 4.150.26 ± 0.15−0.30 ± 0.170.17 ± 0.10−80 ± 0.10
B60.744.4464.4710.84 ± 0.4817.11 ± 0.76
BC391.5359.6277.931.12 ± 0.0714.76 ± 0.88
C201.4829.5385.300.63 ± 0.032.75 ± 0.12
Klausenpass 13,500
K-D1A1150.334.946.8815.29 ± 0.5370.33 ± 2.440.01 ± 0.00−0.38 ± 0.08−0.05 ± 0.010−0.15 ± 0.02
A2130.486.1940.8517.39 ± 0.9163.73 ± 3.34
B40.813.2273.465.31 ± 0.154.54 ± 0.13
BC1361.6358.6375.001.26 ± 0.0418.5 ± 0.59
BC2121.6519.8175.001.46 ± 0.047.24 ± 0.21
Sustenpass 3000 years
S-C1A101.3113.0650.411.04 ± 0.036.76 ± 0.23−2.64 ± 0.38−14.11 ± 2.03−4.58 ± 0.66−11.26 ± 0.20
B201.5130.2868.900.3 ± 0.012.85 ± 0.12
BC251.9047.5763.430.17 ± 0.012.89 ± 0.19
Sustenpass 10,000 years
S-D1O200.7314.6274.373.55 ± 0.113.3 ± 0.39−0.60 ± 0.20−5.27 ± 1.75−1.39 ± 0.46−1.95 ± 0.27
OE160.7111.3647.943.31 ± 0.119.58 ± 0.57
Bs321.2941.1654.761.31 ± 0.0524.31 ± 0.88
BC121.3516.2241.751.55 ± 0.0614.68 ± 0.54
Preparation blank (long-term average). 1 q = 1.1 × 106 atm cm−2 year−1 [45]; 2 q = 4.6 × 106 atm cm−2 year−1 [85]; 3 q = 1.6 × 106 atm cm−2 year−1 [86].
Table 7. Estimation of soil production rates. Profile thickening (Figure 3) was used for soil formation (Fsoil), soil erosion rates from 239+240Pu and 10Be were used as denudation rates (Dsoil), and the total mass balances served as chemical weathering rates (Wsoil). The meteoric 10Be erosion rates (erosion = negative values) were used for the 3 ka, 4.9 ka, 10 ka, and 13.5 ka soils. The denudation rates of the young soils (30 a, 110 a, 160 a) were derived from the short-term (239+240Pu) erosion rates.
Table 7. Estimation of soil production rates. Profile thickening (Figure 3) was used for soil formation (Fsoil), soil erosion rates from 239+240Pu and 10Be were used as denudation rates (Dsoil), and the total mass balances served as chemical weathering rates (Wsoil). The meteoric 10Be erosion rates (erosion = negative values) were used for the 3 ka, 4.9 ka, 10 ka, and 13.5 ka soils. The denudation rates of the young soils (30 a, 110 a, 160 a) were derived from the short-term (239+240Pu) erosion rates.
MoraineAgeSoil
Formation
Soil
Erosion 1
Soil
Weathering
Soil
Production
Equation (15) (239+240Pu)(10Be)(Figure 5b)Equation (1) 2
(years)mm year−1t ha−1 year−1t ha−1 year−1t ha−1 year−1t ha−1 year−1t ha−1 year−1
Klausenpass (Griess Glacier)
K-A1100.000.00−10.23N/A0.1110.34
K-B1600.786.24−4.15N/A−0.1310.52
K-C49000.121.92−1.040.05−0.052.02
K-D13,500>0.06 *1.08−0.32−0.14−0.051.27 *
Sustenpass (Stein Glacier)
S-A301.6528.05N/AN/A−0.6934.15 **
S-B1600.9417.86−5.41N/A0.0023.27
S-C3000>0.19 *>3.42 *−2.65−7.11−0.0410.57 *
S-D10,000>0.08 *>1.04 *−1.92−2.42−0.023.48 *
N/A = not available. 1 Short-term erosion rate (erosion = negative values) derived from 239+240Plutonium. It is the mean yearly soil loss over the past 54 years (data: [53]). 2 Equation (1): Psoil = Fsoil + Dsoil = Fsoil + Wsoil + Esoil. * These are minimum values as the depth of the soil pits did not reach the bottom of the BC horizon (see Figure 3). ** Approximated using the erosion rate of S-B.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Musso, A.; Tikhomirov, D.; Plötze, M.L.; Greinwald, K.; Hartmann, A.; Geitner, C.; Maier, F.; Petibon, F.; Egli, M. Soil Formation and Mass Redistribution during the Holocene Using Meteoric 10Be, Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy. Geosciences 2022, 12, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020099

AMA Style

Musso A, Tikhomirov D, Plötze ML, Greinwald K, Hartmann A, Geitner C, Maier F, Petibon F, Egli M. Soil Formation and Mass Redistribution during the Holocene Using Meteoric 10Be, Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy. Geosciences. 2022; 12(2):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Musso, Alessandra, Dmitry Tikhomirov, Michael L. Plötze, Konrad Greinwald, Anne Hartmann, Clemens Geitner, Fabian Maier, Fanny Petibon, and Markus Egli. 2022. "Soil Formation and Mass Redistribution during the Holocene Using Meteoric 10Be, Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy" Geosciences 12, no. 2: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020099

APA Style

Musso, A., Tikhomirov, D., Plötze, M. L., Greinwald, K., Hartmann, A., Geitner, C., Maier, F., Petibon, F., & Egli, M. (2022). Soil Formation and Mass Redistribution during the Holocene Using Meteoric 10Be, Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy. Geosciences, 12(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop