Next Article in Journal
A Spatially Explicit Comparison of Quantitative and Categorical Modelling Approaches for Mapping Seabed Sediments Using Random Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Earthquake Environmental Effects of the 1992 MS7.3 Suusamyr Earthquake, Kyrgyzstan, and Their Implications for Paleo-Earthquake Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Geotectonic Controls on CO2 Formation and Distribution Processes in the Brazilian Pre-Salt Basins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Reduction of a Tsunami Current through a Hybrid Defense System Comprising a Sea Embankment Followed by a Coastal Forest
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Possible Mechanism for the Tsunami-Related Fires That Occurred at Aonae Harbor on Okushiri Island in the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-Oki Earthquake

Geosciences 2019, 9(6), 253; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9060253
by Yuji Enomoto 1,*, Tsuneaki Yamabe 1, Shigeki Sugiura 2 and Hitoshi Kondo 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Geosciences 2019, 9(6), 253; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9060253
Submission received: 28 April 2019 / Revised: 30 May 2019 / Accepted: 31 May 2019 / Published: 5 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interdisciplinary Geosciences Perspectives of Tsunami Volume 2)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript was very well written with an interesting hypothesis and work to back it up. A pleasure to read.

I have only two minor suggestions

line 50 rather than saying "after the tsunami" saying "after the fault rupture" is much clearer (twice in this line)

line 228 - the bracketed comment "(see fig 1a)" I would move this to line 226 directly after "Sendai Bay"

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable comments. Please check our reply in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper presents an interesting hypothesis for the occurrence mechanism of the tsunami-induced fires that occurred in the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-Oki earthquake, Japan on the basis of video footage, testimonies, and experimental results. The paper is generally well-written and topic is clear presented. The main research findings of this paper will be important for full understanding of tsunami-induced fires and improving preparedness.

There is a concern that the introduction does not include references relevant to studies about tsunami-induced fires. As tsunami-induced fires occurred in great numbers in the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, the concern with tsunami-induced fires has been remarkably growing and several researchers have analyzed the occurrence tendency (e.g. Sekizawa and Sasaki, 2014), the damage situation and the hypothesis of occurrence mechanism (e.g. Hokugo et al., 2013), and have developed models for simulating the fires for improving preparedness (e.g. Nishino and Imazu, 2018). The fires presented in this paper seems to be different from various types of tsunami-induced fires that have been clarified by such studies. I recommended the authors overview relevant studies about tsunami-induced fires in the introduction section and refers to this paper’s uniqueness before I recommend for publication.

Sekizawa, A. and Sasaki, K., 2014. Study on Fires Following the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake based on the Questionnaire Survey to Fire Departments in Affected Areas, Fire Safety Science 11, 691-703.

Hokugo, A., Nishino, T. and Inada, T., 2013. Tsunami Fires After the Great East Japan Earthquake, Journal of Disaster Research 8, 584-593.

Nishino, T. and Imazu, Y., 2018. A Computational Model for Large-Scale Oil Spill Fires on Water in Tsunamis: Simulation of Oil Spill Fires at Kesennuma Bay in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 54, 37-48.

Author Response

Along with the reviewer 2's suggestion, "Introduction " are revised as noted in bule colored.

In addition, we add the description on the signal analyses of Fig.5 in 3.5 to make them more clear. Also noted in blue colored.

Revised manuscript is uploaded

Thank you all.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round  2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has been improved on the basis of the review's suggestion. Therefore, this paper is recommended for publication. Minor revision is needed before publication because the survey report by the Japan Association for Fire Science and Engineering [13] is missing in the list of references. 

Author Response

I add reference 13 as suggested by the reviewer.

Thank you for the comment.

Back to TopTop