Next Article in Journal
Ursolic Acid and Related Analogues: Triterpenoids with Broad Health Benefits
Previous Article in Journal
Unripe Carica papaya Protects Methylglyoxal-Invoked Endothelial Cell Inflammation and Apoptosis via the Suppression of Oxidative Stress and Akt/MAPK/NF-κB Signals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/antiox10081160
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Combined Drug Treatment That Reduces Mitochondrial Iron and Reactive Oxygen Levels Recovers Insulin Secretion in NAF-1-Deficient Pancreatic Cells

by
Ola Karmi
1,
Yang-Sung Sohn
1,
Henri-Baptiste Marjault
1,
Tal Israeli
2,
Gil Leibowitz
2,3,
Konstantinos Ioannidis
1,4,
Yaakov Nahmias
1,4,
Ron Mittler
5,*,
Ioav Z. Cabantchik
1,* and
Rachel Nechushtai
1,*
1
The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus at Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
2
School of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
3
Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
4
Alexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus at Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
5
Department of Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65201, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(8), 1160; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081160
Submission received: 4 June 2021 / Revised: 14 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Decreased insulin secretion, associated with pancreatic β-cell failure, plays a critical role in many human diseases including diabetes, obesity, and cancer. While numerous studies linked β-cell failure with enhanced levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the development of diabetes associated with hereditary conditions that result in iron overload, e.g., hemochromatosis, Friedreich’s ataxia, and Wolfram syndrome type 2 (WFS-T2; a mutation in CISD2, encoding the [2Fe-2S] protein NAF-1), underscores an additional link between iron metabolism and β-cell failure. Here, using NAF-1-repressed INS-1E pancreatic cells, we observed that NAF-1 repression inhibited insulin secretion, as well as impaired mitochondrial and ER structure and function. Importantly, we found that a combined treatment with the cell permeant iron chelator deferiprone and the glutathione precursor N-acetyl cysteine promoted the structural repair of mitochondria and ER, decreased mitochondrial labile iron and ROS levels, and restored glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Additionally, treatment with the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 decreased cellular ROS formation and improved cellular growth of NAF-1 repressed pancreatic cells. Our findings reveal that suppressed expression of NAF-1 is associated with the development of ferroptosis-like features in pancreatic cells, and that reducing the levels of mitochondrial iron and ROS levels could be used as a therapeutic avenue for WFS-T2 patients.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Wolfram Syndrome Type 2 (WFS-T2) is a rare genetic disease found in several different populations worldwide [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Its early onset is characterized by severe insulin deficiency leading to juvenile onset of diabetes mellitus, progressive appearance of gastro-intestinal (GI) ulcers, abnormal platelet aggregation, sensorineural hearing loss, optical nerve atrophy, and psychosis [1,8,9,10,11]. A number of different studies identified the CISD2 gene as the causative agent of WFS-T2, with several different mutations in the CISD2 allele associated with different forms of WFS-T2 [1,2,3,4,6,7]. Most of the mutations in the CISD2 gene, leading to WFS-T2, resulted in a complete or partial loss of the NAF-1 (Nutrient-deprivation Autophagy Factor-1) CISD2 protein, a protein that normally resides on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), and the mitochondria-ER-associated membranes (MAM) [12]. Interactome studies of NAF-1, a member of the [2Fe-2S] NEET protein family [13], implicated this protein in the regulation of autophagy and apoptosis, and added support to the empirical evidence associating NAF-1 with dysfunctional iron metabolism, ROS formation, and Ca2+ signaling at the ER and mitochondria [13,14,15]. The association of NAF-1 function with altered iron and ROS metabolism gained further support from studies conducted in cancer cells [14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. These studies reveal that cancer cells accumulate high levels of NAF-1, and that disrupting NAF-1 function, for example by a point mutation in the NAF-1 [2Fe-2S] cluster-binding domain, or by suppressing NAF-1 protein expression using shRNA, results in enhanced levels of mitochondrial labile iron and ROS levels that trigger apoptosis of cancer cells [14,16,18,22,24].
The studies described above suggest a tight association between NAF-1 protein level and/or function and the protection of cells from overaccumulation of iron and ROS in their mitochondria (a form of ferroptosis, as was shown for cells with reduced expression of mitoNEET, a different member of the NEET protein family; [25,26]). Based on this potential relationship, we hypothesized that treatments that can reduce the levels of iron and ROS in the mitochondria of WFS-T2 patients could ameliorate some of the cell dysfunctions (biochemical and physiological) associated with NAF-1 deficiency in these patients. To begin addressing our hypothesis, we established an insulinoma INS-1E pancreatic β-cell model of NAF-1 stable repression (by gene Knock Down; KD; referred to here as NAF-1(−)), whereby structural and functional properties resulting from NAF-1 gene repression are demonstrably reversed by overexpressing the normal gene. We then assessed to what extent the elevated mitochondrial labile iron (mLI) and ROS (mROS) observed in NAF-1(−) insulinoma cells contributed to impaired stimulated insulin secretion, and whether alleviating mLI and mROS accumulation will improve glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Here, we show that suppressed expression of NAF-1 in INS-1E pancreatic β-cells results in the appearance of ferroptosis-like features that include enhanced lipid peroxidation, enhanced mROS and mLI levels, shrunken mitochondria, decreased expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and enhanced expression of transferrin receptor (TfR). We further show that an anti-ferroptosis treatment based on the combined action of the membrane permeant iron chelator deferiprone (DFP; [27,28]) and the glutathione precursor N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; [29,30,31]), significantly ameliorated mitochondrial labile iron and ROS levels and mitochondrial and ER structural abnormalities, as well as repairing insulin secretion of NAF-1 repressed cells. In addition, we found that treatment with the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 [25,32,33] decreased cellular ROS formation and improved cellular growth of NAF-1(−) INS-1E pancreatic cells. Our findings suggest that targeting ferroptosis of pancreatic cells could be used as a clinical strategy in the treatment of WFS-T2 patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Growth and NAF-1 Expression

INS-1E β-cells were grown as previously described [11]. Plasmids containing shRNA in pGFP-RS vector (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) were used for repressing NAF-1 expression, whereas plasmids containing the pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech Laboratories, Inc. Mountain View, CA, USA) were used for over-expressing NAF-1. Cell growth and transfection were performed as described earlier [16,18]. Three independent stable transfected lines were generated for each construct and transfection and used as different biological controls.

2.2. Protein Blots

For protein blot analyses, cells were grown to full confluence, washed twice with 1X PBS and immediately scraped off the plate into a microcentrifuge tube with 1X Laemmli sample buffer and heated to 95 °C for 10 min. Protein gels were loaded with equal amounts of proteins and analyzed using antibodies against NAF-1 [11,16], Anti-TXNIP (Cell signaling technology, D5F3E), Anti-Thioredoxin 2 antibody (Abcam, [EPR15225] ab185544), Anti-actin (Sigma, MAB1501), Anti-IRE1 antibody (Abcam, ab37073), Anti-IRE1 (phospho S724) antibody (Abcam, [EPR5253] ab124945), anti-Mitofusin 2 antibody (Abcam, [6A8] ab56889), Anti-Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) antibody (R&D Systems, Biotechne, MAB5457), and Anti-Transferrin Receptor Antibody (Abcam, ab84036). Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG, H&L Chain Specific Peroxidase Conjugate (Sigma, 401315) and Peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure Goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Jack-son ImmunoResearch Laboratories, AB_10015289) were used as secondary antibodies [7,24].

2.3. Lipid Peroxidation

Malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured using QuantiChrome TBARS Assay Kit (DTBA-100, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells (5 × 106) were harvested, homogenized in ice cold PBS buffer, and disrupted by sonication. Cell lysates were incubated with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. After the neutralization, the clear sample supernatant was mixed with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution and incubated at 100 °C for 60 min. Fluorometric assay was used for quantitative determination of lipid peroxides (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS); this was evaluated using the Perkin Elmer EnVision 2104-0020 Multilabel Plate Reader at Ex/Em 530/550 nm.

2.4. Fluorescence Probes

Cells were cultured and imaged by epi-fluorescent microscopy for their mitochondrial labile iron (mLI) with the fluorescent probe RPA (rhodamine B-[(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-yl) aminocarbonyl] benzyl ester) (Squarix biotechnology, ME043.1, Marl, Germany), as described in [16]. Mitochondrial ROS accumulation was determined using mitoSOXTM Red (InvitrogenTM, M36008, Massachusetts, USA), according to [18,34]. For protein carbonylation measurements, CH (Coumarin Hydrazine) (Cayman Chemical, 113707-87-2, Michigan, USA) was added at 20 µM, and fluorescence images were acquired and analyzed (excitation 365 nm, emission 430–550 nm) [35]. For mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), we used TMRE (tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester) (Sigma, 87917, Missouri, USA) at a concentration of 0.1 μM. Fura RedTM, AM, cell permeant (InvitrogenTM, F3020) was used to measure cytosolic Ca2+ by exposing cells to 4 µM for 40 min at 37 °C, in the presence of 0.02% Pluronic® F-127 (Sigma, P2443). Images were analyzed with Volocity (Quorum Technologies Inc. Puslinch, ON, Canada) and/or with Image-J. Quantification of fluorescence was performed using 30 different fields (5 cells per field). Quantification of mito-SOXTM fluorescence changes was performed by analyzing 9 different fields (5 cells per field) and averaged for 3 independent experiments. For all fluorescence imaging studies, different cells were plated onto microscope slides glued to perforated 3 cm diameter tissue culture plates, as previously described [16,34]. For Glutathione levels detection, ThiolTracker™ Violet (glutathione detection reagent) (InvitrogenTM, T10095) was used at 20 μM for 30 min at 37 °C, then measured using an Olympus FV3000 confocal laser-scanning. For cell viability, cells were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicates at a density of 2000 cells/well. PrestoBlue™ Cell Viability Reagent (InvitrogenTM, A13261) was used to determine cell viability on days 1, 4, and 7 with or without the addition of ferrostatin-1. Fluorescence was measured on a plate reader after 2 h of incubation at 37 °C (excitation, 560 nm, emission, 590 nm). For cell ROS measurements, CellROX™ Deep Red Reagent detection assay (InvitrogenTM, C10422) was used in conjunction with a Biotek plate reader (excitation 640 nm, emission 665 nm). For Mitochondrial-ER contact fluorescence imaging, cells were transfected with pDsRed2-ER plasmid to give the ER fluorescence signal, then cells were treated with the mitochondrial tracker Rhodamine 800 (Sigma, 83701). Nuclei were stained with bisBenzimide H 33,342 trihydrochloride (Sigma, 14533). Cells were then evaluated by the Olympus FV3000 confocal laser-scanning microscope, and all images were analyzed with image J.

2.5. Treatment of Cells with Ferrostatin-1, the Iron Chelator (DFP), and the Glutathione Precursor CGP (NAC)

Cells were incubated with or without ferrostatin-1 (3-Amino-4-cyclohexylaminobenzoic acid ethyl ester) (Sigma, Product No. SML0583), using a concentration of 2 µM, for the entire experiment period. Cells were also incubated with or without DFP (3-Hydroxy-1,2-dimethyl-4(1H)-pyridone) (Sigma, 379409). The proper concentration was optimized for each cell type and controls; DFP was added at 100 μM for 2 h to cells for mLI and mROS quantifications [11,16]. Cells were treated with/without the cellular glutathione precursor (CGP) (NAC) (N-Acetyl-l-Cysteine) (Sigma, Product No. A7250-10G) antioxidant. Pretreatment was optimized to 100 μM for 2 h, for the experiments of mLI and mROS levels [36,37,38]. In the experiments of insulin secretion and TEM, the DFP concentration used was 50 μM and the NAC concentration used was 100 μM, overnight.

2.6. Mitochondrial Bioenergetics, Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR), Cellular Glycolysis, and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR)

OCR and ECAR were measured using a Seahorse XFp, Agilent, cell mito-stress analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with the XF Cell Mito Stress Kit and XF Glycolysis Stress Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions [39]. INS-1E β-cells (30,000) were grown to approximately 80% confluence in complete medium, 48 h before experiment. The initial medium was then exchanged with a seahorse-running medium consisting of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) base without glucose, L-Glutamine 2 mM, sodium pyruvate 1 mM, with glucose added to a final concentration of 25 mM and pH adjusted to be 7.3–7.4. Then, microplates containing cells were incubated at 37 °C without CO2 for 1 h before the assay. Plates were then placed into the XFp analyzer. The OCR was calculated after the sequential additions of oligomycin A 1 µM, FCCP 10 µM, antimycin A/Rotenone 0.5 µM, using an XF Cell Mito Stress Test kit. The ECAR medium initially did not contain glucose, and was then measured after the addition of glucose 25 mM. The results were expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. All measurements were recorded at set-interval time points. All materials and compounds were obtained from Seahorse Bioscience [16]. Calculations of the OCR and the ECAR test parameters were performed according to the manufacturer recommendations, using the equations described in [39].

2.7. Insulin Secretion Measurement

Cells were plated in 24-well plates 48 h before insulin stimulation with high glucose concentration, as described in [11]. Cells were pre-incubated with a low glucose containing a medium of 1.7 mM after which basal insulin concentration was measure. Then, stimulation was determined after pre-incubation with high glucose (16.7 mM), as described in [11]. Insulin secretion was measured by the insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden, 10-1250-01), then calculated as fold from the basal insulin concentration.

2.8. Mitochondria and ER Structure

Cells were grown on 8-well Permanox chamber slides and, upon reaching approximately 80% confluence, were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature, then prepared for Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) imaging, as described in detail in [16]. The results were evaluated from 5–10 different cells randomly selected, averaged over 10–20 fields per cell; at least 100–200 mitochondria and 200–300 ER were counted. Mitochondrial and ER damages were expressed as the ratio of damaged organelle to total number of the organelle, in three independent experiments [16]. Mitochondrial length was similarly determined in three different biological repeats [16].

2.9. Statistics

Statistical significance tests (Student’s t-test) for protein expression, insulin measurements, and analysis of epi-fluorescent microscope and TEM images were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.3.1 software. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all measured data points; the line inside the box represents the median, the box represents the interquartile range, and the whiskers represent the range. Differences were statistically significant if the Student’s t-test produced a probability value of less than 5% (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).

3. Results

3.1. NAF-1-Suppressed Insulinoma Cells as a Model for Pancreatic β-Cells of WFS-T2

We selected the murine insulinoma INS-1E cells for assessing the consequences of NAF-1 deficiency on pancreatic β-cells of WFS-T2 primarily on the basis that these cells respond to glucose stimuli by secreting insulin. Following NAF-1 shRNA transfection, we selected 3 independent stable clones of INS-1E cells expressing ~50% lower levels of the NAF-1 protein compared with WT control (Figure 1A). Importantly, these NAF-1(−) cells showed a commensurately lower glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ability compared with normal cells (Figure 1B) and a 2.5-fold increase in the level of the thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) (but not thioredoxin (TRX)) (Figure 1C). TXNIP and TRX play antagonistic roles in β-cell function and diabetes pathophysiology, and accumulation of TXNIP in insulinoma cells is typically a sign of oxidative stress [40,41,42]. To ascertain that the changes in cell functions are attributable to a reduction in NAF-1 per se, control WT and NAF-1(−) cells were further transfected with WT NAF-1, referred to here as NAF-1(+) and NAF-1(−/+), respectively (3 independent stable clones for each vector were generated). As shown in Figure 1, the repressed expression of NAF-1, as well as glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and the enhanced expression of TXNIP in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells could be significantly reversed by transfection of NAF-1(−) cells with the WT NAF-1 gene.

3.2. Mitochondrial, ER, and MAM Structural Changes in NAF-1(−) Cells

NAF-1(−) cells displayed various abnormalities in mitochondria size, cristae integrity, and ER structure (Figure 2A), possibly as a result of ER stress, as suggested by the increased expression of phosphorylated IRE-1 expression (Figure 2B), an important component of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Moreover, the number of membranal contacts between mitochondria and ER (MAMs) decreased, suggesting fewer interactions between mitochondria and the ER through these structures (Figure 2A and Figure 3A). This reduced tethering was further supported by measuring the levels of mitofusin 2 (MFN2; [43,44,45]), a protein implicated in the maintenance of MAM integrity (Figure 3B). Importantly, mitochondrial, ER, and MAM abnormalities found in NAF-1(−) cells were largely corrected upon re-expression of WT NAF-1 in NAF-1(−) cells (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

3.3. Biochemical and Physiological Changes in NAF-1(−) Cells

To determine whether the structural changes observed in NAF-1(−) INS-1E (Figure 2 and Figure 3) were accompanied by biochemical and physiological changes in mitochondrial function, we measured mitochondrial respiration, ATP production, mLI, and mROS in NAF-1(−) cells. A significant reduction (~40%) in mitochondrial functions of NAF-1 repressed cells was observed in mitochondrial maximal respiratory capacity, an indicator of functional mitochondrial mass (Figure 4A), cell respiration (Figure 4B), and ATP production (Figure 4C); all indicative of depleted mitochondrial reserves. Restoration of NAF-1 expression to wildtype levels commensurately restored these affected functions. By contrast, extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) of NAF-1(−) did not significantly change, suggesting that, at least in INS-1E cells, a deficiency in NAF-1 levels does not impact glycolysis (Figure S1). In this respect, insulinoma cells are different from epithelial breast cancer cells in which glycolysis was activated upon NAF-1 protein suppression [34]. In addition to its effect on mitochondrial respiration (Figure 4), the reduced expression of NAF-1 led to an increase in mitochondrial labile iron (mLI) (Figure 5A), a rise in the levels of mitochondrial ROS (mROS) (Figure 5B), and an increase in protein carbonylation levels (Figure 5C). Similar to our findings described above for mitochondrial structure and function (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4), restoration of NAF-1 expression to wildtype levels commensurately restored mLI, mROS, and protein carbonylation levels to near WT levels (Figure 5). Additional changes that were restored by recovering the expression of NAF-1 in NAF-1(−) cells were changes in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP; Figure S2), and cytosolic Ca2+ levels (Figure S3).

3.4. Pharmacological Amelioration of NAF-1 Depletion in INS-1E Cells

The findings described above reveal that a reduction in NAF-1 protein level in INS-1E insulinoma cells results in a significant decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (Figure 1), which was accompanied by structural changes to mitochondria and ER (Figure 2 and Figure 3), as well as a decrease in mitochondrial functions (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Most importantly among these are the enhanced accumulation of mLI and mROS, which have been directly linked to NAF-1 function in cells [11,16,18,34]. Because an increase in mLI can lead to an increase in mROS, which would in turn impact mitochondrial function and structure [14], we tested whether treatments such as chelation of mLI and/or inhibition of mROS accumulation could ameliorate insulin secretion and mitochondrial and ER morphology of INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells. To test the potential impact of such treatments on pancreatic pathophysiology, we followed mLI, mROS, and stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic NAF-1(−) cells treated with the membrane permeant iron chelator deferiprone (DFP; [27,28]) and the antioxidant glutathione precursor N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; [29,30,31]), separately and in combination. As shown in Figure 6A,B, treatment with DFP and/or NAC ameliorated the NAF-1(−) induced increase in mLI and mROS, with the combined application of these two agents having the most significant effect. Although each of these agents significantly improved insulin secretion, their combined action was additively corrective (Figure 6C). In addition to correcting some of the biochemical effects of NAF-1 deficiency (Figure 6), the combined treatment of INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells with DFP+NAC ameliorated the impact of NAF-1 deficiency on mitochondrial and ER morphology (Figure 7). Treatments of INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells with DFP and/or NAC, capable of suppressing ferroptosis [46,47,48], were therefore able to correct some of the biochemical, morphological, and functional (insulin secretion) phenotypes of NAF-1 deficiency (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
The rise in mLI, mROS, and cytosolic Ca2+ levels, upon NAF-1 depletion (Figure 5, Figure S3), and the finding that this rise could be suppressed by treatment with NAC and/or DFP (Figure 6), could suggest that NAF-1 deficiency in insulinoma cells triggers ferroptosis [49,50]. To test this possibility, we measured the total levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), the levels of lipid peroxidation, the expression of GPX4 and TfR, and the length of mitochondria in control and NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells. In addition, we studied the effect of the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 [25,32,33] on these cells. Compared with wildtype, NAF-1(−) cells had lower GSH levels (Figure 8A), enhanced lipid peroxidation (Figure 8B), suppressed expression of GPX4 (Figure 8C), enhanced expression of TfR (Figure 8D), and shortened mitochondria (Figure 8E). By contrast, no apoptosis features such as nuclear degradation were observed in NAF-1(−) cells (Figure 8F). In addition, ferrostatin-1 treatment of INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells resulted in a significant reduction in cellular ROS formation and improved cell growth (Figure 8G). The results presented in Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 suggest therefore that NAF-1 deficiency causes the enhanced accumulation of mLI and mROS and that this accumulation triggers ferroptosis-like features of INS-1E cells.

4. Discussion

NAF-1 repression or deficiency in animal and cell models results in cellular dyshomeostasis of calcium, [Fe-S] protein functions, iron status, and ROS production [4,16,34,51], as well as in the activation of cell death processes such as apoptosis [12,13,14,34]. To what extent the changes in cell properties imparted by the experimental repression of NAF-1 fully recapitulate the impaired properties of different tissues found in WFS-T2 patients is still under thorough evaluation. Here, we used the pancreatic INS-1E cellular model system to study how NAF-1 repression impairs insulin secretion in pancreatic cells (Figure 1), recapitulating a key feature of the WFS-T2 phenotype. The repression of NAF-1 induced changes in mitochondrial, ER, and MAM morphology and affected multiple mitochondrial properties (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). First and foremost, we ascertained that it is the actual reduction in NAF-1 per se and not the transfection that led to the changes in the affected cellular properties. This was accomplished by re-expressing wild type NAF-1 in the NAF-1 repressed β-pancreatic INS-1E cellular model and showing significant restoration of properties affected in mitochondria, ER, and MAM structure-function. These included mitochondrial and ER morphology, mitochondrial labile iron and ROS accumulation, as well as changes in calcium levels, respiration, and insulin secretion (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). Changes in mitochondrial morphology and insulin secretion have previously been shown to result from ROS-induced MMP damage [52], ER stress [53], and an unfolded protein response that can lead to cell death [54]. As MAM and cell Ca2+ have also been implicated in glucose-induced insulin secretion [55], NAF-1 presumed role in regulating subcellular Ca+2 concentrations could take place via putative interactions with the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) involved in Ca2+ release from the ER [56] and/or sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2) proteins that control Ca2+ fluxes into the ER [57,58,59].
Aside from NAF-1(−) induced changes in mitochondria-ER MAM integrity (Figure 2 and Figure 3), the multiple changes observed in INS-1E cells upon NAF-1 suppression recapitulate what we and others have observed in previous studies with non-endocrine cells in culture and with animal models of WFS-T2 (i.e., knockouts of NAF-1) [15,60,61,62]. The novel finding of this work is therefore the establishment of a causative association between NAF-1 repression that leads to a mitochondrial labile iron rise and an increased mROS formation that triggers ferroptosis, and the impairment of β-cell insulin secretion. This association was experimentally demonstrated by the combined application of the mitochondrial iron chelator DFP and the GSH precursor NAC (Figure 6 and Figure 7), as well as by the application of the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 [63] (Figure 8). First, we show that reduced GSH levels were significantly decreased in NAF-1(−) cells, possibly explaining the increased mROS formation that could also be attenuated by DFP+NAC, a combined treatment known to reduce these two arms of ferroptosis [49,50]. We further show that suppressed NAF-1 expression results in enhanced lipid peroxidation, suppressed expression of GPX4, enhanced expression of TfR, and the appearance of smaller mitochondria (Figure 8), all classic hallmarks of ferroptosis [64]. GSH may also have a role in iron homeostasis in addition to its antioxidant redox buffer effects [65,66]. Moreover, the combined DFP and NAC treatment of pancreatic INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells led to a significant amelioration of mLI and mROS, as well as enhanced insulin secretion and improved mitochondria and ER morphologies (Figure 6 and Figure 7), which are some of the hallmarks of WFS-T2 [11,60]. Although the use of low levels of DFP was previously shown to cause enhanced accumulation of ROS in cancer cells [67,68], the concentrations used in our study were much higher. These concentrations were previously shown to also suppress ROS formation in cancer cells [16,69] and are acceptable for the application of DFP in other systems [70,71]. Pending additional studies conducted using different cell lines, as well as different model organisms, our findings could provide a novel rationale for pharmacological intervention for symptomatic improvement in an otherwise incurable disease.

5. Conclusions

Currently, it is clinically impractical to change the whole-body intracellular expression levels of NAF-1 in vivo in WFS-T2 patients. Here, we succeeded in alleviating the abnormalities caused by NAF-1 reduction using a pharmacological approach (DFP+NAC). The combined DFP and NAC treatment of pancreatic INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells repaired to near-normal levels the abnormalities in mLI and mROS accumulation, mitochondrial and ER morphologies, and insulin secretion. These findings suggested that ferroptosis could be playing an important role in WFS-T2 β-pancreatic pathophysiology, supported by the correcting effect of ferrostatin-1 on cellular growth as well as cellular ROS generation of INS-1E NAF-1(−) cells. Our findings suggest therefore that targeting ferroptosis of pancreatic cells, for example, by the combined pharmacological application of the clinically approved DFP and NAC, could be used as a viable strategy in the treatment of WFS-T2 patients and perhaps patients suffering from other metabolic diseases that result in enhanced mLI and mROS levels [72,73,74,75,76].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox10081160/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: I.Z.C., R.N. and R.M. Experimental Design: O.K., G.L., Y.N., I.Z.C., R.N. and R.M. Data collection: O.K., Y.-S.S., H.-B.M., T.I. and K.I. Methodology: O.K., I.Z.C. and R.N. Data curation: O.K. Formal analysis: O.K. Funding acquisition: R.M. and R.N. Wrote the manuscript: O.K., I.Z.C., R.N. and R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

O.K. acknowledges the Annual Golda Meir Fellowship and the Hebrew University Rector for the Emergency Scholarship recipients for Postdoctoral fellows, 2020–2021. This work was supported by the NSF-Binational Science Foundation (BSF) Grant NSF-MCB 1613462 (to R.M.) and BSF Grant 2015831 (to R.N.). Support for this study was also provided by NIDDK DK120986 (K.P.M.), DK101753 (K.P.M.), DK114464 (K.P.M.), and GM111364 (to R.M.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CHCoumarin hydrazine
DFPDeferiprone
ECARExtracellular acidification rate
EREndoplasmic reticulum
GIGastro-intestinal
GPX4Glutathione peroxidase 4
GSHGlutathione
IP3RInositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor
IRE-1Serine/threonine-protein kinase/endoribonuclease IRE1
KDKnock down
MAMMitochondria-ER-associated membranes
MDAMalondialdehyde
MFN2Mitofusin 2
mLIMitochondrial labile iron
MMPMitochondrial membrane potential
mROSMitochondrial reactive oxygen species
NACN-acetyl cysteine
NAF-1Nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor-1
OCROxygen consumption rate
OMMOuter mitochondrial membrane
ROSReactive oxygen species
RPARhodamine B-[(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-yl) aminocarbonyl] benzyl ester
SERCA2Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase
TBARSThiobarbituric acid reactive substances
TEMTransmission electron microscope
TfRTransferrin receptor
TMRETetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester
TRXThioredoxin
TXNIPThioredoxin-interacting protein
UPRUnfolded protein response
WFS-T2Wolfram syndrome type 2
WTWildtype

References

  1. Amr, S.; Heisey, C.; Zhang, M.; Xia, X.-J.; Shows, K.H.; Ajlouni, K.; Pandya, A.; Satin, L.S.; El-Shanti, H.; Shiang, R. A Homozygous Mutation in a Novel Zinc-Finger Protein, ERIS, Is Responsible for Wolfram Syndrome 2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mozzillo, E.; Delvecchio, M.; Carella, M.; Grandone, E.; Palumbo, P.; Salina, A.; Aloi, C.; Buono, P.; Izzo, A.; D’Annunzio, G.; et al. A novel CISD2 intragenic deletion, optic neuropathy and platelet aggregation defect in Wolfram syndrome type 2. BMC Med. Genet. 2014, 15, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rondinelli, M.; Novara, F.; Calcaterra, V.; Zuffardi, O.; Genovese, S. Wolfram syndrome 2: A novel CISD2 mutation identified in Italian siblings. Acta Diabetol. 2015, 52, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rouzier, C.; Moore, D.; Delorme, C.; Lacas-Gervais, S.; Ait-El-Mkadem, S.; Fragaki, K.; Burté, F.; Serre, V.; Bannwarth, S.; Chaussenot, A.; et al. A novel CISD2 mutation associated with a classical Wolfram syndrome phenotype alters Ca2+ homeostasis and ER-mitochondria interactions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 1599–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Akturk, H.K.; Msc, S.Y. Previously unreported abnormalities in Wolfram Syndrome Type 2. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2017, 23, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cattaneo, M.; La Sala, L.; Rondinelli, M.; Errichiello, E.; Zuffardi, O.; Puca, A.A.; Genovese, S.; Ceriello, A. A donor splice site mutation in CISD2 generates multiple truncated, non-functional isoforms in Wolfram syndrome type 2 patients. BMC Med. Genet. 2017, 18, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pourreza, M.R.; Sobhani, M.; Rahimi, A.; Aramideh, M.; Kajbafzadeh, A.-M.; Noori-Daloii, M.R.; Tabatabaiefar, M.A. Homozygosity mapping and direct sequencing identify a novel pathogenic variant in the CISD2 gene in an Iranian Wolfram syndrome family. Acta Diabetol. 2020, 57, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ajlouni, K.; Jarrah, N.; El-Khateeb, M.; El-Zaheri, M.; El-Shanti, H.; Lidral, A. Wolfram syndrome: Identification of a phenotypic and genotypic variant from Jordan. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 115, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rigoli, L.; Di Bella, C. Wolfram syndrome 1 and Wolfram syndrome 2. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2012, 24, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Urano, F. Wolfram Syndrome: Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2016, 16, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Danielpur, L.; Sohn, Y.-S.; Karmi, O.; Fogel, C.; Zinger, A.; Abu-Libdeh, A.; Israeli, T.; Riahi, Y.; Pappo, O.; Birk, R.; et al. GLP-1-RA Corrects Mitochondrial Labile Iron Accumulation and Improves β-Cell Function in Type 2 Wolfram Syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, jc20162240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tamir, S.; Paddock, M.L.; Darash-Yahana-Baram, M.; Holt, S.H.; Sohn, Y.S.; Agranat, L.; Michaeli, D.; Stofleth, J.; Lipper, C.H.; Morcos, F.; et al. Structure–function analysis of NEET proteins uncovers their role as key regulators of iron and ROS homeostasis in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1853, 1294–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Karmi, O.; Marjault, H.-B.; Pesce, L.; Carloni, P.; Onuchic, J.N.; Jennings, P.A.; Mittler, R.; Nechushtai, R. The unique fold and lability of the [2Fe-2S] clusters of NEET proteins mediate their key functions in health and disease. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 23, 599–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mittler, R.; Darash-Yahana, M.; Sohn, Y.S.; Bai, F.; Song, L.; Cabantchik, I.Z.; Jennings, P.A.; Onuchic, J.N.; Nechushtai, R. NEET Proteins: A New Link Between Iron Metabolism, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Cancer. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2019, 30, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nechushtai, R.; Karmi, O.; Zuo, K.; Marjault, H.-B.; Darash-Yahana, M.; Sohn, Y.-S.; King, S.D.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Carloni, P.; Mittler, R. The balancing act of NEET proteins: Iron, ROS, calcium and metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sohn, Y.-S.; Tamir, S.; Song, L.; Michaeli, D.; Matouk, I.; Conlan, A.R.; Harir, Y.; Holt, S.H.; Shulaev, V.; Paddock, M.L.; et al. NAF-1 and mitoNEET are central to human breast cancer proliferation by maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and promoting tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14676–14681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Liu, L.; Xia, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; He, M. CISD2 expression is a novel marker correlating with pelvic lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Darash-Yahana, M.; Pozniak, Y.; Lu, M.; Sohn, Y.-S.; Karmi, O.; Tamir, S.; Bai, F.; Song, L.; Jennings, P.A.; Pikarsky, E.; et al. Breast cancer tumorigenicity is dependent on high expression levels of NAF-1 and the lability of its Fe-S clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10890–10895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yang, L.; Hong, S.; Wang, Y.; He, Z.; Liang, S.; Chen, H.; He, S.; Wu, S.; Song, L.; Chen, Y. A novel prognostic score model incorporating CDGSH iron sulfur domain2 (CISD2) predicts risk of disease progression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 22720–22732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, L.; Ouyang, F.; Liu, X.; Wu, S.; Wu, H.-M.; Xu, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhu, J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L. Overexpressed CISD2 has prognostic value in human gastric cancer and promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis via AKT signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 3791–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, S.-M.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-W.; Yen, Y.-C.; Fang, W.-T.; Tsai, F.-Y.; Chang, J.-L.; Shen, Y.-Y.; Huang, S.-F.; Chuu, C.-P.; et al. Upregulation of CISD2 augments ROS homeostasis and contributes to tumorigenesis and poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, J.; Chen, H.; Liao, Y.; Yang, Z. CISD2 enhances the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer through the enhancement of 5-FU-induced apoptosis and the inhibition of autophagy by AKT/mTOR pathway. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2331–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sun, A.-G.; Meng, F.-G.; Wang, M.-G. CISD2 promotes the proliferation of glioma cells via suppressing beclin-1-mediated autophagy and is targeted by microRNA-449a. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7939–7948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, E.H.; Shin, D.; Lee, J.; Jung, A.R.; Roh, J.-L. CISD2 inhibition overcomes resistance to sulfasalazine-induced ferroptotic cell death in head and neck cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018, 432, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Kang, R.; Tang, D. CISD1 inhibits ferroptosis by protection against mitochondrial lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Furihata, T.; Takada, S.; Kakutani, N.; Maekawa, S.; Tsuda, M.; Matsumoto, J.; Mizushima, W.; Fukushima, A.; Yokota, T.; Enzan, N.; et al. Cardiac-specific loss of mitoNEET expression is linked with age-related heart failure. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pandolfo, M.; Hausmann, L. Deferiprone for the treatment of Friedreich’s ataxia. J. Neurochem. 2013, 126, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Agrawal, S.; Fox, J.; Thyagarajan, B.; Fox, J.H. Brain mitochondrial iron accumulates in Huntington’s disease, mediates mitochondrial dysfunction, and can be removed pharmacologically. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 120, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wongjaikam, S.; Kumfu, S.; Khamseekaew, J.; Chattipakorn, S.C.; Chattipakorn, N. Restoring the impaired cardiac calcium homeostasis and cardiac function in iron overload rats by the combined deferiprone and N-acetyl cysteine. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep44460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mohammadi, H.; Sayad, A.; Mohammadi, M.; Niknahad, H.; Heidari, R. N-acetyl cysteine treatment pre-serves mitochondrial indices of functionality in the brain of hyperammonemic mice. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2020, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ommati, M.M.; Amjadinia, A.; Mousavi, K.; Azarpira, N.; Jamshidzadeh, A.; Heidari, R. N-acetyl cysteine treatment mitigates biomarkers of oxidative stress in different tissues of bile duct ligated rats. Stress 2021, 24, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anthonymuthu, T.S.; Tyurina, Y.Y.; Sun, W.-Y.; Mikulska-Ruminska, K.; Shrivastava, I.H.; Tyurin, V.A.; Cinemre, F.B.; Dar, H.H.; VanDemark, A.P.; Holman, T.R.; et al. Resolving the paradox of ferroptotic cell death: Ferrostatin-1 binds to 15LOX/PEBP1 complex, suppresses generation of peroxidized ETE-PE, and protects against ferroptosis. Redox Biol. 2021, 38, 101744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, P.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Xu, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L. Ferrostatin-1 alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via inhibiting ferroptosis. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2020, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Holt, S.H.; Darash-Yahana, M.; Sohn, Y.S.; Song, L.; Karmi, O.; Tamir, S.; Michaeli, D.; Luo, Y.; Paddock, M.L.; Jennings, P.A.; et al. Activation of apoptosis in NAF-1-deficient human epithelial breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mukherjee, K.; Chio, T.I.; Sackett, D.L.; Bane, S.L. Detection of oxidative stress-induced carbonylation in live mammalian cells. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 84, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bharath, S.; Hsu, M.; Kaur, D.; Rajagopalan, S.; Andersen, J.K. Glutathione, iron and Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 1037–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, S.C. Regulation of glutathione synthesis. Mol. Asp. Med. 2009, 30, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS Function in Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Divakaruni, A.S.; Paradyse, A.; Ferrick, D.A.; Murphy, A.N.; Jastroch, M. Analysis and Interpretation of Microplate-Based Oxygen Consumption and pH Data. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 547, pp. 309–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, W.; Li, T.; Gao, L.; Zheng, J.; Yan, J.; Zhang, J.; Shao, A. Apelin-13/APJ system attenuates early brain injury via suppression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation and oxidative stress in a AMPK-dependent manner after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoshihara, E.; Masaki, S.; Matsuo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Tian, H.; Yodoi, J. Thioredoxin/Txnip: Redoxisome, as a Redox Switch for the Pathogenesis of Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, R.; Tardivel, A.; Thorens, B.; Choi, I.; Tschopp, J. Thioredoxin-interacting protein links oxidative stress to inflammasome activation. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schrepfer, E.; Scorrano, L. Mitofusins, from Mitochondria to Metabolism. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. De Brito, O.M.; Scorrano, L. Mitofusin-2 regulates mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum morphology and tethering: The role of Ras. Mitochondrion 2009, 9, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Naon, D.; Zaninello, M.; Giacomello, M.; Varanita, T.; Grespi, F.; Lakshminaranayan, S.; Serafini, A.; Semenzato, M.; Herkenne, S.; Hernández-Alvarez, M.I.; et al. Critical reappraisal confirms that Mitofusin 2 is an endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria tether. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11249–11254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Abdalkader, M.; Lampinen, R.; Kanninen, K.M.; Malm, T.; Liddell, J.R. Targeting Nrf2 to Suppress Ferroptosis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Codenotti, S.; Poli, M.; Asperti, M.; Zizioli, D.; Marampon, F.; Fanzani, A. Cell growth potential drives ferroptosis susceptibility in rhabdomyosarcoma and myoblast cell lines. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 144, 1717–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Li, M.; Chen, Q. The Potential Value of Targeting Ferroptosis in Early Brain Injury After Acute CNS Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yuan, H.; Pratte, J.; Giardina, C. Ferroptosis and its potential as a therapeutic target. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 186, 114486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Z.-J.; Dai, H.-Q.; Huang, X.-W.; Feng, J.; Deng, J.-H.; Wang, Z.-X.; Yang, X.-M.; Liu, Y.-J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, P.-H.; et al. Artesunate synergizes with sorafenib to induce ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-F.; Wu, C.-Y.; Wu, P.-C.; Huang, Y.-L.; Kao, C.-H.; Lin, C.-H.; Kao, L.-S.; Tsai, T.-F.; Wei, Y.-H. Cisd2 modulates the differentiation and functioning of adipocytes by regulating intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 4770–4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Chen, J.; Stimpson, S.; Fernandez-Bueno, G.A.; Mathews, C.E. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Type 1 Diabetes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 1361–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Brozzi, F.; Eizirik, D.L. ER stress and the decline and fall of pancreatic beta cells in type 1 diabetes. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2016, 121, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lerner, A.G.; Upton, J.-P.; Praveen, P.; Ghosh, R.; Nakagawa, Y.; Igbaria, A.; Shen, S.; Nguyen, V.; Backes, B.J.; Heiman, M.; et al. IRE1α Induces Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein to Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome and Promote Programmed Cell Death under Irremediable ER Stress. Cell Metab. 2012, 16, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rutter, G.; Pinton, P. Mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes in insulin signaling. Diabetes 2014, 63, 3163–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Chang, N.C.; Nguyen, M.; Germain, M.; Shore, G.C. Antagonism of Beclin 1-dependent autophagy by BCL-2 at the endoplasmic reticulum requires NAF-1. EMBO J. 2009, 29, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shen, Z.-Q.; Chen, Y.-F.; Chen, J.-R.; Jou, Y.-S.; Wu, P.-C.; Kao, C.-H.; Wang, C.-H.; Huang, Y.-L.; Chen, C.-F.; Huang, T.-S.; et al. CISD2 Haploinsufficiency Disrupts Calcium Homeostasis, Causes Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, and Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 2198–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Shen, Z.-Q.; Huang, Y.-L.; Tsai, T.-F. Cisd2 haploinsufficiency: A driving force for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 2018, 5, e1441627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Rutter, G.A.; Tsuboi, T.; Ravier, M. Ca2+ microdomains and the control of insulin secretion. Cell Calcium 2006, 40, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wiley, S.E.; Andreyev, A.Y.; Divakaruni, A.S.; Karisch, R.; Perkins, G.; Wall, E.A.; van der Geer, P.; Chen, Y.F.; Tsai, T.F.; Simon, M.I.; et al. Wolfram Syndrome protein, Miner1, regulates sulphydryl redox status, the unfolded protein response, and Ca2+ homeostasis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 904–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shen, Z.-Q.; Huang, Y.-L.; Teng, Y.-C.; Wang, T.-W.; Kao, C.-H.; Yeh, C.-H.; Tsai, T.-F. CISD2 maintains cellular homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2021, 1868, 118954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Delprat, B.; Maurice, T.; Delettre, C. Wolfram syndrome: MAMs’ connection? Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Sun, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y. Glutathione depletion induces ferroptosis, autophagy, and premature cell senescence in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Li, J.; Cao, F.; Yin, H.-l.; Huang, Z.-j.; Lin, Z.-t.; Mao, N.; Sun, B.; Wang, G. Ferroptosis: Past, present and future. Cell Death Disease 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Berndt, C.; Lillig, C.H. Glutathione, Glutaredoxins, and Iron. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 27, 1235–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, W.S.; SriRamaratnam, R.; Welsch, M.E.; Shimada, K.; Skouta, R.; Viswanathan, V.; Cheah, J.H.; Clemons, P.A.; Shamji, A.F.; Clish, C.; et al. Regulation of Ferroptotic Cancer Cell Death by GPX4. Cell 2014, 156, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yu, Y.; Gutierrez, E.; Kovacevic, Z.; Saletta, F.; Obeidy, P.; Rahmanto, Y.S.; Richardson, D. Iron Chelators for the Treatment of Cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 2689–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fiorillo, M.; Tóth, F.; Brindisi, M.; Sotgia, F.; Lisanti, M.P. Deferiprone (DFP) Targets Cancer Stem cell (CSC) Propagation by Inhibiting Mitochondrial Metabolism and Inducing ROS Production. Cells 2020, 9, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Buss, J.L.; Greene, B.T.; Turner, J.; Torti, F.M.; Torti, S.V. Iron chelators in cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 1623–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Merkofer, M.; Kissner, R.; Hider, R.C.; Brunk, U.T.; Koppenol, W.H. Fenton Chemistry and Iron Chelation under Physiologically Relevant Conditions: Electrochemistry and Kinetics. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kuo, K.; Mrkobrada, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Deferiprone Monotherapy and in Combination with Deferoxamine for Reduction of Iron Overload in Chronically Transfused Patients with β-Thalassemia. Hemoglobin 2014, 38, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fernández-Real, J.M.; López-Bermejo, A.; Ricart, W. Cross-Talk Between Iron Metabolism and Diabetes. Diabetes 2002, 51, 2348–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Stroh, M.; Swerdlow, R.H.; Zhu, H. Common defects of mitochondria and iron in neurodegeneration and diabetes (MIND): A paradigm worth exploring. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 88, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Swaminathan, S.; Fonseca, V.A.; Alam, M.G.; Shah, S.V. The Role of Iron in Diabetes and Its Complications. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 1926–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wachnowsky, C.; Fidai, I.; Cowan, J.A. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis and trafficking–impact on human disease conditions. Metallomics 2018, 10, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Petronek, M.S.; Spitz, D.R.; Buettner, G.R.; Allen, B.G. Linking Cancer Metabolic Dysfunction and Genetic Instability through the Lens of Iron Metabolism. Cancers 2019, 11, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 10 01160 g001 550
Figure 1. NAF-1 protein levels, insulin secretion, and TXNIP expression in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Protein blots (Top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (Bottom) showing NAF-1 protein levels in control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(−/+), and NAF-1(+) cells. (B) Fold change in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. (C) Protein blots (Top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (Bottom) showing TXNIP and TRX protein levels in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3. Abbreviations: TRX, Thioredoxin; TXNIP, Thioredoxin-interacting protein.
Figure 1. NAF-1 protein levels, insulin secretion, and TXNIP expression in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Protein blots (Top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (Bottom) showing NAF-1 protein levels in control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(−/+), and NAF-1(+) cells. (B) Fold change in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. (C) Protein blots (Top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (Bottom) showing TXNIP and TRX protein levels in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3. Abbreviations: TRX, Thioredoxin; TXNIP, Thioredoxin-interacting protein.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g001
Antioxidants 10 01160 g002 550
Figure 2. Mitochondrial and ER structural alterations and phosphorylation of IRE-1 in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative TEM images (left panels) and statistical analysis (right graphs) of alterations in mitochondrial (top), ER (middle), and ER-mitochondrial contact points (bottom) structures in control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(−/+), and NAF-1(+) cells. (B) Protein blots (top) and graph (bottom) showing the ratio between IRE-1 and phosphorylated IRE-1 (IRE-1P) in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 600 for mitochondria and mitochondrial-ER contact and N = 900 for ER. Abbreviations: IRE, serine/threonine-protein kinase/endoribonuclease.
Figure 2. Mitochondrial and ER structural alterations and phosphorylation of IRE-1 in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative TEM images (left panels) and statistical analysis (right graphs) of alterations in mitochondrial (top), ER (middle), and ER-mitochondrial contact points (bottom) structures in control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(−/+), and NAF-1(+) cells. (B) Protein blots (top) and graph (bottom) showing the ratio between IRE-1 and phosphorylated IRE-1 (IRE-1P) in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 600 for mitochondria and mitochondrial-ER contact and N = 900 for ER. Abbreviations: IRE, serine/threonine-protein kinase/endoribonuclease.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g002
Antioxidants 10 01160 g003 550
Figure 3. Quantification of ER-mitochondrial contacts using confocal microscopy and expression of MFN2 in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative confocal images of INS-1E control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(+), and NAF-1(−/+) cells co-expressing an ER-, mitochondria- and nucleus-targeted red, green, and blue fluorescent proteins, respectively (top). Yellow (green-red merged fluorescence) denotes contact points between the ER and the mitochondria. Quantification graphs showing the number of ER–mitochondrial contact points per cell (bottom). (B) Protein blots (top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (bottom) showing MFN2 protein levels in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 50. Abbreviations: MFN2, mitofusin 2.
Figure 3. Quantification of ER-mitochondrial contacts using confocal microscopy and expression of MFN2 in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative confocal images of INS-1E control, NAF-1(−), NAF-1(+), and NAF-1(−/+) cells co-expressing an ER-, mitochondria- and nucleus-targeted red, green, and blue fluorescent proteins, respectively (top). Yellow (green-red merged fluorescence) denotes contact points between the ER and the mitochondria. Quantification graphs showing the number of ER–mitochondrial contact points per cell (bottom). (B) Protein blots (top) and β-actin-normalized expression graph (bottom) showing MFN2 protein levels in INS-1E cells expressing different levels of NAF-1. The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 50. Abbreviations: MFN2, mitofusin 2.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g003
Antioxidants 10 01160 g004 550
Figure 4. Mitochondrial respiration and ATP production in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Seahorse-generated plots of mitochondrial respiration obtained for the different lines. Data are presented in normalized values. (B) Spare respiratory capacity calculated from (A). (C) ATP levels calculated from (A). Results in (A) were normalized to the number of cells used (30,000). Data in (B,C) are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3.
Figure 4. Mitochondrial respiration and ATP production in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Seahorse-generated plots of mitochondrial respiration obtained for the different lines. Data are presented in normalized values. (B) Spare respiratory capacity calculated from (A). (C) ATP levels calculated from (A). Results in (A) were normalized to the number of cells used (30,000). Data in (B,C) are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured in three different experiments. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g004
Antioxidants 10 01160 g005 550
Figure 5. Mitochondrial labile iron (mLI), ROS (mROS), and protein carbonylation in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative epi-fluorescent images of mitochondrial RPA fluorescence (top), and quantification of mitochondrial RPA fluorescence (bottom graphs) in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 level (left graph is for total RPA fluorescence and right graph is for change in RPA fluorescence from control). Quenching of RPA fluorescence indicates mitochondrial labile iron accumulation. (B) Representative epi-fluorescent images of mitochondrial mito-SOXTM fluorescence (top), and quantitative analysis (bottom, left), of mitochondrial mito-SOXTM fluorescence (indicating mitochondrial superoxide accumulation), in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 level. (C) Cellular content of carbonylated proteins in the different INS-1E cell lines with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels, measured with coumarin hydrazine (CH). The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 450 for (A), N = 150 for (B), and N = 450 for (C).
Figure 5. Mitochondrial labile iron (mLI), ROS (mROS), and protein carbonylation in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels. (A) Representative epi-fluorescent images of mitochondrial RPA fluorescence (top), and quantification of mitochondrial RPA fluorescence (bottom graphs) in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 level (left graph is for total RPA fluorescence and right graph is for change in RPA fluorescence from control). Quenching of RPA fluorescence indicates mitochondrial labile iron accumulation. (B) Representative epi-fluorescent images of mitochondrial mito-SOXTM fluorescence (top), and quantitative analysis (bottom, left), of mitochondrial mito-SOXTM fluorescence (indicating mitochondrial superoxide accumulation), in INS-1E cells with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 level. (C) Cellular content of carbonylated proteins in the different INS-1E cell lines with repressed or overexpressed NAF-1 levels, measured with coumarin hydrazine (CH). The results are presented as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 450 for (A), N = 150 for (B), and N = 450 for (C).
Antioxidants 10 01160 g005
Antioxidants 10 01160 g006 550
Figure 6. Pharmacological amelioration of enhanced mLI and mROS, and decrease insulin production in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells with a combined treatment of DFP and NAC. (A) Mitochondrial labile iron levels in control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of DFP (50 µM) and/or NAC (100 µM). (B) Same as in (A), but for mROS levels. (C) Fold change in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of DFP and/or NAC. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 450 for (A), N = 150 for (B), and N = 3 for (C). Abbreviations: DFP, deferiprone; NAC, N - acetyl cysteine.
Figure 6. Pharmacological amelioration of enhanced mLI and mROS, and decrease insulin production in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells with a combined treatment of DFP and NAC. (A) Mitochondrial labile iron levels in control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of DFP (50 µM) and/or NAC (100 µM). (B) Same as in (A), but for mROS levels. (C) Fold change in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of DFP and/or NAC. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 450 for (A), N = 150 for (B), and N = 3 for (C). Abbreviations: DFP, deferiprone; NAC, N - acetyl cysteine.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g006
Antioxidants 10 01160 g007 550
Figure 7. Pharmacological amelioration of mitochondrial and ER morphology in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells with a combined DFP and NAC treatment. (A–D) Representative TEM images of control and NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells treated or untreated with a NAC (100 µM) + DFP (50 µM) combination (A, Control. (B) NAF-1(−). (C) Control treated with DFP+ NAC. (D) NAF-1(−) treated with DFP+ NAC). Yellow and white arrows indicate ER and mitochondria, respectively. (E,F) Statistical analysis of mitochondrial (E), or ER (F), damage in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells following the combined DFP+ NAC treatment. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 200 for mitochondria, N = 300 for ER. Abbreviations: DFP, deferiprone; NAC, N-acetyl cysteine.
Figure 7. Pharmacological amelioration of mitochondrial and ER morphology in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells with a combined DFP and NAC treatment. (A–D) Representative TEM images of control and NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells treated or untreated with a NAC (100 µM) + DFP (50 µM) combination (A, Control. (B) NAF-1(−). (C) Control treated with DFP+ NAC. (D) NAF-1(−) treated with DFP+ NAC). Yellow and white arrows indicate ER and mitochondria, respectively. (E,F) Statistical analysis of mitochondrial (E), or ER (F), damage in NAF-1(−) INS-1E cells following the combined DFP+ NAC treatment. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 200 for mitochondria, N = 300 for ER. Abbreviations: DFP, deferiprone; NAC, N-acetyl cysteine.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g007
Antioxidants 10 01160 g008 550
Figure 8. Presence of ferroptosis-like symptoms in NAF-1(−) pancreatic cells. Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels (A), increased lipid peroxidation (B), decreased GPX4 expression (C), enhanced TfR expression (D), and shortened mitochondria (E) (representative image: top, control; bottom, NAF-1-deficient) in control and NAF-1(−) pancreatic cells. (F) Morphology of nuclei in control and NAF-1(−) cells (representative image: top, control; bottom, NAF-1-deficient). (G) Cellular ROS levels in control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of 2 µM, ferrostatin-1. (H,I) cell growth of control and NAF-1(−) cells (measured by counting cell numbers (H) or using PrestoBlueTM (I)) in the presence or absence 2 µM ferrostatin-1. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3 for (A,B,G,H,I), N = 5 for (C,D), N = 250 for (E), N = 10 for (F). Abbreviations: GSH, reduced glutathione; MDA, malondialdehyde; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; TfR, transferrin receptor.
Figure 8. Presence of ferroptosis-like symptoms in NAF-1(−) pancreatic cells. Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels (A), increased lipid peroxidation (B), decreased GPX4 expression (C), enhanced TfR expression (D), and shortened mitochondria (E) (representative image: top, control; bottom, NAF-1-deficient) in control and NAF-1(−) pancreatic cells. (F) Morphology of nuclei in control and NAF-1(−) cells (representative image: top, control; bottom, NAF-1-deficient). (G) Cellular ROS levels in control and NAF-1(−) cells in the presence or absence of 2 µM, ferrostatin-1. (H,I) cell growth of control and NAF-1(−) cells (measured by counting cell numbers (H) or using PrestoBlueTM (I)) in the presence or absence 2 µM ferrostatin-1. The results are shown as box-and-whisker plots and include all data points measured from three different experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control; Student’s t-test, N = 3 for (A,B,G,H,I), N = 5 for (C,D), N = 250 for (E), N = 10 for (F). Abbreviations: GSH, reduced glutathione; MDA, malondialdehyde; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; TfR, transferrin receptor.
Antioxidants 10 01160 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karmi, O.; Sohn, Y.-S.; Marjault, H.-B.; Israeli, T.; Leibowitz, G.; Ioannidis, K.; Nahmias, Y.; Mittler, R.; Cabantchik, I.Z.; Nechushtai, R. A Combined Drug Treatment That Reduces Mitochondrial Iron and Reactive Oxygen Levels Recovers Insulin Secretion in NAF-1-Deficient Pancreatic Cells. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081160

AMA Style

Karmi O, Sohn Y-S, Marjault H-B, Israeli T, Leibowitz G, Ioannidis K, Nahmias Y, Mittler R, Cabantchik IZ, Nechushtai R. A Combined Drug Treatment That Reduces Mitochondrial Iron and Reactive Oxygen Levels Recovers Insulin Secretion in NAF-1-Deficient Pancreatic Cells. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(8):1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karmi, Ola, Yang-Sung Sohn, Henri-Baptiste Marjault, Tal Israeli, Gil Leibowitz, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Yaakov Nahmias, Ron Mittler, Ioav Z. Cabantchik, and Rachel Nechushtai. 2021. "A Combined Drug Treatment That Reduces Mitochondrial Iron and Reactive Oxygen Levels Recovers Insulin Secretion in NAF-1-Deficient Pancreatic Cells" Antioxidants 10, no. 8: 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081160

APA Style

Karmi, O., Sohn, Y. -S., Marjault, H. -B., Israeli, T., Leibowitz, G., Ioannidis, K., Nahmias, Y., Mittler, R., Cabantchik, I. Z., & Nechushtai, R. (2021). A Combined Drug Treatment That Reduces Mitochondrial Iron and Reactive Oxygen Levels Recovers Insulin Secretion in NAF-1-Deficient Pancreatic Cells. Antioxidants, 10(8), 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop