Next Article in Journal
Contribution of Elevated Glucose and Oxidized LDL to Macrophage Inflammation: A Role for PRAS40/Akt-Dependent Shedding of Soluble CD14
Previous Article in Journal
Aucubin Exerts Neuroprotection against Forebrain Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Gerbils through Antioxidative and Neurotrophic Effects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant Properties of Cranberry Leaves and Walnut Meal and Their Effect on Nutritional Quality and Oxidative Stability of Broiler Breast Meat

by
Arabela Elena Untea
1,*,
Iulia Varzaru
1,
Mihaela Saracila
1,
Tatiana Dumitra Panaite
2,
Alexandra Gabriela Oancea
1,
Petru Alexandru Vlaicu
1 and
Iulian Alexandru Grosu
3
1
Food and Feed Quality Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Ilfov, Romania
2
Nutrition Physiology Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Ilfov, Romania
3
Animal Biology Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Ilfov, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(5), 1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051084
Submission received: 4 April 2023 / Revised: 5 May 2023 / Accepted: 9 May 2023 / Published: 11 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural and Synthetic Antioxidants)

Abstract

:
Dietary sources of bioactive compounds in animal diets, are the natural way to produce animal food products with improved nutritional quality. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis of a synergistic effect of bioactive compounds of cranberry leaf powder and walnut meal on the nutritional quality and antioxidant compounds of broiler meat. An experiment was conducted on 160 COBB 500 broiler chickens, housed in an experimental hall with permanent wood shave litter in boxes of 3 m2. The six dietary treatments were based on corn and soybean meal; three experimental groups were fed diets supplemented with cranberry leaves (CLs) with three inclusion rates (0% in the control group and CL 1% and CL 2%); two experimental groups were fed diets supplemented with walnut meal (WM) with two inclusion rates (0% and WM 6%); and two groups were fed diets with a combination of the selected supplements (CL 1% WM 6% and CL 2% WM 6%). The results show that the experimental groups registered higher concentrations of copper and iron compared with the control group. An antagonist effect was noticed on lipophilic compounds, and the lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations presented a dose-dependent increasing effect under CL influence, while vitamin E concentrations decreased in the same manner. The dietary WM positively influenced vitamin E deposits on breast tissue. The dietary supplements did not produce any effect on the primary oxidation products, but the secondary products were influenced, and the maximum effect on the TBARS values were recorded for the dietary combination of CL 1% and WM 6%.

1. Introduction

Antioxidants are inhibitors of the oxidation process being integrated into the body’s defence system. Dietary antioxidants can be different vegetal or animal molecular components (natural antioxidants) or synthetic compounds. Nowadays, natural antioxidants are preferred by consumers; they consider that antioxidant-rich foods offer a natural way of protection against free radical occurrence [1]. Natural antioxidants from plants (such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, and spices) are rich in phenolic compounds, liposoluble vitamins, and antioxidant minerals that are valuable free radical inhibitors for humans and animals. According to other studies, different bioactive compounds can act as reducing agents, free radical terminators, metal chelators, and singlet oxygen quenchers in the process of oxidation inhibition [2]. Searching for new feed additives to replace antibiotic growth promoters in farm animal nutrition led the nutritionists to find many alternative natural plants as possible sources of phytochemicals with antimicrobial, antiviral, antiparasitic, antifungal, antioxidant, and anthelminthic properties [3].
Walnut (Juglans regia) is a traditional plant, which grows spontaneously almost all over the world. The fruit consumed unprocessed or in food preparations is considered a significant source of bioactive compounds, such as phenolic acids and flavonoids [4]. Walnut oil is a valuable source of polyunsaturated fatty acids and is extracted for its use in food [5]. After pressing and oil extraction, the meal is obtained. Other authors showed that walnut meal is a rich source of biologically active substances (amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, mineral compounds, and polyphenols) [6].
Vaccinium species are reported in the scientific literature as a source of phenolic compounds. In human nutrition, they are present as fresh fruits, processed products, and dietary supplements [7]. Other studies have shown that berry leaves are a poor source of anthocyanins compared to fruits, but the phenolic compounds are more abundant [8]. The leaves and fruits have been used in traditional remedies against colds, urinary tract inflammation, diabetes, and ocular dysfunction [9]. The same authors demonstrated that cranberry leaves (Vaccinium oxycoccus) are a valuable source of antioxidants, containing significantly more polyphenols than fruit and fruit-based products. In poultry nutrition, cranberry was used mostly as pomace, being a byproduct of the food industry with a minimum economic value. Even though the effects of cranberry pomace on intestinal health [10] and its immunomodulatory effects [11] and the plasma biochemical profile of broilers [12] have been demonstrated, the impact of dietary cranberry leaves in chicken broiler nutrition has not been well documented.
Meat, represented by edible parts of an animal carcass, plays an important role in human evolution due to its chemical composition. Meat is an essential source of high-quality protein, providing all the essential amino acids with high digestibility and is a source of fatty acids and micronutrients [13]. Despite all evident benefits, some studies link a high meat intake with metabolic disorders and heart diseases making nutritionally improved meat a social necessity due to consumer demands [14]. The strategies for improving meat quality follow two main directions: technologies for incorporating bioactive components or nutritional feeding strategies for farm animals. Dietary sources of bioactive compounds in animal diets are the natural way to produce nutrient-enriched animal food products by improving nutrient utilization and antioxidant status and reducing lipid peroxidation in meat production.
Alternative feed resources of bioactive compounds are currently used in broiler nutrition as health-promoting agents, but also to improve the quality of animal products by enriching them in different nutrients and preventing or delaying oxidative damage. A recent study reported that plants, such as basil, thyme, and sage, used in broiler nutrition as phytogenic feed additives led to significant improvements in meat quality [15]. Others showed that the use of byproducts of the food industry, such as grape pomace, tomato peels, or rosehip meal, have positive effects on the oxidative stability of poultry products [16,17]. These studies showed that there is a clear relationship between the quality of animal nutrition and the health safety of the obtained products.
A possible complementary effect of two powerful sources of natural antioxidants was investigated. The study aimed to test the hypothesis of a possible synergistic effect of the bioactive compounds of cranberry leaf powder (a phytogenic feed additive and coproduct derived from the food industry) and walnut meal (a byproduct derived from the food industry) on improving the nutritional profile of broiler meat.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The experimental study was performed on 240 unsexed, hybrid COBB 500 broiler chickens and lasted 30 days (12–42 days). Legislation regarding animal welfare (Romanian documents 206/2004, 43/11 April 2014, and Directive 2010/63/EU) was the basis for the experimental design used in this study. It was approved by the Ethical Committee of the National Research Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition. One-day-old broiler chicks were purchased from a commercial hatchery and housed in an experimental hall with permanent wood shave litter (10–12 cm thick), simulating the semi-intensive system conditions, in boxes of 3 m2 (40 broilers/group/box). They had free access to feed and water. The broilers were weighed individually and assigned to six homogeneous groups based on body weight, following a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. Microclimate parameters (temperature, humidity, and ventilation) were monitored throughout the experiment. During the first 3 days, the room temperature was maintained at 33 °C and then gradually reduced to 22 °C during the entire experimental period ensuring an average temperature of 26.84 ± 3.45 °C. The light program was 23 h light/1 h darkness.
The six dietary treatments were based on corn and soybean meal; three experimental groups were fed diets supplemented with cranberry leaves (CLs) with three inclusion rates (CL 0%, CL 1%, and CL 2%); two experimental groups were fed diets supplemented with walnut meal (WM) with two inclusion rates (WM 0% and WM 6%); and two groups were fed diets with a combination of the selected supplements (CL 1% WM 6% and CL 2% WM 6%). The group with CL 0% and WM 0% was considered the control group. The broilers had free access to feed and water. Diet formulations are presented in Table 1.
At the end of the experiment (42 days), 6 broilers randomly selected from each treatment were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Breast meat samples were collected to determine the nutritional quality and the oxidative stability parameters. The samples were stored in the freezer at −80 °C until further analysis.

2.2. Chemical Analysis

The proximate composition (crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, and crude ash) of vegetal materials and meat samples was determined using the methods and equipment described by Untea et al. [18]. Kjeldahl reference method and a semiautomatic Kjeltek auto 1030—FOSS Tecator AB (Höganäs, Sweden) were used for crude protein determinations; continuous extraction in solvent, followed by fat measurement with Soxhlet FOSS Tecator AB (Höganäs, Sweden) was the method used for crude fat concentrations, and gravimetric methods according to Regulation (CE) no. 152/2009 were applied for dry matter content and crude ash.
Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was used to determine trace minerals following the method described by Untea et al. [19] and using a Thermo Electron—SOLAAR M6 Dual Zeeman Comfort (Cambridge, UK). The sample preparation was performed by applying a microwave digestion method manufactured by Bergof (Eningen, Germany).
The lipophilic antioxidant compounds (vitamin E, lutein, and zeaxanthin) were determined using chromatographic methods. The extraction procedures and determination parameters were described by Varzaru et al. [20]. The pretreatment of samples consisted of hydrolyzation with ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution and extraction with petroleum ether. The extracts were washed with distilled water and evaporated under vacuum until dry. The residue was dissolved in ethanol, and the determination was performed using an HPLC system (high-performance liquid chromatography) (Finningan Surveyor Plus, Thermo-Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) with a HyperSil BDS C18 column.
Spectrophotometric methods (Folin–Ciocalteu and DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazil)) were used to determine polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity from vegetal materials and meat samples. The extraction details (1 g of dried sample in 10 mL of methanol 80%) and calibration curves were described by Untea et al. [21].
To quantify the oxidative stability of breast samples, the following parameters were considered: primary oxidation products (peroxide value, conjugated dienes, and trienes) and secondary oxidation products (p anisidine value and TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances)). Furthermore, markers of lipid peroxidation considered the myoglobin fraction (metmyoglobin, deoxymyoglobin, and oxymyoglobin). All the parameters mentioned above were spectrophotometrically determined using a V-530 Jasco manufactured by Japan Servo Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) spectrophotometer, according to the methods described by Untea et al. [18].
Individual phenolic compounds were identified and quantified using a liquid chromatographic method. The measurements were performed on a Vanquish Core HPLC system equipped with a DAD manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen, Germany) and BDS HyperSil C18 column (250 × 4 mm, 5 µm particle size) Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen, Germany). The binary gradient was prepared from acetic acid (1%) in distilled water (v/v) (solvent A), methanol (solvent B), and acetonitrile (solvent C) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The elution program consisted of: 0–15 min: 5% solv B, 5% solv C; 15–20 min: 4% solv B, 15% solv C; 20–25 min: 3% solv B, 25% solv C; 25–40 min: 2% solv B, 38% solv C; 40–50 min: 5% solv B, 5% solv C. The phenolic compounds were identified by overlaying sample peaks with individual reference standards.
Extraction procedure for individual phenolic compound determination followed the next steps: 0.5 g of vegetal powder was extracted by 10 mL of extraction solvent (water/methanol/acetic acid in the ratio of 69:30:1, v/v/v) in screw-cap test tubes, and the extracts were incubated for 60 min at 50 °C in shaking water bath manufactured by Memmert (Schwabach, Germany), followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min [22].
Gallic acid, syringic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, ellagic acid, 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, methoxycinnamic, catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin, quercetin, rutin, and resveratrol were used as standards for polyphenol identification and quantification and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

2.3. Data Analysis

The experimental data were statistically analysed as a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement using two-way ANOVA (General Linear Model procedure) followed by Tukey’s HSD test. The model included the main effects of the cranberry leaves and walnut meal, as well as the interaction between them. XLStat produced by Addinsoft (New York, NY, USA) software was used for statistical interpretation. p values below 5% were considered significant. The broilers were weighed at the end of the experiment, with the normality of data being checked by Gruber’s test and the outliers being removed. From each group of animals, six broilers were randomly selected, and each of them become an experimental unit for the meat quality parameter evaluation.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of Dietary Supplements

The proximate composition of dietary supplements (Table 2) showed that walnut meal is a valuable source of crude protein and crude fat. Important concentrations of iron were determined in both vegetal materials, with walnut meal presenting also high values of zinc and cranberry leaves being a rich source of manganese.
The concentrations of lipophilic antioxidants of the supplements proved that cranberry leaves are the main source of bioactive compounds from this category (Table 3).
The hydrophilic antioxidants are represented in Table 4 by the phenolic compound profiles. The walnut meal is a vegetal source rich in phenolic acids, particularly ferulic acid (the most abundant phenolic compound in its structure), while CL showed important concentrations of gallic acid and 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid. Cranberry leaves presented higher concentrations of flavonoids, with epicatechin being the main phenolic compound. Rutin is the main flavonol compound both in the WM and CL supplement materials.

3.2. Proximate Composition of Breast Tissue

The results regarding the chemical composition of breast meat (Table 5) show a significant effect of the walnut meal presence in the diet, leading to increased fat concentrations. In contrast, the cranberry leaves produced a decreased dose-dependent effect on breast tissue fat concentrations. Overall, the lowest fat concentration was registered for the group fed with 2% CL and 0% WM. No significant differences were recorded on other proximate parameters.

3.3. Trace Element Composition of Breast Tissue

The individual inclusion of dietary CL and WM increased the Cu level in the breast meat compared with the control group. The combination of the two supplements also increased the copper level compared with the control group but were significantly decreased when compared with the groups where CL and WM were added individually (Table 6). CL dietary supplements increased Fe deposition in the breast meat, but WM did not influence it. Thus, the increased level of Fe observed in groups supplemented with the combination of CL and WM is due to the influence of CL. Both individually and in combination, WM and Cl decreased Zn storage in the breast meat.

3.4. Antioxidant Profile of Breast Meat

Table 7 presents the antioxidant profile of breast tissue as lipophilic bioactive compounds (vitamin E, lutein, and zeaxanthin) and hydrophilic compounds (total polyphenol content). An antagonist effect was noticed between the lipophilic compounds, and under the CL influence, the lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. The vitamin E concentrations decreased in the same manner, but the presence of WM in the diets led to an increasing effect. The WM inclusion in diets led to decreased polyphenol accumulation on breast tissue levels, and a positive effect of CL was noticed on the antioxidant capacity of the samples.

3.5. Oxidative Stability of Breast Meat

The dietary supplements did not produce any effect on the primary oxidation products, but the secondary products were influenced (Table 8). For the maximum positive effect on the inhibition of peroxidation, a synergistic effect of the dietary combination of CL1% and WM 6% was noticed. An inhibitory effect toward the metmyoglobin fraction was noticed in the WM-supplemented groups.

3.6. Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)

A multivariate data analysis technique (PLS-DA) was used to establish the correlation pattern between groups and the analytical data. Furthermore, the PLS-DA score plot indicates the similarities and differences between samples belonging to different groups. A far distance between locations in the score plot represented greater differences between groups. The data presented in Figure 1 show that the experimental samples were clustered very well at the bottom of the plot compared to the control, in different quadrants. In the bottom left part of the diagram, the samples belonging to the CL groups were grouped separately and in different quadrants with the WM group. All three groups, which included WM in the diets, were in the same area. The presence of cranberry leaves in the broilers’ diets is strongly associated with antioxidant parameters, such as total polyphenols, DPPH values, and lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations, but also with primary oxidation products, iron concentrations, and metmyoglobin (Figure 2). Walnut meal (single or in mixture) can be related to the fat and fat-soluble vitamin E, copper, and the other two forms of myoglobin. The control group is associated in its quadrant with zinc and TBARS concentrations.

4. Discussion

4.1. Chemical Composition of Dietary Supplements

Cranberry leaves and walnut meal represent potentially useful feed additives in broiler diets due to their nutritive values and the potential health-promoting effects. The scientific literature is not abundant in data regarding the chemical composition of our studied vegetal material. Considering the growth environment differences, we expected to find slightly different profiles of the chemical composition of plants compared to the data already reported. The proximate composition of cranberry leaves showed that this vegetal material is a poor source of protein or fat. This observation was noticed also by other authors who found that cranberry pomace is a low source of protein [23]. The data presented in our study prove that cranberry leaves are an important source of iron and manganese, results that agree with the mineral profile presented by Karlsons et al. [24] even if the manganese concentrations reported are three times higher than our determination. Oszmianski et al. [9] compared the bioactive content of cranberry fruits, pomace, and leaves from three varieties. They found that the antioxidant potential of leaves is two times higher than fruits and pomace. The DPPH concentrations reported in the leaf samples ranged between 44.4 and 44.6 mM, slightly smaller than our determined values. The antioxidant profiles of cranberry leaves presented higher concentrations of total polyphenols but also of lipophilic antioxidants, which are results confirmed by other authors who found values in the same range [20]. Regarding the walnut meal’s chemical composition, this byproduct is a valuable source of crude protein, crude fat, and minerals, such as iron and zinc. Other authors confirmed that walnut meal is a rich source of protein, accounting for up to 24% of its weight [25]. Vlaicu et al. [26] reported 34.5% crude protein and 12.3% crude fat content in walnut meal dry basis. The crude fat composition contained over 70% polyunsaturated fatty acids, 10% being the omega 3 form [27].
The phenolic compound profiles of the studied vegetal materials consist of five main phenolic groups: hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids as phenolic acids, flavonols, flavanols as flavonoids, and stilbenes.
For CL, the most abundant compounds were represented by flavanols, epicatechin being the major compound, followed by hydroxybenzoic acids. The same observation was reported in the scientific literature by other authors, who found that flavonoids are the most relevant group of phenolics in cranberry plants [7,8]. In a recent study, the authors concluded that even if berry fruits are known to present certain health benefits for human consumption, the potential of bioactive compounds from berry byproducts, such as leaves, is not fully investigated regarding bioavailability and the mechanism of action [28].
The walnut meal phenolic profile showed that hydroxycinnamic acids are the main class of compounds, ferulic acid being the major contributor. Walnut leaves and husks were studied, and the authors found that the tannins (gallotannins and ellagitannins) and naphthoquinone derivative juglone are the main active ingredients [29]. Other authors found that the main phenolic acids present in the nuts are ferulic, vanillic, syringic, synaptic, coumaric, caffeic, and protocatechuic, with gallic acid and derivatives being abundant in walnuts [30].

4.2. Proximate Composition of Breast Tissue

Diet supplementation with CL, WM, or their combination did not change the proximate composition of breast meat in terms of dry matter, crude protein, or crude ash. The fat concentrations were decreased under CL influence and increased under WM influence, compared with the CL groups. Considering that the fat concentration of WM is eight times higher than CL (Table 2) and the inclusion rate of the two considered feed additives (6% WM vs. 1% or 2% CL), the higher fat deposition in the WM group’s breast meat is an expected result. Using cranberry and blueberry pomaces in broiler diets, Xu et al. [31] reported no effect of dietary berries on the proximate composition of the breast meat. The abdominal fat of broilers was significantly decreased in an experiment that used dietary sumac berries leading to reduced low-density lipoproteins in the blood. The results were reported by [32], who considered that the fat reduction was due to the inhibition of regulatory enzymes involved in cholesterol synthesis or the presence of saponins, which prevent its absorption.

4.3. Trace Element Composition of Breast Tissue

It is well recognized that diet is a key factor for chronic diseases; a mixed diet containing meat providing high-quality proteins and minerals could prevent illness [33]. Iron is a trace element involved in the development of the central nervous system, the antioxidant defence system as part of catalase and peroxidase enzymes, and in erythropoiesis, as a part of myoglobin and haemoglobin [34]. The increased level of iron observed in the groups containing the combination of CL and WM was attributed to the presence of CL. Even if WM could be considered a valuable source of minerals, presenting higher concentrations of Cu, Fe, and Zn than CL, the mineral deposition in the breast meat did not respect that pattern. The chemical antagonism of metals, in this case, Fe and Zn, can be noticed in breast meat samples; increased concentrations of iron (all experimental groups compared to the control group) are associated with decreased zinc deposits.

4.4. Antioxidant Profile of Breast Meat

The antioxidant profile of CL presented a direct effect on the antioxidant capacity of the breast tissue. No significant effect, compared with the other groups, was noticed regarding the WM presence in the diets. The CL-supplemented groups developed the maximum antioxidant potential, and the combination of the two studied feed additives did not lead to a combined antioxidant effect, even if the WM is also a valuable source of bioactive compounds. The CL-supplemented groups showed increased lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in a dose-dependent manner without WM influence. Regarding vitamin E concentrations, the same groups registered significantly decreased concentrations in a dose-dependent manner, but a significant antagonist effect was noticed under the WM influence. The combination of the supplements had a positive effect both on vitamin E and lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations, compared with the control group. The antagonist behaviour of vitamin E and xanthophylls was previously noticed by Saracila et al. [35] in a study regarding the effects of chromium picolinate and wooden sorrel dietary supplements on the nutrient quality of broiler meat. The polyphenol concentrations were not influenced by the CL dietary supplements A significant inhibitory effect was noticed when the combination of feed additives was used. Overall, the study on the antioxidant composition of breast meat proved a competing behaviour of selected phytoadditives when they were added in combination and maximum concentrations when they were administrated alone.

4.5. Oxidative Stability of Breast Meat

The effects of the supplements added to the diet of broiler chickens on lipid peroxidation of breast meat were seen only in the secondary products of oxidation. Thus, when CL was added to the diet alone, it did not influence lipid peroxidation, but CL (1%) in combination with WM delayed lipid peroxidation, observed by decreasing the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) concentration in breast meat.
Myoglobin, haemoglobin, and cytochrome c are responsible for meat colour. The bright red colour of meat is the result of the oxygenated form of myoglobin (oxymyoglobin). In the absence of oxygen, oxymyoglobin is converted to deoxymyoglobin, which is responsible for the purple-red colour of meat, and by oxidation of iron from the second to the third state, metmyoglobin is formed, producing the brown colour of meat [30]. The improving colour of meat is related to the reduction in metmyoglobin presence. In our study, the presence of walnut meal in the broilers’ diets led to a significant decrease in the metmyoglobin fraction and a positive effect on the deoxymyoglobin fraction, which reflects the presence of iron in the second state of oxidation.
Lipid peroxidation is the main factor affecting the sensory and nutritional quality of meat, and iron is the major catalyst of this process. In muscle tissues, iron can exist in a “free” form (nonheme) or protein-bound (heme) form, and the peroxidation catalysing mechanism was not fully established [36]. The relationship between lipid and myoglobin oxidation was previously explored, and potential mechanisms that could explain the interaction were proposed. Relevant studies considered for many years that metmyoglobin is the heme protein responsible for the initiation of lipid oxidation in muscle tissue. If the red colour of the meat can be maintained, the deterioration process will be delayed [37]. Under physiological conditions, metmyoglobin does not have a pro-oxidative behaviour, but at an acidic pH and mediated by lipid hydroperoxide, metmyoglobin becomes an effective pro-oxidant [38]. Lipid hydroperoxides increase during the conversion of muscle to meat [37], and other studies reported that lipid oxidation preceded oxymyoglobin oxidation [39].
The interrelation between the discussed oxidation processes highlighted the observation that dietary vitamin E delayed both lipid and myoglobin co-oxidation [40]. The antioxidant effect of vitamin E against lipid oxidation is well documented. In contrast, the delaying of oxymyoglobin oxidation was difficult to explain.
The limitations of the study are related to the fact that the feed additives selected are not easily affordable for farm production. Another limitation of the study is the chemical composition of the plants; the study was not focused on possible antinutritional factors present or the bioavailability of the nutrients. Other limitations include the factors affecting the effective dose of phytochemicals including the chemical structures of phytochemical supplements/additives, animal diet, and animal physiological status.

5. Conclusions

The results of the present study prove that the inclusion of cranberry leaves and walnut meal in broiler diets represents a nutritional solution rich in bioactive compounds, especially antioxidant constituents (liposoluble antioxidants, phenolic acids, and flavonoids), with a significant improvement effect on the antioxidative properties and on retarding the lipid peroxidation of meat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.U. and I.V.; methodology, A.E.U.; software, P.A.V. and I.A.G.; formal analysis, A.E.U., I.V., M.S. and A.G.O.; investigation, M.S.; data curation, T.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.E.U.; writing—review and editing, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation, project PED 631/2022 and supported by the program National Research Development Project to Finance Excellence (PFE)—8/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition (protocol no. 5121/12 August 2020), according to Romanian legislation (Law 206/2004, ordinance 28/31 August 2011, Law 43/11 April 2014, and Directive 2010/63/EU) before the initiation of the study and followed Romanian guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akbarirad, H.; Ardabili, A.G.; Kazemeini, S.M.; Khaneghah, A.M. An overview on some of important sources of natural antioxidants. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 928–933. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goliomytis, M.; Kartsonas, N.; Charismiadou, M.A.; Symeon, G.K.; Simitzis, P.E.; Deligeorgis, S.G. The influence of naringin or hesperidin dietary supplementation on broiler meat quality and oxidative stability. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oluwafemi, R.A.; Olawale, I.; Alagbe, J.O. Recent trends in the utilization of medicinal plants as growth promoters in poultry nutrition-A review. Res. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2020, 4, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Croitoru, A.; Ficai, D.; Craciun, L.; Ficai, A.; Andronescu, E. Evaluation and exploitation of bioactive compounds of walnut, Juglans regia. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grosso, A.L.; Asensio, C.M.; Nepote, V.; Grosso, N.R. Antioxidant activity displayed by phenolic compounds obtained from walnut oil cake used for walnut oil preservation. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2018, 95, 1409–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, G.; Zhong, D.; Liu, H.; Yang, T.; Liang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Water soluble dietary fiber from walnut meal as a prebiotic in preventing metabolic syndrome. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 78, 104358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ștefănescu, B.-E.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Ranga, F.; Fetea, F.; Mocan, A.; Vodnar, D.C.; Crișan, G. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of the Nord-West Romanian Wild Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) Leaves. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Teleszko, M.; Wojdyło, A. Comparison of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential between selected edible fruits and their leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oszmiański, J.; Wojdyło, A.; Lachowicz, S.; Gorzelany, J.; Matłok, N. Comparison of bioactive potential of cranberry fruit and fruit-based products versus leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 22, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Islam, M.R.; Hassan, Y.I.; Das, Q.; Lepp, D.; Hernandez, M.; Godfrey, D.V.; Diarra, M.S. Dietary organic cranberry pomace influences multiple blood biochemical parameters and cecal microbiota in pasture-raised broiler chickens. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 72, 104053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Das, Q.; Tang, J.; Yin, X.; Ross, K.; Warriner, K.; Marcone, M.F.; Diarra, M.S. Organic cranberry pomace and its ethanolic extractives as feed supplement in broiler: Impacts on serum Ig titers, liver and bursal immunity. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kithama, M.; Ross, K.; Diarra, M.S.; Kiarie, E.G. Utilization of grape (Vitis vinifera), cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon), wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), and apple (Malus pumila/domestica) pomaces in broiler chickens when fed without or with multi-enzyme supplement. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 1, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, H.J.; Yong, H.I.; Kim, M.; Choi, Y.S.; Jo, C. Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ursachi, C.Ș.; Perța-Crișan, S.; Munteanu, F.D. Strategies to improve meat products’ quality. Foods 2020, 9, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vlaicu, P.A.; Untea, A.E.; Turcu, R.P.; Saracila, M.; Panaite, T.D.; Cornescu, G.M. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Compounds of Basil, Thyme and Sage Plant Additives and Their Functionality on Broiler Thigh Meat Quality. Foods 2022, 11, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Turcu, R.P.; Panaite, T.D.; Untea, A.E.; Șoica, C.; Iuga, M.; Mironeasa, S. Effects of Supplementing Grape Pomace to Broilers Fed Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Enriched Diets on Meat Quality. Animals 2020, 10, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Varzaru, I.; Untea, A.E.; Panaite, T.; Olteanu, M. Effect of dietary phytochemicals from tomato peels and rosehip meal on the lipid peroxidation of eggs from laying hens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 75, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Untea, A.E.; Panaite, T.D.; Dragomir, C.; Ropota, M.; Olteanu, M.; Varzaru, I. Effect of dietary chromium supplementation on meat nutritional quality and antioxidant status from broilers fed with Camelina-meal-supplemented diets. Animal 2019, 13, 2939–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Untea, A.; Criste, R.C.; Vladescu, L. Development and validation of a microwave digestion–FAAS procedure for Cu, Mn and Zn determination in liver. Rev. De Chim. 2012, 63, 341–346. [Google Scholar]
  20. Varzaru, I.; Untea, A.E.; Saracila, M. In vitro antioxidant properties of berry leaves and their inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation of thigh meat from broiler chickens. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2020, 122, 1900384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Untea, A.E.; Varzaru, I.; Panaite, T.D.; Gavris, T.; Lupu, A.; Ropota, M. The effects of dietary inclusion of bilberry and walnut leaves in laying hens’ diets on the antioxidant properties of eggs. Animals 2020, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Orsavová, J.; Hlaváčová, I.; Mlček, J.; Snopek, L.; Mišurcová, L. Contribution of phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid and vitamin E to antioxidant activity of currant (Ribes L.) and gooseberry (Ribes uva-crispa L.) fruits. Food Chem. 2019, 284, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. White, B.L.; Howard, L.R.; Prior, R.L. Proximate and polyphenolic characterization of cranberry pomace. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4030–4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karlsons, A.; Osvalde, A.; Čekstere, G.; Pormale, J. Research on the mineral composition of cultivated and wild blueberries and cranberries. Agron. Res. 2018, 16, 454463. [Google Scholar]
  25. Arjomandi, M.A.; Salarmoini, M. Walnut Meal as an Excellent Source of Energy and Protein for Growing Japanese Quails. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2016, 6, 925–930. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vlaicu, P.A.; Panaite, T.D.; Voicu, I.; Turcu, R.P.; Olteanu, M.; Ropota, M. Determining the Feeding Value of some Food Industry By-Products. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 51, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  27. Untea, A.E.; Turcu, R.P.; Saracila, M.; Vlaicu, P.A.; Panaite, T.D.; Oancea, A.G. Broiler meat fatty acids composition, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stability parameters as affected by cranberry leaves and walnut meal supplemented diets. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martău, G.A.; Bernadette-Emőke, T.; Odocheanu, R.; Soporan, D.A.; Bochiș, M.; Simon, E.; Vodnar, D.C. Vaccinium Species (Ericaceae): Phytochemistry and Biological Properties of Medicinal Plants. Molecules 2023, 28, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Masek, A.; Latos-Brozio, M.; Chrzescijanska, E.; Podsedek, A. Polyphe-nolic profile and antioxidant activity of Juglans regia L. leaves and husk ex-tracts. Forests 2019, 10, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bodoira, R.; Maestri, D. Phenolic compounds from nuts: Extraction, chemical profiles, and bioactivity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 927–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, Q.; Si, W.; Mba, O.I.; Sienkiewicz, O.; Ngadi, M.; Ross, K.; Zhao, X. Research Note: Effects of supplementing cranberry and blueberry pomaces on meat quality and antioxidative capacity in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ahmadian, A.; Seidavi, A.; Phillips, C.J. Growth, carcass composition, haematology and immunity of broilers supplemented with sumac berries (Rhus coriaria L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris). Animals 2020, 10, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Giromini, C.; Givens, D.I. Benefits and Risks Associated with Meat Consumption during Key Life Processes and in Relation to the Risk of Chronic Diseases. Foods 2022, 11, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Buzala, M.; Slomka, A.; Janicki, B. Heme iron in meat as the main source of iron in the human diet. J. Elem. 2016, 21, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saracila, M.; Untea, A.E.; Panaite, T.D.; Varzaru, I.; Oancea, A.; Turcu, R.P.; Vlaicu, P.A. Creeping wood sorrel and chromium picolinate effect on the nutritional composition and lipid oxidative stability of broiler meat. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, M.; Yan, W.; Wang, D.; Xu, W. Effect of myoglobin, hemin, and ferric iron on quality of chicken breast meat. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baron, C.P.; Andersen, H.J. Myoglobin-induced lipid oxidation. A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3887–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zareian, M.; Tybussek, T.; Silcock, P.; Bremer, P.; Beauchamp, J.; Böhner, N. Interrelationship among myoglobin forms, lipid oxidation and protein carbonyls in minced pork packaged under modified atmosphere. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 20, 100311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faustman, C.; Sun, Q.; Mancini, R.; Suman, S.P. Myoglobin and lipid oxidation interactions: Mechanistic bases and control. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramanathan, R.; Suman, S.P.; Faustman, C. Biomolecular interactions governing fresh meat color in post-mortem skeletal muscle: A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12779–12787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PLS-DA score plot representing the differences between samples belonging to different groups. C—control group; CL—cranberry leaf group; WM—walnut meal group; WMCL—walnut meal plus cranberry leaf group; obs—number of observation.
Figure 1. PLS-DA score plot representing the differences between samples belonging to different groups. C—control group; CL—cranberry leaf group; WM—walnut meal group; WMCL—walnut meal plus cranberry leaf group; obs—number of observation.
Antioxidants 12 01084 g001
Figure 2. PLS-DA score plot representing the correlations between groups and the chemical markers. C—control group; CL—cranberry leaf group; WM—walnut meal group; WMCL—walnut meal plus cranberry leaf group; Zn—zinc; Fe—iron; Cu—copper; vit E—vitamin E; TP—total polyphenolic content; CD—conjugated diene; CT—conjugated triene; PV—peroxide value; Lut and zea—lutein and zeaxanthin; DM—dry matter; met Mb—metmyoglobin; oxy Mb—oxymyoglobin; deo Mb—deoxymyoglobin. The map overlaps the dependent variables (groups—c vectors) and the explanatory variables (determined parameters—w* vectors) and presents the relationship between the variables.
Figure 2. PLS-DA score plot representing the correlations between groups and the chemical markers. C—control group; CL—cranberry leaf group; WM—walnut meal group; WMCL—walnut meal plus cranberry leaf group; Zn—zinc; Fe—iron; Cu—copper; vit E—vitamin E; TP—total polyphenolic content; CD—conjugated diene; CT—conjugated triene; PV—peroxide value; Lut and zea—lutein and zeaxanthin; DM—dry matter; met Mb—metmyoglobin; oxy Mb—oxymyoglobin; deo Mb—deoxymyoglobin. The map overlaps the dependent variables (groups—c vectors) and the explanatory variables (determined parameters—w* vectors) and presents the relationship between the variables.
Antioxidants 12 01084 g002
Table 1. Diet formulations.
Table 1. Diet formulations.
IngredientsGrower Stage (12 to 22 Days)Finisher Stage (23 to 42 Days)
WM 0%WM 6%WM 0%WM 6%
(%)CL0%CL1%CL2%CL0%CL1%CL2%CL0%CL1%CL2%CL0%CL1%CL2%
Maize42.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.0042.00
Wheat18.7316.7714.8215.9113.9612.0020.5618.616.6517.7515.7913.84
SBM30.5330.9031.2727.3727.7428.1128.1028.4528.9325.0325.4025.78
Oil4.104.685.253.964.545.125.115.676.264.975.556.12
WM0006.006.006.000006.006.006.00
CL01.002.0001.002.0001.002.0001.002.00
Lysine0.190.190.180.130.120.120.090.090.080.030.020.02
Methionine0.240.250.250.300.300.310.200.200.200.250.260.26
Threonine0.030.030.030.10.100.100.100.100.100.070.070.07
CaCO31.291.291.291.301.291.291.171.171.171.181.171.17
Ca(H2PO4)21.481.491.501.521.531.541.31.351.321.351.361.37
Salt0.360.360.360.360.360.370.330.330.330.330.340.34
Choline0.050.050.050.050.050.050.040.040.040.040.040.05
Premix1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
Total100100100100100100100100100100100100
Chemical theoretical analysis
ME, Kcal/kg308630863086308630863086316731673167316731673167
Crude protein, %20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0019.0019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
Crude fat, %5.936.517.086.687.257.836.927.498.067.678.248.81
Crude fibre, %3.783.944.104.624.784.943.753.874.034.554.714.87
Ca (%)0.840.840.840.840.840.840.760.760.760.760.760.76
Av. P, %0.420.420.420.420.420.420.380.380.380.380.380.38
Premix composition per kg feed: 11.000 IU/kg vitamin A; 2.000 IU/kg vitamin D3; 27 IU/kg vitamin E; 3 mg/kg vitamin K; 2 mg/kg vitamin B1; 4 mg/kg vitamin B2; 14.85 mg/kg pantothenic acid; 27 mg/kg nicotinic acid; 3 mg/kg vitamin B6; 0.04 mg/kg vitamin B7; 1 mg/kg vitamin B9; 0.018 mg/kg vitamin B12; 20 mg/kg vitamin C; 80 mg/kg Mn; 80 mg/kg Fe; 5 mg/kg Cu; 0.60 mg/kg Zn; 0.37 mg/kg Co; 1.52 mg/kg I; 0.18 mg/kg Se. SBM—Soybean meal; CaCO3—Calcium carbonate; Ca(H2PO4)2—Monocalcium phosphate; ME—Metabolizable energy; Ca—Calcium; Av. P—Available phosphorus.
Table 2. Nutrient composition of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
Table 2. Nutrient composition of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
SpecificationCLWM
Proximate composition
Dry matter (%)93.11 ± 0.7292.88 ± 0.76
Crude protein (%)6.63 ± 0.7629.47 ± 1.03
Crude fat (%)2.52 ± 0.4616.24 ± 1.14
Crude fibre (%)20.15 ± 1.2718.41 ± 1.56
Crude ash (%)3.0 ± 0.363.88 ± 0.75
Mineral composition
Copper (mg/kg)2.182 ± 0.2519.66 ± 1.18
Iron (mg/kg)114.6 ± 14.7225.35 ± 24.2
Zinc (mg/kg)33.88 ± 3.45185.21 ± 14.1
Manganese (mg/kg)448.9 ± 52.172.57 ± 5.85
CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal.
Table 3. Lipophilic antioxidants and antioxidant capacity of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
Table 3. Lipophilic antioxidants and antioxidant capacity of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
SpecificationCLWM
Lipophilic Antioxidants and Antioxidant Capacity
Lutein and zeaxanthin (mg/kg)348.9 ± 44.5 2.903 ± 0.21
Vitamin E (mg/kg)205.5 ± 23.469.32 ± 4.99
DPPH (mM Trolox equiv)69.98 ± 3.9232.77 ± 4.56
CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal; Lipophilic antioxidants: lutein and zeaxanthin; vitamin E.
Table 4. Polyphenolic profile of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
Table 4. Polyphenolic profile of dietary phytogenic additives used in experiment (n = 3).
SpecificationRetention Time
(min.)
λ
(nm)
CL
(mg/100 g)
WM
(mg/100 g)
Phenolic acids 535.86971.27
Hydroxybenzoic acids 358.28150.73
Gallic acid (3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid)6.29270161.6 ± 3.8970.83 ± 1.84
Vanillic acid (4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid)23.8627015.98 ± 2.8112.06 ± 1.38
Syringic acid (3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid)25.5827011.22 ± 1.5711.93 ± 1.51
3-Hydroxybenzoic acid25.90270149.38 ± 8.7548.86 ± 2.73
Ellagic acid (Benzoaric acid)29.8427014.54 ± 1.09n.d.
Protocatechuic acid (3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid)34.112545.53 ± 0.377.05 ± 0.25
Hydroxycinnamic acids 177.58820.54
Chlorogenic acid (5-Caffeoylquinic acid)19.1928025.08 ± 1.4769.34 ± 2.89
Caffeic acid (3,4-Dihydroxycinnamic acid)24.7527016.21 ± 2.2715.63 ± 1.75
Methoxycinnamic acid30.4527038.07 ± 2.1737.05 ± 2.16
Ferulic acid (3-Methoxy-4-Hydroxycinnamic acid)31.6232071.88 ± 4.86698.52 ± 34.3
Cinnamic acid37.652705.87 ± 0.62n.d.
Flavonoids 445.16169.02
Flavanols 415.09154.72
Epigallocatechin14.9927054.96 ± 3.5179.79 ± 6.41
Catechin (3,5,7,3′,4′-Pentahydroxyflavane)18.2428052.47 ± 3.87n.d.
Epicatechin (3,5,7,3′,4′-Pentahydroxyflavane)26.37270307.65 ± 16.174.93 ± 3.49
Flavonols 30.0714.30
Rutin (Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside)29.2827026.39 ± 1.6914.30 ± 1.63
Quercetin (3,5,7,3′,4′-Pentahydroxyflavone)35.702543.69 ± 0.49n.d.
Stilbene 11.3811.89
Resveratrol (3,5,4′-Trihydroxystilbene)34.2425411.38 ± 1.1211.89 ± 0.98
CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal; n.d.—not detected
Table 5. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on proximate composition of breast meat.
Table 5. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on proximate composition of breast meat.
WMCLDry Matter (%)Protein (%)Fat (%)Ash (%)
0022.7720.211.558 b0.961
122.5820.311.299 c0.924
221.4319.251.203 c0.884
6022.6919.941.775 a0.958
122.7320.011.724 a0.944
222.7920.091.653 a0.966
Main effects
WM
0% 22.2619.931.353 b0.923
6% 22.7420.011.717 a0.956
CL
0% 22.7320.081.667 a0.959
1% 22.6520.161.511 b0.934
2% 22.1119.671.428 b0.925
p value
CL 0.5990.6750.00010.474
WM 0.3840.8490.00010.167
CL × WM 0.5130.5460.0610.318
SEM
CL 0.3820.3370.0300.016
WM 0.4680.4120.0360.020
CL × WM 0.6620.5830.0510.029
Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). p—significance level; SEM—standard error of the mean; CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal.
Table 6. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on trace element composition of breast meat.
Table 6. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on trace element composition of breast meat.
WMCLCu (mg/kg)Fe (mg/kg)Zn (mg/kg)
0024.98 d22.75 d37.17 a
126.66 b30.66 ab30.54 d
226.62 b33.40 a34.24 b
6028.29 a26.86 c32.65 bc
125.74 c30.20 abc33.17 bc
225.47 cd29.04 bc31.48 cd
Main effects
WM
0% 26.09 b28.9433.98 a
6% 26.50 a28.7032.43 b
CL
0% 26.63 a24.80 b34.91 a
1% 26.20 b30.43 a31.86 b
2% 26.05 b31.22 a32.86 b
p value
CL 0.0060.00010.0001
WM 0.0080.7320.0001
CL × WM 0.00010.00010.0001
SEM
CL 0.1020.4920.238
WM 0.1250.6030.292
CL × WM 0.1760.8520.413
Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). p—significance level; SEM—standard error of the mean; CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal.
Table 7. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on antioxidant profile of breast meat.
Table 7. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on antioxidant profile of breast meat.
WMCLTotal PolyphenolsVitamin ELutein and ZeaxanthinDPPH
001.000 b70.71 cd0.756 d1.363 c
11.058 b59.18 de1.045 bc1.836 a
21.301 a47.44 e1.260 ab1.846 a
600.859 bc107.31 a0.845 cd1.443 bc
10.767 c91.71 ab1.021 bc1.720 ab
20.718 c86.11 bc1.398 a1.630 ab
Main effects
WM
0% 1.120 a59.11 b1.0201.682
6% 0.782 b95.04 a1.0881.598
CL
0% 0.93089.01 a0.801 c1.403 b
1% 0.91375.45 b1.033 b1.778 a
2% 1.01066.78 b1.329 a1.738 a
p value
CL 0.1670.00010.00010.0001
WM 0.00010.00010.1400.121
CL × WM 0.0010.7190.3290.082
SEM
CL 0.0302.2050.0310.037
WM 0.0372.7000.0380.046
CL × WM 0.0533.8190.0540.065
Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). p—significance level; SEM—standard error of the mean; CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal.
Table 8. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on oxidative stability of breast meat.
Table 8. The effect of WM and CL dietary supplements on oxidative stability of breast meat.
WMCLPVDieneTrieneVATBARSmetMyo deoxyMyooxyMyo
000.21819.285.619 ab26.38173.2 a59.58 a23.64 b16.88
10.21619.866.140 a24.66145.7 ab61.03 a23.46 b15.66
20.22219.355.825 ab21.19167.2 a59.84 a23.71 ab16.55
600.20115.594.214 b23.26194.7 a57.86 b24.63 a16.20
10.20114.855.478 ab19.46109.7 b57.37 b24.95 a17.84
20.22821.136.066 a18.89142.5 ab58.19 ab23.95 ab17.95
Main effects
WM
0% 0.21919.495.86224.08162.160.15 a23.60 b16.36
6% 0.21017.185.25320.54149.058.29 b24.51 a17.33
CL
0% 0.20917.434.91724.82183.9 a59.4524.1316.54
1% 0.20817.355.80922.06127.7 b59.2024.2016.74
2% 0.22520.245.94620.04154.9 ab59.0223.8317.25
p value
CL 0.4970.1470.0410.1160.0010.8300.4490.671
WM 0.4960.0920.0850.0610.2290.0030.0010.153
CL × WM 0.7270.1020.1610.7960.0820.0720.1410.204
SEM
CL 0.0090.9380.2421.2767.5240.4120.1780.466
WM 0.0111.1490.2961.5629.2150.5050.2170.571
CL × WM 0.0161.6240.4181.98713.030.7140.3070.808
Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). PV—peroxide value; VA—p anisidine value; metMyo—metmyoglobin; deoxyMyo—deoxymyoglobin; oxyMyo—oxymyoglobin; p—significance level; SEM—standard error of the mean; CL—cranberry leaf; WM—walnut meal.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Untea, A.E.; Varzaru, I.; Saracila, M.; Panaite, T.D.; Oancea, A.G.; Vlaicu, P.A.; Grosu, I.A. Antioxidant Properties of Cranberry Leaves and Walnut Meal and Their Effect on Nutritional Quality and Oxidative Stability of Broiler Breast Meat. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051084

AMA Style

Untea AE, Varzaru I, Saracila M, Panaite TD, Oancea AG, Vlaicu PA, Grosu IA. Antioxidant Properties of Cranberry Leaves and Walnut Meal and Their Effect on Nutritional Quality and Oxidative Stability of Broiler Breast Meat. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(5):1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Untea, Arabela Elena, Iulia Varzaru, Mihaela Saracila, Tatiana Dumitra Panaite, Alexandra Gabriela Oancea, Petru Alexandru Vlaicu, and Iulian Alexandru Grosu. 2023. "Antioxidant Properties of Cranberry Leaves and Walnut Meal and Their Effect on Nutritional Quality and Oxidative Stability of Broiler Breast Meat" Antioxidants 12, no. 5: 1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop