Next Article in Journal
Radical-Driven Methane Formation in Humans Evidenced by Exogenous Isotope-Labeled DMSO and Methionine
Next Article in Special Issue
Technologically Driven Approaches for the Integrative Use of Wild Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) Fruits in Foods and Nutraceuticals
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biochemistry and Effectiveness of Antioxidants in Food, Fruits, and Marine Algae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, 15-Lipooxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Modulated by Polyphenolic Compounds, Organic Acids, and Carbohydrates of Prunus domestica Fruit

Department of Fruit, Vegetable and Nutraceutical Plant Technology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 37 Chełmońskiego Street, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(7), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071380
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 22 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidants in Fruits and Their Health-Promoting Effects)

Abstract

:
This work aimed to establish the content of phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, and organic acids and to determine their potential to inactivate α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase, 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), and antioxidant activity (ABTSo+ and FRAP) in 43 Prunus domestica cultivars. We identified 20 phenolic compounds, including, in the order of abundance, polymeric procyanidins, flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids, flavonols, and anthocyanins. The total content of phenolic compounds varied depending on the cultivar and ranged from 343.75 to 1419 mg/100 g d.w. The cultivars of Ś2, Ś11, and Ś16 accumulated the greatest amounts of polyphenols, while in cvs. Ś42, Ś35, and Ś20 polyphenols were the least abundant. The highest antioxidant potential of 7.71 (ABTSo+) and 13.28 (FRAP) mmoL Trolox/100 g d.w. was confirmed for cv. Ś11. P. domestica fruits showed inhibitory activity toward α-amylase (2.63–61.53), α-glucosidase (0.19–24.07), pancreatic lipase (0.50–8.20), and lipoxygenase (15-LOX; 4.19–32.67), expressed as IC50 (mg/mL). The anti-AChE effect was stronger than the anti-BuChE one. Cv. Ś3 did not inhibit AChE activity, while cv. Ś35 did not inhibit BuChE. Thanks to the abundance of biologically active compounds, P. domestica offers several health-promoting benefits and may prevent many diseases. For these reasons, they are worth introducing into a daily diet.

1. Introduction

Over 400 species in the Prunus genus belong to the Rosacae family, but only 89 are listed in the Genetic Resources Information System [1]. The main representatives of the Prunus genus are plums, cherries, peaches, apricots, and almonds [2]. Plum (Prunus L.) fruits have gained importance in recent years, as they constitute a considerable share of fruit production in Poland and Europe. The fruits are valued for sensory reasons (taste and smell) and technological properties (attractive and desirable products). The most commonly grown cultivars are European plum (Prunus domestica L.) and Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) [1]. P. domestica fruits come in different skin and flesh colours, which, depending on the cultivar, range from dark purple-red, red to yellow or yellowish-green.
The fruits can be divided into early (‘Królowa Wiktoria’, ‘Kirka’), moderately early (‘Renkloda’, ‘Węgierka’), and late (‘Anna Spath’, ‘Stanley’) [3]. A wide variety of P. domestica cultivars, including late-ripening ones, considerably prolongs their availability on the market, even until October, in the climatic conditions of Europe. Therefore, P. domestica fruits are the second, after peaches and nectarines, the most often produced stone fruits worldwide. Their cultivation area is 2,700,000 ha, and their total annual production is about 12,600,000 tones [4]. With such abundance, P. domestica fruit can be eaten in many ways, either as fresh fruit or as a processed product. P. domestica fruits are used for dried [5], candied or frozen products, jams, mousses, compotes, juices, and powders [6]. With the current “zero to waste” trend, seeds, which account for 10% of the total fruit weight, are also utilized. They are a source of desirable substances for the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industry but less often for the food industry [7].
P. domestica fruits are a rich source of health-promoting substances and nutrients, the content of which varies depending on the cultivar. Due to this variety, the fruits differ significantly in their chemical composition, including the content of simple sugars, organic acids, dietary fiber, minerals, such as K, P, and Ca, vitamins C, A, or those of the B group [5]. P. domestica fruits have a high content of water (88%) and low fats, which makes them low in calories (about 45 kcal/100 g) [7]. Regular consumption of dried P. domestica fruits aids in anticancer, antidiabetes, and antiobesity prevention and improves the functioning of the digestive system [8]. Compared with other fruits, P. domestica ones are characterized by a significant antioxidant potential, which results from their high content of bioactive compounds, including polyphenols. The most important compounds of P. domestica fruit include anthocyanins, flavonol derivatives, and phenolic acids, such as chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acids [1].
P. domestica fruits are valued for their positive effect on the human body. Flavonoids and phenolic acids of P. domestica fruits have strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and anticancer properties. Their high content of anthocyanins and flavonols plays an important role in neuroprotection and prevention of cardiovascular diseases [2]. Thanks to the biologically active compounds, the fruits of the genus Prunus show anticarcinogenic properties. Research conducted by Fang and colleagues [9] proved that apigenin contained in the fruit inhibited the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human ovarian cancer cells. In addition, apigenin inhibited tumorigenesis, as measured by the Matrigel test and the chorioallantoic membrane test (CAM test) [2]. A systematic review by Igwe and Charlton [10] revealed that consumption of P. domestica and P. salicyna fruits improved cognitive function and bone health parameters and reduced cardiovascular risk factors. Undoubtedly, these health-promoting qualities depend on the presence of biologically active substances.
This work aimed to characterize the qualitative and quantitative content of polyphenolic compounds (flavan-3-ols, flavonols, anthocyanins, and phenolic acids) and to determine the antioxidant (ABTSo+, FRAP), antidiabetic (inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase), antiobesity (inhibition of pancreatic lipase), and antidementia (inhibition of acetylcholin- and butyrylcholinesterase) activity of the fruits of 43 P. domestica cultivars grown in the climatic region of Poland. We also determined their content of sugars and organic acids to establish possible relationships based on the principal component analysis (PCA) and agglomeration hierarchical clustering (AHC).

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Plant Material

The examined plant material included 43 Prunus domestica cultivars: ‘Valor’ (Ś1), ‘Cacanska najbolja’ (Ś2), ‘Top’ (Ś3), ‘Cacanska rana’ (Ś4), ‘Silvia’ (Ś5), ‘Verity’ (Ś6), ‘Stanley’ (Ś7), ‘Pitestean’ (Ś8), ‘Magna glaucia’ (Ś9), ‘SL3′ (Ś10), ‘Sanctus Hubertus’ (Ś11), ‘Cacanska lepotica’ (Ś12), ‘SL 13′ (Ś13), ‘Węgierka łowicka’ (Ś14), ‘Fryga’ (Ś15), ‘Tolar’ (Ś16), ‘Opal’ (Ś17), ‘Vision’ (Ś18), ‘Nectavit’ (Ś19), ‘Amers’ (Ś20), ‘Jojo’ (Ś21), ‘Hanita’ (Ś22), ‘Empress’ (Ś23), ‘Węgierka włoska’ (Ś24), ‘Węgierka zwykła’ (Ś25), ‘Valjevka’ (Ś26), ‘Bluefre’ (Ś27), ‘Węgierka wczesna’ (Ś28), ‘Węgierka dąbrowicka’ (Ś29), ‘Węgierka wangenheima’ (Ś30), ‘Diana’ (Ś31), ‘Królowa Wiktoria’ (Ś32), ‘Erliblue’ (Ś33), ‘Katinka’ (Ś34), ‘Czernowitzer’ (Ś35), ‘Elena’ (Ś36), ‘Anna Spath’ (Ś37), ‘Oneida’ (Ś38), ‘Brzoskwiniowa’ (Ś39), ‘Mirabelka z Nancy’ (Ś40), ‘Renkloda Ulena’ (Ś41), ‘Herman’ (Ś42), and ‘Ruth Gerstetter’ (Ś43). The material was obtained from the Research Center for Cultivar Testing in Zybiszów near Wrocław.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Each cultivar was represented by at least 10 P. domestica fruits randomly collected from a single tree. After pitting, the fruits were sliced in liquid nitrogen and lyophilized for 24 h (Christ Alpha 1–4 LSC; Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH; Osterode am Harz, Germany). The homogeneous powder was obtained by grinding the P. domestica fruits in a closed laboratory mill (IKA A.11; Staufen, Germany). The powder was protected against unfavorable external factors to avoid hydration for 48 h without access to light.

2.3. Identification and Quantification of Polyphenolic Compounds

The content of polyphenolic compounds was determined by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography type, Acquity Ultra Performance LC by Waters. The samples (about 1 g) were extracted with 9 mL of a mixture containing methanol:H2O:ascorbic acid:98% of acidic acid (30:67:2:1, v/v/w/v). The extraction was performed twice by incubating the samples for 20 min using sonication (Sonic 6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland), with occasional shaking. Then the suspension was centrifuged at 19,000× g for 10 min (MPW-350R; Warsaw, Poland), and the supernatant was filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE membrane (0.2 µm; Millex Samplicity Filter; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and used for further analysis. All the extractions were performed in triplicate.
Qualitative (LC-MS-Q/TOF) and quantitative (UPLC-PDA) analysis of polyphenols (flavan-3-ols at 280 nm, flavonols at 360 nm, phenolic acids at 320 nm, and anthocyanins at 520 nm) was performed as previously described by Wojdyło, Nowicka, Bąbelewski [11] and Wojdyło, Carbonell-Barrachina, Legua and Hernández [12]. Individual polyphenols were separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters Corporation, Milford, CT, USA) at 30 °C. The samples (5 µL) were injected, and elution was completed after 15 min by gradient and isocratic sequence at a flow rate of 0.42 mL/min. The program started with a gradient elution with 99 to 65% solvent A (0–12 min), followed by a reduction of solvent A to 0% for the conditioning column (12.5–13.5 min), after which the gradient returned to its original composition (99% A) at 14 min. Then the column was equilibrated for 1 min, and at min 15, another analysis began. The mobile phase comprised solvent A (2% formic acid in H2O, v/v) and solvent B (100% acetonitrile). All measurements were repeated three times. The content of polyphenolic compounds was expressed in mg/100 g of dry weight (d.w.).

2.4. Analysis of Polymeric Procyanidins by Phloroglucinolysis

The analysis of the polymer fractions of procyanidins was carried out using the Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography system type, Acquity Ultra Performance LC, by Waters. The analysis was performed as previously described by Wojdyło and Oszmiański [13]. Phloroglucinolysis products were separated on a BEH Shield C18 RP column (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters Corporation, Milford, CT, USA) with solvent A (2.5% acetic acid in H2O) and solvent B (100% acetonitrile). The cycle was set with the following gradient: 0–1.0 min, 2% B; 1.00–2.5 min, 2–3% B; 2.5–3.5 min, 3–10% B; 3.5–5.5 min, 10–15% B; 5.5–7.5 min, 100% B, followed by washing and conditioning of the column. The flow rate was 0.45 mL/min, the injection volume was 5 µL, and the column temperature was 30 °C. Fluorescence was recorded at the excitation wavelength of 278 nm and the emission wavelength of 360 nm. Calibration curves for quantification were made with procyanidin B2, (+)-catechin, and (-)-epicatechin. The average degree of polymerization was calculated as the molar ratio of all flavan-3-ol units to terminal units of (-)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin. All the samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the results were expressed in mg per 100 g d.w.

2.5. Organic Acid and Carbohydrate Content

The analysis of organic acids and carbohydrate was performed as described previously by Wojdyło et al. [14], using HPLC-PDA (Waters Co.; Milford, CT, USA) and HPLC-ELSD (PL-ELS 1000; Merck; Hitachi, Japan), respectively. The sample (approximately 3 g of fruit) was mixed with distilled water, exposed to ultrasounds (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) for 15 min, heated at 90–100 °C for 30 min, and finally centrifuged (MPW-55; Warsaw, Poland) at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was injected into a Sep-Pak C-18 cartridge (1 g, Millipore Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and eluted with H2O into Eppendorf tubes. Before analysis, the extract was filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE membrane (0.20 µm; Millex Simplicity filters; Merck, Germany). The organic acids were analyzed on Polymex IEX H column (8 μm, 250 × 8 mm, Watrex; Prague, Czech Republic) using isocratic elution with 0.9 M sulfuric acid in H2O for 20 min. The carbohydrates were analyzed on Alltech® PrevailTM Carbohydrate ES HPLC Column-W 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm (Columbia, MD, USA) using isocratic elution with 70% acetonitrile in H2O for 20 min. The results were expressed in g per 100 g of d.w.

2.6. Analysis of Biological Activity

All analyses were made using a multi-mode microplate reader SynergyTM H1 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) in three repetitions. The antioxidant activity of ABTSo+ and FRAP was expressed in mmoL Trolox per 100 g. Other results were expressed as the sample capable of reducing the enzyme activity by 50% (IC50) in mg/mL.

2.6.1. Analysis of Antioxidant Activities of ABTSo+ and FRAP

Antioxidant properties were assessed using the ABTSo+ method, which determines the ability to reduce the ABTSo+ cation radical, and the FRAP method, in which Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+. The samples for the analysis were prepared as described by Wojdyło et al. [11]. The fruit powder (about 0.5 g) was mixed with 5 mL of methanol:H2O:HCl (79:20:1; v/v/v), exposed to ultrasounds at 20 °C for 15 min and left for 24 h at 4 °C. Then, the extract was again exposed to ultrasounds for 15 min and centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000× g. In triplicate, all measurements were performed using a PC UV-2401 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The antioxidant activity of ABTSo+ and FRAP was expressed in mmol Trolox per 100 g d.w.

2.6.2. Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, and Pancreatic Lipase

The inhibitory effect on the activity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase (antidiabetic activity), and pancreatic lipase (antiobesity activity) of P. domestica fruits was determined according to the procedure described before by Wojdyło et al. [15,16]. The inhibition of α-amylase activity by the P. domestica extracts was evaluated using the ability of α-amylase to hydrolyze α-1,4-glycosidic bonds. The hydrolysis causes gradual cleavage of starch chains and results in a color reaction of iodine with KJ. Depending on the degree of starch degradation, the colour is dark blue to violet after incubation at 37 °C and shows maximum absorption at 600 nm. Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity by the P. domestica extracts was evaluated based on the interaction of α-glucosidase with PNPG (4-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranose). This reaction in an alkaline environment yields glucose and p-α-nitrophenol (PNG). The latter is yellow and shows a maximum absorbance of 405 nm. The stronger the enzyme inhibition capacity of the tested extracts, the less p-α-nitrophenol is released from PNPG due to enzymatic hydrolysis.
Reference samples and positive control were prepared with a buffer instead of the enzymes and acarbose.
Inhibition of pancreatic lipase by the P. domestica extracts was evaluated based on the enzyme activity mediating the formation of p-nitrophenol from p-nitrophenol acetate at 37 °C. The reaction product shows maximum absorbance at 400 nm. Reference samples and positive control were prepared with a buffer instead of the enzyme and orlistat.

2.6.3. Inhibition of 15-Lipoxygenase

Inhibition of 15-lipoxygenase activity was determined as described by Wojdyło et al. [17]. The inhibitory properties of the P. domestica extracts were assessed based on the formation of conjugated double bonds in linoleic acid hydroperoxide during the reaction carried out at 37 °C for 20 min. The product showed a maximum absorbance of 210 nm [15]. In the reference samples, the enzyme was replaced with Tris-HCl buffer. The results were expressed as IC50 values.

2.6.4. Inhibition of Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and Butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE)

Inhibition of cholinesterase was assessed using the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butylcholinesterase (BuChE) methods described before by Wojdyło et al. [17]. The reaction mixture consisted of a sample of P. domestica extract, Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), acetylthiocholine iodide or S-butylthiocholine iodide and 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). After incubation at 37 °C for 10 min, AChE or BuChE solution was added. The absorbance was measured after 15 min at 412 nm. The results were expressed as IC50 (mg/mL). All assays were performed in triplicate with a PC UV-2401 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with the Statistica package, version 15.03 (StatSoft, Kraków, Poland). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between mean responses were assessed by one-way ANOVA with the Duncan test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using XLSTAT Statistical Software for Microsoft Excel 2017 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Content of Carbohydrates and Organic Acids

Organic acids and carbohydrates contribute significantly to the sensory desirability of fruits, conferring their pleasant taste and aroma. The sugar-to-organic acid ratio is an important quality indicator. The higher the ratio, the more attractive the fruits and the products of their processing [18]. The composition and content of sugars and organic acids in fruit depend mainly on the cultivar. However, environmental factors and growing conditions may also affect their total content [19]. From the technological perspective, acids affect the gelling properties of pectin. They are also less susceptible to changes during storage and processing than other fruit components, such as flavor and aroma compounds or pigments [18].
Carbohydrates content in P. domestica cultivars was highly variable and ranged from 15.51 to 5.49 g/100 g d.w. (Table 1). The main saccharides identified were sucrose and fructose, followed by glucose and sorbitol. Another study showed the dominance of fructose and glucose in the total carbohydrate pool of Prunus domestica L. fruit, while sucrose and sorbitol were detected at low amounts [18]. The highest total carbohydrates content was identified in the cultivars Ś25, Ś30, Ś26, Ś11, Ś38, Ś40, and Ś43 (>13 g/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś32, Ś17, Ś35, Ś27, Ś42, Ś29, Ś15, and Ś21 (<8 g/100 g d.w.). Wu et al. [20] analyzed fruits of various Prunus persica L. Batsch cultivars and found sucrose to be the most abundant carbohydrate in all cultivars. Also, all the cultivars had a higher content of fructose than glucose.
Depending on the cultivar, P. domestica fruits are much richer in sugars than cherries (16.33 and 9.09 mg/100 g, respectively). A comparison of P. domestica fruits with apple [21] showed the same or higher content of sugars in P. domestica. Finally, P. domestica fruits contained less sugar than peaches [22].
The content of organic acids in the analyzed P. domestica cultivars varied and ranged from 4.33 to 1.34 g/100 g d.w. (Table 1). The most common organic acid was malic acid, quinic, and oxalic acid. For the other acids, the order of abundance was as follows: succinic, formic, and citric acid, and they were detected only in trace amounts.
The highest total content of organic acids was determined for the cultivars Ś42, Ś27, Ś23, Ś18, Ś4, Ś13, Ś41, Ś35, Ś7, Ś8, and Ś24 (>2.5 g/100 g d.w.), and the lowest for cvs. Ś12, Ś25, Ś34, Ś31, Ś28, and S10 (<1.6 g/100 g d.w.). The content of malic acid, with the greatest share in total acidity, was consistent with previous data published by Tomić et al. [18].
According to Colaric et al. [23], the ratio of sugars to organic acids, and above all, the content of citric and shikimic acid, have a significant and decisive impact on the perception of sweetness and sourness and thus play an essential role in conferring the taste of the fruit. This ratio for the tested P. domestica fruits ranged widely from 1.47 to 11.96. The cultivars Ś25 (11.96), Ś12 (9.08), Ś26 (8.82), Ś34 (8.57), and Ś10 (8.08) were characterized by the highest sugar-to-organic acid ratio. The ratio was the lowest in the cultivars with the highest content of organic acids, that is, Ś27 (1.47), Ś42 (1.53), Ś35 (2.25), and Ś23 (2.38).
The fruits most popular among consumers should have a ten times high sugar to organic acid ratio [24].

3.2. Identification and Quantification of Polyphenolic Compounds in P. domestica Fruits

Polyphenols are phenolic compounds synthesized in plants as by-products or secondary metabolites. They provide significant health benefits in human nutrition. For example, they reduce the risk of developing chronic diseases, and have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiallergic, antihypertensive, and antiviral properties [25]. In the fruits of the investigated P. domestica cultivars, LC-MS Qtof analysis confirmed the presence of 19 phenolic compounds belonging to four groups: phenolic acids (neochlorogenic, cryptochlorogenic, chlorogenic, 3-caffeoylshikimic, and 3-feruloylquinic acid), flavonols (quercetin of -pentoside-hexoside, -3-O-galactoside, -3-O-glucoside, -3-O-rutinoside, -3-O-arabinoside, 3-O-rhamnoside, 3-O-penthoside-rhamnoside), flavan-3-ols (procyanidin B1 and B3, (+)-catechin), and anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-O-galactoside, -3-O-glucoside, -3-O-rutinoside, and peonidin-3-O-glucoside) (Table 2).
The content of phenolic compounds in P. domestica fruits has been studied by some researchers [18,26], but these studies were limited to several or single cultivars different from those analyzed in our work. In this study, we quantified the concentration of anthocyanins, phenolic acids, flavan-3-ols, and flavonols (Table 3). The average content of polyphenols ranged from 343.75 to 1419.14 mg/100 g d.w. These values indicated significant differences between the cultivars regarding the total content of polyphenols. The highest total content of polyphenolic compounds was determined for cvs. Ś2, Ś9, Ś11, Ś12, Ś16, Ś17, Ś18, Ś19, Ś21, Ś29, Ś33 and Ś43 (>1000 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest for cvs. Ś7, Ś20, Ś35, and Ś42 (<500 mg/100 g d.w.).
Flavan-3-ols were the main group of polyphenols (16.70–83.79%). Phenolic acids constituted next the main group of polyphenolic compounds, accounting for 10.47% to 69.08% of the total phenolic compounds. The other most abundant groups were flavonols (0.82% to 16.08%). Regardless of the cultivar, the least abundant group were anthocyanins (0.35% to 6.63%). The main reason for significant differences in the content of polyphenolic compounds was the cultivar, and the other factors were related to the method of cultivation, climatic conditions of a growing season, and the degree of fruit maturity [27].
Flavan-3-ols belong to flavonoids and play an important role in plant antioxidant activity, including scavenging free radicals, chelation of transition metals, and mediation and inhibiting enzymes. These compounds confer multiple beneficial health-promoting properties, acting as anticancer, antibacterial, antiviral, and cardio- and neuroprotective agents while protecting against cardiovascular diseases [18]. The number-3-ols in the fruits of the investigated P. domestica cultivars ranged from 11.69 to 124.17 mg/100 g d.w. (Table 2). Their total highest content was determined in cvs. Ś2, (>1000 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś7, Ś15, Ś22, Ś26, Ś31, Ś32, Ś35, Ś36, Ś37, Ś40, Ś42, and Ś42 (<300 mg/100 g d.w.). Three flavan-3-ols were detected in the analyzed P. domestica cultivars. Polymeric procyanidin was the most abundant flavanol (77.31–97.27%) in all tested cultivars. Procyanidin B1 was the second most abundant flavanol (>13.96%), followed by (+)-catechin (>3.26%) and finally by procyanidin B3 (>2.73%). The remaining detected flavan-3-ol derivatives accounted for up to 17.33% of the total flavanols. They were the most abundant in cv. Ś2 fruits (1114.47 mg/100 g d.w.), and the least abundant in cv. Ś41 (163.49 mg/100 g d.w.).
Procyanidins are oligomeric compounds formed from (+/−)-(epi)catechin molecules [12,15,28]. They show a protective effect, particularly in preventing chronic metabolic diseases, by minimizing cell damage caused by oxidative stress. They show potent antioxidant properties and can scavenge free radicals and nitrogen forms [29]. Regular consumption of flavan-3-ols alleviates the pathological features of Alzheimer’s disease, improves cognitive functions, and modulates synaptic plasticity [28]. Procyanidins are claimed to inhibit gastrointestinal lipase, thereby reducing plasma triglyceride levels [30].
Phenolic acids have a high antioxidant capacity and exhibit antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer and anti-inflammatory properties [25]. The number of phenolic acids in the fruits of the investigated P. domestica cultivars ranged from 83.20 to 804.77 mg/100 g d.w. The highest total content of phenolic acids was determined in cvs. Ś16, Ś17, Ś18, Ś19, Ś11, Ś40, Ś22, and Ś29 (>500 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś42, Ś20, Ś7, Ś12, Ś28, Ś35, Ś21, and Ś25 (<200 mg/100 g d.w.). We identified five phenolic acids, among which neochlorogenic acid accounted for 78.17% of their total amount. The highest content of neochlorogenic acid was determined in cvs. Ś17, Ś16, Ś11, Ś18, Ś19, Ś29, Ś22, and Ś40 (>400 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś20, Ś7, Ś42, and Ś12 (<100 mg/100 g d.w.). Chlorogenic acid constituted 10.5% of the total amount of phenolic acids, with the highest values in cvs. Ś16, Ś37, Ś33, Ś18, Ś32, and Ś31 (>60 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś27, Ś28, Ś21, and Ś42 (<10 mg/100 g d.w.). Another identified acid was cryptochlorogenic acid, which accounted for 3.64% of all phenolic acids. It was the most abundant in cvs. Ś17, Ś16, Ś11, and Ś19 (>30 mg/100 g d.w.), and the least abundant in cvs. Ś4, Ś20, Ś27, Ś42, Ś7, Ś8, Ś12, and Ś35 (<5 mg/100 g d.w.). 3-Feruloylquinic acid constituted 1.84% of the total phenolic acids, with the highest values in cvs. Ś16, Ś33, Ś19, Ś37, Ś22, Ś14, and Ś1 (>10 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś41, Ś5, Ś4, Ś27, Ś40, Ś15, Ś6, Ś24, and Ś35 (<3 mg/100 g d.w.). The last identified acid was 3-caffeoyl shikimic acid, which accounts for 1.06% of the total phenolic acids. The cultivars with the highest content were Ś16, Ś31, Ś18, Ś29, and Ś17 (>6 mg/100 g d.w.), and those the least abundant in it were Ś20, Ś23, Ś25, Ś37, Ś42, and Ś28 (<1 mg/100 g d.w.). The remaining phenolic acids were pooled together, accounting for 5.17% of the total phenolic acids. In other studies [31,32], neochlorogenic acid was also shown to be the dominant compound, closely followed by chlorogenic acid at lower concentrations.
Phenolic acids usually occur in plants in a bound form of esters and glycosides. They are extremely important for plants, as they actively defend the living tissues against injuries, infections, or insolation. Phenolic acids are characterized by antioxidant activity. They regulate seed germination and plant growth. Esterified derivatives of caffeic acid that is, neochlorogenic and chlorogenic acids, have strong antioxidant, antimutagenic, and anticancer properties and regulate carbohydrate metabolism by lowering the level of glucose in the human body [30]. Research conducted by Navarro-Orcajada et al. [30] revealed anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, antimicrobial, cardioprotective, and neuroprotective effects, and Zhao et al. [28] also reported their antihypertensive properties.
Flavonols are the most common biologically active compounds in plants and have several beneficial properties. The flavonols in the investigated P. domestica cultivars ranged from 7.6 to 128.77 mg/100 g d.w. (Table 2). Their highest total content was determined for cvs. Ś32, Ś18, Ś39, Ś31, and Ś37 (>75 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest for cvs. Ś28, Ś27, Ś24, Ś21, Ś8, Ś42, Ś4 (<25 mg/100 g d.w.). In the analyzed P. domestica fruit samples, we identified seven flavonols, of which quercetin-3-O-galactoside, -3-O-glucoside, -3-O-rutinoside, and -3-O-arabinoside were present in all cultivars. In the total pool of flavonols, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside accounted for 34.18%, quercetin-3-O-galactoside for 21.82%, quercetin-3-O-glucoside for 13.18%, quercetin-3-O-arabinoside for 10.6%, quercetin-penthoside-rhamnoside for 4.72%, quercetin-pentoside-hexoside for 3.77%, and quercetin-rhamnoside for 3.33%. The remaining compounds from this group accounted for 8.2% of all flavonols (Table 2). Another study by Popović et al. [31] also identified quercetin-3-O-rutinoside as a dominant flavonol in Prunus.
Quercetin, a compound commonly found in plants, shows many biological activities [33]. It scavenges free radicals, increases the concentration of glutathione, reduces lipid peroxidation, and thus limits oxidative stress. Thanks to these properties, quercetin may reduce the risk of neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases [34]. It is also known for its antibacterial, anticancer, and antiangiogenic activity [35], and it plays an important role in eliminating mycotoxins, thus protecting plant cells from damage [36]. A study by Sharma et al. [37] showed that quercetin-3-O-rutinoside can considerably protect the digestive tract from damage caused by gamma radiation. The authors confirmed the interaction of quercetin-3-O-rutinoside with essential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory proteins. The interaction of all tested antioxidant proteins (heme oxygenase-1, glutathione S-transferase, glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit, and thioredoxin reductase 1) significantly increased in the presence of quercetin-3-O-rutinoside [37]. Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside was a potent antioxidant, as it effectively quenched free radicals and efficiently chelated iron ions [38].
Anthocyanins are flavonoids commonly found in fruits and vegetables. Their presence in fruits is manifested by the red, blue, or purple color. These compounds exert strong antioxidant activity and play an important health-promoting role. They also protect the plants against abiotic and biotic stresses [39]. Anthocyanins were the least abundant polyphenolic compounds in the investigated fruits, with a maximum amount of up to 8.49%, depending on the cultivar. Their content in the investigated P. domestica cultivars ranged from 3.24 to 53.14 mg/100 g d.w. (Table 2). As all fruits of the P. domestica cultivars had light flesh, all detected anthocyanins accumulated in the fruit skin. According to Michalska et al. [40], the content of anthocyanins, responsible mainly for P. domestica fruit color, ranged from 18 to 170 mg/100 g d.w. The analyzed P. domestica samples contained four anthocyanins, with dominant cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside (51.03%). Their highest content was determined in cvs. Ś18, Ś30, Ś41, Ś32, and Ś16 (>20 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś28, Ś24, Ś42, Ś27, Ś15, Ś21, Ś23, and Ś7 (<5 mg/100 g d.w.). Another identified anthocyanin was cyanidin-3-O-galactoside, which accounted for 16.28% of all anthocyanins. Its highest content was found in cvs. Ś32, Ś39, and Ś31 (>9 mg/100 g d.w.), and the lowest in cvs. Ś21, Ś9, Ś15, Ś27, Ś13, Ś38, Ś22, Ś8 (<1 mg/100 g d.w.). The remaining anthocyanins accounted for 14.95% of their total pool. However, their content did not exceed 10 mg/100 g. These data are in line with the reports of Tomić et al. [18], who found cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and -3-O-rutinoside to be the two most common anthocyanins in P. domestica fruit.

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

3.3.1. Antioxidant Capacity

Antioxidant activity is the ability to scavenge free radicals and prevent oxidative damage [41]. The antioxidant capacity strongly correlates with the content of phenolic compounds. The antioxidant capacity of the P. domestica cultivars was assessed with two independent assays, ABTSo+ and FRAP, with different mechanisms of action (Table 4). Total antioxidant activity in the investigated cultivars ranged from 2.20 to 7.71 mmoL Trolox/100 g and 3.25 to 13.28 mmoL Trolox/100 g for ABTSo+ and FRAP assays, respectively. The highest ABTSo+ activity was determined for cvs. Ś11, Ś2, Ś13, Ś12, Ś39, and Ś20 (>6 mmoL Trolox/100 g), and the lowest for cvs. Ś41, Ś15, Ś31, and Ś22 (<3 mmol Trolox/100 g). The highest FRAP activity was found in cvs. Ś11, Ś13, Ś2, Ś20, Ś32, Ś23, Ś12, Ś27, and Ś39 (>10 mmoL Trolox/100 g), and the lowest in cvs. Ś41, Ś31, Ś15, Ś17, and Ś10 (<6 mmoL Trolox/100 g). The cultivar with the highest ABTSo+ and FRAP activity was Ś11, and the lowest activity for both assays was noted in cv. Ś41 (Table 4).
According to Nowicka et al. [27], ABTSo+ activity in various peach cultivars ranged from 2.04 to 6.65 mmoL Trolox/100 g d.w. In cherries [42], antioxidant activity assessed with the ORAC assay reached 8.13 to 38.11 mmoL TE/100 g d.w. The ABTSo+ assay ranged from 3.72 to 18.40 mmoL TE/100 g d.w. For the FRAP assay, it ranged from 1.93 to 12.95 mmoL TE/100 g d.w. Fig fruits and brevas [16] yielded ORAC values between 0.46 and 1.33 mmoL Trolox/100 g d.w, while in the fruits of Japanese quince, the antioxidant activity was several times higher [43].

3.3.2. Antidiabetic and Antiobesity Properties and Inhibition of Lipoxygenase

Human pancreatic α-amylase and intestinal α-glucosidase are responsible for the hydrolysis of carbohydrates into absorbable simple sugars. Inhibition of these enzymes lowers blood glucose levels by limiting the breakdown of polysaccharides into glucose [44]. IC50 (mg/mL) of α-amylase inhibition in the analyzed P. domestica fruits ranged from 2.63 (Ś34) to 61.53 (Ś41). It was not measured for cvs. Ś1, Ś2, Ś3, Ś8, Ś9, Ś11, Ś12, Ś13, Ś24, Ś28, Ś33, Ś36, and Ś39. For α-glucosidase, IC50 oscillated between 0.19 (Ś12) and 24.07 (Ś41), and the parameter was not assessed in cvs. Ś2, Ś6, Ś7, Ś8, Ś9, and Ś43 (Table 4). IC50 is the concentration of a substance at which 50% of a specific biological or biochemical function is inhibited. Therefore, the lower IC50, the smaller the active substance necessary to achieve the desired effect. The inhibition of α-amylase is due to the activity of bioactive plant compounds, such as polyphenolic glycosides, polysaccharides, steroids, and terpenoids [44]. α-Amylase causes postprandial hyperglycemia and increases blood glucose levels, supporting digestion by breaking down polysaccharide molecules into glucose and maltose [45]. De Sales et al. [46] showed that crude extracts and isolated compounds from plant sources could inhibit α-amylase, and flavonoids exhibited the greatest inhibition potential related to the number of hydroxyl groups in their molecules. Of the naturally occurring flavonoid compounds investigated by Kim et al. [47], the most potent inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase were luteolin, amentoflavone, luteolin 7-O-glucoside, and daidzein. Luteolin at 0.5 mg/mL inhibited α-glucosidase by 36%. Zhang et al. [48], who investigated different cultivars of peaches, found that the fruits inhibited α-glucosidase due to the presence of polyphenolic compounds (chlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid, caffeoylquinic acid, 3-O-feruloylquinic acid, catechin, procyanidin C1, procyanidin B1, procyanidin dimer, procyanidin trimer isomer 1, procyanidin trimer isomer 2, procyanidin B2, and prunus inhibitor b). It was also found that the type of phenolic compounds plays an important role in inhibiting α-glucosidase. Inhibition of this enzyme is one of the main strategies for countering the metabolic changes associated with hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes. Phenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables can affect digestive enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of dietary carbohydrates. In addition, they contribute to the effective prevention of hyperglycemia by limiting lipid absorption [27]. In a study by Nowicka et al. [27], selected peach cultivars showed an inhibitory potential against α-amylase ranging from 1.41 to 4.55 mg/mL, and for α-glucosidase IC50 ranged from 1.31 mg/mL to 10.51 mg/mL. P. domestica fruits were less effective in inhibiting α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Only a few cultivars (Ś1, Ś5, Ś10) showed inhibitory activity below 0.7 mg/mL (Table 4).
Pancreatic lipase is a key enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of dietary fats to monoacylglycerols and free fatty acids. This helps reduce overweight and obesity in patients with diabetes by significantly modulating the inhibitory effects of fat absorbed into the bloodstream [49]. In addition, the enzyme is advocated as a weight-lowering agent. P. domestica fruits efficiently inhibited pancreatic lipase, but this ability was cultivar-dependent (p < 0.05). IC50 [mg/mL] for pancreatic lipase ranged from 0.5 (Ś35) to 8.2 (Ś1) (Table 4). The inhibitory potential of pancreatic lipase in peaches examined by Nowicka et al. [27] was between 0.25 and 1.39 mg/mL. Turkiewicz et al. [50] reported that IC50 for pancreatic lipase in quince fruits ranged from 0.04 to 0.35 mg/mL, depending on the cultivar.
Lipoxygenases (LOXs) are enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids to hydroperoxides [51]. They play an important role in stimulating inflammatory reactions in the human body. Inflammation can be caused by excessive amounts of reactive oxygen species, which stimulate the release of cytokines and subsequent activation of LOX. Studies on the inhibition of lipoxygenases involved in synthesising prostaglandins and leukotrienes were conducted to identify the possibility of preventing conditions such as stroke, cancer, and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [51]. IC50 lipoxygenase inhibition in the tested P. domestica fruits ranged from 4.19 (Ś11) to 32.67 (Ś33) (Table 4)—the cvs. Ś33, Ś17, Ś8, Ś31, Ś15, and Ś37 were characterized by the highest enzyme inhibition capacity (>18.5), while the cvs. Ś11, Ś25, Ś36, Ś43, and Ś6 were the least efficient in this respect (IC50 < 6). Polyphenols can inhibit lipoxygenase activity by binding to the hydrophobic active site, scavenging lipid radicals, and interacting with the hydrophobic fatty acid substrate [51].

3.3.3. Inhibition of AChE and BuChE Activity

A potential therapeutic strategy in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases is to increase cholinergic levels in the brain by inhibiting the biological activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). Therefore, it is important that the diet of people who suffer from these conditions contains potential inhibitors of these enzymes to increase the acetylcholine content in cholinergic synapses and improve nerve conduction [17,49]. Acetylcholinesterase, present in the neuronal synapses of the central nervous system, is a key enzyme in the cholinergic system that terminates the transmission of nerve impulses. Butyrylcholinesterase, as an enzyme associated with glial cells, endothelial cells, neurons, and senile plaques, plays a minor role in the regulation of acetylcholine levels in the brain, but its activity gradually increases in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, while the activity of AChE remains unchanged or decreases [27,52]. The source of substances inhibiting the activity of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase are, among others, biologically active compounds found in plants [52]. Molecular docking showed that polyphenols inhibit the activity of AChE and BuChE, offering neuroprotection and improvement of cognitive functions in Alzheimer’s and dementia [53]. For this reason, we performed additional experiments to assess P. domestica potential to inhibit AChE and BuChE. Inhibition of AChE, expressed as IC50 (mg/mL), ranged from 7.62 (Ś19) to 61.82 (Ś36), and it was not assessed in the sample Ś3 (Table 4). IC50 for the inhibition of BuChE ranged from 15.60 (Ś29) to 75.73 (Ś36), and the effect was not demonstrated in the Ś35 sample. These results confirmed that P. domestica fruits are not the most effective inhibitors of AChE or BuChE. Raw materials with strong AChE inhibition capacity of over 80% at 0.1 mg/mL include, for example, Rhei radix et rhizome, Polygoni multiflori radix, Salviae miltiorrhiza radix, Radix Paeoniae alba, Radix Paeonie rubra, Chelidonii herba, Corydalis intermediae bulbus, Corydalis intermediae herba, or Corydalis cavae bulbus [52]. In their study on polyphenols in Phyllanthus emblica Linn fruit, Wu et al. [54] reported that myricetin, quercetin, fisetin, and gallic acid were highly efficient in inhibiting AChE. Individual plant compounds were found to exert a specific therapeutic effect, which can be potentiated using the compounds in the right combinations [27]. In comparison with other fruits, that is, peaches (AChE: 4.51–42.90 and for BuChE: 8.85–18.79 mg/mL) [27] and quince (mean inhibition values for AChE 13.24, and BuChE 15.32 mg/mL) [52], we concluded that the analyzed Prunus fruits were less efficient at inhibiting the cholinoesterases.

3.4. The Elements of Primary Component Analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) included the following parameters: mean content of sugars, organic acids, phenolic compounds, effects of biological activity (antioxidant [ABTSo+, FRAP]), inhibition potential of α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase, lipoxygenase, AChE, and BuChE, and the examined P. domestica cultivars. The PCA model (Figure 1) presents the most important variables and explains the relationships between 43 P. domestica cultivars, allowing for identifying group patterns. The biplot indicates that 65.69% of the total data variance is represented by F1 and F2. Of these two major components, F1 explains 37.54% of the total variance, and F2 explains 28.16%.
Cluster 1: Seven cultivars: Ś2, Ś3, Ś6, Ś9, Ś11, Ś19, and Ś27 showed a considerable potential to inhibit α-amylase, α-glucosidase, 15-LOX, and AChE, and high activity of FRAP and ABTSo+, which was associated with their content of flavan-3-ols and organic acids. The first principal axis showed the strongest correlations with FRAP, ABTSo+, flavan-3-ol levels and α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition levels. The Pearson test confirmed a correlation between flavan-3-ols and: FRAP and ABTSo+ (0.5 and 0.5, respectively), α-amylase, and α-glucosidase (0.4 and 0.4, respectively).
Cluster 2: Eight cultivars: Ś16, Ś18, Ś22, Ś29, Ś30, Ś32, Ś35, and Ś39 exhibited high content of flavonols, phenolic acids, and anthocyanins, thanks to which they showed inhibitory activity against pancreatic lipase and BuChE. Correlations were found between pancreatic lipase, BuChE activity, phenolic acid, anthocyanins, and flavonols.
Cluster 3: Twelve cultivars: Ś5, Ś14, Ś15, Ś17, Ś21, Ś26, Ś31, Ś37, Ś40, Ś41, Ś41 and Ś42, exhibited low content of flavan-3-ols and organic acids and low activity of FRAP and ABTSo+.
Cluster 4: Thirteen cultivars: Ś1, Ś4, Ś7, Ś8, Ś13, Ś20, Ś23, Ś24, Ś25, Ś28, Ś34, Ś36, and Ś43, were characterized by a high content of sugars (i.e., cv. Ś25 content 16.51 g/100 g total sugars), low content of anthocyanins, flavonols, and phenolic acids. Moreover, similarly to Cluster 3, they had a low inhibitory activity toward the investigated enzymes (pancreatic lipase, α-amylase, α-glucosidase, 15-LOX, AChE, and BuChE) and antioxidant activity (FRAP and ABTSo+). Sugar content correlated with lipoxygenase and BuChE activity. However, some cvs. (Ś13 or Ś20) still present high antioxidant potential and a relatively high content of flavan-3-ols.
PCA confirmed significant differences in the chemical composition of P. domestica fruit depending on the cultivar. The analysis made it possible to indicate common features of the examined cultivars and to categorize the fruits into those with a higher content of polyphenolic compounds and higher biological activity, into more sweet or sour cultivars, and into cultivars characterized by a high and low ability to inhibit α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase, lipoxygenase, AChE, and BuChE.
We also performed agglomeration and hierarchical clustering to summarize the differences in chemical compounds and biological activity among the P. domestica cultivars. The AHC dendrogram is shown in Figure 2. The binary cluster tree clearly shows the differences between the cultivars. The line at 73% in the graph represents an automatic truncation, showing two homogeneous groups. The dendogram presents two groups. The first is more diverse and consists of 27 P. domestica cultivars. The groups are made up of cultivars that show a large diversity concerning the analyzed compounds, which confirms the relationships shown in the PCA.

4. Conclusions

Our study confirmed significant differences in chemical composition, phenolic compounds content, and biological properties of 43 P. domestica cultivars. We identified 19 phenolic compounds, including procyanidins, belonging to four groups: phenolic acids (neochlorogenic, cryptochlorogenic, chlorogenic, 3-caffeoylshikimic, and 3-feruloylquinic acid), flavonols (quercetin of -pentoside-hexoside, -3-O-galactoside, -3-O-glucoside, -3-O-rutinoside, -3-O-arabinoside, 3-O-rhamnoside, 3-O-penthoside-rhamnoside), flavan-3-ols (procyanidin B1 and B3, (+)-catechin), and anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-O-galactoside, -3-O-glucoside, -3-O-rutinoside, and peonidin-3-O-glucoside). P. domestica fruits were confirmed to be a rich source of phenolic compounds, particularly flavan-3-ols (16.70 to 83.79% of total phenolics content) and phenolic acids (10.47 to 69.08%). The cultivars that accumulated the greatest total amounts of biologically active compounds were Ś16, Ś17, Ś18, and Ś11. The assessment of antioxidant capacity identified cv. Ś11 had the highest ABTSo+ and FRAP activity, which was related to its high content of phenolic compounds, especially flavan-3-ols compounds. The analyzed cultivars more effectively inhibited AChE (IC50 = 7.62–61.82) than BuChE (IC50 = 15.60–75.73). P. domestica fruits are a good source of biologically active compounds and provide several health benefits, which make them a desirable element of a daily diet as fresh fruits during the season or some prepared foods such as, i.e., juices, smoothies, dried and others. The fruits of Prunus domestica are rich in flavan-3-ols, which contribute to their ability to inhibit α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and lipoxygenase, and rich in phenolic acid, which contributes to their ability to inhibit pancreatic lipase. For these reasons, they are helpful in the prevention of many noncommunicable diseases, particularly chronic diseases of the cardiovascular system, type 2 diabetes, gastrointestinal diseases, and some cancers.

Author Contributions

M.R.: Writing—original draft; Formal analysis; Writing—review & editing. A.W.: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization, Resources, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding. The APC is financed by the Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All related data and methods are presented in this paper. Additional inquiries should be addressed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The publication is the result of the research group “Plants4Food” activity. The authors would like to thank Paulina Nowicka for her help in in-vitro biological analysis. The authors thank Elżbieta Bucka and Aleksandra Borak for laboratory help and Piotr Laskowski to collected plant materials from Research Center for Cultivar Testing in Zybiszów near Wrocław.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Bahrin, A.A.; Moshawih, S.; Dhaliwal, J.S.; Kanakal, M.M.; Khan, A.; Lee, K.S.; Goh, B.H.; Goh, H.P.; Kifli, N.; Ming, L.C. Cancer Protective Effects of Plums: A Systematic Review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, W.; Nan, G.; Nisar, M.F.; Wan, C. Chemical Constituents and Health Benefits of Four Chinese Plum Species. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 8842506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Borowska, A. Zmiany Na Rynku Śliwek w Polsce w Latach 2010–2016 Ze Szczególnym Uwzględnieniem Śliwek Regionalnych z Oznaczeniami Geograficznymi ChOG. Zesz. Nauk. SGGW-Ekon. I Organ. Gospod. Żywnościowej 2019, 124, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sottile, F.; Caltagirone, C.; Giacalone, G.; Peano, C.; Barone, E. Unlocking Plum Genetic Potential: Where Are We At? Horticulturae 2022, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ropelewska, E. Diversity of Plum Stones Based on Image Texture Parameters and Machine Learning Algorithms. Agronomy 2022, 12, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silvan, J.M.; Ciechanowska, A.M.; Martinez-Rodriguez, A.J. Modulation of Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Properties by Drying of Prunus domestica L. Plum Juice Extracts. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Soares Mateus, A.R.; Pena, A.; Sendón, R.; Almeida, C.; Nieto, G.A.; Khwaldia, K.; Sanches Silva, A. By-Products of Dates, Cherries, Plums and Artichokes: A Source of Valuable Bioactive Compounds. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 131, 220–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jabeen, Q.; Aslam, N. The Pharmacological Activities of Prunes: The Dried Plums. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 1508–1511. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang, J.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, L.Z.; Xia, C.; Hu, X.; Shi, X.; Jiang, B.H. Apigenin Inhibits Tumor Angiogenesis through Decreasing HIF-1α and VEGF Expression. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 858–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Igwe, E.O.; Charlton, K.E. A Systematic Review on the Health Effects of Plums (Prunus domestica and Prunus salicina). Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 701–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Bąbelewski, P. Phenolic and Carotenoid Profile of New Goji Cultivars and Their Anti-Hyperglycemic, Anti-Aging and Antioxidant Properties. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 48, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wojdyło, A.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Legua, P.; Hernández, F. Phenolic Composition, Ascorbic Acid Content, and Antioxidant Capacity of Spanish Jujube (Ziziphus jujube Mill.) Fruits. Food Chem. 2016, 201, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wojdyło, A.; Oszmiański, J. Antioxidant Activity Modulated by Polyphenol Contents in Apple and Leaves during Fruit Development and Ripening. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Turkiewicz, I.P.; Tkacz, K. Profiling of Polyphenols by LC-QTOF/ESI-MS, Characteristics of Nutritional Compounds and In Vitro Effect on Pancreatic Lipase, α-Glucosidase, α-Amylase, Cholinesterase and Cyclooxygenase Activities of Sweet (Prunus avium) and Sour (P. cerasus) Cherries Leaves and Fruits. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 174, 114214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Turkiewicz, I.P.; Tkacz, K.; Hernandez, F. Comparison of Bioactive Compounds and Health Promoting Properties of Fruits and Leaves of Apple, Pear and Quince. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Hernández, F. Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Different Cultivars of Ficus carica L. Fruits. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Tkacz, K.; Turkiewicz, I.P. Sprouts vs. Microgreens as Novel Functional Foods: Variation of Nutritional and Phytochemical Profiles and Their In Vitro Bioactive Properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tomić, J.; Štampar, F.; Glišić, I.; Jakopič, J. Phytochemical Assessment of Plum (Prunus domestica L.) Cultivars Selected in Serbia. Food Chem. 2019, 299, 125113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. García-Gómez, B.E.; Salazar, J.A.; Nicolás-Almansa, M.; Razi, M.; Rubio, M.; Ruiz, D.; Martínez-Gómez, P. Molecular Bases of Fruit Quality in Prunus Species: An Integrated Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Metabolic Review with a Breeding Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Miao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, R.; Shi, X.; Wang, B. Physicochemical Characteristics, Antioxidant Activities, and Aroma Compound Analysis of Seven Peach Cultivars (Prunus persica L. Batsch) in Shihezi, Xinjiang. Foods 2022, 11, 2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aprea, E.; Charles, M.; Endrizzi, I.; Laura Corollaro, M.; Betta, E.; Biasioli, F.; Gasperi, F. Sweet Taste in Apple: The Role of Sorbitol, Individual Sugars, Organic Acids and Volatile Compounds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Nowicka, P.; Wojdyło, A.; Laskowski, P. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Physicochemical Compounds’ Content in Different Cultivars of Peach Fruits, Including Qualification and Quantification of Sugars and Organic Acids by HPLC. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Colaric, M.; Veberic, R.; Stampar, F.; Hudina, M. Evaluation of Peach and Nectarine Fruit Quality and Correlations between Sensory and Chemical Attributes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 2611–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tarko, T.; Duda-Chodak, A.; Pogon, P. Charakterystyka Owoców Pigwowca Japońskiego i Derenia Jadalnego. Żywność Nauka Technol. Jakość 2010, 6, 100–108. [Google Scholar]
  25. Montenegro-Landívar, M.F.; Tapia-Quirós, P.; Vecino, X.; Reig, M.; Valderrama, C.; Granados, M.; Cortina, J.L.; Saurina, J. Polyphenols and Their Potential Role to Fight Viral Diseases: An Overview. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liaudanskas, M.; Okulevičiūtė, R.; Lanauskas, J.; Kviklys, D.; Zymonė, K.; Rendyuk, T.; Žvikas, V.; Uselis, N.; Janulis, V. Variability in the Content of Phenolic Compounds in Plum Fruit. Plants 2020, 9, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nowicka, P.; Wojdyło, A.; Tkacz, K.; Turkiewicz, I.P. Quantitative and Qualitative Determination of Carotenoids and Polyphenolics Compounds in Selected Cultivars of Prunus persica L. and Their Ability to In Vitro Inhibit Lipoxygenase, Cholinoesterase, α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase and Pancreatic Lipase. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, C.; Li, Z.; Rong, S. Procyanidins and Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 5556–5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Valencia-Hernandez, L.J.; Wong-Paz, J.E.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Procyanidins: From Agro-Industrial Waste to Food as Bioactive Molecules. Foods 2021, 10, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Navarro-Orcajada, S.; Matencio, A.; Vicente-Herrero, C.; García-Carmona, F.; López-Nicolás, J.M. Study of the Fluorescence and Interaction between Cyclodextrins and Neochlorogenic Acid, in Comparison with Chlorogenic Acid. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Popović, B.M.; Blagojević, B.; Ždero Pavlović, R.; Mićić, N.; Bijelić, S.; Bogdanović, B.; Mišan, A.; Duarte, C.M.M.; Serra, A.T. Comparison between Polyphenol Profile and Bioactive Response in Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) Genotypes from North Serbia-from Raw Data to PCA Analysis. Food Chem. 2020, 302, 125373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fang, N.; Yu, S.; Prior, R.L. LC/MS/MS Characterization of Phenolic Constituents in Dried Plums. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3579–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, D.; Wang, T.; Long, M.; Li, P. Quercetin: Its Main Pharmacological Activity and Potential Application in Clinical Medicine. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 8825387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patel, R.V.; Mistry, B.M.; Shinde, S.K.; Syed, R.; Singh, V.; Shin, H.S. Therapeutic Potential of Quercetin as a Cardiovascular Agent. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 155, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lupo, G.; Cambria, M.T.; Olivieri, M.; Rocco, C.; Caporarello, N.; Longo, A.; Zanghì, G.; Salmeri, M.; Foti, M.C.; Anfuso, C.D. Anti-angiogenic Effect of Quercetin and Its 8-methyl Pentamethyl Ether Derivative in Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 6565–6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ben Salem, I.; Prola, A.; Boussabbeh, M.; Guilbert, A.; Bacha, H.; Lemaire, C.; Abid-Essefi, S. Activation of ER Stress and Apoptosis by α- and β-Zearalenol in HCT116 Cells, Protective Role of Quercetin. Neurotoxicology 2016, 53, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sharma, S.; Dahiya, A.; Kumar, S.; Verma, Y.K.; Dutta, A. Quercetin 3-O-Rutinoside Prevents Radiation Induced Oxidative Damage and Inflammation by Coordinated Regulation of Nrf2/NF-ΚB/NLRP3- Inflammasome Signaling in Gastrointestine. Phytomed. Plus 2023, 3, 100385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fitzpatrick, L.R.; Woldemariam, T. Small-Molecule Drugs for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 495–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, S.; Tiwari, V.; Kumari, A.; Chaudhary, E.; Sharma, A.; Ali, U.; Garg, M. Protective and Defensive Role of Anthocyanins under Plant Abiotic and Biotic Stresses: An Emerging Application in Sustainable Agriculture. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 361, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Michalska, A.; Łysiak, G. Przydatność do Suszenia Owoców Śliw Uprawianych w Polsce w Aspekcie Przemian Związków Bioaktywnych i Tworzących się Produktów Reakcji Maillarda. Żywność. Nauka. Technol. Jakość Food. Sci. Technol. Qual. 2014, 21, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.K.; Kang, Y.F.; Zhao, X.Y.; Liu, Y.P.; Zhang, X.W.; Zhang, S.J. Effects of Elicitation on Bioactive Compounds and Biological Activities of Sprouts. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 53, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wojdyło, A.; Nowicka, P.; Laskowski, P.; Oszmiański, J. Evaluation of Sour Cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) Fruits for Their Polyphenol Content, Antioxidant Properties, and Nutritional Components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 12332–12345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Teleszko, M.; Wojdyło, A. Comparison of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Potential between Selected Edible Fruits and Their Leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yusuf, E.; Wojdyło, A.; Oszmiański, J.; Nowicka, P. Nutritional, Phytochemical Characteristics and In Vitro Effect on α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Lipase, and Cholinesterase Activities of 12 Coloured Carrot Varieties. Foods 2021, 10, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kaur, N.; Kumar, V.; Nayak, S.K.; Wadhwa, P.; Kaur, P.; Sahu, S.K. Alpha-Amylase as Molecular Target for Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 98, 539–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Sales, P.M.; de Souza, P.M.; Simeoni, L.A.; Magalhães, P.d.O.; Silveira, D. α-Amylase Inhibitors: A Review of Raw Material and Isolated Compounds from Plant Source. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 15, 141–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kim, J.S.; Kwon, C.S.; Son, K.H. Inhibition of Alpha-Glucosidase and Amylase by Luteolin, a Flavonoid. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 2458–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.; Su, M.; Du, J.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Ye, Z. Comparison of Phytochemical Differences of the Pulp of Different Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] Cultivars with Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity Variations in China Using UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. Molecules 2019, 24, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wojdyło, A.; Turkiewicz, I.P.; Tkacz, K.; Nowicka, P.; Bobak, Ł. Nuts as Functional Foods: Variation of Nutritional and Phytochemical Profiles and Their in Vitro Bioactive Properties. Food Chem. X 2022, 15, 100418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Turkiewicz, I.P.; Wojdyło, A.; Tkacz, K.; Nowicka, P.; Golis, T.; Bąbelewski, P. ABTS On-Line Antioxidant, α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, Acetyl- and Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition Activity of Chaenomeles Fruits Determined by Polyphenols and Other Chemical Compounds. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lončarić, M.; Strelec, I.; Moslavac, T.; Šubarić, D.; Pavić, V.; Molnar, M. Lipoxygenase Inhibition by Plant Extracts. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wszelaki, N. Plants as a source of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors. Postępy Fitoter. 2009, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bhullar, K.S.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. Polyphenols: Multipotent Therapeutic Agents in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 891748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wu, M.; Liu, M.; Wang, F.; Cai, J.; Luo, Q.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Tang, Z.; Fang, Z.; Wang, C.; et al. The Inhibition Mechanism of Polyphenols from Phyllanthus Emblica Linn. Fruit on Acetylcholinesterase: A Interaction, Kinetic, Spectroscopic, and Molecular Simulation Study. Food Res. Int. 2022, 158, 111497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of the main components (PCA) biplot of P. domestica fruits and phenolic compounds, sugars, and organic acids, FRAP and ABTSo+ activity, antidiabetic, antiobesity and lipoxygenase inhibition, inhibition of AChE and BuChE activity. Code of the sample, see Section 2.1. Plant material.
Figure 1. Analysis of the main components (PCA) biplot of P. domestica fruits and phenolic compounds, sugars, and organic acids, FRAP and ABTSo+ activity, antidiabetic, antiobesity and lipoxygenase inhibition, inhibition of AChE and BuChE activity. Code of the sample, see Section 2.1. Plant material.
Antioxidants 12 01380 g001
Figure 2. Dendrogram of agglomeration hierarchical clustering (AHC) for the fruits of selected cultivars of P. domestica. Code of the sample, see Section 2.1. Plant material.
Figure 2. Dendrogram of agglomeration hierarchical clustering (AHC) for the fruits of selected cultivars of P. domestica. Code of the sample, see Section 2.1. Plant material.
Antioxidants 12 01380 g002
Table 1. Carbohydrates and organic acid (g/100 g d.w.) of different Prunus domestica cultivars.
Table 1. Carbohydrates and organic acid (g/100 g d.w.) of different Prunus domestica cultivars.
SampleCarbohydrates Organic Acid
FructoseSorbitolGlucoseSaccharoseTotalOxalic AcidCitric AcidMalic AcidQuinic AcidSuccinic AcidFormic AcidTotal
Ś13.52 ± 0.35 g–j0.69 ± 0.11 g–j2.94 ± 0.12 f–l1.84 ± 0.23 n–r8.98 i–l0.15 ± 0.02 k–nnd f1.24 ± 0.21 g–l0.43 ± 0.10 m–p0.09 ± 0.03 ef0.06 ± 0.01 d1.97 h–o
Ś22.72 ± 0.54 k–pnd r3.85 ± 0.21 b–d2.23 ± 0.18 l–p8.80 i–m0.17 ± 0.02 i–l0.07 ± 0.01 a1.01 ± 0.28 l–q0.42 ± 0.11 m–p0.07 ± 0.02 gh0.04 ± 0.01 f1.80 j–p
Ś33.21 ± 0.29 h–m1.04 ± 0.10 cd3.79 ± 0.15 b–d3.25 ± 0.32 k11.28 e–h0.32 ± 0.06 ef0.01 ± 0.00 e1.25 ± 0.11 g–l0.73 ± 0.01 g–j0.09 ± 0.03 ef0.08 ± 0.01 b2.49 b–f
Ś42.05 ± 0.32 p–s0.60 ± 0.09 j–m5.87 ± 0.14 a3.09 ± 0.33 kl11.61 d–h0.33 ± 0.04 e0.02 ± 0.00 d0.87 ± 0.21 p–s1.31 ± 0.26 cd0.09 ± 0.03 ef0.13 ± 0.03 a2.76 bc
Ś52.51 ± 0.10 m–r0.74 ± 0.04 g–i4.35 ± 0.26 b2.55 ± 0.12 k–o10.15 g–k0.16 ± 0.02 j–m0.01 ± 0.00 e0.76 ± 0.09 r–u0.61 ± 0.09 i–k0.05 ± 0.01 ij0.02 ± 0.00 h1.62 m–q
Ś62.06 ± 0.48 p–s1.61 ± 0.06 a3.48 ± 0.32 c–f5.31 ± 0.15 ij12.46 c–f0.28 ± 0.11 fg0.01 ± 0.00 e1.34 ± 0.19 e–j0.54 ± 0.11 k–n0.07 ± 0.02 ghnd j2.24 d–j
Ś72.00 ± 0.49 p–s0.51 ± 0.08 l–n3.78 ± 0.54 b–e5.71 ± 0.67 h–j12.00 c–g0.21 ± 0.06 hi0.02 ± 0.00 d1.02 ± 0.11 l–q1.22 ± 0.11 d0.06 ± 0.01 hi0.07 ± 0.03 c2.61 b–d
Ś82.04 ± 0.19 p–s0.03 ± 0.00 qr3.21 ± 0.19 e–i5.32 ± 0.48 ij10.60 e–i0.28 ± 0.01 fg0.01 ± 0.00 e1.15 ± 0.19 i–o0.96 ± 0.16 e0.06 ± 0.03 hi0.08 ± 0.03 b2.56 b–e
Ś94.06 ± 0.20 fgnd r1.81 ± 0.47 q–u5.89 ± 0.59 g–i11.76 d–h0.06 ± 0.11 rs0.01 ± 0.00 e1.52 ± 0.23 c–f0.77 ± 0.06 f–h0.07 ± 0.04 gh0.04 ± 0.01 f2.47 b–g
Ś105.32 ± 0.48 cdnd r0.99 ± 0.11 w6.38 ± 0.72 e–h12.69 b–e0.09 ± 0.01 p–s0.01± 0.00 e1.19 ± 0.16 i–m0.20 ± 0.02 t0.07 ± 0.05 gh0.01 ± 0.00 i1.57 o–q
Ś112.88 ± 0.29 j–ond r2.98 ± 0.16 f–k8.75 ± 0.39 a14.61 ab0.35 ± 0.11 e0.02 ± 0.00 d1.23 ± 0.31 h–l0.80 ± 0.01 fg0.06 ± 0.01 hi0.04 ± 0.01 f2.50 b–f
Ś121.79 ± 0.34 rsnd r1.92 ± 0.16 p–u8.46 ± 0.54 a12.17 c–g0.10 ± 0.02 o–rnd f0.92 ± 0.21 n–r0.21 ± 0.04 st0.09 ± 0.03 ef0.02 ± 0.00 h1.34 q
Ś133.09 ± 0.24 h–n1.68 ± 0.02 a6.19 ± 0.54 a1.41 ± 0.28 p–s12.38 c–f0.25 ± 0.04 gh0.05 ± 0.01 b1.52 ± 0.15 c–f0.76 ± 0.16 f–i0.08 ± 0.01 fg0.08 ± 0.03 b2.74 bc
Ś141.97 ± 0.38 q–snd r1.58 ± 0.21 t–v7.54 ± 0.19 b–d11.09 e–h0.11 ± 0.05 n–q0.02 ± 0.00 d1.19 ± 0.32 i–m0.25 ± 0.05 r–t0.07 ± 0.01 gh0.03 ± 0.00 g1.68 k–q
Ś153.25 ± 0.18 h–lnd r1.14 ± 0.21 vw2.96 ± 0.32 kl7.35 l–p0.36 ± 0.02 e0.04 ± 0.00 c0.61 ± 0.16 tu0.44 ± 0.19 l–o0.09 ± 0.03 ef0.04 ± 0.01 f1.60 n–q
Ś163.26 ± 0.43 h–l0.87 ± 0.03 ef3.09 ± 0.12 f–j1.73 ± 0.22 o–r8.96 i–l0.25 ± 0.02 gh0.01 ± 0.00 e1.32 ± 0.10 f–k0.41 ± 0.12 n–q0.07 ± 0.01 gh0.02 ± 0.00 h2.09 f–l
Ś171.50 ± 0.27 s0.47 ± 0.7 n1.89 ± 0.17 p–u1.85 ± 0.28 n–r5.71 p0.18 ± 0.01 i–l0.01 ± 0.00 e1.20 ± 0.25 i–l0.55 ± 0.11 k–n0.11 ± 0.01 cd0.08 ± 0.03 b2.15 e–j
Ś183.19 ± 0.29 h–m0.93 ± 0.11 de2.31 ± 0.12 m–r2.28 ± 0.32 l–p8.70 i–n0.49 ± 0.02 c0.01 ± 0.00 e1.76 ± 0.21 bc0.55 ± 0.01 k–n0.09 ± 0.02 efnd j2.90 b
Ś193.71 ± 0.19 f–i0.80 ± 0.37 fg2.97 ± 0.32 f–k2.21 ± 0.37 l–p9.70 h–k0.33 ± 0.03 e0.01 ± 0.00 e1.51 ± 0.22 d–f0.49 ± 0.15 k–o0.09 ± 0.02 ef0.02 ± 0.00 h2.45 b–g
Ś202.88 ± 0.39 j–o0.46 ± 0.29 no2.38 ± 0.18 l–q4.83 ± 0.47 j10.54 f–i0.15 ± 0.10 k–nnd f0.74 ± 0.17 r–u1.00 ± 0.17 e0.04 ± 0.01 j0.02 ± 0.00 h1.96 h–o
Ś212.96 ± 0.25 j–n0.49 ± 0.05 mn2.75 ± 0.19 h–m1.25 ± 0.38 q–s7.44 l–p0.12 ± 0.13 m–p0.01 ± 0.00 e1.61 ± 0.21 cd0.28 ± 0.07 p–t0.10 ± 0.03 de0.02 ± 0.00 h2.14 e–j
Ś224.30 ± 0.50 ef0.34 ± 0.01 o1.98 ± 0.21 p–u1.54 ± 0.28 p–r8.16 k–o0.07 ± 0.11 q–s0.01 ± 0.00 e1.48 ± 0.15 d–g0.64 ± 0.16 h–k0.11 ± 0.03 cd0.02 ± 0.00 h2.33 c–h
Ś233.55 ± 0.19 g–j0.14 ± 0.02 pq3.29 ± 0.34 d–h2.84 ± 0.48 k–m9.82 h–k0.60 ± 0.23 a0.01 ± 0.00 e1.96 ± 0.18 ab1.44 ± 0.21 c0.07 ± 0.01 gh0.04 ± 0.00 f4.12 a
Ś243.02 ± 0.39 i–n0.52 ± 0.11 l–n1.78 ± 0.11 r–u2.99 ± 0.27 kl8.32 j–n0.42 ± 0.05 d0.01 ± 0.00 e1.34 ± 0.32 e–j0.57 ± 0.13 k–m0.11 ± 0.01 cd0.07 ± 0.03 c2.52 b–f
Ś255.30 ± 0.79 cd0.46 ± 0.05 no3.87 ± 0.32 bc6.89 ± 0.33 d–f16.51 a0.14 ± 0.07 l–o0.01 ± 0.00 e0.79 ± 0.17 q–t0.37 ± 0.09 o–r0.05 ± 0.03 ij0.01 ± 0.00 i1.38 pq
Ś263.32 ± 0.55 h–k1.15 ± 0.11 bc2.93 ± 0.21 f–l7.24 ± 0.52 c–e14.64 ab0.09 ± 0.02 p–s0.01 ± 0.00 e1.09 ± 0.21 k–p0.36 ± 0.08 o–s0.06 ± 0.03 hi0.04 ± 0.00 f1.66 l–q
Ś272.21 ± 0.41 o–s0.18 ± 0.03 p1.11 ± 0.22 vw2.64 ± 0.57 k–n6.14 op0.33 ± 0.03 e0.02 ± 0.00 d1.86 ± 0.11 ab1.82 ± 0.11 b0.12 ± 0.03 c0.04 ± 0.00 f4.19 a
Ś286.27 ± 0.26 b0.56 ± 0.02 k–n2.85 ± 0.31 g–m0.12 ± 0.02 u9.80 h–k0.12 ± 0.01 m–p0.02 ± 0.00 d0.91 ± 0.32 o–r0.36 ± 0.02 o–s0.05 ± 0.01 ij0.07 ± 0.08 c1.55 o–q
Ś293.21 ± 0.12 h–m0.18 ± 0.11 p1.44 ± 0.28 u–w2.03 ± 0.26 m–q6.85 m–p0.10 ± 0.01 o–r0.02 ± 0.00 d1.37 ± 0.12 d–j0.26 ± 0.03 q–t0.04 ± 0.01 j0.03 ± 0.00 g1.83 i–p
Ś304.80 ± 0.32 dend r1.73 ± 0.43 s–u8.14 ± 0.33 a–c14.66 ab0.19 ± 0.02 i–k0.02 ± 0.00 d1.57 ± 0.25 c–e0.25 ± 0.01 r–t0.10 ± 0.01 de0.01 ± 0.00 i2.14 e-j
Ś317.00 ± 0.12 a0.09 ± 0.11 p–r3.14 ± 0.66 f–j0.03 ± 0.00 u10.27 g–j0.10 ± 0.01 o–r0.02 ± 0.00 d0.83 ± 0.11 q–t0.45 ± 0.08 l–o0.05 ± 0.01 ij0.02 ± 0.00 h1.48 pq
Ś322.44 ± 0.38 n–rnd r1.43 ± 0.28 u–w1.62 ± 0.02 p–r5.49 p0.08 ± 0.02 p–s0.01 ± 0.00 e0.95 ± 0.10 m–r0.90 ± 0.09 ef0.10 ± 0.03 de0.03 ± 0.00 g2.07 f–m
Ś335.66 ± 0.63 bc0.77 ± 0.11 f–h3.09 ± 0.10 f–j0.15 ± 0.01 tu9.67 h–k0.25 ± 0.05 gh0.01 ± 0.00 e1.16 ± 0.25 i–n0.75 ± 0.10 f–i0.11 ± 0.03 cd0.07 ± 0.03 c2.37 c–h
Ś347.55 ± 0.38 and r3.43 ± 0.29 c–f1.11 ± 0.11 rs12.09 c–g0.05 ± 0.01 s0.01 ± 0.00 e0.54 ± 0.03 u0.63 ± 0.09 h–k0.12 ± 0.01 c0.04 ± 0.00 f1.41 pq
Ś352.57 ± 0.28 l–q0.67 ± 0.14 h–k2.06 ± 0.21 o–t0.59 ± 0.02 s–u5.90 p0.11 ± 0.01 n–q0.01 ± 0.00 e2.09 ± 0.27 a0.26 ± 0.08 q–t0.07 ± 0.02 gh0.07 ± 0.01 c2.62 b–d
Ś362.42 ± 0.72 n–r0.76 ± 0.09 f–h1.91 ± 0.21 p–u7.40 ± 0.43 cd12.49 c–f0.14 ± 0.02 l–o0.01 ± 0.00 e0.64 ± 0.04 s–u0.75 ± 0.17 f–i0.06 ± 0.03 hi0.05 ± 0.01 e1.66 l–q
Ś372.56 ± 0.28 l–qnd r2.17 ± 0.32 n–s3.33 ± 0.16 k8.06 k–o0.11 ± 0.03 n–q0.02 ± 0.00 d0.81 ± 0.03 q–t0.59 ± 0.08 j–l0.07 ± 0.02 gh0.05 ± 0.01 e1.66 l–q
Ś383.36 ± 0.32 g–k1.24 ± 0.23 b2.71 ± 0.25 i–n6.69 ± 0.32 d–g14.00 bc0.17 ± 0.06 i–l0.01 ± 0.00 e1.25 ± 0.11 g–l0.43 ± 0.08 m–p0.11 ± 0.01 cd0.04 ± 0.01 f2.03 g–n
Ś393.30 ± 0.11 h–k1.05 ± 0.11 cd2.41 ± 0.21 k–p1.40 ± 0.37 p–s8.16 k–o0.16 ± 0.02 j–m0.01 ± 0.00 e1.09 ± 0.10 k–p1.04 ±0.12 e0.09 ± 0.01 ef0.02 ± 0.00 h2.41 c–h
Ś405.19 ± 0.51 cdnd r0.06 ± 0.00 x8.40 ± 0.65 ab13.65 b–d0.19± 0.03 i–k0.01 ± 0.00 e1.39 ± 0.16 d–i0.40 ± 0.11 n–r0.07 ± 0.03 gh0.05 ± 0.01 e2.13 e–k
Ś413.30 ± 0.37 h–k0.15 ± 0.03 pq2.58 ± 0.21 j–o6.05 ± 0.87 f–i12.08 c–g0.20 ± 0.02 ij0.02 ± 0.00 d1.24 ± 0.11 g–l0.99 ± 0.03 e0.14 ± 0.01 b0.05 ± 0.01 e2.63 b–d
Ś422.56 ± 0.09 l–q0.62 ± 0.02 i–l2.42 ± 0.17 k–p1.04 ± 0.25 r–t6.63 n–p0.41 ± 0.03 dnd f1.45 ± 0.18 d–h2.22 ± 0.32 a0.18 ± 0.03 a0.04 ± 0.00 f4.33 a
Ś433.80 ± 0.27 f–h0.71 ± 0.10 g–j3.38 ± 0.27 c–g5.69 ± 0.33 h–j13.59 b–d0.55 ± 0.00 bnd f1.14 ± 0.11 j–o0.44 ± 0.11 l–o0.10 ± 0.03 de0.04 ± 0.00 f2.28 d–i
means value of n = 3 independent repetition; nd—not detected; a, b, c,… values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey’s test).
Table 2. Properties of individual main phenolic compounds of the Prunus domestica fruits using their spectral characteristics by LC-MS Qtof in the negative characterization of flavan-3-ols (280 nm), phenolic acid (320 nm), flavonols (360 nm) and positive characterization of anthocyanins (520 nm) ionization mode.
Table 2. Properties of individual main phenolic compounds of the Prunus domestica fruits using their spectral characteristics by LC-MS Qtof in the negative characterization of flavan-3-ols (280 nm), phenolic acid (320 nm), flavonols (360 nm) and positive characterization of anthocyanins (520 nm) ionization mode.
tR (min)Assigned IdentityMolecular Ion [M-H] (m/z)Main Ions MS/MS (m/z)
Flavan-3-ols
2.30(+)-Catechin 289.0143245.0367
3.30Procyanidin dimer (B1) 577.0538289.0143
4.50Procyanidin dimer (B3) 577.0311289.0152
Phenolic acids
3.71Neochlorogenic acid 353.0532191.0232
3.92Cryptochlorogenic acid 353.0534191.0241
4.02Chlorogenic acid 353.0531191.0254
4.833-Caffeoylshikimic acid335.0713191.0511
5.023-Feruloylquinic acid367.2312193.2101/191.2302
Flavonols
3.36Quercetin-3-O-pentoside-hexoside595.0411449.0311/301.0062
3.60Quercetin-3-O-glucoside 463.0523301.0062
4.20Quercetin-3-O-arabinoside 433.0302301.0666
6.62Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside 609.1018301.0133
6.78Quercetin-3-O-galactoside 463.0523301.0054
7.32Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside 447.0902301.0054
10.22Quercetin-O-pentoside-rhamnoside579.0332301.1803
Anthocyanins
4.59Cyanidin-3-O-galactoside 449.0324287.0180
6.29Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside 449.0646299.0216/287.0180
6.55Cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside 595.1507287.0536
6.72Delphinidin-3-O-glucoside 465.0243303.0098
6.86Peonidin-3-O-glucoside 463.1201301.0721
tR, MS and MS/MS, compared with a standard compound; tR, retention time.
Table 3. Phenolic compounds (mg/100 g dw) of different Prunus domestica cultivars.
Table 3. Phenolic compounds (mg/100 g dw) of different Prunus domestica cultivars.
SampleFlavan-3-Ols Phenolic Acid
Procyanidin B1Procyanidin B3(+)-CatechinPPOtherTotalNeochlorogenic AcidCryptochlorogenic AcidChlorogenic Acid3-Caffeoylshikimic Acid3-Feruloylquinic AcidOtherTotal
Ś111.59 ± 1.11 n–p4.15 ± 0.35 j–l4.25 ± 0.23 kl529.3 ± 12.3 f–h31.55 ± 4.21 e580.89 g–k269.11 ± 1.32 h–k9.45 ± 0.32 l–o33.32 ± 1.32 i–l5.95 ± 0.32 ef10.47 ± 0.32 d–f13.47 ± 0.43 j–m341.77 i–l
Ś224.84 ± 2.11 ef9.77 ± 0.34 dnd u1022.7 ± 24.5 a57.15 ± 3.65 b1114.47 a219.20 ± 11.23 j–n10.08 ± 0.12 k–n24.48 ± 2.13 l–p2.90 ± 0.23 n–s4.92 ± 0.14 mn2.74 ± 0.53 t264.32 n–r
Ś38.88 ± 1.76 p–s2.54 ± 0.62 o–r2.56 ± 0.38 n–s618.2 ± 23.1 d–f52.43 ± 3.87 b684.68 d–h216.32 ± 2.64 k–n10.41± 0.32 k–n17.85 ± 1.56 p–t3.77 ± 0.54 k–n6.71 ± 0.43 i–l17.30 ± 0.41 g–j272.34 l–r
Ś419.01 ± 1.87 h–j5.17 ± 0.34 h–j7.57 ± 0.25 de353.3 ± 17.5 kl40.66 ± 2.54 cd425.77 k–o357.06 ± 4.44 fgnd t35.73 ± 2.11 h–k4.86 ± 0.54 g–i1.24 ± 0.32 s–u19.34 ± 0.67 f–h418.23 f–h
Ś511.03 ±1.63 o–q2.51 ± 0.12 o–r3.23 ± 0.23 m–o283.7 ± 12.3 lm10.82 ± 3.28 p–t311.35 n–r275.01 ± 3.32 h–j7.94 ± 1.03 n–q40.10 ± 1.65 g–i3.58 ± 0.34 l–o1.11 ± 0.11 tu12.41 ± 0.29 k–n340.16 i–m
Ś615.59 ± 1.66 j–l3.81 ± 0.13 k–n5.60 ± 0.45 h–j490.2 ± 17.3 g–i37.44 ± 4.29 d552.70 g–l301.18 ± 2.22 g–i7.22 ± 0.99 n–r24.23 ±2.43 m–q1.63 ± 0.12 u2.50 ± 0.24 o–t11.85 ± 0.76 k–o348.60 h–k
Ś724.79 ± 2.11 ef6.21 ± 0.47 f–h9.35 ± 0.11 c238.9 ± 11.1 m–p13.48 ± 1.32 n–s292.80 o–s52.29 ± 2.43 st4.02 ± 0.65 rs35.41 ± 1.44 h–k 2.54 ± 0.32 q–t9.91 ± 0.15 d–f12.03 ± 0.49 k–o116.20 wx
Ś89.89 ± 1.04 o–s3.31 ± 0.23 k–p4.26 ± 0.15 kl540.0 ± 13.2 f–h4.24 ± 1.32 u–w561.74 g–l188.29 ± 3.22 m–p4.02 ± 1.43 rs15.08 ± 2.12 r–v1.76 ± 0.11 tu3.04 ± 0.17 o–r5.10 ± 0.65 r–t217.30 q–t
Ś923.17 ± 1.00 fg6.15 ± 0.47 f–h7.17 ± 0.48 e–g741.3 ± 10.0 c20.06 ± 2.76 h–l797.94 cd360.55 ± 4.23 ef21.73 ± 0.32 e30.57 ± 1.87 j–n4.74 ± 0.43 h–j5.41 ± 0.42 lm 21.98 ± 0.89 f444.97 e–g
Ś1015.37 ± 1.62 j–m1.58 ± 0.21 r–t2.88 ± 0.12 m–r380.2 ± 13.7 jknd w400.12 l–p308.43 ± 1.43 f–h16.33 ± 1.32 f–h28.07 ± 1.84 j–o3.46 ± 0.34 l–p9.05 ± 0.18 fg18.19 ± 0.77 f–i383.53 g–j
Ś1111.65 ± 1.01 m–p4.41 ± 0.43 i–k5.36 ± 0.43 ij686.6 ± 12.2 cd70.17 ± 4.10 a778.27 c–f463.37 ± 3.12 bc33.83 ± 0.87 bc34.56 ± 1.99 i–k2.53 ± 0.24 q–u6.01 ± 0.61 k–m17.89 ± 0.99 f–i558.19 cd
Ś1248.75 ± 0.23 a11.51 ± 0.76 c11.36 ± 0.65 a857.0 ± 10.4 b52.55 ± 5.10 b981.24 ab92.73 ± 1.44 r–t4.08 ± 0.54 rs19.62 ± 1.63 o–s2.61 ± 0.43 p–t3.61 ± 0.36 n–p3.10 ± 0.38 t125.74 v–x
Ś1316.32 ± 1.11 j–l2.62 ± 0.43 o–r3.55 ± 0.34 l–n494.1 ± 10.3 g–i17.70 ± 2.10 i–n534.35 h–l266.54 ± 2.54 h–k11.36 ± 1.32 j–m26.90 ± 1.54 k–o3.01 ± 0.37 m–r3.71 ± 0.28 no10.98 ± 0.56 l–p322.50 j–m
Ś1423.16 ± 0.54 fg15.86 ± 0.32 bnd u429.7 ± 9.9 i–k15.58 ± 2.31 k–q484.40 j–m171.97 ± 2.11 n–p5.51 ± 0.55 qr45.83 ± 1.11 fg2.74 ± 0.12 o–s10.71 ± 0.37 de9.29 ± 0.47 m–r246.04 p–t
Ś154.41 ± 0.32 tu1.77 ± 0.43 q–t1.86 ± 0.11 st202.3 ± 10.7 m–q22.78 ± 2.54 g–i233.18 p–t237.00 ± 0.32 j–m9.01 ± 0.99 l–p22.38 ± 1.76 n–r4.13 ± 0.46 i–l2.18 ± 0.19 p–t10.41 ± 0.38 m–q285.11 k–q
Ś1611.39 ± 0.43 n–p2.78 ± 0.25 n–q2.66 ± 0.23 n–s394.9 ± 11.4 jk5.88 ± 3.29 t–v417.66 k–o502.25 ± 1.54 b36.21 ± 1.11 b167.71 ± 2.54 a16.37 ± 1.01 a20.85 ± 0.57 a61.38 ± 0.88 a804.77 a
Ś1715.51 ±0.26 j–l2.32 ± 0.52 o–s2.02 ± 0.15 q–s234.2 ± 14.3 m–p3.12 ± 0.54 vw257.25 o–t572.68 ± 2.15 a54.55 ± 3.22 a50.93 ± 1.02 ef6.66 ± 0.22 de3.15 ± 0.43 o–q40.23 ± 0.46 d728.20 b
Ś1823.61 ± 0.54 e–g19.42 ± 0.51 and u 269.2 ± 10.5 l–n10.60 ± 1.11 q–t322.85 m–r462.49 ± 2.43 bc17.41 ± 1.05 fg64.27 ± 1.32 cd7.68 ± 0.54. bc8.25 ± 0.12 gh44.96 ± 0.29 c605.07 c
Ś1916.23 ± 0.21 j–l3.43 ± 0.17 k–o3.05 ± 0.31 m–p513.1 ± 21.0 g–i20.61 ± 2.73 h–k556.50 g–l435.02 ± 0.33 c32.84 ± 0.76 c46.41± 1.72 fg3.74 ± 0.28 k–n14.54 ± 0.32 c36.36 ± 1.43 d568.91 cd
Ś2042.65 ± 0.32 b8.28 ± 0.51 e10.27 ± 0.56 bc229.0 ± 10.0 m–p15.31 ± 0.18 l–r305.56 n–r48.17 ± 2.65 tnd t23.49 ± 1.99 m–rnd v7.40 ± 0.37 h–k4.25 ± 0.12 st83.31 x
Ś2110.89 ± 0.11 o–qnd und u885.1 ± 46.1 b13.96 ± 2.01 m–s910.04 bc157.66 ± 1.44 o–q8.24 ± 0.22 m–q8.81 ± 1.73 u–w2.09 ± 0.34 s–u3.29 ± 0.29 op7.46 ± 0.54 p–s187.54 s–w
Ś2214.91 ± 0.42 k–nnd u1.94 ± 0.13 rs83.5 ± 8.3 s21.05 ± 2.82 h–j121.45 st423.93 ± 0.65 cd14.34 ± 2.11 g–j28.99 ± 1.87 j–n5.23 ± 0.23 f–h11.30 ± 1.11 d20.74 ± 0.45 fg504.53 de
Ś2327.28 ± 0.12 dend und u267.4 ± 12.0 l–o12.93 ± 1.44 n–s307.62 n–r193.47 ± 0.99 l–p5.77 ± 0.32 qr24.59 ± 0.81 l–pnd v 3.23 ± 0.43 op7.78 ± 0.48 o–s234.84 p–t
Ś2410.26 ± 0.74 o–r3.01 ± 0.43 l–p3.32 ± 0.25 l–n641.9 ± 10.1 de4.46 ± 0.54 u–w662.98 d–i219.18 ± 0.65 j–n13.81 ± 0.55 h–j15.58 ± 0.71 q–u3.13 ± 0.29 m–r2.68 ± 0.32 o–s11.68 ± 0.99 k–p266.07 m–r
Ś2515.94 ± 0.12 j–lnd u4.82 ± 0.11 jk458.8 ± 10.4 h–j12.42 ± 1.11 o–s491.99 i–m105.22 ± 0.56 q–t5.30 ± 0.99 qr59.55 ± 0.72 dend v 9.77 ± 0.88 ef19.91± 0.94 f–h199.75 r–v
Ś2610.76 ± 0.54 o–qnd u1.81 ± 0.43 st185.2 ± 11.1 n–r14.29 ± 0.88 m–s212.16 q–t192.49 ± 1.32 l–p5.27 ± 0.54 qr43.59 ± 0.99 f–h2.29 ± 0.54 r–u6.83 ± 0.27 h–l8.18 ± 0.48 n–s258.64 o–s
Ś2729.74 ± 0.62 cd6.60 ± 0.23 fg8.22 ± 0.56 d564.3 ± 20.1 e–g13.13 ± 3.11 n–s622.06 e–j231.54 ± 2.43 j–mnd t nd w 3.56 ± 0.29 l–o1.63 ± 0.29 r–t17.14 ± 0.77 g–j253.86 o–t
Ś287.57 ± 1.12 q–t4.06 ± 0.43 j–m3.02 ± 0.54 m–q755.0 ± 20.5 c21.19 ± 1.11 h–j790.90 c–e107.59 ± 1.99 q–s5.80 ± 0.23 p–r6.50 ± 0.72 vw0.70 ± 0.54 v3.08 ± 0.11 o–r6.34 ± 0.56 q–t130.02 u–x
Ś2913.37 ± 0.48 l–o5.40 ± 0.26 hi6.28 ± 0.12 g–i433.1 ± 16.4 i–k13.26 ± 1.43 n–s471.41 j–n426.42 ± 1.56 c13.73 ± 0.45 h–j32.08 ± 1.21 i–m6.89 ± 0.29 cd8.20 ± 0.99 g–i15.97± 0.77 h–k503.29 de
Ś3013.07 ± 0.12 l–o1.13 ± 0.11 tu2.27 ± 0.13 o–s209.3 ± 10.3 m–q3.59 ± 1.03 vw229.36 p–t247.05 ± 1.99 i–l17.32 ± 0.76 fg12.99 ± 0.63 s–v3.91 ± 0.10 j–m6.28 ± 1.11 j–m10.41 ± 0.68 m–q297.95 k–p
Ś311.16 ± 0.15 und u3.76 ± 0.43 lm235.0 ± 10.7 m–p43.40 ± 2.67 c283.37 o–t366.51 ± 2.54 d–f10.26 ± 0.34 k–n61.35 ± 0.71 cd8.57 ± 0.10 b7.45 ± 0.73 h–k27.16 ± 0.99 e481.29 ef
Ś3210.09 ± 0.35 o–rnd und u175.0 ± 10.3 o–s16.77 ± 2.68 j–o201.88 q–t311.67 ± 2.14 f–h14.67 ± 0.99 g–i62.03 ± 0.29 cd2.39 ± 0.47 r–u5.96 ± 0.34 k–m20.52 ± 0.68 fg417.24 f–h
Ś3322.93 ± 0.37 fg7.06 0.23 f7.21 ± 0.36 d–g503.6 ± 11.1 g–i25.07 ± 1.88 f–h565.91 g–l347.88 ± 4.21 fg12.21 ± 0.23 i–l68.69 ± 1.43 c3.30 ± 0.12 l–q16.13 ± 0.53 b11.41 ± 0.59 l–p459.62 ef
Ś348.35 ± 0.39 p–s2.94 ± 0.43 m–q3.09 ± 0.12 m–p568.6 ± 10.4 e–g28.32 ± 2.01 ef611.35 f–j212.83 ± 2.43 k–o5.68 ± 0.37 qr33.86 ± 1.72 i–k5.66 ± 0.15 fg4.88 ± 0.16 mn21.07 ± 0.47 fg283.97 k–q
Ś356.79 ± 0.66 r–tnd u0.89 ± 0.32 tu105.6 ± 11.0 rs4.00 ± 0.36 vw117.35 t137.42 ± 1.99 p–r4.48 ± 0.29 rs23.36 ± 1.54 m–r2.49 ± 0.21 q–u2.84 ± 0.43 o–r11.80 ± 1.02 k–o182.39 t–w
Ś3618.86 ± 0.10 ij6.97 ± 0.43 f6.51 ±0.23 f–h221.1 ± 15.3 m–p10.34 ± 1.01 r–t263.87 o–t162.35 ± 1.45 n–q6.31 ± 0.32 o–r11.82 ± 1.24 s–v1.78 ± 0.45 tu4.85 ± 0.54 mn17.10 ± 2.01 g–j204.20 r–u
Ś3722.75 ± 1.04 f–h6.34 ± 0.46 f–h5.01 ± 0.43 jk211.0 ± 28 m–q27.74 ± 2.01 e–g272.85 o–t150.02 ± 2.11 p–r8.02 ± 0.58 n–q82.54 ± 1.14 bnd v 13.73 ± 1.11 c49.54 ± 0.12 b303.85 k–p
Ś3831.11 ± 0.19 c9.36 ± 0.54 de11.18 ± 0.99 ab274.2 ± 35 l–n17.05 ± 2.07 j–o342.98 m–q362.40 ± 1.54 ef26.86 ± 0.99 d36.36 ± 1.63 h–j3.63 ± 0.52 l–o5.86 ± 1.88 lm20.49 ± 0.43 fg455.61 e–g
Ś3920.90 ± 1.00 g–i5.22 ± 0.65 h–j7.51 ± 0.43 d–f427.6 ± 19 i–k15.84 ± 1.54 k–p477.12 j–n264.32 ± 1.78 h–k12.74 ± 0.79 i–k56.10 ± 1.71 de2.80 ± 0.32 o–s6.77 ± 0.75 h–l14.91 ± 0.19 j–l357.63 h–k
Ś4010.95 ± 0.28 o–q1.21 ± 0.11 st2.17 ± 0.28 p–s154.2 ± 10.2 p–s30.93 ± 0.32 e199.51 q–t417.24 ± 2.66 c–e15.40 ± 0.39 f–i40.20 ± 1.92 g–i4.90 ± 0.54 g–i1.70 ± 0.12 q–t39.17 ± 1.01 d518.61 de
Ś4111.27 ± 0.32 n–q2.17 ± 0.12 p–t3.45 ± 0.47 l–n127.9 ± 10.3 q–s18.69 ± 1.15 i–m163.49 r–t340.10 ± 3.05 fg18.07 ± 1.07 f30.57 ± 1.44 j–n3.86 ± 0.73 j–mnd u20.81± 1.44 fg413.41 f–i
Ś426.15 ± 0.11 st1.16 ± 0.09 s–u2.01 ± 0.18 q–s215.6 ± 11.0 m–q9.24 ± 1.05 s–u134.26 p–t63.88 ± 2.43 st1.56 ± 0.69 st9.67 ± 1.32 t–v0.64 ± 0.11 v3.21 ± 0.43 op4.25 ± 0.43 st83.20 x
Ś4317.88 ± 0.38 i–k5.76 ± 0.32 gh7.00 ± 0.67 e–g662.2 ± 28.9 cd16.76 ± 1.33 j–o709.69 d–g335.25 ± 3.12 fg17.48 ± 1.37 fg19.42 ± 0.23 o–s4.57 ± 0.12 h–k7.77 ± 1.65 g–j8.85 ± 0.99 n–r336.43 j–n
SampleFlavonols Anthocyanins
Q-pentoside-hexosideQ-3-galactosideQ-3-glucosideQ-3-rutinosideQ-arabinosideQ-rhamnosideQ-penthoside rhamnosideOtherTotalC-3-O-galactosideC-3-O-glucosideC-3-O-rutinosidep-3-O-glucosideOtherTotal
Ś12.49 ± 0.23 f–h3.33 ± 0.11 o–t10.73 ± 0.66 g17.58 ± 2.10 e–h5.88 ± 0.38 f–h1.52 ± 0.43 jk4.03 ± 0.21 de7.76 ± 1.01 d53.31 f–i1.08 ± 0.23 o–u3.48 ± 0.12 g11.34 ± 0.32 e–h1.91 ± 0.32 f–h5.13 ± 0.54 cd22.94 j–m
Ś21.09 ± 0.19 n–p11.92 ± 1.11 hi3.75 ± 0.43 m–p8.59 ± 0.55 q–s1.99 ± 0.63 p–u0.84 ± 0.10 l–n0.21 ± 0.02 p–snd u28.38 n–r3.87 ± 0.32 hi1.22 ± 0.11 m–p5.54 ± 0.21 q–s0.65 ± 0.11 p–u0.69 ± 0.09 uv11.97 q–t
Ś31.22 ± 0.21 m–o5.77 ± 0.21 l–o4.78 ± 1.32 l–n11.39 ± 1.77 k–q3.56 ± 0.62 l–ond o1.21 ± 0.14 j–n0.87 ± 0.10 q–u28.80 n–r1.87 ± 0.44 l–o1.55 ± 0-.13 l–n7.35 ± 0.16 k–q1.16 ± 0.32 l–o1.07 ± 0.23 tu13.00 q–s
Ś41.09 ± 0.32 n–p3.72 ± 0.39 n–s1.26 ± 0.37 s–v10.60 ± 0.77 m–r1.17 ± 0.38 s–v0.64 ± 0.01 n0.52 ± 0.19 o–s2.41 ± 0.21 m–p21.42 q–t1.21 ± 0.12 n–t0.41 ± 0.02 s–u6.84 ± 0.43 m–r0.38 ± 0.14 s–v1.52 ± 0.32 p–t10.35 r–v
Ś51.01 ± 0.11 n–p4.62 ± 0.22 m–q1.47 ± 0.34 r–v12.48 ± 0.99 k–p5.65 ± 0.29 f–hnd ond s1.51 ± 0.09 o–r26.74 o–s1.50 ± 0.11 m–q0.48 ± 0.11 r–u8.05 ± 0.37 k–p1.83 ± 0.32 f–h0.82 ± 0.23 t–v12.68 q–t
Ś62.50 ± 0.17 f–h7.01 ± 0.36 k–m2.90 ± 0.66 o–s20.59 ± 0.96 e5.99 ± 0.76 fg1.27 ± 0.22 j–l 2.05 ± 0.11 g2.67 ± 0.47 l–n44.97 i–l2.28 ± 0.11 k–m0.94 ± 0.11 o–s13.29 ± 0.54 e1.94 ± 0.11 fg2.76 ± 0.12 j–m21.20 k–n
Ś71.81 ± 0.11 j–l9.13 ± 0.64 i–k3.16 ± 0.28 n–q7.71 ± 1.21 q–t2.67 ± 0.99 n–r1.70 ± 0.28 ij0.69 ± 0.32 n–r1.88 ± 0.54 n–q28.75 n–r2.96 ± 0.43 i–k1.03 ± 0.23 n–q4.97 ± 0.76 r–t0.87 ± 0.21 n–r1.97 ±0.43 n–q11.80 q–t
Ś81.11 ± 0.09 n–p2.64 ± 0.72 p–t1.19 ± 0.46 t–v8.99 ± 0.77 p–s2.12 ± 0.10 p–u0.73 ± 0.19 mn1.00 ± 0.11 j–ond u 17.78 s–u0.86 ± 0.15 p–u0.39 ± 0.02 tu5.80 ± 0.49 p–s0.69 ± 0.13 p–u0.92 ± 0.18 t–v8.66 s–w
Ś92.54 ± 0.11 fg1.05 ± 0.11 st0.71 ± 0.02 v13.87 ± 0.48 i–m1.59 ± 0.24 r–und o3.41 ± 0.41 ef3.37 ± 0.36 j–m26.53 o–s0.34 ± 0.43 tu0.23 ± 0.12 u8.95 ± 0.54 i–m0.51 ± 0.04 r–u3.03 ± 0.54 i–l13.06 q–s
Ś100.91 ± 0.12 o–q12.10 ± 0.43 h3.91 ± 0.34 m–p19.88 ± 0.54 ef2.46 ± 0.19 o–s3.62 ± 0.46 d2.93 ± 0.38 f1.42 ± 0.43 o–s47.25 h–k3.93 ± 0.16 h1.27 ± 0.02 m–p12.83 ± 0.28 ef0.80 ± 0.06 o–s2.88 ± 0.23 j–l21.71 k–n
Ś111.24 ± 0.11 m–o11.04 ± 0.77 h–j4.41 ± 0.54 m–o12.94 ± 0.48 j–o3.80 ± 0.55 j–n1.13 ± 0.21 k–m0.85 ± 0.22 k–o0.37 ± 0.19 tu35.78 l–o3.58 ± 0.32 h–j1.43 ± 0.32 m–o8.35 ± 0.87 j–o1.23 ± 0.16 j–n1.16 ± 0.33 r–u15.76 o–q
Ś120.77 ± 0.21 p–r20.09 ± 1.32 e–f8.83 ± 0.84 ij8.50 ± 0.77 q–s3.09 ± 0.75 m–q3.24 ± 0.32 de0.60 ± 0.10 n–s1.14 ± 0.63 q–t46.28 h–l6.52 ± 0.13 ef2.87 ± 0.12 ij5.49 ± 0.76 q–s1.00 ± 0.11 m–q1.87 ± 0.19 n–r17.75 n–p
Ś13nd t1.57 ± 0.33 r–t1.42 ± 0.39 r–v13.63 ± 0.59 i–n4.61 ± 0.39 h–l1.46 ± 0.15 jk4.12 ± 0.32 d3.28 ± 0.49 j–m30.09 n–r0.51 ± 0.33 r–u0.46 ± 0.02 r–u8.79 i± 0.99 -n1.50 ± 0.18 h–l2.88 ± 0.12 j–l14.14 p–r
Ś14nd t23.72 ± 0.54 d10.56 ± 0.44 gh14.86 ± 0.74 g–k3.19 ± 0.76 m–p2.15 ± 0.29 hi0.73 ± 0.11 m–r3.07 ± 0.29 k–m58.28 e–g7.70 ± 0.12 d3.43 ± 0.23 gh9.59 ± 0.27 g–k1.03 ± 0.43 m–p1.93 ± 0.32 n–q23.68 j–l
Ś153.55 ± 0.56 d1.12 ± 0.10 st3.05 ± 0.93 o–r7.58 ± 0.82 r–t2.00 ± 0.39 p–u0.86 ± 0.11 l–n1.98 ± 0.29 gh7.72 ± 0.73 d27.85 o–s0.36 ± 0.10 s–u0.99 ± 0.11 o–r4.89 0.56 r–t0.65 ± 0.4 p–u4.58 ± 0.43 d–f11.47 q–u
Ś162.06 ± 0.29 h–k6.53 ± 0.43 k–n4.17 0.37 m–o32.46 ± 0.73 cd9.18 ± 3.66 cd2.91 ± 0.29 ef4.83 ± 0.43 c3.62 ± 0.65 j–l65.75 c–e2.12 ± 0.12 k–n1.35 ± 0.13 m–o20.95 ± 1.11 cd2.98 ± 0.23 cd4.35 ± 0.65 e–g31.75 d–f
Ś171.24 ± 0.33 m–o8.42 ± 0.88 j–l1.97 ± 0.43 q–v18.29 ± 0.88 e–g1.79 ± 0.65 q–u1.38 ± 0.16 jk1.43 ± 0.11 g–k12.88 ± 1.32 b47.41 h–k2.73 ± 0.32 j–l0.64 ± 0.02 q–u11.81 ± 0.88 e–g0.58 ± 0.07 q–u5.50 ± 0.33 c21.26 k–n
Ś181.41 ± 0.11 l–n18.55 ± 1.72 fg9.01 ± 1.21 hi41.61 ± 0.34 a11.77 ± 1.11 b2.92 ± 0.32 ef4.00 ± 0.88 de7.53 ± 0.92 d96.80 b6.02 ± 0.25 fg2.92 ± 0.12 hi26.86 ± 0.77 a3.82 ± 0.23 b5.15 ± 0.54 cd44.77 b
Ś193.63 ± 0.24 cd4.37 ± 0.32 m–r1.39 ± 0.46 s–v16.72 ± 1.12 f–i1.56 ± 0.21 r–und o0.76 ± 0.39 l–r4.28 ± 0.19 g–j32.70 m–p1.42 ± 0.32 m–r0.45 ± 0.07 s–u10.79 ± 0.76 f–i0.51 ± 0.11 r–u2.81 ± 0.26 j–m15.98 o–q
Ś201.38 ± 0.43 l–n3.66 ± 0.37 n–t2.05 ± 0.29 q–v10.08 ± 1.08 n–r5.26 ± 0.31 g–ind o1.35 ± 0.52 i–m14.59 ± 0.32 a38.37 k–n1.19 ± 0.15 n–t0.66 ± 0.06 q–u6.51 ± 1.00 n–r1.71 ± 0.21 g–i5.62 ± 0.41 c15.69 o–q
Ś211.24 ± 0.48 m–o0.75 ± 0.01 t0.65 ± 0.08 v7.60 ± 0.55 r–t1.00 ± 0.11 t–vnd o1.36 ± 0.19 h–l1.38 ± 0.21 p–t13.98 tu0.24 ± 0.02 u0.21 ± 0.03 u4.91 ± 0.10 r–t0.32 ± 0.03 uv1.29 ± 0.43 q–u6.98 u–x
Ś224.45 ± 0.29 b1.88 ± 0.21 q–t7.26 ± 0.58 jk18.78 ± 0.99 ef24.12 ± 0.73 and o9.99 ± 0.42 a5.31 ± 1.03 fg71.79 cd0.61 ± 0.4 q–u2.36 ± 0.29 jk12.12 ± 0.43 ef7.83 ± 0.54 a6.41 ± 0.73 b29.32 f–h
Ś232.86 ± 0.54 ef3.42 ± 0.11 o–t2.51 ± 0.58 p–t7.68 ± 0.29 r–t3.60 ± 0.66 k–o1.68 ± 0.11 j1.54 ± 0.33 g–j1.90 ± 0.11 n–q25.19 p–s1.11 ± 0.09 o–u0.81 ± 0.08 p–t4.96 ± 0.26 r–t1.17 ± 0.27 k–o2.59 ± 0.37 k–n10.64 r–u
Ś24nd t4.90 ± 0.54 m–p1.85 ± 0.29 q–v4.66 ± 0.48 tu1.11 ± 0.12 t–v0.40 ± 0.12 no0.19 ± 0.10 q–s0.46 ± 0.19 s–u13.58 tu1.59 ± 0.12 m–p0.60 ± 0.01 q–u3.01 ± 0.77 tu0.36 ± 0.02 t–v0.34 ± 0.11 v5.90 v–x
Ś250.42 ± 0.02 r–t12.10 ± 0.99 h17.35 ± 0.21 c8.40 ± 0.29 q–s7.73 ± 0.21 end o0.80 ± 0.22 l–q6.37 ± 0.88 e53.17 f–i3.93 ± 0.32 h5.63 ± 0.32 c5.42 ± 0.29 q–s2.51 ± 0.18 e2.47 ± 0.22 l–o19.95 l–o
Ś262.30 ± 0.20 g–i4.64 ± 0.48 m–q11.40 ± 0.42 fg11.04 ± 0.54 l–r4.11 ± 0.32 i–m8.09 ± 0.11 a10.06 ± 1.06 a14.87 ± 1.32 a66.50 c–e1.50 ± 0.12 m–q3.70 ± 0.12 fg7.12 ± 0.88 l–r1.33 ± 0.56 i–m11.46 ± 0.67 a25.12 h–k
Ś270.24 ± 0.11 st1.13 ± 0.29 st0.42 ± 0.01 v6.02 ± 0.55 s–u0.90 ± 0.13 uvnd ond s0.51 ± 0.01 r–u9.21 u0.37 ± 0.01 s–u0.14 ± 0.01 u3.89 ± 0.39 s–u0.29 ± 0.02 uv0.24 ± 0.04 v4.92 wx
Ś28nd t3.51 ± 0.73 o–t0.82 ± 0.01 uv2.40 ± 0.64 u0.15 ± 0.29 v0.52 ± 0.05 n0.15 ± 0.02 rs0.07 ± 0.01 u7.60 u1.14 ± 0.12 o–u0.26 ± 0.02 u1.55 ± 0.44 u0.05 ± 0.00 v0.24 ± 0.01 v3.24 x
Ś292.00 ± 0.10 i–k16.40 ± 0.71 g12.92 ± 0.39 ef20.88 ± 0.49 e11.97 ± 0.92 b2.17 ± 0.23 h1.15 ± 0.05 j–n3.61 ± 0.12 j–l71.09 cd5.32 ± 0.43 g4.19 ± 0.03 ef13.48 ± 0.88 e3.88 ± 0.34 b2.90 ± 0.55 j–l29.77 e–g
Ś30nd t9.98 ± 0.48 h–j8.54 ± 0.32 ij38.99 ± 2.73 ab2.30 ± 0.13 o–tnd o1.85 ± 0.18 g–i4.72 ± 0.32 f–i66.37 c–e3.24 ± 0.26 h–j2.77 ± 0.12 ij25.16 ± 0.66 ab0.75 ± 0.06 o–t2.13 ± 0.18 m–p34.05 c–e
Ś311.30 ± 0.11 m–o28.02 ± 0.49 c11.02 ± 0.43 g30.80 ± 0.38 d7.97 ± 0.21 de2.60 ± 0.32 f–h1.60 ± 0.21 g–j3.91 ± 0.12 h–k87.21 b9.09 ± 0.33 c3.58 ± 0.65 g19.88 ± 0.32 d2.59 ± 0.03 de3.05 ± 0.45 i–l38.19 c
Ś324.12 ± 0.32 b53.67 ± 0.39 a20.34 ± 0.25 b35.35 ± 1.88 bc9.72 ± 0.45 cnd o1.56 ± 0.19 g–j4.01 ± 0.54 h–k128.77 a17.42 ± 0.54 a6.60 ± 0.66 b22.82 ± 0.99 bc3.16 ± 0.43 c3.15 ± 0.45 i–l53.14 a
Ś333.01 ± 0.10 e18.67 ± 0.29 fg6.16 ± 0.12 kl16.67 ± 0.39 f–i5.52 ± 0.44 f–h2.71 ± 0.43 fg1.37 ± 0.29 h–l2.42 ± 0.65 m–o56.53 e–h6.06 ± 0.99 fg2.00 ± 0.65 kl10.76 ± 0.63 f–i1.79 ± 0.25 f–h3.08 ± 0.29 i–l23.70 j–l
Ś340.36 ± 0.02 r–t22.71 ± 0.83 de14.22 ± 0.32 de14.55 ± 1.32 h–l4.67 ± 0.29 h–l3.26 ± 0.29 de0.82 ± 0.11 k–p1.17 ± 0.29 q–t61.75 d–f7.37 ± 0.65 de4.61 ± 0.55 de9.39 ± 0.65 h–l1.52 ± 0.43 g–l1.82 ± 0.19 o–s24.71 i–k
Ś352.93 ± 0.38 ef4.11 ± 0.77 m–r5.02 ± 0.86 lm9.88 ± 0.74 o–r1.97 ± 0.12 p–u2.33 ± 0.33 gh3.99 ± 0.32 de0.61 ± 0.05 r–u30.83 m–q1.33 ± 0.36 n–r1.63 ± 0.13 lm6.37 ± 0.82 o–r0.64 ± 0.52 p–u3.20 ± 0.39 i–k13.18 q–s
Ś361.65 ± 0.32 k–m20.58 ± 1.43 ef12.73 ± 0.19 ef16.59 f–j4.90 ± 0.74 g–k6.20 ± 0.62 b2.87 ± 0.17 f1.46 ± 0.32 o–s66.98 c–e6.68 ± 0.43 ef4.13 ± 0.43 ef10.71± 0.69 f–j1.59 ± 0.29 g–k3.96 ± 0.38 f–h27.06 g–j
Ś370.88 ± 0.06 o–q16.55 ± 1.76 g23.17 ± 0.32 a12.56 k–p11.71 ± 1.32 bnd o1.14 ± 0.21 j–o9.52 ± 0.99 c75.52 c5.37 ± 0.67 g7.52 ± 0.77 a8.11 ± 0.73 k–p3.80 ± 0.54 b3.74 ± 0.19 g–i28.54 f–i
Ś382.20 ± 0.19 g–j1.76 ± 0.53 q–t0.70 ± 0.11 v29.52 d5.07 ± 0.37 g–j0.44 ± 0.05 no4.58 ± 0.11 cd4.89 ± 0.43 f–h49.16 g–j0.57 ± 0.09 q–u0.23 ± 0.06 u19.05 ± 0.88 d1.65 ± 0.29 g–j3.93 ± 0.44 f–h25.42 g–k
Ś390.56 ± 0.03 q–s39.72 ± 0.38 b15.78 ± 0.98 cd19.48 ef6.75 ± 0.52 ef5.26 ± 0.29 c1.02 ± 0.32 j–o3.81 ± 0.76 i–k92.38 b12.89 ± 0.87 b5.12 ± 0.56 cd12.57 ± 0.62 ef2.19 ± 0.29 ef3.46 ± 0.10 h–j36.23 cd
Ś403.19 ± 0.11 de3.96 ± 0.43 n–s1.95 ± 0.28 q–v14.52 h–l1.79 ± 0.10 q–u1.15 ± 0.18 k–m1.37 ± 0.29 h–l5.55 ± 0.39 ef33.49 m–p1.29 ± 0.88 n–s0.63 ± 0.05 q–u9.37 ± 0.99 h–l0.58 ± 0.05 q–u3.66 ± 0.29 g–i15.53 o–q
Ś414.07 ± 0.32 bc3.59 ± 0.29 o–t4.17 ± 0.79 m–o35.92 bc12.42 ± 1.86 b1.52 ± 0.55 jk7.48 ± 0.72 b4.23 ± 0.64 h–j73.39 c1.17 ± 0.43 o–u1.35 ± 0.31 m–o23.18 ± 1.34 bc4.03 ± 0.29 b5.61 ± 0.55 c35.35 cd
Ś420.37 ± 0.05 r–t3.75 ± 0.54 n–s3.73 ± 0.54 m–p5.74 s–u3.14 ± 0.51 m–p1.17 ± 0.43 k–m0.73 ± 0.43 m–r1.14 ± 0.49 q–t19.79 r–t1.22 ± 0.76 n–t1.21 ± 0.23 m–p3.71 ± 0.34 s–u1.02 ± 0.38 m–p1.11 ± 0.16 s–u8.27 t–w
Ś436.91 ± 0.25 a4.21 ± 0.77 m–r2.47 ± 0.49 p–u17.62 e–h1.78 ± 1.63 r–u1.42 j± 0.28 k2.97 ± 0.49 f3.30 ± 0.29 j–m40.67 j–m1.37 ± 0.56 m–r0.80 ± 0.03 p–t11.37 ± 1.93 e–h0.58 ± 0.01 q–u4.74 ± 0.39 de18.86 m–o
means value of n = 3 independent repetition; nd—not detected; q-quercetin; c-cyanidin; p-peonidin; a, b, c,… values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey’s test).
Table 4. Biological activity as antioxidant capacity (ABTSo+, FRAP; mmoL Trolox/100 g d.w.) and antidiabetic, antiobesity, and anticholinergic activity (IC50 as mg/mL) of the tested P. domestica fruits.
Table 4. Biological activity as antioxidant capacity (ABTSo+, FRAP; mmoL Trolox/100 g d.w.) and antidiabetic, antiobesity, and anticholinergic activity (IC50 as mg/mL) of the tested P. domestica fruits.
SampleAntioxidant ActivityAntidiabetic Acitvity Antiobesity Activity 15-LOX Anti-Aging Activity
ABTSo+FRAPα-Amylaseα-GlucosidasePancreatic lipaseAChEBuChE
Ś15.38 ± 0.33 c–h8.32 ± 0.29 g–lnd r2.92 ± 0.11 q7.94 ± 0.02 a9.27 ± 1.01 m–r31.32 ± 0.72 j–m48.60 ± 1.32 g–k
Ś26.97 ± 0.68 ab11.71 ± 0.40 abnd rnd r2.98 ± 0.09 j–o16.71 ± 0.43 e–f37.68 ±1.03 f–k56.33 ± 1.65 c–h
Ś34.53 ± 0.23 g–m8.01 ± 0.60 h–mnd r2.06 ± 0.32 q–r2.56 ± 0.11 n–t11.58 ± 0.23 i–mnd r41.92 ± 2.33 j–n
Ś43.71 ± 0.51 m–o6.12 ± 0.18 op32.57 ± 2.15 g–k1.84 ± 0.11 q–r3.11 ± 0.06 i–o9.54 ± 0.28 m–r41.73 ± 1.64 e–h52.73 ± 2.54 e–i
Ś53.63 ± 0.04 m–o6.06 ± 0.26 op31.70 ± 1.76 h–l0.45 ± 0.31 r4.23 ± 0.04 c–f8.63 ± 0.54 n–s42.71 ± 1.33 d–g56.16 ± 1.42 c–h
Ś64.71 ± 0.59 e–l8.45 ± 0.16 g–l25.97 ± 2.41 m–ond r5.60 ± 0.23 b5.90 ± 0.99 t–v25.19 ± 1.43 m–o25.43 ± 1.76 p
Ś74.73 ± 0.61 e–l8.75 ± 0.69 f–k30.98 ± 2.51 i–mnd r3.70 ± 0.41 f–i7.01 ± 0.29 r–u38.85 ± 2.17 f–j53.89 ± 2.54 d–i
Ś85.58 ± 0.09 c–f9.47 ± 0.76 d–ind rnd r4.69 ± 0.23 cd20.67 ± 0.76 c36.70 ± 2.43 g–k53.04 ± 1.65 e–i
Ś94.83 ± 0.30 e–l8.90 ± 0.89 e–jnd rnd r3.54 ± 0.24 g–k6.59 ± 0.99 s–v18.83 ± 1.43 op32.22 ± 1.27 n–p
Ś103.16 ± 0.24 op5.81 ± 0.30 op30.70 ± 1.11 i–m0.68 ± 0.40 r3.58 ± 0.54 f–k7.26 ± 0.69 q–u27.87 ± 2.52 l–n36.26 ± 2.54 no
Ś117.71 ± 0.47 a13.28 ± 0.30 and r6.93 ± 0.65 m–o3.20 ± 0.32 h–n4.19 ± 0.67 v40.97 ± 2.43 e–h60.54 ± 1.52 b–f
Ś126.25 ± 0.64 bc10.51 ± 0.22 b–end r0.19 ± 0.23 r1.94 ± 0.26 t–w8.28 ± 0.58 o–t31.98 ± 1.11 i–m37.15 ± 1.75 l–o
Ś136.59 ± 0.56 b11.75 ± 0.29 abnd r3.50 ± 1.12 p–q2.50 ± 0.54 o–t14.77 ± 0.76 f–h42.29 ± 2.12 e–g61.37 ± 1.99 b–e
Ś144.67 ± 0.47 f–l9.08 ± 0.43 d–i29.78 ± 2.88 i–m10.44 ± 1.01 i–k2.66 ± 0.83 n–s10.73 ± 0.99 k–o39.43 ± 3.21 f–i51.88 ± 2.72 e–i
Ś152.45 ± 0.24 pq3.57 ± 0.30 q42.34 ± 2.71 c–e14.98 ± 2.43 d–f4.82 ± 0.88 c18.65 ± 0.73 c–e61.72 ± 3.41 a64.72 ± 2.41 bc
Ś164.18 ± 0.33 j–n7.13 ± 0.16 k–p5.24 ± 0.31 r5.14 ± 0.32 o–p2.77 ± 0.34 l–q11.40 ± 0.67 j–m33.11 ± 2.12 i–l46.90 ± 1.99 h–l
Ś173.10 ± 0.20 o–q5.59 ± 0.08 p47.44 ± 2.54 c19.72 ± 2.11 b3.63 ± 0.88 f–j24.67 ±0.78 b44.33 ± 2.16 c–f56.10 ± 1.62 c–h
Ś185.46 ± 0.45 c–g9.85 ± 0.38 c–g27.15 ± 1.11 k–n8.56 ± 0.67 k–m 2.09 ± 0.75 r–u12.40 ± 0.65 h–k20.62 ± 2.11 n–p39.34 ± 1.61 k–n
Ś194.94 ± 0.25 e–k8.88 ± 0.18 e–j21.89 ± 1.43 n–p1.89 ± 0.12 qr1.65 ± 0.54 u–v9.94 ± 0.48 k–p7.62 ± 0.54 q29.06 ± 2.84 op
Ś206.07 ± 0.62 b–d11.33 ± 0.28 bc32.68 ± 2.52 g–j11.75 ± 1.12 g–i2.68 ± 0.78 n–r9.83 ± 0.99 k–q33.03 ± 2.54 i–l48.11 ± 2.91 g–k
Ś213.25 ± 0.12 n–p6.88 ± 0.24 l–p53.57 ± 1.54 b11.49 ± 0.32 g–i3.44 ± 0.45 g–l17.07 ± 0.69 d–f50.77 ± 1.12 bc48.76 ± 1.63 g–k
Ś222.64 ± 0.4 pq6.06 ± 0.17 op37.69 ± 1.11 e–g11.67 ± 1.01 g–i1.40 ± 0.56 vw8.40 ± 0.67 o–t30.36 ± 1.25 k–m28.93 ± 1.45 op
Ś235.04 ± 0.35 e–j10.60 ± 0.65 b–d28.23 ± 0.65 j–m7.68 ± 0.13 l–n2.76 ± 0.54 m–r12.30 ± 0.73 h–l41.97 ± 1.23 e–g51.07 ± 1.63 f–j
Ś245.59 ± 0.89 c–f9.36 ± 0.14 d–ind r15.65 ± 1.23 d3.53 ± 0.65 g–k6.09 ± 0.56 s–v38.77 ± 1.32 f–j57.01 ± 1.52 c–g
Ś254.84 ± 0.20 e–k8.68 ± 0.12 f–k19.79 ± 1.52 pq10.31 ± 1.16 i–k4.45 ± 0.48 c–e4.80 ± 0.48 uv50.87 ±1.45 bc65.08 ± 2.72 bc
Ś263.18 ± 0.25 op6.48 ± 0.31 m–p38.90 ± 1.43 d–f19.62 ± 0.21 b2.79 ± 0.76 l–p12.30 ± 0.99 h–l47.47 ± 2.15 b–e47.94 ± 1.99 g–p
Ś275.43 ± 0.70 c–h10.36 ± 0.36 b–f17.18 ± 1.59 pq8.66 ± 0.54 km3.38 ± 0.41 g–m14.01 ± 0.65 g–i21.26 ± 2.43 no36.64 ± 2.61 m–o
Ś285.08 ± 0.58 e–j8.85 ± 0.35 e–jnd r13.15 ± 1.43 f–h2.18 ± 0.54 p–u7.75 ± 0.46 p–t39.41 ± 2.55 f–i70.26 ± 2.71 ab
Ś294.52 ± 0.50 h–m8.63 ± 0.29 g–k21.13 ± 0.54 op9.59 ± 1.00 i–l1.98 ± 0.43 t–v10.51 ± 0.59 k–o13.32 ± 2.43 pq15.60 ± 2.61 q
Ś304.42 ± 0.29 i–m7.81 ± 0.14 i–n32.67 ± 2.41 g–j13.36 ± 1.01 e–g2.25 ± 0.32 p–u10.41 ± 0.68 k–o18.07 ± 1.65 op35.52 ± 1.11 no
Ś312.48 ± 0.11 pq3.34 ± 0.08 q30.97 ± 2.54 i–m14.50 ± 2.11 d–f2.94 ± 0.53 k–o19.41 ± 0.69 c–d40.77 ± 1.67 e–h51.43 ± 2.61 f–j
Ś324.90 ± 0.59 e–k11.26 ± 0.44 bc37.02 ± 1.11 e–h16.27 ± 0.43 cd1.39 ± 0.75 vw9.79 ± 0.62 l–q35.38 ± 1.79 g–l35.29 ± 2.88 no
Ś334.01 ± 0.18 k–o6.23 ± 0.19 n–pnd r10.19 ± 0.41 i–k1.99 ± 0.65 s–v32.67 ± 0.59 a34.26 ± 2.43 h–l50.49 ± 2.99 g–i
Ś343.90 ± 0.56 l–o6.94 ± 0.47 l–p2.63 ± 0.11 r6.01 ±0.32 n–o3.81 ± 0.47 e–h10.26 ± 0.49 k–p50.13 ± 2.11 b–d64.12 ± 3.99 bc
Ś353.12 ± 0.43 o–q6.54 ± 0.21 m–p26.44 ± 0.22 l–o13.35 ±0.78 e–g0.44 ± 0.65 x6.00 ± 0.59 t–v19.65 ± 2.43 opnd r
Ś365.64 ± 0.36 c–e9.75 ± 0.06 c–gnd r15.50 ± 1.32 de4.89 ± 0.56 c4.98 ± 0.59 uv61.82 ± 1.11 a75.73 ± 3.11 a
Ś374.88 ± 0.56 e–k9.53 ± 0.46 d–h19.47 ± 0.76 pq15.97 ± 1.54 d3.00 ± 0.47 j–o18.52 ± 0.50 c–e41.82 ± 2.12 e–h62.91 ± 1.64 b–d
Ś385.27 ± 0.34 d–i9.68 ± 0.28 c–h15.26 ± 1.43 q11.07 ± 2.13 h–j4.77 ± 0.57 c16.81 ± 0.47 ef52.47 ± 1.11 b53.65 ± 2.61 d–i
Ś396.08 ± 0.67 b–d10.36 ± 0.58 b–fnd r9.15 ± 2.11 j–l1.28 ± 0.54 w15.59 ± 0.38 fg37.65 ± 2.65 f–k32.30 ± 2.75 n–p
Ś403.35 ± 0.07 n–p6.26 ± 0.22 n–p43.62 ± 3.16 cd18.39 ± 3.01 bc2.10 ± 0.54 q–u13.49 ± 0.56 g–j50.83 ± 2.43 bc46.22 ± 1.75 i–m
Ś412.20 ± 0.24 q3.25 ± 0.05 q61.53 ± 2.47 a24.07 ± 2.74 a4.03 ± 0.38 d–g16.99 ± 0.49 d–f45.20 ± 2.13 b–f60.45 ± 2.94 b–f
Ś423.61 ± 0.23 m–o7.35 ± 0.06 j–o40.36 ± 1.11 de16.33 ± 2.01 cd3.95 ± 0.58 e–g11.08 ± 0.39 j–n45.15 ± 2.43 b–f52.71 ± 1.59 e–i
Ś435.55 ± 0.71 c–f9.19 ± 0.47 d–i34.58 ± 3.54 f–ind r4.45 ± 0.54 c–e5.81 ± 0.59 t–v44.46 ± 0.65 c–f61.68 ± 2.01 b–e
mean value of n = 3 independent repetition; nd—not detected. a, b, c,… values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey’s test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rybak, M.; Wojdyło, A. Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, 15-Lipooxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Modulated by Polyphenolic Compounds, Organic Acids, and Carbohydrates of Prunus domestica Fruit. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071380

AMA Style

Rybak M, Wojdyło A. Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, 15-Lipooxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Modulated by Polyphenolic Compounds, Organic Acids, and Carbohydrates of Prunus domestica Fruit. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(7):1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rybak, Martyna, and Aneta Wojdyło. 2023. "Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, 15-Lipooxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Modulated by Polyphenolic Compounds, Organic Acids, and Carbohydrates of Prunus domestica Fruit" Antioxidants 12, no. 7: 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071380

APA Style

Rybak, M., & Wojdyło, A. (2023). Inhibition of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Pancreatic Lipase, 15-Lipooxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Modulated by Polyphenolic Compounds, Organic Acids, and Carbohydrates of Prunus domestica Fruit. Antioxidants, 12(7), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12071380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop