Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress: The Hidden Catalyst Fueling Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Terminalia Chebula Extract Replacing Zinc Oxide Enhances Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Capabilities, Improves Growth Performance, and Promotes Intestinal Health in Weaned Piglets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Higher Plant-Derived Biostimulants: Mechanisms of Action and Their Role in Mitigating Plant Abiotic Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Abscisic Acid Receptor Gene StPYL8-like from Solanum tuberosum Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress in Transgenic Plants

1
State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2024, 13(9), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091088
Submission received: 28 July 2024 / Revised: 31 August 2024 / Accepted: 2 September 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense in Crop Plants)

Abstract

:
Pyrabactin resistance 1-like (PYL) proteins are abscisic acid (ABA) receptors that play a crucial role in the plant’s response to adverse environmental conditions. However, as of yet, there is limited research on the role of PYL proteins in potato. In this study, a potato PYL gene, StPYL8-like, was identified through transcriptome analysis under drought stress. Molecular characterization revealed that the StPYL8-like protein possesses a highly conserved PYL family domain. Evolutionary analysis demonstrated that StPYL8-like protein clusters with various PYL proteins are involved in stress responses across different species. Functional assays showed that StPYL8-like robustly responds to different abiotic stresses, including drought and ABA treatment. Furthermore, the transient and stable expressions of StPYL8-like in tobacco enhanced their drought resistance, leading to increased plant height, leaf number, and fresh weight, as well as an improved root system. Transgenic tobacco carrying the StPYL8-like gene exhibited lower malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and higher proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activity compared to wild-type plants under drought conditions. Moreover, StPYL8-like upregulated the expression of stress-responsive genes (NtRD29A, NtLEA5, NtP5CS, NtPOD, NtSOD, and NtCAT) in transgenic plants subjected to drought stress. Collectively, these findings highlight the positive regulatory role of the StPYL8-like gene in enhancing potato plants’ response to drought stress.

1. Introduction

The growth and development of plants are frequently impacted by a variety of abiotic stresses, including drought, low temperature, high salinity and so on. Abiotic stress poses a significant latent threat to agricultural production, often resulting in pervasive reductions in crop yield. In response to abiotic stress, plants must orchestrate a range of physiological and biochemical responses, in addition to gene regulation, to effectively acclimate to adverse environmental conditions [1,2]. Gene regulation is intricately linked to stress-induced hormonal signaling pathways. Studies have demonstrated the critical involvement of ABA as a stress hormone in mediating plant responses to abiotic stressors [3,4]. It is crucial to conduct in-depth research on the ABA signaling pathway to improve plant adaptability to stressful environments.
Previous studies have identified the three fundamental components of the ABA signaling pathway: the ABA receptor PYL protein, the negative regulatory factor 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C), and the positive regulatory factor SNF1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2). These components collectively establish a dual-negative regulatory system, known as PYL-PP2C-SnRK2, which governs ABA signaling and subsequent responses [5,6]. Under normal circumstances, plants maintain low ABA levels, leading to the dimeric form of PYL that is unable to interact with PP2C. Consequently, PP2C exhibits high phosphatase activity, binding to SnRK2 to suppress its kinase function, thereby impeding downstream transcription-factor phosphorylation and gene expression within the ABA signaling pathway. However, in response to stressors like drought, ABA levels surge, facilitating the binding of ABA to and inducing a conformational change in PYL from its dimeric to its monomeric form. The monomeric PYL-ABA complex then associates with PP2C, forming a ternary complex that obstructs the active site of PP2C’s phosphatase activity. This interaction releases SnRK2 activity, enabling the phosphorylation of downstream targets and the subsequent regulation of stomatal closure and resistance mechanisms [7,8]. In essence, the ABA receptor protein PYL functions upstream of the PYL-PP2C-SnRK2 regulatory system within the ABA signaling pathway, crucially involved in ABA signal recognition, PP2C inhibition, and the initiation of ABA signaling transduction.
As a stress hormone, ABA content in plants rapidly elevates under abiotic-stress conditions, particularly drought and salt stress. In recent years, the role of ABA receptors in plant responses to abiotic stress has been gradually elucidated. To date, researchers have conducted functional analyses on 35 PYL proteins across 13 species, revealing the pivotal role of PYL in plant responses to abiotic stress [9], root development [10], fruit ripening [11], and various physiological processes. Primarily, PYL’s function lies in mediating signal transduction in plant responses to abiotic stress, with divergent mechanisms of action observed. For instance, Arabidopsis PYL5 bolsters drought resistance by directly inhibiting type A PP2Cs [12]; wheat PYL4 enhances water-use efficiency and drought tolerance by modulating stomatal conductance and elevating photosynthetic activity in transgenic plants [13]; rice PYL3/10 heightens seed sensitivity to ABA during germination and early seedling stages, thereby enhancing adaptability to stress factors [14]; and maize PYL8/9/12 enhances drought tolerance in transgenic plants through increased proline accumulation [15]. Furthermore, investigations on PYL gene function in various plant species such as grapes [16], tomatoes [17], rapeseed [18], strawberries [19], and apples [20] have demonstrated that modulating the expression of this gene family can enhance drought resistance in plants. In essence, the PYL gene significantly contributes to plant responses to drought stress, with its regulatory potential offering a means to enhance plant resilience, albeit through diverse mechanisms of action.
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plays a critical role in ensuring global food security as the fourth-largest staple crop globally. It is primarily grown in northwestern China, where water scarcity frequently induces drought stress in potatoes, consequently exerting a significant influence on both local and national commercial potato production [21]. Consequently, there is a growing emphasis on exploring and characterizing drought-resistant genes in potato to enhance stress tolerance. Some progress has also been made in the functional study of key genes in the ABA signaling pathway for potato drought tolerance. For instance, Bai et al. [22] identified the SnRK family genes in potatoes, and Yao et al. [23] further validated the drought-resistance function of this gene family. Wang et al. [24] conducted a comprehensive screening of the potato PP2C gene family at the genome level and observed the response of each gene to abiotic stress. Garia et al. [25] discovered that StPP2Ac2b plays a positive regulatory role in tuber formation in creeping stems. Moreover, Gui et al. [26] recently identified the PYL family genes in potatoes and assessed the response of each gene to various abiotic stresses. In the initial phase of this study, comprehensive whole-genome profiling of the potato PYL gene family was carried out, alongside the assessment of the expression profiles of individual PYL genes under drought conditions. Subsequently, StPYL8-like, exhibiting a pronounced response to drought stress, was chosen as the target for further exploration, and its role in drought resistance mechanisms was investigated. Then, the drought-resistance function of StPYL8-like was verified through transient and stable transformation methods. The outcomes of this investigation advance and diversify research on the ABA signaling pathway in potatoes, offering insights for exploring the molecular regulatory network of potato drought tolerance and enhancing the molecular breeding of drought-resistant potato cultivars.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

The potato cultivars “Qingshu 9” (QS9) and the tobacco variety NT12 were conserved at the State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science of Gansu Agricultural University. Potato plants were cultivated in an artificial growth chamber under a light regimen of 16 h of illumination and 8 h of darkness, maintained at a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C, with a relative humidity of 60%. Tobacco seedlings were cultured in a greenhouse with a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, a light cycle of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness, and a relative humidity of 60%. The plant expression vector pCAMBIA1304 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 were housed within our laboratory.

2.2. Isolation and Characterization of StPYL8-like

The potato reference-genome sequence and GFF annotation file were acquired from the potato genome website (http://spuddb.uga.edu/, accessed on 5 March 2022), while all AtPYL protein sequences were sourced from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 5 March 2022). The StPYL protein sequences were derived through sequence alignment and screening using TBtools. Subsequently, the expression profile of StPYLs was analyzed through transcriptome data of potatoes under drought stress. Finally, the StPYL8-like gene (Gene ID: PGSC0003DMG400005016) that significantly responds to drought stress was cloned. Following the sequencing outcomes, specific primers were designed for the amplification of the StPYL8-like gene (534 bp, GenBank ID: XP_006360709), which was subsequently cloned using potato young-leaf cDNA as a template. The protein sequence encoded by StPYL8-like was then subjected to multiple-sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis using the Cluster X and MEGA software tools (https://app.clusterx.com/, https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 8 April 2022).

2.3. Expression Analysis of StPYL8-like

The response of StPYL8-like to diverse abiotic stresses was detected using qRT-PCR. Three-week-old potato plants were subjected to stress treatments, including 200 mM mannitol, 100 mM NaCl, 100 µM ABA, 100 µM SA, and 100 µM MeJA. Control conditions consisted of a normal MS medium for drought and salt treatments, while alcohol spraying served as the control for hormone treatments. Samples were collected 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 h post stress induction, followed by RNA extraction post liquid-nitrogen freezing. Each stress treatment was replicated thrice. The qRT-PCR primers are detailed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.4. Promoter cis-Element Analysis

The 2000 bp promoter sequence upstream of the start codon of the StPYL8-like gene was extracted using TBtools. Subsequently, the cis-acting elements of the StPYL8-like promoter sequence were analyzed utilizing the PlantCARE online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 15 April 2022). Following this, StPYL8-like promoter was incorporated into the plant expression vector pBI101-GUS through homologous recombination. The transient transformation of 4-week-old tender tobacco leaves was carried out using Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101, with samples collected 2 days later for GUS histological staining at 37 °C to assess the activity of the StPYL8-like promoter.

2.5. Evaluation of Drought Resistance after Transient Transformation of Tobacco

The coding sequence (CDS) of the StPYL8-like gene was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers. The PCR product was subsequently digested with Bgl II and Spe I restriction enzymes and ligated into the pCAMBIA1304-GUS vector to generate the recombinant plasmid pC1304-StPYL8-like-GUS. The construct was then transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 cells using the heat-shock method. To assess the biological function of the StPYL8-like gene, transient transformation was performed in tobacco plants. Tobacco plants grown under normal conditions for approximately 4 weeks were transferred to Hoglund nutrient solution for a 2-day culture period. Following this, GV3101 harboring pC1304-StPYL8-like-GUS was infiltrated into tobacco leaves, with the empty vector pC1304 serving as a negative control. After 2 days of recovery, all the plants were subjected to stress treatment with 20% PEG600 in the Hoglund nutrient solution. GUS staining was carried out after 6 h to confirm successful transformation. Subsequently, various physiological parameters associated with stress responses were measured to evaluate the impact of the StPYL8-like gene on drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants.

2.6. Evaluation of Drought Resistance after Stable Transformation of Tobacco

The recombinant plasmid pC1304-StPYL8-like-GUS was introduced into tobacco T12 through the Agrobacterium-mediated leaf-disk transformation method. Subsequently, transgenic plants were cultivated on MS medium and screened for resistant seedlings using 1/2 MS medium supplemented with hygromycin (50 mg L−1, w/v). Positive lines were then confirmed by qRT-PCR and GUS staining. Based on the qRT-PCR results, three transgenic lines exhibiting the highest StPYL8-like expression levels were selected. These lines were subsequently subjected to drought stress by cutting them into uniform stem segments and transferring them to MS medium supplemented with 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM mannitol. A control group was maintained under normal MS medium conditions. Following a 30-day drought-stress treatment period, various indicators related to stress response were evaluated.

2.7. β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Staining

GUS histological staining was performed as detailed in a previous publication. Transgenic plant leaves were collected and immersed in a reaction solution containing 2 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM ferrocyanide, and 0.1% Triton X-100 at pH 7.0. The samples were then incubated at 37 °C in darkness for 12 h. Subsequently, the stained leaves were subjected to a gradient elution process using 30%, 60%, and 100% ethanol in an 80 °C water bath. Once chlorophyll was completely removed, micrographs were captured using an optical microscope.

2.8. Determination of Phenotypic and Physiological Indicators

The proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents were quantified following the methodologies outlined in previous studies. Enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) were assessed in both transgenic and control plants utilizing commercially available assay kits (BC0170, BC0220, BC0200, and BC0200 from Beijing Solaibao Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Phenotypic characteristics primarily encompass plant height, stem diameter, and root length. Furthermore, a root scanner was employed for the evaluation of root parameters including total root length, number of root tips, root surface area, and root volume.

2.9. Expression Measurement of Stress-Responsive Genes

Total RNA was extracted from tobacco samples subjected to various stress conditions and reverse-transcribed to cDNA. Subsequently, specific primers (Table S1) were employed to quantify the expression levels of stress-responsive genes via qRT-PCR.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The expression analysis and physiological index determination under abiotic stress were both performed for three independent biological replicates with three technical repeats. The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for each treatment based on the collected data from these replicates. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using SPSS v19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to assess the variability among the three overexpression lines (OE) and control plants, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05 or p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Characterization Analysis of StPYL8-like

The whole-genome identification results revealed the presence of 20 PYL genes in potatoes, among which three genes exhibited two different transcripts (Table S2). All PYL proteins contain the distinctive conserved domains characteristic of this protein family (Figure S1). Subsequently, the response of all StPYL genes to drought stress was evaluated through the transcriptome analysis of ‘QS9’ potato under drought conditions, revealing distinct expression patterns among PYL family members under such stress. Notably, StPYL16, displaying a significant response to drought stress, was singled out for further investigation (Figure S2). Nevertheless, the sequence was submitted to the NCBI database a few years ago and named StPYL8-like (GenBank ID: XP_006360709). To ensure coherence, we ultimately labeled the PYL sequence under investigation in this study StPYL8-like.
The StPYL8-like gene comprises a 534 bp open reading frame that encodes a protein consisting of 177 amino acids. Blastx analysis revealed that StPYL8-like shares sequence identities with AtPYL9 and AtPYL8 of 78% and 77% in Arabidopsis, respectively. Subsequent sequence alignment demonstrated a high similarity between the StPYL8-like protein sequence and the conserved domains of PYL proteins found in Arabidopsis, apple, cotton, and rice. Moreover, typical Gate and Latch motifs, which are key features of the PYL family proteins, were identified (Figure 1a). Additionally, phylogenetic analysis placed StPYL8-like in subgroup III, where it clustered with most PYL proteins involved in abiotic stress regulation, such as MdPYL9, GhPYL26, and OsPYL7/10/11 (Figure 1b). This suggested that StPYL8-like may possess similar biological functions to those proteins.

3.2. StPYL8-like Is Strongly Induced by Drought Treatment

To explore the reaction of StPYL8-like to a range of abiotic stresses, such as drought, salt, 4 °C, and ABA and SA treatments, experiments were conducted (Figure 2). In general, the StPYL8-like gene displays diverse expression patterns in response to the different abiotic-stress treatments. The findings revealed that in QS9, StPYL8-like demonstrated a pattern of initial increase followed by decrease across multiple stressors. Specifically, under drought, salt, 4 °C, and ABA stimuli, StPYL8-like exhibited a notable rise to its peak value after 1 h of stress, followed by a gradual decline after 3 h. Conversely, under SA and MeJA stimuli, a continuous upward trajectory was observed.

3.3. Transient Transformation of StPYL8-like Improves Drought Tolerance of Transgenic Tobacco

To preliminarily investigate the function of StPYL8-like, we transiently expressed it in tobacco and exposed the plants to drought stress (Figure 3a). Initially, GUS staining was conducted on the transgenic plants, revealing a distinct blue color in StPYL8-like-transformed leaves as opposed to slightly yellow control leaves, indicating the successful integration of the target gene (Figure 3b). Furthermore, to elucidate the effects of StPYL8-like on transgenic plants, we evaluated the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT) closely associated with plant stress responses, along with the accumulation levels of MDA and Pro (Figure 3c). Our findings demonstrated that the overexpression of StPYL8-like resulted in a substantial increase in Pro accumulation in transgenic plants under drought-stress conditions while decreasing MDA levels. Conversely, no significant differences were observed between the two indicators under normal conditions. The activity of antioxidant enzymes followed a similar trend. Under normal circumstances, there was a certain variance in antioxidant enzyme activity between control and transgenic plants, albeit not statistically significantly; however, under drought-stress conditions, the activity of all three antioxidant enzymes in transgenic plants exhibited a noteworthy increase compared to the control.

3.4. Generation of Stable Transgenic Tobacco

To further explore the role of StPYL8-like in response to drought stress, we established an overexpression of StPYL8-like in tobacco via an Agrobacterium-mediated leaf-disc transformation technique (Figure 4a). Subsequent hygromycin selection yielded 20 transgenic plants exhibiting resistance. Following RT-PCR analysis, the presence of the vector tag gene was confirmed in 13 out of the 20 resistant plants (Figure 4b). This finding was consistent with positive GUS histological staining in seedlings (Figure 4c). Subsequently, the quantitative assessment of StPYL8-like expression levels in each positive plant was performed using qRT-PCR, leading to the selection of three transgenic lines (OE-6, OE-8, and OE-9), characterized by high StPYL8-like expression levels, for further investigation (Figure 4d).

3.5. Overexpression of StPYL8-like Increases Tobacco Drought Tolerance

To determine the drought-resistance function of StPYL8-like, transgenic tobacco and control plants were subjected to drought-stress treatments. Initially, images of each plant genotype were captured under stress conditions for visual assessment. The results indicated discernible disparities in the growth patterns between transgenic and control strains under normal conditions, with transgenic plants displaying superior growth performance. Upon exposure to stress, the growth of all plants was impeded, with control plants exhibiting a more pronounced inhibition compared to transgenic plants. Furthermore, this discrepancy magnified with escalating stress severity. A notable observation was that transgenic plants maintained normal root growth at a concentration of 200 mM mannitol, whereas the root growth of control plants was completely suppressed (Figure 5a).
To more specifically illustrate the impact of StPYL8-like overexpression on the growth of transgenic plants, detailed measurements were conducted on parameters including leaf number, plant height and fresh weight (Figure 5b). The results indicated that under normal conditions, the StPYL8-like transgenic plants exhibited significantly higher leaf numbers, plant heights, and fresh weights compared to control plants, suggesting that the overexpression of StPYL8-like may contribute to both plant development and enhanced drought resistance in transgenic plants. This difference was even more pronounced under 100 mM mannitol stress conditions. When the root growth of wild-type plants was inhibited (200 mM mannitol), no significant differences were observed in leaf number and fresh weight compared to transgenic plants; however, the plant height remained notably lower in wild-type plants. Under 300 mM mannitol conditions, no significant variations were detected in the aforementioned parameters.
The aforementioned findings demonstrated that the overexpression of StPYL8-like has a substantial impact on the growth of transgenic plant roots. Subsequently, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of root phenotypes and associated metrics across different plant strains subjected to varying stress conditions. Morphologically, the root system of StPYL8-like transgenic plants exhibited superior development compared to control plants under both normal and stress conditions (Figure 6a). These observations were substantiated by the evaluation of pertinent metrics. Specifically, parameters such as primary root length, total root length, root area, number of root tips, and total root volume displayed a consistent pattern. Under normal circumstances, the metrics for transgenic plants were markedly higher than those for control plants, whereas under stress conditions, all line indicators experienced inhibition; however, the discrepancy persisted, peaking at 200 mM mannitol (Figure 6b). Notably, there was no significant alteration in root diameter pre- and post-stress during standard root growth.
Finally, the activity of three antioxidant enzymes associated with anti-stress was further measured. As showed in the figure, under normal conditions, the POD activity of transgenic plants was significantly higher than that of the control, whereas the SOD and CAT activities did not display significant deviations from the control. Conversely, when subjected to stress conditions, the activities of all three enzymes followed a similar trend of alteration, with enzyme levels in transgenic plants markedly surpassing those in control plants. Notably, this disparity widened concomitantly with escalating stress intensity. Moreover, two key physiological indicators closely associated with drought stress, MDA and Pro, were assessed (Figure 7). While the overexpression of StPYL8-like led to alterations in the growth phenotype of transgenic plants under normal conditions, there was no discernible impact on the accumulation of MDA and Pro compared to the control group. Specifically, no significant differences were observed between the transgenic plants and the control group under normal conditions. However, when exposed to stress conditions of 200 mM and 300 mM mannitol, the MDA levels in each transgenic strain were markedly lower than those in the control plants, with a noticeable concentration-dependent effect. Similarly, under stress conditions, the Pro levels in transgenic plants were considerably higher than those in the control plants, and this disparity intensified with the severity of the stress.

3.6. Stress-Related Gene Expression in Transgenic Tobacco Plants under Drought Stress Mediated by StPYL8-like

To investigate the potential mechanism underlying the enhancement of drought tolerance in transgenic plants expressing StPYL8-like, we analyzed the expression patterns of stress-related genes in both StPYL8-like transgenic lines and control plants under normal and drought conditions. Our findings revealed that upon exposure to drought stress, the transcript levels of various stress-related genes, such as NtRD29A, NtLEA5, NtP5CS, NtPOD, NtSOD, and NtCAT, were markedly elevated in StPYL8-like transgenic plants compared to the control plants (Figure 7). Interestingly, no significant differences were observed in gene expression levels between StPYL8-like transgenic plants and control plants under normal growth conditions, except for the NtPOD gene. Importantly, under drought-stress conditions, the expression levels of all identified genes in both wild-type and transgenic plants exhibited a substantial increase relative to normal conditions (Figure 8). These results suggest that the overexpression of StPYL8-like could potentially modulate the expression of these stress-related genes either directly or indirectly, thereby bolstering the drought resistance of transgenic plants.

4. Discussion

The plant hormone ABA plays a pivotal role in regulating plant growth, development, and responses to stress [27]. Drought stress typically results in heightened intracellular ABA synthesis, with the ABA receptor protein PYL playing a central role in the ABA-mediated signaling pathway that governs plant drought-resistance mechanisms [28]. This current study successfully cloned the StPYL8-like, a member of the PYL gene family, from potato. Subsequently, following a comprehensive molecular characterization, we confirmed its regulatory impact on drought resistance by assessing transient and stable expression in transgenic tobacco plants.
While ABA plays a pivotal role in this process, it was not until 2009 that researchers unearthed PYL in an investigation on a synthetic ABA agonist known as pyranose, designating PYL as an ABA receptor [29]. Afterwards, extensive research endeavors have been directed towards the screening and identification of PYL family proteins across diverse plant species. In Arabidopsis, 14 PYL proteins have been categorized into three subfamilies based on phylogenetic analysis and structural and functional characterization [30]. Discrepancies in the number of PYL family genes have been unveiled among different plant species through whole-genome identification. For instance, there are 15 in tomato [31], 40 in cotton [32], 14 in poplar [33], 8 in grapes [16], 38 in wheat [34], and 13 in rice [35]. Despite variations in the quantity of PLY family genes across species, the clustering patterns of these genes exhibit substantial consistency among plants. The classification of PYL family members into three subfamilies in various species indicates a relatively conserved function of PYL proteins throughout the evolutionary process. Recent investigations, utilizing transcriptome data from drought-stressed potato, have pinpointed the StPYL8-like gene as significantly responsive to drought stress. Further phylogenetic analysis has revealed that StPYL8-like protein clusters with PYLs are implicated in the abiotic stress response in organisms such as Arabidopsis, rice, and cotton (Figure 1). This finding underscores the potential significance of StPYL8-like in mediating the potato’s response to drought stress.
Numerous studies have validated its function in enhancing plant drought tolerance. For instance, the overexpression of AtPYR1 and AtPYL1/2/3/8/9 notably boosted the drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis [36]. Comparable outcomes have likewise been observed in other plant species like maize [15], rice [14], poplar [37], wheat [13], and cotton [38]. Wheat PYL4 demonstrates the ability to enhance water-use efficiency and drought resistance by reducing stomatal aperture and increasing photosynthetic activity in transgenic plants [13]. The overexpression of rice PYL3/10 [14,39] and cotton PYL10/12/26 [38] heightens seed sensitivity to ABA during the germination and seedling stages, thereby enhancing plant adaptability to abiotic stress. Maize PYL3/9/10/13 enhances the drought-stress tolerance of transgenic plants by elevating proline accumulation [15]. Research on PYL in crops such as grapes [16], tomato [17], rapeseed [18], strawberries [19], and apple [20] has also exhibited that upregulating this gene family can enhance plant resistance to abiotic stress. This investigation identifies StPYL8-like, a member of the PYL gene family, through transcriptome analysis under early drought stress, potentially participating in the potato response to drought stress. Similar to previously studied PYL genes, the overexpression of StPYL8-like mitigated damage to drought-stressed transgenic plants and improved their growth status under stress conditions. Moreover, the response to ABA results showed that the expression level of the StPYL8-like gene was significantly affected after 1 h of stress, and the expression trend was almost identical to that under drought, salt, and low-temperature stress. These findings suggested that the StPYL8-like gene may be involved in modulating abiotic stress responses through the ABA signaling pathway, not only in drought stress but also potentially in salt and low-temperature stress. There have been similar reports before, such as the OsPYL10 gene in rice, which simultaneously enhances the survival rate of transgenic plants under drought- and low-temperature stress conditions [39]; the grape VaPYL4 gene simultaneously enhances the tolerance of transgenic plants to three abiotic stresses: drought, salt, and low temperature [40]; and the TaPYL1-1B gene in wheat not only enhances the drought resistance of transgenic plants but also increases field yield [41]. These collective results highlight the multi-faceted role of ABA receptor PYL in plants, and whether the StPYL8-like gene also has the function of regulating multiple signal pathways needs further study and confirmation.
When plants are exposed to drought stress, the equilibrium between reactive-oxygen-species production and clearance in cells is disrupted, leading to an accumulation of reactive oxygen species, resulting in oxidative damage and eventual cell death [42]. This phenomenon has been extensively researched and confirmed in various plant species. In response to drought stress, plants typically upregulate the transcription levels of antioxidant enzyme genes such as SOD, POD, and CAT. Consequently, the activity of SOD/CAT/POD enzymes increases, ultimately facilitating the elimination of reactive oxygen species [43,44]. These response mechanisms are pivotal in enhancing plant resilience to drought stress. This study found that under drought-stress conditions, the expression levels of SOD/CAT/POD genes and the activities of SOD/CAT/POD enzymes were significantly elevated in StPYL8-like transgenic plants as compared to the control plants (Figure 3 and Figure 8). Notably, under normal growth conditions, the expression of the NtPOD gene in StPYL8-like-overexpressing plants exceeded that in control plants. The reduced MDA content in transgenic plants lends further support to this observation (Figure 7), indicating a decrease in oxidative damage. The scavenging system for reactive oxygen species is crucial for plants to combat drought stress, involving a variety of enzymatic and non-enzymatic scavengers. These enzymes work collectively to mitigate the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species [45,46]. MDA, a product of lipid oxidation, serves as a marker of oxidative damage in plants [47]. Proline, an osmolyte present in plant cytoplasm, plays a critical role in maintaining membrane and protein structure, eliminating reactive oxygen species, and minimizing photodamage to chloroplast thylakoid membranes [48]. In this study, the overexpression of StPYL8-like led to an elevation in free proline content in transgenic plants under drought stress, accompanied by the upregulation of the key gene NtP5CS involved in proline synthesis (Figure 8). Plants possess two pathways for proline synthesis: the glutamate pathway and the ornithine pathway, with the former predominantly active under osmotic stress. In the glutamate pathway, glutamate (Glu) is converted by pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthase (P5CS) into glutamyl semialdehyde (GSA), which cyclizes spontaneously to form pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid (P5C). P5C is then converted to proline through the action of pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid reductase (P5CR) [49,50]. The P5CS gene, serving as the primary rate-limiting enzyme in this synthesis pathway, is crucial for proline biosynthesis [51,52]. Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that StPYL8-like may enhance the drought tolerance of transgenic plants by influencing proline synthesis, necessitating further experimental investigations to elucidate its molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, prior investigations have indicated that PYL genes may be involved in plant growth and development or contribute to plant drought resistance through the modulation of growth and development processes. For instance, the overexpression of GhPYL10/12/26 genes in cotton has been shown to improve drought resistance in transgenic plants, as well as promote enhanced root-system development under normal growth conditions [38]. Arabidopsis PYL9 not only enhances drought resistance by reducing water evaporation but also by promoting leaf senescence in old leaves and suppressing growth in young tissues under severe drought stress [10]. Intriguingly, parallel findings were observed in our study. Specifically, under standard growth conditions, transgenic plants with StPYL8-like characteristics exhibited superior growth compared to control plants, notably reflected in their more robust root systems. Thus, it is hypothesized that StPYL8-like genes could not only boost plant drought resistance through facilitating proline synthesis but could also be involved in modulating plant growth and development. The upregulation of the StPYL8-like gene results in transgenic plants with well-developed root systems, enabling them to absorb more water during drought stress, thereby improving drought resistance. Hence, our hypothesis is that the StPYL8-like gene could modulate transgenic plant-root development via ABA signaling, concurrently facilitating proline biosynthesis, thereby augmenting the drought-stress tolerance of transgenic plants. In light of this hypothesis, we propose to extend our investigation by screening the interacting proteins of StPYL8-like under drought-stress conditions and evaluating the transcriptional impact of gene overexpression on transgenic plants. Through a holistic approach encompassing physiological, biochemical, transcriptional, and proteomic analyses, we could comprehensively elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of StPYL8-like genes in plant drought resistance. Furthermore, our upcoming research endeavors will involve an investigation into the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the StPYL8-like gene across various potato genotypes. Subsequently, we aim to elucidate the potential association between such polymorphisms and drought-resistance levels in different potato genotypes. This comprehensive analysis is poised to enhance our understanding of the biological role of the StPYL8-like gene while serving as a valuable resource for the establishment of molecular markers linked to drought resistance in potatoes. Ultimately, these findings are anticipated to significantly advance the molecular breeding efforts targeted at developing drought-tolerant potato cultivars.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this research, we successfully cloned a member of the potato PYL gene family: StPYL8-like. Stress-response assays revealed that StPYL8-like exhibited significant responses to a range of stress stimuli, such as drought and ABA. Subsequent functional characterization demonstrated that the overexpression of StPYL8-like led to elevated levels of proline accumulation and the enhanced activity of antioxidant enzymes in transgenic plants when exposed to drought stress, ultimately resulting in increased drought-stress tolerance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox13091088/s1, Figure S1: Analysis of conserved domains of PYL proteins in Arabidopsis (A) and potatoes (B); Figure S2: Expression level analysis of StPYL genes under drought stress; Table S1: The sequences of primers were used in the study; Table S2: Molecular characteristics of potato PYL family genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Y. and Z.B.; methodology, C.Z., J.C. and C.S.; software, P.Y., Y.L. and Z.L.; validation, C.Z., J.W. and X.S.; formal analysis, C.Z., J.W., X.S. and Y.L.; investigation, P.Y. and Z.B.; data curation, J.B. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Y. and Z.B.; writing—review and editing, P.Y., J.B. and Z.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Department (Grant No. 23JRRA1414); the Gansu Province Education Science and Technology Innovation Project (Grant No. 2024A-052); the Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 22JR5RA833); the University Industry Support Program (Grant No. 2024CYZC-29); the China Agricultural University Corresponding Support Research Joint Fund (Grant No. GSAU-DKZY-2024-005); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32060502), and the Research Program Sponsored by State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science of China (Grant No. GSCS-2022-Z01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Arbona, V.; Manzi, M.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Vives-Peris, V.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Physiological, metabolic, and molecular responses of plants to abiotic stress. In Stress Signaling in Plants: Genomics and Proteomics Perspective; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 20–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben Rejeb, I.; Pastor, V.; Mauch-Mani, B. Plant responses to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress: Molecular mechanisms. Plants 2014, 3, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, J.; Jia, W.; Yang, J.; Ismail, A.M. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 97, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sakata, Y.; Komatsu, K.; Takezawa, D. ABA as a universal plant hormone. In Progress in Botany; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; Volume 75, pp. 57–96. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miyazono, K.I.; Miyakawa, T.; Sawano, Y.; Kubota, K.; Kang, H.J.; Asano, A.; Miyauchi, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Zhi, Y.; Fujita, Y. Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. Nature 2009, 462, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Melcher, K.; Ng, L.M.; Zhou, X.E.; Soon, F.F.; Xu, Y.; Suino-Powell, K.M.; Park, S.Y.; Weiner, J.J.; Fujii, H.; Chinnusamy, V. A gate–latch–lock mechanism for hormone signalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature 2009, 462, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Zélicourt, A.; Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. The role of MAPK modules and ABA during abiotic stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saddhe, A.A.; Kundan, K.; Padmanabh, D. Mechanism of ABA signaling in response to abiotic stress in plants. In Mechanism of Plant Hormone Signaling under Stress; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 173–195. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Chan, Z.; Gao, J.; Xing, L.; Cao, M.; Yu, C.; Hu, Y.; You, J.; Shi, H.; Zhu, Y. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gao, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Luo, M.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Duan, S.; Wang, L. Characterization of the ABA receptor VlPYL1 that regulates anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry skin. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Quan, W.; Hu, Y.; Mu, Z.; Shi, H.; Chan, Z. Overexpression of AtPYL5 under the control of guard cell specific promoter improves drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 129, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mega, R.; Abe, F.; Kim, J.S.; Tsuboi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Sakata, Y.; Hanada, K.; Tsujimoto, H.; Kikuchi, J. Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lenka, S.K.; Muthusamy, S.K.; Chinnusamy, V.; Bansal, K.C. Ectopic expression of rice PYL3 enhances cold and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Biotechnol. 2018, 60, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, Z.; Zhong, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Terzaghi, W.; Dai, M. The maize ABA receptors ZmPYL8, 9, and 12 facilitate plant drought resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Qi, G.; Ren, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.; Wu, X. Analysis of PYL genes and their potential relevance to stress tolerance and berry ripening in grape. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 145, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, T.; Xu, X.; Yang, H.; Li, J. Virus-induced gene silencing of SlPYL4 decreases the drought tolerance of tomato. Hortic. Plant J. 2022, 8, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Sun, C.; Hu, X.; Mu, X.; Hu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, C.G.; Zhou, X. Molecular characterization of an AtPYL1-like protein, BrPYL1, as a putative ABA receptor in Brassica rapa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 487, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hou, B.Z.; Chen, X.H.; Shen, Y.Y. Interactions between strawberry ABA receptor PYR/PYLs and protein phosphatase PP2Cs on basis of transcriptome and yeast two-hybrid analyses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhou, S.; Xu, B.; Chen, P.; Ma, F.; Mao, K. The ABA receptor gene MdPYL9 confers tolerance to drought stress in transgenic apple (Malus domestica). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 194, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qin, R.; Zhang, F.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Qi, J.; Li, F.M. Contributions made by rain-fed potato with mulching to food security in China. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 133, 126435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bai, J.; Mao, J.; Yang, H.; Khan, A.; Fan, A.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Gao, H.; Zhang, J. Sucrose non-ferment 1 related protein kinase 2 (SnRK 2) genes could mediate the stress responses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yao, P.; Sun, L.; Dekomah, S.; Bi, Z.; Sun, C.; Mao, J.; Zhang, C.; Qin, T.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Evolutionary analysis of StSnRK2 family genes and their overexpression in transgenic tobacco improve drought tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.F.; Liao, Y.Q.; Wang, Y.P.; Yang, J.W.; Zhang, N.; Si, H.J. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of StPP2C gene family in response to multiple stresses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 1609–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muñiz García, M.N.; Muro, M.C.; Mazzocchi, L.C.; País, S.M.; Stritzler, M.; Schlesinger, M.; Capiati, D.A. The protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit StPP2Ac2b acts as a positive regulator of tuberization induction in Solanum tuberosum L. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 93, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gul, S.; Gul, H.; Shahzad, M.; Ullah, I.; Shahzad, A.; Khan, S.U. Comprehensive analysis of potato (Solanum tuberosum) PYL genes highlights their role in stress responses. Funct. Plant Biol. 2024, 51, FP24094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bulgakov, V.P.; Wu, H.C.; Jinn, T.L. Coordination of ABA and chaperone signaling in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 636–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Saradadevi, R.; Palta, J.A.; Siddique, K.H. ABA-mediated stomatal response in regulating water use during the development of terminal drought in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.F. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dittrich, M.; Mueller, H.M.; Bauer, H.; Peirats-Llobet, M.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Geilfus, C.M.; Carpentier, S.C.; Al Rasheid, K.A.; Kollist, H.; Merilo, E. The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. González-Guzmán, M.; Rodríguez, L.; Lorenzo-Orts, L.; Pons, C.; Sarrión-Perdigones, A.; Fernández, M.A.; Peirats-Llobet, M.; Forment, J.; Moreno-Alvero, M.; Cutler, S.R. Tomato PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors show high expression in root, differential sensitivity to the abscisic acid agonist quinabactin, and the capability to enhance plant drought resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4451–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, G.; Lu, T.; Miao, W.; Sun, L.; Tian, M.; Wang, J.; Hao, F. Genome-wide identification of ABA receptor PYL family and expression analysis of PYLs in response to ABA and osmotic stress in Gossypium. PeerJ 2017, 5, e4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, G.; Xie, H.; Yao, H.; Li, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, B.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.H. Genome-wide identification and characterization of ABA receptor PYL/RCAR gene family reveals evolution and roles in drought stress in Nicotiana tabacum. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lei, P.; Wei, X.; Gao, R.; Huo, F.; Nie, X.; Tong, W.; Song, W. Genome-wide identification of PYL gene family in wheat: Evolution, expression and 3D structure analysis. Genomics 2021, 113, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yadav, S.K.; Santosh Kumar, V.V.; Verma, R.K.; Yadav, P.; Saroha, A.; Wankhede, D.P.; Chaudhary, B.; Chinnusamy, V. Genome-wide identification and characterization of ABA receptor PYL gene family in rice. BMC Genomics 2020, 21, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, X.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Kong, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Yang, Y. ABA receptor subfamily III enhances abscisic acid sensitivity and improves the drought tolerance of Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yu, J.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Tang, R.; Wang, Y.; Ge, H.; Wu, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, F.; Luan, S. Overexpression of poplar pyrabactin resistance-like abscisic acid receptors promotes abscisic acid sensitivity and drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.; Feng, L.; Wei, N.; Liu, Z.H.; Hu, S.; Li, X.B. Overexpression of cotton PYL genes in Arabidopsis enhances the transgenic plant tolerance to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Verma, R.K.; Santosh Kumar, V.V.; Yadav, S.K.; Pushkar, S.; Rao, M.V.; Chinnusamy, V. Overexpression of ABA receptor PYL10 gene confers drought and cold tolerance to indica rice. Front Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ren, C.; Kuang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Fan, P.; Li, S.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of grape ABA receptor gene VaPYL4 enhances tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mao, H.; Jian, C.; Cheng, X.; Chen, B.; Mei, F.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Du, L.; Li, T. The wheat ABA receptor gene TaPYL1-1B contributes to drought tolerance and grain yield by increasing water-use efficiency. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 846–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Physiological roles of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sheng, L.; Sun, X.; Mo, C.; Hao, M.; Wei, X.; Ma, A. Relationship between antioxidant enzymes and sclerotial formation of Pleurotus tuber-regium under abiotic stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 1391–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hou, L.; Zhao, M.; Huang, C.; He, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. Alternative oxidase gene induced by nitric oxide is involved in the regulation of ROS and enhances the resistance of Pleurotus ostreatus to heat stress. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sachdev, S.; Ansari, S.A.; Ansari, M.I.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: Generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zaid, A.; Wani, S.H. Reactive oxygen species generation, scavenging and signaling in plant defense responses. In Bioactive Molecules in Plant Defense; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 23, pp. 111–132. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jaleel, C.A.; Gopi, R.; Sankar, B.; Manivannan, P.; Kishorekumar, A.; Sridharan, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Studies on germination, seedling vigour, lipid peroxidation and proline metabolism in Catharanthus roseus seedlings under salt stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ding, Z.; Ericksen, R.E.; Escande-Beillard, N.; Lee, Q.Y.; Loh, A.; Denil, S.; Steckel, M.; Haegebarth, A.; Ho, T.S.W.; Chow, P. Metabolic pathway analyses identify proline biosynthesis pathway as a promoter of liver tumorigenesis. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Phang, J.M.; Liu, W.; Zabirnyk, O. Proline metabolism and microenvironmental stress. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2010, 30, 441–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amini, S.; Ghobadi, C.; Yamchi, A. Proline accumulation and osmotic stress: An overview of P5CS gene in plants. J. Plant Mol. Breed. 2015, 3, 44–55. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rai, A.N.; Penna, S. Molecular evolution of plant P5CS gene involved in proline biosynthesis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 6429–6435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of the structure of StPYL8-like protein. (a) Sequence alignment of StPYL8-like with other PYL proteins. Gate and Latch conserved domains are indicated; (b) Phylogenetic relationship of StPYL8-like with other PYL proteins. The red asterisk represents potato StPYL8-like protein.
Figure 1. Analysis of the structure of StPYL8-like protein. (a) Sequence alignment of StPYL8-like with other PYL proteins. Gate and Latch conserved domains are indicated; (b) Phylogenetic relationship of StPYL8-like with other PYL proteins. The red asterisk represents potato StPYL8-like protein.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g001
Figure 2. The relative expression level of the StPYL8-like gene under abiotic-stress conditions. (af) represent 200 mM mannitol, 100 mM NaCl, 100 µM ABA, 100 µM SA, and 100 µM MeJA stress, respectively. Data represent the means ± SD of three replicates. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at 0 h.
Figure 2. The relative expression level of the StPYL8-like gene under abiotic-stress conditions. (af) represent 200 mM mannitol, 100 mM NaCl, 100 µM ABA, 100 µM SA, and 100 µM MeJA stress, respectively. Data represent the means ± SD of three replicates. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at 0 h.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g002
Figure 3. Identification of drought resistance in tobacco after transient transformation of the StPYL8-like gene. (a) Schematic diagram of the StPYL8-like gene plant-overexpression vector; (b) GUS histochemical staining of StPYL8-like transgenic plants; (c) Determination of physiological indexes related to stress. CK and PEG represent normal Hogland nutrient solution and Hogland nutrient solution containing 20% PEG6000, respectively. *, **, ***, and **** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant.
Figure 3. Identification of drought resistance in tobacco after transient transformation of the StPYL8-like gene. (a) Schematic diagram of the StPYL8-like gene plant-overexpression vector; (b) GUS histochemical staining of StPYL8-like transgenic plants; (c) Determination of physiological indexes related to stress. CK and PEG represent normal Hogland nutrient solution and Hogland nutrient solution containing 20% PEG6000, respectively. *, **, ***, and **** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g003
Figure 4. Positive identification of StPYL8-like transgenic tobacco. (a) The process of transforming StPYL8-like into tobacco; (b) PCR molecular identification of positive StPYL8-like transgenic lines; (c) GUS histochemical staining of StPYL8-like transgenic lines and control plants; (d) Analysis of expression level of StPYL8-like in transgenic lines. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Figure 4. Positive identification of StPYL8-like transgenic tobacco. (a) The process of transforming StPYL8-like into tobacco; (b) PCR molecular identification of positive StPYL8-like transgenic lines; (c) GUS histochemical staining of StPYL8-like transgenic lines and control plants; (d) Analysis of expression level of StPYL8-like in transgenic lines. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g004
Figure 5. Drought-resistance function of StPYL8-like after stable transformation of tobacco. Transgenic tobacco-stem segments with consistent growth were transferred to MS medium as well as MS medium supplemented with 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM mannitol for 30 d to stress, followed by the measurement of various phenotypic traits. (a) Phenotypic identification of plants under drought stress; (b) Statistics of leaf number, plant height and fresh weight of plants under normal and drought stress. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Figure 5. Drought-resistance function of StPYL8-like after stable transformation of tobacco. Transgenic tobacco-stem segments with consistent growth were transferred to MS medium as well as MS medium supplemented with 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM mannitol for 30 d to stress, followed by the measurement of various phenotypic traits. (a) Phenotypic identification of plants under drought stress; (b) Statistics of leaf number, plant height and fresh weight of plants under normal and drought stress. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g005
Figure 6. Identification of root phenotype of StPYL8-like transgenic plants under stress conditions (a) Root-scanning diagram of each plant under different treatment conditions; (b) Determination of root system-related indexes of various plants under different treatment conditions. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Figure 6. Identification of root phenotype of StPYL8-like transgenic plants under stress conditions (a) Root-scanning diagram of each plant under different treatment conditions; (b) Determination of root system-related indexes of various plants under different treatment conditions. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g006
Figure 7. Determination of stress-related physiological index contents in different plants under different treatment conditions. (a) POD activity; (b) SOD activity; (c) CAT activity; (d) MDA content; (e) Pro content. WT represents wild tobacco. OE-6, OE-8 and OE-9 represent three transgenic lines. ** indicates significant difference at p < 0.01 level. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Figure 7. Determination of stress-related physiological index contents in different plants under different treatment conditions. (a) POD activity; (b) SOD activity; (c) CAT activity; (d) MDA content; (e) Pro content. WT represents wild tobacco. OE-6, OE-8 and OE-9 represent three transgenic lines. ** indicates significant difference at p < 0.01 level. ns indicates that the difference is not significant. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at WT.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g007
Figure 8. Expression analysis of stress-related genes in transgenic plants and wild-type plants. (af) represents NtRD29A, NtLEA5, and NtP5CS, NtPOD, NtSOD, NtCAT genes, respectively. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. CK represents wild tobacco. OE-6, OE-8 and OE-9 represent three transgenic lines. 0 mM and 100 mM represent normal MS medium and MS medium containing 100 mM mannitol, respectively. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at CK.
Figure 8. Expression analysis of stress-related genes in transgenic plants and wild-type plants. (af) represents NtRD29A, NtLEA5, and NtP5CS, NtPOD, NtSOD, NtCAT genes, respectively. ** represents significant differences between transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01. CK represents wild tobacco. OE-6, OE-8 and OE-9 represent three transgenic lines. 0 mM and 100 mM represent normal MS medium and MS medium containing 100 mM mannitol, respectively. The horizontal line above the column indicates that the data below the line have the same level of significance difference compared to the data at CK.
Antioxidants 13 01088 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, P.; Zhang, C.; Sun, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wei, J.; Su, X.; Bai, J.; Cui, J.; Bi, Z. The Abscisic Acid Receptor Gene StPYL8-like from Solanum tuberosum Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress in Transgenic Plants. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091088

AMA Style

Yao P, Zhang C, Sun C, Liu Y, Liu Z, Wei J, Su X, Bai J, Cui J, Bi Z. The Abscisic Acid Receptor Gene StPYL8-like from Solanum tuberosum Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress in Transgenic Plants. Antioxidants. 2024; 13(9):1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Panfeng, Chunli Zhang, Chao Sun, Yuhui Liu, Zhen Liu, Jia Wei, Xinglong Su, Jiangping Bai, Junmei Cui, and Zhenzhen Bi. 2024. "The Abscisic Acid Receptor Gene StPYL8-like from Solanum tuberosum Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress in Transgenic Plants" Antioxidants 13, no. 9: 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13091088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop