Next Article in Journal
Human Relaxin-2 (Serelaxin) Attenuates Oxidative Stress in Cardiac Muscle Cells Exposed In Vitro to Hypoxia–Reoxygenation. Evidence for the Involvement of Reduced Glutathione Up-Regulation
Previous Article in Journal
The Catalytic Cycle of the Antioxidant and Cancer-Associated Human NQO1 Enzyme: Hydride Transfer, Conformational Dynamics and Functional Cooperativity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/antiox9090773
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

WIP Modulates Oxidative Stress through NRF2/KEAP1 in Glioblastoma Cells

by
Maribel Escoll
1,2,3,4,
Diego Lastra
1,2,3,4,
Natalia Robledinos-Antón
1,2,3,4,
Francisco Wandosell
4,5,
Inés María Antón
4,6 and
Antonio Cuadrado
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Medical College, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Arzobispo Morcillo 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols (CSIC-UAM), Arturo Duperier 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPaz), Pedro Rico 6, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Valderrebollo 5, 28049 Madrid, Spain
5
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma Madrid, Nicolás Cabrera 1, 28049 Madrid, Spain
6
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2020, 9(9), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090773
Submission received: 1 August 2020 / Revised: 17 August 2020 / Accepted: 17 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Antioxidant Enzyme Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to their high metabolic rate, tumor cells produce exacerbated levels of reactive oxygen species that need to be under control. Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-interacting protein (WIP) is a scaffold protein with multiple yet poorly understood functions that participates in tumor progression and promotes cancer cell survival. However, its participation in the control of oxidative stress has not been addressed yet. We show that WIP depletion increases the levels of reactive oxygen species and reduces the levels of transcription factor NRF2, the master regulator of redox homeostasis. We found that WIP stabilizes NRF2 by restraining the activity of its main NRF2 repressor, the E3 ligase adapter KEAP1, because the overexpression of a NRF2ΔETGE mutant that is resistant to targeted proteasome degradation by KEAP1 or the knock-down of KEAP1 maintains NRF2 levels in the absence of WIP. Mechanistically, we show that the increased KEAP1 activity in WIP-depleted cells is not due to the protection of KEAP1 from autophagic degradation, but is dependent on the organization of the Actin cytoskeleton, probably through binding between KEAP1 and F-Actin. Our study provides a new role of WIP in maintaining the oxidant tolerance of cancer cells that may have therapeutic implications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer cells undergo modifications in morphology associated with the cytoskeleton that lead to changes in the cell shape, adhesion, and contractility. These changes favor migratory capacity, anchorage-independent growth, and the capacity to metastasize [1,2]. Actin filaments play an essential role in cytoskeletal formation and remodeling. Actin-rich adhesions establish close contact with the substratum and are structural components of the extracellular matrix degradative structures, podosomes and invadopodia [3]. At this time, the mechanisms involved in the remodeling of the Actin cytoskeleton are still very little defined in these structures. However, it is known that the Actin-related protein Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-interacting protein (WIP), among other proteins [4,5], plays a fundamental role.
Human WIP is a proline-rich, ubiquitously expressed scaffold protein with multiple, yet poorly understood, functions in cell signaling, endocytosis, and cytoskeleton remodeling [5,6]. WIP participates in the formation of Actin-rich structures, such as immune synapses, filopodia, lamellipodia, stress fibers, and podosomes [5]. WIP-deficient mice exhibit a reduced formation of podosomes [7,8,9] and invadopodia [5,9], evidencing its relevance in the regulation of Actin polymerization. All these observations also support the pro-tumoral role of WIP by endowing some cancer cells with anchorage-independent growth and higher motility [6,10]. In fact, a high WIP expression correlates with poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [11], lung cancer [12], colorectal cancers, breast cancer, and gliomas [13].
WIP also increases cell survival and the proliferation of cancer cells by yet poorly defined mechanisms [6]. Its participation in redox control, crucial for the survival of cancer cells, has not been addressed yet. The highly proliferative activity of cancer cells leads to increased ROS levels and changes in the redox metabolism that favor protumoral functions such as genetic instability, cell migration, and mitotic signaling [14]. Loss of cell contact inhibition, survival upon matrix detachment, migratory ability, and tissue infiltration are all critical features of tumor metastasis, and ROS have been implicated in these processes [15,16]. However, the sustained elevation of ROS levels induces cell cycle arrest, senescence, and cancer cell death [17,18,19]. Therefore, tumor cells develop strategies to restrain ROS production to tolerable levels by activating endogenous antioxidant systems such transcription factor NRF2, the master regulator of redox metabolism [20,21], as well as many other cytoprotective functions related to metabolic reprogramming that contribute to cell proliferation in cooperation with other oncogenic pathways [22,23].
In this study, we found that, in the absence of WIP, the NRF2 levels are reduced due to its increased ubiquitin-proteasome degradation mediated by the E3 ligase adapter KEAP1. Our study provides a new role of WIP in maintaining the oxidant tolerance of cancer cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

The validated cell lines HEK293T (ATCC, CRL-11268), U-373 MG (ATCC, HTB-17), and U-87 MG (ATCC, HTB-14) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in 5% CO2 at 37 °C conditions. Sulforaphane (SFN), MG132, leupeptin, and ammonium chloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The gene IDs of this study include: WIP/WIPF1 (WASP-interacting protein; gene ID: 7456), NFE2L2/NRF2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; gene ID: 4780), KEAP1 (kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; gene ID: 9817), HMOX1 (heme oxygenase-1; gene ID: 3162), NQO1 (NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1; gene ID: 1728), and GCLM (glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit; gene ID: 2730).

2.2. Immunoblotting

This protocol was performed as described in [24]. Briefly, the cells were homogenized in lysis buffer (TRIS pH 7.6 50 mM, 400 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 1% SDS) and the samples were heated at 95 °C for 15 min, sonicated, and pre-cleared by centrifugation. The proteins were resolved in SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore) membranes. The proteins of interest were detected with the following primary antibodies: Actin (sc-1616, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CB1001, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), KEAP1 (8047, Cell Signaling Techonology, Danvers, MA, USA), LaminB (sc-6217, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), LC3 (2775, Cell Signaling Technology), NRF2 (homemade and validated in [25]), NQO1 (ab2346, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), p62 (P0067-200UL, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and WIP (sc-25533, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Proper peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).

2.3. Lentiviral Vector Production and Infection

Pseudotyped lentiviral vectors were produced in HEK293T cells transiently co-transfected with the corresponding lentiviral vector (10 µg), the packaging plasmid pSPAX2 (6 µg; Addgene code 12260, Watertown, MA, USA), and theplasmid pMD2G, expressing the glycoprotein of the vesicular stomatitis virus (6 µg; Addgene code 12259), using the Lipofectamine Plus reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Lentiviral vector shRNA control (shco) (Addgene code 1864), shWIP (NM_ 003387 TRCN0000029825), and shKEAP1 (NM_ 012289 TRCN0000154657) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MISSION shRNA). The lentiviral vectors pWPXL-NRF2WT, NRF2ΔETGE, and NRF26SA were homemade from previous pcDNA3 constructs using the expression vector pWPXL (Addgene, 12257). The cells were infected in the presence of 4 μg/mL of polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich) and selected with 1 μg/mL of puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.4. Analysis of mRNA Levels

The total RNA extraction and qRT-PCR were performed as detailed in [26]. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Data analysis was based on the ∆∆CT method, with the normalization of the raw data by the geometric mean to the housekeeping genes GAPDH and TBP (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All the PCRs were performed in triplicate.

2.5. Immunofluorescence and Image Analysis

The cells were adhered on coverslips and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Immunofluorescence was performed as described in [27]. Briefly, the cells were washed, blocked, and permeabilized in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100% and 3% bovine serum albumin and incubated for 16 h at 4 °C. Then, the cells were incubated for 2 h with the HA primary antibodies (1:400) (MMS-101R, Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA) and then for 45 min with Alexa Fluor546-conjugated Phalloidin (1:200) (A22283, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), DAPI (1:1000) (D1306, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa Fluor 488 (1:500) (Life Technologies-Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY, USA). Images were quantified using the Fiji Software (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). The fluorescence intensity and M1 and M2 colocalization coefficients were measured by Manders analysis using the JACoP plug-in. The co-localization coefficients, M1 and M2, are proportional to the amount of fluorescence of the co-localizing objects in each component of the image, relative to the total fluorescence in that component [28].

2.6. Flow Cytometry Determination of Reactive Oxygen Species

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected in a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson) with hydroethidine (HE) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which, upon oxidation, emits orange fluorescence (Excitation/Emission: 518/606 nm). The cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 2 μM of HE and then detached from the plate, washed once with cold PBS, and analyzed immediately.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) or S.E.M. (standard error of the mean), as indicated in each case. Statistical assessments of the differences between groups were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software by an unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA, as indicated in the legends to the figures.

3. Results

3.1. WIP Knocked-Down Cells Exhibit Increased ROS and Decreased NRF2 Levels

First, we determined if WIP can generate changes in the basal redox state of tumor cells. We silenced WIP in the glioblastoma cell lines U-87 MG and U-373 MG with a lentiviral vector expressing shWIP (Supplemental Figure S1). After three days of interference, the intracellular ROS status was analyzed using the superoxide-sensitive fluorescent probe hydroethidine (HE). In both cell lines, the WIP knock-down led to an increase in the ROS levels (Figure 1A,B). Considering that transcription factor NRF2 is a master regulator of genes involved in redox metabolism, we analyzed possible changes in the levels of this protein. We observed that WIP-depleted glioblastoma cells presented low NRF2 levels compared to the transduced cells with the control vector (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure S1). Moreover, the decrease in NRF2 correlated with reduced transcriptional activity, reflected as the lower mRNA levels of three target genes, HMOX1, NQO1, and GCLM, encoding heme oxygenase-1, NADPH quinone oxidoreductase, and modulator γ-glutamyl cysteine ligase, respectively (Figure 1D).

3.2. The Regulation of NRF2 by WIP is KEAP1-Dependent

We submitted control and WIP-silenced U-87 MG and U-373 MG cells to the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Figure 2A,B). In the control cells, both WIP and NRF2 accumulated progressively in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor, indicating that both proteins are turned over by this mechanism. However, in the WIP-silenced cells, MG132 still accumulated NRF2. These observations indicate that WIP-depletion leads to the exacerbated degradation of NRF2 by the proteasome, as MG132 can rescue this effect.
NRF2 is a short half-life protein with exquisite post-translational regulation by at least two different E3 ligase adapters, KEAP1 and GSK3/β-TrCP, that target NRF2 for ubiquitin/proteasome degradation [20,29]. We used the NRF2 mutants, NRF2ΔETGE and NRF26SA, which respectively escape to KEAP1 or β-TrCP-mediated degradation (see Figure 2C for details). Glioblastoma cells U-87 MG and U-373 MG were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing wild-type NRF2, NRF2ΔETGE, NRF26SA, or empty vector as a control, and then with control interference (shco) or with shWIP lentiviral vectors. After 3 days of WIP interference, we reproduced the drop in the levels of ectopically expressed wild-type NRF2, and the NRF26SA levels were similarly decreased. By contrast, the NRF2ΔETGE levels were insensitive to the WIP knockdown (Figure 2D,G). These results suggest that the drop in NRF2 caused by WIP silencing is due to the induction of the KEAP1 degradation pathway. To further confirm this observation, the control and WIP-knocked-down cells were treated with the selective KEAP1 inhibitor sulforaphane (SFN) (Figure 2E,H). Both SFN-treated cell lines accumulated NRF2 despite the WIP depletion. The accumulation was lower than in the control cells, but it must be noted that the initial amount of NRF2 in the WIP-silenced cells was also lower. Additionally, we used lentiviral KEAP1 knock-down in combination with WIP knockdown (Figure 2F,I). KEAP1 deficiency increased the NRF2 levels, as expected, and also rescued the NRF2 downregulation elicited by the WIP knockdown. Altogether, these genetic and chemical approaches indicate that WIP protects NRF2 from KEAP1-mediated degradation.

3.3. The Control of the Cellular Redox State by WIP Is NRF2-Dependent

To determine if the changes in redox status resulting from WIP depletion are dependent on the observed reduction in NRF2, we analyzed the effect of NRF2ΔETGE in WIP-knocked-down cells. In agreement with Figure 1, WIP silencing increased the intracellular ROS levels, as determined by HE oxidation, but NRF2ΔETGE rescued the normal ROS levels (Figure 3A,B,D,E). Consistently, under these experimental conditions, we confirmed WIP interference and NRF2ΔETGE overexpression by immunoblot (Figure 3C,F). Therefore, WIP requires NRF2 for maintaining the basal redox status.

3.4. WIP Does Not Regulate KEAP1 Degradation

One possible explanation for the protective effect of WIP over the KEAP1-mediated degradation of NRF2 might be that WIP modifies the stability of KEAP1. KEAP1 degradation involves selective autophagy through interaction with the cargo protein p62 [30]. Considering that WIP participates in multiple aspects of endosomal trafficking, we explored if WIP might be controlling KEAP1 degradation through autophagy. WIP-depleted cells were treated with a standard cocktail of ammonium chloride and leupeptin (N/L), which inhibits lysosomal proteases [24,31]. In U-87 MG and U-373 MG glioblastoma cells, the inhibition of autophagy was confirmed by the increased accumulation of lipidated LC3-II and p62 proteins (Figure 4A,B). In agreement with other reports, KEAP1 was also accumulated [30] (Figure 4A,B). Regarding NRF2, its levels decreased when KEAP1 was protected from autophagy by the N/L cocktail, and the WIP-depleted cells still led to the further degradation of NRF2. Even more, as shown in Figure 4A,B, the KEAP1 levels were similar in the control and WIP-knocked-down cells, even in the absence of the autophagy inhibitors, therefore excluding other potential pathways for KEAP1 degradation. Hence, the effect of WIP on KEAP1 inhibition is at least in part independent of its degradation.

3.5. WIP-Depleted Cells Exhibit Increased Co-Localization between KEAP1 and F-Actin

The remodeling of the Actin cytoskeleton is a well-established function attributed to WIP. Therefore, we analyzed if WIP-silencing might alter the dynamics of Actin microfilaments in the U-87 MG and U-373 MG glioblastoma lines. Following three days of WIP knockdown, there was not a change in the amount of Actin detected by immunoblot (Supplementary Figure S2a,d), but when the cells were stained with Phalloidin, a toxin that selectively binds to filamentous Actin (F-Actin), WIP depletion led to a ~1.5-fold increase in polymerized Actin over the control (Supplementary Figure S2b,c,e,f).
KEAP1 was initially defined as a cytoskeleton-associated protein [32,33]. Therefore, we analyzed if WIP maintains NRF2 stability by altering the KEAP1 interaction with the Actin cytoskeleton. Due to the low KEAP1 levels and lack of suitable antibodies for the immunofluorescence of endogenous KEAP1, the co-localization between KEAP1 and the polymerized Actin was studied in cells ectopically expressing HA-tagged KEAP1. In the U-87 MG and U-373 MG glioblastoma lines, a pool of KEAP1 was localized in at the perinuclear cytoplasm, and another was close to the plasma membrane clustered in the podosomes, invadosomes, or other Actin-rich structures. In WIP-depleted cells, we found increased co-localization between KEAP1-HA and F-Actin at the Actin-rich structures of the plasma membrane (Figure 5A,B) that was further quantified using Manders’ overlap coefficients (Figure 5C,D).
Altogether, all these data indicate that WIP deficiency alters Actin dynamics, possibly increasing the interaction of KEAP1 with microfilaments, increasing the cytoplasmic retention and degradation of NRF2, and altering the cellular basal redox state.

4. Discussion

The role of WIP in the organization of the Actin microfilaments endows this protein with a unique function in cytoskeletal remodeling and vesicle trafficking, which are required for cell survival, proliferation, and tumorigenesis [6,10]. In this study, we show for the first time that WIP also participates in the control of redox status by protecting NRF2 from ubiquitin-proteasome degradation. The importance of NRF2 in cancer progression has been widely described as it increases tolerance to the high ROS production that characterizes tumor cell growth [14,34,35,36]. Consistent with our observations in cell culture, glioma patients also exhibit high expression levels of both WIP and NRF2, resulting in poor prognosis [6,37,38].
The best-characterized pathways that control NRF2 stability are KEAP1 and β-TrCP [39]. These two mechanisms appear to obey to different cellular circumstances. Thus, KEAP1 connects NRF2 degradation with redox signaling and β-TrCP with growth factor signaling. The use of specific NRF2 mutants that are resistant to KEAP1 or β-TrCP-mediated degradation as well as the chemical and genetic silencing of KEAP1 allowed us to conclude that WIP restrains the capacity of KEAP1 to target NRF2 for degradation. Therefore, our results favor a role of WIP in the control of oxidative stress.
Considering that WIP participates in vesicular trafficking, we analyzed if the regulation of NRF2 stability by WIP might involve KEAP1 degradation by autophagy. KEAP1 interacts with the autophagy cargo protein p62/SQSTM1, which sequesters the complex in inclusion bodies and promotes its degradation [40,41]. The participation of WIP in autophagy has not been addressed yet, but the Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), a binding partner of WIP in innate immune cells, appears to participate in autophagy [42]. Thus, WASP deficiency results in impaired autophagic p62/LC3 recruitment and defective formation of canonical autophagosomes [42]. However, although the inhibition of autophagy led to a concomitant increase in KEAP1, this effect was independent of WIP, because WIP depletion did not alter KEAP1 levels at the baseline or following autophagosome inhibition. The most characterized WIP partner in non-immune cell types, including glioblastomas, is neural-WASP ((N)-WASP) [43,44]. WIP reorganizes of the Actin cytoskeleton in glioblastoma cells in a (N)-WASP-dependent and independent manner [5,45,46], and therefore future studies are required to determine if (N)-WASP, alone or together with WIP, might modulate the autophagy flux in these cell types.
Before the realization that KEAP1 is an E3 ligase adaptor to the CUL3/RBX complex [47,48], it was considered that KEAP1 binds to the Actin cytoskeleton and traps NRF2 in the cytoplasm, thereby preventing its nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity [32]. Drugs that disassemble or stabilize the Actin cytoskeleton led to increased or decreased NRF2 levels, respectively [32], and it was suggested that, by analogy with other proteins that contain a Kelch repeat, KEAP1 might bind F-Actin [32]. Although later on it was found that the Kelch repeats are actually a WD40 propeller involved in NRF2 ubiquitination, these studies provided evidence for the binding of KEAP1 to Actin. The association of KEAP1 with Actin-rich adhesion complexes was further analyzed in different tissues and cell types [33]. KEAP1 is present in focal adhesions of kidney proximal tubule cells and in adherens junctions at the base of the bile canaliculi, in association with Actin. KEAP1 appears to play also a role in podosome formation [49]. Our results are in agreement with an interaction between KEAP1 and F-Actin, and show that this association might be responsible for increased ubiquitination of NRF2 in the absence of WIP. However, we must consider that WIP is a cellular multi-tasker that participates in multiple protein-protein interactions, as it has been recently reviewed [50], and therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that, besides Actin, other proteins interacting with WIP might play a relevant role in KEAP1 repression. These proteins, most of them interacting with the proline-rich central portion of WIP through its SH3 domain, might include Cortactin, Profilin1/2, and NCK1/2, among others [50], and have functions beyond cytoskeletal dynamics that might regulate the KEAP1/NRF2 axis. For instance, Nck1-knockdown in adipocyte cell lines leads to their impaired differentiation in response to platelet-derived growth factor α, accompanied by the increased activation of the transcription factor NRF2 [51]. Whether this pathway of NRF2 regulation is connected to WIP/KEAP1 axis remains to be elucidated.
More recently, a new connection between the NRF2 system and the Actin cytoskeleton has been reported to control of NRF2 activity by the Arp2/3 complex [49], although the role of WIP was not analyzed. The Arp2/3 complex catalyzes the polymerization of monomeric Actin into branched Actin microfilaments [52]. It was found that depletion of the Arp2/3 complex by knockout of Arpc4 leads in keratinocytes to a reduction in Actin microfilaments, including stress fibers, and NRF2 hyperactivation. Our results are in agreement with this study as we found that WIP-depletion leads to the opposite effect—i.e., more stress fibers correlated with a lower NRF2 activity. However, in keratinocytes these authors did not detect the expected increase in the NRF2 protein levels despite the fact that they found the increased phosphorylation of the Ser40 of NRF2. This result is contradictory, as Ser40 is located at the Neh2 domain of NRF2 that binds to KEAP1 and has been reported as a mechanism to escape KEAP1-targeted degradation [49]. Further studies will be required to determine if indeed the hyperactivation of NRF2 is or not related to impaired KEAP1 activity in keratinocytes.
There is abundant evidence of the effect of ROS in Actin remodeling. For instance, several critical cysteine and methionine amino acids are susceptible to oxidation in Actin, resulting in alterations in Actin polymerization [53]. Thus, NOX-derived ROS promote the formation Actin-rich protrusions of the plasma membrane [54] and mitochondrial ROS support KRAS-induced anchorage-independent growth of murine lung cancer cells [55]. Therefore, we propose that WIP might act as a regulator of the overall redox state, through NRF2 regulation, and provide a feedback mechanism for the protection of Actin microfilaments from uncontrolled oxidation.

5. Conclusions

WIP participates in tumor progression and promotes cancer cell survival. Here, we report a new role of this multi-taker protein in the control of the redox adaptation of cancer cells by preventing the KEAP-dependent degradation of NRF2. Most likely this effect is due to the reorganization of the Actin cytoskeleton. Therefore, we propose that WIP might act as a regulator of the overall redox state, through NRF2 regulation, and provide a feedback mechanism for the protection of Actin microfilaments from uncontrolled oxidation. Our study provides a new role of WIP in maintaining the oxidant tolerance of cancer cells, which may have therapeutic implications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/9/9/773/s1: Figure S1: Two different WIP shRNAs decrease NRF2 protein levels. Figure S2: WIP knocked-down cells exhibit increased F-Actin levels. Table S1: Oligonucleotides used for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.E. and A.C.; resources: F.W, I.M.A. and A.C.; investigation: M.E., D.L. and A.C.; methodology: M.E., D.L., N.R.-A.; writing—original draft: M.E. and A.C.; writing—review: M.E., D.L., N.R.-A., F.W., I.M.A. and A.C.; funding acquisition: A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by PID2019-110061RB-I00, RTI2018-096303-B-C31 and SAF2017-82436R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness; and by the P_37_732/2016 grant (REDBRAIN) financed by the European Regional Development Fund, Competitiveness Operational Program 2014–2020, and Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (grant B2017/BMD-3827). M.E. was recipient of a postdoctoral contract Juan de la Cierva; D.L. and N.R.-A. enjoied a FPU contract of MINECO.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seetharaman, S.; Etienne-Manneville, S. Cytoskeletal crosstalk in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, X.; Wang, J. Mechanical tumor microenvironment and transduction: Cytoskeleton mediates cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 2014–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lehtimäki, J.; Hakala, M.; Lappalainen, P. Actin filament structures in migrating cells. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 235, 123–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. García, E.; Jones, G.E.; Machesky, L.M.; Antón, I.M. WIP: WASP-interacting proteins at invadopodia and podosomes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 91, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Antón, I.M.; Jones, G.E.; Wandosell, F.; Geha, R.; Ramesh, N. WASP-interacting protein (WIP): Working in polymerisation and much more. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gargini, R.; Escoll, M.; García, E.; García-Escudero, R.; Wandosell, F.; Antón, I.M. WIP drives tumor progression through YAP/TAZ-dependent autonomous cell growth. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1962–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chou, H.-C.; Antón, I.M.; Holt, M.R.; Curcio, C.; Lanzardo, S.; Worth, A.; Burns, S.; Thrasher, A.J.; Jones, G.E.; Calle, Y. WIP regulates the stability and localization of WASP to podosomes in migrating dendritic cells. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Banon-Rodriguez, I.; Saez de Guinoa, J.; Bernardini, A.; Ragazzini, C.; Fernandez, E.; Carrasco, Y.R.; Jones, G.E.; Wandosell, F.; Anton, I.M. WIP regulates persistence of cell migration and ruffle formation in both mesenchymal and amoeboid modes of motility. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Antón, I.M.; de la Fuente, M.A.; Sims, T.N.; Freeman, S.; Ramesh, N.; Hartwig, J.H.; Dustin, M.L.; Geha, R.S. WIP deficiency reveals a differential role for WIP and the actin cytoskeleton in T and B cell activation. Immunity 2002, 16, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Escoll, M.; Gargini, R.; Cuadrado, A.; Anton, I.M.; Wandosell, F. Mutant p53 oncogenic functions in cancer stem cells are regulated by WIP through YAP/TAZ. Oncogene 2017, 36, 3515–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, Y.; Lu, F.; Xiong, P.; Pan, M.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; Pan, M.; Huang, H. WIPF1 antagonizes the tumor suppressive effect of miR-141/200c and is associated with poor survival in patients with PDAC. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yu, W.; Hua, Y.; Qiu, H.; Hao, J.; Zou, K.; Li, Z.; Hu, S.; Guo, P.; Chen, M.; Sui, S.; et al. PD-L1 promotes tumor growth and progression by activating WIP and β-catenin signaling pathways and predicts poor prognosis in lung cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Staub, E.; Groene, J.; Heinze, M.; Mennerich, D.; Roepcke, S.; Klaman, I.; Hinzmann, B.; Castanos-Velez, E.; Pilarsky, C.; Mann, B.; et al. An expression module of WIPF1-coexpressed genes identifies patients with favorable prognosis in three tumor types. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 87, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Cairns, R.A.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chiang, A.C.; Massagué, J. Molecular basis of metastasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2814–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Moldogazieva, N.T.; Lutsenko, S.V.; Terentiev, A.A. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species-induced protein modifications: Implication in carcinogenesis and anticancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 6040–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Panieri, E.; Gogvadze, V.; Norberg, E.; Venkatesh, R.; Orrenius, S.; Zhivotovsky, B. Reactive oxygen species generated in different compartments induce cell death, survival, or senescence. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 57, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vurusaner, B.; Poli, G.; Basaga, H. Tumor suppressor genes and ROS: Complex networks of interactions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moon, D.-O.; Kim, M.-O.; Choi, Y.H.; Hyun, J.W.; Chang, W.Y.; Kim, G.-Y. Butein induces G(2)/M phase arrest and apoptosis in human hepatoma cancer cells through ROS generation. Cancer Lett. 2010, 288, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cuadrado, A.; Rojo, A.I.; Wells, G.; Hayes, J.D.; Cousin, S.P.; Rumsey, W.L.; Attucks, O.C.; Franklin, S.; Levonen, A.-L.; Kensler, T.W.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of the NRF2 and KEAP1 partnership in chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 295–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cuadrado, A.; Manda, G.; Hassan, A.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Barbas, C.; Daiber, A.; Ghezzi, P.; León, R.; López, M.G.; Oliva, B.; et al. Transcription factor NRF2 as a therapeutic target for chronic diseases: A systems medicine approach. Pharmacol. Rev. 2018, 70, 348–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kitamura, H.; Motohashi, H. NRF2 addiction in cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 900–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pani, G.; Galeotti, T.; Chiarugi, P. Metastasis: Cancer cell’s escape from oxidative stress. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010, 29, 351–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pajares, M.; Jiménez-Moreno, N.; García-Yagüe, Á.J.; Escoll, M.; de Ceballos, M.L.; Van Leuven, F.; Rábano, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Rojo, A.I.; Cuadrado, A. Transcription factor NFE2L2/NRF2 is a regulator of macroautophagy genes. Autophagy 2016, 12, 1902–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Rada, P.; Rojo, A.I.; Chowdhry, S.; McMahon, M.; Hayes, J.D.; Cuadrado, A. SCF/β-TrCP promotes glycogen synthase kinase 3-dependent degradation of the Nrf2 transcription factor in a Keap1-independent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rojo, A.I.; Innamorato, N.G.; Martín-Moreno, A.M.; De Ceballos, M.L.; Yamamoto, M.; Cuadrado, A. Nrf2 regulates microglial dynamics and neuroinflammation in experimental Parkinson’s disease. Glia 2010, 58, 588–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Robledinos-Antón, N.; Rojo, A.I.; Ferreiro, E.; Núñez, Á.; Krause, K.-H.; Jaquet, V.; Cuadrado, A. Transcription factor NRF2 controls the fate of neural stem cells in the subgranular zone of the hippocampus. Redox Biol. 2017, 13, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. MANDERS, E.M.M.; VERBEEK, F.J.; ATEN, J.A. Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. J. Microsc. 1993, 169, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cuadrado, A. Structural and functional characterization of Nrf2 degradation by glycogen synthase kinase 3/β-TrCP. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Komatsu, M.; Kurokawa, H.; Waguri, S.; Taguchi, K.; Kobayashi, A.; Ichimura, Y.; Sou, Y.-S.; Ueno, I.; Sakamoto, A.; Tong, K.I.; et al. The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pajares, M.; Rojo, A.I.; Arias, E.; Díaz-Carretero, A.; Cuervo, A.M.; Cuadrado, A. Transcription factor NFE2L2/NRF2 modulates chaperone-mediated autophagy through the regulation of LAMP2A. Autophagy 2018, 14, 1310–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kang, M.-I.; Kobayashi, A.; Wakabayashi, N.; Kim, S.-G.; Yamamoto, M. Scaffolding of Keap1 to the actin cytoskeleton controls the function of Nrf2 as key regulator of cytoprotective phase 2 genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2046–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Velichkova, M.; Hasson, T. Keap1 in adhesion complexes. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2003, 56, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jaramillo, M.C.; Zhang, D.D. The emerging role of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway in cancer. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 2179–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Menegon, S.; Columbano, A.; Giordano, S. The dual roles of NRF2 in cancer. Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 578–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gorrini, C.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 931–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kanamori, M.; Higa, T.; Sonoda, Y.; Murakami, S.; Dodo, M.; Kitamura, H.; Taguchi, K.; Shibata, T.; Watanabe, M.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Activation of the NRF2 pathway and its impact on the prognosis of anaplastic glioma patients. Neuro. Oncol. 2015, 17, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Escoll, M.; Lastra, D.; Pajares, M.; Robledinos-Antón, N.; Rojo, A.I.; Fernández-Ginés, R.; Mendiola, M.; Martínez-Marín, V.; Esteban, I.; López-Larrubia, P.; et al. Transcription factor NRF2 uses the Hippo pathway effector TAZ to induce tumorigenesis in glioblastomas. Redox Biol. 2020, 30, 101425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tebay, L.E.; Robertson, H.; Durant, S.T.; Vitale, S.R.; Penning, T.M.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Hayes, J.D. Mechanisms of activation of the transcription factor Nrf2 by redox stressors, nutrient cues, and energy status and the pathways through which it attenuates degenerative disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 108–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fan, W.; Tang, Z.; Chen, D.; Moughon, D.; Ding, X.; Chen, S.; Zhu, M.; Zhong, Q. Keap1 facilitates p62-mediated ubiquitin aggregate clearance via autophagy. Autophagy 2010, 6, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jain, A.; Lamark, T.; Sjøttem, E.; Larsen, K.B.; Awuh, J.A.; Øvervatn, A.; McMahon, M.; Hayes, J.D.; Johansen, T. p62/SQSTM1 is a target gene for transcription factor NRF2 and creates a positive feedback loop by inducing antioxidant response element-driven gene transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22576–22591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lee, P.P.; Lobato-Márquez, D.; Pramanik, N.; Sirianni, A.; Daza-Cajigal, V.; Rivers, E.; Cavazza, A.; Bouma, G.; Moulding, D.; Hultenby, K.; et al. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein regulates autophagy and inflammasome activity in innate immune cells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tang, Z.; Araysi, L.M.; Fathallah-Shaykh, H.M. c-Src and neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) promote low oxygen-induced accelerated brain invasion by gliomas. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ziv-Av, A.; Giladi, N.D.; Lee, H.K.; Cazacu, S.; Finniss, S.; Xiang, C.; Pauker, M.H.; Barda-Saad, M.; Poisson, L.; Brodie, C. RTVP-1 regulates glioma cell migration and invasion via interaction with N-WASP and hnRNPK. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 19826–19840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Antón, I.M.; Jones, G.E. WIP: A multifunctional protein involved in actin cytoskeleton regulation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martinez-Quiles, N.; Rohatgi, R.; Antón, I.M.; Medina, M.; Saville, S.P.; Miki, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Takenawa, T.; Hartwig, J.H.; Geha, R.S.; et al. WIP regulates N-WASP-mediated actin polymerization and filopodium formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cullinan, S.B.; Gordan, J.D.; Jin, J.; Harper, J.W.; Diehl, J.A. The Keap1-BTB protein is an adaptor that bridges Nrf2 to a Cul3-based E3 ligase: Oxidative stress sensing by a Cul3-Keap1 ligase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 8477–8486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kobayashi, A.; Kang, M.-I.; Okawa, H.; Ohtsuji, M.; Zenke, Y.; Chiba, T.; Igarashi, K.; Yamamoto, M. Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3-based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. van der Kammen, R.; Song, J.-Y.; de Rink, I.; Janssen, H.; Madonna, S.; Scarponi, C.; Albanesi, C.; Brugman, W.; Innocenti, M. Knockout of the Arp2/3 complex in epidermis causes a psoriasis-like disease hallmarked by hyperactivation of transcription factor Nrf2. Development 2017, 144, 4588–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sokolik, C.G.; Qassem, N.; Chill, J.H. The disordered cellular multi-tasker WIP and its protein-protein interactions: A structural view. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haider, N.; Larose, L. Activation of the PDGFRα-Nrf2 pathway mediates impaired adipocyte differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells lacking Nck1. Cell. Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Rotty, J.D.; Wu, C.; Bear, J.E. New insights into the regulation and cellular functions of the ARP2/3 complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fedorova, M.; Kuleva, N.; Hoffmann, R. Identification of cysteine, methionine and tryptophan residues of actin oxidized in vivo during oxidative stress. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1598–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Diaz, B.; Shani, G.; Pass, I.; Anderson, D.; Quintavalle, M.; Courtneidge, S.A. Tks5-dependent, nox-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species is necessary for invadopodia formation. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Weinberg, F.; Hamanaka, R.; Wheaton, W.W.; Weinberg, S.; Joseph, J.; Lopez, M.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Mutlu, G.M.; Budinger, G.R.S.; Chandel, N.S. Mitochondrial metabolism and ROS generation are essential for Kras-mediated tumorigenicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 8788–8793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 09 00773 g001 550
Figure 1. WIP knocked-down cells exhibit increased evels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased NRF2. U-87 MG and U-373 MG glioblastoma cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shcontrol (shco) or human shWIP. (A) Changes in intracellular ROS were determined by HE staining (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission) (n = 3). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of shNRF2-induced intracellular ROS production in HE stained cells (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission). A representative sample of 10,000 cells is shown for each condition. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. ** p ≤ 0.01 according to a Student’s t-test. (C) Representative immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, GAPDH, and LaminB as loading controls (n = 3). (D) Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of HMOX1, NQO1, GCLM were determined by qRT-PCR and normalized by the geometric mean of GAPDH and TBP. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3) * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 according to a Student’s t-test.
Figure 1. WIP knocked-down cells exhibit increased evels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased NRF2. U-87 MG and U-373 MG glioblastoma cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shcontrol (shco) or human shWIP. (A) Changes in intracellular ROS were determined by HE staining (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission) (n = 3). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of shNRF2-induced intracellular ROS production in HE stained cells (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission). A representative sample of 10,000 cells is shown for each condition. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. ** p ≤ 0.01 according to a Student’s t-test. (C) Representative immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, GAPDH, and LaminB as loading controls (n = 3). (D) Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of HMOX1, NQO1, GCLM were determined by qRT-PCR and normalized by the geometric mean of GAPDH and TBP. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3) * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 according to a Student’s t-test.
Antioxidants 09 00773 g001
Antioxidants 09 00773 g002 550
Figure 2. The regulation of NRF2 by WIP is KEAP1-dependent. (A,B) Time-dependent accumulation of NRF2 in control and WIP-silenced U-87 MG (A) and U-373 cells (B) and cells treated with 10 µM of MG132. (C) Scheme of the two domains of NRF2, Neh2 and Nhe6, which are targeted for proteasome degradation. A KEAP1 homodimer binds the N-terminal region of NRF2 (Neh2 domain) through interaction with a low affinity (DLG) and high affinity (ETGE) amino acid motifs. Thus, the mutated version of NRF2 that lacks the ETGE motif (NRF2ΔETGE) is insensitive to KEAP1-mediated degradation [20]. On the other hand, several phosphorylation events, in which Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is an essential kinase, generate a degradation domain (phosphodegron) that is recognized by the E3 ligase adapter β-TrCP. Thus, the mutated version of NRF2 in which six serines involved in the generation of the phosphorylation have been changed to alanines (NRF26SA) generates a NRF2 insensitive to β-TrCP-mediated degradation [29]. (D,G) Immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (D) and U-373 MG (G) cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing NRF2WT, NRF2ΔETGE, NRF26SA or with empty vector as control and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or shWIP. (E,H) immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (E) and U-373 MG (H) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shWIP and then treated with 15 µM of SFN. (F,I) Immunoblots of WIP, KEAP1, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (F) and U-373 MG (I) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shKEAP1 or shWIP, as indicated.
Figure 2. The regulation of NRF2 by WIP is KEAP1-dependent. (A,B) Time-dependent accumulation of NRF2 in control and WIP-silenced U-87 MG (A) and U-373 cells (B) and cells treated with 10 µM of MG132. (C) Scheme of the two domains of NRF2, Neh2 and Nhe6, which are targeted for proteasome degradation. A KEAP1 homodimer binds the N-terminal region of NRF2 (Neh2 domain) through interaction with a low affinity (DLG) and high affinity (ETGE) amino acid motifs. Thus, the mutated version of NRF2 that lacks the ETGE motif (NRF2ΔETGE) is insensitive to KEAP1-mediated degradation [20]. On the other hand, several phosphorylation events, in which Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is an essential kinase, generate a degradation domain (phosphodegron) that is recognized by the E3 ligase adapter β-TrCP. Thus, the mutated version of NRF2 in which six serines involved in the generation of the phosphorylation have been changed to alanines (NRF26SA) generates a NRF2 insensitive to β-TrCP-mediated degradation [29]. (D,G) Immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (D) and U-373 MG (G) cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing NRF2WT, NRF2ΔETGE, NRF26SA or with empty vector as control and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or shWIP. (E,H) immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (E) and U-373 MG (H) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shWIP and then treated with 15 µM of SFN. (F,I) Immunoblots of WIP, KEAP1, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (F) and U-373 MG (I) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shKEAP1 or shWIP, as indicated.
Antioxidants 09 00773 g002
Antioxidants 09 00773 g003 550
Figure 3. The regulation of redox state by WIP is NRF2-dependent. (A–C) U-87 MG and (D–F) U-373 MG glioblastoma cells were transduced with empty lentiviral as control or a lentivirus expressing NRF2ΔETGE, and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or shWIP. (A,D) Changes in intracellular ROS were determined by flow cytometry of HE staining (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission). A representative sample of 10,000 cells is shown for each condition. (B,E) Quantification of intracellular ROS production in HE-stained (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission) (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± S.D. ** p ≤ 0.01 according to one-way ANOVA. (C,F) Representative immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control.
Figure 3. The regulation of redox state by WIP is NRF2-dependent. (A–C) U-87 MG and (D–F) U-373 MG glioblastoma cells were transduced with empty lentiviral as control or a lentivirus expressing NRF2ΔETGE, and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or shWIP. (A,D) Changes in intracellular ROS were determined by flow cytometry of HE staining (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission). A representative sample of 10,000 cells is shown for each condition. (B,E) Quantification of intracellular ROS production in HE-stained (a.u., arbitrary units of fluorescence emission) (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± S.D. ** p ≤ 0.01 according to one-way ANOVA. (C,F) Representative immunoblots of WIP, NRF2, and GAPDH as a loading control.
Antioxidants 09 00773 g003
Antioxidants 09 00773 g004 550
Figure 4. WIP does not regulate KEAP1 degradation. Immunoblots of WIP, p62, LC3, NRF2, KEAP1, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (A) and U-373 MG (B) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shWIP and then treated with a standard cocktail of ammonium chloride and leupeptin (N/L), to 20 µM and 100 µM, respectively, during 24 h.
Figure 4. WIP does not regulate KEAP1 degradation. Immunoblots of WIP, p62, LC3, NRF2, KEAP1, and GAPDH as a loading control of U-87 MG (A) and U-373 MG (B) glioblastoma cells that were transduced with lentiviral vectors containing shco or shWIP and then treated with a standard cocktail of ammonium chloride and leupeptin (N/L), to 20 µM and 100 µM, respectively, during 24 h.
Antioxidants 09 00773 g004
Antioxidants 09 00773 g005 550
Figure 5. WIP knocked-down cells exhibit increased co-localization between KEAP1 and F-Actin. U-87 MG (A,C) and U-373 MG (B,D) glioblastoma cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing KEAP1-HA and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or human shWIP. (A,B) Immunostaining of KEAP1 with HA antibody and counterstaining with Phalloidin and DAPI to show F-Actin and nuclei, respectively. (C,D) Quantification of colocalization between F-Actin and KEAP1-HA expressed as Manders’ overlap coefficients. Fluorescence was quantified in 1 µm-thick stacks using the JACoP plugin of ImageJ software. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 20) * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 according to one-way ANOVA.
Figure 5. WIP knocked-down cells exhibit increased co-localization between KEAP1 and F-Actin. U-87 MG (A,C) and U-373 MG (B,D) glioblastoma cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing KEAP1-HA and then with a lentivirus expressing shco or human shWIP. (A,B) Immunostaining of KEAP1 with HA antibody and counterstaining with Phalloidin and DAPI to show F-Actin and nuclei, respectively. (C,D) Quantification of colocalization between F-Actin and KEAP1-HA expressed as Manders’ overlap coefficients. Fluorescence was quantified in 1 µm-thick stacks using the JACoP plugin of ImageJ software. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 20) * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 according to one-way ANOVA.
Antioxidants 09 00773 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Escoll, M.; Lastra, D.; Robledinos-Antón, N.; Wandosell, F.; Antón, I.M.; Cuadrado, A. WIP Modulates Oxidative Stress through NRF2/KEAP1 in Glioblastoma Cells. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090773

AMA Style

Escoll M, Lastra D, Robledinos-Antón N, Wandosell F, Antón IM, Cuadrado A. WIP Modulates Oxidative Stress through NRF2/KEAP1 in Glioblastoma Cells. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(9):773. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090773

Chicago/Turabian Style

Escoll, Maribel, Diego Lastra, Natalia Robledinos-Antón, Francisco Wandosell, Inés María Antón, and Antonio Cuadrado. 2020. "WIP Modulates Oxidative Stress through NRF2/KEAP1 in Glioblastoma Cells" Antioxidants 9, no. 9: 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090773

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop